Loading...
Minutes 04-28-87MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING ~ELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1987 AT 7:30 P.M. PRESENT Walter "Marty" Trauger, Marilyn Huckle Martin Jackier Simon Ryder Robert Walshak Allan Nyquist, Alternate William Schultz, Alternate ABSENT *Harold Blanchette Robert Wandelt Chairman Jim Golden, Assistant City Planner Tambri Heyden, Assistant City Planner *Should be excused. See 5/12/87 minutes. Chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. He recognized in the audience the presence of Mayor Nick Cassandra, Commissioner Ezell Hester, former Vice Mayor Carl Zimmerman, and Bill Cooper with The Palm Beach Post. Chairman~ Trauger introduced the Board members, Mr. Golden, Ms. Heyden, and the Recording Secretary. MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 1987 Mr. Ryder moved to adopt the minutes of April 14, 1987 as presented. Mr. Schultz seconded the motion, which carried 6-0. Mrs. Huckle abstained from voting, because she was not present at that meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Golden asked if the Board wished to postpone election of a Vice Chairman until a full Board of the regular members was present. Mrs. Huckle moved to delay the election of a Vice C~airman until the next regular Board meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Schultz and carried 7-0. COMMUNICATIONS Chairman Trauger wished to comment on two memorandums. The first memo was an inquiry from City Manager Cheney to City Attorney Rea dated April 21, 1987. The second was a reply memo from City Attorney Rea to City Manager Cheney dated April 22, 1987. (See "Addendums A and B" attached to the original copy of these minutes in the City Clerk's office.) The memos addressed two questions: (1) what the roles of the Planning and Zoning Board (PZB) and the Community Appearance - 1 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 Board (CAB) are in connection with review of architectural features and colors of buildings, and (2) whether colored elevations and architectural features ~ould become a part of the site plan review procedure of the PZB, and whether construction totally consistent with such presentations could be required by the City prior to certification of occupancy for such buildings. Chairman Tr~qer agreed wholeheartedly with the City Attorney's interpretation of the issues. Mr. Ryder moved that for clarification at further PZB meetings, the memo from the City Attorney, answerin~ the two inquiries of the City Manager concerning the ~uties of the Board and Board procedure, sh0~ld be attached to the minutes of this meeting. ~rs~. Buckle seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. OLD BUSINESS A. SITE PLANS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Quail Lake West (Tabled) Robert P. Burnett Costain Florida, Inc. North side of Golf Road, Congress Avenue west of Tracts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9 according to the plat of Quail Lake West and Tracts 1 and 2 as recorded in Plat Book 50, at Pages 3, 4 and 5 in and for the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for site plan approval to construct 96 multi-family units plus landscaping at Tract 2 and the southern portion of Tract 6 at the Quail Lake West Planned Unit Development Mrs. Buckle moved to remove the Quail Lake West project from the table. The motion, seconded by Mr. Ryder, carried 7-0. Mr. Golden saw no need to repeat the presentation of this project. Be reminded the Board that the Technical Review Board (TRB) had recommended approval, subject to staff comments. The project had been tabled until the ~applicant could provide colored artist renderings. Don Cuozzo, Costain Florida, Inc., Suiite 400 East Building, 1900 Corporate Blvd. N.W., Boca RatOn, Florida 33431, advised - 2 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 that he had colored renderings of both the site plan and the architectural elevations of the building. Mr. Ryder asked Mr. Cuozzo to describe the boundaries of the project. Mr. Cuozzo replied that the boundaries include Golf Road, Congress Avenue, S.W. 26th Street, and Woolbright Road. Mr. Cuozzo said the units are all two-story with individual garages; each unit is above its own garage. Mr. Cuozzo explained that the buildings have terra cotta colored flat cement glazed tile, metal doors, brown trim, and bronze windows. All this was shown on the front elevation. The rear elevation revealed screened enclosures; the side eleva- tions showed a side entr~ on the first floor. Mr. Ryder inquired about the south elevation, which would be facing the existing development across the road. Mr. Cuozzo stated that there would be a berm and a fenced landscaping feature along Golf Road, making it very difficult to see the property. In response to Mr. Schultz' in~uirv, Mr. Cuozzo explained that there is no porch over the-gar~e. Mr. Cuozzo told Mr. Jackier that the colo~s on the rendering are as true as could be obtained on a drawing, and he added that the units are beiqe stucco with brown trim. Mr. Cuozso noted that this same type unit is currently being constructed for Boca Golf and Te~is and in HOllywood, FLorida. Chairman Trauger asked if there was anything with the ren- derings describing the specific paint colors. Mr. Cuozzo replied that he had that information, but had not provided it for the PZB. He said he had provided colors to the CAB. In answer to Mr. Ryder's inquiry, Mr. Cuozzo said the entrance to the project does not line up with the entrance of the project across the street. Mr. Cuozzo advised that there are eight units in each building, which would be condominiums. He added that there would be a master association for the entire project, a homeowners association for the 21 single-family units, and a condominium association for these units. A large recreational facility is planned for the entire area. In response to Mrs. Huckle's inquiry, Mr. Cuozzo stated there would be no dumpsters, but rather curbside pickup. In response to Mayor Cassandra's comments, Mr. Cuozzo said there would be proper lighting also. Mr. Schultz moved to approve the site plan request of Quail Lake West to construct 96 multi-family units, subject to staff comments. (See "Addendum C" attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Mr. Schultz pointed out that the landscaping for Tract 2 and the southern portion of Tract 6, as per the City Attorney's letter, would be approved by the CAB. Chairman - 3 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 Trauger advised that the motion should also state that approval is also made in accordance with the renderings displayed, and final construction must reflect these renderings. Mrs. Buckle seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Mr. Walshak wanted to know what would happen to the archi- tectural renderings after the developers have completed the entire review process. Mr. Golden advised that, in the past, they took the drawings back; however, with the new require- ments and the fact that the Board is holding them to the color schemes, he felt it might be wise to hold on to the renderings. Mr. Waishak agreed with Mr. Golden's opinion. Mr. Schultz said the City Attorney had addressed that question in his memo, saying the d~awing, s would becem~ a part of the City's pre City so desired. Chairman Trauger said Mr. ~ but the with of some considered keep' a not she moved renderings be a part of th~ for the si~ review pr~c~. She added that~any 'asshould ~o~ f~m~'~ th~ City staff and ty ~ttorney. ~ir. Ryder seCO~ the m~t~on, which carried 7-0. the expense should be 3ultz suggested did and Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Diaz Shopping Center (Tabled) Kimberly Dellastatious Pedro and Brenda Diaz North side of West Boynton Beach Boulevard, east of Knuth Dairy Road That portion of Tract 7, Palm Beach Farms Company Plat No. 8, according to the Plat thereof of file in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 73. Lying North of right-of-way of State Road 804. Less the north 27 feet thereof conveyed to Lake Worth Drainage District by official Record Book 3655, Page 1979, Palm Beach County Public Records Request for site plan approval to construct a 14,400 square foot com- mercial building on 1.18 acres MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 Mr. Ryder moved to remove the Diaz Shopping Center project from the table. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Huckle and carried 7-0. Mr. Golden reminded the Board that the TRB had recommended approval of the project, subject to staff comments. Kimberly Dellastatious, Currie Schneider Associates AIA, 25 Seabreeze Avenue, Delra~ Beach, Florida 33444, showed a street elevation, two side elevations, and a rear elevation. Ms. Dellastatious told Chairman Trauger that the building has blue tile and piped columns, as well as stucco columns. Ms. Dellastatious also showed the site plan. In response to Mr. Ryder's inquiry, Ms. Deltastatious reported that the building is set back about 72 feet frQm the road. She told Mr. Schultz that there is a three foot parapet from the roof. The walls are off-white with a slight pinkish tone, and the tile and columns are blue. There was discussion concerning the location of the project in relationship to various streets. Ms. Dellastatious advised the the site is about 2,000 feet from Congress Avenue. Mrs. Buckle asked if the building would be all retail or partly olffice also. Ms. Dellastatious stated that the space is not leased yet, ~but anything that is permissible in C-3 zoning might go there. Mrs. Buckle asked about the parking requirements, and Mr. Golden answered that the site plan has sufficient parking to accommodate retail, medical or professional office use. In response to Mr. Nyquist's inquiry, Ms. Dellastatious stated the walls are 240 feet in length, and she said there would be fire walls with a one hour rating or a two hour rating, but no major fire walls. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the site plan request of the Diaz Shopping Center to construct a 14,400 square foot com- mercial building on 1.18 acres, subject to all staff comments (See "Addendum D" attached to the original copy of these ~inutes.) and subject to conformance to the colored renderings. The motion was seconded by Mr. Nyquist and carried 7-0. Project Name: Jacobs Office Building (Tabled) Agent: None Owner: Dr. and Mrs. M. N. Jacobs Location: West Boynton Beach Boulevard at Old Boynton Road, northeast corner Legal Description: West quarter of Lot 8 of the sub- - 5 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 Description: division of Section 20 Township 45 South, Range 43 East, according to Plat Book 1, Page 4, less the East 3 acres as described in Deed Book 975, Page 125, Public Records of Palm Beach County Request for site plan approval to construct a 6,885 square foot pro- fessional office building on .89 acres Mr. Schultz moved to remove the Jacobs Office Building project from the table. The motion was seconded by Mr. Walshak and carried 7-0. Mr. Golden stated that the project had been recommended for approval by the TRB, subject to staff comments. David Diesselhorst, Project Manager for Dr. Jacobs, 10811 Cedar Avenue, Fairfax, Virginia, displayed colored elevations of the building. Mr. Diesselhorst said the colors would be the same as those shown in the drawings, and he stated that he already has made a color selection with manufacturer color numbers that are available in this area. In response to a comment by Chairman Trauger concerning Mr. Diesselhorst's statement at the City Commission meeting that the PZB should be reprimanded for tabling these projects, Mr. Dissselhorst stated that his remarks were not meant to be a personal statement against any individual. Mr. Ryder replied that the comments were an insult to the Board; he said the people on the Board give their time freely to serve the City and do not deserve such comments. Mr. Diesselhorst responded that he had just expressed his interpretation of a City's ordinance. Mrs. Huckle believed that the Mayor and the City Commissioners had adequately responded to his remarks in support of the Board, and she thought that should be the end of the issue. Mr. Walshak expressed his agreement with Mrs. Huckle's statement. Mr. Diesselhorst informed Mrs. Huckle that the building was a light beige or sand color with darker brown accents. He said the roof was a substantial weight (320 pounds), with fiberglass shingles. Mr. Walshak asked if this property abuts residential property. Mr. Golden advised that it abuts an R-2 parcel to the west that is owned by Florida Power and Light; further to the west on that parcel is the FP&L substation. Mr. Diesselhorst noted there would be a six-foot wall between the front portion of MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 the C-2 lot and the R-2 area. Mr. Golden said it is a require- ment of the zoning regulation that the wall be provided at that site. In response to Mr. Ryder's inquiry, Mr. Golden said that to the east of the existing dental office along Boynton Beach Boulevard there is C-2 zoning; to the east of the proposed building there is R-1-A zoning. There will also be a rezoning request in May for one of the parcels immediately east of this building. Mr. Diesselhorst concurred with Mr. Walshak's state- ment that 3/_4 of the surrounding property is residential. Mr. Diesselhorst added that the back part of the property being built on is C-1 zoning, which requires a six-foot hedge or wall. Mr. Golden said the only place the wall has to be provided is at the C-2 zoned parcel on the west side; the remainder of the commercial propert~ (C-l) which abuts residential has the choice of a six-foot wall or hedge. The reason for the choice is beoa~use an office use is not viewed as being as offensive as a r~ail use. Mr. Diessethorst said a hibiscus hedge will be maintained around the rest of the property that does not require the wall. In response to Mr. R~der's inquiry, Mr. Diesselhorst stated there would be a a~ximum of four offices, including Dr. Jacobs' office. Dr. Jacobs' dental labor~atory might take up a second office. Mr. Ryder commented that there is now a 40% vacancy rate for office spaces in Palm Beach County. Mrs. Buckle thought that Dr. Jacobs' presence as an owner-occupant would assure that the facility would be maintained in excellent condition as long as he is there. In response to Mrs. Buckle's inquiry, Dr. Jacobs said he did not yet know what he would do with his current building, which is zoned C-2. In response to Mr. Walshak's inquiry, Mr. Diesselhorst noted that the curb cuts are existing and are located on Boynton Beach Boulevard. Mr. Golden advised that a variance has been granted for the driveway, which is a single two-way driveway toward the eastern property. Mrs. Buckle referred to a comment made by Mr. Annunziato about the correct loca- tion of the driveway, and Mr. Diesselhorst said the location shown on the landscape plan and the site plan are now the same. Mrs. Buckle moved to approve the site plan request of Dr. Jacobs to construct a 6,885 square foot professional office building on .89 acres, subject to all staff comments (See "Addendum E" attached to the original copy of these minutes.) and with the understanding that the construction will conform to the color renderings submitted tonight. The motion was seconded by Mr. Schultz and carried 7-0. - 7 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA APRIL 28, 1987 NEW BUSINESS A. Comments by Members Mr. Ryder wished to comment on the fact that Garry Winter was no longer a member of the PZB. Mr. Ryder said former Vice Chairman Winter has been on advisory boards for over 12 years. As Mr. Ryder had served on the PZB with Mr. Winter for many years, he felt the Board would be remiss if they did not commend his years of public service with the City. Mr. Ryder felt it was deplorable that Mr. Winter had to leave his service to the City, because he was not leaving of his own volition and was willing to continue serving the. Board. Mr. Ryder moved tha~ the Board indicate their appreciation for hls public service ~o the ciky of Boynton B~ach for so many years. The mo%ion was seconded by Mrs. Huckle and carried 7-0. Mr. Walshak wished to thank Mayor Cassandra and the City Commission members for standing behind this Board at the City Commission meeting last*Thursday concerning the tabling of these projects and the request for artist renderings. He also thanked the City Manager, the City Attorney, and City Commissioner Mann who researched the duties of the Planning and Zoning Board. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Trauger moved to adjOurn, and Mr. Schultz seconded the motion. There being no further business to come before the BOard, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 P.M. Linda Warlick Recording Secretary (One Tape) *Should be Tuesday. 5/12/87 Minutes. - 8 - MEMORANDUM April 21, 1987 To: Re: RaymondRea, City 'Attorney Role of Planning and Zoning Board Relative'to Architecture and Design Review At the April 14, 1987 Planning and Zoning Board meeting, a number of site plans were tabled because the Members of the Board wished to have the developers_pre- sent to the Board colored renderings of the facade and more detailed elevations of the buildings that will be considered on the site plans being reviewed by the Boards. At the end of the meeting, the Board requested that considerations be given specifically requ;iring each application coming to the Board include ~olored elevations of builldings to be bu!lt. This request raises concerns that you are being asked to ~eview as follows. What are the appropriate roles that are clearly outlined in the Ordinances for Planning and Zoning and Conmunity Appearance Board in con'nection with review of architectual features of buildings and colors of buildings? If colored elevations and architectual features become a part of the site plan review procedure for the Planning and Zoning Board, can a construction totally consistent with such presenta- tions be required by the City prior to a Certificate of Occupancy for such buildings? City Manager PLC:mh CC: Honorable Mayor and City Conmission Planning and Zoning Board Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director ADDENDUM A MEMORANDUM April 22, 1987 TO: Peter Cheney, City Manager RE: Role of Planning and Zoning Board Relative to Architecture and Design Review Your Memorandum of April 21, 1987, raises two primary concerns related to the April 14, 1987, Planning and Zoning Board meeting. I will try to address these issues independently and as clearly as possible. 1. Pursuant to City Ordinance, what are. the appropriate roles for Planning and Zoning and the Community Appearance Board in connection with review of architectural features and colors of buildings? The roles of Planning & Zoning and Community Appearance Board appear to be somewhat overlapping pursuan~ to the requirements of Section 19-26 and Section 19-43 of the Code of Ordinances of this City. Under Section 19-26 the Planning & Zoning Board is to make recommendations to the City Commission. These recommendations may .impose conditions designed to safe-guard the community ~elating to the promotion of public health, safety, morals and general welfare. Various criteria are established. The broadest grant of authority related to criteria for review is established in Section 19-26(b) which states: "The proposed use, building or structure is generally compatible and in harmony with the uses and structures on adjacent and nearby properties and is appropriate in relation to the established character of other structures in the immediate area or neighboring areas." It appears from this grant of authority and this particular criteria that the Planning & Zoning Board has a very broad perspective upon which site plans may be reviewed. The Community Appearance Board criteria generally parallel those provided to the Planning & Zoning Board. In Section 19!-43(a) it is required that "the proposed use, building or structure is in harmony and generally compatible with the standards of architecuure, beauty and other aesthetic considerations as established in the community design plan." Sub-paragraph (b) of Section 19-43 states as an additional criteria that "the proposed~use, building or ADDENDUM B Peter Cheney, City Manager Page 2 April 22, 1987 structure is in harmony with the uses and structures on adjacent and nearby properties as to landscaping, preservation and maintenance of beauty, reforestation, open space, greenery and other aesthetic features of the immediate and neighboring areas. Thus it appears that the specific grant to the Community Appearance Board with regard to review criteria relates directly to standards of architecture, beauty, and other aestheti~ considerations. In additien the Community Appearance Board is specifically charged with evaluation of l~dscaping, preservation and maintenance of beauty, reforestation, open space, greenery and other aesthetic features of the immediate and neighboring areas. By evaluating these two sections of the Code as they relate to the Planning & Zoning Board and the Community Appearance Board, it appears that the. Planning & Zoning Board can require color renderings for the___e_~llka~ion of a building or ~cture~$_~'t_relat~s Go th~ cDm~ty and harmo~se~ ~t~u~%~_ni ad~nt ~nd nearby pro~!~t~l~ Th~ Communi~--Appearan~ B6ard, ~owev~r,-is the only Board which can and should consider aesthetics, architecture, beauty, open space, greenery, landscaping and reforestation. It is important to point out that in Section 19-17, that the City Planner may request "such other data as will assist the technical committee in reviewing and evaluating the proposed use, building or structure." This provision adds additional authority to the Planning staff in its administrative capacity, to request color renderings for evaluation not only by the technical committee but also Planning & Zoning and Community Appearance. I must additionally point out that specific spe~~t%~ur~l features ~i~ay~-~--under a color rendering canno-6k~e---_t~~ u~_~w~ic3~kJ~n~i~q~ Boafd~'~~--~ased. These particular items are those spg~c~f%~-allyw~--W~tf~zn-f~t~e exclusive authority of the Community Appearance Board. 2. Can colored elevations and architectural features become a part of the site plan review procedure for the Planning & Zoning Board? Can construction totally consistent with such presentations be required by the City prior to certification of occupancy for such buildings? The answer to these two questions are in the affirmative. Since colored elevations and architectural Peter Cheney, City Manager Page 3 April 22, 1987 features would be considered an integral part of the site plan review procedure, this City can mandate construction totally consistent with such presentations. The only procedural problem would be documentation in the site plan file of the architectural features and the colored elevations for future reference. Should the City decide to enforce consistency with the elevations and architectural features for final construction it would be advisable for this city to prouide sufficient notice to an applicant that Colored elevations and a~chitectural features are considered an integral part of the site plan regieW~process~ Raymond A. Rea City Attorney RAR/r Enc. as stated cc: Honorable Mayor and City Commission Planning & Zoning Board Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director MEMORANDUM April 3, 1987 TO: PROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Departnment TQm Clark City-Engineer Site Plans, Quail Lake West, Phase I Comments: 1o A cost estimate is required. 2.. A key'sketch should be shown on th~ development plans or sheet 2 should show the.match lines. Construction plans are incomplete for the public road north of match line A. A reference ds to how and when and with what plans this will be done should be shown on the plans. e A sidewalk should be shown on the easu side of S.W. 26th Avenue. Street lighting and parking lot lighting is required. Comorehensive plans and details are required. Parking lot lighting should be minimum I ft. candle. 6. Radii of turnouts and curves should be shown. Plans for Woolbright Avenue are required. Plans should show 4-lane construction to the west limits of the property. 8. Ail private streets should be named. ' 9. comprehensive plus and details are required for the recreation facilities site plans including the parking lot. 10. Landscaping in the public and private streets should meet the D~.O.T. requirements for sight distance, set backs from roadway and size, etc. 11. Traffic'control signs must meet the MUTCD manual. ft. clearance is required for stop signs. Seven 12. Plans for the irrigation system required for landscaping in p~blic and private streets should be shown. ADDENDUM C con't ..... Quail Lake West comments con't. The title of the preliminary plat should be identified as a re-plat of a portion of the first plat that~was recorded for this-project and identify the Tracts tD~t are being re-platted. 14. The name of the project shown on ~he development plans should be consistant with the site plansand plat. ¢ concerning the required~ 15. The areas that are identified o~ pl at. shown and 16. Utility Easementsshould be dedicated to the appropriate UtitityCompanies, not to the Association. 17. A clarification for the private street dedication language is requested° 18. If the Buffer and Landscaping Easements include utility and drainage easements they should be titled as such on the plan sheets. Sidew~iks should be one ft. inside the 60 ft. R.O.W. where light poles may be planned. 20. As per Subdivision Regulations the inlet structures are required to be in grassy swales and the mountable curb's are required to have openings to allow run-off into swales which are also required; ie., section B-B is not acceptable. 21. Swale should be shown on section D-D. 22. Eight ft. sidewalk is not correctly shown in cross-section for 60 ft. R.O.W. 23. Swale depth ~or Golf Road should be 13% inches. 24. Grass sod should be shown on roadway cross-section. 25. An 8 ft. bicycle ~ath is required for one side of Woolbright Road. 26. Complete construction details are required for the outfall structure and for the control structure. 27. A recent sales contract and/or appraisal should be submitted with the formal submission of the preliminary plat for a reassessment for the recreation fee. 28. Traffic control devices and pavement markings should be shown. con't Quail Lake West comments con't. 29. 30. Construction plans for parkin~ lots must be There is no sheet 1'5. complete. TAC/ck Tom Clark · MEMORANDUM Date: Carmen Rnnunzieto, Planning Dire~or -' Guidry= Director o~ Utilit%es~~j~v Subject: TRB Review - 0wail Lake We can eoprove this project sub)act to the {ollo~ing conditions: Only select tree species will be alloyed in utility eosements. Block olive is not permitted in enid eosements. Relocate ond odd gore valves os needed. ___~._~Extend water main in {font o{ Buiiding~ 30-32 so os to shorten uater services. 4. Rdd a note thor,the City uill maintoin main line eeuers only. 5. Sho~ cleanouts at each bend in sonitory sewer. Cleanouts located under paved oreas or driveuovs must have mini- Extend the 16" water main on Woolbright Rood to the nest proaert? line, as part of the proposed phase, ' ' Delete th6 rods betueen valve ond hydrant on the ~ire hvdront detail. ' Use D.I.P. in sanitory seuer uhere storm drain crosses obove with less than 18" clearance. 10. Recon~tgure oump stotion discharge plping to allow insertion o{ a 6" cleaning Dig. 11. Rl~rm light and horn may be deleted {rom control panel at puma s~at~on. Minimum 1~ Rmo service renuirod on FP&L service ond main ~eed. IZ. Provide Flou calculotions ~or sizing pumps. 'Ouai! Lake West Page Z Rpril 9.. lBS? 13. 14. IT. Rdd a note that all utility construction and aate.ials will con{orm to the City o{ Boynton Beach standard criteria, and not~{v the contractor that he is responsible ~or obtaining sa~d criteria' and incorporating the City's requirements intb his bid amount. Rll ~orce main and O.[.P, gravity sewer to be polyethylene-lined. City water is not to be used ~or irrigation° May have to uograde L.$. at Uoolbright Center (which also handles Sutton Place). We ~ii! make this determination a~ter revieui'ng Re!ocate, the entrance wa1! outside ot the uti!ity easement, unless you can ~rovide concurrence with tt~ location ~Pom the utilities which will use it. dmt Mr. J. Golden '- ~ April 7, 19.87. Planning Dept. Lt. Dale S. ~an~ack '"'~'=' Quail Lakes West Poi ice Dept. Reference our discussion at the T.R.B. meeting of 7 April 1987, I am recommending the following: I. Need street names ano numbering system of buildings. 2. Parking lot lighting plans. Stop signs at Exit of S.W, 26 St. onto Wootbright Rd. and at the first street on the west side of S.W. 26th St. North of Golf Road. DH:as · Dale S Hammack Pol~i ce Department MEMOP~NDUt, i S April 1987 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. A~nunziato Planrring Director RE: Quail Lake West-. Staff comments Please he advised of approval. the Planning Department's comments in for site plan As noted on ~heengineering plans, future site plan approval will be required for the recreation'area and the entrance signage. Included in this site plan approval is tract no. 2 and the southern portion of tract no. 6. Tract no. 1, which consists of single-family platted lots, does not require site plan approval and is not included as a part of this application. A lighting plan with full details is required for all parking lot areas, with the exception of the driveway parking in front of the units. With reference to the driveway parking, double-striping Will not be required for these spaces. Ail local streets are to be aligned with S.W. 26th Street to form proper intersections. In connection with site development, the City's Comprehensive Plan requires the use o~ fences, wetting operations, seeding and mulching, phased clearing, and other Soil treatment techniques to control blowing sand. Seeding and mulching is required if construction does not commence within 30 days of clearing work. 6. Concrete sidewalks are required on both sides of S.W. 26th Street. If it is the desire of the developer to construc= a bicycle path as an alternate to the required sidewalks, the procedure which allows for relief from this requirement is outlined in Section 22-25(b) of the Street and Sidewalk Ordinance. A letter of request submitted to the Planning Department will initiate this procedure. If the Littoral Zone has not been completed prior to the expiration of construction bonds, an additional bond must.be posted to insure completion of this requirement. If any residential tracts.are to be platted prior to the tract containing the recreation facilities, the developer must submit a bond to cover the cost of construction for the~ recreation facilities. /bks-' CARM~/~' S. ~NNUNZIATO MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunzisto - Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan. Forester/Hot ticult~rist April 10, 1987 Site Plan The following ~emarks pertain to the existing trees and landscape plan for the above project:-- A) There are numerous trees on the site which are slated for removal. The developer should prepare a T~ee Management Plan stating: 1) how many tree~ exist (not exotics) and the species, 2) the total number of trees removed, transplanted and/or preserved, 3) the reason why trees cannot be preserved or transplanted, 4) this information should coincide with the submitted tree survey, 5) all trees should be preserved where possible. 2. All exotic trees must be removed from the entire site. 3. All road R.O.W..'S along Golf Road and SW 26th Street should be sodded and receive irrigation. 4. The type of sod to he used throughout the project should be noted. 5. Entrance medians that are landscaped must receive irrigation of water. 6. The parking area and project road to the cut-de-sac abutting Woolbright Road mus= be screened visually with a 36" height hedge. (NWcorner of project area). 7. A Management Plan for the littoral zoneplantings should be submitted. This is applicable to all shoreline property within the platt. Y~TH: ad · Grayarc- REPLY MESSAGE · Fole At { ~ ) TO Fit G~y~r¢ Wir~lo~ Envelope #,EWIOp FROM ~ f2.¢~ R,~-~ ~c"'F~ .,~.:-"-- PLEASE REPLY TO ~ SIGNED DATE: SIGNED MEMORANDUK, Carmen Annunziato City Planner April 13, 1987 ,u,J,~ Site Plan Review: Quail Lake West ~s~.acon~ition of site plan approval, the following comments should be the related documents b'r the [cant: ~ struction for the structures in 2. All site amenities should be accurately located on the site Show the relationship of the proposed to the-dedicated easements. 3. B~ildings must for fire ratings of exterior walls end percent of ali 4. Sidewalks should be constructed along Golf Road and Woolhright Road in cOnjuncti°nwith the development of this project. 5. The light pole ~tructures must he designed in accordance with Section I205,3SBC for a fastest mile of wind of 120 mph. This statement must accompany the d~tails of the plans. 6. All documents prepared by a licensed professional for public record must be signed and sealed bY state law. 7. At the T.R.B. mee'ting, the applicant's representative agreed to change the a~lignment ofinterior roadways in order to comply with a Planning ~epartm~nt comment, Plans Showing this new condition should be submitted for review, accurately indicating all proposed site plan changes. 8. Before permits can be issued for the entrance and buffer walls that are proposed to be constructed in dedicated easements, a release from all relevant utility companies must he on file. 9. ~ne sign ordinance addresses only the permitting of signage attached to ennry walls, not free standing as proposed. The following comments are for the applicant's information: In order to facilitate the permitting process, the following documenns should be submitted in duplicate, to the Building De~artmen~ for review at the time the permits are applied for: 1. Complete sets of construction documents and plans, signed and sealed By the relevant design professionals, licensed in the State of Florida. 2. Soil borings with a soil engineer's recommendations on the required procedure for obtaining the necessary soil bearing values. 3. Energy forms in compliance with State Energy Codes. 4. Copies of the South Florida Water Management District approval for the site. (continued) 4f13/87 Site Plan Review: Quail Lake West Page 2 NOTES: t. The street names and addresses must be approved by the Building, Fire and Police Departments and tlhe. Post Office. 2. Seperate permits are required for excavation, filling, paving, drainage and signage. 3. This approval is onl~ for the portion of the site wherespecific develop- ment D14ns were submztted. The applicant's promp~ compliance with the preceding comments wilt insure DOn Jaeger DJ/ill CC: Building Official TO: FROM: RE: Commen~s: MEMORA E DUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning. Dep~rtment Tom Claz~ City Engineer Diaz Shopping Center, Site Plan April 1, 1987 1. The level of lighting, ie., ft. candles should be shown. The legend for elevations should be shown on paving and grading sheet. Additional elevations are requested for finish pavement elevations. The additional 7 ft. for the ultimate R.O.W. is required to he dedicated to the county. Section A-A should show dimensions and bottom elevation. A permit from the Lake Worth Drainage District is required. Additional dimensions are required for the landscaped areas. The overflow pipe should be shown at the west limits of the dry pond. " 6. 7. 8. 9. Cross-sections are requested thru all landscaped areas. Sections should show elevations, etc. A cross-section thru the canal should be sh~n and should show the outfalt pipe and'headwa!l construction details. 10. ll. As per the survey, if the L.W.D.D. required riqht-6f-way extends 8 ft. into the property, will-not this have to be dedicated to the L.W.D.D.? 12. Sidewalk construction may be required unless the County .plans.~on improvements to Boynton Beach Blvd.: in the very near future. 13. Included .here is a memo from Bill Flushing d~ted Mar. 30, 1987 TAC/ck ADDENDUM D Tom Clark Attack. FROM: RE: 1. m Tom Clark Bill Flushing Diaz- Shopping ~enter The sanitary sewer location on the plan does not agree with the survey, also a jog is shown in the sewer line on t~p nest side. The rim elevation on the inlet catch basin ~hould be at least six (&) inches ~igher than the base of the dry detention-area. A detail will be required that will show how the run-o~ ~rom the parking lot enters the 'dry detention area. It should sho~ what measures are being taken to prevent erosion. The ~eir plate notes are missing. The l'x 2~ opening at the bottom o~ catch baZin structure should have a 5/4 inch mesh cover to prevent the ~ash rock .~rom being sucked up during maintenance cleaning. The architects drawings for site and landscaping are m~sleading in that they imply that 'a cur.b, will be provide~ along Boynton Beach Blvd. Bill Flusbihg To-' Date: Subj act: Carmen Rnnunzlato, Planning Director John A. 6uidry, Oirector oF Utilities ~ ~pril 8, 1987 TRB Review - Diaz 5hopping Center We can approve this project sub~ect to the {allowing conditions: 1. City ~ater. is not to be used {or irrigation. Z. fldd valves on the water main at the tee to the hydrant and 40' west a~ the p]ugged end. Black olive ~rees are not permitted in utility easements. 4. Show all utility easements on the plans and survey. S. Plaza szgn and light posts ~ay not be installed in utility ease- merits unless they can be shown to have no imoaet on underground MEMORANDUM Mr. J. Golden P1 anning Dept. Lt. Dale S...Hammack. Poli ce Dept.- April 7, I987 Diaz Shopping Center Reference our discussion at the T.R.B. meeting of 7 April 1987, I am recommehding the followiDg: 1. Provide lighting details. · a e . ammack Pol ice Department DH:as MEMORANDUM 8 April 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Member~ Planning and Zoning Board Carmen $. Annunziat0 Planning Director Diaz Plaza - Staff Comments Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval. Since the owner has made the decision not to culvert L.W.D.D. L-24 canal, the Lake Worth Drainage District will require an easement or quit-claim deed for eight (8) feet of additional canal right-of-way. Improvements in this eight foot area such as theoptional wall and the parking lot back-up space will require approval from the District prior to the issuance of a building permit from the City. 2.' Lighting details to be provided. An additional seven (7) feet of right-of-way for' West Boynton Beach Boulevard is to be dedicated to Palm Beach County within forty-five (45) days of site plan approval. /bks ME/ ORANDUM Planning Director KeVin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist April 10, 1987 Diaz Shoppinq Center site Fla~ The following comments pertain to the landscape plan submitted for the a~ove project: 1. Any landscape area (near building, itself) which is e~croached by vehicIes does not count toward meeting the interior parking landscape requirements. 2. Tree species selected must be 50% native add in quantities. Black Olive is not deemed native. 3. Thirty (30%) percent of all shrub/hedge species must be native. 4. Hedge material abutting Boynton Beach Boulevard must be'36" in height at ti~e of planting. 5. Foundation plantings are not delineated as to species, size, etc. KJH:ad Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief Inspector , ' EMORANDUM April loth, 1987 SITE. PD4N REVIEW DIAZ SHOPPING CENTER AS a Condition of site-plan approval, the following co~ents should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: ~ conIormance ~th ~lassify the p~oposed type of conet, ruction for the str~cture 'n ~ ' 'Section 60~. t. ~ of the Standard Building Code (SBC). j. .~? allowable building area must comply with Table 400. SBC for the type of constr~c- tiOn and proposed occupancy. This Occupancy will be classified as mercantile t~e purpose of defining code requirements. $. ~he building m~st comply with Table 67~, SBC for required fire rating of exterior walls and per cent o~ allowable openings. (contlnued - Page II) The following co~ente are for the applicant's information. In <~rder' to facilitate the permitting process, the following documents should be submitted to the Building Department, in d~plicate, for review at the time permits are appl~e~d fo?: Complete sets of conetr~ction documents and plans, signed and sealed b~ the relevent design professio~ale licensed in the State of Florida. Soil tests and borings with recon~nendations for obtaining the required soil bearing values, by a licensed Florida engineer. $. Energy forms in compliance with State Energy codes. ~. A thorn-out permit from the Department of Transportation for work in the right- of-way. NOTES: Separate per~its are required for excavations, hauling operations, paving, drainage and eignage. Bldg. Official The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting procese. Do~ Jae~ g Page ~/ April ~Oth. 1987 9. I0. Table $05.2 of the countywide amendments to the Stang~d Building Code requires thre~ ( ) handicapped p~rk~ng st~lls ~han between fifty ($0) and seventh-five (?~ stalls are provided. · . $. I~ the rea~_ eight (B) feet of the pr~.oper~y m~st be ded~oate~ to the L~ ~i~e ~t~t.' the wall ~d ~kln~ ~ea ~t be moved ~d the ~.~ foo~' ~c~ed b~ffer ~st be mainlined. It also ~e~s t~t trees ~e sh~ t~ ~a that ~ be ~dicated 'to B.O.T. f~ ~ght-of-w~ ac~sitio~. 7. ~ro~ ~he ~ey, tb~e appq~ to~ be' dedicated ~ on th~ pr~ ~t ~ ~ t~ d~el~me~t p~s~ ~ ~c~t~d e~ on the ~o~ ~ d~ster ~d ~t be considered ~ concrete. ~ ~tai~ of the C~ enc loewe. - It appears from the-developme~ plans that the rear e~it doors open onto ~ drainage pit_..a~d safer means of egress should be devieed. The light poles and sign str~ct~re at the front property line appear to ~e in a utility easement. The~e str~ct~res m~t not conflict with established ~tiIity lines. The light pole structures must be designed in accordance with Section '~205. SBC for a fastest mi~e of wind o~ ~20 mph. Carmen Annunziato ' Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief Inspector MEMORANDUM April 7, 1987 Site Jacobs Offic~ Building As a condition of site be incorporated into the co-me, tS should !. Dimension the site plan with all Luding dimensions of~ '~, setback dimensions, buil Accurately locate structure on the :. 2. All buildings must be accessibleto the handicapped. Indicate from the parking areas to :ated. marked with 4. 5. 6o the location and details of ali thebuJ adjacent tO signage consistent The s turn dens~, six, foat 7. CuTbzng is parking stalls. 8. Parking stalls.must be double Co~es. 9. I0o should extend through the accessibility. with Section 1205, ~ of wind of 120 m.p.h. ~d tie beams must be reinforced must be set back a minimum of two tl. the perimeter of the property .er must be maintained by a wall must be constructed. ~ed areas adjacent to striped in accordance with City A 3,0 foot building setback must be maintained from the property line and roof overhamgs are not allowed to protrude .into this setback. The submitted landscape plan conflicts with th~ plan. These detazls should be addressed prior to submittal to ~e CommunityAppearance Board. The location and ele~ation of site signage should be shown on the plans. The fDt%owing information is for the applicant's informatzom.' In order to facilitate the permitting process, the following documents should be submitted in duplicate to the Building Department for review at the time permits are applied for: i. Documentation legally altering the ingress and egress easement presently existing on the property. ADDENDUM E Memo to Carmen AnnunziAto RE: Site. Plan Approval: April 7, 1987 Page Two Jacobs Office Building 2. Complete sets of construction documents and plans, si~ned and sealed by the relevant design professionals licensed in the State of Florida. 3. Soil borings with soil engineer's recommendations and energy forms in compliance with State Energy Codes. 4. Permits the State and County D.O.T. for proposed work in -way. NOTE: Separate permits are requi~ed for demolition, paving and drainage. The applicant's prompt ~compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. DJ:bh XC: E. E. HOwell Don Jaeger MEMORANDUM April 6, 1987 TO: Mr. Jim Golden' Planning Department FROM: Tom Clark City~ Engineer RE: Site 'Plan for Drl Jacobs Office Building Comments: 1. Double striping required for parking spaces. 2. Handicapped spaces to be shown on plans with details shown on detail sheets. 3. Rai~ed curbs are required adjacent to landscaped areas at parking spaces. Traffid control' devices and pavement marking is to conform with the MUTCD. 5. Lighting With minimum average intensity of l'ft. candle shall be provided. Location and details are required. Separate letter size detail should be on working drawings. 6. Sidewalk should extend thru the turnout onto U.S. %1. See D.O.T~ standards for this construction. 7. Handicapped ramps should be indicated and detailed. 8. Sidewalks in public R.O.W. are not to include wire mesh. Information is required where interior sidewalks meet building. 10. A memo from Bill Flushing dated April 2, 1987 is included here° Tom Clark TAC/ck Attach. TO: Tom Clark B~ I1 Flushing Dr...~acobs O~fic~ Building A means should be provided to prevent from tbm inflow to CB ~1 (see section "D"). Detm~ is.should be provided. Orainagm calculations are required. the catch basin than the bottom A lighting plan Curb-lng adjacent erosion should be added showing that grase elevations are highe~ of the dry detention areas. is required. is reeuired, around planting =r=as- - to parking areas. Bill ~lushing APR 9 ZgS? pLANNING DEFT. To: From: Date: Subject: Car~e. Rnnunziato= Planning Direc*or .~ $ohn '~'. Guidrv. Director o{ U~ilities/~~ Rpril 8= {SST TRB R~vieu - Dr. Sacob'e O{{ice Buiiding . Ue can approve this project subject to the {ollouing conditions: 1. Fudd a gate'valve at' the hydrant: and relocate the termine~ gate to a point, z pipe lengths be{ore the plu~. Rdd a note that the li{f station and {orca main are to be privately_o~ned and maintained. Ue recommend a larger diameter {orca main. Indicate all proposea utilLties easements. City water ie not to be used ~or irrigation. dmt Mr. J. Golden Planning Dept. Lt. DaTe S. Hammack Police Department ,MEMORANDUM o~,, April 7, I987 Dr. Jacob Reference our discussion at the T.R.B. meeting of'7 April 1987, I am recommending the following: l. The painted 2 way d~rectiona? arrows be placed on the pavement at the entrance/exit onto West Boynton Beach Blvd. DH:as mmack Police Department TO: FROM: RE: M~MOI~D~JM 8 April 1987 Chairman and Member planning and zcning Board carmen S. Annumziato Planning Director Jacobs office Build~nq - Staff comments · ~ the Planning Department's comments in se be advzsed of . --A~d ~uest for site plan plea _. ~h the aDove-~=~ ...... re__ connection w~=~-- . approval. 1. The type of lighting on sheet E-2 (metal halide) contradicts the type of lighting indicated on the typical pole detail [high pressure sodium). 2. Location of driveway to the orchard which lies to the north as show~ on the landscape plan, contradicts the driveway location shown on the site plan. 3.' parking lot layout and design for lighting plan on sheet E-2 contracts site plan. cARME~ $- ANN%rNzIAT /bks Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist MEMORANDUM April 10, 1987. Jacobs Office Building Site Plan There are numerous trees on this site which are slated for removal. The developer should submit a Tree Management Plan stating: lk_how many trees exist and the species, 2) the total number removed, transplanted and/or preserved, 3)-the reasons whytrees cannot be preserved or transplanted, 4) the total number of trees newly planted on the site should equal or exceed the existing number of trees, 5) this information should coincide with %he submitted tree survey. 2. The developer is required to place a hedge that will attain 6' in height along the western property line(nQ~th of wall termination). KJH:ad