Minutes 05-15-72'MINUTES OF .THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD, ]{ELD AT CITY
HALL, BOYb~fON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON ~DNDAY
May IS, 1972 at 7:30 P.M.
Mr. R. Olds
Mr. K. E~ing
P. Moore
Mr. Robert Largent, City Planner
~tr. J. W. Barrett, Acting Building
Official
meeting of the Pi~ & Zon~gBoard to .order at .7:38 P.M.
Weaver made motion that'the minutes of May 8, 1972 be approved as written, seconded
by Mrs. Moore. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Olds read memo from Mr. T. Kilgore, City Manager, stating in essence that he
was glad the problems arising betWeen Planner, Mr. Largent, Building Dept. and
Planning & Zoning had been. resolved. He also stated 'that he Wished to have Mr.
Largent provide leadership and staff assistance, with the assistance of the Building
Mr. Largent stated that he knew the members of the Board had worked many years on the-
proposed new Ordinance but for the time being the Council would like the many loop holes
closed in the present Ordinance.
the C-1 and C-2 .had no controls for density and this was the
that ~should be Closed.
could be done as far ss ammending the present
cause us to have .a newlOrdinM/1ce, thUS making public
Mr& three or more dwelling units should
and R-3A requirements.
Therefore under B~itding Site Area Regulations for C~I Zone, Page 12 - C the follm~ing
should be inserted ,,Any building which contains offices, sto~es, etc.. and three or
more dwelling units, shall be considered as a multi-family unit. This closes the
loophole in C-1. Also Page 13 under C-2 C - Building Site Area Regulation - the
same claUSe should be inserted.
Special Meeting of the
Planning & Zoning Board
5-15-72
stated
B "is repta~ng page 12.' :B , under C1 and c2 Bui!d~n. g .egulations,
Hveryone on the Board was in accord with this ammendment to C1 and 'C2.
. in C1 and C2 and said the 75 ,feat was changed by Resolution
Weaver in ~tiscussing this Seemed to. take a dim vim of this re~trictfon.' He felt
been issued
Mr. Ayres stated Boynton is. going to have to go over 4S, and this Resolution is just
a stop gap for now.
Ten ~ B , (page 10 - B ) will have to be changed to 45' under C1 and C-2, according
to the Resolution passed. ' ·
Much discussion ensued Tel.:C1, yard requirements, Mr. Wea~er thought it Would be better
to reduce front yard requirements and have more parking area in 'rear with more
cau~eS conCIsion1.
Mr.. Olds
b~r. Kostner brought up. that,no rear' entrances are required and ~ that :this should
Code and N~ti~onat Fire PreventiOn Associaton
require a rear door.
stated
property.
Suggestions were made'to change minfi~ floor:a.rea requirement on page 14, R1AA as to '
percentages, including garage, screened porches and carport or to change, floor area from
1S00 to 1800 feet.
DisCUSsion ensued as to what was ammending and what would cause public hearings eto.~.
, All decided that changing percentages w0uld mean~ also. ch~angi~g· other- zo~ng areas~ and
that changing minnimum floor requirement for R-1AA to 1800 feet Would be the
best. All .agreed.
i
to those provided by R-5" Sectio~~ 7 of th~ 'Znn~ng Cmd~. nert_~Mn~ng tn ~,~_tio!e ~m~lv
units and the same 'phrase inserted in Section "C" of C-2 Zone.
We also define multi-family dwelling as follows: Any building containing stores,
offices etc.. and three or more dwellings ur~its shall be considered as 'a multi-family
unit, and Conform to regulations of R-3.
items put in proper legal form. This also should be taken up with the City: Manager.
.first. ~ · -
MrS; Moore-secohded the motion and motion unanimoUSly carried.
1i be a re,ar meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board next Monday May 22,' 1972
at 7:30 P.M.
~Mr. Kostner made motion to adjourn seconded by Mrs. Moore~ all voted aye.
Mr. RObert Olds, Chairman