Minutes 04-28-69MINUTES OF REGLW~,AR PLANNING g ZONING BO;~D MEETING HELD MONDAY,
APRIL 28, 1969, AT 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL, BO'~qf0N BEACH, FLORIDA.
Stanley WeaveP, Cha~
Le~n Cloutiep
James Mae~pine
James Sarmo
Ma)~ard Wertz
Clyde Wor~ell
Ray Allen (late)
Stuart Fulle~, Building Official
_PRESSMT FOR C~i~OS PROPERTIES
Jorge Echaz~e
Thomas Domando
Riebardo Rossi
Bill Leonard, Attorney
The ~eting was called ~o orde~ by ~he Cha~ at 7:32 P.M. Mo~ion was
called fora to approve ~he minutes of The last meeting. M~. We~tz made
the motion, M~. Safco Seconded. Unan~ly carried.
OLD BUSI~ZSS
, -~,,p ,a aourn, Fange g3 East, lying West
of westemty ~ight-of-way line Equalizing Canal E-~, less Parcels A, B, C,
D, g E, R-IAA with Special Exceptions as provided in Ordinance 68-19, of
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, fora the cc~struetion of single-family
d~ellings, planned unit developmmnt unde~ the condominium concept.
M~. Weavem read additional letters opposing the application made by Caldos
~e new proposed plat submitted by Caldos was put on the Board and described.
M~. Weaver sunmm~ized the events of the meeting of April 1~.
The flooP was opened for questions from the audience.
F~. Bill Leonard, Attorney for Caldos PropePties came forward and advised
in reference to the question raised eaPlie~ about Caldos' ownership of the
properdry, tha~ sale of the prope~ was closed and tr~D~ferx~d to Caldos
Properties, Inc. He submitted the deed, da~ed Febr~ 2~, 1969, for ex-
amination by the Board, along with a copy of the deed to be put on record.
M~. Leonard discussed the area proposed fo~ Special Exception and advised
that it would not lower the properdry value in Golf View Ha~bou~. He then
said tha~ Caldos Propez~es would be glad to tr~ to answer any questions
from the Board o~ the audience.'
M~. Sarno then stated that the double lots along Southeast 28~d Avenue
will remm{n R-I~ zoned, and they will have To comply with the zoning
z~g,_,~_tions.
-1-
~Jnutes
Planning $ Zoning Board
April 28, 1969
The questic~ was raised from the audiene~ as to ~hat exactly R-i~A zoning
I'~. %,~aver expl~ed that R-1AA. ii single-family residence of 1500 square
feet per house. He also advised ~hat ~e only zoning changes were i~ the
a~as. of _c°mmercial~ develop~nt. _ and the condomJnziums ~ evemything else
......... ,~ry ~s ailowe~ lot planned lmit developn~nt un'er a
condominium concept, such as Leisumevil!e. Setbacks are also different.
~-~. David Phi<ay, Attorney representing the residents of Golf View PIRRBOUR
came forward. He stated that his clients still feel that ~eir requests,
as stated at the previous meeting (April 1~) were not out of the question.
-~. Leona~O c~ forward to give statistics of density, fora Leisureville,
including the recreation and lake areas, which summed up to be a fraction
less than that of Golf View Harboum,
A lengthy discussion was held. Objeetiop~ and opinions ;~re heard from
the audience.
?~. Leonard1 camm fo~,;ard to state that zoning change was not sought, -.but
rather that Special Exception be granted to %his area.
Ful~ther discussion follow, ed. ~ne Board adjo~ed at 9:01 P.M. for 5 minute
reCO. S S o
~eting was !called to order at 9:I1 P.M.
Mm. Weaver then read anothem letter submitted to the Board for the records,
in opposition to the g~anting of the Special Exception.
~r. I~,brrell asked ~,5~. Eeharte if a ~col!eetor street¥, could ~ put in front
of the double lots parallel to 29rd Avenue. ~. E~harte stated that it
would be possible.
Mb. Wemtz asked if Caldos planned to comply ~th the single-family zoning
regulations cf 1500 square feet per house on the large lots. ~'~. Echarte
confirm, ed that t~s ~s correct.
P~. P[cKay c~ forward and suggested that Caldos hold the land fora a year
or so before developing it. T~Js would give the Board time to see what
was produced in_ the part already under construction.
Brief discussion follow,ed.
~. Weaver then called for a motion gnmn~ or denying Special Exception
to Caldos ?roperties ~ Inc.
~'~. Worme!l advised that he did not think it economically possible for
Caldos to hold the land a year before developing it~ as suggested by ~.
khKay. He also advised h~ beneficial the building was to the area of
}~/nutes
Planning g 2~ng Board
~pri! 283 ]969
Boynton Beach, along ~,~.t.h the business %he influx of people themselves
would bring to the ~ty. ~r~ Worrell them_ made mOtion that Special
Exception be gr~nted Caldos Propemties, /nc.: under the condition that the
t~ rows of lots parallel to Southwest 28rd Avenue be restmicted to 1500
"csquare~ feet~ over-all building area per house~ and that the service or ~'
· o±iectom' street be reoor~ed J_nto the plat. -~.~. Cloutier seconded ~]e
motion. LhanLmous!y carried. Motion for Special Exception gr~nted,
Parcels A, B, C, D~ g E~ as desemibed belcrw.
PARCEL A: A parcel of l~nd in the ~,~7 1/4 of Section 9~
To~skip 45 S~ P~nge 4~ E~ City of Boynton Beach,
Florida~ Palm Beaah County~ more Particularly
described as foll~s:
PARCEL B:
PARCEL C:
PARCEL D:
The South 605 feet of the North 951 feet of the
East 700 feet of the West 750 feet less the North
200 feet of the ~st 200 feet of the herein desemibed
parcel of land~ containing 8.80~ acres of land, more
or less, and being subject ~o any and all easements
and/or Rights-of~zay of record.
Request: R-1AA to C-! - for Neighborhood Shopping Center
A parcel of land in the k%7 1/4 of Section 82, T~nship 45 S
Range 48 E, City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida, more Particularly described as folt~zs:
The South 200 feet of the Nomth 5~6 feet of the East
200 feet of ~he West 250 Feet, containing 0.918 acres
more or less~ and being subject to any an all eas~rents
end/or Rights-of-way of record.
Request: R-L AA to C~! - to be used for service static~.
A parcel of l~nd in the ~ 1/4 of Section 32, T~,~hip 45 S
Range 43E, City of Bosauton Beach, Pe3~_ Beach Co~nty~
Florida~ more particularly described as foll~s:
~ne South 200 feet of the North 240 Feet of the East
700 Feet of the West ?50 Feet, containing ~.214 acres of
!~nd, more om !ess~ and being subject to any and all
eas~ts end/or rights-of-way of record.
Request: R~IBA to R-8 = to p=~r~gt the construction of
a ~ -~otel.
A parcel of land in the North half (N 1/2) of Section 32,
To%,mship 45 S, Range 43 E, City of Boynton Bead~, Palm.
Beach County, Flomida, more particularly descmibed as
follows:
The South 200 feet of the North 240 feet of the East
1860 feet of %he West 2820 feet~ containing 8,540 acres
of land, more om less, and being subject to ~n.V and all
easements and/or Rights-of-way of record.
Finutes
Planning g Zoning Board
April 28, 1969
PARCEL E:
Request: R-1AA to R-3A - for construction of two--story
~ultiple family residential dwelling consisting
of aP~tments with 8 to 16 units per apartment
building.
A parcel of land in Section 32, Towns.hip 45S, Range 43 E,
City of Boston Beach, County of PaLm Beach, Flomida,
more par~ieulamly described as follows:
%ne East 460 feet of the West 510 feet of the North
380 feet of the South 421 feet of the .~ 1/4 of Section
32, To~sbip 45 S~ Range 43 E, City of Boynton Beach,
Palm. Beach County, Florida, ¢onta/ning ~.013 acres, more or less,
and be/ng subject to any and all easements and/or P, ights-
of~wa~v of record.
Request: Conditional use to allow constmuction of Church.
Applicant: Parcel A, B, C, D~ E: Caldos Propemties.
~. Weaver called for discussion of the granting of these parcels. No
discussion or questions were brought forward. ·
Mr. Weaver called for motion to grant or deny request for gran ~ting of the
Parcels.
Fir.imouslySarmOcarmied.made motion to accept the parcels. ~.m. Wemtz seconded. Unan-
.~,~.W BUS]2~SS
Parcel 1:
Lots 12 and 15, High PoLnt, a subdivision in the City
of Boynton Beach, Florida, according to the plat thereof
recorded in the Office of ~ue Clerk of the Circuit Court,
in Plat'- Book 23, Page 225, P ~a!m_, Beach County records.
Request: Lo%' 12 from R-1 to R-3 and
Lot !5 from R-2 to
Address: 246 S. E. 23rd Avenue add
243 S. E. 24th Avenue
Applicant: B4~nes Stoner
~. Lee, Attorney for l'~s. Stoner presented plans for the proposed con~
stmuction to the Board fora examination, p~. Lee then explained the location
of the ~1~o~ 6!s R?ell ~s sumrounding propePties.
~. Sarno asked if the lots were sufficiently sized for the construction
proposed in relation to parking.
t~. Fulle~ stated that they we_~e.
FRnutes
Planning $ ZonJ_ng Board
April 28, 1989
Mr. Weaver asked for further questions from the Board. I'-~. Weaver then
called for any objectiop~ against ~he proposed building.
Complaints were expressed from the audience and discussion was held.
~, Lee advised that the property was free and clean of any mortgages.
Furhter discussion follc~ed.
Mm. Weaver called for motion to grant or deny rezoning.
~. Sarno made m~ion that the rezoning be denied. Seconded by ~.~. Allen,
Unanimously carried. Request denied.
Request for approval of the proposed layout of the apartments, submitted
by Caldos Properties, Inc. ~t~.e Board decided to let I,~. Fuller tske the
plot plan and bring figures on it to the Board at a lateP date.
Mr. Allen made motion that the Plot Plan be turned o~r to the City Building
Departn~nt for stu~,, l'~. Sarno seconded. ~tion was tabled for the
Building Department to study and to be discussed at special meeting to be
called at a later t~.
Re~ision of Ordinance 62~9 (R-2 Zoning) was briefly distressed.
'eetmng was adjourned by the Chair~n at 10.10 P.M.
-5-