R91-034RESOLOT O R91-J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
SUPPORTING A GRANT APPLICATION OF PALM
BEACH COUNTY FOR A SHORE PROTECTION
PROJECT IN OCEAN RIDGE.
WHEREAS, Palm Beach County has submitted an
esignated DNR Reference File Number PRO-PB-92-2
,f Florida; and
application
to the State
WHEREAS, said application requests funding for a shore
~rotection project in Ocean Ridge south of the South Lake
~0rth Inlet.
THE CITY COMMISSION
of the
stated
public
City of
support
in the
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY
DF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the City City Commission
~ity of Boynton Beach, Florida supports the above
project to bring sand to the beach and feels the
interest will be served by said project.
Section 2. That the City Commission of the
3oynton Beach, Florida urges that all legislators
;he project in the Governor's recommended budget
~mount of $1,038,375.00.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this ~ da~ of /2//~ ,
L991. /
, / -
c6mmissioner -
con~issioner
Commi s s~oner
ATTEST:
( Corporat9 .Seal
SHORE
3AC/r 2/27/91
Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association
864 EAST PARK AVENUE * TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 3'.2301 · STAN TAIT. EXECLq'IVE DIRECTOR * '1904~ 222-7677
February 11, 1991 REC~[ VED
~-~ ~VERNOR CHILES DRVEILS MIS BUDGET RECO~EWDATIONS FOR FY1991-92:
SO~ MD NEWS AND SOME B~2 NEWS FOR FLORIDA'S BEACH PRO(3R~
FEB t 5 1991
CiTY ~ANAGER'$ OFFICE
Governor hawton Chiles released today his budget recommendations for the coming year.
The good news is that he identified beach preservation as one of his "highlighted" and favored
programs.
He asks the Legislature to appropriate $5.? million for "beach planning, protection and
renourishment." It breaks down this way:
* $2 million for inlet sand transfer and inlet management planning
* $3.7 million for beach restoration and renourishmunt
The very fact that the Governor wants to fund beach planning and construction programs is good news.
I~ didn't start out that way. ,~In fact, our first indication was that the Governor's budget office
might ax all beach project mondy as part of their aggressive cost-cutting effort. However, FSBPA's
lobbyist stepped in and persuaded the budget staff that beach funding should be a high priority for
Governor Chiles. They agreed. And we won a big tactical victory.
WHA~ DOES IT ALL MEAN? A MUCH MORE DIFFICULT LOBBYING JOB FOR FSBPA
~he not-so-good news is that proposed funding is way down from last year.
The 1990 Legislature appropriated $16 million for beach projects. That's $10 million more than
Governor Chiles proposes for the coming year.
Despite the proposed reduction in beach spending, we will enter the 1991 legislative session with a
big leg up, The Governor has identified beaches as one of his favored programs, one that deserves
share of the state funding pie. That gives us an opening advantage with the Legislature which
traditionally begins its budget deliberations with the Governor's budget as [ts starting point.
~here is a chance that the Legislature can be persuaded to add on to the Governor's proposal,
especially when it comes to beach nourishment projects that rank high on DNR's priority list.
But it won't be easy. We are facing the tightest state budget squeeze in modern history. It will
take a monumental lobbying program on the part of FBBPA to get more money for beaches than Governor-
Chiles' $5.7 million recommendation.
DIVISION OF BEACHES AND SHORES COMES OUT A WlMNER
Governor Chiles went out of his way to be nice to the Division of Beaches and Shores. Be
demonstrated this several ways:
While cutting thousands of job positions throughout state government,
Chiles spared two new and as yet unfilled positions in the beach management program.
He also spared the Division from themundatory 5% cutback in
operations that virtually every other agency in state government must make.
While the beach program was cleurly favored, the Governor recommended some hard licks against the
Department of Natural Resources as a whole. Be wants to lop 130 of DNR's 2,588 current staff.
Where he bore down the hardest -- as promised -- was in DRR's bureaucracy. The office of Executive
Director and its Division of Administrative Services currently has 198 employees. Chiles proposes
to cut them to 53. Positions lost would include lawyers, planners, policy-makers and personnel
staff.
HOWI~d~ OF A LOBBYINg ~EN6E ~ WE FACE IN THE 1991 ~6I$~?URE? CONSIDER THIS: -
The Governor has recommended $5.? million for beachand inlet projects for next year.
Below is the DNR budget reque~{J~f~;$2~millinn forthe coming~year :~ +<< ~=As.you ~ cansee, a lot of good
projects will be cuu if we don',t mount a monumenually successful lobbying campaign in the upcoming
legislative session,
Beach Funding Re
Project Name
BEACH RESTORATION
Venice Beacr~
Ocean Ridge Beach
Longboat Key
Sub Total
BEACH NOURISHMENT
N. Reamgton Beach/Redington Shores
INLET SAND TRANSFER/INL --T MANAGEMENT
South:Lake-Worih Inlet Sand Byp~ ssing Operation
Lake Worth Inlet Sar~ Bypassing ~ )potation
Lake Worth Inlet Sand Bypassing ,mpr(~veman[s
Sebastian Inlet Sand Bypass Plat: Design & Sand Transfer
Boca Raton Inlet Feeoer Beach P~oject
Hiflsboro In]et Sand Transfer Proj~c[
Port Everglades Inlet Managemen Plan Stuby
Stump Pass Inlet Management Plan Stuoy
Redtish Pass/Blind Pass Inlet Management Study
Venice Inlet Management Plan
Gordon Pass Sand Transfer
_ Statewide nJet Se.od Transfer/!n;~tMan~me~tp{~-~ning
Sub Tota~
DUNE RECONSTR UCTION/I ROTECTiON
Santa Rosa Island Dune Protecti:m Project
Indian Rocks Beach Dune Overv~,alk Project
Sunny Isles Dune Reconstruct~o~ Proje, ct
Brevard County Dune Prctectior~ Proie~t
Okaloasa County Dune Protection Proj~ect
Bahia Honda State Recreation ~une Project
Palm Beach Coumy Dune Program
Key Biscayne Beach Vegetatio~
Daytona Shores Dune Restorat~)n Project
Indian River County Dune Prote,:tion Project
Naples Dune Protection
Nassau County Dune Walkove! ~
Escambia County Dune Proted on
Venice Dune Cons]ruction
Sub Total
PROJECT RELATED STUJ tIES
Park Shore/Naples Beach Resioration & Design Stud,~
Charlotte County Environmen~l & Sand Source Stud;,
Vanderbilt Beach Environment~d Sand Source & Des~!)n Study
Lido Key Beach Sand Search
.~o,,a Cove Beach Ano Dune fJonitoring
Jupiter/CarJin Beach Monitorin I
Brevard County Beach Erosio~;Cnntrol Program Study
Venice Beach Environmental ~[ Shdreline Monitoring
Sub Total
STRUCTURAL AND MISC~=LLANEOUS
Hollywood Beach - Beac~ Hazard Removal
Naples Beach Hazard Ramov; ,I
Key Biscayne Beach Hazard ~'emoval
Fl. Lauderdale Beach Parking ~acJlJty
Sub Total
TOTAL
quest For FY1991-92
Estimated Coe~
Federal State Local
Total
,$4.863.540 $1.353,508 ,~,285,352 $6.502,400
1,355,O00 1,038,375 476,625 2,870,000
620,299 2,864,160 12.668,R64 16,152,623
$6,838,839 $5,256,043 $13~30,141 $25,525,023
875,000 656,250 218,750 1,750,000
0 123,750 41,250 165,000
0 120,000 4VD,OOO 160,000
2,00U .000 375,000 125,000 2,500,000
0 669,750 223,250 893,000
0 1,395,000 465,000 1,860,000
0 1,481,250 493,75C 1,975,000
0 99,750 33,250 133,000
0 63,750 21,250 85,000
0 199,500 66,500 266,000
0 120,000 40,000 160,000
86,250 64~687 21,563 172.500
2,000,000 2,00(3,00b 0 4,00U,000
$4,086,250 $6,712,437 $1,570,813 $12,36%500
0 376.875 125,625 502,500
0 450,00 150,000 600.000
0 1,031,250 343.750 1,375.000
0 768,940 256,313 1,025.253
0 41,250 13,750 55,000
0 21,500 0 21~500
0 154,500 51,500 206,000
0 315,000 13~000 445,000
0 269,749 8~916 359.665
0 244,575 .81,525 326,100
0 8,040 2.680 10,720
0 18.750 6~5g 25,000
0 12,000 3,000 15.000
0 262,500 87,500 350,000
$3,974,929 $1.341,809 $5,316,738
523,867 174,622 698,489
300,000 100,000 400,000
153,383 51,12~ 204,511
75,000 25,00£ 100,000
88,125 29,375 117,500
90,000 30,000 120,000
26,250 8,750 35~00
282.000 188.000 470,000
$1,538,625 $606,875 $2,145,500
0 562,500 187,500 750,000
0 10,500 3,500 14,000
0 45,000 15,000 60,000
0 2~94,500 4,431,500 6,926,000
0 $3,112,500 $4,637.500 $7,750,000
$11,800,089
$21,250,784
$21,805,888 $54,856,761