APPLICATION
, AF'R-12-:~;ci liED 15:25 ID:K LDAY & ASSOC
TEL t..jIJ: 407-689-2592
/:1066 P01
..., . ~,a 11.....
LIndIoIDt Arohl1lO1lll PlII . ,.
,., Forum PIlot
S~1tI100A
W. ,..Im ,,"h. r'1vrtUI 1
1<<1111B-1II22. FIX: l401 ..aau
w m fn)
APR I 2 /995 ~
\
0/;":--.
April 12, 19ge
Ms, Tambrl Heyden Planning Director
City of Boynton B Planning & Zoning Department
100 eut Boynton B Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL. 33425
R.: Knuth Road .C.O. Extension Request Boynton Beach P.C.D. extension
Request and .... Oak. P,U.O. extension Request
O...r Project No.: .1G
Dear Ms. Heyden.
Thl, letter will serve as several requests. Flratly, on behalf of my clients, I have
been authorized to r uost an addltlon&\l thirty (30) day postponement of both the
Knuth Road P.C.D, tne Boynton 8each P.C.D, As Indicated In my previous
correspondence of March 16, 1995, my clients have been tJylng to firm up
development time bles to address the concerns which were raised by the
Planning CommlB81 n. They al'8 stili In this process and would pl'8fer the
additional thirty (30) ay. to be In a better position to address these luu. bm,..
tne City COuncil.
In the case of the Ti Oaks P.U.D., we do Intend to present the mattsrto the city
Council on Tueada I April 18, 1005. In this J:lartieular ease, my clients have
entered Into a cont ct with Pulte Homes who will develop the project. W. are
requesting that repr ntatlves of Pul1e Hom~ accompeny us to the meeting to
better explain their proposal to the COUncil. In all likelihoOd, because their
housing type will squire modification of the master plan, a master plan
modification I'8qUK would shortly follow approval of the extension. On Tueeday
night, we can provld the Council with more details regarding their saIe8 program.
However, given the ot that we are anxious to move snead with the Pulte Homes
I Tara Oeks propo 8. I do need to get the impaot fee credits IHue resolved for
the construction of nuth Road. You will recall, that I addressed this matter to you
In a separate letter of January 24, 1996, (attached). Sometime ago, both the
County Representa es and City Staff recommended approval of these Impact fee
credits. However, I order to faollltate that approval, a resoluUon must be passed
by the City Council 0 be submitted to Palm Beach CountY. Attached you will
I ;,1._. ~'.I,......"" ~I__.,-
WR-12-'95 WED 15:25 ID:KI . Y t~ RSSOC
TEL NO:407-8B9-2592
~066 P02
Ms. Tambr1 Heyden
April 12, 1885
page 2 Of 2
flnd a draft of a resol on that contains the necessary Information according to
the Courny Ordlnanc, I would reQuest that this matter be on tt1e agenda for
action on Tuesday nl htB meeting as well .. the Tara Oak extension. R8IOIutton
Of this Issue Is a reg Irement of our oontmct with Pulte Heme..
Please call me If you have any questions regarding any of theee matters.
Stnaerely.
-K\1I(D.~~~~l ~
Kieran J. Klldav
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
KJKlcdd\Cheyden.41
Auaohments
00: Mike Sch r: Sohrosder & Larche
Carrie Parker. City of Boynton Beac", City Manager
APR-1Z_-:::~ 95 WED 1~.:.26 ID:I<I 00'( & ASSOC
TEL NO:407-689-2592
1:*066 P03
..
-t-
o
.
~
1.,-
II . I'.
....., .. AaIo .1....
LI",*",. AtoN-.ne'P ere
1.1 florum r..
lulM '*
Yftet ,tlM a..ah. I=larld 3M01
1.-07) ",IIZI . Fu: 1040 I _ 2682
JanulUY 24, 1ea5
Ms. Tambrl Heyden,
City of Boynton BeB
100 Saat BoVnton
Boynton Baaah, FL
IGnnlng DIrector
Planning & Zoning Department
h Blvd.
3425
Re;
dita tor the Conetruotlon of Knuth Road
.: 799,16
Dear Ms. Heyden.
As you are aware, client. Mr. Bill Wlnohester, Is responsible for the constl\Jotlon of
Knuth Road as part of the Conditions of Approval for the two Planned Commercial
Development. and 0 . PIl\nned Unit Cevelopment whIch are ourrently being consIdered
for Time E)Ctenslon Sinoe the projGQt& have been apprQved, tharo has been an
assumption that the cats Incurred with regClrd to the oonetruotlon of t""l. road would bra
credited against Pal eeach County TrAffic Impact Fees. aeoClU" Knuth Road Ie .
collector road deslg ad on the City's Comprehen51ve PICln, tho VAlue of tho ccnetruotion
of Knuth Road Is m e resident serving than project serving.
In reviewing our files It appears that the Issue of Impact fee oredlt has never been finally
eoordinated with Pel Beach County. I am attaching a letter written by Mr, Chris Cutro
on May 28, '992 to r. Heney Frakes. It Is my understanding that our County stlllff II
prepared to racom nd approval of tha Impact f88 credits, but 8 resolution requesting
&u~h credlte neede 0 be adopted by the City Council, Attaeh.d you will11nd 8 draft
resolution which w prepared by my office to assist Mr. Outro at the time he waO
pursuing this matter, As you are aware, Mr. CutrQ left the City without tnls matt.r beins
finally resolved. As ar as I know, this resolution has not be.n reviewed by your City
Attomey or presents to the C~y Council for their approval. At this time, aSlumlng that
the City Council app oves the extensions for these projects, ~ seems appro~rlat.to also
resolv& this Issue, y getting this Issue resolved now, there .hould be no additional
delays In moving th e projects forward within the time period allowed by the e><tenslon.
If loan be of any as IstanQQ In this mattar, please do not hesItate to contaot me.
Kieran J. KlldaV
tclday 6; Auoclat.. I no.
I "" ....
,......
WR-12-' 95 bED 15: 27 ID: KI Y & RSSOC
, ,ji-f'l-:l-II-'~ 1\..-': ~l~ ',- I~H..~Y ,~ ~~
TEL ~D:407-689-2592
II:!. ..N.JI~r'-t#;I-~
t:t066 P04
~~
-
.
MaY 28, 1112
fIU.y l'raJUllI
~.~.~.n~ coun~ IA9~..r
r.~m ...qb ~g~ y In;~nelr1n9 ~ '~~Le WO~~.
100 I, Au.~r.l~ n Avenue, Airport Mllton Cener.
Wilt 'a.. a..;h fL J3607
C~.d1t fo~ Road construction 1n L1eu 01 paym_nt of %~P&ct
reeB tor utb RQ&d (~1nk ~otw..n WOOl~r1;nt 10&4 and
IOUDtan a. ch aQulevarQ)
D..r HI', rr-ak..
RE:
Pur.Uabe to ..e 1Qn 12-2' ~x.~p~10n and ~.41t. .,gt~on of tht
PA!. .~ ~OM~ :aUT~ON FOR ROAD IM.KOV_HlNTI ORDtNAKCI, % am
wri.~n9 .0 olar fy that KnU~n AOad, . ma,or col1.ctcr .ho~ Q~
.k. ."y'. Tbo~ ~vhf.~ trotee~10n N.p W111 ~. .nt,tl.~ to
~...LV. tbo G~. ~~ fo~ .mp.c~ Fe.. prOV14.4 ~or 1n tbe Ord1DaDCI.
Aee..k.. VO~ ~i 1 f~A. . ~QPY ~: th. .~gfted Tng.oughfarl 'lln
Map lo~ ek. CL~ ~! ~o~~gn a.aQh. lA~tb ~Q.4 11 .hown on th1.
sap .. & oo11.e .~ 1.~.1~~y I_~ Wgg~~.1gn~ ~O.Q not~D.rlY to thl
..ynuon ..4ch H 1~. A~~1tiQn.11Yt co~n ~D. Cl~~ ana the tountI
.pp..~v.d. ne." al ,n-ment. tc. ~. nortll 'nQ o~ lA~th Road .IV':'
y..r. .'0 to &1 ow tor ~.tt.r utilization of Chi. road I' an
alt.~fta~~v. nor h/.e~tn c~l~.;tgr aervini tbl H~~l (Tn. nlw
.~~~Rae~t P~gV~ .4 for the no~tn tlrmLnUI ot Knuth Rol4 to a11vn
d1reetly w1th ~ . w..t.~ly entranc. to tbe Mall.) tn. road haa
alway. b..n env .1oned a. a~ llt.rn.tiva to Con;r... Av.nue whiGh
18 at tb1a ~1.. the only north/lcuth arttr1al in ~k. area.
eurr.ntlY, . p~ t10n of Xnuth Road 1. CQn.truct.d louth of
laV"ton 18&ob. laYArd. In the past, ~.caa.. Wool~r10ht Road
did ~ot .H~'t ~ tw..n COnQre.3 Av'n~. and M1L1ta~ ~r.il, t,.
r..ainift9 Gon.t ot1o~ ol th1. link w.. na~ a pr1or1ty. HOW.Y.~,
~e~ wi~h Woclb~ h~ ~oad o~en Aft~ op.ra~inq .~tb .iin~~lG.h~
tr.f~1e, th. ~Q tr~ct1oD of Knu~h RQ.4 woul. Ql..~~y ~.
d..~.&bl. and w rant.d.
..
Jh''1rUQ,s 9/l.~'~Y to t~e fi~lfstmJm
1t""."I'. .......~
.
, '
'"
, I'"
.APR--12-'9S LJED 15:27 ID:f<I' MY & RSSOC
..J~,j-10- · 95 T~ ~: IZl5 ,~ - 'd I..tf:lY I) ~O::~'(:
\.
.
..
~
...
.
B'A.)' rJ:au8
TEL t~:407-689-2592
.. Tel-N'.11 4W-~-":'.--'~
t:i066 P05
=283 P0S
-
-&-
HAY ZG, 1"t
~~..h~ly, ~... 0._ tWQ ~rgj.ct. MhLQh have ~.o.~v.d .PPCQval
~.om th. City wb Gh in .~!tl~n to baViAI f~o~t.9.. O~ .1tb.~
Woo~r1gb~ ~.4 ~ Boynton ...cb DcUl.V&~41 a1.o h.v. 'rOft~a9.'
O~ Kn~th Road, . pDrt of the 4oY.~o,n.nt ..p~ov.l p~OG..., tb.
CltY w1eb.. to h V~ .1tn.~ Qn. or ~o;h o~ ~b... P~O~.Gt. Gom,let.
tbe m1.8~nq link of Kn~th Road. The developer. of t~~.e pa~o...
h.ve r.~..t.4 a ar1!1eation as to whIther im,aat !.. erld1t can
oe obta1~ed for he ee~.!ruet!e~ ef Knuth Road wh1eh 18 not
~1r~etly rAl.t..~ to ~he n~ed ~f ~h@ ~roj.e~ pur.uant to 'lct1on
22-21 oe tbe aO& .~p.ct r.. or~1nane.. Ba..d upon my r..dinq of
~~. CI".U,nano. an tIn. 4.:!1u1 t~C)n ot I'. ."jol:' 1:'0.4 n.<t"'Q&'"k
.Y.~..", % ~.l~. . ~h.. Kn~~h RO.~ .boYl~ ~a1i.y .. ~h. ..~or
e.l1.c..~ wo.. w ~ch ~. .nv~.io..4 1a t~1. O~4Lftaft=..
Additionally, ba aU8a Xnu~h aoad will prov14a ~h. .~r.t ...eerlV
north/south al~~ n~~1ve to ~onar... Avenue, 1~ ahou14 provide
~.11.f aa4 ~h.~. ~r~ ~d4~~iona1 eapa~ity for convr... Avenue ..
..11.
t would apprec1a , your response te th1. latt.r. N..41... to
lay, we expect e It w. would n..d ~o m..e 111 of ebt ~'~Ulr...at.
of :be ord1nance W1t~ ra.p.et to ~roe.our..~ COlt ..t1mat..r a~d
,cop. of eon.trut1on activity. ~ah~ you for Jour
eOD.S,d..&-.tioll.
ce : c:p
InG.
A,.S.:a.day
.
.inoerely,
~~
Cb~t.t~b.~ Cq;~O, _ICP
'lanntnc an4 ZOOiD; DireQ;or
- I.,..... .M 1J1 L ~
. APR-12-'95 kED 15:28 ID:K DAY & ASSOC TEL NO:407-E89-2592
JJ:N-1a-'95 TU: Q9IGlJ - 'K'1L.0I:l'T' a. A6SOC TEL t-()14?-~ '2
~P06
*l2SIS Ni2
., .,.
~
."
ID()rl~ti
..
I
'IOIOIID DIOL
WIIIItD. tho a.r ton J..oh Oompr.h.nai.ve ~1.1t, OrcU..n."". '~-2',
i.d6ntU!le. Knuth Rot.cl I., It CL_:t a<>11.oto.~ (IJKhl~!.~ A), aft.
WHIRIAa the c~ty o! Baynton Beach ha. ob~.1Ded and p~o~....d ~he
R1ght.~f-W.~ fg lnutb Road as part of it. adoptea Tbo~OQ9hf~.
'lan, and
WBBkBAI ~nuth Ro d p~Q\'id$. . Q~it!o.l NQrth/Sauth al~.rn.tiv. ~Q
eO~9~... Avenue etwe~n Woolbright Roed and Old Boynton fto.d, and
, wa.liftBAtt 'Coll. Cit ot 3Qy.aton aeach b.. .~prCJved KIl\lth !\oad reD
j (O~din.n~. 0'0-1 J and ~UT.. Oak. .UD (Ordinonge O'O-'S~ whicb botb
I C5'en~ on. .n.u:toll 1\ ad" and
I~._~'
.v~~l ~.WB.~ tn. ci~7 ot DOrn~~n D.a~h h.. ~.qui.~ en. pe~1~10n.r. ot
~~ JIl,~? ~nu'Ch _oaCS 1t0D a d 'tara Oak. reD to COtl.t~uot tb. m...11li link af
~~lll .. Kl\u'th J\oad. bet-v.. lioynt-on E1..ch Doul.va:r:d an~J!!'-.9~.br19ht. I'oacs, and
j) /J L1--..m1ASA8 ~he con. ta=uction 0:1: Knuth Itoacl 1.../~o't 1 8lte :related
(~;;4~!r.matlt of . thor Knuth ftoad FCD or T.~;UC, an4
n&'RI:AI the CIon t.r'QClt.:i..on of ltn.~tb. Rocad J.. ~gn.idu.~ fa" o:f
~mpl.~ion of tbe major road network ot the city of Io7ntoD a.agh,
and
WliIR.IAS the c:ltil n. of Boynton Sflach and u.nincorporated >>.1iA "&Oil
County will b8n. 1t fram th. oompleted link of Knuth Xaad betve.n
Woolbright ROAd d Old Boynton Road., and
WBIR!AS Article 1 .1 ~.l.g, ot tha Palm Beaah County Unified Land
De\felopment Code rovide. impact f.. credits whEe cODatructioft of
a po%tian of a mA 0: .road network i. proposea, and
9IIlBQAS tbe C.lt of Boynt.on a.ach ba. det8mJ.necl t.hat tII.
coo.t~gtion of I ~th Road m..t. the standard. for or.dit of read
~=t i..., ot ~ therefore RBSOLVID that,
TBB Clty or Born en B.ach requ..t tbat Palm .Beaeh COUDt, _ke &
tlnd1n~ ~h&~ cred t fo~ the preparat10n of plan. aDd oon.~rue~toa
of Knutb Road 81 approved by the city of Boynton B8aeh and ,.1m
~.C'lh County b. 9 I!lnted dga in.t thl!!! Road Impact: Pees due trOll tftuth
lIoad reD and ~a%. Oak. PlJD~
...
1M1I
;+ is
.--=
?
<lP
,"1,~~
~ :1\ .t!
r'lHf:l-l'":'-"?':, FPI J';'::::3 ID:f<l [HI ,~~ A%CiC.
TEL tj[l: 4D?-t:,;:j'3-25':32
1:*450 F'C11
...., . _eM_
~pe Atcl1ltlC1l/PlII\
1 ti& 1 fl9rum PIle>>
suitt 'OOA
Wwt p'l)lm a..ah, Florid. 1
\4011 0I!e-1MJ2Z . "x: (4()7) ~
Maret, 18, 1995
Me. lamb" Heyden, Dlreotor
City of Boynton e Planning & Zoning Department
100 Eaat Boynton ch BlVd. '
Boynton Beach, FL
"
RE: Tam OakS P. .o.J, Knuth Road P,C.t?1. Boyntl)n BMOh 90utward P.C.O.
OUR PROJECT NO.; 78S.i"(}-----u--
Dear Ms. Heyden,
. request to postpOne consid,~n of the above three (3)
extension requests a pertOd of thirty (30) daYf~ untll the City commission
Meeting of Aprtl 18, 1995. We are requestl'lg thl.. postpOnement In order to
prope\1y ass888 effects of the Zoning Commissions recommendations ~
rttgarding th... proj ts assuming theal are adopted by the CIty Council.
At the Zoning Com Isslan Meeting, It $eemed appererrt that the Commissioners
Wl8I"I&'J to nave t)ett reassurance that these projects will In faCt move forward to
develop If time ext nsions are granted. Aa there are ongoing dl8CU88lons
regarding the develo ment of all of the propertlN at this time, we feel that during
the additional thirty ~ days we can try to solidify time tables for development
&0 we can better it ress this Issue at the CIty Council Meeting.
this time to assess the effect of B denial of these petitions
u ths status of pnwloU5 dRdlcatlans of right-of-way which
loue approvals. WIth regard to these le8uee, our attOmey
to mG. with the City Attomey 1m dlsQUSS the ramfflcatlons
m the City Councfl's adopting the recommendatlonl of the
Additionally, we will
Includ ing sueh Issu
rMultod from the pr
wlstleB adequate tlm
whiOh would result
Zoning Commission
--..- -. .-.-..'-.... . ......---
~ ~ :~2: ~"~ ~
~
PLt\NNINGE"'pNlO
lONING D .
--.......,...
.", -"
rJtt~-l',.--'~':., H i ~ ;'; ':':4 Il':IIL-I;H, H=bU..
i ~L flU; .4:j.'--I.:,:::;).,j--,,5'::3c'
i:i4511 PlJ2
...
Tharlk you fOr your
Slnesrely,
/"
-~~.
Kieran J. Kt Cia
KIlday & 1-*, nc~
OC~ Mike 80hr0ed$r
KJKlodd\cheyden.31
~
Board of Counly Commissioners
Ken L. Foster, Chairman
Hurt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
COllnl v Administrator
IZobert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
March 7, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag,
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boul ard
P.o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL
RE: BOYNTON BEACH BOULE
KNUTH RoAD P.C.O."
TARA OAKS P.U.D.
Dear Mr. Haag:
The Palm Beach County Tra fic Division has traffic reviewed the three traffic
analyses prepared by Simmo s & White for these three proposed developments. The
three studies are updates 0 the K. S. Rogers traffic studies prepared in 1990.
They use the trip generati n and trip distribution from the K. S. Rogers studies
and update the existing t affic volumes (1994) and the future traffic (1997)
volumes. These traffic st dies do not address traffic on Gateway Boulevard for
the two P.C.D.s, as woul be required by the existing Traffic Performance
Standards (TPS). A letter eceived yesterday from Simmons & White provides some
of the requested additiona information for Gateway Boulevard.
Bo nton Beach Boulevard P. .0.
The updated traffic study ddresses 120,000 square feet of general retail. The
traffic study states that t address 110,375 square feet of general retail, and
outparce1s consisting of a ,625 square foot bank with drive-through, and a 4,000
square foot hi gh-turnov'er staurant. The outparcel s are hi gh traffi c generators
and the traffic study does not properly address the outparce1 uses.
The 120,000 square feet 0 retail will generate 4,818 net daily trips with a
build-out of 1997. The st dy shows that the project will meet the requirements
of TPS on all roadways exce t Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard restricts the
development to 75,700 squa e feet of general retail (3,361 daily trips) until it
is widened to six-lanes in FY 96/97.
Knuth Road P.C.D.
The updated traffic study ddresses a 120,000 square foot shopping center which
includes 110,375 square fe t of general retail and outparcels consisting a 4,500
square foot bank with driv -through, and service station with a 2,000 square foot
convenience store, and a ar wash. The project will generate 6,221 net daily
trips with a build-out of 997. The study shows that the project will meet the
requirements of TPS on all roadways except Gateway Boulevard. Gateway Boulevard
"An Equ I Opportunity - AffirJll<1tivl' Action EmploYl'r"
~ printed on recycled paper
Box 21229 W 5t Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-40011
March 7, 1995
Mr. Mike Haag
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD .CD.
KNUTH ROAD P.C.D.
TARA OAKS P.U.D.
page two
restricts the developmen to 75,700 square feet of general retail (3,361 daily
trips) until, it' is wid~n to six-lanes in FY 96/97.
Tara Oaks P.U.D.
The updated traffic stud di scusses a project consi sti ng of 192 multi-family
dwelling Ynit~. and a 20, 00 square foot church. This project would generate
1,498 daily ~rips. The s udy mentions an unidentified previous petition which
accounts for 770 of the p ojects daily trips. Like the K. S. Rogers study, the
updated study does not ad ress these trips. Rather, it addresses 728 daily trips
from an undefined project The updated study shows that this undefined project
meets TPS on all roadways, based on a build-out of 1997.
In your letter dated Ja uary 20, 1995, you requested verification that the
roadway improvements list d in the Simmons & White reports are still applicable.
There is no information i these reports that allows me to verify the need for
those roadway improvement .
I am sorry for the delay in responding to your request. The form of the updated
traffic studies and missi g information did not allow a timely review. If you
have any questions regard ng this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGI EER
090-- Jv~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior,Registp.rert C~vil
cc. Rob Rennebaum, P.E. Simmons & White
File: TPS - Mun. - Traff'c Study Review
h:\traffic\diw\boyn37
I ! '.~.'. Ii; -'-"f;'~ ii"
.1 n) c''!. ...I~L,': ....L ..
IIJ!'ll ' . ,
ill '
! L--....-.-....
i PUi;\!Nli~G Iti:O Qh
i zQNlliQJJ.ltL..... \y
-... U::.. A6. /II~ '9'1- 6()~
1
-60
Kilday & Auocl.tes
Landscape Architects/ Plan rs
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 1
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) -2592
January 19, 1995
Mr. William Hukill, Director 0 Development
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Bo levard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Knuth Road PCD, Bo nton Beach Blvd. PCD and Tara Oaks PUD,
Boynton Beach, Flori a
Our File No. 799.16
Dear Mr. Hukill,
Pursuant to our discussion, lease find attached three (3) separate traffic studies for the
aforementioned projects. As discussed, these reports have been prepared by Simmons
& White, I nc. for the purp se of reviewing these projects pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards add ssed in the previous Traffic Impact Analysis under current
roadway volumes and growt rates.
Please feel free to contact this office if you have any questions or require further
information.
Sincerely,
c:z:.~Z' U' '-
7 If /'.1 '..
/ .'. . {~J..- /
Kieran J i1day
:'b
. {-/~0 .
cc: Mike Haag
Mike Schroeder
Bill Winchester
Rob Rennebaum
Enclosures
LAWll/jb/hukil1.119
SIM
ONS & WHITE, INC.
E gineers . Planners · Consultants
January 18, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beac
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach,
Attention:
Mr. William Hukill
Direct of Development
33425
Knuth
Boynto
Dear Mr. Hukill:
ad P.C.D.
Beach, Florida
Re:
This office has been retained to revisit the above referenced
project with regard 0 Traffic Performance. A Traffic Impact
Analysis was prepared by K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer, Inc.
dated January 30, 1990 The Analysis addressed a total development
of 120,000 S.F. consis ing of 108,532 S.F. of retail area with two
defined outparcel use The outparels consisted of a 6068 S.F.
high-turnover, sit-dow restaurant and a 5400 S.F. bank with drive-
through. Subsequent reports prepared by Simmons & White, Inc.
dated January 7, 1992 nd April 14, 1992 have revised the original
scheme of development for this 120,000 S.F. center. The revised
scheme includes 112,98 S.F. of retail ~rea, a 4500 S.F. banK with
drive-through, a serv'ce station with 2000 S.F. convenience store
and 512 S. F. car was. Please refert:o the site plan on file
prepared by Kilday & ssociates.
d,53;; rp
rCi":' +-
S>4c ~ <'.. ..k
~, O/';ltes,{
...;.! '
\. 1
Site access to. the par el remains unchanged with two proposed full
connections to Knuth Road and two right-in, right-out only
connections to Boynto Beach Blvd. The original analysis assumed
a build-out or compl tion date of 1993. The review presented
herein will assume a uild-out date of 1997. The purpose of this
review is to demonstra e that the proj ect will continue to meet the ..
Traffic Performance S andards addressed in the previous Traffic
Impact Analysis under current roadway volumes and growth rates.
/~
4623 Forest Hill B ulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415
Telephone (407) 965-9144
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pa Two
TRAFFIC GENERATION
The original traffic eneration rate and passer-by capture rate
yielded an anticipated external traffic generation addressed in the
original analysis of 4818 tpd as follows:
RETAIL 120 000
Ln (T) = 0.65 Ln (120) + 5.92
T = 8365 tpd
Pass-By % = 45.1 - .0225 (120)
= 42.4%
NET = 8365 - 8365 ( .424)
= 4818 tpd
As stated above, a su sequent report prepared by Simmons & White,
Inc. dated April 14, 1 92 revised the scheme of development for the
shopping center. The generation from the approved report may be
summarized as follows:
Bank With Drive-Throu S.F.
4500 S.F. x 29
1000
Less 18.05% Inte
Less 46% Capture
NET
Service Station
Service Station
Less 14% Interna
Less 58% Capture
NET
= 1310 tpd
= (236)
= (494)
= 580 tpd
= 748 tpd
= (105)
= (373)
= 270 tpd
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 -
TRAF IC GENERATION CONTINUED
Car Wash
Car Wash
=
166 tpd
Convenience Store
2000 S.F. x
TOTAL
= 1774 tpd
= (277)
= (674)
= 823 tpd
= 6221 tpd
Less 37%
Less 45% Capture
NET
For the purposes of t is review, the most recent total generation
of 6221 tpd will be a dressed. It is important to note, however,
that this total genera ion is approximately 30 percent higher than
the generation addres ed in the original K.S. Rogers, Consulting
Engineer, Inc. repo t and is due largely to local agency
interpretation of gen ration methodologies.
Based upon the exist' ng and proposed geometry of the roadway
network, a review of he existing and historical travel patterns,
as well as a review of the proposed development and improvements in
the area, the traffic distribution assumed in the original K.S.
Rogers reports contin es to appear applicable:
IC ASSIGNMENT DISTRIBUTION
25.7%
25.8%
21.7%
26.8%
The prorated distribu ed traffic volumes for the project may be
seen in Table 3.
The roadway conditions and daily volumes in the area of the subject
parcel have changed c nsiderably since 1990 for the better. The
following Table summ rizes the 1989 volumes, roadway laneage,
historical growth rat s and calculated roadway volumes at project
buildout in 1993 from the original report:
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 -
CONTINUED
TABLE 1
LINK 1989 HISTORICAL ESTIMATED
VOLUME GROWTH RATE 1993 VOLUME
A. BOYNTON BEACH
BLVD.
1. EI Clair to
Military 6L 46,300 23,660 7.6% 27,661
2. Military to
Lawrence 6L 46,300 24,420 6.7% 31,652
3. Lawrence to
Knuth 6L 46,300 27,365 6.7% 35,469
4 . Knuth to
Mall Rd. 6L 46,300 27,365 6.7% 35,469
5. Mall Rd. to
Congress 6L 46,300 27,365 6.7% 35,469
6 . Congress to
Old Boynton 6L 46,300 31,972 8.5% 44,309
7. Old Boynton
to I-95 6L 46,300 43,886 8.5% 60,819
B. OLD BOYNTON ROAD
1. Military to
Lawrence 2L 13,100 11,383 6.5% 14,644
2. Lawrence to
Congress 2L 13,100 11,383 6.5% 14,644
Four
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pag Five
TRAFFIC ASS GNMENT DISTRIBUTION CONTINUED
TABLE 1
LINK
1989
VOLUME
HISTORICAL ESTIMATED
GROWTH RATE 1993 VOLUME
C. CONGRESS AVENUE
1. N.W. 22nd to
Old Boynton 4L 30,000 29,808 11.2% 45,578
2 . Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 6L 46,400 29,808 11.2% 45,578
3 . Boynton Beach Blvd.
to Woolbright 6L 46,400 25,170 9.8% 36,584
D. LAWRENCE ROAD
1. N.W. 22nd Ave.
to Old Boynton 2L 13,100 8,680 7.5% 11,592
2 . Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 2L 13,100 8,680 7.5% 11,592
E. MILITARY TRAIL
l. N.W. 22nd to
Old Boynton 6L 46,400 22,105 11.9% 34,658
2 . Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 6L 46,400 22,105 11.9% 34,658
3. Boynton Beach
Blvd. to
Woolbright 4L 30,000 23,662 11.9% 37,099
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pag Six
TRAFFIC ASS GNMENT DISTRIBUTION CONTINUED
TABLE 1
LINK
19 9
EAGE/
CA ACITY
1989
VOLUME
HISTORICAL ESTIMATED
GROWTH RATE 1993 VOLUME
F. N.W. 22ND AVE.
1. Military to
Lawrence 9,188 14.5% 11,818
2. Lawrence to
Congress 6,876 14.5% 14,876
Updating the above Ta Ie to address the 1994 volumes and roadway
laneage, current hist rical growth rates and calculated roadway
volumes at project bui d-out in 1997 yields the following:
LINK
TABLE 2
1994
VOLUME
HISTORICAL
GROWTH RATE
1997
VOLUME
A. BOYNTON BEACH
BLVD.
1. EI Clair to
Military 6L 45,000 30,292 8.93% 39,153
2 . Military to
Lawrence 6L 45,000 30,729 2.92% 33,500
3. Lawrence to
Knuth 6L 45,000 31,899 0% 31,899
4 . Knuth to
Mall Rd. 45,000 31,899 0% 31,899
5. Mall Rd. to
Congress 45,000 31,899 0% 31,899
6. Congress to
Old Boynton 29,554 0% 29,554
7. Old Boynton
to I-95 6 /45,000 40,494 0% 40,494
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pa
Seven
CONTINUED
TABLE 2
LINK 4 1994 HISTORICAL 1997
EAGE/ VOLUME GROWTH RATE VOLUME
ACITY
B. OLD BOYNTON ROAD
1. Military to
Lawrence 4L 29,400 8,655-0 0% 8,655-0
2. Lawrence to
Congress 4L 29,400 10,099-0 0% 10,099-0
C. CONGRESS AVENUE
1. N.W. 22nd to
Old Boynton 6L 45,000 37,777 4% 42,494
2 . Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 6L 45,000 37,777 4% 42,494
3. Boynton Beach Blvd.
to Woolbright 6L 45,000 30,818 2.28% 32,974
D. LAWRENCE ROAD
1. N.W. 22nd Ave.
to Old Boynton 2L 13,400 10,733 0% 10,733
2. Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 2L 13,400 10,733 0% 10,733
E. MILITARY TRAIL
1. N.W. 22nd to
Old Boynton 6L 45,000 25,952 6.7% 31,526
2. Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 6L 45,000 25,952 6.7% 31,526
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pag Eight
TRAFFIC ASS GNMENT DISTRIBUTION CONTINUED
TABLE 2
LINK
1994
VOLUME
HISTORICAL
GROWTH RATE
1997
VOLUME
3. Boynton Beach
Blvd. to
Woolbright 4L 45,000 26,486 0% 26,486
F. N.W. 22ND AVE.
1. Military to
Lawrence 6L 45,000 * 15,388 25.46% 30,388
2. Lawrence to
Congress 6L 45,000 * 21,791 15.26% 33,367
* Scheduled for c nstruction by Palm Beach County in
Fiscal Year 199 /1997 as a six-lane section.
Due to the opening of he interchange at I-95 and N.W. 22nd Avenue
(Gateway Blvd.) as wel as the construction of Woolbright Road from
Military Trail to Cong ess Avenue, the above-referenced links are
anticipated to have ad quate capacity at project build-out in 1997
for the trips to be ge erated by the project. The following Table
identifies the previo s traffic assignment (based on 4818 total
trips), the most recen traffic assignment (based on 6221 tpd), the
total 1997 volume and the Level of Service Standard. All of the
following links are sh wn to meet the Level of Service Standard at
project build-out in 1 97:
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - pag Nine
TRAFFIC ASS GNMENT DISTRIBUTION CONTINUED
TABLE 3
LINK PR VIOUS CURRENT TOTAL LEVEL OF
AS IGNMENT ASSIGNMENT 1997 SERVICE
{48 8 TOTAL {6221 TOTAL (includes STANDARD
t d tod) current
assiqnment)
A. BOYNTON BEACH
BLVD.
1. EI Clair to
Military 243 314 39,467 45,000
2. Military to
Lawrence 1 038 1,340 34,840 45,000
3 . Lawrence to
Knuth 1,604 2,071 33,970 45,000
4 . Knuth to
Mall Rd. 2,575 3,325 35,224 45,000
5. Mall Rd. to
Congress 2,431 3,139 35,038 45,000
6. Congress to
Old Boynton 929 1,200 30,754 45,000
7. Old Boynton
to I-95 794 1,025 41,519 45,000
B. OLD BOYNTON ROAD
1. Military to
Lawrence 138 178 8,833-0 29,400
2. Lawrence to
Congress 164 212 10,277-0 29,400
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 -
TRAFFIC AS DISTRIBUTION CONTINUED
TABLE 3
LINK CURRENT TOTAL LEVEL OF
ASSIGNMENT 1997 SERVICE
d (6221 TOTAL VOLUME STANDARD
tpd) ( incl udes
current
assianment
C. CONGRESS AVENUE
1. N.W. 22nd to
Old Boynton 535 691 43,185 45,000
2. Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 611 789 43,283 45,000
3. Boynton Beach Blvd.
to Woolbright 842 1,087 34,061 45,000
D. LAWRENCE ROAD
1. N.W. 22nd Ave.
to Old Boynton 384 496 11,229 13,400
2. Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 472 609 11,342 13,400
E. MILITARY TRAIL
1. N.W. 22nd to
Old Boynton 438 566 32,092 45,000
2. Old Boynton to
Boynton Beach
Blvd. 402 519 32,045 45,000
3. Boynton Beach
Blvd. to
Woolbright 268 346 26,832 45,000
F. N.W. 22ND AVE.
1. Military to
Lawrence 192 248 30,636 45,000
2 . Lawrence to
Congress 96 124 33,491 45,000
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - pag Eleven
PEAK HOUR
The P.M. peak hour urning movement volumes and directional
distributions for the 20,000 S.F. shopping center were calculated
as follows in the orig'nal K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer, Inc.
report:
120,000 S.F.
IN
OUT
LAND USE
85
336
349
The P.M. peak hour tra to be generated by the overall shopping
center with the pro osed bank and service station facility
considered separately ay be calculated as follows:
USE
TOTAL
TRIPS
P.H.F.
PEAK
HOUR
TRIPS
DIRECTIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
(% IN / OUT)
DIRECTIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
(TRIPS IN/OUT)
RETAIL (112,988 S.F.)
P.M.
7628
9.3%
709
50% / 50%
354 / 355
978
16.5%
4500 S.F.
BANK WITH DRIVE-THROUG
P.M.
161
48% / 52%
77 / 84
SERVICE STATION
AND CAR WASH
P.M.
2008
5%
100
50% / 50%
50 / 50
481 / 489
P.M. TOTAL:
The above total P.M. p ak hour trips have been distributed to the
project's access point and to the intersection of Knuth Road and
Boynton Beach Blvd. as follows:
Eastbound Right-Turn I
t Entrance Ri ht-In Ri ht-Out Onl
Bo ton Beach Blvd.
Eastbound Right-Turn I
202 pht
Bo nton Beach Blvd. Ea t Entrance Ri ht-In Ri ht-Out Onl
46 pht
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pa e Twelve
PEAK HOUR CONTINUED
The original analysis repared by K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer,
Inc. recommended th following roadway improvements at the
intersection of Boynt n Beach Blvd. and Knuth Road:
unrestricted
Knuth Road North
Southbound Right Turn
Northbound Left Turn
159 pht
2 pht
Knuth Road South
Unrestricted
Southbound Right Turn
Northbound Left Turn
59 pht
13 pht
Bo nton Beach Blvd.
Road
Eastbound Left:
Eastbound Right:
Northbound Left:
Northbound Right:
Westbound Left:
a. Lengthen the exis ing left turn lane on Knuth Road, south
approach to accom odate additional left turning vehicles.
b. Signalize the int rsection, when warranted, as determined
by the County En ineer. Because of the close proximity
to the intersect on with Mall Road, these two signals
should be inter- onnected.
Based on a review
turning movements,
applicable.
the above and the anticipated peak hour
above recommendation continues to appear
CONCLUSION
This proposed 120,000 quare foot mixed-use retail development was
addressed with regar traffic performance by K. S. Rogers,
Consul t ing Engineer, in a Traf f ic Impact Anal ys is da ted
January 30, 1990. he project was expected to generate 4818
additional trips per d y with an anticipated development build-out
date of 1993.
Mr. William Hukill
January 18, 1995 - Pa e Thirteen
The analysis presente in this letter has demonstrated that the
project will continue to meet the Traffic Performance Standards
addressed in the prev'ous analysis under current roadway volumes,
adjusted growth rates and traffic generation rates through 1997.
In short, all of the addressed links will meet the applicable
Traffic Performance S andards in 1997.
ONCLUSION CONTINUED
If you have any comme ts concerning the above, please call. I am
available to respond 'mmediately to any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
SIMMONS & WHITE, INC.
/'
/;..>--;:'~
.~~-:.<--- - -- -- --------------=-:a
~~t F. Renneb~um, P.E.
RFR/jp
95-008
cc: Mr. Bill Winches
Mr. Kerry Kilday
Mr. Michael A. S
Mr. Mike Haag
/
rrIie City of
t.Boynton t.Beacli
hU:: M fJffrt 9Y.'_fJlA)
f
Gv rE=. 9'-1- 0-0 </
tJJOuUvartf
10
tJJoynton tJJeadt., :Fro 33425-0310
City 1fa[[: (40 375-6000
:FJU: (407) 3 '5-6090
January 20, 1995
Mr. Dan Weisberg
Palm Beach Co~~ty D partment of engineering
and Public Works - raffic Division
P.o. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Attn: Dan Weisberg Senior Engineer
RE: Boynton Beach oulevard P.C.D.
Knuth Road P.C D.
Tara Oaks P.U. .
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Enclosed please find the original traffic impact analysis, prepared
by K. S. Rogers, Co suIting Engineer, Inc., and recent summary,
prepared by Simmons White, Inc., documenting the trip generation
of the above-refer nced projects. The original traffic impact
analysis for all tree of the projects assumed a build-out or
completion date tha has elapsed. What impact does this have on
their trips? Have they lost their trips? Please verify the
applicability of th roadway improvements listed in the Simmons &
White reports.
We understand that
request, we would a
to our office as
suffice while a wri
prompt response.
you have thirty (30) days to respond to our
reciate if you could provide written comments
oon as possible, a phone conversation will
ten response is provided. Thank you for your
5lme . as (jateway to tlie (jutfstream
page 2
Mr. Dan Weisberg
If there are any que tions, please contact me at (407) 375-6260.
Sincerely,
?~
:el E. Haag
g and Site Deve opment Administrator
MEH/pb
Attachments
cc: Bill Hukill, Ci y Engineer
Central files
Board'\lI' County Commissioners
County Administrator
Jan Winters
CarolJ. Elmquist, Chairman
Karen T. Marcus, Vice Chair
Carol A. Roberts
Ron Howard
Carole Phillips
June 5, 1990
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
James J. Golden
Senior City Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435-031
---~
FOR .",
PCD AND KNUTH ROAD PCD '
''-'-_''''--'------
"
RE: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANAlYS
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVA
Dear Mr. Golden:
As requested by your lett of April 3, 1990, the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division has reviewed the t affic reports for the two proposed shopping centers
entitled Boynton Beach Boul vard PCD and Knuth Road PCD. The following comments
are submitted for your con ideration:
1) Based upon copies of correspondence from your office to the applicant's
agent (Kilday & Ass ciates, Inc.) dated February 13, 1990, we do not
consider the applica ions for these projects to have been complete prior
to February 1, 1990 a therefore vested against the new Countywide Traffic
Performance Standard (County Ordinance 90-7) as per the Municipal
Implementation Ordin nce (County Ordinance 90-6). To comply with these
County Ordinances, ew traffic reports need to be submitted by the
applicant to your of ice as well as our office for review.
2) If the outparcels 0 each of the shopping center site plans will be
specifically limited to restaurant and financial institution use, their
trip generation shou d be separately calculated at the higher rates that
are representative 0 these land uses rather than included as part of the
general retail comme cial area.
@ prmted on recycled paper
3) Under Test #1 of the ew Countywide Traffic Standard (which is comparable
to the previous unin orporated area standard - County Ordinance 87-18),
significant project raffic would occur on two links of Boynton Beach
Boul evard that are projected to exceed thei r exi st i ng and committed
capacities. No impro ements are recommended for either of these two links
(Military Trail to El Claire Ranch Road and Old Boynton Road to Interstate
95). Without some c mmitment from these developers to improve~~e two
links trre traffic st ndard is violated. Jr(~:C'l)I~
. -C_ VJ:;7"'),
-.... -*..d*
..(fII 1J
PlA. -- ~ 1990
'..\n Lqu 1 Opportunit\ - .\ffirIl1Jtil.c :\ctio/1 hl1ployer" NNING Dr-
c.f>r
BOX 2429 WEST ALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402-2429 (407) 684-4000 .
James J. Golden
Page 2
June 4, 1990
Your transmittal of thes traffic reports for our review is appreciated. Please
do not hes i tate to con act me if you have any quest ions concern i ng these
comments.
Sincerely,
~OU4 NEER
Allan A. Ennis, P.E., AI
Development Review Engin
AAE:sb
cc: Audrey Wolfe, Speci 1 Projects Coordinator - County Engineering Dept.
File: General - TPS - M nicipalities - Traffic Study Reviews
Intersection: "B ynton Beach Blvd. & Knuth Road"
General - TPS - M nicipalities - Vesting Determinations
aae\BB&KnPCD
'~
Kilday &- AuocI.-e
Landscape Architectsl Plann
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 1
(4071 689-5522 · Fax: (4071 2592
December 28, 1994
Mr. Mike Haag, Site and Zonin Administrator
City of Boynton Beach Plannin & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach .Boule ard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Request for Tim Extensions
Tara Oaks P.U.D
Knuth Road P. C. .
Boynton Beach Ivd. P.C.D.
Our Project No.: 799.16
Re:
Projects:
Dear Mr. Haag,
Pursuant to our telephone conv rsation, please find attached three(3) checks each in the amount
of $125.00 payable to the City f Boynton Beach. As discussed, these checks represent filing
fees for requests for time exlen ons for commencement of development of the above referenced
projects.
It is my understanding thatthes items are scheduled for the January 10,1995 Technical Review
Committee meeting at 9:00 a. . It is also my understanding from our conversation, that these
requests will be heard by the C y's Planning and Development Board on February 14,1995 and
the City Commission on Febru ry 21 ,1995. If any of this information is incorrect, please contact
me at your earliest convenienc .
I will be contacting you next w ek with regard to the TRC meeting, however, please feel free to
contact me if you have any qu stions or require further information.
Sincerely,
/0/'. :7
~Jn4~.
Lindsey A. Walter
cc: Michael Schroeder
Bill Winchester