Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS MEMORANDUM 4 February 1986 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Humana Medfirst - Parking Lot Variance Request Section 5-144(c)4 of the Code of Ordinances requires that when a variance to Section 5, Article X, Parking Lots is requested, the Technical Review Board must forward to the Plannina and Zonina Board a recommendation, and that the recommendatio~ forwarded-is to be made a part of the Public Hearing proceedings. To that end, this memo is forwarded, consistent with 5-144(c) (4). Sally S. Benson, agent for Humdeco, Inc., has requested a variance to Section 5-141(g) (3) Driveways, of the Parking Lot regulations which requires, among other things, that no driveways may be constructed closer than 180 feet to the intersection of the rights-of-way lines on streets of a higher classification (collectors/arterials). In this instance, the applicant is requesting to be permitted to retain an existing curb cut located on Boynton Beach Boulevard approximately 170 feet from the intersection with N.W.7th Street. For an ex- planation of the Code requirement, the nature of the variance requested, and the variance justification, please refer to the attached Notice of Public Hearing and application. On Tuesday, February 4, 1986 the Technical Review Board (TRB) met to review the plans and documents submitted, and to formulate a recommendation with regard to the variance requested. After re- view and discussion, the TRB recommended that the variance requested be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the developer close the existing median cuts on Boynton Beach Boulevard at N.W. 7th Street (both sides) and construct the U-turn at N.W. 7th Court as per the approved DOT plan for reconstruction of median cuts in this area of the City. Page Two. 2. That the driveway onto Boynton Beach Boulevard be constructed with a 25 foot radius to facilitate ingress and egress to the site, as recommended in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Murray-Dudek and Associates. 3. That the improvements listed under item #1 and #2 above be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. {' ~~ -- Carmen ,ft ~ _ .r: S. Ann zlato flat cc: City Manager Technical Review Board Central File t" ~-, ( MEMOR.'iNDUM 31 January 1986 TO: Betty S. Boroni, City Clerk FRO!1: James J. Golden, Assistant City Planner RE: Humana Medfirst Parkina Lot Variance - Attached you will find a copy of the revised warranty deed (including the east half of lot 28 and lot 29) which completes the above-referenced request. 4-- f. ~ OJame~ J. Golden flat cc: Central File Attach. ... ... ... I ~ II ~ II ,., <I << Ii .., Ii a: ... Ii .., tII II II , !i I' I. ~ I Ul t:l r- -< 0- r- oD r ".. CD ..,:..' y ., : ~', Cor' c:t lve wAIUIon ... 1hls 1fmanIg Itttl MoJ. .~. 1jU" d.,./ January A, D, I. 86 6, ROBERT Q. WYCKOFF and DORIS E. WYCKOFF. his lwre "_h,.'I_ cofl.d ,"'_ graniCI', I. HlfiMDECO. tNC., . Delaware Corporation wAo,. ~--:;::'d,..n i. 5"00 U..htSt t'1'\p.;1\J S"'((t~I..;Lotl;.s",II"C, Ky fO:J.&/-I",3' '''''""0''.'' call.J ,I.. grantH: lwtwft.... .... ........ 1M _ ".......... ..ot .,...u....,.. ;.,.1... ... .~ ,....leo .. II",. 1M_I.... .... ....n. '-11,1 ~.....;_ ..... ...... '" ...d.w.dll&k. .ad 1M ....~_ 1M _... ., -.-._..., 1tfitntSSdh: TIa.. "If' 9ronlor, 1M and in con,idil!raflon 0/11.. IU," of S 10.00------...1 011._ va'_M", cnn.iJ_Uon.. rKf'lpl wlt",""'1 I. It.reb, oclmowll'dg.J. It.r.b, nran',. "-",cd",. ..Il.. .1.1...... ,.. mb... ,...'.on.. con....,. and coni'""' unfa II.. gran'". aU ,ha, cerlailt land .'1110'. In Palm Beach Counl,. Florida. "iI:~ PARCEL ONE: Lots 22 and 23 less the North Ten (10') feet and additional 1-95 Right-Of-Way a8 in Official Record Book 2163. page 1967 and Official Record Book 2194. page 107 and Lot 29. and the East one-half (1/2) of Lot 28. Block 2. LAKE BOYNTON ESTATES. PLAT I, according to the Plat thereof recorded 1n Plat Book 11. page 32. of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. SUBJECT TO restrictions and easement of record, if any; taxes for the year 1985 and all subsequent years, and to all valid zoning ordinances. THIS DEED IS BEING RECORDED TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DE~CRIPTION AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 4696, PAGE 637. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH CDUSTY. FLORIDA . Iogelhtr wi/It all Ihl' 'f'nl:'mrnls, Iu'r.eli/ompn's and opputl.nonrps ,h.r.,o belonging or in on7- u.is. npprtloinin". To Hallt and 10 Hold, ,,," ,..", ,. ,,'" ,'mpl, /."',,, Rnd ,llr "parllor IIf'rr'hY cOI'PflaF1h u'i111 ~nirl qrnn'('f" 11..0' Ihf" "ronlor i.. loU'flJll}. '.''Led of '(lId land in fr'p ~i".plr'; Ihal II". WOlllor lifts "nod ,ifill' anrl Imdul ou,horily '0 ,fOil Oriel ('0"".' ,oid LJnJ: 11.0' 11... pranl"r 11r"r'hY full" ""I,rn,.I.' 1/... IiIlp 10 SOj,1 land lInd u'ill rll'fr'nd Ihr' '(lmt> ogoin" lh. lawlul clai",. 01 oil PPrsOlIS W/lOmsOf.I....r: (llIrI ,hfl' "lIiJ laml i. frf'(> of all .'nrumhrorl(,(>$. Pu....pl 'OJlt>, accruinG 'lJb'll'qu~n' 10 f)r'cf'mbf'r '\1. IQ84. . __.U,","" N . ,-I) . r""ft."..,.N. tlU~'I.~~' ,I....e. In lEIilntss U1hrrrof, Ih' ,.id g,.n'., h,,, firsl obol'f' w,ilIt>n. if/riP" (mol 1.01..1 IhPIf' prplI':nl, ,It. Jay a"J )'~'lr ct~.rxc~rt~. ...""''''L:'.!k,l~1<'''''' .. DorJ.s E..._-w)'c 0 .___~___._ n. ..__. . .au IfIOW rOl IICCOaCIln UII S~gn~nd;J1."'dre;~ .. w~r~z~, .......... H.-nE OF FLORIDA COl.'Nn' OF PALH BEACH I HEREBY CERTIFY Ihat on Ihil day. bdon mr, an offirrr rlul)' aUlho.ind in Ihr Slalr afornaid and in Ihr Counly JlfOt('lald to tJlb .t1r.nowlrdlllmt'nu. potnonally appntrd Robert Q. Wyckoff and Doris E. Wy~koff. his wife I'" ~ .nown 10 bf' !tIt' .ppnong dt'Ktibfod in and who toPruttd Ihr . 'OI'rtainlf illllrum,lIl and they. at.nuw~dlllrd bdnft' mt' ,h.. they C',pr\lt,d Ihr lamt'. . . . WITNESS my, 'Lud alld olfidal, "al _in Iht' Co..nty and Slall' 1&11 afotuaid Ihi. ,'I. '/3 eA. day 01 .Jaruary . A. D. 19 86 .~L..$ f~~ FIr UJno vF.~IF;rO FAtM (J::.1,CH r:j~U:':T': f",_ JOI"-J~' .: ., ClE, ',;...IIITr~ ,. .. ........ ~ ~ . : ~'; , My eoqd,u"to9 ~ ~m1.,r~.: ,('.~~.... .t 1.?~7 Notary Public I ,~ 1 11,1 ~gd ~j~l ~gleJ ;Ji ',y , ...,..",\ :-'0 :~I.~!.fll ,',~ .I;".\~ ...."':f~....d'.>'&.. , " ..f:."-' . ~'j .."'..Y ...- ...- ."f -1" ~ ,/ -: f.'''''''','; -'jl. ~ -. ~ ~ ~ \ 1f 'tl }f ~0; ~~ ~;li'l~-lJ CmmVY .lS'fAT!! ijf FlUti~M 'J;....." ...... ,.;;;,~":".~.L.':'~ l "~,,;,,1 L~tuh( certify thal the ",., ,..... .:1 f{~'.J>~~t~""."",".",,,:~:";.;) i..J:::'~1Qinn is 01 true (;ovt t, ,.r" ~ ~ ;: '.' .-J 'U\" . ,,11 t ",:,';''' cI du: ucord in my offi<< "lee''';'''> ~ 'l1b~f .. ~u. 19.fu Jl)HI~ fj~ a..kc'~~ D i!;ri~~'''':1.- ... ..;w1. nc. , ~", Tr M E M 0 RAN D U !1 /1"-:,: r-.,. , .~: -:d;~G Ur:.;">T. TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato Planning Director DATE: January 17, 1986 FROM: Sue Kruse Deputy City Clerk . Attached please find copies of the following which are ~cheduled for the Planning & Zoning Board meeting of February 11, 1986: Humdeco Parking Lot Variance Public Hearing Notice Humdeco Abandonment Public Hearing Notice Praxis Adult Care Residence Conditional Use Public Hearing Notice G~J/ ~~~ Sue Kruse sk Attachments cc: City Manager NENORANDUN 2 October 1985 TO: Chairman and Hembers Plannina and Zonina Board .~ ~ FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director RE: Humana MedFirst Site Plan Humedco, Inc. has submitted a site plan to construct a 3,l25 square foot medical facility which is proposed to be located on the south side of West Boynton Beach Boulevard, approximately 100 feet east of N.W. 7th Street. Among the issues raised in the discussion of this plan at the Technical Review Board (TRB) meeting of October I, 1985 was the matter of traffic in general and the interface of the proposed northerly driveway with West Boynton Beach Boulevard specifically. The TRB was advised by the Planning Director that the plan was to be considered with only a one-way driveway onto Boynton Beach Boulevard as the planned configuration resulted in a conflict with the parking lot regulations - 180 feet required between the inter- section of rights-of-way lines and driveways on arterials. Other issues raised which were related to traffic were as follows: I. The direction of flow of the modified one-way driveway. 2. The configuration of the median cut on West Boynton Beach Boulevard as it relates to ingress to and egress from this site and to N.W. 7th Street to the north. 3. The proposal to construct a fast-food restaurant just west of this site. 4. The need for a right-turn deceleration lane. 5. The plans by DOT to reconstruct the medians in this area. 6. The impact of office traffic on the residential area to the south, and MEMORANDUM 2 October 1985 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Humana MedFirst - Additional Staff Comments In addition to the traffic impacts which are covered under a separate memo, please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above referenced site plan: I. Must provide dumpster enclosure detail for dumpster pad. 2. Parking lot code requires sodium vapor lighting - mercury vapor lighting is not acceptable. (~~P~ry~4 -~armen S. nnunziato . flat M E M 0 RAN DUM October I, 1985 TO: Mr. Carmen Annunziato City Planner FROM: Tom Clark City Engineer RE: "Med First", Boynton Beach Blvd. and N.W. 7th Street, Site Plan Comments: I. Bottom elevation of the detention area should be shown. 2. A traffic survey should be made with special attention to the connection to Boynton Beach Blvd. ~ y ~ cPcv>L-- Tom Clark TAC:ck MEMORANDUM October I, 1985 TO: Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato Director of Planning RE: Humana/Med First- N. W. 2nd Ave. & N. W. 7th street Water meter location is presently shown on the west property line near the old easement. This water meter must be located at the east side near the proposed telephone booth in a grassed area. We are returning the plans. G ~. per~essna, Di,rector of utilities apt Attachment: a/s above MEMO fwm t~ Jut. of C-7 RICHARD S. WALKE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, Boynton Beach IO-I-85 Planning Department: Humana MedFirst project does not show Dumpster Location,' Concrete pad. et~ Also, access needs to be shown. ~~ Rick Walke T I, MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSUL rANTS December 5, 1985 Randy B. Oakes, Project Manager Medfirst Construction Humana Inc., The Humana Building 500 West Main Street P.O. Box 1438 Louisville, Kentucky 40201-1438 Re: Traffic Report For The Proposed Medfirst Site On The Southside Of Boynton Beach Road Between 1-95 & NW 7th Street In The City Of Boynton Beach In Palm Beach County ...:......:...... _.,,,,~, . . '~ ~f JV' Ill} l>iit ':,i";~: - :~., . MDDM Project #85-156 Dear Randy, I am pleased to submit the Traffic Impact Statement Analysis Report for the subject project. The report outlines the evaluation and summarizes the findings and recommendations. I appreciated the opportunity of providing this traffic engineering service. Please advise if further information and/or clarifications are required on this report. Sincerely, 2J~M?rl~ Daniel N. Murray, P.e- L ME"'TT 'SCAND Of"CE BOCA RATON OFFICE: 100 PARNELL STREET' MERRITT ISLAND, FLORIDA 32953' (305) 459-2905 1388 NW, 2ND AVE.' BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33432'(305) 391-MDDM =M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC IMPACT STAT~ffiNT ANALYSIS REPORT , ON THE PROPOSED MEDFIRST FACILITY LOCATED BETWEEN 1-95 & NW 7TH STREET ON THE SOUTHS IDE OF BOYNTON BEACH ROAD IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH IN PALM BEACH COUNTY MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCiATES Prepared By: ~~If/,/o/~ ',pkf Daniel N. Murray, P.E. Date =M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENT ---------------- ---------------- Page Introduction. ... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .1 Site Location Map -- Figure #1......................................2 Site Data Facts............................. -0-......................3 Traffic Facts From Comparable Medfirst Sites........................3 Trip Distribution...................................................4 Trip Generation.....................................................5 . Development Traffic Assignment......................................5 Area Average Development Traffic Assigned -- Figure #2..............6 AM Peak Hour Turning Counts Figure #3............................7 PM Peak Hour Turning Counts Figure #4............................8 Impact Of Offsite Traffic Modifications.............................9 Access Onto Boynton Beach Road.....................................lO Access For Westbound Boynton Beach Road............................ll Conclusions.... .................. ... ....... ............. ....... . .. .12 Appendix "A" Activity Data At Other Medfirst Facilities Appendix "B" Florida Department of Transportation Conceptual Plan On Boynton Beach Road Median Opening Revisions Just West Of 1-95 Appendix "c" - Summary Of 24-Hour Machine Counts ==M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES INTRODUCTION ========;;;:=== A parcel of property located on the southside of Boynton Beach Road between 1-95 & NW 7th Street is being proposed for development as "MEDFIRST" facility. Directly north of the site is a Wendy's fast food facility & a Texaco Gas Station, which currently have full access to Boynton Beach Road via a median opening at the north approach of NW 7th Street. Additionally, Gateway Centre ~s under construction on the southwest corner of ~~ 7th Street intersection with Boynton Beach Road. Also, the vacant 0.3 acre parcel in the southeast quadrant of m, 7th Street & Boynton Beach Road was recently denied approval as a ice cream store. For additional details, reference should be made to the Site Location Map Figure #1. To ensure that the traffic flow and safety issues are properly addressed, City of Boynton Beach has required a current traffic impact statement analysis & report be undertaken to address the traffic generated by the proposed development and its effect on the adjacent highway links & intersections. As a result Murray Dudeck & Associates, Traffic Engineering Consultants have been retained by the developer to investigate and determine the traffic impacts created by the proposed Medfirst faCility at full capacity. In conducting the traffic study, it was necessary to evaluate the existing highway network and their associated traffic volumes. Furthermore to effectively determine the intensity of traffic generated by a typical Medfirst operation, machine counts were undertaken at a comparable faCility. Also, records of patient activity for a consecutive 10 day period were obtained to substantiate a typical Medifirst operation. This data is shown in Appendix "A". Then the development traffic had to be determined at full build-out capacity and assigned to the surrounding highways. Consideration of adjacent trip attractions & trip productions, as well as the desired route selections were important in determining trip patterns. Traffic data from Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of Transportation was utilized. Included was the DOT plan as depicted in Appendix "B", which indicates proposed geometric changes to the Boynton Beach Road median openings between Industrial Avenue & NW 8th Street. Likewise, an inventory of the adjacent highway network and 24-hour machine traffic counts on the critical link approaches was collected. This data is summarized in Appendix "C". -1- =M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES Relocated Old Boynton Rd. NH 8th Street SITE LOCATION MAP ----------------- ----------------- Old Boynton Rd. To De Relocated NH 7th Court Gateway Centre m! 7th Street Figure #1 NIl 7th Street I'endy's Texaco t NORTI' 1-95 Industrial Avenue NH 1st Ave. PROJECT SITE :(~}:--:****'l~};:*~;:; ~:::~::: -2- =AI~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES SITE DATA FACTS c:=:============ The Traffic Engineering Impact Statement & Analysis was based on the site plan & site data prepared by Godsey Associates Architects. Specifically, the site plan reflects a proposed MedFirst site with access onto Boynton Beach Road & onto NW 1st Avenue. The characteristics of the site are comparable to the standard Medfirst facility. The following items are pertinent to this traffic statement analysis: ........................................................................... ........................................................................... Site Size = 0.58 acres Building Size = 3,125 sq. ft. Proposed Use = Single Story Medical Office Building Parking = 29 spaces ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: TRAFFIC FACTS FROM CO~WARABLE MEDFIRST SITES -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- To accurately determine the trip generating characteristics of the Medfirst operations, two existing sites were evaluated. One site is located on NW 2nd. Avenue in Boca Raton and the other facility is on State Road 7 in Plantation. The site in Boca Raton averages 30 to 40 patients per day and employs: 1 physician, 1 nurse, 1 x-ray technician and 1 receptionist. The hours of operation are from 8 am to 8 pm. Based on 24-hour machine counters installed on the one driveway serving the facility, there were a total of 245 vehicles on 11/4/85, a total of 220 vehicles on 11/5/85, and a total of 158 vehicles on 11/6/85. The site in Plantation has the same number of employees, but is not as active. A research of their November Marketing Utilization Report substantiates that the daily average number of patients is 16. -3- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES If you assume that some of the patients generate 2 trips/visit and others generate 4 trips/visit because their ride drops them off and then returns later, it would be realistic to use an average of 3 trips/visit. Also, it is assumed that the employees all generate 4 trips/day and various deliveries generate 10 trips/day. Based on these assumptions, the number of patients on 11/4/85, 11/5/85, & 11/6/85 are calculated as follows: ........................................................................... ........................................................................... Trips/Day Date Total Daily Traffic Employee + Delivery + Misc. Patients/day ------------------- ------- -------- ---------- 11/4/85 245 tpd. 20 tpd 10 tpd 25 tpd 190/3 = 63 pd 11/5/85 220 tpd. 20 tpd 10 tpd 10 t pd 180/3 = 60 pd 11/6/85 158 tpd. 20 tpd 10 tpd o tpd 128/3 = 43 pd ............................................................................ ........................................................................... To determine a typical daily traffic generation level for a Medfirst operation, the 3 day traffic figure were average as follows: 1/3 ( 245 tpd. + 220 tpd. + 158 tpd.) = 208 tpd. ******* TRIP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- ----------------- To determine a realistic traffic distribution pattern it is essential to undertake a careful review and evaluation of the surrounding residential trip productions & other trip attractions. Also, the characteristics of the highway links were reviewed to estimate the most logical route selection. Based on the previously indicated factors, it is assumed that 60% of the trips will approach from the east or depart toward the east. Approximately 35% of the trips will utilized Boynton Beach Road to the west and 5% will be dispersed to the surrounding residential communities to the south. -4- =M~ MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC GENERATION ================== Since the Medfirst operation is not quite the same as a normal medical office building, the usage of the recently published Institute of Transportations Engineers Trip Generation--Third Edition Publication under the "Medical Office Building" category is not recommended. Also in referring to the 1981 Update Study Of Vehicular Traffic Generation Characteristics Within Palm Beach County, it is evident that this study did not address this specific type of land use. To arrive at a more realistic trip forecast, the methodology utilized was to collect data at comparable sites, which are depicted in Appendix "A" and previously discussed. Based on this data source the subsequent computations were made: ........................................................................... ........................................................................... Type of Facility Unit Size Trip Rate Daily Trips --------------- ---------------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- Medfirst 1 unit 208.0 trips/duo 208 tpd ........................................................................... ........................................................................... DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ------------------------------ ------------------------------ After a thorough review of all the traffic engineering aspects that would impact the traffic distribution patterns, the calculation of the Area Average Daily Development Traffic Assigned as shown in Figure #2 was undertaken. The figures reflect the existing 1985 daily traffic and the development traffic. The development traffic on each of the surrounding highway link was determined, by utilizing the trip distribution percentages previously stated. To compute the peak hour traffic at each of the development access and onto NW 7th Street, it was necessary to utilize the hourly traffic figures shown in Appendix "A" data. Additionally, the peak hour directional traffic movements were determined by utilizing the trip distribution percentages as well. The "Project Development Peak Hour Traffic" is depicted in the AM Peak Hour Turning Counts -- Figure #3 & PM Peak Hour Turning Counts Figure #4. -5- =M~ MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES AVERAGE DAILY DEVELOPI'CENT TRAFfIC ASSIGNED ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ Figure #2 t NONTI! 1-95 Relocated Old Boynton Rd. EST. 8000 (10) "801 O'~' '\ 35774 (120) *35894* 35774 (130) *35B94* Industrial Avenue 35774 (62) *35836* N\! 7th Court NP 7th Street 35774 (167) *35941* 35774 (125 ) *35899" <62> 2483 B2 ~21> EST. 5000 (16) *5016" ~ 1904 .- (10) JI' *1914* (16) ~ NIl 1st Ave. PROJECT SITE *::::;~ ':~ ~~ :}:* ;}: ':.:~~ ::~;:~ 11',1 8th Street NP 7th Street :;~*~o,"*::~ NOTE: IIDDN eastbound Boynton Beach Road count failed, so the westbound count of 17,887 was doubled for 2-way traffic. Palm Beach County 1984 AADT = 25,510 LEGEND 1904 (10) *1914* 1985 Existing Daily Traffic By NDDN Nedfirst Development Daily Traffic Existing + Development Daily Traffic <21> EST. 5000 U-Turns Created By f'ledian Closures By DOT Estimated Daily Traffic \!ith Regional 11a11 & Signal At 11'11 8th Street -6- ==M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES AN PEAK HOUR TURNING COUNTS --------------------------- --------------------------- Figure #3 t NO"TII 1-95 Relocated Old Boynton Rd. Industrial Avenue NI-! 7th Court. N\, 7th Street ( 2) - 1064 (3) (2)1443~ (00)....... ....-: (5) (1) (3) 1443-- NI-l 1st Ave. PROJECT SITE ***}):~~******~~ NH 8th Street mv 7th Street LEGEND *****,' 1064 AN IVestbound Existinp, Peak !lour Traffic 1443 AH Eastbound Existing Peak Hour Traffic (5) Development Peak Hour Traffic -7- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES pt.j PEAK !lOUR TURNING COUNTS --------------------------- --------------------------- Figure #4 t NORT<! 1-95 Relocated Old Boynton Rd. Industrial Avenue liH 7th Court N\'! 7th Street (4)1064~ (00) ..-.... - (4) -141,3 (6) (10) (2) (6) 1064 ~ N\i 1st Ave. PROJECT SITE ~: ~:e ~:o:: ~~:* * };: ~::}:: ~:* NIl 8th Street lilY 7th Street LEGEND **;'::*** 1443 P~l Westbound Existing Peak Hour Traffic 1064 PN Eastbound Existing Peak Hour Traffic (10) Development Peak Hour Traffic -8- =M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES IMPACT OF OFFSITE TRAFFIC MODIFICATIONS ======================================= A. Boynton Beach Road Median Opening Revisions As depicted in Appendix "B", certain median opening revisions are proposed by the Florida Department of Transportation. The project is scheduled for a fiscal 86/87 letting. The intention is to develop adequate left turn storage lanes and to more positively control the turning conflicts. To accomplish this the median opening for the north approach & south approach of NW 7th Street will be closed. Also, the left turn egress maneuver from NW 7th Court will be physically prohibited. Likewise, thru positive signing, U-turns will be permitted & encouraged at NW 8th Street, at NW 7th Court, and at Industrial Avenue median openings. The impact on the Medfirst site, is the elimination of direct left turns to & from the access on Boynton Beach Road and the indirect use of NW 7th Street to execute the left turn movements. It will be necessary to make a U-turn at Industrial Avenue for left turn egressing motorists and to make a U-turn at NW 8th Street for ingressing vehicles. With this configuration, there will be a small number of vehicles from the Medfirst facility that use NW 1st Avenue to gain access to NW 8th Street. The daily figure of 16 vehicles is depicted in Figure #2. It is important to note that with the median opening reV1S1ons, some of the 1904 daily traffic that presently uses the south approach to NW 7th Street will divert to NW 8th Street, because of the elimination of the left turn movements and due to the fact that signalization at NW 8th Street will offer a protected movement, which will be more desireab1e to certain motorists. Since there are several street linkages to Nl1 8th Street, it is not anticipated that all rerouted trips would use NW 1st Avenue between NW 7th Street & NW 8th Street. A1sQ, a segment of the 1904 trips are to the commercial sites east of the Seaboard Coast Railroad, which will be eliminate in this area, when the Woolbright projects build the new railroad crossing & connection to NW 8th Street, just north of Woolbright Road. The suggested geometric improvements are essential, because of the substandard spacing of median openings & inadequate left turn storage design. The existing highway configuration is just waiting for a serious accident, thus the proposed improvements should be accelerated. Based on recent traffic data collected, the vehicular activity on Boynton Beach Road has significantly increased due to the opening of the Regional Mall. With the proposed improvements being implemented, it will materially benefit the Medfirst site from a traffic safety standpoint. From an access standpoint the safety will be enhanced, but some additional travel time will be required. -9- =Mr;;p- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES B. Signalization Of NW 8th Street & Boynton Beach Road The signal is to be installed by Palm Beach County within the next 3-6 months. It will positively assign several traffic movements within the area. In conjunction with the signalization, is the relocation of Old Boynton Beach Road directly opposite mv 8th Street. Turn lane improvements will be included in these modifications. The proposed traffic signal will facilitate the ingress & egress movements at the intersection. Additionally, the signal will introduce artificial gaps in the Boynton Beach Road traffic flow, such as to provide easier right turn exiting for the Medfirst access on Boynton Beach Road. Access onto Boynton Beach Road ------------------------------ ------------------------------ The consideration of permitting access onto Boynton Beach Road was evaluated by the Florida Department of Transportation, when Medfirst submitted for a driveway permit. On 10/16/85 the DOT issued a driveway permit which would permit right turns in & out of the site. It was recognized by DOT personnel that any left turns would be eliminated by there proposed median opening revision. Also, the approved signal at the NW 8th Street intersection will provide gaps in the traffic stream & will undoubt1y slow the overall travel speeds on Boynton Beach Road. Furthermore, a development such as the proposed Medfirst facility, is a very low traffic generator, which will introduce minimum number of turning conflicts. In fact, the total peak hour traffic using this driveway will be on 18 vehicles/hour. The maximum traffic activity for the Medfirst operation is during the off-peak periods and the maximum anticipated traffic using this driveway would be a total of 30 vehicles/hour. To facilitate the ingress &'egress movements to the Medfirst site, it is suggested that a 25 foot radii on the driveway be provided. This will guarantee a reasonable ingress entry speed to avoid any potential rear-end accident problem and enhance the ability of egressing traffic to accelerate during the right turning maneuver. Additionally, with Boynton Beach Road as a six lane divided highway, motorists expect the right thru lane to be used by right turning vehicles, so they are more perceptive & ready for vehicular speed reductions. The primary causation of rear-end accidents in the right thru lane of a 6-1ane divided highway, has been due to the fact that the driveway radii or profile has been so restrictive that any entering vehicle comes almost to a complete stop in the roadway. By controlling these factors, such an accident causation situation can be avoided. -10- =Mif1J)xr MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES The consideration of constructing a right turn lane is normally not made unless there are a minimum of 50 right turn ingress movements per hour. This is the standard that Palm Beach County Engineering uses. Secondly, the need of a right turn deceleration is intended on high speed roadways, where you want to encourage vehicles to leave the thru lane at the same speed as the prevailing thru lane speed. This type of design is intended for interchange ramps at expressways or major arterial intersections. Access For Westbound Boynton Beach Road --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Motorists will utilize the U-turn movement being developed by DOT at the intersection of Industrial Avenue & Boynton Beach Road. This U-turn location will be used by drivers desiring to gain access to Wendy's & Texaco and by exiting vehicles from Gateway Centre & Medfirst desiring to proceed westbound on Boynton Beach Road. With the revised median opening design, these movements can be accomodated and if sometime in the future the need arises, a U-turn signal could be installed. A second choice for egressing motorists Medfirst is to use NW 1st Avenue to m, 8th Street, which allows motorists to use the signalized intersection for the northbound left turn movement desiring to proceed westbound on Boynton Beach Road. The level of traffic from the Medfirst project that would use NW 1st Avenue is very limited. In fact Figure #2 reflects a total of 26 daily trips between the access & m, 7th Street and 16 daily trips between NW 7th Street & NW 8th Street. The Gateway Centre has a s~cond option to execute a U-turn by using the m, 7th Court left turn storage lane, where U-turns are permitted. It is anticipated that a minimal number of vehicles may choose to use the NW 1st Avenue-- NW 8th Street option to gain access to the signalized intersection. -11- =MriJ)xt- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CONCLUSIONS ----------- ----------- As a result of traffic engineering these determinations the aforementioned evaluations & analysis, findings & recommendations were reached. the subsequent comments are offered: certain Based on #1 The Medfirst facility will be a low traffic generator, which will not significantly impact the roadway network capacity. #2 Access location onto Boynton Beach Road as reflected in the site plan is reasonable & acceptable from a traffic flow & safety standpoint. #3 The traffic operational improvements to the median openings & left turn storage lanes along Boynton Beach Road will enhance the overall traffic flow & safety on this state highway and improve the ingress--egress movement from the Medfirst site. #4 The need for a secondary access onto NW from an emergency aspect and to allow the option to use the signalized intersection 1st. Avenue is recommended less agressive driver the at NW 8th Street. #5 The traffic signal to be installed by Palm Beach County at the intersection of m, 8th Street & Boynton Beach Road will improve upon the overall traffic safety, especially with the increased traffic from the Regional Mall. Indirectly it will benefit the Medfirst site, because of the introduction of artificial gaps in the eastbound stream of traffic and because it will reduce the eastbound average travel speeds. #6 The traffic characteristics of a Medfirst operation are more uniform throughout the day with mimjma1 peaking periods. Secondly, most vehicles will be passenger cars and not commercial type vehicles. Thirdly, the ~Iedfirst facility does not receive emergency vehicle patients. #7 The predominant vehicles using the residential streets to the the site will be residents in these neighborhoods using the facilities. Ready access to a outpatient medical facility available under the proposed site plan. south of Medfirst will be Based on the aforementioned conclusions, it is MURRAY-DUDECK ASSOCIATES professional opinion that the overall traffic flow & safety of the general public motorist will not be adversely impacted by the proposed Medfirst facility. Thus from a traffic engineering aspect this project is supportable & recommendable. -12- =M~ MURRAY -DUDECK Be ASSOCIATES APPENDIX "A" ----------- ----------- Activity Data At Other Medfirst Facilities ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ #1 Boca Raton Site On h~, 2nd. Avenue -- 3-day--24 Hour Counts #2 Plantation Site On State Road 7 -- 10 day number of patients =MSJ):I{]- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HUMANA MED-FIRST N.W. 2nd AVE FLOW HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUME < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 AM 0 1 4 2 7 ** 8 AM 0 2 2 6 10 *** 9 AM 2 2 9 0 13 *** 10 AM 8 4 7 10 29 ******* 11 AM 10 4 7 6 27 ******* 12 PM 6 3 3 0 12 *** 1 PM 7 10 11 3 31 ******** 2 PM 9 7 9 5 30 ******** 3 PM 11 2 0 6 19 ***** 4 PM 7 1 9 0 17 **** 5 PM 2 0 6 6 14 **** 6 PM 1 3 2 0 6 ** 7 PM 4 3 6 3 16 **** 8 PM 9 3 2 0 14 **** 9 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VOLUME IS 245 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 31 BEGINS AT 10:45 AM (12%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 33 BEGINS AT 1: 15 PM (13%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1985. =M1J):r- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HUMANA MED-FIRST N.W. 2nd AVE FLOW HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUME < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 AM 0 0 2 3 5 * 8 AM 4 1 2 1 8 ** 9 AM 2 4 3 8 17 **** 10 AM 8 5 9 8 30 ******** 11 AM 4 1 5 5 15 **** 12 PM 6 11 6 7 30 ******** 1 PM 2 5 9 5 21 ***** 2 PM 1 2 6 3 12 *** 3 PM 4 2 7 4 17 **** 4 PM 2 6 2 5 15 **** 5 PM 5 6 3 1 15 **** 6 PM 3 7 2 5 17 **** 7 PM 8 2 2 0 12 *** 8 PM 6 0 0 0 6 ** 9 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VOLUME IS 220 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 30 BEGINS AT 9:45 AM (13%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 30 BEGINS AT 12:00 PM (13%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PM ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1985. =MtfJ),Yt- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HUMANA MED-FIRST N.W. 2nd AVE FLOW HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUME < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 AM 0 0 0 0 0 4 AM 0 0 0 0 0 5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 AM 0 0 0 4 4 * 8 AM 4 0 2 3 9 ** 9 AM 3 0 0 10 13 *** 10 AM 6 6 3 6 21 ***** 11 AM 6 7 0 3 16 **** 12 PM 6 2 6 7 21 ***** 1 PM 1 0 1 1 3 * 2 PM 8 1 1 0 10 *** 3 PM 2 2 0 3 7 ** 4 PM 2 1 10 4 17 **** 5 PM 2 6 0 3 11 *** 6 PM 3 2 2 0 7 ** 7 PM 6 0 0 2 8 ** 8 PM 2 0 3 3 8 ** 9 PM 0 3 0 0 3 * 10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VOLUME IS 158 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 25 BEGINS AT 9:45 AM (15% ) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 22 BEGINS AT 4:30 PM (13%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PM ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1985. -Humana MARKETING UTILIZATION REPORT MEDFIRST PhVSIClan Care Facility Name . ~%,,,,, /"l-/';"',,,/ HU.8?? 12/84 0 ~ 0 (i () 0 0 0 .:U 0 cJ 0 //3 0 /~ 0 0 I" J.6 0 0 15 0 ==Mtff})xt- MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX "13" ------------ ------------ Florida Department of Transportation Conceptual Plan ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- On Boynton Beach Road Median Opening Revisions Just West Of 1-95 ================================================================ Funded For Fiscal Year 1986/1987 --------------------------------- --------------------------------- , =M~ MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES APPENDIX "c" ----------- ----------- Summary Of 24-11our ~lachine Counts --------------------------------- --------------------------------- A. Boynton Beach Road Westbound B. Boynton Beach Road Eastbound -- counter malfunctioned C. m, 7th Street--North Of Boynton Beach Road Southbound D. mIl 7th Street--North Of Boynton Beach Road Both Directions E. m.J 7th Street--South Of Boynton Beach Road Southbound F. NlY 7th Street--South Of Boynton Beach Road Both Directions G. N\, 7th Court---North Of Boynton Beach Road Northbound H. NH 7th Court---North Of Boynton Beach Road Both Directions MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HOUR OF DAY 12 AM 1 Ml 2 Af.1 3 AM 4 A 1'1 5 Af.\ 6 Af.1 7 Af.l 8 Af.l 9 A~i 10 A 1,1 11 M 12 PM 1 Pl1 2 P~l 3 P~l 4 pr'l 5 PM 6 pr1 7 PM 8 P~1 9 Pf" 1 0 P~' 11 P~1 BOYNTON BEACH RD. APPROACH TO tUL 7 TH vJ EST BOU N D - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL 34 51 32 23 14 29 22 20 36 25 27 11 12 10 7 11 2 21 22 17 21 29 39 55 65 129 228 173 238 218 290 285 265 279 275 245 255 262 269 253 283 274 290 303 304 331 324 338 328 336 298 309 289 275 310 318 357 339 354 349 368 354 345 385 379 418 386 413 431 379 320 313 272 215 201 206 206 166 131 127 125 111 98 116 106 104 77 105 84 63 43 63 51 41 41 36 140 85 99 40 62 H4 595 1031 1064 1039 1150 1297 1271 1192 1399 1452 1596 1443 894 630 450 392 253 169 EACH * REPRESENTS 59 VEHICLES A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUME < 30 ** * ** * * ~.* ****~.;E-.**** ***************** ****************** ****************** ******************* **********;~*********** ********************** ******************** ************************ ************************* *************~************* ************************ **{.,I..************ i~*-t-*******~- ******** ****-3!-** ***il- *** TOTAL VOLUME IS 17,887 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 1,297 BEGINS AT 11:00 AM (7%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 1,648 BEGINS AT 4:15 PM (9%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PM ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES BOYNTON BEACH RD. APPROACH TO NW 7 TH EASTBOUND HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 21W 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH l'lEANS HOUR VOLUME < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 A 1"1 0 0 0 0 0 2 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 Ml 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ml 0 0 0 0 0 5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 6 A~I 2 0 0 0 2 * 7 MI 0 1 0 2 3 * 8 Af.1 1 0 0 0 1 9 At~ 1 2 1 2 6 *-}(. 10 AI,' 1 1 0 1 3 * 1 1 At,] 2 2 4 1 9 ** 12 PI~ 4 4 2 0 10 *~(.* 1 pr~ 3 3 3 1 10 **.~ 2 pr~ 4 2 0 29 35 **{~**.~{:-** 3 p r\~ 17 37 20 21 95 ************************ 4 PI~ 14 1 9 10 11 54 ***.;l-~.********~(. 5 PI!' 16 14 16 9 55 -r.-~.-:[-~. -Y..,t- -~ * ~- * * .~.. *-ll- 6 PI,' 34 30 25 18 107 *************************** 7 PN 18 28 1 5 15 76 ******************* 8 PM 14 11 12 17 54 ******-It-******.,t- 9 P~l 12 13 7 8 40 *****-~.r,.-*** 10 PH 10 9 8 5 32 **.,('**i(.-~--h- 11 PH 8 8 4 2 22 ';(.*-It--y'--l!-* TOTAL VO L U~l E IS 614 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: ~10RNING PEAK HOUR VOLUI1E OF 9 BEGINS AT 10: 45 Ar~ ( 1%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUI'1E OF 107 BEGINS AT 6:00 PIA (17%) DATA COLLECTIOI'~ BEGAN AT 12 PI'1 ON TUESDAY, DE C E 1'1 B E R 3, 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES N. Vi. 7TH ST. NORTH OF BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. SOUTHBOUND HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 5 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUflE < 3 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 AM 2 5 0 1 8 ** 1 At1 1 0 0 0 1 2 At'l 2 4 1 0 7 * 3 A~l 1 0 3 1 5 * 4 Af1 1 1 4 3 9 ** 5 At,1 2 2 3 5 12 ** 6 AI1 8 20 17 29 74 ****~..y(".:}**.~***** 7 M1 29 34 34 25 122 ************************ 8 AI~ 22 18 1 9 16 75 *.;r************* 9 AH 12 23 17 10 62 *?r****.:';*.~*?(-* 10 AI~ 21 11 19 6 57 **~~**-~{r**** 11 A 1,1 10 19 10 1 6 55 *******{!--:I-** 12 PI'l 12 16 10 18 56 **.r,4**~-****~- 1 P~l 17 18 13 21 69 ******-rd~-**-:}*** 2 Pfl 1 6 12 1 5 27 70 ****.;!-*-i}*****.;!-* 3 PI'l 20 10 21 17 68 ***.;!-****.;l-***{:-* 4 P~' 16 18 1 9 14 67 ******-~**-l:::--:t-*~- 5 Pf1 1 3 20 18 21 72 ****?I-.r,-******** 6 PI,' 18 31 21 25 95 ******************* 7 Pf1 24 13 5 1 3 55 *********-ir.;!- 8 pr" 6 8 1 0 1 5 39 ******** 9 Pf'1 15 9 7 5 36 ***.;!-*** 10 Pfi 8 4 4 7 23 ***** 11 P~1 2 4 1 4 11 ** TOTAL VOLUI'1E IS 1. 148 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: ~'ORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUI'lE OF 126 BEGINS AT 6:45 A 1'1 (11 %) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLU~1E OF 101 BEG H! S AT 6: 15 PM (8%) DATA COLLECTIOtJ BEGAN AT 12 PI'1 ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HOUR OF DAY 12 AM 1 AM 2 AI,] 3 AM 4 Ml 5 A~l 6 Ar<l 7 A~1 8 AI~ 9 Ar1 10 Ml 11 M1 12 P~l 1 PH 2 PI\1 3 PI'1 4 PI-' 5 P~I 6 P~1 7 PI'! 8 PM 9 PM 10 PM 11 PM II. \1 . 7T H S T. NORTH OF BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. BOTH - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL 4 8 4 3 19 30003 3 9 1 0 13 1 1 4 1 7 1 2 6 3 12 2 3 5 7 17 13 26 21 38 98 40 53 49 43 185 33 35 37 27 132 26 35 23 14 98 34 26 33 16 109 29 46 37 49 161 36 52 27 33 148 39 35 29 44 147 45 26 46 50 167 35 28 47 48 158 43 45 56 46 190 48 58 61 52 219 51 51 45 49 196 52 28 14 34 128 22 21 27 34 104 29 23 24 17 93 18 7 12 20 57 8 7 1 6 22 EACH * REPRESENTS 8 VEHICLES A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUME < 4 ** ** * ** ** ******~~-*it-~t.** *********************** ***************** ******+,1..***** *****if-***-r.-**** ******************** ******************* ****************** ********************* ******************** ************************ *************************** ************************* i;.****i,,*ie-ie-*****i~* *ie-******ir-r..*** *********i'..** ******* *** TOTAL VOLUME IS 2,483 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 185 BEGINS AT 7:00 AM (7%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 222 BEGINS AT 5:15 PM (8%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PM ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK Be ASSOCIATES N.W. 7TH ST. SOUTH OF BOYNTON BEACH RD. SOUTHBOUND HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1 ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH r,1EANS HOUR VOLUME < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 At'1 2 10 3 1 16 ***.~ 1 AM 3 3 2 1 9 ** 2 A~' 1 2 3 1 7 ** 3 AM 1 0 1 0 2 * ~ 4 M 0 2 1 0 3 * 5 AM 2 0 0 1 3 * 6 At~ 1 3 4 8 16 **** 7 AM 7 6 16 1 1 40 **~!-*.~.:J_**** 8 AI,j 14 18 13 17 62 **ir*ir*******"r*{.t.* 9 M1 6 10 17 1 3 46 *ir****-r....-f..**** 10 Af.1 13 11 10 5 39 *******ir** 11 AM 16 5 12 1 1 44 ******-lr**** 12 PI,' 21 14 13 10 58 ***ir-r....***{..t.*"l't-**** 1 P ~, 14 11 7 19 51 *ir****-rr.;r**-r..** 2 PI,' 23 13 18 1 3 67 ***************** 3 PI-! 17 20 16 21 74 ******************* 4 PI,' 1 9 14 19 30 82 ********************* 5 PI'1 32 23 14 23 92 *********************** 6 PM 16 22 11 10 59 ******-r.-******ir-r.. 7 PI-, 18 13 11 6 48 ***********-lr 8 PM 10 5 5 14 34 *****,:,,!-*-l:- 9 P~'I 14 7 11 8 40 **.;r***-~-*** 10 P~' 10 11 4 4 29 ****-r..*-lr 11 PM 6 1 0 4 1 1 *** TOTAL VOLUI'1E IS 932 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUI'lE OF 62 BEGINS AT 8:00 AI" (6%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VO L UI-! E OF 104 BEGINS AT 4:30 P~1 (11%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PI~ ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES N. \~. 7TH ST. SOUTH OF BOYNTON BEACH RD. BOTH HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH ,'t REPRESENTS 6 VEHICLES OF DAY 1 ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH MEANS HOUR VOLUt~E < 3 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 A~1 2 11 4 3 20 *** 1 AM 4 5 3 2 14 ** 2 Ar~ 1 3 3 2 9 ** 3 AI~ 2 1 1 0 4 * 4 At!j 0 3 1 0 4 * '- 5 Af.l 3 4 3 5 1 5 *** 6 Af.1 9 12 21 24 66 *********{(-* 7 Af.l 28 29 48 38 143 ************************ 8 All 38 36 29 29 132 ********************** 9 A 1,1 20 39 27 29 115 ******************* 10 AI" 23 27 23 22 95 **************** 11 A~1 31 24 30 35 120 ******************** 12 Pt'1 33 23 26 34 116 ******************* 1 Pt.l 22 25 27 33 107 ****************** 2 PI'1 40 28 36 28 132 ********************** 3 PI'l 35 35 27 42 139 *********************** 4 P~i 37 41 42 45 165 **************************** 5 PM 44 38 22 42 146 ************************ 6 P~1 30 30 28 18 106 ****************** 7 PI,' 27 17 19 1 3 76 **~~**.}E.*-r.-***** 8 PI,' 20 10 10 22 62 *******{HHI- 9 Pt., 18 11 18 11 58 **~i--l~****** 10 PI'1 1 3 1 5 7 12 47 ****-)~*** 11 PI~ 6 2 1 4 13 ** TOTAL VOLUNE IS 1,904 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: ~lORN I NG PEAK HOUR VOLUr~E OF 160 BEGINS AT 7: 30 Af.l (8%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUt,1E OF 172 BEGINS AT 4: 15 PI<i (9%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 P ~1 ON TUESDAY, DECEI,lBER 3, 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES N. vi. 7TH CT. NORTH OF BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. NORTHBOUND HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH I~EANS HOUR VOLUME < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 Ar~ 0 0 0 0 0 1 Ml 0 0 0 0 0 2 Ar~ 0 0 0 0 0 3 AI" 0 D 0 0 0 ~ 4 A~' 0 0 1 0 1 5 A~I 0 0 1 0 1 6 M1 0 0 0 1 1 7 AM 0 1 0 1 2 * 8 Ml 0 0 1 1 2 * 9 AI~ 2 1 1 1 5 * 10 A~: 2 0 1 3 6 -r.~* 11 M1 0 0 2 2 4 * 12 P~I 2 2 1 1 6 .n.* 1 PI~ 0 1 2 0 3 " 2 PI'1 2 2 0 3 7 ** 3 PI'1 4 4 0 2 10 *** 4 PI1 2 0 0 0 2 * 5 PI'1 0 0 0 0 0 6 P~l 0 0 0 0 0 7 PI~ 0 0 0 0 0 8 PI1J 0 0 0 0 0 9 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 P~1 0 0 0 0 0 11 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VOLU~"E IS 50 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: r~ORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUr~E OF 6 BEGINS AT 10:00 Ml (12%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLur'1E OF 1 1 BEGINS AT 2: 45 PI,' (22%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PM 011 TUESDAY. DECEMBER 3. 1985. MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES N . ~I. 7TH C T. NORTH OF BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. BOTH HOUR - - QUARTER HOUR - - HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES OF DAY 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH TOTAL A DASH ~IEANS HOUR VOLUI'IE < 2 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------------------------------ 12 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 Ar~ 0 0 0 0 0 2 A[.1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Ml 0 0 1 0 1 4 AI~ 0 0 1 0 1 5 A~l 0 1 1 0 2 -l(- 6 M 0 0 0 1 1 7 M1 1 2 0 0 3 -l(- 8 All 0 0 1 2 3 * 9 M 3 1 1 1 6 ** 10 All 1 1 1 0 3 ~ 11 AI,j 1 0 1 1 3 * 1 2 PfVl 2 3 2 1 8 *" -~ 1 PI,: 1 2 2 0 5 * 2 PI,l 1 1 0 1 3 * 3 Pt>1 4 5 0 2 11 **,f 4 PI'1 2 3 1 0 6 ** 5 P~: 0 1 1 3 5 * 6 P r~l 4 1 4 0 9 *-* 7 PI'1 1 2 0 1 4 * 8 P~I 1 0 0 0 1 9 PI~ 0 0 1 0 1 10 PI~ 4 0 0 1 5 * 11 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VOLUI~E IS 82 VEHICLES. PEAK HOURS: 110RNING PEAK HOUR VOLUI1E OF 7 BEGINS AT 8: 4 5 Af.1 (8%) EVENING PEAK HOUR VOLUI~E OF 12 BEGINS AT 5:45 PI'l (14%) DATA COLLECTION BEGAN AT 12 PI,' OIJ TUESDAY. DECEI1BER 3. 1985. , 299 Ninth Street North St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 iSI3i 822-4317 l( George F. Young, Inc. A Subsidia(/f of George F. Young of Florida, Inc. Since 1919 ;\HClIITE~TI In: 0 EI\(;]\I':I]\I:\(;:J l'L\\\INC [-l~l'H\'I:YIM; Dn:STlNC September 24, 19B5 City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: Proposed Med First Medical Center N. W. 1st Avenue, East of N.W. 7th Street Boynton Beach, Florida Our Order No. B5 12 0292 Gentlemen: The site for the proposed medical center is an "L" shaped lot located on N.W. 1st Avenue, fifty (50) feet East of N.W. 7th Street in Boynton Beach, Florida. (See Attachment #1). The site is bounded on the South by N.W. 1st Avenue, on the North by New Boynton Road, and on the East by a vacant field. The property is currently occupied by a one story house. The ground around the house is a lawn and the remainder of the property is sparsely covered by weeds and other low vegetation. The proposed medical facility will be a one-story, structure with park- ing facilities. There will be an on-site storm water retention basin designed to retain 2B20 cf, which is a greater volume than the 2700 cf required for a 3 year - 1 hour duration event. (See Attachment #2). According to the soils report prepared by Geologic Associates, Inc., (See Attachment #3) the surface water drainage and infiltration is good. The soils consist of fine to medium-grained sand. Permeability for medium grained sand is approximately 6.3 inches per hour. This yields a drawdown time of approximately 14.37 hours which is less than the re- quired maximum of 36 hours as per State D.E.R. requirements. (See Attachment #4). Groundwater was not encountered by the hand-augered hole which was ten feet deep. George F. Young, Inc. will be submitting site plans and drainage re- tention calculations along with the necessary Exemption Notice form to the South Florida Water Management District for their approval. ST. PETERSBURG 0 TAMPA D BMl>ENTON 0 PAL\1 HARBOR OFFICERSIDIRECTORS: EDWARD C. AHL~~ P.L.S.. GARY A. BOllCHF.R. P.E.. LEWIS H. KENT, P.LS.. RONALD D. lARSEN. P.L.S.. MARTIN T. LOTT, A.lA. KIRBY W. MALONE. CPA. ALDEN F. NURGE, P.E.. ROBERT Ii. PIERRO. PE.. EARL W. RAMER, P.L.S.. JOHN STEIN\VAY, P.L.S. OIRECTORS EMERITUS; GEORGE F. YOUNG 11879 to ]955). \\.'ILLIA.\1 H. THOMPSON, P.E.. P.L.S.. ANTHONY J. RESTNO. P.L.S -------------;i-- r to" :~:l '" N W~ P SC\€"'''''I'... 1)'-1 cO'" "'-n:CClN FO'\L R~\"-I..J~Cl<0 A'<-~ I"'- ,\l....:Lp....'\"0C, ,,-)\...,....l\L ---..... /fl - 11/;:: /If~ i ._ .___._____._...:1..._. _ _____ --.<t" , 'J ."- ""._---~----- ..:!- , , , , n,!__ :j I ------.--l I ------_.~-~--------"-- . C-,()\I~l N:L~C\ " I >- CQ.I:)c,.<::,.- <;\iC"-'.:'>"'uw ~ "9._______________ /1 ( ;r /,1 / ~ I J II \ ---.- ;: Q;'>.'\0....^ p..."\ n.O~ OF Q~~~T~D~ ?~N~ CIL"'>'> - ~",C-,3:.~W A-A A . ?l-t>-N To I=' 0>=\3"'_"'.1'- A BoTTo'''> .o.\"- _.12_CL€",TI..C>r-l li'Ot-JO .Y'f"'TIi::\l-_'-:!::,o,<!: . _J>.'\ .f-(,__ _____ _____ ____.___..___ _.'H AT. c \l.._ u_ ,-L '" C "-.'ul-\", VI.. \0: W €Gh)F-,:i::ONS -/ . H :=c~_)'> l i!: 'iSL l H =--:~~ ~ ~1-Ju c.'i 'rc'j >/ I:::-/~ >/ ' " H ~~ - ~€~b~.4 \.:- Ci.'J::',,"q:- " 1 w"-i\LQ. "'\"'\3\.X. 'E\.i:.y,..,x:.c::,..J . I ~ ~ '('- + "C,!L ~ 'i L ( \ .. ",c) (E'0N'I) ,_'?~SJ,A~Q,0" '-l'i ^\l~f'.O r ''i'J'C:.\T€t:> 'P\:O:~::r::..N'-~\~\L - \&-2':~~-~9-----(~-Q"', tJ __.________._ _c.________ .\"."'. __P.\IE::'L"'L~ 'C.____"-E R::r:1'^_~:I-C:_a., . __~",,~c~TU. .___Oi"__ _ . _1'-.~_'C_N~:CI::9_f'=!.___. '!,_D ",-Q__ .\3,ww;:::-:::o.J. ___ 'A,__J'-'" \) '01----- L ~ JL '+-\"0...)_1_1-.__ \-\'C:'"-\) c-(;)N -------,--t9. ::.:~;~A ~___ _L~G)~,-~ ---A\<c=. . ^""'-'Y"<.""--=:' FA,-'--:>::'" '" , ">uR-FAL'C:. A,11-€/>- OF [t,~T>;;:N'\~\)t0 "----~._----- - " ii Ii Q ij-----,-"'----R&::r:.<::~O F Ii P'DNU , I:---.--_.-:----------~._~--..,------~~--------------~_._-------~_.__.._. " " [, _---.? C!<" \::) eo, ~TyV ~e.N__1::\ 1-_';__J:l_'LJ~___ t:>.h.s,_C."U_t'oS?'__"=l:<;::___L'<:.,^,.'L:r:-.N ~_\2",- \ ~\I~O tJ _______1 =____D<;:]) _'-~___Q_E._-"l,(bI~~_, ,_,~:S:::.'J_E.~.,_._.bR_()_\!_\;o_&QI\ 0 11\ .9E__ "-:s:.--,_e..!'IT~\)~____? '()~ ?_. .._ ('-1.'#_0). .__.__ ______._~ _._~'L"'_ - -.~i----.--_..._"-".~ " " L..._.... _ __9:'<:'= _~0c,,~\;:"M_\::.~3_6'- C!d",~_(-, ~___~~_.~ -C::\'> '\ 'd . I:r-.Jc"''ik<::'t:':L'C;_N_'-J'>:~_ __ _(:j:::\~N.l"'1~___~_<:::,l__L >....I-.!-.'C . ji VOL:-JM'<: \2-Alc. oi== F\. 0 '.'-1 IU \'-.\)0 (-, \.-l A (--;:x:: y ~N . c.\2J::)~S - St=CII:tH'-JA.L f'< '\L:-<::. A '?'C.\2-\->'C;.-.lI:::>IL'..JLi'>-V- 10 \Lt~- 'j " Ii FLQW _I .. .._._..._.._~____._____._..n__. .IL--L.q'L~____ _(cGlN, .'-\) i I '-'---- ---II ____:.___ G?'L-'" __Y-"'I~_Qr:____\)::r:_""_c,,\-l!'::S?,,__b_<_._ TY. R.u(,)~-S-I.-\ ____ .11 I' ----if-- ---- Ii _____---'-.c:..Ilcj;)_'>S--==--->_i2:.LJ -'- .!l_o-;;,Jo..l-- ~'Z-<::.A, 'F! ~', .{ , ~__V.__=____Q 1>-1<._<:'~ "",,-_L_Qs.,:r:,::L~I__(__S '.'_JV\I:::::__~ ___________.__~\o::,~tA'c,A~~\-_.l--'.'L___ 'R~\~___ K~ , ;,>'. jL~___~______ ----Aw-= ___ f'.R"::.-"'.....___.N.9_IlMA-\.......__n_lo.___.'t:-_1.0_W___';;;:r:\1..\E. ( \ ~QH,--- ... ..__61:1'<=.1.1:<::.9_ ._u_j='-.o:_l1l0~I0.'2:.:.\_';:;R.)_.___.__ Ii ---~~- 'i--- II , ,.~).' -~\.'~ TL1~ A,,^D0";-" Or D~>q..j""~~ _D_~",,>e::.,J~__.. .0"':' .'\'Y-c. "''<!:~u",,~i>-'\3.:S::'-:.r:~_'L_________~___ r010D =<, PS'-\ 0;/"M "'__ ~/'-\ L~'-JI:.N.C, f>-. .fl-{:.,<O:N '\'C () 0. ~\C .l"'-) p..N~__ ':\'0...'C__..'N>:::D-c:.D . ?'C:Q="",<!:\~",=__..A~f..c..~vJ~_ hS \U-E:. ","-E.I\~D_ . J>'C:\lA:. /-.A '<2:\-=:::'\L '::,a bOES; :TL\:c nn_1>~.$. c..1-\ i'>-(Ly' ~ ~ \\.. "^' ~ A B. -:c ~::\"I .'i?-[>-,~ n(I'-\ 0vJ) Y'i'€I:\,e:e;, \"€v \1Y,:~.\tR, . 01=01).;:::\>\0 .. ('1) n__f'.._s_ A 11.<::,,,,... D.~LQ..~"'-S._~_____ ~\~. '\U-'C :c.s c..DI0.';, f'>.N"____.. .Th~ __. A t=U N q,c?tJ ::cs 'SNCJwrv ~r--J \ ' -c. Q W '0,_ \~_L______ . un________~._i'>>l"S.O ____,...n____C<.)~.~I:I::.D_!'"J__.____O .'i'C__ . U'C:_~T.'_:\.._._ ('i) ,__ [3 C~ _.____.m__._____.__E:QN~_~ ..__3__~_':\.___._90.~_~'<:::.>_c.r:-,'>\ _.3\-\ "=--.__RA-3:_~____D "" . .. i:P:.S,-ll..<>-RC,,,C::- u__L.~.'fr.y:,S_____6~_'/ .n.:c..~^_'_._ 'TL:\~_.._.n ::__..:L~ ._ _c0N , _"'" _ __'}1'J~__ y.,f>-'3~ .DX..sc':l~~':'l'C:: R",:3"_\::.5_. _p.5L~ c. po..--:, . <:'OM.B;:r:"J~__TO B..'=. t::0J0 ,"-::S:~C:>N '_un ._:Il-lT~_____s:t:.~0.L'<C g<:::.. .or= u.. ~<;,c..y\~~<,__,J:::S , , -c.Q'-..lr:-L ___A ';>D___tQ..l\.L.>_~~_ _Fo\UV\ .uf>-. s.::r:,~_~.,-~_______ .-'c.00p';-O;::UN ...c:..f'c.r::J._____ Po t'J'.N_NI 0>.';:'<:::>.__ T_Q_u__P'C\'<:::S:LN\:s:::....l'<2:. n."\\\~ .u.:c'>..cv.P-\2-.c.., <::::____h____ OF _ .IT:,^-~ R'c:,.Q0:,L."-<:::::\? \( o,-_-.jt(\_~._ ....O_\- u_ ..:v:-.l. f'>;::\62-, (':!:.."'c..r-l. ",0 ':;,1.) .1:> '? :r.:t::.I~_'C:___'<::::.:c;:,!".L__.'::L__::r:~J::O_ _~_eD..N_L3 . ____C-'r;.Aw.')A~_=___A_\>-.AJ.~__(~_Q.:N ,'?.J .. ._.________L__"'-.:l_?o_"'_TD_0\ ~... ___ __S2\S1.r-J_.__<---__:I:;..",l_'Ss::>u .._ ....-<=:Q....J ,__<=;_______ ! ______ ,________ .... .. ___--" <-._t':Lv'__U-_'l:.'-__\'-__ c1"",__=__0_<.?o..EJ___~.Q.N~b~., I'.' ~ I ' ., Ii :1 __JL_____.__ _~_ .__. I ii " ....--~-----;r--.. n__".__ il -~-=-= cl t_ :=~~~~~~~~_~~ --------,;-- , ----------------lr--.---~ .m__._.__"'....______._____.._ _ .. un __ ~o--~.:.:-=--u \S\.J~'l:. '- ~" . ".., ------ \-\ - .--...- --.- ...-.- ) \.+J'i }-\:;.:-- ---- \'. S\.\\!:\l."'''~ " \ '"\ . A-\l.. ( '\ 1:. co. K.L \11... '<0'" L", \.-\, - Ln \.-\'-) ,.___--._- ,....___------:::>"--... \\ 1 -- \1, 1.. ) . A ~ L", (H'/'r\J \ /) '-t.~ ( (cD,..),"l) /v _ _~~_~~ '-,'<o:__~ j \ ~\lL\,,-Q.E. : - -- ---------....---.1'" , 'i . AIL ~ /'.,\)"-Q",,C,'3.. ___'>GQ\=hc..:<:= /'>.\<.,,-A OF "-c.. \~,.J\I:~__J=o~.I::>___ , __ __13>€\'''' i2..;::.-Ju t:\, ~H 1- . AYL ~ 0-, \--A,--)j '-____J3~) Q.~I~NT:s::.D,.-..J ?o0_Q_~_ , ....- ~-----_._----!--_.~... _A \~._>\.)\2.-\::"'_\.\2:,___ hfL}i:.A OF ______-------'L___________i\-r_l:):<:.y_~____tL,-- (FI j _~________L_____A l-- :0_ _ ':::> \l\1-\=""~\E:______,.,.....\Lt:1'> .._ <:>F. i<, \2.\~':S:: G,..J ......~~.::>..J \) L_~~_____~""::t___D~,:i'J":L-\.__n_tl"1.__' (FT')._ if ___._L_~____'_ ._:=__-"','JI2.~":1E~__'?_~~~ f'I'....;::\'C::\I,..,LE.0 c.., }\A_O:c: ____ _. ________D-~I:s:_:",rI:~9t--J_ ___\:'s>"-.)D \:o.~\vJC.'2,.j . ., -- --. -. -- , \-\ '\.. \-\ __l_~_,~2~. .___ ____L___ _ ______m.. L _~_ ('= ':':b-.,.) /.<- ____ ..( FT ) . _______,L____l ,_::'__I=''C\'LI,/J\.c--'-::::R..___'-~r:JS:T\..\ _ _ _0" -pOr"-Jv.____b:I__ \:).'C-\)\\-\ __8,_. 12:12: TE::r:-l\ "--00 lEI). __ ______._:]______ l'\.-_...?__ _PC:: \'L,~ M_c."~q,,______,-'C. NV. '\\-l .. un 0 t:' __ _ "-c'C. ,EO, NT':I: 0 N , I -- -- --------------.-1------- PO", i) f>...1; b'2yT0, .\-k, lrT~) ------11--- __nuT:": . S:L\:>C__ n'SL<:::>\>C. \)F.. Q'C.\-c..N\:LON~__~D<0 Q.-0 ;-:=..) \(. ::.SOTL.m_P~RM_c:,:>.J';;IQ\"\ _ . I-""L\O\L\~LT::l.~ I ___ ____1. :1 '!----- !! i_ . :1 II ,-------------..--.- !, H __~__;:'____._m. H1-.~ :i m__._____~_JLm._______m . E:L~Y..e_~r::,t-.I ___-'I:.9 (3,DTlOI:0 .'.'I"~'. ~~__SY..Jl-\'O ~L~ _Of'. .. nl1--_-c::I-<- ~ T:I:O .J . __tI 'un.::_.. _bEP_T'Y _____FI1,,()M___..T N:-'-- IX. /'-.'- _PI.:>N.I::>_,~(ET..)m--~.. . \)~l-\ .. . 1"::<'-:0 IV> ... p:LN""''- . vv f'>.\~(L. _:'~<::-:r.~'=~ C-.L>eY&'_\l:,O",eJ_ m__=>:O lSQ'.TDM _OF J~~:::Y~O..J . . :j 'I !1 "----~-------------~-.T------'--.-- Ii _____I=9,,-y\:>_._.___JI::._\:L~__ n ',,1 , ! .'! I N ., ~.-~~ .. ",' I ; ~ lZ. -'I- ... (', ., . 1 '" - ~ ! a: j~ '- :.::, I- LAUR EL I- u (f),Z 2 ~ ~ :::>- HILLS 0 , a: Cl. r0 z. ;'1- 'N 5 ; ~ ,15 <J) -,-- I~. :::> .c 0 -:J' ~ ( -38) ,2 1, :: CI~ ~ f > 0 " I, I ~ 4 ! 3. 'co : ~ 4- '4\ ~.~~ , ..' ~502 J') 0 z ,Ii,',. ,J~ I co' :1 ~C; ~' 2- , ,. u. ,.. ..' .. ,.; . \1 NEW . \"yll~~.f'. . :~':"~I. RD--- ,. . ,. s.'----;;:. ". ,. , ., ,. " .. ,. 1 " . ( " . " I _. '.., ,. '0" - .t . . ,! "IS' ': ;- . , 's I " " " ,.. ~ i::: '1 - --;;; " II Z\ Z6 J ~ ~ " ~ 32 '0 , :: ~ . ~ .. , .. .. ,. .. ,. ,. .. .. . " ,. .. ,. .. ., "-..... - " VE ~ ,. ,. " " .. ,. " ,. " " " " I " ,. " " " .. , I.. " ., 1'4' , " I " W 1S ' I ~. l rt i ._' ,L t~ I< - - " l6 A '3 \; ... 'B .1 ~. " " -.. tl J T N T P N.: t ~~ I P ll'. I r-"' : .. " ,.. .. ." .... " J,":" OCEAN AVE. .. .. .. J ,. .. " ! < ,I .. ,. '7 " 7 , ," '- " . 7/ .' " I " ,,' " I- : 8 ;J <J) - " .' .. ,. .. ......... CT . "1.1 "I pt," '.. VICINITY MAP Attachment III ~ '" N 8 0 N OlliJ 0 8 -" + ~<O "" "'''' > z ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 "" ~ 8 z L i' 0 u ~ ~ ~ '" -" '" ~ '" '" -" "" ~ ~ z > 8 ~ ~ ~ 0 "- ~ <0 II '" '0 0 . " 0 0. 0 .. 0. "" U Z 0 '" w ~ f- ~ f- 0: ~ "- L co f- U ~ 0 ~ "" ~ z " '" '" 0 "- u ~ "- ~ "" ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ " i:;> L ~ co L ~ U "- Z L ~ '" ~ "- ~ -" z "- "- " ~ ~ f- 0 0 ~ ~ > :;: '" " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " L 0 ~ -" L " ~ Z f- ~ co ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ "" ';;; u ';;; 0> ~ ~ U ~ 0: Z L ~ ~ "- "- "- " f- ~ ~ ~ " "- " 0: ~ 0: ~ ~ 0 '" U L U ~ 0 ~ L ~ ~ ~ L U L U ~ 0 > '" u C" ~ " z ~ ~ ~ ~ >< ~ 0 o.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ co z ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ U L f- 0: >: "0> f- ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 :;: ~ "" z ~ '" u -" U 0> " -" "- ~ " ~ co -" '" ~ u "" u ~ -" 0: >: ~ ~ "" ? u ~ '" co ~ ~ u >: "" ~ L ~ Z .0 0> t:; '" ~ i' ~ L L co '" co 00 "" > -" "-"- z '" ~ w "" "" ~ 0: > S ~ f- ~ "" '" .. 0: '" co ~ z 0 '" >: "- ;S 0 '" u 0 "'0 " ~ 0 '" 0> N Z f- " "- ~ '" '" -" 00 "" "" '" "- "" -" -" -" ." "- "- '" " "- co " '" w "- . z '" U '0 co "- w. ~ -" ~ 0: f- "" .. "' f- U 0 co 0 '" '" .c ~ -" '" ~ co -" "" 0. "" ~ "" ~ u "" 0: ~ . -" '" "" .. '" '" '" . . '" z ~ "- >, . '" "- "- ~ '" '" '" u ~ f- -" Z U "" W co "" -" > '" co W 0' U '" "- "- -" '" " "" 0 ." '" u ~ 1- '" 0 >: '" z ~ '" 0 ,,' '0 "" ~ "- ID ID ~ '" '" u :: " ~ f- ~ ~ 0 "" '" "- "- 0 N "- U '" ~ ~ '" ~ . I '" '" 0: '" 0 '0 r= "- f- "- U S .c "' 0 u :;: '" . . -" '" "" ~ " z ~I -" 0 '" f- U f- " "" f- " ~ 0 '" , ~ >: co ~ -" ~ 0 > x ~ - ~ 0' co "- N N 0 ~ 0 0 ;:2 I .:= ~ '" oo ~ oo 0 '" 0 ~ 0 '" '" ~ f- 0. ~ ~ N N N N '" 0 L '" 0. ~ 0' '" " co > 0' '" w 1/ '" - / ~I ~ "- .:: ~ ~ / x II p....--: / u'" u "- " 0 V /vo 0 " ~ ~ N '" " N .. " ~ 0 ~ N " ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '" ~ / -" x "- ~ f- a co '" 1/ '" ~ ~ ~ .. L "- ~ "- '" ~ z ~ 0 ~ oo " co ~ ~ '" f',," '" ~ . ~ ID "- 0 0 0 0 0 co ~- ..:: '<;> z . ;::;! ~ ~ , )3 .- X ID eyh - ~I :; "- ~ 0. 0 L " 0.._ UO o+c , . "- ~ N oo U N 0 " .- ~ ~ '" '" oo '" N N '" '" ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N '" '" '" '" " '" 0. ~ 0 "- L Z 0. - 0' - .. ~ . ID "- L "- U '" r: z co - '" .- ~ ~ ..0 ~ '" '" ~ . "- 0 ~o. .:= '" 0' ~ " N 0 W N ~ ~ .-< .-< .-< '" " '" 0. "- 0 '" L '" 0. "- 0-" > --: f- L - = '" - ~ oo N " oo '" '" z .- w - " ~ '" " '" '" f- ::: N ;S Z - , 0 - u 00 0 0 '" '" 0 f- ID 00 0 '" '" '" 0 ;:2 ~ vo N co " '" co - - - N M '" co 0 ~ -" - -" - "" "- " 00 0 '" '" '" '" z - N '" " "' co - E ;:2 ., \. 'r I c> ", h. ~ x ~~, '---" i.,;-- . \ i I // // rJ'.. -----.. ,..~ , " F' ~., , , c ", .... "-----~j " --, "j.' ~, '."> ~ '\ " \ ! ~ ~ '0 U .. ." ~ ~ 0' . U ~ U 0 0 ~ ~ N U 0 ^ N oo '0 N . '0 II ." > '0 0 . U '0 0- ." > "- 0 u .. 0.0 N .oo EN 0 .-< " o z >< Attachment //2 r J J j j ] ] j ] PROPOSED MEDFIRST MEDICAL CENTER BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD @ NW 7TH STREET BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA. HUMEDCO PROJECT NO. 70971-353 GA PROJECT NO. 85-266FHD I \, ;/\iS~~ " '/ /\ </,^ t, '''r.'.;' .,-n ~.,/ , I~. ' .1 _-"- -., d '~p" \ cOl. .. -'" 0(; I()?~ E3. ~~ '.' ' V{'\,-, . \ ,/ " . ! l I Attachment 113 Attention: Mr. Mark Thompson Gentlemen: Re: Proposed MedFirst Medical Center Boynton Beach Boulevard @ N. W. 7th Street Boynton Beach, Florida HUMDECO Project No. 70971-353 GA Project No. 85-266FHD I I I ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] We have completed the geotechnical site assessment for the subject project and herewith present the data, our comments and recommendations for site preparation, foundation and pavement design and construction. SITE EXPLORATION AND TESTING The site for the proposed medical center is an "L" shaped lot located at the southeast quadrant formed by the intersection of Boynton Beach Road and N. W. 7th Street in Boynton Beach, Florida. The site is bounded on the south by N. W. 7th Street and on the east by a vacant field. The , property is currently occupied by a house about twenty years old; the ground around the house is a lawn and the remainder of the property is sparsely covered by weeds and other low vegetation. The ground surface is nearly level, and we estimate that the property is only about two or three feet higher than Boynton Beach Boulevard. Generally, surface water drainage and infiltration is good. photographs of the property are i nAppend i x r I J I J I J I J I J I ] I ] I ] I J ,J I J ] Geologie Assoeiates, Ine. HUMDECO, I nc. Page 2 June 28, 1985 continuously tested for consistency with a mechanical "dutch" cone in general conformance with ASTM D 3441 (Friction Cone Penetration Test of Soil); all of the borings were terminated in the overburden at a depth of from twenty-six feet to about thirty-six feet. The exploration was augmented by a ten-feet deep, hand-augered boring to help identify the near-surface soils and determine the depth to ground water. The soil samples were visually classified at the site by a member of our professional staff. Ground water levels were measured in the auger boring. The soil descriptions are shown by the Logs (Appendix II). The soil samples will be retained for a period of sixty days. Thereafter, they will be discarded unless we are instructed otherwise by you. ] The shallow subsurface conditions at the locations explored consisted of about one foot of loose, slightly organic sand topsoil. Below that, and extending to the limits of the exploration, is fine to medium-grained sand. Based on the results of the friction cone tests, the consistency of the inorganic soil is generally medium dense to dense, although a loose zone was detected in each of the borings from about four feet to seven feet below the ground surface. ] Ground water was not encountered by the hand-augered hole. ] Based on our experience in the south Florida region, the subsurface data - obtained from this site and our examination of adjacent properties, we consider the risk of ground subsidence associated with sinkhole development to be low for this site. ] ] ] l J J J J J ] ] ] ] ] J ] ] HUMDECO, Inc. Page 3 June 28, 1985 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The proposed medical facility will be a one-story, lightly loaded structure which will be constructed at the approximate location shown by the Plan. We assume that the structure will be similar to other MedFirst facilities in that a slab-on-grade will be utilized, and structural loads will be transmitted to the foundation system by means of interior and exterior load-bearing walls. Column loads are not expected to exceed 30 kips; wall loads will probably be less than 2 KSF. Surrounding pavements will be subjected only to light automobile traffic. We estimate that very little grading will be required to achieve final grades for the project. Because this report has been developed based on preliminary design criteria, we must review our comments and recommendations in the light of the final design. J J J -J -J -J COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation Initially, the existing structure, ground vegetation and organic soil must be removed from within the proposed building and pavement area. Following satisfactory stripping, the exposed surface within the building and new paved areas, including an area extending ten feet beyond the proposed building limits, should be proofrol1ed with a loaded, tandem-axle dump truck in order to help define any zones of unstable soil or buried debris. Any such unsuitable material must be excavated to firm ground, and resulting excavations must be backfilled with engineered fill compacted as stated below. Thereafter, the building and new pavement subgrades must be uniformly densified to the requirements for engineered fill using a vibratory roller having a minimum static weight of ten tons. The vibratory ] J J .., J l J l - ] ] l l -I ] ] ] J -] -] 1 HUMDECO, Inc. Page 4 June 28, 1985 compaction should consist of at least ten complete coverages over the stripped subgrade, but should continue until at least the upper three feet of the existing subgrade have been compacted to the requirements for engineered fill. Engineel"ed fill required to grade the proposed building and paved areas should contain less than 10% particles finer than the 200 mesh sieve and should be compacted to at least 98% of its maximum dry density as per ASTM D 698 (standard Proctor). Compaction tests should be performed as the fill is placed in order to verify that it complies with these requirements. Foundation Design We recommend that the building be founded by means of a conventionally designed, shallow foundation system bearing on the stable, properly compacted fill. In order to improve the bearing capability of the subgrade soil and to provi de a uniform subgrade reacti on, it wi 11 be necessary to thoroughly densify the bearing surface within each foundation excavation. Specifically, we recommend that each foundation subgrade be densified with a vibrating sled compactor until it is compacted to at least 98% of the soil's maximum dry density as per ASTM D 698. In order to facilitate compaction of the sand below the footing subgrades to the greatest depth practicable, specifications should require at least five complete coverages with the compactor, regardless of the compaction achieved at the surface. If the subgrade is prepared as recommended above, footings may be proportioned based on an allowable bearing pressure of 3 KSF. In order to enable the foundations to span minor inconsistencies in the subgrade, footings should be at least eighteen inches in width, regardless of loading. Furthermore, all footings should bear at least eighteen inches below finished, exterior grade in order to provide adequate confinement. Geologic Associat(.s, 1m'. 1 - I - HUMDECO, I nc. Page 5 June 28, 1985 1 - J J Provided that the foundation subgrades are properly prepared, settlement of the lightly loaded, shallow foundations should be within tolerable limits for the proposed facility. Specifically, we estimate that total foundation settlement will not exceed one-half inch; differential settlement of adjacent, dissimilarly loaded footings should be less than fifty percent of tha t tota 1 increment. , J ] ] ] J -l A conventionally designed slab-on-grade should perform satisfactorily provided that the subgrade has been properly prepared in accordance with the site grading recommendations presented in this text. A vapor barrier should be included in the floor slab design. Pavement Desion , .J Considering the type and frequency of traffic likely to be associated with the operation of this facility, it is our opinion that a light-duty pavement section consisting of 1.5 inches of asphalt surface course (Hot Mix) overlying six inches of compacted limerock base will perform satisfactorily. The limerock base should be compacted to at least 98% of its maximum dry density as per AASHTO T 180 (modified Proctor). In addition, the pavement subgrade should be stabilized to have an FBV (Florida Bearing Value) of at least 50. All pavement subgrades should be proofrolled again immediately prior to paving in order to detect any soft zones that have developed during construction. Any such zones should be repaired in the manner outlined earlier in this text. -J J ] ] 1 -J ] All paving materials and procedures should conform to the applicable requirements of the Florida Department of Transportation's "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction," except as modified above. Geologic A.,sociares, Inc. ....... Hu~mECO, I nc. Pane 6 June 28, 1985 ) r . t QUALITY CONTROL Site preparation and foundation construction for this project should be routine. Nonetheless, the satisfactory, long-term performance of the foundation system and the pavement will be dependent on the quality of that work. Accordingly, we recommend that site preparation, foundation excavation and paving operations be monitored and tested by experienced engineering technicians. In accordance with our current agreement, we will plan to provide these essential services en your behalf during construction. . , , I I I I j 1 Geologic Associates, Inc., appreciates this opportunity to be of continuing service to HUMDECO, Inc. At your convenience, we are available to discuss the details of this study. Respectfully submitted, GEOLOGIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ Michael J. Watson Project Coordinator ] ~c. M~~ L. E. \,ilson, P. E. Florida Registration No. 33496 ] J J ] disk9 1 ] j l LOOKING SOUTH FROM ACROSS BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. ] ] J 1 1 l 1 1 1 LOOKING NORTH ACROSS SITE FROM NEAR THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER. ] 1 . J 1 I . , ...! , __, VIEW OF EXISTING FROM NORTHWEST HOUSE LOOKING 1st. ST. NORTHWEST 'i "] -' l l l, -l, .' -, BACKYARD OF EXISTING HOUSE LOOKING WEST, - " \ 1- I .P-2 . PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED BUILDING .p-J .P-4 . . . . c' ',. _~" '. _: .- _ , .. ,r '. ,c ' '. '" . , ,. c'. ,.'. . , ,., '1 "'~,- ., - .".- . " .5 I 102.0 LOOSE SANO ~ MEDIUM DENSE SAND ~ LOOSE SAND ~ MEDIUM DENSE $AND ~ LOOSE SAND 75.7 LOGS SCALE: 1'" = 10: VERT.: NO HORtZ 2 101.8 lOOSf: SAND ~ VEDIf./AI DENSE SAND ~ LOOSE SANO ~ AlEOIf)U otNSE SANO 75.5 3 103.0 LOOSE SAND ~ MEDIUM SAND ~SE SAND ~ !.IED/VM OENSE SAND ~ OOISE SAND ~ AlfJ)IUA/ DENSE SAND ~ DENSE SAND 67.0 4 103.5 LOOSE: SANO ~ AlE1JIl}AI DENSE SAND ~ LOOSE SAND ~ AlEOIUM DENSE SAND ~SE SAND ~ UfZ)JUM DENSE SAND ~ DENSE SAND 77.2 5 102.5 lOOSE SAND ~ MEDIUM DENSE SAND ~ Loose SAND ~ LEGEND 1 HOLE NO. 1020 ELEVA llON JlED DENSE _____ CHANGE IN loll ~ OENSC 76.2 80.0 80 TrOM OF HOI !J r J POINT RESISTANCE, KG/CM 2 o 100 200 I, J f J I ~J , lJ tJ I 1J , , i0 J~ , l( '-, '(::.. J~ ltb -C:) ~ J~ s::J J~ Vj ] J ] ] J 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' 25' 30' 35' 40' Geologi(~ Associates, Inc. MECHANICAL FRICTION CONE - SOUNDING NO. / FRICTION RA TlO, % 01234 'J \. 'J J , 'J l J ~ ] , , ~ ] I J L.... ~ J~ ~~ J~ jl:::) '\.:) J~ '~ ]~ .CJ tv) Geologi(' Associates, Inc. MECHANICAL FRICTION CONE - SOUNDING NO. 2 POINT RESISTANCE, KG/CM 2 o 700 200 1:- L , I [ I [ I [ " " Ii t Ii " .. 5' 70' 75' 20' 25' 30J 35' 40J FRICTION RA TlO, % o 7 2 3 4 0' ________..... .__,______~"._...,_ ___n_________..._.._.________.._.,'--__._______________ .. ): , Geologi(' Assot'iates, IDl'. MECHANICAL FRICTION CONE - SOUNDING NO.3 POINT RESISTANCE; KG/CM 2 FRICTION RA TlO, % o 100 200 0 1 2 3 4 J J J , J ] ] , I ] !I~ J~ J'==- .2;: ]~ ,~ J~ :~ !- :::::: (:::5 -'C:l .lr) ] J "] 1 L] '1 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' 25' 30' 35' 40' J ] J l - ] ] ] ] 10 ]~ L;:: J~ .. 2: lPw ...:C:J -~ i~ -~ ..~ JC) lr] Gpologi(' A"so('iates, I JU'. MECHANICAL FRICTION CONE - SOUNDING NO. 4 POINT RESISTANCE, KG/CM 2 o 100 200 - ] j j ] l 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' 25' 30' 35' 40' FRICTION RA Tlo, % o 1 2 3 4 II II I jl : ' J - I Geologie Associates, Int', MECHANICAL FRICTION CONE - SOUNDING NO. 5 POINT RESISTANCE, KG/CM 2 o 100 200 'I 'I - I . - J t 1 r~ -, l J I Ii f:: i I~ r - ;-<J . l( . ~ '-.::. I r -~ L J ~ ; J~ 1 ~ \..J ;:: . ----.:: IS::) L;::: . '::::S j - (::) LV) ~'-...." ~. L , . i L ; i [ , I ~ ( , , ~,~ 0' 5' 10' 15' 20' 25' 30' 35' 40) FRICTION RA TlQ % o 1 2 3 4 DRAWDOWN Using a permeability of approximately 6.3 to ZO.O in/hr for a medium grained sand; then K 6.3 in x 1 ft = - - hr lZ in O. 53 ft hr t (Ill) ARln HZ KL(V1+Z2) (see attached derivation) ~ = l7BZ sf L = 170 If HI Z ft IIZ O.l ft. Z = 4 C,O) then: t (1782) 1nO.l = 14.37 hours (0.53) (170) ( vl+(4)< ) 14.37 hours <: 36 hours Attachment 114