Minutes 11-05-58~IIA~U~I~S ~ A PUBLIC H31ARiNQ ~TINQ 0F ~ i~,~R PLaN C0~ISSiON
I~0VEt~IBE~ 5, t 958.
Stanley %Teaver ~ Chat ~man.
Charles Lavin~ Secretary.
l~lartin Durkin~ Oouncil~n,
Paul Harri~gt on~
~%~ E. Shook
~on~ L~ Ba~s
B, C, ~Iff
Rober~ P~ Griffith~ Jr.~ City Attorney~
The meeting w.~.$ called to order at ?~30 P.~ by the Chairr~n~
~fr~ Pimentel presented an outline in detail of theduties smd
f~uctions of the Zoning Board of Appeals (copy placed on file) to be
considered by the City Council,
This being a public hearing it was decided that ccmpis~ints received
would be placed on record for study and decision at a later date,
Time for each co~olaint or objection will be limited to only eno~gh
to be presented, ~ny grotto is asked to have a spokesman. Anyone
presentir~ objections or requests sh~l! be recognized and will approach
the t~ble so that the recordir~ machine can pick up the voice clearly,
~ ~itten petition or objection to be turned in to the Cha. irman~
~$e will take written objections first and then v~ will allow as
much time a.s ~ can to each speaker.
The Chairma~u presented ~r. Pimentel and said he would be given
five minutes in which to make some introductory remarks.
]'Xr, Pimentel said he had been approached by several individ~!s
in the City ~o decla~d the zoning plan was prepared by hLmse!f and
put before the ~ster Plan Co~nission for the purpose of shoving it
down the throats of the citizens of Boynton Beach, ~f~ can be
further from the truth because this plan i~ made according to
the Statutes of the law of Florida. It is my interpretation of the
type of zoning that should predominate in the areas shown. The
areas ~re considered by every member of the ~aster Plan Commission
without exception, They approved of the entire plan for presentation
to a public hearing so that if a~vone h~ objection to the type of
zoning in any way and for aDV reason~ such objections could be pre~
sented at this lr~.blic hearir~g, These zones are c~eated for the
health, ssfety and public welfare of the comm~uity~ They are not
p'ermanent~ they are tentative smd for study~ If a~yone here tonight
has any ojection to the zoning as shovm on this map, then they must
make their objection known by coming, up to the plan here and pointing
out the area, and I will discuss it with you in public and make a
recommendation to the ~aster .PI~ Commission to do one of three things:-
1~ if your point of view in my opinion is what it should be~ ~
personally will recommend to the l~aster Plan Conu~i~sion that they
study it further v~th m6r recommendation for approval ~
2~ If your suggestion could endanger the a~tting property or property
across the street I will recom~oend to the ~[aster Plan Commission
that it be given further study and at the next public hearing a
decision will be presented to you~
Zf you present a chef'ge from what we have he~ because of conditions
depreciation of property, public afe~y being involved, or other
conditions e×istin~, in that area, I will reco~me~xt to the Commission
that further study be given~ with your opinion as to v~ly it
should be changed.
I want to say that every statement you make here. tonight will be
to the ~.~aster Plan Commission and will be on record for you and for the
public. You mus~ remember a zoning plan can beautify a City or ruin
it. I w~t to point out that in connection with the B ! A type o~f
shopping center the specifications in your o~5~inanoe call for la~t~
soaping, special setbacks and the avoidance of any obnoxious view~
~r~ Weaver then asked for the indulgence of theaudience whiI~ he
read the letters received covering objections to the proposed zoning
2J~D krPS, W~LTER NOLAI~: 0%~ers of Lot 9 and the West 20 ft. of Lot !0
in Blo_'Sk 9 which is designated for ?00 ft.
of living, space in the new pian~
They request it be left for d~iexes, being an ideal location for
elderly people who wish to walk to the Post Office, CttyHalt Stores
S ~
a~d h~*zleboard Court~ '
j, W~ J~CIfSON: Ovmer of Sec~28~5-43 Savior's Addition, Lot 1, Block
!4~ is opposed to its being zoned for "school~
They have occupied the property for ~5 years and ask the proposed
zoning be changed from ~School'' to "Apartment $~ Hotel~.
Mrs~ Jackson v.,~s present and spoke in support of her request.
,SHOOK requests that Zo~s 27, 28, and 29 Dewey, s Subdivision,
tentatively zoned as R-Z, be zoned to permit a yacht basin,
since this was the reason for which the property was
purchased.
-6-
Owns by contract the East 94 ft~ of ~ ~- of Lot 5
a subdivision of Section £8, Township 4~0 South
l~nge 4~$ East City of Boynton Beach, bet~veen
N~W~ 1st and ~¢~ 2nd Avenue~ on ~ side of £nd
,&ye n~e ~
On October t~ he rea£&ested zonin~ be c,hanged from duplex constr~o-
tion to perm, it him to build & medical office. The property being
94 ~ £95 ~ltl provide ~mple roo~ for necessary setbacks &nd off~street
parking ~
His 8~.ending letter of October 25 requested the front 175 feet
on Lake Avenue on~ be rezoned to per,mit hi~ to build a %~edic&! office~
leaving the rear portion zoned as it is.
R. L~ Brandev~ie~ Trustee, Venetian Isle,
ilEl%Vl:~ E. TH0~,'~ON~ Trustee, Glen ~rbor.
Heve been building and
develc Pi~o Venetian Park,
Venetian Isle ~l Glen Arbor
subdivisions, &djacedt to
%¢est Boynton Road.
They state the n~v zoning would not be in keeping ~th existing
develop~ent and ~vo~id make them halt development in that area. They
request the ne~ plans be in conformity with the neighborhood &r~ the
carefully laid plans of the Plar~uin¢ Board, Zoning Board. and City
Council, &nd o~ers and developers of sub,eot property ss follows:
Venetian Isle, new zoning 1-~&
Venetian Isle Addition No.!
Venetian Park !~AB
Glen arbor ~ddition I~o ~I
T_eb deed restrictions in these subdivisions recuire_ carports etc.
and architectural conCormdtyo
20~L~ B~JI~DESS Jr., Sea*¢~y Villas, Detray Beach.
Recjzests re-zoni~o ss Ci ~nd B!t classification this triangle
section lying betvgeen Boynton Road and Lake ivenue, and bordered on
the '~{est by ~ dirt road. Three parcels so zoned are in the i~ediate
vicinity,~ to the '~e,st the DeZ~:arco property, to the ~?o the Florida
Power & Light Co~, to the East, road froo~Sage r~nni_~ approximately
I000 ft. along' the S. side of Boynton Poad~ Other co~uerciaI property
is nes~rby. A major natio~ol compa~y is interested in usi_~g part of
this triar~le for their business~
Requests the zoning of~:-V'ots
B~ock ~, 0ri~i~l Town of Boynton~ be char~,~ed to
B-l~ so t~ae~ can be used _~or high class business proper~
ty, instead of the proposed
P~uests Lots &~ 5 and 8~ Block $, Town of Boynton~
be mha~d to B~l~ She would !ihs this to be cor~ider~
ed with t~e ~ ~ ~ -
..... ~o~o~ng H~L~Keatts property~
CLY~ W.WOOS~Y
Call attention to proposed development of their
lar~ on West Boyntoa Poad~ The Co~o_uty plans
to extend Congress .&venue through to Boynton ~Rd~
The intersection should be of important, ce and
worthy of co~oerciai development,
~m~=e~ re~j~est this zoning for an area 800 x $00 feet from Ho~iey
Road to City ~ ~-
They also request residential zoning of R ~. ~ for the area ~Yest
of Venetian Isle as they hope to develop this in homes of the present
1000 ft~ zonin~T to sell ii? the $1£,500 to $15~000 price ctass~
'$~mrrotuading properties will not permit higher oriced horaes~
Own lots ££~ 2~ £4 and
~o 2 of ~ake Boynton Estates~
They are not in favor of the B ~ ,~ pro~osed zo~:fng~ ~,G~
Block 2 i-~ pro~oosed .... B-$ and they ~=e! ~ne~r~ property sho~d be zoned
acco~iagly~ They bo~ht the prope~y with the idea of developing
commercially on completion of Boynton West Pond ~o %ilitary Traii~
The !ets are li0 ft~ in depth~ and slier the Co~ty and State ~ad De~
partment have ~qo~sted I0 ft~ from the front of the lots for Ri~t
of %~y on Bo~nton~ Ros;2~ they woudd be '~desirable for res_ae~zal~ ~ '
bui ! ding.
!<[r~ ~/okoff was present a -oassed copies of a smal~ plat ',~ ,
- Sfi~!ng
the location of_}~is .~rooerty~ ~ to each member of ~'~e Co~ss_on..~ ' ~
Presidez~t~' ,- - ~
~oynton Beac.~ Lai~ Co, Owns property located on the East
and ~fest side of Seac~t, S
of the cemeta~ a~l the property
of the City of Boynton Beach~ purchased from the City, Febr~ty 28,
1952~ & major consideration for the purchase was the agreement amd
undertaking~ of the City to ca~e the property to be zoned in acco~ance
with the ~derstanding of the pa~ies~ Par~6 of the agreement
quoted in full in the letter.
S~E SHIP~TT~ T:r'~stee of Southside Baptist Ch~Irok:
Request their 8 lots - Nos~!?~ !8~ 19 and £0~ Block I£~
and Nos. 5~ 8~ ? and 8~ Block I£~
CE~]RAL P~ ~h~X~ be zoned ~ ~-o_ instead of R i ~%,~
~ooo~noe w~h o~ker ck~3~rch prope~y.
of
Were owners of Lots 15 to 18 inc~.u~ive~
Block £, Palm Beach Country Club
Estates, Boynton Beach~
The property 'was sold to ifr. Dan. ¥our~_t of Pittsburg, Pa. ~ on
the premises it was zoned light industry. According to the
Plan it is no%? zoned ?~esidentiai~ They reouest it be
to Light Indust ry,
Recuest no oha~g~ be made in zonir~g of Lots 1~ li and 2 o~ Lee
~[anor i~les~ The property South of them wilt be zoned b~siness
-muder the new plan. The property across the street has a service
station~ and_ a restaurant is directly across the street from the
No rth end.
Carter was present and ft%rther exolained his request~
GAIL H~ ~0RRISON (£ letters)~
Owner of Lots ! through £&, inc!usive~
Block !~ ~£oD0~iD PAEK~
According to proposed plan this proper~y is changed to P~ ! iii~
He opposes a~%V change in zoni~· of his property~ He thinks it would
prohibit development and consequently %york an u~ufair hardship on
him ~
GDADYS E~ BOLLBACI£ and H~%~3~f j, BOLLBICI~:
They ~ish to enter a protest to the proposed change of zoning
in Cher~/ Hills Subdivision and Enow!es Subdivision~ and any ~har~ge
in the minimum lot size.
J.W. $~ITH and DORO~tfY $~[iTH: Ov;me~s of acreage:-
do~
~ J:~ of SE T of t~g~ less !80'
281.05' of Wo568~08' of Lot
of S
281~0~~ of Lot 6 of Lainha~s $/D
They protest 2he zoni~ of R i ,i, R I AB and R 1%¢ith size of lo~s
as ~0~ on I~JV lith ~ver~e and ~0~ on ~J i0~h ~ve~e, no~ feasible for
i~NRI k?~SKEL, Jr,
Jon P. Merkel,
%~i~h to enter a protest to the ~roposed change in
zonin~ of 5ct !0~ ~lock ~, Roliir~ ~reen Section !
from duplex to single fs~ly~
W.H, HAL~f~I~.~ of Boca Raton~ representing
5~r. 0. BOTTSOHAFER and DICK BOTTSCHA~ER, as T~stees of the Standa~
Supply and L~mber Co. ~ of
Florida~ Ltd~ owners of
parcel of land In Section
Tovmship &5 S~ ~e &3 E.
!yi~ alo~ the ~C~ ~y~ in
Boynt on Road~
They do not v~sh to have the prooerty cha~ed from z~nt Industry
tort.
~r. Walter Dutch is ~ent for the Rottscnafers in regard to
this land and has been asked to be present ~t a hearing.
Detailed description attached to letter.
BEI~H~ I. H~f a~xl GLAJ)YS H~l~I~f:
~ lots i and 2 in Block
Lake Boynton Estates.
Wish to retain their present ~Besidentia!' soning, in effect
since 1928~ ~en their family home was built~ instead of
They o%m four lots which are back-to-back in Block 5, two in each
classification ~ R I A~ and R 2. ~'iil this affect sales value?
The block directly across from their residence now is tentatively
zoned B 3~ except the Western end which is R I ~%g~ They object to
the Block beingo designated ~Commercialw on the South ~ide~
THEI~ P, ~AVEE and ~ECUS L. WEAVER:
0wm Lots 23, 24 and 25 in Block 5,
Sec. 29~45~&$, Lake Boynton
Estates ~
Protest the tentative zoning of Lots adjacent to and across from
their residential "R 1 A~~ listed above~
Block 5 ~ tentatively planned to be cut in two - they request
be kept ~ R I ~Ji~
They request the South half of Block 2 be kept restricted to
~{RB. ETEEL PIEF~: Owns Lot 2, Block 15, Sawyer's ~ddition.
Protests the tentative zoning2, of this property as "Park Irea"~
and ~%rishes to retain the recently allowed zoning of "iffultiple
Family I~e !!ings".
~rs. Pierce was present a~ud I~r~ ?~eaver info~med her a further
hearing, would be had on the matter.
LiEE BOYNTON ESTA'~S~ ~ petition with 29 signatures of residents~
property ovmers~ taxpayers and ~otere who wish
to be heard before the proposed zoning goes into effect to change
the zoning on certain sections of property abutting theirs~
~r. R~o~sel! Ee!ly, one of the petition signers~ was present
and said a minimum of 1,000 sq. ft~ residences was requested°
~r. Pimentel explained zoning should be controlled by living
SHE~ ED ~Dlq[ ~J)D iT I 0N:
~ oetition signed by 18 residents owning
Lots 1 through 12, Block !,
Request their lots be included in the commercial area, the
other half of the block being already zoned commercial.
~ ~DDITiON TO BOYh~ON BEACH:
Four letters were received from carries
o,~ni~ lots in this Addition~ making the
same zor~ng request, viz:
Owners of So half of Lot 5, all of Lot 6, Block
LAE2 ~k~DITION TO BOYhV~0E EEOC
Besuest the zoning of these lots be changed from present
to R ~ -~Eultiple Unit Drillings.
BACON s~ud FLO~CE. B~CON:
Own Lots 1 and £, Block 6, L~E ~DDiTION
to BOYi~20N BEACH.
P~qu~st the tenative zoning of these lots be ,changed from the
present It 1 ~M~ to ]t ~ ~ ~.lultiple Unit Dwellio~s
Owns Lets t, 2, ~, 4 smd North half of Lot 5,
B~k 7, ~ ADDITION TO BOYNTON I~ztCH
Request zoning of these lots be changed from the present
to B 5 ~ ~u!tiple Unit D%~!lings~
W&ED ~, i~0BINSON of Delray Beach:
Reo?ests the zoning of Lots 18 through 25, inclusive, Block
LAEE .~k])D IT ION TO BO~TON ~CH~ be ohar~ged from the present R 1
to R S ~ ~zt~pie Unit Drillings
NICHOI~S FOE~ABY: (3 letters). ~o,1 signed as President of Westchester
Heights~ Inc.
Feels that zoning approved by the City when S/D was platted
preferable to the now tentative zoning of "R I ~
No~2 requests Lots 18,
59, &0, 45, &6, &7~ &8~ &9 and 51 in
HIgH ~I~ be zoned R 1 ~B~ instead of
the tents~tive zoning of
that Lots 41 ~d ~ should ~main as
duplex ~ R 2.
No.5: Recuests Lots 13 and l&~ HIGH POINT
$/D~ remain in bus~uess and be zoned
B 2, instead of the tentative R 2.
~[r~ Fornaby was present an5_ disc'~ssed his requests with l~r~
Pimento I ~
Owns the N. 75 ft~ of Lots t, 2,5 and 44 Block
BOTNTON ~IGHTS.
Re~/~ests this property be zoned ~Cormuercial~'~ 0nly 75~ in
depth with !00' frontao~e. Not enough room for home or duplex s~fter
street ~dening s~ud setback~ He v~nts to build several small
stores ~
I~IL E, ~ ~C~IL~ Ittorney of De!ray Beach~ representing
E~ J. V~ESTPHAL and his wife, ovmers of property immediately South
of Lee ~ia~uor Isles~ E. of the Pdght of Way of U.S.1, fronting on
Federal Highw~ay and r~ui~ East to the intracoastml ~aterway.
l%quests thst the B 1 district extend to a depth of at least
500 ft. on Federal Highway from this property, to provide sdequat~
room for p~rking, buildings, etc.
i letter from E.J~Westphal~ of Green Bay, Wisconsin is attached
to ~r~ ~Ie3~illzn~s tetter~ requesting a reply by mail~
!~r. 5~c~lil!an was present and pointed out on the map the property
referred to. He was ~sked to reply to l~r~ Westphal's letter.
Ovmers of Lots 7~ 8 and 9, Block 2~
5, 4, 5~ 6~ 7~ 8~ 9 and !0
Block $~
SLS~?ff D~IE, a S/D of 8ec.25, Twp~ &5 S.,
i~ge 45 E,, Boynton Beach.
They object to arff char,~ in zonin& of above property which will
increase the required sq~re foot area above the present 1,000 sq. ft.
re qui reme nt ~
This completed the readin~~ of the letters and the Chairman
asked for speakers from the f!oor~
-!0-
l~r, Fra~ Hewltt~ spokesman for the Chapel Hill Yisso¢iation~
said t~hat on_ ~he new map Chapel Hill is zoned R ! ~. Immediaieiy
~o the Eas~ is ~ission Hill zoned R ! ,~. We feel ~ha~ s~b~ivision
is approximately the s~ne as regals desirabi!i~y as
To ~he North of/is
The largest to~ I~ve been able ~o find in Fo~s~ Hills is only 90~
x 110~ whe~as our !o~s ~n from Ii$~ ~o !~0~.
,$eaorest Hills to the t~o~h of I~iission Hill is also zoned
and the maximum lot there I find is 85' by 105~.
~tso the land ne~ io the hospital is zoned ~ fronting in
a Boulevard streei~
We believe our assessments in Chapel Hill r~m the highest of a~y
place inthe City and v? do not feel v~ should be down-graded w~t'h
respect to d,~velo~ments surrounding us on two sides. We wo~ld be
in~ez~s~ed in havir~g ~ zoning.
He asked why there were some unzoned areas and ~,gro Pimentet
explained that all zmzoned areas in a~%~ City are automatically' the
highest zoning, ~less agrio~!~u~!, according to law. Eve."one
in the area is protected and the zoning can only be cha~ed after
public hearing-s for that area~
He was assured by the City ~-ttorney that the l~[aster Plsm ordir~nce
cannot be read three t~es in one day and passed the ssme day~ It
vziil not be e~cted %%util it has passed two re~alar meetings of the
City Council~ It has not been presented to the Co~mucil yet~
~Ir. Pimentel said the State res£aires advertising 15 days before
a public heari~~ is held. This is a hearing before the ~[aster Plan
Commission~ The second hearing to be held must be advertised fifteen
days prior to the meeting.
F[ro Lavin: In other words~ there is no chance of this being
passed in January?
5fr~ Pime~tel said there is still a lot of work to be done on it
smd he will be satisfied if it is passed in Februa~
~r. Koepenick: I represent the people on S.E. 5rd Street,
on the Northern end of the blo&m~ We ov~n a snell piece of la~ to
the West zoned B ~ industrial, in the street I am on eve~%~ lot
b'mt two has a home on it~ Across the street from us is a small
area zoned R i ~2C~ There are only ~ or & lots in tD~t area° The
rest is built up~ %~e feel that if a small factory' or something
moved in there it v~oz~Id do serious ham to our homes. He showed the
area on the map and said, they wouldlike it zoned E i ~kC also~
~r~ ~d~ Smith off 326 ~,¥~, 2nd Avenue~ said they wish ~o ~o on
~co~ as objec~i~ ~o ~he p~oPose~ zonin~ be2ween i~W, 5r~ a~ 4~k
Streets. They feel spo~ zoni~ is not in o~er and ~ntil ~tJ~ 2n~
~ivenue become~ a thoro~are it should ~main ~side~ial rather
than business~ Thi~ ~fers to the No~h side~
~fr. Falconelti: i have come over for the same reason° I am
in the middle of this zoning which v~ll hurt me more than anybody.
It was pointed out on the map~
l~Ir~ Thomas Dwyer of Royal Palm Village - regarding Zone B ~ =
we realise it has to be commercial of some type, but feel the proposed
b~£fer strip of 105 ft~ is not sufficient protection.
~fr~ Pimentel pointed dut it would be necessary to have ~50~ if
the !05~ is increased~
l~{r. Dv~er said they vrould be satisfied if it is mexte ,~80~ or 350'.
l{r~ Pimentel said his constructive s~gestion wo-atd be taken under
cons ide rat i on.
~'[r. ~twe!l l[cConnell, ~kttorney of West Palm Beach, representing
i~!r~ and ~[rso H ~amilton J~ Boyd, of Baldwin, Lo_ag istand~ N~Y.~ the
ovmers of ~ots i and 2 BOY~0N HEIGHTS ADDITION No.l, at present
zoned E l, said they have their plans drawn up for multiple dweliings~
and he underst~udS there are three duplexes to the West of this property.
-Re-zoning of the property would be a great hardship on them~ He asked
that this be tmken under consideration~
~Ir. ~aporte of Cog~ina Cove objected to the advertised zonir~g
~ depreciati~g their property. He said they would not mind if a,
buffer zone of about 90~ was put there.
I~[r. C~riffith explained a letter had been submitted in which the
property was described and the v~iter requested it be advertised. The
advertisement sent to the publisher included the whole instead of
3!2' as far back only as Coquina Cove, from Highway NOol, to be sorted
co~:~.ercia!, the rest to remain as at present zoned~ The error in the
advertisement was cor~.~cted before being= passed on by the Zoning
Board.
Jim ~[cGoniget, 410 i~.W. 5rd Avenue, protested against his
property 8n i~'.W.2nd Avenue at Srd Street beir4' zoned commercial.
Dan Avery of 2511 8.E~ &th Street~ said he o~ed a portion of
the property of which the so-called representmtive of Royal PaLm
Viliag~ spoke (~r. D~.~er). He does not represent me and I do not
wish his su&'gestion to go ~uopposed~ l~%r. ~very pointed out on
the m~o ~hat he had in .~mind to do with his property ~ a road
sufficient to acconzmodate five lots on either side. The fronts&e
is £58~ He would is3~ out a street 50~ wide which would leave
lots of 105~ in dep. th~ ~our lots of 85~ on street and one of ?5'
would make ~55'. He asked if it would be agreeable to ma.be that
~55~ or is there some reason vfny it nm~st be $50~.
Er~ Pimentel ~ °' it
~ az~ could be made
Ilro Avery said that would be satisfactory to him ar~l leave the
rest as B ~
!fir, I~fer said it would be satisfacto~- to him.
t~fr~ ivery said he was not in accord with running the t~orth~South
P~ad pa~tlel to &th Street as there is no p!ac~ for it to come
out at except through private land~
~',~r~ Frarfm ~dmno said he thou~'~ht Zake ~venue should be co~mmercial
all the ~y up on both sides to save a lot of future troubie~
Colonel Ca~pbell, one of the owners of and representing, the
piece down on Seacrest Boulevard - 58 acres ~ which is zoo~ed R 1 AaA
and a small part R 1 ~ - said he %~s not objecting to the classif~
ication but would like to go on record as reserving the right ~o go
before the ~asmter Plan Commission or the City Council a.t a later date
as, frar~k!y, ~'~ have no idea of what w~ might ~nt to do with the
property.~'
Tom Ducat of 108 S.Y~ !st Avenue~ just off Seacrest, also has
lot on N~ !st *%venue ar~t ~th Street.
"l~e are contemplating puttimg duplexes on those two now zoned
for that~ Right across the street from the S~¥,~ !st Avenue property,
which is on the ou~n side, is a small g~ment house, and on
c~st bet~en 0cegn a~ S~ 1st the~ a~ several apa~ment houses~
To the ~
~est there a~ c~ite a n~ber of duplexes and it see~ to me
they are going to hu~ me ms the prope~y ~der these circ~stances
would not be easily sa!cable. I wou!8 not build a single ~
the~ and think the zoni~ should be ~conside~d.~
On the D-,~%~. &th Street property also are older bui!diogs,
the property to the West of me is duplex. It i~ my opinion tb~t
that preperty will probably be sold and be broken up into s~!ler
aps, rtme nt s.
Joseph C. lotta says he holds property across the street from
the Ocean Lt~mber Co~ In ans~r to his question regarding depth,
he was told it was 550~.
~r. Pimente! said that, for a point of information for everyone
k~re, every industry and light manufacturing concern al!o%~ed must
do one thing - they ~st s~.pp!y off-street parki?~ff to satisfy the
P!a~ming Board ar~t the City of Boynton Beach.
>fr~ De~;~rco said he~d like to go on record as opposing his
property beir~ff changed from commercial to residential~ mostly where
his present plant is~ approximately three acres.
~irs. B~port of 249 I~.W. ist Street said she would like her
property to remain in R 2 zoning. Their property is a do~lex and
faces a vacant lot which they also ova and which has been set up for a
duplex to face their~ If zoned R 1 it will ruin their plans~
George Rei!ly cyrus Lots ?, ~ and 9 and I0 on the original town
of Boynton, on _¥~W. !st and 2nd Streets, on which there are four
duplexes at present~ It is desii~d to have it zoned for duplexes.
~i[r~ Weaver expressed, pleased surprise t~hat the rew~ re so few
objections~ and said i~r~ Pimentel has evidently come up with a ~ood
workin~ plan, or we would have more objections.
~F
There w~ll be another meeting of the ]~:~aster Plan Commission
on the first Wednesday in December~
~r. Pimente! s~gested of the members of the 1,~Iaster Plan Com~
mission hold a :meeting themselves after the recordir& of this meeting
has been typed out~
The next public meeti~gwill be in Janua~
se cretary.
O~e&~
Boyn~on
City COuncil
City Ball
Boynton Beach, Florida
LOts 7,8 and 9 Block 2
Lots 3,~,5~?,8,9 and 10 ~loek 3
Sunny Dale, &S~bdtvlsl
Gent le~en:
do Object
which Will
houses to be built on ~hese lots above the
thousand square feet ~equi~ement.
one
~ OFFI'~EPHONE 317~
JACK H. RAULSTON, M. D.
423 N. FEDERAL
BOYNTON BE~CH, FLA.
RES. PHONE 9208