REVIEW COMMENTS
~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 91-161CC
August 23, 1991
TO: Christopher Cutro
Director of Planning
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
RE: THE GROVE
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RESPONSE TO APPLICANT - LEE C. SUMMERS
Pursuant to agreements made during the August 22, 1991 meeting with myself,
w. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Michael Haag, Don Jaeger and Tambri Heyden of your
office, this memorandum serves to document that you will take the lead role in
communicating with Mr. Summers regarding his most recent request.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
Michael Haag, Site Development Compliance Administrator
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Tambri Heyden, Senior City Planner
RECEIVED
",UG r,~ ...--
PLANN\NG DEFf.
-
-
'f.J
---
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NO. 91-436
FROM:
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning Director
DATE:
August 21, 1991
SUBJECT:
Grove Shopping Center - Request for extension
Please be
extension
is deemed
available
advised that this office has no objection to an
of time for the subject site plan, if such extension
necessary. Adequate water and sewer capacity is
to serve the entire project as originally proposed.
I would like to mention, however, that the state-issued permit
to construct the water distr~hl1tion system for this project
has apparently expired, and ~~e ~eY21oper must make new
application to the Palm Beach County Public Health Unit, in
order to secure their approval. I would also advise that
additional building permits not ~ issued until Health Unit
approval has been obtained. This is in keeping with standard
site plan procedures.
If you have any additional questions on this matter, please
refer them to Peter Mazzella of this office.
RECEIVED
JAG/PVM
be: P. Mazzella
t
.
AUG 22
PLANNL,G DEPT.
-
-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEKORANDUM
August 15. 1991
TO: Don Jaeger. Building Official
Michael Haag, Site Development Compliance Administrator
~Christopher Cutro, Director of Planning
Tambri Heyden. Senior City Planner
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
FROM: Vincent A. Finizio
Administrative Coordinator of Engineering
RE: THE GROVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
THE GROVE SHOPPING CENTER
REQUEST FOR A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION
Please be advised that a meeting will be held in Conference Room B (City Manager's
Conference Room) on Thursday, August 22nd at 10:30 A.M. to discuss the referenced
request. Please bring to the meeting with you. any and all information regarding
prior status reports for this project.
Thank you in advance of your anticipated cooperation in this matter.
u__~~
Vincent A.
VAF/ck
RECEIVED
",UG 15
PLANN\NG D'E.,?T.
t:" -
-
... I
MEMORANDUM
October 5, 1989
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner
THRU:
George Hunt, Interim City Manager
Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
FROM:
Raymond Rea, City Attorney
RE:
Five Foot Limited Access Easement for
The Grove Shopping Center site Plan
File No. 245
I have reviewed your Memorandum and attachments, dated
September 27, 1989, regarding the above and find no problem
as to the form of the Declaration of Restrictions provided;
however, I would suggest that you forward this to the
appropriate Department for verifying the legal description
attached to the Declaration as Exhibit "A".
~~~
Raymond Rea, City Attorney
RR/r
RECEIVED
OCT~JS89
PLANNING DE.PT.
MEMORANDUM
September 27, 1989
TO:
Raymond Rea, City Attorney
THRU:
George N. Hunt, Interim City Manager
THRU:
~.Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner
RE:
Five Foot Limited Access Easement for The Grove
Shopping Center Site Plan - File No. 245
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a document submitted
by the applicant to satisfy one of the conditions of site plan
approval for the Grove Shopping Center; dedication of a five foot
limited access easement along the rights-of-way lines of Federal
Highw~y and Old Dixie Highway. Please provide a written response
as to whether this document is acceptable as submitted so that
the applicant may record it as soon as possible.
TJH:frb
Attachment
cc: Central File
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Lee C. Summers, Esq.
SIEGEL & LIPMAN
Crocker Plaza - Suite" 801
5355 Town Center Road
Boca Raton, FL 33486
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
.'
" -,' .....,.... If'
RECITALS:
A. GROVE PARTNERS LIMITED, a Florida limited partnership
("Owner") is the owner of that certa~n real
· property more fully
described on Exhibit A attached he~eto and made a part hereof
(the "Property").
Page Two.
.>>-~-......,,-..-,
~Sj~___________._"
~~ .::1.
~ Platting is required if outlots are to be maintained
under separate ownership from main shopping center.
~Rear of shopping center to have roof treatment (parapet)
to conceal mechanical equipment on roof and for sound
mitigation.
~ Project name "Boynton Beach Shopping Center" is not ac-
ceptable and must be changed on plans in order to reduce
confusion resulting from similarly named projects.
c:!-A- -. --/7 ~ ~_?:
Carmen S. An nziato
flat
cc: City Manager
Technical Review Board
Central File
;,1-
~r
..'~'
~f
Ii,.'
~'
t'; "
r'
ii
h~;:
~'"
~~
\,.
',I'..
:;. .
4. Effective Date.
effective upon its execution.
This Declaration shall become
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has caused this document to be
executed on this ~ day of September, 1989.
signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
GROVE PARTNERS LIMITED,
By Grove Equities Corp.,
itS~l Partner
Be rtJ!~ &:rfiU<l
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)
COUNTY OF PA~M BEACH )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly
authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements
personally appeared T.RR r !=:TTMMRR!=: ,as Secty/TreasureJOf GROVE
EQUITIES CORP.., to me personally known, who this day acknowledged
before me that he executed the foregoing instrument for the
purposes therein expressed.
WITNESS my hand
last aforesaid, this
My
2
\
t
,
\ I
.. I
,
.~
I
.
/' A_"..i '#"#;; ~
"""'~.,~
1
gJ.IQlE.xa.
~, ..~..... ...-
)1
\\1\
t\\
'~!~\
~hl!
.. ~t.
'&l!v, .
h\l! ~.
u l' ~
i01~! ~
f;Go.,i . ~
.. Hi!' II
\ \\\\\ \
\\\\\\\\\
\W~'\l\
\.\\\M
\\\i'~\b
!\!~fh'l
~'iiliil
, j\\\\\\\
." ........
..
..
WI
~
.......lI.... ~~\
- ""
Ii
i~~
t, t
,\ ,
,
,
,
~
\\.~
~,~
~~ e \ a~ a'
iqt~~ !l'. · ~~~
i i~.\U~ ~~:~;~~; . \'~\"i:~ "
e .0 e.' . ....e.!~e ~~ "l"~
.. p Ii t 'B ..'-.... S' \0... \5
~ ~\~li',.. ~~~\\~~i~~ i\\~~n .
i ~a~~~ ~ p~~ .~ ~ . a~!."~i\5
% ~,,&. i .~....'!~~ '~q!'i ~
i ~'!'.Ui ~.i\~li~' 'i!.i~.2
! i~\ti~~ ~~~\~~~':.\ \~~i~!~i
~ a\\5~i~\5: \5tl~\'4~~'~~ '~i~~\~t
\ t<!l: ..tl~ \'\~~ ~\ -' ~,.,"'-~ .~~
~~rJ .~ ~t;~ ''a..t 0.... ,S"'S
.t~.I.' .."l.i... ,~,'I-i'
~ ~~~~~~s ~..~~~ag..~~ S~i~"'~\5\5
~ ~.0\5""''' :~~~.~>5~~ 2.. l:~o \ .
.. ........ ...a..... ... ....." a"""~'"
.... .... .......... ... ...........
~ ~~~~\r. r~-~~a\5i~~~ ~~~-~~~ ~
I ..._.. .,.... 0.' ........
. .... ,. ,r~.,.a .~t ~.".'.' ·
~ ._.altU '~~~I~!.~~' '.a'~~~~ ·
~.~i.."1a ." i~ <I..... '0 S82tl ~~.. 8
:\ 'O\5\5~~.\~. \i\~S\S~\5~~S ~A~6i~~~ ~
~!" : ~ .2 ~.~.o' ~~.~.:.~
... ~ o' ~.. ~.. ..,.,..~..ou'"
t' \~~,\~~ ~\~~~~\i\;i ~ii~~~~. I
.i.r.<' E <ii.', "E S~".o~,U ·
~ ~~~~~i~ 2\..~I~~ii~~... ~ i:~!~~ ~
tl '0 ~ :; l:\ ... 'll " ~ . . U'O" ~ g 'S ~ .. ~
\ \~~~i\\i \ ~s~~~.\\;i \~~\5~~~~ q
~ ,'""'i \i~..~i\'\ \?i~.i~ ~
i\ ~i~i~&~ aa\i'\\;\~~ ~\~S\~\' ~
i .. .ai\~l; .\,\\i\\~~~ '\"\f.\~ ~ .
~ \\ \\l\1\\ \\\~\\\i\\~ 'i\\\\\\ \
C)
l- a:
C>""
C)
\IJ
W > ..........,
:t 0
~I
..,..
-0
.J;*.'~.,'fI.
" ';h ~MN .....,
... ,.
/' 4f.\ -,,' ~~
/.; ~~~ u
I . ~\~ .\ ~
~\'Il. ( ~'. ~ . ~~ '. \ ~.. :
\; \ tl ~ 1 nlt I ~.
'. \.14,.. . "t\;~ .
~~ ~. ~ . t.\". i
~~\.. ~. / r
~ ,,~~ .,/
..........- -" .
.'
~
\
" Z I-
0m
-~
t ~1Il
- '" ~
5 ~8
.^ III III
~I~ W Ul
I0Io' (.) "
09..J
O - ~
Zo~
CS:~8
:t ~ ~
() ~ '"
~~
cJ)l/I
..
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Lee C. Summers, Esq.
SIEGEL & LIPMAN
Crocker Plaza - Suite' 801
5355 Town Center Road
Boca Raton, FL 33486
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
.' ..~...' ...7 .... I"
.'
RECITALS:
A. GROVE PARTNERS LIMITED, a Florida limited partnership
("Owner") is the owner of that certain real property more fully
described on Exhibit A attached he~eto and made a part hereof
(the "Property").
B. Owner is desirous
commercial shopping center
approval of a site plan by
which approval was granted
1989.
of developing the Property as a
and has applied for and received
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida,
by the City Commission on August 15,
C. One of
by the City of
strip of land
vehicular access
the conditions of the approval of the site plan
Boynton Beach was the dedication by Owner of a
along the frontage of the Property limiting
to the Property.
D. Owner desires to make the dedication of this strip of
land to satisfy this condition of the site plan approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, Owner hereby declares that the Property is
and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied
subject to the covenants, reservations, restrictions, easements,
assessments, charges, liens and other provisions hereinafter set
forth.
1. Use Restriction. No tenant, occupant or owner of any
portion of the Property shall use or permit the use of any
portion of the area more fully described on Exhibit B attached
hereto and made a part hereof (the "Limited Access Area") for
vehicular ingress and egress to the Property.
2. Remedies. The covenants and restrictions of this
Declaration shall run with and bind the Property and shall inure
to the benefit of and be enforceable by Owner and the City of
Boynton Beach by and through its Planning and Zoning Commission,
and their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and
assigns. Violation or breach of any condition, covenant or
restriction herein contained shall give the Declarant and/or the
City of Boynton Beach a right of action before any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether in law or in equity, to compel
compliance with the terms of the covenants or restriction, and to
prevent the violation or breach of any of them, and the expense
of such litigation (including reasonable attorneys' fees) shall
be borne by the person in violation.
3. Amendment. This Declaration may be amended at any time
and from time to time by Owner, its successors and assigns, but
only with the written consent and joinder of the City of Boynton
Beach through signature of its then City Manager.
_L_,._::....:..:."~_. :";..,_.. ''';'_''''''''~'''''' ;.....-.....~ _._-_ ..--..:.........:_.1........ ..'"""'""'.....~_. .~~_.,..~__.~_.....~_~,.....""~"'_.........,...~........._"....'___,.__...~...."'._.._....._._......_.......__.._
'",... '"- .....
STAFF COMMENTS
THE GROVE SHOPPING CENTER
NEW SITE PLAN
BUILDING DEPARTMENT:
See attached memo
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
See attached memo
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT:
See attached memo
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
See attached rnern~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
See attached memo
FORESTER/HORTICULTURIST:
See attached memo
MEMORANDUM
August 2, 1989
TO: Carmen Annunziato,
Planning Director
FROM: Med Kopczynski,
Deputy Building Official
RE: Site Plan Review
The Grove Shopping Center
Upon review of the above mentioned site
plan, the following comments must be
addressed in order for the project to
conform with Boynton Beach City Codes:
1. The theatre is a threshold building
and must conform to FS-553.
2. Show occupancies and construction
types.
He12&::1 ~
Deputy Building Official
MK:ld
XC: Don Jaeger
RECEIVED
AUGl_
PLANNING DEPT.
~"
-
MEMORANDUM
August 2, 1989
TO: Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
VIA: George Hunt
Acting Engineering Administrator
FROM: Roger Kuver
Engineering Inspector
RE: TRB Comments
The Grove
1. D.O.T. permit is required for work done in Right-of-Ways of Federal
Highway and Old Dixie Highway.
2. Islands adjacent to main aisles in parking lot shall have stop signs
and stop bars (pavement markings).
3. Parking lot aisle immediately in front of Retail "c" appears to be
inadequately lit. Engineering Department suggests an additional light
be provided in landscaped island which abuts this aisle.
Roger Kuver
RK/ck
MEMORANDUM
To:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning
Director ~ ,,\/
Uti lities ,~
From:
John A. Guidry, Director of
Date: August 2, 1989
Subject: TRB Review - The Grove Shopping Center - Resubmittal
We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions:
1 .
Add a gate valve on the fire sprinkler line near retail C.
2 .
Add a second gate valve on all hydrant lines greater than ZO
feet long, in accordance with our adopted standards.
3.
Delete the note regarding VCP on the shallow manhole detail,
in that it conflicts with the standard manhole detail.
4.
It was our understanding and recommendation that poly-lined
DIP be used on the sanitary sewer directly under the buffer
wall.
5.
Add a note to the effect that all new water mains must be
cleaned with a minimum of two soft-sided swabs.
dmt
bc:
Peter Mazze IIa
~.'_...~..
~
I\U8G 11"
~~l~^-,,"'_.
--~~f~
-
~
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Jim Golden
Date: 04 August 1989
From: Lt. Dale S. Hammack
Ref: The Grove
As per our discussion at the Technical Review Board Meeting
of 01 August 1989, I am recommending the following:
1. Additional stop signs and stop bars at:
A. The end of the driveway that goes behind the center
near the entrance on to Old Dixie Highway. (City
Ordinance #5-142C).
B. At both ends of the loop parking isle that connect
to the driveway that goes behind the center. (City________
Ordinance #5-142C).
2. Comply with security construction ordinance. (City
Ordinance #578G).
~Qo!im6~
DSH/sab
'.~~.. -
RECEIVED
AUG 4 198~
PLANNiiJG DEPT.
MEMORANDUM
August 2, 1989
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM: Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE: The Grove Shopping Center - Site Plan - Staff Comments
1. The shared parking study and the application do not reflect
the same square footage as indicated on the plans (sheet
SP-I) for the anchor, including the exterior coolers. Also,
the number of parking spaces provided appears to be 841, not
830. Both of these items affect the following documents
which should be amended for final sign-off: pages 3, 4 and
15 of the parking study, tables 1 and 2 of the parking
study, page 4 of the application - 6 (h) and 10 and sheet
SP-2 data table.
2. Provide verification that the five foot limited access
easement along the rights-of-way lines of Federal Highway
and Old Dixie Highway has been dedicated.
3.
Label the
enclosure,
building,
elevations
submitted.
colors of the building signage, dumpster
buffer wall and all architectural features of the
including building signage materials, on the
to correspond with the colored elevations
4. Provide details for the proposed Federal Highway median turn
lane modifications to accommodate the driveway at the
northeast corner of the property without conflicting with
the existing egress driveway at the Homing Inn. Article II,
Section 19-17(e).
5. Roadway and signal improvements determined to be necessary
by Keith and Schnars to be completed prior to opening of the
shopping center. Article II, Section 19-17(K) and Article
X, Parking Lots, Section 5-144(n).
6. Add note to plans that existing drop curbs on Federal
Highway will be removed and reconstructed to provide a
continuous raised curb and sidewalk. Article II, Section
19-17(e) .
7. Provide a copy of the deed verifying that the additional
right-of-way needed for Old Dixie Highway, 40 feet from
centerline, has been dedicated.
8. A future site plan modification is required for approval of
the freestanding sign to include sign color, size, height,
setback, wording, materials, letter size and style. Chapter
21, Section 21-9.
9. The following comments are for informational purposes:
a) The shared parking study submitted is consistent with
Section 11-H(13) of the Zoning Code and provides
quantitative evidence that at the peak hour parking
demand at the shopping center, 2:00 P.M. Saturdays, for
both the retail and cinema uses combined, the shared
parking allocation allows for sufficient parking to
meet the zoning code requirement plus the required 10%
buffer. The parking scheme proposed provides 841
parking spaces; a buffer of 12.7%.
b) The future expansion of the anchor store will require
site plan review and modification to the shared parking
study to incorporate the increase in square footage.
Article X, Parking Lots, Section 5-138(a).
c) Future coolers placed in the rear of the shopping
center will require site plan review and parking study
revisions. Article X, Parking Lots, Section 5-138(a).
d)
Depending on the uses
outparcels, conditional
At minimum, future site
for the outbuildings.
6(C)lA.
planned for the three leased
use approval may be required.
plan approval will be required
Appendix A-Zoning, Section
~ ~, a-,d IflL-.
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
TJH:frb
cc: Central File
Grshctr
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
DATE: August 2, 1989
RE: The Grove Shopping Center - Site Plan
1. The applicant must submit the Tree Management Plan for all
existing trees.
2. When this project was originally proposed, there was a
ruling that a row of 20' height trees be planted along the
northern property line. This statement is reflected in
minutes from a Planning and Zoning Meeting during the
original submittal for this project.
3. The SW corner of the property should have additional
plantings.
I{~ ~ -IfdJ4'
Kevin J. II an -
Forester/Hort~culturist
KJH:ad
DOC:A:GROVE
FJJ;CIIVklJ
0400 1_
PLANNiNG DEPT-
.. .\
--
--
. /
I.. Ii
~
MEMORANDUM
June 12, 1989
TO:
Doug Walker,
Goldenholz-Fischer, Architects & Planners, P.A.
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner
The Grove Shopping Center - File No 245
Site Plan Submittal - Staff Comments
RE:
Please be advised that the plans submitted for site plan review
are deficient with respect to the following items:
1. The agent from Goldenholz-Fischer who is representing the
applicant/owner has not signed the application submitted.
2. The shared parking study submitted is consistent with
Section 11-H(13) of the Zoning Code and provides
quantitative evidence that at the peak hour parking demand
at the shopping center, 2:00 P.M. Saturdays, for both the
retail and cinema uses combined, the shared parking
allocation allows for sufficient parking to meet the zoning
code requirement plus the required 10% buffer. Since
a buffer of 25% is provided on the site plan, 15% greater
than what is actually required, equating to 114 parking
spaces, the opportunity/flexibility exists to reevaluate
landscaping/green areas provided, traffic flow and drainage
design concerns addressed in item #9 and #13.
If a reduction in parking spaces is a viable solution for
the applicant, tenant changes and future expansions are
factors to be considered when restudying the shared parking
allocation. Should the theater be replaced with retail
uses, there would be no opportunity for shared parking or
the 60% parking requirement allowed for the small retail
shops, i.e., the code requirement of one parking space for
every 200 square feet of gross floor area would be required
for the total shopping center square footage.
Any changes to the total number of parking spaces provided
on the resubmitted site plans should be documented in a
revised copy of the shared parking study and submitted at
the next deadline.
3. The future expansion of the anchor store will require site
plan review and modification to the shared parking study to
incorporate the increase in square footage.
4. If the square footage for the outside freezers/coolers
located at the rear of the center and the receiving room has
not been included in the total square footage figure
provided, it must be added and reflected on the application
and shared parking study. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 1 -
gross floor area. Future coolers placed in the rear of the
shopping center will require review and parking study
revisions.
5. The number of parking spaces provided on the site plan and
indicated on the application submitted is 927. The shared
parking study, page 15, indicates 925.
6. Depending on the uses planned for the three leased
outparcels, conditional use approval may be required. At
minimum, future site plan approval will be required for the
outbuildings. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 6(C)lA.
7. Platting shall be required if leased outparcels shown on the
site plan are to be maintained under separate ownership from
the shopping center. Appendix C-Subdiviions, Platting,
Article VI, Section 1.
8. A five foot limited access easement shall be dedicated along
right-of-way lines of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway.
9. Traffic engineer should reevaluate the following problems:
a) driveway intersections in the vicinity of the 100 foot
throat, northwest of the main entrance. The number of
driveways should be reduced to form a proper
intersection.
b) driveway onto Federal Highway at the northeast corner
of the property. The conflict with the adjacent egress
driveway at the Homing Inn should be mitigated.
10. Indicate the building colors on the elevations and the color
of the buffer walls and dumpster enclosures.
11. Dimension buffer wall setback from property line. Said
buffer wall shall not be constructed within any easements or
over any existing utilities and shall be setback a minimum
of two feet from adjoining property lines, to encompass
footer. Appendix A-Zoning, Section 4,L.
12. Locate the existing wells on the plans and survey. Appendix
A-Zoning, section 11A.
13. A parking lot variance will be needed to permit any catch
basins within paved areas for which a hardship will have to
be proved. It has been determined that the existing
infrastructure is not grandfathered and must meet current
standards - pretreatment of stormwater through the use of
grassy swales prior to discharge into catch basins. Article
X-Parking Lots, Section 5-141(n) and 5-142(f). As discussed
in item #2, there is opportunity to reduce the number of
parking spaces provided to redesign the parking lot layout
and location of landscaped islands/strips around the
existing catch basins and/or increase the percentage of
grassed areas.
14. The following information is required on the lighting plan:
photocell activation and illumination levels (photometrics
plan) of a minimum of one footcandle per square foot of
paved area. Article X, Section 5-142(a). Light poles
proposed adjacent to residences shall be directed away from
neighboring property. Appendix A-Section 4(N)F.
15. The retaining wall shown on the engineering and landscape
drawings is not shown on the site plan, SP-1. On the
grading plan, this wall is shown extended farther west at
the northeast project entrance. Provide details on this
wall for construction, height, materials, colors, and
setback from property line. Article II, Section 19-17(f).
16. Dimension all landscape strips and islands. Landscape
strips adjacent to public rights-of-way must be a minimum of
5 feet in width. Article II, Section 7.5-35(d)1. Landscape
islands must be a minimum of 5 feet in width excluding
curbing. Article I, Section 7.5-35(e).
17. The parking lot regulations require parking spaces to be 9
feet by 18 feet in size with wheelstops 2 feet from the end
of the stall or 9 feet by 16 feet in size with raised
curbing at the end of the stall. Article X, Section
5-142(i)1. When using 9 foot by 16 foot stalls adjacent to
a required landscaped area, the two foot overhang is allowed
provided that the required 5 foot minimum width, landscaped
strip is increased to 7 feet in width (9 feet in width if
parking spaces overhang into the landscaped strip from both
sides - such as the layout proposed on the site plan for the
interior spaces.) Article II, section 7.5-33(b)4.
Should the 7 foot wide interior landscaped strips shown be
needed to meet the interior landscape requirement of 20
square feet of landscaping for every interior parking space,
these strips will need to be widened to 9 feet. As stated
in Article II, Section 7.5-35(g), the required landscaped
areas can be located in any manner consistent with this
section in order to divide and break up expansive paved
areas, i.e., landscaped strips are not required everywhere
there are parking bays abutting each other unless they are
needed to meet the interior landscape requirement. Consult
the City Forester for clarification on this issue.
18. Consult City Forester on City policy regarding maintenance
responsibility for maintaining landscaped medians within
public rights-of-way (intersection of Old Dixie Highway and
Federal Highway) adjacent to project boundaries.
19. Provide verification on the survey that the 5 foot utility
easement shown on the site plan was dedicated.
20. The following sign information is required on the pylon
sign: size, height, setback, wording, materials, letter
size, letter style and colors. If this information cannot
be provided at this time, a future site plan modification
will be required. The following building signage
information is needed for Community Appearance Board
approval (consult the Building Department): letter style,
size, color and material.
21. The following comments were made with the original site plan
approval. Please provide verification that they have been
addressed:
a) Property owner to dedicate right-of-way for Old Dixie
Highway 40 feet from centerline prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
b) Developer to check right-of-way width for Old Dixie
Highway to determine feasibility of proposed roadway
improvements.
c) Developer to construct left turn lane into main
shopping center driveway from southwest approach on Old
Dixie Highway.
d) Roadway and signal improvements determined to be
necessary by Keith and Schnars to be completed prior to
opening of shopping center.
e) Existing drop curbs on Federal Highway to be removed
and reconstructed to provide a continuous raised curb
and sidewalk.
22. The traffic study should be revised to reflect the
following: the number of peak hour trips for the cinema
(13) should be quantified, as the figure appears to be low
and the trip generation rate for cinemas is 1.75/seat found
in the fourth edition I.T.E. Manual.
tf7 ' :7 i ~
,~.~4
~AMBRI J. ~DEN .
TJH:frb
cc: Central File
...EMORANDUM
TO
Jim Golden - Planning
DATE
12 June 1989
FILl'
""OM
5U8JI'CT
The Grove Shopping Center
Lt. Galbraith - Police
It is my opinion that the traffic ways in the front parking
lot are confusing and the 5 way intersection on the south drive
way is hazardous. I recommend that some of the thruways be closed
at that intersection and blind corners be changed to allow unobstructed
views. I further recommend proper sinage be installed.
Respectfully submitted;
':/I ~g71
Lt. William Gal r lth II
WG/sab
TO
r
:s ~ rr\ e;- s. Go L.. t:::>elt....J
561'-.l' 'OR. C,--r-y'---Pt-A r-lN5~
-,
FROM
---;;;:68~ ~Nc:> ~ ~ r
'lcr/~& ~8'/c.- ~1If?K$~1'~~
SUBJECT: .__J:'IZ=~ .. .......~~.. ...~ 7H'~...~P~~~p.(".;q .....~ATE:.._6._~_2~j_______
!WOL.D .
J r>-1 .;e- Or 7h'-4'
OE" C#A A/c;:t!F.o ..
;2)vrnPs rEi>"C .6 G&}-T/o^--,.-5" /f/~.a
CO/V-r-~=r- ~BL./c:::.. Nc:>~~.s 70
~
~~t/I'~ #ee:-v Lo.e::::~-:r-/oA/J
7:?i>- 7~:2.Y
PLEASE REPLY TO .
REPLY
RECEIVED
JUN '1 1989
PLANNING DEPT.
DATE:
SIGNED
Item 1/ F269 Grayarc, P.o. Box 2944, Hartford, CT 06104.2944
@ Wheeler Group, Inc. 1982 THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
~.\EMORANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
DATE:
June 7, 1989
""OM
John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities
FILl'
5U.J~CT
TRB Review - Grove Shopping Center
Site Plan
We offer the following comments on this project:
1.
Some of our adopted
initially reviewed.
following:
design criteria have changed since this project was
Please change your detail sheets to reflect the
a. Water services with either end under pavement shall be constructed
of Type "K" copper from the main to the meter.
b. Reduced pressure backflow preventers are required by the Health
Dept. on all restaurants.
c. The sewer manhole detail shall indicate that at least 9 feet of
polyethylene-lined ductile iron pipe is to be installed at each
inlet, with a transition to VCP via a Fernco shear ring adapter.
d. Substitute 20 feet of polyethylene-lined ductile iron pipe for
VCP at the storm drain crossings between manholes 3-4, and man-
holes 7-8.
e. Use a brass ball valve, square nut adapter, and a valve box
installed to grade in place of a corporation stop for all service
taps into the main.
f. A Ford Y1 1-474 wye may be used to obtain four one-inch services
from a single two-inch tap, if you choose, This may save a
substantial amount of copper tubing.
g. Please obtain a current copy of our criteria sheets for your
reference.
2. Add a note to the effect that the City will own and maintain the ma~n
line sanitary sewer and that the sewer services will be private.
3. We recommend a 6" diameter cleanout on 6" sewer serv~ces, with an access
cover on all cleanouts in pavement.
4. Water meters are not permitted in sidewalks or parking spaces, and
should be located in grass areas whenever possible.
5. Correct the meter yoke detail.
RECEMn
JON 9 !SSg
PLAN N~NG 9€rl.
TRB Review - Grove Shopping Center Site Plan
Page 2
June 7, 1989
6. Correct the pressure test note to read "150 psi" instead of ]25
ps~ .
7. Coordinate with this office or the Fire Department to obtain a
current flow test on the off-site water main. If flow is sufficient
a large portion of the redundant, interior fire loop may be deleted.
dmt
bc: Peter Mazzella
M E M 0 RAN DUM
June 5, 1989
TO:
Jim Golden
Senior City Planner ?f/
George N. Hunt ~!
Acting City Enginer~V/'
Vincent A. Finizio
Engineering Department
1. R. B. Conments
The Grove Shopping Center
Go1denho1z - Fischer Architects
Keith & SChnars, P.A.
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
1. Provide a parking lot lighting plan consistent with the Requirements of
Boynton Beach Parking Lot Regulations, Article X, Section 5-142(A),
Required Lighting and Section 5-141(N) Lighting Standards.
2. The one thousand (1,000) watt high intensity discharge (H.I.D.)
Luminaires at the major driveway at Federal Highway and along property
perimeter abutting U.S. Hwy. #1 shall be reduced to a fixture of less
intensity to mitigate glare. Appendix "A" Zoning Section 4 N,
Performance Standard Prohibiting Glare.
3. Revise plans to indicate Standard Stall Striping, Traffic Arrows and
Fire Lane Messages in "white" paint. Handicap stalls in "blue" paint.
Fire Lane curbing in "reflective yellow" paint.
4. Indicate on plans Fire Lane Messages and signage consistent with the
requirements of Section 5-142(M) Fire Lanes and Section 5-141(N) Fire
Lane Standards.
5. Provide a continuous uninterrupted yellow line down the centerline of
the major aisle along bUilding frontage. Section 5-142)C) Traffic
Control and the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as listed in
Section 5-142(N) Traffic Control Standards. A single yellow line shall
be used when there are two (2) opposing traffic lanes and passing is
prohibited. Section 5-140(A) Safety Objectives.
6. Revise plans to indicate the location of all raised continuous curb and
curb cuts that will facilitate drainage. Revise all plans to indicate
curbing 13~ inches in total depth of which 6 inches-will be above the
asphalt surface grader. Section 5-142(E) Curbing (extruded curb prohi-
'bited) Section 5-141(N) Curbing Standards. Chapter 19, Section 19-17(E)
Curb Cuts.
7. Sidewalks along Old Dixie Hwy., North R.O.W. shall continue through
ingress/egress approach and be transitioned to acconmondate the han-
dicapped. Sidewalks in these area shall be minimum thickness of six (6)
inches in conformance with Section 5-141(N) Sidewalk Standards.
-2-
Groves-cont1d
8. Handicap Ramps should be aligned with Handicap Stall locations to aid
handicap ACCESS to structures. Specific area of concern is the ramp
locations in front of Winn Dixie. Handicap stalls east of building
"Retail F" should be moved in proximity to building entrances.
Handicap stall near building "Retail All should be moved to the west
side of the landscraped island in order to keep wheelchairs out of the
traffic lanes.
Section 5-142{K) Handicap Requirements
Section 5-140{A) Safety Objectives
Section 5-141{N) Appendix "C" sheet 2 of 3
Paragraph #4 states "Handicap Parking Stalls shall be located as near
as possible to building entrances or centrally located in parking lots
between buildings.
9. Stall dimension detail on SP-2 indicates a 91 x 181 stall, plan SP-1
indicates a stall dimension of 91 x 16'.
Clarify proposed construction.
Section 5-141{N) Construction Standards.
10. Provide construction details for all regulatory and advisory signs
including sign foundation details. Section 5-141{N) Traffic Control
Standards.
11. Provide a drainage plan consistent with the requirements of Section
5-142{F) Drainage and 5-141 (N) Drainage Standards.
Also locate
CB 29 & 30
CB 25, 26
CB 11
the following catch basins in grassy swale areas.
21, 16, 40, 10, 18
Convert 27 & 28, 24 to junction boxes and locate associated inlets in
grassed area to the north.
Convert B 18 & 19 to junction boxes and locate associated inlets in
grassy areas to the southeast.
All grass areas are to be depressed to facilitate proper drainage.
All other inlets in pavement areas require bicycle proof grates in con-
formance with Section 5-141{N) Drainage Standards and Standard
Engineering Department Drawing #A 87-005. Bicycle Proof grates for
inlets in pavement.
12. Provide a cost estimate for signalization improvements along with
funding necessary to construct and implement signalization in confor-
mance with Traffic Impact Analysis
i
-3-
Groves-cont'd
13. Pavement markings on Goldenholz-Fischer plans - sheet 6 of 9 -
conflicts with similar markings on SP-l. Clarify intent.
14. Provide County and State permits to construct within their R.O.W.
15. Survey does not indicate the existence of a large on-site supply well.
Provide infonmation on status ~ anticipated use of well.
16. Provide F.P.L. street lighting along the R.O.W. of Old Dixie Highway to
provide for vehicular and pedestrian safety and convenience, Chapter
19, Section 19-21(A) Automotive & Pedestrian Safety and Convenience.
17. No Rumble Strips in Parking Lot
Florida Statute 316.0747
Section 5-141 Standards
.
Vincent A. Finizio
Engineering Department
V AF: j b
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
DATE: June 8, 1989
RE: The Grove Shopping Center - site Plan
1. The applicant should review the Tree Management Plan
submitted with the originally approved C.A.B. landscape plan
(10-20-86) to ascertain the current condition of trees on
the site.
2. The existing live trees on site should receive conditions I,
C, D of the "Tree Preservation Format With Methodology",
prior to any heavy construction equipment allowed around the
trees. I will be available to work with the applicant to
follow the guidelines established in the Tree Management
Plan.
3. The preliminary variental list (landscape legend) should
include the following:
a. Quantities of newly planted materials showing 50%
native species.
b. All trees minimum 8' in height at time of planting.
c. Location of existing trees which will be preserved
based upon item #1 above.
d. A replacement plan for trees which perished over the
three year period which were to be preserved.
e. All interior parking lot trees, minimum 5' clear trunk.
4. The applicant is required to provide irrigation and a
landscape plan for the grassed medians on U. s. #1 and Old
Dixie Highway. The permit to do this work is secured
through the State Department of Transportation.
5. The applicant should review how existing overhead powerlines
will affect the future pruning of trees proposed.
6. It is recommended that Ficus benjamina not be used where
there is adjacent sidewalks or asphalt.
7. I remember that the City Commission requested that a row of
large trees be planted along the north property line to
visually screen the adjacent residences. This was a
condition of approval which these plans mayor may not
reflect.
8. All road R.O.W. grassed areas to receive irrigation.
~ -~~
~;G- "
Kevin J. H llahan
Forester/Horticulturist
KJH:ad
DOC:A:GROVE
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
DATE: January 5, 1988
SUBJECT: The Grove Development (Dixie and Federal Highway)
This memorandum is in response to your inquiry of December 29,
1987 (E) pertaining to the above project.
1. There are existing trees on the site still alive which should
be treated in accordance to the attached Tree Preservation
Format with Methodology document, Section I. Items C and D
of this document should be completed prior to any additional
excavation/fill operations occurring on the site.
2. There are several trees which have been damaged and should be
removed. The tree management plan shows approximately 48
trees to be preserved. If the new developer agrees to
replace any of the trees which have perished and would
install plant material in accordance with the Community
Appearance Board approved (10/20/86) landscape plan, a
revised site plan would not be necessary.
3. The other comment pertaining to landscaping is the second
attached memorandum dated October 10, 1986.
Several trees had to be removed to install the underground
utilities, and the trees were never replaced. If the new
developer agrees to follow the recommendations ad outlined, this
would rectify the situation. There is an active well on the site
to provide irrigation to any trees preserved or newly planted
materials. The property has blowing sand which should be
addressed depending on how soon the new developer will initiate
activity on the site. I will be available to work.in conjunction
with the new developer to comply with the tree management and
approved landscape plan.
I{ ~'V. ~- ~(l LUL_
K'evin J. allfa an
KJH:pb
CC:
Charles C. Frederick, Recreation & Park Director
John F. Wildner, Superintendent of Parks
DOC:THEGROVE
JJ ko I1za~ E. !Bt:aj.{ E.lJ - Landscape Architect
954 North Dixie Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephones 426-1434 395.6307
TREE PRESERVATION FORMAT WITH METHODOLOGY
IIZill Tract". U. S. fll and Old Dixie Highway, Boynton Beach, Fl.
.
1. ONSITE TREES TO REMAIN IN PLACE:
A. All trees to be preserved in place are to be limbed up to a minimum of six feet of
clear trunk. All dead branches and wood is to be cleanly removed. The crown is to
be trimmed to represent a good form for its' specie. Limbs and trimmings are to be
chipped into mulch and broadcast about the base of the tree.
B. Fertilizer in the amount of two ounces per inch of diameter of the tree, measured
at four feet above grade will be drilled into the soil at a point of circumference
five feet away from the trunk_at even intervals. Fertilizer will be a slow release
or sulphur coated substance with a garaunteed analysis of 16-10-12.
C. A barricade; four feet in height, will be constructed at the drip line of the tree.
Said barricade will be constructed of wood or wire mesh and is constructed to repel
the pressures of construction stress to trunk and roots.
D. If a deviation of more than eight inches is coused by new grading proceedures, a
retainer wall or tree well must be constructed on seventy-five percent of the
drip line circumference. Said retainer/well will be constructed of creosote rail~
road ties or reinforced concrete for a permanent installation.
E. Trees are to be supplemented with additional water should a draught occur during
construction phases. Supplemental watering should amount to eighty gallons of water
per week and be placed inside of the drip line.
.
II. TREES DESIGNATED TO BE TRANSPLANTED ONSITE&
A. All trees to be transplanted onsite must first be limbed up to eight feet of clear
trunk. Dead wood and limbs must be pruned from the crown. The crown of the tree
must then be reduced by one third in a manner of uniformity and to represent a
crown form indicative of the specie. Any cuts measuring more than It" must be coated
with approved tree paint. All trimmings are to be chipped at the site and the mulch
broadcast about the base of the tree. .
B. Root pruning of 240 degrees of the circumference of roots measured a minimum of 3811
from the trunk the tree will be accomplished. Root prune ditc9 will measure at least
twelve inches wide and twenty four inches deep. Ditch will be made with a sharp
spade or saw and any root encountered will be cleanly and evenly cut. Pruning ditch
will then be backfilled with one half soil and one half wood chips. The ditch will
then be tamped and thouroughly watered. The balance of the soil will then be used
to build a basin to hold water into the root pruned area.
C. MEintenance watering of fifty gallons applied twice a week will "be applied to this
basin area. The ~ime of on-going maintenance will be for six consecutive weeks. At
that time the root edge will be checked to measure the evidence of newly formed
roots. If an inadequate amount of roots are found. the maintenance program will
continue for another two or three weeks.
D. Transplanting activities with B l'Tree Spade'l ro Tree Crane will then begin. All trans-
planting Bnd bracing will be done in aecordance with details and diagrams shown
.. on Landscape Sheets. Further, a sixty day maintenance period as-described in the
General Notes will be followed.
. fJ hOlna!J. E. !Be.aj{e.lj - Landscape Architect
954 North Dixie Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Telephones426-1434 395.6]07
TREE PRESERVATION FORMAT.(cont.)
III..ONSITE TREES TO BE ADOPTED OR REMOVED:
A. Local government agencies will be contacted and offered surplus trees from this
site. These agencies will be (but not limited to) the County School Board, The
Board of Regents. Boynton Beach Parks Dept., Palm Beach County Parks Department
and other city Parks departments. Afterwards. the remaining trees will be offered
to the general public. A limitation of time, commensurate with onsite transplants,
will be enforced so as not to hold up development work.
B. Trees that are not claimed as per the above outline will be removed and destroyed.
.
-"
t1EMORANDU.H
~'-'----,-_..~~......
'l
4 December 1985
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE:
Boynton Beach Shopping Center - Staff Comments
P3.ease be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced site plan:
1. If a restaurant with drive-thru windows at outlet "F" is
to be constructed, an application for Conditional Use approval
must first be approved by the City Council.
2. Lighting details to be provided.
3. Parking provided (811 spaces) requires 3 additional handicapped
parking spaces (17 total).
4. Property owner to dedic~te a limited access easement along
----.f"Jgl1:t-:Q:f::lV:CiY-J.Jne for Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway.
tLJroperty owner --~o--~~~-~-~~~~ ~:ight-of-way for Old Dixie Iiighwa;7'\
40 feet from centerline prior to the issuance of a building l
permit. \
~ \
Developer to check right-of-way width for Old Dixie Highway \
to determine feasibility of proposed roadway improvernentsu
11eveloper to construct left turn lane into main shopping
center driveway from southwest approach on qld Dixie Highway.
~2adWay and signal improvements determined to be necessary
by Keith and Schnars to be completed prior to opening of
shopping center.
~2isting drop curbs on Federal Highway to be removed and
reconstructed to provide a continuous raised curb and
sidewalk.
\
-~
\
\
\
i
\
.~
.//
___.....d"-
A~ [: tv\ 0 R A ('-1 DUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
O.T.
October 10, 1986
~I\.r
"'''0''
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester/Horticulturist
suaJICT
The Grove Shopping Center
Site Plan Modification
This memorandum is in reference to the Tree Management Plan for
the above project. Representatives for the developer have in-
dicated that because of changes to the site plan, some of the
~rees originally slated to be preserved will have to be removed
and replaced. This is especially noted to occur along the
Northern property line.
I suggest the representatives show how each specific tree will be
affected and this information addressed in the Tree Management Plan.
The trees along the Northern property line should be replaced (if
desired for removal) with large, buffering species of trees, e.g.
Red Cedar, which will provide immediate visual screening for the
adjacent homeowners. Any other trees removed throughout the site
should also be replaced with equal or larger sized trees. This
information should be included as an addendum to the original
Tree Management Plan.
_~'-C~ G--/Ja~A__~
Kevin J(/ Hallahan ~._---
#
KJH:ad
~
TRB CHECK LIST FOR COMMERCIAL"
./7
'-
I }---'
~--~ I
Front Setback....................... .~..;;()
t'G(4A;;(:::?6r/l~?? Jdl<!l- .
Side Setback........................!3_ 3()' ~./_
DATE7- ::16,-' %9
JOB TITLE ;;lAL .M1.../JZ-<<L-
PREP. BY '-:1.7 ( . ZONING C. 3
REQUIREMENTS
1.
Permitted Zone Use......... .........
OCC.
flleV'CAtv*L
I'I~ /
CLASS -;tL-~.. CONST.TYPE
_~<ffVIA,f'J~ REMARKS
()/~
.
t4-
2.
CB!) Requirements. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
SPRINKLERED
,) /./3~""
c. r\
J.()/
- /..--'"
6. Rear Setback....................... /'YU.z .I..('L rt-!,",-"...' Ie.>
14.
15.
16.
17.
3.
4.
5. Side Setback (Corner)..............
7.
Floor Area.........................
. l n1..tuV
'-IOC5Jo =
/~t/
75 ~,.(A<u
/fLlJ - /
1./5'/ /huoy
\..
/)g'~))3
;{; 3) ,;)o?'
~
8.
% of Lot Coverage..................
FVl f,\:- Y
~ k:
o '
/'
~,~
1<9.3.3
,
9.
Lot Area...........................
18. Max. Sq. Ft. for Type Const.Shown........
/,
r
)
10.
Lot Frontage.......................
19. Fire Protection at Property Line......:..
u, .
Lot Depth (Cl-C2-C4)...............
12.
Structure Height...................
13.
Roof Overhang......................
Dimension Site Plan................
Architect or Engineer (Sealed).....
Proposed Finished Floor............
Flood Zone Elevation................
20. Fire Separations..................
.0 ,~
23. Site Lighting.................... "_1\ e '-,~
24. Landscape Ord...................... f? ~ &,
25. Sign Ordinance..................... f, CL.- /) (&-- (.(/~ { 0
21.
22.
Parking Ord. (Lighting, Curbs Stops,
Dbl. Striping, Turnouts)..........
Dumpsters.. . . .. .. ... . . . ... . . . . . . . . .
,?
~
~Q0
\
~, -.
, "\,,
,5 'K
,^^ ~/,- t ()
v" <C ~ c:.()[~
26. Handicap Access (Thruout).......... ~ ~ ~
27. General............................
28. Interagency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
" ~ l-+k~~LV'
4/}/J/t;o.{ (' O[A
(7- If
'/ j)1 "J-L L
. 7 / -/ l' "I"'P. L
.
~
('7
vcr- ----r-f\v <2 :, (I u cj
-;
/'Jc./ ( L cj l ~r
if
~~ c(
, -.-
PLANS CHECK & TRB CHECK LIST FOR COMMERCIAL
DAT0-~';; b KC
CONST. SITE ADDRESS
JOB TITLE
LOT
SUB
PREP. BY
ZONING
OCC.CLASS
AGENCY APPROVALS '\ \~ .~O~ ",,-,,'I \'I.,J'\~
1. Palm Beach Co. Health Dept.......
- (Envir. issues)
2. Palm Beach Co. Health Dept.......
3 .
D.O.T........................... .
4.
County Eng. (Turnout, etc.)......
5. Army Corp of Eng. ...............
6. E.R.B............................
7. Water Mgmt. (2 Acres Imp.).......
8. Lake Worth Drainage..............
9. Sub.Street Names-Check Landfile..
10. House No.&Street Names-MultiUnit.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMEN~S
11. Dimension Site Plan..............
12. Architect or Engineer (Sealed) ...
13. Permitted Zone Use...............
14. Recorded Plat....................
15. Survey (Unity of Title) ..........
16. Front Setback....................
17. S ide Setback.....................
18. Side Setback (Corner)............
19. Rear Setback.....................
20. Floor Area.......................
21. % of Lot Cov"rage.................
22. Lot Area.........................
"
23. Lot FrontagE:.....................
24. Lot Depth (e l-C2-C4) .............
25. Structure H"ight. ...............
26. Roof Overha,lg....................
27.
BLK
CONST.
TYPE::QSPRINKLERED~
\J.v i r. ~'(ol1l,
~'(\v(."""1
REMARKS )
(IJV,4\NAc;,(, b'\"O~L."'ry
...-
- ior\" ~
"J':> t,.,j-<;
C o",of\
V\c:... "',-"
/1/1
,J-~,E
-
--R~
rfJ/C /
(;-,1
Protective I.uffer (Wall,Fence,Hedge)
Handic~p Ac,:ess (Thruout). .QJk\(.mtfJ;!!
Unload~ng 5i'ace..................
9~f1
- IS'
I
28.
29.
,
PLANS CHECK & TRB CHECK LIST FOR COMMERCIAL (CONT'D)
30.
Dumps ter s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31.
Sidewalks (l\ppx. "c" & Chap. 22)..
32.
Road Impact Fees.................
33.
Water & Sewer Flow Rate..........
34.
.................. .
35.
Site Lighting....................
36.
Sign Ord.........................
37.
Exi ting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38. Flood Zone.......................
39. Finish Floor.............. ... .. ..
40. Road Height......................
41. Finish Grade Elev................
42. Type/Unit-Condo,Fee Simple,Lease.
43. C.B.D. Reauirements..............
44. Max. Sq. Ft. for type Const.Shbwn
45. Fire Protection @ Property Line..
46. Fire Separations.................
47. Fire Hydrants/Fire Lanes.........
.
- /)
-l5
48. Parking Ord. (Lighting, Curbs-
c- /J
Stops, Db1.Striping, Turnouts)... ~.:) -e.i
49. Tree Survey & Forester Report....
50. TOPO (Existing Trees on Site). ...
51. Swimming Pool Ord. (Night Use) ...
52. Threshold Inspector..... .........
53. Construction Trailers............
54. Utility Easements................
55. Landscape Ord....................
56. Soil Tests (Borings, Recommenda-
tions, Drainage) .................
57. Awnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58. Liquor Ord.......................
/ ?
f./;' ~ (>
7.j f_) j 'f 0