Minutes 10-23-79MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD HELD
AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, October 23rd, 1979
PRESENT
Arnold Thompson, Chairman
Lillian Bond
Ezell Hester
Simon Ryder
Gene Johnson
Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
Craig Grabeel, Asst. Planner
ABSENT
Caesar Mauti (excused)
Fred DiSalle, Vice Chairman
Chairman Thompson welcomed everyone and called the meeting to
order at 7:30 P.M. He introduced the members of the Board
and the City Planner.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9th, 1979
Mr. Johnson made a motion to accept the minutes of the Planning &
Zoning Board meeting of October 9th, 1979, seconded by Mrs. Bond.
Motion carried unanimously.
CITIZENS AWARENESS PRESENTATION:
Mr. Bob Bergen/Pine Jog Environmental Center
"The Nature of South Florida"
Mr. Grabeel then introduced Mr. Bergen, We then saw an excellent
slide presentation depicting the ecologial characteristics of
our area.
OLD BUSINESS
Subdivision Regulation Pre-Application:
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
........... TABLED
Edgewood Heights (Danny O'Brien, agent)
North of N.W. 8%h Court at Old Boynton Road
See Survey
22 Residential Lots on 6.13 acres
Mr. Hester made a motion to remove this item from the table;
seconded by Mr. Johnson; motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Annunziato explained that this pre-application had been
on the agenda two meetings ago and kept on the table at the last
meeting because the applicant had not completed the modifications
to the pre-application plans. What you have before you tonight
is the modification plans, taking into account the comments
that c~ne through when this was reviewed by the Board. Several
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
10-23-79
things of interest include the addition of N.W. 10th Street being
paved, interior road right-of-way, the elimination of through lots
and the removal of on-site pond area, with water retention to be
accomplished in the developable lots.
Mr. Annunziato referred to staff comments and read the following
comments from Mr. Bill Flushing, Deputy City Engineer as follows:
The following right-of-way requirements shall be included in
the Master Plan and pre-plat applications: 1. The intersection
of the proposed N.W. 10th St. and the existing N.W. 8th Court
must have paving with 30-ft. radiuses. Additional right-of-way
will be required to provide the 30,ft. radiusl 2. In order to
provide a 60-ft. right-of-way for N.W. 10th Street 15 feet
must be provided by each abutting property owner. It is there,
fore required that the applicant provide 15 feet as opposed to
the 10 feet as shown. Platting may have to be adjusted to
maintain the minimum 8000 sq. ft. requirement. 3. The planned
right-of-way for N.W. 8th Court is 60 feet. This will require
20 feet of additional right-of-way as opposed to 10 feet additional
as shown. 4. The Master Plan utility plans should show the
existing 16-inch force main in N.W. 10th Street and the 20-inch
force main in N.W. 8th Court. Mr. Annunziato continued with
the comments from the Utility Department as follows: The following
corrections should be made regarding utilities: 1. The water
serving the two (2) cul,de-sacs should be designed with a 4"
looped system on each cul-de-sac. 2. No water main will be
allowed in the rear easements. 3. Indicate sizes of proposed
water mains. 4. Connect the proposed water main on N.W. 10th
Street to the exisitng 6" water main at N.W. 8 Ct. and 10 th St.
The Police Department has noted:STOP sign required at N.W. 10th
Street and 8th Ct. Public Works Department; NO underground
garbage cans will be permitted. Mr. Annunziato then read a memo
from the Recreation Department as follows: 22 units @ .018
acres per unit = 3.96 acres required land dedication per our S~b-
division requirements. Recommend fee in lieu equivalent to .396
acres. Staff recommends that the Pre-Application be approved,
subject to comments.
Mr. Danny O'Brien, agent representing the owners, appeared before
the Board, and stated that they are in agreement to all staff
comments.
Mr. Johnson asked what entrance Lots ~and 2 would use and Mr.
O'Brien indicated N.W. 8th Court.
Chairman Thompson asked about the Recreation Fee and if there
has been .an appraisal submitted? Mr. Annunziato clarified that it
would be submitted when the Preliminary Plat is submitted to the
Board. Chairman Thompson suggested that a current appraisal
accompany it at that time and this would solve problems and
eliminate ~,burden upon the Board and if all developers would do
this it w6uld be helpfdl and beneficial to all.
MINUTES PLANNNING & ZONING BOARD 10-23-79
Mr. Johnson moved to approve this pre-application for Edgewood
Heights, subject to staff comments; seconded by Mr. Hester;
motion carried 5-0.
NEW BUSINESS
Public Hearing - Rezoning Request
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Use:
Request:
Project
Name:
Las Palmas Venture (Mr. Fernandez, agent)
Between N.E. 26th Avenue and N.E. 22nd Avenue
and between FEC Failroad & N.E. 4th Street
See Exhibit 'A'
Planned Residential Community (duplex units
136, apartments 80, total number of units 216)
REZONE from C-3 to PUD(Planned Unit Development)
with LUI=5.0
Bellamar Villas
Mr. Annunziato then explained to the Board that this property is
now zoned C-3 and he then explained that the applicant appeared
before Council at the last and final meeting of the adoption of
the Comprehensive Plan requesting the commercial part of this
tract be C-3 and Council granted this change which is reflected
in the future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. The land
use ~lement provides for a maximum 10.8 units per acre and the
applicant is requesting approximately 7 units per acre for approx-
imately 65% of the maximum density. On-site there will be 2 recreation
areas with tennis courts and pools located at each. The devel-
opment is comprised of 30 acres with a total of 216 units.
Mr. Fernandez, agent, then appeared before the Board, Ail roads
will be private and will be privately maintained by the condo-
minium association, The apartments (80) will be rental apart-
ments. The only difference between the duplex units is that the
larger ones will have a garage; the smaller ones will have
parking outside. They will' be sOld fee-simple. Mr. Fernandez
continued, that there will be no e~ondominium apartments, only
rental apartments; t~o'-story buildings. The duplexes are
condominium and the apartments are rental. No single-family
homes. We will provide a decorative barrier by the railroad
tracks. Discussion then followed on what type of rentals and
the state law pertaining to said. Mr. Fernandez stated tha~
even though it was not required they did do a traffic impact analysis.
Trips generated would be 2100 per,~day.
Mr. Ryder stated the land use plan of the Comprehensive Plan
recommended this change from commercial to residential use
and in essence we are following the dic~tes of this plan.
e
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD 10-23-79
Mr. Annunziato stated that this site plan has gone through
several changes prior to coming before the Board. Mr. Annunziato
then read a memo from the Utility Director, as follows:
The water system as drawn is approved, subject to a 10' clearance
from any building for lines between buildings with appropriate
easements. The sewer system requires two major changes: 1.
The lift station shall be located at the northwest corner
of the property as originally conceived. 2. The gravity lines
must be set so they are all in the street R.O.W. and not cutting
across property outside of the R.O.W. The Police Department
noted street lights and traffic signs required. The Planning
Department noted a requirement to dedicate N.E. 26th Avenue
to construct sidewalks on N.E. 4th Street & N.E. 26th Avenue and
a bike path on N.E. 22nd Avenue. Recreation Department noted
the following: Private recreation facilities to be bonded and
based on the subdivision regulations~; the Recreation and Open
Space dedication requirement for subject development is:
duplexes: 136 units @ .018 acre= 2.448 acres; apartments:
80 units @ .015= 1.200 acres; total 3.648 acres. One half
credit for private ~recreation facilities provided reduces the
requirement to 1.824 acres. Recommend fee in lieu of land be
Provided equivalent to 1.824 acres. Staff recommends that the
Master Plan be approved, subject to comments. Mr. Annunziato
then read a letter from the School Board of Palm Beach County
as follows: The administration will recommend to the Boynton
Beach City Council that the petitioneer consider a contribution
equivalent to .4 of 1% of the selling price or commensurate value
of each residential dwelling unit, on a one time initial sales
basis,as a means of assisting the School Board in its attempt
to acquire funds with which to alleviate overcrowded school
conditions. These funds will be placed in a special capital
outlay account to be used in the area impacted by this develop-
ment (see attached copy of letter).
Mr. Annunziato, then read into the record a letter from the South
Florida Water Management District as follows: C~lcutations'
indicate that the required finished floor elevations will be
15 feet mean sea level; however when detailed informatiOn be-
comes available revision of this elevation may beindic~ted at
that time. The applicant mu~obtain a~Surface Water Management
Permit from the South Florida Water Management District prior
to construction of this proposed project. (see attached copy
of letter).
Chairman Thompson then asked if there was anyone in the audience
who wished to speak in favor of this rezoning, to please come
forward at this time. No one responded.
Chairman Thompson~then asked if there was anyone in the audience
who wished to speak against this rezoning, to please come for-
ward.
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD 10-23-79
Mr. Ryan of N.E. 3rd Court, appeared before the Board and wanted
to know if this is going to be low-cost rentals or housing.
Mr. Fernandez answered negatively, that they are aiming more at
the middle class range,about $50,000 for a duplex, and that
the apartmen~will rent fOr about $250.
Chairman Thompson then read into the record a letter from
Donald & Eleanor Schmidt, of 81 E. Sylvias Lane, Westport,
Mass, owners of property located at 2646 N.E. 4th Court who
would like to express their desire to have the property~'~
remain C~3. · _
Mr. Fernandez stated, regarding N.E. 26th A{~enue ,that they
w~!_dedi~at~_tha entire _ri~ht~of,wav_dQwn to.~t~eFEC r~h~-
of-way but they are only going to build 26th Aven~e to their
entrance.
Mrs. Bond questiQned the rental portion of the condominium
association. How will the people be assessed for their respon-
sibility for the commen elements? Mr. Fernandez, stated their
impact (they will have their own recreation) is basically only
on the roads in the development and drainage. The costs will
be broken down to a per-unit basis. They wilt have their own
pool and tennis courts. The land will be owned by the condonimium
association. The apartments are one section and the rental
apartments are another section. Mr. Fernandez clarified his
company will retain management of the rentals.
Mr. Hester made a motion to approve the rezoning request to PUD,
subject to staff comments; seconded by Mrs. Bond; motion carried
5-0.
Public Hearin~ - Abandonment Request
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Request:
Las Palmas Venture (Mr. Fernandez, agent)
The north 12 feet of the alley on the north
side of Block 12, Boynton Ridge
See Survey and Exhibit 'A'
Alley Abandonment
Mr. Annunziato then showed on the survey exactly where said
alley is and further explained that this 30-ft alley originally
separated the commercial lots from the residential tract.
Several years ago the south 22-ft of the alley was abandoned but
the City did not abandon the n~th 12 feet of the alley. The
intent was to keep it as an alley for Florida Power and Light
Company. The application before you ~now is to abandon that
12-ft. alley.
Mr. Annunziato, then stated the grounds and reasons submitted
in support ofathis application: AMI Investments Inc., has
e
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD 10-23-79
entered into a joint venture known as Las Palmas Venture to
develop the abutting property. The alley as shown on Plat Book
24, Page 28 (see Exhibit A) was intended to serve commercial lots
which will no longer be there. The proposed development will
be all residential and said alley will not be consistent with
the proposed master plan and land usage. Mr. Annunziato, then
read into the record a memo from the City Engineer: This
street and alley have been previously checked out with concerned
parties for abandonment. An. F.P.&L. easement of 12-ft. width
along the north limits of the 30 ft. alley should be retained.
A utility easement of 20-ft. width should also be retained along
the east lim~£ts of the 20-ft. alley. The south limits of the
50-ft. street right-of-way sufficient to provide for an 80-ft
right-Of-way on N.E. 22nd Avenue should be retained. Except
for above provisions we recommend that the street and alley
abandonment request be approved. Planning Department noted
no objections to the abandonment of the above mentioned alley.
Public Works department noted no objections either. Florida
Power and Light noted the following: Thank you for your recent
letter advising us of a request to abandon the referenced right-
of-way. We must object to the request for abandonment unless
a utility easement is granted to Florida Power and Light Co.,
twelve feet in width, permitting continued use. I have enclosed
the necessary easement documents ready for execution in the
event the petitioner elects to proceed with the abandonment
and grant FP&L the easement rights.
Staff recommends that this abandonment be approved, subject to
granting a 12-ft. easement to Florida Power and Light Co., or
by working out an agreement satisfactory to both parties.
Chairman Thompson then asked if there was anyone in the audience
who wished to speak in favor of this abandonment. No reply.
Chairman Thompson then asked if there was anyone in the audience
who wished to speak against this abandonment. No reply.
Mr. Fernandez'reply to FP&L~S~ letter is that they would like to modify
the requirement to make it subject to an agreement between the
developer and FP&L. Discussion followed. Mr. Annunziato stated
that our intent is to make sure FP&L has at least an easement and
he thinks FP&L should be protected by an easement.
Mr. Ryder moved to approve this abandonment request by Las Palmas
Venture, subject to staff comments, and with mutual agreement
between the developer and FP&L regarding the 12-ft. easement; seconded
by Mrs. bond; motion carried 5-0.
Public Hearing - Abandonment Request
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
10-23-79
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Request:
Christian Development of Boynton Beach, Inc
(Clyde Worrell, agent)
East 30-ft of Parcel E as shown on the_
original PUD plan submitted by Leisureville
according to the Plat of the Tenth Section
Plat Book 30, Pages 129 thru 141
same as location
Roadway easement
Mr. Annunziato then explained why it was scratched from the last
agenda, due to it being advertised incorrectly. The application
has been readvertised and the request is before you now. This
is the east 30-ft. of Parcel E, shown on the Tenth section of
Leisureville, located at the south of the N.E. corner of the
intersection of $.W. 19th Avenue and congress Avenue, lying
between Leisureville and Congress Avenue north of and adjacent
to Cedarwood Villas Development. Mr. Annunziato then read into
the record the following comments: the Building Department
noted we have no objection to the easement of this thirty foot
road. The Utility Department noted: To clarify my previous
memo, dated 10-2-79, we do require a minimum of 10-ft. for
easement for sewers across the east end of this property,
so that the property to the north of their property and south
of Lindsley Lumber can be served by gravity sewers. From
Southern Bell the following letter: Please be advised that
Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company objects to the
above mentioned abandonment unless a 12-ft utility easement is
granted along the east side of the parcel to cover our interest.
Southern Bell has no facilities in the above mentioned parcel at
the present time but plans to place buried cable during December
1979 to serve future expansion of Cedarwood Villas and the
tracts H3 and H5 to the north. Florida Power and Light Company
noted the following: Please be advised that FP&L will require
the east 12-ft of the referenced 30-ft. road for electrical
facilities. We have no objections to the abandonment provided
the east 12-ft, is dedicated as a utility easement permitting
FP&L to co-utilitze this area for the installation of electrical
facilities. We would appreciate a copy of the recorded utility
easement for our files. Planning Department noted no objections.
Staff recommendation is that this abandonment be approved subject
to the 12-ft reverting to a utility easement. Mr. Ryder clarified
that FP&L, So. Bell and sewers are all to be in this 12-ft.
easement.
Chairman Thompson then asked if there ~aS~ anyone in the audience
who wished to speak against this abandonment request.
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
10-23-79
Mr. Bob Guterma of 398 West Camino Garden Boulevard, Boca Raton,
appeared before the Board stating that he is owner of the
property north of the proposed abandonment. When he purchased
this property he,bought it thinking he had rear access. Since
then he has sold off a major portion of the front of the property
on Woolbright Rd.to Sun Bank. He still has frontage on Wool-
bright but it is somewhat limited. But the loss of the rear
access would severel~ affect the value of the property and quality
of the development. Mr. Guterma then submitted into the record
a copy of a letter frcmSun Bank protesting this abandonment.
Mr. Guterma continued. There is alreadv~a.~30~ift~ e~ement, and
ii%s p~poseliS~verv c!~ar ~ha~ it
Mr. Hester commented that he hopes we are not getting ourselves
in another bind like the Rollyson Property, a land-locked piece
of property. They are very similar. Mr. Annunziato clarified
that,as of right now,there are no land-locked tracts.
ChairmanTDDmpson then read into the record a letter from Sun
Bank to Mr. Guterma as follows: It has been brought to my attention
that certain parties .are requesting the abandonment of the ease-
ment leading into your property from S.'W. 19th Avenue, Boynton
Beach, Florida, running parallel to a Lake Worth drainage canal.
We wish at this time to registero~u~r protest to this action as
we feel it will greatly effect the value of this entire commercial
complex. It will restrict the flow of traffic to only a north
and west access. In turn, this could have a very adverse effect
on the quality of tenants that may avail themselves of your
carefu!ly~pt~nned commercialcom~lex.
Chairman Thompson then asked if there was anyone in. the audience
who wished to speak in favor of this abandonment.
Mr. Clyde Worrell, 915 Palm Trail, Delray Beach, agent for the
applicant appeared before the Board stating this Parcel 'E'
was just rezoned from C-3 to R-3 and in our design we saw the
conflict of a road way coming from a commercial area-~through our
residential.~area into an ~xclusive residential community, which would
be ~r~en~l~to the traffic flow in the community. The canal is
not now in an attractive state. If the easement was there and
the roadway abolished,we would be responsible for landscaping
and I believe it would make it a much more attractive area.
Mr. Ryder asked Mr. Worrell if he understood that ~he cannot
build on the easement area and would have to incorporate the
lift station. Mr. Worrell replied yes, he understood and,in-
fact, Southern Bell already has some pedestals in there now.
Chairman Thompson commen~ed that Mr. Guterma can sell the en-
tire parcel as one and that he is reluctant to have a roadway
next to~c~a~ becaus~ ~_~_~heob~viou~ safety~h.azard~and~that
routing commercial traffic through residential neighborhoods is
in direct conflict with our Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
10-23-79
Mr. Ryder made a motion that this Board recommend to Council
approval of the abandonment of the east 30-ft of Parcel 'E',
submitted by Leisureville,according to the Plat of the Tenth
Section,Plat Book 30, Pages 129. thru 141, with the understanding
that the applicant will comply with the requirements of the
Technical Review Board with reg~d~ to the easement that iS
required for ~h~C~y,~S0~rn~'Bell!and FP&L~Seconded '
by Mr. Johnson; motion carried 5-0.
At 9:20 P.M. Chairman Thompson called for a 5 minute break.
Chairman Thompson then called the meeting back to order at
9:25 P.M.
Site Plan Approval
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
James & Genevieve Rollyson (G. Wasser~, agent)
West of 1-95 immediately south of Minor Rd,
extended
See Survey (acreage)
Warehouse/Manufacturing Facility
Mr. Annunziato then plotted the location of this development
and commented that this application should look familiar to you
(appeared before the Board on 6-26-79) and because we have
reviewed this at great length and thorough discussions. This
request is to construct a 50,000 square feet metal building
with an automatic fire sprinkler system. It is intended that
this site be accessed by traveling south on High Ridge Road
to Hypoluxo Rd. and then east along an easement and then into
the site itself. The site proposed to have parking along the
eastern boundary and western boundary. The reason it has~come
before the Board again is that the initial site plan proved to be
unbuildable owing to the location of the building and its interf, erence
With an FP&L easement~, The plan ~as changed .to~qualif~ i~ ~for a
new site plan approval requirement. Another difference between
this plan and the plan that was previous approved is the additio'n
of a drainage pond on adjacent property separated by a 50-ft
access easement which will serve not only this development but
the remainder of the industrial plat when and if it is recorded.
Mr. George Wasser, Architect and agent for Rollyson Aluminum
Products appeared before the Board giving some history as to why
they have to reappear (FP&L easement). They have not changed ~
anything except the position of the building, parking (ap~roxi-
imat~ly the same) and a drainage pond.
MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
10-23-79
Mr. Annunziato then read into the record the TeChnical Review
Board comments starting with the Building Department (Bud Howell),
dated 6-21-79, noting the following: 1. No commercial building in
the City of Boynton Beach under the present ordinance, which was
just passed at the June 19th Council meeting, could be permitted
without extending water and sewer lines to the facility. Further,
a fire sprinkler system could not be dependent on a well supply
system, for obvious reasons. 2. On-site storm water retention
calculations for the first three inches of run-off are required.
3. Water Management approval is required for over two acres of
impervious material. 4. Approval for turn-out required for High
Ridge Road which is a County right-of-way. 5. It is not recom-
mended that the City approve any building, now or in the future,
on any road paved in any way other than asphalt or concrete. It
is also recommended that High Ridge Road be extended to N.W. 22nd
Avenue. Mr. Wasser clarified that the paving of the road from the
building to High Ridge Road would be done. Mr. knnunziato then
continued with a memo from the Building Department (Bert Keehr),
dated 10-15-79, noting the following: 1. There is some question
concerning the required parking and how it is figured. 2. All
signs must be approved and permitted on a separate permit.
3. Sidewalks will be required either now or when future roads are
constructed.. 4. Bathrooms and entrances do not meet handicap
law. 5. This site plan shows more than two acres of impervious
area; Water Management must approve. The Fire Department noted
that the plans are subject to Fire Marshal's final approval of
fire protection system. And from the Utility Department the
following is noted: Inasmuch as water and sewer are not available
in the vic~'-~ni~ky of this development, it is recommended that their
permit be denied on the basis of Section B (3) of Ordinance #79-18.
The reason for this is because it would not be economically feasible
for the City to participate with the developer in extending water
and sewer services to this piece of property at this time. This
denial should be appealable to the City Council under Section
B4 of Ordinance ~#79~18. If an appeal is made by the developer,
it should be granted, subject to: 1. Submission of plans and
completion of all on-site utilities, with appropriate easements
before or at the time of construction. 2. Agreement to partici-
pate with other developers in the cost of providing off~site
utilities proportionately, when off-site utilities are extended
into this area. 3. Pay the capital facilities charge when off-
site utilities are available. 4. Pay appropriate connection
charges at the time of connection of the off-site utilities. From
the Engineering Department came the following memo: 1. Easement
for roadway and utilities must be recorded or platted; if ease-
ment is recorded, provide.book and page number. 2. An easement
is required for the 2.5 acre drainage dry depression, and also
an indication of who will maintain this area. 3. A statement
as to who will maintain the off-site street drainage system is
required.
10.
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
10-23-79
The Police Department noted that lighting is required.
The Planning Department noted the following: 1. The landscape
strip along the proposed N/S road to the west of the project
should be moved 5-ft. east to provide for placement on private
property. 2. Pave High Ridge Road from where it currently
terminates to the entrance road. 3. Pave the entrance road
from High Ridge Road to the parking lot paving. 4. All road
paving to be consistent with City specifications. 5. The 50-ft.
easement shown on survey should be dedicated to the public and
should be expanded to a 60-f~.~as~ement. ~ ~6. Dedicate that portion
of Miner Rd. adjacent to said development for public right-Of-
way purposes. 7. A perpetual easement for the off-site drainage
pond must be recorded prior to issuance of permits. 8. The
off-site drainage pond must not encroach into dedicated easement
show~ on survey as it will exist in its 60-ft expanded form.
9. Must submit a revised survey indicating all physical and
easement encroachments on the land.
Mr. Annunziato then stated that he had asked Mr. Wasser to
clarify the parking requirements on the Plan. And, he then
read into the record the following letter from Mr. Wasser:
According to the City Parking requirements,one car space per 2
employees on the largest shift is required. The Rollysons have
advised us,as their agen~hat a maximum of 25 employees ar~
envisioned for ~he initial stages of their project. At that time
2 company vehicles will be used, giving a total of 14.5 spaces
required. Since we know that in the future there maybe
need for manufacturing, requiring more employees and car spaces,
we have provided an additional 62 spaces for 20,000 square feet.
However, at present the total facility is for storage~only.
Mr. Wasser questioned why his client should pave the street
in front of Florida Pneumatic. -Mr. Ryder replied, that he has~
an alternative~.~to go to Miner Road-from High Ridge ROad~
Mr, Annunziato stated he thinks the applie~an~ ~S interested
in developing thi~ site in ~n expedite% manner.~f it, s developed
subject to staff comments as submitted there is always the
potential future modifying of the site, subject to new conditions.
But we can't take into account those new conditions becaUse
they are not presented to the Board now.
Chairman Thompson questioned that if~~ rior to occu anc o~ ~h'
building,~ a~ter main would be ~ br6~ght oVer-from -SeacOaSt, ahd
if that~is not a part of the original, application. Mr. Annunziato
stated that he didn't know if that was ever determined in the
final approval by Council. He thought that~Mr. Cessna's comments
in memo form reflect what our recommendation was when the plan
was approved. Also, Mr. Annunziato clarified that initiall~
the applicant was perfectly will~ng_~o pav~_~th~t, portion of High
Ridge Road to the entrance road.
11.
MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board
10-23-79
Mr. Hester made a motion to approve this site plan subject to
all staff comments; seconded by Mr. Johnson; motion carried
5-0. Mr. Annunziato clarified the Building Department's memo
from Bud Howell only items 2, 3, 4 and part of 5, are applicable.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Ryder made a motion to adjourn;seconded by Mr. Hester~
motion carried 5-0; and, the meeting was properly adjourned at
10:15 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary
(three tapes)
12.
THOMAS J. MILLS
SUPERINTENDENT
OF SCHOOLS
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
120 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida
OCT 2 3 1979
THE SCHOOl, BOARD
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA
~323 BELVEDERE ROAD
WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33402
October 23, 1979
ARTHUR H. BOOGAE
LOUIS J. EASSA
JAMES C. DE LONGA
ROBERT S. HOWELl.
BERNARD KIMMEL,
SUSAN R. PELL
THOMAS W. SA~NSBURY
33435
Att: Craig Grabeel, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: BELLAMARVILLAS P.U.D.
Dear Mr. Grabeel:
The Department of School Plant Planning has reviewed the information provided
relative to proposed Bellamar Villas P.U.D. on a 30.4 acre parcel in Boynton
Beach. The information provided to this office indicates that Bellamar
Villas P.U.D. when completed will consist of 216 dwelling units. The mix of
units w~ll be 80 one and two bedroom apartments and 68 duplexes (136 D.U.).
Total dwelling units in Bellamar Villas P.U.D. will be 216 units.
This office estimates that Bellamar Villas P.U.D. will generate approximately
86 public school age students when completed. A probable grade level break-
down of which would be as follows: 38 pupils in grades K-5, 22 pupils in
grades 6-8, 26 pupils in grades 9-12.
Schools of attendance assuming existing attendance boundaries remain and no
new schools are built at the time Bellamar Villas P.U.D. is completed, are
listed below. Also listed are the present membership, the additional student
membership to be generated by the development and a projection of the number
of students each school will be expected to house in five years, as well as,
the usable permanent capacity of each school.
School Name
1983-84 Usable
Existing Membership Projected Permanent
Membership 1__/ from Devlop. Membership 2__/ Capacity
Rolling Green 656
Congress Middle 1415
Lake Worth Senior 2391
38 800 670
22 1700 1441
2§ 1600 1619 3--/
1-/.
Existing membership represents student membership reported as of
September 1979, which constitutes the first attendance accounting
period.
2/.
The 1983-84 projected membership will be evaluated annually and may be
revised based on each schools' actual enrollment and the amount of resi-
dential building activity within each school's attendance boundary.
3_/.
Planning is underway for senior high school S-3 to be located west of
Lantana. If funds become available and this school is completed, it will
relieve overcrowded conditions at Lake Worth Sr. High School.
Page 2
Craig Grabeel, Assistant Planner
October 23, 1979
You will note that the schools which will be expected to house students emana-
ting from these units are projected to be seriously overcrowded. While the
School Board and Administration recognize the need for additional school
facilities, there are at present no funds available to build such facilities.
The factor that will determine enrollments is dependent upon the rate at which
the various developments in the area are completed. It should also be noted
that this is a countywide system. Therefore, the school system's ability to
meet building needs in one area must be viewed against the total county school
construction demand.
State funds are allocated to school districts based on the actual number of_
students in attendance rather than on projected enrollment. Based
experience, state capital outlay funding allocations for this district, are
generally inadequate to provide facilities necessary for the additional
students emanating from the approved developments. Therefore funds for
capital outlay use must be generated locally, perhaps through millage
creases, ad valorem bond issues or some type of "fair share" impact assess-
ment. The Administration, therefore, will recommend to the Boynton Beach
City Council that the petitioner consider a contribution equivalent to .4 of
1% of the selling price or commensurate value of each residential dwelling
unit, on a one time initial sales basis, as a means of assisting the School
Board in its attempt to acquire funds with which to alleviate overcrowded
school conditions. These funds will be placed in a special capital outlay
account to be used in the area impacted by this development.
The School Board has twice in the past 8 years attempted without success to
pass bond issues to finance new school construction. It is essential that
a reliable source of school construction funds be found; this will require
a strong cooperative effort with the School Board by other governmental
entities, responsible developers and concerned parents. However, if the
school funding problem could be successfully resolved, the School Board
would be able to build the fa~cilities necessary to accommodate new resi-
dential growth within the county.
How~
Senior Planning Specialist
School Plant Planning
HJ:gcn
JOHN R. MALOY, Executive Director
South Florida
Water Management District
POST OFFICE BOX 'V', WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA ~3402
TELEPHONE (305} 686-8800
IN REPLY REFER TO:
6-PBA
October 17, 1979
Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
P;O. Box,31Q
Bosnton Beach, FL.~33435
RE: BELLAMAR VILLAS PUD
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
Following are our comments on the above referenced project which Cs
located On a 30'.36 acre parcel of land located in Section-15, Township
45 South, Range.43 East, in Boynton Beach.
'Water'S~Pply. 'The lproposed development is located within the service area
of the City's water supply facilities. Water Use Permit No. 50-00499-W
was issued to the City of Boynton Beach on March 16, 1978 with an annual
allocation of~3.89 billion gallons, pursuant to Chapter~373,' Part II,
Florida Statutes, District staff calculations estimate that a potable
water demand of approximately 75,000 gallons per day will be generated
by the proposed 216 unit project. When this. figure is compared with
information contained in our files, it appears that the City's water
supply facility has the groundwater withdrawal capability to serve the
subject development.
storm'Water'Disposal. DistriJt staff has reviewed the preliminary drainage
information for the ~roposed development, and it appears that adequate -
retention has been provided for in the drainage design. Our calculations
indicate that the required finished floor elevations will be 15 feet mean
sea level; however, this figure was derived using the preliminary infor-
mation provided. When de~ailed information becomes available, revision
of this elevation may be indicated at that time.
ROBERT L CLARK, JR.
Chairman - Fort Lauderdale
ROBERT W. PADRtCK
Vice Chairman - Fort Pierce
W. J. SCARBOROUGH
Lake Placid
R. HARDY MATHESON
Miami
BEN SHEPARD
Hialeah
STANLEY HOLE MAURIC!E L. PLUMMER NATHANtEL REED J. NElL GALLAGHER JOHN L. HUNDLEY
Naples Fort Myers Hobe Sound St. Cloud Pahokee
6-PBA
Mr. Carmen Annunziato
Page 2
ha ter 373,' Part IV, Florida Statutes, the applicant must
As required by C p _. th Florida Water
obtain a Surface Water Management Permit from the Sou
· ' t riot to construction of this proposed project, if
Management Dlstrlc., .P ...... -,-~,~ ~^- ~e annlication review of the
approved.' District staTt is aw~u,: ~v, v-:' ~r
Proposed drainage, system if the applicant so desires.
o ~ter related problems appear to be associated with the
In su~rY, n . :' this o ortunity to
proposed planned unit development. We appreciate PP
cogent.
/~ nc~ly,
/ /OOHN'R. MALOY . '
Executive Director
TF!E NORTH 12 FEET OF THE ALLEY ON THE NORT~
SIDE OF BLOCK 12
(Amended Plat of Boynton Ridge)
Commence at the S.W. corner of the N.W. ¼ of Section 15, Township 45
South, Range 43 East, as shown in the Amended Plat of B~ynton Ridge, recorded
in Plat Book 24, page 28, inclusive of the Public Records of palm Beach
County, Florida; thence S l°-53'-20" E along the Easterly Right of Way line
of N.E. 4th Street, a distance of 256.69 feet to the Point of Beginning of
the hereinafter described North 12 foot portion of the alley; thence N 89°-
40'-40" E, a distance of 694.43 feet to the Westerly Right of Way line of
a Florida East Coast Railway Right of Way; thence along said Right of Way
line S 7o-05'-40'' W, a distance of 12.10 feet; thence S 89°-40'-40" W a
distance of 692.54 feet to the Easterly Right of Way line of N.E. 4th Street;
thence N 1°-53'-20'' E along said Right of Way line a distance of 12.00 feet
to the Point of Beginning; containing 0.19. acres more or- less.
I hereby certify that the above legal description
is complete and accurate to the best of my know-
ledge and ability.
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Regular Meeting
October 23rd, 1979
7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall
Acknowledgement of Members and Visitors.
2. Reading and Approving of Minutes.
3. Announcement.
4. Communications.
~5. "Citizens Awareness" Presentation:
-~-Mr. Bob Bergen/Pine Jog Environmental Center
% "The Nature of South~Florida-
~6. Old Business:
A. Subdivision Requlation Pre-ADDlication:
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Edgewood Heights (Danny O'Brien, agent) .... TABLED
North of N.W. 8th Court at Old Boynton Raod
See Survey
22 residential lots on 6.13 acres
New Business:
A. Public Hearings:
REZONING REQUEST
1. Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Use:
Request:
Las Palmas Venture (Mr. Fernandez, ~gent)
Between N.E. 26th Avenue & N.E. 22nd Avenue and
between FEC Railroad and N.E. 4th Street
See Exhibit 'A'
Planned Residential Community (Duplex units 136,
Apartments 80 Total Number of units 216)
REZONE from C-3 to PUD(Planned Unit Development)
with LUI = 5.0
ABANDONMENT REQUESTS
1. Applicant: Las Palmas Venture (Mr. Fernandez, agent)
Location: The North 12 feet of the Alley on the North side
of Block 12, Boynton Ridge
Legal ~
Description: See ~$urvey & Exhibit 'A'
.... Reqh~es~-~ ...... AlteY~bandon~nent
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Request:~
Christian Development of Boynton Beach, Inc.
(Clyde Worrell, agent)
East 30-ft. of Parcel E as shown on the original
PUD plan submitted by Leisureville according
to the Plat of the Tenth Section Plat Book 30
Pages 129 thru 141 '
same as location
Roadway easement
Planning & Zoning Board Agenda
October 23rd, 1979
Page 2
Site Plan Approval:
Applicant: James & Genevieve Rollyson (G. Wasser, agent)
Location: West of 1-95 immediately south of Minor Rd extended
Legal
Descripti0n: see survey (acreage)
Project -~
Description: Warehouse/Manufacturing Facility