Loading...
Minutes 12-19-72~LD %~JESDA~-~ DECTlMBER 19, 1972 0 7:0 'P.M,-CI~f Kill BOYNTON B .EACH FLOP~A PRESL~T ~; R. ,Olds t~. C. AyePs Fir. 0 Walker Mr, Robert Largent, City Planner ' ~. S. Weaver Mme. P. Moore Mr~ .F. Kostnem zoni Poard come b~zore the City C°unc~i' %here were ~o items to be acted on so that they could ' lst' on Ag_enda-~ Plat of S~cti~on~' 9f 8. !0 .kno~m as .Plat 9 Mr. E~i ~en of Brockway g Owen presented the Lemsurevm!le Plat; and staaed the Planning ~& Zoning had given approval several months ago. But was here to agamn ~d explain the plat. ~. OWen exPla~ed that th/s 'is a~tu~ly Plat '9 wi~ a Combination o~' section ~.' He said this area-extends down to C~ua! L 26 and is identical to the s_a!es 'plat. Mr. Ayers made motion to approve plat of LeisUrevi!le 9 with a co~ina~on~ of section 9 .~ 10 as Submitted on old sales plat-, Ym~ ~ seconded ~e motion all voted. aye. 'Motion c~ed 4-0. : ' 2nd Item On Ag?nda - Mango Heights and Mango Heights tst Addition Mr. Carleton~ engineer for the Developer of Mango Heights presented the plats on which were incoz~porated the c2~mnges requested by Mr.. Largent~ City Planner. First ahange was the catchment basin 2nd was to extend S. W. 2nd street and 3rd was S. W. 6 Avenue of which the City wants ~the North half dedicated so that there would be a 50' Street. Three lots had to be sacrificed Ln order to give the additional] 25' feet needed to m. eet City specifications. Mr. Ewing ~ = , . Drought up th~ question if these streets So W~ S Ave. and S W.' 2nd Street were to be' Paved. He stated that' the way it was presented we were .gOing to have half of a s~reet~ Disoassion ensued as to~tJ~e whose responsibility it was to pave the entire S~ Wo 2 Street~ ~. Carieton stated he didn't believe it-was~ %he Developers responsibility. Mro i~ing again stated that we sho%~d have-the ~ngineer's opinion on this ~tter before the Board gives their decision. Mm. Tom Clerked City engineer was c~tled' in to give his opi~nion on the matt~er~ He stated that So W~ 8 Avenue was in good condition and as' long as they paved the addi~70n~_ 25 zeet to City spe~fmcat~on mt was OK, He also st~e~ that zf the City had a ickier from the Pre6Oyterien Church giving fore citY ROW on S~W~ 2 it would be better to have the entire street paved ~nd not leave a half of lStree%. ' .Hro Ew~_ng stated that the ~{iniSter had already given ~fm~ Largent a letter to feat effe%t and had m~de a statement at~ PlanNing & Zoning Board meeting alsoo Mm. Carleton stated that he Still did not believe that was necessary before tlo~e co~!d give their approval of the plats. - }~. Ayers and .Mm. ~ing stated that they thought =dnis should be decided now and not .leave a hal~ of stree* that *ie City wo~ild ~ ~ -~ ~ ~c a !ateP date have to pave~ be approved with all provisions regarding S, 'W. 2nd Street and S~ W. 6 AvenUe be m. et~ . MP~ Ayers seconded motion'ali' voted aye~ Motion carried 4-0~ ' P~. MuFry end Mr. CaP!eton conferred ,and Mr. Carieton stated that Hr~ Mu~ said he would pave it if tine City could pmove right-of-, way was given, to City~ PP~ Walke_ made moiion that Plat of Mango ~ ' Hemgh~s and }~mngo Hemghts ist Addition me%ion all .voeed aye, Hr. Ayers made motion to adjourn~ Robert O!ds ~na~ '