REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERI G DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-197
r'mo rn@.rnu'W8
I E'..-.-
,
" : , ,) r'
I~J ;. d
! PLANNltJ'GAND
L ZONING DEPT.
.'....,.,.b.'l
'.
TO:
, ~~~~e A. arker, City Manager
~~~lam Hu P.E., City Engineer
June 20, 1
: j !
l~
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
KNUTH ROAD PCD
f""' ~
The June 6 Bennett Ie ter referred to this office on the 19th seems
to assume conditions not prevailing at this time. The entire
letter seems to be witten to support the Winchester gas station
which, of course, is certainly within the purview of the writer.
The problem is that pproval of the gas station is not the Knuth
Road construction tr'gger - development of the Knuth Road PCD is.
It is my opinion th
included both constru
buffer. They were no
states that a writte
the Knuth Road PCD development acceptance
tion of the road and provision of a wall and
only conditions of approval but Mr. Bennett
agreement to that effect is in existence.
There is no periphera legitimate reason to leverage approval of a
gas station onto t e site simply because a development, any
development I wants a remote wall immediately. The station should
stand on its own mer'ts, and it did. If the commission wishes to
reconsider, so be it. But the reason to change the decision should
be based on the n ed for a station at that location, not
accelerated construct 'on of a distant wall and the desire for guard
gates.
The Knuth Road situat on right now as I understand is that the Tara
Oaks developer (south of Stonehaven) will build Knuth Road west of
Tara Oaks simultaneou
short missing link
developer. That
conversations in whi
participated reached
consensus was that t
at one time, with
developers.
ly with construction of the development. The
ust be constructed by the Knuth Road PCD
construction schedule is unknown, but
h Mr. Winchester and Tara Oaks developers
consensus, in my opinion. That developer
entire remaining road would be constructed
costs proportionally distributed to the
With regard to the Be nett comment that "it could be years before
the wall and landscap buffers" are built is true only if the Knuth
Road PCD is not deve oped and Mr. Winchester does not honor his
commitment to Stoneha en. The City has no control over that, and
should not approve a non-permitted use (gas station) solely to
accomplish (right now Mr. winchester's commitment if, in fact. one
exists.
xc: Tambri Heyden, Panning & Zoning Director
WVHlck
C:KNlfrllPCIl
FIRE PREV NTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-202 WDC
TO:
Planning De artment
FROM:
Fire Depart ent
DATE:
January 17, 1995
RE: Time Extens'on
Tara Oaks P D
Knuth Rd PU
Boynton Bea Blvd PCD
We have no objection to the time extension on these projects.
However, reviews eve y six months to insure maintenance of the
parcels should be man atory.
William D.
rn ~ @ ffi " 'If] ~.~
i '
PlMmlNG AND .\iD.-.'
70Ni~)G DEPT. .'~-W j