Minutes 05-12-81MINUTES OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING
HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1981
PRESENT:
Simon Ryder, Chairman
Garry Winter, Vice Chairman
Lillian Bond
Ezell Hester
Ronald Linkous
Robert Wandelt
ABSENT:
Simon Zive
Carmen Annunziato,
City Planner
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Ryder, who
welComed those present and introduced the Board members, the City
Planner and the new Recording Secretary Audrey Vaughn. Mr. Simon
Zive was not present and was recorded absent. The Chairman acknow-
ledged Councilman Joe deLong and City Manager Peter Cheney in the
audience.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Winter noted an error in the minutes of the April 28th meeting:
In the paragraph approving the April 14th meeting minute§, "Motion
carried 7-0" was incorrect inasmuch as one member had been absent
that night. The correction is to read, "MotiOn carried 6-0".
Mr. Wandelt made a motion, which was duly seconded, that the minutes
be approved as corrected. The motion carried 6-0.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The Chairman related correspondence had been received from
Mr. Douglas Sussman, Chairman of the Community Relations Board,
announcing a presentation, "Know Your City Government" will be
held at City Hall Council Chambers, on Thursday, May 14, 1981,
at 7:30 p.m. Board members were invited to attend this program
and meet with Boynton Beach residents over coffee and light
refreshments after the presentation.
COMMUNICATIONS
None
OLD BUSINESS
Under old business Chairman Ryder referred to two interrelated
applications for further discussion and briefly outlined the
relevant details: Following City Council's approval of the Burger
King application, Century Bank presented plans for relocating
parking spaces currently in the proposed Burger King area. Part
of this plan introduced a new driveway on Federal Highway (US 1)
at their northerly end, confining the bank's plot. There is
currently a bank driveway exiting, to the south of the bank.
Staff and Board members strongly object to an additional driveway
with the rationale that it would create a hazardous condition due
to the proposed driveway for Burger King in close proximity. Cen-
tury Bank's plan was approved by the Planning & Zoning Board
provided the proposed driveway is eliminated. At its May 5
meeting, the City Council considered this application. In view
of this Board's recommendation, Council suggested that the appli-
cant'S.representative consider eliminating this means of access.
The applican't's representative disagreed with this recommendation;
therefore, Council denied the plan proposed. This leaves Burger
King in a holding position and Century Bank's application is
unresolved.
Then-, in presenting an'overview, Mr. Ryder described the Cumber-
land Farms store application, proposing to build a three-store
building - one of which they would occupy - fronting on NW 2nd Ave.
at Leisureville Plaza and in front of the bowling alley, which is
set back from the street. Speaking at a previous Board meeting,
residents in the immediate vicinity objected to Cumberland Farms
relocating their store in closer proximity to the residential
area, rather than the previously approved location, which was
adjacent to the commercial area. Spokesmen for the residents
also attended the May 5 City Council meeting and voiced their
objections. Council felt the original application would be more
appropriate since it would minimize annoyance and inconvenience
to the nearby residents. Council denied Cumberland Farms' appli-
cation. At present the applicant has an option to revert to the
original application, which placed the Cumberland Farms store on
the westerly side of the building.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing - 7:30 p.m.
At this time Chairman'/Ryder advised that the Planning & Zoning
Board would assume the role of the Local Planning Agency, which is
another function of the Board, to consider a proposed Amendment to
Ordinance #75-19 (Appendix A), The Local Planning Agency will
review and discuss the Ordinance Amendment and submit its recom-
mendation to the City Council.
-2-
The Chairman reported the proposed Amendment has been appropriately
advertised as mandated by law, and is as follows:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 75-19
(APPENDIX A) "ZONING REGULATIONS, DEFINITIONS"
TO ADD A DEFINITION OF COMMUNITY ANTENNA
TELEVISION SYSTEMS; AMENDING SECTION 4F4
BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 4F4-1 PROVIDING
AN EXEMPTION FROM THE TWENTY-FIVE (25) FOOT
HEIGHT REGULATION AND LIMITING SAID ANTENNA
HEIGHTS TO SIXTY-FIVE (65) FEET; PROVIDING
FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; REPEALING PROVISION;
AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES."
Continuing, Mr. Ryder provided background information on Ordi-
nance ~75-19: In 1975 the city recognized a problem caused by
television and radio antennas of various heights throughout the
city. Not only were they unsightly but in some instances caused
interference to their neighbors' reception. This Ordinance cur-
rently reads as follows:
"Section 4F4. In residential zones, freestanding television
and citizens' band broadcasting antennas may not exceed
twenty-five feet in height, and no freestanding antenna
may be constructed within the building setback lines. Roof
mounted or wall supported antennas may exceed the maximum
district height regulation by ten (10) feet; but, in no
instance, may an antenna exceed the roo'f line height by more
than fifteen (15) feet."
The proposed Amendment is as follows:
"Private Community Antenna System. A system of equipment
designed to receive and distribute television and radio
signals serving a minimum of 10 residential units in a
Condominium or non-profit Homeowners Association."
Regulation would be as follows:
"With respect to private community antenna systems as
defined in this Code, the aforesaid twenty-five (25)
feet height regulation shall not apply. In the instance
of private community antenna systems, the receiving
antenna may not exceed sixty-five (65) feet in height,
and no part of any receiving antenna may encroach in any
set back."
At the Chair's request Mr. Annunziato provided further details,
stating that it was determined that need for the proposed Amend-
ment. was indicated when requests by several condominiums and home-
owners associations were received by the city. Their private
community antenna systems required receiving antennas of greater
height than the 25' restriction.
-3-
It was also felt that a single antenna, rather than many, would
be more aesthetically pleasing, This Amendment has a twofold
purpose: i, It provides for clear definition of a private com-
munity antenna system; and 2, It permits use of antennas of
greater height.
In response to Mr~. Wandelt's question, Mr. Annunziato advised
this Amendment would affect~ only homeowners associations with ten
(10) units or more, e.g., a homeowners association like that at
Cranbrook Lake Estates with 169 members. They own common property
and may benefit by constructing their own master antenna and
installing the distribution facilities underground. Mr. Ryder
pointed out the advantages of a 'single, centrally located antenna
which would not have any adverse affect on the surrounding areas.
The City Planner explained the Code requirement for a franchise
as it presently stands, adding that the Amendment refines the
Ordinance and introduces new technology into the Code.
A general discussion followed, wherein views and opinions were
expressed.
The Chair provided the audience an opportunity to address this
matter, with no response,
With no further discussion offered, Chairman Ryder entertained a
motion. Mr. Wandelt moved -- seconded by Mr. Linkous -- that the
Board recommend approval of the Ordinance as proposed. The motion
carried 5-1.
(This concluded the Local Planning Agency portion of the agenda,
The Board ~everted to planning and zoning duties,)
B.Subdivisions
None
C. Site Plans
In regard to the Holiday Inn project which is-nearing completion,
the Chairman identified the location and noted that a number of
changes have been made to the original plans, Mr. Annunziato was
asked to comment.
Members were supplied with site plans and related correspondence
to the original plan and also to the modifications under consider-
ation. The City Planner advised the Holiday Inn is nearly finished
and it is incumbent upon the applicant to present site plan ~modifi-
cations now being considered, in order to bring the plans in line
with the actual construction. Many items which, were changed had
-4-
to do w~th the-topography of the site and to errors which
occurred in the survey. Additional changes occurred in making
the building easier to construct, i.e., moving walls over. Some
modifications were changes, such as the outline and limit of the
pool, which took esthetics into consideration. Mr. Annunziato
said he planned to read related correspondence into the record
of the meeting minutes, with their responses, and would amplify
when necessary. (Ed. note: Mr. Annunziato's comments' will be
inserted under the appropriate sentence and will be indicated by
quote marks. *** indicates end of letter,~
Last week the TRB met to discuss these issues, Mr. Annunziato
continued, as the Board examined their copies of an "as built"
survey reflecting changes consistent with the following letter
which accompanied the plans:
COPY
Holiday Inn
Executive Offices
679 N.W. 79th St.
Miami, Florida
33150
4-27-81
City Hall
Boynton Beach, Fi.
Modifications reported by Bland Construction on Holiday Inn of
N.W. 2nd Ave., #480, Boynton Beach.
1. Electrical "pad" required to be walled in by FPL.
2. Retaining wall and cover added for sundeck. (cover proposed)
~Wall approved by Mr. Howell)
"Mr. Howell does not agree that he approved the wall."
3. Covered-walkway diverted and extended to meet back entrances.
4. Windows of dinning (isic) room changed to include overhang;
compensating for additional interior fixture, (salad bar)
5. Parking:
a. Proposed - 143
b. Provided - 144' / 140 actual ~
4 spaces lost for 1 St, ent, & retaining mature tree, etc.
~2 or 3 spaces can be recovered by cutting the ...)
-5-
10.
11,
Re-arrange drives to one way to provide more "green areas",
and adjustment of total widths to appropriate size.
Place two handicap parking spaces closer to ramp/walkway.
Retaining wall erected to keep pool patio consistant elevation.
Planting areas in drives adjusted for easier access and
efficiency, or retention of mature planting.
"Several landscaped islands had to be modified in size to
accommodate parking which meets the city criteria. Also,
where 4th St. and 1st Ave. intersect on the southern portion
of the property, there is a ficus tree, an example of #9."
Decorative end wall tile - reduced and lowered.
Unit count clar%fication; floor 2 & 3 contain one suite each.
[living room with bedroom) 100 units total.
"This item refers to two 2-room suites, one each located on
the 2nd and 3rd floors. Although it appears there are 102
units shown, in effect there are only 100. These are bedrooms
with a companion unit for a sitting room."
Staff's response is the following:
COPY
Memorandum to Chairman and Members, Planning & Zoning Board
from Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner
Re: Holiday Inn Site Plan Modification Submission
Dated 5/11/81
The purpose of this memo is to advise the Board of the differ-
ences which exist between, the approved site plan for the Holiday
Inn and the proposed plan which incorporates modifications to
the proposal. Additionally, a list of items will be offered
for your consideration in which the plan fails to meet City Code
requirements and provisos attached to the plan at the time of
approval,
To that end, you will find accompanying this memo a list which
was submitted by Mr. Leemon, owner, comprising eleven items. To
that list should be-.~added additional changes which become apparent
upon plan evaluation as follows:
-6-
1. The approved site plan did not accoun~ for grade changes
which resulted in the construction of retaining walls;
"The approved site plan was one dimensional. The site is
obviously not one dimensional; it has some topography. This
resulted 'in construction of retaining walls and differences in
elevations from east to west." In response to a question by
Mr. Ryder, the City Planner continued, "Apparently the Building
Dept. has many letters on record, notifying the applicant of the
importance of coming through with the modifications."
2. The traffic pattern and arrangement of parking spaces as
constructed is different than the approved plan;
"In many places. The approved plan, for example, had designated
the driveway at the eastern end of the property. It is now
moved some 35-40 feet to the west. Many dimensions differ.. Many
parking arrangements were changed."
3. The north end of the commercial building is 8' + wider than
approved;
"There is a one-story CBS building at the north end of the site,
about 8' in ~, built to take advantage of a wall which forms
one of the bases of the underground parking. I.t may have been an
on-site adjustment to conditions."
4. The commercial building is located 5' west of where it was
approved;
"The building is located 5' west of where it was approved.
building~has now been reduced by 5'."
This
5. The canopy arrangement is different than approved;
6. The hotel building is different in shape than approved;
7. The east/west dimension of the lot along NW 1st Ave. is
different on the proposal than what appeared on the approved site
plan by approximately 7.5 feet less;
"As approved, the site plan shows approximately 378.5'. This
resulted in shrinking the property in tke east-west dimension,
and affected on parking and the location of the CBS building."
8. The pool is different in shape, and the landscaping plan has
been modified;
-71
9. Increase the width of the curb cut on NW 2nd Avenue to
better accommodate turning traffic;
"Items 9, 10 and 11 are staff's proposed changes. The present
curb cut is 25' wide; it is difficult to turn in, given ~he
width of'the driveway. Staff recommends a width of 31' +."
10. At the emergency entrance on NW 1st Avenue, provide a chain
welded to.posts and Sign consistent with Fire Marshal's comments;
"The Fire Marshal's on-site inspection during construction deter-
mined that this site would be serviced by the main fire stationfrom
N~. ~ 1st Ave. To provide access it would be necessary to have
an emergency entrance for the Fire Department's use only."
11. Along eastern border, CBS wall encroaches beyond property
line and must be brought onto site.
"The plans contain a note that the CBS wall encroaches the property
line and need to be brought on site. I believe the applicant will
propose an exchange of property, since he is also the owner of the
contiguous residential property to the east, which ties the wall
encroachment to the Holiday Inn,"
Concerning~Code requirements and Council imposed provisos, please
be advised of the following:
1. Sidewalks on NW 1st Avenue through to the west side of NW 4th St.
have not been constructed;
"This is a code requirement."
2. Concrete steps which project through the buffer wall on the
east side must be removed and the wall be made complete;
"The site plans contain a note that the concrete steps encroach,
in violation of the wall requirement, which requires a solid decor-
ativa- maso]
3. The can~
be relocate~
"After on-s
the propose~
adequately
lry wall."
)py overhang must be eliminated or the dumpster must
testing, the Public Works Dept. is satisfied that
dumpster location to the north of the building can be
ccessed without difficulty."
-8-
4. Ail parking must meet the City standards for back-up
space; and
5. The proposal is lacking approximately 12 parking spaces with
146 approved and 134 provided.
The changes proposed to the approved plan are significant in
nature but do not result in a conflict with C~ty ordinances and
standards; however, the problems associated with parking are of a
more serious nature and need to be addressed prior to issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy, The parking issue is composed
of two parts - the number of spaces and the size of spaces. Both
need to be adjusted to meet City standards. The parking issue
is compounded by the problems associated with the dumpster and
canopy. This item, the sidewalk on NW 1st Avenue and the wall
section mqst also be addressed prior to issuance of a Certifi-
cate of O~cupancy,
These cha~ges proposed to the plan are bround to your attention
in order go make the Board Members aware of the issues that still
need to be resolved concerning the Holiday Inn.
Following is the applicant's response.
COPY
Holiday Inn
Executive Offices
679 N..W.
Miami, Fi
To the Ci~
from C. L.
Boyton Be~
Re City P:
Memo o!
The purpo~
listed thc
A. Items
1. R~
f~
a
'Rth St.
~r±da 33150
:y Planning & Zoning Board
n'eemon, owner
ch Holiday Inn (~undated~_
anners Site Plan
Holiday Inn
e of this memorandum is to EXPLAIN and correct items
the above memorandum on listed modifications.
taining walls were required instead of sloping land to
lcilitate landscaping and to insure leveling of patios,
well as sidewalks for handicapped.
-9-
Traffic pattern and parking modified in order to:
a. Allow entrance for emergency vehicles.
b. Retain mature tree and foliage,
c. Maintain simplier (sic) traffic flow to lobby
and then to parking for guests.
d. Facilitate trash truck accessibility.
e. Compensate for 7.5' error in original survey
of E-W lot line.
f. Increase parking spaces near restaurant entrances.
10.
Increased width on north end of commercial building in
order to allign (sic) wall of parking garage with com-
mercial building.
11.
Westerly 5 ft. adjustment .of commercial building to com-
pensate for error in 2 (d) above.
"I think that should probably be 2 [e) above."
Canopy relocation to insure greater clearance for
trash trucks.
Hotel shape altered to provide electrical meter room
for FPL.
2 (,d) above·
"Also should be 2 (e} above."
Pool & landscape plan revised on advise from Holiday I.nns
to improve beauty and appearance.
Recommended revised parking plan by City Building Officials,
~City Planner as well as construction company officers
encorporates increased curb cut·
Fire Marshall requirements as approved by city will be
complied with, on emergency entrance.
Documentation is being provided by attorneys to correct
any encroachment since hotel owns all lots.
B. Items: (concerning Code requirements & Council provisos.)
Sidewalk requirement; installation scheduled at completion
of landscaping and sprinkler system.
Buffer wall opening and steps:
on 5-11-81.
Correction contracted for
3. Corrected by drive modification in item A,9 above.
-10-
4. Meets City Standards by Item A2 and A9.
Recommended Item A9 parking plan incorporates 140 parking
spaces including 2 spaces credited for emergency entrance
by Fire Marshall in lieu of 143 proposed and would result
in nine less seats in lounge.
(sig~ed)
C. L. Leemon, owner
Holiday Inn of Boynton Beach
"The owner suggests the loss of 2 parking spaces will result
because of the fire emergency entrance. The following memo
notes that neither staff, Planning & Zoning Board, nor Council
can do anything about that because only the Board of Adjust-
ment is authorized to grant variances to the Zoning Code. Also,
there is a problem with the 2 parking spaces shown to the east
of the canopy. The space can actually only accommodate one
space. The Building Official feels that even though there is
26' of roof overhang, the columns measure 20' across. The
angle parking that results is one parking space."
COPY
Memo to Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
From Edgar E. Howell, Building Official
Subject: Holiday Inn Date:
5-12-81
In conjunction with the above, be advised of the following require-
ments.
As built plans required for all buildings and site plan; Install
railings on all retaining walls, and around underground parking
area, on handicapped entrance ramp from the parking area, and
walkway between motel and restaurant.
Show handicapped sign locations on as-built plans. Curb-stops
required on all parking spaces, Department of Transportation turn-
out approval for widening of turn-out.
"Apparently no turn-out permit exists for the existing curb cut
because there was an existing curb cut prior to construction.
Expansion of that curb cut will be subject to a permit."
COPY
Memo to Carmen AnnunziatO, City Planner
From Allan H. Nyquist, Fire Marshal
Subject: Holiday Inn, 400 NW 2nd Ave.
(Proposed Addition)
Boynton Beach, Fi.
-11-
(.The preceding memo is dated May 1, 1981)
After reviewing the plans submitted to the City Planners Office
on the above captioned subject, the Fire Prevention Bureau's
findings are as follows:
For proposed sun deck area:
It will be necessary to extend fire sprinklers in the
lower parking area.
Rear fire entrance:
A welded chain shall be placed across this entrance on
NW 1st Ave. and 4th Street, with a sign reading "FIRE
DEPT. USE ONLY" - BY ORDER OF CITY FIRE M~RSHAL.
"The welded chain is to eliminate any traffic other than
emergency to access this site at this location. One of the
problems previously discussed was access to the site from
the residential area on 1st Ave. This was disallowed."
COPY
Memo to Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
From Tom Clark, City Engineer
Re Revisions to Holiday Inn dated May 5, 1981
The changes made do not affect the drainage.
The latest "record drawing" of the site dated April 28, 1981
shows parking that does not comply with code requirements.
The entrance as shown will not allow a normal turning radius
for ingress and egress and will require large vehicles to go
against the traffic.
I recommend that the parking be revised to conform with code
requirements and that the entrance be improved to better
handle entering and exiting vehicles.
"NW 4th Street was abandoned between NW 1st Ave. and NW 2nd Ave.
to accommodate the construction of this facility. The Holiday Inn
owner owned both sides of the street.
"There existed a 16" water line on .NW 4th St. At the time of plan
approval the buildings were determined to be too close to the
water line in the event of an emergency. It was agreed to relocate
the water line elsewhere in the parking lot. The water line was
moved, but at installation the water line was swerved from the
easement that .was prepared for it, resulting in the dedication
of a new easement."
-12-
COPY
Memo to Mr. Carmen AnnunziatO, City Planner
From Perry A. Cessna, Directo~ of Utilities
Subject: Holiday Inn Date: 5/5/81
I have been advised by the City Attorney that he has an
unexecuted easement and Hold ~armless Clause which is
satiSfactory. In this case, insofar as utilities are
concerned, we would release, subject to the execution
of the documents presently in the City Attorney's
hands.
"After the easement is recorded the Utility Director will be
willing to recommend that this plan be released for a Certifi-
cate of Occupancy."
COPY
Memo to Chairman and Members of the Planning & Zoning Board
From Carmen S. Annunziato, C%ty Planner
Re: Holiday Inn Modified site Plan Date: May 12, 1981,
This memorandum is in response to the revised parking plans sub-
mitted by Bland Construction for Charles Leemon, owner of the
Holiday Inn.
Concerning the number of park
reported in Mr. Leemon's mem¢
Board, please be advised of t
Neither the City Staf
City Council are aut~
Zoning Ordinance, T~
credited with parkin¢
of the need for an e~
"That parking bay mai
by modifying the ang]
subject for further
The parking space lo
restaurant/lounge buJ
location of the siam~
Given a modification
south and east of thc
gained,
The parking area sho~
accommodate one park~
ing spaces shown on the plan and
randum to the Planning & Zoning
he following:
f, Planning & Zoning Board nor the
.orized to grant variances to the
~erefore, the applicant cannot be
~ for the two spaces lost as a result
~ergency entrance off of NW 1st Ave.
' be able to gain one parking space
~e of the curbs. This will be a
tudy,"
ated at the southeast corner of the
.lding must be removed owing to the
~se fire connection,
to the angle parking bay to the
canopy, one parking space may be
to the east of the canopy can only
space, not two, as shown.
_3-
So
The number of parking spaces initially required was 146;
however, the parking in the meeting room was computed
at the rate of 1 space for each 3 seats, It would have
been more appropriate to compute the parking at 1 space
for each 4 seats for places of assembly. This results
in a savings of 3 parking spaces based on a meeting room
which would accommodate forty people.
The net result of all of these parking changes is a total of
137 spaces computed as follows:
Ground parking 114
~arage parking 24
Canopy adjustment (1)
Siamese connection adj. (1)
Modification of
parking bay
Total
spaces
spaces
space
space
1 space
137 spaces
() denotes decrease
The number of parking spaces required to occupy the entire
Holiday Inn complex is as follows:
1 PS/room X 100
1 PS/2 employees X 14
1 PS/3 seats (rest.) X 40
1 PS/3 seats (Lounge) X 40
1 PS/4 seats (Mtg. rm) X 40
Total
rooms = 100 spaces
employees = 7 spaces
seats = 13 spaces
seats = 13 spaces
seats = 10 spaces
143 spaces
When parking spaces required are compared with parking spaces
provided there is a net deficiency of six spaces (143-137=6).
Either additional parking must be provided or the applicant
must limit occupancy in his hotel or seats in his commercial
building.
In addition, please be advised of the additional items which are
recommended to be included as provisos on this application:
Modify parking island to the west of the center parking
bay to provide a minimum of 23' from the parking island
to the south.
"The island at the western end of the parking bay is too
close to the parking island to the south to accommodate
an adequate turning radius."
Construct a curb along the northerly limit of the central
angle parking bay.
-14-
"It is proposed that a curb be constructed along the
northerly limits of that angle parking."
In all instances,~ 41 feet must be provided for one way,
60° angle parking, and 64 feet for two way, 60° angle
parking.
"There is a discrepancy between this plan and the City
Code requirements. Based on field measurements it appears
to staff that the parking can be made to fit."
4. Place curb stops in each parking space.
5. Construct a 4 foot chain link fence along the south
property line to inhibit users of the Holiday Inn from
parking along NW 1st Avenue.
***
The City Planner closed his remarks and referred the Board to
the applicant, who was present in the audience. The Chair
recognized the applicant-owner, Mr. Charles Leemon, who ques-
tiOned t~e Board regarding CitY Code requirements for curb stops
for ever~ parking space.
Mr. Annur
the parki
from extE
Mr. Leemc
recommend
he would
that the
the fence
might be
Mr. Ryde~
there ar6
asked the
Mr. Leemc
had to b6
The Chai~
locations
ziato explained.that the curbing is the outer limit of
ng space, that a curb stop will prevent an automobile
nding into a traffic lane.
n then addressed the chain link fence on NW 1st Avenue
ation. He feels that type fence is unattractive and
prefer "no parking" signs. The City Planner explained
staff had considered various solutions and decided
would be the most feasible. He added that a hedge
planted to hide the fence from view.
related that he had visited the site and observed that
no railings on various ramps and entrances, and he
applicant if he hadplans for their installation.
n explained that rails would be installed but they
built according to field measurements.
man advised the applicant that the railings and their
must be reflected on the plans.
Chairman Ryder spoke of the Board's concern about the parking area
lights, that they must be shielded to avoid disturbing the resi-
dents whc live nearby. The applicant assured Mr. Ryder that the
lights a~e very conservative and are properly shielded to light
only the parking areas.
-15-
Mr. Leemon inquired about the parking space count discrepancy,
adding that his designers feel the city requirement is eXorbi-
tant. The Chair advised that the applicant must have this matter
resolved by the time the modifications are presented to the City
Council.
Mr. Ryder observed that there were trusses stored in the garage
area and asked if they were to be used for the sun deck, and was
it an afterthought. The applicant explained that the deck is a
result of the retaining wall of the building and the garage. His
design people feels it will make an attractive sun deck over-
looking the pool.
The discussion closed with Chairman Ryder advising the applicant
that all "as built" plans must be complete and filed with the
proper city department. Mr. Leemon stated he felt they were with
the exception of the parking space count.
Mr. L±nkous made a motion, seconded by Mr. Hester, that the
Holiday Inn site plan modifications as presented be approved,
subject to staff comments as presented. Mr. Ryder added an amend-
ment, subject to staff comments and that the applicant resolve
inadequacies. The motion carried 6-0.
There being no further business to come before the Board,
Mr. Wandelt moved adjournment. Seconded by Mr. Linkous, the motion
carried 6-0, and the meeting adjourned at 9 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Recording Secretary
( 2 tapes
-16-
AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
DATE:
TIME. '
PLACE:
April 28, 1981
7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall
1. Acknowledgement of Members and Visitors
2. Reading and Approval of Minutes
3o Announcements
4. Communications
5. Old Business:
A. Site Plan Approval:
1o Applicant:
Century Bank, Inc., (Tabled)
(J.Daniel Stephens, Vice Pres.,Agent)
Location:
Legal
Description: See Survey
S.E.18th.Ave. at US 1, S.W.Corner
Project
Description: Relocation of Parking Lots to accommodate Burger
King Development
6. New Business
'A. PUBLIC HEARI~i
'B. SUBDIVISIC
Pre-applJ
PROJE~
AC~ ~
New Business
C. SITE PLANS
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
A G E N D A
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
(Page 2)
Cumberland Farms (Site Plan Modification)
William Selig
V.S.H.Realty
N.W.2nd Avenue, North of Fairlanes Bowling Alley
3400 sq.~t. Commercial Building
Village Royale on the Green
Management Offices & Craft Rooms
George Barnett
village Royale Green Owners League, Inc.
2501 N.E.First Court, Boynton Beach, Fla.33435
Modification of Existing Models