Loading...
Minutes 09-20-76MIh~UTES OF THE WORKSHOP ~ETING OF TPLE PLANNING & ZONING B~ARD HELD AT CITY F~&LL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MONDAY, SEPTEmbER 20, 1976 AT 2:00 P. M. PRESENT Joseph T. Kelly, Chairman Fred Kostner, Vice Chairman Richard L~mber t Simon Ryder Garry Winter ABSENT Louis Reim~r Otis Walker (Excused) (Excused) Carmen Annunziato, City Planner Chairman Kelly welcomed everyone and called the meeting to order at 2:05 Board and the Chairman Kelly cuss the quest mitted use in homework since ence anyone, b of the Blue Bo it spells OUt m read same. In this with Section D, it referred to and approval under the C-3 zone. ?, Mo He then introduced the members of the ~mty Planner. announced that this meeting was called to dis- ~on of hotels and motels primarily being a per- bhe R-3 zone. The Chair has done a little the last meeting and doesn't wish to influ- ~t would like to put on record that on Page 21 ~k, Section 5G3 under Uses Permitted, (b), nulti-family residential structures and he his opinion, Section C completely contradicts commercial enterprises, in reference to restrictive to a degree with having to be Planning & Zoning Board for recommendation the City Council. Section E is covered Section G is covered under the C-1 He then decl~ed the floor open for discussion. Ym. Ryder stat probably ch~ag are ~ted. questions: wh to permit on a pla6e in the R eral Highway. other business retain A, B an bly C-1; and p Mr. Lambert qu under the C-1 ~m~y structu but nursing ho occupants to h be located in etc. ~d that after studying this, he agreed that ~s other than the matter of hotels and motels He explained how he had asked himself three ich to permit, which to relocate, and which conditional basis. Hotels seem to be out of -3 zone. Most of them are looated along Fed- He explained how they seemed to be useful to ~s. He then stated his recommendation was to: D; relocatedC to ~ossibly~ C-3 and G to possi- ~rmit E and F as conditional uses. ~stioned the difference of putting Section G zone and Mr. Annunziato explained how multi- ¢es were single family residences of sorts, ~es or convalescent facilities require the ~ve resident care. Also under C-1, they would onSunction with hospitals, medical clinics, MINUTES PLANNiNG & ZONING BOARD PAGE T~O SEPTEMBER 20, 1976 Mm. Lambert r~ferrem to apartments and questioned why it included serving meals and Chairm~u Kelly explained how condominiums arranged to serve meals in their auditoriums. Mr. AnnunziatOadaed that the clause waspprobably included to, handle recreation centers with kitchens. Chairman Kelly added that they were still not commercial enterprises. Mr. Kostner sSated he did not believe Section G, nursin~ homes and convalescent f~cilities should be in ~he R-3 ~one because there are hospitals, medical and dental offices, etc. in the C~1 zone. He agrees they should be ~aken o~t of the R-3 zone and~put into the C-1 zone. In r~ference to Section F, ro~ considered re~ R-3 zone. ~ strictly resi should be per~ clarification: lng factors t( ~ming and boarding houses, he feels they are :idential and should not be t~ken out of the 'ooming house is usually a ~mall building and .ential. Chairman Kelly agreed and stated they ~itted as a conditional use. To give further he read the laser ps~agraph on Page 21 regard- be considered. ~. Kostner agreed. Mm. Kostner c¢ may be an ass~ He agreed wit~ they willhhav~ ferred to the siderabl~ dis( he had mixed to comment fu .ntinued with explaining how he felt Section E ,t and should be included as a conditional use. Mr. Ryder that Section D should remain as control. In reference to Section C, he re- streets where they were to be located and con- ussion about this previously. He explained why ~eelings on this and requested the Board members ther. Mr. Annunziat ~ meeting and s~ located adjac~ multi-family for motels ~ad Kelly replied of initiating in the C-3 zoz referred to the comments he made at theilast ~ated he did not think the R-3 zone was properly nt to single family homes. The R-3 zone is .nd not co~nercial. It is not the proper place hotels and their attendant uses. Chairman that he agreed and added that anyone desirous co~maercial business of this type can find land ~em Mr. Winter re~ R-3 zones inv( ~f Leisurevi!~ from those tw~ ment in the w~ eliminated in believed it s] area. He canz is commercial On Sections D tions.H Howev~ told about the should be ~qua~ and referred erred to the zoning map and stated the only !ved were along 15th Avenue and the north side e. It is his opinion to eliminate Section C ~ parcels. Chairman Kelly referred to develop- s~ and stated he did not think it should be certain areas. ~&~. Winter continued that he ~ould be eliminated. There is plenty of C-3 .ot see any reason to leave it in there. There property available adjacent to the R-3 areas. and E, he agrees with Mr. Ryder's recommenda- r, rooming houses are a touchy subject and he possibility of having a large one. They ified by conditional use. ~'~. Ryder agreed o large areas of commercial property along MINUTe. S PI~NI{ig~G & ZONING PA~E r SE?TE~ER 20, 1976 Congress Avenue place for motel commercial zon~ Mr. La~2oer t thoroughfares copy with them pretty well adk . Also, he ~s~= this is a more aporopriate s and hotels. He thinks the facilities for ng are adequate. .ed what the overall study indicated for these nd it was ascertained that nobody had their and Chairman Kelly informed him that they had ered to the plan. M~. Lambert ststed that his feelings on Sections C, D, E, F, and G was that they possibly should be left in with conditional uses. Mr. Ryder replied that he tried to assess this as far as practical a~d feasible and believes they should take out commercial aspects. ~. Lambert explained how a possible location may b~ in conflict. However, he cannot see objections to having hotels and motels in the R-3 zone. He further ex- plained that h~ would go along with conditional uses. M~. Kostner re! referred to the He believes wit tected if it i~ with ~. Lambez feels it shoul~ be areas where there was the Chairman Kelly and Mr. Annunz~ recreational ve some talk about M~r. Kostner cla not to lock it is adequate prc tractor or dev~ lng. ~. Ryder refe~ ing and explain ply with Leisur about the peopl erred to his mixed feelings on Section C and possibilities at the interchange on 15th Ave. h conditional use, this could be well pro- terfersd with any residential area. He agrees t that inssome areas it may be applicable.H He not be completely eliminated beCause there may it would be desirable. He then explained how ossibility of changes taking place. referred to a section on 15th Ave. zoned C-4 ato informed him it was a storage area for hicles. Mr. Levitow referred to there being a marina for this location. rified that it was his main reason and concern out entirely. If they use conditional use, i~ tection. ~. Annunziato referred to the con- loper also having the right to request rezon- red to ~. Kostner's mention of changes occur- ed how this area a~ 15th Avenue would not ap- eville being located there. He again told e~ concern living in that area. M~. Annunziato stated that the City has provided enough pro- perty for hotels and motels in Boynton Beach without includ- ing them in R-3. They do not need any more zoning for hotels mhd motels and have probably exceeded the requirement. Chair- man Eelly agreed. M~. Lambert replied that he did not. He agrees that acreagewise there is possibly adequate C-3, but he does not agree with reference to the locations. He ex- plained how he felt the place to put motels and hotels was on the major roads. ~. Levito~ disagreed and referred to MINUTES ~A~ING & ZONING BOARD PAGE FOUR SEPTEt~ER 20, 1976 there being ad. He continued t with trying to he does not re in the hearing be on this par security. The between reslde~ dents. ~quate commercial acreage adjacent to this area. of the zoning is excellent and business. However, ~all the inclusion of these clauses as a factor a year ago. They were told apartments would ~icular property and were lulled into false basic intent is to establish and distinguish ~tial and business. They must protect the resi- Chairman Kelly announced they could proceed into a special ~ee~ing to an official motion regarding this. There was some discu~ only a worksho' ~Annunziato su pare a propose on September Chairman mendations mad~ ~r. Winter sta~ Section C; lea~ uses recommend~ by the City Co~ ~m. Ryder stat~ C and relegate and conditional whether this would be proper in view that meeting was ~dvertised for today. Mr. ested stating their intent and he would pre- for the Board for their next regular meeting and they could take proper action then. decided to take a poll regarding the recom- by ~. Ryder and various comments. ed his recommendation would be to eliminate ~e Sections D, E, and F, in with conditional ~d by the Planing & Zoning Board and approved ~ncil; and eliminate Section G. ~d his recommendation would be to remove Section to the C zone; remove Section G to the C zone; uses for Sections E, D, and F. Mr. Lambert recommended to leave hotels, m?tels, hotel apart- ments and mote~ apartments under Section C~ add another letter for accessory uses as stated with conditional uses, and leave Sections D, E, F, and G as conditional uses under R-3. ~. Kostner st~ and F as condi~ Chairman Kelly Sections A and D~ E, and F as and put into z~ Mr. Lambert as~ concerned abou~ in the R-3 zon~ whole thing ou~ pect. ~. Ls established an~ these being inc previously. He acres availabl~ ~ted his recommendation was to le~-e C, D, E, ~ional uses; and remove nursing homes entirely. agreed with Mr. Winter's recommendations: B to remain; take out Section C; leave Sections conditional uses; take Section G out of R-3 ~ne C-1. :ed the members of the audience if they were hotels and~otels or the accessory uses being and Mr. Levitow replied that they wanted the and explained how they were a commercial as- mbert referred to the commercial areas being Mr. Levitow replied that they did not recall luded or would ~ave voiced their objections stressed again that there were hundreds of along Congress ~venue. MINUTES PLA~NING & ZONING BOARD PAGE FIVE SEPTE~ER 20, 1976 ~. Arnold Fas~ S. W. 14th Ave~ this section to remain. He w~ich is to pr permitting hot~ with the inten Mr. Lambert re~ and questioned ~xplained how - plan showing ~ was approved u~ was zoned to p~ ~. Levitow qu~ the change wou~ the Planning & the City Counc~ etc. Chairman method they co~ Annunziato add~ mendation for t discussion reg~ gested having regular me~tin~ suggestion and ~no stated his name and his address as 2093 ~ue. He stated he thought it wo~zld devaluate ~ the community if this section were permitted referred specifically to the intent of R-3 )vide a higher residential density, etc. By ~ls and motels, it certainly is inconsistent ~. Chairman Kelly agreed. ~erred to this being a planned unit development if the Board could change it and ~. Annunziato ~he developer must submit an overall development ~eas of land use. He then explained how this ~der a different ordinance than existing and it · ovide the uses. ~stioned the procedure to be followed before .d t~ke effect and ~. Annunziato explained how Zoning Board would make a recommendation to .1 followed with an ordinance, public hearings, Kelly further explained how this was the best ~ld follow under the circumstances. Mr. ~d that the City Council would have this recom- ~heir first meeting in October. T~ere was some ~rding a special meeting and M~. Levitow sug- ,his meeting serve as a continuation of their ~. There was some discussion regarding this it was pointed out that the owners of this land must also be notified. There was further discussion egarding the ~ctuai procedu_~e and Chairman Kelly announced hat the Board was working on this in a prudent and legal manner. Chairman Kelly then declared the meeting adjourned at 3:11 P,M. Respectfully submitted, SuZanne Kruse Recording Secretary (Two Tapes)