Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 91-161CC August 23, 1991 TO: Christopher Cutro Director of Planning FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Administrative Coordinator of Engineering RE: THE GROVE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RESPONSE TO APPLICANT - LEE C. SUMMERS Pursuant to agreements made during the August 22, 1991 meeting with myself, w. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Michael Haag, Don Jaeger and Tambri Heyden of your office, this memorandum serves to document that you will take the lead role in communicating with Mr. Summers regarding his most recent request. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. VAF/ck cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers Michael Haag, Site Development Compliance Administrator Don Jaeger, Building Official Tambri Heyden, Senior City Planner RECEIVED ",UG r,~ ...-- PLANN\NG DEFf. - - 'f.J --- MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NO. 91-436 FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director TO: Chris Cutro, Planning Director DATE: August 21, 1991 SUBJECT: Grove Shopping Center - Request for extension Please be extension is deemed available advised that this office has no objection to an of time for the subject site plan, if such extension necessary. Adequate water and sewer capacity is to serve the entire project as originally proposed. I would like to mention, however, that the state-issued permit to construct the water distr~hl1tion system for this project has apparently expired, and ~~e ~eY21oper must make new application to the Palm Beach County Public Health Unit, in order to secure their approval. I would also advise that additional building permits not ~ issued until Health Unit approval has been obtained. This is in keeping with standard site plan procedures. If you have any additional questions on this matter, please refer them to Peter Mazzella of this office. RECEIVED JAG/PVM be: P. Mazzella t . AUG 22 PLANNL,G DEPT. - - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEKORANDUM August 15. 1991 TO: Don Jaeger. Building Official Michael Haag, Site Development Compliance Administrator ~Christopher Cutro, Director of Planning Tambri Heyden. Senior City Planner W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Administrative Coordinator of Engineering RE: THE GROVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP THE GROVE SHOPPING CENTER REQUEST FOR A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION Please be advised that a meeting will be held in Conference Room B (City Manager's Conference Room) on Thursday, August 22nd at 10:30 A.M. to discuss the referenced request. Please bring to the meeting with you. any and all information regarding prior status reports for this project. Thank you in advance of your anticipated cooperation in this matter. u__~~ Vincent A. VAF/ck RECEIVED ",UG 15 PLANN\NG D'E.,?T. t:" - - ... I MEMORANDUM October 5, 1989 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner THRU: George Hunt, Interim City Manager Carmen Annunziato, City Planner FROM: Raymond Rea, City Attorney RE: Five Foot Limited Access Easement for The Grove Shopping Center site Plan File No. 245 I have reviewed your Memorandum and attachments, dated September 27, 1989, regarding the above and find no problem as to the form of the Declaration of Restrictions provided; however, I would suggest that you forward this to the appropriate Department for verifying the legal description attached to the Declaration as Exhibit "A". ~~~ Raymond Rea, City Attorney RR/r RECEIVED OCT~JS89 PLANNING DE.PT. MEMORANDUM September 27, 1989 TO: Raymond Rea, City Attorney THRU: George N. Hunt, Interim City Manager THRU: ~.Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner RE: Five Foot Limited Access Easement for The Grove Shopping Center Site Plan - File No. 245 Accompanying this memorandum you will find a document submitted by the applicant to satisfy one of the conditions of site plan approval for the Grove Shopping Center; dedication of a five foot limited access easement along the rights-of-way lines of Federal Highw~y and Old Dixie Highway. Please provide a written response as to whether this document is acceptable as submitted so that the applicant may record it as soon as possible. TJH:frb Attachment cc: Central File PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Lee C. Summers, Esq. SIEGEL & LIPMAN Crocker Plaza - Suite" 801 5355 Town Center Road Boca Raton, FL 33486 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS .' " -,' .....,.... If' RECITALS: A. GROVE PARTNERS LIMITED, a Florida limited partnership ("Owner") is the owner of that certa~n real · property more fully described on Exhibit A attached he~eto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). Page Two. .>>-~-......,,-..-, ~Sj~___________._" ~~ .::1. ~ Platting is required if outlots are to be maintained under separate ownership from main shopping center. ~Rear of shopping center to have roof treatment (parapet) to conceal mechanical equipment on roof and for sound mitigation. ~ Project name "Boynton Beach Shopping Center" is not ac- ceptable and must be changed on plans in order to reduce confusion resulting from similarly named projects. c:!-A- -. --/7 ~ ~_?: Carmen S. An nziato flat cc: City Manager Technical Review Board Central File ;,1- ~r ..'~' ~f Ii,.' ~' t'; " r' ii h~;: ~'" ~~ \,. ',I'.. :;. . 4. Effective Date. effective upon its execution. This Declaration shall become IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has caused this document to be executed on this ~ day of September, 1989. signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: GROVE PARTNERS LIMITED, By Grove Equities Corp., itS~l Partner Be rtJ!~ &:rfiU<l STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) COUNTY OF PA~M BEACH ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements personally appeared T.RR r !=:TTMMRR!=: ,as Secty/TreasureJOf GROVE EQUITIES CORP.., to me personally known, who this day acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand last aforesaid, this My 2 \ t , \ I .. I , .~ I . /' A_"..i '#"#;; ~ """'~.,~ 1 gJ.IQlE.xa. ~, ..~..... ...- )1 \\1\ t\\ '~!~\ ~hl! .. ~t. '&l!v, . h\l! ~. u l' ~ i01~! ~ f;Go.,i . ~ .. Hi!' II \ \\\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\ \W~'\l\ \.\\\M \\\i'~\b !\!~fh'l ~'iiliil , j\\\\\\\ ." ........ .. .. WI ~ .......lI.... ~~\ - "" Ii i~~ t, t ,\ , , , , ~ \\.~ ~,~ ~~ e \ a~ a' iqt~~ !l'. · ~~~ i i~.\U~ ~~:~;~~; . \'~\"i:~ " e .0 e.' . ....e.!~e ~~ "l"~ .. p Ii t 'B ..'-.... S' \0... \5 ~ ~\~li',.. ~~~\\~~i~~ i\\~~n . i ~a~~~ ~ p~~ .~ ~ . a~!."~i\5 % ~,,&. i .~....'!~~ '~q!'i ~ i ~'!'.Ui ~.i\~li~' 'i!.i~.2 ! i~\ti~~ ~~~\~~~':.\ \~~i~!~i ~ a\\5~i~\5: \5tl~\'4~~'~~ '~i~~\~t \ t<!l: ..tl~ \'\~~ ~\ -' ~,.,"'-~ .~~ ~~rJ .~ ~t;~ ''a..t 0.... ,S"'S .t~.I.' .."l.i... ,~,'I-i' ~ ~~~~~~s ~..~~~ag..~~ S~i~"'~\5\5 ~ ~.0\5""''' :~~~.~>5~~ 2.. l:~o \ . .. ........ ...a..... ... ....." a"""~'" .... .... .......... ... ........... ~ ~~~~\r. r~-~~a\5i~~~ ~~~-~~~ ~ I ..._.. .,.... 0.' ........ . .... ,. ,r~.,.a .~t ~.".'.' · ~ ._.altU '~~~I~!.~~' '.a'~~~~ · ~.~i.."1a ." i~ <I..... '0 S82tl ~~.. 8 :\ 'O\5\5~~.\~. \i\~S\S~\5~~S ~A~6i~~~ ~ ~!" : ~ .2 ~.~.o' ~~.~.:.~ ... ~ o' ~.. ~.. ..,.,..~..ou'" t' \~~,\~~ ~\~~~~\i\;i ~ii~~~~. I .i.r.<' E <ii.', "E S~".o~,U · ~ ~~~~~i~ 2\..~I~~ii~~... ~ i:~!~~ ~ tl '0 ~ :; l:\ ... 'll " ~ . . U'O" ~ g 'S ~ .. ~ \ \~~~i\\i \ ~s~~~.\\;i \~~\5~~~~ q ~ ,'""'i \i~..~i\'\ \?i~.i~ ~ i\ ~i~i~&~ aa\i'\\;\~~ ~\~S\~\' ~ i .. .ai\~l; .\,\\i\\~~~ '\"\f.\~ ~ . ~ \\ \\l\1\\ \\\~\\\i\\~ 'i\\\\\\ \ C) l- a: C>"" C) \IJ W > .........., :t 0 ~I ..,.. -0 .J;*.'~.,'fI. " ';h ~MN ....., ... ,. /' 4f.\ -,,' ~~ /.; ~~~ u I . ~\~ .\ ~ ~\'Il. ( ~'. ~ . ~~ '. \ ~.. : \; \ tl ~ 1 nlt I ~. '. \.14,.. . "t\;~ . ~~ ~. ~ . t.\". i ~~\.. ~. / r ~ ,,~~ .,/ ..........- -" . .' ~ \ " Z I- 0m -~ t ~1Il - '" ~ 5 ~8 .^ III III ~I~ W Ul I0Io' (.) " 09..J O - ~ Zo~ CS:~8 :t ~ ~ () ~ '" ~~ cJ)l/I .. PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: Lee C. Summers, Esq. SIEGEL & LIPMAN Crocker Plaza - Suite' 801 5355 Town Center Road Boca Raton, FL 33486 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS .' ..~...' ...7 .... I" .' RECITALS: A. GROVE PARTNERS LIMITED, a Florida limited partnership ("Owner") is the owner of that certain real property more fully described on Exhibit A attached he~eto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. Owner is desirous commercial shopping center approval of a site plan by which approval was granted 1989. of developing the Property as a and has applied for and received the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, by the City Commission on August 15, C. One of by the City of strip of land vehicular access the conditions of the approval of the site plan Boynton Beach was the dedication by Owner of a along the frontage of the Property limiting to the Property. D. Owner desires to make the dedication of this strip of land to satisfy this condition of the site plan approval. NOW, THEREFORE, Owner hereby declares that the Property is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, reservations, restrictions, easements, assessments, charges, liens and other provisions hereinafter set forth. 1. Use Restriction. No tenant, occupant or owner of any portion of the Property shall use or permit the use of any portion of the area more fully described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Limited Access Area") for vehicular ingress and egress to the Property. 2. Remedies. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with and bind the Property and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by Owner and the City of Boynton Beach by and through its Planning and Zoning Commission, and their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. Violation or breach of any condition, covenant or restriction herein contained shall give the Declarant and/or the City of Boynton Beach a right of action before any court of competent jurisdiction, whether in law or in equity, to compel compliance with the terms of the covenants or restriction, and to prevent the violation or breach of any of them, and the expense of such litigation (including reasonable attorneys' fees) shall be borne by the person in violation. 3. Amendment. This Declaration may be amended at any time and from time to time by Owner, its successors and assigns, but only with the written consent and joinder of the City of Boynton Beach through signature of its then City Manager. _L_,._::....:..:."~_. :";..,_.. ''';'_''''''''~'''''' ;.....-.....~ _._-_ ..--..:.........:_.1........ ..'"""'""'.....~_. .~~_.,..~__.~_.....~_~,.....""~"'_.........,...~........._"....'___,.__...~...."'._.._....._._......_.......__.._ '",... '"- ..... STAFF COMMENTS THE GROVE SHOPPING CENTER NEW SITE PLAN BUILDING DEPARTMENT: See attached memo ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: See attached memo UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: See attached memo POLICE DEPARTMENT: See attached rnern~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT: See attached memo FORESTER/HORTICULTURIST: See attached memo MEMORANDUM August 2, 1989 TO: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director FROM: Med Kopczynski, Deputy Building Official RE: Site Plan Review The Grove Shopping Center Upon review of the above mentioned site plan, the following comments must be addressed in order for the project to conform with Boynton Beach City Codes: 1. The theatre is a threshold building and must conform to FS-553. 2. Show occupancies and construction types. He12&::1 ~ Deputy Building Official MK:ld XC: Don Jaeger RECEIVED AUGl_ PLANNING DEPT. ~" - MEMORANDUM August 2, 1989 TO: Jim Golden Senior City Planner VIA: George Hunt Acting Engineering Administrator FROM: Roger Kuver Engineering Inspector RE: TRB Comments The Grove 1. D.O.T. permit is required for work done in Right-of-Ways of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway. 2. Islands adjacent to main aisles in parking lot shall have stop signs and stop bars (pavement markings). 3. Parking lot aisle immediately in front of Retail "c" appears to be inadequately lit. Engineering Department suggests an additional light be provided in landscaped island which abuts this aisle. Roger Kuver RK/ck MEMORANDUM To: Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director ~ ,,\/ Uti lities ,~ From: John A. Guidry, Director of Date: August 2, 1989 Subject: TRB Review - The Grove Shopping Center - Resubmittal We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Add a gate valve on the fire sprinkler line near retail C. 2 . Add a second gate valve on all hydrant lines greater than ZO feet long, in accordance with our adopted standards. 3. Delete the note regarding VCP on the shallow manhole detail, in that it conflicts with the standard manhole detail. 4. It was our understanding and recommendation that poly-lined DIP be used on the sanitary sewer directly under the buffer wall. 5. Add a note to the effect that all new water mains must be cleaned with a minimum of two soft-sided swabs. dmt bc: Peter Mazze IIa ~.'_...~.. ~ I\U8G 11" ~~l~^-,,"'_. --~~f~ - ~ MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Jim Golden Date: 04 August 1989 From: Lt. Dale S. Hammack Ref: The Grove As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board Meeting of 01 August 1989, I am recommending the following: 1. Additional stop signs and stop bars at: A. The end of the driveway that goes behind the center near the entrance on to Old Dixie Highway. (City Ordinance #5-142C). B. At both ends of the loop parking isle that connect to the driveway that goes behind the center. (City________ Ordinance #5-142C). 2. Comply with security construction ordinance. (City Ordinance #578G). ~Qo!im6~ DSH/sab '.~~.. - RECEIVED AUG 4 198~ PLANNiiJG DEPT. MEMORANDUM August 2, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: The Grove Shopping Center - Site Plan - Staff Comments 1. The shared parking study and the application do not reflect the same square footage as indicated on the plans (sheet SP-I) for the anchor, including the exterior coolers. Also, the number of parking spaces provided appears to be 841, not 830. Both of these items affect the following documents which should be amended for final sign-off: pages 3, 4 and 15 of the parking study, tables 1 and 2 of the parking study, page 4 of the application - 6 (h) and 10 and sheet SP-2 data table. 2. Provide verification that the five foot limited access easement along the rights-of-way lines of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway has been dedicated. 3. Label the enclosure, building, elevations submitted. colors of the building signage, dumpster buffer wall and all architectural features of the including building signage materials, on the to correspond with the colored elevations 4. Provide details for the proposed Federal Highway median turn lane modifications to accommodate the driveway at the northeast corner of the property without conflicting with the existing egress driveway at the Homing Inn. Article II, Section 19-17(e). 5. Roadway and signal improvements determined to be necessary by Keith and Schnars to be completed prior to opening of the shopping center. Article II, Section 19-17(K) and Article X, Parking Lots, Section 5-144(n). 6. Add note to plans that existing drop curbs on Federal Highway will be removed and reconstructed to provide a continuous raised curb and sidewalk. Article II, Section 19-17(e) . 7. Provide a copy of the deed verifying that the additional right-of-way needed for Old Dixie Highway, 40 feet from centerline, has been dedicated. 8. A future site plan modification is required for approval of the freestanding sign to include sign color, size, height, setback, wording, materials, letter size and style. Chapter 21, Section 21-9. 9. The following comments are for informational purposes: a) The shared parking study submitted is consistent with Section 11-H(13) of the Zoning Code and provides quantitative evidence that at the peak hour parking demand at the shopping center, 2:00 P.M. Saturdays, for both the retail and cinema uses combined, the shared parking allocation allows for sufficient parking to meet the zoning code requirement plus the required 10% buffer. The parking scheme proposed provides 841 parking spaces; a buffer of 12.7%. b) The future expansion of the anchor store will require site plan review and modification to the shared parking study to incorporate the increase in square footage. Article X, Parking Lots, Section 5-138(a). c) Future coolers placed in the rear of the shopping center will require site plan review and parking study revisions. Article X, Parking Lots, Section 5-138(a). d) Depending on the uses outparcels, conditional At minimum, future site for the outbuildings. 6(C)lA. planned for the three leased use approval may be required. plan approval will be required Appendix A-Zoning, Section ~ ~, a-,d IflL-. CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO TJH:frb cc: Central File Grshctr MEMORANDUM TO: Carmen Annunziato Planning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist DATE: August 2, 1989 RE: The Grove Shopping Center - Site Plan 1. The applicant must submit the Tree Management Plan for all existing trees. 2. When this project was originally proposed, there was a ruling that a row of 20' height trees be planted along the northern property line. This statement is reflected in minutes from a Planning and Zoning Meeting during the original submittal for this project. 3. The SW corner of the property should have additional plantings. I{~ ~ -IfdJ4' Kevin J. II an - Forester/Hort~culturist KJH:ad DOC:A:GROVE FJJ;CIIVklJ 0400 1_ PLANNiNG DEPT- .. .\ -- -- . / I.. Ii ~ MEMORANDUM June 12, 1989 TO: Doug Walker, Goldenholz-Fischer, Architects & Planners, P.A. FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner The Grove Shopping Center - File No 245 Site Plan Submittal - Staff Comments RE: Please be advised that the plans submitted for site plan review are deficient with respect to the following items: 1. The agent from Goldenholz-Fischer who is representing the applicant/owner has not signed the application submitted. 2. The shared parking study submitted is consistent with Section 11-H(13) of the Zoning Code and provides quantitative evidence that at the peak hour parking demand at the shopping center, 2:00 P.M. Saturdays, for both the retail and cinema uses combined, the shared parking allocation allows for sufficient parking to meet the zoning code requirement plus the required 10% buffer. Since a buffer of 25% is provided on the site plan, 15% greater than what is actually required, equating to 114 parking spaces, the opportunity/flexibility exists to reevaluate landscaping/green areas provided, traffic flow and drainage design concerns addressed in item #9 and #13. If a reduction in parking spaces is a viable solution for the applicant, tenant changes and future expansions are factors to be considered when restudying the shared parking allocation. Should the theater be replaced with retail uses, there would be no opportunity for shared parking or the 60% parking requirement allowed for the small retail shops, i.e., the code requirement of one parking space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area would be required for the total shopping center square footage. Any changes to the total number of parking spaces provided on the resubmitted site plans should be documented in a revised copy of the shared parking study and submitted at the next deadline. 3. The future expansion of the anchor store will require site plan review and modification to the shared parking study to incorporate the increase in square footage. 4. If the square footage for the outside freezers/coolers located at the rear of the center and the receiving room has not been included in the total square footage figure provided, it must be added and reflected on the application and shared parking study. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 1 - gross floor area. Future coolers placed in the rear of the shopping center will require review and parking study revisions. 5. The number of parking spaces provided on the site plan and indicated on the application submitted is 927. The shared parking study, page 15, indicates 925. 6. Depending on the uses planned for the three leased outparcels, conditional use approval may be required. At minimum, future site plan approval will be required for the outbuildings. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 6(C)lA. 7. Platting shall be required if leased outparcels shown on the site plan are to be maintained under separate ownership from the shopping center. Appendix C-Subdiviions, Platting, Article VI, Section 1. 8. A five foot limited access easement shall be dedicated along right-of-way lines of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway. 9. Traffic engineer should reevaluate the following problems: a) driveway intersections in the vicinity of the 100 foot throat, northwest of the main entrance. The number of driveways should be reduced to form a proper intersection. b) driveway onto Federal Highway at the northeast corner of the property. The conflict with the adjacent egress driveway at the Homing Inn should be mitigated. 10. Indicate the building colors on the elevations and the color of the buffer walls and dumpster enclosures. 11. Dimension buffer wall setback from property line. Said buffer wall shall not be constructed within any easements or over any existing utilities and shall be setback a minimum of two feet from adjoining property lines, to encompass footer. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 4,L. 12. Locate the existing wells on the plans and survey. Appendix A-Zoning, section 11A. 13. A parking lot variance will be needed to permit any catch basins within paved areas for which a hardship will have to be proved. It has been determined that the existing infrastructure is not grandfathered and must meet current standards - pretreatment of stormwater through the use of grassy swales prior to discharge into catch basins. Article X-Parking Lots, Section 5-141(n) and 5-142(f). As discussed in item #2, there is opportunity to reduce the number of parking spaces provided to redesign the parking lot layout and location of landscaped islands/strips around the existing catch basins and/or increase the percentage of grassed areas. 14. The following information is required on the lighting plan: photocell activation and illumination levels (photometrics plan) of a minimum of one footcandle per square foot of paved area. Article X, Section 5-142(a). Light poles proposed adjacent to residences shall be directed away from neighboring property. Appendix A-Section 4(N)F. 15. The retaining wall shown on the engineering and landscape drawings is not shown on the site plan, SP-1. On the grading plan, this wall is shown extended farther west at the northeast project entrance. Provide details on this wall for construction, height, materials, colors, and setback from property line. Article II, Section 19-17(f). 16. Dimension all landscape strips and islands. Landscape strips adjacent to public rights-of-way must be a minimum of 5 feet in width. Article II, Section 7.5-35(d)1. Landscape islands must be a minimum of 5 feet in width excluding curbing. Article I, Section 7.5-35(e). 17. The parking lot regulations require parking spaces to be 9 feet by 18 feet in size with wheelstops 2 feet from the end of the stall or 9 feet by 16 feet in size with raised curbing at the end of the stall. Article X, Section 5-142(i)1. When using 9 foot by 16 foot stalls adjacent to a required landscaped area, the two foot overhang is allowed provided that the required 5 foot minimum width, landscaped strip is increased to 7 feet in width (9 feet in width if parking spaces overhang into the landscaped strip from both sides - such as the layout proposed on the site plan for the interior spaces.) Article II, section 7.5-33(b)4. Should the 7 foot wide interior landscaped strips shown be needed to meet the interior landscape requirement of 20 square feet of landscaping for every interior parking space, these strips will need to be widened to 9 feet. As stated in Article II, Section 7.5-35(g), the required landscaped areas can be located in any manner consistent with this section in order to divide and break up expansive paved areas, i.e., landscaped strips are not required everywhere there are parking bays abutting each other unless they are needed to meet the interior landscape requirement. Consult the City Forester for clarification on this issue. 18. Consult City Forester on City policy regarding maintenance responsibility for maintaining landscaped medians within public rights-of-way (intersection of Old Dixie Highway and Federal Highway) adjacent to project boundaries. 19. Provide verification on the survey that the 5 foot utility easement shown on the site plan was dedicated. 20. The following sign information is required on the pylon sign: size, height, setback, wording, materials, letter size, letter style and colors. If this information cannot be provided at this time, a future site plan modification will be required. The following building signage information is needed for Community Appearance Board approval (consult the Building Department): letter style, size, color and material. 21. The following comments were made with the original site plan approval. Please provide verification that they have been addressed: a) Property owner to dedicate right-of-way for Old Dixie Highway 40 feet from centerline prior to the issuance of a building permit. b) Developer to check right-of-way width for Old Dixie Highway to determine feasibility of proposed roadway improvements. c) Developer to construct left turn lane into main shopping center driveway from southwest approach on Old Dixie Highway. d) Roadway and signal improvements determined to be necessary by Keith and Schnars to be completed prior to opening of shopping center. e) Existing drop curbs on Federal Highway to be removed and reconstructed to provide a continuous raised curb and sidewalk. 22. The traffic study should be revised to reflect the following: the number of peak hour trips for the cinema (13) should be quantified, as the figure appears to be low and the trip generation rate for cinemas is 1.75/seat found in the fourth edition I.T.E. Manual. tf7 ' :7 i ~ ,~.~4 ~AMBRI J. ~DEN . TJH:frb cc: Central File ...EMORANDUM TO Jim Golden - Planning DATE 12 June 1989 FILl' ""OM 5U8JI'CT The Grove Shopping Center Lt. Galbraith - Police It is my opinion that the traffic ways in the front parking lot are confusing and the 5 way intersection on the south drive way is hazardous. I recommend that some of the thruways be closed at that intersection and blind corners be changed to allow unobstructed views. I further recommend proper sinage be installed. Respectfully submitted; ':/I ~g71 Lt. William Gal r lth II WG/sab TO r :s ~ rr\ e;- s. Go L.. t:::>elt....J 561'-.l' 'OR. C,--r-y'---Pt-A r-lN5~ -, FROM ---;;;:68~ ~Nc:> ~ ~ r 'lcr/~& ~8'/c.- ~1If?K$~1'~~ SUBJECT: .__J:'IZ=~ .. .......~~.. ...~ 7H'~...~P~~~p.(".;q .....~ATE:.._6._~_2~j_______ !WOL.D . J r>-1 .;e- Or 7h'-4' OE" C#A A/c;:t!F.o .. ;2)vrnPs rEi>"C .6 G&}-T/o^--,.-5" /f/~.a CO/V-r-~=r- ~BL./c:::.. Nc:>~~.s 70 ~ ~~t/I'~ #ee:-v Lo.e::::~-:r-/oA/J 7:?i>- 7~:2.Y PLEASE REPLY TO . REPLY RECEIVED JUN '1 1989 PLANNING DEPT. DATE: SIGNED Item 1/ F269 Grayarc, P.o. Box 2944, Hartford, CT 06104.2944 @ Wheeler Group, Inc. 1982 THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED ~.\EMORANDUM TO Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director DATE: June 7, 1989 ""OM John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities FILl' 5U.J~CT TRB Review - Grove Shopping Center Site Plan We offer the following comments on this project: 1. Some of our adopted initially reviewed. following: design criteria have changed since this project was Please change your detail sheets to reflect the a. Water services with either end under pavement shall be constructed of Type "K" copper from the main to the meter. b. Reduced pressure backflow preventers are required by the Health Dept. on all restaurants. c. The sewer manhole detail shall indicate that at least 9 feet of polyethylene-lined ductile iron pipe is to be installed at each inlet, with a transition to VCP via a Fernco shear ring adapter. d. Substitute 20 feet of polyethylene-lined ductile iron pipe for VCP at the storm drain crossings between manholes 3-4, and man- holes 7-8. e. Use a brass ball valve, square nut adapter, and a valve box installed to grade in place of a corporation stop for all service taps into the main. f. A Ford Y1 1-474 wye may be used to obtain four one-inch services from a single two-inch tap, if you choose, This may save a substantial amount of copper tubing. g. Please obtain a current copy of our criteria sheets for your reference. 2. Add a note to the effect that the City will own and maintain the ma~n line sanitary sewer and that the sewer services will be private. 3. We recommend a 6" diameter cleanout on 6" sewer serv~ces, with an access cover on all cleanouts in pavement. 4. Water meters are not permitted in sidewalks or parking spaces, and should be located in grass areas whenever possible. 5. Correct the meter yoke detail. RECEMn JON 9 !SSg PLAN N~NG 9€rl. TRB Review - Grove Shopping Center Site Plan Page 2 June 7, 1989 6. Correct the pressure test note to read "150 psi" instead of ]25 ps~ . 7. Coordinate with this office or the Fire Department to obtain a current flow test on the off-site water main. If flow is sufficient a large portion of the redundant, interior fire loop may be deleted. dmt bc: Peter Mazzella M E M 0 RAN DUM June 5, 1989 TO: Jim Golden Senior City Planner ?f/ George N. Hunt ~! Acting City Enginer~V/' Vincent A. Finizio Engineering Department 1. R. B. Conments The Grove Shopping Center Go1denho1z - Fischer Architects Keith & SChnars, P.A. VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: 1. Provide a parking lot lighting plan consistent with the Requirements of Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, Article X, Section 5-142(A), Required Lighting and Section 5-141(N) Lighting Standards. 2. The one thousand (1,000) watt high intensity discharge (H.I.D.) Luminaires at the major driveway at Federal Highway and along property perimeter abutting U.S. Hwy. #1 shall be reduced to a fixture of less intensity to mitigate glare. Appendix "A" Zoning Section 4 N, Performance Standard Prohibiting Glare. 3. Revise plans to indicate Standard Stall Striping, Traffic Arrows and Fire Lane Messages in "white" paint. Handicap stalls in "blue" paint. Fire Lane curbing in "reflective yellow" paint. 4. Indicate on plans Fire Lane Messages and signage consistent with the requirements of Section 5-142(M) Fire Lanes and Section 5-141(N) Fire Lane Standards. 5. Provide a continuous uninterrupted yellow line down the centerline of the major aisle along bUilding frontage. Section 5-142)C) Traffic Control and the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as listed in Section 5-142(N) Traffic Control Standards. A single yellow line shall be used when there are two (2) opposing traffic lanes and passing is prohibited. Section 5-140(A) Safety Objectives. 6. Revise plans to indicate the location of all raised continuous curb and curb cuts that will facilitate drainage. Revise all plans to indicate curbing 13~ inches in total depth of which 6 inches-will be above the asphalt surface grader. Section 5-142(E) Curbing (extruded curb prohi- 'bited) Section 5-141(N) Curbing Standards. Chapter 19, Section 19-17(E) Curb Cuts. 7. Sidewalks along Old Dixie Hwy., North R.O.W. shall continue through ingress/egress approach and be transitioned to acconmondate the han- dicapped. Sidewalks in these area shall be minimum thickness of six (6) inches in conformance with Section 5-141(N) Sidewalk Standards. -2- Groves-cont1d 8. Handicap Ramps should be aligned with Handicap Stall locations to aid handicap ACCESS to structures. Specific area of concern is the ramp locations in front of Winn Dixie. Handicap stalls east of building "Retail F" should be moved in proximity to building entrances. Handicap stall near building "Retail All should be moved to the west side of the landscraped island in order to keep wheelchairs out of the traffic lanes. Section 5-142{K) Handicap Requirements Section 5-140{A) Safety Objectives Section 5-141{N) Appendix "C" sheet 2 of 3 Paragraph #4 states "Handicap Parking Stalls shall be located as near as possible to building entrances or centrally located in parking lots between buildings. 9. Stall dimension detail on SP-2 indicates a 91 x 181 stall, plan SP-1 indicates a stall dimension of 91 x 16'. Clarify proposed construction. Section 5-141{N) Construction Standards. 10. Provide construction details for all regulatory and advisory signs including sign foundation details. Section 5-141{N) Traffic Control Standards. 11. Provide a drainage plan consistent with the requirements of Section 5-142{F) Drainage and 5-141 (N) Drainage Standards. Also locate CB 29 & 30 CB 25, 26 CB 11 the following catch basins in grassy swale areas. 21, 16, 40, 10, 18 Convert 27 & 28, 24 to junction boxes and locate associated inlets in grassed area to the north. Convert B 18 & 19 to junction boxes and locate associated inlets in grassy areas to the southeast. All grass areas are to be depressed to facilitate proper drainage. All other inlets in pavement areas require bicycle proof grates in con- formance with Section 5-141{N) Drainage Standards and Standard Engineering Department Drawing #A 87-005. Bicycle Proof grates for inlets in pavement. 12. Provide a cost estimate for signalization improvements along with funding necessary to construct and implement signalization in confor- mance with Traffic Impact Analysis i -3- Groves-cont'd 13. Pavement markings on Goldenholz-Fischer plans - sheet 6 of 9 - conflicts with similar markings on SP-l. Clarify intent. 14. Provide County and State permits to construct within their R.O.W. 15. Survey does not indicate the existence of a large on-site supply well. Provide infonmation on status ~ anticipated use of well. 16. Provide F.P.L. street lighting along the R.O.W. of Old Dixie Highway to provide for vehicular and pedestrian safety and convenience, Chapter 19, Section 19-21(A) Automotive & Pedestrian Safety and Convenience. 17. No Rumble Strips in Parking Lot Florida Statute 316.0747 Section 5-141 Standards . Vincent A. Finizio Engineering Department V AF: j b MEMORANDUM TO: Carmen Annunziato Planning Director FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist DATE: June 8, 1989 RE: The Grove Shopping Center - site Plan 1. The applicant should review the Tree Management Plan submitted with the originally approved C.A.B. landscape plan (10-20-86) to ascertain the current condition of trees on the site. 2. The existing live trees on site should receive conditions I, C, D of the "Tree Preservation Format With Methodology", prior to any heavy construction equipment allowed around the trees. I will be available to work with the applicant to follow the guidelines established in the Tree Management Plan. 3. The preliminary variental list (landscape legend) should include the following: a. Quantities of newly planted materials showing 50% native species. b. All trees minimum 8' in height at time of planting. c. Location of existing trees which will be preserved based upon item #1 above. d. A replacement plan for trees which perished over the three year period which were to be preserved. e. All interior parking lot trees, minimum 5' clear trunk. 4. The applicant is required to provide irrigation and a landscape plan for the grassed medians on U. s. #1 and Old Dixie Highway. The permit to do this work is secured through the State Department of Transportation. 5. The applicant should review how existing overhead powerlines will affect the future pruning of trees proposed. 6. It is recommended that Ficus benjamina not be used where there is adjacent sidewalks or asphalt. 7. I remember that the City Commission requested that a row of large trees be planted along the north property line to visually screen the adjacent residences. This was a condition of approval which these plans mayor may not reflect. 8. All road R.O.W. grassed areas to receive irrigation. ~ -~~ ~;G- " Kevin J. H llahan Forester/Horticulturist KJH:ad DOC:A:GROVE M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist DATE: January 5, 1988 SUBJECT: The Grove Development (Dixie and Federal Highway) This memorandum is in response to your inquiry of December 29, 1987 (E) pertaining to the above project. 1. There are existing trees on the site still alive which should be treated in accordance to the attached Tree Preservation Format with Methodology document, Section I. Items C and D of this document should be completed prior to any additional excavation/fill operations occurring on the site. 2. There are several trees which have been damaged and should be removed. The tree management plan shows approximately 48 trees to be preserved. If the new developer agrees to replace any of the trees which have perished and would install plant material in accordance with the Community Appearance Board approved (10/20/86) landscape plan, a revised site plan would not be necessary. 3. The other comment pertaining to landscaping is the second attached memorandum dated October 10, 1986. Several trees had to be removed to install the underground utilities, and the trees were never replaced. If the new developer agrees to follow the recommendations ad outlined, this would rectify the situation. There is an active well on the site to provide irrigation to any trees preserved or newly planted materials. The property has blowing sand which should be addressed depending on how soon the new developer will initiate activity on the site. I will be available to work.in conjunction with the new developer to comply with the tree management and approved landscape plan. I{ ~'V. ~- ~(l LUL_ K'evin J. allfa an KJH:pb CC: Charles C. Frederick, Recreation & Park Director John F. Wildner, Superintendent of Parks DOC:THEGROVE JJ ko I1za~ E. !Bt:aj.{ E.lJ - Landscape Architect 954 North Dixie Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33432 Telephones 426-1434 395.6307 TREE PRESERVATION FORMAT WITH METHODOLOGY IIZill Tract". U. S. fll and Old Dixie Highway, Boynton Beach, Fl. . 1. ONSITE TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE: A. All trees to be preserved in place are to be limbed up to a minimum of six feet of clear trunk. All dead branches and wood is to be cleanly removed. The crown is to be trimmed to represent a good form for its' specie. Limbs and trimmings are to be chipped into mulch and broadcast about the base of the tree. B. Fertilizer in the amount of two ounces per inch of diameter of the tree, measured at four feet above grade will be drilled into the soil at a point of circumference five feet away from the trunk_at even intervals. Fertilizer will be a slow release or sulphur coated substance with a garaunteed analysis of 16-10-12. C. A barricade; four feet in height, will be constructed at the drip line of the tree. Said barricade will be constructed of wood or wire mesh and is constructed to repel the pressures of construction stress to trunk and roots. D. If a deviation of more than eight inches is coused by new grading proceedures, a retainer wall or tree well must be constructed on seventy-five percent of the drip line circumference. Said retainer/well will be constructed of creosote rail~ road ties or reinforced concrete for a permanent installation. E. Trees are to be supplemented with additional water should a draught occur during construction phases. Supplemental watering should amount to eighty gallons of water per week and be placed inside of the drip line. . II. TREES DESIGNATED TO BE TRANSPLANTED ONSITE& A. All trees to be transplanted onsite must first be limbed up to eight feet of clear trunk. Dead wood and limbs must be pruned from the crown. The crown of the tree must then be reduced by one third in a manner of uniformity and to represent a crown form indicative of the specie. Any cuts measuring more than It" must be coated with approved tree paint. All trimmings are to be chipped at the site and the mulch broadcast about the base of the tree. . B. Root pruning of 240 degrees of the circumference of roots measured a minimum of 3811 from the trunk the tree will be accomplished. Root prune ditc9 will measure at least twelve inches wide and twenty four inches deep. Ditch will be made with a sharp spade or saw and any root encountered will be cleanly and evenly cut. Pruning ditch will then be backfilled with one half soil and one half wood chips. The ditch will then be tamped and thouroughly watered. The balance of the soil will then be used to build a basin to hold water into the root pruned area. C. MEintenance watering of fifty gallons applied twice a week will "be applied to this basin area. The ~ime of on-going maintenance will be for six consecutive weeks. At that time the root edge will be checked to measure the evidence of newly formed roots. If an inadequate amount of roots are found. the maintenance program will continue for another two or three weeks. D. Transplanting activities with B l'Tree Spade'l ro Tree Crane will then begin. All trans- planting Bnd bracing will be done in aecordance with details and diagrams shown .. on Landscape Sheets. Further, a sixty day maintenance period as-described in the General Notes will be followed. . fJ hOlna!J. E. !Be.aj{e.lj - Landscape Architect 954 North Dixie Highway Boca Raton, Florida 33432 Telephones426-1434 395.6]07 TREE PRESERVATION FORMAT.(cont.) III..ONSITE TREES TO BE ADOPTED OR REMOVED: A. Local government agencies will be contacted and offered surplus trees from this site. These agencies will be (but not limited to) the County School Board, The Board of Regents. Boynton Beach Parks Dept., Palm Beach County Parks Department and other city Parks departments. Afterwards. the remaining trees will be offered to the general public. A limitation of time, commensurate with onsite transplants, will be enforced so as not to hold up development work. B. Trees that are not claimed as per the above outline will be removed and destroyed. . -" t1EMORANDU.H ~'-'----,-_..~~...... 'l 4 December 1985 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato Planning Director RE: Boynton Beach Shopping Center - Staff Comments P3.ease be advised of the Planning Department's comments in connection with the above-referenced site plan: 1. If a restaurant with drive-thru windows at outlet "F" is to be constructed, an application for Conditional Use approval must first be approved by the City Council. 2. Lighting details to be provided. 3. Parking provided (811 spaces) requires 3 additional handicapped parking spaces (17 total). 4. Property owner to dedic~te a limited access easement along ----.f"Jgl1:t-:Q:f::lV:CiY-J.Jne for Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway. tLJroperty owner --~o--~~~-~-~~~~ ~:ight-of-way for Old Dixie Iiighwa;7'\ 40 feet from centerline prior to the issuance of a building l permit. \ ~ \ Developer to check right-of-way width for Old Dixie Highway \ to determine feasibility of proposed roadway improvernentsu 11eveloper to construct left turn lane into main shopping center driveway from southwest approach on qld Dixie Highway. ~2adWay and signal improvements determined to be necessary by Keith and Schnars to be completed prior to opening of shopping center. ~2isting drop curbs on Federal Highway to be removed and reconstructed to provide a continuous raised curb and sidewalk. \ -~ \ \ \ i \ .~ .// ___.....d"- A~ [: tv\ 0 R A ('-1 DUM TO Carmen Annunziato Planning Director O.T. October 10, 1986 ~I\.r "'''0'' Kevin J. Hallahan Forester/Horticulturist suaJICT The Grove Shopping Center Site Plan Modification This memorandum is in reference to the Tree Management Plan for the above project. Representatives for the developer have in- dicated that because of changes to the site plan, some of the ~rees originally slated to be preserved will have to be removed and replaced. This is especially noted to occur along the Northern property line. I suggest the representatives show how each specific tree will be affected and this information addressed in the Tree Management Plan. The trees along the Northern property line should be replaced (if desired for removal) with large, buffering species of trees, e.g. Red Cedar, which will provide immediate visual screening for the adjacent homeowners. Any other trees removed throughout the site should also be replaced with equal or larger sized trees. This information should be included as an addendum to the original Tree Management Plan. _~'-C~ G--/Ja~A__~ Kevin J(/ Hallahan ~._--- # KJH:ad ~ TRB CHECK LIST FOR COMMERCIAL" ./7 '- I }---' ~--~ I Front Setback....................... .~..;;() t'G(4A;;(:::?6r/l~?? Jdl<!l- . Side Setback........................!3_ 3()' ~./_ DATE7- ::16,-' %9 JOB TITLE ;;lAL .M1.../JZ-<<L- PREP. BY '-:1.7 ( . ZONING C. 3 REQUIREMENTS 1. Permitted Zone Use......... ......... OCC. flleV'CAtv*L I'I~ / CLASS -;tL-~.. CONST.TYPE _~<ffVIA,f'J~ REMARKS ()/~ . t4- 2. CB!) Requirements. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . SPRINKLERED ,) /./3~"" c. r\ J.()/ - /..--'" 6. Rear Setback....................... /'YU.z .I..('L rt-!,",-"...' Ie.> 14. 15. 16. 17. 3. 4. 5. Side Setback (Corner).............. 7. Floor Area......................... . l n1..tuV '-IOC5Jo = /~t/ 75 ~,.(A<u /fLlJ - / 1./5'/ /huoy \.. /)g'~))3 ;{; 3) ,;)o?' ~ 8. % of Lot Coverage.................. FVl f,\:- Y ~ k: o ' /' ~,~ 1<9.3.3 , 9. Lot Area........................... 18. Max. Sq. Ft. for Type Const.Shown........ /, r ) 10. Lot Frontage....................... 19. Fire Protection at Property Line......:.. u, . Lot Depth (Cl-C2-C4)............... 12. Structure Height................... 13. Roof Overhang...................... Dimension Site Plan................ Architect or Engineer (Sealed)..... Proposed Finished Floor............ Flood Zone Elevation................ 20. Fire Separations.................. .0 ,~ 23. Site Lighting.................... "_1\ e '-,~ 24. Landscape Ord...................... f? ~ &, 25. Sign Ordinance..................... f, CL.- /) (&-- (.(/~ { 0 21. 22. Parking Ord. (Lighting, Curbs Stops, Dbl. Striping, Turnouts).......... Dumpsters.. . . .. .. ... . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ,? ~ ~Q0 \ ~, -. , "\,, ,5 'K ,^^ ~/,- t () v" <C ~ c:.()[~ 26. Handicap Access (Thruout).......... ~ ~ ~ 27. General............................ 28. Interagency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " ~ l-+k~~LV' 4/}/J/t;o.{ (' O[A (7- If '/ j)1 "J-L L . 7 / -/ l' "I"'P. L . ~ ('7 vcr- ----r-f\v <2 :, (I u cj -; /'Jc./ ( L cj l ~r if ~~ c( , -.- PLANS CHECK & TRB CHECK LIST FOR COMMERCIAL DAT0-~';; b KC CONST. SITE ADDRESS JOB TITLE LOT SUB PREP. BY ZONING OCC.CLASS AGENCY APPROVALS '\ \~ .~O~ ",,-,,'I \'I.,J'\~ 1. Palm Beach Co. Health Dept....... - (Envir. issues) 2. Palm Beach Co. Health Dept....... 3 . D.O.T........................... . 4. County Eng. (Turnout, etc.)...... 5. Army Corp of Eng. ............... 6. E.R.B............................ 7. Water Mgmt. (2 Acres Imp.)....... 8. Lake Worth Drainage.............. 9. Sub.Street Names-Check Landfile.. 10. House No.&Street Names-MultiUnit. ORDINANCE REQUIREMEN~S 11. Dimension Site Plan.............. 12. Architect or Engineer (Sealed) ... 13. Permitted Zone Use............... 14. Recorded Plat.................... 15. Survey (Unity of Title) .......... 16. Front Setback.................... 17. S ide Setback..................... 18. Side Setback (Corner)............ 19. Rear Setback..................... 20. Floor Area....................... 21. % of Lot Cov"rage................. 22. Lot Area......................... " 23. Lot FrontagE:..................... 24. Lot Depth (e l-C2-C4) ............. 25. Structure H"ight. ............... 26. Roof Overha,lg.................... 27. BLK CONST. TYPE::QSPRINKLERED~ \J.v i r. ~'(ol1l, ~'(\v(."""1 REMARKS ) (IJV,4\NAc;,(, b'\"O~L."'ry ...- - ior\" ~ "J':> t,.,j-<; C o",of\ V\c:... "',-" /1/1 ,J-~,E - --R~ rfJ/C / (;-,1 Protective I.uffer (Wall,Fence,Hedge) Handic~p Ac,:ess (Thruout). .QJk\(.mtfJ;!! Unload~ng 5i'ace.................. 9~f1 - IS' I 28. 29. , PLANS CHECK & TRB CHECK LIST FOR COMMERCIAL (CONT'D) 30. Dumps ter s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31. Sidewalks (l\ppx. "c" & Chap. 22).. 32. Road Impact Fees................. 33. Water & Sewer Flow Rate.......... 34. .................. . 35. Site Lighting.................... 36. Sign Ord......................... 37. Exi ting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38. Flood Zone....................... 39. Finish Floor.............. ... .. .. 40. Road Height...................... 41. Finish Grade Elev................ 42. Type/Unit-Condo,Fee Simple,Lease. 43. C.B.D. Reauirements.............. 44. Max. Sq. Ft. for type Const.Shbwn 45. Fire Protection @ Property Line.. 46. Fire Separations................. 47. Fire Hydrants/Fire Lanes......... . - /) -l5 48. Parking Ord. (Lighting, Curbs- c- /J Stops, Db1.Striping, Turnouts)... ~.:) -e.i 49. Tree Survey & Forester Report.... 50. TOPO (Existing Trees on Site). ... 51. Swimming Pool Ord. (Night Use) ... 52. Threshold Inspector..... ......... 53. Construction Trailers............ 54. Utility Easements................ 55. Landscape Ord.................... 56. Soil Tests (Borings, Recommenda- tions, Drainage) ................. 57. Awnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58. Liquor Ord....................... / ? f./;' ~ (> 7.j f_) j 'f 0