Loading...
Minutes 09-08-71~,4Lk~JrEs OP T~ PL~}~tNG ~ ZONING BOARD ~,~)RY~SHOP }~D AT cITY ~{ALL, M)YNTON, BK~CH, FLORIDA AT 7:30 P.M. SE, PT~MER 8, 1971 PRESENt ~r. Jay Sarno I~. Robert Olds Pit. Stanley Weaver Dr. Robert Raborn }~1r. Joseph Brutl M~c. Charles Avers Mr. Oris Walker Mr. S. B. Puller, Building Official ~. Gerald Dake The n~eting was called to order at 7:40 P.M. ~'~is meeting concerns the meetings of August 24 and 50 to make a decision on every parcel that was questioned. Tb~ Board started at the North end of the City and will work South and discuss each area questioned at the Public Hearings. First area to be discussed is strip commercial zoning from Boynton Canal to North City Li~ts along U.S. 1 . Mr. Dake explained that by comparing present zoning with the proposed zoning, it would show a substantial a~nt o£ con~aercial deleted. Not much commercial in this area in past decade. Apartment type cormt~action tach more suitable for future and ~il! tend to go that way, more so when 1-95 is completed. ~r. Datce recommended that this area remain R-5 as shown. Board discussed this area and brought out that ~illicent Properties had requested their conmercial along U.S. 1 remain commercial. Dr. R~born made a motion that Mr. ~r~ke's reconmendation be £ollowed and property. left R-5 as shown. I':btion was seconded by ~r. ~ralker and carried 7-0. Second area to be discassed was the area from the Intracoastal to U.S. 1 in the Lake Addition section. This is presently proposed to be Weaver stated he would abstain as he owns property ~, this area. Mr. Dake then explained that there were very £ew places that have aharacteristics ~ich are good for high-rise type buildings and that this area is good for type construction. This property, expecially from !~est of N. £. 7th Street to the Intracoastal, presents a real soil problem and will cost considerable to develop. Under proposed hi-rise formula, would have a lot of open space, etc.. I~e to this, .Mr. Dake tb~nks that hi-rise is a good zone for this area. He believes it would be be~tter than ~ro or three story, use whero apartment can be closer together. Varied'~land use patterns are needed. Only otb.~r area similar at present is that just South of Causeway Square. Dr. Raborn asked k~. Dake if elLv~nation of R-4 completely would raise a legal question and Mr. Pake's opinionwas that fl~.is was a distinct possibility if Planning and. Board Meeting 9- 8- 71 such was considered the best use for the land. ¥~ard had considerable discussion on this area concerning ~hanginE to possible R-5. Beard discussed making area from 225 feet West of N. E. 7th Avenue to Intracoastal~ R-5 along area sho~m as R-4 proposed. ( ..hr. Raborn proposed this be done in a motion seconde~ by Mr. Walker.) Further discussion ensued and it was suggested that the existing strip of commercial along U.S. 1, which is also in this area, be changed to R-5. Beard discussed this at length and it was pointed out that most of these lots were too shallow for proposed use. ~buld need approximately 200 feet depth to be used as R-5. Area on West side of U.S. # 1 would have to remain commercial as it is now more developed and against Railroad track. Area under discussion to follo~ lot lines as close to 200 feet deep as possible along U.S. 1. Mr. Simons, Attorney~ came fom~mrd to speak on Lake Addition in general but was denied by Chairnmn as Mr. Sarno stated this had been before Public Hearing. ~. Jim Patterson, 619 N. E. 7th Street, objected to proposed R-5 as he claimed that streets would have to be ~4dened to tmke extra traffic and t~hat property owners on both ends of streets would have increased property value while those in middle would not be benefit. Dr. Raborn ammended his motion to include this also and Mr. Yfalker again seconded. ?~. Clarence Berry~ stated they are building 114 apartments North from N. E. 10th Avenue, and this would put hin in a non-co~_{orming use zone. Dr. Raborn then moved to include this area in his motion and M,r. Walker again seconded, The final motion being that the area shc~m on the proposed map as R-4 be changed to show an area from 225 feet West of N. E. 7th Street to the Intracoastal bounded on the North by N. £. 10th Avenue amd on t~he South by N. E. 7th Avenue and West to U.S. 1 be made R-5. Furt~her, that a strip approxiaratety 200 feet deep to tahe East of U.S. 1 and following existing lot lines, be made R-$. The inferior areas encompassed by these boundaries be made R-IA. }dr, Ayers moved that commercial strip along U.S. 1 be changed from C-4 to C-1 for a depth of one lot in lieu of R-3. ~,,~tion seconded, by };~. Olds. Vote was 3-3 with ~ir. ~eaver abstaini~4. }(~tion failed by tie vote. ~e r~hird area for discassion wa~Sterlin~"Vifl~ag~' this should probably be Dr. Raborn made motion to change this to R-3 for Sterling Village proper. This was -5- ~;;inutes of the Planning ¢ ZonLug ~,!eetins 9-8-71 seconded by }J~r. Ayers and motion carried 7-0. Board t~hen discussed area from Sterling Village North to Ocean Avenue and botmded on l%'est by S. E. 6th ~Ii~X~YoX and. on East by Intracoastal. Street ' ~ter discussion, Dr. Raborn moved to cl~.ange this area to R-3. ~,~¥. Sarno relinquished gavel to ~r. Olds and seconded the motion. YT~)I~, called for vote and motion carried 7-0. Area Sm~tJx of Sterlin£ Village and adjacent to Bo)n~ton Isles ~liscussed and Dr. P~born moved fl.~at this be ~,ade R.-1AA. ~is was seconded by ~,~r. Ayers and motion carried 7-0. The next area to be -.~isu~ was from Hampshire Gardens South, to the City limits botmcled on west by U.S. 1 and ~ast by Intracoastal. ~-'..~st of this area already being built or existing as R-3, except for Su~-We~h Restaurant. ~'~otion made by ~,~*.r. ~?alker to zone this area R-3 from R-4 with tJr~e exception of S%~ ~%.ra~h property to be made C-3. ,%:btion seconded by Dr. P~orn and carried 7-0. Property North of Hampshire Gardens to C-5 presently shown as R-4 was next discussed, Betided on East by Intracoastal and ¥~est by '? c 1. Board thilL-ks this s.~.ou!d be R-$ with, exception of restm~rants ~J~ere. These should be zoned C-3. ~,~. Weaver motioned *Jmt ff",.is area be zoned R-5 except for restaurant areas would be C-3 to end of their parking areas. - This :motion seconded by ~r. Bru!i and carried 6-1 with 1,'k'. Same voting no. Board then discussed strip East of Intracoastal adjacent to R-3 on %Vest. ~'fr. Dake recommended this go to R-3 also. Dr. Raborn motioned tJ~at ~4r. Dakes recommendation be accepted and seconded by ~4r. Ayers. Motion carried 7-0. ~xt area discussed, was ~ast side of Seacrest Boulevard across from the hospital. It was explained tJmt this was pri~.arily for emdansion of hospital related facilitie~ and hospital would contLuue to expand and ~.is area was needed for doctors, etc.. Mr. Weaver ~oved that t31is remain C-1 as she, re. on the m~p. This motion seconded by ~¢~. Ayers and carried 7-0. ~e next area discussed was West of Seacrest ¢oulevard along S. ~% 15th Avenue. 3~r. Jim ~:,~ier, Deparimmnt of Transportation, came forward witJ~ R.O.W. maps and explained area tJmt would be affected. Boa,rd discussed this area and Mr. }~%aver m~de a xotion to extend C-2 zoning, one lot deep, west to S. W. 3rd Street. P,,btion was seconded by l~,lr. Olds and, carried ~4inutes of the Planr~ng and Zoning Board 9-8-71 Next area discussed was from Seacrest ,Boulevard I{est to S. W. !st Street, b~dnded on }~rth by S. %V. 1st Avenue and on Sou~h by S. kL 2nd Avenue. Owner had requested this go to C-1 from R-5 as he had a proposed project for this area. qI~is had been previously discussed at another meeting. Dr. Raborn n'~ved ~hat this area be changed to C-t. !v~otion was seconded by }~r. ~{alker and carried 7-0. Next area discussed was area Nort.h of SR 804 to Venetian and Treasure Isles. ~r. ~geaver abstains as he has son~ interest in property Lu the area. Mr. Dake explained this areaand its best potential to the Board. Dr. Raborn made a motion to leave portion l'~[est of E-4 Canal as R-5 as shown on map. This was seconded by b~r. Bru!l. Discussion followed by Board. Dr. Rabom with- drew his motion and ~. Brull withdrew his second. Chairman asked for another n~tion and none was made so area remaiD3 as sb_a~n on map. i¥-~r. ~,[aynard }~ertz requested Board d~ange Venetian Isles area from R-lA to R-1AA. ~.~btion to ~hange tlxis area from R-lA to R-lgA made by b~ir. }~teaver, seconded, by Olds and carried 7-0. /"ne next area to be discussed was I~Yesterly portion of Golfvie~, _~larbor along Congress Avenue. ~qr. Brull abstained as he is a property ~ner. Dr. Fry, representLng Golfview Harbor Civic Association, presented a letter to the Chairman objecting to zoning as presently sho~m. k'.~lnor Corporation has a letter on record..,committLng R-$ area to only two stories. Discussion held and ~-~lnor to meet with Civic Association to explain their plmns. Dr. Raborn motioned to rescess until %%%dnesd.a¥ S~tember 22nd at 7:50 P.~I. Seconded by ~r. t~,%aver. Vote was 2-4 against motion and it failed. ),~inutes of t~he Pla~3dng ~ Zoning ~,,~eting 9-8-71 Mr. Dake explained ~,~tnor plan along Congress Avenue and development in general on Congress. Dr. Raborn had opinion that B'iilnor Company could come up with alternate plan with no R-2 or R-3. ~Vould use a perimeter~oad instead. Should leave as R1AA. No motion made to change proposed plan and area remains as shown on map. Area adjacent to and South of Golfview Harbor, directly bela~ canal on North, sho~m ?,ir. Dake explained that both City and County own~Iand in: ,~his area~ar~ it should remain R1AA as a buffer to ~{1 zoning to South. This strip would probably help city acquire access to this area. ~<¥. Bake would like to see ~his used for a park or school in the future. No motion was made by Board and property remains as sh~n on proposed map. Next area for discussion was S. }%~. 25rd Avenue !~¥est of Seacrest Boulevard. Board discussed this area at length. Motion to ~hange as follows, East of S. W. 3 Street to S. W. 1st Street, North of S. IV. 23 Avenue from C-1 to R/AA, l~'est of present High Point property to SCL-RR from C-1 to PJAA { Norfl~ of S. ~. 23 Ave. ) made by Dr. Raborn and seconded by Mr. Ayers. ~btion carried 5- 2. Existing I~gh Point section in this area to change from C1 to ~3. This motion made by Mr. Ayers and seconded by ~,fro 0Ids. ~,~tion carried 7-0. Board next disCUSsed property North of Lott pr ~operty and Sou~h of Lee ~,~nor Isles. Property presently being developed by Snug Harbor. Property bounded on %'test by U.S.1 and East by Intracoastal. Dr. Raborn made motion to change this property from CZ to ~ as it is being developed. Motion seconded by Mr. Ayers and carried 7-0. At this point meeting was adjourned but was reopened when ~,~r. Weaver suggested Board take up another area. Property bounded on West by S. W. 3 Street, on North by S. ~'~. 6th Ave. on South by one lot beyond S. }?. 10th Avenue. and on 5ast by R-2 zonir~ shown on map~ was next discussed. -6 k~utes of the Planning and Zoning Board i,-.~eeting 9- 8- 71 ~Ir. ~eaver explained to Board that he was fam.&liar with this area and most of it is alrea~tydeveloped as R1AA although shown P~2A. ~btion to change this from R1A to RI~A made by ~:~r. Olds seconded by ~¥~. ~qeaver. All voted aye and motion carried, Chaimau asked for ~¢orkshop on September 22, 1971 at 7 ~50 P~. ~eeting adjourned at 12:05 A.~. ~To 3~raes Sarno Chairman \ \