Loading...
Minutes 02-10-87MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1987 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESENT Walter "Marty" Trauger, Chairman Garry Winter, Vice Chairman Marilyn Huckle John Pagliarulo Simon Ryder Robert Wandelt William Schultz, Alternate Leonard Mann, Alternate Carmen Annunziato, Director of Planning Tim Cannon, Senior City Planner Jim Golden, Assistant City Planner Chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M., recognized the presence in the audience of Mayor Nick Cassandra; Vice Mayor Carl Zimmerman; Councilman Ezell Hester; Councilman Ralph Marchese; Peter L. Cheney, City Manager; and Samuel Scheiner, Vice Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Agency. He introduced the Board Members, Mr. Annunziato, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Golden, and the Recording Secretary, and then requested that Mr. Schultz leave the audience and sit with the Board. MINUTES OF JANUARY 13, 1987 On page 3, Mrs. Huckle called attention to the paragraph beginning, "Jay Colestock, Agent", and read that he said the "tOP portion of the building is a proposed addition." She did not recall anything about a top portion to the building. Mr.-Annunziato said the addition is to the north. Mr. Colestock was looking at the rendering as he was speaking, so Mrs. Huckle said the minutes should be corrected to read, "to the north is a proposed addition.'~ Mrs. Huckle also called attention to Mr. Annunziato's statement in the 4th paragraph of page 9, which began, "Mr. Annunziato thought, and asked for clarification. Mr. Annunziato explalined, and it was then decided "to remove lighting" should be changed "to deflect lighting." Mrs. Huckle further said the dates on all pages should be changed to January 13, 1987. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the minutes as corrected, seconded by Mr. Pagliarulo. Motion carried 7-0. - i - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 COMMUNICATIONS Pro~ect Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Boynton Lakes Plaza Siteworks Architects & Planners, Inc. Edge Equities Southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue See Addendum A attached (1) Request for joint allocation of parking to allow parking spaces to be shared among uses with different demand characteristics (2) Request for approval of construction plans and the preliminary plat of Boynton Lakes Plaza Mr. Annunziato had a communication concerning a request by the applicant to be placed on tonight's agenda. There was a request to build a shopping center at the southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue. The request went to the Technical Review Board (TRB) with the recommendation from the TRB to the applicant that it would go on to the Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Board tonight, subject to the applicant submitting a revised shared parking request, which was also a request for approval. Mr. Annunziato summarized his memorandum dated February 9, 1987, which is attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addendum B, and said it was up to the Board as to whether they wanted to add this item to the agenda. Chairman Trauger commented that the Board was not able to review this as they reviewed the other items on the agenda this evening, and he thought it was an unfair burden on the Board at this particular time. Mr. Ryder asked about the TRB. Mr. Annunziato advised that the TRB completed its review, and he requested that the Board let the applicant explain some problems he might have. Mr. Schultz drew attention to 43 staff comments on one project and stated that he did not think that application was worth looking at. He also referred to C.5, "Mariner's Way" under "SITE PLANS" and said the swimming pool is in the Intracoastal. Mr. Schultz further pointed out that the sur- vey for Mariner's Way was not complete, and he questioned how they could vote on anything like that. Mr. Schultz wondered why the Board could not consider this application when they were going to consider a project with 43 comments. Since the agenda tonight was long, Mr. Ryder thought it was rushing things, and he recommended that it be held over until - 2 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 the next meeting. After discussion, Chairman Trauger's suggestion to let his position. the Members agreed with the applicant explain Craig Livingston, Architect, Siteworks Architects & Planners, Inc., 1301 North Congress Avenue, Suite 320, Boynton Beach, said the major difficulty they had in working out their cross parking agreements represented the problem of having the theater and the number of seats in the theater. The 35 or 38 staff comments represented standard comments that are attached to applications such as, "The applicant should pro- vide a sidewalk,'~ etc. In their parking study, Mr. Livingston said they presented evidence based on the cinema requirements. The cinema is proposed to be 2,100 seats. The theater, in giving the applicant information based on their market studies, does not sell out more than 30% to 35% of their seats at any one time. As part of the Code, Mr. Livingston said they presented evidence by a Traffic Engineer that showed that the shared parking concept, based on the C~de requirements, works. Mr. Livingston said their study showed a peak time of Saturday at 2:00 P. M., which is when the matinee "kicks in. However, most of the people that attend the matinee are children that are being dropped off by adults. They have a nursery, and the peak time on that is spread through- out the day. Their parking requirements are different than those of a standard shopping center and a food or grocery anchor. They presented their parking study along with their drawings as a part of their application and went through a significant process with the TRB. Mr. Livingston said the TRB recommended approval, subject to staff com- ments, and subject to the applicant reissuing information based on the number of seats and spacing allocated. The applicant revised the parking study and brought it back. Again, the TRB recommended approval of the drawings. Mr. Livingston emphasized that the drawings have not changed, lUSt the number of seats. The building is still the same size and is only affected by the number of seats and the impact during that peak time of the day. Mr. Livingston met with Mr. Annunziato and Mr. Golden. There was still some confusion about the applicant's interpretation of the peak times. Mr. Livingston felt the most expedient way to do it would be to reduce the number of - 3 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 seats. By doing that, not only have they gone below the parking that was required, but he thought it would signi- cantly reduce the impact when the cars are there. Mr. Livingston stated that they intend to work closely with all staff members, and he requested that the Members go through the review. Based upon their reliance on the TRB and its ability to interpret the plans, Mr. Livingston asked the Board to hear them tonight. Chairman Trauger asked what harm it would do if the Board postponed this until their next meeting. Mr. Livingston replied that two months ago, a food anchor tenant was going on the site. In going through the process, because of the market in Palm Beach County, they decided to go out of the area and not on the site. They now have anchor tenants ready to go in on the site, and if they lose 30 days, Mr. Livingston said they may move out of the market area. It would severely impact and provide a financial hardship on the applicant. Mr. Annunziato informed Chairman Trauger that the Planning Department was prepared to make presentations. Mr. Ryder pointed out that the Members had not seen plans. Mr. Pagliarulo asked if the only issue was the parking for the seating of the theater. Mr. Livingston answered affirma- tively and added that it was ]ust the number of seats they had in the theater. Mrs. Huckle asked how many staff comments there were. Mr. Livingston estimated there were approximately 35 to 38. However, they were comments that they reviewed, and he felt they could accept the comments as a part of the review process. Mr. Ryder recalled the Board was first introduced to this at the same time Publix was going in across the street. He wanted to see the plans, regardless of what the comments were, and reiterated that reviewing it now would be pushing and rushing the project. Vice Chairman Winter moved to TABLE the request until the next meeting of the P&Z Board, seconded by Mr. Ryder. Motion carried 5-2. Messrs. Pagliarulo and Schultz voted against the motion. - 4 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOTfNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS ABANDONMENTS 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Quantum Park of Commerce Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald and Sheehan, P. A. Quantum Associates West side of Interstate 95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton Canal See Exhibit C attached. Request for the abandonment of that portion of High Ridge Road extending north from N. W. 22nd Avenue to the northern property boundary of the Quantum Park of Commerce PID Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Quantum Park of Commerce Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald and Sheehan, P. A. Quantum Associates West side of Interstate 95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton Canal Ail of High Ridge Road lying south of N. W. 22nd Avenue, as depicted in Road Plat Book 6, Pages 151-154, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for the abandonment of that portion of High Ridge Road extending south from N. W. 22nd Avenue to the Boynton Canal within the Quantum Park of Commerce PID Mr. Golden presented both the north and south abandonments in one presentation. The developer is requesting the abandonment of High Ridge Road in connection with the platting of Quantum Park of Commerce. This is being requested, in addition to the platting, to clear the 'title to the property. - 5 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 The City Engineer notified the public utilities, and from tbs responses received, the public utilities have no objec- tions to either request. There was also no objection from the City's Department of Utilities. The Planning Department was recommending conditional approval, contingent upon the rededication of High Ridge Road north of N. W. 22nd Avenue and construction of a new roadway north and south of N. W. 22nd Avenue. ~owever, the applicant proposed an acceptable alternative, which was to grant temporary easements for the existing roadway that will disappear after the new roadway is constructed. George Zimmerman, Vice President of the development for Quantum Associatesf 2455 East Sunrise Boulevard, Suite 1106, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304, added that the abandonment of the south right-of-way was also joined in by Curt G. Joa and George J. Gould, the property owners on the southern tip of the roadway. Mr. Zimmerman also mentioned that both the infrastructure improvement plans for Quantum PID and the master plan that was approved as part of the development of regional impact (DRI) process illustrated the relocation of this roadway, Which was the reason for the abandonment. Mr. Annunziato showed how High Ridge Road was relocated. High Ridge Road, to the north of N. W. 22nd Avenue, will be public. To the south of N. W. 22nd Avenue, High Ridge Road will be private. Mr. Zimmerman said the alignment of the current roadway is directly north and south. Mr. Zimmerman responded to a question from Chairman Trauger by saying it appeared as if they were 60 to 90 days away from the beginning of construction on the proposed road. It will be 16 months before the construction of the infrastructure. He estimated it would take approximately 20 to 22 months for completion of the project. As far as the operational procedure on the roadways, it would remain as it is until the new roadways are accepted. Mr. Ryder asked if people presently fronting on the road were in accord, because their access will be somewhat changed. Mr. Zimmerman concurred that it would be changed on the south portion of the roadway. No one else joined on the north abandonment because they are the property owners on both sides of the right-of-way. Mr. Zimmerman agreed with Mr. Ryder that the accesses of Curt G. Joa and George J. Gould, on the south, would be changed, and the applicant is giving them easement rights. There were no problems with Mr. Joa or Mr. Gould that Re was aware of. - 6 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the proposal re High Ridge Road extending north. There was no response. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to object to the proposal. There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Motion re High Ridge Road extending north Mr. Wandelt moved to approve the abandonment of that portion of High Ridge Road extending north from N. W. 22nd Avenue to the northern property boundary of the Quantum Park of Commerce PID, conditioned upon the rededication and construc- tion of High Ridge Road, as proposed in the approved master plan for the Quantum Park of Commerce, prior to the abandon- ment of the existing right-of-way. Mr. Ryder seconded the motion. Max Schorr, 250 Royal Palm Way, Palm Beach, Florida 33480, wished to speak. Chairman Trauger objected, saying the Board was in the middle of a vote. Mr. Schorr explained that if he was not mistaken, their property was contiguous to the projected abandonment, and he had no notice of this whatsoever. According to Robert's Rules of Order, Chairman Trauger advised that Mr. Schorr was out of order. Mr. Schorr remarked that Chairman Trauger was not giving him permission to speak. Mr. Pagliarulo moved that the Board hear from Mr. Schorr. Mr. Wandelt withdrew his motion. Mr. Ryder refused to with- draw his second. A vote was taken on Mr. Wandelt's motion. Motion carried 7-0. High Ridge Road extending south Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the proposal re Higk Ridge Road extending south. There was no response. Chairman Trauger asked if anone wished to object to the proposal. Max Schorr, as Trustee, 250 Royal Palm Way, Palm Beach, Florida 33480, thought the parcel he owned was immediately to the north of the proposed abandonment. Mr. Cannon pointed on the overlay to Mr. Schorr's property, and Mr. Schorr reiterated that he received no notice. Mr. Annunziato explained that those property owners imme- diately adjacent to the roadway being abandoned were noti- fied. In this instance, High Ridge Road was not being MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 abandoned where it would be in front of Mr. Schorr's property. Mr. Annunziato assured Mr. Schorr that it would not inter- fere with access to his property because the road will be reconstructed as a four lane divided highway from hi~ prop- erty line south to 22nd Avenue. The existing High Ridge Road will not be taken OUt of service until that new connec- tion is made, so it should not affect Mr. Schorr's property. Mr. Schorr asked if the access will remain open. Mr. Annunziato replied, "until such time as the new road is built and dedicated." Mr. Schorr asked what period of time "a temporary abandonment" would be. Mr. Annunziato answered that the temp~rar~ abandonment will remain in ~effect until such time as the new road has been constructed and accepted by the City. Chairman Trau~er informed him that Mr. Zimmerman said 20 to 22 months. As long as their access is not interfered with, Mr. Zimmerman had no objections. Mr. Annunziato reiterated that the access through the south should not be interfered wi~h. As no one else wished to speak, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the abandonment of that portion of High Ridge Road extending south from N. W. 22nd Avenue to the Boynton Canal within the Quantum Park of Commerce PID, subject to completion of the new private road prior to the abandonment of High Ridge Road. Mr. Schultz seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. PARKING LOT VARIANCES Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Jacobs Office Building None Dr. and Mrs. M. N. Jacobs North side of West Boynton Beach Boule- vard, east of intersection with Old Boynton Road 1/4 of Lot 8, Subdivision of Sec. 20, Twpo 45 South, Rge. 43 East, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida Request for relief from Section 5-141(g) (3) "Driveways" of the Parking Lot Regulations Mr. Golden read the memo addressed to the Members from Mr. Annunziato, which was dated February 4, 1987. In the last - 8 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 paragraph of the memo, he read that a building permit will not be issued until the County has completed the reconstruc- tion of West Boynton Beach Boulevard to create an intersec- tion at N. W. 8th Street and Old Boynton Road, which will be rerouted to align with 8th Street. The portion adjacent to the applicant's property will be taken out of service. Mr. Golden said it is not known at this time whether it will be abandoned, but it will be closed off and sealed from use. Therefore, the applicants would still have the intersecting rights-of-way lines on that side, in addition to the east, where there is N. W. 7th Court. Mr. Ryder was in accord with having just one driveway, but did not think the one on the corner should be considered at all because it would be hazardous to make that turn. He brought out that there is an island just to the north of that which separates the main roadway from the turn into Old Boynton Road, and said there will be problems coming around that corner. Mr. Golden explained that if the applicants provide a drive- way at that location, they will have to wait until that portion of the street is sealed off, per County plans. It will no longer be in service, and there will be a four way intersection at 8th Street. If the applicants provide a driveway at that location, they will not be able to secure a permit until the County has closed Old Boynton Road, adjacent to that property. Chairman Trauger watched it this afternoon at 3:30 or 3:45 P. M., and 130 cars went through the intersection. Whether it is curved or square, there will be about the same volume of traffic. Even if they straighten the driveway, it will be a traffic hazard. Chairman Trauger stated he would rather see the driveway put back, further up on Old Boynton Road. Mr. Golden thought the reason for the allowance of flexibil- ity was that with the new intersection, they would exceed 180 feet. Even if the driveway was located on the western portion of the property, it would still meet the Zoning Code requirement of 180 feet. With what they were now faced with, Mr. Ryder thought it would be best to go with the easterly entrance. The other one appeared too hazardous, and they did not know what would happen when the road is realigned nor what the proposed access would be at that time. - 9 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Mr. Wandelt did not see how they could go much further west. If the applicants do not get the two driveways, Mr. Golden said it might alter their site plan, and he was not sure what effect that would have. He thought the applicants might want some flexibility to provide for a driveway in the eastern portion to provide for a driveway along the frontage on West Boynton Beach Boulevard. If there is no change on the realignment of Boynton Road and this is moved further to the west, Mr. Ryder predicted they would still have the problem, as they will be too close to the corner. If there is no egress driveway on the west, Mr. Golden said it will result in a change in the site plan to allow traffic toward the eastern portion of the site to provide for that egress. That will call for a change in the parking lot layout and design, which may have some impact on the provision of only one two-way driveway. Chairman Trauger asked what the most western point would be where they could put it and still be in compliance. Mr. Golden thought that was something the Board needed to establish because he felt there was some flexibility. Mr. Pagliarulo asked what the width of the property was. Mr. Cannon replied that it is 130 feet. Once Old Boynton Road is taken out of service, Mr. Golden said it probably never will be restored as a functional road. Mr. Pagliarulo asked if the property would be altered in any way (made greater or smaller) by the change of that abandonment~ Mr. Annunziato answered that there was a possibility, and he added that the applicants could receive an abandonment from the County to square off the property in the southwest corner. Mr. Annunziato explained that the realignment of Old Boynton Road will not require the taking of any property from this tract, but it will require takings from other tracts. In fact, it will modify the median cuts, so there will not be any median openings to serve this property. In other words, you will not be able to go eastbound and turn left into any of the driveways, in connection with the reconstruction of Old Boynton Road to 8th Street. Dr. Merle N. Jacobs, 614 N. W. 8th Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444, talked to the Architect this afternoon. The Architect said he could rearrange it for one driveway. The Architect said Dr. Jacobs should point out that in the 11 or 12 years they have been there, there has never been a 10 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 traffic accident caused by their driveways as they are now. If they have to go with one driveway, Dr. Jacobs said it would be better to have it on the east side because the dental clinic is on the west side. Mr. Schultz asked if Dr. Jacobs was saying he would put the double driveway or egress and ingress as far to the eastern portion of the property as possible. Dr. Jacobs stated he would say as far east as the Architect would think it would be feasible, but probably not along the edge. The Members expressed that solved the problem. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the proposal. There was no response. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the proposal. There was no response. Dr. Jacobs asked if the Board was going to tell them where to put the driveway. Chairman Trauger replied that it would be in the motion. As no one else wished to speak, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Schultz moved that the variance be accepted, subject to staff comments (attached as Addendum D to the original copy of these minute~), with an ingress and egress on the extreme eastern end of the property, as far as the Architect or Engineer can feasibly put it. Mr. Ryder seconded the motion. Dr. Jacobs was in agreement with all of the staff comments. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Cross Creek Centre Kevin McGinley Land Research Management, Inc. Steve Rhodes, D. R. Associates West Boynton Beach Boulevard at L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal, northwest corner See Addendum E attached to the original copy of these minutes. Request for relief from Section 5-141(m) "Fire Lanes" of the Parking Lot Regulations Mr. Golden told the Members this parcel was recently rezoned to a Planned Commercial Development (PCD). He read Mr. Annunziato's memo of February 4, 1987, which was addressed to the Board. - 11 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Mr. Golden showed where the parking spaces were located and said there would be at least 16 and possibly a few more. Mr. Ryder was in accord with that. All along, the Board has been very careful to make sure shopping centers like this one do not have cars where there should be a fire lane. Mr. Ryder could see that there were sprinklers in the smaller building in lieu of that. He guessed the Board could go with that, but would not want to go without a fire lane in the larger building because it would be contrary to the policy the Board has established. Mrs. Huckle asked what parking spaces they would be knocking out. Mr. Ryder answered, "The 16 in front of the big building." Eugene Lawrence, Architect, The Lawrence Group, Chartered Architects and Planners, 205 Worth Avenue, Palm Beach, Florida 33480, said Mr. McGinley was present, but he wished to address the issue because his representatives met with the Fire Department. Mr. McGinley agreed with Mr. Golden that the parking spaces could be located in other areas. He wan~ed to reenforce two or three things he thought were very important. (1) They have a very shallow site. (2) There was an additional seven feet of possible future right-of-way that the County said they did not want, but the City said the applicant should not use it, so they have not used it. Architecturally, Mr. McGinley's concern was that this is a neighborhood convenience center. He showed on the overlay that if they eliminate those 16 parking spaces, the cars will be on the site but they will not be c~onvenient or adja- cent to the building. They also propose to sprinkle that ar ea. Mr. McGinley brought to the Board's attention something that was overwhelming to him, and that was that there has never been a reported death in a fully sprinkled building with the exception of someone caught in a bed or a chair. They have access all the way down the face of the building, but it is not adjacent to the building. If the Planning Department or Fire Department would consider it, Hr. McG~nley suggested that they put the separating fire wall down the center of this building so in lieu of the 20,00Q feet the Planning Department pointed out, they would split it from a fire rating standpoint, into two 10,000 square foot buildings. They think this can accommodate the life saving and protection. From a functional standpoint, 12 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Mr. McGinley thought it would be very difficult for the center shops to have only the one space close by. Mr. McGinley was not sure the Planning Department was aware of it, but the Engineering Department required that all of the drainage of the property be drained forward. As that drain-age plan was redone, some of the parking spaces along the face were lost because of the requirement to drain all of the storm water from the back to the front part of the site. Mr. McGinley stated that they propose to sprinkle the building and think the parking spaces closer to the shops are very important to the success of the shops. He further sta%ed that they believe they can deal with the safety factors in another way. Chairman Trauger asked how far the spaces across are from where Mr. McGinley has them in front of lng. Mr. McGinley replied that it is 45 feet. the street the build- Mr. Ryder pointed out that they would have the condition of cars backing up against each other in the middle of a main thoroughfare, which would not be safe. If they maintain the fire lane, they will not have that condition. There was discussion. Mr. McGinley drew attention to the lane in the rear of the building. Mr. Ryder repeated his prior comments. If Mr. McGinley went by the building at 8:00 A. M., Mr. Schultz said more than 2/3 of the 16 parking spaces would be used by employees. There are shopping centers now where it would be very easy to mark "Employee Parking Only" on the lefthand side. Mr. Schultz did not think they would lose that many paying customer parking spaces if the employees would walk 50 feet. Mr. McGinley responded that they have built many shopping centers and have never had any problem with having those employees park where they are supposed to park. Mr. McGinley reiterated that they have worked with the Fire Department and split it into two pieces so they would have two 10,000 foot buildings instead of one 20,000 foot build- ing. He asked if that would mitigate the circumstances. Mr. Ryder did not see how it would. There was discussion about what other jurisdictions allow. Chairman Trauger asked if any one wished to speak in favor of or in objection to the proposal. There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. 13 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Mr. Ryder moved to concur with the recommendation of the TRB and permit the elimination of the fire lane from the smaller building, but require sprinklers in that building, and require a fire lane in front of the larqer building, subject to staff comments. (See Addendum F attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Mrs. Huckle seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. CONDITIONAL USE 5. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Arby's Restaurant at Oakwood Square Shopping Center Edward W. Duggan, HSW Investments Oakwood Square Associates North Congress Avenue at Old Boynton Road, southeast corner See Addendum G attached to the original copy of these minutes. Request for conditional use approval to construct a 3,230 square foot restaurant with drive-thru facilities at a leased out parcel located on the south side of the main shopping center driveway Mr. Golden told the Members uhis shopping center is currently under construction. He read the memo dated February 6, 1987, addressed to the Board, from Mr. Annunziato. (See Addendum H attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Mr. Golden called attention to the tan and brown color scheme of Arby's Restaurant and said this would not conform with the color scheme of the shopping center which is a blue tiled roof and light gray stucco. After discussion, Mrs. Huckle asked if this would be addressed by the Community Appearance Board (CAB), and she wondered if that was not normally where colo~ schemes come up. Mr. Golden replied that the CAB evaluates color schemes and confor- mance of buildings, as well as landscaping. Mrs. Huckle thought a recommendation to the CAB would not hurt. Mr. Edward W. Duggan, Agent, 6350 North Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, asked if the color scheme could be addressed at the CAB meeting. Mr. Ryder thought it should be brought up at the CAB meeting. Chairman Trauger asked if Arby's on U. S. 1 would be closed when this one is opened. Mr. Duggan did not know. Chairman 14 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Trauger's concern was that there would be another vacant store on U. S. 1. On normal Arby's construction, Mr. Schultz said the flat rear portion of the roof construction is left for air conditioning and cooling units, etc. It was absent on the plans. If that was the case, Mr. Schultz thought the Board should consider a mansard around to hide it because it would be visible from the entire shopping center. He explained that there should be something to shield the units. The plans showed mansard around three sides, but there was a flat roof on the back side. Mr. Schultz elaborated. Mr. Duggan did not object to that recommendation. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposal. There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. of Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the conditional use, subject to staff comments (shown on Addendum H attached to the ori- ginal copy of these minutes) and the shielding of units on the flat roof. The motion also included a recommendation that the CAB review the colors. Mr. Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. REZONING Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: The High Ridge Center Roy Barden Max Schorr, Trustee High Ridge Road at Miner Road southwest corner extended, A parcel of land (10.84 acres) in Old Government Lot 1,'Section 17, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, fronting High Ridge Road. Request for a rezoning from R-lA_AA (Single Family Residential) to M-1 (Light Industrial) for the purpose of allowing construction of a 10.45 acre light industrial development Mr. Golden advised that this property from the Boynton Distribution Center. Mr. Annunziato dated February 2, 1987, to the Board. is directly across He read the memo from which was addressed 15 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Roy Barden, Landscape Architect, Roy Barden Planning Group, 1300 West Lantana Road, Lantana, Florida 33462, said, obviously, the applicant was requesting that the Board act favorably on the M-1 zoning and said Mr. Golden had very effectively reviewed the background. However, Mr. Barden said he was present during the public hearing on the land use amendment, and he responded to the request to comply with conditions. The idea was that if the City does impose conditions, the applicant will certainly have to live with them, if that is a requirement. Mr. Bard en said they understand the concern the City has for the site. They submitted it originally as a Planned Indus- trial Development (PID) and were caught in the dimensional or acreage department of the City. Two owners of the project were present in the audience, and Mr. Barden said they are anxious to get under construction. The market is good right now for the kinds of uses proposed. Mr. Ryder noted this was not in the City and asked what "RS" meant. Mr. Annunziato answered, "Single family," Mr. Ryder inquired whether the City heard from the County. In these unincorporated pockets, because they will be annexed as part of the development process, Mr. Annunziato said t~e County has more or less delegated the planning responsibility to the cities. T~e land use decision in this ~rea was really made When the~ Boynton Beach Park of commerce was approved. You cannot have a 560 acre PID and leave 10 or 20 acre pockets of single family zoning, especially when industrial zoning is on ~hree sides of it. Mr. Annunziato said these are interim m~asures. As the properties develop, they will develop in a form consistent with what the PID regulations provide f6r, and he hoped there would be some sort of cohesive land development there. Mr. Annunziato informed Mr. Ryder that both the R1AAA parcel and the parcel that is not in the City are zoned Single Family and are both owned by the same person. Chairman Trauger asked if the person was notified of this application. Mr. Barden answered affirmatively. There was discussion regarding the plan. Chairman Trauger asked if Mr. Barden read the staff comments and recommenda- tions, based upon the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Barden had read them. At the time they were before the Board for a PID, they agreed to them reluctantly because they were severe requirements, but they were allowed a kind of mixed use in the PID which they are not being allowed in the M-1. The - 16 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 M-1 zoning has certain restrictions for types of use. Mr. Barden gave examples and said M-1 is strictly for straight warehousing or unmixed uses. Mr. Barden continued that PID, however, provides an applicant with a very rich award for complying wi~h very high perform- ance standards. Normally, the applicant does not oppose those conditions because he is getting a just award. Mr. Barden emphasized that they were seeking rezoning, as they have tried for almost two years now, because the area, as the City staff pointed out, is justifiably industrial. It would be an extreme hardship to develop it otherwise. Mr. Barden thought the Board~ elected officials, and owners were in agreement with that. Mr. Barden questioned how severely the Board was going to impose design standards on the applicant without giving him some reward as they were giving all PID applicants. In a sense, he was saying if the City required conditions on the applicant, the owner must have it rezoned because he must be a~ie tO p~oceed the way his neighbor across the street is proceeding. If the Board imposed conditions and the appli- cant must comply with them, in Mr. Barden!s judgment, the applicant should be given some privileges that his neighbors that have PID zoning are given. That was to allow the appli- cant to mix some uses, subject to site plan approval, or mix offices in his warehouse the way it is being done across the street, which they call the service distribution type of center. M~r. Annunziato advised that the applicant was entitled only to those uses which would be provided in the M-1 zoning regulations. Chairman Trauger wanted to make sure the appli- cant understood the conditions for both the explicit Code requirements and the others provided in the staff comments. Mr. Ryder asked why the PID was precluded. Mr. Annunziato replied it was because of the Code. Mrs. Huckle recalled this came up before. It was less than half the required acreage for a PID. Chairman Trauger again asksd Mr. Barden if he was in agree- ment with all of the staff comments. Mr. Barden guessed he was not answering as explicitly as Chairman Trauger was saying the staff recommendations were. He said they were seeking the Board's recommendation for rezoning. If the Board imposes the staff's conditions, Mr. Barden stated that the applicant will likely have to live with those conditions. 17 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 However, he and the other owners expressed concern with each one. They went through that last year in great detail. For example, Mr. Barden mentioned the sand pine preserve. Staff is now asking for one acre set aside or two 1/2 acre parcels. Last year, they were in general agreement that preservation could be accommodated in the setback areas and the distances between the buildings which would accumulate in the pieces, so he said there are details in the conditions that are tough to live with. With the PID, they were given some trade-offs for following those conditions. Mr. Barden did not quite know how to address it to the Board, and said the applicants felt they were in a bind situation and that if they did not agree to the conditions, the Board would not recommend rezoning. He told the Members the conditions they were imposing were not M-1 conditions under the Municipal Code but were PID conditions. Mr. Barden said the Members were taking a high standard and imposing those conditions on a lower quality of zoning. For the record, Chairman Trauger again asked Mr. Barden if he agreed, without reservation, to the conditions stated, (both the explicit Code requirements and the staff recommen- dations). Chairman Trauger requested Mr. Barden to answer "Yes" or "No." Mr. Barden agreed explicitly that if the City imposes these conditions upon the applicant, the appli- cant will have to live with~those conditions because the applicant wishes to have the property zoned M-1. Mrs. Huckle asked Mr. Annunziato if the applicant was correct in stating that the requirements here for M-1 were reflect- ing the requirements for PID. Mr. Annunziato answered, "In part, and in part, no." Since the previous application was approved, there have been amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, and he explained. Mr. Ryder thought they had to keep in mind that they were talking about quite a change from R1AAA to an M-1. He saw nothing wrong with prescribing the conditions, whether they were a part of PID or whatever. Mr. Annunziato said there were some conditions, setbacks, etc. which reflected PID regulations. However, he thought it was quite clear at the time this application went through the Council that the applicants were going to comply with the PID requirements. That concept was left with the Council, and Mr. Annunziato believed that was instrumental in the Council going ahead and adopting the Land Use Element. - 18 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 For Mr. Annunziato's benefit, Mr. Barden confirmed that Mr. Annunziato's statements were correct. The applicants were quite aware of the conditions all along from last year and from the staff comments at the time of the Board of Adjustment hearing and the City Council hearing. The appli- cant was not here to tell the Board they were not aware of the conditions and were not here to say they would not accept those conditions, if the City imposed them. Mr. Barden recalled that the words he used before the City Council was that if the city does give those conditions, the applicants will live with them, which was what he was tell- ing the Board tonight. He reiterated that they are severe conditions. Hopefully, at the time they get into site plan review and the subdivision plat, conditions will improve along High Ridge Road that will allow them to readdzess the restriction of the number of driveways on High Ridge Road and where they preserve the sand pines. Mr. Barden said Mr. Annunziato and the other staff members have always worked well with them. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the proposal. There was no response. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the change in zoning from R1AAA to M-l, subject to staff comments attached as Exhibit I to the original copy of these minutes. Mrs. Huckle seconded the motion. Motion caried 7-0. THE BOARD TOOK A BREAK AT 9:00 P. M. The meeting resumed at 9:12 P. M. B. SUBDIVISIONS PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Meadows 300 Tract N (Wellesley) Thomas J. Twomey, P.'E. Michael B. Schorah & Associates, Inc. Burg & DiVosta Corporation West side of North Congress Avenue, south of Hypoluxo Road Request for the approval of the construction plans and preliminary plat which provides for the construc- tion of infrastructure improvements to serve 288 units in connection with a previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) - 19 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Mr. Golden said Tract N is located at the northwest corner of Congress Avenue and Meadows Boulevard south. To the east is Congress Avenue; to the south, Meadows Boulevard; to the west, a storm water retention area and -~o~ the north, the L-19 Canal. Across the canal is the Ryan Homes development of Bayshore. The water system will tie into the existing system on Meadows Boulevard to the south and will be moved to the north by an aerial crossing over the L-l~9 Canal that will tie into the Bayshore system in Tract A of the Ryan Homes project. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments attached as Addendum J to the original copy of these minutes. Michael B. Schorah, Engineer, Michael B. Schorab & Associates, Inc., Suite 205, 1850 Forest Hill Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406, read the~Staff ~omments detail and agreed with them as presented, ~ut w~shed for clarificatio~ ~rom the City staff. in some Mr. Schorah called attention to comments 12 and 17 in the memorandum ~rom Tom Clark, City Engineer, dated February 4, 1987. He a~reed with the rest of the staff comments, had no objection to them, and said they would take care of them. Some have already been taken care of. However, Mr. Schorah was not quite s~re of the intent of comment 12. He did not have an opport~u~ity to talk to Mr. Clark. Mr. Annunziato said his recommendation would still be that the request be approved, subject to staff comments. This would give Mr. Schorah an opportunity to meet with Mr. Clark between now and next Tuesday, when the Council meets. Mr. Annunziato suspected there would be a technical solution. Mr. Schorah agreed with Chairman Trauger that it would also apply to comment 17. Mr. Schultz noted ther~ were 42 staff comments. When an Engineer submits a site plan, he wondered if he is not to submit the plan as the Code applies. He wondered why all of a sudden the Board was getting so many staff comments for a site plan that was submitted by an Architect or Engineer. Mr. Annunziato responded that the TRB has expanded its scope of review in such a way that they are pointin~ out minor 20 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 problems on site plans more as advice or information to the applicant so when he submits his plans for plat recording or permit, these minor things will be resolved. Nothing in the comments was inconsistent with the Code requirements. Mr. Schultz asked how the Board could be expected to pass something on, to the Council with 42 staff comments. In this instance, Mr. Annunziato said there was nothing in the comments that would cause the plans to fail. Mr. Schultz noticed 44 staff comments on the next site plan. Mr. Annunziato reassured him that there was nothing that would cause the plans to fail. Mr. Schultz could not agree with that, and he began reading some of the comments. Mr. Annunziato said the City asked for a great deal of informa- tion. After discussion, ~r. Ryder emphasized that the staff comments are a function of the TRB. He thought it was great that there were 42 staff comments. There was further discussion, and Mr. Annunziato said Boynton Beach probably requires more detail on plans than any city in Palm Beach County. Mr. Schorah told Mr. Schultz that some of the comments were just points of advice, and the applicant accepted them and will further add to the plans where necessary. There was more ~iscussion. Mr. Annunziato said there are instances where the plan is incurably flawed or where a comment is made that so impacts the design on the plan that the plan would not be substan- tially the same. In this instance, the plan will not change substantially, etc. Mr. Schorah said they had no problem with any of the water and sewer comments. Chairman Trauger asked if he agreed with all of the comments. Mr. Schorah answered affirmatively. Mrs. Huckle read the third paragraph from the memo dated February 3, 1987 from Don Jaeger, Chief - Plans Review, Building Department, and asked what "approved opening protectives" are. Mr. Annunziato explained that if you have an opening, you should have a fire rated door. Mr. Schultz advised it is Class A. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the request, subject to staff comments attached as Exhibit J to the original copy of these minutes. Mr. Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 6-1. Mr. Schultz voted against the motion. - 21 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 C. SITE PLANS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Meadows 300 Tract N (Wellesley) George Gentile/Donald Hearing GBS Architects Burg & DiVosta Corporation West side of North Congress Avenue, of Hypoluxo Road south Tract "N", according to the plat of the P.U.D. Meadows 300, plat number 3, as recorded in Plat Book 48, at pages 196 through 200, in and for the public records of Palm Beach County, Florida. Containing in ali 36.77 acres, more or less. Request for site plan approval to c~struct 288 townhouse units plus recreation and landscaping at the Meadows Planned Unit Development (PUD) Mr. Golden said this will be immediately north of Willow- brook, a Hasco multi-f~amily project. These are quadraplex units, similar to Sandalwood and Willowbrook, but with a different layout and d~esign. These are two story, two bed- room units constructed to a height of 29'8". The entrance is located on Meadows Boulevard, and a guardhouse will be provided. Mr. Golden said the applicant submitted the preliminary plat, which the Board just reviewed, in connection with the site plan. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments attached hereto as Exhibit K. George Gentile, Architect, 1080 East Indiantown Road, Suite 205, Jupiter, Florida 33477, presented renderings. He said the units will have pitched roofs and will have a total of 1,319 square feet. Mr. Gentile informed Mr. Wandelt that these units are a little larger than Sandalwood, which has 1,285 square feet. Mr. Gentile said there will be a very attractive entrance with a multitude of landscaping and entrance wall designs and a nice signage feature. The boulevard takes residents into the project and into the neighborhood units they developed. The parking courts will individualize neighbor- hoods, and they will be specifically identified with street names. Oak trees will line all of the boulevards. Mr. - 22 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Gentile informed Mr. Ryder that Meadows Boulevard is the end of They accented the pavement area area. they are private roads. the public right-of-way. to denote the guardhouse Ail street lights are denoted on the site plan. Mr. Gentile said they will have a historic type of fixture, which he thought would be attractive. Mr. Ryder asked what type of lighting it would be. Mr. Gentile thought it was metal halide, which meets the Code requirements. Mr. Gentile said all of the circulation had been worked out with the Public Works Department in regard to servicing and comments that were brought up in the numerous meetings they had with staff prior to submission for technical review. H.e stated they would have no problem complying with the comments. However, there were particular comments they wanted to further diScuss and get clarification on. Mr. Gentile referred to item $3 on the memo from Don Jaeger, Chief - Plans Review, Building Department, and said it was a Building Code situation, which they will clarify with him and resolve to meet the Code. The other comment was the Police Department's comment with regard to circulation, and Mr. Gentile wished to discuss that wi~h them. He thought the circulation ~actor of the plan had been worked out very well and said there is complete radius turning in and around all of the parking areas i~ each one of the neighborhoods. Mr. Gentile thought it added a note of dimension to the site plan. The Public Works and Fire Departments felt that it werked and served those vehicles. Mr. Gentile said they would work out other comments with the staff, if the Board desired them to. He asked for the Board's recommendation of approval on the site plan with them working out those two minor Code situations. Mr. Gentile expressed t~is is a new product for the Burg & DiVosta Company and to Boynton, which he thought would add a nice factor to the entire City. Chairman Trauger asked Mr. Gentile if he would work out a satisfactory agreement with the City as to these two comments and would agree to all of the other staff comments. Mr. Gentile answered that he would meet all of the City Codes with regard to them. It did not seem to Mr. Schultz that the fire walls penetrated the roofs. Mr. Gentile answered that they do not penetrate through the roof but go to the roof. - 23 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 On the plan and in a comment made, Mr. Schultz said there was talk about an emergency fire entrance to the west. Mr. Gentile confirmed that it is grassed and said it is a denoted fire access. It will not be a regular entrance but the Fire Department will know they have access through there, and it will be made available to them. With regard to the recommendation of Sgt. Harris, Police Department, about circular streets, it looked to Mrs. Huckle as though it would be something large to work out. Sgt. Harris wants a complete circle, and Mr. Gentile wanted wandering streets. Mr. Gentile thought they needed to discuss that. Sgt. Harris had some concern about the emergency vehicles accessing the facility and was looking for a looped system on the project. Mr. Gentile thought they had addresse~ that as.far as turning radii, because it is ~imilar to a single family situation where you go into a cul~de-sa? area. He thought an explanation to Sgt. Harris of Ghat situation would ~soive it because ~e Public Works and~Fire Departments had no problem. Mr. Gentile continued that they tried to create an aesthetic neighborhood. By providing curved streets, it suppresses spe~ders from going through bhere because they do not have a straight run to drag strip. If Sgt. Harris needs some other access, they will try to work it out with him. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff comments. Vice Chairman Winter seconded the motion. Mrs. Huckle expressed concern about the two items and wondered if the Board was allowing for negotiations. Mr. Annunziato understood her concern and advised he was making those arrangements. He said he will be involved in the meetings and will be able to discuss the Board's point of view. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Commendation for Don Jaeger, Building Departmen~ Mr. Ryder commended Mr Jaeger's participation on the TRB, as he appears to be very thorough. Mr. Jaeger is also a very welcome adjunct on the Downtown Review Board. In Mr. Ryder's opinion, Mr. Ja~ger is doing a great job. Chairman Trauger asked that the record reflect this and directed that a copy be sent to the Building Department. Comments were also made about Mr. Jaeger's appearance, and the Members expressed that he is "a handsome guy.'~ - 24 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Project Name: Publix Distribution Center Agent: Kieran J. Kilday Owner: Publix Supermarkets, Inc. Location: South of N. W. 22nd Avenue, Quantum Park PID Legal Description: Description: within the See Addendum L attached to the original copy of these minutes. Request for site plan approval to construct a 426,690 square foot automated distribution center on a 55 acre parcel at the Quantum Park Planned Industrial Development Mr. Golden said the site plan provides for the distribution center and a 14,994 square foot service center. Three warehouse additions are proposed, which would require future site plan approval. The entrance is located on South Park Boulevard. Inside of the entrance way, a large parking area is provided for employees and visitors.- North of the employees' parking lot is trailer parking on the south side of the building and a three story office area. On the west side of the building is the truck service area, and a parking area is to the north for the diesel cabs which haul the trailers. A railroad spur track is located along the northern property boundary, which extends on site from the Seaboard main line adjacent to 1-95. Mr. Golden showed an elevation for the warehouse and an elevation for the truck service center. Mr. Golden said the sanitary sewer system is adequate, sub- ject to the comments from the Department of Utilities. As stated in the Department of Utilities' memorandum, approval o~ the site plan is conditioned upon the City having an adequate delivery system and storage to meet the fire flow requirements of the site, in addition to its demands through- out the service area. If calculations indicate the need for an on site fire system, including storage tanks, Mr. Golden said a site plan modification will be required. Chairman Trauger asked when that would be determined. Mr. Annunziato suspected it would be very soon. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Exhibit M. Jon C. Moyle, Attorney for Publix Supermarkets Incorporated, Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald & Sheehan, P.A., 9th Floor - 25 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Barnett Centre, 625 North Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, introduced Charles Jenkins, Jr., Vice President of Publix and in charge of the real estate operations in Florida; and Tom O'Connor, Property and Distribution Manager for the Southeast Division of Publix. Attorney Moyle elaborated and then said Kiernan Kilday, Planner, and Enrico Rossi, Engineer, were also present. Although the notice said the distribution center is fully automated, Attorney Moyle said it is not. There are some aspects of automation, but a lot of people will be involved with it. They talked about it at length when they came in for the Quantum DRI amendment to the development order, so Attorney Moyle believed the Members were familiar with the center. Attorney Moyle said it is dry storage and what will be distributed will not be subject to refrigeration. It will supply the Publix markets in this area and will go to somewhere in Broward County. Attorney Moyle said they were here tonight for site plan approval for a 1,024,126 square foot distribution center. Tonight is just the first phase. He talked to Mr. Annunziato and thought he had a clarification which would resolve into an understanding that, should the Board see fit to recommend approval, it would be vested for the full site plan approval. Attorney Moyle said George Zimmerman would back him up in his statement that Quantum, the owners of the park, have met many times aad reviewed this site plan very carefully before it went to the TRB because (1) Ed Deutsch wants quality in Quantum Park and (2) Ed Deutsch promised Boynton Beach, the P&Z Board, and City Council that they will have high quality. Attorney Moyle was pleased with the buffering that will take place. It will be buffered with alternating buffering and berm so that people will probably just see the architectural design on the top of the distribution center. They will not see the docks and the trucks. Attorney Moyle had no problems with the staff recommendations but wanted to address two things. One was the truck move- ment. Attorney Moyle said they were concerned about Mr. Annunziato's recommendation ~2, which would prohibit truck traffic on High Ridge Road north of Miner Road, N. E. 22nd Avenue east of 1-95, and Seacrest Boulevard. He stated that - 26 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOTfl~TON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Publix does not have a great deal of problems with High Ridge Road and N. E. 22nd Avenue, but they do have somewhat of a problem with Seacrest. Attorney Moyle suggested that the best way to handle this, as opposed to putting it as a part of the site plan approval, (and there was some question on the legalities involved in ~hat) was that it be addressed so that it would apply to every one uniformally. He thought the best approach was to approach it with some type of Ordinance as opposed to putting it as a condition of the site plan approval. This was one reason Attorney Moyle was concerned about the com- ment. Attorney Moyle recommended that comment 92 in Mr. Annunziato's memo of February 4, 1987 be taken out and that the Board let the applicants get with Mr. Annunziato and City Attorney Rea to work it out because Boynton Beach approved the DRI development order. An integral part of that was the overall traffic circulation plan. The impact fees and the whole approval process were based on that distribution system in the thoroughfare plan. If they did this, Attorney Moyle was concerned from a legal point of view that it may impact the development order the Board already approved. Attorney Moyle thought if they did it by Ordinance, the applicants would not have to worry about it impacting the development. He said they did not have any intention of using High Ridge Road north of Miner Road and had no problem with N. W. 22nd Avenue east of Seacrest Boulevard because Quantum has to four lane up to Seacrest. They do not intend to use Seacrest Boulevard a great deal but th'ey do intend to use it to qet to the store located at Sunshine Square. The easiest access will be out on Congress. After the interchange is opened, it will be on 1-95. Attorney Moyle believed they would be making a mistake by putting Mr. Annunziato's comment 92 as a condition of site plan approval and again asked that it be deferred. The second comment Attorney Moyle addressed was ~5 in Mr. Annunziato's memo. He talked to Mr. Annunziato and asked that it read: Future building additions or phases will require site plan approval of architectural .and related engineering drawings and plans. This will mean that the applicant will not have to refile for parking, landscaping, and the site data they presented for the entire thing. When they come in with phase 2, it will be the architectural and design drawings they did here. Attorne~ Moyle said 27 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 the landscaping, parking, and traffic is included in the original sits plan. With those two changes, he said they would have no problem with the staff recommendations. With regard to ~2, Mr. Ryder was concerned because they did not know when the interchange between N. W. 22nd Avenue and 1-95 would take place. Wt~en that happens, the picture will change. In the meantime, this may be impacting on the area east of 1-95. Chairman Trauger asked if they could not go west on 22nd to Congress Avenue, down Congress Avenue, and then go east. Mr. Golden was sure the vast majority of traffic would go that way. Chairman Trauger meant to go to Sunshine Square. Attorney Moyle said they could. If the Board made it as a condition, Attorney Moyle said they would be happy to. He added that they will comply with whatever restrictions the Board puts on Seacrest Boulevard. If they did not do it by Ordinance and require this as e condi- tion on the site plan, Attorney Moyle stressed that it would isolate it on one applicant. He thought an Ordinance was the proper approach. Attorney Moyle honestly had some con- cern about it being inconsis~tent with the Board's approval of the development Ordinance for Quantum Park and reiterated that they needed to get with Attorney Rea and Mr. Annunziato to see if they could work it out. Mr. Annunzi~to recommended that they continue to show it as a comment on the site plan, and this would trigger discussion. He stated it was important that discussion be conducted more generally as it related to the development. Mr. Annunziato thought the points raised by Attorney Moyle were valid. If the comment continued to appear on the plan, he thought it would focus discussion at the Council meeting, and in that way it will involve the City Attorney either before or after that time. Mr. Ryder thought they would find they would be using Congress Avenue anyway, and he explained. There was discussion about where the trucks could go. Mr. Annunziato explained that they were not only talking about one or two trucks, but trucks that service Publix. It is not simply a Publix issue, although Publix was the first facility the Board looked at. Mr. Annunziato explained and suspected they would focus ~n on this discussion in great detail with the City Attorney present. 28 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Attorney Moyle and Mr. Zimmerman were talking, and they thought the item probably should be addressed to Quantum, opposed to a condition of this site plan approval. as Mr. George Zimmerman, speaking for Quantum Associates, interjected that one of the things they have been trying to do in presenting and marketing the land is to have a consistent and clear-cut approach from potential buyer to potential buyer about what the restrictions and regulations are. They felt it would be detrimental to them if these kinds of restrictions would stay. If the Board left it as a comment, Mr. Zimmerman asked if it would go away. W~nen it gets to the Council, he wondered if they were going to discuss it and then it would go away. Mr. Zimmerman thought it needed ~o~.stay on as a comment, but he would not like to see the applicant agree to the truck restrictions as indicated in that comment. He wanted to bring to a head discussions between Quantum and the City and the study that went into the original transportation plan and even the ongoing transportation plan that has to do with the interchange. Mr. Zimmerman said the comments about Seacrest were that the study that created the widening project that will go on Seacrest had to do with the traffic flows to relieve the intersection at t-95 and Boynton Beach Boulevard and give the opportunity to travel up Seacrest to get on at the Hypoluxo entrance. That roadway and the expansion of the roadway were meant to do exactly what this potential user and other potential users of the park will want to use Seacrest for. Mr. Zimmermah thought this was a question that ought to be in their area and resolved. He stated he would hate to see it attached to Publix' site plan because there could be one set of restrictions for them and one set of restrictions for other people like Motorola. Mr. Zimmerman thought a consistent way to handle it would be through their covenants and an understanding of how the traffic would be handled within the park. Mr. Zimmerman said Quantum feels it has some basic rights to the roadway grid as approved and as it now exists on the County plan, since impact fees were assessed against their development, based on that grid plan of the County network. 22nd Avenue, Seacrest Boulevard, and High Ridge Road, north of 22nd Avenue, are key parts of that County network. Mr. - 29 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Zimmerman thought it really needed to be handled with Quantum, if the City could see its way clear to do that. Mr. Ryder responded that they could not overlook the fact that eventually both sides of 22nd Avenue will be developed commercially, which will induce a lot more trucks. Mr. Annunziato welcomed Mr. Zimmerman's comments. Chairman Trauger thought the comment would have to stay as a staff comment as presented, if the Board went ahead with it. Mr. Annunziato advised that the City staff is looking for some comment from the City Council with respect to what the policy is going to be in terms of truck traffic on residen- tial streets. He was talking about truck routes on residen- tial Streets. Because they are old streets, they have almost, on a lot by lot basis, single family :d~iveways back- ing onto the highway. Mr. Annunziato said the City is encouraging additional traffic by making Se~crest Boulevard five lanes. Mr. Annunziato certainly did not discount the comments made by Attorney Moyle and Mr. Zimmerman concerning how this would impact the development. Chairman Trauger thought they had to go with the comments as presented but add that as a part of the contingency for approval, they be resolved by the City Council and developer with the City Attorney. Attorney Moyle thought it was something that needed to be talked about, and he could not say they would accept it because he thought it needed to be addressed. To get this item over with, Chairman Trauger suggested they leave the comment in, the applicant accept it as such, and the Board would provide the provision for the resolving of it. Attorney Moyle had no problem with the Board leaving it in as a comment and said they would certainly work with Mr. Annunziato and Attorney Rea. Chairman Trauger reminded him that it would become a binding comment if it is in there and approved. Mr. A~nunziato advised it could become unbinding if the Council does something else. Mr. Pagliarulo asked why the Board could not strike the comment and make the recommendation to Council to look into it. With it in, the applicant is bound to it. There was discussion. With reference to his comment $5, Mr. Annunziato said the intent of the applicant clearly was to have their entire - 30 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 project of approximately 1,000,000 square feet approved. Staff's concern was that they must come back and go through site plan approval for each additional structure in the intended parking lots and service structure. Mr. Annunziato did not see any inconsistency caused by the language suggested by Attorney Moyle and advised that if the Board accepted it, it would meet both staff's and the applicant's concerns. Mr. Schultz asked if the applicant intended to do the site work on the entire area now or just on that portion. If the applicant was going to do the complete site work now, he thought the Board would go along with that. Mr. Zimmerman said there are two parts to the site work. One was approved as part of the overall development plan for Quantum Park prior to Christmas, in terms of handling the base grading of the site. Mr. Zimmerman said the other site work, which is the finished site work for the site, could be presented by Mr. Kilday. In the sense Mr. Schultz meant it, Attorney Moyle said the site will be developed. For instance, the parcels that are not building the additional square footage Will be graded out, and grass will be planted there. That was what Mr. Schultz was getting at. Mr. Annunziato asked what the treatment of the areas not developed at this time would be. Mr. Kilday showed the areas that would be graded as part of the grading plan. The areas will then be seeded and irrigated, and they will be maintained. Mr. Annunziato read the wording suggested by Attorney Moyle for comment 5. Attorney Moyle had no problem with that. There was discussion. Enrico Rossi, Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc., 1675 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, West Palm Beachr Engineers for Quantum Park and Publix, said a question was raised about the impact the fire flow would have on the City's system. He met with John Guidry, Director of Utilities, and talked to Steve King, who is doing all of the interior designing and who ultimately will get the sprinkler people to do the designing system, to find out how the system works. Mr. Rossi said you cannot possibly serve all of the possible water you need from the sprinkler system for the protection of the entire building. It is a matter of zonzng it to meet the underwriter's requirements and comes down to a situation where they will need about 1600 gallons a minute, based on the designs of 31 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 other similar facilities. Mr. King is going to furnish Mr. Rossi with backup. Mr. Rossi said they are working with the utility people, and he will work it out with them. There was discussion. Attorney Moyle said they had to have some clarification on comment ~2, and they will meet with Attorney Rea and Mr. Annunziato to work that out. Chairman Trauger asked Attorney Moyle if he agreed with the staff comments as now presented (~5 as corrected by Attorney Moyle). Attorney Moyle was'sorry an Attorney was not present, as he thought there were some very serious problems with comment ~2. One was as to whether it was a proper condition of site plan approval. Second was the impact on the development. Attorney Moyle said Chairman Trauger was asking him to say definitely, when he may be doing something that would adversely impact previous action that the Board had taken. It put him in a bad position. Chairman Trauger clarified that he was talking about comment · 5 and said comment ~2 would stand as written. Attorney Moyle said comment ~5 was all right as amended. He did not mind comment ~2 standing as it was written, as long as the Board understood that the applicant would seek to clarify and amend it with the Caunty Attorney. Chairman Trauger responded that might be, but it was a risk the Board was going to take. Mrs. Huckle wanted to hear what Attorney Moyle had to offer. If the Board was going to require them to state "yes" or "no" categorically, Attorney Moyle wanted it amended to read, "Truck traffic to be prohibited on High Ridge Road north of Miner Road, Northeast 22nd Avenue east of Seacrest Boulevard, and Seacrest Boulevard, if all truck traffic is prohibited." As they were talking about a County road, Chairman Trauger did not believe the Board had the authority to amend or change it. Attorney Moyle advised that the best thing the Board could do would be to take it out as a condition and put it as a special note that the applicant is instructed to meet with Mr. Annunziato and Attorney Rea to work it out as to how the truck traffic can best be presented to the P&Z Board and to the City Council for resolution. Chairman Trauger agreed, but he was going to insist on it staying as it was. Then the Board would know action would be taken. Mr. Annunziato preferred to not pull comment ~2 out. He thought it should be the focus of some discussion at the - 32 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 City Council meeting. Attorney Moyl~ did not think the Board should force him to say "yes" or "no" at this point until the applicant had a chance to work something out. If the Board was to approve it tonight, Chairman Trauger said he would have to insist upon a "yes" or "no". Otherwise, he would postpone the action. Mr. Annunziato was ~Ot sure how much the Board would accomplish by postponing the action. The necessary action to resolve the problem could not occur at this level. It needed to get before the City Council and City Attorney. It may be no problem from the point of view of the Council. He preferred that Comment ~2 stay in. If it was a matter of tabling or turning the request down, he would rather see it pulled out. Mr. Annunziato thought it needed to be specifi- cally discussed at the Council meeting. Attorney Moyle did not want to be put in a position of categorically saying something and then go before~the City Council and have someone say he agreed to it. Mr. Annunziato advised the Board to take comment 92 out and in their motion to request that the Council offer clarification as to their desires for truck traffic on these roads. Mr. Wandelt thought comment ~2 should be eliminated. Mrs. Huckle agreed. Mr. Schultz moved that the site plan approval for construc- tion of a 1,024,126 square foot automated distribution center on a 55 acre parcel at the Quantum Park PID be approved, subject to staff comments, with the Planning Director's comment ~2 omitted and referred to the City Council for resolution and comment ~5 as amended. Mr. Pagliarulo seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Boynton Lakes Plat 3B Private Recreation Facility Carlos A. Diaz, Vice President Lennar Homes, Inc. East side of North Congress Avenue, of Hypoluxo Road south Tract "B, of Boynton Lakes Plat No. 3B PUD, as recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, in Plat Book 53 at pages 56 and 57 Request for site plan approval to construct a private recreation facility and landscaping at Plat 3B of the Boynton Lakes Planned Unit Development 33 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Mr. Golden said the recreation area is located at the north- east corner of Boynton Lakes Boulevard and Walcott Drive. The site plan provides for a swimming pool, a cabana adjacent to the swimming pool, a fenced playground, picnic area, and two handball courts. A 31 space parking lot has been pro- vided to serve the proposed facility. With respect to utilities, Mr. Golden said the facility will be served by the extension of lines from the existing system in Boynton Lakes Boulevard. The TRB recommended approval of the site plan, subject to staff comments attached to the original copy of these minutes as Exhibit N. Mr. Jeff ~opper, Lennar Homes, Inc., 700 N. W. 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 331712, accepted all of the staff comments. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff comments. Vice Chairman Winter seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Catalina Centre Plat No. Kimberly Dellastatious Currie, Schneider Associates, P. A. Walboyn, Inc. North Congress Avenue at Boynton Canal, northwest corner See Addendum O attached. Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for a change in building layout and design for the Plat No. hotel Mr. Golden informed the Members that this is located on the west side of Congress Avenue, across from MotorOla. The hotel is currently under Construction. The request for a modification has been submitted to allow for a change in the design and'configuration of the north wing, which is where the non-suite area of the hotel is proposed. The suite area is in the south wing. Mr. Golden said the changes in the building footprint are the result of changes made to the interior floor plans, as follows: The restaurant has been reduced from 100 seats to 34 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 90 seats. The lounge is being reduced from 275 seats to 225 seats, and the meeting room has been increased from 256 to 300 seats. Mr. Golden also showed how the new wing will appear. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments from the Building Department, attached to the original copy of these minutes as Addendum P. Tom McMurrain, Vice President, Walboyn, Inc., 8132 West Glades Road, Boca Raton, Florida 33434, agreed with the staff comments. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the amended site plan, subject to staff comments. Mr. Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 6-1. Mr. Ryder voted against the motion and explained that he had to be consistent. He had opposed the rezoning and all subsequent applications. Project Name: Mariner's Way Agent: Frederick Vecchione Owner: First Oxford Development Corporation Location: Federal Highway at N. E. 12th Avenue, east side Legal Description: Description: See Addendum Q attached to the original copy of these minutes. Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for the addition of a swimming pool Mr. Golden said two additional parking spaces have been provided for those residents living furthest away. The Planning Department recommended that those be relocated to the area adjacent to the pool. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff attached to the original copy of these minutes R. comments as Addendum Frederick Veochione, General Contractor, said the swimming pool is 30'x15' and is in the easternmost corner of the project. Mr. Schultz read the first comment in the memo dated February 3, 1987 from Don Jaeger, Chief - Plans Review, which said the survey document was incomplete, Mr. Vecchione said the elevations would be added to the survey, and informed Mr. Schultz that the two additional parking spaces are not there, but there is room for them. - 35 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Chairman Trauger asked if there is any piling under the buildings. Mr. Vecchione answered, "No", and said they used a compact sub-base. Investigations were done by two engineer- ing firms and the testing has been submitted to the Building Department. There was discussion. Mrs. Huckle commented about the size of the pool and asked if there was any way to make a bigger pool. Mr. Vecchione replied that there was not. He advised that there are 32 units there. Mr. A/~nunziato told the Members the develop- ment paid the full impact fee, and no credit was given them against recreational amenities on site.' Until they had a complete survey, Mr. Schultz did not think the Board could vote on such an issue. He explained and said, as a General Contractor, Mr. Vecchione should know a complete survey is required for the construction of any building or facility. Mr. Schultz elaborated. Mr. Ryder asked why the P&Z Board had to require that when the Building Department requires it. Mr. Wandelt agreed that it is up %o the Building Department to get the survey. After discussion, Mr. Wandelt advised that this Board was approv.ing it subject to the staff comments. Mr. Annunziato clarified that a survey was submitted. The question raised by Mr. Jaeger was that he needs a survey that has more documentation on it. An up-to-date survey was not submitted. After more discussion, Mr. Annunziato stated it was only a swimming pool. Mr. Schultz repeated Mr. Annunziato's statement and said that the next time it will be onl~ a single family house, and the next time it will be off the property. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the amended site plan, subject to staff comments. Mr. Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-2. Mr. Schultz and Chairman Trauger voted against the motion. 6. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Centrust Savings Bank at Oakwood Square Shopping Center Edward W. Duggan, Project Engineer Oakwood Square Associates Nort~ Congress Avenue at Old Boynton Road, southeast corner A portion of Tract 61 thru 67 inclusive, as shown on the Plat of the subdivision of Sections 29 and 20, Twp. 45 South, - 36 MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 10, 1987 Description: Rge. 43 East, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, at Page 20, Public Records of Palm Beach County. Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for the construction of a 2,944 square foot branch bank building with drive thru facilities at a leased out parcel located on the north side of the main shopping center driveway Mr. Golden said this is the same shopping center where Arby's will be located. The bank is square in shape with the main entrance located on Congress Avenue. The drive thru facilities will be located on the south side of the building, adjacent to the main shopping center entrance. Parking will be provided on the remaining three sides of the building. The building colors will be gray, blue, and white to match the colors of the shopping center. The TRB recommended approval, subject to the staff comments attached as Addendum S to the original copy of these minutes. Edward W. Duggan, Project Engineer, 6350 North Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, agreed to all of the staff comments. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the amended site plan, subject to staff comments, and with the recommendation that the Community Appearance Board consider the colors. Mr. Ryder seconded the motion, and the motion carried 6-1. Mr. Wandelt voted against the motion because he thought there were enough banks in the City. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting properly adjourned at 10:50 P. M. Patricia Ramseyer Recording Secretary (Five Tapes. Static Was on one tape.) 37 - Li~3AL nESCR ~' PT2ON A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 8 . TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH. RANG." 43 ~.%ST, PALM HEAC~ COU~.~TT.o FLORIDA° SAID PA~EL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTIC'JLARLY DESCRIHED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NOR..THW~T CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8, ~"'~CE NORTH 8.='10'2¢° FAST, AL~ THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SE~!ON 8, L~NE OF CONGAS AV~E ~ ~E NOR~ R~=~T OF WAY LINE OF L.W.D.D. ~ ~T~ 18 ~E~ENT ~ RSCTRDZD IN 0.~. ~K 3030. ~E D~IB~ ~SEMENT, SAID LINE ~SG BEI~ ~K SOU~ ~IGHT OF WAY L~NE OF HY~L~XO RO~, A DIST~C~ OF TH= ~INT OF B~INNING. THICK CONTINUE ~0~ ~E B~I~ OF NOR~ 8]'I0'~4' ~T, A DIET'CE OF 644.15 F~: TH~C~ SOU~ 49'49'36' ~T. A~ DIET.CE OF 35.36 FEET; ~CE SOU~ 4~49'36" ~T, A DIET. CE OF 612.00 FEET; THENC~ SOU~ 85'10'~4" W~T, A DIET'CE OF 861.57 FEET ~ A ~INT ON ~E ~T ~IG~ OF WAY LINE OF CONGRESS AVENUE; ~CE WITH A ~E A~ THE RIGHT 0F WAY LINE OF CONGR~S AV~E ~AVING A CHO~ B~ING OF NOR~ 0~'46'15" W~T, A R~IUS OF CEN~ ~GLZ OF 0'50'37", ~ AN ~C L~G~ OF 8 .... FE~; ~CE NOR~ 5'!1'35' W~T, A DIET'CE OF 178.~Z FEET~ ~C~ WITH A ~{E ~ ~E RIG~ HAVING A ~IUS OF i1399.1~ FE~. A CEN~ ~LE OF 0'~6'08', ~ ~ ~C L~G~ 0F 152.~7 TH~CZ NGR~ 85'10'~4' E~T. A DIST~CE OF I~3.43 FE~; ~CE NGR~ 4'49'36" W~T, A DIET'CE OF 219.96 F~T MORE ~ THE ~INT OF B~NN!NG; L~S ~ RIGHT OF WAY ~ ~NGRESS AVENUE. CONTAINING: !1.63 ACXES, 'MOR£ TR L?~$. SUBJECT. TO F. ASEMENTS, REE~ICTIONH, KE~.RVATIONS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD. Legal Description Provided by: Bench Mark Land Surveying & Mapping, Inc. MEMORANDUM 9 February 1987 TO: FROM: RE: ~Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato .Planning Director Approval of Boynton Lakes Plaza Site Plan and Request for Shared Parking and Approval of the Preliminary Plat of Boynto~ Lakes Plaza Sitework$ Architects and Planners, Inc. has requested approval of the Site Plan of Boynton Lakes Plaza. Accompanying this application are two. additional requests as follows: i_. A request for a joint allocation of parking to allow parking spaces to be shared among uses with different demand characteristicS; and, 2. A request for the approval of construction plans. and the. preliminary plat of Boynton Lakes Plaza. Boynton Lakes Plaza is a proposed shopping center located in the southeast corner of H!rpotuxo Road and Congress Avenue consisting of 139,000 square feet of floor space including a 2,124 seat cinema. At the Technical Review Board meeting of February 3, 1987 the Board reviewed these plans and determined that the plans were in sufficient form for forwarding to the Planning and Zoning Board, subject to resubmitting shared parking · calculations, as the original calculations lacked detail and incorrectly identified the square footage of the shopping center. These calculations were resubmitted on February 4, 1987 but the resubmitted calculations did not properly identify the number of required parking spaces or the re_quired buffer. These requests were not placed on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Board as a result of the Planning Department making a finding that the request for a joint allocation of ADDENDUM B parking, incorrectly calculated the number of parking spaces necessary and the required buffer. In total, the plan lacked approximately 100 parking spaces according to code requirements. The decision to not agenda this request was based in part on the applicant's original approach to solve this problem which was to reduce floor space and add parking spaces. The reduction in floor space would require new calculations for shared parking and the construction of additional parking spaces would require changes to the construction plans, affecting the review requirements of more than one d~partmeht. Additionally, the list of comments/recommendations was lengthy. Subsequent to the proposed changes to the floor area and site, the applicant proposed a second solution to solving the parking space deficiency; that is, to reduce the seats in the cinema from 2,t~4 to approximately 1,750. This reduction should allow the Plaza to be developed within the constraints zmposed by the City's parking space regulations. Based on this solution, the applicant is requesting to be placed on the Board's agenda of February 10, 1987. CARMEN S. A~NUNZIATO /bks 0335B EXHIBIT "C" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY FOR HIGH RIDGE ROAD The West 40 feet of the Southwest One Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest One Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 16, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach'County, .Florid~, LESS the right-of-Way for NW 22nd Avenue. TOGETHER with that part of said Southwest One Quarter (SW 1~4) of the Northwest One Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 16, lying '°Southwest of the chord of a curve having a radius ~f 25 feet; said curve being tangent on the West to a line ~0 feet East of, as measured at right angles to and parallel to the West line of the Northwest Ohe Quarter (NW t/4) of said section 16, and tangent en the South to the North right-of-way line of NW 22nd k~enu~. The East 40 feet of that part of Government Lot 1 lying in Southeas~ One Quarter of the Northeast One Quarter of Section 1~,- To~hship 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach. County," Florida, less the right of way of NW 22nd Avenue and also the right of way of f-95. TOGETHER WITH that part of said Government Lot i lying Southeast of the chord of a curve having a radius of 25 feet; said curve being tangent on the East to a line 40 feet~Wes~ of, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the East line of said Government Lot t, and tangent on the South to the North right of way line of NW 22nd Avenue. ADDENDUM C ~MEMOPO~NDUM 4 February 1987 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM; Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Jacobs Office Building - Parking Lot Varianc~ Section 5-144(c)(4) of.the Code of Ordinances requires that when a variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested, the Technical Review Board m~st forward to the Planning-and Zoning Bsard a recommendation, and that the recommendation forwarded is to be made part o~ the public hearing proceedings. To that end, this memo l~ forwarded, consistent with 5-144(c)(4). Dr..and Mrs. Jacgbs, property owners, have requested a variance to. Sectzo~ 5-141(?)(3) "Driveways', of the Parking Lot Regulatzons which requires, among other things, that no ~riveways m~y be constructed closer.than 180 fee~ to the · ntersection of the rights-of-way lznes on arterzaI and collector roads. In this instance, the applicant is requesting to be permitted to provide two driveways onto West ~oynto~ Beach Boulevard in connection wit~ subsequent site plan approval to allow for the constructi0n of a new - medical office building. The new medicai offiq? building is proposed to be located at the rear of the exis61ng dental clini~ (see attached preliminar s~te lan . . Y P ) ~oth driveways are proposed tobe twelve feet wide and would ~!low for one-way traffic flow. The easternmost driveway, which is to serve as an entrance, is proposed to be tocated a distance of 2~15 feetLfrom the eastern ~roperty boundary. The exis~g ~asternmost driveway is located a idis~ance of approximately 37.5 feet from the eastern Proper~y boundary. The ~es~e~nm~st driveway, ~hich is to serve as ~n axit, is proposed to be located a distance of 2.5 feet fzom the ~estern property boundary. This would place it in ~pproximately the same location as the existing westernmost riveway. The property in questionis.loca~ed ~n the~north side of West Boynt~n Beach Boulevard, immediately eas~ of the intersectiOn with Old Boynt0n Road. FOr an explanation of the code requirement, the natur~ of the variance requested, and the variance justi~fication, please refer to th~ attached Notice of Publi~ H~ar~ng and a~plication. On T~esday, February 3, 1987 the Technical Revie~ Board (TRB) met to review the plans and~d0cuments submitted, and ADDENDUM D to formulate a recommendation with regard to the variance requested. After review and discussion, the TRB recommended that the variance requested be approved in part and denied in part. With respect to the recommendation for approval, the TRB made findings that the applicant would be unable to access his property if required to not have a driveway within 18~ feet of the intersection of the rights-of-way lines of Old Boynton Road and N.W. 7th Court. Therefore, the TRB recommended that the applicant he allowed to have one driveway with-two-way traffic flow to be locate~ on the southern frontagefor either West Boynton Beach Boulevard or Old Boynton Road. H6wever, the request to provide for two separate ingreSs/egress driveways was recommended for denial. The reasons for this recommendation' are as follows: 1. Allowing for separate ingress/egress, driveways as opposed to one driveway with tWo-way traffic flow- results in the creation of additional traffic hazards (iJe., a vehiclD missing the ingress driveway and then entering the egress driveway). 2. It is the policy of the City to allow for one driveway in situations where the access provisions within the Parking Lot Regulations would otherwise deny any access to a given parcel. In addition, the TRB requested that the applicant be advised that if a driveway is to be provided on the southwest ~rontage at the intersection of West Boynton Beach Boulevard and~O!d Boynton Road, a building permit will not be issued until the reconstruction of West Bo!rnton Beach Boulevard to create an intersection at N.W. 8th Street has been completed, including the closing of Old Boynton Road adjacent to the applicant's property. /bks co: City Manager Technical Review Board Dr. and Mrs. Jacobs Central File ~-~ ~f~.. __--~ CARMEN S. ANNU~ZIATO ~ ~';~' ~f ~ton Beach. Palm Beach'County, Florida, more pa~tlcu£ariy....;~;';~-.'-- scribed-as/follows: ,.'. '"". - '~ ' .. i · . .. , ..' .. .~ .'.- · ::,'*~*.'*",':.~ ....... ~: ' * '. '" . '"i , ' ".'* ' * .~ ?:~'- ; . Pa~ ~ C~ty, .Florida ~ ~rth 87~43~48"East.alo~ ~he. North,~m~ o~ ~ of':~-~rein d~ ~*~1 ~tinue tt~ alo~ the No~ W~'~ion 29~ 87°4~,48"}mst a d~st~ of 1!56.0a ~t to~ ~li~.of..-- ~e ~r~"D~e Dis~i~ ~al E-4' ~ ~th 2u05'54'' ~ ~o~ of said Cana]~ E-4.-a'd~stance of- 274,82 f~e.t, more.or less, to.1 State Road-S~804' ~s~' saua* is. r~rd~ in t~1 Pla 1.35 f~t, ~re'6r' less ?2 ~-.-~ 75'f~t'.~f for-~-~q of L.W.D.D, C~a] E-4, . ..:- f~t ~ S-804 ~as sl~ in~.~ ~lat. [' C ~%ty~ Flor~a.~"~?<~?~.:~.~, '~'~'~/~' %*'- r%.. '*;" ADDENDUM E MEMORANDUM 4 February 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board 'Carmen S. Annunzatio Planning Director .~ross creek centre - Parking Lot Variance section 5-144[c)(4) of the Code of Ordinances requires that when ~ variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested, the Technichl Review Board must forward to the Planning and Zoning Board a recommendation, and that the recom~endat-ion forwarded is to be made part of the public hearing proceedings. To that end, this memo is forwarded consistent with 5-t44[c)(4). Kevin McGintey, agent for Steven Rhodes, has requested a variance to Section 5-141(m) "Fire Lanes" of the Parking Lot Regulationswhich requires that all shopping centers, retail-office complexes, and retail establishments for which the gross floor area is fifteen thousand (15,000.) square feet or greater shall have fire lanes along the front of all buildings which shall allow efficient access to the fronts ofall buildings' ' by fire protection vehicles. Furthermore, five !an~s shall notbe encumbered by parked vehicles, and shall not be used for loading or unloading of commercial vehicles, tn this instance, the applicant is rec~esting relief from the requirement for fare lanes along-the front of the 20,000 square~foot commercial building and the 15,000 square foot office building. The variance request is being submitted in connection with subsequent site planapproval which proposes to construct a 35,000 square foot retail/office planned commercial d~ve~opment, consisting of a 20,000 squar? f~ot commercial building ~and a 15,000 square foot office b~ilding. FOr an explanatio~ of the code requirement, the nature of the variance ~equested, and the variance justification, please refer to the attached Notice of P~b!ic Hearing and application. On Tuesday, February 3, 1987 the Technical Review Board (TP~) met to review the plans and documents submitted, and to formulate a recommendation with regard to the variance requested. After review and discussion, the TRB recommended that the variance requested be approved in part and denied in part. With respect to the recommendationfor approval, the TRB made findings that requiring the applicant to ADDENDUM F construct a fire lane along the front of both the commercial building and the office building would impose an unreasonable hardship owing to the narrow configuration of the parcel. Therefore, the TRB recommended approval of the variance request to eliminate the fire lane in front of the 15,000 square foot office building, provided that this building be sprinkled. However, the request to eliminate the fire lane in front of the 20,000 square foot cc¥?~ercial building was denied. The reasons for this recommendation ars as follows: There is a greater need for a fire iane along the front of the 20,000 square foot commercial building as this building is a larger building and the use is a more intensive use. The TRB made a finding that the opportunity exists to relocate the 16 parking spaces located along the front of the 20,000 squa-re foot commercial building elsewhere on-site in order to provide for the fire lane. /bks cc: City Manager Technical Review Board .... Kevin McGinley Central File CARMEN S. ~NNUNZIATO A portion of Tracts 61 thru 67 inclasiv~ as shewn on the plat of the SUB- D]VlS]ON of Sections 29 and 20, TownShip 45 South, Range 43 East, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat BO~k 7 at page 20 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly described es follows: B~gin at the Southeast corner of said Tract 61~ thence South ~7'-49'-24" West among theSo~th li~e of s~id lract ?, ~lso, be~ng the South line of sai~ Section 20forS67~g8 ~eet; thence N~rth OD -5'7 -37 .West along a line 60 fee~ East of and parallel~ththe West l~ne o~ said Section 20, said line also being the Avenue for 1154.42 feet; thence North thence South 9 44 37 East along a line 20 with the Northerly line of said Tracts 65 66 and DD Eastalong the East lithe of said Tracts61 ) for 1155.82 feet to the P~int of Beginning. ADDENDUM G MEMORANDUM 6 February 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen'S. Annunziato Planning Director Arby'sRestaurant at Oakwood Square Shopping Center --Conditional Use Application Summary: 'Edward 'Duggan, agent for Oakwood Square Associates, L'm' - 1 lte~, is requesting Conditional Use approval for an Arby's Restaurant with drive-through facilities to be located within the Oakwood S~aare Shopping Center. The shopping center, which occupies a 15.2 acre parcel at the southeast corner of North Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, has a 1,154 foot frontage on Congress Avenue and a 543 foot frontage on Old Boynton Road. The Arby's =estaurant is proposed to be located at a leased outparcel-on the south side of the main shopping center driveway onto Congress Avenue. The shopping center is zoned C-3, Community Commercial, and it is currently under construction. ~ Restaurants~withdrive-thru facilities are permitted subject to -' Conditona! Use approval in the C-3 zoning district. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning (see attached locatio~ map): Abutting the subject parcel to the north is the right-of-way for Old Boynton Road. Further to the north, across Old Boynton Road, is a large vacant parcel zoned R-1AA, Single-Family ReSidential. Abutting the subject parcel to the east is the right-of-way for Hoad!ey Roa~. F~rther to the east, across Hoadley Road, is a condomini~ zoned R-5, Multi-Family Residential. South of the condominium, also along the east side of Hoadtey Road, is a single-f-~lr~ily neighborhoodzoned R-1AA. Abutting the subject parcel to the south Us the right-of-way for the L.W. D,D. L-24 canal. Further to the south, across the canal right-of-way, is the Vll__ge= shopping c~nter, a convenience store, anda vacant Chevron automotive s~rvzce station zoned C-3. Abutting the subject parcel to the west is the right-of-way for Congress Avenue. F~rther to the west, across Congress Avenue, is a vacant parcel zoned AR, Agricultural Residential, in Palm Beach County. It is a~nti~ipated that this property will be developed for comm. erciai useswhen annexed into the City, as the Future Land Use Element of the ~6mprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal report for the ~eser~e annexation area shows the land use for this parcel to be "Lo~.al Retail Commercial". - 1 ADDENDUM H Proposed Use (see attached site plan): The applicant is proposing to decrease the size of the outparcel from 4,500 square feet to 3,230 square feet and to change the configuration of the building footprint and the surrounding parking lot in order to accomodate the Arby's restaurant and drive-thru facility. Under the proposed layout and design of the outparcel, the drive-thru window would be located on the east side of the building, facing away from Congress Avenue. · The drive-thru entrance would be located at the southwest co~ner of the building, with the exit located at the northeast corner of the building. The main entrance to the--building would be located on the west side facing Congress Avenue. Conditional Uses: Section ll.2.D of the the following standards to which ~na! uses are required to conform. Following each of the Planning Department'sevaluation of the to whether it would comply with the particular The PlannLng and Zoning Board and City Council shall consider o~ty such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations, and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the faithful adherence to and of fulfillment of such restrictions and conditiom~ including, but not limited to, the dedication of propert~ for streets, alleys, and recreation space, and sidewalks, as shall be necessary for the protection of the surrounding_area and the citizen's general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. .In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Council shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety, and welfare of the community, and make written findings certifying that satisfactory ~as been made concerning the following standards, where Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed strucuures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Proposed access to the restaurant out-parcel would occur byway of the shopping center driveways onto Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. These driveways would allow for sufficient access to the proposed use. Within the interior shopping center parking lot, the proposed par~cing lot layout and design appears adequate to accomodate the proposed use. Off-SUreet parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection D.1. above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor 2 effects the conditional use would have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a Whole. Since the leased out-parcel is under the same ownership as the shopping center, the parking requirement for the out-parcel is included in the parking calculation for the shopping center. A sufficient number of parking spaces are provided to meet the needs of the entire shopping center, which includes the proposed drive-thru restaurant. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items insub~ection D.1 and D.2 above. A du~mp_ster is proposed to be located near the southeast corner of the building.. The Public Works Director has indicated that this would be a suitable location for the dumpster. Utilities, With reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The site is served with water and sewer lines which are adequate-to serve the proposed use. Screening, buffering, and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions and character. ~h~ proposed landscaping and buffering for the shopping center meets or exceeds the requirements of the landscape and zoning regulations respectively. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to gtare~ traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby prope~ies. As ou~!ined in the comments from the Building Department, two free ~tanding signs were approved for the original shopping center for the use of all project tenants, which is the maxLm~m allowed under the sign regulations. Additional building signage is to be permitted separately through the Building Department. The parking lot lighting in the vicinity of this outparcel was previously approved as a part of the original site plan for the Oakwood Square shopping center and it appears to be adequate. The type of lighting proposed is metal halide. 7. Re.~uired setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed building setbacks exceed the requirements of the C-3 zoning regulations. 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and 3 other properties in the zoning district. The proposed use of the outpareel would be compatible with other uses in the shopping center and other properties in the vicinity. It is not anticipated that the proposed drive-thru restaurant will result in the creation of any adverse impacts. The nearest residentially-zoned property in the vicinity of the proposed drive-thru restaurant lies over 450 feet away and is located on the east side of Hoadley Road. This excludes the par6el located on the west side of Congress Avenue across from the shopping center, which is curre~tlyundeveloped and zoned AR in Palm Beach County use category. The Future Landl Use in the Comprehensive Plan and ~ ?~ for t~is property is CommerCial. -It is anticipated that.this commercial purposes upon of BOYnton Beach under either a C-3 or category. 9. Height.of ~uildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties, and the City as a whole. The proPosed building is a one-story structure which is ~ompatible with surrounding land uses. 10. Econo.~c effects on adjacent properties and the City as a whole. It is not anticipated that the proposed drive-thru expanSion would have an adverse impact on property values .in the vicinity, or would impair the developability of these properties. Comprehensive Plan Policies The fol~--c~ing Comprehensive Plan Policies are relevant to this Conditional Use application: "Provide a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods." (p. 7) "Provide a range of land use types to accomodate a full range of services and activities." (p. 7) "Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts." (p. 7) "Encourage the development of complementary land uses." (p. 7) "Encourage the development of commercial land uses where accessibility is the greatest and where impacts to residential uses are minimized." (p. 7) Conclusions/Recommendations The proposed use and development of the property would be~ compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. Therefore, the Planning Department recommends that this Conditional Use application be approved subject to staff comments as follows: Utilities 1. Locate the. water main in a landscaped area. 2. Indicate the~sewer cleanout location. Buildinq 1. Indicate'the type of construction of the structure in accordance.with SeCtion 601.1 of the Standard Building Code. 2. Indicate the number of seats for the restaurant area. When restaurants seat over 100 people, the structure is classified as an assembly occupancy and must comply with the applicable code requirements. 3. Show~etails on the dumpster enclosure andhandicapped ra~p.' 4. The project is allowed two free-standing signs which they showed on the original site plan. These signs are for the use of all project tennants. Each out parcel would not be permitted to have individual PYlon signs. Building signs should comply with Section 2i-!5(E} of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. In order '~ facilitate the building permit review process, the fotlowin~_~ ~nformation should be provided at the time of submittal in duplicate: 1. Heal, Department approval and a copy of the Hotel and Restaurant Commission application. 2. Copies of the South Florida Water Management District approval. 3. Soil tests and Energy Code compliance forms. Note: Separate permits are required for signs, paving, drainage and excavation. CAR~.IEN S. ANNUN~IATO /bks MEMORANDUM 2 February 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunzi~to Planning Director The High Ridge Center - Rezonin9 Application Summary: Roy Barden, agent for Max Schorr, Trustee, is requesting that'a 10.84 acre parcel be rezoned from R-1A~, Single-Family Residential, to M-l, Light Industrial.- The_ Future Land Use Plan designation for this parcel is to remain unchanged (Industrial Commercial). The property is currently vacant and is heavily wooded, with sandpznes occupying most of the property. The proposed use of the property is a small industrial/warehouse development to consist of a maximum of four parcels (see attached Master Plan~. Current Zoning/Proposed Zoning (see attached location map: Prior to annexation, the property was zoned RS, Single-Family Residentia!, in Palm Beach County. The RS zoning reflected the land use that was originally anticipated for the entire area lying between the Miner Road corridor and the Boynton Canal; namely, low density residential. In Septembe~ 1985, the City ~ Council voted to approve the annexation of the subject property and the rezoning of the property to the City's R-1AAA zoning district. It was then the applicant's intent to seek a rezoning and Future Land Use Element Amendment to allow development of this site as a Planned Industrial Development. It was necessary for the applicant to annex under a residential land use and zoning category, as he was precluded from requesting an industrial land use classification and PID zoning because the minimum lot area for PID's is 25 acresr and unless the property was annexed, no relief could be granted to the minimum lot size requirement. On December 8, 1986 the Board of Adjustment met to consider the applicant's request for a variance to the minimum lot are~ for zoning to PID, at which time the request was denied. However, onDecember 16, 198~ the City Council proceeded to adopt an ordinance which amended the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, changing the future land Use category on the subject parcel from Low Density Residential to Indugtrial, as the request was consistent with Comprehensive Plan policy for this area of the City. The chang~ in land use has provided the framework for the applicant to requ~ a re:zoning from R-iAAA, Single-Family Residential to M-l, Light Industrial. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: The property to the east of the subject parcel is in an M-1 Light Industrial zoning district, which is separated from the subject parcel by High Ridge Road. This M-1 district is currently being developed for warehouse and light industrial uses. To the south of the subject parcel is a portion of the Quantum Park of Comme~ce, which is proposed for industrial uses. To the southwest and southeast is a vacant parcel lying partly in the City and partly in the unincorporated area. This parcel is presently zoned for single-family use, however, it is anticipated that it will-eventually be .placed in an industrial land use category and developed as a PID. The Evaluation and Appraisal Report, in fact, reco~Lut~ends an industrial land use category for this parcel. Comprehensive PTan - Future Land Use Map: The Future~Lar~L~se Plan shows this property to be under the "Industrial" category. Therefore, an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan would not be necessary. Comprehensive Plan - Text: The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are relevant to this application: Area 49 Unincorporated parcels at the southwest corner of Miner Road Extended and High Ridge Road. "This is an unincorporated enclave that should be annexed. These parcels should eventually be placed in the "Industrial" land use category and developed as Planned Industrial Developments, wheze the parcel size permits and should be developed in a manner similar to the adjacent Boynton Beach Park of Commerce." (P-ll, 12/16/86 addendum) "Encourage the complete development of industrial land as i industrial parks or concentrated industrial areas in order to maximize the linkage between complimentary industries". (P-39) "Ensure th~ough site plan review procedures that maximum buffering To adjacent residential areas is provided." [P-39) "Recommend that vegetative screening be industrial developments and residential 12/16/86 addendum). required between zoning districts." (P-9, "As a minimum, 25 percent of all native plant communities which occur on a site (e.g. Pine Flatwoods, Sand Pine Scrub, Xeric Oak Forest, Hardwood Hammock, etc.) shall be preserved." (P-6, 12/16/86 addendum) "Habitat shall be preserved with intact canopy, understory, and ground cover." (P-6, 12/16/86 addendum). 2 "Discourage noncompatib!e development in scrub habitat". (P-6, 12/16/86 addendum) "Minimize development which would exacerbate surface and su/bsurface water quality". (P-6) "The City should require the use of "best management practices"' in new development in order to reduce pollution associated with non-point sources." {P-28) "During land clearing and site preparation, wetting operations or other soil treatment techniques appropriate for controlling unconfined emissions, including seeding and mulching of disturbed areas, shall be undertaken and implemented by the developer." (P-8, 12/16/86 addendum) Issues: Ordinance 86-10 requires that the Planning Department evaluate land use amendment/rezoning requests with respect to the following issues: a. "Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies. The Planning Department shall also recormuend limitations or requirements which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan." The current Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of "concentrated industrial areas". The proposed development would functionas an extension of the 540-acre Quantum Park of Commerce and therefore would serve to create a concentrated industrial area. In order to prevent the "indiscriminate destruction of native vegetation", it is recommended that the developer preserve 20% of the site as a sand pine preserve, as the PID regulations require 20% of the site to be preserved as open space, which should be construed to mean~open space which is above and beyond the landscaped areas which are required for parking lots. The Urban Forester's memorandum, which is attached to this report, outlines the measures which will be necessary for preserving sand pines on site. In order to provide buffering between the proposed industrial development and future residential development to the north, a greenbelt with a width of 40 feet is recommended-along the northern property line. This greenbelt is a requirement of the PID regulations. Along the eastern, southern, and western property !~nes, this greenbelt is required to be at least 25 feet wide and is also recommended for this project. In order to "Minimize development which would exacerbate surface and subsurface water quality" the following conditions should be imposed: (1) Truck well drainage systems should be.designed and maintained to include oil and grease receptors and open bottom sedimentation sumps as pollution retardant structures. Parking areas and roadways adjacent to truck wells should be designed to divert runoff to storage and exfiltration on-site prior To discharge into the surface water management system. (2) Prior to occupancy, each specific tenant or owner that uses, handles, stores, or displays hazardous materials or generates hazardous waste should meet the following requirements: (a) The tenant or owner should construct an appropriate spill containment system which should be designed to hold spilled hazardous materials for cleanup and to prevent such materials from entering the storm water drainage system. In addition to a containment system, tenants or owners should develop an appropriate early warning system for hazardous materi~ls and wastes. The tenant or owner shouted also submit to the City a hazardous materials response plan. These containment, monitoring, and response systems ~nouldbe approved by the City in accordance with the- Environmental Review Permit procedure. (b) Generation and disposal of hazardous waste effluents into the sanitary sewer system should be prohibited unless adequate pretreatment facilities are constructed by tenants or owners generating such effluents. Pretreatment facilities should be approved by the City in accordance with the Environmental Review Permit procedure, and should comply with Chapter 26,, 2%rticle IV. "Sewers" of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. In order to m/nimize erosion and reduce blowing sand, clearing of building site should not commence prior to development of the site. Furthermore, during land clearing and site preparation, wetting operations or other techniques for controlling blowing sand should be undertaken and implemented by the developer. b. "W.hether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted withthe protection of the public welfare." It is a policy of the Evaluation and Appraisal report that all of the property south of Miner Road be placed in an "Industrial" land use category. This recommendation was based upon the fact that the i~-I zoning to the east of the subject parcel, and the establiskment of th~ Quantum Park of Commerce to the south and west of the subject parcel, has established industrial development as the predominant land use in the area. c. "Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable." As stated in the paragraph above, the surrounding areas to the east, south and west are developing for industrial use. Therefore, development of the subject parcel for industri~l use would be desirable, p~ovided that it is devetoped~as a high quality industrial park. d. "Whether the. proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities." The following analysis assumes that the proposed develoment would contain approximately 182,000 square feet of industrial/warehouse floor space, and would employ approximately 434 persons. By comparison, R-iAAA'zoning on the subject parcel would allow for the construction of 32 single-family dwellings, and would house approximately 100 persons. The proposed industrial and warehouse uses would consume 4,000 to 8,00~'gallons of water per day compared to 13,000 gallons per day if the property were to be developed for single-family housing. Water is available from an existing water main in High Ridge Road. Sewage generated by the industrial and warehouse uses would range from 1,700 to 6~500 gallons per day, compared to 7,500 gallons per day for residential uses. A sewer connection is available from a manhole located on the eastern property tine% The demand on utility systems would be less than or equal to that which would occur under the current zoning, and could be accomodated by the City's utility systems. Traffic generated by the proposed development would be approximately 1,000 trips per day, with 200 trips entering and exiting in the evening peak hour. Development under R-i'A~kA -~ zoning, by comparison, would generate 320 trips per day. The traffic generated by this project would not be substantial enough to warrant major improvements to the surrounding roadways. Roadway ±mprovements which will be made in the vicinity as part of the Quantum Park of Commerce will generally be adequate to serve the ~dbject parcel. These roadway improvements include the 4-!aning of 22nd Avenue from Seacrest Boulevard to Congress Avenue and construction of left and right turn lanes at High Ridge Road ~nd N.W. 22nd Avenue. The applicant should, however, berequired to construct left turn lanes,, northbound, at High Ridge Road and Industrial Way and High Ridge Road and Miner Road, and should also be required to construct Miner Road as an arterial~ and Industrial Way as a collector, to the western limits of the parcel. Both of the roads which abut the proposed development are collector roads, therefore, access to these roads should be 5 limited, in order to maintain efficient flow. The Planning Department recommends that access to the proposed development be limited to two access points: (1) A driveway on Miner Road at the western boundary of the property; (2) An access point on High Ridge Road at the center of the property, aligning with Industrial Way. An 80 foot-wide collector road should be dedicated and built to the western edge of the property at this location, in order to provide access to the parcel which lies to the west. The applicant could then provide a marginal access road'running to the north and south, which would serve all four lots. The applicant should also be required to pay a proportionate share of the cost of signalizing this intersection, if and when a signal is warranted. Furthermore, the applicant should be required to ~edicate additional right-of-way for Miner Road, in order to obtain half of the 108-foot right-of-way which will be required for Miner Road. e. "W~nether the proposed rez0ning would be compatible with the current-and future use of adjacent and nearby properties~ or would affect the property values of adjacent and nearby properties." If the property is developed as a high-quality industrial park, similar to the Quantum Park of Commerce, it could be anticipated that such development would be compatible with surrounding land uses. f. "%~nether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning". It is arguable that the subject property, together with the 52-acre parcel which lies to the west, could still be develope~ for low density housing, however, due to the M-1 zoning which lies to the east, and the industrial and office development which will occur to the south and west, the subject parcel can no longer be considered to be an appropriate location for residential uses. g. "Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably rel~ted to the needs of the neighborhood and the City as a whole." Demand for warehouse and light manufacturing floorspace occurs at the regional level as opposed to the local level. The applicant has submitted a market analysis, which indicates that there is a strong regional demand for warehouse and high-tecb~uology manufacturing space. Based upon the absorbtion rate which was projected for the Quantum Park of Commerce, it can be anticipated that build-out of the subject property would take approximately seven years. h. "Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the City for the proposed use, in districts where suck use is already allowed." 6 The Quantum Park of Commerce, Boynton Beach Distribution Center, and High Ridge Commerce Park are all existing approved developments which contain250 acres which are suitable for light industrial/warehouse development. There are also about 150 acres of vacant industrial property located in other areas of the City. The subject parcel should be considered, however, to be Dart of the cluster of light industrial and commercial developments centered around NW 22nd Avenue. This is the only part of ~the City where the opportunity exists for the development of large scale industrial/office development. By comparison, there are numerous sites elsewhere in the C~ty, and particularly in the unincorporated area west of the City, where large-lot, single-family homes could be built. Conclusions/Recommendations:' The .most appropriate zoning for this property would be as a Planned Industrial Development, with uses similar to those which will be allowed in the adjacent Quantum Park of Commerce. However, since the application to rezone to PiD has been precluded by denial of the minim~ lot area variance by the Board of Adjustment, it would be appropriate to rezone the subject parcel to M-i, Light Industrial, consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policies which require the development of this property for light industrial land uses. As previously mentioned, the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan has rece~tty been amended to place this property in an "Industrial land use category. If theproperty is developed in accordance with staff coraments, which include conformance with PID design standards, handling of hazardous materials, and limitations on~ access, development of this property would be compatible with surrounding land uses, including the Quantum Park of Commerce. Therefore, the Planning Department recommends that this rezoning request be ~pproved, subject to the staff comments and recommendations ~ontained in this memorandum which have been summarized below: STAFF RECO-~.?~NDATIONS BASED ON EXPLICIT CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. Provide buffering between the proposed light industrial development and future residential development to the north, using a greenbelt with a width of 40 feet along the nor~hern property line. This greenbelt is required by the PID regulations. Along the eastern, southern, and western property lines, this greenbelt is required to be at least 25 feet side (Sec. 7.H~17 of Appendix A, p. 1928). 2. Preserve 20% of the site as open space. The PID regulations require this open space, which should be construed to mean open space which is above and ~eyond the landscaped areas which are required for parking lots (Sec. 7.H.13 of Appendix A, p. 1928). 7 3. Once the open space areas has been established and delineated on ~he site plan, the area should be prote~ted from any encroachment° This includes not allowing the area to be used for water drainage or on-site water retention. The developer should consider the location of this open space in the overall design of the project to assure that the area remains in its natural state. (Sec. 7.5-15 on p. 600 and Sec. 7.5-24 on p. 604). 4. Submit an accurate and detailed tree survey showing the location of all Sand Pine trees over 6" in diameter. Any groups of t-rees of smaller diameter can be shown on the survey as "clusters" of the tree species (Sec. 7.5-7., p. 597). 5. Construct ~iner Road and Industrial Way to the western limits of the parcel. This requirement is based on Article X, Sec. 10 of Appendix C (p. 2137), which states: The p~oposed subdivision street layout shall he coordinated with the Street system-of the surrounding area and consideration shall be given to existing and planned streets, relation to topographic conditions, public convenience, safety, and their appropriate relation to the proposed useof land to be served by such streets. The arrangement of-streets in new. subdivisions shall provide for the continuation of existing streets in areas not subdivided, and the arrangement of streets in new subdiYisions shall provide for the proper projection of streets. When a new subdivision adjoins unsubdivided land, then the new street, where necessary, shall be carried to the boundary of the tract proposed to be subdivided to promote reasonable development of adjacent lands and provide continuity of street systems. (6) Construct Miner Road as an arterial, and Industrial Way as a collector, with a t08-foot wide right-of-way for Miner Road and an 80 foot wide right-of-way for Industrial Way..(Article X, Sec. 19 of Appendix C, 2147). (7) Dedicate additional right-of-way for Miner Road, in order to obtain half of the 108-foot right-of-way which will be required for Miner Road (required by Article X, Sec. 10 of Appendix C (p. 2137) in t~e Subdivision Regulations, and required by the Thoroughfare Plan, on page 65 of the Comprehensive Plan, which is adopted bT Sec. 19-7 of the Code of Ordinances). (8) Lk~it access to the site to two points: (a) A driveway on Miner Road at the western boundary of the property. (b) ~kn access point on High Ridge Road at the center of the property, aligning with Industrial Way. The applicant could then provide a.~marginal access road running to the north and south, which would serve all four lots. 8 The requirements listed under {8) above are necessary to conform to Article X, Section 1, of Appendix C (p. 2130) which states that "The subdivision shall be designed to accomplish access to the lots by the use of local streets...Where access is desired along collector or arterial streets, it shall be provided by means of a marginal access road". (9) Make the following improvements to the intersectionslof High Ridge Road and Industrial Way and High Ridge Road and Miner Road: (a) Construct a left turn lane, northbound, at High Ridge Road and Industrial Way. (b) Pay a proportionate share of the cost of signalizing this intersection, if and when a signal is warranted. (c) Contract a left-turn lane, northbound, at High Ridge Road and Miner Road. The requirements listed under (9) above are necessary in order to "Provide for safe and efficient movement within the City" (page 7 of Comprehensive Plan), and are required by Article X, Sec. 12 of Appendix C (p. 2128), and Article X, Sec. 16 of Appendix C (p. 2129). STAFF RECOSa%MENDATIONS WHICH ARE BASED ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CONTAINED IN ZONING REGULATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES. (t0)-~In c~der to minimize contaimination of surface and subsurface water the following conditions should be imposed:. (a) Truck well drainage systems should be designed and maintained to include oil and grease receptors and open bottom sedimentation sumps as pollution retardant struc,_~es. Parking areas and roadways adjacent to truck wells should be designed to divert runoff to storage and exfiitration on-site prior to discharge into the surface water management system. (b) Prior to occupancy, each specific tenant or owner that uses, handles, stores, or displays hazardous materials or gene~ates hazardous waste should meet the following requirements: (c) The tenant or owner should construct an appropriate spi!l.containmentsystem whichshould be designed to hold spilled hazardous materials for cleanup and to prevent such materials from entering the storm water drainage system. In addition to a containment system, tenants or owners should develop an appropriate early warning system for hazardous materials and wastes. The tenant or owner should also submit to the City a hazardous materials response plan. These contai~ents, monitoring, and response systems should 9 be approved by the City in accordance with the Environmental Review Permit Procedure. (d) Generation and disposal of hazardous waste effluents into the sanitary sewer system should be prohibited unless adequate pretreatment facilities are constructed by tenants or owners generating such effluents. Pretreatmen~ facilities should be approved by the City in accordance with the Environmental Review Permit procedure, and should comply with Chapter 26, Article IV. "Sewers" of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The requirements' listed under (10) above to serve "Minimize deve!opmerr~which would exacerbate surface and subsurface water quality" (p. 6 of Comprehensive Plan), and ars necsssary in order to implement 'Best management practices'...in new development in order to reduce pollution associated'with non-point sources" (p. 28 of Comprehensive Plan~. Also, Sec. 4.N.5. of Appendix A prohibits toxic or noxious matter which would "...contaminate any public waters or an~_~ groundwater" (p. 1902.1). (11) In order to minimize erosion and reduce blowing sand: (a) Clearing of building site should not commence prior to development of the site. (b) During land clearing and site preparation, wetting operations or other techniques for controlling blowing sand should be undertaken and implemented by the developer. The requirements listed under (11) above serve to "Minimize a~d - mitigate erosion" (p. 34 of Comprehensive Plan), and are necessary to meet Sec. 4.N.3. of Appendix A, which prohibits "the emission of smoke, dust, dirt, or other particulate matter which may cause damage to property or vegetation, discomfort or harm to persons or animals, or prevent the reasonable use and enjoyment of property and rights-of-way, at or beyond the proper~y lines of the property on which the use is located" (p. 1902.1). STAFF RECO~ViENDATIONS WHICH ARE BASED ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: (12) From the tree survey, that area where the largest and most viable Sand Pine trees exist should be designated as the 20% open space area. This area can either be one 2 acre site or two 1 acre sites, but no more than two sites used to meet this requirement. (13) As a minimum, 25 percent of all native plant communities which occur on a site (e.g. Pine Flatwoods, Sand Pine Scrub, Xeric Oak Forest, Hardwood Hammock, etc.) shall be preserved. 10 (It is recom_mended that this preservation primarily occur in the 20% open space area as outlined in No. 12 above, or within the O parking 1 t landscaping, if necessary.) The requirements listed under (12) and (13) above, serve to "Eliminate the indiscriminate destruction of the native vegetation" (page 6 of Comprehensive Plan) and page 6 of the 12/16/86 addendum to the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. /bks CC: City Manager Technical Review Board~ Roy Barden Central File CARMEN So ANNU~ZIATO 11 ~armen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review February 3, 1987 Preliminary Plat & Site Plan Apprcval - Meadows 300 Tract N "W~=-~ As a condition of sit& plan approval, the following com2~ents should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. Indicate any existing easements on the subject property for lake maintenance. 2. Indicate how-~he building foot print relates to the platted lots. The building setbacks from the property line on the site plan do ~- not appear to be accurate when compared to the plat-document. Structures also appear to be placed over utility easements. 3. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line must be equipped with approved opening protectives in compliance with Section 703 of ~he Standard Building Code. Relief from this section, given the mitigating circumstances of Iakefronz exposure, is possih!e through the Building Board of Appeals. 4. The close clustering of these structures creates a potential fire hazard. Table 600 of the Standard Building Code must be strictly adhered to in relation to fire ratings of exterior walls and percent of allowable openings. Note J of labia 600 states that when a wall is within 5 feet of an assumed property line, the required fire rating must be based on both exterior ~,~ and interior fire exposure. Accurately show all building ~i~ 5 setbacks from the property Iine and from adjacent s~ruc~ures. ~ . Entrance walls cannot be constructed over utility easements. Sheet S-!-shows details on many different wall configurations. Indicate on the plans the location of these different wall sections. 6. Street names should be shown on the plat document and on the site plan, A house numbering system should be deve!ooed which requires the approval of the Building, Police and Fire !i Departments. 7. In order to facilitate pedestrian traffic around the project, i~~ I reco~end a cohesive system of sidewalks which connect the structures to sidewalks along the main thoroughfares. Ail sidewalks should be ramped for handicapped accessibility. 8. Plans should indicate the type of construction for the structures .... in accordance with Chapter Six of the Standard Building Code. Two-story structures of Type VI construction must be fully sprinkled in accordance with NFiPA 13. 9. Show details of the recreational amenities including adjacent parking areas. For clarity, one sheet of the plans should show all site lighting, all main sidewalks, the location of handicapped stalls and ramps and the location of all dumpster ~ pads. Details should be provided for typical parking lot striping, typical dumpster enclosures and engineering on the light poles. ADDI~OM J-1 Memo to: Carmen Annunziato RE: Meadows 300 Tract N "Wellesley" February 3, 1987 Page 2 In order to facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided at the time of submittal. South Florida Water Management District approval for the site zs required, indicating minimum finished floor elevations and minimum road elevations. Soil testsand Energy Code forms in compliance with State Codes should be submitted. The recreation arsa requires Health Department approval. The pool must hef designed by a Florida reKistered_ engineer. Sewer and water low rates by a registered engineer should be submitted in order for the Building~Department to calculate capital facilities chargas~ Site lighting and fences around the pool area should be shown on the plans. Separate permits are required for excavation, paving, drainage and signage. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. DJ:bh Don Jaeg~ U FROM 1'>o=/o7-- -/ ,w_.LR t>-.~-F~ '> zC,--/u/.¢O-~- oO/c.,c. SIGNED TI-IlS C;OP¥ FOR PERSON ADDRESSED ADDENDUM J-2 TO: FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Preliminary'Plat, Wellesley at Boynton of Meadows 300) February 4, 1937 RECEIVED PtANNING DSPL Beach (Tract N ConLm~nts: - 1. 3%il easements shall be located with dimensions and bearings, etc. 2. The platted area south of Meadows Blvd. should be identified. Show raised curbs at the several locations adjacent to landscaping where not shown. .4. Street lights to be shown. 5. Parking lot lighting to be shown. 6. Cost estimate required. 7. Dimensions required for locating parking lot. 8. Prin,-ate roadway to have stabilized subgrade to F.F.V. or 40 L.B.R. 50 p.s.i. , 9. Typical parking section 'to show wheel stops and/or raised curb. 10o Streets-must be named. 11. Comprehensive information concerning the dry swale area where storm water is discharged should be shown, such as elevations, contours, discharge structures, overflow structures, cross-sections, etc. 12. Separate overflow structures must discharge is to a "dry" pond area replaces the existing ditch]. be provided so that all (see outfall that con't ...... ADDENDUM J-3 To: Mr. Jim Golden February 4, Re: Wellesley at Boynton Beach Page 2 1987 Comments contr. 13. A construction permit will be required from the Water Management District, 14. Will not a berm be required to retain water in the "dry pond- area? 15. Any previously recorded Easements for lake maintenance berms should be shown on-the plat document. 16. If additional berm is required to contain storm water in "dry swale" area, all details should be shown on plans. 17. ~ alternate design for the location of inlets is recommended for consideration. Factors to consider would, of course, be the porousity of the sand, depth to water table, relative amount of pervious areas, etc., all within the purview of the Design Engineer and the Landscape Architect. TAC/ck Tom Clark ..... 0 RP, rk,.-uM FEB 6 t98t PLANNh~G DEPT. To: From: Date: Carmen Bnnunzieto. Planning Director February 4. 1B87 Subjeci;: TRB Review - Wellesley e% Boyn%on Beech Plat and Si%e Plan Ue cam approve %h~s projec%,.subjac% to %he ?el]owing revisions: PLRT I. Rewise %he pla% as needed %0 correspond %0 site plan ccmmemis. Z. Indicate the building ¢ootprint Car all lots which encroach upon utility easements. SITE PLBN -Indicate whether the building ou%Iines shown are the ac%ual ?oat- print o{ the proposed buildin~e. Speci{y a 1~ ~oo~ minimum separation ~rom water mains %o the nearest point o~ %he build~ng. a% each lace%ion where %he mains approach %he building. Retoca%e we%er me%ers or ~he we%er mains so as %0 shorten the dis{ante o~ '%he meier {ro~ the main. Ii. appears the entrance wail crosses over utility lines. Relocate the lines %0 avoid %he wall and provide s drawing showing %ha welt ~n~ utility lines on the same sheet. 4. Provide a de%ail on the canal crossing and a valve a% %he terminus o~ ~he line. Provide a cross-sectional Congress ~venue, ehowing u%ili%y easement area. de%ell o{ minimum and %he landscaping berm along maximum elevations in %he ~. Show all storm drainage eleva%ion~ on %he sewer proC%la cheats. 7. Rdd velving as required in %he wa%er main. Use polyethylene-lined DIP in sewers %ha% pass under trees., are be%ween build{ngs, or %hat crose storm drainage. ADDENDUM J-4 TR8 Revie~ - Uellcste¥ a{ Boynton Beech Pla~ and Si{e P[en February 4, 1987 B. Sdd a no{e {hat {he Ci{y uill oun end mein{ein main line se~Jers only. 10. In ~ha~ only one meter is provided per building et the deve!oper's req~es{,-' ~he developer, and subsequen{ly {he ho;qeouners' ~ssocia{ion. mus{ provide an execu{ed agreement e~irming {ha~ ~he¥ uil! be responsible ¢or a11 ua{er end seuer mon{hly bil)s. Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review February 3, 1987 Preliminarv Plat & Site Plan ApproQal Meadows 300 'Tract N"WeiAesie As a condition of site plan approval, the following co~menns should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. Indicate any exis'ting easements on the subject property for lake maintenance_ 2. Indicate how the building foot print relates to the platted lots. The building setbacks from the property line on the site plan do not appear to be accurate when compared to the plat document. Structures also appear to be placed over utility easements. 3. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a properny line must be equipped with approved opening protectives in compliance with Section 703 o~ the Standard Building Code. Relief from this section., give, the mitigating circumstances of lakefront exposure, is possible through the Building Board of Appeals. 4. The close, clustering of these structures creates a potential fire hazard. Table 600 of the Standard Building Code must be strictly adhered to in relation to fire ratings of exterior walls and percent of allowable openings. Note J of Table 600 states that when a wall is within 5 feet of an assumed property line, the required fire rating must be based on both exterior and interior fire exposure. Accurately show all building setbacks-from the property line and from adjacent structures. 5. Entrance walls cannot be constructed over utility easements.- Sheet S-t shows details on many different wall configarations. Indicate on the plans the location of these different wall sections. 6. Street names should be shown on the plat document and on the site plan. A house numbering system should be developed which requires the approval of the Building, Police and Fire Departments. 7. In order to facilitate pedestrian traffic around the project, I reco~and a cohesive system of sidewalks which connect the structures to sidewalks along the main thoroughfares. Ail sidewalks should be ramped for handicapped accessibility. 8. Plans_should indicate the type of construction for the struczures in accordance with Chapter Six of the Standard Building Code. Two-story strucnures of Type VI construction must be fully sprinkled in accordance with NFiPA 13. 9. Show details of the recreational amenities including adjacent parking areas. For clarity, one sheet of the plans should show all site lighting, all main sidewalks, the location of handicapped stalls and ramps and the location of all dumpster pads. Details should be provided for typical parking lot striping, typical dumpster enclosures and engineering on the light poles. ADDENDUM K-1 Memo to: Carmen Annunziato RE: Meadows 300 Tract N "Wellesley" February 3, 1987 Page 2 In order to following facilitate the building permit review process, the information should be provided at the time of s~bmittal. 1. South Florida Water Management District approval for the Site is required, indicating minimum finished floor elevations and minimum road elevations. 2o Soil t'estsand Energy Code forms in compliance with State Codes should be submitted. 3. The recreation area requires Health Department approval. The pool must be designed by a Florida registered engineer. Sewer and water flow rates by a registered engineer should be submitted in order_for the Building Department to calculate capital facilities charges. Site lighting and fences around the pool area should be shown on the plans. 4. Separate permits are required for excavation, paving, drainage and signage. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. DJ:bh r- FROM F z~e Dc=-P7- ~g PLEASE REPLY TO ' REPLY SIGNED DATE: SIGNED THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED ADDENDUM K-2 TO: .FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Preliminary-Plat, Wellesley at of Meadows 300) February 4, 1937 RECEFFED 4 t987 PLANNING DEPT. Boynton Beach (Tract N Comments:- 1. All easements shall be located with dimensions and bearings, etc. The platted area south of Meadows Blvd. should be identified. Show raised curbs at the several locations adjacent to landscaping where not shown. 4. Street lights to be shown. 5. Parking lot lighting to be shown. 6. Cost estimate required. 7. Dimensions. required for locating parking lot. 8. Pri3zate roadway to have stabilized subgrade to F.F.V. or 40 L.B.R. 50 p.s.i., e Typical parking section to show wheel stops and/or raised curb. 10. S+~eets must be named. 11. 12. Co~Drehensive information concerning the dry swale area where storm water is discharged should be shown, such as elevations, contours, discharge structures, overflow structures, cross-sections, etc. Separate overflow structures discharge is to a "dry" pond replaces the existing ditch). must be provided so that all area (see outfall that con't ...... ADDENDUM K-3 To: Mr. Jim Golden February Re: Wellesley at Boynton Beach Page 2 4, 1987 Comments con't. 13. A construction permit will be required from the Water Management D%strict~ 14. Will nog a berm be required to retain water in the "dry pond" area? 15. 16. 17. Any previously recorded Easements for lake maintenance berms should be shown on the plat document. If additional berm is required to contain storm water in "dry swale" area, all details should be shown on plans. An alternate design for the location of inlets is recommended for consideration. Factors to consider would, of course, be the porousity of the sand, depth to water table, relative amount of pervious areas, etc., all within the purview of the Design Engineer and the Landscape Architect. TAC/ck om Clark ~EHORRNDUM FEB 6 !98i PLANNhxG DEPT. To: F~rom: Da~e: Subj act: Cerme.r, ~nnunziato, Planning Director John R. Guidry, Direc~or of Utilities February 4'. IB87 TRB Review - Wellesley et Boynton Beech Plat and Site Plan Ue can approve this project,-subject to the following revisions: PLRT 1. Revise the plat es needed to correepond to site plan comments. 2. Indicate the building {ootprint {or all lots which encroach upon utility easements. SITE PLBN "l,~cete whether the building outlines shoun are the actual foot- print of the proposed buildings. Specify e t~ foot minimum at each location where the maine approach th~ building. Relocate water meters or the water mains eo as to shorten distance o? the meter ~rom the ~ain. It appears the entrance well crosses over utility lines. Relocate tbs lines to avoid thewall' and provide a drawing showing the wai~' ' andl utility lines on the same sheet. 4. Provide a detail on the canal crossing and a valve at the terminu~ o~ the line. Provide a cross~sectional detail o{ Congress Rvenue, showing minimum end utility easement area. the landscaping berm along maximum elevations in the Show ell storm drainage elevations on the sewer profile sheets. 7. ~dd valving as required in the water main. 8. Use polyethylene-lined DIP in sewers that pass under trees, are between buildings, or that cross storm drainage. ADDENDUM K-4 TRB Revieu - Wellesley at Boynton Beach Plat and Site Plan hdd a note %hat the City ~ill oun an~ maintain Main line se~ers only. In that only one meter i~ provided per building at the develomer'e request, the developer, and subsequently the homeo~ner~' ~hey will be responsible {or all water and ~euer monthly bills. MEMORANDUM Jim Golden Planning Department Sgt. Marlon Harris Police Depargment 05 February 1987 Wellesley at BoyntomBeach (Meadows Development) Sir, Per our ~iscussion in the TRB Meeting, 03 February 1987, regarding the Wellesley at BOyntom Beach Development, it is my ~ecomendation that some changes amd revisions be made regarding the atreet layout in the development. The two main s~reets running through the development both come to dead ends (or Cul-de-sacs). It is my rrecomm~ndation that these streets be redesigned to make a complete circle and ~he streets be named. The streets wind excess- ively andfo= ~afety reasons, I would recommend the streets make a complete circle for eas~eraccess for Police and Fire. Respectfully submitted, Sgt. ~{arlon Harris ADDENDUM K-5 Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin John Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist February 5. 1987 Meadows 300 Tract N "Wellesley" - Site Plan The following comments pertain to the landscape plan for the above project: Ail the trees located within the interior parking areas must have a clear trunk of five feet (5') at time of plant- ing. The type of tree designated as "FICUS" cannot be planted within twelve feet (12') of any public improvement. in Jo~n Hallahan -~ KJH:ad ADDE~ ~I~D ~M K-6 I DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 17 AND 20, TOWN SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, AND IN' PORTIONS OF A SUBDIVISION OF SECTIONS~? AND 29, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, AS RECORDED IN PLAT PAGE 20 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM' BEACH COUNTY, STATE OF FLOR: ~ND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT' THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ' SECTION 20i THENCE, $OUTI: 88° 59' 23" WEST ALONG THE NORTH' LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 A DISTANCE OF 295.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF THENCE, SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 609.53 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE (A RADIAL?; LINE PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 20° 38' 53" EAST) CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY ]~LAVING A RADIUS OF 515.47 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21° 51' 25"; THENCE, WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 196.64 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; THENCE, NORTH 88° 47' 28" WEST ALONG SAiD TANGENT LiNE A DISTANCE OF 927.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 3044.18 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09° 09' 56"; THENCE, WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 486.98 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; THENCE.' 6OUTH 82° 02' 36" WEST ALONG SAID TANGENT LINE A DISTANCE OF 289,82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 536.?? FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11° 32' 52"; THENCE, WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A' DISTANCE OF t08.18 FEET; TtlENCE, NORTH A DISTANCE OF 1253.60. FEET;, THENCE, EAST A DISTANCE OF 1913.~&0 FEET.; THENCE SOUTH 60° 00' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUIH A DISTANCE OF 507.77 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 55.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS. (AREA= 2595800.02 SQUARE FEET-) TOGETttER WITH AN EASEMENT RUNNING [N FAVOR OF THE ABOVE DESCRIB'ED' LAND 'FOR RAILROAD PURPOSES OVER, ACROSS, AND UNDER A STRIP OF LAND 50.00 FEET [hi WIDTH LYING 25.00 FEET ON EACH SiDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLiNEo COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECT[Obi 20; THENCE; SOUTH 89° 04' 4?" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECT[ON 16, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST A DISTANCE OF 669.08 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LiNE OF THE SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS SAID RIGHT-OF-WAy IS NOW LAID OUT AND iN USE (JUNE 25, 19~6); THENCE~ ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAy LINE NORTH 00o 31' 17" EAST A DISTANCE OF 26.06 FEET; THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 14° 07' 14" EAST A DISTANCE OF 157.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON AN ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY ~A RADIAL LiNE PASSING T~.HROEGH SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 71° 21' 01" EAST) HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND A CEN1RAL ANGLE S1' 26"; t'HENCE, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG TtlE ARC OF SAID CHRVE A DIS]ANCE OF 622.65 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE; THENCE, WES]ERLY A[.ONG SAID 1ANGENT LINE A '1DISTANCE Oi 529.32 FEE[ lO TilE EASTERLY BO[JNDARY ()F TtIE HEREIN ABOVE ' DE'SCRIBED 55.00 ACRE PARCEL ' AND file END CENTERLINE EASEMENT DESCRIP1~ON. LESS AND EXCEl)liNG lttERE[R[)M ALL OF THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN TttE PUBLIC RIGHT-DF-WAY OF HJGIt RID]JR ROAD. IT IS INTENDED THAT THE SIDE LINES OF THE. ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENI ARE TO BE PROLONGED TO INTERSECT AND TERMINATE ON THE BOUNDARY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 55.00 ACRE PARCEL, I ' t ADDENDUM L MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review February 3, 1987 Site Plan Approval: Publix Distribution Facility (Quantum Park) As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. Indicate the type of construction of the structures in accordance with Section 601.1.1 of the Standard Building Code on the site plan. 2. Show details for handicapped accessibility from the parking areas to all portions of each structure. Show locations, details and eleva- tions of all handicapped ramps. 3. The wood fences and light poles must be designed to withstand a 120 m.p.h, wind load. 4. Show the finished floor elevations for the office building, gate house and other structures in compliance with South Florida Water Management District requirements. 5. Curbing must be provided for parking stalls adjacent to landscaped areas. 6. Show detmils on the perimeter concrete wall. In order to information duplic~%e: facilitate the building permit s~ould be provided at the time review process, the following of plans submittal in 1. A complete set of working drawings for each structure. The ~ezzanines must comply With Section 402.2.3 of the Standard Building Code. 2. Health Department approval is required for the kitchen area, the Truck Service Center with underground fuel tanks and the Distribution Center. 3. Submit copies of the City Environmental Review permit, Energy Code compliance forms for conditioned areas and soil tests. 4. Submit copies of the South Florida Water Management District approval. 5. Submit water and sewer flow calculations by a Florida registered engineer for the Distribution Cenner, office complex and for the Truck Service Center with the truck wash in order for the Building Department to calculate the appropriate Capital Facilitias charges. 6. The battery charging area and pesticide storage area must be separated and ventilated in accordance with minimum codes. Note: Separate permits are required for: paving, drainage, excavation, pump house, gate house, Truck Service Center, office building, Distribu- tion Center~ fire sprinkler systems, fences, signs, lawn sprinklers and flag poles. The applicantrs prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insura a timety permitting process. Don Jaege~J u DJ:bh ADDENDUM M-1 RECEIVED To: From: Da%e: Subject: ~EMORRNDUM Carmen ~nnunzia~o. Planning Direc%op John ~. Suidry, Direr%or o{ u%ili%i- ~/~ ' February 4, 1987 TRB Review - Publix Dis%ribution Cen~er FEB 6 ~8i PLANNh~G DEPT. h4 · can approve % .9 projec% subje¢% %0 %he ~otlouing revisions: ~. ~ack{lou preventers are'~o be located on %he building s-ida me,er, BO% %he u%ili%¥ ~ide. Z. Sho~ ail ~ani%ary service to ~he main building. 3. Indica%e ail sani%ary cleenou%s. 4. Indicate e double check valve on %he discharge line %0 %he ~ire booster pump. This valve uill be priva%e)y euned and maintained. 5. Provide de,ails on the grease and sand %raps a~ ~he %ruck service Relocate ~he sanitary seusr so as %0 main%air a minimum dis%an6e o{ '~S~ee~ {rom bo%h buildings. 7. Manholes must be in pavemen% or mithin 10 {es% so as ~o be accessible fo cleaning equipMen%. Add a no%a indies%lng %ha% a 1Z' wide s~rip over %he 12" wa~er main ~ill have a s%abitized grads sui%mble ~or heavy equipmen%. Provide peak (GPM) {ire ~low demand {or %he an%ire on-site ¢ire eye%em. Indica%e %he lore%ion {or on-si%e tankage %o provide volu~e {or the axpec%ed {ire even% dura%ion. 8]so indica%e approximate size and capaci%y o{ the proposed sprinkler pump(s): ho~ many ara planned, and ~ha% ~heir source o{ emergency po~er ~ill be. Our approval o{ ~his entire si%e plan ia condi%ioned upon ~he Ci%y having an adequa%a delivery'sys%e~ and s~orage %0 mae% %he ~ire {leu requiremen%s o~ %his si%e. in addi%ion ~o i~e demands ~hrou~hou% {ha em%ire service area. Rn on-si%e {~re supply system wi%h ground or slava%ed s%orage %arks may ba required, in uhich case %he si%e plan ~euid have ~e be re-done and re-approved. ADDENDUM M-2 MEMORANDUM February 4, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman add Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annu~ziato Planning Director Publix Distribution Center - Staff Commen~s Please be mdvised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: 1. Site plan approval contingent upon compliance with the City's noise ordinance. ~!~,~.~ ~ ~ Mlner~rtheast 22nd Avenue east of Interstate 95. an ~ ~ . d ~i~ c,~ Seacr~st Bou~i-eva~. .~..~- 3. An Envlror~ental Review Permit is required prior to th~ · 1¥,~- issu~ce of a building permit for those use~ reviewed--~t the Nove~r 26, ~1986 Enviro~ental Review Board meeting. 4. Screening detail to be provided for compactor located at loading dock on west side of building. 5. Futu~ building ~dditions will require ~ site plan 6. Provide t~ical elevation of lighting pole detail. /let CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO ADDENDUM M-3 M.E,tv ORA N D UM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review February 3, 1987 Site Plan Approval: Boynton Lakes Plat No. Recreation Area 3B As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. In order to foster safe pedestrian circulatio~ from the surrounding residential areas, a sidewalk should be included along Walcott Drive and into the site from both of the adjacent roadway right of ways. 2. The survey, sheet A-1 and the paving ~nd drainage ~lan show conflicting details on ~he parking area. Please correct the over- sight. The proposed finish floor elevation for the recreation building is in conflict on the survey and on the paving and drainage plan. Supply copies of the South Florida Water Management DisTrict approval to the Building Department with the submission for permit. 4. Curbing should be provided around all parking stalls adjacent to landscaped areas~ 5. Show a detail on the handicapped ramp from the parking area to the recreatio~ building. 6. Show the pool and playground site lighting on the site plan. In order to facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided at the time of submittal: 1. The pool and recreation building must have Health Department approval. The pool must be designed by a Florida registered engineer. Sewer and water flow rates by a registered engineer should be submitted in order for the Building Department to calculate capital facilities charges. 2. The color of the awnings for the shelters should be submitted to the Community Appearance Board for their approval. Engineered shop drawings of these shelters should be submitted to the Building Department for review. The app!icant"s prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. Don Jaege'r,.J DJ:bh ADDENDUM N-1 TO: FROM: RE: MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Boynton Lakes Recreation Area, Plat 3B February 3, 1987 FEB ~ 1.,9~ PI -_AN NING DEPT. Comments.:- Clarification is required concerning where raised curbs ~re going. Raised curbs are required adjacent to parking spaces at landscaped areas. I recommend that a crowned parking lot be planned with storm water discharging to the grass areas surrounding the parking lot. Elevations of low grass areas should be shown so that flow into said grass areas would be assured. 3. The parking lot striping detail needs to be corrected, ie., ...... 16 ft. space may be used when raised curbs are constructed. 4. Rounded corners are recommended for landscaped areas~ TAC/ck Tom Olark ADDENDUm{ N-2 RECEIVED FEB 6 ~8i PLANNI,~G OEPT. MEMORBNOUM To: From: Da~e: Subject: can ~pprove ~hi~ oroject, subject tO ~he Following revisions: 1. R drop manhole ie required. 2. Show ma~er~ls~ cleanou~s end inverts on ~he ~ani%ary ~ervice~. U~e a corporation ~op ine~ead o~ a ga~e valve on ~he ~a%er ADDENDUM N-3 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin John Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist February 5, 1987 Boynton Lakes Plat ~3B Recreation Area - Site Plan The following pertai~ to the landscape plan submitted for the above project: 1. The applicant should designate the type of sod which will be used throughout the recreation area. The applicant's list of trees and vegetation must meet the requirements of 8c, ~.4 of the "Addendum, Changes to Compre- hensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report Document(1986), December 16, 1986". This section requires at leas~ 30% of all l~ndscape material and 50% of all trees listed must be native species. Under this same document, Section 8a, p.4, potable water may not be used to meet irrigation needs where non-potable alternative sources are available. Kevin J~n -~allahan ~'~ KJH:ad ADDENDUM DESCriPTION: A gort£On of: CONGRESS ~3~KEs-p~T NO. i (p.U.Do}, as recorde~ in plat Book 46, page.129 of ~he Publ£c Records of Palm Beach County; lying in Sec~n 19~ ~o~nship 45 Sou~h, Range 43 P~lm Beach ~un~y, ~o~i~a; bei~ City.of BoyntO~ Be~ch~ particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at ~ Southeast (~) corner of saia Plat of ~ngress lakes; thence Sou~ 8B'5~~17" west a distance of 550.45 feet; 'thence Nor~ 01'44'21" E~t a dfstanc~ of 217.~7 feet; ~ence Nor~ 46'44'2~"-East a distance of B~.TB feet; ~ce Nor~ ~01'44'21" E~t a ~stance of 298.32 fe~t; thenc~ North ~East a distan~of 9.49 fe~t;~ ~ence North 0~'44~57' ~est a range of 94.36 feet~ ~ence South 88'15~3g" East = ~ist~C~ 144.B0 fee~ ~ence North 0~'44"~21" E'~t a distancs of 275.~hence feet; ~nce North B5'47'0B"~ East a distance.of 289.54 ,0~ East a distance of B5.36 feet'to a ~int on the Avenue~ ~ence South ~5B.27 feet t~ ~e PO~T OF BEG~NING. S~d lan~ sit~te, lying an~ ~i~g in Boynton Bea~, Palm B~a~ ' 9 Coutny~ Flori~ an~ contazn .6B7 ~cres~ ~re or less.' ADDENDUM 0 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review February 3, 1987 Site Plan Modification: Catalina Centre Plat 1 As a condition o~ site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated znto t~e related documents by the applicant: 1. Classify the ~ype of construction for the structure in conformance with Section 601.1.1 of the Standard Building Code. Indicate if the building will be fully sprinkled. 2. The allowable building area must comply with Table 400 of the Standard Building Code for the type of construction and occupancy, Comply with Section 403 of the Standard Building Code for mixed occupancy separation. The presentfloor plan and building area does n~t comply_with Code requirements without a four hour wall separating the occupancies. 3. Clarify tl~e~confticting setback dimensions on Sheets A-1 and A-3. 4. Show details on the location and construction of handicapped ramps for accessibility to the building. 5. Sheet A-4 mhowsv'a wind vane above 45 feet. City Council approval of a height exception is required for this embellishment. 6. In order to p~destrian traffic from the Congress Avenue w~lkway, be provided into the site. tn order to facilitate the.building per,it review process, the following information should be pro~ded at the time of plans submittal in duplicate: !. Health Department approval is required for the revised plans. 2. Submit copies of the Hotel and Restaurant Commission application form. 3. Submit revised Energy Code compliance forms. Note: A threshold inspector is required for this structure. The applicant's insure a timelj DJ:bh prompt compliance with permitting process. the preceding comments will Don Jaeger ~ ADDENDUM p EXHIBIT A TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION OF ~RINER'S WAY CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH/PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA · _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, Wilms Way, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 23 on page llD of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; The North 165 feet of the South 700 feet of Government Lot 3 of Section 22, Township 45 South, Range 43 East lying East of said Lot 9 of Wilms Wa~, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida; D-ND A parcel of submerged land in Lake Worth in Section 22~ Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, more particu- larly described as follows: BegL~ning at the point of intersection of a line 699.50 feet North of and parallel to the South line of Government Lot 3 in said Section 22 and the City of Boynton Beach Bulkhead Line, estabIished November 19, 1956 by Ordinance No. 289; thence Sou~ ~S~ 37' 00" West along said City of Boynton Beach Bulkhead Line, a distance of.130.76 feet; thence North 89" 22' 01" West, a distance of 375 feet to a point in the high water line on the Westerly shore of Lake Worth; thence North 44~ 37' 59" East, along said high water line, a distance of 165 feet; ~hence Nor+-h 88~ 24' 26" East, along said high water line a distance of 278.76 feet to the Point of Beginning. ADDENDUM Q 'STAFF 'CObiMENTS MARINER' S WAY SITE PLAN MODIFICATION Building D~partmen=: Engineering Department: Utilities Department: Planning Department: See attached memo. See attached memo° See attached memo. It is recommended that the two pool parking spaces be relocated to the northeast portion of the cul-de-sac adjacent to the pool. ADDENDUM R-1 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunmiato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review -February 3, 1987 Site Plan Modification: Mariner's Way (Pool) As a conditionof site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. The survey document is incomplete. Show existing conditions around the pool area on a recent survey with elevations. 2. The parking area should be in compliance with Chapter 5, Article t0 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Show details on cur.bing, double striping and parking lot construction. 3. Ail corm~on facilities should be handicapped accessible and a marked handica ed arkin stal ' · pp p g i I provzded zn the parking area. show detmils of--handicapped ramps and signs. 4. Show pool setbacks and deck setbacks from the property .line and canal. Show exterior site iight~ng and r~quired fences. 5. Show lands~apin~ around the parking area in conformance with Chapter 7.5 ~rticle TI of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. In order to facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided atthe time of plans submittal in duplicate: 1. The pool area must have Health Department approval or else su. bmit verification from the Department exempting this project from compliance w%th Section 10D-S.110 of the Florida Administrative Code. 2. Department of Enwironmental Regulation and Army Corps of Engineers approval is required. If this project is exempt from Agency requirements, submit written verification. 3. The pool ~ust be designed by a Florida registered engineer. Sewer a~c water flow rates, calculated by a registered engineer, should be submitted in order for the Building Department to calculace Capital Facilities charges. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. DJ:bh Don Jaeger~ ADDENDUM R-2 M E M 0 R A ND U M February 3, 1987 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Mariner's Way Pool ~Addition Cor~%~el~.t$: - Elevations, grades and cross-sections, etc. are required for the additional parking spaces. 2. Dimensions, elevations, set backs and cross-sections are required for the swimming pool si~e plan. TAC/ck Tom Clark ADDE~DIJbl R-3 PLA.,ji ~G ~EMORRNDUM To: Data: Carman Rnnur~ tat o, Pt arming Director ~ ~ JohnnY[. Guidry, Director Subject: TRB Review -Mariner's Way Swimming Pool We can approve this project, subject to the ~ollowing revisions: ~. C~ty water is not to be used ~or irrigation. The note re{erencing irri~ation must be stricken {rom the plans. Sho~ the location, slope, materials and cleanout {or the sanitary service unless the applicant can provide {irm evidence {rom the Healfh Department that restrooms or pool drainage uill not be required. Revise the survey so that utility easements will be properI? lock, ed--to -include all existing utilities. The ~ater meter should be relocated to ~he west side o{ the cul- de-aac. :~ ' dmt ADDENDUM R-4 MEMORANDUM - Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief-Plans Review February 3, 1987 Site Plan Modification: Centrust Bank (Oakwood Square) C As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments be incorporated into th~ related documents by the applicant: 1. should Indicate the type of construction of the structure in accordance with Section ~6D~.l of the Standard Building Code. 2. Oakwood Square Shopping Center is allowed two free-standing signs for the project, which is indicated on their original site plan. These signs are.for the use of all tenants, and each out arce w?uld no~ be p~rmitted individual free s~ .... · · - ~u~ Slk~T~S. ~U1£ szgns sh~rald c 1 with __ ~zng omp y Sectzon 21-15(E) of the Bo Code of Ordinances. ' ]~ua-neath 3. The east-and west elevations on Sheet A-3 have been switched. Please correct t~is oversight. In order to information duplicate: facflitate the building permit review process, the following should be provided at the time of plans submittal in 1.construction.Signed and sealed sets of working drawings for the building 2. Soil tests and Energy Code compliance forms. 3. Copies of the South Florida'Water Management District approva~t.' andN°te:drainage~Separate permits are required for signs, excavation, paving The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments wi'Il insure a timely permitting process. DJ:bh ADDENDUM S-1 FEB 6 i°.~; PLANN;NG ~ENORRNOUM To; From: Date: Subject: Carmen Rnnunziato, Planning Director John a. Guidry. Oirec~0r o~ Utilities TRB Review - Bank at Oakaood Square Qe can ~ove ~his project, subject ~o the ~ol)o~ing revisions: 1. Loce~ ~he water meter in'a landscaped area. Z, Indicate the cleanout location on the sanitary service, dmt ADDENDUM S-2