Loading...
Minutes 10-06-76MI~YJTES OF T~ WORKSHOP ~ETIN~ OF TB~ PLANNING & HELD ~T cITy H~.LL, BOYE~TON BEACH., FLORIDA WEDRU~SDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1976 AT 3:30 P. M. ZONING BOARD PRESENT Joseph T. Kelly, Chairman Rich}.rd Lambert Louis Reiser Simon Ryder 0tis Walker Garry Winter ABSENT Carmen Ann~uziato, City Planner Tom Clark, City Engineer Fred Kostner, Vice Chairman (Excused) they are requi pages being de M~. Walker que the definition in the City. Chairman Kelly 2 and M~. Annu ~. Lambert re above A in exc lng about reco ble conflict w and no more th and also the d decided to ask returned. M~. Lambert th if the Piannin a decision und tional power a They discussed duties of the red to plat it. finitions. He referred to the first stioned jurisdiction and M~. Annunziato read and clarified that this covered all the lands suggested noting the purpose, Article 4 on P~Ee nziato read same. ferred to Page 18, bottom of paragraph right eptions, and asked if they were strictly talk- rding or subdividing. He referred to a possi- ith i~ stating three or more lots on Pag~ 14 an three lots on Page t8. They discussed this istinction between platting and recording and M~. Clark for a further explanation when he sn referred to Page 18 under A-3 and questioned g & Zoning Board had any authority to make such ~r the current laws? Is this giving them addi- ad M~. Annunziato replied that the power exists. this and read the definition of the powers and Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Annunziato continued with referring to the flow diagram. It is his understanding ~he pre-application and the steos to be followed ar~ not mandatory, but ar~ at the owner's d~scre- tion. By the time the man finishes the pre-application, he is pretty certain the design of the subdivision is not going to be changed by the Planning & Zoning Board. He can come in MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BO~D OCTOBER 6, 1 976 PAGE T~JO at the master plan level. The master p.lan is mandatory. V~ ~ The master plan is routed through just about ever~ oozy in conjunction w~th a pre-plat. The pre-plat is actually the last document the Planning & Zoning Board will act on. Mr. Lambert remarked that~it could be the first and last. A discussion enSued regarding preliminary and final plat pre- sentation. At this time, Mr. Clark returned and Mr. Annunziato brought him update date. He advised that they had discussed a possi- ble discrepancy regarding the wording of three lots. Mr. Clark replied ~hat a subdivision is three or more and it is not a question of the replied that unless it is recording of s map. It is a ther~ the wor~ gested statin ~. Annunziat referred to a agreed it was lng whether tl once and M~~. it. Mr. Clart completely de~ for a final p~ ion if there are three or less. It is just a they want to do. Mr. Annunziato then asked between platted and recorded and Mr,. Clark make a plat, but it is not a plat To clarify it, they should say the · map msy not be required~or possibly property plat if it is recorded. The~ discussed fur- ing of the three lots and M~. Annunziato sug- : four or more contiguous lots on Page 14. then continued with the flow diagram. He pre-application being required and Mr. Clark optional. Mr. Annunziato referred to discuss- ~e Planning & Zoning Board would only see it ~der suggested having the City Planner check ~ explained how a proper preliminary plat was initive. He then explained what was required .at. ~. Lambert referred to the possibility give to the ~.~ Mr. Glark the~ the responsib: them. After If it is in a bility for th~ Clerk's Offic~ ~. Clark the~ bond off the year, it is 1 sent for sewe~ City 1% in e~ be revised on Page 53 ~e City Engineer submit the final plat to ~er and thence to the City Manager° Mr. Annun- ~d that he would give it back to Mr. Clark to .ty Manager. informed them that the County does not have .lity of approving plats, but just records ~he first of the year, the City approves them. municipality, the City assumes the responsi- plat, but it must be recorded in the County ~oked at and renegetiated. A bill is then ', water, streets, etc. They must give the ~h and they bill them for expenses in excess .MINUTES PL~NNING & ZONING BOARD OCTOBER 6 , 1 976 RAGE THR~ of that. The ~ay it is now, they are just sending a bill for the costs as occurred and add an approximate percentage for overhead. This will eliminate a headache with collect- ing 1% on top. He explained the procedure further and there was some discu sion. Mr,. Lambert reierred to the time limit and. referred to the possibility of selling parcels of land to different buyers at different t~mes. Mr. Clark explained that when applying for a building permit, everything must be properly subdivided with streets n£ted, etc. Mr. Clark then stated that he didn't think they had provided for a rural su~.division and explained how the County provided for it. Chairnan Kelly questioned whether it was necessary and Mr. Annunziato explained how it could happen in the future. They discussed this some. Mr. Clark'.then informed them that the sidewalks are included and are bonded ~nd are part of the improve~ents. He explained how a contract¢ could elect to use sidewalks during construc- tion. He explained further this new requirement. ~. Clark then informed them that another change is that a contractor will have the option to put in street lights and he explained t~e requirements. Mr. Annunziato then referred to PUD and PID,s on Page 97. M~.Lambert re~erred to them j~ping all over and stated he was under the ~mpression they were going to go over the first 25% and that is what he is prepared for. He suggested they touch on highlights today and set a schedule for considering it thoroughly. ~. Clark referred to this ordinance being prepared about one year ago mud ccmments from department heads being made. He advised that he would make copies of the comments for the next meeting. He then read some of the comments. He added that this was kased on the Comuty ordinance and included over 80 changes smde by them. Mr. Annunziato then continued with mentioning some of the highlights and referred to Page 97, Planning Developments, and advised th~ t they did not have to come back with a master plan for devel, pment. Also, there are requirements for recreational p:rposes. The members then discussed when to hold the next workshop meeting and the schedule for discussing the ordinance. It was agreed to discuss up to Page 54, Articles I thru 8, at the next meeting; then Articles 9 and 10 to Page 91; then Articles 11 thru 14; then Articles 15 thru 18; then the forms and appendages. They also agreed to set a date for the next werkshop meeting at their regular meeting on Tuesday night. MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD OCTOBER 6, 1976 PAGE FOUR ~. Lambert~as other city ord had just cause that he though Chairman Kelly Respectfully Suzanne Kruse Recording Sec~ (~%vo Tapes ) ked if it would be helpful to have copies of inances and Chairman Kelly' explained how they d confusion in the past. Mr. Annunziato added t they had everything in this ordinance. declared the meeting adjourned at 5:00 P. M. ubmitted, etary