Minutes 07-28-69l'~S OF REgJLAR PLANNING g ZONING BOBRD M!~TING BZLD MONDAY,
dULLY 28: 1969, A~ 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH., FLORIDA.
PPL~S~
James Mac Alpine, Vice Chairman
Stanley Weaver, Chairman (ammived late)
James Sarno
Leon Cloutier Stuart Fuller, Build/ng Official
Maynard Wertz
~ay Allen
Clyde Wo/Tell
PRESENT FOR DAKE g ASSOCL6TES
Gerald Dake
As Chairman Weaver not present, meeting called to order at 7:45 P.M. by
Vice Chairman MeAlpine.
l~'btion to approve minutes from. past three ~_eetings~ as ~mitten, made by ~.
Sarno, seconded by ~. Wormell. ;./i voted aye.
~. Tomberg, representing proposed high rise developmmmt, c~me fo~,~ard to
explain density in various areas. He stated tbmt De]ray has no true
density control at present. South Palm Beach, bel~ H~3ard Johnson's,
no density control. Other areas are similar. Ft. Lauderdale has 600
Sq. Ft. peru unit of land area in their requirem~ts~ 150 Ft. in height ~nd
figures at 72 units per acre approximately.
Mr. TomLerg assured Board that Boliee and Fire dep~nts had assured him._
~hat there would be no problem, in this matter. Density appears to be his
only problem with the Board. }{is client is v~lling to reduce plans to
60 to 61 per acre.
f~ner~ would assume additional costs of bringing in sewer and ~.~ter:
etc. They will bring in Architects and Engineers to work with City, if
granted zoning. These would be high value units and tax revenue to City
would be great.
Ray All~n stated that restrictions held Delray to 43 units per acre.
I¥~. Tomberg refuted this and stated that this is not always so, as there
have been exceptions to this and some are up to 55 units per acre.
A local motel owner from near proposed project came fo~ard to sta~e that
he was for the project. Also~ a local lunch stand c~mer in vicinity came
for~ard with same statement.
Vice Chairman called for dissenters in audience to come fon~ard.
Mm. Dake stated ~at under the Planned Unit Development, this could not
be passed as it requires a m/nimum of 100 acres. I~m. Dake then rended
that this be put under P.U.D. and get a Special Exception from the Board
of A~justment on %he 100 acre requ/rements. The new land use plan will
Miuutes
Planning $ Zoning Bomrd
July 28, 1969
reconmmnd high density in this area. Controls are needed for tmaffic,
design and utilities.
A C-2 Zoning could be gm~nted, if a contractural agreement between develop-
ers and City could be made, to insure controls. Such sm agmee2rent could -
contain a clause to revert to original zoning if conditions required
were not wet. This statement by ~'~. Tomberg.
[~ayor Gallo stated traffic would be OK wi~] police, with proper i~ss and
egress. Stacking l~nes would be needed.
}L!rold Hopkins, Public Works Direetom, stated that water supply would be
500 to 700 G.P.M. at peak ti~es. Nearest water at S. E. 21st Avenue could
supply 400 G.P.M. OK. Next nearest at Seacrest and would supply more.
Treatment facilities for se%~ge at Present is almost at capacity. II, is
~11 be remedied in neap fu ,ture~ when it is deter~/ned if outfall system
or expansion of present system will be used. Should have new facilities
within tm~;o years. Approxfumately 2500 feet to nearest sewer lines° Can
furnish potable water to approximately 1200 units OK. Developem will
have to furnish sewer and water costs for the project.
It was brought forth that if sewer and water were available in this area,
Tradewinds Estates m~ght consider annexation into the City. Facilities
should be desiDned for future loads. In sun~, ~. Hopkines see~ed to
think services would be possible if developers and City could get together.
M~. Tombemg again stated that time was of ~e essence as he needed zoning
change in ordem to close the sale of this land.
andMm' itW°rrel!would statedtake atthatleastMr' 45ILukedays.Wanted a new ordinance to cover this
Mr. D~<e stated that there was no ordinance on the books at Present to
cover such a development. He doesn,t believe it should be C-2 Zone, as
other uses could be had unless tied do~m to the requested use, by contract.
C0ntractumal zoning can be legally questionable.
Mr. Tomberg stated ~at his clients would accept a contract %~th City only
for use Proposed. No service stations, shopping centers, etc. Contract
would be with Co,nell and could be made binding. His client plans
$27,000.800.00 in construction. In such an amount, sewer, water~ parking,
etc., not considered any great expense in relation to overall project.
FurTher, esthetic values would be necessary in order to sell units.. As of
tonight, Mm. Tomberg has been before Board six times and would like decision
one way or another.
Mr. Dake then explained F.}LA. multiple housing standards ~nd Said that
using #7 index, over 1,500,000 square feet could be done on this site in
building area. Dwelling unit sizes controlled by area. Fifteen of 22
acres would contain no building and ~ acres for parking and 9 acres of
open space.
linutes
Planning g Zoning
July 28:19S9
Fir~ Chief l,'~ight stated that fi~e protection would be built in and no
snorkel would be necessary. This should pose no problem.
Me. Tombe~g aga/n requested action by the Board.
M~. Sarno ~ecc~nended the adoption of a R-S or~_inance fo~ this develop-
ment.
According to t~.r. Tombe~g, this would take too long and he needs C-2 for
his contuact. His client will accept coni-~a~al 'uses.
Board discussed possible motion to clea~ up this zoning.
Board recessed at 9:40 P.M. for five m/nutes in order to discuss for-
nation of nution.
M~. Dake Prepared a motion which he felt ~ould cover this development.
Motion read as follo~:
Recommand to be C-2 C~neral Commercial zoning with the follow/ng con-
ditional Provisions which will he included in the adopting ordinance by
the City Council v~th any other provisions seen necessary by the City
Attorney,
Condition ~1.~ The City Planning Board shall have site plan approval of the
Proposed development at the time a .building permit is obtained. Such site
plan approval shall consider those ~tems outlined in the Plar~ed Lbit
Development Section of the Zoning Ordinance.
Condition #2.- The development shall conform to %he requirements of the
minimum property standards for ~ '
· '~ultzple Family Housing (F.H.A.), No. 2600:
November 1968: page $$ thru ~8 and a land use intensity of 7.0 with the
appropriate conditions of this intensity ratio.
Condition #2.- The developer shall meet s/! necessary requirements of the
City Engineer~ relative to water and sewer facilities.
Condition #4.- That the developer enter into a contract with the City
which will include these conditions.
Board was then called .back into session by Chairman Weaver,
The Dbove motion ~s then made by ~. Allen and seconded by ~,~. Mae~lpine.
~tion carried by all.
It was noted that service station ordinance was still on table.
Board adjourned at 10:00 P.M.
~inutes
Plsnning g Zoning Boar~
July 28~, 1969
ALSO ATTENDI7,t6
C0~CZ%
DEP~ m:Ar:S.
~'~. Gene ~,,~?might~ ~ire Chief
~'~- Harold Hopk/ns~ Director Public Works
-4-