Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Minutes 05-13-86
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON TUESDAY, MAY 13, 1986 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESENT: Walter "Marty" Trauger Chairman Garry Winter vice Chairman simon Ryder George deLong John Pagliarulo Robert Wandelt Marilyn G. Huckle William Schultz, Alternate Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Tim Cannon Senior city Planner Jim Golden Assistant city Planner ABSENT: Norman Gregory, Alternate chairman Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:30 PiM., and introduced the members of the Board and the Recording Secretary. He recognized the presence in the audience of Mayor Nick Cassandra, vice Mayor Carl zimmerman, Councilman Ezell Hester, Councilwoman Dee zibelli, city Manager Peter L. Cheney, and Owen Anderson of the Greater Boynton Beach Chamber of Commerce. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of Meeting, April 8, 1986 Mr. Ryder moved to approve the minutes as presented, seconded by Vice Chairman Winter. Ms. Huckle abstained from voting since she was not present at the April 8 meeting. Motion carried 6-0. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Annunziato announced that attached to the display board downstairs in the Information Center, City Hall, were some of the maps, one of a kind, non-reproducible maps, which were in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. He suggested that the members read through them at their leisure and noted that they might be a little easier to read than the ones in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. -1- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato also informed the members that his office would be sending out the next day a letter which lists all the meetings which the Board has set, such as, Workshops and Public Hearings with dates and times. COMMUNICATIONS None. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJECT NAME: S. E. 1st Avenue Right-of-Way Abandonment AGENT: Peter L. Cheney, city Manager OWNER: City of Boynton Beach LOCATION: South of Boynton Beach Boulevard, between Seacrest Boulevard and S. E. 1st Street (Sawyer's Addition) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A parcel of land lying in Section 28, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, said land being more particularly described as that portion of the 40 foot right-of-way named Southeast First Avenue (Jessamine Street) lying between the extended east right-of-way line of Seacrest Boulevard, as now in use, and the southerly extension of the East line of LOT 2 BLOCK 15 PLAT OF SAWYER'S ADDITION, as recorded in the Palm Beach County Official Records in Plat Book 1 Page 69. DESCRIPTION: Request for the abandonment of a 40 foot local street. -2- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13~ 1986 Mr. Annunziato apprised the Board members that this is a request for an abandonment of a public right-of-way which lies between the Library and the Recreation Center, one block south of Ocean Avenue. It runs from Seacrest Boulevard eastward to within about 100 feet of S. E. 1st Street. Its location was pointed out on the display screen by Tim Cannon. As generally known, the street is currently not in service and serves as a parking lot for the Library and the civic Center. In connection with the redevelopment of the library and the construction of the new parking lot, it will be necessary to officially take the street out of service through a resolution for abandonment. The staff has secured responses from the various utilities, since there are utili- ties in the street, it is the city's responsibility to make accommodations in connection with all the construction in order to comply with the needs of Florida Power and Light and Southern Bell. In addition, there is a water main which is the City's responsibility in conforming With construc- tion. Mr. Annunziato advised that the staff's recommen- datiion is that this abandonment be approved subject to coordination with the utility groups. Mr. Annunziato confirmed Mr. Ryder's question that it is not a through street and terminates at Seacrest Boulevard. In reference to the parking lot that exits into that street, Mr. Annunziato replied that portion of the street will not be taken out of service. Chairman Trauger asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in favor or in opposition to the abandonment. Since the reply was negative, Mr. Ryder moved that the request for the abandonment of S. E. 1st Avenue be approved, seconded by Mr. winter. The motion carried 7-0. 2. PROJECT NAME: N. E. 8th Avenue AGENT: Peter L. Cheney, city Manager OWNER: City of Boynton Beach LOCATION: Within the Public works complex, between N. E. 1st Street and the east line of lot 140 of Arden Park. -3- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 LEGAL DESCIPTION: DESCRIPTION: A parcel of land lying in Section 21, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, said land being more particularly described as that portion of the 40 foot right-of-way named Northeast 8 Avenue (Orange Street) lying be- tween the northerly extended east right-of-way line of Northeast First Street (Pine Street) and the southerly extension of the East line of LOT 140 ARDEN PARK, as recorded in the Palm Beach County official Records in Plat Book 2 Page 96. Request for the abandonment of a 40 foot local street. Mr. Annunziato reported that this next request for abandonment is also related to reconstruction projects approved about a year ago as part of the bond issue. In this instance, it con- cerns a street which lies within the Public works complex. It doesn't exist as a street but forms part of a parking lot in the Public Works complex. Because of the construction, it is necessary to officially take it out of service as a street and convert it to land as such because it will be part of the building construction project. This item was reviewed by the City Technical Staff and comes to the Board with recommen- dations to approve as submitted. Mr. Annunziato advised there are no utilities in this right-of-way. Referencing Mr. Annunziato's memo, Ms. Huckle noted that the Planning Department had no objection to the abandonment of these two streets since they have already been taken out of service as public rights-of-way and questioned when they orgi- nally had been taken out of service. Mr. Annunziato stated he could not answer that question as to when or how they were taken out of service but admitted that as long as he has liv~d in Boynton Beach it has been referred to as the public Works complex and has not been used by the public. Mr. Ann~nziato stated that such abandonment requests have been approved in the past for other streets in the city. -4- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Chairman Trauger asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or in opposition for the abandonment. Hearing no response, Chairman Trauger declared the PUBLIC HEARING closed. MS. Huckle moVed to approve the request for abandonment of the 40 foot local street, N. E. 8th Avenue, with staff comments, seconded by Mr. Ryder. The motion carried 7-0. B. SUBDIVISIONS MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION 1. PROJECT NAME: Meadows 300 - Tracts K, L, and G AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Ed Schwab The Wilshire Corporation West side of Congress Avenue, south of Hypoluxo Road Request for approval of an amended master plan to allow for a shift of 16 units from Tract "L" and 11 units from Tract "K" to Tract "G" at the Meadows 300 Planned Unit Development (PUD). Mr. Golden stated that on Tuesday, April 15, 1986 the city Council reviewed this request. Since this request did not entail a substantial change, the City Council recommended for- warding this application to the Planning and zoning Board. The proposed mOdification calls fOr an increase of 27 units in Tract G. Out of the 27 units shifted to Track G, 16 are being taken from Tract L and eleven from Tract K. .After reviewing this request at their April meeting, the Technical Review Board determined that this modification would not result in a change in the overall impact in PUD and forwarded that recommendation to the City Council. Tracts K, L, and G are all located in the vicinity of Track H, which is the Meadows Rental Apartments, located behind Meadow Square Shopping Center. -5- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Ms. Huckle inquired if there was any reason offered as to why the applicant requested this shift of units. Mr. Golden stated that it concerns the construction of additional ren- tal apartments and surmised that they wanted to increase the number of rental apartments and decrease their unit housing. Ms. Huckle referred to Tracts L and K. Mr. Golden did not recall exactly what type of units were located on those two tracts but stated that rentals were located on Tract G. In Mr. Annunziato's opinion, the end result is to drop the density in Tract K and L and increase the density in Tract G. He stated that there might be some logic in the number 170 and the way that divides up in terms of multi-family story in a multi-story building as opposed to 143 which is difficult to build in that form. Mr. Annunziato believed it is their intent to extend or contin6e the rental housing on that tract. Mr. deLong noted that the owner probably read the Comprehensive Plan and was aware of the need for rental housing in that area. Ms. Huckle pointed out that since one is making a deter- mination as to whether or not there is a substantial change that it would be logical that one would want to know what the change is. Mr. Annunziato explained that any change issues are more related to the impact on the buildings and stated that this will not increase traffic and will probably diminish the number of trips per day. The impact on water and sewer lines will not be substantially effected and the unit count will remain the same. Since there is no substantial change, Mr. Ryder could see no objection in concurring with the findings of the council. Mr. Ryder moved to approve the request for the amended master plan to allow for a shift of 16 units from Tract L and 11 units from Tract K to Tract G at the Meadows - 300 Planned unit Development, seconded by Mr. deLong. The motion carried 7-0. -6- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2. PROJECT NAME: Manor Care AGENT: Rick Rossi, P. E. OWNER: Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc. LOCATION-. Congress Avenue at Charter Drive, Northwest corner. DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of construc- tion plans and preliminary plat which provides for the construction of infrastructure improvements to serve a 120 bed personal care facility adjacent to the existing nursing center. Mr. Golden stated that Manor Care proposes to divide its existing commercial property into two parcels approximately 4.6 acres in size in order to provide for the construction of infrastructure improvements to the existing nursing center. Mr. Golden noted that the pre-application and master plan were originally approved by the Board. Mr. Golden drew the Board's attention to the display screen and pointed out the site plan configuration. He noted that basically it compri- ses two vacant parcels, 4.6 acres in size. On the map displayed on the screen, Mr. Golden noted that there is a line running through the middle from west to east depicting the referenced division of the property. The proposed per- sonal care facility includes 120 beds, several parking areas and two dry retention areas. The utility plans have been approved by the Utility Department subject to relocation of the manholes. Mr. Golden informed the Board that the specific Side issues were to be addressed with the Site Plan request to be discusSed as the next item on the agenda. The TeChnical Review Board recommends approval of this request subject to the staff comments. Chairman Trauger inquired as to the difference between a personal care facility and a nursing care facility. Mr. deLong remarked that a nursing home involves a higher intensity of care than a personal care facility. -7- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato explained to Ms. Huckle that a retention area (depressed lawn) was located on the right side near Congress Avenue. In reference to the U-shaped driveway, Mr. Golden informed Ms. Huckle that those details would be addressed more thoroughly when discussing the next item on the site Plan for Manor Care. In response to Chairman Trauger's request for additional comments, Mr. Ron Collins, associated with the firm of Walt Flanagan, Katz, Shapiro and Sheehan, stated that he was pre- sent at this meeting to represent Manor Care. He introduced Rick Rossi, the Project Engineer, and Don Feldman, Director of Development for Manor Care. Mr. Collins pointed out that his colleagues were also present at the meeting in order to answer any questions submitted by the Board. Additionally, he pointed out that there were a few items on the agenda which related to this project. The first one is a prelimi- nary plat and the second is a site plan. Just as a prelimi- nary matter, Mr. Collins pointed out two items that were proposed by Manor Care. The one was a 120 bed personal care facility which was accurately described as the lesser inten- sity of care facility than the nursing center. He noted that it is a stepping stone for senior citizens to go from the intense level of care in the nursing home ultimately to living at home themselves. Thus, it definitely provides a benefit to senior citizens of this. community. The second item involves an expansion of sixty beds of the existing nursing center. Mr. Collins noted that this proposal was unanimously approved at the pre-application hearing and at the master plan hearing and that the staff recommendations were satisfactorily acceptable to Manor Care. Mr. Feldman clarified Mr. Ryder's question that there would be some transitional movement by residents either going in or coming out of the nursing center and into whatever reha- bilitation program they require. Mr. Feldman agreed with Mr. Ryder's statement that there is a distinction between the type of care existing now and the purpose of the new addition. Mr. deLong commented on items discussed previously. He remarked that this is a total concept and a very needed one in that it doesn't provide the trauma of arresting an individual -8- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986' from a familiar environment nor cause a patient to travel miles from home to obtain lesser treatment or greater treat- ment. Mr. deLong emphasized that it is an excellent idea to keep these needed services within one complex and within the same familiar environment. In response to Mr. Ryder's question, Mr. Feldman stated that this is a concept that basically is being fostered by the Department of Health and the State of Florida as well as many other states. He remarked that this type of concept is very successful and popular in many areas. Mr. Feldman believed that the number of these continual care facilities will substantially increase in providing services to senior citi- zens. There being no further comments, Mr. deLong moved that the Manor Care application be approved subject to any staff com- ments, seconded by Mr. Pagliarulo. Chairman Trauger clarified that it was moved and seconded to approve the construction plans for the preliminary plat which provides for the construction of infrastructure improvements to serve a 120 bed personal care facility adjacent to the existing nursing center subject to staff comments. The motion carried 7-0. Ce SITE PLANS 1. PROJECT NAME: Manor Care Personal Care Facility AGENT: Rick Rossi, P. E. John R. Cochran, Jr., A.I.A. OWNER: LOCATION: Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc. Congress Avenue at Charter Drive, northwest corner. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached "Addendum A" DESCRIPTION: Request for site plan approval to construct a 120 bed personal care facility on 4.63 acres. -9- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Golden advised that the proposed 120 bed personal care facility which will be located on Parcel B, the lower of the two parcels, is roughly designed in the shape of the letter "H" and was displayed on the screen for the Board members' viewing. The opening that faces toward Congress Avenue con- tains a loop-shape driveway which raps around the inside. The number of parking spaces provided in the areas to the east, north and west of the personal care facility exceed the code requirements for the proposed use. Access will be provided by a driveway onto Congress Avenue which will be shared with the existing nursing center and two driveways onto Charter Drive. The driveway and parking areas between the nursing center and the personal care facility will be shared between the two facilities. The proposed expansion for the existing nursing center is a future expansion which will require site plan approval at a future date. The building architecture is proposed to be CBS construction with a concrete tile roof. Mr. Golden stated that the Technical Review Board recommends approval of this project subject to staff comments. Mr. deLong confirmed that the architecture would be similar to the existing nursing care facility. One item of concern to Chairman Trauger was the statement that the Charter Drive median and irrigation system was to be repaired by the developer. In response, Mr. Golden explained when the developer constructs the eastern-most driveway onto Charter Drive, he will provide for a cut in that median and when he reconstructs the median to provide the cut, he will be required to reconstruct and repair the irrigation and curbing for the median. Pointing out his concern for the shared parking, Mr. Ryder confirmed with Mr. Rossi that the Management would remain the same for both facilities. There being no further comments, Mr. deLong moved that the application by Manor Care Personal Care Facility be approved subject to staff comments, seconded by Mr. Wandelt. The Board approved the site plan for the construction of a 120 bed personal care facility on 4.63 acres for Manor Care Personal Care Facility, subject to staff comments. The motion carried 7-0. -10- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: The Shoppes of Seacrest Jesgo Development Corporation of Palm Beach County, Inc. Jesgo Development Corporation of Palm Beach County, Inc. North Seacrest Boulevard at Miner Road, northwest corner Request for site plan approval to construct a 40,320 square foot shopping center consisting of three buildings on 5.9 acres. Mr. Golden stated that as indicated in the memorandum from Kevin Hallahan, City Forester, in the Agenda packet there was a problem with conformance to the tree preservation regulations· Since the Technical Review Board, they have had a number of conversations between the developer, the engineer, the architect, and the City Staff, as well as a meeting on May 12, 1986 concerning that situation. A scheme was worked out to the agreement of Mr. Hallahan and the Planning Department to resolve that problem of tree pre- servation. Mr. Golden pointed out that the handout distri- buted by Mr. Annunizato referenced that issue. Essentially that scheme is as follows: the developer put in writing his intent to correspond to the comments in Mr. Hallahan's memo, a few areas were not addressed in the developer's origina1 letter. Mr. Hallahan prepared an additional memo to cover those comments the developer made in his letter to the Planning Department. Additionally, as part of that revised landscape plan, the developer will submit a revised plan to the Building Department by noon the fOllowing day to be distributed to the Community Appearance Board which will contain or incorporate the comments from Mr. Hallahan in his two memos, and that should cover the issue. -11- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Golden would suggest that if the Board moves to approve the site plan that they approve it subject to approval of the revised landscape plan by the Community Appearance Board. Mr. Golden informed the members that the proposed shopping center is located on the west side of North Seacrest Boulevard across from the intersection with Miner Road. Mr. Golden confirmed to Chairman Trauger that the existing convenience store, Mr. Grocer, would be removed. The pro- posed shopping center consists of three buildings. The two buildings located on the north and south are of equal size - 12,480 square feet. The center building is 15,360 square feet. The usage will be limited to those permitted under the C-2 Zoning. Parking to be provided exceeds the code requirements for its use by eight spaces. Access will be provided by a main entrance onto Seacrest Boulevard that will line with Palm Road across the street to form an inter- section. Secondary access will be provided by a driveway onto Miner Road. The developer will be required to dedicate and provide for Miner Road from Seacrest to the western pro- perty boundary, to provide for access to the undeveloped residential parcel to the rear of the shopping center. The shopping center will be of CBS construction with an off- white finish. The store front will be glass with an alumi- num frame. The roof will match the store front. In regard to utilities, Mr. Golden advised that there exists adequate utilities to serve the entire shopping center sub- ject to the comments made by the Utilities Director. Mr. Golden pointed out that under the comments submitted by the Planning Department on the Staff Comment Sheet, there is an issue pertaining to the traffic impact analysis. In the original analysis, the numbers provided were for a shopping center of less intensive use. The applicant had the engineer revise the study and the plan was resubmitted. The addi- tional numbers did not require that any further improve- ments be made by the developer to the adjacent roadway -12- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 system. Mr. Golden noted that the county plans to widen Seacrest Boulevard to five lanes. The middle lane will be a dual left turn lane and would be sufficient to handle the traffic to the shopping center. Mr. Golden advised that comment should be deleted from the comments on the agenda. Mr. Golden stated that the Technical Review Board recom- mended approval of this project subject to the Community Appearance Board's approval of the revised landscape plans. Chairman Trauger understood that there would be no impact fee for any part of the improvement of Seacrest Boulevard in this. Mr. Annunziato clarified the impact fee is always there. Chairman Trauger said the improvements of Seacrest Boulevard itself are costing the County money and questioned if there is any impact fee extracted from this developer to pay for that part of the improvement of Seacrest, or does the City pay its part and the County its part. Mr. Annunziato responded not beyond that, it would be paid as part of the permitting structure which is paid by the square foot. Chairman Trauger pointed out an area where the City has invested considerably to control flooding with areas of swales and questioned how the water would be contained. Mr. Cannon advised that the applicant did provide a drainage plan which will have to meet the parking lot regulations for retaining three inches of rainfall for the first one hour period. Chairman Trauger said the City's problems have been with the 8-10 inches of rainfall within a 24-48 hour period, and he is apprehensive about this project because of the amount of work and expense invested in the swales in the entire area and now he does not feel they will have a swale area in front of this project. -13- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato advised that the design must meet South Florida Water Management requirements and, as part of the reconstruction of Seacrest, the drainage will be reconstructed, with retention. It will be positive drainage to a retention area along Hypoluxo Road. Most of Seacrest is going to be paved on its right-of-way to right-of-way line as it is by the City Hall. Chairman Trauger said reconstruction of Seacrest has been delayed many times and his concern is what will happen during the transition period. Pending the widening of Seacrest, Mr. Ryder asked if provisions will be made at that time for left turns and approaches to the entrance on Seacrest. In response to these inquiries, Mr. Annunziato stated that he believed the completion of the reconstruction of Seacrest Boulevard was not too far away. When this pro- posed project is built and occupied to where it would create a problem, Seacrest Boulevard will be in place. He reminded the members that this is a funded project and design has been ongoing for about a year. Discussion followed. Mr. Pagliarulo asked if Miner Road right-of-way is through to 1-95. Mr. Annunziato replied, not yet, when the vacant property behind this project develops Miner Road would then have to be dedicated through to 1-95. It would tie into one or two streets from the south. Chairman Trauger expressed concern over the past history of this area. He owned property in this area and over the years has seen a tremendous turnover of businesses and vacant stores. Looking at the past history, he is apprehensive as to the final success of this project. -14- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTONBEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato pointed out that this is one area of the city and this area is not overzoned commercially. In agreement with Mr. Ryder's statement, Mr. Annunziato noted that this project is close to the Village Royale on the Green which has substantial potential for business. Mr. Annunziato believed the population existed to support a neighborhood shopping center. Additionally, Mr. Annunziato reminded the Board members that a neighborhood shopping center does not exist in that area and the closest shopping center, Yachtman's Plaza, is located on the east end. Accordingly, Mr. Ryder said he has noticed that many of the residents from Village Royale travel to the Publix Supermarket on Congress Avenue to do their food shopping. Presentations by Applicant Jeff Godfrey, Owner 1650 South Dixie Highway Boca Raton, FL Chairman Trauger referred the BOard's comments as to the drainage and the apparent existing economic barrier. From the marketability standpoint, Mr. Godfrey said they had investigated the surrounding areas to the north, south and east and felt that the problem areas that concerned the Board members were located just south of the property in about a one to two mile radius. Those properties went up on a smaller level and really did not accomplish a major shopping center of this -15- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 type and as such could not afford the funding of marke- tability programs, etc. Mr. Godfrey said they have received letters of interest from various neighborhood store operations who are willing to come into the center. Chairman Trauger inquired as to the number of store units, sections or bays that would be encompassed in this center. Mr. Godfrey responded that Building A, which is the southern-most building, has letters of interest for five stores. In order to give an insight towards what the entire center would encompass, Mr. Godfrey advised that possibly there would be five stores on the south, five stores on the north and seven to eight stores in the center, collectively about eighteen stores. In response to Chairman Trauger's question as to the type of stores involved, Mr. Godfrey stated they would be neigh- borhood-type operations, such as, grocery stores, a dry cleaning establishment, pizza restaurant, stores which would fit the niche of the neighborhood. He added that an inten- sive marketability study was performed for the area. Ms. Huckle was apprised that Mr. Godfrey did have firm com- mitments for this center. She questioned if Mr. Godfrey owned an out parcel in that area and asked if there was any particular reason why the out parcel was not being deve- loped. Mr. Godfrey replied that at this point he had plans in the future for a food operation such as a Wendy's Restaurant. Mr. Godfrey confirmed with Mr. Ryder that he was aware of the comments with regard to the landscaping. He stated that on several occasions he had discussed the need for pre- serving landscaping on site and they have gone to great lengths to incorporate the current landscaping into his plan and they accept the staff comments as presented and could foresee no problem in conforming with them. Chairman Trauger invited Councilwoman Dee Zibelli to speak before the Board on this subject. -16- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Dee Zibelli 440 Ocean Parkway Boynton Beach, Florida Ms. zibelli advised the Board members that she resides within two blocks from the proposed shopping center. She added that she has been a strong supporter for the widening of Seacrest Boulevard but at that time the proposed shopping center was not exactly what she had in mind. There are many children residing in the subject area and stated that it was an ethnic community. The neighbors have been attempting to raise the quality of the homes as well as the quality of the living environment in the area. Ms. zibelli firmly believed that the proposed shopping center would not aid in this endeavor of promoting the quality of living in the neighborhood by putting in a Wendy's Restaurant or a pizza restaurant and would only be another place for the children to "hang out." This was Ms. zibelli's main concern. She added that there is only one store located in the area and there is no problem existing at the present time. However, the store has been going downhill in the last few years. In regard to the traffic impact, she remarked that across from Miner Road there is a little two way road on which vehicles can barely drive past one anotlher. Ms. zibelli further commented that it is an attractive residential street. She was apprehensive that the cars would utilize this street as a thoroughfare to reach U. S. 1 thereby creating a traffic problem. !It was further stated by Ms. zibelli that at the present time there are signs erected which stipulate a maximum driving speed of fifteen miles an hour. However, these speed limits are constantly ignored. Even though she was aware that this parcel is zoned commercial, Ms. zibelli empha- sized her opposition to the proposed shopping center due to the adverse traffic impact it would create. As the discussion ensued, Mr. deLong pointed out that it was previously verified that the proposed property was zoned C-2 and the type of establishments were described. Furthermore, he stated that the Board was aware of the codification and of the type of stores that are permitted in a C-2 zoning. He noted that the discussion was addressing marketability or feasibility and reiterated that it ~was not advantageous to -17- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 discuss whether an application is economically feasible. If a developer believes he can build a better "mousetrap" by constructing such stores, he has that right. Additionally, since the property is zoned C-2, it is apparent that the developer is not asking to construct buildings on that pro- perty that are not permitted there. Mr. deLong stated that apparently the prospective stores previously mentioned by the developer are acceptable in a C-2 zone. Accordingly, he noted that it would be unfortunate if this area along Seacrest Boulevard were to be residential and it wasn't zoned such. The developer has a legitimate application to C-2 zoning. Otherwise, Mr. deLong failed to foresee how the Board could penalize someone who owns property that is already zoned to meet the purpose of the developer's plans. Mr. deLong stressed that restriction upon restriction cannot be imposed upon developers without at some point offering them compensation for demeaning of their property rights. Mr. deLong wholeheartedly agreed with Chairman Trauger's concern for the residents' protection but added that he is promoting individual property rights. If the property is zoned C-2 then the owner has the right to use it as a C-2 piece of property, with guidance and certain stipulations from the Planning and Zoning Board, the City Planner, and the City's authoritative governmental bodies. There should not exist an anti-developer, anti-commercial attitude and there has to be something in the City for everybody. In response to Chairman Trauger's concern for the guarantee of quality in new developments, Mr. deLong commented that the Board can refine quality and upgrade construction. He stressed that there are means of accomplishing this goal without taking away zoning rights or zoning privileges within in a specified codification. Discussion continued between Ms. Huckle and Mr. Golden on the possible use of the out parcel for a Wendy's Restaurant. Mr. Golden stated that if a Wendy's Restaurant had a drive- throUgh window, zoning would require a conditional use. ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 However, Mr. Golden reminded the Board members that there has been no Wendy's Restaurant or gasoline station proposed as part of this development. With the exception of Mr. Grocer and an old gas station, Mr. deLong inquired if there were any other commercial acti- vity of a C-2 or C-3 nature from Tenth Avenue to Hypoluxo Road. Mr. Annunziato responded that there was a planned tract of C-2 property located at the old gasoline station site, but that property is now in public domain. He further stated that the site of the proposed shopping center is the last remaining commercial tract on Seacrest Boulevard between Hypoluxo and Tenth Avenue, and the most accessible commer- cial property aside from the subject property would be along U. S. 1 or along 10th Avenue. Mr. Ryder appreciated Councilwoman Zibelli's concern regarding the proposed shopping center, they are faced here with a permissive use under the existing zoning. In com- parison, he added that it would be as difficult for the Board to consider changes from areas currently zoned resi- dential to go to commercial. He could not foresee how he could take a stand against a permissive use in a par- ticular location which is zoned for that use. On the other hand, Mr. Ryder remarked that there is always a future possibility that under the current C-2 zoning there could exist an undesirable development. In agreement with Mr. deLong's statement, Mr. Ryder concluded that the Board was confronted with the fact that this is a permissive use in this location and his own opinion is he does not have real basis to disapprove it. In concurrence with Mr. Ryder's comments, Ms. Huckle remarked that this proposed shopping center could have a positive impact. Since the property is zoned C-2, there is nothing the Board can do to change the zoning. She added that the uses are spelled out in the zoning Code and she believed that there could be a positiveness to this because it could be attractively done. It was evident to her that the owner investigated his potential investment or he wouldn't be spending his money on this project. Additionally, since there is no other shopping center in the area, Ms. Huckle -19- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 concluded that this development could have a very positive impact on the neighborhood and may upgrade some of the areas in the vicinity with its aesthetic appearance. As the discussion ensued, Mr. deLong commented that the landscaping plans included extensive planting of trees and that a large amount of capital would be spent on landscaping the shopping center. He believed the neighboring area would be aesthetically improved due to that particular improvement. Chairman Trauger addressed the developer and received con- currence from him that he had accepted the staff comments as presented along with the stipulation for additional landscaping. There being no additional questions, Mr. deLong moved that the application for Shoppes of Seacrest be approved subject to the staff comments and subject to the remarks made by Mr. Golden with specific regard to the horticultural letters that have been exchanged between Mr. Hallahan and the developer, and subject to the approval of the Community ApPearance Board, seconded by Mr. Pagliarulo. Chairman Trauger clarified that it was moved and seconded to approve the site plan as presented subject to staff comments and subject to the approval of the Community Appearance Board. The motion carried 7-0. PLAN MODIFICATIONS PROJECT NAME: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: Publix at Sunshine Square Shopping Center Kieran J. Kilday The Building Company Federal Highway at Woolbright Road, southwest corner -20- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for the addi- tion of a 40,000 square foot supermarket to the rear of the existing shopping center, a revised shared parking allocation, and a change in parking lot layout and design. Mr. Golden reported that the new supermarket would be located to the rear or the south of the existing shopping center directly on S. E. 18th Avenue across from the Sun Bank Branch and Burger King. The building will be located against the FEC right-of-way toward the west end of the pro- perty. The applicant proposes a 40,000 square foot super- market and 376 additional parking spaces which are to be located to the rear of the existing shopping center. Access will be provided to the proposed supermarket by the existing driveways onto WoOlbright Road and Federal Highway. A new driveway will also be provided in the vicinity of the new Publix on to S. E. 18th Avenue and the vicinity of Burger King. The Planning Department is also requiring the appli- cant to bond the cost of future signalization of the two intersections for its project. The first intersection is located at S. E. 18th Avenue and Federal Highway and the second is the driveway onto Woolbright Road near Donovan's Buffet Restaurant. Mr. Golden further noted that it is not the road nearest to the Railroad tracks but the second one to the east of the Railroad tracks. The proposed super- market will be constructed of CBS and some brick construc- tion with a wood facia and barrel-tile roof. In connection with approval of the site plan, the applicant is also requesting approval of the revised shared parking allocation for the Sunshine Square Shopping Center. The ratio of parking provided on site as compared to that required by the City zoning regulations under the proposed site plan modification, is exactly the same as approved in the original site plan approval which is about .88 or .89. In addition, a buffer of 18% is being provided. The Board was advised that the Technical Review Board recommended approval of the site plan subject to staff comments. -21- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 The TRB also recommends approval of the shared parking allo- cation as submitted. Mr. Golden suggested that a revision be made concerning the shared parking allocation. He stated that included as part of the traffic impact analysis and shared parking allocation was Donovan's Buffet Restaurant. It was pointed out by Mr. Golden that the developer is adding a walk-in cooler to the rear of the additional shopping center. Mr. Golden addressed the Board's attention to a little rectangular shape to the rear which in the plans shows the location of the proposed walk-in cooler. Mr. Annunziato commented on an item which became apparent to him when he reviewed the plan. He directed the Board's attention to the driveway which will serve the north-south exit in front of Donovan's Buffet Restaurant. He noted on the plans that there are two lines which appear to separate the parking lot from the driVeway and on the plans it resembled a planting island. He stated that this area is currently open and suggested that it be closed. However, it was unclear in the plan whether it was a striped cut out or an enhanced cut off. In Mr. Annunziato's opinion, it should be curbed so people will be prohibited from exiting that parking lot through that opening which woul~ address to it some degree of traffic. He suggested that this item be incorporated in the comments. Ms. Huckle pointed out that in the packet plans the referenced exit was shown open. She inquired if there is to be a driveway from the proposed Publix going past the theatre and Donovan's Buffet Restaurant. Ms. Huckle questioned the black line depicted on the plan which was drawn from the wall which closes the driveway off. In response to Ms. Huckle's inquiry, Ms. Haley explained that it was just part of the petition showing that our petition is south of that line. In addition, Mr. Golden explained that the black line separated the existing from the proposed in terms of the approval being requested. Chairman Trauger questioned the existence of a covered walk- way from the existing shopping center to the proposed Publix location. Mr. Annunziato stated that the only canopy will be where the existing cover is now constructed. -22- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Ms. Huckle commented that there are presently only two entrances and exits -- one to the south and one to the north. Mr. Annunziato advised that there is an exit south to S. E. 18th Avenue, east to U. S. 1, two ways east and two ways north. Mr. Ryder stressed concern over the shared parking for the theatre and Donovan's Buffet Restaurant. Mr. Golden stated that it was determined that the impact from Donovan's Buffet Restaurant is the same as the impact received from Fountain's Department Store which previously existed at that location. There was no additional traffic or parking impact created. In response to Ms. Huckle and Mr. Ryder's questions, Mr. Annunziato requested the Board members to look at a copy of the site plan which accompanied their agenda packages. He believed it would be easier for them to look at the overlay concerning the issues of egress and ingress. He noted that coming south on U. S. 1 one could enter either of the two driveways currently existing in the shopping center or S. E. 18th Avenue. Additionally, he pointed out that if one was coming east from Seacrest he could enter at either of the three driveways which are off of Woolbright Road. Mr. Ryder verified the location of the proposed shopping center on the plans submitted to the Board members and noted that it was a separate building from the existing Publix supermarket. As a point of interest, Mr. Annunziato commented that there was a similar shopping center in Deerfield Beach in which Publix had a leased facility in the shopping center and eventually built a free-standing store on an adjacent vacant piece of property. Mr. Annunziato pointed out that this is a similar concept and should be as successful. Mr. Ryder commented that it appeared to be a more logical development of this area than what was previously presented for development of this particular location. -23- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 In response to Ms. Huckles' inquiry as to the size of the proposed Publix, Ms. Haley advised that it would be similar in size to the Publix Supermarket located on Congress Avenue and HyPoluxo Road. Presentation byApplicant Brenda Haley Kilday ASsociates Ms. Haley requested the Board consider another item in regard to allowing a cart opening which would be wide enough for the carts and pedestrians. The Board could foresee no problem With that request. However, Mr. Ryder apprised Ms. Haley that the frontage is a fire lane and no parking is permitted. Ms. Huckle was concerned with the exits and signal lights to be installed. Mr. Annunziato agreed that was a problem but clarified that signalization may be warranted in the future at S. E. 18th Avenue. He added that this is not a desirable location for a traffic signal. In their conversations with the County Traffic Engineerl, the Planning Department is requestinig that the applicant be responsible for constructing a signal if one is warranted. If it becomes so dangerous that a traffic signal is warranted because of the shopping center, it should ibe the applicant's responsibility to instai1 it. However, Mr. Annunziato believed the County Traffic Engineer is not going~t° determine the necessity of the traffic signal at this time and added that ft is not an ideal location for a signal light intersection. The discussion continued in regard to the previous signal light sites and time factors involved in obtaining the necessary traffic lights. Ms. Huckle questioned if the Board was considering the entire Publix shopping center as one site plan and if com- ments could be addressed to the existing building. Ms. Huckle stated that she resides in the vicinity of the store and was concerned as to whether the Board could make recommendations for improving the traffic flow in and out of the main entrance on Woolbright Road. Ms. Huckle noted that there was an ample amount of landscaped areas. She added that another lane was needed so that drivers who turn right -24- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 do not back up the entire shopping center because of one or two who want to make a left turn. If there was another driveway it could eliminate this congestion problem for the drivers who live east or west of the turn. Ms. Huckle stated that the same problem exists by the railroad tracks except there are two options available - going around by the Italian Restaurant or going out that exit. Discussion continued with Mr. Ryder stating his concern that this huge building would create more traffic. Vice Chairman Winter wondered what would happen to the existing Publix building once this proposed one was completed and how will that affect the existing stores since they will no longer be in the forefront of the shopping center, but will more or less be in the background. Mr. Annunziato did not know if a lease was signed yet for the existing Publix store. However, in all of the analyses, it has been concluded that this store will be some form of retail operation. Mr. Annunziato could not comment on the feasibility of the existing stores. Vice Chairman Winter was concerned that the consumers would be entering into a different part of the shopping center to get to Publix and the existing merchants will more or less be in the background and not part of the existing or busi- ness right-of-ways. Mr. Annunziato agreed with Vice Chairman Winter's statement that some of those businesses derive their income because there isa Publix located in their shopping center. However, he commented that he is not certain there is anything the Board can do to protect them. Ms. Haley requested clarification of the changes or modifi- cations required. Mr. Annunziato stated that there should be two lanes out and one lane into the shopping center. In reply, Ms. Haley inquired if she could verify this change with Mr. Linkous the owner of the center and Publix since he had hired her -25- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13~ 1986 firm to represent him. At this point, Mr. Annunziato advised Ms. Haley that if she could not speak for the planner that this issue would have to be tabled until there is someone present who can speak for her client. In order to avoid any further delay, Ms. Haley stated she could see no problem with the stipulated revision. In Mr. Ryder's opinion, he believed these two recommen- dations are important. If they are approved on that basis, an opportunity would exist for the applicant to be present at the Council meeting to discuss them. However, the Board felt strongly about this issue and this meeting is the Board's opportunity to obtain their requested changes. Additionally, he concluded that this concurrence would pre- vent the applicant's request from being held up. Ms. Haley stated she was in agreement with Mr. Ryder on this issue. Mr. Wandelt questioned if the new addition was soley owned by Publix and not part of the existing shopping center. Accordingly, Mr. deLong inquired if this parcel was sold by the present owner, John Moore, to Publix. If so, Publix is then the owner of the property but it is not stipulated in the package. Mr. deLong noted that the package shows that John Moore signed the application. Additionally, Ms. Buckle noted that the package stipulated that the property owner~is the Building Company and the Building Company is John Moore. Ms. Haley stated that they were done in conjunction. Mr. Linkous, owner of the center, and Publix have hired us to put this petition through as one single piece, but the peti- tion is only concerning the southern-most end of the pro- perty. Mr. Annunziato suggested that perhaps John Moore signed the application and that he might be in a position of being under contract. He did'not fully know the facts but if the Board desired, he would obtain additional information for the Council. In response to Ms. Buckle's question, Mr. Annunziato replied that this is a one-site, site plan. Publix is part and parcel of this entire development and is not separate -26- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 from it. He further commented that it impacts legitimately on other aspects of this entire shopping center. The traf- fic patterns change because of this proposed location on the shoppping center site and the owner has acknowledged that through the Traffic Engineeers. Mr. Annunziato informed Ms. Huckle that he did not know who owned the Publix store, but would further investigate this issue. Mr. deLong agreed that Ms. Huckle brought up a good point. He stated that if it is an amended site plan then it should be the owner, as the Board knows the owner, the Building Company. He added if Publix purchased this property, they should be making their own application. At the present time, Mr. Annunziato stated that Publix does not own this property because Mr. Moore signed the applica- tion. Mr. Wandelt said if Publix owns the property, you could not pressure them to make these changes; however, if it is owned by the same owner as the shopping center, then the pressure can be put on them. As a matter of significance, Mr. Ryder stated that in the past when changes were brought before the Board on Sunshine Square, Ron Linkous represented the applicant and asked Ms. Haley if he is out of the picture in this instance. To clarify the issue, Ms. Haley stated that they are working with Publix, because Publix is the main person concerned in this part of the petition and are trying to conform with their wishes for the Publix layout. As far as the application is concerned, Mr. Annunziato com- mented that the Building Company has authorized Kilday and Associates to represent them and the Building Company, which is the owner of Sunshine Square, is the applicant of record. On the topic of shared parking allocation, Mr. Ryder pointed out that this issue includes everyone and the Board would be justified in approving this on the basis of recommending changes to the two entrances on Woolbright Road. -27- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Ryder moved to approve the site plan request for a 40,000 square foot Publix Supermarket providing that the staff comments are incorporated and also that the two entrances on Woolbright Road be widened to permit three lanes for better entrance and exit, seconded by Ms. Huckle. Chairman Trauger clarified that it has been moved and seconded to approve the request for the amended site plan for the addition of a 40,000 square foot supermarket to the rear of the existing shopping center, a revised shared parking allocation, and a change in parking lot layout and design, subject to staff comments and with the comment that the two exits on Woolbright be permitted for three lanes of traffic in and out. Mr. Annunziato will further formulate and clarify the recommendation on the entrance and exit issue onto WoOlbright Road and stated that it is the existing major access, plus the access which is on north- south driveway. The motion carried 7-0. PROJECT NAME: Farm Store at Meadows Square Shopping Center AGENT: Kieran J. Kilday OWNER: Turks and Caicos Corporation, B.V. LOCATION: Congress Avenue at Hypoluxo Road, southwest corner DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for the addi- tion of a 1,600 square foot con- venience store including retail gasoline sales and a change in parking lot layout and design. Mr. Golden stated that this site plan was originally included with modifications approved last month. It was withdrawn from the Technical Review Board due to problems with congestion on site and the basic layout design at that time. The applicant has redesigned that area of the shopping center for the Farm Stores incor- porating the comments made by the Technical Review Board at ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 the April meeting. Also, included along with the Farm Store is a request for approval of a compactor to be located behind Publix which was not included on the site plan but comment was made that it should be properly screened. There also is a comment from Public Works Department pertaining to the location of the compactor. Additional items included in the request for approval are the installation of three coolers to the rear of the existing shopping center. Mr. Golden noted that two parking spaces were removed to provide for two out of the three coolers. The Technical Review Board recommends approval of this request subject to staff comments. However, Mr. Golden pointed out that there is a memo from the Utilities Director which was distributed prior to this request which indicates that more information is needed in regard to the proposed location of the coolers behind the existing shopping center and they cannot be approved at this time. Mr. Golden pointed out that only affects the coolers and not the compactor or the Farm Store. Mr. Golden continued that the Farm Store, which is the main topic of this request is located in the northwest corner of the shopping center at the intersection of Meadows Lane and Hypoluxo Road. The Farm Store includes a 1600 square foot convenience store and gasoline pump island on the north and south sides of the building. Access to this site will be provided by the existing curb cutoff in Meadows Way at the southwest corner of the Farm Store site. The parking for the entire shopping center including the additional parking for the Farm Store will exceed the code requirements for the shopping center by approximately eight spaces. The Planning Department and the Police Department require that three end-to-end parking spaces on the south side of the convenience store adjacent to the pump islands be removed to facilitate on-site traffic flow and minimize congestion. The proposed Farm Store is to be a concrete block stucco and brick construction with a sprayed-textured stucco finish. The roof will be terra cotta tile with wood trim. The color scheme will be creme with a brown roof. The proposed signage as indicated on the overlay is a barn shaped facade with a large cow and the store name. -29- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 At this point, Mr. Golden advised that the Planning Department would like to make a statement about the proposed signage. The Planning Department feels the proposed sign is incompatible with the existing shopping center and from an aesthetic standpoint, is not pleasing to the eye. They would recommend that something more appropriate could be provided to fit in with the existing shopping center and to allow for a more favorable aesthetic appearance. In response to Ms. Huckle's inquiry, Mr. Golden responded that the Farm Store would not have a drive-through window since that option would require conditional use approval. This would be a walk-in convenience store. Mr. Golden stated there was also another sketch which was more detailed on the architecture. However, he did not make an overlay of that plan since it did not show the full extent of the exterior design. With the exception of the sign, Mr. Golden remarked that this is a very basic building sketch. Ms. Huckle noticed that the Planning Department had not incorporated their comments on the signage in the Board's packet. Mr. Golden explained that as far as the actual dimensions of the sign and the configuration, it does meet the code. The Planning Department is commenting on the appearance of the sign. Mr. Golden clarified this is not a code issue, but they felt it was inappropriate, so they did not include this in their comments. In answer to Mr. Ryder's question as to whether this was a Butler type building, Mr. Golden stated that it is CBS construction. Mr. Annunziato informed the Board members that all comments about the sign should be taken as a matter of opinion. The intent is to have a shopping center with a design which is consistent throughout in terms of signage, construction, etc. He stated that this configuration of signage will stand out like a "sore thumb." It does not compliment the shopping center and the City. As discussion continued, Mr. deLong noted that the shopping center is now very attractively done. He added that the Publix sign as well as the other store signs look good. In agreement with Mr. Annunziato's statement, Mr. deLong stated that the Farm Store sign would be very incongruous aestheti- cally with the rest of the existing shopping center. -30- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato believed that comments can be made about having the signage for this building be consistent with the signage for the shopping center. Mr. Annunziato emphasized that it does not compliment a fairly attractive shopping center which already exists. He added there is room for recommendation that the applicant reconsider the signage for this Farm Store and make it more compatible with the signage of the shopping center. Mr. Ryder commented that the architectural treatment of the elevation on Hypoluxo is not very attractive; it is dOwnright plain. Mr. Golden stated that the applicant can prowide more information. On the plans, there is another elevation showing more detail, but it was difficult to make an overlay to show this on the screen. The overlay in the packet does not provide for the actual architectural detail. Discussion followed. Mr. Annunziato pointed out the signage that was being pro- posed on the subject building. He stated that the building is somewhat more attractive and does, in effect, offer an architectural design which is consistent with the shopping center and is not consistent with the proposed sign. Ms. Haley advised the Board members that this sign is part of the Farm Stores' national logo, but she believed that the recommendatiOns of the Board could be complied with. Mr. Wandelt commented that the sign does not look bad if the border of the barn was taken away because it extends above the building and only the sign itself, "FARMSTORES" and the cow, tend to make it look less like a barn. Mr. Annunziato suggested that since these comments have been made known to the applicant, if the Board is going to make the motion to recommend approval, they should include some comments about the signage for this Farm Store complimenting the signage of the shopping center. Mr. Annunziato believed that would give the applicant sufficient leeway. -31- ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Ms. Haley stated that she would convey the Board's comments to Mr. Kilday and that she was confident he would be able to comply with them. Ms. Huckle expressed her concern for the gas station pump access. This is a completely enclosed operation and there is only one access from Meadows Drive. She did not understand how a gas station could operate efficiently under these circumstances. Mr. Annunziato stated that when his department first looked at this site approximately three months ago, the first series of comments made were that this is not an appropriate site for a gasoline station, it was not large enough, not only are they asking for a gasoline station, they are asking for a convenience store, it is a congested portion of the site. The developer has tinkered with it to the point where they think they have it to fit and apparently it does not negate any of our local ordinances. It puts the City in a position wherein it was recommended because it worked without aggregating any of the local codes. However, there is no question that this is a congested site. As the discussion progressed, Ms. Huckle stated she could not imagine why anyone would go in there to get gas. It looks as though one would have to go through an obstacle course before finding a pump and getting out would be the same problem in reverse. Ms. Huckle asked if it was possible to get more curb cuts for access to the pumps. Ms. Haley stated that it is an approved use for the zoning, and the applicant did meet all of the criteria for that zoning and has gone before all the members to obtain their input. She concluded by stating that this proposal had been through every department in the City about four times. Ms. Huckle said she approved of the Farm Stores idea, but she did not approve of the gas pump idea. Ms. Huckle did not know what the jurisdiction of the Board is on this. Mr. Annunziato pointed out that it was suggested to the applicant that this was not an appropriate site for the use. MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Ryder concurred with Ms. Haley that she would convey the Board's comments to Mr. Kilday and was confident that he would be able to comply with them. Mr. Annunziato stated that the compactor for Publix was another issue that should be addressed positively. Publix is requesting that a compactor be installed behind its store. The Board members were advised that this was another aspect of the site plan modification which can be addressed positively in the same motion. Ms. Huckle moved to approve the Farm Store and the compac- tor, with staff comments, and to deny approval for the gas station due to the congestion of the site and inac- cessibility factor, seconded by Vice Chairman Winter. Chairman Trauger clarified the motion to approve the Farm Store and the compactor site and the coolers, but to deny the use of the gas station due to the inaccessibility and congestion. The Board also recommends modification to the signage so it will be compatible with the rest of the shopping center. Notation was made that the subject of the coolers would be incorporated in the staff comments. The motion carried 7-0. Se PROJECT NAME: Boynton Lakes - Plat 4 Recreation Area AGENT: James H. Holland, Vice President OWNER: Boynton Lakes Joint Venture - c/o Lennar Homes, Inc. LOCATION: East Side of Congress Avenue, south of Hypoluxo Road ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for a change in layout and design of recreational amenities. Mr. Golden stated that the proposed recreation area is to be located on the west side of Boynton Lakes Boulevard between Chesterfield Drive and Redford Drive. Redford to the north and Chesterfield to the south just south of the overlay. The site plan was previously approved for this recreation area. Mr. Golden advised that the parking lot remains the same and the proposed changes concern the area of the pool. The pool is to be the same size. There was a cabana pro- vided on the southside of the pool just north of where the playground is now located. The applicant removed that in favor of the pavilion on the opposite side between the pool and the parking lot. The building is slightly larger than the previous site plan which showed the cabana. The playground on the southside of the pool has been moved to where the cabana was located from the southeast area of the pool, and that this is essentially the major change being requested. Mr. Annunziato commented that as the Planning Department began to approve the final plats for the property south of Canal 19, it became apparent that there were some recreational requirements from the original master plan from 1979 which had not been met. It required some adjustments, and that is why this is a site plan modification. It was a requirement to have meeting facilities both north and south of Canal 19. This application now reflects the balancing and recreational amenity package which meets the requirements of the 1979 master plan. That is the genesis of this request for site plan modification. Mr. Golden added that the Technical Review Board recommends approval subject to the staff comments. ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 There being no further comments, Mr. deLong made a motion that the application made by Boynton Lakes for the recreation area Plat 4 be approved subject to staff com- ments, seconded by Ms. Huckle. Chairman Trauger clarifed that it has moved and seconded that the site plan for Boynton Lakes Plat 4 Recreation Area, subject to staff comments, be approved. The motion carried 7-0. 6. PROJECT NAME: Meadows 300 - Tract A AGENT: Tim Lynch OWNER: Boynton West Corporation LOCATION: West Side of Congress Avenue, south of Hypoluxo Road DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of an amended site plan to allow for the addi- tion of screened enclosures within the building line of the existing multi-family units. Mr. Golden stated that this is a request for a site plan modification that proposes to allow the addition of optional screen enclosures onto the concrete patio area of the villa units at Willowbrook. The proposed enclosures as indicated on the second overlay, will be limited to the concrete patio within the wooden fence area of the units and will not be allowed to exceed the building line. The enclo- sures will also be completely screened without a solid roof. On the overlay, the side elevation can been seen of the enclosure. The screen enclosure woUld be within the con- fine of the wooden fence and patio. The Technical Review Board recommends approval of this request as submitted. There were no staff comments. ~INUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato stated that it is a recurring problem. They constantly advise people in their multi-family developments to consider screen enclosures. He added that it is understandable that people enjoy sitting outside without getting bitten by bugs. In response to Vice Chairman Winter's comment of why they do not put solid roofs on the screened rooms, Mr. Annunziato stated there are many reasons - sometimes it becomes a set- back violation and sometimes it violates their common pro- perty requirements - there are many reasons. Mr. Ryder commented this is the beginning in many instances of a substantial expansion at a future date. One starts with a concrete slab patio, then encloses it with a screen, and then walls and windows are put in. Thereby, it affects setbacks, they are infringed upon and this is a problem. Mr. Annunziato verifed with Ms. Huckle that the roofs would be made of screen as opposed to a solid roof. He added if the occupant wanted to have a roof installed at a later date they would have to go through another modification and that could become a master plan issue. At this point, the owner would be adding floor space. Screen roofs do not count as enclosed floor space. When a roof is installed, the area space is changed. Discussion followed. Presentation by Applicant Ted Lynch Project Manager Boynton West COrporation 840 U. S. Highway One, Suite 400 North Palm BeaCh, FL 33408 Mr. Lynch stated they are not exceeding their allowable building area. However, on the subject of solid roofs, the developer does not want to install solid roofs and explained these are prohibited and they do not want to create that type of environment where people will be enclosing patios with solid roofs. -36- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Ryder commented that if the Board approved this request that there should be a stipulation that no permanent construction or other such construction should be permitted. In response to Ms. Huckle's inquiry, Mr. Lynch advised that some of these units already exist. There are 31 four unit buildings that are allowed in the development and there are about ten either completed or under construction. Ms. Huckle questioned if there was a Homeowners' Association. Mr. Lynch advised that the Homeowners' Association has not yet taken over. At this time, the developer is the Association and Mr. Lynch is representing the developer. Ms. Huckle asked if the existing homeowners are in favor of this modification. Mr. Lynch responded that is the reason why the developer is requesting this modification because of the many requests from the homeowners. As far as construction costs, he stated that if the homeowner wishes to install this screening it would be at their expense. The developer will not be undertaking the installation. It will be the responsibility of the individual homeowner since this is the homeowner's request. Mr. Lynch stated that there are probably a dozen homeowners who have already purchased their homes or who are presently residing in the complex and have requested this modification. Mr. Lynch stated that he is attempting to revise the site plan for them. Without a site planimodification, the homeowners cannot individually get their screening installed. Mr. Ryder believed that it should be spelled out at this point that the screen should run over the top as well as around the sides and that there will be no permanent roofing permitted. Vice Chairman Winter confirmed that there is a difference between the term screen enclosure and screen porch. A screen porch has a solid roof and a screen enclosure has a screen roof. -37- MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA May 13, 1986 Mr. Annunziato stated that the plan submitted shows screen enclosures and that is all the Building Department will per- mit. There being no further questions, Mr. deLong moved to approve the site plan submitted subject to staff comments, seconded by Ms. Huckle. Chairman Trauger clarified the motion to approve the amended site plan to allow for the addition of screened enclosure within the building line of the existing multi-family units. The motion carried 7-0. ' D. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS None. E. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board adjourned at 9:30 P.M. Carol Ann Brown Recording Secretary (3 tapes) -38- ADDENDUM A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCELOF LAND IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAS~T~T~, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~.~.~. - COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST. CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6;"C~tENCE .SouT~o,~ 16. WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION~6, ~ DI~Zg~CE OF 40.02 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88° 34' 06" WEST, ALONGA LIN~ 40 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION6 A DISTANCE OF 53.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE 88° 34' 06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 640.42 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 1° 13' 13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 642.43 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 88 46' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF--620.44'FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH Qo 33' 16" EAST, ALONG A LINE 5S FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 DISTANCE OF 645.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPT APPROXIMATELY 1.9 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 88° 34' 06" WEST, ALONG A. LINE '40 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 408.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 1© 13' 13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 356.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 88° 46' 47" EAST A DISTANCE OF 396.62 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 0© 33' 16" EAST, ALONG A LINE 53 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 357.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 7.467 ACRES MORE OF LESS. ADDENDUM A STAFF CO~4ENTS MANOR CARE PRELIMINARY PLAT .... Enaineerinc Department: Utilities Department: Planning Department: Recreation Dep~tment: See attached memo. See attached memo. Applicant to provide for equal' access to all shared parking areas in connection with final plat approval. Charter Drive median and irrigation system to be repaired by developer at time of reconstruction. '~ MEMORANDUM May 7, 1986 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Planqing Department Tom Clark City Engineer Manor Care, Preliminary Plat Comments: 1. Trac%--i,,C;,~'-and Tract ,,D- should be identified on Sheet 2. Tract "D" should be dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach. 3. Ca!cul.a%ions are required for drainage. 4. Stripping for traffic control should be shown. 5. Radii should be shown on turnouts. TAC:ck TO DRTE: SUBJECT: MEMORRNDUM Carmen 8nnunz ia~o'i P1 arming Director May ,5, 198B TRB comments- Hanor Care Personal Care Facility Our only comment on this project regards the location o~ proposed manhoie ~Z. / This manhole shouId be relocated to within ten Feet o~ pavement to allow ~elevisingand maintenanco. Perry ~.~~ sna '/ Utilities Director STAFFCO~o~NTS ~,~NOR CARE PERSONAL CARE FACILITY SITE PLAN Building Department: · ~ see attached memo. Engineering Department: Utilities D~partment: See attached memo. See attached memo. Police Department: See attached memo. Public Works Deoartment: See attached memo. Planning Department: Provide dumDster enclosure detail including minimum t0' x 10' concrete pad and 6' concrete block wall on 3 sides with stucco finish to match building. Recreation Department: Forester: Charter Drive median and irrigation system to be repaired by devetooer at time of reconstruction. See attached memo. f~'~BJECT: Manor Care Personal ~are Facilit_y_ DATE: 5~6~86 Upon review of the above mentioned site plan, please be .advised of the following: 1. Health Dept. approval required. 2. Need tomeet handicap code (r~m~ps, doors, etc.). BD:bh PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED Bob Donovan Item ~f F2b'9 © Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 SIGNED THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED MEMORANDUM May 8, 1986 TO: FROM: RE: Mr. Jim Golden Planning Department Tom Clark City Engineer Manor Care, Inc., Site Plans Comments: TAC:ck Sidewalks should extend thru the driveway turn-oUts. Tom Clark NENORRNDUH TO : D~TE: SUBJECT: Carmen Rnnunziato-~z'Plannzng Director' Hay 5, IBB6 ~_ TRB comments - Nan66 Care Personal Care Facility Our only comment on this project regards the location o¢ proposed manhole ~Z. This manhole should be relocated to within ten ¢ee$ o~ pavement $o allow televising and maintenance. Utilities Director MEMORANDUM Plainning Dept. ~ Lt. Dale Hammack Police Dept. FILE SUBJECT May 7, 1986 Manor Care As per the discussion at the T.R.B. meeting on 6 May 1986, the following changes are required: 1. Exterior lights to be photo cell activated- "~L/t. Dale Hammack ?ol±ce Dept. DH:as M E M 0 R A N D U M May 6, 1986 FROM: TO: SUBJ: ROADS AND STREETS SUPERVISOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT M~NOR CARE INC i PERSONAL CARE FACILITY Dumpster pad must be detailed and angled to allow access - Must notify Public works~before pad is poured. jea Warren Shelhamer ME'MORANDUM car'men Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallahan Fores ter/Hor ti c-ul t uri st May 7, 1986 Manor Care Personal Care Facility - Site Plan This memorandum is in reference to the landscape plan sub- mitted for the above project. The landscaping scheme of trees and hedges should be con- tinued along.the access ways along-the ingress and egress areas of the project. This is in accordance with Landscape Ordinance #81-22, sect. 7.5-34. Ke~/in J. ~allahan ........... STAFF CO~'IENT S s~o~P~s OF S~ACR~ST Building Department: Fire Department: See attached memo. See attached memo. ~Engineering Department: See attached memo. Utilities Department: See attached memo. Planning Department: F,orester/Horticu!turist: (i) See attached memo pertaining to site plan comments. (2) Additional comments con- cerning traffic impact analysis to be distributed at meeting. See attached memo. Grayarc - P,O. Box 2944 Hartford. CT 06104 / ' - _,_,'CALl.TOLL FREE: I-B00-243-5250 TO" "Carmen Annunzi ato Cit¥ PI anner .:-._.:. . . REPLY MESSAGE - - ' Fold At ( ~ ) To Fit Grayarc Window Envelope # EW10P -. -' ........ ' r '~ REORDER i?EM # F269 FROM ~ ~ -~. -- Bob Donovan Chief Plan Reviewer ~ Sho_~.pes of Seacrest BD:bh Upon review of the above mentioned site plan, the following: 1.- Hse will be limited toe-!, ¢-2 uses. 2. Permitting will be per building. 8. Need to meet handicap code (ramps, doors, parking). handicap parking space required. PLEASE REPLY TO -' ; SIGNED __DATE: 5/6/86 please be advised of Bob Donovan One additional Eem # F269 D Wheeter Group Inc. 1979 SIGNED "rH~S COPY FOR PERSO;,¢ A ~ t..,.,'l r__~,.~E O' ~'~ r', ,-* =~ ~ · G ra~larc - P.O, Box 2944. HarZfo~d. CT 06104 CALL TOLL FREE:3.800-243- 5250 REPLY rv~ a.->SA,~ ~- Fold Al [ ~ ) To Fit Grayarc Window Envelope # EW10P FROM REORDER ITEM If F269 U~;JECT: ,PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED DATE: Item # F269 © Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 /<' -SIGNED THIS coPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED ME M.O RAN DUM TO: FROM: Comments: t Mr. Jim Golden Planning Depa~ent Tom Clark City Engineer Site Plans, Th~'~-~hOppes of Seacrest A Tee turnaround is required at the west end of Miner Road. ~ County approval is required for turnouts into Seacrest Blvd.. J A cross-section'o~'-Miner Road is required. A R.O.W. deed to the County is required for the 80 ft. R.O.W. for Miner ROad. 5. Sidewalks shOuld~extend thru turnouts. 6. Pri~a~e exfiltration'trenches must be moved out of the Miner Road R.O.W.~iand revisions made to plans. 7. Field tests for the percolation rate used in calculations must be made and submitted with drainage calculations. 8. Section B-B should show correct dimensions and'raised. curbs. "Low" elevations or high elevations should appear on plan when necessary for construction. 10. A cross-sectiOn thru the entrance road should be shown. 11. Cross-sections should show the "Type F" curb and gutter. TAC:ck Tom Clark MEMORRNDU~ TO : DATE: SUBJECT: Carmen Annunzia%o, Planning DJ.rector May S, 1986 TRB commen~s - Shoppes o~ Seacres~ Ue request %he {ollowing changes be made in %he design o~ %he sub3ec% project: 1). Maintain a minimum ZO-~oot separation be%ween %he proposed B-inch wa%er main and %he rear o~ building on %he wes% sioe. Z). hdd-~-BZ.~ch gate valve a% a midpoint o{ the on-site system. 3). Rdd necessary tees and valves a% %he south end o~ proposed 1Z-inch line, to allow connection o~ a ~uture 8-inch line ~rom ~he south, 4>. Me%er boxes are %'0 be placed in landscape areas along ~ront o~ ~he buildings, not in sidewalk areas. S). Rdd a ~'ire hydrant in the .southeast corner along Seacres% Blvd. B). Includ,~ a n°ta~ion %hat ~he City o{ Boynton Beach will maintain only' the main sewer lines, not service connections. Uti!i%ies Director TO: -MEMORANDUM --~ May 6., 1986 Chairman and Members Planning'& Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziatlo Planning Director RE: The Shoppes of Seacrest - Staff Comments Please be advis~ of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: - 1. Property owner to dedicate 80' of right-of-way for Miner Road prior to the issuance of'a building permit. 2. Dumpster pad detail to be provided including a minimum 10' X 10' concrete pad and overall dimensions. 3. Lighting details to be provided. CARMEN S. ANNU~IATO Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM Carmen Annunziato Planning Director Kevin J. Hallah~an Forester/Horti cul turist ~fay 7, 1986 --- The S:~oppe7 of ~"Seacrest -% Sit e ~. ~n .~-~ This memorandum is in reference to the project site in relation to the proposed tree survey and landscape plan. My comments will address both items as they fulfill the intent of the Tree Preser- vation Ordinance #81-21 and Landscape Ordinance #81-22. L.O. #81-21 Tree Preservation 1. The particUlar site in question is a unique ecosystem designa- ted as a Sand Pine ridge encompassing an entire tract of vary- ing sizes and ages of Sand Pine trees and scrub oak understory. In accordance with section 7.5-~2, the submitted tree survey should be more detailed in indentifying all trees on the site. This is-also necessary to give a proper quantity of replacement trees to be accounted for on the landscape plan (7.5-13). 2. In accordance with section 7.5-15 and ~7..5-24 the Sand Pine trees and understory should be preserved in "clumps" rather than as individual trees as shown on the tree survey. These clumps should ~ ~- ':~'~----be left in one--of.-two ways: a. as areas of landscaping in the parking lot, adjacent to the proposed buildings or landscaped islands. b. as a wide linear buffer towards the western property bound- ary which abutts a residential zone. 3. There exists a large Seaside Mahoe tree on the north-central portion of the property which should be preserved or efforts made to re- locate on the. property (sect. 7.5-12). / 4. I will meet with the applicant to discuss these measures and have been available prior in .accordance with section 7.5-9. L.O. #81-22 Landscape Ordinance In relation to the uniqueness of the site in question (comprises less than 2% of the land types in Palm Beach County), I would encourage the applicant to make use of native trees and hedges which are endemic to t. he Sand Pine ridge area. The landscape plan submitted does not reflect the use of tr.ees and hedges which are appropriate for the site (L.0.#81-21, sect.7.5-22). 2. Trees as shown along the Miner roadway cannot be placed in the right-of-way. . 3. When a more detailed tree survey is submitted, there may be an in- creased number of trees required to be shown on the landscape plan for replacement quantities(secti 7.5-13). Page 2 of 2 Any efforts put fort~ to~.~reserve existi'hg trees and. understory can be applied toward meeting the requirements of the land- scape ordinance in accordmnce with section 7.5-35 i. A five foot landscape st~p must. be provided along the Miner Road right-of-way, (sect: .7k. 5-35 dl) . , _ ............~.:,,..~e?in J .~H~i ) ahan ,r~...._. KJH: a d ~* ~rayarc- ,0:~ Box 2944 · . Hartford. CT 06104 - :~' CALL TOLL FREE:l-800-243-5250 ~ ~'.:~':;--'-: .... TO .,-?':<' Carmen Annun_z Jato REPLY MESSAGE FoldAt(~)ToFitGrayarcWindowEnvelope#EWlOR - ::.:. _.~ · : - '-'" FROM Bob Donovan Chief Plan Reviewer -" ~-: "REORDER ITEM tf F269 ..:' Square Shopping Center (Publix) DATE: 5/6/86 Upon review 6r-'thO"above mentioned site plan modification, please be advised of thefollowing: Health Dept. approval required. Need to meet timndicapCode (ramps, doors, etc.). BD:bh PLEASE REPLY TO ~ SIGNED Bob Donovan LY DATE: Item It F269 © Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 SIGNED T?'ifS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED ayarc"' · .o. Box 2944 Hartford. CT 06104 CALL TOLL FREE:1-800-243-SZS0' -:' JREPLY MESSAGE -,', :: d: '. '~: ~ Fold At (4) TO.Fit Grayarc Window Envelope #. EWlOP ~:~ '- FROM FOLD PLEASE REPLY TO REPLY DATE: Item ~, F269 © Wheeler Group Inc. t979 SIGNED ' .j MEMORRNDUM TO : DRTE: SUBJECT: Carmen Rnnunziato, Planning Director May 5, 1986 TRB comments - Sunshine Square Shopping Center (Publix) Our approval is-conditioned upon satisfactory completion o~ the following items: 1>. Show the location of the existing water main to the rear oF ~he present shopping center. Rdditional fire hydrants and ~he relocation o~ existing water services will be required. 2). The metered service line for ~he new Publix is shown to be tapped o.~f o~ the ~ire hydrant and sprinkler line. To increase reliab~iity ~his ~ap should be made directly into the main. U~ilities Director MEMORANDUM Planning Dept. Lt. Dale Hammack Police Dept. May 7, 1986 Publix Store at Sunshine Square As per the discussion at the ~.R.B. meeting on 6 May 1986, the following changes are required: 1. Pole mounted lighting_ erected in the back (West side) of the building. ..:. 2. Firelanes to be striped. 3. Stop signs erected a~'-the 2 Exits onto S.E. 18th Ave. ~ . e Harm~a ck Police Department DH:as MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: May 7, 1986 Chairman and Members Planning & Zoning.Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Publix at sunshine S~uare - staff Comments Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection-with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: 1. Traffic signals are to be provided at the following locations when warranted by the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineer: (1) intersection of Federal Highway and S.E. 18th Avenue, and (2) shopping center driveway onto Woolbright Road at west wing of shopping cente~'flocated approximately 140 feet east of the right-of,way line for the Florida East Coast Railroad. The cost of future signalization at.these locations is to be bonded by the developer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. One-half (25') of the right-of-way for S.E, 3rd Street (from S.E. 18th Avenue to southern property boundary) to be dediCated by the property owner within 45 days of site plan approval, or prior to the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. 3. Parking space layout and design to be shown for all reconstructed and newly constructed portions of the parking lot, ~ncluding the southwest corner of the property and the rear of the existing Shopping center. Page Two. 4. Dumpster pad detail to be provided including mimimum 10'x 10' concrete pad and screening on 3 sides (6' concrete block wall with stucco finish to match building). /lat Lighting details to be provided. 6. Required backup space (.18')~as specified in the Parking Lot Regulations must be provided.at the west end of the row of 16 parking spaces in front of the proposed supermarket. MEMORANDUM 9 May 1986 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Publix at Sunshine Square - Shared Parking Allocation Section ll-H(13) of the Zoning. Code contains the following provision for shared parking: Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part-or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Evidence for joint allocation of required parking spaces shall be submitted to the_~.Technical Review Board, and approval of joint allocation of required parking spaces shall be made by the Council, after review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Board. With respect to the above, Kieran J. Kilday, agent for Publix Supermarkets, Inc., applicant, is requested approval of a modified shared parking allocation for the proposed 40,000 squ~are foot new Publix supermarket to be located to the rear of the existing Sunshine Square Shopping Center at the southwest corner of Federal Highway and Woolbright Road.~ ~The original shared parking allocation for the Sunshine Square Shopping Center was approved in February 1983. Under the current proposal, the new 40,000 square foot Publix Supe_rmarket requires 200 parking spaces. The amended site plan proposes to add 372 parking spaces which will serve the new supermarket as well as the existing shopping center. With the addition of the new supermarket, the proposed square footage for the expanded shopping center is 143,825 square feet. The required number of parking spaces as per the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations is 672-~ 4 = 168 for the cinema and 134,420 ~ 200 = 673 for the retail square footage for a grand total of 841 parking spaces for the overall shopping center. 751 parking spaces are proposed under the modified site plan. The ratio of parking provided on-site as compared to that required by the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations under the proposed modification (751/841) is exactly the same as'that approved for the shopping center under the previous site plan approval (569/640), which provided for the construction of the shopping center in its current layout and design. With respect to the 'revised shared parking study prepared by Kimley-Horn for' the shopping center, the following findings are relevant in regard to the request for approval of the revised shared parking allocation: 1. The study incorporated the impact of the Donovan's Buffet Restaurant. 2.. 600 parking spaces are indicated as being sufficient for the expanded shopping center except during the ChriStmas shopping season or special promotions. 751 parking ~spaces are proposed to be provided on-site which can be u, sed to accommodate these additional parking demands. 3. 'Peak hour parking demand for the cinema and Donovan's Buffet.will occur between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. daily while the peak hour parking demand for the remaining shopping center will occur between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. daily. 4. The peak hour parking demand for.the.new Publix Supermarket will occur at 1:00 p.m. daily and will require the use of approximately 152 parking spaces, 48 spaces less than that required by the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations. 5. The weekend peak hour parking demand for the vario~s uses at the shopping center is comparable to the weekday parking demand. In addition to the ab~ve~ it is the Planning Department's findings that: 1. The ratio of parking provided on site as compared to that required by the City of Boynton Beach zoning regulations under the proposed modification is exactly the same as that approved for the shopping center in its current form. 2. That the buffer provided to ensure that a sufficient number of parking spaces are available at times of peak hour use is approximately 18% (151 ~ 841 x 100%). Based on the analysis performed by Kimley-Horn and the Planning Department as outlined in this memorandum, it is the Planning Department's recommendation that the request. for a modification to the previously approved shared parking allocation for the Sunshine Square Shopping Center submitted by Kieran J. Kilday, agent for Publix Supermarkets, Inc., applicant, be approved as submitted. /BKS CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO ~rayarc - ' %-P.O. Box 2944 ', HartfOrd CT 06104 -'. ~ .. 'CALL TOLL FREE:1-800-243-525Q TO BJECT: __ FO'LO ~ Carmen :Annunz i~to City Planner · ~?:i:' REPLY MESSAGE ' 3'o Fit Grayarc Window Envelope # EWlOP · . --, ' : FROM - Bob Donovan 7" Chief Plan Reviewer ~IVleadows Sc~ure Sho_p~p_.i.!!g Center'_(Farm Store) DATE: 5/6/_86 '~:Upon review of the above mentioned site plan modification, please be advised of the following: 1.. Need to meet Handicap Code (ran~ps, doors, etc,). BD:bh PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED Bob Donovau REPLY SIGNED Item ¢~ F269 ~ Wheeler Group inc. 1979 ~ ra yarc ~ .,o..o. 2~*~ ................. ~' REPLY MESSAGE Hartford. CT 06104 CALL TOLL FREE:~~800-243-525Q .... .:..' :, ' . ~ Fold ~t [ ~) TO Fit Grayarc Window Envelope ~ EW10P FROM - REORDER ITEM # F269 PLEASE'REPLY TO ~ SIGNED DATE: item tt F[;%-'9 53 Wheeler Group Inc. 1979 SIGNED MEMORANDUM TO : DATE: SUBJECT: Carmen Rnnunziato. Planning Director Hay ~',-7986 Please have ~he applican~ provide fhe ~ollowing: l). Re-locate fhe l" wafer service and meier box fo the landscaped strip. Z). Indicate the location o~ ~he underground gasoline tanks relative to ~he watch and sewer lines. Tanks will have ~o be located so as nor ~o inter~ere with water or s~wer line operafion and maintenance. U~ili+.y Director MEMORANDUM Planning Dept. Lt. Dale Hammack Police Department As per ~he discussion at the-T.R.B, meeting'on 6 May 1986, the following changes are required: 1. Erect a stop sign at the North Exit onto I~adows Way 2. Eliminate the 3 horizontal parking spaces on the South side of the building. · '~': ~. Dale Hammack DH:as Police Dept. ~iEMORANDUM May 6, 1986 TO: FROM: RE: Chairman and Members, Planning & Zoning Board Carmen S. Annunziato, PlanningDirector Farm Store at Meadows Square - Staff Comments Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: 1. Trash compactor behind Publix supermarket to be placed according to Public Works Department criteria and properly screened on 3 sides with a 6' high concrete block wall with stucco finish toad"match~ building. 2. Engineering plans to conform to site plan. 3. Three (3) end-to-end parking spaces on south side of convenience store to be removed to facilitate on-site traffic flow and minimize congestion. CARMEN S. ANN~UNZIATO M E M R A N D U M May 7, 1986 TO: JIM GOLDEN L ~I2tNNING DEPT. FROM: BOB E ICHORST REF: COMPACTOR BEHIND PUBLIX-MEADOWS SQUARE Contact must be made With:Public Works prior to the repositioning of ~the compactor and construction of the required screen. BE:ja Bob Eichorst ~P.o..o,,W,~ '-'-~>-'?'..'7 ~:T '. ' ' ,':- '?~ * ;-':"~; REPLY MESSAGE CALL TOLL FREE:I-8~243-52~ ~ - :~: ;~' ~.~, ~ ~'. ~*- ~*: --~ ~,~: - Fold At ( ~ ) TO Fit Grayarc Window Envelo~ ~ EW10P -. =~*- ~ ~ ~to ........ -~ ; ~b ~nov~ Plier ~ief Pi~ ~viewer FOLD -'*' ~ .... '~- ~-*: -: REORDER ITEM t~ F269 '--* r Boynton Lakes Plat 4 (Recreation Area) DATE: ~L6..L86 , Upon review of the above mentioned site plan modification, please be advised of .,the following: 1. Need to meet. Handicap. COde (ramps, doors, bathrooms, etc.). - 2.. Setbacks should be clarified. 3.. .-Need sewer md water flow rate per Florida Registered Engineer '.to be approved by Utility Dept. Ig):bh PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED Bob Donovan Ga--r-yarc- P.O. BOX 2944 ....... . :'*.~ ..___--R.FP/Y' MESSAGE Hartford, CT 06104 CALL TOLL FREE:l-800-243,-525Q -;~!~.~ ..... '"~.-,,~,-;-~,~,- ~' 7' ~, FoldAt(~)ToFitGrayarcWindowEnvelope#EW10P REORDER ITEM ~ F269 TO PLEASE REPLY TO ~ MEMORANDUM Planning Dept. Lt. Dale Hammack Police Dept. DATE May 7, 1986 Boynton Lakes As per the discussion at the T.R.B. meeting on 6 May 1986, the following changes are required: 1. Stop~-~ign to be erected at Exit onto Redford Drive. 2. Need lighting details. DH:as Lt. Dale Hammack Police Department TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM Chairman and Members Planning & Zoning Board April 7, .1986 Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director Boynton Lakes Plat 4 Recreation Area - Staff Comments Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced request for site plan approval: 1. Metal Halide,lighting is not acceptable. City Parking Lot Regulations require high pressure sodium lighting. 2. Lighting details to be.Provided. 3. Parking spaces to be double-striped with curb stops. 4. Dimensions forltypical roadway section on paving and drainage plan are incorrect. /lat CARMEN S. ANNUNZ~ATO