Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Minutes 01-13-87
MINUTES COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, PRESENT OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING HELD IN BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, 1986'AT 7:30 P. M. Should be1987. See2/10/87~/~nutes. Walter "Marty" Trauger, Chairman Garry Winter, Vice Chairman George De Long Marilyn Huckle John Pagliarulo Simon Ryder Robert Wandelt Leonard Mann, Alternate William Schultz, Alternate Carmen Annunziato, Director of Planning Tim Cannon. Senior City Planner Jim Golden, Assistant City Planner Chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:33 P. M., recognized the presence in the audience of Mayor Nick Cassandra; Vice Mayor Carl Zimmerman; Councilman Ezell Hester; Councilman Ralph Marchese; Councilwoman Dee Zibelli; Peter L. Cheney, City Manager; Owen Anderson, Executive Vice President of the Greater Boynton Beach Chamber of Commerce; Samuel, Scheiner, Vice Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Agency; Barbara Schwertfager, Administrative Assistant, Planning Department; Rebecca Theim and Kathy Cantillon, Sun Sentinel; and introduced the Board Members, Mr. Annunziato, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Golden, and the Recording Secretary. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 1986 Mr. Ryder moved, seconded by Mrs. Huckle, to adopt the minutes as presented. Motion carried 7-0. COMMUNICATIONS None. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS PARKING LOT VARIANCE Project Name: Smith Office Building Agent: John D. Conway/Robert Owner: Dr. J. R. Smith J. Colestock MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' Location: Legal Description: Description: South Federal Highway at S. E. 5th Avenue, northwest corner PENCE SUBDIVISION 1, Lots 20 and 21 (Less W. 58' and SR 5 R/W), Block A Request for relief from Section 5-141 (g) (3) "Driveways" of the Parking Lot Regulations Mr. Golden read the memorandum dated January 7, 1987 from Mr. Annunziato to the Board, which is attached to the original copy of these minutes as "Addendum A". Currently, Mr. Ryder said a couple of curb cuts are there, and he thouqht the curb cut could possibly be moved further north, away from the intersection. Mr. Golden called atten- tion to one of the entrances to Sterling Village, which is immediately across from the proposed location of the drive- way, and indicated the stacking lane for cars waiting to enter Sterling Village. By moving the curb cut, it could possibly create more dangerous turning movements than the proposed location. Mr. Golden advised that it was the consensus of the Technical Review Board (TRB) that the applicant had a hard- ship in that he would not be able to have a driveway on Federal Highway if given the parking lot requirements of I80 feet, and this would be the most ideal location for a driveway due to the median configuration and turn lane in the entrance to Sterling Village. The TRB recommended approval of the driveway at the proposed location with the condition that a "No Left Turn" sign be provided at the egress on Federal-Highway. Mr. De Long noted this was a proposed medical building and said~the doctor would have an established clientele. He wondered if it would be possible for the applicant to have no entrances off Federal Highway. People could come in and out off 5th Avenue, and it would be less of a hazard to the heavy traffic on Federal Highway. Chairman Trauger thought almost anything would improve that area and the image of the City. He added this was needed in the downtown to get rid of the unsightly appearance. Mr. Ryder thought Mr. De Long's point was well taken because there is an opening in the median at 5th Avenue, so it *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 ~ M3_nutes. - 2 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' would present no hardship for access from the north or the south. He felt the fewer curb cuts on Federal Highway, the better off the City is, particularly in this instance where it is opposite Sterling Village. Mr. Golden said the TRB felt the applicant should be allowed a right turn in and right turn out, but they wanted to discourage the left turn movement, which was the reason for the recommendation for a "No Left Turn" sign. It was also the TRB's feeling that most people using the facility and traveling north on Federal Highway would most likely go out on 5th Avenue and use the flashing light at the intersection. Mr. Ryder wondered if the TRB considered Mr. De Long's suggestion. It came up, but Mr. Golden said the TRB felt it was a hardship in that there was not sufficient frontage to provide a driveway onto Federal Highway. Mr. Wandelt did not see why there was a problem with an extra curb cut there, because a doctor's office does not have that much traffic. There was discussion about northbound traffic, turning move- ments, and the potential for left turns. Jay Colestock, Agent, 814 Blue Ridge Circle, West Palm Beach, said~the top portion of the building is a proposed addition. The part to the left is the existing Gulf station. The drive is located no further north. Mr. Colestock indicated the only place where they can put an addition, which he said will be rentable space, so all of the building will not be a doctor's office. He told Mrs. Huckle the rental space will not necessarily be a medical unit. Mr. Ryder understood the cost was $100,000 and said, in that event, (P&Z) Board will not see the site about the building. estimated to be under the Planning and Zoning plan. There were comments Mr. De Long asked how the applicant felt about just egress off of S. E. 5th Avenue and questioned whether it would hamper the operation. Mr. Colestock answered that (1) it would hamper the sale value of the addition itself; and (2) they wanted to create an easy flow access through the park- ing lot so there would not be a stop and turnaround process. If there was only one driveway, it would be a dead end drive, which would create more hassle within the parking lot itself. Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. *Should be portion to the north. See 2/10/87 Minutes. - 3 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' Mr. Ryder asked what kind of hazard you could have in the parking area. If all of the spots were filled, and someone pulled in, Mr. Colestock explained that the person would have to turn around in the lane itself. *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes Mr. De Long was concerned because traffic is heavy, and he thought it would be heavier. Immediately to the north is 1.3 acres, which has been on the market. At one time a retail office complex was planned there, and that would take at least two curb cuts. Flamingo Plaza has two curb cuts, and the bank has a number-of them. The reason for Mr. De Long's suggestion was because of so much backup coming out of these areas. John Robert Smith, M. D., 250 Dixie Boulevard, Delray Beach, Florida 33444, said he and another tenant will occupy the building. He preferred that the tenant be a medical person but said, if the project "goes", the tenant will remain to be seen. Dr. Smith stressed that traffic flow was an important thing in the project. To have only one access through the area would be a problem, and he hoped the Members would consider his need for the access. Otherwise, cars will be trying to come and go through just one access, and there will be a real traffic flow problem. Mr. Ryder called attention to Benson's, which has only one access on 5th Avenue. Dr. Smith pointed out that Benson's has a much larger access and a bigger piece of land. Mrs. Huckle thought Mr. Colestock made a good point about the circulation on the lot. Dr. Smith was very interested in building the building and wanted it to be attractive and something Boynton Beach would be proud of. Having been in the community for 18 years and having an established following, he felt access from U. S. 1 was very important. Dr. Smith told Mr. Wandelt he is moving his practice from Delray Beach to Boynton Beach. Mr. De Long agreed that Mr. Colestock's point was well taken, and said quite a jam would be created in the interior of their parking lot. In reviewing it, Mrs. Huckle thought the positive aspects of the circulation and the curb cut on Federal Highway outweighed the negative aspects of closing it up. Mr. Ryder was concerned about the opening at 5th Avenue and another opening slightly to the north, opposite Sterling MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING B~ARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY Village. They are so close together that in many 13, 1986 * *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. instances, going northbound, cars will pass 5th Avenue, make the turn opposite Sterling Village, and will be going the wrong way to get into the doctor's office. Mr. Colestock replied that the median itself is against the street, and there is a turn lane to go into 5th Avenue, so most people would make the turn. If there was a problem with that, there could be a "No Left Turn" sign from that median. Mr. Annunziato agreed that by having the median cut there, it would encourage a northbound left turn. There is not the ability to stack on Federal Highway for the left turn, so you could have cars stopping or slowing down in the passing lane to make a left turn. The only way to solve that problem is to close the median cut. There is not enough space between 5th Avenue and the median cut to put in a stacking lane on the highway. Chairman Trauger commented that the same problem goes on up and dOWn the highway every day of the week. Mr. Annunziato added that the other problem would be the number of curb cuts on the west side of the highway itself. He thought Mrs. Huckle was correct in saying you have to weigh the benefits of the internal traffic movements. Mr. Annunziato was not one to believe in "No Left Turn" signs. People are going to make movements when no one is looking, which is another negative to consider. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the project. As there was no response, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Mr. De Long moved to approve the application as submitted, subject to staff comments. Mr. Winter seconded the motion, and the motion carried 6-1. Mr. Ryder voted against the motion. CONDITIONAL USE MODIFICATION Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Leqal Description: Girtman Child Care Center Douglas R. Root, AIA Eroyn Girtman North Seacrest Boulevard at N. N. E. 6th Streets E. 5th and The Ely 118.91' of the Wly 158.91' of the South 160' of the North 185' and the Ely 118.61' of the Wly 158.61' of the Sly MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Description: JAiqU~_R¥ 13, 1986, *Should be 1987. See 2/20/87 Minutes. 82.93' of the Nly 317.93' of the N½ of the NE~ of the SE~ of Sec. 21, Twp. 45 S., Rge. 43 E., LESS E. r/w of Seacrest Blvd., as recorded in O.R. Book 2840, Page 984, Palm Beach County Public Records. Request for a modification to a previously approved Conditional Use to allow for a 600 square foot increase in the size of the building, an increase in the maximum child capacity to 100 and a change in parking lot layout and design. Mr. Golden told the Members this was a request for an amend- ment to a previously approved Conditional Use application which was before the Board in July, 1986. (1) The square footage of the building has been increased from 4,400 square feet to 5,000 square feet. (2) The maximum number of children allowed has increased from 89 to 100 under the State rules and regulations. (3) Modifications have been made to the parking lot and site. (4) The applicant has incorporated various costs and measures into the construc- tion of the building and site. Mr. Golden read from the memorandum to the Board from Mr. Annunziato, dated January 8, 1986, copy of which is attached to the original copy of these minutes as "Addendum B". He called attention to paragraph ~1 on page 3, and paragraph 9s 5 and 6 on page 4 of the memorandum. The Planning Department recommended approval of the application, subject to staff comments. Mr. De Long questioned the recommendation in paragraph ~5 on page 4 (that the wooden fence be changed to a six foot high concrete wall) and asked if they were talking about noise when they said it was a more adequate buffer. Mr. Golden answered affirmatively. Mr. De Long thought there would be quite a difference in cost. Mrs. Huckle thought a concrete wall would be a significant factor with 100 children enclosed. In discussion with the Architect, Mr. Golden said it was indicated that when the State grants its approval, the center would probably not reach 100 children because the State has very stringent criteria. Apparently, there would be suffici- ent capacity for 100 children, but that was not to say the State would approve 100 children at this facility. Mrs. Huckle thought the concrete wall had a great deal to be said for it. - 6 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986 * · Should be 1987. See 2/10/~87~ ~/inu~s. ~.~¥ Jim Fulwider, Project Architect for the Day Care Center, 872_S. W. 9th Avenue, Boca Raton, said on the original pro- posal for 89 children, they did not take into account the area the furniture will occupy. The Health Department actually measures tables, wall cabinets, etc. and deducts that from the square footage. Now, they were proposing 3,500 square feet net children activity area, which will allocate for 100 children without furnitur~. It was hard for Mr. Fulwider to say how many children will be there, but he thought it would come close to about 90 children. They changed the parking layout to accommodate the extra square footages. Chairman Trauger asked what happened to the plan the Board approved about six months ago. Mr. Fulwider answered that the problem was somewhat related to his part. His client requested that they have about 90 children, which was not what his office gave the client. That was why they revised the drawings. Mrs. Euckle asked if there was any problem getting a larger facility on the property. Mr. Fulwider replied, "No", and added that they had to move things and work around them, but there is no problem getting the building in the required set- backs. Mr. De Long wondered if the additional parcel and parking was included when the Board originally approved this. Mr. Fulwider answered affirmatively. On the original first site plan, they called up 22 parking stalls, but they made a mistake. They actually are showing 23, so that was one park- ing stall they picked up. They then provided two more when they rearranged the parking layout. Mrs. Huckle asked if there are two exits on the separate parking lot across the street. Mr. Fulwider answered that there are and explained that they were located that way because they are trying to save some existing trees. Eroyn Girtman, 1920 N. E. 1st Lane, Boynton Beach, wanted to bring to the Board's attention the fact that the wooden fence was after discussion with his contractor. Before making their final decision, he wanted the Board to consider it would be a hardship to get the block wall in there because they found they were "over their heads" in what they wanted to get into, and they entertained the idea of putting in a wood fence throughout the entire boundary of the prop- erty line. Mr. Girtman added that they would fulfill the - 7 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. six foot requirement. He guessed the question would come to mind as to whether a concrete block wall would retain sound better than a wooden fence. Mr. Girtman's contractor advised him a lot would be saved there. Mr. Girtman also wanted to make the Members aware that the trees in the playground area may vary because a sandbox is in ~the center. The trees are not there as a requirement but are there because the Health Department is requiring that the applicant provide a certain amount of shade. Mr. Girtman said the Health Department may tell them to shift the trees, but right now, they are placed in that area. The trees may not shift drastically, but they may shift. Chairman Trauger wanted to know the difference between the wooden fence and concrete wall. Mr. Annunziato replied that many issues are involved in separation walls: noise, continued maintenance, cost of upkeep, and construction costs from the point of view of the owner. The issue here was primarily containment of noise. A concrete wall would pro- vide a sound barrier of greater longevity. Wood fences tend to deteriorate rather quickly. As the City ms attempting to protect the single family homes to the east, the wall was a serious consideration. Mr. Annunziato said the fence was probably an acceptable alternative, but it would not do the job, and it will be a continued maintenance problem that could, in the future, result in a deterioration of housing to the east. Mr. Annunziato informed Mrs. Huckle that it is zoned R-2 duplex to the east. He was not sure all of the lots were occupied but said it is likely they will be. Mr. Annunziato believed the primary form of land use was single family. Mr. De Long wondered if the decibel rating of a concrete stucco wall was lower than the decibel rating of a wooden fence. Mr. Annunziato did not know but stated that it is probably equal. That was what Mr. De Long said he would think, especially when the fence ms slx feet. He pointed out that the State has mandated that Day Care Centers can go into R-1 zoning, and he questioned what they would do if single family houses were on each side of another single family house that wanted to use it as a Day Care Center. Mr. Annunzlato thought they would have to make the same kind of evaluations. There was discussion. Mr. Annunziato brought up the fact that this would have 90 children, is an enterprise, and is expensive. He confirmed - 8 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA for Mrs. Huckle that he thought a wooden JANUARY 13, 1986, *Should be1987. See2/10/87 Minutes. fence could be as sound proof as a concrete wall. It would be a physical barrier of the sound, but Mr. Annunziato stated that he does not know much about the effect of sound as it travels through barriers. He assumed the density of the concrete would act as a greater barrier. In reading the staff comments, Mr. De Long observed that the area is in bad need of something like this. He stated he would hate to see that kind of project not get off the ground or be forced to start on shaky footing because the Board would require a much more expensive type of barrier. Mr. De Long did not think it was that important in this case. The only thing he could agree with was the maintenance, and the Board could never ensure whether the owner would have a tendency to let it run down. In this case, Mr. De Long was inclined to recommend that the ~oard go with a ~ooden fence to keep the cost down. Mr. Pagliarulo informed Mr. De Long that the wall is 205 feet long. Mr. De Long said they were talking about probably $8,000, and he explained. The owner did not have the actual figures. Mr. Pagliarulo told Vice Chairman Winter the last time he figured it out for concrete, it was close to $20 a foot as opposed to $4 or $5 a foot for wood. Mr. Annunziato said the area that would be most affected with noise would be the children's play area, which is the lot that lies east of the building. If noise is the issue, that is where they should have the greatest amount of protection. Mr. Annunziato thought maybe a reasonable solution would be to have that in some sort of block area and put fences on the other sides to ~emove lighting, etc. *Should be from the parking lot for the rest of the project, deflect. See 2/10/87 Chairman Trauger called Mr. Girtman forward, and Mr. Minutes. Annunziato's suggestion was explained to him. Mr. Girtman told the Members he intends to keep the property maintained. If they have a connecting wood fence with the wood, he thought it should satisfy the noise issue and do the same job. When you have a masonry wall, Mr. Ryder said you are isolating one unit from another. It is a matter of physical separation, and a wall is considered more of a permanent type of thing than a wooden fence. Mr. Annunziato agreed with Mrs. Huckle that the Planning Department's comment that they "require that the wall be MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986. *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. concrete block" was a bit strong. Vice Chairman Winter said it was a recommendation, and stated that the more money the owner puts into the fence or wall, the less he will put into the property itself. As no one wished to speak in favor of or in the proposal, Chairman Trauger declared THE CLOSED. opposition to PUBLIC HEARING Mr. De Long moved to approve the application, subject to staff comments, and with the proviso that the fence the owner is to erect be made of wood construction, as the owner originally suggested. Vice Chairman Winter seconded the motion. Mrs. Huckle questioned whether the fence would be five or six feet high because the concrete wall proposed by the Planning Department was slx feet, and the wooden fence was five feet. She thought they should specify slx feet. This was agreeable to Mr. De Long and Vice Chairman Winter. Mr. Girtman and his Architect agreed with the staff comments. A vote was taken on the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. B. SITE PLANS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description-. Description: Hi-Tech Centre None David E. Mackey North side of S. W. 30th Avenue, between S. W. 13th Place and S. W. 14th Place Lot 2, LAWSON INDUSTRIAL PARK, Plat #1 Request for site plan approval to construct a 32,775 sqaure foot mixed use industrial/warehouse building on 1.66 acres Mr. Golden informed the Members that the building will consist of 32 bays, which are to be leased out for the uses permitted under M-1 zoning. The building shape is rectangu- lar, and it extends lengthwise from S. W. 14th Place to S. W. 13th Place. Parking is provided on the north and south sides of the building with access on S. W. 13th and S. W. 14th Place. - 10 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA J~NUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987 See 2/10/87 Mr. Golden continued by saying the construction of the Minutes. building will be CBS. The color scheme has not been indi- cated. It will be a single story building, approximately 21½ feet high. Bay doors are proposed to be located on the north and south sides of the building. Extensions for water and sewer lines on surrounding roadways. subject to staff comments. will be made from existing The TRB recommended approval, David E. Mackey, 220 Shore Drive, Riviera Beach, explained that he was not the applicant but the applicant's father, and he told why his son was not present. George Davis, Architect, was in the audience. Mr. Mackey read all of the staff comments thoroughly and knew his son would agree with all of them except %2 in the memo dated January 6, 1987 from Don Jaeger, Chief Plans Inspector, Building Department, which required a hedge on the north side of the property. He observed the property today and saw that the storage property to the north of their site plan already has an existing hedge 3 feet high. Mr. Mackey said about 8 foot high trees are also planted on 35 foot centers in a solid buffer strip between his son's property and the property immediately to the north, so he requested that they not be r~quired to plant a hedge against a hedge, which seemed redundant. Mr. Mackey said they would accept everything else staff recommended. Mr. Annunziato commented that Code requirements are lust that. He thought Mr. Mackey's point was well taken and suggested he make an appeal to the Community Appearance Board, who could offer the applicant some relief. This Board could not offer the relief he was requesting. There was discussion. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff comments. (See Addendum C attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Mr. Pagliarulo seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Hunters Run Tract I Charles N. Gilbert Summit Associates, Ltd. West side of South Congress Avenue, between the LW-DD L-28 and L-30 Canals Request for site plan approval to ~ construct 86 duplex and multi-family units plus recreation and landscaping at Tract I of the Hunters Run Planned Unit Development (PUD) - 11 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, *Should be 1987. Minutes. 1986' See 2/10/87 Mr. Golden said Tract I is located in the northeast corner of the PUD, north of the clubhouse. The proposed site plan includes 13 duplexes, 12 of which are located on the west side of Clubhouse Lane North. An additional duplex is located in the eastern portion of the site plan. The remainder of the units are multi-family. Mr. Golden said a swzmming pool is provided at the inter- section of Clubhouse Lane and the proposed road which extends to the east. The architecture and design of the units appeared to be similar to those previously constructed in ~unters Run. Mr. Golden referred to the staff comments from the Engineer- ing and Utilities Departments and said the applicant must submit a preliminary plat document of Tract I at a future date, as one has not been submitted with the site plan. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments. (See Addendum D attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Charles N. Gilbert, Architect, 3500 Clubbhouse Lane, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436, confirmed that the units are the same as they previously constructed. The multi-family ones are two story units. The rest are one story. Mr. Gilbert told the Members all of this carries out the philosophy of Hunters Run wherein all units face either water or the golf course. Mr. Gilbert informed Chairman Trauger that he had no problem with the staff comments. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the site plan, comments. Vice Chairman Winter seconded the motion carried 7-0. subject to staff the motion, and On the memorandum from the City Forester, Mr. Annunziato asked the Members to note the comments relative to the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum. The City received comments back from the Regional Planning Council concerning the planting of fresh water plants within the lakes that are created. The Council adopted that policy as part of the adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal (E&A) Report. - 12 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. 3. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: Sutton Place (formerly Savannah Place) Richard C. Really, Architect S. P. Development, Inc. e/o Phillip Connor South Congress Avenue at Golf Road, northwest corner A plat of Quail Lake, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 40, pages 47 & 48, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for site plan approval to construct 135 townhouse units plus recreation and landscaping at the Quail Lake Planned Unit Development Mr. Golden reminded the Members that this was presented at last month's meeting. It was a request for site plan approval for the former Savannah Place site plan after the original expired because permits had not been applied for within a year of the original approval. Mr. Golden informed Chairman Trauger this was the one the Board unanimously recommended be denied last month, and it was withdrawn prior to review by the City Council. A new site plan was being presented this evening. Mr. Golden said the site plan included 135 fee simple town- house units in 11 separate buildings with a maximum height of two stories 27 feet high. The guard house is being removed from the entrance, and the maintenance building has been moved to the southwest corner. The tennis courts and swimming pool are in the same place in the western portion. The water and sewer laterals are to connect onto existing systems located at Congress Avenue and Golf Road. Some modifications are necessary, amd Mr. Golden drew attention to the staff comments of the Utilities and Fire Departments. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments. (See Addendum E attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Richard Broadhurst, who works for Richard C. Reilly, Archi- tect, P. A., 2500 North Federal Highway, Suite 303, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, showed a rendering of the project. As a result of the comments from the December meeting, the project was completely redesigned. Some of the objections the Board had were addressed. Mr. Broadhurst told the Members all of the buildings have been changed to CBS construction, and the vinyl siding is - 13 MINUTES - PLAiFNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. out. The predominant finish of the buildings will be stucco. There was concern about three story buildings considering that the surrounding property is predominantly two stories, and Mr. Broadhurst said all of the buildings now are two story buildings. Concern was also expressed about the lack of covered parking for garages. Mr. Broadhurst said the indentations on the plan indicate garage units. 33 three bedroom units have garages with options for about six more of those units. Mr. Broadhurst informed the Members that they will have 135 townhouse units and the same number of buildings. Chairman Trauger recalled that previously they had three stories, and he wondered where they spread the two stories. Mr. Broadhurst replied that there is mo~e land coverage now. Mr. Ryder recollected the Board was concerned about the appearance of the concrete wall running along Congress Avenue. Mr. Broadhurst said the wall has been eliminated, and they now have a series of berming and landscaping along Congress Avenue. Mr. Ryder said that was consistent with what the City now has to the north. Mr. Broadhurst added that they have wider lands~caped areas than they had before. They have bigger setbacks, so the buildings are further away from the street than they used to be. Mr. Ryder thought they had come a long way and now had some- thing which should be acceptable. Mr. Golden informed Chairman Trauger that the TRB was primarily concerned with the technical aspects of the plan. There were not a lot of comments on the architectural design and the site design features at the meeting. Mr. Annunziato stated that it appeared that they did address the concerns raised by the Board at the December meeting. Mr. De Long asked if they read all of the staff comments. Mr. Broadhurst replied that they took exception to the Director of Utilities' comment with regard to their dumpster pads (comment ~2) and said there are two utility easements parallel to Congress Avenue, where they placed four or five 10xl0 concrete dumpster pads with the now required six foot CBS wall around them. The applicant wants to keep the pads where the~ are. The developer can supply a hold harmless letter to the City as far as replacing the wall if the City ever has to get to the mains that are there. Mr. Broadhurst said it is usually a "pretty standard" item. In the past, Mr. Annunziato said the City has allowed walls and encumbrances on utility easements, subject to the hold 14 - MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYI~TON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. harmless. In this instance, there are two utilities in the easement that parallels Congress Avenue. One carries a 36" force main, and the other a water main. If either one of those goes, it will take everything with it. In the past, this has not been a substantial problem because of the hold harmless agreement. It was something Mr. Annunziato wanted to talk to Mr. Guidry about to see if there was an alterna- tive. If the City has a hold harmless agreement with the developer, Chairman Trauger wondered if it would carry through to the condominium or homeowners' association later. Mr. Annunziato thought it was possible because the property had to be platted to encumber the property with that agreement on the platted document. Mr. Broadhurst said the only other possible exception was the parking lot striping. The parking lot is laid out in such a way that there are more private driveways as opposed to a public parking lot in front of the buildings. They would rather not stripe directly in front of the units. Overflow traffic is across the street, and they will stripe that. It will be a typical parking lot situation, but Mr. Broadhurst said they would rather maintain the character of the residential drives. Mr. Annunziato replied that the City would never stripe home driveways but would stripe parking lots. He thought they had a combination of a parking lot and driveways ~o serve houses. It would not serve much of a purpose to stripe the driveways, but it makes sense to stripe parking lots. Vice Chairman Winter asked if there was a clubhouse. Richard Reilly, Architect, answered that it is a pool with changing rooms. They are private homes, and it a condominium. It is fee simple ownership. house is not Mrs. Huckle wondered what would happen to the hold harmless on a fee simple situation. Because it has to be platted, Mr. Annunziato thought arrangements like that could be worked out at the plat time itself. There would still have to be an association. Mr. A/lnunziato informed Chairman Trauger that a bike path will go on the east side of Congress Avenue. Mr. De Long saw no problem with a hold harmless not only from the applicant but from the homeowners' association. 15 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See2/10/87 Minutes. Mrs. Huckle inquired about the clubhouse. For a long time, Mr. Annunziato said the Board and Council have insisted on having clubhouses to serve developments. He thought there was a realization that having a clubhouse facility for every association became a burden to the extent that the continued maintenance of these facilities is very high. Concern was raised that there would not be a place for the association to meet, and Mr. Annunziato said that was addressed by some developers by having a screened in area where they could conduct their yearly meeting. He suggested that perhaps the g~zebo could be expanded to include a screened in area to accommodate 40 or 50 people. If they had 1/3 or all of the unit owners at a meeting, it would probably be a lot, as the number of people that turn out for community meetings is very small. Mrs. Huckle understood the gazebo was essentially a changing room. Mr. Reilly pointed to the utility area of a building where he believed they could accommodate what the Board would like, and informed Vice Chairman Winter the size of the building was 30x50. It was felt that would be adequate for as often as the people would meet. Mrs. Huckle questioned how much of the building is used for maintenance. Mr. Reilly answered, "Not very much," and said it is a storage area for lawn maintenance. He showed where the pool facilities would be and added that the basiu part of the filters run in the ground. Mrs° Huckle determined there would be close to 300 people. Mr. De Long noted there would be 109 two bedroom and 26 three bedroom units. Mr. Annunziato said the City sees a problem in the future for maintenance of common areas in developments, not only the recreational facilities, but the drainage facilities and lakes. There was discussion. If they stipulate that the building will be used as some kind of meeting room, Mrs. Huckle wondered about parking around the building. Mr. Broadhurst replied that people could walk to the meeting; it would not be that far. If it is a meeting room, Mr. Annunziato advised there would be parking requirements, but this is a PUD, and that would have to be weighed against what the walking distance is. There would probably be a unit more than 1,200 feet away from the building. Mr. Annunziato said there would be flexibility because it is not a general public meeting facility. 16 - MINUTES BOYNTON Chairman Annunziato thought Mr. Broadhurst's point was well taken and wanted to talk to John Guidry, Director of Utilities. If there is a problem, that discussion will be generated the Council. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986, *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. Trauger inquired about the dumpster pads. Mr. to Mr. De Long observed that the applicant was indicating that he was bringing up minor items so if they did not quite go his way, he was "pretty much" in agreement with them. Mr. Broadhurst replied that there are other alternatives. Chairman Trauger asked if the applicant would then concur, as to this meeting, with the staff comments as presented. Mr. Broadhurst replied that they had no objections. Mrs. Huckle thought the developers Should be congratulated for coming up with something much improved over what the Board first saw. She moved to approve the site plan for Sutton Place, subject to staff comments, and the comments the Board incorporated tonight. Mr. De Long seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Ryder pointed out that, apparently, the position the Board took before was a proper one. The plan the Board now saw was much different, and he felt it would be more accept- able to the Council and people in the area. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: WXEL Broadcasting Facility Briel, Rhame, Poynter & Hauser, A/E, Inc., c/o Roy F. Deng, Jr., AIA Department of Education State of Florida West side of South Congress Avenue, south of Charter Drive See Addendum F attached.) Request for site plan approval to construct a 32,700 square foot public broadcasting facility including a broadcasting tower and a satellite dish farm on 6.20 acres Mr. Golden said the proposed facility would be located almost immediately across Congress Avenue from the Strauss & Wassner building in Regency Plaza. The tower, which will be constructed to a height of 90 feet, received a height exception from the City Council. Mr. Golden continued that parking will be located on the east, north, and west sides of the building. A single drive- - 17 - MINUTES - PtJ~NNtNG & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA way is to be provided on Congress JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes. Avenue near the northern property boundary. A median cut on Congress Avenue is pro- posed to be closed as a part of the site plan approval. This will help eliminate traffic hazards concerning left turn movements. Mr. Golden said the proposed building will be constructed to a height of 34 feet. The exterior is to consist of stucco surfaces with chromium gray metal louvers, doors, and frames and solid gray stained glass panels. On site utility extensions will be made from existing utilities located on the west side of Congress Avenue and within a utility easement which runs along the southerly property boundary. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments. There was discussion about the location of the project and the height Of the antenna. Mrs. Huckle asked if "satellite dish farm" meant there were a lot of satellite dishes. Mr. Golden answered that it was indicated that there will be multiple dishes on the farm. Mr. Ryder wondered if the western boundary bordered Hunters Run. Mr. Golden replied that the western boundary is up against the lake of Hunters Run property. There was discussion about the plan. Mrs. Huckle asked how the City determines parking on this. Mr. Annunziato answered that it is an office building (a studio). Mark Burton, Architect, Briel, Rhame, Poynter & Houser, A/E, Inc., 5301 North Federal Highway, Suite 100, Boca Raton, Florida 33431, said they needed minor clarification on some of the Department of Utilities comments but, overall, they did not have any problems with the staff comments. (See Addendum G.) With reference to %1 in the memo from John Guidry, Director of Utilities, dated January 5, 1987, Mr. Burton said WXEL has agreed to pay a share of'the costs, but they need to know what the percentage is because they have a fixed budget and need to know they are talking about the same numbers. Generally, Mr. Annunziato said those costs are based on the applicant's consumption. The applicant's Engineers will have to resolve that with the Utilities Department. - 18 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986. *Should be1987. See2/10/87 Minutes. Originally, Mr. Burton said they talked with Mr. Cessna about the utilities the City is responsible for putting in. WXEL will pay for those utilities, but they understood that the City wanted to put them in so they would be done per the City's design standards. Mr. Burton wanted to make sure they were talking about the same things and same design standards. Mr. Annunzlato said the City would look those problems over and work them out. Mr. Burton informed Chairman Trauger that there is an exist- ing irrigation pump on the site. They will either try to hook up to the existing pump or put in their own pump. If they put in their own pump, they will probably go for a ground water pump instead of going to the lake because it takes more time, and they do not have time to get permission from Hunters Run. In any case, they will put a filter on it so rus~ will not hit the building. All their client will have to do is change filters. The existing tower zs 235 feet, and Mr. Burton said this tower is 85 feet. It is not a metal tower but a concrete pole and not obtrusive at all. The building is CBS with a very light gray stucco finish with dark gray glass. The important features of the building are the middle column and lower drum, which are blue. Mr. Buruon told Mr. Ryder there will be on site lighting in the parking area of high pressure sodium vapor. Chairman Trauger asked if Mr. Burton agreed with all of the staff comments. Mr. Burton replied that they did basically, but they need to get those clarifications. Mrs. Huckle noticed the City Horticulturist had a comment about the landscaping. Mr. Burton advised that the Landscape Architect had talked to the City Horticulturist. He understood from the conversation the Landscape Architect had with the City Horticulturist that they could comply with that and there was no problem. Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the site plan, subject to staff comments. Mr. Wandelt seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. - 19 - MINUTES - PLANNING & ZONING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA BOARD JANUARY 13, 1986' *Should be 1987. See 2/10/87 Minutes o SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Paul Brown - Sign Craft, Inc. Bethesda Memorial Hospital West side of South Seacrest Boulevard, south of Golf Road 2815 South Seacrest Boulevard Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for improvements in informational and directional signage Mr. Golden said the request was submitted under site plan A as there is a gap in the Sign Ordinance which does not regu- late this type of project. The signage proposed is for traffic control in parking lot areas and for identification of the hospital and its ancillary functions, such as the emergency room, radiation, ambulatory care, etc. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments. (See Addendum H attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Mr. Ryder called attention to comment ~3 in the memo from Don Jaeger, Chief Plans Inspector, Boynton Beach, dated January 6, 1987. Mr. Golden indicated on the overlay where the sign would be and said a couple of issues arose about the location of that sign (visibility and location in the right-of-way.) Chairman Trauger asked how high the sign would be. Mr. Annunziato estimated it was 13½ or 14 feet high. Mr. Wandelt added that it was five'feet off the ground. Mr. Annunziato informed the Members that the sign would require a license from the City. There was discussion. No one was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Annunziato suspected that the applicant would comply with the staff comments, and he did not think there was anything that should be a substantial problem. There was discussion about the Sign Code. Mr. Wandelt moved to approve the site plan modification, subject to staff comments. Mr. Pagl~arulo seconded the motion, and the motion carried 7-0. - 20 - MINUTES PLA/~NING & ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JAi~UARY 13, 1986, 6. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Legal Description: Description: *Should be 1987. ~/nutes. Oakwood Square Shopping Center Ciccio's Restaurant Ed Duggan, Project Engineer Oakwood Square Associates, Ltd. North Road, See 2/1G/87 Congress Avenue at Old Boynton southeast corner A portion of Tract 61 thru 67 inclus- ive, as shown on the plat of the sub- division of Sections 29 and 20, Twp. 45 South, Rge. 43 East, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 20, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for a change in site layout and design in the vicinity of the southernmost o~t parcel in connection with a lease agreement for Ciccio's restaurant Mr. Golden said the shopping center is under construction. The owner of Ciccio's restauran= has requested a modification to accommodate its building. The proposed change would decrease the size of the out parcel from the previous site plan, which showed 4,490 square feet, to 4,230 square feet. The configuration of the footprint walls are changed from square to rectangular with a corresponding change in parking on layout and design in the area immediately surrounding the building. The applicant had not indicated the color scheme of the building, and Mr. Golden had advised the applicant that the color scheme and construction should match the shopping center. Chairman Trauger asked how the reception was to this. Mr. Golden did not encounter any negatives or opposi- tion. The TRB recommended approval, subject to staff comments. (See Addendum I attached to the original copy of these minutes.) Edward Duggan, Project Engineer, Oakwood Square Associates, Ltd., 6350 North Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, informed Mr. Ryder that just the portion around the out parcel would be changed. When they went through for site plan approval, they just showed them as square out parcels because they did not have a lease. They are decreas- ing the size of the parcel from the original site plan. Along with the shape of the building, they had to change the Configuration of the parking lot. - 21 - MINUTEs _ PLANNING & ZONING BOARD BOYNToN BEACH, FLORIDA JANUARY 13, 1986, *~J~U~s.be~-- 1987. See 2/10/87 Chairman Trauger asked · ' ' rest of the bu~a~_ ~f the archite added ~=~ .~ t~u~ng· Mr. Du~=~ Ctur= woul~ mat Mr. ~ni~=.zu ls very similar=~~ answered affirmatiCh,the ~ nUnzlato asked ~ ~ put does not ~=~-= .. very and UUggan Spoke w~ =- ~ ~ne colors woul~ ~ -,~u~ it exactl . authorization ~;? ~ OWners about the-~o~; une Same. Mr.y em to conform With t~ ~_~nd was given Mr. Duggan confirmed Mr. Ryder's Statement that this is one of four out parcels and is the southernmos= parcel. Mrs. HUckle asked if they had any plans for the Other three out parcels. Mr. Duggan replied that Arby,s zs CUrrently in for conditional Use approval, which Will COme up in February. One of the Other two out parcels Will possibly be a bank. Mrs. HUckle inquired whether the anchor Stores w and Mr. Ryder W~ndered about the natur . ere leased, ~ns~ered that they h .... ~.,' · e of tn~m ~' ~- Max. T. j ~,. ~= ~lnn Dixie, B~ ~ .... ~r. D~q~an ~. z-~ax car ri es ~ .... ~= nuy Drugs, an~ products, SUch as china, etc. Yard King decided not to go ~u~nlng and SOme household with the center. Mr. Duggan agreed with all of the Staff COmments. Mr. De Long moved to approve the Site plan modifications, subject to Staff COmments, Seconded by Mr. Wandelt. Motion carried 7-0. COMMENTs BY MEMBER~ None. ADJOURNMENT There being no Other business to Come before the Board, Mr. Wandelt moved, Seconded by Mr. Pagliarulo, to adjourn. MOtion carried 7-0, and the meeting properly adjourned at 9:25 p. Patricia Ramseyer Recording Secretary (Two Tapes) - 22 - MEMOR~_NDUM January 7, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director smith Office Building r Parking Lot Variance Section 5-144(c)(4) of the Code of Ordinances requires that when a variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested, the Technical Review Board must forward to the Planning and Zoning Board a recommendation, an~ that the recommendation forwarded is to be made part of the public hearing proceedings. To that end, this memo is forwarded, consistent with 5-144(c)(4). Job_nD. Conway and Robert J. Colestock, agents for J.R. Smith, M.D. have requested a variance to Section 5-141[g)(3) "Driveways", of the Parking Lot Regulations which requires, among other things, that no driveways may be constructed closer than 180 feet to the intersection Of the rights-of-way lines on arterial roads. In this instance, the applicant is requesting to be permitted to provide a 20 foot wide driveway onto Federal Highway to be located a distance of 82.5 fee~ from the intersecting right-of-way lines between Federal Highway and S.E. 5th Avenue. The variance request is~be.ing submitted prior to a request for site plan approval, as the proposed driveway location, in this particular instance, is necessary to allow for the proposed expansion of the formerGulf service station owing to setbackt parking, and access constraints. The preliminary site plan submitted by the applicant p~oposes to add a new wing onto the north side of ~heformer ~ulf service station and to renovate the existing structure into a medical office building. Since the cost of construction for thi~ project would have a total value of less than $100~000, the proposed site plan would be processed administratively by the Buiiaing Department and would not require review and approval by the Planning and~. Zoning Board and City Councit~ The former Gulf service station is located at the northwest corner of Federal Highway and S.E. 5th Avenue. For an explanation cf the code.requ%rement, the nature of the variance requested, and the variance ~ustification, please refer to the attached Notice of Public Hearing and application. ADDENDUM A Page Two. On Tuesday, January 6, 1987 the Te6hnical Review Board met to review the plans and documents submitted, and to formulate a recommendation with regard to the variance requested. After review and discussion, the TRB recommended approval of the variance request as submitted, subject to the conditio~ that a "no left turn" sign be provided at the egress onto Federal Highway. This recommendation was made based on the TRB finding that the applicant would be unable to access his property from a major arteriai (Federal Highway) if required to not have a driveway within 180 feet of the intersection of the'rights-of-way lin~s. '~ . - CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO /lat cc: City Manager Technical Review Board Central File Attachment MEMORANDUM January 8, 1987 FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Girtman Child Care Center - Revised Conditional Use Application Summary: Douglas R. Root, agent for Eroyn Girtman, trustee, is requesting Conditional Use approval for a children's day care center to be located on a .51 acre parcel on the east side of seacrest Boulevard between N.E. 5th Avenue and N.E. 6th Avenue. Additional parking for the day care center is to be provided_on a separate parcel located on the south side of N.E. 5th Avenue across from the parcel where the day care center is to be located. The total acreage for the main site and the additional parking lot is .71 acres. A maximum of 100 children can be accommodated by the proposed day care center based on state requirements for this type of facility. This represents an increase of 11 children from the previous approval. The subject property is zoned R-2 (Duplex) and is currently vacant. Surroundin9 Land Use and Zo~in9 (see attached map): To the north of the subject property, across N.E. 6th Avenue, are the Yorktown Condos zoned R-3, Multi-Family Residential. The Yorktown Condos consist of 3 Multi-Family buildings which front on the north side' of N.E. 6th Avenue between Seacrest Boulevard and N.E. Street. Abutting the subject property to the east is an R-2 zoned neighborhood~Sunny Side Estates) which has been predominantly developed for single-family homes. Abutting the subject property to the south, where the additional parking is to be located, is a 15 foot wide alley which is platted but not constructed. Further ~o the south, across the 15foot wide platted alley, is a-single-family home Zoned R-2, duplex. The subject-property is bordered along the west by the right-of-way for Seacrest Boulevard: Further to the west, fronting on the west side of Seacrest Boulevard, is a vacant lot and a residence zoned C-2, Neighborhood Commercial. ADDENDUM B 1 Preposed Use (see attached site plan): The applicant is proposing to construct a one-story day care center which would have a maximum height of 24 feet. The building is proposed to ~ontain 5,000 square feet of floor space, which represents an increase of 600 square feet from the previous approval. Included within the building are four multi-purpose rooms, offices, and the necessary ancillary facilities for a day care center. The site plan includes the required outdoor recreation area (7,500 square feet) and a separate enclosed play area at the northwest corner of the building. It should be noted that the size of the outdoor recreation area has been increased by 495 feet from the previous approval. Under the state regulations.pertaining to day care centers, the site could accommodate a maximum of 100 children; an increase of il.children from the prev~ious ~pproval. In front of the building, eight parking spacesare provided with access avail way of separate ingress~egress d~iveways located 50 feet apart. The ~ driveWay is from Seacrest Boulevard spaces) is provided across the str o~ N.E. 5thAvenue. Access would be lngress~e~reSS driveways feet apart. The WEstern (ingress) driveway is located adis~an~e of.~approximately 40 f~et from Seacrest Boulevard. Standardsfor e~aluating Conditional Uses: Section 11.2 D of the Zoning Regulat~ns contains the following standards to which conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standard~ is the Planning Department's evaluation of the application as to whether it would comply with the particular standard. The Planning and Zoning Board and City Council shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under~ the terms of these zoning regulations, and~in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the faithful adherence to the fulfillment of such restrictions and conditions including, but not limitedto, the dedication of property for-streets, alleys, and recreation space, and sidewalks, as shallbe necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when notin harmony wi~h the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for. conditional use, the Board and Council shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety, and welfare of the community, and make written f-indings certifying that satisfactory provision has been made concerning the foIlowing standards, where applicable: 2 1.' Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. As previously notedunder the heading "Proposed Use", the applicant is proposing to construct separate ingress and egress driveways for each of the two parking lots onto N.E. 5th Avenue. As with the previous Conditional Use approval, the easternmost of the two driveways would have a proper alignment while the westernmost two driveways would not. It is recommended that the two westernmost driveways be constructed with a proper alignment to minimize traffic hazards. 2. Off street parking and 16ading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection D.1. above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use would have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the City as a whole. The proposed site plan provides for 25 parking spaces. This is the minimum number required for this use by the zoning regulations under the proposed exRansion. The required 25 parking spaces are divided into two parking areas: an 8 space parking lot in front of the building and a 17 space parking lot across the street. As stated under condition 91 above,__the staff is recommending that the westernmost access have a proper alignment as this will minimize traffic hazards and will enable more efficient channelization of vehicles through the parking lot at times of peak hour use. It is not anticipated that glare from parking lot lighting and from automobile headlights will pose a nuisance to adjacent properties as the parking lot lighting will be directed away from nearby residences and day care centers normally do not operate during evening hours. ~n addition, the Planning Department is recommending that the residences abutting the proposed day care center to the east be screened from the proposed use by a 6 foot high concrete-block wall. During the daytime hours while the day care center is in operation, some noise will be generated.by-the children playing in the outdoor recreation area, It is anticipated that this noise will be limited to periodic intervals during the daytime hours while the day care center is in operation and will not be of an extent so as to pose a nuisance to the abutting property owners. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection D.1 ~nd D.2 above. The proposed location of the dumpster is at the southwest corner of the building, approximately 100 feet from the nearest 3 residence. The odors from the dumpster would be perceptible for up to 200 feet away. However, this is probably the best location to place the dumpster owing to the size and configuration of the parcel and the proposed parking lot layout and design° Placing the dumpster at this location also facilitates access by the City's front end loaders. 4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. The site is served with water and sewer lines which are adequate to serve the proposed use subject to the modifications recommended by the Utilites Department at the.end of this report. As noted in the comments from the Utilites Department, the applicant must provide an additional fire hydrant as the proposed day care center does not fall within 200 feet of"the existing hydrant on the west side of Seacrest Boulevard~-- 5. Screening, buffering, and landscaping, type, dimension, and character. withreference to The site plan shows landscaping which meets or exceeds the landscape code. However, a higher percentage of native species must be provided as noted in comment ~2 from the Forester/ Horticulturist. The children's play area is enclosed by a 5 foot high wooden fence ,which is continued southward along the east property line in order to provide a continuous buffer between the day care center and the two residences which abut the property to the east. The Planning Department is requiring that this wall be of concrete block construction along the entire eastern property boundary and be constructed to a height of 6 feet which is the maximum height allowable under the current zoning regulations. 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, and economic effect, and~compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. -~ Since there are no details for signage provided~ it is assumed that signs will be permitted separately. The site' plan indicates that five pole-mounted lights with a fifteen foot height are to be provided: two of these are proposed for the main site where the building is located, while the rest are to be-~laced in the parking lot across the street from the main site. From the location of the fixtures on the site plan, it appears that the proposed lighting will not pose a nuisance to the surrounding residential properties. However, as on the previous site plan, a note should be plac~d on the current plans indicating that all lighting is to be directed away from the abutting residential properties. The type of lighting proposed is high pressure sodium. 4 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The setbacks for the building are 60 feet from the south property line, 25 feet from the west property line, 25 feet from the north property line, and 10 feet from the east property line. These setbacks meet or exceed the requirements of the R-2 zoning regulations. 8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other properties in the zoning district. Currently, the property to the north is occupied by multi-family residential uses while the properties to the east and south are occupied by single-family and.duplex uses. The proposed day care center has been designed with a residential architectural style (as opposed to a commercial architectural style) in order to conform to the residential character of the neigb_borhoed. As noted previously in this report, the children's play area is abutted on the east and south sides by two residences. It can be anticipated that some noisewill be generated during periodic intervals during the daytime hours when the children are u~ing the play area. However, it is not anticipated that this noise will be of a nature to pose a significant nuisance to the abutting residential uses and, in fact, the proposed use may be of a net benefit to t~ese abutting residences ~s the proposed structure a~d 6 foot ~igh concrete block wall will provide_a_ buffer between tAese two residences and the noise, generated by vehicular Boulevard. In,addition, the vacant proper.~ will a useful and needed purpose and it will no longer ~onti~ue to be used as dumping ground. As a result of these improvements, this property witi also cease to exist as an eyesore to the ~eighborhood and the community as a whole. 9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony, with adjacent and nearby properties, and the City as a whole. The proposed building is one .story with a maximum height of 24 feet. The height of the building would be compatible with other ~roperties in the vicinity. Proper screening and noise tigation-are recommended for any mechanical equipment to be placed on the building rooftop, or at ground level. 10. Economic effects on adjacent properties and the city as a whole. It is not anticipated that the location of a day care center on the subject property would have a significant adverse impact on the property valuesin the vicinity, or would impair the developability of these properties. On the contrary, the improvements to the property associated with the request for 5 C~nditional Use approval, including landscaping, would likely serve as a positive influence on an area of the City which has been experiencing deterioration and blight. It should also be noted that there is a greater need for day care centers in the City, as noted in the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The excerpt from this report pertaining to day care centers appears in the following section, entitled "Comprehensive Plan Policies". Comprehensive Plan Policies: The following Comprehensive Plan Policies are relevant to this Conditional Use application. "Provide a suitable living environment in all neighborhoods." (page 6) "Provide a range of land use types to accommodate a. full range of services and activities." (page 6) -. - "Eliminate existing and potential land use conflicts". (page 7) "Encourage the development of comRlimentary land uses." (page 7) The subject property falls within area 2, Sub-area B of the Comprehensive Plan. One of the provisions of Sub-area B is to encourage, infill development (item 43, page 23). This section of the plan notes that "the existence of a large number of vacant lots has tended to fragment the neighborhood, and the existence of properties covered with debris and trash constitutes a major environmental problem". In addition, this section of the plan "encourages private development of vacant lots along Seacrest Boulevard." Page 105 of the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and-'Appraisal Report notes the increased need for day care centers as follows: 3.3.4.4.2. Day Care Centers~ The number of female-headed households has'increased dramatically in Bo!rnton-Beach. In 1970, female-headed households constituted about 5% of all families, whereas in 1980 over 20% of all families were headed by women. The number of households where both parents workers also increased substantially. These demographic changes indicate that the need for day care centers has also increased substantially since 1970. The City's zoning regulations currently allow day-care centers only in R-2 and R-3 districts and.in commercial zoning districts. Consequently, the number of sites for day care centers is greatly restricted, and are often lacking in single-family neighborhoods, where the demand is greatest. Couc!usions/Recommendations: The proposed use and development of the property would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and would be consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. Therefore, the Planning Department recommends that this Conditional Use application be approved subject to staff comments and recommendations as follows: BUILDING DEPARTMENT As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents: 1. Copies of the Unity of Title documents, unifying all lots under one ownership, should b? supplied. 2. Due to the configuration of the other lots on this block, this site has three 25 foot front setbacks, on the north, south and west sides of the site. Any fences or permitted walls in these setbacks are limited to a height of four feet, with a six foot height allowed throughout the rest of the site. 3. A utility easement should be dedicated to the City for the relocated water line. 4. Driveways on local streets should'be thirty feet back from the intersecting right-of-way lines. 5. Enclosure walls for dumpsters should be six-feet in height. 6. Show details on the handicapped ramps from the parking stalls to the building, as well as signs delineating the stalls reserved for the handicapped. 7. City Code requires parking stalls to be double striped with the car stop located two feet back .from the end of an t8 foot stall. 8. Extruded curbs should be~extended into the Subbase as per City Standards. In order to facilitate the building permit review process~ the following information should be provided at the time of submittal. 1. Any room designed for the gathering of 100 must meet the minimum code requirements for an under the Standard Building Code. 2. Heai~h Department approval is required. 3. Two sets of signed ~nd sealed construction plans with tests and energy compliance forms should be provided. people or more assembly occupanCY soil 7 FIRE DEPARt, tENT 1. Provide a fire hydrant to conform to subdivision requirements. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT t. Signs and pavement marking to be according to MOUTCD. 2. Extruded curb must be a minimum of 6" x 13 1/2". 4. A detail is required side of the building. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Sidewalk to run through parking lot ingress and egress. for the swale retention area on the west 1. Specify the minimum distance of the water main from the building. 2. On the sanitary service, specify a minimuml percent slope. VCP cleanouts at the property line, if lacking, cleanout at five (5) feet from the building, and materials used in construction. 3. Add a fire hydrant assembly to be within 200~feet of the furthest point on the building. 4. Provide a detail of the stucco buffer wall adjoining and crossing the water main. 5. Provide an easement for existing 4" water main. FORESTER/HORTICULTURIST 1. There should be a no~ation as to the type of~_~sgd and automatic irrigation system to be installed. 2. The landscape, plan does ~ot meet the requirements of revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan 1986" Pg. 4,5. The applicant should make landscape plan. the Addendum~ November 19~ these changes in his /lat CC: City Manager Technical Review Board Central File MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief Plans Inspector January 6, 1987 Site Plan Approval: Hi-Tech Centre As a condition of site plan approval, the following commenns should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant: 1. The office area per bay should not exceed one third of the total bay area. 2. The landscaped buffer along the north property line should be provided with a hedge. 3. The plans show conflicting details on handicapped accessibility to the building. 4. The overhangs on the east and west sides of the structure should not encroach into the building setback area. In order to facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided at the time of submittal: 1. Sewer and water flow ranes, calculated by a Florida registered engineer, should be provided in order to calculate capital facilities charges. 2. Engineering on the exnerior wood trusses should be provided~ 3. Table 400 of the 1985 Standard Building Code should be reviewed for compliance. 4. Energy Code compliance forms, soil tests, South Florida Water Management District approval, and sealed consnruction documents should be provided. 5. Separate permits are required for signage. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will insure a timely permitting process. DJ: bh Don J a e ge~j ~ ADDENDUM C-1 REPLY MESSAGE Fold At ( ~ ) TO Fit Grayarc Window Envelope # EW10P 'REORDER ITEM # F269 U SUBJECt: PLEASE REPLY TO ' R~EPLY DATE: ~Y't~-/f,J /Ox, SIGNED - ,< %~ATE: ADDENDUM C-2 SIGNED THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED HEHORRNOUM To: From: Date: Subject: Carmen Rnnunzia%o, Planning Direc%or%~ John R. Guidry, Director o~ U%ilities~ TRB Review - Hi-Tech Centre We can approve %his plan sub~ec~ to ~he {ollowing conditions: Speci{y that ail workmanship and materials {or water and sewer utilities are to meet the Ci%y'~ s~andard criteria. Speci{y a 1~ minimum slope on the sanitary service, with cleanouts at the proper%y line, a~ all bends, end {ive (5> {ee~ {rom the building. Irrigation will not be permitted with City water. Provide details on the source o{ irrige%ion ua%er. dmt ADDENDUM C-3 MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Lt. Dale S. Hammack Police Department January 7, 1987 Hi gh Tech Reference our discussion at the T.R.B. meeting on 6 January 1987, I recommend the following: 1. Provide lighting fixture details. t~t. Dale S. qammack Poli ce Department DH: as ADDENDUM C-4 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist January 7, 1987 Hi-Tech Centre Site Plan This memorandum is in reference to the landscape plan sub- mitted for the above project. The applicant should address the following: Those trees noted to have a clear trunk of six feet should be larger then eight feet in height at the time of planting. Hedge plants must be planted 24" on center, not 36" on center. The interior parking lot landscaping appears to be defi- cient in meeting the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. The choice of quirements of Plan Addendum, landscape materials does not meet the re- the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive November 19, 1986"~pg. 4,5. The appli- cant should make these changes in his landscape plan. 5. There should be a hedge planted along the rear property line between the adjacent property and this project site. Kevin-- J.~ Hallahan '~ KJH:ad ADDENDUM C-5 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief Plans Inspector January 8th, 1987 SITE PLAN APPROVAL HUNTERS RUN - TRAGT I As a condition of site-plan approval, the following commenvs should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant. 2ccurately locate all structures and amenities on the site. Deliniate any anticipated pool or screen enclosure areas for the individual units, and show dimensions between the units. 2. Show details of the street lighting. The parking lo~ for the recreavion area shold be included in the same phase as the recreation buildings. Buildings in this area should be constructed at the established minimum finished floor elevation or else flood proofed below this elevation. A handicapped parking stall should be provided with accessibility to all co~non facilities. Site-lighting should be shown for this area, and a fence is required around the pool and deck area. Details on the masonry entrance walls should be provided, along with a typical detail of the dumps~er slab and enclosure. The con~osition chart on the site-plan does no~ agree with the phase numbers plan. In order ~o facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided at the time of submittal: 1. Soil tests, energy compliance forms, and South Florida Waver Managemenv District approva~ should be provided. The recreation area requires Health Depar~men~ approval. Pool should be designed by a Florida registered engineer, with sewer and water flow raves supplied for the bath house and amenities. 3. Buildings should comply with Ta~ le 600 of the 1985 Standard Building Code for exterior wall fire ratings and percenv of allowable openings. Please Note 1. Street names and unit numbers require approval from the Building, Police and Fire Deparvments. 2. Play musv be recorded ~rior ~o obtaining permits. The applicant's promp~ ~ompliance with the preceding con~nents will insure a timely permitting process. /fs D'on~Ja~? -' ADDENDUM D-1 P.O ~o~44 REPLY MESSAGE Ha~ord. CT 06104 FROM PLEASE REPLY TO · ~REPLY ~,~ATE: ADDENDUM D-2 SIGNED THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM January 7, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Site Plans, Tract I-1 & I-2, Hunters Run Comments: Site plans will be complete when complete development plans to accompany the preliminary plat are submitted showing all construction details for paving, drainage, parking lots and utilities. TAC/ck Attach. ADDENDUM D-3 ~EMORBNOUM To; From: Sub~ec%: Carmen ~nnunzia%o, Planning Direc%or ~ / John ~. Guidr¥, Dirac%or o~ U%ili%ia January S, ~987 TRB Revieu - Hun%ers Run POD I We cmn approve ~hie plan, eub~ec% %o %he Following condi%~ons: Engineering drauings mu~% be provided, indicating %he ~ollouing: 1. Clari~y axis%lng rs, proposed u%ili%ies. Clearly iden%i~y axis%- lng u%ili%ies %ha% are to be removed or abandoned. 2. Provide Pull ~e%ails on mil wa%er and eewer lines in ~he POD. ADDENDUM D-4 MEMORANDUM Planning Director Forester/Horticulturist January 7, 1987 Hunters Run - Tract I Site Plan The following is in refsrence to the landscape plan submitted for the above project. The landscape plan must meet the requirements of the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986", pg. 4,5. The lake areas on the tract must also meet the requirements of the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986", pg. 5,6A. The applicant must also submit a survey in conjunction with the tree survey which meet the requirements of the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986", pg. 5,12A. Kevin J.~Ha~lahan ~t~ KJH: ad ADDENDUM D-5 STAFF COMMENTS SUTTON PLACE SITE PLAN Building Department: Fire Department: Engineering Department: Utilities Department: Police Department: See attached memo. See attached memo.~_ See attached memo. See attached memo. See attached memo. parking detail including double- curb stops and handicapped parking details. ~'2-~'Entrance signagew~Ii require separate site plan approvals-as details have n~ been provided with this ForeSter/Horticulturist: submission. See attached memo. ADDENDUM E MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief - Plans Review ~^~ January 7th, 1987 -'u~¢TSITE PLAN APPROVAL: SUTTON PLACE As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents by ~he applicant: 1. Accurately locate the buildings and a~enities on a plot plan or layout survey. 2. Parking lot lighting does not comply with the minimum recommended average levels of one foot candle. The type of construction, according ~o Chapter Six of the 1985 Standard Building Code, should be indicated on the plans. The buildings mus~ also comply with Table 400, S.B.C., w~th respec~ to the area requirements. If buildings ~re classified as Type VI, under the Standard Building Code, they would be required ~o be fully sprinkled. Show finished floor elevations for all structures in compliance with the minimum elevations established by South Florida Water Managemenv District. 5. The recreation area should be handicapped accessible, and a parking stall should be provided for this purpose. 6. Details should be provided for a typical dumps~er pad and enclosure. 7. The pool and deck area require a fence and site lighting, if night use is anticipated. 8. Details of parking lot striping and curbing around landscaped areas adjacent ~o parking stalls should be provided. In order ~o facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided ay the time of submittal. 1. Construction in the City right-of-way on S.W. 19th Avenue would require permits f~om.,~he City Engineering Department. 2. Tenant separation should be detailed and comply with Section 403.2, S.B.C. 3. Soil tests, Energy Code Compliance forms, and SoUth Florida Water Management District approval. 4. Buildings should comply with Table 600, S.B.C. for exterior Wall fire ratings, and percent of allowable openings. The pool and facilities are required to have Health Department approval. Sewer and Water flow rates should be provided by a Florida registered engineer, and the pool should be d~signed by an engineer. 6. Street names and unit numbering system should have the approval of the Building, Police, and Fire Departments. ADDENDUM E-1 Page II ?. All doors within dwelling units, with thee~ception of closet doors, should be a minimum of 29" in the clear. 8. All signage requires separate permits. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding con~nents will insure a timely permitting process. REPLY MESSAGE DATE:/' PLEASE REPLY TO ~ DATE: Item # F269 © Wheeler Grou[3 Inc. 197S~'~ SIGNED ADDENDUM E-2 THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM January 7, 1987 TO: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: Site Plans for Sutton Place Comments: 1. Inlet structures shall be placed in grassy swale areas and/or dry grassy pond areas to comply with the sub- division regulations. 2. Cross-section thru lake should show one to four bank slope from control elevation to two feet below. 3. Signing and pavement marking to be according to MOUTCD. 4. Memo from Bill Flushing dated January 2, 1987 is included herewith. TAC/ck Attach. Tom Clark ADDENDUM E-3 TO: Tom Clark FROM: Bill Fiusbing RE: Sutton P!ace The following discrepancies should 1. 2. 3. be noted: Parking space and car stop details are required. Curb detail and curb location is required. Opening in bottom of catch basin should be covered with a one half inch screen mesh. Catch basins should be relocated to grassy swale areas~ they should not be in paved areas. Bill F1 usLing CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ADDENDUM E-4 MEMORRNDUM To; From: Date: Subj act: Carmen Rnnunziato, Planning Director John R. Guidry, Oirector o{ Utilitie~ Sanuary S, TRB Review -Sutton Place We can approve this plan, subject to the {ollowing conditione: R dry detention basin has been superimposed over the utility easement along Congress Rvenue. Rt the proposed elevations, water and Force mains may be exposed. Said design is not acceptable. Relocate dumpster pads out o{ utility easements. Recalculate the pressure drop in the on-site water Main usin~ the actual required {ire {low. 4. Manholes are %0 have a ~0" minimum opening. S= Indicate the slope, materials and cleanouts on all sanitary serv3ces, hdd a note that theee are to be privately ouned and maintained. Some oF the trees within utility easements are not suitable species. Provide an agreement {rom ~he owner ~o %he e{~ect that the City will not be responsible {or replacing landscaping that i5 damaged as a result o{ Maintenance activities within easements. 8. The existing gravity sewer that is to be abandoned must be cut. plugged and {illed. Please note %his on %he plane. dmt ADDENDUM E-5 MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden P1 anni n g Department Lt. Dale S. Hammack Poli ce Department January 7, 1987 Sutton Place Reference our discussion at the T.R.B. meeting on 6 January 1987, I recommend the following: That the emergency access from Sutton Place to Golf Road be closed to public useage with a locked gate. 2. That traffic control details be orovided. 3. That the street lighting be photo cell activated. DH:as Lt. Dale S. Hammack Police Department AE~ENDUM E-6 MEMORANDUM Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist January 7, 1987 Sutton Place Site Plans The following comments should be addressed by the applicant in reference to the landscape plan. The landscape plan must meet the requirements of the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986",pg. 4,5. The lake areas on the project must also meet the require- ments of the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986", pg. 5,6A. This will disallow it to be used as a "beach". 3. Applicant apply to City to landscape median. 4. Applicant submit additional plans showing berm and landscape along perimeter of property. Kevin J.~Hallahan ~ KJH:ad ADDENDUM E-7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, DISTANCE OF 1783.92 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF WEST, A DISTANCE OF 53.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CONGRESS AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE WITH A BEARING OF SOUTH, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CONGRESS AVENUE; SAID'LINE LYING 53.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 480.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF WEST, A DISTANCE OF 370.00 FEET; THENCE WITH A BEARINGOF SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 111.28 FEET; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF WEST, A DISTANCE OF 380.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SUBDIVISION ?MMIT PLAT NO. 1, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 36, PAGE 48-51, OF THE PUBLI~ RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE~WITN A BEARINGOF NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SUMMIT PLAT NO. 1, A DISIANCE OF 229.26 FEET; THENCE WITH A BEARING OF EAST, A DISTANCEOF 3~O.O0~FEET; THENCE WI~H~ASEAR~NG OF NORTH A DISTANCE OF 391.09 FEET; THENCE. WI.TH A BEARING OF SOUTH85° 30' 30" ~ EAST, A DISTANCE OF 371.14 PEET MO~E OR LESS TO T~E POINT OF BEGINNINg. CONTAINING 6.2~06 ACRES, MORE OR bESS AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD. ATTACHMENT A ADDENDUM F STAFF COMMENTS WXEL BROADCASTING FACILITY SITE PLAN Building Department: Engineering Department: Utilities Department: Police Department: Planning Department: Recreation Department: Forester/Horticulturist: See attached memo. See attached memo. See attached memo. See attached memo. Sheet A-1 refers to sheet A-5A for the dumpster detail. However, there is no sheet A-5A. The required screening for a dumpster is a six-foot concrete block wall (3 sides) with stucco finish to match the building. The dumpster is to be placed on a minimum 10' x 10' slab. See attached memo. See attached memo. ADDENDUM G-1 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato City Planner Don Jaeger Chief Plans Inspector January 8th, 1987 SITE PLAN REVIEW WXEL BROADCASTING FACILITY As a cendition of site-plan approval, the following co~ents should be incorporated into the related documentsby the applicant: The type of construction, according to chapter 6 of the 1985 Standard Building Code ehould be indicated on the plans. The building must also comply with Table 400, S.B.C., for a~a requirements. Changes in elevation of the sidewalk at the turn-out should be ramped for handicapped accessibility. Accessibility from the handicapped stall at the front of the building should be provided to the main envrance. Details on the dumpster slab ~nd enclosure should be provided. Curbing is required a~acenv to parking stalls in areas where landscaping is provided. Wheel-stops for 18' parking stalls should be installed 2' from the sidewalk. (See note 2-108 on Sheet C-1) 7. Four handicapped ~arking stalls are required. In order to facilitate the building permit review process, be provided a~ the time of submittal: 1. 2. the following information should A County vurn-out permit is required. Separate permits ~re required ~or paving, drainage, excavations, fill, signs and fences. 3. Engineering on the satellite dishes and microwave antenna should be provided. These dishes should be screened on three sides with a 6' wall or hedge. 4. Soil tests, energy code compliance forms, and South Florida Water Management District approval should be provided. The applicant's prompv compliance with the preceding co~ents will insure a timely permitting process. /fs D e AD~ENDUM G-2 MEMORANDUM January 8, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer WXEL Site Plans Comments: 1. Signzng and pavement marking to be according to MOUTCD. Relocation of city irrigation pipes to the south and east limits of the property is required, along with the easements necessary. Irrigation lines could go in the same easement with other utilities. TAC/ck Tom Clark ADDENDUM G-3 MEMORRNDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Carmen Rnnunzia%o, Planning Director John ~. Guidry, Director of U%ilities~ TRB Review - WXEL We can approve the re{erenced plan conditionally upon the following changes being mede: The City will only be responsible ~or constructing %he water main along Congress Rvenue, the lift station, and %he 6" force main. The City will include a 12" x 6" tee and a 6" gate valve at the appropriate locations in the water main along Congress Rvenue. WXEL uill be responsible for paying their share o~ these costs based on the percent capacity used. The on-site gravity sewer and water system must be installed by W×EL. The proposed li{t station must be on e 30' z 30' site deeded %o the City, If this is not feasible, the lift s~ation will be constructed on City property, eno an easement ~xtending southward across the WXEL property will be required. Provide fire {low calculations for this building. Provide details on ail utility construction, including the sanitary service. Rdo no~e that ell construction is to meet the City's standard criteria. S. City water is not to be used for irrigation. The actual source irrigation water is unclear. Please clarify. C ADDENDUM G-4 MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Lt. Dale S. Hammack Police Department January 7, 1987 WXEL Reference our discussion at the T.R.B. meeting on 6 January 1987, I recommend the following: 1. Pole mounted exterior lighting must be photo cell activated. DH: as Police Department ADDENDUM G-5 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato ~A,, January 8, 1987 Planning Director John Wildner -,,,j,~ WXEL Broadcasting Facility Parks Superintendent The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the plans for the WXEL Broadcasting Facility. The following recommendations are made: The existing City irrigation line which runs along the southern boundary of this property and along the northern boundary of the adjacent property shall be relocated in the proposed utilities easement. 2. The electric power line which serves the irrigation system shall also be relocated in this same easement. The easement shall also include the site of the existing irrigation pump (located in the rear of the property on the lake). Ail adjustments to the existing irrigation system shall be made at WXEL expense. Access to these City facilities shall be provided as required for maintenance, etc. ohn Wildner CC: Charles Frederick, Director Recreation & Park Department Bill Flushing File JW:ad ADDEMDUM G-6 ,MEMORANDUM Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist January 7, 1987 WXEL Broadcasting Site Plan Facility _ The landscape plan submitted for the above project should address the following comments: The hedge material along Congress Avenue must be 36" in heiqht at the time of planting. The species selected for the landscape plan do not meet the requirements of the revised "Bo~nton Beach Compre- hensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986", pg. 4,5. The applicant should review this document and make the necessary changes. There appears to be vegetation planted on top of the utility easement which should be selected as to not interfere with the functioning of any underground utilities. ~vin J. ~Hallahan KJH:ad ADDENDUM G-7 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don 3aeger Chief Plans Inspector January 6, 1987 Site Plan Modification Bethesda Memorial Hospital (Directional and Information Signage) As a condition of this site plan approval, the following comments should be'addressed: Planning and Zoning Board and City Council approval is required due to omissions in the Sign Ordinance which fails to address Public Usage or Planned Unit Developmenn zoning. 2. Sign structures should not be constructed in utility easements. These easements should be shown on the site plan. The sign in the right-of-way on S.W. 23 Avenue creates a visibility problem for traffic turning on to the roadway. If it is necessary for this sign to be constructed in the right-of-way, the TRB recommends moving the sign closer to the property line, and a license agreement would have to be consummated between the hospital and the City. In order to facilitate the building permit review process, the following information should be provided an the time of submittal: 1. Ail signs should be designed to withstand a 50 pound per square foot wind load. 2. Ail signs over 40 square feet should be designed by a Florida registered engineer. The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding commenns will insure a timely permitting process. DJ:bh Don Jaeger~I f ADDENDUM H-1 MEMOR~NOUM Subj ec~: CapMen Rnnunzi=%o. Planning Oire¢%o~ John R, Guidry. Oipec%or o{ Utili~i~ TRB Review - Be%he,da Si~e Plan (signage) Our commen~s ere as ?ollo~s: Tine main entrance sign must be ~rom the sanitary sewer. Please indicate %his on ~he plan. installed at least ~ive (5) ~eet ADDENDUM B-2 MEMORANDUM Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Lt. Dale S. Hammack Police Department January 7, 1987 Be thes da Hospital Reference our discussion at the T.R,B. m~eting on 6 January 1987, I recommend the following: Sign on S.W. 23rd Ave. (Golf Road) must not obscure vision of vehicles exiting the hospital from East bound traffic o~ S.W. 23rd Ave. 2. All traffic control signs must conform to D.O.T. standards. Police Department DH: as ADDENDUM H-3 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist DATE January 7, 1987 Bethesda Memorial Hospital Site Plan Modification This memorandum is in reference to the landscape plan for the above project. The applicant should note if there will be any landscape materials planted around the base of any of the signs. If there will be landscape plantings, the choice of material must meet the requirements of the revised "Bo~nton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986",pg. 4,5. Tbs applicant should review these pages and make changes accordingly in the landscape plan. Kevin J. ~Hallahan KJH:ad ADDENDUM H-4 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Don Jaeger Chief Plans Inspector January 6, 1987 Site Plan Modification: Oakwood Square Shopping Center (Ciccio's Restaurant) As a condition of site plan approval, the following comments should be incorporated into the related documents: 1. Indicate the dimension from the property line to nhe building on the site plan, sheet A-1. 2. Show details of the handicapped ramp and handicapped accessibility at the building entrance. 3. Accurately locate the building on a site or plot plan. 4. Show details of the dumpster pad and enclosure. I~ order to facilitate the building permit review process, information should be provided at the time of submittal: the following 1. This use is classified as an assembly occupancy and as such, should meet all code requirements for this type of occupancy. 2. Board of Health approval is required. 3. Exit corridors requzre two hour walls and an automatically actuated supplemental light system. 4. Two copies of the soil tests, energy compliance forms, and South Florida Water Management District approval. 5. Signed and sealed plans for building construction. The applicant's prompn compliance with the preceding commenns will insure a timely permitting process. Don Jae~r f DJ:bh ADDENDUM I-1 ~EMOR~NOUM To: Fram: Da~e: Subject: Carmen Rnnunzia~o. Planning Director John R. Guidry, Director o~ U~ilitie~ January S~ 1987 TR8 Revieu - Oak~ood Square - Ciccio's Res%auran~ We can approve %hi~ plan subjec~ ~a %he {ollouing condition: Indicate %he loca%ion o~ ~he cleanou%, the ma%erials, and slope on %he sanitary service. dm~ ADDENDUM I-2 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato ~lanning Director Ke~in J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist January 7, 1987 Cakwood Square Shopping Site Plan Modification Center C The following comments should be addressed by the applicant in reference to the landscape plan. The landscape plan should show a 36" hedge planted along all road right-of-ways where there are parking stalls. Ail interior parking lot trees must have a clear trunk of 5' at time of planting. 3. The landscape plan does not mset the requirements of the revised "Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Addendum, November 19, 1986~,pg. 4,5. The applicant should make changes in the landscape plan to meet the requirements. ,. ~ ~ Kev~n J. Hallahan KJH:ad ADDENDUM I-3