Loading...
R22-134 1 RESOLUTION NO. R22-134 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, 4 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN A GRANT 5 APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 6 PROTECTION FOR A RESILIENT FLORIDA INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT FOR 7 THE COQUINA COVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WITH A 52% 8 CITY COST SHARE OF$1,634,213;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 9 10 11 WHEREAS, on May 12, 2021, Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law Senate Bill 1954, 12 now section 380.093, F.S. which established new Resilient Florida grant programs that are 13 available to counties, municipalities, water management districts, flood control districts and 14 regional resilience entities; and 15 WHEREAS, the Statewide Flooding and Sea Level Rise Resilience Plan provides state 16 and federal funding for infrastructure projects that address risks of flooding or sea level rise 17 identified in vulnerability assessments that meet the requirements of the statute; and 18 WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach is submitting an application for the Coquina 19 Cove Drainage Improvement project to be included in the Statewide Flooding and Sea Level 20 Rise Resilience Plan; and 21 WHEREAS,the requested grant funding for the project is $1,500,000 for construction, 22 with a 52% City cost share for a total estimated project cost of $3,134,213. 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 24 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: 25 Section 1. The foregoing "Whereas" clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as 26 being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this Resolution upon adoption 27 hereof. S:1CA\RESO\Agreements\Grants\FDEP Resilient Florida Grant(Coquina Cove Drainage}Reso.Docx 28 Section 2. The City Commission approves and authorizes the Mayor to sign a grant 29 application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for a Resilient Florida 30 Infrastructure Grant for the Coquina Cove Drainage Improvements project with a 52% City 31 cost share of$1,634,213,a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 32 "A". 33 Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon passage. 34 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of September, 2022. 35 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 36 37 YES NO 38 V 39 Mayor—Ty Penserga 40 41 Vice Mayor—Angela Cruz 42 t " 43 Commissioner—Woodrow L. Hay 44 45 Commissioner—Thomas Turkin 46 47 Commissioner—Aimee Kelley 48 49 VOTE 50 51 ATT . • 52 / 53 � � ' ilL— l /— 54 Maylee D� esus, Pt 8 %% Ty Pe ,.t"��— 55 City Cl- k � QoIVATf'••.•C `it , Mayor 56 f�:0 o: 57 �--: �RP(E ; ; APP' �` E AS FO' y. 58 (Corporate Sea `� \N�0 2O : % /� 59 1,� •.• - 60 FLO°_ Michael D. Cirullo,Jr. 61 City Attorney S:\CA\RESO\Agreements\Grants\FDEP Resilient Florida Grant(Coquina Cove Drainage)-Reso.Docx 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition • Close Window • Print This Page • Expand All I Collapse All RAN-00474 State Agency Florida Department of Environmental Protection State Program Resilient Florida Applicant Information Grant Funding Type Funding for Resilient Florida- Status Submitted Infrastructure Grants Applicant Account City of Boynton Beach Applicant Contact Applicant Authorized Ty Penserga Applicant Fiscal Corinne Elliot Signee Agent Regional Resilience Applicant Grant Rebecca Harvey Entity Account Manager Project Information RPG Project Type Project Title Coquina Cove Drainage Improvements Entity Category County, Municipality, or Authorized Project Location Special District Addressing Risks of Flooding or Sea Level Rise Identified in a Vulnerability Assessment Resilient Florida Grant Mitigate threats from flooding and sea Project Geo Location The Coquina Cove neighborhood is Program Types level rise; Coastal Flood Control; Narrative located in the City of Boynton Beach Domestic Wastewater Infrastructure; east of US 1, west of the Intracoastal Stormwater Infrastructure;Transportation Waterway, south of NE 15th Place, and and Evacuation; Utilities Infrastructure north of the Boynton Canal (SFWMD C- 16 Canal). The neighborhood is approximately 15.5 acres in size and consists of two roadways, Ocean Inlet Drive and Shore Drive, and 64 single- family residences. The project will be implemented in the City's right-of-way and easements granted to the City for outfalls. See Exhibit A-Project Location Map. List the City(ies)/ City of Boynton Beach State Lands Lease Town(s)Mllage(s) Agreement No. State Lands or State No Project Geo Location 26.540194444444445 Parks Utilized -80.05652777777777 Area Served Project Geo Location Metadata Sponsor City/County Percent of Population Total Population Total Grant Match $1,634,213.00 Amount Prior Vulnerability Total Grant Funding $1,500,000.00 Amount Requested Prior Vulnerability Prior Vulnerability Share Entities Project Critical Assets Funding for Regional Resilience https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 1/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474—Salesforce-Enterprise Edition General Information Project Need The City of Boynton Beach led the Coastal Resilience Partnership(CRP)of Southeast Palm Beach County to complete a comprehensive vulnerability assessment(CVA)meeting the required statutory elements of Section 380.093, F.S.,with support from three Resilient Florida (RF)Planning Grants (Agreement Nos. R1817, R1906,and 22RRE09).The CVA identified the most vulnerable areas in Boynton Beach as areas with aging infrastructure and where critical facilities are located near waterbodies; particularly areas with relatively low elevation. Coquina Cove is one of these areas, bordered by the Intracoastal Waterway and the Boynton Canal, with elevations ranging from 8-9 ft. (NAVD 88)at the west entrance of the neighborhood down to approximately 4 ft.where the roads end at the Intracoastal Waterway. Specifically, the CVA found that both roads in Coquina Cove, the majority of single-family residences, and critical stormwater, wastewater, and drinking water infrastructure are highly vulnerable and at risk to current storm surge and rainfall- induced flooding, both of which worsen in future sea level rise scenarios for 2040 and 2070.Although tidal flooding is not a current problem in the neighborhood,the CVA found 20%of the neighborhood's parcels and all of Shore Dr.to be vulnerable to this threat in 2070. Currently the neighborhood experiences road flooding from heavy rainfall events and storm surge.This drainage improvement project is needed to improve level of service to the neighborhood by protecting all structures from flooding in the 100-year/72-hour design storm event, and keeping roadways to 0.5 feet or less of flooding for the 10-year/72-hour event and 0.8 feet or less for the 25-year/72-hour event. The need for drainage improvements was identified in 2019 when the City's Public Works department evaluated the Coquina Cove neighborhood for a planned road resurfacing project.This resulted in coordination between PW and Utilities and broadening the scope to include rehabilitation of drainage, sanitary sewer,and drinking water infrastructure.The assessment found that the neighborhood lacked stormwater inlets resulting in insufficient drainage to the Intracoastal Waterway,and that existing drainage structures were undersized and in need of an upgrade. It also identified the needs to replace aging and undersized water mains, replace sanitary sewer laterals to the homes, add https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 2/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition lining to the sanitary sewer main to resolve leakage and inflation as wells as to extend its useful life,and address continually failing asphalt on top of the sanitary sewer pipe segment.The report concluded that the City should develop a complete utilities improvements project. Project Fit The Coquina Cove Drainage Improvements project entails necessary modifications and supplementations to Stormwater Infrastructure to improve drainage level of service.The project addresses Coastal Flood Control and aims to Mitigate Threats from Flooding and Sea Level Rise identified in the comprehensive vulnerability assessment. The project also addresses Transportation and Evacuation because it involves flood mitigation on two neighborhood roads which need to be safe to drive for residents to egress the community and access the evacuation route on N. Federal Hwy. The project includes replacement and upgrades to Domestic Wastewater Infrastructure and Utilities Infrastructure including the sanitary sewer system and replacement of a drinking water main. GI Critical Asset VAAP Yes GI Critical Asset VAAP The CVA assessed vulnerabilities and Explanation risks to tidal flooding, storm surge, and rainfall-induced flooding for current (2020)conditions, NOAA intermediate- low projection for 2040(4"above 2020), NOAA intermediate-high 2040/intermediate-low 2070(11"), and NOAA intermediate-high 2070 (33"). The assessment identified both roads (Shore Dr. and Ocean Inlet Dr.)and 82%of the 64 residential parcels in Coquina Cove neighborhood as highly vulnerable and at risk to 2020 and 2040 storm surge and 2020 rainfall flooding; and 98%of residences as highly vulnerable and at risk to 2070 storm surge and 2070 rainfall flooding. Tidal flooding was not found to be an immediate threat, but by 2070 80%of parcels were in inundation extent with 20% identified as medium to high vulnerability.The project will reduce these risks by upgrading the Coquina Cove drainage system (including piping, drainage structures, outfalls, grading and paving)to increase flood resilience. GI Flood Erosion Yes GI Flood Erosion The rainfall-induced flooding threat in the Reducing Reducing Explanation CVA is technically a measure of compound flooding (as defined in 62S- 8.002).The model combined rainfall depth over the 100-year, 24-hour storm event with sea level rise estimates (added to the existing conditions high- tide value)to estimate future water depths.The assessment identified the roads (Shore Dr. and Ocean Inlet Dr.) and 97% of the 64 residential parcels in Coquina Cove neighborhood as highly vulnerable and at risk to 2020 rainfall flooding;and 98%of residences as https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEOAR/p 3/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition highly vulnerable and at risk to 2070 storm surge and 2070 rainfall flooding. In an additional analysis for confidential water infrastructure,the CVA found the entirety of Coquina Cove would be inundated by the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall combined with 2020 storm surge. The project will reduce these risks by upgrading the Coquina Cove drainage system(including piping, drainage structures, outfalls, grading and paving) to increase flood resilience. GI Regionally No GI Regionally Significant Significant Explanation GI Percent CA 80%or more GI Percent CA "Medium to high vulnerability and risk" Vulnerable Vulnerable (V&R)was defined based on exposure, Explanation sensitivity,adaptive capacity, risk probability and risk consequence. Storm surge and tidal flooding were assessed for 2020, 2040, and 2070 sea-level rise scenarios outlined in paragraph 380.093(3)(d), F.S. Rainfall-induced flooding was assessed for 2020(100-yr and 500-yr), 2040 (100-yr, 5"SLR above 2020 baseline)and 2070 (100-yr, 33" SLR). Critical assets identified as V&R for rainfall-induced flooding and storm surge (2020, 2040, and 2070)include: Critical stormwater infrastructure: 100%- all 4 stormwater outfalls Drinking water distribution system: 100% -AC water main on Ocean Inlet Dr. Wastewater conveyance system: 97% - sanitary mains and sanitary laterals Transportation: 100%-Shore Dr. and Ocean Inlet Dr. potentially isolated; 2070 also includes portions of N. Federal Hwy. V&R for tidal flooding (2070): 50%of transportation assets (Shore Dr.); 20%of water infrastructure assets GI Existing Flood Yes, by incorporating new or enhanced GI Existing Flood Improved drainage system and Mitigation structure Mitigation Explanation upgrades to water and sanitary sewer GI Site Currently Has been flooded at least 3 times in the GI Site Currently Several times a year, normal and severe Flood last 5 years or is experiencing ongoing Flood Explanation rainfall events cause localized flooding. erosion Severe events cause major flooding (6- 10")on the east ends of both roads and the community entrance making the road impassable and disrupting community access and egress (Exhibit C-Flooding Photos).Additionally, the deterioration of the roadway poses a traffic hazard. Problems also arise with ground saturation from continuous rainfall events. Documentation is presented in attached Exhibit D-Alternatives Analysis Report (results pp. 5-6 and map p.8).Tables 2, 3 and 4 document that the existing drainage system fails to meet level of service in 5 of the 7 modeled subbasins for the 10-year/72-hour and 25-year/72- hour storm events; and in 4 subbasins for the 100-year/72-hour event.This https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 4/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition means that in these areas, roadways are currently not protected from 0.5 feet of flooding for the 10-year event and 0.8 feet for the 25-year event; and structures are not protected from flooding in the 100-year event. GI Current Flood Zone Flooding greater than 3 inches in last 3 GI Current Flood Zone years or has ever experienced Explanation unmitigated erosion GI Project Design Partially designed or site-specific GI Project Permitting All necessary permits have been Stage environmental or geotechnical reports Stage Explanation identified and will be obtained when the have been completed design is at a 90%. Currently,the design is at 60%. The current 24-inch pipe on Ocean Inlet Drive has a permanent drainage easement. The City has not yet secured the necessary easement for additional outfall on Shore Drive. GI Project Permitting Necessary permits and easements have GI Cost Share There is$1,400,000 in matching funds Stage been identified Explanation budgeted for construction in the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)fiscal year 2022-2023 budget(Exhibit E).The City has already spent$234,213 on preconstruction activities (Tasks 1-6 detailed in the Task table below)for a total match of$1,634,213 (52%). GI Cost Share Yes GI Habitat Enhancement Explanation GI Habitat No GI Critical Habitat Enhancement Explanation GI Critical Habitat No GI Project Cost Initial engineering tasks have been Effective Explanation completed, which included alternatives formulation and evaluation. The selected alternative was the most efficient way to resolve the neighborhood issues(see Exhibit D-Alternatives Analysis Report).The 60% Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost is approximately$3 million. After completion of design, staff will work with the engineering consultant to perform value engineering in order to implement the most cost-effective and technically sound project at the best price and schedule. GI Project Cost Yes GI Funding Secured There is$1,400,000 in matching funds Effective Project Explanation budgeted for construction in the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)fiscal year 2022-2023 budget(Exhibit E). The City has already spent$234,213 on preconstruction activities(Tasks 1-6 detailed in the Task table below)for a total match of$1,634,213 (52%). GI Funding Secured Yes (Cost share has been secured) GI Previous State For Project Involvement Explanatio GI Previous State None GI Will Exceed FL The project will exceed requirements of Involvement Bldng Code local floodplain management Explanation regulations. Florida Building Code flood- resistant requirements are for the structures(i.e., houses).The project will be implemented in the streets/rights-of- https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a1 95G00000X3kuEQAR/p 5/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition way and easements granted to the City for outfalls. GI Will Exceed Florida Yes GI Innovative Tech Building Code Reduce Cost Explanati GI Innovative Tech No GI Community Referencing the 2020 American Reduce Cost Financially Community Survey 5-Year Estimates for Disadvantaged E Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2020 inflation-adjusted dollars) (item numbers S1903 and B19013,data.census.gov), both the Census Tract and Census Block Group containing Coquina Cove have a lower median household income than the City and State medians. Median Household Income: State of Florida-$57,703 City of Boynton Beach-$56,850 Census Tract 57.02-$46,898 Census Tract 57.02, Block Group 4- $48,218 GI Community Yes GI Benefit Spring Financially Explanation Disadvantaged GI Benefit Spring No GI Protect Water Sources Explanation GI Protect Water No GI Facilities Waste Improvements to aging infrastructure in Sources Treatment Explanatio the sanitary sewer system, including replacement of sanitary sewer laterals to the homes, addition of lining to the sanitary sewer main to resolve leakage and inflation as wells as to extend its useful life,and manhole rehabilitation. GI Facilities Waste Yes GI Convert Septic To Treatment Sewer Explanation GI Convert Septic To No GI Green Stormwater Sewer Infrastrure Expl GI Green Stormwater No GI Applied Other Infrastructure Programs Explanation GI Applied Other No Programs GI Community 80,869 Population Project Work Plan Project Summary The Coquina Cove Drainage Project Description The City of Boynton Beach's CVA Improvements project will mitigate identified critical assets in the Coquina coastal flooding and provide an improved Cove neighborhood as highly vulnerable level of service to a neighborhood with and at risk to current storm surge and vulnerable critical assets identified in a rainfall-induced flooding,with vulnerability assessment.The project vulnerabilities worsening in sea level rise includes adding catch basins to connect scenarios for 2040 and 2070. Coquina to existing outfalls, upgrading a 4-inch Cove is a low-lying coastal area with outfall to 24-inch, complete standard aging infrastructure that currently paving and grading, replacement of an experiences road flooding from heavy existing Asbestos-Cement(AC)water rainfall events and storm surge.The City main, lining of sanitary mains, conducted site reconnaissance and replacement of sanitary laterals,and determined that the neighborhood has utility relocation to accommodate the an insufficient drainage network that drainage improvements. needs modifications or supplementations.The current system utilizes four(4)existing outfalls ranging https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 6/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474—Salesforce-Enterprise Edition in diameter between 4 inches and 24 inches. Drainage is directed to inlets adjacent to the outfalls, leaving vast areas underserved.The Coquina Cove Drainage Improvements project is designed to address existing drainage issues and result in an improved level of service to the neighborhood. The City's coordination between Public Works and Utilities began in 2019 to define the neighborhood needs and project scope. In 2020 the City contracted a comprehensive survey for the entire neighborhood, including topography,elevations, utilities, easements, edge of pavement,and landscaping. In May 2021, the City Contracted with AECOM for the design, permitting, public engagement and limited services during construction. AECOM provided 60%construction plans and a preliminary cost estimate in July 2022. Public meetings were held in July 2021 and August 2022. The project scope includes adding catch basins to connect to the 3 existing outfalls,grading,and replacement of the outfall at the east end of Shore Drive (currently 4")with a 24-inch pipe (see Exhibit B-Outfall Map). Currently,the City is working to attain a drainage easement to enable installation of that outfall.Additional project components address necessary improvements to aging infrastructure in the drinking water and sanitary sewer systems, including replacement of the existing AC water main on Ocean Inlet Drive, addition of fire protection, manhole rehabilitation, cured in-place pipe lining, sanitary laterals replacement, and associated utility relocation to accommodate the proposed drainage system. Project Need and Benefit Project Feasability Project Vulnerability Vulnerability Assessment include State Budget Budget Narrative Work Performed by Indirect Percent Signature Authorized Signers Ty Penserga Signature Certification Agreement https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 7/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition System Information Created By Rebecca Harvey, 8/31/2022 9:02 AM Preparer Type Applicant Last Modified By Rebecca Harvey, 9/1/2022 1:34 PM Preparer Account City of Boynton Beach Owner Rebecca Harvey Preparer Contact Rebecca Harvey EGR Application RAN-00474 Preparer User Rebecca Harvey Name Files Coquina Cove - Exhibit H -AECOM Phase 1 P.O. Coquina Cove -Exhibit G -AECOM Phase 1 Proposal Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:24 AM Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:24 AM Created By Rebecca Harvey Created By Rebecca Harvey Coquina Cove - Exhibit F -Topgraphic Survey Coquina Cove -Exhibit E - Utilities CIP Budget Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:24 AM Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:24 AM Created By Rebecca Harvey Created By Rebecca Harvey Coquina Cove - Exhibit D -Alternatives Analysis Report Coquina Cove - Exhibit C - Flooding Photos Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:24 AM Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:24 AM Created By Rebecca Harvey Created By Rebecca Harvey Coquina Cove -Exhibit B -Outfall Map Coquina Cove - Exhibit A -Project Location Map Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:23 AM Last Modified 9/1/2022 10:23 AM Created By Rebecca Harvey Created By Rebecca Harvey EGR Application Tasks RTN-02327 Task Number 1 Task Description Topographic Survey for the entire Coquina Cove neighborhood, including topo, elevations, utilities, easements, edge of payment, landscape. Total Task Amount Requested $0.00 RTN-02329 Task Number 2 Geotechnical work to include three field permeability tests to determine seasonal high Task Description groundwater elevation and soil profile; three borings within the roadway to determine the existing road section and two 10-foot auger borings to determine underlying soil conditions. Total Task Amount Requested $0.00 RTN-02331 Task Number 3 Alternatives Analysis; Conceptual Design Plans based on analysis recommendations; Task Description conceptual cost estimate; 60% Plans and Cost Estimate; 90%Contract Documents (plans, technical specifications, and cost estimates); Tabulation of Value Engineering Cost Savings; Permit application packages; 100%Contract documents. Total Task Amount Requested $0.00 RTN-02337 Task Number 6 Contract administration, coordination of project staff, monitoring of progress and project costs, Task Description progress reporting, quality management system, Project Kick-Off and Design Progress Meetings, review of contractor submittals and proposed change/field orders, substantial completion inspection, and review of record drawings. Total Task Amount Requested $0.00 https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 8/9 9/6/22, 10:48 AM RAN-00474-Salesforce-Enterprise Edition RTN-02334 Task Number 5 Public Involvement Plan, neighborhood outreach materials, public informational meetings, Task Description neighborhood easement canvassing, construction notifications, resident communications phone line, social media, and webpage. Total Task Amount Requested $0.00 RTN-02336 Task Number 7 Adding catch basins to connect to existing outfalls, upgrading a 4-inch outfall to 24-inch, Task Description complete standard paving and grading, replacement of an existing Asbestos-Cement(AC) water main, lining of sanitary mains, replacement of sanitary laterals, and utility relocation to accommodate the drainage improvements. Total Task Amount Requested $1,500,000.00 RTN-02933 Task Number 4 Attend pre-bid meeting, respond to questions from prospective bidders, review proposed Task Description addenda, assist in review and evaluation of bids, provide a written recommendation,and provide up to four(4)sets of Conformed Documents for the Contractor.All other document copies will be provided electronically. Total Task Amount Requested $0.00 Copyright©2000-2022 salesforce.com, inc.All rights reserved. https://fdep.my.salesforce.com/a195G00000X3kuEQAR/p 9/9 �". 3 ���M l/ �' R•� t.'} i ; III ' '„,....- ___________ „ .,;?j•,.0!,,)', ',? 9 02 } r m r , ‘ „ .:__r II*. .. .', A.- - r,' ' 0. . u, ' .411 ; — motif `''40-__--_-_-__- r>_ .4 ter, — 1 1 .11111 „ ..•••• - • _ -N•Federal .'' , .a111111E4r. pe" eio -..„. ---.......... a*�► 1000 ' j'/Eire' r, . // en r f• 4040 •, _ _ja 1010, ,R s°1. — s O D • _- `l',, '`. , 102_011 . c ' 44030* :r. ., - Z -1 � / L Yd 4020 P N a- 1030 .t i s 'F• 1 }` 'yam• 4 r . ;L,,:., . o Mi 401.0 r , osow 1040 ` • " s p W z,. 'I jj It _\ ,ov.l. , NA o0, Ol kilif `Jo ` , s. .(1'k, '''92. o • k . - -. t " A � �= 411110 S � �y " ' ., Z£9 ` - ,::♦ cZ9� 6' \..\\ 633 -_; Y _ . _,610 8£9 9£9 [- 634 639 � k - ,. j .� 625 Fs. 114 i 6.44 649 . 640 645`: " '.4:':' -i . - , _. �. _• re�a .'635. 1 011 ti 01 650 �' i' FK, 647 • til hilhilit! 651 - 63• �: ' ot �' �. ! _ ;- .r6111*645- ' s . 640 I Z « 7 6 s f ,y 705.E,...-. 1 i ; (' ` 706 '1' • 705 '', ' J AS 1� ',\ ` '� `'"'r4 650 �'� ' 1 712 �� 711 el 712 711 �r r ' ' ' ._ _.. r 665 III 660 '.rc,i31 amia 718: 7x17/ 1 713 717 1Ilia 675 H y'° i OL9 ' i --,,a724 725 724 0o 725 �, , 6 0 � �I . le 730' '�, 729 I II 7:10 `° 729= ,y • . ./41.04es1 es,- ,,; {..^ .,:...,:.--..4-„---.-,:•,•-. ,. o 1` :.�'9440;,,9 ,40;;;,_,.,9#0.. ; 4R. / lippy, --•____:.....„::.- .,,,...,,.-„,, :,..,._ _ ________ mit __ ie--,-, --v _ ..s. , :„..., •..)„..,,,,,, ,P 0,- - u, ------__L__::.__..- 44-_-___ e J ,„,_ ____...„.______. L.._:, _. 4 • ;'• 't114 -4*"4"- P" .. .. . ';.... --'''-',.--' It ,..1::.,41!.'"47, -----.--------=-- .':------7.:-------":7- .." �'�"� — -N•Federal•Hwy --- / . . f . .0. 1,000 �. ;:41-7;07- .. ' .� �`' ` • 10,10 � ,� ,,,, _ o '4030,:; 3i > Cir:. r1.'"'' Ticiti'(51' . ._1020, �� ., ;�, ;�,• ..ki:.... 1030 s .� ,�ri4,020r , y �:,.777.,41,4_, ' a _, MP:,,. 40,1:A�: - -�.1 �: 104'0 :,o .. f i' jy20 . „x. 0 Y SSS :> f. +,�y i1- _201.__ o r..,"4o•7 . i i �:.t �'- '-`' 202QI rA, �Q� FQ ` ,.. Q0g 2030 ',o� :O'Q�Q Q Y j ' ' rv 1 040 �� ^ . •. .'. . i�. le er s -14.-F Z£9 -.4 :/ c g 6.0 ' 633 I .': �, ir ..�.... PP11. 111111111101k. _ 615 ,gtaiL. *. :, ,1 i 5 i, :i.i4„4'!...,:c'91...':.'. ).L �:•' ?*,� � ^nom. -6108£9I ' 634 w 639 i ,. il_...i, �.r i - . . . . .,. ii- _ _ 625' (1.- 44 f( 6411 ' ,,„ 640 645 : 620 I�� '. r :r n . ' •� `'635 e 7. 630 650 j �T� r� 647 N646 651 �YS4 r e {{wall T����r -4 —.rte•.7 L .;,..,1 r.�.�-14(„ _ 645 - r 746 . PA ' 705 M t ' 706 ` X705 640 i' a :p.,....,, .,- . ' a � >aa 2.1 tips S �.._ 655 ` _712 . • i . 71'1 _ ..... - -4rnr _ • !.. . 712 712 ' I. :711 650 : .. . . .. . -.:. • • _ a.s cc .lc..Ll-oiMl.1E•t 7,-.t.,.;,“':r-vt!1•.:..... ' 718 7._,_. .,p,r_s.,_:..,.-..:..z_.,t....•...4s:.•,",..1.., .- .r : ;; 7?: . , H — t,; 725' 724 O 725• OL9 -,, .. ,-„, 4 , .. . . tw-- v__•, , . ...•.., , ,....‘ . . - 3-4,,,, r w. t- '.t' 'f`''.- r',1730 v 729 t, q .,Y''"'. 730 P F'.f� 729 ''''''44'.. � Resilient Florida Implementation Grant Application Applicant: City of Boynton Beach Project Title: Coquina Cove Drainage Improvements Exhibit C—Flooding Photos Shore Drive—East (November 24, 2021) M .. . liii k AIL, s : - ;fir. i'lot Ai r `` t' 41• • 1 _ !'T ink- r ,.,, K'' 1 r A. : ,4,,-,,,,'.:'-,:e- r,—!`' ti Z .- t-s=ue YS,; Coquina Cove- Exhibit C- pg. 1 Shore Drive—West(November 24, 2021) ,, ___------- . , .., .. . , . ,. . ..,. i . ,. %,fr., • w., .. Vit,,, I iY ' ' ilii � _ . I '�i lip /r" , 1 t. ,,rk Y • .-x �-: ` 'f , ;red s , '",,f'-:',,,. •s" Ti. - - ,. - 57X „p t..,•ff 9,.w1:,;r3'7R''i f.. '}r ,t ---i �_ �' -.-;.:1‘.,. iiiiiiii.iiiiiiiiiiii ,, • Ocean Inlet Drive—Ea_st(November 24, 2021) • s i A. I. ' ANIiiii,ill 11 _ _‘ .. ,, , 4,-' — _ - • ; .-\ 000 w1 a f ! ':'''..t .-i. ,. mo i.4 R./t �h .-:A '�', ! ,� V ! Cr k r `,, * # • f - --1 '- ., ;, l.-: r. A. ' :?fes 7Au rate. . ,y O� ) • ',I,',4";-,fu � y atvy CS .`7 r?i ? rs $tom ! Coquina Cove - Exhibit C-pg. 2 AECOM Imagine it. AECOM Delivered. 2090 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd,Suite 600 West Palm Beach,FL 33409 aecom.com Project name: City of Boynton Beach—Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Project ref: To: 60654448 Ms.Angela Prymas, PE From: City of Boynton Beach Amy Eason,PE 124 E.Woolbright Road Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Date: June 22,2021 CC: Technical Memo Subject: Alternatives Analysis Evaluation Report Introduction The City of Boynton Beach has identified the Coquina Cove neighborhood as having an insufficient drainage network that needs modifications or supplementations. The current system utilizes four (4) existing outfalls ranging in diameter between 4-inches to 24-inches. Drainage is directed to inlets adjacent to the outfalls, leaving vast areas under served. To provide the best solution, AECOM conducted a 1D hydrologic analysis of the project area along with three (3)alternatives.Alternative 1 utilized the existing outfalls and provided an interconnected drainage network to better convey stormwater to the existing outfalls.Alternative 2 added more outfalls while still utilizing an interconnected drainage network. Alternative 3 utilized the existing outfalls with the addition of interconnecting the system with exfiltration trenches. Methodology To conduct the analysis, a range of software was utilized such as AutoCAD, ArcGIS, and ICPR 4. A highlight of key model building blocks has been compiled and is described below: Subbasins Subbasins were developed utilizing the City-provided AutoCAD survey to identify high spots and locations that are underserved. Subbasins were created with alternatives and the proposed layouts in mind. This was to reduce the need to recut subbasins and allow for one set to be used to have an "apples to apples" comparison when analyzing the results. In addition, the subbasin boundaries were adjusted to be on top of the seawalls. Appendix A shows the location of each subbasin and Table 1 summarizes the area of each subbasin. DRAFT 1/7 Technical Memo DRAFT City of Boynton Beach—Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Table 1 Subbasin Areas Name Area (acres) CC_1 2.27 CC_2 2.44 CC_3 2.06 CC_4 2.29 CC_5 1.62 CC_6 2.20 CC_7 2.94 It was assumed that the curve number for each subbasin would be 95 based oon the lots being highly developed with minimal pervious areas. Stage Area Lidar information was utilized to generate stage area data within ICPR 4. The Lidar was processed using the Palm Beach County 2017 Lidar point cloud data set with vertical accuracy of ±0.59 feet. The data set was modified to correct for low point density along the water's edge. A hard boundary was set to represent the sea wall at 4 feet NAVD. A bare earth float raster was created that represents the terrain without vegetation or structures. In a spot test with the City-provided survey in non-vegetated terrain, the average accuracy was ±0.16 feet. Boundary Stage Data from NOAAs tidal monitoring stations were used to best represent the tailwater conditions. The closest monitoring station to the project site was located at the Lake Worth Beach Pier approximately 5 miles away. The sea level used in the model to represent the tailwater was the Mean High Water (MHW) elevation, which had a reported value of 0.37 feet NAVD88. Figure 1 shows the monitoring station's recorded values. AECOM DRAFT Technical Memo DRAFT City of Boynton Beach—Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Datums for 8722670, Lake Worth Pier, Atlantic Ocean, FL Ali figures in feet re;ative to NAVD88 1- VMIW 0.sS ibk.'. . III 0.87. DFS 0.19 0MAV088:0 MSI �0.9TTL-0.98 KR:-0.99 MN:2.72 p el GT:3.06 FFp MIK,.-2.35 MLLW:-2.51 DLQ:0.1 5 _; =1 l 3 \\Datums 1 *MA NOS CO-OPS Figure 1 NOAA Tidal Conditions Existing conveyance and outfalls Much of the existing stormwater is conveyed by overland flow to the outfalls. The City-provided AutoCAD Survey was utilized to create the overland weirs and set the outfall inverts. The overland flow weirs only considered the 50 foot road right-of-way. It was assumed the residents are responsible to convey all runoff to the front of their lots and into the City's right-of-way for discharge. It was assumed the outfalls did not have any backflow prevention devices. Swales Swales were not considered within the modeling to be more conservative and to best illustrate the effects of each solution. Geotechnical/Groundwater At the time of writing this report the geotechnical subconsultant (Terracon) had not completed their analysis of the project site. Therefore, some assumptions where made to expedite the modeling analysis. The groundwater was estimated based off the Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) elevation of 1 0.55 feet NAVD88 (found in Figure 1) with 1 foot added to represent the freshwater lens. The result is an estimated groundwater elevation of 1.55 feet NAVD88. Storm Events AECOM has modeled the 10-year 3-day, 25-year 3-day, and 100-year 3-day storm events. Each simulation utilized the SFWMD 72 hour rainfall distribution curve. Rainfall amounts are derived from SFWMD ERP Handbook Volume II rainfall isohyetal maps. The rainfall amounts are 11.5 inches for the 10-year 3-day, 14.5 inches for the 25-year 3-day, and 18 inches for the 100-year 3-day. AECOM DRAFT 3/7 Technical Memo DRAFT City of Boynton Beach—Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Warning Stages The level of service/warning stage has been set so that the 10-year 3-day storm is allowed 0.5 feet of water above the minimum crown of road, the 25-year 3-day storm is allowed 0.8 feet of water above the minimum crown of road, and the 100-year 3-day storm is set to the lowest finished floor elevation per subbasin. Modeling Alternatives Alternative 1 —Alt 1 consists of interconnecting the existing outfalls.A 24-inch diameter RCP pipe was found to be most suitable as it did not exceed the existing discharge capacity and provided the ability to avoid nearby existing infrastructure. It is recommended in this alternative to replace the existing catch basins and structure to maximize the effectiveness of each outfall. The conceptual layout can be found in Appendix B. Alternative 2 —Alt 2 provided a similar interconnected system as Alt 1 with a 24-inch diameter RCP pipe, but also added three (3) additional outfalls. Each new outfall was sized to best meet the discharge requirements of the study area. From the analysis, all three (3) proposed outfalls are sized to be 24- inches. The minimum easement size the City will need to secure to fit the proposed outfalls is 10 feet. The conceptual layout can be found in Appendix C. Based on the meeting held May 27th, 2021 with the City, that water quality should not be an issue with the permitting agencies. An amendment to this report may be needed after the pre-application meeting with the permitting agencies. Alternative 3 — Alt 3 interconnected the existing outfalls utilizing 24-inch diameter RCP pipe with sections of exfiltration trench. The dimensions of the exfiltration trench are 6 feet wide by 6 feet tall, with a 24-inch diameter perforated pipe. In order to satisfy the City's requirement to reduce impacts to residential landscaping, the exfiltration trench was designed to be within the roadway and utilize the City's standard detail for exfiltration trenches. The proximity of the groundwater in relation to the surface will impact the effectiveness of the proposed exfiltration trench by reducing the available unsaturated layer. The reduction in the unsaturated layer will leave parts of the trench fully saturated, further reducing the cost effectiveness. Alternative 3 built out the maximum length of exfiltration trench available to compensate for the reduced unsaturated layer. The conceptual layout can be found in Appendix D. AECOM DRAFT 4/7 Technical Memo DRAFT City of Boynton Beach-Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Analysis Tables 2, 3, and 4 summarize the model results for the 10, 25, and 100-year storm events. The results in red represent stage elevations above the set warning stage, indicating a failure to meet level of service. Alternative 2 is the only proposed solution that did not fail to meet the level of service. Table 2 10-Year 3-Day Model Results 10-Year 3-Day Basin Warning Stage Existing Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) CC_1 4.85 4.98 5.1 1.71 4.80 CC_2 4.89 4.97 5.1 2.29 4.80 I CC_3 5.25 4.98 5.1 2.64 4.81 CC_4 7.03 6.16 5.39 2.46 5.13 CC_5 5.01 5.48 5.28 3.18 5.11 CC_6 4.72 5.48 5.28 3.19 5.12 CC_7 4.33 5.48 5.28 2.32 5.12 Table 3 25-Year 3-Day Model Results 25-Year 3-Day Basin Warning Stage Existing Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) CC_1 5.15 5.21 5.32 2.23 5.11 CC_2 5.19 5.21 5.32 3.11 5.11 CC_3 5.55 5.21 5.32 3.65 5.11 CC_4 7.33 6.20 5.73 3.36 5.48 CC_5 5.31 5.68 5.45 4.21 5.32 CC_6 5.02 5.68 5.45 4.21 5.32 CC_7 4.63 5.68 5.45 3.15 5.32 AECOM DRAFT 5/7 Technical Memo DRAFT City of Boynton Beach-Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Table 4 100-Year 3-Day Model Results 100-Year 3-Day Basin Warning Stage Existing Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) (ft NAVD) CC_1 5.66 5.41 5.51 2.93 5.35 CC_2 5.34 5.41 5.51 4.02 5.35 CC_3 5.85 5.41 5.51 4.58 5.35 CC_4 7.05 6.24 5.98 4.05 5.87 CC_5 5.00 5.9 5.63 4.55 5.51 CC_6 4.99 5.9 5.63 4.55 5.51 CC_7 5.55 5.9 5.63 4.43 5.51 Furthermore, a closer analysis of the minimum crown of road with the model results was conducted. The analysis illustrated that only Alternative 2 was able to produce results that did not exceed the minimum crown for some of the storm events.Alternative 2 was able to stay below the minimum crown of road for the 10-year and 25-year storm events. Cost AECOM has performed an engineering preliminary cost analysis for each alternative. Table 5 summaries the total cost. Appendix E has the total cost breakdown. Please note that the cost estimates do not include sanitary sewer or potable water work. Table 5 Summary of Preliminary Cost Estimates Alternative Cost Alt 1 $953,700 Alt 2 $3,240,700 Alt 3 $2,153,200 The preliminary cost estimates indicate that the cheapest option would be to implement Alternative 1, however, when weighed with the results, the improvements do not meet the City's level of service. Alternative 2 is the most expensive solution and the only solution that meets the level of service set forth by the City. AECOM DRAFT 6/7 Technical Memo DRAFT City of Boynton Beach—Coquina Cove Drainage Improvement Project Recommendations Based on the model results and cost estimates Alternative 2 provides the best cost benefit to improve drainage within the Coquina Cove neighborhood. Alternative 2 is the only model that consistently provides improvement for each simulated storm event and has the greatest impact. It is recommended that the City look to implement the Alternative 2 design approach and look to add swales where applicable to provide additional storage and water quality. AECOM DRAFT 7/7 1,;,.....4) 1":.:..-- _ . — I• pitipr ______ ii _ Y � ` q... :s% )PJ` �( 3 10 •C.- ' +. r ' .' ,.. _40 _ • • ' -_ -_----4 t ..,1/4- ‘••;.iz Asa cide.inykr,, .rte Ate, 4w N. - - - -tom ��arw �� �I ,ii if G � c��C `# +' a •` l �:. ' I i *, CS,,,,,i!..,,:,...4010,,...1.-..... F 4.116, 1011111 \IT 4' ''*'''''4 II** ''.' - , ir , • p, 11111111111i - .. • % _ A .; 14.4k I, v....0 . 1141 1 —. ,, w Wit.; ' i ::' ' 1,41 • GC�,�G,� r` le o- , , . ,oilis:NJNJ ; ;r1 1a Tom ueap0 X11 . •.r - Y•a'� ?. ,: • :'arid'_ i., : 9 ,l' t ' "IP � ti• ,�, a ,. .. �L-•.., .. �" - i.: .— 7 r �`+s „S .. .. , ;;....,,,...s, . • iIt NjY ..� 1` imil • 1 L. c ' sx .is }. '' .r:'!' 1 3, �w"a•s w., . . _. . . it 4 4 . • ?. - . ill'. A : .� f Fr` + q :,:it.'fir` !�k 1r 1L2 L c1 F l� •aAY�`7f7 1 Id LBSL 3N . . -. `: / • .moi y\ c,R? . AL i ..zi. ,t< J mom ' / / .10 t 1 .-1/,:i. u�Z • 1{ .1 h. , - :]; 4'. is, i ' ir. r . N1A �4 14‘,'5r o. . ------ * . 1 , ..pz ' - ;'..,-,:-.:, .-,-• : fr ,:.,.. . .,• ....„ , •-_,..0,,,,,,, „.;,„,,...„.• - - •••• .tir,„;;.,..•-...',,k.-fic,'-'-.77- i i.xis- i '.. •__ .1 • r �' l` - 1 - 111 ., ..., 17 -.. ,-• ..% w '' - ,r-+ 4ileri. TM, ._._. • ,� 'is") w�. 4' d �v►aid:.- . 1.'.�.Kifi 1 • ;`t . -7...141‘.7.;:."-''''."?T''' .`ti. 'n9•;. „'may '.r 1.'77.. ♦to V � •� - • ^.- ,, `.t �x ♦� :i' ;, �, �. ... .re ...t„,.. .. i.,.,,y :.., .•. \ , -' 1 v7 tl,� .% s, Ilir;y.-` � a 1 ,,,,,.,, _ .:. .. _. ..pz , _ _ , ,...., ,,, . ,.., . T • .. ..t.1 .' ., . ierli ''• ?•'',-.•''....••-•-6' .1..: - III ... , ......,... , ., I 1 I �. ir 4. Vii. • W tit, 41; ' '•.+♦ Y; O4 =.i. VA x. �.� ie • 40..L.',K- -1 • •„'-,`,, 1,7 . . : . ..,..,• ... 4. ti.. 1 tim-,- , sE, ; . ,....\ TI, ,r Aii;iiit,.. ., _ . , „� �7 r.c' z „ZL T° ''' -- t a. __ - _ •P }.gid ,... {� ` ._ -M1 '..1,• •••••••'c' 'r � �/{ '1 • _' a• , . • , ,. ., ,.,,. . .. ..„... -.. .,. l ,, , , A • , •..,... j„„. .,. , , .:., „,....... • ... , , , .. ,_ .,,.. .„ , - ,. ... ... ,,,... , , .,. , , . . . . . ... t v. . . . . ♦t. {� C. i .,.,. ,\ . ,.I I __... .3�.'�. .. „r �C �1. 4 1.'.IAC`,„,.,, , --,- - - Y -,:.. - - • „4,4_, it 4. t:,•.1..,.:ii.; ,, 4 ,., ' , ,..mom t .. . ... ,,..... 2.. .....4., , , ,,lid„. �, „ ,__ 2,..,:l I s: +� yri �33rollr w OP.' — y, i �r,n. y} lariA,q;IA,: .4ppg :. .,.:_.ka., :. ,&•..--,.i.,,*-42,;•,,, "'A, �-0' L,_ oma. �.. ;i•"'.t"�io ',• '4. pi s*P' y. ,�.+,N, w •r- .@ �' }l '4 • \ •�, fit, "fir., , ',.::,..4.....:-. in .• : . '‘.. i * ' 11 ' • 175. ., .fiy tt. . .. ,4,4, ... .,... s.i , .1, ,,, lil.k., % Nossorr ,.,. ; 5 .I. It / 6%., '� .' 4...v. 1 % ..\ -.I; ipil .,,:ir ...144a. - . „tiZ - 1 ; 1.•,. 't., i "-_ .- ' , • , 4. 4 J .-44 `"... i , ct,:, . . • . r Z ♦ w1 �i 1I` 111114„, , lisiwill041. , Irl 'Va. .-i Oldj.,.... i I. ,*14 4604., 1,:ihilr .,•;.0401111k., . • i , ... 4 I , .... __ ,,,, , . ...• .......„., . .. ... . . .. , • . ” , ,., .. . , . , .., . . ...,. .. , ... . .. • . • .. _ , .‘, , , • '"a. ". �`9 .i` pyo 1 r cv. f.. v ; /,} h1 ' 1 ' / 4Y+ --. - r, vZr ,. - «',A�� >S �t y � l f' �. t7 -•.• .. Z .,Y, 4" •'►1. ',- `\I c Y,P,Yf, ., f 4 J rA � li _ - P r4 �. V� !� e r -- i4. t` A Ili • M ray., • . r y"' fin_ f q f , Pr rwi�7 , `L.te�1r,+'- ,\ - , •~ •. ppb ., rY . ` dti \ � % v `yam 14, i. r' - to �/ a ' ' , 1\k, t ahA I `'` .} \ .•1 a.r it 40 .:. — f ,i_.,._- - '' 4 ; ,1 • `. 11 j t ,,,. „ ... ,,. • . yhied: `" , - ;y� 4' wl ',Mr.- Mr. r' `1^1„4., '4.!n7,.,µ '~ -`N lY. fr.- *. �. �_ ,:.- fn 1i T P P 3_ f +w._ f - �\ �`�'+i "r }( 6 l c' r , ' ,,,.• � SR•._ h.( its _ .\ ..'s' �1`•. , '' -iiiii-III , i''' 4 + f 7: V '.. �� e .� fes! i !1+ - it Yt ��'" ;:: C� ^* _ i�� ik IFS cai . i "'. 4..... - 4t L d / � lr r R • �� City of Boynton Beach Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Alternative 1 Total Cost Rounded to o •escri. -$0 pla_ 1 Reinforced Concrete Pipe 24" LF 2,440.15 $ 85.00 $ 207,413 $ 207,400 2 Outfall Barnacle Removal _ LF 466.67 $ 45.00 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 3 Concrete Manhole Each 4.00 $ 4,333.00 $ 17,332 $ 17,300 4 FDOT Type E Ditch Bottom Inlet Each 18.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 86,400 $ 86,400 5 Inlet Filters Each 18.00 $ 300.00 $ 5,400 $ 5,400 6 Tideflex Valves(outfalls) Each 4.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 7 Concrete Pavement Removal SY 6,704.49 $ 14.00 $ 93,863 $ 93,900 8 1.5"Type SP-9.5 Asphalt SY 6,704.49 $ 10.00 $ 67,045 $ 67,000 9 Base Rock SY 6,704.49 $ 7.00 $ 46,931 $ 46,900 10 12"Compacted Subgrade SY 6,704.49 $ 2.50 $ 16,761 $ 16,800 11 Concrete Curb&Gutter LF 6,034.04 $ 20.42 $ 123,215 $ 123,200 12 Inlet Protection Each 18.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 13 Silt Fence LF 400.00 $ 2.00 $ 800 $ 800 14 Floating Turbidity Barrier LF 160.00 $ 10.00 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 15 Sodding SY 400.00 $ 2.52 $ 1,008 $ 1,000 Subtotal $ 722,500 16 Construction Contingency(20%) $ 0.20 144,500 144,500 17 Mobilization(6%) $ 0.06 43,350 43,400 18 Maintenance of Traffic(5%) _ $ 0.05 36,125 36,100 19 Material Testing(1%) $ 0.01 7,225 7,200 Subtotal $ 231,200 NOTE:This is not a complete cost estimate for the entire project. This is a cost estimate of the stormwater infrastructure only for comparison reasons between alternatives. Total $ 953,700 City of Boynton Beach Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Alternative 2 Ir . . _ ,. . . ,. Tota I. Rounded to -scrip '. ! ,..m qu. .r ,, -, al Cost A0 ! ,-_ce 1 Reinforced Concrete Pipe 24" LF 2,440.15 $ 85.00 $ 207,413 $ 207,400 2 Jack and Bore _ LF 773.00 _ $ 500.00 $ 386,500 $ 386,500 3 Seawall Repairs Each 3.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 1,320,000 $ 1,320,000 4 Outfall Barnacle Removal LF 466.67 $ 45.00 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 5 Concrete Manhole Each 4.00 $ 4,333.00 $ 17,332 $ 17,300 6 FDOT Type E Ditch Bottom Inlet Each 18.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 86,400 $ 86,400 7 Inlet Filters Each 18.00 $ 300.00 $ 5,400 $ 5,400 8 Tideflex Valves(outfalls) Each 7.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 9 Concrete Pavement Removal SY 6,704.49 $ 14.00 $ 93,863 $ 93,900 10 1.5"Type SP-9.5 Asphalt SY 6,704.49 $ 10.00 $ 67,045 $ 67,000 11 Base Rock SY 6,704.49 $ 7.00 $ 46,931 $ 46,900 12 12"Compacted Subgrade SY 6,704.49 $ 2.50 $ 16,761 $ 16,800 13 Concrete Curb&Gutter LF 6,034.04 $ 20.42 $ 123,215 $ 123,200 14 Inlet Protection Each 18.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 15 Silt Fence LF 400.00 $ 2.00 $ 800 $ 800 16 Floating Turbidity Barrier LF 280.00 $ 10.00 $ 2,800 $ 2,800 17 Sodding SY 700.00 $ 2.52 $ 1,764 $ 1,800 Subtotal $ 2,455,000 18 _Construction Contingency(20%) $ 0.20 491,000 491,000 19 Mobilization(6%) $ 0.06 147,300 147,300 20 Maintenance of Traffic(5%) $ 0.05 122,750 122,800 21 Material Testing(1%) $ 0.01 24,550 24,600 Subtotal $ 785,700 NOTE:This is not a complete cost estimate for the entire project. This is a cost estimate of the stormwater infrastructure only for comparison reasons between alternatives. Due to the inceased quantity ofoutfalls,water Total $ 3,240,700 City of Boynton Beach Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Alternative 3 _.. ._ Total Cost .. • 'ounded to It;, No. Item Des - -- - Units Quantity Unit Cost Total Co . 100 plac- - - 1 Reinforced Concrete Pipe 24" LF 648.00 $ 85.00 $ 55,080 $ 55,100 2 24"French Drain LF 2,080.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,040,000 $ 1,040,000 3 Cleanouts Each 15.60 $ 1,250.00 $ 19,500 $ 19,500 4 Outfall Barnacle Removal LF 466.67 $ 45.00 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 5 Concrete Manhole Each 4.00 $ 4,333.00 $ 17,332 $ 17,300 6 FDOT Type E Ditch Bottom Inlet Each 18.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 86,400 $ 86,400 7 Inlet Filters Each 18.00 $ 300.00 $ 5,400 $ 5,400 8 Tideflex Valves(outfalls) Each 4.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 32,000 $ 32,000 9 Concrete Pavement Removal SY 6,704.49 $ 14.00 $ 93,863 $ 93,900 10 1.5"Type SP-9.5 Asphalt SY 6,704.49 $ 10.00 $ 67,045 $ 67,000 11 Base Rock SY 6,704.49 $ 7.00 $ 46,931 $ 46,900 12 12"Compacted Subgrade SY 6,704.49 $ 2.50 $ 16,761 $ 16,800 13 Concrete Curb&Gutter LF 6,034.04 $ 20.42 $ 123,215 $ 123,200 14 Inlet Protection Each 18.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 15 Silt Fence LF 400.00 $ 2.00 $ 800 $ 800 16 Floating Turbidity Barrier LF 160.00 $ 10.00 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 17 Sodding SY 1,000.00 $ 2.52 $ 2,520 $ 2,500 Subtotal $ 1,631,200 18 Construction Contingency(20%) _ $ 0.20 326,240 326,200 19 Mobilization(6%) $ 0.06 97,872 97,900 20 Maintenance of Traffic(5%) $ 0.05 81,560 81,600 21 Material Testing(1%) $ 0.01 16,312 16,300 Subtotal $ 522,000 NOTE:This is not a complete cost estimate for the entire project. This is a cost estimate of the stormwater infrastructure only for comparison reasons between alternatives. Total $ 2,153,200 Resilient Florida Implementation Grant Application Applicant: City of Boynton Beach Project Title: Coquina Cove Drainage Improvements Exhibit E-Utilities Capital Improvement Plan Budget Excerpt 6 Propo:ed Account CDP Project Name 2022/2023 202312024 202412025 202512026 202612027 5 Year CIP Ftp., Deco Etta C�-Project- PROJECT TOTAL 7 1[ As Proposed Plan Plan Plan Plan s Neighborhood Utility Imermem Neighborhood Utility Improvements s 403 5000 538 65.1 UC1802 Dimick&Potter Utility Stormwater $ - io 403 5000 533 65 UC1802 Dimick&Potter Utility Water Improvements $ tt Bernick&Potter subtotal - ! - 12 13 403 5000 538 65.1 UC2102 Coquina Cove Stormwater Improvements 600,000 $ 600,000 lit 403 5000 UC2102 Cogyirta Cove Wastewater Improvements 600,000 $ 600,000 is 403 5000 533 65- UC2102 Coquina Cove Water Improvements 200.000 $ 200,000 16 Coquina Cove subtotal 1,400,000 $ t400,000 17 403 5000 533 65 UC2103 Industrial Way(Water) is 403 5000 533 65 UC2103 Industrial Way(Sewer) yi 20 403 5000 533 65 UC2103 Industrial Way(Stormwater) z1 403 5000 533 65 UC2103 Central Seacrest Corridor(Phase 3) 22 403 5000 533 65 UC2201 Central Seacrest Corridor(Phase 3)-Water 250,000 6,000,000 $ 6,250,000 23 403 5000 535 65 UC2103 Central Seacrest Corridor(Phase 3)-Sewer ;,_ 7 1,000,000 $ 1,750,000 �ge 24 Central Seacrest Corridor leh3,],=_,_ ,_. »_. 50,000 1,1;036151 O Q,b00 25 4Q 5016 53Q _..65.1 STM022 Seacrest Corridor SwaIelSTORh'MATER $ 28 403 5016 533 65 WTR106 Seacrest Corridor WATER Main Replacements $ - 27 Central Seacrest Corridor subtotal 1_000,000 - - - seiiiiii 9,000,000 28 403 5000 533 65 UC23xx San Castle(DEO Grant)-Water 35000 200,000 5,300,000 $ 5,535,000 23 _„- •_•_••_••••,••••„,„_•_ Improvements S 5 M Grant San Castle(DEO Grant)-Sewer 403 5000 535 65 UC23xx 35,000 200,000 5,300,000 $ 5,535,000 30 _ Improvements- $16.5 M Grant .. . Improvementsrse'XC.1c: ''I'R7"..:Jttrrmw' (wI _ _..._......__._....._»..._.._..._............._..._...__..................._...._.._.........».......-.........»..»..... 403 5000 538 65.1 UC23xx Improvements-$16.5 M Grant 35,000 200,000 5,195,000 $ 5,430,000 31 (n_' I- r r 3 32t....___ San Castle(DEO Grant)subtotal 105,000 600,000 15,795,000 - - 16,500,000 33 Heart of tloynton1IVILK1-Water 34 .403 5000 533 65 UC23xx Inncvrnuomanra 100,000 1,000,000 _._. ._..._.5........__.._ 1,100,000 Heart of Boynton(MLK)-Sewer 403 5000 535 65 UC23xx 100,000 1,000,000 $ 1,100,000 35 hot Pt/merits _.._...__......_..___...__...______.. ....._._._.»._...........„..............»......__...»..._...._.__........».._..._......_......_.» Heart of Boynton(MLK)-Stormwater 403 5000 538 65.1 UC23xx 100,000 1,000,000 $ 1,100,000 36 »•••„•••»„ Improvements dear'artstsyn Orfr'r7Cr:r'-traO7aTMet7 3?1 403 5000 533 65 UC23xx r-,_.., ... 100,000 300,000 $ 400,000 Heart of Boynton(MLK)subtotal 400,000 3,300,000` - - 3,700,000 36 sa..._.._........._..._ Palm BeachlLersurevle-Water 403 5vm - rewer.........._...._............__......_.»....»..._.__...._ _.__._...»............._..._........_..._......... ..........._..._........_......._..._...._..._...»..........._..._..._.»_..._.._».._ -_.».._.__ � 000 533 65 UC24xx 75,000 500,000 $ 575,000 1 40 41 403 5000 535 65 UC24xx 75,000 500,000 $ 575,000 a7mtfeac(Lersurewtte-Stormy ater _._._..._..._..._...»._..._ _ _»..._....».._ ._.l 403 5000 538 65.1 UC24xx 4...�.e.e,., 75,000 500,000 $ 575,000 Utility CIP FY22-23(Detail) Utility CIP FY22-23(by Acct) Utility CIP FY20-21 (Summary) I Utility CIP FY20-21 (By GL Acc) In PURCHASE ORDER CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROCUREMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 100 EAST OCEAN AVE P.O. BOX 310 P.O. #: 211048 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 DATE: 05/04/21 VENDOR 9499 SHIP TO: TO: AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC City of Boynton Beach 6151 LAKE OSPREY DRIVE EAST UTILITY ADMIN THIRD FLOOR 124 E. WOOLBRIGHT ROAD SARASOTA, FL 34240 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435 REQUISITION NO. ORDERING DEPARTMENT. INQUIRIES REGARDING - - PURCHASE ORDER CALL DATE NEEDED: CONTRACT NO , COMMISSION APPROVED: (5611742-6310 046282117 I EXTENDED LINE# QUANTITY UOM ITEM NO. AND DESCRIPTION UNIT COST COST 1 1.00 DL TASK 1-PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASK 83200 .0000 183200.00 2- GEOTECHNICAL Task 3- Preparation of Construction .Plans and Technical Speoifi.cat•iOn4.. Task 4- Permitting Activities Task 5- Bidding Services Task 6- Public Engagement Services Task 6. 1 Project Meetings Task 6.2 Neighborhood Outreach support Materials and activities Task 6.3 Schedule Coordinate and Conduct (2) Virtual Neighborhood Outreach V`�v Meetings Task 6.4 No Neighborhogd/Resident Easement (� C.11° O.40 Canvassing' \1\P �G:► Task 6 .5 Neighborhood Construction oae Notifications yt� • Task 6.6 Resident 0� Communications Phone Line . Task 6.7 Social Media Task• 6.8 Project. Webpage Task'. 7.p Services during CotStructicn REMARKS: CONTRACT # 046282117 TERM 09.06.2021 PROJ UC2102 TASK ORDER # UT-3B-02 (SCOPE B) COQUINA COVE STORM WATER AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS LLPROC��URSSEMgqENT SERVICTTES; � lr� C/' P.O. TOTAL• I 183200.00 F CERTIFICATE 5 TEN SALES AL8E 80AX EXEMPTION XEMPC ON I 1 IMPORTANTIIN. tUC'fIONS 1 RENDER SEPARATE INVOICE FOR THIS ,OUR PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL ORDER OR FOR EACH SHIPMENT THEREON PACKAGES, TICKETS, INVOICES, STATEMENTS, AND IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SHIPMENT. THE CITY OF BOYNTON. BEACH IS EXEMPT FROM CORRESPONDENCE. 2PREPAIO FREIGHT CHARGEABLE TO THE FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES: WHERE TAX APPLIES CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH MUST BE INVOICE MUST SHOW GROSS PRICE, AMOUNT OF THE MAIL INVOICES TO: SUPPORTED BY CARRIER'S RECEIPT. TAX, AND NET PRICE. EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE WILL FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT BE FURNISHED UPON REQUEST P.O.BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33425-0310 3JNVOICES AND STATEMENTS SUBJECT TO CASH DISCOUNT SPECIFIED HEREON. ORIGINAL PURCHASE ORDER CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROCUREMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 100 EAST OCEAN AVE P.O. BOX 310 P.O. #: 211048 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 DATE: 05/04/21 VENDOR 9499 SHIP TO: TO: AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC City of Boynton Beach 6151 LAKE OSPREY DRIVE EAST UTILITY ADMIN THIRD FLOOR 124 E. WOOLBRIGHT ROAD SARASOTA, FL 34240 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33435 REQUISITION NO- ORDERING DEPARTMENT: INQUIRIES REGARDING PURCHASE ORDER CALL DATE NEEDED: CONTRACT NO COMMISSION APPROVED: (561)742 0310 046282117 - EXTENDED LINE# QUANTITY UOM ITEM NO. AND DESCRIPTION UNIT COST COST PROVIDE DATA COLLECTION, STORM WATER MODELLING, WATER MAIN UPGRADE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, PERMITTING ASSISTANCE, BID PHASE SERVICES, ..PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND:SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. FOR THE COQUINA COVE NEIGHBORHOOD STORM WATER MAIN. IMPROVEMENTS. GENERAL CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR COBB COMM APPRVD 08 . 20.2018 RENEWED 09. 07.2020 THROUGH 09.06.2021 . COMM APPRVD TASK ORDER 02 , 16.2021 PROCUREMENT SERVICES: 1V_f- s'11)21 P.O.TOTAL: I FLORIDA STATE SALES TAX EXEMPTION IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS 1 RENDER SEPARATE INVOICE FOR THIS CERTIFICATE NO. 85-80126216440-0 OUR PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL ORDER OR FOR EACH SHIPMENT THEREON PACKAGES, TICKETS, INVOICES, STATEMENTS, AND IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SHIPMENT. THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH IS EXEMPT FROM CORRESPONDENCE. 2PREPAIO FREIGHT CHARGEABLE TO THE FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES: WHERE TAX APPLIES I CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH MUST BE INVOICE MUST SHOW GROSS PRICE,AMOUNT OF THE MAIL INVOICES TO: SUPPORTED BY BEACH RECEIPT, TAX AND NET PRICE. EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE WILL FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT BE FURNISHED UPON REQUEST. P.O.80BOYNTON BEACH, 310 L 33425-0310 31NVOICES AND STATEMENTS SUBJECT TO CASH DISCOUNT SPECIFIED_HEREON. ORIGINAL