Minutes 01-19-22 MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY STANDARDS SPECIAL MAGISTRATE
CODE COMPLIANCE/LIEN REDUCTION HEARINGS
HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS, 100 E. OCEAN AVE.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2022, AT 9 A.M.
PRESENT:
Hilary Zalman, Esq., Community Standards Special Magistrate
Vestiguerne Pierre, Community Standards Supervisor
Tanya Guim, Administrative Supervisor Community Standards
Charnice Harrison, Community Standards Associate
Jennifer Oh, Recording Secretary, Prototype, Inc.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Hilary Zalman, Community Standards Special Magistrate, called the Hearings to order
at 9:10 a.m. and explained the Magistrate's role and the procedures. Pursuant to Chapter
162, Florida Statutes, all orders are appealable only to the Circuit Court in Palm Beach
County and not to the City Commission. Also, a fine will be imposed if the violation(s) are
not corrected by the deadline.
II. INTRODUCTION AND SWEARING IN OF WITNESSES
Administrative Supervisor Guim administered an oath to all those intending to testify.
III. CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
Item Case No. Status
7 21-2914 Complied
8 21-1056 Removed
12 19-2393 Tabled 60 days
27 20-0595 No show
IV. NEW BUSINESS
Case No. 21-1000 White Rose Homes LLC
Property Address: 132 NE 12th Avenue
Property Type:
Property Violation(s)-
This case was not heard.
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-2623 United Lynk LLC
Property Address: 918 NW 1 st Street
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Property Type: Single-Family Non-Homesteaded
Property Violation(s): LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2A2
Please obtain required permits for carport posts that were
replaced, window change out, hot water heater change,
and all other unpermitted work.
Contact Building Department at 561-742-6350
Officer Estime presented this case, which was a routine inspection. The initial inspection
was October 6, 2021, and written Notice was issued on October 9, 2021, with 30 days to
comply. Notice was posted at the property and City Hall on January 8, 2022. It was noted
that per Officer Hill, she has not heard anything from the Respondent. The property was
last inspected on January 18, 2022. This is not a health and safety hazard. The City
recommends 30 days, February 21, 2022, for compliance or a fine of $50 per day, plus
administrative fees in the amount of$384.12.
Carol Lacey, permit expediter hired to take care of these permit issues.
Ms. Zalman asked if the Respondent provided an affidavit allowing Ms. Lacey to speak
on their behalf.
Ms. Lacey was hired by the contractor, who was hired by the owner. The owner was
unavailable due to illness.
Ms. Zalman advised the Respondent must be present to make a case. If they are not
going to be here, they have to fill out a form giving someone permission to speak on their
behalf. She will make an Order and asked Officer Estime if 30 days was enough time to
comply.
Officer Estime stated the property owners have not attempted to contact the Officer, so
he feels 30 days is sufficient. He noted the Respondent applied yesterday.
Ms. Zalman suggested 45 days, March 7, 2022, since they are working on it
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of March 7, 2022, or a fine
of$50 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Case No. 21-2471 Wilson Beverley
Property Address: 3095 North Seacrest Boulevard
Property Type:
Property Violation(s)-
This case was not heard.
Page 2
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-2505 SLOM LLC
Property Address: 24 Crossings Circle, Unit B
Property Type: Multi-Family
Property Violation(s): LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2A2
COH CH 13 SEC 13-7 Inclusive
COH CH 13 SEC 13-16
Licensed contractor and building permits required to repair
all damages, sheetrock, wood, electrical, and plumbing
issues.
COUBTR required for home rental
Apply for license and COU inspection
Officer Weixler presented this case, which was a Fire Department referral. The initial
inspection date was April 16, 2021, and the case was reopened on September 21, 2021,
because there is a new owner. Notice was issued on April 16, 2021, and resent on
September 21, 2021, with 15 days to comply. Notice was sent via certified mail on
November 30, 2021, and a signed green card was received on December 8, 2021. The
Fire Department was on site because a sewer pipe had burst and flooded the unit with
raw sewage and sparks were shooting out of the electrical receptacle. The building was
posted as an unsafe structure and no occupancy. The property was last inspected on
January 18, 2022, and the violations still exist. This was a health and safety hazard until
the raw sewage was removed and an electrical contractor is needed to verify the electric
is safe. The City recommends a compliance date of February 21, 2022, or a fine of$100
per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12. He read the Red Tag dated April 16, 2021,
for unsafe posting.
In response to Ms. Zalman, Officer Weixler stated there were tenants present at the time,
but they have since vacated and the building was sold. He explained the previous owner
did not provide any information saying the Association was responsible for the inside
work. The new owners applied for a permit several months prior to purchasing the
building, but it was rejected. They pulled a permit for sheetrock only and he told them that
electrical needed to be added; according to the Red Tag, everything needed to be added.
He explained to the new owners that they might be able to assume the permit if they
contact the Building Department and submit corrections, but that has not happened.
Ronen Tish, owner, was present.
Ms. Zalman questioned names of the current owners.
Mr. Tish indicated this is a corporation; SLOM LLC, and he is part of the management.
Page 3
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Ms. Zalman questioned what is going to be done with this property. The City is
recommending compliance by February 21, 2022.
Mr. Tish explained they purchased the property in July and have been paying monthly
HOA fees on time. The new Property Manager, Chris Sorreno, with GRS Management,
did not show up for this Hearing even though he was sent numerous emails. It was his
understanding when they purchased the unit that the previous owner tried to pull a permit,
but it was placed on hold. They contacted the contractor and they wanted $20,000 to do
drywall work. The permit expired because they were not going to deal with that contractor
and contacted their own contractor they use for all repairs, and he started the process
until the new Property Manager told them it is the Association's responsibility; they are
the ones who pulled the drywall off and did all the work until now and they are required to
put everything back. It took two or three months before the Attorney for the Association
gave them approval to go ahead. Now, they are waiting for the Board to decide, so the
drywall can be put up. The last they heard was that the Property Manager called and said
they are not responsible for the electrical, that it is part of the drywall. Their intent for the
property is to rent it out. They are losing $1,800 per month just from a rental aspect. He
does not know what to do; it seems like they are going to have to move froward with their
own crew to do work on the property, so they can start collecting income and somehow
go after the Association. He questioned if there was any way to do a violation to the
Association.
Ms. Zalman advised the violation goes to SLOM, LLC because they are the owner. An
Order will be entered with a compliance date. She suggested Mr. Tish advise Legal
Counsel and let them know the City is giving them 30 days to come into compliance, so
they have 30 days; after 30 days there will be a fine of$100 per day.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of February 21, 2022, or a
fine in the amount of$100 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-2696 Green Wayne & Jacqueline
Property Address: 8 Eastgate Drive, Unit A
Type of Property: Multi-Family
Violation(s): LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2A2
Permit required for unpermitted interior renovation
Officer Weixler presented this case, which was a routine inspection. The initial inspection
date was October 13, 2021, and written Notice was issued on October 14, 2021, with 15
days to comply. Notice was sent via certified mail on November 22, 2021, and a signed
green card was received on November 29, 2021. There was what appeared to be
Page 4
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
unlicensed contractors at the property, as there were no markings on the vehicle, so the
Building Department got involved and put a Stop Work Order on the home and told them
to apply for permits immediately. The Stop Work Order was removed, which is illegal, and
in speaking with the Building Official, he said he was going to deal with that at the
appropriate time, and then the work proceeded. The Respondent applied for a permit to
replace kitchen cabinets and install laminate flooring. In looking at photos, the work is
very substantial, walls were removed, and the slab was raised. The application was in
Plan Check, and it was rejected. The City recommends a compliance date of February
21, 2022, or $100 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Wayne Green, owner, and Robert McClure, contractor, were present.
Mr. McClure advised everything is in process, waiting to be signed off.
Officer Weixler questioned what was covered under the permit because it does not match
the pictures. He asked Mr. McClure to send him the scope of work.
Mr. McClure indicated everything in the system is pretty much on track.
Ms. Zalman stated there is a concern and Officer Weixler is trying to prevent the permit
from being rejected if it does not match the photos.
Officer Weixler reiterated that he needs clarification of exactly what the permit entails. He
did not know why the Red Tag was removed, but the Building Official is going to take care
of that.
Mr. McClure advised people are moving in, so they took everything off the door. The job
is close to being completed, so if he needs an Engineer report after the Inspectors come
in, they can do so.
Officer Weixler stated he needs an email that says what exactly they applied for; the
scope of the work of the permit, so he can see that it matches the violation. When looking
at the application in the system, it is very vague and says kitchen cabinets and a laminate
floor.
Supervisor Pierre asked Officer Weixler what the Red Tag said.
Officer Weixler indicated that the Red Tag said that Michael Gorachek, Building Inspector,
visited the property on September 7, 2021. The interior and remodel were in progress,
permits are required, submit permit applications by September 13, 2021, to avoid a fee,
secure permits, and obtain applicable inspections. The Stop Order that was removed says
there is a construction stop on this building by order of the Building Department Boynton
Beach, for failure to comply with the City Building, Plumbing, and Electrical Codes
Page 5
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Supervisor Pierre advised they are going by what the Red Tag said and what is in the
permit.
Ms. Zalman recommended staying in touch with Officer Weixler.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of February 21, 2022, or a
fine in the amount of$100 per day, plus administrative fees in the amount of$384.12.
Case No. 21-2936 Cid Claudio
Property Address: 3501 Old Dixie Highway
Violation(s): CO CH 14 SEC 14-3
Oversized truck parking — First offense is $100 plus
administrative fees
Officer Weixler presented this case. The violation occurred on November 13, 2021. The
property was inspected yesterday, and the truck is no longer there. There is one
occurrence of noncompliance and a fine of$100 applies. As of this date, the fine is $100,
plus administrative fees of$384.12, for a total of$484.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed with the City's
recommendation.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman ordered a fine of $484.12, which includes
administrative fees of$384.12.
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-2914 Boynton Commerce Center LLC
Property Address: 1920 Corporate Drive
Property Type:
Property Violation(s)-
This case complied prior to the Hearing.
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-1056 Bruder Christy
Property Address: 726 SW 27th Way
This case was removed prior to the Hearing.
Page 6
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Case Hearing
Case No. 19-1523 Jules Guerline
Property Address: 411 NE 15th Court
Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violation
Officer Karageorge presented this case. This is not a health and safety hazard. The
Respondent was waiting on the insurance company and then decided to do an addition.
They applied for a permit, which has been in Plan Check for multiple months. The
Respondent is not responding, and they have changed contractors. The new contractor
is not responding to the questions the Permitting Department has asked. The City
recommends a compliance date of March 21, 2022, or a fine of $50 per day, plus
administrative fees of$384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed with the City's
recommendation.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of March 21,
2022, or a fine in the amount of $50 per day, plus administrative fees in the amount of
$384.12.
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-1354 Jerkins Edward
Property Address: 1420 NW 1St Court
Violation(s): As noted in Notice of Violation
Officer Karageorge presented this case. This is not a health and safety hazard. The
Respondent said they were going to get the Exemption but have not and it has not been
renewed since 2016. The City recommends a compliance date of February 21, 2022, or
a fine of$50 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed with the City's
recommendation.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of February 21,
2022, or a fine in the amount of $50 per day, plus administrative fees in the amount of
$384.12.
Page 7
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Case Hearing
Case No. 21-1595 De Souza Ellen D & Ewerton
Property Address: 240 NE 16th Court
Type of Violation(s): As noted in the Notice of Violation
Officer Karageorge presented this case. This is not a health and safety hazard. The
Respondent was supposed to get permits for change-outs. The permits have been in Plan
Check for multiple months and the contractors are not responding to questions from the
Permitting Department. He has been in contact with the Respondent about this repeatedly
and he is trying to push the contractor. The City recommends a compliance date of
February 21, 2022, or a fine of$50 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed with the City's
recommendation.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of February 21,
2022, or a fine in the amount of$50 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Case Hearing
Case No. 19-2393 Ennever Stuart
Property Address: 101 Leisure Lake Circle, #103
Property Type: Condominium
Property Violation(s): LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2A2
Please obtain permits for electrical and plumbing work
done without permits.
Contact 561-742-6350 to resolve.
Officer Hart presented this case. The initial inspection date was August 19, 2019, and a
Courtesy Notice was issued December 11, 2019, with 30 days to comply. Notice was sent
certified mail on November 30, 2021, and a signed green card was received on December
6, 2021. Permits were applied for during the process, but not approved. He has been in
contact with the Respondent on several occasions and the contractor as well,who applied
for the original permits. He also put the Respondent in contact with the Building Official
and personally contacted the contractor who has written him off. The Respondent had to
have some work done to move into the property and has been stuck in limbo. He has
hired a gentleman to take care of this as of last month. They are working on the permitting
process and should receive the permit on Monday. Because of the situation, Officer Hart
did not have a problem tabling this for another month.
Dave Shelbedder, Property Manager, was present.
Page 8
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Ms. Zalman questioned if the owner provided him with an affidavit to speak on his behalf.
Mr. Shelbedder replied no, but stated he is present. He explained the delay in this process
is because the City Building Department changed their policy and no longer accepts
paper copies of plans, or scans of paper copies, they must be digitally signed and sealed.
The Architect in Fort Lauderdale who drew the plans is not set up for digital and he was
out of town, just returning on January 11, 2022. In speaking with the Architect and trying
to get the plans digitally signed and sealed, he assured they would either have his digital
plans signed and sealed or another Architect's signed and sealed plans by Monday, at
which time they would be submitted for the review process, which can take a minimum of
four to six weeks. Once the permit is issued, they will have to get inspections. He
requested at least 60 if not 90 days. He noted the owner is visually impaired and his
physical impairment was kind of an advantage point.
Ms. Zalman commented this could be tabled and revisited in 60 days or an Order could
be entered for 90 days.
Mr. Shelbedder commented that tabling the item for 60 days would be appreciated.
Supervisor Pierre suggested tabling this case.
Ms. Zalman agreed with tabling the case for 60 days.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman tabled this case for 60 days.
Case Hearing
Case No. 20-2957 Miah Farhana
Property Address: 2314 SW 13th Street
Property Violation(s): LDR CH 2 ART 4 SEC 2A2
Please obtain permit for fence installed without a permit
Contact 561-742-6350 to resolve
Officer Hart presented this case. The Respondent was given 15 days to comply and proof
of service was sent certified mail on November 30, 2021, and a signed green card was
signed and dated December 8, 2021. The property was last inspected on January 18,
2022, and the violation still exists. The City recommends a compliance date of February
21, 2022, or a fine of$25 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed with the City's
recommendation.
Page 9
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman ordered a compliance date of February 21,
2022, or a fine in the amount of $25 per day, plus administrative fees in the amount of
$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-2314 Boynton Partners LLC
Property Address: 502 SW 1St Street
Officer Estime presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was November
17, 2021, and no one appeared. A compliance date was set for December 2, 2021, or a
fine of$200 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12. The property was inspected on
January 14, 2022, and the violation still exits. There are 48 days of noncompliance, and
the fine continues to accrue at $200 per day. As of this date, the fine is $9,994.12, which
includes administrative fees.
In response to Ms. Zalman, Officer Estime stated that in speaking with the Property
Manager, they have to pull a permit, but they are trying to come into compliance.
No one was present on behalf of the Respondent. Ms. Zalman agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $9,994.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-1396 Po Ying Sem Trust & Sem Po Ying
Property Address: 621 NW 2nd Street
Property Violation(s): CO CH 15 SEC 15-120D
Overgrown grass needs to be mowed
CO CH 10 SEC 10-26D
Please replace missing screen on windows/enclosed
carport
CO CH 13 SEC 13-7 Inclusive
CO CH 13 SEC 13-16
Expired Business Tax Receipt, must renew and pass
inspections
Contact 561-742-6350 to resolve.
Page 10
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Officer Estime presented this case. The Notice of Violation date is June 21, 2021. The
Special Magistrate Hearing was November 17, 2021, and no one appeared.A compliance
date was set for December 10, 2021, or a fine of $100 per day, plus administrative fees
in the amount of $384.12. The property was inspected on January 18, 2022, and the
violations still exist. There are 40 days of noncompliance at $100 per day. The total is
$4,000 plus administrative fees for a grant total of$4,384.12.
Po Sem, owner, was present.
Ms. Zalman advised she is certifying a fine today.
The Respondent stated she did not know, and she did not get a certified letter.
Officer Estime indicated they have a green card signed December 17, 2021. He told the
Respondent about the violations.
Ms. Zalman commented that the violations have not complied, and the fine is still accruing
at $100 per day.
The Respondent said she paid the license in September or October.
Officer Estime stated it is still inactive.
Ms. Zalman suggested the Respondent check with her Property Manager, it is not in the
system, and there are missing screens on the carport and overgrown grass.
The Respondent stated there are screens on the windows; everything was done.
Officer Estime indicated that Officer Hill inspected the property on January 18, 2022, and
he checked the property this morning and the rental license is delinquent.
Ms. Zalman advised she was going to enter an Order and told the Respondent to stay in
touch with the City to show them everything was done so the fine stops accruing. She
told the Respondent she could apply for a Fine Reduction at a later date if she wished to
do so.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman certified the fine for $4,384.12, which includes
administrative fees.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-1561 Cranbrook Lake Ests Property
Page 11
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Property Address: 2306 SW Cranbrook Drive
Officer Weixler presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing was October 20,
20221, and the Respondent did not appear. A compliance date was set for November 20,
2021, or a fine of $50 per day, plus administrative fees of $384.12. The property was
inspected yesterday, and the violation still exists. There are 61 days of noncompliance,
and the fine continues to accrue at $50 per day. As of this date, the fine is $3,050 plus
administrative fees of$384.12, for a total of$3,434.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine for $3,434.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-2373 Johnston John T TR
Property Address: 701 West Ocean Avenue
Officer Weixler presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was November
17, 2021, for a Cease-and-Desist Order, and the Respondent did not appear. A
compliance date was set for December 3, 2021, or a fine of $500 per occurrence, plus
administrative fees of $384.12. The property was last inspected yesterday, and the
violation no longer exists. There is one occurrence of noncompliance at $500 per
occurrence. As of this date, the fine is $500 plus administrative fees of $384.12, for a
total of$884.12.
Dean Johnston, owner, was present; he is one of the Trustees.
Ms. Zalman indicated there was a Hearing a few months ago and no one appeared. There
was a violation that the property was being used to store other property and there was a
storage violation and a fine of $500, which was later cured. This Hearing is to certify the
fine on record.
Mr. Johnson stated he stopped by the property with his trailers overnight, but he will not
do that anymore.
Officer Weixler reported that when he initially handed the Respondent the first Notice, he
explained it to him. Then it happened again, and the Respondent said he was removing
the trailer over the weekend, so he gave him extra days, but then it happened a third time,
at which time a Cease and Desist was ordered.
Page 12
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Ms. Zalman advised the fine that will be certified today is the City fine, which is $500 and
$384.12 for administrative fees, for a total of$884.12. An Order will be sent via mail.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $884.12, which includes
administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-1508 M K Daniel LLC
Property Address: 2861 North Seacrest Boulevard
Officer Karageorge presented this case. The Respondent had a compliance date of
November 19, 2021. The property was inspected yesterday, and the violation still exists.
There are 60 days of noncompliance, and the fine continues to accrue at $50 per day.
As of this date, the fine is $3,000 plus administrative fees of $384.12, for a total of
$3,384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $3,384.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 20-1706 Saint Felix Carline
Property Address: 2930 SE 2nd Street
Officer Daniels presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was October
20, 2021, and the Respondent did not appear. A compliance date was set November 19,
2021, or a fine of $50 per day, plus administrative fees of $384.12. The violation still
exists. There are 60 days of noncompliance. As of this date, the fine is $3,000 plus
administrative fees of$384.12, for a total of$3,384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $3,384.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Page 13
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 20-2675 ESYL LLC
Property Address: 218 Meadows Circle
Officer Daniels presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was October
10, 2021, and the Respondent did not appear. A compliance date was set for November
19, 2021, or a fine of$50 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12. The property came
into compliance on December 16, 2021. There were 26 days of noncompliance. As of this
date, the fine is $1,360, plus administrative fees of$384.12, for a total of$1,684.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine for $1,684.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 20-2872 Crossings Master Assn Inc.
Property Address: 36 Crossings Circle
Officer Hart presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing was October 22, 2021,
and the Respondent did not appear. A compliance date was set for November 19, 2021,
or a fine of $50 per day, plus administrative fees of $384.12. The property was last
inspected on January 18, 2022, and the violation still exists. There are 60 days of
noncompliance, and the fine continues to accrue at $50 per day. As of this date, the fine
is $3,000 plus administrative fees of$384.12, for a total of$3,384.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine for $3,384.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-0923 Pravata Michele
Property Address: 706 SW 3rd Avenue
Officer Hart presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was October 22,
2021, and the Respondent did appear. A compliance date was November 19, 2021, or a
Page 14
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
fine of$25 per day, plus administrative fees of$384.12. The property was last inspected
on January 18, 2022, and the violation still exists. There are 60 days of noncompliance,
and the fine continues to accrue at $25 per day. As of this date, the fine is $1,500 plus
administrative fees of$384.12, for a total of$1,884.12.
Ms. Zalman noted the property owner was not present. She agreed to certify the fine.
Decision
As no one was present to testify, Ms. Zalman certified the fine for $1,884.12, which
includes administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-1871 Po Ying Sem Trust & Sem Po Yi
Property Address: 1202 NW 7t" Court
Po Sem, owner, was present.
Officer Hart presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was October 27,
2021, and the respondent did appear. A compliance date was set for November 19, 2021,
or a fine of$50 per day, plus administrative fees in the amount of$384.12. The property
was last inspected on January 18, 2022, and the violations still exist. There are 60 days
of noncompliance, and the fine continues to accrue at $50 per day. As of this date, the
fine is $3,000 plus administrative fees in the amount of$384.12, for a total of$3,384.12.
Ms. Zalman thought there was a tree stump, and the property manager was at the Hearing
and said they would take care of it, and they have not.
Officer Hart stated the tree stump must be removed or replaced by the same diameter
tree. The property was recently mowed, so that is all that needs to be done.
Ms. Zalman recommended every time one of these things is addressed, have the property
manager or herself call the City and check to see if it is right to make sure the fines stop.
She agrees with the City's recommendation and an Order will be issued.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman certified the fine of $3,384.12, which includes
administrative fees of$384.12.
Fine Certification Hearing
Case No. 21-2242 Sem Po Ying Trust
Page 15
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Property Address: 140 NW 14th Avenue
Officer Hart presented this case. The Special Magistrate Hearing date was October 20,
2021, and the Respondent did appear. A compliance date was set for November 19,
2021, or a fine of $500 per day, plus administrative fees of $384.12. The property was
last inspected on January 18, 2022, and the violation still exists. There are 60 days of
noncompliance, and the fine continues to accrue at $500 per day. As of this date, the fine
is $30,000 plus $384.12 administrative fees, for a total of$30,384.12.
Sem Po, owner, was present.
In response to Ms. Zalman, Officer Hart stated the fine is due to work without permits.
The Respondent still has not applied for permits.
Ms. Zalman thought the Respondent brought a contractor or a manager to the last
Hearing and they said they were going to address this, but they still have not fixed it.
The Respondent stated they took her money, but they have not done anything.
Officer Hart indicated that nothing has been done and the property is currently occupied.
Ms. Zalman agrees with the City's recommendation and an Order will be issued.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman certified the fine for $30,384.12, which includes
administrative fees of$384.12.
NON-AGENDA
Case No. 09-3565 Rabbi Shalom Korf
Property Address: 911 Meadows Circle
Violation(s): As stated for Code sections below
Officer Pierre presented this case. The Notice of Violation date was November 12, 2009.
The Special Magistrate Hearing date was January 20, 2010, and no one appeared. A
compliance date was set for February 4, 2010, or a fine of$150 per day. The Respondent
complied January 11, 2022. There are 4,358 days of noncompliance at$150 per day. The
total fine is $653,700, plus administrative fees of$384.12 for a total of$654,334.12. The
Respondent complied with the Lien Reduction process to move forward.
Rabbi Shalom Korf, one of the owners, was present.
Ms. Zalman commented this is a large lien and questioned how the property is currently
being used and if it is up for sale.
Page 16
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Rabbi Korf indicated his partner is managing the property; he is going to sell it. He was
made aware of this issue about two days ago and was told a license was required to rent
property.
In response to Ms. Zalman, Rabbi Korf was not sure, but thought the property was under
contract for sale.
Ms. Zalman commented that Rabbi Korf might not be the best person to represent the
case because he was not aware how much money was spent to bring the property into
compliance and how much they are trying to sell it for.
Rabbi Korf advised there is a mortgage on the property, but he did not know the sale price
and thought they paid between $155,000 or$160,000 for the property. He thinks the value
is about the same because they lost money.
Ms. Zalman commented that the lien is well over the value of the property.
Rabbi Korf reiterated it is somewhere in that range. The property was rented for a long
time and unfortunately, the renter died in the apartment. The renter did not have any
family, so it made it difficult to clean out the place. Regarding the license, they should
have been aware, but they were not.
Ms. Zalman assumed his partner might have started working with a title company to put
the property up for sale, they realized there was a lien, and the lien would block the sale,
so they had to go through the process to clear the lien and get it reduced, so the property
could be sold. This is an investment property, and the lien does not go away, this is just
the reduction process. Even though the lien will be reduced, there will still be a lien that
has to be cleared at or before closing.
Rabbi Korf understood.
Ms. Zalman questioned if Rabbi Korf and his partner have a suggestion they were hoping
to reduce the lien to.
Rabbi Korf stated the property is not worth the amount of the lien. He commented there
may be unknown reasons why they did not know about this
Ms. Zalman advised there had to be mailed Hearings and certified mail. Maybe because
it was an investment property and there was a tenancy, the address was the tenancy. Her
concern was they did not know the number needed to get the property sold because she
does not know the balance of the mortgage.
Rabbi Korf indicated he could message his partner.
Page 17
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Ms. Zalman commented that she would put this case on hold, so Rabbi Korf could
message his partner to find out the amount of the mortgage and to find out if there is a
contract for sale. In running the numbers, she noted going down to 75% is still in the
$40,000 range.
Officer Pierre recommended 10%.
Rabbi Korf stated they had a contract with the Housing Department for Housing
assistance. He questioned if they should have asked if they had a license from the City
of Boynton Beach since they had the property for a while.
Ms. Zalman could not answer that question. Once the City became aware of it, they issued
a Notice to get the license and when ignored is when it starts accruing a daily fine. The
City is recommending a 10% reduction, which would be $65,433.41. She suggested
Rabbi Korf contact his partner and they will come back to this case later to do an Order.
This case was recalled at 10:25 a.m. Rabbi Korf advised that he spoke with his partner
who said there is an offer for $160,000, not a contract. He thinks they paid $155,000 for
the property many years ago and there was a cost of $20,000 to clean up and help with
a funeral. They paid 15% at the time of purchase and there is a mortgage.
Ms. Zalman stated 15% is at least another $24,000 plus interest and then they went out
of pocket for the tenant who passed away. There is no ill will, this was not intentional, but
at the same time, the City incurred fees and costs. If the lien is not cured, the property
cannot sell and that is not the goal. She recalculated using numbers provided and the
money that was spent. If the reduced number is used with consideration of the deceased,
the mortgage, and the value, that would bring the original number, which is around 5% of
the lien, to $32,716.71. The City originally recommended $65,000. If the property were
sold as is, not knowing the exact amount of mortgage, she is not sure if they are over or
under.
Rabbi Korf commented they are under. It was a Home Equity Line of credit, so when they
took out the loan the interest was 9%.
Ms. Zalman mentioned she would take the lien to 3%, which is $19,630.
Officer Pierre stated there is an offer for $160,000 and he questioned how much they
would like to pay.
Rabbi Korf replied as little as possible because they are under water. He feels guilty
saying it, but he offered $1,000.
Officer Pierre suggested Rabbi Korf to pay $10,000 and they would be even.
Page 18
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Rabbi Korf stated he would have to check with is partner before accepting the amount.
Ms. Zalman placed this case on hold.
This item was called back, and Rabbi Korf advised there is no way his partner can accept
the offer. He questioned if there should be some protection before getting to this point.
Officer Pierre stated they posted the property, sent letters to them, they came back, and
they posted the property. All the evidence is there that they tried to make contact.
Ms. Zalman explained as a property owner, when a property is purchased, if there is going
to be mail from a tax authority or a City, the address should be changed with the Palm
Beach Records Tax Appraiser, or the deed should be updated so mail goes to the correct
person. If the address is not updated, mail goes straight to the investment property. The
City only has the address provided in public records, so they are doing everything possible
to reach the property owner, but if the address is not changed, all they can do is send
letters to the address provided in public records.
Officer Pierre asked if they were taking the $10,000 offer or not.
Rabbi Korf stated they do not have the money. He reiterated he would pay $1,000.
In response to Ms. Zalman, Rabbi Korf stated his partner was okay with $1,000. He noted
they recently spent $20,000 on the property.
Ms. Zalman commented even if they knocked the amount down to the next percentage,
which is 1%, it would still be $6,543.34, which she would be inclined to order. Once the
offer goes through and if it gets under contract prior to the 90 days, it could be in held by
a title company. The lien does not have to be paid out of pocket to the City before the
closing; it would be pulled from the seller proceeds. Otherwise, within 90 days the fine
reverts to the full amount. The City is not trying to prevent the sale of the property in any
way. An Order will be entered for $6,543.34.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman reduced the lien to $6,543.34, which includes
administrative fees, payable within 90 days.
Lien Reduction Hearing
Case No. 18-0691 TAH 2017 2 Borrower LLC
Property Address: 19 Peachtree Place
Violation(s): As stated below
Page 19
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Officer Pierre presented this case. The Notice of Violation date was April 6, 2018. The
Special Magistrate Hearing date was August 15, 2018, and no one appeared. A
compliance date was set for September 24, 2018, or a fine of $50 per day. The
Respondent complied on January 13, 2022. There are 1,208 days of noncompliance at
$50 per day. The total is $60,400, plus administrative fees in the amount of$384.12. The
total lien is $61,034.12. The Respondent complied with the Lien Reduction process to
move forward.
John Scalia, is a realtor and was present on behalf of the owner. He provided an
authorization form.
Ms. Zalman assumed the property is being sold and/or under contract.
Ms. Scalia advised the property is cross attached into several properties they are trying
to solve. He noted this is a rental property.
Ms. Zalman asked if they had to spend any money to bring this into compliance and what
the goal is for the property.
Mr. Scalia thought money was spent on one or two of the violations, but it was not too
much. He stated they are going to keep the property and rent it. They paid all the Business
Tax Receipts up to date, and they are trying to sell the other two properties.
Officer Pierre recommended 10% of the lien.
Ms. Zalman indicated 10%, is $6,040 plus administrative fees.
Mr. Scalia asked if he could get 7%.
Ms. Zalman stated 7% would be $4,228 plus administrative fees, which is like 8% if she
takes the total. She thinks that is fair because it is really 8%. The Orderwill not be received
right away.
Mr. Scalia advised he spoke with Supervisor Guim and she will send an email to the title
company tomorrow.
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman reduced the lien to $4,862.12, which includes
administrative fees, payable within 90 days.
Lien Reduction Hearing
Case No. 18-1037 Cileus Faustin & Resilien J
Page 20
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Property Address: 465 SW 2nd Avenue
Violation(s): As stated below
Officer Pierre presented this case. The Notice of Violation date was June 1, 2018. The
Special Magistrate Hearing was on August 15, 2018, and no one appeared. A compliance
date was set for September 24, 2018, or a fine of$25 per day. The Respondent complied
January 10, 2022. There are 1,205 days of noncompliance at $25 per day. The total
amount of the fine is $30,125 plus administrative fees. The Respondent complied with the
Lien Reduction process to move forward.
Faustin Cileus, owner, was present.
In response to Ms. Zalman, the Respondent stated this is his primary residence. He is not
trying to sell the property; he is trying to refinance. He stated no closing date is set yet;
they said the lien must be satisfied first.
Ms. Zalman asked if money or fees had to be spent to bring this into compliance. She
also asked what the Respondent was hoping to reduce the lien to.
The Respondent advised he does not have any money.
Ms. Zalman explained whatever amount is entered today must be paid within 90 days or
it reverts to the full lien.
Officer Pierre indicated the violations were outside storage, trash, and debris; nothing
major.
Ms. Zalman mentioned they usually try to get an Order for around 10% for investment
properties, but this is the Respondent's Homestead, and he is not making any money off
the property. A 5% reduction would be $1,537. She asked if the Respondent would be
able to pay within 90 days.
The Respondent asked if the lien could be reduced a little more because he does not
have the money.
Ms. Zalman stated 3% would be $922.77 and the City is agreeable.
The Respondent advised he could pay that amount; he will pay tomorrow. He asked if he
would have a receipt tomorrow.
Supervisor Guim indicated she could provide a letter. She told the Respondent to call her
so she could explain the process.
Page 21
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman reduced the fine to $922.77, which includes
administrative fees, payable within 90 days.
Lien Reduction Hearing
Case No. 20-0595 Joseph Ulrick & Yvonne
Property Address: 3180 East Atlantic Drive
Supervisor Guim advised this case was a no show.
Lien Reduction Hearing
Case No. 20-2181 Munoz Luis O
Property Address: 2205 NE 4t" Court
Violation(s): As stated below
Officer Pierre presented this case. The Notice of Violation date was October 6, 2020. The
Special Magistrate Hearing date was March 17, 2021, and no one appeared. A
compliance date was set for May 29, 2021, or a fine of $50 per day. The Respondent
complied on November 9, 2021. There are 160 days of noncompliance. The total amount
of the fine is $8,150 plus administrative fees in the amount of $384.12. The Respondent
complied with the Lien Reduction process to move forward.
Luis Munoz, owner, and his father, James Munoz, were present.
Ms. Zalman questioned if this was the Respondent's investment property. She asked if
this lien accrued under the Respondent's ownership or if he purchased the property with
a lien.
The Respondent advised he is planning to live there; the property is currently vacant. He
stated the lien accrued under his ownership.
Ms. Zalman questioned how much was spent to come into compliance.
The Respondent indicated he is a first-time buyer, and his father has more of an idea.
James Munoz, the Respondent's father, explained this has been going on for a while.
They received Notice in September 2020, and were told to apply for a permit, which they
did on November 6, 2020. They were then told the property would be inspected on
November 29, 2020, and they thought that would take care of everything. They did not
hear from anyone until March 17, 2021, when they received a letter saying that had to
Page 22
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
come to this Hearing. That was the only letter he ever received, and he has paperwork
showing the letters were sent to the wrong person.
In response to Ms. Zalman, Mr. Munoz stated the address on the envelope was correct,
but the name was wrong. He submitted the envelope.
Ms. Zalman advised the envelope is to Mr. Munoz, but inside is a letter and a violation for
someone else; the Hearing was for someone else.
Mr. Munoz indicated once they found out that they were in violation, they pulled the permit
because they realized they were being penalized. They applied for the permit when the
Department was moving from one building to another, so it took a while to get the permit
through and then additional information was requested. The Permitting Department asked
them to get surveys and things that took longer and every time they applied for something,
they asked for more. The Permitting Department then wanted an easement consent,
which took longer, and then the City rejected it, but they finally passed after a long time.
They had to spend money on all kinds of things to comply and the even painted the
exterior of the house. He lives next door to the Respondent, and they are here for the
long haul. He was hoping to remove the lien, so they can move forward; they want to put
the money on the house.
Ms. Zalman stated during this process they put down gravel, repainted, and did other
things.
Mr. Munoz stated they are doing the best they can. He is a licensed contractor in Boynton
Beach, and they would like to remodel the house with a new roof and everything it needs.
The Respondent wants to apply for a Homestead this year, so he can move in.
Officer Pierre asked Mr. Munoz why he did work without a permit.
Mr. Munoz advised the permit was for pavers and he did not know a permit was required.
They did a pool at another house they owned a long time ago and were told the only
permits needed were for concrete. As far as he knew, on sand, no permit was required.
He is a the contractor and they do not usually pull permits.
Officer Pierre recommended 5%. Ms. Zalman indicated 5% is $426.71.
Mr. Munoz requested 3% and Officer Pierre reiterated 5%.
Ms. Zalman stated she would make it $400 even.
Page 23
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Decision
Based on testimony, Ms. Zalman reduced the fine to $400, which includes administrative
fees, payable within 90 days.
NON-AGENDA
Case No. 20-2858
Property Address: 108 SE 31St Avenue
Officer Daniels presented this case. This case was dismissed in error on December 15,
2021. The case came into compliance on September 22, 2021, but due to some delays,
no fault of the Respondent, the City is recommending the fines are completely waived.
At the end of the Hearing last month, she asked that this case be dismissed, when she
should have brought it before the Special Magistrate, so waiving the fees would be on
record.
Ms. Zalman clarified that Officer Daniels was correcting the record where instead of
dismissing the case, the record should have reflected that the City waived the fines on
that date. She agreed to the recommendation to correct; instead of a dismissal, it was a
waiver of fees per the City.
Decision
As per Officer Daniels' request, Ms. Zalman corrected the dismissal to a waiver of fees
per the City.
NON-AGENDA
Case No. 21-2150
Property Address: 83 Cambridge Lane
Officer Weixler presented this case. He cited the Respondent for a permit for an air
conditioning unit. The Building Department has something called Streamline Permits, and
it appears the company submitted a Streamline Permit, but it was never processed by the
Building Department. The Respondent submitted proof that it was done before the fine
certification date, so he requested rescinding the fine of$384.12.
Ms. Zalman questioned if there were any additional fines besides the $384.12.
Officer Weixler stated the Respondent provided proof within the compliance date, but the
$384.12 was assessed, so he would like to waive that fee.
Ms. Zalman clarified they were doing a record correction because evidence was
submitted and $384.12 should not have been assessed; it is considered $0.
Page 24
Meeting Minutes
Community Standards Special Magistrate Hearings
Boynton Beach, Florida January 19, 2021
Decision
As per Officer Weixler's request, Ms. Zalman waived the fee of $384.12 to $0 since
evidence was submitted.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Zalman concluded the hearing at 11:12 a.m.
[Minutes by C. Guifarro, Prototype Inc.]
Page 25