Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS J:\SHRDATAIPLANNINGlSHARED\WPIPROJECTSIQUANTUM 2000IHAMPTON INN MSPM OO-ooIIAGENDA REQUEST FOR CC 3-21-00 .DOC City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources -/tCA~) 'i~- Plannmg and Z mg DlTector City Manager's Signature Department of Development Director AL TERNA TlVES: FISCAL IMP ACT: PROGRAM IMPACT: DESCRIPTION: Request for major site plan modification to expand the existing hotel by 54 rooms, to a total of 161 rooms or a total of 103,993 square feet, and related site improvements. 1475 West Gateway Boulevard LOCATION: North Boynton Hospitality, Limited OWNER: Richard Carlson, Jr., Esq. AGENT: EXPLANATION: PROJECT HAMPTON INN - QUANTUM PARK RECOMMENDA TlON: Please place the request below on the March 21, 2000 City Commission Agenda under Consent - Ratification of Planning and Development Board action. The Planning and Development board with a unanimous vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments. For further details pertaining to this request see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 00-061. o Development Plans o New Business o Legal o Unfmished Business o Presentation o Administrative IZI Consent Agenda o Public Hearing o Bids o Announcement NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM April 5,2000 (5:00 p.m.) [8] March 21, 2000 o April 4, 2000 o April 18, 2000 o May 2, 2000 June 7,2000 (5:00 p.m.) o May 16, 2000 o June 6, 2000 o June 20, 2000 o July 5. 2000 April 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) June 21,2000 (5:00 p.m.) May 17.2000 (5:00 p.m.) March 22,2000 (5:00 p.m.) May 3, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) March 8, 2000 (5:00 p.m.) Date Final Form Must be Turned in to Ci!y"'Clerk's Office Requested City Commission Meeting Dates Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM HAMPTON INN QUANTUM PARK MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 6.A.1 West - Water Management Tract "A". Farther west is Shoppes of Boynton Shopping Center, zoned C-3 East - Lot I-A, zoned PID and the Lake Worth Drainage District E-4 Canal. Farther east is office Lot 21, zoned PID South - N.W. 2200 Avenue (Gateway Blvd.). Farther south is Motorola, zoned PID North - Remainder of Quantum Park Lot 2, vacant, zoned PID (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map) Site Area: 155,799.6 square feet (3.57 acres) Building Area: 103,993 square feet 107 54 161 Existing Proposed TOTAL Hotel Planned Industrial Development, (PID) Industrial (I) MSPM 00-001 1475 West Gateway Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33426 Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2, Quantum Park PID Richard W. Carlson, Jr., Esq. North Boynton Beach Hospitality, LTD. Hampton Inn Surrounding land uses and Zoning District: Square Footage: Number of Rooms: Type of Use: Zoning Designation: Land Use Plan Designation: File No.: Location: Applicant/Agent: Property Owner: Project Name: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT March 8, 2000 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-061 There are 115 parking spaces existing on site. The additional parking area will increase the total parking count to 179 spaces, including three (3) new spaces designated as handicapped accessible for a total of eight (8). Spaces for employees and guests are included in the total. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) 6th Parking Facility: Existing on-site traffic circulation consists of a 27-foot wide, loop drive aisle with two access points on Gateway Boulevard. Guests, employees and restaurant patrons currently use both entrances. The existing vehicular use area provides parking areas containing a combination of 9 feet by 16 feet (9'xI6') and 9 feet by 18 feet (9'xI8') spaces. An additional 27-foot wide drive with similar parking stalls is planned for the hotel expansion. All existing paved areas will remain as approved and constructed. Driveways: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the city's review. The city's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of permit review. b. Drainage- Overall PID traffic concurrency was addressed, when the Quantum Park PID was master planned. A comprehensive traffic study was evaluated by the Palm Beach County (PBC) Traffic Division prior to master plan approval. It was determined that 63,752 maximum trips would be permitted within the Quantum Park PID. The PBC Traffic Division approved a traffic statement for the existing 107 room Hampton Inn. A revised traffic study showing an increase in square footage and rooms, was not submitted for approval and written confirmation has not been received from Palm Beach County regarding the approval of the increased traffic rates. The written verification of Palm Beach County Traffic Division's acceptance of the new trip generations, as well as compliance with traffic performance standards shall be a condition of approval. Concurrency: a. Traffic- The developer is proposing an addition of 54 rooms, consisting of 38,177 square feet, to the existing 107 room, 65,816 square foot, 3 story hotel building. The expansion is proposed to extend on to the adjacent Lot 2. Additional parking area will be added to accommodate the additional rooms, (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan). The Quantum Park PID master plan was approved with a maximum limit of 400 hotel rooms, which currently includes the 107 rooms of the existing Hampton Inn. If the hotel's 54 room addition is approved and constructed, 239 hotel rooms would be allowed within future developments of the Quantum Park PID. Proposed Development: Lot 1 is currently a developed, 3.57-acre parcel. The development consists of an existing Hampton Inn 107 room hotel and The Original Pancake House restaurant on an outparcel (Lot I-A). To the south of the site along the Gateway Boulevard right-of-way line, is a row of street trees and a 15 + foot wide maintained grass area which provides some screening for the adjacent uses. Existing Site Characteristics: Page 2 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #00-061 Hampton Inn Quantum Park xc: Central File J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM 2000\Hampton Inn MSPM OO-OOllSite plan sraffreport Hampton Inn. doc RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. A project sign plan was approved during review of the original hotel building. The plans for the proposed addition did not include additional site signage. The applicant was informed prior to the submittal, that if they were planning for additional signs, sign details must be submitted and reviewed as a sign plan amendment. A condition of approval would include meeting architectural requirements of the Quantum Park approved sign plan Signage: The proposed building fa9ade for the new addition, as viewed from Gateway Boulevard, is architecturally compatible with the existing hotel building. The building addition will receive surface treatments, materials and colors similar to the existing structure. Quantum Park's Architectural Review Committee reviewed the plans for the hotel addition and verification of approval was received on February la, 2000. Community Design Plan: Building and site regulations will fully meet code when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. Building and Site Regulations: The landscaping of the site will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. The development will be provided with the required amount of perimeter landscaping. Landscaping: Edition Manual was utilized in determining the parking requirements for the existing hotel use. It was felt to be a preferable methodology over the city's standard for industrial uses which are solely based on employees and an estimate of visitors (to be determined by the petitioner). If seven (7) spaces are allocated to employees (using the city's standard of 1.5 spaces per 2 employees and assuming 9 employees), 166 spaces will remain for guests. This yields 1.03 spaces per room parking ratio. In comparison, ITE standards which were previously used in determining parking needs for the approved 107 room Hampton Inn, yields a slightly lower parking standard than the city's industrial parking regulations. The ITE analysis previously accepted by the city would yield a 0.9 space per-room minimum parking ratio. The plan currently uses the 0.9 space per room as a minimum parking requirement while proposing 1.03 parking spaces per room. The parking plan will meet the city's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning and ADA requirements for this use, and will provide 21 surplus spaces above that required by the ITE standard. Page 3 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #00-061 Hampton Inn Quantum Park ~~\ \-.::.: / \ ~~-----_.=- ~,;~ ,__ .~ - -111.'''' --.- 4' \\, - \ \1 '0 ,\/B MILES '\\\, ~ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .' - , '0 400 BOO fEEl - .-"" '-" " . ,...." ",- - "N\o-ro~Ol-p.'1i p,O .. t'l 0 "1" ,N C\1"'Y E.)(\-\\B\\ 11 {\" m X I - OJ - -i - - OJ - Hampton North Boynton A~tIun -- . - . ~:.~r,~!:, ~~.it~ Ral~~~)~-~ if r!' I Ii E H'.II .. - ,,-- ~ --- 'JJIOp<J$ ,,- --=- ... .... -- -- ~.-...--- i ~ I II - ;. !F i-i JT1 -0 'I r I~~ I :> I I ' . r Z I r ! . - ! Hf~;,;;J UJii'ffS f:~llii! %3f.,I~: 'II:1ij- f'jhil I It J UJJ~ in, .~ lIfe I of :If, f If ~11~t :i:. '~~i: ;;fi ~n · Sf': ~ "I . ,1;1 ii.Ji '~-~t ,~J 'ii ii I m '" I' X ! 'ii f J: J ,; ':( s " I: - .C ?Q CD . :) - ~f 1! ; -i II - - CD - - ~ *-HAMf""TON SUlT"Es ~A:::&... _ Ceorge F. White ^.l.A. and MsoOates. nc. o .... -. '-......,. ..... ,. '-'_"'" "u, ....".... en "U I N ...---...-'"";--- ------------- ~ //I "--,-- m it ~1 ~i ~ n x it I + + + - OJ - 'Fir ~ J i~ - ; I - I OJ - - II~~Z.II~ I '11' I ~I I 11~ ~ I I E.'" -l I '-1 8J I : I T I lL- I I~ II. r-t I' I 1- I: -J.- I I I .. L 11 ~LJ I t 881 I I T J:... I I . r-i ~ I .J I'-.: t Ll · ~ ~ ,'-- U · .- i t:. I I I ,_ i~.1. I I '~ :l I I....- :Ll.. I . J T4 ~ ill T ,~t:QJ I I!=: ~L. .. t:: J~- I I = I I . ~ 1:= -- -4 - ~:::::::): . .. 1 ~ ,-I I II II I JI ~ rEf' W---'- · ,.... 9, iii i' r\:.I -j .-+--1 'B~ r1l-!H'~ I I I II P I I\) George F. White AlA and Associates, Ioc. '4'5 North F'eod_at Mlq"wor sYit. F'. Boca "G(Otto "orlda JJ487 (.5e1) !J17-SI98 Hampton Nortn Boynton Ac:::ldlltlon -- - z 881 0 ~ :D ~ 8 ~ 0 m 8 m r ~ r m S~ < I I I I ) - ) :I, ~:I ~' ;-.0 ,8 c. Z 0 8 ~; ~i ~i ij! II; ~~ it l: ~ ; I . + + + + ;i ~ ij! ~~ !I~ ~~! ij~ 'I: ~: ~: ~% + + + ....~ f'; ~iill ij I! '1 Il + il'~ I' II + 'I' !: il + ~l! I" I + ~ + , I I I j' I I ~ h l- h if ~ ~t~~i ~8h ~r'>~ I I r I .'- P 1.-- ~ I . . I 8 0 8 ""11" I . . . I II I . . I :I I. . .- '- I . . I II .- .- . I I , . . I ,I . . . II . 881 I . . I 88 I . . I rj , : I I . I i. + I . ,. . .- I . . . . I II . . .- ~ I I I. . ~ . . -. 81 I ~ I 0 8 m ) ~ m r ~jl~ ,) "'-; ~5 cZ & II ~ m II r ~~ ,) ::1 ~~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: X 1. All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.518.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2. Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. X City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 3. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has X approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) Dept. of Health Permits will be required for the water and sewer systems X 4. serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) FIRE Comments: 5. A water distribution system plan is required and was not provided. LDR X 6-16. Include location ofF.D. connection. POLICE Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 6. Combine Lots 1 & 2 with a Unity of Title. X 7. Any fill operation shall require an excavation/fill permit. X Project name: HAMPTON INN - QUANTUM PARK File number: MSPM 00-00 I Reference: 2nd Review, Maior site plan modification. File # MSPM 00-001 with a Februarv 22.2000 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking EXHIBIT "C" Conditions o[An.m:ovaI DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING Comments: 8. Add a symbol to the site plan drawings (SP-l and SP-2) that represents the X perimeter limits of constructions for the proposed new work. 9. Show and label the haI1dicap accessible entrance doors on the drawing X entitled 1 st floor plan. The location of the accessible entrance doors shall match those that are shown on the site plan. 10. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing (SP-l). The symbol shall X represent and delineate the path of travel of the accessible route that is required between the new accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door to the building. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route (Note: The minimum width required by the code is forty- four (44) inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The symbol represents the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path. Please note at the time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans verifying that the accessible route in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. 11. The number of new accessible parking spaces that are shown on site plan X SP-l does not match the number shown on site plan SP-2. The number shown on both plans shall match. X 12. Within the site data found on both sheets titled site plan, identify the proposed finish floor elevation of the building (lowest floor elevation). Verify that the proposed elevation complies with regulations of the code by adding specifications and notes to the site data addressing the following issues: a.) From the FIRM map, identify the title of the flood zone the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate this on the plans b.) As the design professional-of-record for the project, state that the proposed floor elevation is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations. [Section 3 107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code] Page 2 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No.: MSPM 00-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT c.) Identify the floor elevation the design professional has established for the new building within the footprint of the building showing on the site plans, 1 st floor plan and civil plan. Also, identify the finish floor elevation of the existing building. 13. On site plan (SP-2), label the symbol that represents the location of the X proposed site lighting poles. 14. On site plan (SP-l and SP-2), identify the symbol that represents the X property line. 15. Add to the site plan (SP-I) all the easements that are shown on the survey. X The location type and size of the easement(s) shall be shown and identified on the site plan. Where applicable, amend the plans so that the structures do not encroach into an easement. 16. Identify on both drawings that are titled site plan the actual distance that the X building is setback from the north, east and west property lines. Please note that overhangs, covered walkways, canopies, awnings and other appurtenances that are attached to the building shall be considered when identifying building setbacks. Therefore, identify the width of the overhangs, covered walkways, canopies, awnings, etc. The building setbacks shall comply with setback regulations specified in the Zoning Code. Identify whether the area located on the west side of the building is covered. Also, indicate the use of the area. 17. At the time of permit submittal, provide a completed and executed City X Unity of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed for each property being unified is required to process the form. Each recorded deed shall include a legal description and the owner identified on each deed shall match. 18. Before permit review, submit a current survey of the subject site. X 19. Compliance with the Building Codes will be evaluated at time of permit X review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, Fire and Life Safety fees, County fees and State fees will be determined at time of permit review. 20. Permits are required to construct the improvements shown on the approved X site plan. Permit application forms are available in the Building Division of the Development Department. A permit submittal checklist is available in the Building Division. The list identifies the basic documents the Plan Analyst checks for when an applicant submits for permit review. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE Page 3 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No.: MSPM 00-001 DEP AR TMENTS INCLUDE REJECT FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: The following comments relate to the requirements in Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review 21. Provide a current survey of the adjacent property (Lot 1) showing the X connection between the existing building and the addition, a portion of which is located on Lot 1. 22. Provide a north arrow on the site plan sheet SP-2. X 23. Indicate on the elevation drawings the building colors and materials to be X used. 24. Indicate the dimension of the setback from the west property line. X 25. Indicate and label the location of the sidewalk on site plan sheets SP-I and X SP-2. 26. Indicate and label the location of the site lighting on the site plan and landscape plan. Provide a site lighting detail with the height dimension. X 27. Provide a colored elevation drawing showing all elevations of the building for the Planning and Development Board Meeting. X 28. Indicate on the landscape plan the method of irrigation and the source of X water to be used on site. The following comments relate to the requirements of Chapter 23 - Parking Lots 29. Provide a dimension for the parking lot drive aisle width on the site plan. X 30. Provide a detail of the required handicapped parking sign. X 31. The proposed building addition must match the character and design of the X existing building. Indicate this on the elevation drawings. (Chapter. 9, Sec. 2) 32. Additional signs were not submitted for approval with this site plan. Signs X must meet the requirements of Chapter 23. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS X 33. NONE X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 34. To be determined Page 4 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No.: MSPM 00-001 J:ISHRDA T AIPLANNINGISHAREDIWPIPROJECTSIQUANTUM 2000IHAMPTON INN MSPM 00-001 lIST REVIEW COMMENTS. DOC Page 5 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No.: MSPM 00-001 City Clerk J:ISHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDIWPlPROJECTSIQUANTUM 2000lHAMPTON INN MSPM 0O-O01\Hampton Inn D.O.doc DATED: 7. Other 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby ~ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included". established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 2. The Applicant -2L HAS HAS NOT 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: OR x THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Major Site Plan Modification LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 1475 West Gateway Boulevard in Quantum Park DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 21,2000 APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 1475 West Gateway Boulevard PROJECT NAME: Hampton Inn- Quantum Park APPLICANT'S AGENT: Richard W. Carlson, Esquire DEVELOPMf - ORDER OF THE CITY COMMIS: )N OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 2. PROJECT NAME: POLY PLASTIC PACKAGING, INC. New Site Plans Request for major site plan modification to expand the existing hotel by 54 rooms, to a total of 161 rooms or a total of 103,993 square feet, and related site improvements. DESCRIPTION: 1475 West Gateway Boulevard LOCATION: North Boynton Hospitality, Limited OWNER: Richard Carlson, Jr., Esq. AGENT: 1. PROJECT NAME: HAMPTON INN -Quantum Park Major Site elan Modification A. SITE PLANS 6. New Business 1) Final disposition of February 22, 2000 Planning and Development Board meeting agenda items. A. Planning and Zoning Report 5. Communications and Announcements 4. Approval of Minutes. 3. Agenda Approval. 2. Introduction of the Board. 1. Pledge of Allegiance. PLACE: Commission Chambers 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida TIME: 7:00 P.M. DATE: March 16,2000 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING AGENDA - J:ISHRDATA\PlanningISHAREDlWPIAGENDASIP&D 1\2000 P&D AGENDASI3-16-00.doc /nl xc: Central File THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDMDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE. PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (561) 742-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLE ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S. 266.0105) ALL ITEMS WHICH ARE NOT PUBLIC HEARING, WILL GO FORTH TO THE CITY COMMISSION AS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. NOTICE 10. Adjournment 9. Comments by members 8. Other Request for major site plan modification to expand the existing industrial facility by 11,503 square feet, to a total of 26,711 square feet and related site improvements. DESCRIPTION: 510 East Industrial Avenue LOCATION: POLY PLASTIC PACKAGING, INC. OWNER: Robert E. Fetrow, Gator Engineering Planning and Development Board ~. _ .ing Agenda March 16, 2000 AGENT: Page 2 HAMPTON INN QUANTUM PARK MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 6.A.1 West - Water Management Tract <<A". Farther west is Shoppes of Boynton Shopping Center, zoned C-3 East - Lot I-A, zoned PID and the Lake Worth Drainage District E-4 Canal. Farther east is office Lot 21, zoned PID South - N.W. 22nd Avenue (Gateway Blvd.). Farther south is Motorola, zoned PID North - Remainder of Quantum Park Lot 2, vacant, zoned PID (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map) Surrounding land uses and Zoning District: Site Area: 155,799.6 square feet (3.57 acres) Building Area: 103,993 square feet Square Footage: 107 54 161 Existing Proposed TOTAL Number of Rooms: Hotel Type of Use: Planned Industrial Development, (PID) Zoning Designation: Industrial (I) Land Use Plan Designation: MSPM 00-001 File No.: 1475 West Gateway Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33426 Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2, Quantum Park PID Location: Richard W. Carlson, Jr., Esq. Applicant/Agent: North Boynton Beach Hospitality, LTD. Property Owner: Hampton Inn Project Name: DESCRIPTIQ1'LOF PROJECT March 8, 2000 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 00-061 There are 115 parking spaces existing on site. The additional parking area will increase the total parking count to 179 spaces, including three (3) new spaces designated as handicapped accessible for a total of eight (8). Spaces for employees and guests are included in the total. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) 6th Parking Facility: Existing on-site traffic circulation consists of a 27-foot wide, loop drive aisle with two access points on Gateway Boulevard. Guests, employees and restaurant patrons currently use both entrances. The existing vehicular use area provides parking areas containing a combination of 9 feet by 16 feet (9'xI6') and 9 feet by 18 feet (9'xI8') spaces. An additional 27-foot wide drive with similar parking stalls is planned for the hotel expansion. All existing paved areas will remain as approved and constructed. Driveways: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the city's review. The city's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred to time of permit review. b. Drainage- Overall PID traffic concurrency was addressed, when the Quantum Park PID was master planned. A comprehensive traffic study was evaluated by the Palm Beach County (PBC) Traffic Division prior to master plan approval. It was determined that 63,752 maximum trips would be permitted within the Quantum Park PID. The PBC Traffic Division approved a traffic statement for the existing 107 room Hampton Inn. A revised traffic study showing an increase in square footage and rooms, was not submitted for approval and written confirmation has not been received from Palm Beach County regarding the approval of the increased traffic rates. The written verification of Palm Beach County Traffic Division's acceptance of the new trip generations, as well as compliance with traffic performance standards shall be a condition of approval. Concurrency: a. Traffic- The developer is proposing an addition of 54 rooms, consisting of 38,177 square feet, to the existing 107 room, 65,816 square foot, 3 story hotel building. The expansion is proposed to extend on to the adjacent Lot 2. Additional parking area will be added to accommodate the additional rooms, (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan). The Quantum Park PID master plan was approved with a maximum limit of 400 hotel rooms, which currently includes the 107 rooms of the existing Hampton Inn. If the hotel's 54 room addition is approved and constructed, 239 hotel rooms would be allowed within future developments of the Quantum Park PID. Proposed Development: Lot 1 is currently a developed, 3.57-acre parcel. The development consists of an existing Hampton Inn 107 room hotel and The Original Pancake House restaurant on an outparcel (Lot I-A). To the south of the site along the Gateway Boulevard right-of-way line, is a row of street trees and a 15 + foot wide maintained grass area which provides some screening for the adjacent uses. Existing Site Characteristics: Page 2 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #00-061 Hampton Inn Quantum Park xc: Central File J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\QUANTUM 2000\Hampton Inn MSPM OO-OOI\Site plan staff report Hampton Inn.doc RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. A project sign plan was approved during review of the original hotel building. The plans for the proposed addition did not include additional site signage. The applicant was informed prior to the submittal, that if they were planning for additional signs, sign details must be submitted and reviewed as a sign plan amendment. A condition of approval would include meeting architectural requirements of the Quantum Park approved sign plan Signage: The proposed building fal;ade for the new addition, as viewed from Gateway Boulevard, is architecturally compatible with the existing hotel building. The building addition will receive surface treatments, materials and colors similar to the existing structure. Quantum Park's Architectural Review Committee reviewed the plans for the hotel addition and verification of approval was received on February 10, 2000. Community Design Plan: Building and site regulations will fully meet code when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. Building and Site Regulations: The landscaping of the site will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. The development will be provided with the required amount of perimeter landscaping. Landscaping: Edition Manual was utilized in determining the parking requirements for the existing hotel use. It was felt to be a preferable methodology over the city's standard for industrial uses which are solely based on employees and an estimate of visitors (to be determined by the petitioner). If seven (7) spaces are allocated to employees (using the city's standard of 1.5 spaces per 2 employees and assuming 9 employees), 166 spaces will remain for guests. This yields 1.03 spaces per room parking ratio. In comparison, ITE standards which were previously used in determining parking needs for the approved 107 room Hampton Inn, yields a slightly lower parking standard than the city's industrial parking regulations. The ITE analysis previously accepted by the city would yield a 0.9 space per-room minimum parking ratio. The plan currently uses the 0.9 space per room as a minimum parking requirement while proposing 1.03 parking spaces per room. The parking plan will meet the city's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning and ADA requirements for this use, and will provide 21 surplus spaces above that required by the ITE standard. Page 3 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #00-061 Hampton Inn Quantum Park Hi "- COMMe~ UANTUN' PA~K) . ~ U'------~ , / ,~. '.. - - _: '\ L.. c;3 \ r=~ \ '-~~ .~\ \1 '\ . ',\ f I I I , \~ ol\ \ \ \ 1\8\ Ml~E\ -: - ;'\~ '0 400. .800 FEET . PI.ANN'''';: ()F-Pf"'. ,.3...00 ... 'r" \\ \\\ "t '-;. PIC \~ UIV10TOROLAj: I NO-r IN CITY L-JCATION MAP _ EXHIBIT "A" HA~pN INN -..---------" ~ m X :r: - OJ - -f - - OJ - - Har1"IPton Nor-th Boynton A~tklon -- -- . ~~r!~ ~ ~.~~t;. RoI~ ~~:::_~ iff!' I Ii i II'. II ,f~i ii I lIt:iii tP!" i'- : :r: ''',' I " I E III II I I f : J. p, I I~ ., . i' . a; iUs .....,. ~p~;zt~ , - ~ 1JI'~ ,,- ........ ~ .....-- -". ---- i .. . if .. .. I !I~ i~ fT'l ~ I = I~ L 11: ! nr~;,;;1 .;Iij~~ia !~llhl! ~h=t&~: tU~liii ('I~~ ! I ,~ I - .I lUI~ iiii "'I) II' ~ ~ i t II ill~, ;~- ~~.a'~ I 'lil~ hr ~ . It · ~ aSJ · . Is;1 nul Ii i ii m .h~~ ~i1~ m I" I' >< I i Ii ~, ~Ili -~ J :::c - I' lQ OJ i ~ e) - ~i f!~ --f II - - OJ - - ~ --HAMPTON SUfTES ~~- George F. White A.IA. and Associates. Inc. o ~S5 N....U. rod_ HIqIl"'" Sullo r. Boca Ralan, rlGlida 334S7 ~1 1&7 saas (J) 11 I N -, I ~ i _....-- .---- I _,..._ --- --- ,-- - .- ~ m ~ -.-"'-.-- .~-- m i . r f ~ n >< n n i . . , I ... ... ... ... - OJ - -Fi' ~ : ii - - I OJ - - J~jiLJ- - II!~ U/J I T lf~1 I ~ ill-!. -l- U l ill I I I f~ L-...J J L · I. ,-.-, I I I I- I 1 ~L+--J .. of- L II II ,I L- I.....--t I U T /rj . . -'- I I 'r r-.I- I , r:::: . . -r H rael T"t I I- I 1 I.. r- ~_ J ~ L \nil ~ LL · .. II = u- I~ J I ~ IlL I...- Ill. I. ,. II.- ~ ~ J I '- ~~ L . I'" T l- . ~ I I _ r= E frJ. · ~ LL I!:::: I I · t::.... I-- 1----1 ,L pL.!- iTi fll _ ~ 1-II 1-81 ggldl~~a:- ~ . ..,.,1:::::::b---1 i . ~ -I f--J t- ..... B ,~ I I II ~rWr l> I N George F. White AlA and Associates., Inc. 54~~ Nor'" "ed..oI Hlqnway ~iI.'o Boca Roton. FlOf"iClo JJ4S7 ("') 'I1-e"UI Hampton Nonn Boynton Addltlc:>n -- - 8 n ~ ~~ ~f ... ij~ ... ee 8 n 8 e n 81 ~ ~~ ~~ ij~ ~~i~ : I( ~, 4 ; . \ II e \ · ... ... ... ...~ 8 10 8 ~; ... ~i ... ~~ :I~ ~y il! I, IZ ... ll~ .- j. \ ... 'I' F ;~ " ... I' II il ... ~~ 'I: ... I ' I lJl ' H I H,~ I t~ .~~~ I >--- I I II: '--- iLl r . '--0 8 I .- . I I I .- I -- . I I . . . I . I .- I -= I I I ;1.- . I .- I I . . 88 - I I . r L 81 I . T I; . if l'. ~ II I . ... . . I .- I - L r I I ,- II.. I . I ~ '- I . . ~ - . L T 8 'i I ~ L- 0 -t 8 m }> ~ m r ~m r."< .;:l> "'01 ;0 ~Z ~ II ~ m II r S~ ,) ::f ~2 - - __m__ - -- ~- DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: NONE UTILITIES Comments: 1. All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities, In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LOR Sec. 7.518.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2. Comp Plan policy 3C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available, 3. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec. 26-15) 4, Dept. of Health Permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec. 26-12) FIRE Comments: 5. A water distribution system plan is required and was not provided. LOR 6-16. Include location of F .0. connection. POLICE Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 6, Combine Lots I & 2 with a Unity of Title. 7, Any fill operation shall require an excavation/fill permit. Project name: HAMPTON INN - QUANTUM PARK File number: MSPM 00-00 I Reference: 2nd Review, Maior site plan modification. File # MSPM 00-001 with a Februarv 22,2000 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Al!lll"ovaI DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING Comments: 8, Add a symbol to the site plan drawings (SP-l and SP-2) that represents the perimeter limits of constructions for the proposed new work, 9, Show and label the handicap accessible entrance doors on the drawing entitled I st floor plan. The location of the accessible entrance doors shall match those that are shown on the site plan. 10, Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing (SP-l). The symbol shall represent and delineate the path of travel of the accessible route that is required between the new accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door to the building, Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route (Note: The minimum width required by the code is forty- four (44) inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The symbol represents the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path. Please note at the time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans verifying that the accessible route in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. 11. The number of new accessible parking spaces that are shown on site plan SP-l does not match the number shown on site plan SP-2. The number shown on both plans shall match. 12. Within the site data found on both sheets titled site plan, identify the proposed finish floor elevation of the building (lowest floor elevation). Verify that the proposed elevation complies with regulations of the code by adding specifications and notes to the site data addressing the following Issues: a,) From the FIRM map, identify the title of the flood zone the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate this on the plans b.) As the design professional-of-record for the project, state that the proposed floor elevation is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations. [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code] Page 2 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No.: MSPM 00-00 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT c,) Identify the floor elevation the design professional has established for the new building within the footprint of the building showing on the site plans, I st floor plan and civil plan. Also, identify the finish floor elevation of the existing building. 13. On site plan (SP-2), label the symbol that represents the location of the proposed site lighting poles. 14. On site plan (SP-I and SP-2), identify the symbol that represents the property line, 15. Add to the site plan (SP-I) all the easements that are shown on the survey. The location type and size of the easement(s) shall be shown and identified on the site plan. Where applicable, amend the plans so that the structures do not encroach into an easement. 16. Identify on both drawings that are titled site plan the actual distance that the building is setback from the north, east and west property lines. Please note that overhangs, covered walkways, canopies, awnings and other appurtenances that are attached to the building shall be considered when identifying building setbacks, Therefore, identify the width of the overhangs, covered walkways, canopies, awnings, etc. The building setbacks shall comply with setback regulations specified in the Zoning Code. Identify whether the area located on the west side of the building is covered. Also, indicate the use of the area. 17. At the time of permit submittal, provide a completed and executed City Unity of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed for each property being unified is required to process the form. Each recorded deed shall include a legal description and the owner identified on each deed shall match. 18. Before permit review, submit a current survev of the subject site. 19, Compliance with the Building Codes will be evaluated at time of permit review. The permit fee, water and sewer facility fees, Fire and Life Safety fees, County fees and State fees will be determined at time of permit review. 20. Permits are required to construct the improvements shown on the approved site plan. Permit application forms are available in the Building Division of the Development Department. A permit submittal checklist is available in the Building Division. The list identifies the basic documents the Plan Analyst checks for when an applicant submits for permit review. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE Page 3 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No,: MSPM 00-001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALlST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: The following comments relate to the requirements in Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review 21, Provide a current survey of the adjacent property (Lot 1) showing the connection between the existing building and the addition, a portion of which is located on Lot 1. 22. Provide a north arrow on the site plan sheet SP-2. 23. Indicate on the elevation drawings the building colors and materials to be used. 24. Indicate the dimension of the setback from the west property line. 25, Indicate and label the location of the sidewalk on site plan sheets SP-I and SP-2. 26. Indicate and label the location of the site lighting on the site plan and landscape plan. Provide a site lighting detail with the height dimension. 27, Provide a colored elevation drawing showing all elevations of the building for the Planning and Development Board Meeting. 28. Indicate on the landscape plan the method of irrigation and the source of water to be used on site. The following comments relate to the requirements of Chapter 23 - Parking Lots 29. Provide a dimension for the parking lot drive aisle width on the site plan. 30, Provide a detail of the required handicapped parking sign. 31. The proposed building addition must match the character and design of the existing building, Indicate this on the elevation drawings. (Chapter. 9, Sec. 2) 32, Additional signs were not submitted for approval with this site plan, Signs must meet the requirements of Chapter 23. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 33, To be determined ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 34. To be determined Page 4 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No,: MSPM 00-001 J:ISHRDA T AIPLANNING\SHAREDIWP\PROlECTSIQUANTUM 2000IHAMPTON INN MSPM 00-00 III ST REVIEW COMMENTS. DOC Page 5 Hampton Inn - Quantum Park File No.: MSPM 00-001 City Clerk J:ISHROATA\Planning\SHAREOI\NPIPROJECTS\QUANTUM 2000IHAMPTON INN MSPM OO.oo1\Hampton Inn O.O.doc DATED: 7, Other 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order, 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 4, The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof, DENIED 3, The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included", established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations, THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: OR x THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO. TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Major Site Plan Modification LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 1475 West Gateway Boulevard in Quantum Park DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 21,2000 APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 1475 West Gateway Boulevard APPLICANT'S AGENT: Richard W. Carlson, Esquire PROJECT NAME: Hampton Inn- Quantum Park DEVELOPME. _ ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISt _ )N OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA DESCRIPTION: Request for major site plan modification to expand the existing industrial facility by 11,503 square feet, to a total of 26,711 square feet and site modifications. 510 East Industrial Avenue LOCATION: Poly Plastic Packaging Company, Inc OWNER: Robert E, Fetrow, Gator Engineering AGENT: POLY PLASTIC PACKAGING 2, PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: Request for major site plan modification to expand the existing hotel by 54 rooms, to a total of 161 rooms or a total of 103,993 square feet, and related site improvements, 1475 West Gateway Boulevard LOCATION: North Boynton Hospitality, Ltd, OWNER: Richard W, Carlson, Jr., Esq AGENT: HAMPTON INN-Quantum Park 1, PROJECT: A. MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1, New Business Conference Room C, 2nd Floor, West Wing, City Hall PLACE: 9:00 A.M. TIME: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 DATE: Michael W, Rumpf, Chairman FROM Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshall Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Mike Lane, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag, Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Larry Quinn, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division John Guidry, Interim Director of Engineering Jose Alfaro, Planning Division Lusia Galav, Planning Division Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Division Dave Kelly, Engineering Division TO: TECHNICA' REVIEW COMMITTEE I\~EETING AGENDA J:\SHRDA T AIPLANN INGISHARED\WPIAGENDASITRCIAPPITRC - 2000\2-22-00. DOC Adjournment 4, Learning Depot Dr. Verma Office Building BAPS Temple Current rectified Plan: 3, Comments by members 2, DESCRIPTION: Request for new site plan approval to construct a 98-room suite hotel, a 2-story 12,500 square foot office-retail building and a S,OOO-square foot restaurant on 4.41 acres, Northeast corner of Congress Avenue and SW 30th Avenue LOCATION: Estelle Blumberg and Mega Mini Co, Ltd, OWNER: William G, Thomas AGENT: CANDLEWOOD TOWER PLAZA . 2. PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: Request for new site plan approval to construct three warehouse/office buildings totaling 336,050 square feet in the Quantum PID on 23.56-acre, Lots 32 - 38 of Quantum Park located north of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard LOCATION: Premier Asset Management, Inc, or Assigns (Contract Purchaser) OWNER: Winston Lee, ASLA, AICP Winston Lee & Associates, Inc AGENT: QUANTUM BUSINESS CENTER (LOTS 32-38) 1, PROJECT: B. NEW SITE PLAN Page 2 TRC Meeting Agenda February 22, 1999