APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME: POLYPLASTIC PACKAGING
LOCATION:.510 East Industrial Ave.
COMPUTER ID:
PERMIT #:
I Major site plan mod. II TYPE OF APPLICATION: MSPM bO-~o21
APPLICANT/CONT ACT PERSON: OWNER! APPLICANT:
Robert Fetrow
Gator Engineering PHONE
PHONE: 841-9990 ADDRESS:
FAX: 841-9991
ADDRESS:
7289 Garden Rd., Suite 214
West Palm Beach, FL 33404
Date of submittal/Projected meetin~ dates:
SUBMITTAL I RESUBMITT AL 1/11/00
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE:
PUBLIC NOTICE: N/A
TRC MEETING: 2/22/00
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 3~00
MEETING: 3/ !&/{J(J
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 3121/00
COMMENTS:
..At 1 ) A.,h ;. TJ( i At),.. .I ~IL -5 t, J~) (J ()() - () 0 /
S:\FORMS\PROJECT TRACKING INFO
"
_ ,7,
.; .....
--------.
oc-co ~
ITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORI[
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION t\ S PM
FOR
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE
Application Acceptance'L:;ate: {- I ( ~ 00
Fee Paid: 150 , ()() Receipt N~mber: 1'( '2:> 8~
This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and Zoning
Divis~on. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of pla~s including
a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of the Site Plan
Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL Will NOT BE PROCESSED.
I
Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name: Poly Plastic Packa__~n__l Company Ac'~cHt:ion
2. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made):
Poly-Plastic Packaqinq COffiDanv. Inc.
Address:
510 Eo Tnnll!=:t:ri;::tl
~V~t ~nyn~nn ~o~~nr
li'T. J 34 Vi.
(Zip Code)
Phone: (561) 732-2117
Fax: ( 1161 ) 7":\6-q1 73
3. Agent's Name {person, if any, representing applicant)Robert E. Fetrow
~/o ~~t:nr Enqin~~rinq ~prvi~p!=:. Tn~
Address:
7289 Garden Rd.. Suite 214
West Palm Beaqh, FT.-:tl404
(Zip Code)
Phone: (561) 841 -99c}O
Fax: { '1;61 ) 841 -9991
4. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: Poy Pl ~!=:t: i ~ P~~k::\lJi nlJ rn
Address: 510 Eo Tnnll!=:t:ri::\l Avp Rnynt-otl. B~i1C"h, i'I. 13415
{Zip Code}
Phone: {561 )732-21 i 7
Fax: (1161 ) 716 q 1 7-:t
5. Correspondence to be mailed to agent only; if no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute
is specified below:*
*This is the one address to which all agendas, letters and other materials will be mailed.
6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer
contract purchaser. etc.)
Owner
7.
Street address or location of site: 510 E. Industrial ave., Boynton Bp-ach, FL
8.
Property Control #: 0 8 - 4 3 - 4 5 - 2 0 - 0 0 - 000 - 0 0 7 1
Legal description of site: The South 7t;O i=~~t- of tl;;t(i li:illit half ni= Lot 7 of
thp. ":mhIHui~;nn ni= tn(i F.;:llc:t Quarter.. of SP-~ti0!1 701 'T'nwnc:hip ..it;
~ol1t-h R~nqp- 43 Ea~t, ;lS TP-corded ill. P:J-~t ~k 1, Page 4, Palm Beach
COllnty. Pnhlir- R~r:-orQIi: less the street riaht-of-wav:said Tract
being in Boynton Beach, Florida.
Intended use(s) of site: r.i qht Tnnu~tr; ~ 1
9.
-
10.
Developer or Builder:
N/A.
11. Architect: N / A
12. Landscape Architect: Mucciolo Desian
13. Site Planner.
14. Engineer:... Gator: Pong; n~~r; ng ~~rui C"~9. IQC"
15. Surveyor. n'Rr;~n ~l1it-er & n'Rri~n Tnr-
16. Traffic Engineer. Pinder Troutman Con~111 t i nq, Tn~
17. Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property? No
18. Estimated construction costs of proposed improvements shown on this site plan:
$t;OO,ooo,oo
II. SITE DATA
The following infonnation must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of the site
plan. .
1.
2.
3.
4.
Land Use Cateaorv shown in the Comorehensive Plan Industr; a 1
Zonina OistriCt M-1
Area of Site 1 '. 75 acres 76 . 054
Land Use - Acreaae Breakdown
sq. ft.
a. Residential, including acres % of site
surrounding lot area
of grounds
b. Recreation Areas * acres % of site
(excluding water area)
c. Water Area acres % of site
d. Commercial acres % of site
e. Industrial 1 .75 acres 100 % of site
f. PublicJl nstitutional acres % of site
g. Public. Private and C(1~.55-00oDR:)
Canal rights-of-way acres % of site
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev 10/15/1998
J \SHROA T A IPLANNING\SHAREO\WP\FORMS\APPS\NWSP\SITEPLAN. DOC
h.
Other (specify)
% of site
acres
i.
Other (specify)
% of site
acres
j.
Total area of site
1 . 7 5 acres 1 00 % of site
· including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft.
by 50 ft.
5. Surface Cover
a.
Ground floor building _ 582 acres 33 _ 4
area ("building footprint")
% of site
b.
% of site
Water area
acres
c. Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts.
_ 80 acres 45 7 % of site
d.
% of site
Total impervious area _ acres
e.
Landscaped area
.36.6 acres 20.9 % of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq.ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
Landscape Code).
f.
Other landScaped areas,_ acres
% of site
g. Other pervious areas, including golf course, natural areas, yards, and swales, but excluding
water areas acres % of site
h.
Total pervious areas .366 acres 20.9
% of site
i.
% of site
Total area of site
1 . 75 acres 1 00
6. Floor Area
a. Residential sq. ft.
b. CommerciaUOffice sq. ft.
c. IndustrialJWarehouse 26 , 711 sq. ft.
d. Recreational sq. ft.
e. Public/Institutional sq. ft.
f. Other (specify)
sq. ft.
g. Other (specify)
sq. ft.
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev. 10/15/1998
J:\SHROA T A\PLANNING\SHAREO\Wfl'FORMS\APPS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.OOC
h.
Total floor area
sq. ft.
7. Number of Residential DwellinQ Units
a.
Single-family detached
sq. ft.
b.
Duplex
sq. ft.
c. Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units)
(1) Efficiency dwelling units
(2) 1 Bedroom dwelling units
(3) 2 Bedroom dwelling units
(4) 3+ Bedroom dwelling units
d.
Total multi-family
dwelling units
e. Total number of dwelling units
8.
Gross Densitv
dwelling units per acre
9.
Maximum heiQht of structures on s'ite 28 _ 0
feet
2
stories
10. Reauired off-street oarkina
a. Calculation of required b.
number of off-street
parking spaces
Warehouse 1/800 Sq. Ft.
11,209 Sq. Ft./800 = 15
Manufacturing: 1/500 Sq. Ft.
14,095 Sq. Ft./500 = 29
Office: 1/300 Sq. Ft.
1,407 Sq. Ft./300 = 5
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
Provided =' 49 -f- ~ tf1t,..t) I O1p'(1::1) So PAc..ES
Total Required Parking= 49
Representative of the project must be present at all Technical Review Committee, Planning
and Development and City Commission meetings held to review this project.
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev. 10/15/1998
J. \SHRDA T A \PLANN I NG\SHAREOIWP\FORMS\APPS\NWSP\SITEPLAN. DOC
11/: CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (VVe) hereby certify that the
above statement~.and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are
true to the of ( y) (our) knowledge and belief. ~is application will not be accepted unless
Si9~~' d '.. r in to he i structions below.
/ '(
j
Sigmatur -bf OWner(s)'or Trustee, of
Authorized Principal if property is owned by
a corporation or other business entity.
IV. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
Signature of Authorized Agent
Date
(I) (VIle) hereby'~.gnate the above signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this
appli~r' / ~\ ~ .
~ I' ! ~
// " I I ' ( . )fO
./ ' , ()
Sig . e 0 er( ) or rus ee, D~te
or AUthorized Principal if property is owned
by a corporation or other business entity.
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review Schedule:
Date Received
Technical Review Committee
Planning & Development Board
Community Appearance Board
City Commission
Date
Date
Date
Date
Stipulations of Final Approval:
Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted:
Additional Remarks:
A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TRC, P&D
AND CC MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT.
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev. 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDA T A\PlANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\APPS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.DOC
RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLlCA TIOf'.4
The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that
all plans, specifications. drawings, engineering, and other data submi~ed with this application for review by the
City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by the various boards, commissions, staff personnel and other parties
designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall
rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and substantial.
The undersigned hereby:agrees that all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering and other data which
may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, staff or designees shall be
constructed in strict compliance with the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall be
deemed material and shall place the applicant inmlation of this application and all approvals and permits which
may be granted. '..
Witness
, 19--:.
Planning and Zoning Division - Rev. 10/15/1998
J:\SHRDA T A\PLANNING\SHAREO\WP\FORMSIAPPS\NWSP\SITEPLAN.OOC
Department of Engineering
and Public works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
wwwco.palm-beach.f1.us
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Maude Ford Lee, Chair
Warren H. Newell, Vice Chairrnan
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
"An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
fv1AR 2 0 '
March 16, 1999
Mr. Michael Rumpf
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE:POLI-PLASTIC PACKING COMPANY
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study
(dated January 11, 2000) for the project entitled Poli-Plastic Packine
Comnanvpursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the
Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project is summarized as
follows:
Location: East Industrial Way
Municipality: Boynton Beach
Proposed Use: Industrial (addition)
New Trips: 77 per day
Build-out: 2001
(11,652 sf)
Based on our review the Traffic Division has determined that the project
meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Please
contact me if you have any questions regarding this review.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~x~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Assistant Director - Traffic Division
cc: Andrea Troutman, P.E. - Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F:'TRAFFIC'apf\tps'OOOllapp.wpd - TAZ 4B.1
POLl-PLASTIC PACKIHG COMPAHY
COHCORREnCY TRflFFIC IMPflCT flHflLYSIS
Prepared for
GflTO~ EnGlnEE~lnG SE~VlCES
Prepared by
PlnDE~ TROOTMfln COHSOL TlnG. IHC.
2324 Sooth Congress flvenue. Solte 1"
West Palm Beach. FL 33406
~I
. r\ \\\ \0
And a '\v1. Troutman, P.E.
Florid' Re~stration #45409
#PTC99-170
January 11. 2000
...
POll-PLASTIC PACKING COMPANY
CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
I ntrod uction
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. has been retained to conduct a trafficJmpact analysis for a
proposed expansion of an existing industrial facility in the City of Boynton Beach. The
purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of
Article 15, Traffic Performance Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land
Development Code (ULDC).
Site Data
The site is located at 510 East Industrial Avenue in the Boynton Beach Industrial Park, north
of Boynton Beach Boulevard, as shown on Exhibit 1, in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAl) 484. It is
proposed to expand the existing 12,621 SF indistrial facility by adding 11,652 SF. Access to
the proposed project is from East Industrial Avenue via West Industrial Avenue, which
connects to Boynton Beach Boulevard. Year 2001 conditions were examined for this
analysis.
Existing (1998/1999) Traffic Conditions
Exhibit 2 provides the 1998/1999 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the
surrounding roadway network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
of P~lm Beach County. Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor
of 9.3% to the MDT volumes. These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with
roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the adopted LOS D service volumes.
Project Traffic
T rip Generation
Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC was
reviewed to determine acceptable daily trip generation rates for the proposed
project. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition
was utilized as the source for peak hour trip generation rates.
1\.1',')I,rl r I') " \ I I 1 (II If
Exhibit 3 provides the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data, for the
proposed development. For Traffic Performance Standards purposes, based on the
daily trip generation of 77, the Test 1 radius of development influence is the directly-
accessed link. The Test 2 radius of development influence is also the directly-
accessed link
Trip Distribution and Assignment
A directional distribution was developed based on a review of land use patterns and
existing travel patterns
Future Traffic Conditions
Roadway Improvements
A review ofthe Transportation Improvement Program (FY 2000-2004) from the MPO
of Palm Beach County, adopted June 17, 1999, and the Palm Beach County Five
Year Road Program, adopted September 28, 1999, was undertaken. No roadway
improvements are programmed for roadways within the project's radius of
development influence.
Background Traffic
Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of
future background traffic volumes. Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 4 for
the surrounding roadway links. Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County,
was reviewed. No Major Projects are projected to have a 10% impact on the study
area roadways within the analysis time frame of the proposed development.
Traffic Performance Standards Analysis
Test 1 (Link Test)
This first test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links are
projected to operate below adopted level of service standards. Exhibit 4 shows future
daily, AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for the analyzed roadway links. All
!'f'!ll wi (1'1 /"( I I /(1 I III
2
analyzed roadway links are projected to operate above the adopted Test 1 level of
service standards, therefore, the requirements of Test 1 are met.
Test 2 (Model Test)
The second test examines traffic conditions based on model-projections that are
developed and maintained by Palm Beach County. The directly accessed link of
Boynton Beach Boulevard is not a Test 2 deficiency; therefore, the requirements of
Test 2 are met.
Intersection Analysis
Major intersections for which a proposed development adds more than 10% of the
total traffic on any link connecting a major intersection are required to be analyzed.
No major intersections meet this requirement based on the proposed development's
impact.
Driveway Volumes
AM and PM peak hour project driveway volumes are provided on Exhibit 6.
Conclusions
This analysis shows that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the
Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
h.'1 '/ Ie )rl ll' I "( I r Ii! i ;( I
3
"
EXHIBITS
o
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
~
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
o
-<
~
L.U
U
Z
L.U
ex:
~
L.U
::)
Z
L.U
>
-<
Vl
Vl
L.U
ex:
c.J
Z
o
U
SITE
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
Lrl
T
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
o
ex:
-<
~
-l
::)
o
co
~
Vl
L.U
ex:
U
~
Vl
o
N.T.S.
~
1/10/99
POll-PLASTIC
PACKING COMPANY
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION
~
o
- ~
o
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
o
<(
~
LoU
U
Z
LoU
co:
3
:s
POLl-PLASTIC
PACKING COMPANY
2L
11603 D
14300
1079 D
1330
SITE
LoU
::)
Z
LoU
~
V)
V)
u..J
co:
lJ
Z
o
U
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
6LD 6LD
29486 D 41282 D
47500 47500
2742 D 3839 D
4420 4420
o
co:
;;;;
LoU
-"
::)
o
CO
l-
V)
u..J
co:
U
~
V)
Lrl
T
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
LEGEND
6LD - ROADWAY LANES
41282 D - DAILY TRAFFIC AND LOS
47500 - DAILY ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
3839 D - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND LOS
4420 - PEAK HOUR ADOPTED
SERVICE VOl UME
EXHIBIT 2
EXISTING (1998/99) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
N.T.S.
~
1/10/99
~
0 8 0 ....
...... .... .....
.... 0' , 0
a., ....
.... 0
0'1 -- 1S'o
u .... ......
....
f- a., n:l
a.. a..
~ en
c
1S'o
.g-
>..
c:
C'Cl
0-
E
0
U
eo
c:
32 c:
u 0
C'Cl
0- ',p
C'Cl
U ...
',p Q)
M VI c:
... C'Cl Q)
:0 c: <..J
I 0- ~
..c:
x 0 '\:
w 0- ~
"
"
~
.;::
I-
~
ClJ
Z
,..., '*
S U")
VI
e..
.;::
I- -
>. "<t
...a
I
VI
VI
rn
a..
~
co
,e.
...
I-
19
0
I-
,...,
~
-
ClJ u...
..... rJ)
ctl
~ 0
0
c: 0
0 ~
'Z; -
ctl "
...
ClJ 0\
c: \.0
ClJ
<.J
c.
.;::
I-
~ u...
'ijj
c: rJ)
ClJ N
~ U")
- \.0
,
~
~
ClJ
VI
::>
-0 ""iij
c: ';::
ctl .....
....J VI
::l
-0
c:
-
...
::l
o
I
~
ctl
ClJ
a..
~
-<
13 0
~
0
VI l-
e..
';:: ..... .....
~ ::l
~ 0
ClJ
Z 0">
c:
-
'*
U")
>----
...as
I ~I-
VI
VI
ctl ~I~
a..
"iij ~
..... ~
0
~ ~
.;:: ..... ~
I- ::l
"iij 0
.....
0
~ 0
c: .....
-
,...,
<:'1
~
,..., -
~ CO
s:?
ClJ u...
..... rJ)
ctl
0:: 0
c: 0
0
0 ~
'Z; -
ctl N
...
ClJ 0\
c: 0
ClJ
<.J
e..
.;::
l-
.e;. u...
'ijj
c: rJ)
oS N
c: U")
- \.0
,
~
~
(IJ
VI
::>
-0 ""iij
c: ';::
ctl .....
....J VI
::l
-0
c:
-
\.
...
::l
o
I
~
ctl
(IJ
a..
~
a..
19 0
0 ~
VI l-
e..
.;:: ..... 0'1
I- ::l
~ 0
(IJ
Z
c: ~
-
'*
U")
>----
...as
I (g, I--
VI
VI
ctl ';:: ~
a.. I-
!9 ~
0 ~
~ ~
';:: ..... 0
I- :J ~
~ 0
.....
0
I- .....
c:
-
co
~
,..., N
~ S
(IJ u...
..... rJ)
ctl
0:: 0
c: 0
0
0 .....
'Z; -
ctl CO
...
(IJ 0\
c: 0
(IJ
<.J
e..
';::
I-
~ u...
'ijj
c: rJ)
(IJ N
.....
c: U")
- ~
~
~
(IJ
VI
::>
-0 ""iij
c: ';::
ctl .....
....J VI
::l
-0
C
~~
c
~
w
..c
.:0
.21
.il
~
cu
~
I!:
OJ
OJ
C
'00
V) C
.... W
OJ C
U 0
~ .~
u' 8-
o tIl
-' C
::> (;!
ct:
c 0
::: Q)
o .....
u .a
..r; .,i:j
~ ~
OJ
o:l OJ
E ~
-;;; 5
a.. V)
Exhibit 4
Poli-Plastic Packing Company
Historic Growth
#PTC99-170
growth99-170 1-10
11-10100
Page 1 of 1
Daily Traffic Volumes Growth
Roadway 1995/96 1998/99 Rate
Boynton Beach Boulevard
West of 1-95 40,434 41,282 0.69% /Year
O~O~
.... ~-
~ . 0
~:!::~~
O~.... &
b: ~c.
_ S:
c
.2'
::
'1'
l
>-
c::
a
E
o
u,..
.~8
,:.<N
~ .!a
Cl..~
.g iij
':; :Q ~
:015:,..
:.E:.:!:~
~d:..1-
......o'1.
.~ ~ '"
e E '":
Cl.._o
VI
0 a
-'
.~ 8
u
~ '"
'"
D ...
1i~ <J:l
'"
0
.=a '"
...
-
...
i~
e
"-
*
;;; '"
>- <J:l
-' ~ d
<;:'
08 '#
~
.:;
~ ~
E <J:l
<.J .a ...
$ '"
0
'"
o -a
'ji' .~
~ e
Cl..
1106\ '"
""
c:: CO> "t
'.;:J Ci\" :;
.~ 0'\
)( CO>
""c
~1oI'I a
'5l ~ ....l
.- ... '""
~-'
...
c
:::;
~I
~
1!
~ ~
..90!
::l
0
'1:1 co
'"
0 .c
ell: u
...
~
co
c
B
c::
is'
co
t!
~
c
.~
..
ii
c
o
~
'6
~
~
g
)
VI
0 Cl
-'
.~
u 0
~ '"
D ~
1i - '"
0 ~
0
t= ~ ;:;;
-
j;
.~ ~
e
"-
ell:
::l *
0 CO>
J: ... '""
:.c: : d
< ;::-~
.... g'#
Cl..
~ ~
< -51 ~l
~ ~
- E
l) ::l
I~
0
'"
o tj
'ji'.~
~ e
Cl..
I 1106\
c CO> CO>
~;; ...,
.- CO> 00
)( CO> ...,
""c
~'" Cl
.tl ~ -'
~~ '""
...
c
::;
'"
~
'0
~
~
'E
,.
~ >
..!I
::l
0
'1:1 co
'"
0 .c
ell: u
'"
~
co
c
.9
c
is'
co
t!
~
.~
:l
..
i
'6
....
~
g
1
&l
VI
9 a
.~
u 0
~ N
...
D ...
1i $i '"
...
~
t= is. ...,
-
j;
u ""
.~
e
"-
ell:
::l *
0 ...
J: II <J:l
:.c: ;::-~ <0
;:5 8'#
"-
~ ~
"-1 ~ ~l
e E
l) ::l
0
>
0
'"
I 0 ~
';;;.~
~ e
Cl..
1106\
c CO> '"
=Ci5 ...,
.~ O"l ""
)( a> ...,
""c
OJ)
~ ~ Cl
....l
.- ... <J:l
)( ....l
....
...
c
::;
'"
~
'0
~
'E
,..
~ 1
::l
0
'1:1 co
'"
o .c
ell: U
...
'"
co
c
.9
c::
is'
""
~
E
c
'"
':
co
ii
I
'6
~
In
....
g
1
&l
- ~
I
(
AM
1 (1) [2]
+
~I
PM
7 (7) [14]
+
=I
POll-PLASTIC
PACKING COMPANY
110
~
LJ...J
:::l
Z
LJ...J
>
-<
.....J
-<
02
f-
VOl
:::l
a
~
f-
<n
-<
LJ...J
LEGEND
7 - EXISTING PROJECT TRAFFIC*
(7) - PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC
[14] - TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC
110 - TOTAL DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC
. ESTIMATED BASED ON ITE RATES FOR
THE EXISTING 12,621 SF BUILDING.
1/10/00
~
EXHIBIT 6
PROJEa DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
I .....,.
.-
o."_..w, T. N I :2.. '1.J.e ()O
~1 ... r hh-ctUe .,.. '4.
.~'I.'I"
WARRANTY DEED
N
_-{ THIS WARRANTY DEED, mad.e this 30th d.ay o"r. November , 1984,
o by UNITED' STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a corporation e~isting und.er the laws
r- of the State of Delaware, hereinafter called the -Grantor", whose mailing
.0 address is 233 Peachtree Street, Northeast Atlanta," Georgia 30303, to POLY
ru PLASTIC PACKAGING CO., INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the
State of New York, whose post office'ad.d.ress is 44-80 11th Street, Long
~ Island City, New York, New York 11101, hereinafter called the "Grantee";
CO
(The terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all parties to this instrument,
and the heirs, l~gal representatives and asaigns of individuals and the
successors and assigns of corporations.)
\I)
4
WITNESSETH: That. the Grantor, for and in consid.eration of the sum of TEN
1$10.00) DOLLARS, and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is
z: hereby acknoWledged, hereby.grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises,
releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, all that certain land
situate in Palm Beach County, Florida, viz:
Ul
I
(J
~
'i
dJ
(pSOrc<P
q log 0;:
;;.5 /
~~
All that certain tract or parcel of land situate,
and being in the Town of Boynton Beach, County of
Beach and State. of' Florida,deEcribed as follows,
wit: .
The South 250 feet of the East One-Half (E~) of the
East One-Half (E~) of LOt 7, a subdivision of the East
Quarter of Section ~O, Township 45 South, Range .43
East, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat
Book 1, page 4, of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida, which. lies Easterly of Industrial
Avenue.
lying
Palm
to
SUBJECT TO restrictions, reservations and easements of record;
ALSO SUBJECT TO taxes for the year of 1984 and thereafter.
TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto
belonging or in any wise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor. hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is
lawfully seized of said land, that. the Grantor hereby fully warrants the
title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of
all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances,
except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1984.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents
the day and year first above written.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED
in our pre~encE\:
.);': .
. .~I
I;Z*^- B;'~
UNITED STAXES STEEL CORPORATION
ru
C>
r
C>
(L
ru
-(
;to
:t-
tXl
. .
. ~. ,.":... : ... - ... .~: '..- ~
- fl~~ ".
. i
..~
"f-:#.
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
I HEREBY C~RTIFY that, on this ~ay, before me, an officer ~uly
authorized in the State and Cou~ty aforesai~ to take acknowled~nts,
personally appear"~ J8llIell 1l.. ffitdll' ~rid .'
F. J. Pr1nzo , we nown to llIe. to bo the Vice-Prtls1dcnt and
Assistant Secreuryrespectively of the corporation named .s qrantor in the
foregoing d~ed, and that they severally acknowledqed-oxecutinq the same in
the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily under
authority ~uly veste~ in them by said corporation and that the Beal affixed
thereto is the true corporate seal of sai~ corporation.
WITNESS MY HAND and official seal this 30th day of NOVelllber
1984.
My Commission Expires:
NotIry Public, ~a, Std It lalit'
My CommII&Ion Explm Mil'. 1.1981
~~/~ .'''''''.
~ '" >~:~..~~ I~'~~'~".>"",
Not r;y Pic . ...,'_16EAL'.....;.....';...
, (Jt.".')~i;
'...~.~" "f. '.) ,....:
......;./ -.... .,,'
'.. /) I........ nC\
....::;.'.::,},~.~.?;.. .
............,....,"\\\,\
.,._----;""E Cl!f~II"11
.:-~~ ..........0/',
(f-,.'. 'm" "~~ STArr OF FI.ORlnA . PALM HF ACII CO! INn'
~ . :. '-: E I hcrch, Cl'l1l1\' Ihal Ihe
'I, ~ ". J. i;:' f forq;'l)IIH! I" J lrut' cop'
" (' . -
","" '. -l.,' = _1./11 the rl'eord 111111\ 11111((
"~I Ill-' . .,-.." _: , /\T~\ \
I, l'A CI CCl',\ --- 1(.' '. ,
";\",,,!,,,.,,,,,-'- 111lS L.::::- D.\ \' Of' JeLl..! i LO I.~ :'() ~
'\ DU:{OII.IYIL\\ILK,~,.
\ CLElU; or CIRClIj"I" COUj(~
)
By
~ THIS ~NSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: f,/~
a f Michael D. GOrdon., Esq.
cwy BASKIN' SEARS, P,A.
Servico Centre.South, Suite 201A
1601 Belvedere Road
West Palm Beach, Florida 33406
RECORO \'tRIFlEO
P ,l..LM BEf\CH CQUNT'l' FL"
JOHN B. OUNKLE
ClEJ~K CIRCUIT COURT
ru
-i
, :t-
.:t-
>:~
~'j:.~
:. ....:.. ~