Loading...
Minutes 04-11-78MINUTES OF THE REGUL_~R M~.ETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 1978 AT 7:30 P. M. PRESEMT Simon Ryder, Chairman Col. Walter M. Trauger, Vice Chairman Ronald Arena Marilyn Huckle John Jameson Richard Lambert Garry Winter Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Chairman Ryder welcomed everyone and called the meeting to order at 7:35 P. M. He introduced the members of the Board, City Planner and Recording Secretary. He then acknowledged the presence of Mayor Emily Mo Jackson in the audience. ~. Lambert made a motion that the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 28 be approved as presented, seconded by Col. Trauger. Motion carried 6-0 with Mr. Winter abstain- ing. AhrNOUNCE ~NTS Chairman Ryder referred to M~s. Huckle's suggestion at the last meeting to give a report on the items which the Board recommended to the City Council. He referred to the plan for parking at the Boulevard Manor Nursing Home on which we recommended approval and stated that the Council approved it. Another item recommended was to explore the feasibility of retaining the consultam_ts to do a study for the reserve annexation area and although~:this matter did not appear on the agenda, it was subsequently added and the Council re- quested the City Manager to follow this recommendation. He stated that also appearing on the agenda was the matter of amending the ordinance with regard~to buffer walls. This was discussed previously and we felt apparently the ordinance needed a change, but we did not come up with a specific recom- mendation. It was tabled by the Council and no action was taken and he understands they have decided to wait until we meet with the Technical Review Bo~d. C O~UN IC.~TIONS Chairman Ryder announc:ed that some letters had been received, but will come under matters on the agenda. OLD BUS I~SS Site Plan Approval MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BO.&RD APRIL 11, 1978 Applicant: Richard S. Johnson & James P. Kintz (Tabled) Location: 246 N. Congress Avenue, Leisureville Plaza Legal Description: Acreage Project Description: Branch Bank for First Federal Sav- ings & Loan Assoc. of Lake Worth Chairman P~der announced that this application is for the installation of a branch bank adjacent to the south end of the Winn-Dixie Shopping Center or Leisureville Plaza at 804 and Congress Avenue~ This matter was discussed, but there appeared to be a question of sufficient parking to provide for the present operations and new operations. It wa~ felt it would be advisable to table it for the benefit of the applicant and the Board to explore it further. This matter was tabled and is on the agenda tonight. However, he received a letter today from the attorney representing the applicant advising that they are studying the matter of providing addi- tional parking space and request it to be tabled tonight and appear on the agenda for our next meeting on April 25. At that time, they hope to have completed a study where they can indicate to the satisfaction of the City that adequate parking will be provided for all activities in Leisureville Plaza. He suggests this be left on the table and the members agreed. Public~_Hearing Rezoning Request: Applicant: Mr. S. J. Jarvis (Tabled) Location: 900 S. W. 15th Avenue Legal Description: Acreage Project Description: To be developed under uses per- mitted by C-3 zone Request: Rezone to C-3 from R1-AA Chairman Ryder announced that this is the land which lies be- tween the canal and the Seaboard Railroad, bounded on the north by 15th Avenue and on the south by 23rd Avenue. This Board has held two previous hearings at which this matter was discussed, but in each instance the matter ended being tabled at the request of the applicant because he felt he needed more time to complete his presentation. The requests were granted and the date was set for tonight for determina- tion of this application. Because of the interest in this matter, the City Council felt the need to set a date to have a special meeting to discuss this matter. Following the Board's action tonight, our recommendation will go to the City Council and on April 20 at 7:30 P. M., the City Council will hold a public hearing on this matter. Chairman Ryder then requested the City Planner to comment. M~. Annunziato replied that he has some comments in reference to the traffic analysis, but suggests that the presentation be given first. -2- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Chairman Ryder first referred to there actually being two requests for this parcel of land. He stated that one re- quest was to rezone the southern part from R-1AA to PID and the other to rezone the northern part from R-1AA to C-3, which is a commercial category. Subsequently after the second meeting, the City was notified by Mr. Jarvis that he wished to withdraw the request for rezoning to PID. We will proceed tonight to consider the matter of the Change in zoning from Rml~ to C-3 for the frontage on Woolbright Road from the E-4 Canal to 1-95. Col. Trauger made a motion that the rezoning request of Mx. Jarvis be removed from the table, seconded by ~. Lambert. Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Robert F. Griffith, Jr., representing M~. S. J. Jarvis, appeared before the Board, He referred to the property pre- sently being zoned R-1AA and advised that it was purchased by ~. Jarvis in 1970 when it was zoned Ct3. The application before the Board to be considered is to place the property back in the same category that it had when purchased by Mr. Jarvis in 1970. The records reflect that in 1975, at the time the master plan was adopted, this property was rezoned to the present zoning of R-~AA. He showed a map and e~'- plained the location of the property. He stated that it is bounded by the Seaboard Railroad one, the east, Woolbright Road on the north, mud the E-4 canal which has a right-of-way of ~50 feet from the property to the west. The property located on the western side is zoned C-4, which is a lower zoning classification than the parcel in question. He also pointed out that the ~epth equals the parcel to the west. He then showed an artist.~s rendering of the parcel. The land area is~.5 acres. He told about the intended develop- ment including a motel on the eastern portion and general marketing or shopping area to the west. The motel would be a chain type unit such as Holiday Inn or Ramada Inn and he understands both have expressed interest in the Boynton Beach area. He thinks most people are familiar with their operations with having a motel and restaurant and cocktail lounge for their guests. It would be the usual pattern connected with motel service. They felt in planning the community center adjacent, it should be a grocery type shopping store such as Publix or Winn-Dixie with support- ing retail outlets. The cost of this development based upon what is shown would be $3,250,000. Computing that on the present tax base, this would be a revenue of $74,410 in real estate taxes to the City of Boynton Beach. The deve- loper has retained a ~iation to present the traffic analysis which Mr. ~to will cover in more detail. Each member of the Board has been supplied a copy of this traffic analysis which includes maps and charts along with explanations. It is their contention that this survey indicates that this roadway that services this area -3- MI~JTES PL~_~tNG & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11., 1978 is more than adequate for this shopping center without adding to the congestion. He showed a photograph of the aerial view of the property. He then pointed out the parcel on the City zoning map and also the adjoining C-4 parcel to the east. He also pointed out the other C-2 areas to the north and further west. He also pointed out undeveloped land zoned R-3 extend- ing to the west to Congress Avenue. The request tonight is as shown on the map to change the zoning from what is presently R-1AA to C-3. Chairman Ryder requested comments from the City Planner re- garding the traffic study plan. Mr. Annunziato first read a report from the City Engineer referring to the traffic analy- sis not addressing itself to the property lying south of the proposed plaza. Also, the necessity for traffic signals was not investigated. There is also the question about the need for a storage lane coming from the west for a right turn. It is recommended that these items be investigated and traffic signals be installed when warranted. He clarified that it meant the traffic impact did not address the entire parcel, leaving the acreage to the south still a question. It will either be developed as single family or other purposes de- pending upon further actions. The width entering the property is a question. One of the recommendations is if this zoning is approved, that the developer be required to dedicate right- of-way for access to the south and the developer be responsim bls for a tr~fic signal when warranted. Chairman Ryder read the traffic distribution from the report estimating 4~% going to the west, 30% going east and 36 going north and south on 1-95 for the shopping center. The distribution of the motel traffic is estimated in a similar man. her with 15% going west, 25% going east to Federal High- way and 30% going north and south on 1-95. The 2~ hour counts on 15th Avenue would be approximately 12,000 east- bound and 120300 west bound and approximately 1/3 of that would be related to access to this development. The 24 hour count for movement within the development on the access road would be approximately 8,600. M~. Lambert referred to right-of-way requests and traffic lights being made at the time of site plan review in view of it possibly not being developed according to these plans and Mr. Annunziato replied that if it was not developed, it would not be required. Mr. Lambert questioned when the traf- fic light would be required and M~. Annunziato explained that it would be required when warranted. Chairman Ryder referred to the area to the south being an important consideration because it would be physically hard to provide access from 23rd ~Avenue to this site. He ex- plained how it was limited from Woolbright Road with the right-of-way being there for i-95. He explained how careful -4- MINUTES PLi~ING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 planning was important in regards to internal distribution and access and egress to the development and there also must be consideration given to it being on a grade and curve. Chairman Ryder announced that long periods of time were de- voted to this application at previous meetings and many letters have been received together with a petition. Every- one will Be given a chance to speak, but he requests that the comments not be repetitious. Mx. Fred Lewis, 1996 Campanelli Blvd., appeared before the Bomrd and advised that he is a licensed professional engineer in the State of New Jersey. He requests the Board to address itself to two basic questions on the minds of many people whose property value would be greatly affected. What were the cir- cumstances and reasons for rezoning this parcel from commer- cial to residential in 19757 It seems that the commercial property was re.zoned to residential at the time the homes were being built adjoining. A large premium was paid for the residential lots on the water. Now that all the lots have been sold, it see~ strangle there is a proposml to rezene the property back to commercial. If this was done to expedite the sales, then the buyers were deceived. It is not hard to see that these properties will go down in value if the pro- per~y is rezoned. ~. Lewis then stated pursuant to Florida Statute 1t9.07, they request that the Board furnish the names of the owners of the property underconsideration for rezoning including the corporations, partners, share holders, etc. They have been told that ~. Jarvis is the trustee, but do not know who the owner is.. They have the right to _know who controls this property. Mr. Frank Bower, ~008 Roma Way, appeared before the Board and ~u~mitted three photographs taken in February, 1978. He advised that the first photograph was of a typical home probably v~lued between $60,000 to $75,000. These homes are directly across from the proposed rezoning to C-3. The second and third photographs are of the south end of the pro- posed area showing that ~,n~e access to the land can be made at this area. He explained how the area would have to be a cul-de-sac which would cause a real problem in the case of a fire. The original master plan showed this whole area as R-1~A. That was the intent of the zoning at the time and why should it be changed at this time? This is a residen- tial area with homes to the west and east. Section 9 of Ordinance No. 75-19 indicates that the proposed developer must indicate the plan of development. Has he done so other than the map presented? Hms he submitted a plan to the Board? Chairman Ryder replied that a plan was not required at this time. ~. Bower stated that under Section 9 of -5- MINUTES PI~NNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Ordinance 75-19, he understands such a plan must be submitted. Chairman Ryder informed him that this takes place when the developer comes before the Board with a site plan. He added that between the time the zoning change is granted and appli- cation is made for the site plan, very often the developer may change his mind. At this time, the Board cannot pin him down to a definite plan. If the zoning change is granted, any uses under the C-3 category are permitted. Mr. Bower referred to the proposed population and densi%ies and Chair- man Ryder explained how this was also considered in the site plan review. Mr. Bower referred to the possibility of having a sports arena and shopping mall ink, the area and asked if the traffic plan had taken this into consideration and Chairman Ryder replied that he didn't know how tho~e possibilities could be equated with these plans. Ms. Joseph J. King, 1716 S. W. 16th Street, appeared before the Board and advised that he is an active real estate broker and has been for 20 years. When he moved to this area, he checked the zoning and was told this area was definitely R-1AA. At that time, homes were supposed to be built. He felt there was little chance there would be anything but residential to go on that property even though he was not aware of the C-3 zoning previously. H~ referred to there being court cases pertaining to not interfering with the inte- grity of already developed co~munit~s unless there was an absolute need. There is no absolute need for this at this time. This is zoned R-I_~A now and he thinks it should be. The ~ster plan should be followed. He referred to the whole area being R-1AA and it was C-3 when there was not any develop- ment here. It really stumps everybody why it should come uo at this time. There was reference to FHA homes being built on this property, but it would be impossible to get FHA fi- nancing for that area. Decent homes would have to be built selling with normal mortgages. He told about houses being built in other areas along the railroad and !-95 encounter- ing no problems with sales. He then told about staying in motels for years and how they were always located at highway interchanges which caused traffic congestion. He stressed that planning must be emphasimed for the property adjoining the interchanges. He showed a map of the interchanges in the West Palm Beach area and told about the traffic being con- gested. He then referred back to the R-IAA zoning and stated again that we should keep it. He does not believe any money would be lost. He referre~ to the Boynton Beach exits from 1-95 being overpasses and explained how the traffic situa- tion must be considered. Ns. Lee Levitow, 2078 S. W. 14th Avenue, appeared before the Board. He referred to the master plan basically being the bible for orderly growth in the City and stated that many zones are commited to various categories. This is a good -6- MINUTES PLANNIT~G & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 sized parcel of land and was zoned R-1AA on the master plan after considerable study. He doesn't recall ~. Jarvis or a representative coming at that time to make any request for a change. He feels Mr. Jarvis should have requested review of this particular parcel At that time. It was not done and it seems weirdto come up at this time° It will be to the harm of the residents who lite in Boynton Beach Leisureville. When this original request came through, it was requested for the whole parcel. They have gone through this before with it be- ing amended to just include one parcel. He thinks it is obvi- ous if this is zoned C-3, there will be no use for the other parcel as R-'IAA and they will step in at a later date. The C-4 land referred to is a very small piece, possibly 125 x 150 ft., and it was planned to be a marina. He does not think this is a tangible argument. They are opposed to this re- quested change. Chairman Ryder ascertained there were no further speakers and opened the discussion to the Board members. ~. Lambert referred to this having been discussed for quite awhile and everyone having had the opportunity to take a good look at the area. There are two interchanges from 1-95 in Boynton Beach and it see~ this area is the most desirable for commercial planning. He has observed the streets and tried to see what properties may or may not face 15th Ave. There are properties with their rears on the south side of Woolbright Road, but the only ones facing Woolbright Road will be the R-3 area under development, He talked to the owners of the R-3 property and they have no objections. Being a licensed real estate broker, he has yet to approach an owner where there was a shopping center within walP~ng d~stance where it subtracted from the value. Under normal circumstances with a shopping center ~ithin walking distance, it is a plus factor. As far as properties being across the canal, this property is immediately east of the C-4 property and there are no residential properties across the caAal. Also, there is a natural buffer of 155 ft. for the canal with no bridges. Traffic will come with growth and Wool- bright Road is..®lanned to be a major road. We only have two exits from !-95. He does not see this request as being unreasonable for that particular location. The commercial being proposed is only for 400 ft. off of Woolbright Road which is even to the C-4 across the canal. Across the street, there is a ~0 to 12 acre parcel which is C-2o They are not requesting C-3 for the whole parcel. It is just being re- quested for the frontage along Woolbright Road. M~. Winter questioned the length of the C-4 from Woolbright to the souther~ boundary and Chairman Ryder replied that it was more than 150 ft. and Mr. Annunziato added that it was approximately 350 feet. Col. Trauger clarified that the total application was for 12.25 acres and Mr. Arena added that the southern boundary line of C-3 will not exten8 fur- ther south than the C-4. -7- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Mrs. Huckle asked the applicant for an expression of some kind of indication as to the possible use for the rest of the area without making a commitment and Mxo Steve Jarvis replied that when he withdrew the application for the PID, he me~ with planners and they are working on something to be able to use the rear property for and to not antagonize the people. They are trying to work something out where they can accommodate the City with water wells and power lines° Until there is more definite planning, he cannot say. At this p~oint, apparently the PID is dead and he hms gone back to the planning boards to see what they can de. In reference to it being zoned R-1AA previously, he did come before the Board in 1975 when it was zoned R-I~ and met with City people and was told R-I~ was a holding type zoning until it was platted. He was refused building per- mits because of the moratorium being in effect. He does not know what can be done with the rear property until the planners consider it further. They are trying to do the best they can. Chairman Ryder referred to being permitted the heighth of 45 fto in the C-3 zone and stated that this may pose a good deal of problems, particularly on the west end. He sug- gested possibly planning something with a low profile for the western section in the C-1 category, which allows a maximum height of two stories. Mr. Jarvis replied that he does not know of anything in the C-3 districts in Boynton Beach that is four stories high at the present time and he does not see any need for anything 45 ft. high, except possi- bly the motel. He explained how the land was situated 22 ft. below the railroad tracks. He does not see any reason for 45 ft. in the commercial area° He would like to keep the C-3 request, but would agree to a height restriction on the western piece if necessary. Mr. Lambert questioned what the benefit would be by limiting the height and buffering it from the C-4 across the canal and Chairman Ryder replied that he was thinking about the homes buil~ below there and the impact on them~ As far as the C-4 property, we do not know what is intended. He thinks it might be helpful to maintain this low profile on the other side of the canal. He clarified that his suggestion was for the western parcel to be C-1 and the eastern parcel to be C-3. Col. Trauger replied that he ~id not see the reason and Mr. Lambert pointed out that there was C-4 across the canal. Chairman Ryder stated he was talking ~bout a gradual transition and ~. Lambert replied that he did not see any homes on the west side of this parcel and it is zoned C-4. Chairman Ryder replied that he was aware of this, but was concerned about the homes i~mediately below. ~. Lambert stated that the applicant also has R-I~A zoning immediately to the south mnd he questions whether the man will utilize his own pro- perty which would harm his residential property to the south. -8- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 M~s. Huckle referred to the application requesting C-3 zoning and stated she thought we should direct our concentration to the uses allowed in C-3 and to consider all possibilities. If the zoning is changed, any items listed under C-3 would be legally permitted. She thinks this will open up a large area of commercial possibilities. Chair~n Ryder replied that the only way to control it would be to change it to C-1 or C-2 and Mrs. Huckle stated that it should be addressed as C-3, as applied for. Col. Trauger referred to the uses permitted and stated possibly the only one questionable would be greenhouses and F~s. Huckle referred to bars and cocktail lounges being included. Col. Trauger referred to motels having such faci- lities and added that he had yet to see an objectionable lounge connected to a motel and ~s. Huckle replied that if the motel did not become ~ reality, it could be the site of a large bar and cocktail lounge. Mr. Lambert added that beer and wine sales were permitted in the C-2 zone. Mr. Annunziato referred to the use being questioned for the western tract and stated that probably C-1 would be a more acceptable transition for the homes to the west. It would also probably eliminate the need for wrap-around driveways to the rear. Col. Trauger stated he could find no objection to the plan. He has listened to many arguments regarding the downgrading of property, but in looking at the development of Boynton Beach during the past ten ~ears, he cannot see any property which has been downgraded. He does not agree that any pro- perty will be downgraded. Mr. ~rena referred to the trend being to ~venue and 15th ~venue to the entrances he did not feel the trend was to put commercial directly in the center of residential communities. On this particular tract of land, it is basically surrounded by commercial and the developer feels the best use would be to rezone it to C-3 and he agrees with him. He thinks it would be the best Mr~ Lambert referred to motels usually choking a site by interchanges and stated if this zoning is not granted, it would be silly for anyone to assume motels would not be built. There could be a~possible site a little further west at Congress Avenue and Woolbright, which would in- crea~e the traffic through this area. Chairman Ryder referred to Woolbright Road being four laned and agreed that traffic is increasing. He hopes with proper planning that the impact ~s experienced by Miami will be avoided here. -9- MINUTES PLightinG & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Mr. Annunziato told about the plans for Woolbright Road to be a major road from the east to the west ending at Jog Road. It is also located at an interchange of the Interstate High- way. Given planning considerations if there are going to be commercial uses, he would rather have them oriented at the interchange than strung out along the highway with numerous curb cuts. What is proposed is limited access to Woolbright Road with the potential for a signal as opposed to having curb cuts strung out all, along, Chairman Ryder referred to the question asked about what has happened to signify the change to commercial and stated that what has happened is 1-95 and the interchange is a physical reality. This property is now directly on the entr~u~ce to 1-95. This has become a main road. He is a resident of Lei- sureville and knows it has been a constant battle to keep areas from being downgraded around the perimeter and at no time, would he be in favor of the P~D. He thinP~ PID is too drastic of a change across the canal from homes, but this property is on the interchange. All along 1-95~t inter- cha~ges, there are restaurants and motels. He thinks this situation must be faced. There is C-2 property to the north of this site with residential behind it and going west, there is C-2 property. He does not see residential on an entrance to 1-95. He does see residential to the south of this area. He has tried desperately to maintain status-quo, but the 15th ~venue interchange has happened. However, he would like to see control for the western parcel. If it is zoned C-3, we do not ~ow what will be presented. M~. Arena referred to the traffic study and asked if there wa~ any objection to providing a traffic signal when war- ranted and ~o Jarvis replied that if it is warranted, they will furnish it. M~. Arena referred to the dedication of the 80 ft. right-of-way and ~. Jarvis replied that they would dedicate whatever is called for. Mr. Arena referred to the western tract being zoned C-1 and Mr. Jarvis replied that he would like to stay with C-3 because of C-4 across the canal. He purposely kept the depth at ~O0 ft. so no homes would back up to it. Col~ TrauEer referred to the development of the motel complex and commercial as shown on the plan and stated he thought many people would feel comfortable if reasonable assurance could be given that this is really the plan he would like to see implemented if the zoning request is granted and M~o Jarvis replied that he has,letters on file from motels and his definite plans are to build a motel towards the inter- change. M~. Winter referred to the people stating they were directly across the canal from this proDosed rezoning and clarified that they would actually be across from the parcel remaining -10- MINUTES PL~ING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 R-I~A. This whole parcel of land actually extends to the same boundary as the C-4 property. There are no residential parcels directly across from it. The houses on 17th Avenue are not across from the property. The lots on the canal are not across from this area at all. Chairman Ryder referred to the houses being diagonally across from it and Mr. Lambert added that they were also abutting C-4. Mrs. Huckle asked if this property were to be split to accom- modate C-1 or something lower on the western section and C-3 on the eastern section, what would be the approximate area of the C'3 site and Mm. Annunziato informed her that there were 9.387 acres on the east and approximately 3 acres on the west. M~. Lambert stated he could not understand any reason for buffering from a C-4 area and made a motion that the appli- cation for ~. Jarvis for rezoning from R-1AA to C-3 be recommended to the City Council for approval, including a traffic signal when warranted, and an 80 ft. right-of-way as shown on the survey to be dedicated. Col. Trauger seconded the motion. As requested, ~s. Kruse took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Mr. Arena - No Mrs. Huckte - No Mr. Winter - No Mm. Lambert - Aye M~. Jameson - Yes Col. Trauger - Yes Mr. ~yder - NO Motion failed 4-3. Mr. Arena made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the Jarvis application subject to the follow- ing: western tract to be rezoned to C-i, eastern tract to be rezoned to C-3, and subject to the applicant providing traffic signals when warranted and dedication of ~u 80 ft. right-of-way. M~. Lambert seconded the motion. Under dis- cussion, ~. Lambert asked if the tracts were defined enough to refer to tracts east and west and Mr. Annunziato replied that they were clear. As requested, ~s. Kruse took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Mr. Arena - Yes M~s. Huckle - No Mr. Winter - Yes Mr. Lambert - Tes Ma~. Jameson - ~es Col. Trauger - Yes M~. Ryder - ~es Motion carried 6-1. -11- MINUTES APRIL 1t, 1978 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD Chairman Ryder declared an intermission at 9:10 Po Mo During the intermission, Col. Trauger requested to be ex- cused and left. Chairman Ryder reconvened the meeting at 9:20 P. M. BUSINESS Site~_. plan ApDr~ova~ ApPlicant: St~ ~L~rk's Parish Center Location: 730 N. E. 6th Avenue Legal Description: Lots 5,6,10,1t,12 of Deweys Subdivi- sion and Lots 8,9,10,11,12,13, Block 2, Civic Center S/D Project Description: New Parish Hall Chairman Ryder requested input from the City Planner. M~. Annunziato stated that this applicatio~ follows the action taken by the Planning & Zoning Board approximately one month ago. He referred to requesting a parking determination from the Board at that meeting since our code does not mention recreation buildings. He suggested at that time that the Board adopt the policy consistent with the Southern Standard Building Code which is 20 sq. feet per person, one car for each four individuals. This would have afforded a rational way to determine the number of parking spaces for a use we had no requirement for. However, the Board instructed him to have a site plan presented and they would determine the num- ber required. The Building Department has noted that the required parking must be provide,d. The Engineer has requested paving and drainag~ plans with~elevations for the new dri~e- Code requirement. Chairman Ryder asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on behalf of this application. Father Donquil appeared before the Board and explained that the proposed hall would be used as a cafeteria, for cultural events of the school, gymnasium for the children to play indoors on rainy days, and a social hall. There will never be a time when the Parish Hall will be used at the same time as the church and he feels there i~ no conflict as far as the p~r~uing is concerned. Chairman Ryder asked if he was aware of the stipulation re- Earding additional parking and Father Donquil replied that he is aware there is a~controversy, but they feel there is not a need because they have parking now for the church and there have been no additional members in the past few years. There will be no additional need for parking for the uses for which this building is proposed. Mr. Lambert referred to the facilities not being used at the sa~e time, but asked if this did happen and more parking was -12- MI~JTES PLAN~ING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 needed, do they have additional land and Father Donquil re- plied affirmatively. Mr. Lambert clarified that it was just their feeling that it is not needed and Father Donquil agreed and told how there was no expectation of the number of mem- bers increasing. Mr. Lambert asked if there had been problems on holidays with overflow parking at the shopping center and Father Donquil replied that there wasn't, because if the shop- ping center was used, it was on Sunday. Mr. Lambert stated that he approached some of the store owners and they did not indicate any problems and he is not sure they were aware that cars were parking there from the church. Me. Jameson asked if masses would be held in the new building and Father Donquil replied they would occassionally with over- crowded masses in the winter. NE. Jameson clarified that the intention was more than just recreation and Father Donquil agreed that it would be a social parish hall. Chairman Ryder referred to the plan indicating there is 600 ft. east of the proposed parish hall going to,the waterway, so it is not a matter of having room. Father Donquil agreed that they do have the room, but advised from their investi- gations, it would impose a tremendous financial problem to the parish in view of the condition of the area. Chairman Ryder stated that the Board is faced with approving a new building and in such matters, the parking required must be considered. This is an additional building and it would appear that additional parking would be required. Mr. Lambert replied that he didn't see in the code where additional park- ing places are required. He referred to Paragraph W on Page 46 referring to a use which is not specifically spelled out, the parking shall be determined by the City Council after re- view and recommendation by the Planning & Zoning Board. He submits there is not any way whatsoever where there is a park- ing requirement plan to meet all uses and that is why this paragraph was included. They have reviewed the parking re- quired for the present facilities and the only time there is an overflow situation is mostly during the season for mass when the school facilities won't be used, there will be no employees parking and the teachers aren't working. Taking this into consideration and going by our code book of not having an absolute requirement for mixed uses, he does not see why 37 additional parking spaces are required. Chairman Ryder stated that it is possible under the present condition that the present facilities are inadequate since there is the shopping center parking nearby. We do not know how many park in the shopping center presently. Mr. Lambert stated he still did not think 37 spaces should be required as it is not based on our code. The Planning & Zoning Board and City Council must make this decision. Chairman Ryder clarified that he was saying there is another building coming in, but no additional parking is needed. Mr. Lambert replied that -13- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Paragraph W was included for this reason. Also, all the faci- lities are not to be used at the same time. Chairman Ryder stated that he feels because of the proximity of the Kwik- Chek parking plaza, there apparently always seems to be plenty of room. ~. ~rena referred to this possibly being the first situation of its type and stated that it must be given consideration. He does not think a precedent will be set. He explained how it couldn't be compared to the extension of Leisureville Plaza as in that case, more traffic wa~' generated with addi- tional stores. It is definitely spelled out in the code book in Paragraph W that we must consider each plan individually. Chairman Ryder replied that he thought a precedent would be set. ~. Lambert stated that parking for shopping centers is in the code, but this is not. Paragraph W covers all other uses not spelled out. This is the first time there has been a plan with not being covered in the code. M~. Annunziato stated that his recommendation is firm. He cannot see adding square footage which will add congestion at some time without adding parking. Each individual develop- ment should stand on its own. He thinks possibly there is not enough parking on Sundays at St. Mark's and the overflow parking in the shopping center is violating the intent of the zoning code. M~s. Huckle asked how he arrived at the 37 parking spaces and ~. Annunziato explained how it was computed according to the Southern Standard Building Code~with considering the number of employees, square footage of the building, number of seats and uses. He believes the recommendation for 37 is logical. Mr. Arena referred to the Southern Standard Building Code applying to a recreation building as a free standing entity' where there is no existing parking which can be utilized, but this is a unique situation. This is an additional build- ing being built where there is parking which can be utilized and this must be considered. M~. Jameson stated that if this building is going to be used ~or masses on Sunday, then it is going to tax ~he parking there. Furthermore, there are too many applications coming before us pointing to the fact of using parking somewhere else.~ Father Donquil clarified that the overflow of mass did not mean additional cars at all as they will have the same number of people. M~s. Huckle asked if they had run out of p~king and Father Donquil replied that it is crowded and they have parked on the grass during the short time of mas~. ~. Arena pointed out that the parking was computed on all the facilities being used at once, but some common sense must be used. He does not see ~ll the buildings being used at the same time. MINUTES PL~_h~NING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 ~. Lambert made a motion that the Planning & Zoning Board recommend to the City Council the approval of St. MArk's Parish Center subject to the Technical Review Board's com- ments and reco~endations with the exception of the 37 addi- tional parking spaces. ~. Arena seconded the motion. As requested, Mrs. Kruse took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: M~. Arena - Yes Mrs. Huckle - No Mr. Winter - No ~. Lambert - Yes Mr. Jameson - No Mr. Ryder - No Motion failed 4-2. Mrs. Huckle made a motion that the Planning & Zoning Board recommend to the City Council the approval of St. Mark's Parish Hall based upon the staff recommendations, seconded by M~. Winter. As requested, Mrs. Kruse took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: ~. Arena - No Mrs. Huckle - Yes Mr. Winter - Yes N~. Lambert - No Mr. Jameson - Yes Mr. Ryder - Yes Motion carried 4-2. Mr. Lambert clarified his vote that he is for the St. Mark's Parish Center Building, but is not in favor of the additional 37 parking spaces being required. He thinks adequate parking is provided because it is virtually impossible for all these facilities to be in use at the same time. Applicant: Village Royale on the Green (Irving Gross) Location: 2600 N. E. l~t Court Legal Description: Acreage Project Description: Two Story Recreation Bmilding ~. ~nnunziato informed the Board that this application was submitted by Village Royale on the Green, Inc. and it com- prises a two story recreation building and he told about the various rooms it would contain. The location is sand- wiched between two existing condominium buildings. 16 park- ing spaces have been provided for the 7,500 sq. feet of re- creation area and 720 sq. feet of offices. It is a two story concept. The big plan is not accurate with respect to this application, but the small site plan reflects this request. The overall dimensions of the building are 112 x 57 feet. The elevations are presented on Page AS. A land- scaping plan has been provided. Concerning the staff comments, -15- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 the Building Department has noted that a 20 ft. side yard setback must be provided to the south of the proposed re- creation building. 10 ft. is shown and it would necessitate shifting the building t0 ft. to the north. Parking must be provided which must be determined by the Board. The Engineer has and drainage plans with elevations for the s. His comments are that additional parking spaces are required. This is a recreation building and there are no parking requirements in the zoning code and he explained how he computed 96 parking spaces to be re- quired and only 16 are provided. He explained how consid- eration should be given to this being within a condominium area and most people would be within walking or bicycling distance. ¥~. Jerry Gross appeared before the Board and informed them that this recreation building was submitted in accordance with the site plan. In October, 1972, this Board approved a site plan under which Village Royale on the Green was con- structed. The number of parking spaces required and loca- tion of this building is delineated on that site plan. They feel they have vested rights over that approved site plan for the construction of this building under the Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. He does not see any reason for any additional parking. Ma. Lambert asked if this was the last building to be deve- loped and ~. Gross replied that according to the site plan, there is room for three more buildings. The plan was sub- mitted, but they were held back under the moratorium. The model building can also be completed as a multi-purpose building. Mr. I~ambert asked if he was involved with the original site plan and Mr. Gross replied affirmatively. Ma. Lambert clarified that it was his position that most of the people would be walking to this building and .Mr. Gross agreed since it is located in the enclosed facility and is for the use of the residents only. Mr. Lambert asked if the City Planner was aware of the ap- proved site plan and Mr. Annunziato replied that he was not personally aware of this site plan. He asked if the condo- minium was constructed according to the site plan presented and Mr. Gross replied that he did not know, but this build- ing is in accordance to the site plan. Mr. Annunziato clari- fied that if the site plan was approved, he must ~uow if everything was buil~ according to the plan and ~o Gross replied that he did not know. Chairman Ryder referred to a later site plan showing the pool in a different location and t~. Gross replied that he was advised that there was an error in the site plan and it was corrected for approval by the City. Chairman Ryder refelrred to the two plans not being consistent and M~. Gross informed him that the small sheet was what was approved. Mr. Amnunziato stated that the loca- tion is not consistent with t~e physical location as it -16- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 exists nor with the recreation building proposed. Chairman Ryder clarified that it was not in accordance with the ori- ginal plan. Dr. Arthur List, General Contractor, appeared before the Board. Mrs. Huckle asked if he had a copy of the 1972 site plan and Dr. List replied affirmatively and submitted it to the Board. I~r. Annunziato noted that this site plan did not have the parking as proposed on the application and Dr. List replied that this was the original site plan. He explained that after the first phase of the western portion was built, the eastern port±on was amended as requested by the City. He advised that the small drawing reflects the actual situa- tion as built and approved and released by the City. Village Royle has obtained C/O's for all the buildings and they have been in use since 1974. They also received approval for the recreation facilities. Mr. Annunziato stated that it was important to have an accur- ate site plan reflecting what and where the buildings are on the site. He clarified that they were stating that the large site plan drawn on 10 March 1978 does not reflect what was approved, but the small plan reflects what was approved in 1972 and Dr. List agreed, Mx. Annunziato stated that he did not have that site plan for verification. He asked when the last C/O was issued and Dr. List replied that the last build- ing was C/O'd in February, 1975. Mr Annunziato claris_ed that approximately three years have passed and there may be a question of continuing use. ~. Lambert referred to the sketches indicating that ten parking spaces were required and M~. Annunziato clarified that the application submitted was a change from the design and number of parking spaces, as well as the design of the building. They discussed further the differences in the plans. Mr. LamBert referred to the Leisurevitle Shopping Plaza making an addition with no side setbacks required and ques- tioned why it would be required on this plan and Mr. Annun- ziato informed him that this application was submitted with a separate survey and under separate ownership. M~. Lambert asked if the Board could go further before making a determination which site plan is in force and M~. Annunziato replied that he did not know since there are questions which cannot be answered by this Board or himself. There are the questions of continuing project, vested rights, the accurate site plan. He thinks there was more than one amendment to the site plan. Chairman Ryder suggested hearing from the other speakers. -17- ~TES PLA~iNG & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Mr. Joseph Aranow, 2520 N. E. 1st Court, appeared before the Board and stated he wanted to make it clear for the record that he is a unit owner and is talking for himself and not talking for any association or building. He does not want to argue the facts with Dr. List or P~. Gross. For over three years, they have been trying to get this second recreation building. There have been four or five site plans, but his main interest is obtaining a copy of the plan for this building, which he has been unable to do. Under the circumstances, he respect- fully requests the Board to table this matter. The people of Village Royale appeared before the Board in June, 1975, and he suggests cheCking the minutes from that meeting for further information about this. Mr. Morton Levine, 2515 N. E. 2nd Court, appeared before the Board and advised that he is a resident of Village Royale on the Green and is speaking for himself as a unit owner. There see~ to be some confusion about the parking area; however, a plat was submitted for the overall construction and 14 build- ings were erected with each being a separate entity and cor- poration. The proposed recreation center will be on a lot by itself and should be treated as such. The existing parking areas are on private property and should not be considered. Tillage Royale on the Green is 14 separate condominiums with each having their own lot as recorded in the County records. Mr. Lambert questioned who would pay for this clubhouse and ~. Levine replied that the residents of Village Ro~e would under a 99 year lease. ~. Lambert asked if there was ample room for additional parking on this site and N~. Levine re- plied that there was not on this plot of land because it is sandwiched between two independently owned buildings. He does not believe there would be sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the approximate 112 parking spaces needed. Chairman Ryder asked where the plans were indicating the relative positions of the various building lines in this area and Dr. List replied that they have not been able to find them as the Building Department claimed they were lost when they moved. ~. Annunziato pointed out that the survey submitted has the property lines drawn and there is a dis- tance of 9.8 ft. to the south building and 15.8 ft. to the north building. Chairman Ryder clarified that there were only two buildings in this immediate vicinity and Annunziato agreed. Chairman Ryder stated he did not think the Board could go much further and suggested possibly tabling this to obtain more information. ~. Gross restated his position that when this site plan was approved in 1972, it set out the plan for building at Village Royale on the Green. The building now proposed is -18- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 the recreation area shown on,the site plan which was approved by this Board and the City. The parking was delineated by number and lines on the plan. He feels it is an administra- tive function of the Planning & Zoning Board to pass on the plans in line with the approved site plan. Chairman Ryder referred to his previous reference to having vested rights and Mr. Gross replied that a moratorium was imposed. Chairman Ryder stated he thought an opinion must be obtained from the City' Attorney on this. Mr. Lambert requested clarification of why this should be tabled and Chairman Ryder explained how information should be obtained of what happened in the interim and give the parking matter further consideration. M~. Annunziato added that a verifiable approved site plan should be obtained. He is aware there have been many changes to the site plan, but he thinks an approved site plan should be related to exactly what was built. If there are changes from as builts to amendments, that is a question. The parking must be rec- tified. Ownership must be satisfied. The vested~rights should be explored. The moratorium has been. off since Aug- ust, 1975. There was discussion about the action to be taken and ~s. Huckle questioned why the Technical Review Board did not ob- tain specific plans and Ms. Annunziato clarified that what was presented to him was an apPlication for site plan appro- vaI with a survey and independent ownership. It was just a question of the number of parking spaces required. It was ~pparent a requirement could not be made for parking. The question of the site plans only became apparent tonight. ~s. Huckle stated she could not understand tabling some- thing which almost has to start over again. Further discus- sion followed about the procedure to follow. Dr. List stated that before the Board makes any decision, he would like to state to his knowledge that Village Royale on the Green does not request site plan approval, but is questing a building permit. The site plan has been done twice with the original and amendment. There is no need for site plan approval. Chairman Ryder informed him that accord- ing to the City procedure, since a new building is proposed the site plan mUst be reviewed. Mr. Arena added that there was also a signed application submitted requesting site plan review. Mr. Lambert suggested tabling this with instructions to M~. Annunziato to find the chain of documents and M~. Annunziato replied that he think~ that may be impossible~ Ms. Lambert added that we also must get a determination from the City Attorney on his recommendation on the procedure. Mr. Annun- ziato requested that this direction be modified as he thinks -19m MINUTES PLA~iNG & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 it is the applicant's responsibility to produce the documents. He also thinks it is veryimportant to see an as-built plan with respect to the site plan they buil~ under. He thinks it is important to tie the two together and check any variations. Mr. Lambert referred to this requiring a total survey and Mr. Annunziato clarified that the basic locations of the buildings and parking must be shown. Ms. Lambert referred to inspections having been made and building permits issned and asked if it was fair to assume it was not built per the site plans approved by all the Boards. ~s. Huckle suggested tabling this to get verification of the continuity of this project and whether it is still valid° Mr. Arena referred to the problem being that the applicant has indicated there are amended site plans approved at dif- ferent intervals. He is interested to know which one of the site plans was used to develop the project. The parking determinations were probably made on the total project. Which site plans were used for certain buildings? He does not see how we can make any determination until we know what site plan is to be used and if it was built as indi¢~ated. M~. Annunziato informed the Board that this application could stay on its own with respect to our code for R-3 zoning pur- poses. If it is not v~sted with respect to the site plan approved, it does not need to be built as shown. However, the question is whether 16 parking places are adequate. Mrs. Huckle clarified that the continuity of the project must be resolved and Chairman Ryder added that he thought more information was needed. Mr. Lambert asked what would be done if this is tabled and ~. Annunziato replied that we must be provided with the approved site plan and data sub- ~antiating it. We must obtain an opinion on the vested rights question. There were also additional condominium units mentioned which should possibly be considered. We should be provided with some as-built plans relating to the site plan. We must verify what procedure has to be followe~. Mr. Lambert moved to table this subject to the above, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. Motion carried 6-0. Applicant: 7 - Eleven Stores Location: 101S. W. 15th Avenue Legal Description: Lots 1,2,3,4,21,22,23 & 24, Block 12, Central Park Annex Project Description: Modification to existing building The members reviewed the plan and Mr. Annunziato explained the modifications proposed for the front facade, replacement of the existing roof, and interior changss. His comment is that there is residential zoning to the rear and a wa~l must be provided by ordinance. -20- MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11, 1978 Chairman Ryder asked if anyone wished to speak on behalf of this application. Mr. Dale McCullough appeared before the Board and informed the members that they recently purchased the corner at Seacrest and 15th Avenue and want to remodel the 7-11 Store to make it a nice looking store. They have not been able to up to this point because the bank was unde- cided whether they were going to use this corner for a bank. They would like to improve the exterior and remodel the in- terior per the plan submitted. Mr. Lambert referred to the buffer wall requirement and McCullough replied that they own that whole block from 15th ~¢venue to the next street. Chairman. Ryder stated that this wall would still be required and Mr. McCullough replied that they have no objection~and there will be no problem. Mr. Arena made a motion that the Pl~uning & Zoning Board recommend approval to the City Council of the 7-11 Store at 101S. W. 15th Avenue for the modifications to the exist- ing building subject to staff recommendations, seconded by M~. Jameson. ~nder discussion, ~¢~o Lambert stated he would personally like the City Council to take into consideration the 6 ft. concrete block wall requirement as recently there has been some relief given at the Council level and he would like them to pay particular attention to whether it is~neces- sary in this case. Mr. Arena replied that he thinks the Council in this particular case would do the City a big favor to keep the wall and not do away with it as this is a 24 hour operation and traffic is generated constantly. He does not think any relief should be given in this parti- cular case. Chairman Ryder agreed this was not similar to doctors~ offices such as the recent applications. La~Yoert clarified that he did not say to give relief, but to pay particular attention to it. The easements in the rear must be considered also. Motion carried 6-0. Master Plan Applicant: Riteco Development Company Legal Description: Acreage Location: Sections 17 and 20, Township 45 South, R~nge 43 East Project Name: Sandhill Chairman Ryder announced that this is another step in the subdivision regula~whereby following the pre-application and approval, the next step is submission of a master plan. He re~nds the Board that according to the subdivision regu- lations and flow chart, in this instance, this Board approves or disapproves but does not recommend to the Council. -21- MINUTES PLAh~ING & ZONING BO~_RD APRIL 11, 1978 Mr. Annunziato stated that the procedure required the City Engineer to hold a Technical Review Board meeting to relate the subdivision regulation to the Master plan submission. The application and documents submitted were reviewed and found to be complete and true. Two cha~ges were recomma~ded, one concering the water lines and one concerning the rights- of-way width and they have been corrected to the staff's satisfaction. He suggests turning the discussion over to the applicant. Chairman Ryder suggested hearing from the City Engineer first~ ~. Tom Clark appeared before the Board and explained how the master plan was submitted in numerous sheets in accord- ance with the newly adopted suhdivision regulations. All the plans comply with the Technical Review Board's comments preceeding the development of the master plan. Me explained how the individual plats must be consistent with the master plan. Chairman Ryder questioned the minimum width of the streets to be dedicated to the City and M~. Clark informed him that the minimum are 60 ft~ according to the ordinance. Chairman Ryder asked if they were private streets and ~o Clark replied that they are not indicated at this point; however, the only private streets would be those serving the multi-family dwel- lings. He added that they dedicated additional right-of-way' for 22nd ~venue to be consistent with the County thoroughfare plan and will dedicate additional right-of-way for Congress ~venue. ¥~. Bud Post, Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jarnigan, appeared before the Board and advised that the information they w~ut to present is one step beyond the land planning that accom- panied the rezoning application. They want to give as much explanation as desired on the ~ster planning stages such as road and street layout, master water and sewer plans, and whatever information is desired. He explained how the plans were defined. If these master plans are approved to- night, they will continue with the detailed engineering plans. He then introduced ~. Bill Todd to explain the drawings. Chairman Ryder asked if he was aware of the stipulations and if there would be any problems. Mr. Post told about the size of the water mains being adequate for their develo? ment and told about negotiations with the City regarding this. He also explained how the plans would be submitted in phases~ He stressed that they will comply with the ordi- nances and dedicate the required land for the roads. Chairman Ryder asked how far north on Congress Avenue the interceptor would go and Mr. Clark replied that actually there is no interceptor and explained how they could tie -22- MINUTES PL~NNING & ZONING BOARD APRIL 11~ 1978 into the existing 161" force main along the canal. He added that the pumps would have to accommodate whatever heads are involved. M~. Bill Todd appeared before the Board and distributed the attached outline of the exhibits to each member. He first referred to the original sketch plan submitted in January and then showed how it was refined into the master plan. He explained the road and lot layouts. He pointed out the approximate 57 acres of private open space and approximate 23 acres of public open space. He then showed and explained the Topographical Exhibit° He then explained 'the Master Water Main Plan. He referred to the Master Plan for the Sanitary Sewer and pointed out the five sewage collection areas served by the pumping station and explained the col- lection system. He also told about the well system and the flow routes. He referred to the drainage plans and explained how the water would be contained on the site. There was some discussion about the flood elevations. Mr. Todd then contin- ued with showing a boundary map and property owners map. He referred to Exhibit 3.2 showing the zoning classifications approved on March t4. He then explained the soils map defin- ing the characteristics of the soil. M~. Post then referred to the rezoning being recommended sub- ject to three elements, the School Board contract, the traf- fic impact, and annexation of the parcel in the extreme south end~ He requested his attorney, ~. Bill Pruitt, to give a report on these. Mr. Bill Pruitt informed the Board that they completed their contract negotiations with the School Board and they approved and executed the contract. They discussed the traffic situation with ~ ~alker from the County and had a conference tod~¥ with the ~ssistant County ~ttorney. ~ rough draft was prepared. The annexa- tion is in progress. The zoning from the County is RS, which is single family and that is what it will be. The density will be less and there will be no problems. ~. L~nbert asked what was decided with the School Board agreement and Mr. Pruitt replied that it would be .4% upon closing of the transaction. ~lso, the money will be spent within the City limits of Boynton Beach and its reserve area. ~. Post added that they have tried to be thorough ~bout this from the beginning. He noticed that they were blasted about the~lack of planning and they tried to be thorough tonight. If these master plans are approved, they are pre- pared to go ahead with detailed construction plans prepara- tory to obtaining bids. He added that they want the quality of construction to be first rate. -23- MINUTES PLA~ING & ZONING BOfLMD APRIL 11, 1978 Mx. Winter made a motion that the Riteco Development Company Master Plan of' the Sandhill Project be approved by this Board, seconded by F~. Arena. Motion 6arried 620. Chairman Ryder added that he thinks this is all working out very well. He feels a thorough job is being done and shows first class planning and will be an asset to the City, Mr. Annunziato referred to receiving some adverse co~ments in respect to planning and the Sandhill Project and stated that with our regulations, this application~has received more planning, review, etc. than anything prior. He personally takes'objection to the comments that little or no planning was involved in this application. Mr. Lambert added that he thinks those comments were ridiculous. Discussion Antenna Heights, Site Plan Approval Procedure, and Buffer Walls Chairman Ryder suggested deferring the remainder of the agenda and ~,.~. Lambert asked if a special meeting would be needed to discuss these three items. ~. Annunziato referred to the antenna heights being about finalized,but it was recom- mended that the Board meet with the Technical Review Board to discuss the site plan procedure. ~. Lambert stated he was not sure just what chsaqges were wanted in reference to the site plan procedure and thinks we must sit down with the Technical Review Board and dis- cuss the matter and reach a decision. Chairman Ryder sug- gested discussion by the Board in preparation for the meet- ing and P~. Lambert agreed that a special meeting would be in order for this purpose. After discussion, it was agreed to meet on Wednesday, April 19 at 3:00 P. M. ~. Annunziato suggested that the members come prepared with written input to the meeting. M~. Arena referred to not know- ing what the objections were to the Board reviewing the plan and suggested that an explanation be given why it is not nec- essary. ~iro Lambert suggested that possibly the Chairman could get a copy of the recommendation from the Building Department to give us something to work with. Chairman Ryder suggested exploring the whole matter. ADJOURN~NT ~@. Jameson moved to mdjourn, seconded by ~. Lambert. Motion carried 6-0 and the meeting was properly adjourned at 11:30 P. M. Re c or ding S e c re tary (Four Tapes) -24- Re: Submission of Developer's Master Plan--Sandhill Project, Riteco Develop- merit Corporation Master Plan Exhibit A The Master Plan - Showihg the location and right-of-way width of all proposed streets; ti~e proposed layout of the lots and blocks; the incorporation and compatible development of present or future City streets including access points to collector-and arterial streets; sites proposed for parks and recreational areas. Exhibit B Topographical Conditions - Showing the topographical conditions on the tract including existing water courses, drainage ditches, bodies of water.and other significant features i.e., exist- ing pavement elevations and ground elevations by contour lines at intervals of one foot based on N.O.S. datum. Exhibit C Master Plan Water l,lains - Showing the onsite potable water distribution mains, the off-site extension connection to the existing Boynton Beach potable water supply and required easements. Exhibit D Master Plan Sanitary Sewer - Showing the on-site wastewater collection systems, the off-site connection to the existing Boynton Beach water collection forcemain and required easements. Also included is a generalized statement regarding provisions for gas~ electric, and telephone utilities~ and the design of the water distribu- tion and sanitary sewer systems° Exhibit 2.1 Boundary Map - Showing the tract boundary by bearing and distance and the written description; all existing streets and alley- ways on or adjacent to the tract including name and right-of-way width dimension to the tract boundary; al! existing property lines, easements and rights-of-ways, their purpose and effect on the property to be sub- divided~ Exhibit 2.2~Property Owners Map -- Showing the location and names of adjacent subdivisions by plat book and page reference; all exisitin~ property lines, easements and rightsLof-way their purpose and effect on the property to be subdivided. Adjacent property owners are listed and identified by Palm Beach County Fulio Number. Exhibit 3.2. ~P~roposed Rezoning - Showing the Zoning Classifications of AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Regular Meeting DATE: TIME: -PLACE: April llth, 1978 7:30 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall 1. Acknowledgement of Members and Visitors. 2. Reading and Approving of Minutes. 3. Announcements~ 4. communications. 5. Old Business: A. Site Plan Approval: A~p-l-i~ant:- Richard S. Johnson and James P. Kintz (Tabled) -~-LocatiOn: '246rNorth Congress Avenue,_rLeisureville Plaza Legal-Description: ~ acreage Project Description: BranchBank for First Federal Savings and Loan~ssociation-~of Lake Worth- B. Public Hearing: 1. Rezoning~Request: Applicant: Mr. S. J. Jarvis (Tabled) Location: 900 S.W. 15th Avenue Legal Description: acreage Project Description: to be developed under uses permitted by C-3 zone Request: Rezone to C-3 from R1-AA 6. New Business: A. Site Plan Approval: Applicant: St. Mark's Parish Center Location: 730.N.E. 6th Avenue Legal Description: Lots 5,6,10,1!,12 of Deweys SubidviSion and Lots 8,9,10,11,12,13, Block 2, Civic Center.S/D Project Description: New Parish Hall Applicant: Village Royale on the Green (Irving Gross) Location: 2600 N.E. 1st Court Legal Description: acreage .Project Description: 2 story Recreation Building Applicant: 7 - Eleven Stores Location: 101 S.W. 15th Avenue Legal Description: Lots 1,2,3,4,21,22,23 & 24, Block 12, Central Park Annex Project Description: Modification to existing building Planning and Zoning Agenda Page 2 April llth, 1978 B. Master Plan Applicant: Riteco Development Company Legal Description: Acreage Location: Sections 17 and 20, Township 45 South, Range 43 East ProjeCt Name: SANDHILL C. Discussion: 1. Antenna Heights 2. Site Plan Approval Procedure 3. Buffer Walls