Loading...
Minutes 02-15-73 (2) SPECI. AL MEETING PLAiNNING AND ZONING BOARD. MINUTES MF~W~ ERS PRESET FEBRUARY 15, 1973 Mr. Richard B. Vastine, Vice Chairman P~. Fred J. Kostner Col. Albert J. Wehrell Mr. L. R.'Blaketer Mrs. Lynn Huckle Mr. Robert B. Olds, Chairman . Robert R. Larg~ut,. City Planner Mr. Oris W.. Walker The meeting 'was called, to order at 7:40 P.M. by Vice Chairman Vastlne to discuss the density as a result of the growth of Boynton Beach; furthermore,to give a recommendation as to what what density the Planning and Zoning Board wo~/td reconunen~ Mr. Largent recOmmended an overall density of six (6) dwell- lng units per acre, that between the Intracoastal and 1-95 ' · a density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre be used as the average density, further, from 1-95 to Congress he proposes a density of five (5) units per acre and from Congress to Military Trail he suggested an average density of three-(~ dwelling units per acre. The Planner stated between Congress and 1-95 ~ere ~e now mostly. single family dwellings, which will produce an average figure of five (5)'per acre. He stated the recommendation of five was favorable because of the size of the lots. Mr. Largent' further stated that the total of 3, 5 and t0 '-is-'eig~it~en '(18) lng eighteen (18) by three (3) which is the number of parcels would produce the desired overall density of six (6) dwelling units per acre. A problem was that in .asking for guidance from City Council, four (4) dwelling units per acre were discussed, but this limit would drastically reduce the amount of dwelling units from 1-95 east, this would play a hardship in this area and would not give a reasonable type use to such lands that have high values. - . The Board discussed Fir. Largent's proposal. continued Minutes Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Board February 15, 1973 - 2 - Mr. Kostner stated that the Board should not b.e concerned with the developers and %~hat they paid for land. we are concerned for what is good for the City. By using a formula of 10-5--3 allows for a great flexibility. There are many vacant lots in the City, but the' City is 50% built up. We are primarily concerned with large tracts of land where developers are coming in and crowding them .up .which is evident all over the Citgo ge thinks this formula is an excellent idea for density from~ the Intraco~stal to 1-95. He thinks this ~ould give the City identity, which it needs. . . Mr. Kostner stated that Boynton has the Inlet %vhich is an asset. We should use it to the greatest advantage~ A marina, with a good first-class restaurant would 'bring people~off 1-95 and " give the City identity. ~ ' - ~ Mrs. Huckle asked Mr. Largent that he means by "average" Mr. L~rgent stated that someone said you Cannot use an average, you would have to be firm and fast on, for instance, a density of t0. He questioned if there ~re some'[.times when we might, at!~ more than 10, particularly in this area and yet it would be difficult 'to use discretion. This thought should proba~ty ~e_retracted. It was moved and secOnded that from the Intrac0astal Wate~ay to 1-95 the density be limited to 10 units per acre and from 1-95 to Congress Avenue 5 per acre and from Congress Avenue t~ 5~ilitary Trail 3 per acre. Discussion followed. Mr. Kostner asked what about motels. $~hen classified as resi- .......... dentiaI,.~s_~ega~d__.~0~densitY, Mr~L~ar~ent stated that many of the motels are just open for the Season. In addition, there will be more business on Federal No. 1 and Seacrest and more land taken for professional offices, more recrea.ti~on area, all of which will leave us a cer'tain reducdd amo~n-t for residential. This situation will help as regard to density. ~opefully, he said motels would not be put into a residential category', but a commercial category. continued Minutes Special Meeting Planning & Zoning Board February 15, 1973 - 3 - Mr. DeLong asked why the motion does not include all the way to the West boundary of the reserve area. Mr. Blacketer moved that the Board recommend to City Council a density°f ten dwelling units from the Intracoastal to 1-95 and from 1-95 to Congress a density of five dwelling units and from Congress to the Western boundary of the-reserve area a density of three units per acre~'seconded by Colo~WehreI1. Mo%ion carried 5-0. '. The Board's recommendation is based on the reconnnended density, availability of water and the ecologY and the capacity of our plant. Meeting adjourned. '_ Robert Olds. Ch&irman