Minutes 09-25-79MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD HELD
AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
PRESENT
Arnold Thompson, Chairman
Fred DiSalle, Vice Chairman
Lillian Bond
Ezell Hester
Gene Johnson
Caesar Mauti
Simon Ryder
Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
Craig Grabeel, Asst. City Planner
Chairman Thompson welcomed everyone and called the meeting to
order at 7:30 P. M. He introduced the members of the Board,
City Planner and Recording Secretary.
MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1979
Mrs. Bond made a motion to accept the minutes of the Planning
Zoning Board meeting of September 11, seconded by Mr. Mauti.
Motion carried unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS~
Chairman Thompson read the attached letter from Mr. Howell per-
taining to boat houses on private lakes and waterways. He re-
quested this item to be put on the agenda for the next meeting
for discussion with any information pertaining to this to be
sent to the members with the agenda for review. He also requested
that a memo be sent to Mr. Howell asking him to be present at the
meeting.
Mr. Grabeel referred to the Citizens' Awareness Programs and ad-
vised that he checked with the Area Planning Board, County, and
other cities and there are no such programs. He has been receiv-
ing responses to the letters he sent.
NEW BHS!NESS
Subdivision Regulation Pre-Application
Applicant:
Location:
Project
Description:
Edgewood Heights (Danny O'Brien, Agent)
North of N. W. 8th Court at Old Boynton Road
21 residential lots on 6.13 acres
Mr. Annunziato explained the location and stated the Technical
Review BOard reviewed this and many comments were forthcoming.
Perhaps the applicant can make his presentation and then he
will state the City's concerns.
MIN-~TES - PLANNING g ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
Mr. Danny O'Brien stated this is a 6.13 acre subdivision lying
in a R-1AA zone. It is unique property with having elevation
differential. There were two comments made at the Technical
Review Board meeting pertaining to additional road right-of-way
on 8th Court and looping the water line and they have no pro-
blems with these. Also, the question of a recreation fee is no
problem. There was a question regarding the width of the right-
of-way being 50 ft. or 60 ft. and they feel 50 ft. is adequate
since that is what is required by code.
Mr. O'Brien stated that two problems to be resolved are double
frontage lots and drainage. Due to the topography of the area,
this is the best design taking into consideration all factors.
Limited access would be required for houses to front on N. W.
10th St. A water retention area is shown on Tract A. There
will be a homeowners association for complete maintenance of
this area. The major points are frontage on N. W. 10th Street
and the retentionarea on Tract A. They would like to proceed
with this subdivision. These questions are not within the sub-
division, but ~uture maintenance. These can be resolved in dif-
ferent ways. The City Engineer had no problem with this plan.
They would like to get the Board's informal approval of this
pre-application so they can proceed into the master plan phase.
Mr. Johnson referred to R-tAA requiring 75 ft. frontage and
pointed out that two lots only show 28 feet. Mr. Annunziato
explained how lots on a cul-de-sac measure the frontage at the
setback line. Mr. OTBrien i~formed him that these lots all
meet the code as far as square footage, frontage, width and
depth.
Mr. Ryder referred to not having received a formal application
and Mr. Annunziato informed him the general statement submitted
by Mr. OTBrien pretty much constitutes the basic required infor-
mation that is within the subdivision regulation~ If the Board
wishes, they aah require additional information for their review.
Mr. Ryder suggested possibly there should be something similar
to the application with supplemental information. Mr. Annunziato
informed him that there are no specific applications for anything
occurring in the subdivision regulations but certain requirements
must be met. He explained they do have a check list which out-
lines the kinds of information to be submitted and a copy of this
could be sent to the Board members and Mr. Mauti agreed this would
be helpful.
Mr. O~Brien referred to the procedure and stated actually the
pre-application and master plan could be done as one and the
preliminary plat'and final plat could be done as one
-2-
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
Chairman Thompson referred to the plan and stated because N. W.
10th Street will ultimately be a thru street, for safety pur-
poses possibly there should be a cul-de-sac turn to come off
N. W. 10th Street so the double faced lots would be on dead end
streets in the project, He is against a lot facing two streets.
Mr. Annunziato stated the staff has several comments concerning
these particular areas. Several memos were submitted and this
pre-application was the topic of much discussion at the Techni-
cal Review Board meeting Many reservations were expressed by
the Technical Review Board members. Concerning drainage, it is
understood there are some topographical features making it a
little more difficult to construct 60 ft. streets and provide
drainage along the back lot lines and within swales. Parcel A
is noted as a drainage and recreation area. After the April
flood, it was brought to the CouncilTs attention how one of
these areas did flood. The staff has deep reservations about
construction of these with on-site retention ponds. Not only
do they fall into disrepair, but they present a hazard to sur-
rounding neighbors. With having 21 homes, all of which have to
participate financially to support the maintenance of the retention
pond, it is very easy for a small group to complain to the City
Council and ask the City to maintain the area. This resulted in
a strong objection from the Recreation Director since he realizes
this will be a maintenance responsibility for the City. Regard-
less of the topography, there are .ways to maintain drainage on
site. Homeowners usually maintain swale areas without having an
out parcel which becomes a burden.
Mr. Annunziato referred to double faced lots and read the defini-
tion from the subdivision regulations. He thinks it has not
been defined thoroughly enough to d~termine if this subdivision
could exist in a different configuration.
Mr. Annunziato referred to staff comments and read the following
comments from Mr. Howell: The engineer should show elevation of
adjacent property bordering on the east side ~f the proposed
development and he recommends that no retainage pond be allowed
on this project. He read the following comments from the Engi-
neering Department:
1. Valleycurbs are required for 50 ft. right-of-way.
Swales inca 60 ft. right-of-way will accommodate storm
water better.
2. Lot "A" if it is to be used for drainage without an
emergency outfall should be centrally~located.
Recreation requirements should be addressed.
4. A legal description~of the property should be included
in the pre-application.
5. A topographical map should be submitted.
6. Adjacentpropertyshould be identified..
-3-
MINUTES - PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
Mr. Annunziato continued with advising the Utility Department noted
the water line to be looped. The Police Department has noted
street lights. His comment noted there are to be no double
frontage lots. He does not think it has been demonstrated it is
essential to have this design of lots.
Mr. Annunziato then read the following comments from the Recreation
Director:
1. Based on the subdivision ordinance requirements,
the recreation and open space dedication require-
ment is: 21 units ~ .018 acres equals .378 acres.
Recommend fee in lieu of land equivalent to .378
seres.
2. Recommend that the developer provide other means of
drainage accommodations other than the water reten-
tion ponding area as indicated on the plan. These
areas present maintenance, health and safety pro-
blems for the City work forces and area residents.
Mr. Annunziato stated the overall comment is that this pre-applica-
tion for this subdivision could be addressed differently. Perhaps
with the lots fronting on N. W. 10th Street, this street could be
improved. Perhaps if going to a 60 ft. right-of-way instead of
50 ft., there could be swales accommodating the storm water runoff
and the lots would be deep enough to accommodate water in the rear.
Mr. Ryder referred to N. W. 10th Street being shown as 30 ft. in
width and asked if this is to be a dedicated City street, shouldn't
it be widened and Mr. Annunziato replied the pre-application does
provide for this. The 30 ft. dedication was part of the oldpplat.
It is proposed to dedicate an additional 10 ft. from each side.
Mr. Ryder referred to walks and Mr. Annunziato informed him these
would have to be within the 10 ft.
Mr. Ryder stated that drainage is a critical point. Retention
areas are great, but without positive means of directing the
flow, it is questionable how ~ffective they can be. He thinks
a centrally~located retention area would be more efficient.
Chairman Thompson referred to there being no plans to improve
N. W. 10th Street and Mr. O~Brien agreed and added they do not
know where it is going. Mr. Annunziato stated he thinks it is
incumbent upon this subdivider to improve N. W. 10th Street. He
doesntt think it has been proven this is the only way this sub-
division can be developed. Lots could front on N. W. 10th
Street and N. W. 10th Street could be utilized for the proper
purpose.
Mr. O'Brien stated he did not think it was necessary to prove
every statement at this time, but this should be done at the
master plan. The question on retainage is philosophical and
regards maintenance. The homeowners association will be respon-
sible for taking care of the retention pond and can be cited by
-4-
MINUTES - PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
the City by ordinance. Drainage is an engineering problem. The
City Engineer insures that they must take care of a certain amount
of drainage. The drainage question is an engineering question
that they have not submitted full information on. It will be
included with the master plan and preliminary sections of the code.
He is not prepared to argue the question of double frontage and
drainage. There are sections in the code dealing with double
frontage lots. This will all be covered at the proper time at
the master plan or preliminary plat level.
Mr. Annunziato stated N. W. 10th Street will be a local street,
Lots could front on N. W. 10th Street. He doesn't think there is
anything which would preclude that from occurring. As far as
drainage, there are other solutions to the drainage problems
other than a retention pond. He feels there are better solutions
than shown here. There is no objection to going forward to the
master plan with the understanding there will be no double front-
age lots and no retention ponds on site and consideration be given
to redesign.
Mr. Mauti suggested tabling this until Mr. O~Brien has the proper
time to review the staff comments and when he comes back with full
knowledge of the staff comments, we can proceed from there. Mr.
Ryder agreed since some of these points are critical. He feels
developing N~ W. 10th Street is an important factor and he would
like that explored. N. W. 10th Street abuts this property for a
considerable distance and they are excluding any provision for
putting in this street. He thinks we must address the responsi-
bility of this developer to contribute something to the future
installation of this street.
Mr. O~Brien stated that according to the code, a pre-application
is to consult informally with the Technical Review Board and Plan-
ning & Zoning Board prior to the preparation of the master plan
and formal application. It does not state in the code this pre-
application can be turned down. He considers the pre-application
an informal meeting whereby he can present the plan, get staff
comments, get the Board's comments, put these comments together
and come back with the master plan. Mr. Annunziato replied that
he is of the opinion that the Board has the right and opportunity
to approve, approve with recommendations, not approve or table
any action. If the Board is not ready to make a decision con-
cerning any application, they can table. However, tabling might
not be the answer. He would like direction if there is a tabling
motion. Mr. Ryder has pointed out that N. W. 10th Street is im-
portant and he concurs. The Board might want to discuss with Mr.
O'Brien the topic of double frontage lots and drainage and he
will have direction in which to modify the pre-application.
Mr. Mauti stated he brought this up because Mr. O~Brien is the
agent and not the owner. He thought tabling might possibly be
the answer so Mr. O~Brien can read the staff comments, bring
them to the owner's attention and come back.
MINUTES - PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
Mr. Hester stated he doesn't think this should be tabled. Mr.
O'Brien has heard the comments from the Board. If the recom-
mendations are not met, there is reason to turn down the plan
when the master plan is presented. Mr. O'Brien agreed and
added there will be master plan review and the Board will have
more authority than on the pre-application plan.
~hairman Thompson stated there is also reasoning if these pro-
blems are worked out at this time, the master plan would be
easier to approve. Mr. Ryder added that we are talking about
fundamental factors and the principal is not present. He does
not think we can imply any approval until these things are
developed.
Mr. Ryder moved to table this matter in regard to installation
of N. W. 10th Street, the matter of providing an acceptable
drainage area, and no thrusstreets. Mr. Mauti added that he
thinks Mr. Annunziato has commented on all the provisions which
were made and Mr. O'Brien will receive a copy of those provi-
sions. We have the authority to approve this subject to staff
comments which means everything must be included. However, he
doesn't think we should until we hear from the owners of the
property.
Mr. O'Brien stated he would like the Board to let him move
forward to the master plan section taking all the comments
made tonight and incorporating them into the subdivision.
If he can't do it to the Board's satisfaction at the master
plan, that is it. Mr. Mauti asked if he would like the Board
to approve this plan subject to all staff comments and Mr.
O'Brien replied negatively, not subject to staff comments but
approval with the consideration of staff comments and at master
plan~approval, he will come back. Mr. Mauti informed him the
Board could not give a half approval.
Chairman Thompsonclarified that there is a motion on the floor
to table this due to the numerous reasons stated. Mrs. Bond
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-1 with Mr. Hester dis-
· senting and Mr. Mauti abstaining.
Mr. O'Brien questioned the time on this motion to table and
ChairmanThompsoninformed him this will be reviewed at the
next meeting on October 9.
Preliminary Plats
Applicant:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Hunter's Run Golf & Racque~tClub
Replat Housing Tract M, SummitPlat No. 1
48 two $ three bedroom condominium homes
plus pool and pavillion
-6-
MINUTES - PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
Mr. Annunziato stated the Board has already recommended approval
for the site plans for this villa home proposed on Tract M. The
City Council approved the site plan. This preliminary plat
covers the technical aspects. The staff reviewed this and two
comments were made.by the Police Department to provide street
lighting and traffic control signs per Florida State Statutes
and the Public Works Department noted no underground garbage
cans. The site plan showed the street lights; however, it was
not keyed in to what the mark on the plan meant. The applicant
has submitted proper documentation. The staff recommendation
is to approve subject to staff comments.
Chairman Thompson referred to this not changing any layout of the
lots and Mr. Annunziato agreed and added that it is a condominium
with common land.
Mr. Mauti referred to the letter submitted regarding bonding
figures and Mr. Annunziato informed him that each preliminary
plat has to be accompanied by the developerts engineerts esti-
mate of the cost of construction for public improvements. Mr.
Mauti asked if this met the approval of Mr. Clark and Mr.
Annunziato replied affirmatively.
Mr. Hester moved to approve this preliminary plat for Hunter's
Run, Tract M, Summit Plat No. 1, with staff comments. Mr.
Johnson seconded the motion. No discussion. Motioncarried 7-0.
AppliCant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Anthony La,no (Danny O'Brien, Agent)
East of S.E. 2nd Street $ West of the FEC
Railraad and North of S.E. 3!st Avenue
A replat of Tract A, Seacrest Estates, Plat
Book 24, Page 245; Section 4, Township 46
South, Range 43 East
Josephine S. Latino Subdivision
12 Duplex Lots (24 Units)
Mr. Annunziato stated this preliminary plat f~llows the pre-
applicationand master plan,approved by the BoaDd at the last
Planning & Zoning Board meeting. This plat covers the techni-
cal plans. These were reviewed by.the staff. The Building
Department notes the sidewalks have to be constructed. The
Police Department notes it is subject to streetlights, fire
hydrants anda buffer on the rear lot. The Recreation Depart-
ment notes the developer is to provide a copyof the contract
of purchase to provide the Planning g Zoning Board necessary
information~to determine the required fee for recreationand
openspace dedication. He has computed the acreage for the
benefit of the applicant. Based on.3.15 acres of land and 24
units, .438acres would have to be dedicated. The question
arises as to the value of the land. This Board must determine
-7-
MINUTES - PLANNING $ ZONING BOARD
SEPTEMBER 25, 1979
the-~alue of the land for their recommendation to the City Council.
The applicant has provided a letter with David L. Reidfs signature
noting the appraised value of $44,780 which would be $14,217 per
acre which he thinks is probably close to the fair market value.
Also, a letter from Mr. James L. Hillard indicates the appraised
value is correct and in compliance with State law.
Mr. Annunziato continued that concerning the School Board, they
recommend the Planning & Zoning Board accept .4 of 1% on the
value of the unit or closing costs be transferred to the School
Board for 8onstruction of schools in Boynton Beach. Mr. Of Brien
clarified that the School Board is going with their standard
clause and it will be .4 of 1% of ~alue, which is the selling
price of the home. The plans have been corrected to show the
sidewalks, street lights and buffer area and have been resub-
mitted to the City Engineer.
Mr. Mauti made a motion to approve subject to all staff comments,
seconded by Mr. DiSalle. Motion carried 7-0.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Mauti made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Johnson.
Motion carried 7-0 and the meeting was properly~adjourned at
8:30 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
Suzanne M. Kruse
Recording Secretary
(One Tape)
-8-
CITY
BOYNTON BEACH
P. O. BOX 310
~20 N.E. 2ND AVENUE
BOYN'rON BEACH. FLORIDA
Office of the BuildSng Official
September 18th, 1979
Mr. Arnold E. Thompson
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Board ~
1307 North West 8th Court
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Reference: Boat Houses on Private Lakes, Canals, and Waterways
Dear Mr. Thompson;
I respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Board consider
· allowingthe necessity boat of houseSa variance, to be permitted within set-back areas, without
Accordingly, I feel this is a hardship on the citizens of Boynton
Beach and additionally, an unnecessary expense. I would venture to.
state that ninety-five percent (95%) of the individuals who purchase
property bordering waterways do so with the-intent of instituting
docks and in fifty-percent (50%) of the instances, a boat house in
mind at the time of purchase.
Hopefully you will be in agreement with me on this, along with possi-
ble limitation as to size and heights. (Possibly the same type roof
as the residence on that property, for aesthetic reasons.)
I will appreciate your consideration in this matter.
EEH:fs
xc: City Planner
City Manager /
Central Files
Yours very sincerely,
AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Regular Meeting
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
September 25th, 1979---
7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall
1. Acknowledgement of Members and Visitors.
2. Reading and Approving. of Minutes.
3. Announcements. ~
4. Communications.
5. Old Business:
6. New Business:
I. Subdivision Regulation Pre-Application:
.Applicant:
-Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
EdgewoodHeights (Danny O'Brien, agent)
North of N.W. 8th Court at Old Boynton Road
See Survey
21 residential lots on 6.13 acres
II. Preliminary Plats:
1. .Applicant:
Location.:
Legal
Description:
Project-
Description:'
Applicant:
Location:
Legal
Description:
Project
Description:
Hunter's Run Golf & Racquet Club (Paul Hykel,agent)
Hunter's Run Golf & Racquet Club
Replat Housinq Tract "M",Summit Plat No. I
48/~w6'-~ thr~e bedroom condominium homes plus
pool and pavi!lion
Anthony Latino (Danny O'Brien, .agent)
East of S.E. 2nd Street & West-of the FEC
Railroad and North of S.E. 31st Avenue
A replat of Tract A, Seacrest Estates, Plat
Book 24, Page 245; Section 4, Township 46 South,
Range 43 East
Josephine S. Latino Subdivision
12 Duplex Lots (24 units)
O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC.
Land Surveyors
Civil Engineers 26o~ N. F~DERAL H,GHWAY
Land Planners DELR^',' BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
DELRAY 276.4501
BOYNTON 732.3279
September 4, 1979
Offi6e of the City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Re'
SEP
Pre-Application -'Edgewood. Heights, a Proposed Subdivision
ATTN: Carmen Annunziato
Dear Carmen'
Accompanying this correspondence are seven copies
of a statement generally describing the site of the ref~
erenced subdivision~ together with seven prints of a
sketch 'plan and a check for fifty dollars ($50).
We ask that you~review this-information and place
it on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning Board.
Thanking you in advance for your cooperation in
this matter I remain,
Sincerely,
/~EN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC.
//// )
DJO/pw
Encl.
1979
GENERAL STATEMENT
FOR
EDGEWOOD HE IGHTS
SEP 5
A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
]979
The proposed subdivision referred to is located North
of N.W. 8th Court, East of N.W. 10th Street and South and
West of platted subdivisions.
The parcel containing 6.13 acres lies in an area
classified as R-1AA Zoning within the city's corporate limits.
It is the intent of the owner (contract purchaser) to
develop this property into 21 residential lots each having a
minimum size of 8,000 square feet. All~ lots are to be con-
nected to the City of Boynton Beach Public Utilities.
The property has a ground elevation ranging from a
+9.0 feet above mean sea level to an elevation of +19 feet,
with approximately three acres of thick foliage dense shrubs
and tree coverage. '
It is estimated that certain earth work will have-to be
accomplished to raise portions of the site to insure proper
design of drainage and utilities.
Preliminary layout depicts a 10,000 square foot parcel
that is intended to be used as a storm water runoff area and
may be utilitzed for recreational purposes.
TO
Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
EDGEWOOD HEIGHTS
~£ E. Howell
Building Official
,DATE:. 9-18-79
With reference to the above reliminary plans, pIease be advised
of the following comments:
The engineer should show elevation of adjacent property bordering
on the east side of the proposed development.
I recommend that no retainage pond be allowed on this project.
EEH:fs
PLEASE REPLY TO ' : SIGNED
REPLY
E. Howell
DATE: SIGNED
GRAYARC CO., ~NC., BROOKLYN, N. Y. 11232-
THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
MEMORANDUM
S£p 2 5
September 25, 1979
TO:
FROM:
Re:
Mr. Carmen Annunziato,
City Planner
Tom Clark,
City Engineer
Edgewood Heights
Comments concerning the proposed subdivision are as follows:
1. Valley curbs are required for 50-ft. right of way._
Swales in a 60-ft. right-of-way will accommodate
storm water better.
2. Lot "A" if it is to be used for drainage without
an emergency outfall should be centrally located.
3. Recreation requirements should be addressed.
4. A legal description of the property should be
included in .the pre-application.
5. A topographical map~ should be submitted.
6, Adjacent property should be identified.
Tom Clark
TAC:mb
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
Po O. BOX 310
I20 N.I[. 2ND AVENUE
I~OYNTOt~ :BEACH, FLORIDA 33,435
September 7th, 1979
Mr. Daniel J. O'Brien, L.S.
O'Brien, Suiter & O'Brien, Inc.
2601 No. Federal Highway
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Dear Danny:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your Pre-
Application submission for the proposed~Edgewood H~~
Subdivision. In accordance with City S~d'~~'h--~rdinance,
please be advised of the following:
As previously noted the street right-of-way
width must be 60-feet as opposed to 50-feet as
shown on the Plat, unless curbs and gutter
are to be utilized. If curbs and gutter
are to utilized I suggest that you coordinate
with the South Florida Water Management District;
and,
e
Existing City utilities their location and sizes
and proposed tie-in points should~be shown.
Additionally, I might add that I will not recommen~ :
approval of any subdivision with peripheral drainage/recreational
tracts. These areas generally fall into disrepair and become
a burden on neighboring areas. However, if you wish to locate
this tract in a more central location to'the plat I will have
no objection.
Upon clarification of the above mentioned items I will
process the EdgeWood Heights Pre-Application with the entire
- TeChnical Review Board.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
CARMEN S . ANNUNZIATO,
City Planner
CSA:pf
CC:
Peter Cheney, City Manager
Central File
O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC ....
Land Surveyors
Civil Engineers 26oi N. FEDERAL HIGHWAY
Land Planners DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
DELRAY 276-4501
BOYNTON 732-3279
Office of the City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
Palm Beach County, Florida
September 10, 1979
A~FN: Carmen S. Annunziato, City Planner
Re: BdgewoodHeights - A Proposed Subdivision
Dear Carmen;
In regard to your letter in reference to the mentioned subject dated
September 7,' 1979, the following comments are forwarded.
It is the intent to construct the fifty foot right of ways in accord
with the City's specifications.
I see no need at this time to contact the S.F.W.M.D. for varied reasons,
one of which'is that by Regulation we have to seek a General Permit from the
District, however at this stage this permit is premature.
It is my contention that until such time as the Master Plan is approved
that the developer should not have to stand the expense of any thing more
than conceptual engineering design due to the fact that any change in lot,
unit or road configuration may cause a complete redesign of the engineering
factors. Up to the point of preliminary plat approval these considerations
could and should be conditional in nature.
The Peripheral Drainage/Recreational Drainage tract is placed as shown
due to the topographical nature of the lands involved and it is our contention,
when considering all of the factors, involved, that this is its best location.
Can not your concerns be alleviated if this tract were owned and maintained
by a Property Owner's Association thereby causing an entity that the City's
insPectors can site in accord with the City ordinances as they do presently
with the private property owner?
Attached are seven'copies of the Site Plan revised to indicate the size,
location and connection points to the City's utilities.
Believing that this clarifies most of our differences, we ask that you
continue the processing of this project.
DJO/pw
l
Daniel J. O'Bri~ L. S.
TO: Carmen Annunziat o
City Planner
RE: ~Edgewood~Heights -
MEMORANUDUM
SEP 1 C, i979
September 18, 1979
$£P 1 9 1979
Based on the Sub-Division Ordinance requirements, the Recreation
and Open Space dedicatiion requirement is:
21 units @ .018 acres equals .378 acres. Recommend fee in
lieu of land equivalent to .378 acres.
Recommend that the developer provide other means of drainage
accommodations other than the water retention ponding area as
indicated on the plan.
These areas present maintenance, health, and safety problems
for the City work forces and area residents.
Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Parks Department
eOF/as
EDGEWOOD HEIGHTS
~OYNTON
September 7, 1979
Mr. Thomas A. Clark, P. E.
City Engineer
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
120 N. E. Second Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida
Subject: HUNTERS RUN
Dear Mr. Clark:
Pursuant to your subdivision:regulations, Summit
Associates, Ltd. hereby requests a pre-plat~and final
plat approval.
I have enclosed the original plat executed by the approx.
priate parties along with~six prints-of same.- Also
enclosed please find a bond in the amount of.$200,000
along with three checks payable to the City o~ Boynton
Beach for-the appropriate fees.
Previously submitted to you were-the working drawings for
the sewer, water, paving and drainage by Conrad Schaefer.
Should'you need any additional information, please feel free
to contact~me.·
Very truly yours,
Paul G~ Hykel
Project Manager
PGH:jes
Enclosures
3500 Clubhouse Lane, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436. Telephone: (305) 734~5000.
CONJULTING ENOINEEES, INC.
EXEC~IV~ CO~Ny. ~O ~OOR
2001 PALM BEACH ~KES BLVD.
WE~ PALM B~CH, FLORIDA 33401
TE~PHON E 305 / 686-0663
September i1, 1979
Mr. Tom Clark, P.E.
City Engineer
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida
SUBJECT: Hunter's Run POD "M" Bond Amount
Dear Mr. Clark:
Following is our breakdown for bonding of subject project:
(1) Paving and Drainage
(2) Water Distribution System
(3) Sewage Collection System
If you have any ~questions, please call us.
Sincerely,
CONRAD W. ~CHAEFER, PP~ESIDENT
CWS/op
$ 95,000.00
3O,OOO.O0
75,000.00
$200,000.00
im
F
H~U'N~TE R'S
R~U-N ......
2601 N. FEDERAl HIGHWAY
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC.
Land Surveyors
Civil Engineers
Land Planners
L r. ,",. ,~'~ ~,,'",
DELRAY 276-450!
BoYNToN 732-3279
Tom Clark, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
August 28, 1979
Re: Josephine S. Latino Subdivision
Dear Mr. Clark;
Accompanying this correspondence you will find
prints of the ~relininar~.~for the above mentioned
subdivision along with construction plans for the pro-
posed road, sanitary sewer and water distribution systems
together with a check for $50 to cover the filing fee for
a preliminary plat.
Sincerely,
O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC.
pamela M. Widmann
For-the Firm
PMW/pmw
.. Encl
~ ~d~ P.~ >LAC F*
T. ST.
SE
MEMORANDUM
SEP 3l
September 19, 1979
TO:
RE:
Mr. Tom Clark
City Engineer
~ Sub-Division
Preliminary Plat
Developer to provide copy of Contract of Purchase to provide
Planning and Zoning Board necessary information to determine the
required fee for Recreation and Open Space Dedication.
Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Parks Department
CCF/as
XC: .,,Carmen Annunziato
City Planner