Minutes 06-07-22 Community Redevelopment Agency Special Board Meeting
Tuesday, June 7, 2022 - 5:00 PM
GoToWebinar Online Meeting and City Hall Chambers,
100 E. Ocean Avenue
PRESENT:
Ty Penserga, Chair Thuy Shutt, Executive Director
Angela Cruz, Vice Chair Timothy Tack, Assistant Director
Woodrow Hay, Commissioner Kathryn Rossmell, Board Counsel
Thomas Turkin, Commissioner
Aimee Kelley, Commissioner
1. Call to Order
Chair Penserga called the meeting to Order at 5:04 p.m.
2. Invocation
Board Member Hay gave the invocation.
3. Pledge of Allegiance
Board Member Turkin led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. Roll Call
Deputy City Clerk Stanzione called the roll. A quorum was present.
5. Agenda Approval
A. Additions, Deletions, Corrections to the Agenda
B. Adoption of Agenda
Motion
Board Member Hay moved to approve the agenda. Board Member Turkin seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
6. Legal
None.
Meeting Minutes
Special CRA Board meeting
Boynton Beach, Florida June 7, 2022
7. Informational Items and Disclosures by Board Members and CRA Staff:
A. Disclosure of Conflicts, Contacts, and Relationships for Items Presented to
the CRA Board on Agenda
Chair Penserga disclosed that he met with Affiliated Principals, Jeff Burns, Nick Rojo and
their Counsel, Michael Weiner.
Board Member Kelley disclosed that she spoke with Jeff Burns.
Board Member Turkin disclosed that he spoke with Nick Rojo.
Vice Chair Cruz disclosed that she spoke with both Jeff Burns and Nick Rojo.
Board Member Hay had no disclosures to make.
8. Public Comments
Chair Penserga opened Public Comments. No one came forward, Public Comments was
closed.
9. Old Business
A. Discussion and Approval of the Purchase and Development Agreement, the Tax
Increment Revenue Funding Agreement (TIRFA), and the Parking Lease Agreement
between the CRA and Affiliated Development, LLC for the 115 N. Federal Hwy Infill Mixed
Use Redevelopment Project.
Thuy Shutt, Executive Director, summarized that at the March 9th meeting, the prior
Board asked staff to reevaluate the terms and conditions, and on April 12th, the Board
asked for additional time to become acquainted with the project. She stated that on May
10th, the Board met and several concessions were made by the developers regarding
affordable units and how long they would remain affordable, and in return, TIF was
capped at$7M to supplement that. She commented that the 150 parking spaces, required
by the RFP/RFQ, is above what is required by the project, and at the May 10th meeting,
the Board directed those spaces to be used in the parking calculations for the project.
She said that to-date, those three agreements have been negotiated and materially
agreed on, which is in the revised document, and there are three remaining outstanding
items from the May 10th meeting. Ms. Shutt noted that there is an associated maintenance
and operations costs because the CRA will be leasing the spaces from Affiliated, which
they will be building as part of the cost of the land, which is $5.515M. She said that staff
feels that if those spaces were to be counted towards the parking count for the project,
the operational costs should be subtracted, because the CRA should not be paying for
the spaces they are using. She stated that since the spaces are required by the RFP,
2
Meeting Minutes
Special CRA Board meeting
Boynton Beach, Florida June 7, 2022
staff requested that the Board waive the requirements or inconsistencies with the
RFP/RFQ, which is already incorporated in the motion. She explained the timeline for the
project, and the requirements in the agreement. She requested that if the Board wanted
to do this in less time, it be done during the budget process. She explained that the CRA
will receive TIF information in late June, which is used in the budget planning process,
and they do not know the amount, but that if is similar to last year, they would be close to
having a deficit. She further explained that in order for the CRA to not be in default and
be unable to turn the land over to the developer when they close, they may need an
extension from Affiliated. She advised that the City Commission needs to approve the
disposition of the land because it is below fair market value, and they need to approve a
parking lease agreement because it is a tri-partied agreement. She noted items 4 A, 5 A
and 7 B are the latest agreements negotiated between staff, legal counsel and the
developer. She reviewed the three options contained in the agenda item.
Kathryn Rossmell, Board Counsel, explained the closing process and the need to possibly
extend the closing, to satisfy the mortgage. She stated that staff believes it can be
accomplished no later than December 2024. She noted that in regards to the parking, it
is staff's position that for any spaces the developer uses to meet Code, staff should not
pay operation and maintenance on because the developer would have been required to
pay for them anyway. She explained that another option is to put a cap on the number of
spaces the developer could use towards meeting Code, and she provided an example.
She noted that there are two minor errors she wanted to correct: she clarified that
Affiliated can adjust their site plan to increase their residential units or commercial square
footage without coming back to the Board; and the other is to clarify language pertaining
to if the CRA, with the consent of the developer, enters into leases that extend past
closing, they will turn over those leases to the developer.
Jeff Burns, Affiliated Development, discussed the timeline, and explained that they
structured their agreement to move as quickly as they can, and to have checks and
balances to do so. He suggested that it should be discussed during this meeting and with
the budget. He explained in regard to parking, that they are meeting the provisions of the
RFP/RFQ and are providing 150 parking spaces in addition to what is required for the
residential and commercial components. He further explained that per their lease, they
have no rights to those spaces, and what is being proposed is if they had a tenant that
required an extra few spaces, they would look to the parking lease to accommodate the
tenant and it would be reasonable to pay the operating expenses for those spaces. Mr.
Burns stated that he was not comfortable having a cap, because they do not know what
it will be and it is generally done during the site plan approval.
Chair Penserga commented that the fourth item needs to be addressed at the City
Commission level. He stated that the parking has to do with Code, and that is the role of
the City and they will go with that process. He asked the applicant if there is a discrepancy
and the Code requires them to use some of the CRA's 150 parking spaces, if they are
willing to cover the operation and maintenance of those spaces.
3
Meeting Minutes
Special CRA Board meeting
Boynton Beach, Florida June 7, 2022
Mr. Burns responded they would.
Attorney Rossmell asked if they would be subtracting those spaces from the 150 that the
CRA has access to.
Mr. Burns responded it was.
Attorney Rossmell clarified that in the event Affiliated determines that they need additional
parking spaces, they can approach the CRA and pay the operation and maintenance on
those spaces, and they would no longer be public parking spaces. She stated that this is
different than what staff is proposing, which is for the difference in the number of spaces
between what the Code requires and what Affiliated feels are needed. She mentioned
that they pay the operation and maintenance on the spaces, regardless of if they are
used.
Mr. Burns explained that they have a lease agreement, and if they feel that they need
more spaces, they have to appear before the Board and amend the agreement. He
explained that their bank will not allow them to under park commercial space, and he was
confident that the parking would exceed the Code requirements. He stated that if the CRA
approved for Affiliated to "take back" 10 of those spaces, the CRA would no longer own
them.
Board Member Kelley stated that she was comfortable with if the applicant using some of
CRA's spaces as long as the CRA would not be responsible for them anymore.
Vice Chair Cruz and Board Member Turkin also agreed.
Board Member Hay reluctantly agreed, but asked if Affiliated needed additional spaces
from the CRA, and there was an event, if the public could use those 10 spaces.
Mr. Burns commented he thought there would be more than enough parking, but that he
was fine with coming back to the Board.
Vice Chair Cruz noted that the next paragraph was significant, which she read, pertaining
to the maintenance costs.
Mr. Burns explained that the paragraph pertains to any operating expenses in that parking
garage, over a certain dollar amount, would be covered by Affiliated. He noted that the
CRA can generate significant revenue from those spaces and is agreeing to pay its pro
rata share of operating expenses associated with maintaining a garage. He stated that
they agreed to negotiate with the City and CRA to cap that, so that in the event their
expenses get out of hand, the CRA is capped at a certain amount of exposure.
4
Meeting Minutes
Special CRA Board meeting
Boynton Beach, Florida June 7, 2022
Vice Chair Cruz noted the contract says the cost could be up to $50 per space, per month,
and she supported lowering the $50 per month cap.
Mr. Burns explained how they developed the cost per space, and it is possible to reduce
it, but he was not comfortable reducing it right now, as the project needs to be
underwritten by their lender. He summarized that the agreement has deadlines, not
timelines, and they are in place to ensure that the project moves along expeditiously and
the timeline is as fast as they can.
Board Member Hay commented that he did not support a project that would take nine
years and supported four to five years.
Mr. Burns explained depending on timing and on permitting, they may be able to get the
permits, close at the end of next year and it is not unreasonable that they could break
ground at the end of next year. He reviewed timelines of other projects similar to this
project, and anticipated completion, in a best-case scenario, in fall/winter 2023.
Attorney Rossmell explained that the contract allows for them to take up to 9.5 years from
now, which is not a problem, but the only thing binding is the contract.
There was discussion regarding extending the closing deadline, and CRA funding being
addressed at the budget workshop.
Mr. Burns explained that the reason for timeframes is because they are investing millions
of dollars to get the project going, and they need to be given every opportunity to do so,
and that they act as fiduciaries.
Board Member Turkin did not want an extension to kill the project. He stated that he and
Board Member Hay agreed that the issue should be discussed at the budget hearings.
Vice Chair Cruz also agreed, but hoped it would be without the need for an extension and
pointed out that it would depend on the public need at the time.
Attorney Rossmell requested clarification and stated if Affiliated asks for the 150 spaces
from the CRA, and it comes back to the Board, will the Board have absolute authority to
approve or deny it.
Mr. Burns was fine with approval or denial at the full authority of the Board, depending on
the need at the time.
Attorney Rossmell further recapped the discussion as follows: the provision regarding 9.5
years to complete construction in the contract will remain unchanged; the CRA will pay
operation and maintenance on all 150 spaces and there will be no cap on the number of
spaces that Affiliated can use, to meet Code requirements; if Affiliated would like to dip
5
Meeting Minutes
Special CRA Board meeting
Boynton Beach, Florida June 7, 2022
into the CRA spaces, they have to appear before the Board, and the CRA can approve
or deny the request in their sole and absolute discretion, and for any spaces taken over
by Affiliated, they will also assume maintenance and operation of those spaces; the CRA
will retain the right to use those spaces for events in a form to be worked out; as to the
Section 9.6 of the Purchase and Development Agreement, it will be amended and she
will change the word Sellers to Purchasers to make it clear which type of leases can be
handed to the developer on closing; and in Section 3.1 of the TERFA, they will make clear
that Affiliated can increase the number of units or square footage without further CRA
approval, but would require CRA approval if they decreased the number of units or square
footage, and the agreement will not include a closing date extension that is available to
the CRA.
There was Board consensus on Attorney Rossmell's recap.
Vice Chair Cruz asked if they were discussing the maintenance cost cap or not.
Brief discussion followed, and an example was given that West Palm Beach and Delray
Beach pay $100 and $300 a month respectively. There was Board consensus that the
$50 per month will remain unchanged.
Chair Penserga opened public comments.
An unidentified man commented on the space that is supposed to be for a parking
structure next to City Hall, and suggested a property exchange.
Mr. Katz was online and was unable to speak.
Chair Penserga closed public comments.
Chair Penserga asked for a motion to approve the Purchase and Development
Agreement, the TERFA Agreement and Parking Lease agreements as presented, waiving
any inconsistencies with the public RFP/RFQ, and authorizing the Board Chair to execute
the agreement subject to final legal review and consistent with the direction given by the
Board tonight, as stated by legal counsel.
Motion
Vice Chair Cruz so moved. Board Member Kelley seconded the motion. The motion
passed unanimously.
10. Adjournment
6
Meeting Minutes
Special CRA Board meeting
Boynton Beach, Florida June 7, 2022
Motion
Vice Chair Cruz moved to adjourn the meeting. Board Member Hay seconded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6:04 p.m.
dj,-U&Wy�—dy14"',
Catherine Cherry
Minutes Specialist
7