Loading...
Minutes 06-10-86MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 1986 AT 7:30 P.M. PRESENT: Walter "Marry" Trauger Chairman Garry winter vice Chairman Marilyn G. Huckle Simon Ryder George deLong John Pagliarulo Robert Wandelt William Schultz, Alternate Tim Cannon, Senior city Planner Jim Golden Assistant City Planner ABSENT: Norman Gregory, Alternate Chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. The meeting proceeded with Chairman Trauger introducing the members of the Board. He recognized the presence in the audience of the Vice Mayor Carl zimmerman, Councilman Ezell Hester, City Manager Peter L. Cheney, Executive vice President of the Greater Boynton Beach Chamber of Commerce Owen Anderson, Councilwoman Dee zibelli, Tim Cannon, Senior City Planner, Jim Golden, Assistant City Planner, and the Recording Secretary. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES Meeting of Tuesday, May 20, 1986 There being no corrections and additions, Mr. Ryder ~ accept the minutes, seconded by Mr. Pagliarulo. The carred 7-0. Meeting of Thursday,_May 22, 1986 Mrs. Huckle noted on Page 24, it states "if 80 inche of water ~ atom hits the earth's service." It should read "if 80 lnc~-~ of water annually hits the earth's service." ~oved to motion - 1 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 There being no further corrections or additions, Mrs. Huckle moved to accept the minutes as corrected, seconded by Mr. Ryder. The motion carried 7-0. Meeting_of Thursday, M__ _ay 29, 1986 Mrs. Huckle noted on Pages 12 and 13, under the county Thoroughfare Plan, it states 1-95 is 120 feet wide and on another page, Mr. Annunziato states 1-95 is 300 feet. She asked if there was a discrepancy. Mr. Cannon explained the figure for 120 feet applies to the arterial and major collector streets under the county Thoroughfare Plan. The right-of-way for 1-95 is about 300 feet. Mr. Cannon stated, if referring to 1-95, it should be 300 feet. There being no further corrections or additions, Mr. Ryder moved to accept the minutes as corrected, seconded by Mr. Pagliarulo. The motion carried 7-0. ANNOUNCEMENTS ed the PUBLIC HEARING is scheduled for r Cannon announc .... ~ ~ ~h meetin will M . _ ..... '_~ ~.~n p M. Tne su~3~ .... e . g __~ June 12, £~ a~.-&~- -2. ~ ~m~ndment and Rezonlng, ~u be the woolbrignt ~uD L~d Us ....... Plan to an Application to the Amendment to the Comprehensive provide a railroad crossing immediately north of the PCD. There are two additional Comprehensive Plan amendments to be addressed on June 12, 1986. Mr. Cannon apprised the members the first hearing on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report is scheduled for Monday, June 16, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. The second hearing on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report will be June 23, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Cannon stated he distributed to the Board members a compilation of*all the comments generated by the Board during the workshop sessions on the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. He noted the memorandum dated June 10, 1986, included Attachments A, B, C, and D. Mr. Cannon explained Attachment A contains various comments made by the Board members during the workshops. In addi- tion, it includes a compilation of the comments offered by the city staff. *most-see minutes of July 8,~ 1986 - 2 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Attachment B is a breakdown of acreage and dwelling units, which the Board had requested. Attachment C is a land use analysis of the property along the east side of U. S. I. Attachment D is the original Evaluation and Appraisal Report for the Energy Element, which the Energy Coordinator recom- mended the Board review. Mr. Cannon suggested the Board members read the referenced materials before the meeting on June 16, 1986. In addition, Mr. Cannon distributed to the Board members correspondence he received from the various Government agen- cies and one organization in the City concerning the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. COMMUNICATIONS None. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS A. SUBDIVISIONS PREAPPLICATION PROJECT NAME: AGENT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Rollingwood Patricia F. Ramudo, P.E. West side of South Seacrest Boulevard, across from Gulfstream Boulevard. Request for preapplication approval for a previously sub- mitted R-1AAB subdivision to allow for an increase in single - 3 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 family lots from 52 to 54 and to modify the location of public rights-of-way and access and utility easements. Mr. Golden stated this is a resubmission of a previously submitted subdivision request. The preliminary plat for the original submission was approved in March, 1985. The final plat was never recorded from the original concept. This presentation will cover both the preapplication and the master plan which were submitted as one document, and this presentation will address both concurrently. Location In regard to location, Mr. Golden stated the Rollingwood Subdivision is located between Swinton Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard, across from Gulfstream Boulevard. The parcel is approximately 15.4 acres in size. The proposed access to the subdivision will occur by way of a single, 50 foot wide local street, which will link Seacrest on the east to Swinton Avenue on the west. Utilities Mr. Golden advised an 8 inch water main is to be provided within the right-of-way for the 50 foot local street. The proposed 8 inch main will connect the existing 6 inch line along Swinton Avenue with the proposed 12 inch main along Seacrest Boulevard, which will be extended southward from the vicinity of Mission Hill Road. This will be extended down to Gulfstream Boulevard to provide future service in that area. On the Staff Comment Sheet, Mr. Golden noted there was a comment next to Utilities Department, which states, "Memo to be distributed." Mr. Golden stated there would be no memo from the Utilities Department. The applicant has worked out an agreement with the Utilities Department concerning the provisions for sewer service. The agreement reached deletes the easement between Lots 12, 13, 18, and 19, and requires maintainance of the sanitary source system along the 50 foot right-of-way of the local street. In addition, some elevations will be raised toward the east of the pro- perty. - 4 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Mr. Golden advised the Technical Review Board recommends approval of this project subject to staff comments. The staff comments include a memorandum from the Forester regarding submission of the tree preservation plan which will be submitted with the preliminary plat document. Mr. Ryder questioned to what extent does this differ from the original one other than providing two more units, and is the layout generally the same as what was previously sub- mitted. Mr. Golden responded that the overall concept is essentially the same. However, they did increase the number of lots by two, and the general layout is somewhat dif- ferent. Mr. Ryder asked if the means of access were the same. Mr. Golden believed they were essentially the same, and did not differ substantially. He commented if they did, it was only small minor changes. Both the connectiononto Swinton Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard link up with 34th or 35th and form intersections at both the northeast and northwest cor- ners of the property. In response to Chairman Trauger's inquiry, Mr. Golden stated that in a regular shaped lot the required frontage is 60% of the normal frontage requirement for the relevant zoning district. For the R-1AAB, it would be 90 feet with 67½ feet measured at the building line. There is a second overlay which showed more clearly the building line. Concerning the lot referred by Chairman Trauger, Mr. Golden stated the building line would be measured where it cuts over to northwest and to the west. The building line would be measured about 10 feet in and across the front for the required 67½ feet. He advised that has been resolved, and they do have the required frontage. Chairman Trauger remarked they were unusual looking lots, and wondered if it were possible to fit a driveway. Mr. Ryder questioned if the ownership changed. Mr. Golden believed the ownership had changed, but was not certain since he was not here at the time of the original approval. - 5 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Mr. deLong verified the density allowed is 4.8 dwellings an acre, and this proposed density, 3.51, is below that con- siderably. The two lots make it less than .09. Mr. deLong concluded that the density proposed is still below the called-for density for that zone. Applicant Patricia F. Ramudo, P. E. Project Engineer A1 Cook Trimark Homes Mr. Cook advised Mr. Ryder there has not yet been a change in ownership. He stated his contract is specific. There is an intention to change ownership, and the contract calls for them to close. Mr. Cook stated he intends to develop the property, and that is the reason why the change is being undertaken. Mr. Ryder asked if Mr. Cook was familiar with the staff com- ments. Mr. Cook responded he had no problems with the staff comments, and he agreed with them. Mr. Cook stated he would be the builder of most of the houses and intended to sell a few lots. In response to Chairman Trauger's question, Mr. Cook stated he would expect to retail the homes at approximately $135,000 to 150,000. Mr. Winter asked when the development of the houses was expected to begin. Mr. Cook responded with the schedule they are on now with the City's framework, he would expect the final plat in August or September, and that time, they would be in a position to obtain a development permit and start improvements. Mr. Ryder moved that the request for preapplication approval for a previously submitted R-1AAB subdivision to allow for an increase in single family lots from 52 to 54 and to modify the location of public rights-of-way and access and utility easements be approved, subject to staff comments, seconded by Mr. Winter. - 6 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Chairman Trauger stated it has been moved and seconded that the Board approve the request for the preapplication appro- val for the previously submitted R-1AAB subdivision to allow for an increase in single family lots from 52 to 54 and to modify the location of public rights-of-way and access and utility easements, subject to staff comments The motion carried 7-0. - MASTER PLAN PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Rollingwood Patricia F. Ramudo, P.E. Trimark Homes I, Limited West side of South Seacrest Boulevard, across from Gulfstream Boulevard. Request for master plan approval for a previously submitted R-1AAB subdivision to allow for an increase in single-family lots from 52 to 54 and to modify the location of public rights-of-way and access and utility easements. Mr. Cannon stated the Master Plan and identical. Preapplication are Mrs. Huckle moved to approve the request for Master Plan approval, seconded by Mr. Ryder. Chairman Trauger stated the Board moved to approve the request for the Master Plan approval for the previously sub- mitted R-1AAB for Rollingwood Subdivision to allow for an increase in single-family lots from 52 to 54 and to modify the location of public rights-of-way and access.and utility easements. The motion carried 7-0. - 7 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 SITE PLANS 1. PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Boynton Square Shopping Center Edward Duggan, HSW investments Harold S. Wenal, Trustee Congress Avenue at Old Boynton Road, southeast corner. Request for site plan approval to construct a 169,510 square foot shopping center including a super- market, a home improvement store, and 4 outlots on 15.22 acres. Mr. Golden advised Harold Wenal holds a contract to purchase this property which is owned by Montgomery ward Development Corporation. The property is bordered on the west by Congress Avenue, on the north by Old Boynton Road, on the east by Hoadley Road, and on the south by the Lake Worth Drainage District L-24 Canal. tated u on receipt of the staff comments from Mr. Golden s P ..... ~Ars the Planning Department the Technical Review ~oara m~m~ , i mments and arrived at the decision that the rev~ ~e~ ~omments pertaining to thi~ pr~jec~_~d the an es requlrea Lo ~.~ ..... 1 ~ . number of ch g ..... =A ~ neveloDment regulations greater conformance wl~n un= ~ ~ ~- such that and the Technical Review Board requirements, were the plan was not ready to go before the Board for approval. Therefore, the Planning Department's recommendation is that this request be tabled pending redesign of the site plan according to the staff comments. However, the applicant requested this project be presented to the Board for their review and comment pending redesign and incorporation of any comments. Therefore, at the request of the Board, Mr. Golden will continue with the presentation of the site plan. Mr. Golden stated the applicant is attempting to get an idea if there are any additional items the Board would like to see incorporated into the site plan. - 8 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 In response to Mr. Ryder's inquiry, Mr. Golden stated the Murray Report was resubmitted, and a new set of comments will be issued with the revised site plan pertaining to the revised report. The Board members agreed to review the site plans with the applicant. Mr. Cannon displayed Overlay Number 2 on the screen for the Board's review. Mr. deLong remarked the charts, maps and graphic details the Board received for the last three meetings were not clear and difficult to follow. Mr. Golden stated in some cases, the quality of the original is bad, and in other cases, it is a photocopier problem. He stated he would bring this issue to the attention of the proper individual to resolve the problem. Mr. Golden proceeded with an overview of the project. Mr. Golden stated the proposed floor area for the shopping center is 169,510 square feet. Included in this total is a 35,000 square foot supermarket, a 16,800 square foot home improvement store, a nursery to the rear, and four outlots. Mr. Golden advised the outlots appear on the site plan overlay, but not on the floor plan overlay. At this point, Mr. Cannon displayed the site plan on the screen for the Board's review. Mr. Golden stated the outlots are not out parcels. They will be under unified control with the main shopping center and will be under the same ownership. The parking provided for the shopping center will exceed the Code requirements by 65 spaces. However, he pointed out the applicant submitted a preliminary revised site plan today, and some of the surplus parking was removed to provide for better access and additional landscaping, and still exceed the Code requirement. In regard to the access, Mr. Golden stated the main entrance to the shopping center will be located on Congress Avenue - 9 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 between the intersection of Old Boynton Beach Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard. The applicant will be required to bond the cost of signalization at the main entrance which will be constructed when warranted by the County Traffic Engineer. A secondary entrance, right turn in and right turn out only, will be provided at the southwest corner of the site, immediately north of the Chevron Station and the L-24 Canal. Driveways Mr. Golden advised two driveways will be provided onto Old Boynton Road. The west driveway will be located 180 feet from the intersection of Congress Avenue, and will be right turn in and right turn out only. He pointed out that the revised site plan provides for only one driveway onto Old Boynton Road. This is recommended by the applicant's traf- fic engineer, Dan Murray, and also was done in attempting to meet with staff comments regarding problems with the two driveways at that location. The one driveway has been made wider, it is more centrally located, and does allow for the right and left turn movements. The one driveway onto Old Boynton Road will be right and left turn in and out. Mr. Golden clarified although the plan showed two driveways, the revised plan provides for one driveway onto Old Boynton Road. With the one driveway, he noted hazards are reduced by not having two driveways located close together, and noted the intersection at the northwest corner of Building A was not designed properly with the west driveway. As indicated in the memorandum from the Planning Department, Mr. Golden stated there are several other interior driveways that do not align properly. The revised site plan, shown to the Planning Department today, does provide for proper alignment. Therefore, this comment has been accounted for. Architectural Design In regard to the architectural design for the shopping center, Mr. Golden stated there is a separate overlay which provides a typical elevation for the shopping center. It is proposed to be a one-story structure with the exception of the north-west portion, which is labeled as Building A on the - 10 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 site plan. This structure will be two stories in height. The shopping center will be CBS construction with a concrete tile roof. The proposed color scheme includes a tan stucco finish with an anodized black aluminum store front. The concrete tile roof will be mission red or a similar color. Tree Preservation As indicated in the memorandum from the Forester, the appli- cant is currently developing a tree preservation management plan that will address the future status and disposition of each tree on site. In addition, upon resubmission, the Planning Department is recommending that the applicant pro- vide a landscaped buffer along Hoadley Road, as well as a six foot high concrete block wall. Mr. Golden stated there would also be a row of trees along the wall with a canopy above the wall to provide for additional screening for the rear loading areas and the trailers which will be parked behind the shopping center. The screen is to be tractor trailer high in order to conceal the rear loading areas and trailers from view of the residents on the east side of Hoadley Road. Mr. Golden clarified that the houses on Hoadley Road will not have a direct view of the rear of the buildings since the details of the activities will be screened. Infrastructure Mr. Golden stated the existing water and sewer system in the vicinity and the improvements proposed by the applicant will be adequate to serve the shopping center, subject to the comments from the Utilities Department. There is an additional memo from the Fire Department, distributed prior to the meeting, which indicates the volume of water required for fire protection purposes. Mr. Golden pointed out the nature and quantity of the comments dictate this project be tabled pending redesign and resubmission, and will be forwarded to the Technical Review Board for review. Mr. Golden referenced a memo from the Lake Worth Drainage District pertaining to an easement. It pointed out the site plan does provide for a 25 foot easement along the south for the canal. This comment was made to ensure the applicant - 11 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 meets the request of the Lake Worth Drainage District for the appropriate easement. Traffic Impact and Passing Trips In Mr. Annunziato's memo pertaining to the traffic impact analysis and the passing trips, Mr. Golden stated the figure used by Dan Murray for passing trips is 25%. In his memo, Mr. Annunziato points out this standard is not a standard of Palm Beach County, and his recommendation was for a 10% figure, as opposed to 25% for allowable passing trips. He requested Mr. Golden point out for the record that the Palm Beach County standard is less than 25%, but it is not exactly specified. Mr. Golden reiterated Mr. Annunziato's recommendation is 10%. From the front view of the site, Chairman Trauger could not determine if there was a coVered walkway, or if it was open from Building A to the last building. Mr. Golden stated the details of the building plans did not indicate if there would be a canopy in front of the shopping center. He noted that the appliCant was present, and could address the issue. In reference to Mrs. Huckle inquiry, Mr. Golden advised the two-story building was to be used for general retail pur- poses. However, the applicant did not specify what type of user would lease the building nor the activities located in that portion of the shopping center. Applicant's Presentation Edward Duggan Representing HSW Investments 6350 North Andrews Avenue Chairman Trauger referenced the out parcels and questioned their size. Mr. Golden believed they were 1,100 square feet. Mr. Duggan verified they were roughly 1,000 to 3,000 square feet. In reference to Mr. deLong's inquiry, Mr. Duggan clarified the two-story building will have an elevator. - 12 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Mr. Ryder questioned if this area was called out parcels because the use was being determined at this time. Mr. Duggan verified they are free standing buildings which are going to be physically separate from the main shopping center. They designate them as out parcels, and will be free standing restaurants or banks. The entire shopping center will be under one control. Once the building is completed, Mr. Duggan stated the main- tenance and landscaping of the out parcels are the respon- sibility of the entire shopping center. He advised there will be a covered walkway from Building A and around. In response to Mrs. Huckle's inquiry, Mr. Duggan stated at the present time they do not have any leases signed on the two-story buildings, but they will be within the Code limitations for that zoning district, and would be retail or restaurant usage. Mr. Ryder questioned if there was any problem with the recommendations raised by Mr. Annunziato, the Planning Director in regard to the trip reduction. Mr. Duggan responded that Mr. Annunziato had made a recommendation to go to 10%. He stated he had the traffic engineer present at the meeting, and he would explain the trip reduction and why they had gone to the 25%. Mr. Duggan added he did not understand why he must reduce it to 10%. He stated the traffic engineer has the facts to back up his statement. Mr. Duggan stated it is almost definite that the "Yard King" home improvement store will be leasing space. This store deals with almost everything related to the exterior of the home, garden and lawn products. As far as the supermarket, Mr. Duggan stated, at the present time, he did not know who it would be. Daniel Murray Traffic Engineer Mr. Murray stated he did the traffic report and submitted a revised traffic analysis. As his cover letter indicated, he stated revisions were made based on City policy. He explained the concept of the shopping center and the latest "state of the art" in the traffic-engineering field. There - 13 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 have been some recent national meetings concerning this type of development. There are three characteristic trips to any kind of a development, such as a shopping plaza. The following is a list of how they are classified: New Trips Passing Trips Multi-Purpose Trips Passing Tri~ Mr. Murray explained a passing trip is a person who utilizes a particular roadway, and in his trip to or from, he passes by the site and swings into the site. There has been a fair amount of data collected on a number of shopping plazas. Predominantly, the data is outside the confines of Palm Beach County, although his firm has completed a recent eval- uation of a shopping plaza on Glades Road and Lyons Road, which came up with comparative figures of 25%. It was Mr. Murray's suggestion to the client that he could look at a few comparative shopping centers, and meet with Charlie Walker and Mr. Annunziato to review these figures. In his professional opinion, 25% is reasonable and recognized in the profession on the passing trip. Multi-Purpose Trip Mr. Murray explained that the concept of the shopping plaza is to make it attractive so that a person does not visit it for one trip. When there is a mix where you have food, banking facilities, gas stations, small retail, large retail, it lends itself for two or three kinds of shopping, all done in one trip. Studies have been completed whereby people have been interviewed, and have come up with the 25% figure. There is some data that reflects higher than 25%, and some data that reflects lower than 25%. However, Mr. Murray believed that 25% was the reasonable average. Mr. Murray stated the policy that Mr. Annunziato had indi- cated was the City is receptive to 10% for each of those two type trips. He noted that the second report reflected 10%, and indicated the one driveway instead of the two drive- way recommendation. - 14 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 In response to Mr. deLong's statement, Mr. Murray agreed the traffic analysis is not an exact science, but it is the best evaluation or estimate. Mr. Murray believed the profession is attempting to zero in on these two issues and Palm Beach county will be slowly going toward that way. Mrs. Huckle asked Mr. Murray to readdress the traffic situation on Old Boynton Road concerning the ingress and egress, and questioned if it would be a single lane in and out at one opening. Mr. Murray stated the current proposed plan recommends one driveway. He strongly recommended the driveway on Old Boynton Road have one driveway and have the ability for left turns. In his report, Mr. Murray had suggested, if and when warranted, signalization would be put at the main driveway at the Plaza. However, he noted this would not be warranted based on the Plaza alone. It depends on what comes in across the street, and even then, it will be a very de- batable issue because there are two signals, one at Boynton Beach Boulevard and one at Old Boynton Beach Road. He believed for this plaza, you would want a secondary access or a relief point where the more timid driver, who does not want to execute the left turn out to Congress Avenue, during peak hours, will be able to gain access to Congress Avenue through an easier method. Mr. Murray's original thought with the two driveways was to have the first driveway strictly right turns in and out, and he suggested a raised median to ensure no left turns occur at that location. However, with the one driveway con- cept, the driveway is pushed back farther from Congress Avenue which is needed. Mr. Murray advised the distance recommended in the report was approximately 400 feet, and no less than 330 feet, which gives reasonable distance to develop the left turn at the signal of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, and gives a distance back so that a person can comfortably judge the traffic before making a left turn. Mrs. Huckle questioned how the left turn would be controlled when coming out of the shopping center and going westbound. Mr. Murray clarified there would a stop control at the - 15 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Plaza. The driver will sit there, look to the left, look to the right, and make a decision to turn out. In response to Mrs. Huckle's inquiry, Mr. Murray stated the median was suggested in the original report which stated if they had the second driveway, which was closer, there were to be no left turns. In his opinion, Mr. Murray stated you must physically prevent this from happening. You can designate no left turns, but people will cheat on that system. That was the original concept with the two drive- ways. Mr. Murray stated with the two driveway concept, the driveway to the east had the ability of the left turn out. In the current proposed plan, Mr. Murray advised they are eliminating one driveway, and as far as the amount of traffic, one driveway will more than adequately service that need. In reference to one driveway where a vehicle is coming in and another vehicle is going out and turning, Chairman Trauger asked if the lane was wide enough for a vehicle to get out if turning to go east on Old Boynton Road, or must the vehicle wait for the other car to turn left before he can get out. Mr. Murray stated this situation is called a "cross-over conflict." At every median opening, the left turn coming into the site tends to inch in to the "opening area." He stated it definitely has to be designed and laid out so there is an open area. However, any time when you have a left turn going out and left turn coming in simulta- neously, it depends on where the two vehicles stop. The key blockage is the left turn in. He noted, at times, it is an aggressive driver who determines he is going to go in before the other car comes out. There is no doubt those two vehicles are in conflict, and someone has to give. The law stipulates that the left turn in has the right-of-way over the left turn out. Mr. Murray advised the driveway is set up wide enough for two lanes, one in and two out. This has merits, but there is also a negative aspect, which occurs when there are two lanes, a left lane and a right lane. He explained there is a certain amount of view obstruction when a vehicle is in the right turning lane, and a truck is in the left turning lane. - 16 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 Mr. Murray added when certain drivers are delayed, they have tendencies to become impatient, and that is when there could be an accident. Overall, the recommendation to have two lanes is what Mr. Murray would advise in this case. Mr. Golden pointed out two additional items. The access issues of the new site plan will be addressed with the for- mal submission of the revised site plan. The revised traf- fic impact analysis, submitted within the past day or two by Dan Murray and adjusting the passing trips at 10%, does not make provisions for any additional roadway improvement with the additional trip generation. Mr. deLong moved to table the application subject to the applicant reconciling with the Technical Review Board or other involved agencies in resubmitting the apPlication. Since it was the definite conclusion of the Planning Department that the application be tabled because of the lack of final information, Mr. Ryder seconded the motion. Chairman Trauger stated it has been moved and seconded that the apPlication for the Boynton Square Shopping Site Plan be tabled. The motion carried 7-0. 2. PROJECT NAME: Dr. Jonathan Chua Eye Clinic AGENT: Menendez - Ste. Marie, Architects and Planners, Inc. OWNER: Transworld Associates LOCATION: Woolbright Road at L.W.D.D. E-4 canal, northwest corner DESCRIPTION: Request for site plan approval to construct a 10,360 square foot medical clinic on 1 72 acres. · Mr. Golden stated this is a request approval of a medical clinic for Dr. Chua in connection with the approval of the rezoning request that became effective on December 18, 1984. Since it has been over a year since the request for rezoning to C-1 was approved, the applicant must request an extension for the rezoning approval by the City Council. Included in - 17 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 the Agenda package is a copy of the letter submitted by the applicant requesting an extension of the zoning. Mr. Golden stated it is intended that both the rezoning extension and the site plan be approved concurrently by the City Council upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Board. Location Mr. Golden advised the proposed medical clinic will be located on the north side of Woolbright Road, between the E-4 Canal and the existing shopping center to the west. Architectural Desig_q On the second overlayw Mr. Golden apprised the Board it pro- vides for the architectural design of the clinic. The clinic will be one story high, consisting of exposed poured concrete, and stainless steel facade with dark bronze aluminum store front, including solar bronze glazing. Parking The parking provided exceeds the Code requirement by eight spaces for the clinic. Within the interior of the east parking lot, an outdoor waiting gazebo will be provided for the patients' use. Access to the side of the clinic will be a right turn in and a right turn out driveway onto Woolbright Road, and a shared driveway with the shopping center on the western boundary of the property, which currently exists. Concrete Wall Mr. Golden noted that a six foot high concrete block wall is provided on the northern and eastern property boundaries in order to buffer the proposed medical clinic from the homes in Leisureville, as per the conditions of the rezoning approval. Utilities Mr. Golden advised water service will be provided by connec- tion onto an existing six inch water main at the northwest - 18 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 corner of the property. There is a comment from the Utilities Department requiring details and extending the water service eastward across the E-4 Canal at a future date. This will provide for a loop in the system. The developer is required to provide one-half of the expected cost of the canal crossing. In regard to sewer service, Mr. Golden stated it would be provided by a connection onto an-eight inch main which is located at the northwest corner of the property. Mr. Golden stated the Technical Review Board recommends approval of this request, subject to staff comments. In addition, Mr. Golden pointed out a motion should be made contingent upon the City Council approving the extension of the zoning. Mrs. Huckle questioned if this was to be developed in two phases. In response to Mrs. Huckle inquiry, Mr. Golden stated a second phase was included in the site plan, but is not part of the site plan, and will have to go through the modifications. However, the intent and the outline of Phase II are there, and Mr. Golden believed it was a good idea to incorporate it with the initial approval. Applicant,s Presentation Robert Ste. Marie Representing Menendez - Ste. Marie, Architects West Palm Beach, Florida Mr. Ryder questioned to what extent does the site plan vary from the plan previously submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Ste. Marie responded that the site plan is the same content. He added that the floor plan varies but the use of the facility is the~same. ' Mr. Golden clarified this is the first time that the Board is reviewing the site plan for this property. The previous approval was for rezoning for C-l, which was approved. At that time, the intent was for rezoning. The architect - 19 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 has worked with Dr. Chua. His needs are very particular for his surgical suite, and this helped determined the "footprint" of the building. Mr. Ryder questioned the number of parking spaces planned. Mr. Ste. Marie believed they would ultimately have 72 spaces, and have increased it from sixty parking spaces. Mr. Ste. Marie advised there were no problems with the staff comments. Mr. deLong moved that the application be approved, subject to staff comments, and subject to Council's approval of extending the zoning, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. Chairman Trauger stated it has been moved and seconded that the Board approve the site plan subject to staff comments, and that the City Council extend the current zoning. The motion carried 7-0. SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 2. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Boat Club Park AGENT: Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates OWNER: City of Boynton Beach LOCATION: Between U. S. Highway No. 1 and the Intracoastal Waterway, north of Oak Street DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for an expansion of the existing park to include a bait shop, a picnic area and 33 additional parking spaces. Mr. Golden stated the area proposed for the park expansion includes the property to the east of Morey's Lounge, and across the park entrance to the south, where the existing - 20 - MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 bait shop is located. This property was recently cleared in connection with future expansion as proposed under this plan. Mr. Golden advised the proposed park expansion includes a new 685 square foot bait shop. The bait shop will include a drive-through service. To the south of the bait shop, there will be a picnic area, which will include two shelters and barbeque facilities. Parking Facilities Along with the expansion, there will be 33 parking spaces, 16 of which are the long spaces for the boat trailers. Construction The new bait shop will be constructed of wood, siding and shingles to match the existing bath house. Access Road The existing access onto Federal Highway will be maintained. A concrete block wall will be constructed in the vicinity of Morey's to screen the active recreational use from the passive recreational use. Utilities The utilities are available on site to accommodate the pro- posed expansion. Recommendation Mr. Golden advised the Board that the Technical Review Board recommends approval subject to staff comments. The Board members were shown displays of the site plan on the screen. Mr. Golden advised the existing bait shop will be razed, and a new bait shop will be built. Phase I will include the construction of the bait shop, and will move eastward toward the existing parking area. He noted that 16 additional parking spaces are proposed under the modification of the plan, which is Phase II. In Phase III, there is additional - 21- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 ~parkingparking.and a planned island between existing and proposed Mrs. Huckle questioned the vacant land. Mr. Golden stated this is the area of the proposed expansion which will be constructed according to the site plan. The new bait shop will be in the vicinity of the old bait shop. To the south, there will be barbeque areas. There will be additional parking for trailers around the bait shop. Mr. Cheney stated the expansion includes where the park area will be grassed and extended up to Federal Highway. There will be two picnic tables, but primarily it will be a green area. Driving out on Federal Highway, you will see new landscaping. It will also be available for trailer overflow parking, when it is necessary. The attempt is to get more picnic area, and the existing grass area will be continued up to Federal Highway. The bait shop is there temporarily, and the City will have a lease with the present occupant to continue to operate the bait shop. With the next contract, there will be a new bait shop built, and the old bait shop will be torn down. Mr. Cheney noted the new bait shop will be the same style as the rest room building, and the buildings will be the same color. Mrs. Huckle remarked she was very impressed with the Boynton Beach Boat Club Park. Mr. deLong made a motion to approve the application, subject to staff comments, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. Chairman Trauger stated it has been moved and seconded to approve the request for the amended site plan to allow for an expansion of the existing park to include a bait shop, a picnic area, and 33 additional parking spaces, subject to staff commments. The motion carried 7-0. OTHER 1. Rescheduling of November 11, 1986 meeting of the Plannin~ and Zonin_~ Board (Veterans, Da_~) Mr. Golden advised the Board while looking ahead for the remainder of this year, it has been noted that there is a - 22- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA June 10, 1986 conflict with the Veterans' Day Holiday, and that meeting will have to be rescheduled. The Board agreed to cancel the November 11, 1986 meeting, and reschedule it for November 12, 1986. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Planning and Zoning Board meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M. Carol Ann Brown Recording Secretary (Two tapes) - 23 - P O. Box 2944 Hat, foCal, CT 06'104 ~ CALL TO, CARMEN ANNUNIZATO PLANNING REPLY MESSAGE Fold At (~) To Fit Grayarc Window Envelope # EW10P FROM TOM SHEMWICK'~ FIRE DEPT. REORDER ITEM ill F269 FOLD EY~__C_L!2~C - W~L~GHT ROAD DATE~:__ Please be advised 1200 gallons of water must be suppI~ed at this site. PLEASE REPLY TO =- Shemwick. Lt. DATE: Item ill F269 © Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 / SIGNED' THIS coPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin j. Hallahan F°rester/Horti cul turi st MEMORANbUM June 4, 1986 Dr. Chua Eye Clinic Site Plan theThis above memorandum project, is. in reference to the landscape plan for. The foundation landscaping-should be more clearly identified. The variety of grass (sod) used should also be identified. There are no trees on the site which must be Preserved. KJH : ad Planning Deot. Lt. Dale S. Hammack MEMORANDUM 3 June 1986 t_ Dr. Oona t hah ~_Chua ~.ye_Cl~inic on As discussed in the T.R.B. meeting of 3 June 1986, a stop sign should be erected at the Westerly exit and that arrows indicating traffic flow be painted on the pavement 'at the entrance and exits. Po] ice Dept. DH:as FOLD Carmen Annunzi ato Planning Director FROM Bob Donovan Chief Plan Reviewer Dr. Chua__Eye Clinie DATE:_ $/3/86 Uponfol lowing:review of the above mentioned site plan, please be advised of the 1. Need county turnout permit. 2. Need Water Management permit. 3. Spell out type of construction on building plans (I - VI). BD:bh PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED Bob Donovan DATE: Item # F26g © Wheeler Group inc. 1979 SIGNED - ' THIS COPy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM TO : DRTE: SUBJECT: Carmen Rnnunziato, Planning Director T~B comments - Dr. Chua Eye Clinic The subject plans are approved conditionally upon the Following changes being made to the plans: i) Provide greater separation between the proposed water main and the G' high retaining wall. Relocate the sewer as needed to maintain a 10' horizontal separation. connection. Indicate how the E-4 canal provide one-hal? oF the expected cost oF ...... ~his Dept. Will be crossed and the canal crossing to. 3) Easements must be provided For water and sewer lines, plus services. 4) Note ZO on sheet 4 should indicate ~ission coupling instead o? Fernco adapters For D-I,P./V.C.p. transitions. Sincerely. Peter V. Mazzella, Utility Engineer cc: File TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM May 4, 1986 Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Jonathan Chub Eye Clinic, DeveI6pment Plans Comments: Typical section thru roadway and parking area should show "smooth plane" fdr asphalt surface. Requi~d transitions for different rock base. thickness and asphalt thickness should be shown. 2. Gratings for inlet structures should be the type that mini- mize or eliminate the penetration of bicycle tires. 3. Information concerning the date, laboratory, location, etc., for the open-hole percolation test Should be added to the ..... plans or test results included. . 4. Radius.for turnouts should be shown. 5. The exfiltration trench should have the pervious membrane returned over the top of the pea gravel. Direction arrows are required at intersections.' Design/~ievations indicate that a-transition will be re- quired on the sidewalk at the Woolbright Road entrance, ie. proposed elevations do not'agree with topo sheet. ~. ' ~idewalks to be 6 inch thick min. thru turnouts. County standards will be required for turnout. A note concerning traffic control in Woolbright Road during construction is requested. Construction requirements of exfiltration trench adjacent to structures should be shown. Construction should minimize the potential for settlement adjacent to structures. Sewer service line should be D.I.p where extending thru ~exfiltration.trench. - 9. 10. 11. 12. con't ...... TO: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Jonathan Chua Eye Clinic May 4, 1986 Page 2 Corame~ts contr. 13. A no teft~_. . _- turn signal is required, at the turnout. 14. BecauSe of the Steep gradient between the back o~ the sidewalk and the parking lot, consideration should be given-'to changing grades or raising the raised curb bey°nd_~.lthe. ~... USual 6 inches. MEMORANDUM Planning Dept. June 3, 1986 Lt. Dale S. Hammack Police Dept-. Public Boat Ramp Expansion As discussed in the T.R.B. meeting of 3 June 1986, all post mounted signs must be raised from the proposed 6 foot minimum to a 7 foot minimum from the bottom of signs to ground level. DH:as MEMORRNOU~ TO : DRTE: SUBJECT: Carmen Rnnunziato. Planning Director June 3, 1988 ../ TRB comments - BOyn~on Beach Boa~ Club Park Expansion Our approval o{ the subjec~ plan is conditioned upon ~he {ollowing changes being made: !> Relocate ~he City's sewer cleanou~ away ~rom the Bai~ Shop building, and to the edge o{ ~he landscaped area. This will be the limi~ o~ the U~ili~y's Dept. maintenance. Z> Regarding ~he irrigation line. relocate ~he vacuum breaker ~o a poin~ douns~ream o~ ~he irrigation zone vaive. This wili cause ~he breaker to ~unc~ion during zone changes, and provide be%~er pro~ec~ion ~o the City's wa~er ~ys~em. 3) Note ~ha~ 'a Z" me,er requires a custom 5e~ter wi~h a bui]t-in bypass. Re,er ~o ~he City's standard speci~ica~£on. 4) Z I/Z" ~aps are no~ permitted in~o wa~er mains.~ Please specify either a Z" or a 4" ~ap. with reducers it needed.-_. Sincerely, Peter V. Mazzella U~ili~y Engzneer cc-' File MEMORANDUM MaY 3, 1986 TO: FR. OM: Mr. Jim 'Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Boynton Beach. Boat Club Expansion Site Plans Comments: --1o Design elevations and construction details are' required for the new parking lot. ....... 2. Raised curbs are required where parking spaces are adjacent and parallel to landscaped areas. TAC:ck - Tom Clark .Grayarc- P.O. Box 2944 ~trlar~ford, CT 06104 ~ -- TO JIM GOLDEN REPLY MESSAGE Fold At ( ~ ) To Fit Grayarc Window Envelope # EWl0P ~ ~' - ~ FROM ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER ...... *- -~-"~IEORDER ITEM ~ F269 * ~' RICHARD S. WT~T,~U~ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BOYNTON SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER DATE: 6/4/86 Request no dumpster pads and loading zones be located the same area. Also, dumpsters should ~11 be serviced in same general traffic flow. PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED t DATE: Item # F269 © Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 SIGNED THIS COPY'FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM P1 arming Dept. ':'^'~'~ Lt. Dale S. Hammack Police Dept. June 3, 1986 Shopping Center - Old Boynton Ro~d to' North Congress Blvd. As discussed in the T.R.B. meeting of 3 June 1986, all interior travel lines should align and stop signs erected to control traffic flow. Traffic lanes should be arrowed to indicate traffic flow and fire lanes marked as such. Bond money should be posted to erect traffic light ~at the main entrance-exit onto N. Cong'ress Ave. if and when the count3; deems it necessary. Also a solid median should be constructed on Old Boynton Road to prevent left turns from the Westerly exit on the North side of the Mall. -~Lt. Dale S. Han~nack DH:as MEMORRNDU~ TO : Carmen Rnnunzia~o, Plann~ng Director DRTE: June 3, 198B SUBJECT: TRB comments - Boynton Square Our approval of this site plan is conditioned upon the {ollouing changes fo the plans: t) Note fhaf the City's standard manhole cover and rim have veen- changed to a double ring model (U.S. Foundry nos. Z30-RB-M or 663-RB-M). Z) The City uill only maintain main line sewers downstrea~o~ the ~irst manhole on each run. The rest o~ the gravity system is to be private. 3) Provide a head loss analysis or increase pipe size ~or the water distribution system in order to provide adequate ~re {~o~. 4) The dumps~er pad ~s currently Iocated over a water service and part o~ the main. Either the pad o~ the ma~n should be relocated. cc: ~ile Sincerely, Peter V. Mazzella Utility Engineer MEMORANDUM May 4, 1986 TO: F ROM: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Boynton Square, Site Plans Comments: 1. Parking geometry in the northeast corner..~houtd~ be modified so as to maintain two way traffic. 2. Location of pipes should be shown on the details for the outfall control structure detail. 3. The pervious membrane should be returned over the top of the pea gravel in the exfiltration trencheS. 4o "BicycLe proof" inlet gratings should be used in traffic lanes. 5o Typical roadway and parking area section should show transitions with rock and wearing surface so asphalt surface will not have a ridge due to the change in thickness. 6. Dimensions are required on the paving and drainage plans' for turnouts and driveways. 7. Construction 'drawings are required for the work in county rights-of-way. 8.' Where design elevations will not be as shown on the typical roadway and parking area section they should be shown on the plans. Tom Clark TAC:ck MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members, Planning & Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director Boynton Square Shopping Center - Staff Comments / 1. Configuration of interior parking lot intersection adjacent to building "A" at western driveway onto Old Boynton Road is unacceptable. The interior access aisle adjacent to building "A" should align with the driveway to form a proper intersection. This will require redesign of the site plan in the northwest portion of the property. 2. Several other interior parking lot intersections ar~_a~? designed inappropriately and are to be redesigned with a proper ~intersection alignment. 3. The row of 22 angled parking spaces in the northeast corner of the site are to be removed to permit two-way traffic flow behind the shopping center. 4. parking lot regulations require high pressure sodium lightin~ - metal halide lighting is not acceptable. Also lighting details must.be provided. 5. Since 90° parking spaces in front of building "F" function as angled parking spaces in relation to the adjacent access aisles, the 18-foot back-up space required by the parking lot regulations should be provided at the ingress to each of these aisles. CARMEN S. ANNU~iATO MEMORANDUM 3 June 1986 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Boynton Square Shopping Center - Traffic Impact Palm Beach County does not recognize a reductio9 in average daily trips for Multf-Land Use Development or for Passing Trips. Multi-Land Use Trips are defined as trips which will not enter the roadway network because of thecomplimentary nature of uses on site, and Passing Trips are defined as second stop trips, that is, trips which have more than one purpose; The reasons for not allowing any reductions are, among others, the lack of specific data for Palm Beach County which sets a reliable percentage reduction and the fact that commercial trips are not assessed a full share of the impact under the Palm Beach County Road Impact Fee Ordinance. Intuitively, one would agree that trips of this nature do occur, and that not all of the average daily trips generated by a facility are new trips. The question becomes Whether or not the percentage of reduction makes sense, given the specific pattern of land uses in the area, other intervening opportunities, and the nature of the project,-among others. In this regard, the-appliCant has submitted aTraffic Report for the proposed shopping center which assumes a 25% reduction in average daily trips for Multi-Land Use trips and an additional 25% reduction for Passing Trips. The basis for using a figure of 25% is an analysis of the literature which tests this theory in other parts of the nation. Consistent with Palm Beach County, the Planning Department concurs that without specific data related to the Palm BeaCh County experience, it is inappropriate to assume an across-the-board 25% reduction, however, some level of reduction: is likely to %e appropriate. Therefore, it is recommended that unless specific data is provided relative to the site in question, a reduction of not more than 10% in each ~instance is recommended. Concerning this project, the additional recommendations related to traffic impact are as follows: 1. The applicant should recalculate the impact of this project based~on reductions for Multi-Land Use and Passing Trips of only 10% in each instance and submit the results to the City. If, as a result of this recalculation, any conclusions previously reached are changed in termsof highway link capacity or intersection critical movements, among Others, the applicant should resubmit his plans as a site plan modification. 2. If, in the case of 1. above, no new or different conclusions are.reached, the applicant Shguld construct the improvements recommended in the Murray Report of May 28, 1986, subject to securing permits from Palm Beach County. 3. As recommended by Murray, the proper location of the westerly driveway on Old Boynton Road is west of and adjacent to the west side of Building A. The reason that the driveway is located off='center is a parking lot regulation requirement that no driveway may be located nearer than 180 feet to the intersection of the rights-of-way lines of collector andarterial streets. Therefore, in order to attain a direct driveway alignment as recommended by Mr.' Murray,. the applicant should reconfigure Building A to allow driveway alignment. 4. The applicant should bond his proportionate share of the traffic signal to be installed aC-the intersection of the major driveway on Congress Avenue with-the signal to be installed if.and when warranted, as determined by the County Traffic Engineer. /bks cc: Charles Walker Central File MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist O^T~ June 4, 1986 FILE ~.~¢T Boynton Square Shopping C~nter Site Plan This memorandum is in reference, to the existing trees on the site for the proposed project. The developer should submit a tree management plan which outlines the following criteria: 1. The total number of trees on the site from the tree sur- vey, delineating the species, height, diamet'er and ioca- ti on. 2. The total number of trees to be preserved at the location where they presently exist. 3. The total number of trees which will be transplanted from where they exist to other landscape or green 'areas on the site. 4e J The reasons why any trees are not transplanted on the site and a plan submitted showing .a replacement for each tree on the landscape plan. The replacement plan should compare an economic fair market valuation for each tree and replacement trees to be larger diameter and height to compare in economic value. 7e The replacement valuation of the trees should:equal or ex- -ceed the valuation of the existing trees. The species of trees used as replacement trees should be the same or a type 'adapted to the site.. - The total number of trees, on the fianl site plan, should equal or exceed the quantity which exists and shown on the landscape plan. ':- A detail of how any of the trees preserved or~ ~ransPlanted will be cared for during the construction process relative to barricading, watering, fertilizer, etc. 10. Ail efforts should be made to preserve as many of the exist- ing trees as possible a, nd landscaping 'provided to keep the character of the site as it presently exist$~ ,%in J.~Hallahan ~ KJH:ad LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT .... · ' .-^--."---'"-- .'-_.L_ ^...\ ~.._~;,._ 13081 MILITARY TRAIL DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33445 George McMurrain C. Stanley Weaver Kermit Dell Interim Secretary!l~,anage¢ William G. Winters Assistant Manager Richard S. Wheelihan Attorney John H. Adams Ray 7, 1986 Ms. Betty S. Boroni, City Clerk City of Boynton'B~ach 120 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33432 Re: Application No. 2' Applicant: Harold S. 'Wenal, Trustee Project Name: Boynton West Plaza Dear Ms. Boroni: _.? The Oistrict would request the City of Boynton Beach to condition any approval on the referenced site to include furnishing the Lake Worth Drainage District with the required right-of-way for Lateral No. 24. ' Your favorable consideration would be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, Richard S, Wheelihan Assistant Manager RSW/dmt Delray Beach & Boca Raton 498-5363 Boynton Beach & West Palm Beach 737.3~35 P.O. Box 2944 Hartford. CT 06104 CALL TOL[.*FR~E: !-800- 243-5250 ,tO C~EN ANNUNIZA~ PLANNING Fold At (~ }~TO Fit Grayarc Window Enve}ope # EW10P ];'EOM i TOM SHEMWICK FIRE DEPT. REORDER ITEM # F259 FOLD Old Boynton Road & Congress Ave.- Shopping Center DATE:,. 6/6/86 Please be advised 1500 gallons of water must be supplied at this site. PLEASE REPLY TO =.- Tom Shemwick, Lt., Insp. DATE: Item ~ F269 © Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 SIGNED THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM May 3, 1986 TO: FROM: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Rollingwood, Master Plan Comments: 1. Storm sewer inlet ~grates must be "biCycle proof". 2. Where is water control structur~~- 3. The City will not accept swales on private property for maintenance. 4. Radii for curves should be shown. 5. Sidewalk is required in Swinton Avenue. 6. A note to the effect that street light plans will be done by Florida Power & Light, subject to City approval should be added to plans. 7. Back of sidewalks to be one foot from the right-of-way line. 8. A retaining wall or extensive grading on adjacent property will probably be required in the vicinity of lot 54. · 9. Roadway subgrade to be stabilized to 50 p.s.i, in F.B.V. Tom Clark TAC:ck- Carmen Annunziato ?lanningDirector FROM .-/ Bob Donovan Chief Plan Reviewer Upon review of the above mentioned preapplicat~on/master plan;-please be advised of the following: 1. Need dimensions to building lines; 2. On corner lots adjacent to the street, the side yard setback shall be not less than ~ the front yard requirement, except where the corner lot faces a different street than the remaining lots in the block; Then the front setback shall be maintained_ on both streets. 3. Rear setbacks must bemet. 4. Should spell out setbacks for screen enclosures, pools, etc. 5. Water Management approval required. 6. COunty or D.O.T. turnout approval required. Rem# F269 © wheeler Group Ink 1979 SIGNED ~ THIS COPY FOR pERSON ADDRESSED · MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist June 4, 1986 ~u..,~'r Rolling Wood SubdiVision(Repia~) Preapplication/Master Plan (Combined DOcument) This memorandum is in reference to the existing trees on the site for the proposed project. The developer should submit a tree management plan which outlines the following criteria: 1. The total number of trees on the site from the tree s~rve~, delineating the species, height diameter and location- Trees greater than six inches in diameter' are of primary concern. Trees smaller can be grouped in clumps and shown on the site plan. 2. The total number of trees to be preserved a t the location where the~ presently exist. 3. The total number of trees transplanted (if any). 4. The reason why any trees are not transplanted and the land- scape plan. 5:. The species of trees used as replacement trees should be the same or a type adapted to the site. 6. The total number of trees on the final site plan should equal or exceed the quantity which exists and shown on the landscape plan. 7. A detail of how any of the trees preserved wil.1 be cared for during the construction process relative to barricad- ing, watering, fertilizing, etc. 8. Ail efforts should be made to preserve as man~ of the existing trees as possible and ~landscaping provided to keep the character of the site as it presentl~ exists. ~vin J~ H~allahan KJH:ad