Minutes 03-09-76MINUTES OF Thee REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
TUESDAY, F~RCH 9, 1976 AT 7:30 P. M.
PRESENT
Joseph T. Kelly, Chairman
Fred Kostner, Vic~ Chairman_
Richard Lambert
Simon Ryder
Garry Winter
ABSENT
Enrico Rossi
Oris Walker
(Excused)
Chairman Kelly called the first regular meeting in the month
of March of the Planning & Zoning Board of the City of Boynton
Beach to order at 7:40 P. M. He announced they had been wait-
ing for Mr. Walker to arrive, but do have a quorum with five
members present. He then introduced the members of the Board
and the Recording Secretary and added that Mr. Rossi was unable
to be present due to business in West Palm Beach. He then
acknowledged two visitors present, Mr. Charles Fronrath and
Mr. Edward P. Duffy, Jr., each representing an item on the
agenda.
Minutes of February 24, 197~
Chairman Kelly referred to Page 6, third paragraph, and stated
the one sentence should read: "He has yet to see an assessment
that exceeded 50 to 60%." M~. Lambert referred to Page 3,
next to last paragraph, and suggested eliminating the sentence
beginning with t'I~' and ending with t'growth" pertaining to a
cap on the population growth.
Mr. Lambert made a motion to accept the .minutes as corrected,
seconded by ~. Winter. Motion carried 4-0, with ~¢r. Kostner
abstaining since he was not present at this meeting,
Announcements
Chairman Kelly informed the members that yesterday he and M~.
Winter spent a couple hours at the Building Department and
today, he and ~. Kostner did. Mr. Howell has promised he
will amend the procedure at the Building Department, so any
applicant will have to have their plans in the Building De-
partment no later than Wednesday afternoon preceeding the
meeting on the following Tuesday.
Communications
None
MI~JTES
PLAI~NING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE TWO
MARCH 9, 1976
Old Business
Lake Worth Mariner Village Subdivision
Wilm Way (Willard Road)
Rep, r Paul cq~t~.~ Florida Coastal, .In~.
Chairman Kelly informed the Board that ~. Conte requested
this matter be postponed until the second meeting on March
23, as he was not prepared with the plan.
Cogen Annexation
S. Congress Ave. & S. W. 23rd Avenue
~ep. --Joseph Co~en
Chairman Kelly requested Mx. Fronrath to step forward and~
referred to having new members on the Board and asked him
to proceed with a current history. TM. Fronrath informed
the Board that the property lies west of Congress Avenue on
both sides of Golf Road. There are 120 acres on the north
side of Golf Road, which was a muck pit, and it will have a
35 acre lake in this property. It was approved for annexation
with the zoning of C-3 and R-1AA by the Planning & Zoning
Board and City Council. Under R-1AA, he is planning to build
191 homes. He may possibly have a few less lots as he now
plans to put in tennis courts and a ramp for boats on the
lake. He feels it will be quite an asset to the City of
Boynton Beach. It will not be strictly retirement, but for
families. It abuts Quail Ridge. The parcel on the south is
80 acres and abuts the Village of Golf and will have four
smaller lakes with the same type homes. On the south side,
he is not asking for any commercial. On the north side, he
is asking for C-3 commercial for approximately 335 feet in
depth fronting on Congress and running to Woolbright Road
and along Woolbright Road. Hie is asking for the. second lot
from the corner of Woolbright Road to be zoned for a service
station because it is directly contiguous to the westerly one
acre which is being donated to the City for a water tower.
Chairman ~elly asked if the service station was something new
and ~. Fronrath replied that it was on the original and it
is included in C-3 zoning, but they wanted to bring this to
the Board's attention.
Mr. Ryder referred to when this Board and the City Council
recommended annexation and questions were raised regarding
the R-1AA areas and C-3 areas, which were not specifically
located at that time and they expected to get site develop-
ment plans. He asked if this is what was being presented
tonight and Mr. Fronrath replied: definitely. ~. Ryder
continued that at the meeting regarding the annexation, he
MINb~TES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE THREE
M~RCH 9, 1 976
took exception to homes along Congress on the south track
and he notes it is laid out for homes now. Mr. Fronrath re-
plied that they will go any way the Board desires. He did
not think the need was there for commercial and wants to keep
beautification there. Mr. Ryder then asked if there would be
any community recreational center and Mr. Fronrath replied
that it was not a planned unit development. Mw. Ryder ex-
plained that he thought there should be some kind of buffer.
He added that he still takes exception to homes along Congress.
Mr. Fronrath asked what type of buffer he would suggest and
in reply, Mr. Ryder suggested that the other members should
state their views.
Mx. Winter pointed out that this would be the same type of
arrangement as in Leisurevil!e with having R-1AA along Con-
gress. He sees no reason to change it at this time. He
would like to go along with the south side as shown.
Mr. Lambert referred to the annexation stating limited com-
mercial. Mr. Fronrath agreed bud stated that they meant
limited along Congress Avenue. Mr. Lambert asked if it had
been considered for any portion to be R-lA and Mr. Fronrath
informed him that he asked for R-lA, but the City Council and
this Board were not in favor of it. Chairman Kelly pointed
out that less lots were shown now in order to meet the R-1AA
recommendation. Mr. Ryder added that at that time, they also
had to consider how the County zoned it. Chairman Kelly added
that Mr. Fronrath had informed them that the homes would be
priced from $40,000 to $50,000 and ~. Fronrath replied they
would probably be $40,000 to $55,000 now with increasing the
size of the lots. Mr. Lambert referred to 335 ft. of commer-
cial being requested and referred to Sears asking for 450 ft.
Mr. Fronrath explained how the 335 feet would give them
plenty of depth~and the size of the lake also determined this
to some exten~. Mr. Lambert referred to the commercial running
along Woolbright and asked if this was to be C-3 and ~.
Fronrath replied: yes as actually there is nothing else you
can do with it with the canal and road there. ~. Lambert
suggested multi-family and Mr. Fronrath replied it would not
be feasible to put m~lti-family along this highly travelled
road and canal. M~. Lambert questioned whether commercial
would create a traffic hazard and ~. Fronrath replied that
he thought there was enough depth and they were thinking of
professional offices along there. Mr. Lambert asked if he
wanted C-3 versus C-1 or C-2 and Mr. Fronrath replied: yes
as it gives them more latitude.
Mr. Kostner stated that this afternoon, the Chairman and he
viewed these site plans and ma~e quite a study of the plans
and found them to be in keeping with what the City would de-
sire. From the standpoint of good planning, it has always
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE FOUR
~&RCH 9, 1976
been advisable along any travelled thoroughfare, such as
Congress Avenue, to have a break instead of commercial all
the way and this is what they have done. He concurs with
these plans and believes they are very presentable and will
be good for the City. He believes consideration should be
given to egress and ingress. If an access road is required
for the residential, it should be considered. Mr. Fronrath
replied that it would definitely be considered.
Chairman Kelly suggested that the members view the plans now
and the members studied them. Mr. Kostner pointed out that
there was no buffer between the C-3 and R-1AA and Mr. Fronrath
replied that the canal was there and he is sure that a buffer
of some type, such as a fench, wall, trees, etc., will be put
there. Chairman Kelly referred to one ingress and egress road
being located on the north and south and asked if there would
by any others and Mr. Fronrath informed him that he wanted
to keep it private for the residents only to use. He may
even possibly put in a guard house. ~h~. Kostner questioned
if it would be difficult for access by ambulances, fire
service, etc.? He thinks this should be considered as there
will be many people living here. He asked if the Engineering
Department had checked this and Mr. Fronrath informed him
that only the Building Department had looked at it. ~.
Kostner continued that he was concerned about this ingress
and egress for 196 lots and Chairman Kelly agreed this should
be noted for the T.R.E. to check. Mr. Kostner referred to
the possibility of having a disaster and not being able to
get out on Golf Road and ~. Duffy suggested having another
exit chained off like the Village of Golf. The members and
Mr. Fronrath agreed that this should be considered further.
Mr. Lambert then asked about the maintenance of the lakes and
Mr. Fronrath informed him~there would be an association to
take care of them and ~ey would not be the City's responsi-
bility. Mr. Fronrath continued with pointing out the possi-
ble location of the tennis courts and boat ramp. Mr. Lambert
asked where this plan went from here and ~. Fronrath informed
him that this was just a preliminary review and would go to
the City Council next and then come back to this Board. ~.
Lambert suggested common ground for a recreational facility
and Mr. Fronrath informed him that he wanted to put in a PUD,
but the City did not want it. Chairman Kelly explained how
M~. Cogen had appeared before the City Council requesting a
PUD, but two members of the Council remarked that the City
had enough PUD's.
M~. Winter referred to C-3 zoning being noted on a five acre
piece by Village of Golf and ~. Fronrath informed him that
this was adjacent to their golf course. He pointed out that
it was narrow with the setbacks and they could not do much
with it. ~. ~inter remarked that he saw no value in commer-
cial zoning there. ~. Fronrath explained how they were
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE FIVE
M_~RCH 9, 1976
limited and were thinking of putting professional offices
here. Mr. Winter suggested a recreation area and Mw, Fron-
rath pointed out that it would be on a highly travelled road.
He added that it must be approved by the City. Mr. Winter
then referred to the C-3 area with the lake coming up to it
and ~. Duffy explained that they could only come back 335
feet.
~v~. Lambert asked why the City did not want a PUD and Chair-
man Kelly informed him that they just stated they had enough
PUD's. Mr. Duffy agreed this was the only reason they re-
ceived. ~@. Lambert asked what the Planning & Zoning Board's
opinion was and Chairman Kelly informed him thatit did not
come to this Board, but was presented first to the City Coun-
cil by M~. Cogen. Mr. Ryder agreed that they indicated they
would not go PUD and further explained the problems they had
had with Leisureville being a PUD. They discussed further
the possible advantages to having had this annexed as a PUD.
Mr. Lambert concluded that he thought a PUD would have been
desirable. Mr. Fronrath agreed and pointed out that they
could have a maintenance company, but cannot do it now. He
added that they preferred PUD and would still go PUD.
Mr. Kostner stated that since all the members have viewed the
site plan of the proposed Cogen Annexation located at S.
Congress Avenue & S. W. 23rd Avenue, which lies adjacent to
Congress Avenue and north andssouth of Golf Road, it is his
opinion that he finds it very attractive. He is concerned
with there being only one egress and ingress road shown and
believes it would be advisable to consider as a safety ~actor
at least two ingress and egress road for the two ps~cels.
Subject to this, he moves to recommend to the City Council
th~ ~re!iminary site plan. Mr. Winter seconded the motion SeeM in. o~
an~airman KO~narreq~ested a roll call vote. M~s. K~se ~/2~/76
too~ a ro~l call ~ote on the motion as follows:
Mr. Winter
M~. Ryder
Mr. Lambert
Mr. Kostner
Chairman Kelly
- Aye
- No, as he is still opposed to
having homes directly abut-
ting the west ~ide of Con-
gress on the south tract.
- No
- Aye
- Aye
Motion carried 3-2. ~
New Business
Sears, Roebuck & Company
Rezoning Request of 100 Acres on S. Congress Ave.
Rep. - Charles E. E~onrath~ Land Unlimited Realty
MII~UfTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE SIX
IARC I 9, 1976
Mr. Edward P. Dully, Jr. appeared before the Board and re-
ferred to a letter giventto the members authorizing him to
represent ~ears, Roebuck & Co. Mr. Duf£y informed the Board
that Sears bought this a20 acre track and 100 acres was takeh
in the name of Sears and the remainder by Leon Farber. Sears
came to the City as C-3 to be used as a shopping mall. Since
that time, DeBarto!o has purchased 104 acres approximately a
mile to the north and went to the County and had it rezoned
for a shopping mall. Sears feels that two shopping malls of
this magnitude would be too much for this area. They have
incorporated with DeBarto!o to make one mall. They feel it
would be too much to se~t all this as C-3. The present C-~
zoning states multi-family can be built under R-3 regulations.
They feel that this would be better than keeping it and selling
it all as C-3. Actually, they would get more money selling
for C-3. Sears & Father are in this business and they feel
450 £eet isrrequired for a commercial area. With the addi-
tional depth, they can have a limited access road and also
a buffer zone. This is why they want 450 feet, which will
be better along Congress.
Mr. Ryder asked iff he was going to request the remainder to
be R-3 and Mr. Duf£y replied that they didn't want it rezoned
to R-3, but wanted to use it as R-3. Mr. Ryder asked if he
was making the sale contingent on the use and ~. Duf£y replied
that Sears will sell it, but don't want C-3 for the 100 acres.
M~. Ryder suggested looking at the plans.
M~. Ryder ciarmf~em that they were asking for a depth o£
£eet or 20 acres to remain C-3 with the remaining to stay at
C-3 to be used for R-3 and ~. Dully replied that this was
correct, it would be C-~ limited to R-3. Chairman Kelly
clarified that they must consider the request £or ~50 feet to
be C-~ and the remaining 80 acres to be R-3. Mr. Fronrath
agreed this was the ws~ they wanted it and ~. Du££y added
that they would go for rezoning on the back 80 acres.
Mr. Winter asked if they were authorized to make this request
for a change in zoning and !~. Du£fy referred to the letter
submitted. Chairman Kelly read a letter dated February 19~
1976, from Sears, Roebuck & Co., Atlanta, Georgia, addressed
to ~. Dufffy, Land Unlimited Realty, P. 0. Box ~048, Boynton
Beach, signed by T. W. Wheeler, Property Manager, as follows:
"You may use this letter as authorization for Mr.
Charles Fronrath and ~. Edward Duf£y of Land Unlimited
~ealty to represent Sears, Roebuck & Co. in representing
the plat o£ the certain 100 acre track of land owned by
Sears, Roebuck & Co. to the City of Boynton Beach requesting
a change in the existing zoning to provide for C-3 zoning to
a depth of 450 feet along Congress Avenue and multi-family
zoning for the remainder of the property."
MINUTES
PLA~ING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE SEVEN
MARCH 9, 1976
Mr. Ryder pointed out that the proper rezoning application
had not been submitted and he thinks this should be an infor-
mal approval pending receipt of the proper applications.
Chairman Kelly agreed and added that they would have a favor-
able reaction from the Planning & Zoning Board, but must
follow procedures. M~. Lambert questioned why they should
take any action since the proper for~ have not been sub-
mitted and he thinks they would be setting a precedent.
Mr. Duffy explained that they did it this way because they
were not applying for rezoning, but just requesting R-3 use
in C-3. It was not rezoning being requested. ~. Lambert
replied that he didn't think~it could be done that way. He
then asked if it could be done by deed restriction and
Fronrath replied this was a good suggestion instead of going
through the formality of rezoning. ~. Kostner stated that
it must be rezoned to R-3 or they would have problems later.
Chairman Kelly added that there was also a public hearing
required on zoning changes. M~. Ryder stated tha~ rather
than going ahead with tentative approval, the application
must be filed for rezoning. ~. Kostner agreed an~ added
that it would be for their protection. Chairman Kelly agreed
it would be the best route.
Other
Chairman Kelly brought the members' attention to a letter
from Mr. Howell nu~erating five things to be aware of in
reference to the zoning book. He suggests they study these
and possibly discuss them very shortly.
Mr. Lambert then requested further discussion of the two
plans presented tonight. Chairman Kelly agreed, but cau-
tioned him that no changes could be made since the repre-
sentatives had left. M~o Lambert asked if when it was ori-
ginally zoned C-3, was the intent for a shopping center and
Chairman Kelly explained that it was known to the City Coun-
cil and Planning & Zoning Board in 1973, t974, and 1975,
that Sears planned to put in a large shopping center before
DeBartolo appeared on the scene. He believes Sears did not
go ahead with the project because of the economic situation..
Apparently now they have changed their mind regarding the
disposition of this property.
~. Lambert questioned why this was not considered spot
zoning and Chairman Kelly replied that this was a whole area
of 80 acres. Mr. Lambert explained how ~ thought this was
a spot. M~ Ryder referred to the original zoning being C-2
and how Leisureville had objected when it was proposed for
C-4. The members discussed how two malls would not be feasi-
ble being so close together. M~. Kostner then explained how
spot zoning was having a small parcel different than the re-
maining zoning around it. A large open area is not spot
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE EIGHT
~CH 9, 1976
zoning. Also, Quail Ridge and Leisureville are there and this
would conform with them. Mr. Lambert asked if R-3 fitted in
with what the Board felt was good zoning practices there and
the members replied that they thought so. Chairman Kelly
added that Limetree is multi-family and Mr. Kostner also
pointed out that they were coming in with low density.
~. Lambert then asked if they were taking into consideration
the economics of the westward expansion. He asked if there
wereaany subdivisions being proposed for smaller homes and
Chairman Kelly replied that they had not received any plans
for any as yet, but he doesn't believe the Board would exclude
them. M~. Kostner added that they could not tell an applicant
they had to build smaller homes and they must pass judgment
on the applicant's plans. M~. Ryder told about some middle
income developments not getting started after receiving appro-
val. M~. Lambert continued that he was concerned about the
existing older sections of town and what will happen. People
will not be able to afford to go west of Congress. This will
force the old areas of Boynton Beach into low housing.
Winter pointed out that ~-3 zoning could include $16,000
apartments and ~r. Ryder added also condominiums. Chairman
Kelly referred to homes in the $40,000 bracket being located
mn the northeast section and how vacant lots would probably
be built with the same. They are not precluding anybody from
the older section of ~the City where there is vacant land.
~. Lambert continued that he could not believe it was not
economically feasible to build medium priced homes. He told
about a section in the County not being able to build homes
fast enough in this price range. He thinks it is definitely
within the scope of the Planning & Zoning Board to make recom-
mendations on the westward expansion. Chairman Kelly informed
him that the comprehensive plan had been adopted for this.
Mr. Lambert continued that he disagreed that upgrading means
pricing property out of moderately priced homes. ~. Kostner
questioned the price range in the future and M~. Lambert re-
plied they should talk about sizewise, square footage, then.
He explained how smaller sized homes could be desirable.
This must be considered. ~. Kostner informed him that they
had received no requests for it and M~. Lambert replied that
this was not valid and they must recommend it. ~. Ryder re-
ferred to the general rezoning and told about the problems
created by it. Chairman Kelly stated that he had not seen
any plans for R-lA. The trend was there for multi-family,
but now the trend is for single family residences. M~. Lam-
bert continued with explaining further how they must recom-
mend to the City Council not to just accept R-1AA or multi-
family. Mr. Kostner told about The Meadows planning reason-
ably priced homes, but having never been developed. The
econo~mics govern what the builders can sell. They never can
tell someone to go into R-1 or R-2, but must consider their
request. Chairman Kelly added that if an application conforms
to the zoning, they must accept it.
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
PAGE NINE
~RCH 9, 1976
~journment
P~. Ryder made a motion to adjourn, seconded by ~. Winter.
Motion carried ~-0 and the meeting was properly adjourned at
9:10 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
Suzanne Kruse
Recording Secretary
(Two Tapes)
:~6~NDA
Regular Planning and Zoning Meeting
Time:
Date:
Place:
7:30 P.M.
· March 9, 1976
Council Chambers
t. Acknc~ledgement of members and visitors.
2. Reading and approving of minutes.
4. Communications:
5. 01d business:
1. Lake Worth Mariner Village 3.
Subdivision
Wilm Way (Willard Road)
Rep., Paul Conte
Florida Coastal, Inc.
Cogen Annexation
S. Congress Ave.
S.W. 23rd Ave.
Rep., Joseph Cogen
6. New business:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Rezoning Request of
100 Acres on S. Congress Ave.
Rep., Charles E. Fronrath
Land Unlimited, Realty