AGENDA DOCUMENTS
1
Administrative Conditions/ReQuirements- HILLS AT LAKE EDEN
Reference: 3 Sheets prepared by Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.,
identified as 3rd submittal with Planning and Zoning Department January 3,
1996, date stamn markina.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. The water and sewer lines crossing between lots X
17 & 18 of block 3 (as shown on sheet 3 ) will
require at least a 30-foot wide easement in order
to maintain the minimum 10-foot setback from
homes, a~d the 10-foot horizontal separation
between . ater and sewer mains as required by the
Palm Beach Health Unit.
2. A capacity reservation fee for this project X
totalling $8,593.20 will be due within 30 days of
City Commission approval of the site plan, or "
upon request for Utility Department signature on
the water and sewer line permit applications to
the Health Unit. rSecti~n 26-34(E)1
3. Construction of the off-site 12-inch diameter X
water main extension on Seacrest Boulevard shall
extend to the City'S 16-inch main on Mission Hill
Road. The developer shall be responsible for the
design and construction cost of the off-site
main, and will be granted appropriate credits
towards his water capital facilities charges.
rSection 26-34(A)]
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
4. The plans call for an emergency access and X
utility easement gate, from S. Seacrest
Boulevard, with telephone access code. The
Police Department requests the same type of
gate/telephone access gate for the main
entrance/exit on Swinton Avenue.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
5. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local X
and collector streets. Chap. 6, Art. III, Sec.
l1A, pg. 6-3. (SIDEWALKS TO BE PROVIDED ON ONE
SIDE ONLY J
6. Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual X
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap. 23,
Art. IIB2. na. 23-7.
7. Sidewalk is still required along Swinton, X
although the note on the drawings previously
cited has been removed. Chap. 6, Art. III, Sec.
l1A na. 6-3.
TEXT IN ITALICS REPRESENTS DOCUMENTATION OR REVISIONS TO
CONDITIONS GENERATED/APPROVED AT PUBLIC HEARING.
t' ....
'1 n.e L,r..ty oj
':B ..ton tBeacli
~nning d" ZDrt.i.rvI '.De~_..t.
zoo 'x.. 'BaynUlln 'Bc.u:1i. ~vard'
!P.o. '.Bcuc..lIZO
'Boy..""''''' '.Blaeli.. 74>ri4a ..J34:ZS-0.JZQ
(407)37~-6260. PAX.(A07)375-6090
I
r
:EP"'~ ~~-~~~...-
,
~~~ ----:=.:....a..::~~~
I
DATE: ------n,<::a.~) ~-\qq~
FAX N't1'MESER. TRANSM%TT:I:NG TO ~ Q5"\ 'd...-11'-\ \
\ec,
NUMBER. OF PAGES SB%NG T.RANSM%~a
(Xng1~d~=g Cover L_~ter)
TOe
-----xs < ...<-> Q
c~~
Jl'KOM c
o~.
~
"
.....
~~~~G
REa
~~?~. ~~~ -
O~4!I1{;1~----J.
,
s.n.1=. By.
~\..~,. a ~~~
..... "-.J
C. FA.X _ .::I'M
flln-r.eric:a'..s qate-evay to tlie qulfstrearn
TRANSMISSION REPORT
THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
WAS SENT
** COUNT **
# 16
*** SEND ***
Nol REMOTE STATION 1. D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES ! COMMENT
1 I I
407 272 7741 " 4-96 3:49PM 13'36" 16 I
~-
TOTAL
0:13'36"
16
XEROX TELECOPIER 7020
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-107
Agenda Memorandum for
March 5, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden '~~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: February 29, 1996
SUBJECT: The Hills at Lake Eden - File No. REZN 95-002
Rezoning from R-1-AAB to PUD
Please place the above-referenced request on the March 5, 1996 City
Commission agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading.
DESCRIPTION: You will recall that this request from Newport
Properties, Inc., to rezone a 15.45 acre parcel from R-1-AAB
(Single-family Residential) to PUD w/LUI=5 (Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Insity of 5) was approved by Commission
on February 20, 1996 subject to numerous conditions. It is now
ready to finalize through adoption of an ordinance. The property
is located on the west side of the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard. The proposed use is a Planned
Unit Development (PUD) consisting of 56 single-family dwelling
units.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached ordinance be
approved on first reading.
TJH:dim
Attachment
a:REZNCCAG.Hil
ORDINANCE NO. 096-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COt1MISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING REZONING OF THE PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
INTERSECTION OF SEACREST BOULEVARD AND
GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD, KNOWN AS "THE HILLS
AT LAKE EDEN"; AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70
OF SAID CITY BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT
OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, FROM R-1-AAB (SINGLE-F~MILY
RESIDENTIAL) TO PUD W/LUI=5 (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITH A LAND USE INTENSITY OF
5); AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP
ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No. 91-70, In which a
Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, Newport Properties, Inc., cwners of the property
more particularly described hereinafter, through their agent
Burl Gentry, Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying, Inc., has
hereto tore filed a Petition, pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix
A-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, for the purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land
consisting of 15.45 acres, said land being more particularly
described
hereinafter,
from
R-1-AAB
(Single-Family
Residential) to PUD w/LUI=5 (Planned Unit Development with a
Land Use Intensity of 5);
WHBREAS,
the City Commission deems it in the best
interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the
aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
,
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: The following described land, located in the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to-wit:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT HA"
be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-l-AAB (Single-Family
Residential) to PUD w/LUI=5 (Planned Unit Development with a
Land Use Intensity of 5). A location map is attached hereto
as Exhibit "B" and made a part of this Ordinance by reference;
that attached hereto as Exhibit "C" is a copy of the Master
Planj
and
attached
as
Exhibit
"0"
1 :i
aLe
conditions/requiremetns
for
this
re::onlng,
1:vhl ch
at'8
incorporated herein.
Section 2: 'l'hat the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the
City shall be amended accordingly.
Sect ion 3:
All ordinances or pcrts of ordinances ln
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Sect ion 4:
Should any section or provision of this
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall net
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5:
This ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this
day of
, 1996.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
day of
, 1996.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
L.k.Ed.n.Rezon1~g
J 11/96
ORB C69B pg 13?e
EXHIBIT A
PARCEL I
The South 2 acres of the East 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Section 5, Township 46
South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, (Jess the right-of-way for Swinton Avenue
as shown in Road Plat Book 3, Pages 250 and 251, Palm Beach County Pubic Records).
PARCEL 2
The S.W, 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4, less the County road right-of-way, of Section
4, Township 46 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida.
PARCEL 3
The East 1/2 of the S.E. 1/4 of the S,E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, of Section 5, Township 46 South,
Range 43 East, ,less the South 257.29 feet thereof, and also including the following described
parcel:
A portion of the N.E. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N .E. 1/4 of Section 5, Township
46 South, Range 43 East, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, and more
particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of said N. E.
1/4 of S.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4, Section 5; thence run S. 88deg48min02sec. W.
along the South line of said N.E. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4, Section 5, 336.91
feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Swinton A venue; thence run
N. OOdegO 1 minOOsec. E. along said right-of-way 69.18 feet to a point; thence run
S. 89deg59minOOsec. E., 188,55 feet to a point of curve; thence run Southerly
along the arc of a curve to the right 87.96 feet, said curve having a central angle
of 90degOOminOOsec. and a radius of 56.00 feet; thence run S. 89deg59minOOsec,
E. 92.31 feet to a point on the East Line of said N.E. 1/4, S.E. 1/4, N,E. 1/4 of
Section 5; thence run S. OOdeg04min28sec. W., 6.03 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING. Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
Tax Folio Number: 08-43-46-05-00-000-1060
08-43 -46-05-00-000-1 070
08-43-46-05-00-000-1090
08-43-46-04-00-000-3010
,
DI ! J"" I I
4411 ~(l 1"IJIIJ
LACArIUI\J IVIAL.I
HILLS OF LAKE EDEN
:~~ .,~.. !-'.':'J IF==::V/f / WI! I'~"'.' .~" 'i-:;
'~.':~'. :"~. ~\l~ . ,.~ ~ iW/ /)m ~ 6~~"'l1~h. ,~
,$'.1"'.;' "- '-, ~If ~ ..;..1 ~/ A
t' ^t-~. ~ "J ~: ~7 /J.~,/I/' t-....rn0~~ ~IVJ~. -fJ~ .
1.1.4 - .v-___--"'" --.-1' br!/ 'CR -I- L"-l pB I I Y/'< l/
, I I ' ~ j/, "j'" - I \ ~
\-\" J 110-' ~...I I I ,,-- ,:' l~~11I I EB~: ~ , I~I~ irl "', ~y,/, I m.lJ l
I ..- '-4; : " ~l" ,1 f-- . --. YI ..J
Illl,1 I I I I I J,: R .' ~ rh .L.!-. -r"\ - . i~;.... I I~ I Fll; J
~ '_~J I I I I till/I ;' E./ f/~~ ~ ~~ f=:: ~// ~ ~ I lIT]
I/~ I I ~'J ff .... . q.'t ~ 11 R~= ~ .-. =~ - 1- - ~R-~ J~,r ( I Jill I
..: ~(J '111 Tt1)- 4:, ..~ '/J ~~_~~~,f-~ - .~)~(~ IffiE
' I :lill' t:~ -1:": .~ ~ r/ylJ -'",~~ ~rJt;, .;, ~ ~ .ffiH-E ::
I W '..., -., -::': ~/ J r-t I I I J I~ ~ I f r-' -1. J~, _
. . . ::[:.1 -j: ' ~ 1IJj I t J(1' i i . L~ - II!!!~
- -" - rL-'J..l :' ~ I ~ f-o 77 -'J I I I \I
) ~ -~-: _. j ~ ~ ~_~ L.~' ;':' 'I ~lr II 'H 1 t - .. ~ r-:-~: : . I: : \ II I J.J
Ilirr~-O:--' . j. '11'/f(11 11. -. - /_ "HI. IlldiL/'
I ~"; :'l':rlil-i.~- : '[ 'II~/~ H', I.. -- - - ./r - ,.1 J, - !~/
\. I,Ur rl~J.J~; ij/I -j 1 }h-. 1- H-t ~~ == ~ III' =..;
II ' , , , I I . j ,J I ~ l _ .1_ _ I I. _ L.L. U 1 LJ I- l 'L...JJ-- 'a - r~.Jf- . - _
I ,. . . ,-... Ii '/) -ll 'r if r II .lot 1 I I I ...,
'_ : f.ll 'ooj'~-'" ,r~ ~ _ _ ..JI! ,_ ':""'.... .J.- "f;'Hi3. I I I l _ {
I, ~ :'J , R.~ I .t1 :-r- .--- - -+- $!' -l H-i --1' -t-1
. I' ~ :i~~ 'l.~ :5 ~ c~~, -,-' ~-1J j tfJ{.: :': { T -i !
II \/:'IJ~/j n~~ = ~~0J.J!,- I I I -. r~ rn I I I I 1111;-; I I -..wJ j
'~'III ~~ - - . '1 I .. - r=l4'IAA RE
\. ,'j/I~J/! 7 t\ -- ~ - ..---:=1: : -= ~ < :'
R ... III c_-: l\ 1/ ,'\...... - _' --'- - t i
E " -%' J ~ 7:?' .'" 1.1 \ - n:c - -- .:: -=- ;
I -=. :'i~ -:-- rrrp f - .\1 II I : I II I"" II~-I-It: .-. I
C "";1 " r.t, . 'k ~.\J::iu-.! ~ I ~ E:I ~ I -- - - - , !
I .../J 1// / : ~. ,. .'\. r I J I ! I I I-, , ! I L' ~1-::-:-"('1 1.1..)! _c
>> I / "'.'. I ' 't}J 11 r-( t ,I ~i:a Ll:::' 1 ~ .~.u II )~L~'
: /~~'~ /1/. /r~'~,llit'(fLl' fte%,:~:m~~::~:~~ l~ lILf-~ . .- ~- :,... I 1'1 :
,/ 1/1/ jl':/l"~7J:;~'---'\, ':)3- -'r 'r? tttttt~%;Wt ~. I,~ It:. -.-- - .~.: -: NI~T .;'/; C
d I, f I -~~~ , j ,- .:.::.:.:.::.:.:.: .:':':":':':,,:.:.::.:.:. -:.L ,- 4.4 .I
, I ~ ,....... .~... ....,........' . r
~ I II f' Ii' L 11 .:::.:.::::.:.:::. :.::::.:.::::.:.::::.:.:::: . -, C I T v
III' /.(/".'A[ ~\ :r~' -u'-':j'-;-lJ.'? t}%ft~}t}Wt nn lill!" 'Ill II -
r / I Ijl ' :' I / I~" . __ ) ) : , . 3L H: ':-iWi'" ...... ...... .... ...... ....... .... iiIIi lL , ~ ,~:::L.
. . I II ,. .~....:- . .'1 I I I I I _ I~' ,
'Ifl/ "i7'il ' n'..'; -J -:r:: J - !
l~l/ /. - til,.1: /"<.;' ~ I I ~ r.- . 1- ~ '.. I.:;
:(/ I ," \ '. ,~J \-'-- :~_____J,__ _u:.... '-'1-4 ", I O~! __
,I, / ~ ' -"\ :' Itl' ,
);d. " " ~ ~;~>-~\I ---~ !
.' I '.' .... D) ., ,I:;>'.t"....., \ I I I. ! I
~ { , " '-L : 0,' . i'" ... ..: :.~ \\ I ! II
~ I" ~~. : ( . b ~. - -. 'r'--m-"'-'-:, I
" ','f, ~" .' : I I I' . \.:=J. r ..' --"1 C; II
" t" ~-+:- I ~ -.,.. '. ~ ~ I
I ..... .........-- I I I I ~l "- - ,- I ,,- --" I
I ! c: "I, el " !of' ,~~.
-- . - .'1= ~::)' I ' I , , " '" .~ ~~'+n'_ "
I -- i-- '. ~~--~ - - ~= =i:~1Iffi .0 118 MIL~Sr/ ....~\
i ,-~ . '-(1' . -(\-- ,. :T[[ '\'1111 'I' 1 ,
'_ I _ _ 'r , 1 r _... .' .
ftk'g~ \(8 1/ '0 400. '800 FEET
/3
[)tJ~ lIe II
>.
~<
:;:J
fTjv..
,0,
I-
,J:
Ie
f) pi;pir J p-
li'lo;7Ji" <VI
\"....;,( EOE'" SUBOIIJI$IQN Pl...T NQ .. 0 ! -1 ~i ~ ~ ;i. ;. 0= lTl:iE
lP 8 JO PG 1221 . ----- ""'?"
laME "'UI ~ i;::; - Jill' I ~ I I 1r1~ ~
~ : ;~~~ 6~ : :~~ · II t'~1 ~\ \ fl~N
A . 181 ~~~._________._._____._.i.-._.1'!"J.t'!T9N.~YE~U~_.J.P . _ / i .J..t2,l1.- _.
IXITING 2. "'....LT '."e"HT ~r
, I' W 574,98' .
;:II"'i"
.c.
CD
\;1111._____-
'4S-
os'
~ i;;;~ ;
__ i ....,_
\,,/, ~ ..."",.
'" i ::Ii i
~~,-.. E
o ~",Cl-~'=~
\Q -. ....c,.
!~:~I~;
~;. t~11
lI....lill!!d':'~,..
,"oial!t wo -
=.' !:i-~il ~~
i ... ,~
;.., i..~ , ~
:..t~ld a
~ .... ::.:
'I: !J
i Ii; ;;
i i! i
: !~
-.-. '-'-'''iii-'-':-'-'-'-'--_._'-'_._--'_._'-'-'-'_._'-'~'~'~,~,~,:.~._._-_. . .~ itrii
Cl nii I: - - . i -, STIU" [SU11I ., 'U PO ,., ~I ~,<< 15TH avl QUaM".' UhTU
.. 'O ! C J-II- . . . ZOIlI 1.1 I ( "I 23 'G 232.
~ ~ ~I a~ i:iHI: - r.~iM;IUI!mP.lrllllCr.r ifi;rGip.l~iI'.1 ii!ft .il'II'lljl;~ 10-. "" 'Sol'
.. - :; ..1.Il .~i. ~iii . i~1 Ci:.g li":I..:I!li!:.: .iil . iih"'II~hil!lllilal Ii l.:i;1 . t:;.
~ - ~i i:ri ~,;;!: 'i .:Ii'ii;llhll t. 111:11 ill ".'!il i .il'l :1:::&"1' .' 1111 II!
i ~~ i~ a ~;i ~ . ii Ir~~I!I~I;1.I :;11 Ii. !iJii!f. il;IIUliillll,'iUmt ~.:::iM~
i ~ . ~ I !17 ~ H : 11.;;ra,.1 :1&11 I, I' :11 r. 1~19 I p'il ii:,ill,1 II 11:i!'Ir.iJ
· - i I ~ Iii lii~ fI ; ~. !Im~nmm bi !I!m! I n~ 11m ilii~!11 !~il!!l' i~I' i~
': - i I - 0 i .. II .~ il.; .:I! I'b= iJ' I I,'d I II~ "~I!fl..IJ I'''.'il II
. ~ 0 "'. I !! Ii J'i ~;fi!;:U ~~:U 'I ,:If!r i I~~ 1111,~i;~M:i: :!iill i i
.: '" - < . 'i: .., II .~..,.I", rj.t l,r..' I trio. II IlIlr!I:- 11'('fl. ,
z - .---.., ., "f 1- ,- l-r'..' I J" .
o !;, !' ., : : ' ~~! 1=-fiO ! I. .-lfil , _:U." !'~;Ji'.~ '!';::; !
.i : i I jl :i. i !- ::1 __- r I.' i i! - ,. .1," .:::~JI .
___ ___~ _ ~ __~ ______ i ~ ': :.~: U !: ljF ::4f.i = ·
_avo.. r-.
. ~
._t"lO ::
~ =. ..
-.:>
~~~ ;
"'0 .... .
;~~= -
c:.i,i;; ~
=i~,,~
.. .. \,.oooJ
i..g - f\J
"l
t". ."'\
! ;i
. ~z
~.~:
"......' ,."",,- ...."
g""
~q~11
!Iit.-
.~II!i
"-III
~I! .
4:,;1
I:~ih
I~im
i~ii!
!~Iji;
UF~~
'hlli
:~~!;!
'!I.!: ~
:;I:ii l
::iu
l .I!
i
!
i
:;;~ Vl
.-
M CD
~ IJ:)
~. .
A
:: -
::: N
...
i
. ~
0\
N
o
!ml'!!!'11 :..
..". .. ,... '"
:ii: 1 a,o liP Ii'
nn .-
!!!!l Iii
.... I =
I ,~ i~
I --
- I!~
is
I:
=;
!:i
-.
I
S.U
I DU
I "'1
. ....
.. .-.
1-
IIIP
r-~
~z
;lil C-i
o~.. ::a
::::o~-c
~. :=1 =~
~M ",0
~Z'''"' -(-
~_: z~
.. 0""
,:&I
n'
-- -
U' 73'
------
z
OJ
<D
.
73'
73
31'
-lH
CXlO
CXl,
o
.....'D
l.f1
IT,
"AI't'ATE "OlD." .. _I.
6S
65'
6S
7' .
as
IS'
CD
<c '0
N.
l-"'
.loO
::::c Ui ':.:..
"l01C;
<cO
0\0
6S'
10.
IlOC~
~4S_
as. IS'
~.~ ..u~ _ _ _
1IIIIIIi
n ...-~
~ ~ i
~~ -
. z..""....
L!'~
! i.-~
:;..:~:
. 0
.. -~"'g
o Q =:i~
z ~ :-e...~
I ~:.i
Q) "'iC..::
lQ (J) ... 0 .o..~
. !:~f~~
A 0_0:%<0(__
L.n .'O. .. ":..6
. f\..)..~ I r_
LI1 0\- a :0. ..
I'\J '. J i
. oel ...-s:::
0".0
~' z
0......0
~."'...
~
f-- . " - - " . - - - -
I
!
!
65'
::.'
, .
_uu_ ~.
II
.
t
.
4"
65'
IS'
,
I
I
!
I
I
!
I
I
!
!
!
I
I"II'~~ I
' ~ ~
- - - - - - - - .00-"
l'Tl -...
,_.
1'T1~
...
2
6S'
i ~
i
'LOC~
n.
~.
IS'
Administrative Conditions- HILLS AT LAKE EDEN
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. The water and sewer lines crossing between lots X
17 & 18 of block 3 (as shown on sheet 3 ) will
require at least a 30-foot wide easement in order
to maintain the minimum 10-foot setback from
home s , and the 10-foot horizontal separation
between water and sewer mains as required by the
Palm Beach Health Unit,
2. A capacity reservation fee for this project X
totalling $8,593.20 will be due within 30 days of
City Commission approval of the site plan, or
upon request for Utility Department signature on
the water and sewer line permit applications to
the Health Unit. [Section 26-34(E)]
3. Construction of the off-site 12-inch diameter X
water main extension on Seacrest Boulevard shall
extend to the City'S 16-inch main on Mission Hill
Road. The developer shall be responsible for the
design and construction cost of the off-site
main, and will be granted appropriate credits
towards his water capital facilities charges,
[Section 26-34(A)]
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
4. The plans call for an emergency access and X
utility easement gate, from S. Seacrest
Boulevard, with telephone access code. The
Police Department requests the same type of
gate/telephone access gate for the main
entrance/exit on Swinton Avenue.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
5 . Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local X
and collector streets. Chap. 6, Art. III, Sec. !
llA, pg. 6-3~ (SIDEWALKS TO BE PROVIDED ON ONE
SIDE ONLY)
6. Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual X
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices II . Chap. 23,
Art. IIa2. pg. 23-7.
7. Sidewalk is still required along Swinton, X
although the note on the drawings previously
cited has been removed. Chap. 6, Art, I::;: I , Sec.
llA no 6-3.
~ )/lLL~t . 'f) "
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. All plans submitted for specific permits shall X
meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following; site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and
traffic control devices, Permits required from
agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD & L'NDD and
any other permitting agency shall be included
with your nermit reauest.
9. Site plan review and approval required. Chap. 4, X
Sec. 2 no. 4-1.
10. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. X
Chao. 8, Art. 1. Sec. 2, 00, 8-1.
11. The citation in Note 6, Sheet 1 of 3, should be X
chanoed to Chao. 6, Art. IV, Sect lOT
12. Note 10 does not clearly specify that the POA ~s X
responsible for perpetual maintenance of Tracts C ,
I
and D.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
13. The tree preservation area easement shown as X
Tract C and Tract D shall be fenced off frc::l t~e ,
remainder of the lots before any construction on ~ I
site and no owner of lots, including the .
preservation easement, can build, construct,
install, or have installed patios or any
appurtenances within said easement. (TREE
PRESERVA TION AREAS TO BE ESTABLI SHED/ DELINEA TED
BY TRACT, NOT EASEMENT)
14. The setbacks for screen enclosures are for Ix 1
i
enclosures with screen roofs only; no hard r-oofs ,
will be permitted unless it complies with the
setbacks for the main structure.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
t
15. Since the number of residential units has been X I
reduced from 62 S6 single family units, I
to ':he i ,
recreation dedication requirement is: ,
S6 single-family units x. 0180 acres/d.u. = 1. 01
acres.
16. The developer has indicated he does not wish to X I
apply for one-half credit for private recreation , i
nrovided. i
Recommendations: I ~
~
17, Recommend cash oavment in lieu of land. X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: , I
I
18. The applicant should include the Preservation IX j
Area Management Plan dated November 1995 !
(document A) part of the Homeowner Association f .
as ~ f
documents.
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT
19. The Preservation Area Management Plan should be X
referenced on the master plan as comment #18 and
~ procedures outlined in document A will be
completed by the applicant prior to turning the
preserve areas over to the Homeowner Association,
(Reference document A #4.0. Dacre 7),
20. The applicant shall install a six foot high · X
black, vinyl-coated chain link fence around the
perimeter of the preserve areas (inside boundary)
and place "Natural Area Preserveu signs en the
fence at the rear of each lot adjacent to the
preserve. (Reference document A, #4.0 A, page 7
and #8.0, page 12), The location of this fence
shall be indicated on the master olan,
21. The applicant will add a note to the master plan X
stating that no permits, determined by the
Development Director to be unsuitable for, er
causing ~ intrusion into the natural area
preserves will be permitted. This comment will i
prohibit abutting lot owners from applying ~o the I
City of Boynton Beach to construct any
improvement to the lot which intrudes into the
preserves, (See Building Division Memo No. 96-
011) ,
22.. The paragraph #5 described on #10.0 page 13 of
document A shall be included as a note on the
master olano
L
X
23. The tree survey indicates a total of 211 trees on X
the site. The tree preservation code #81-21
should be reviewed by the applicant to address
the removal, relocation, and replacement of these
trees. The code will allow removal of trees
located within the buildable areas and roadways.
The three (3) landscape buffer areas (not
preserves) should be recipient areas for the
appropriate trees. The no net loss of trees I
should be quantified and indicated on the
landscape plan. The management plan for the
landscape buffer areas should be compiled similar
to the preserve areas management plan. (TREES TO
BE PRESERVED AND RELOCATED WILL BE PLACED IN
BUFFER AREAS)
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
I
I
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24, Identify the location, size, specie, spacing and X
planting specifications for the landscape
material proposed for tracts A, B, C, D and E.
It lS recommended that a row of trees and hedges
be shown along the Swinton Avenue and Seacrest
Boulevard frontage of the project. The tree-
scape shall be enhanced with a meandering
continuous hedge row, The trees shall be at
least t::.i.yllL ( 8 ) ten (10 ) feet in height at
planting, spaced no more than "4-e' (20) feet on
center and be an evergreen specie with a moderate
drought tolerance classification (prohibited
plant species are not allowed) , The hedge
material shall be at least 24 inches in height at I
planting, spaced no more than 24 inches on center
and be an evergreen specie ttd th a moderate
drought tolerance classificcltion (prohibited
plant species are not allowed) . The landscape
plan shall include tree preservation areas as I
well as the location of landscape material
required to comply with the tree management plan.
[Chapter 2,5, Section 11. B. and C. of the Ci ty "s 1
Land Develooment Regulations 1
25. Change the text note #3 of the master plan by X 1
1n ~
omitting the word width and insert the word I
- frontaae. j
26. Show on sheet 1 of 3 a ten (10 ) foot setbacl~ from X I
the north property line to the leading edge of I
the sign shown north of the main ingress/egress.
Also, add a note indicating that the s1gnage will j
comply with the siqn code. j
27. It lS recommended that the maximum building I X
height be limited to 30 feet (two stories) , to I
minimize impact to the adjacent residential
neighborhoods having a 25 foot height limit. !
rather than the proposed 35 feet. Thirty f'~et ,
rather than 25 feet, is recommended to recognize
flexibility in unit design for cathedral
ceilinas. (AS PROPOSED, 33 FEET APPROVED) ,
ji
28. Correct the LUI table regarding Lur ratios, The X ~
table specifies the Lur of 5, however the table
uses ratios for a Lur of 4. Correct all data and
comoutations accordingly,
29. A oL..LccL \.,;UI111C\,...; L ~ UIJ. ~l.LC:lll Lc lLLaJ.c Lu .5t::Cll..,;Lt::;-,L X /
Buu.lcVQ.LJ ClL t::.i.LlLt::L .5.1!:. 3SLlL Avt::uut:: UL ~,1!:. 36Lh I
AVC11U.C V.I. t::^Lt::u~ 8.". 36 Lll Avt::uut:: Q1.LJ J.uaA.t:: Cl
~Ul,U,1C\.,;L.i.Ul1 Lilt:: C^LC11JC~ L~yllL-uI-wClY \!a-LLcL !
Lu !
.LCY,U.i..LCQ l,.;UU.L~.i..l1aL.i..u,1.J1 W~Lll Lilt:: C~Ly uI Eh::lL Cly " f
8f.:::Q'Wll - \.,;V1UbJ.L ,=ll'=11D.i.. v c P la.l1 Pvl.i.\...iY 2. 2.~. Auy
aJJ.i. L ~ vl1a.l QLLCcL \,.;VJ.ll1C\,,; L ..Lu.u, l:)iLClll Cll~yu wJ.Lh I
LUCl~Q .i.l1 c;uJj CI\wCl1L ~,-,Lt.l.i. v ~;:t.i.V11~ a.11~ J..ll LLu::: ~=,u,c.L.CLl
V.i.,-..i.ll~L.r - CU1UjrlL CllCJ.Ii:>>.i. v t: Plcw, Pul.i.\..'y 1. 3. 9) I
[Aj,./j,./cu~~^ C, ALL.i.t..;!c X, !C~L.i.Ul1 16. V. ] :r Lll.i.l:) I
'-' '-'1""UClA 11. ~D Jvl'lllLad L,y Lllc C...,.LUUL.i.., Q lUll, LlLc I
aJ:.llJl.i.~Cl4IL l:)llClll I~lc Cl \",;V1U!:J.L. cl.&t::.&4i:).i. v c j,./lCll! I
Q4""::.&.l~"C44L Lu Pul.i......,y 2.2.9. (CONDITION AMENDED TO ,
, I
READ: AS A RESULT OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I
CONDUCTED BY DELRAY BEACH, THE APPLICANT SHALL I
FILE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO POLLey
2.2.9. )
--_.
30. Provide a copy of unified control dOCUI'1~nl.d that X ,
haVA bAAn ed bv the cit:.v attornev. ,
DEPARTMENTS
31. Since platting does not require any review by the X
Planning and Development Board, and City
Commission review does not occur until the end,
no opportunity lS available for the Co~~ission to
set land value for purpose of calculating the
recreation fee. Therefore, since this request
involves additional fees to be p~id and Slnce the
property was recently sold, it lS recornmendej the
land value be set using the purchase pric9 at the
time of the most recent sale of the PUD property.
This will require the applicant to submit a =opy
of their ourchase contract.
32. To show the proper front setback omit the off-set X
shaped buildable area shown at the front of lots
24 and 30. The front setback extends acrcss the
entire front of the lot at a distance of 21 feet
from the front orooertv line.
Check the scale (1" to 40') of the di3ta~ce
between the rear of the buildable area of the
buildings ln block 2 and the rear property line.
The setback chart indicates this distance co be
41.5 feet, however the space scales approxinately
37.5 feet.
33.
34.
The plans identify area A, C, D and E as tracts,
however the plans show these areas with a symbol
that 1S generally used to represent an easement.
Correct this believed contradiction. Eve~ though
the home owners' documents includes language to
eliminate improvements in these easeme~ts,
installation of fences with signs around the tree
preserve easement and deed restrictions t~ac
restrict lot owners from making improvements ln
the easements, it is believed that these ar~as do
not qualify as easements. Therefore, restore
these areas as tracts owned and maintained by the
homeowners' association.
35.
Show on the plan a fence with access gates
encompassing the tree preservation areas. ~he
location of the fence shall be within the
boundary of the preservation areas and the type
and height of fence shall be delineated on the
plan. It is recommended that the access ;a~es be
off-set from the private right-of-way to a~low an
area for a vehicle without blocking the rig::t-of-
way.
36.
Il. WQQ ".1i;Iiv';',-,uolx a.~~va.J Lv by 1..1.1.':: Q.t.JJ..Il~~,- Ltnat
L11C:: lCUua.l.~~:a,u..;'y Cl~-"';C.,i:t wvulJ Lc luuJ~r~cJ. _U }:J.t..uv.i.J"e
Q!.L .i.IU!rJ.LUVCJ. i:)U,.L[Cl'WC Lv", V.I..I.IC-WClY C~Lc~:n::> U1J.to
!cQ'WLCQL BuulcvaLJ. nIt: aJ~cJ C~~CQQ wu_lJ
J...i.Q...,C.L i;)C u.l.l-i:Il..i.Lc L.q.[ C.i.\.,.; ClllJ alluw c.uU=.Lyt.::...~y
.i.U\::p.~;:)l)/~~.L.~;:)l). MuJ..i.[,y Lll~ j,JlClul) Lu .,l.uw t-:-re
~~.L.~l);:). (CONDITION AMENDED TO READ: PROVIDE A
TWO-WA1- (ONE-WAY) ENT1tANC~ EZ.I:X ONLY ONl'O
SEACREST BOULEVARD (THIS SHALL REPLACE THE':?O
FOOT ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE
PLANS). IT IS PREFERRED THAT THE ENTRANCE ALIGN
WITH OESTA VISTA DRIVE. J
37, Submission of a rectified master plan sho':?iag I X
compliance with the conditions of appr(.Jv...\l :or
the project will be required to be submitced to
the Planning and Zoning Department, 1n
triplicate, prior to platting and site p~a~
review of the project, A survey shall be in~luded
with the rectified master olan drawinas.
INCLUDE
REJECT
x
X
X
x
f
;,
I
\
"
"
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR~
,. MEMORANDUM NO. 96-107
x. LEGAL
B.2
cc: Planning, Developu
Agenda Memorandum for
'Marth 5, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden 7/ r-J
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
February 29, 1996
SUBJECT:
The Hills at Lake Eden - File No. REZN 95-002
Rezoning from R-1-AAB to PUD
Please place the above-referenced request on the March 5, 1996 City
Commission agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading.
DESCRIPTION: You will recall that this request from Newport
Properties, Inc., to rezone a 15.45 acre parcel from R-1-AAB
(Single-family Residential) to PUD w/LUI=5 (Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Insity of 5) was approved by Commission
on February 20, 1996 subject to numerous conditions. It is now
ready to finalize through adoption of an ordinance. The property
is located on the west side of the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard. The proposed use is a Planned
Unit Development (PUD) consisting of 56 single-family dwelling
units.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached ordinance be
approved on first reading.
TJH:dim
Attachment
a:REZNCCAG.Hil
---~-_.
:~c::
~'l
, wY!(;(~~/;Z~ ~ ~h"
~ ~~,.V' \)....1
~ ~~~ ~. -
,~~ J\~ J:2dC/L '1-~~41P- C-6t~V~~/
o/~!~IY ..' I '
~ ~!Jo ILffH~ ~L-~j
-"", \. '? 'f ,'" .r -:7 t:c.ef
\l..j,-,.J C ./'lA d......-7""".,--a~~. i '..6-1- ::~ -.
3 -.;r'\ / I'L,..>"'" Le:. ,.- c:7'
/1 -~ No. .". it'
, " \J '. i.. '7'
f p}~' <;J .^-;J If ~~. ./_ j} ;/2.~/ /1 i~--/o
" !>-'. iL;./I': ../' ~- , lJ (j:'y~). c..... . ../..
! /,/--' -k"- ' -
6f'f^' ".'/ . A~.ll . /} "f '% .:nO. !Z.~?->.' V)L6( I (;>Z'--
(J// fYr-~HrL.- ,~~/
( ,~ '.* 0r. ' !1 J:"V~. ,... .' /.~\...' JI 'j''\., ~d-;. i:. ~.~. 1:"' ~ -I, tv C;).7A_'JU~~~..:z..
~ r;f'.' ~ J IJJI' -iY#' . \J~. -t~ ! /IY\- :d&t J V <>If,: ./<-4d. '-!~_ ~ A-7/, / I:
;V ) :Iv J,~ J I' . ~~ .... 4 ~ .'--.~
- I............ ' Pt>1, ' ,\) ,. \J A' ./ --1
'; rrJ. l,4i k'.......' ,,/11 .\Y \r"~~ 0.' .i'I'7"" .y /Glt::?--nt:0i.z-;;t-.1.J: L~"LL-z:":"d:~
, ," ['Ii .', .';J" .)}> j J'-Y- 1...<2.-5 "1 .,-..
V ' t..., " ". v I,}-. ,,' '<:I'" r,/. .' ..., .~
. Af~..~ ,.)/ fJ!' ~ ~ J.}..'.' ,~.j.../~,."'x...z "'v. (JlM...;.,,;7:.Tl..Y';.' z!,.t.V ;;jL,t..i?. '..&'~~.. rb. ' 6[
~'4. .J.ru jv' ~L~ -j.;.Y J' , ",1, .' ~ f ---h.. '1
, ,IvV rrX ,~'.~;~ i,.Y,,~~ 4d.ili~h~cAz. {h.,.,. ~. , ': IV kp,-'iJ~_ /1nJ ~
.,
..,
ORDINANCE NO. 096-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COt1MISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING REZONING OF' THE PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
INTERSECTION OF SEACREST BOULEVARD AND
GULFSTREAM BOULEVARD, KNOWN AS "THE HILLS
AT LAKE EDEN"; AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70
OF SAID CITY BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT
OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, FROM R-1-AAB (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) TO PUD W/LUI=5 (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITH A LAND USE INTENSITY OF
5); AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP
ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No. 91-70, In which a
Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, Newport Properties, Inc., cwners of the property
more particularly described hereinafter, through their agent
Burl Gentry, Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying, Inc., has
heretofore filed a Petition, pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix
A-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, for the purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land
consisting of 15.45 acres, said land being more particularly
described
hereinafter,
from
R-1-AAB
(Single-Family
Residential) to PUD w/LUI=5 (Planned Unit Development with a
Land Use Intensity of 5);
WHEREAS,
the City Commission deems it in the best
interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the
aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: The fOllowing described land, located in the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to-wit:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-l-AAB (Single-Family
Residential) to PUD w/LUI=5 (Planned Unit Development with a
Land Use Intensity of 5). A location map is attached hereto
as Exhibit "B" and made a part of this Ordinance by reference;
that attached hereto as Exhibit "C" is a copy of the Master
Plan;
and
attached
as
Exhibit
"D"
lS
are
conditions/requiremetns
for
this
rezoning,
which
are
incorporated herein.
Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the
City shall be amended accordingly,
Sect ion 3:
All ordinances or p~rts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4:
Should any section or provls1on of this
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance,
Section 5:
This ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this
day of
, 1996.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
day 0 f
, 1996.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
vice Mayor
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
LakeEden.Rezonlng
3/1/96
.,
.""." ORB C69B pg 13?e
EXHIBIT A
PARCEL 1
The South 2 acres of the East 1/4 of the S,E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Section 5, Township 46
South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, (Jess the right-of-way for Swinton Avenue
as shown in Road Plat Book 3, Pages 250 and 251, Palm Beach County Pubic Records).
PARCEL 2
The S.W. 1/4 of the S,W. 1/4 of the N.W, 1/4, less the County road right-of-way, of Section
4, Township 46 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida.
PARCEL 3
The East 1/2 of the S.E. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, of Section 5, Township 46 South,
Range 43 East, ,less the South 257.29 feet thereof, and also including the following described
parcel:
A portion of the N.E. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Section 5, Township
46 South, Range 43 East, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, and more
particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of said N. E.
1/4 of S.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4, Section 5; thence run S. 88deg48min02sec. W.
along the South line of said N.E. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4, Section 5, 336,91
feet to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of Swinton A venue; thence run
N, OOdegOlminOOsec. E. along said right-of-way 69.18 feet to a point; thence run
S. 89deg59minOOsec. E., 188.55 feet to a point of curve; thence run Southerly
along the arc of a curve to the right 87.96 feet, said curve having a central angle
of 90degOOminOOsec. and a radius of 56.00 feet; thence run S. 89deg59minOOsec.
E. 92.31 feet to a point on the East Line of said N.E. 1/4, S.E. 1/4, N.E, 1/4 of
Section 5; thence run S. OOdeg04min28sec. W., 6.03 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING. Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
Tax Folio Number: 08-43-46-05-00-000-1060
08-43 -46-05-00-000-1 070
08-43-46-05-00-000-1090
08-43-46-04-00-000-3010
DI I Jr,." I I
l~ J ! ,10;(1 I.llJK.J
~
..",
t1~ 't: I'
lONE R I &AI
il ~.)
. 0
-..
z: .
~n 0
'"
"'~
:> _r'
z..
o
.
~
~
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT
8. All plans submitted for specific permits shall X
meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following; site lighting, pavlng,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and
traffic control devices, Permits required from
agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD & LWDC and
any other permitting agency shall be included
with your oermit reauest,
9. Site plan review and approval required. Chap, 4, X
Sec. 2. pg. 4-1.
10. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required.
Chao, 8, Art. I, Sec, 2, pq. 8-1.
11, The citation in Note 6, Sheet 1 of 3, should be X
chanqed to Chao. 6, Art. IV, Sect lOT
X
12. Note 10 does not clearly specify that the POA lS X
;
responsible for perpetual maintenance of Tracts C j
and D.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
13. The tree preservation area easement shown as
Tract C and Tract D shall be fenced off fro~ t~e
remainder of the lots before any construction on
site and no owner of lots, including the
preservation easement, can build, construct,
install, or have installed patios or any
appurtenances within said easement. (TREE
PRESERVA TION AREAS TO BE ESTABLI SHED/ DELINEA TED
BY TRACT, NOT EASEMENT)
14. The setbacks for screen enclosures are for I X
enclosures with screen roofs only; no hard roofs :
will be permitted unless it complies with the
setbacks for the main structure,
X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
15. Since the number of residential units has been
reduced from 62 to 56 single family units, the
recreation dedication requirement is:
x
16. The developer has indicated he does not wish to
apply for one-half credit for private recreation
provided,
Recommendations:
X
~
I
l
i
I
~
~
56 single-family units x. 0180 acres/d.u, = 1.01
acres.
17. Recommend cash pavrnent in lieu of land.
Ix
-
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
19. The Preservation Area Management Plan should be X
referenced on the master plan as comment #18 and
all procedures outlined in document A will be
completed by the applicant prior to turning the
preserve areas over to the Homeowner Association.
(Reference document A, #4.0, nacre 7).
20, The applicant shall install a six foot high · X
black, vinyl-coated chain link fence around the
perimeter of the preserve areas (inside boundary)
and place "Natural Area Preserveu signs en the
fence at the rear of each lot adjacent to the
preserve. (Reference document A, #4,0 A, page 7
and #8.0, page 12). The location of this fence
shall be indicated on the master olano
21. The applicant will add a note to the master plan X
stating that no permits, determined by the
Development Director to be unsuitable for, er
causing ~ intrusion into the natural area
preserves will be permitted. This comment will i
prohibit abutting lot owners from applying ~o the I
City of Boynton Beach to construct any
improvement to the lot which intrudes into the
preserves. (See Building Division Memo No. 96-
011) .
22. The paragraph #5 described on #10.0 page 13 of
document A shall be included as a note on the
master olano
X
23. The tree survey indicates a total of 211 trees on X
the site. The tree preservation code #81-21
should be reviewed by the applicant to address
the removal, relocation, and replacement of these
trees. The code will allow removal of trees
located within the buildable areas and roadways.
The three (3) landscape buffer areas (not
preserves) should be recipient areas for the
appropriate trees. The no net loss of trees I
should be quantified and indicated on the
landscape plan. The management plan for the
landscape buffer areas should be compiled similar
to the preserve areas management plan. (TREES TO
BE PRESERVED AND RELOCATED WILL BE PLACED IN
BUFFER AREAS)
PLANNING AND ZONING
COImnents:
,
I
REJECT
~
ADDITIONAL CONDI~ONS OR DESIGN CHARACTERI~IC~ AGREED UPON /' I~LUDE THE
FQLtPWIJ/G: , , j ,
.~<'too SQ1RE FOOT MINIMUM UNDER AIR; j'
.~~%600 SQ E FOOT AVERAGE UNDER AIR;
. A 3 FOOT ERM ALONG SWINTON AVENUE;
. A CONTROLLED, GATED EXIT ONTO SEACREST;
. 29 LOTS AT 9,000 SQUARE FEET; AND
. 27 INTERIOR LOTS AT 7,150 TO 7,180 SQUARe F3ET.
.
TEXT IN ITALICS REPRESENTS DOCUMENTATION O~ REVISIONS TO CONDITIONS
GENERATED/APPROVED AT PUBLIC HEARING.
..C...-.c.IU,...
NR
3/1/96
\"./
'-.../
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
rn
FF1 2 0 9Jj ~ 00
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPI
February 20. 1996
6:30 P.M.
I. OPENINGS:
'A. Call to Order. Mayor Jerry Taylor
B, Invocation. Rev. Conrad Braaten, Ascension Lutheran Church
C, Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Vice Mayor Matt Bradley
D. Agenda Approval:
1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections
2. Adoption
II. ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. Appointments to be made:
APPOINTMENT LENGTH OF TERM
TO BE MADE BOARD EXPIRATION DATE
IV Matson Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Code Enforcement Board Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96 TABL~D
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Reg Term expires 4/97 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Reg Term expires 4/97 TABLED
IV Matson Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 2 yr term to 1/98 TABLED
III Jaskiewicz Education Advisory Board Stu Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
II Bradley Adv Brd Children & Youth Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
I Education Advisory Brd Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
II Bradley Community Relations Brd Reg Term expires 4/98 TABLED
III Jaskiewicz Board of Zoning Appeals Reg Term expires 1/97 TABLED
8, Authorization to renew Boynton's G,A,l.A, Beer Garden Proposal
III. CONSENT AGENDA
Matters in this Section of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manager
for "Consent Agenda" approval of the action indicated in each Item, with all of the
accompanying material to become a part of the Public Record and subjec~ to staff
comments.
A, Minutes
1, Regular City Commission Meeting Minutes of February 6, 1996
2. Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes with COBWRA & City Commission of Feb, 8, 1996
8, Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1995-96 Adopted
Budget
1, Award bid 'or 12" Well Point System & Accessory Package to Thompson Pump &
Manufacturing Company, Inc.
1
;,
2. Award bid for the purchase of uniforms to Martin Lamar Uniforms and Harrrson
Uniforms
C. Resolutions
1. Proposed Resolution No. R96- RE: Water Service Agreement for J. Scott and
Mary W. McOwen located on the east side of South Federal Highway opposite the
Stow-A-Way Self Storage business and northeast of the Gulfstream Mall
2. Proposed Resolution No. R96- RE: Subordination of Easement along
Lawrence Road - Nautica Sound P.U.D.
3, Proposed Resolution No, R9S- RE: Authorize execution of Agreement
between Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach for proposed potable
water interconnects .
4. Proposed Resolution No, R96- RE: Boynton Festive Center Substitution of
Letter of Credit - $57,000 Complete installation of Phase II of the Water distribution
System
5. Proposed Resolution No. R96- RE: Boynton Festive Center Substitution of
Letter of Credit - $11,000 Restoration Bond
6. Proposed Resolution No. R96- RE: Extension for Community Development
Block Grant on NE 13th Avenue reference Palmetto Greens Park
7. Proposed Resolution No. R96-
Accountability Act of 1996
RE: Supporting House Bill #107 - Lottery
8. Proposed Resolution No. R96- RE: Ratification of the grant of sanitary sewer
and water easement between the City of Boynton Beach and Sand S Investm~~ts
D. Approval of Bills
E. Payment of Bills - January 1996
F. Authorize replacement of TV camera for the Sewage Collection 1V Truck from Cues in
the amount of $6,000
G. Approve request to transfer cemetery Lots 97 B, 98 A & B, Block 0 to Roy and Virginia
Larizza
H. Approve request to Install an extended 8' vinyl fence around the outfield at the Senior
League Field in Uttle League Park from Martin Fence (Palm Beach County Contract) in
the amount of $12,215
I. Approve purchase of an upgrade to the interface software for the Perkin Elmer Gas
Chromatograph (Ge) laboratory instrument located at the West Water Treatment Plant
in the amount of $7,910
J, Approve sole source purchase of Flygt Pumps from Ellis K. Phelps & Company in the
amount of $46,798
K, Approve disposal of records. City Clerk'. Office
IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS. PRESENTATIONS:
A. Announcements
1. Volunteers still needed for Leathers Park build - February 26 - March 3. 1996
2. Library Quilt Show at the Woman's Club - March 1 st, 2nd & 3rd
3. 1996 Goldcoast Surf Festival at Oceanfront Park - March 2nd & 3rd
4. General City Election - March 12, 1996
2
B. Presentations
1. Proclamations
a} Community Caring Center of Boynton Beach Week - Feb, 25th thru March 2nd
b) Women's History Month - March 1996
2. Review of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fi,scal year ending
September 30, 1995 by Paul Bremer, Ernst & Young
V. iBIDS:
.None
VI. :PUBLlC HEARING:
A. PROJECT:
AGENT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
B. PROJECT:
AGENT:
APPLICANT:
LOCA TION:
DESCRIPTION:
C, PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
D. PROJECT:
OWNER
APLlCANT
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
7:00 PM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS
Charter Drive North - Parcel C
Stuart H, Cunningham, P,E. and P.L.S.
Hunter'. Run Property Owner'. Association, Inc.
Western terminus of Charter Drive North
ABANDONMENT - Request to abandon a portion of Charter Drive
North, legally described as Parcel C
Charter Drive North - Parcels A and B
Stuart H. Cunningham, P.E. and P.L.S.
Hunters Run Golf and Racquet Club, Inc,
Western terminus of Charter Drive North
ABANDONMENT - Request to abandon a portion of Charter Drive
North, legally described as Parcels A and B
Hills of Lake Eden PUO ' T ABLEO
Burlison A. Gentry - Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying, Inc.
Newport Properties, Inc,
Northwest corner of S,E. 36th Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard
REZONING - Request for master plan approval to construct 56
single-family detached homes on 15.45 acres of land in connection
with a rezoning from R-l-AAB (single-family residential) to Planned
Unit Development with a land use intensity of 5 (PUD with LUI=5)
Boynton Beach Mall
Debartolo Corporation
Mr. Thomas Marsicano
Approximately 900' west of the intersection of Congress Avenue & Old
Boynton Road
DRI AMENDMENT - Amend development order to change traffic
conditions and build out date
VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE:
INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS Will BE LIMITED TO 3 MINUTE PRESENTATIONS
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: l
A, PROJECT:; '<.1.
AGENT:
APPLICANT:
LOCA TION:
DESCRIPTION:
High 'Ridge 'commerce Park PIO .
Richard C. Ahrens ,
Condor Investments of 'Palm Beach County, Inc.
Northeast corner of High Ridge Road and Miner Road
USE APPROVAL - Request to amend the list of High Ridge
Commerce Park PID permitted uses to allow wholesale distribution
and service of turf equipment
3
XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
XIII. OTHER:
XIV. ADJOURNMENT:
NOTICE
IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY
MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING. HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND. FOR
SUCH PURPOSE, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE.
WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
(F.S. 286,0105)
THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO
AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY
THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE. PROGRAM. OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT
JOYCE COSTELLO. (407) 375.6013 AT LEAST TWENTY.FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR
ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST,
I~ .
5
PLANNI. J AND ZONING DEPARTMEN
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-079
Agenda Memorandum for
February 20, 1995 City Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
City Manager fJ . J4t~
mb ' i"o{lw
Ta r1 J. Heyden 7~~r
Planning and Zonin Director
TO:
DATil.
February 16, 1996
SUBJBCT:
Hills at Lake Eden PUD (REZN 95-002)
Request for Rezoning to Planned Unite Development (PUD)
:INTRODUCTION
The above-referenced item is on the table under Public Hearings for
the February 20, 1996 City Commission agenda. At the January 16,
1996 City Commission meeting this item was tabled for remanding to
the Planning and Development Board for recommendation regarding the
revisions to the master plan that occurred since the November 14,
1995 Planning and Development Board meeting when this request was
considered and forwarded by the Board. On February 13, 1996, the
Planning and Development Board reconsidered the request and
unanimously recommends denial. The master plan revisions that have
been made by the applicant are discussed in detail in the attached
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-020 (see Exhibit
"F" for a copy of the revised master plan). Since the January 16th
City Commission meeting, additional exhibits (Exhibit J, K, L, M,
N) have been added as supportive documentation,
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this request as reflected on the
master plan in Exhibit "F", subject to the revised staff comments
in Exhibit "J", with one exception regarding street connections,
which affects comment 29 and 36, Since the applicant did not
address in their traffic study the effect of noncompliance with
comprehensive plan policy 2.2,9, requiring extension of 36th
Avenue, Delray Beach, at their own expense, re-evaluated this
requirement which was also in their comprehensive plan. The
results of the study indicate that the extension is not necessary,
however "the extension is desirable from a traffic operations
standpoint" in that it is a "logical and desirable extension of an
east/west oriented collector which crosses the FEC railroad, and
would provide more convenient, less circuitous access from the
residential neighborhoods to the west of Swinton Avenue to Seacrest
Boulevard and Federal Highway." Therefore, staff recommends that
comments 29 and 36 be revised as follows:
29. As a result of the traffic analysis conducted by Delray Beach,
the applicant shall file a comprehensive plan amendment to
policy 2.2.9.
36. Provide a two-way entrance onto Seacrest Boulevard (this shall
replace the 20 foot access/utility easement shown on the
plans). It is preferred that the entrance align with Oesta
Vista Drive.
I have spoken to the Fire and Police Departments about the traffic
study conclusions and they strongly support an entrance onto
Seacrest Boulevard since the entrance onto Swinton Avenue would
result in a longer response time, especially since this project is
at the southern extreme of the city's boundaries, and would allow
backing-up of response personnel. Memoranda from Police and Fire
are forthcoming and will be available for the City Commission
meeting.
TJH:dim
Attachments
xc: Central File
a:CCAgdmem.Hil
C I T Y
PLANNING &
o F BOY N TON B E A C H
DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
AGENDA
DATE:
Tuesday, February 13, 1996
TIME:
7:00 P.M.
PLACE:
Commission Chambers
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Introduction of Mayor, Commissioners and Board Members.
3. Agenda Approval.
4. Approval of Minutes,
5. Communications and Announcements.
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
1) Pinal disposition of last month's agenda items.
6. Old Business:
None
7. New Business:
A. PUBLIC HEARING
Abandonment
1. PROJECT NAME: Charter Drive North - Parcel C
AGENT:
Stuart H. Cunningham, P.E. and P.L.S.
APPLICANT:
Hunter's Run Property Owner's Association,
Inc. "'I
LOCATION:
Western terminus of Charter Drive North
DESCRIPTION:
Request to abandon a portion of Charter Drive
North, legally described as Parcel C.
2. PROJECT NAME: Charter Drive North - Parcels A and B
AGENT:
Stuart H. Cunningham, P.E. and P.L.S.
APPLICANT:
Hunter's Run Golf and Racquet Club, Inc.
LOCATION:
Western terminus of Charter Drive North
DESCRIPTION:
Request to abandon a portion of Charter Drive
North, legally described as Parcels A and B
B. REZONING (City Commission remanded on January 16, 1996 to the
Planning and ~8velopment Board)
1. PROJECT NAME: Hills of Lake Eden PUD
AGENT:
Burlison A. Gentry
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
Page 2
Planning & Development Board Meeting
Agenda for February 13, 1996
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
C. USE APPROVAL
1.
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATlIiON:
DESCRIPTION:
2.
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
D. SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
1.
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
2.
PROJECT:
AGENT:
Newport Pr0~erties, Inc.
Northwest corner of S.E. 36th Avenue and
Seacrest Boulevard
Request for master plan approval to construct
56 single-family detached homes on 15.45 acres
of land in connection with a rezoning from R-
1-AAB (single - family residential) to Planned
Unit Development with a land use intensity of
5 (PUD with LUI=5) .
High Ridge Commerce Park PID
Richard C. Ahrens
Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc.
Northeast corner of High Ridge Road and Miner
Road
to amend the list of High Ridge
Park PID permitted uses to allow
distribution and service of turf
Request
Commerce
wholesale
equipment.
Boynton Commercenter PID
Frederick Roth, Jr. PE
Michael B. Schorah and Associates
Boynton Commercenter, Ltd.
Approximately 700 feet south of the southwest
corner of Woolbright Road and 1-95.
Request to amend the Boynton Commercenter PID
list of allowed uses to include communication
towers.
Tara Oaks PUD
Kieran J. Kilday
Kilday and Associates, Inc. for Pulte Home
Corporation
Tara Oaks Development Company
East side of Knuth Road approximately 570 feet
north of Woolbright Road
Request for site plan approval to develop
14,47 acres of the Tara Oaks PUD for a 192
unit townhouse project with private recreation
facilities.
The Kilpatrick Company
Richard C. Ahrens
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-075
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
Tambri J. HeYden-mrJ
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
February 9, 1996
SUBJECT:
Hills at Lake Eden PUD - REZN 95-002
Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD)
INTRODUCTION
At the January 16, 1996 City Commission meeting, the Commission
remanded the above-request to the Planning and Development for
review at their next meeting (February 13, 1996). It was remanded
for recommendation regarding the revisions to the master plan that
occurred since the November 14, 1995 Planning and Development Board
meeting when this request was considered and forwarded by the
Board. Attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-
020 discusses in detail the master plan revisions that have been
made by the applicant (see Exhibit "F" for a copy of the revised
master plan). Exhibit "J" - Administrative Conditions contains new
staff comments (which have been revised again since the January
16th Commission meeting) generated from review of the revised
master plan and supersedes the staff comments within Exhibit "D".
During a recent meeting with the applicant, he stated that he
agrees to comply with all staff comments, with the exception of
comment 5 (sidewalks on both sides of the private streets), comment
27 (building height), comment 29 (project entrance onto Seacrest
Boulevard) and comment 34 (preservation areas as tracts, rather
than easements). Also, since the January 16th Commission meeting,
additional exhibits have been added to the attached support
documentation as follows:
Exhibit "K" applicant's
environmentalist's 1/16/96
contained in Exhibit "I";
1/12/96
response
response and applicant's
to environmental concerns
Exhibit "L" - a comparison of the building and site regulations
proposed for the Hills at Lake Eden PUD vs. the building and site
regulations of the R-1-AAB, R-1-AA, R-1-A and R-1 zoning districts;
Exhibit "M" - two diagrams illustrating the effect on setbacks due
to the conversion of the preservation area from tract to easement;
and
Exhibit "N" - two diagrams illustrating the effect on setbacks due
to the conversion of the buffer area from tract to easement.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends' that this request (Exhibit F master plan) be
approved subject to the staff comments in Exhibit J.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
C:HLakeEdn
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-020
Agenda Memorandum for
January 16, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden -rQ.I.J
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
January 11, 1996
Hills at Lake Eden PUD - REZN 95-002
Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (POD)
The above-referenced item is on the table for the January 16, 1996
City Commission agenda under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: At the January 2, 1996 City Commission meeting, the
above-referenced request, submitted by Burl Gentry of Gentry
Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc., agent for Newport Properties,
Inc., property owner, was tabled to the January 16, 1996 Commission
meeting, as requested by the applicant. The reason for the request
to table was to allow the Technical Review Committee (TRC) to
review revised drawings that were discussed with the applicant on
December 28, 1995 and submitted on January 3, 1996 for TRC review.
The revisions have resulted from the concerns expressed by the
Planning and Development Board (small \ setbacks, and anticipated
excessive lot coverages which the Board felt was incompatible with
adjacent properties) and neighboring residents' concern (desire for
a minimum 9,000 square foot lot size, units having a minimum 3,000
square feet of air conditioned space and access from the southeast
portion of the site, rather than as proposed). The revised master
plan (revised since the November 9, 1995 staff report, the November
14, 1995 Planning and Development Bo~rd recommendation for denial
and the original November 21, 1995 City Commission action to table
until January 2, 1996) reflects the revisions below - see Exhibit
~ to Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-648 for a
copy of the revised master plan.
1. The minimum lot area has been increased from 6,727.50 square
feet to 9,000 square feet. Tpis has'been achieved through two
means:
a. deletion of six (6) lots from the project (a
reduction from 62 units to 56 units, which reduces
the density from 4 units to 3.6 units per acre) and
b. subdividing the landscape buffer tracts (Tracts A
and E) located along N. Swinton Avenue and S.
Seacrest Boulevard and the two scrub preserves/tree
preservation areas to combine this land area with
each individual abutting lot. The preservation
areas will be fenced to avoid encroachment by the
homeowner on whose lot the portion of the
preservation area is located and will be deed
restricted, encumbered by a preservation easement
and enforced by the association documents (more
discussion regarding the impact of this change is
provided under 4 below).
2. As a direct result of reduction in lots, allowing spreading
out of units along tD~ north and south PUD perimeter, the
minimum lot frontage (width) increased from 63.75 feet to 65
feet and the minimum lot frontage for irregular-shaped lots
increased from 20 feet to 40 feet. This addressed one of
staff's original comments.
~
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
January 11, 1996
3. The minimum front setback has been reduced from '22.5 feet to
21 feet. This addressed one of staff's original
recommendation. to .hift this 1.5 foot difference to the rear
of the lot to allow slightly more rear separation from the
surrounding properties and the preservation area. As a point
of comparison, the front setback approved for Isles of Hunters
Run was 15 feet.
4. As a direct result of incorporation of the preservation areas
and buffer areas into the lot areas, the lot depth has
increased "on paper" significantly; some by as much as 32.5
feet - half the width of the widest preserve area. In all
honesty, this is a false sense of increased lot size, since
after construction, the previous master plan will yield the
same "true" lot size when viewed in the field,
The Planning and Zoning Department believes there are four
additional problems with the treatment of the preservation
areas as easements, rather than tracts.
a. Since any type of use of the preservation area is
prohibited, other than preservation and
maintenance, this characteristic does not meet the
standard definition of an easement, which is, an
interest in land granted for limited use purpose,
but which does not convey title to real property.
In other words, an easement on your property means
you still own the property which the easement
encumbers, but the easement gives rights to the
grantee (another individual or entity) to use the
easement area for a specific, limited purpose.
b. Only the project's homeowners having such a
preservation easement on their lot would have to
pay for the taxes on the land, rather than having
it spread out among all the project's homeowners.
There is a counter-argument to this point and that
is that abutting the preserve does have distance
separation benefits which are only enjoyed by those
homeowners abutting the preserve.
c. Very recently the Building Division had to respond
to a disgruntled citizen who had a utility easement
on his lot and had his concerns published in the
newspaper as to why he believed he had the right to
use all the land on his lot. This is a typical
problem that city staff runs into and if the idea
of limited use of part of your lot is difficult to
accept, then it is anticipated that total
prohibition of part of your lot will pose even
greater problems.
d. Taking the preservation area out of individual
homeo~ner ownership adds somewhat more assurance
that this type of scarce, non-renewable natural
resource will exist in perpetuity with the
generally understood notion that you don't touch
what's not yours.
5. In response to a previous staff comment, the master plan
includes the minimum and maximum floor area to be maintained
on all lots as defined by the LUI calculations. Staff
originally requested a maximum floor area of 4,327 square
feet. The maximum floor area requested is 4,791 square feet
which is slightly higher and attributable to the "real"
increase in some of the lot sizes and the reduction in number
of lots.
4
~~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-088
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden -r;;~
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
February 14, 1996
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City CQmmi..ion at the
February 20, 1996 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (3)
current development projects:
Rezoning - Hills ~ Lake
REZN 95-002
sets of plans for the following
Eden PUD
New Site Plan
- Tara Oaks PUD
NWSP 95-011
- The Kilpatrick Company
NWSP 95-013
Note:
Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and
Zoning Department following the meeting.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
TJH:bme
Attachments
a:transmtl.FEB/P&D
TO: Carrie Parker
-3-
January 11. 1996
6. The distance between the buildable area of the lots abutting
Seacrest Boulevard and the right-of-way line of Seacrest
Boulevard has decreased from 42.5 feet to 29 feet. This
means that from Seacrest Boulevard, structures will be closer
to road. There will, however, continue to be an intervening,
though narrower, landscape buffer.
7. The last change is increases in the minimum rear building
setbacks and the minimum rear setbacks for pools and screened
enclosures.
Rear building setback:
7.5' to 36.5' - abutting 55' wide preserve (27.5' of the
- setback is the preserve easement)
7.5' to 41.5' - abutting 65' wide preserve (32.5' of the
setback is the preserve easement)
7.5' to 29' - abutting landscape buffer (20' of the setback is
the buffer width)
7.5' to 10' - abutting the north and south PUD perimeter
Rear pool/screened enclosure setback:
7.5' to 10' - abutting the north and south PUD perimeter
3.5' to 5' abutting the preserve or the buffers along
Swinton Avenue or Seacrest Boulevard
The original staff report (Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 95-648) is attached and has not been changed since
the above listed revisions have almost no bearing on the rezoning
analyses and data within this report. Please note that the
neighborhood parks levels of service discussion at the very bottom
of page 8 of the original staff report can be ignored, since in
1990 the Commission froze these levels of service at those levels
that existed in 1987 due to shortage of dollars.
The original staff report also referenced pending responses from
the Palm Beach County School Board, regarding school capacity in
this vicinity, the City of Delray Beach regarding the reference in
their own comprehensive plan regarding coordinating with Boynton
Beach the westward extension of S. E. 36th Avenue and the city
attorney regarding whether the requirement for unified control
documents 'was satisfied by the applicant. Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 95-648 Exhibit G contains a letter from
the School Board indicating that two of the three schools which
will serve the residents of this proj ect are over capacity.
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum 95-648 Exhibit H contains
a letter from the City of Delray Beach indicating that because the
impact of not extending S.E. 36th Avenue was not addressed in the
applicant's traffic study, Delray Beach will need to conduct their
own analysis which will not be completed prior to the January 16,
1996 City Commission meeting. On this note, the applicant had
indicated verbally that they would, in response to staff's original
comment, convert the grassed emergency entrance to a one way only
exit for residents; this revision is no longer proposed by the
applicant.
Due to several inquiries the department has received regarding the
preservation areas, to which staff could not provide adequate
responses, as previously discussed with you, Exhibit I of Planning
and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-648 contains the letter
recently sent to the applicant asking for responses to several
environmental issues. No response has yet been received, however
due to the date these inquiries were received, it is anticipated
that a response will be received prior to the Commission meeting.
~
TO: Carrie Parker
-4 -
January 11, 1996
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this request for rezoning to
Planned Unit Development be approved, subject to the revised staff
comments in Exhibit J of Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum
No. 95-648. Lastly, please note that during their closing remarks
at the January 9, 1996 Planning and Development Board meeting, the
Board inquired as to why the revised plan was not scheduled for re-
review by the Board, prior to the upcoming City Commission meeting.
During my and the city attorney's meeting with the applicant on
December 28, 1995 to discuss their revisions, the schedule
established at that time did not include additional Board review.
Furthermore, re-review by the Board would not have been able to
occur until the February Planning and Development Board meeting,
since the TRC meeting did not take place until the day of the
January Planning and Development Board meeting. There is no
procedure set forth in the code to address this circumstance,
however that does not preclude the Commission from remanding this
request to the Planning and Development Board, prior to Commission
final action.
tjh
Attachments
A:LEdenCom.Not
xc: Central File
"-
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-648
j
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
Tambri J. H.Yden,~~
Planning and Zoning Director
THRU.
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
DATE:
November 9, 1995
SUBJECT:
The Rills at Lake Eden (REZN 95-002)
Request to Rezone to Planned Unit Development
INTRODUCTION
Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying Inc. agent for Newport Properties,
Inc" property owner, is proposing to change the zoning on 15.45 acres
of property located on the west side of the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard (see attached location map in
Exhibit "A"), from R-1-AAB (Single Family Residential) to Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w!LUI=5). The
proposed Hills at Lake Eden PUD provides for the construction of 62
single family detached homes with a gross density of 4,0 units per
acre (see attached copy of reduced master plan in Exhibit "B"). The
future land use classification will remain as Low Density Residential,
and continue to limit the area to a maximum gross density of 4.84
units per acre.
PROCEDURE
Pursuant to the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9
(Administration and Enforcement), when a rezoning request does not
require an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, staff analysis is not
required to include an evaluation of the project using the eight (8)
criteria under Section 9(C) (7). Since this request is only for
rezoning, the above-described analysis is not required. The analysis
conained herein evaluates the performance of the proposed master plan
and include selected portions of the above-described criteria which
pertain to impact upon municipal services, and consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and adjacent neighborhoods.
ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING
The land uses and zoning in the surrounding area varies and are
presented in the table that follows:
Direction
Zoninq
Land Use
North
R-2
St, Jo..ph'. ChurCh/School
Seacrest Boulevard
East
n/a
Farther east
R-I-A
Single family homes
Southeast (Delray Beach)
R-l-AA
Vacant
Southwest (Delray Beach)
R-l-AA
n/a
Lakeview Bapti.t Church
W..t
N. Swinton Avenue
Farther West
R-l-AAB
Single family homes
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (see proposed master plan -.Attachment "B")
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from R-1-AAB
(Single-Family Residential) to Planned Unit Development with a Land
Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w!LUI=5). As defined within Chapter 2.5-
Planned Unit Developments of the Land Development Regulations, a
"planned unit development:
'1
The Hills at Lake Eden
-2-
November 9, 1995
Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole
in a single development operation or an approved programmed
series of development operations for dwelling units and related
uses and facilities;
Includes principal and accessory uses and structures
substantially related to the character of the development itself
and the surrounding area of which it is a part;
Is developed aooording to oomprehensive and detailed plans which
include streets, utilities, lots, building sites and' the like and
site plans, floor plans and elevations for all buildings except
for single family homes intended to be located, constructed,
used, and related to one another, and detailed plans for other
uses and improvements on the land related to the buildings;
Includes a program for full provision, maintenance, and operation
of such areas, improvements, facilities, and unit development,
but will not be provided, operated, or maintained at public
expense."
Due to intended differences between PUD developments resulting from
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical design tailored to the
specific site, submittal of a site development master plan is required
at the time of request for zoning to PUD. This master plan is
attached to the zoning of the land and sets forth specific guidelines
for future development of the parcel.
The proposed use of the PUD is detached single-family dwellings. The
dwelling units are to be located on 62 platted lots, fronting on a
private roadway of which access is to be limited to N. Swinton Avenue.
The site contains common property which includes two preservation
tracts. The uses proposed for the site, and the acreage and percent
devoted to each, are as follows:
Single-family lots: 467,874.32 10.74 acres
(square feet)
69.52%
Common property
including
preservation area:
96,731.33 2,22 acres
(square feet)
14.37%
Private
right-of-way:
108,396.35 2.48 acres
(square feet)
673,002.00 15.44 acres
(square feet)
The 15.4-acre site with 62 single-family units yields a gross density
of 4,01 units per acre. The following building and site regulations
proposed for the projeot are as follows:
16.11%
Total
100.00%
Minimum lot area:
6,727.50 square feet
Minimum lot frontage:
not all specified on plan
47 lots at 63.75 feet
15 irregular-shaped lots at 30 feet
Minimum lot width:
63,75 feet
Minimum building setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
22.5 feet
7,5 feet (both sides)
12,5 feet
7.5 feet
~
The Hills at Lake Eden
-5-
November 9, 1995
Policy 1.17.8: "Maintain and improve the character of existing
single-family and lower-density neighborhoods, by preventing
conversions to higher densities."
(For an analysis of the applicability of Policy 1.17.8, see the
examination below under CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND
USE PATTERN.)
Objective 1.15: "Encourage planned development projects which
are sensitive to characteristics of the site and to surrounding
land uses, and..."
Policy 1.16.2: "Subsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to allow planned unit developments up to
the maximum density shown on the Future Land Use Plan, if all
other Comprehensive Plan policies and development regulations are
complied with, and the proposed PUD is compatible with
surrounding land uses. II
See analysis below under CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND
USE PATTERN-Gross Density for application of Objective 1.15 and Policy
1,16.2.
Policy 1.11,14: IISubsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to provide for open space preservation by
requiring the preservation of 25% of all "All, liB", and IIC" rated
sites of 10 or more acres, as designated in the Conservation
Element Support Document.. ,.11
Objective 4.4: liThe City shall, to the maximum extent feasible,
protect all remaining areas of substantial native upland and
wetland vegetation...1I
Policy 4.3.3: liThe City shall establish a Density Bonus program
or other incentives in the City Plan and/or appropriate support
regulations to preserve natural areas; ...11
Policy 4.4.1: II,. .the City shall require subsequent to Plan
adoption, a detailed flora and fauna survey on any IIBII and IICII
rated site subject to a development proposal and any site greater
than 10 acres in size, Based on survey results, micro-preserves
may be required oriented to preservation of a minimum of 25% of
all native plant communities which occur on-site. Habitat shall
be preserved with intact canopy, understory and ground cover. II
For purposes of identification and preservation, all native habitat,
or Florida Scrub areas within the County have been rated on a relative
scale from II All (highest quality or of most importance to biological
corridors) to IIDII (lowest quality or not representative of ideal scrub
habitat). Florida Scrub is a desert-like native ecosystem dominated
by sand pine, several species of oaks, saw palmetto, other shrubs, and
provides habitat and food for recognized fauna such as the Gopher
Tortoise, Florida Scrub Jay and Eastern Indigo snake. The
Comprehensive Plan Conservation Support Document includes a map and
list of these natural areas which have also been adopted into the
Conservation Element (see attached Table #2 and map in Exhibit IICII).
As indicated on Table #2 of the Conservation Support Document, the
subject property is a "CII rated site, and as required pursuant to
Policies 1.11.14 and 4.4.1, a minimum of 25% of the property occupied
by the environmentally sensitive ecosystem (as defined by a current
flora and fauna survey) must be preserved. The preserve for this
project is proposed as two similarly sized IImicro-preservesll which
total 1.28 acres. This total, represents 32% of the total scrub
habitat which is indicated as being 4.2 acres in the applicant's
environmental assessment (flora and fauna survey). The only
"observed" animal specie on the site is the Gopher Tortoise, and all
tort~oses have already been properly relocated through the required
perm1tting process of the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission.
Although the character of the natural area present on this site The
IJ
The Hills at Lake Eden
-6-
November 9, 1995
warrants only a "C" designation, and consists of only a total of 4,2
acres, the Comprehensive Plan still requires that a minimum of 25% of
such "e" rated ecosystems be preserved. The location of the two (2)
areas proposed to be preserved by the applicant, which are consistent
with the recommendation within the environmental assessment, are along
the higher elevations of the site, atop the site's two natural ridges.
Surrounding the preserve tracts are proposed residential lots near the
center of the project. Within these upland areas of the site are the
least disturbed habitat exhibiting features of the greatest quality
relative to the entire site. Furthermore, the higher elevations
naturally provide sun exposure and hydrologic conditions apparently
necessary for the continued existence and growth of typical Florida
scrub. With respect to staff review of these preserves, the City's
environmentalist/forester concurs with the location and size of the
proposed preservation tracts (see Recreation and Parks Department
Memorandum #95-517 within Attachment "D") ,
Lastly, the level of natural degradation of the Florida scrub could be
further increased as a result of impacts from development activities
and abuse by owners of adjacent properties unless properly managed,
including permanent preservation without encroachment of any
buildings, proper site design relative to drainage which is reflective
of the preserve areas and their sensitive characteristics, the regular
removal of exotic plant species, and by preventing the dumping of
garbage, trash or vegetative matter into the preserve. If such
preserves are not kept free of exotic and invasive plant and tree
species, as well as other of debris, this non-renewable native
ecosystem will continue to degrade. These practices and other
appropriate mechanisms to protect the preserve should be established
within the project's tree management plan, documented and demonstrated
within subsequent construction drawings, and ultimately incorporated
into the project's maintenance rules and regulations. Such a tree
management plan was submitted at the time of finalizing this report
and is pending review by the city's environmentalist/urban forester.
Objective 2.2: "The City shall implement the future Traffic
Circulation Plan on a priority basis and shall coordinate same
with the City's Future Land Use Plan."
Policy 2.2.9: "The City shall cooperate with Delray Beach and
support efforts to extend S. 36th Avenue (Gulfstream Boulevard)
between Swinton Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard."
The Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element and Support
Document recommend the extension of S. 36th Avenue from Seacrest
Boulevard to N. Swinton Avenue, and specifically recommends
coordination between the City and the City of Delray Beach as
necessary to support this project. However, the proposed master plan
proposes the development of that area over which this road would be
extended. Although the logical reason for this road extension is the
connection of two (2) county collector roads (Seacrest Boulevard and
N, Swinton Avenue) and the extension of a city collector which
provides direct access to U,S. 1, the support document contains no
narrative which specifically explains or justifies this
recommendation. The City of Delray Beach was notified of this issue;
however, staff had not received comments prior to completing this
report. It should be noted that if the City approves the proposed
master, staff snould be directed to process a comprehensive plan
amendment to remove this recommended improvement from the Traffic
Circulation Element.
B) CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND USE PATTERN
As indicated above, land uses that abut the proposed project include
the St. Joseph's Church and School (north), Seacrest Boulevard (east)
v~ca~t residentially-zoned property and the Lakeview Baptist Church '
w1th1n the City of Delray Beach (south), and Swinton Road (west). The
only two built residential areas immediately adjacent to the project
are to the east and west, and consist of single family detached homes
w~thi~ the R-l-AAB zoning district (west) and the R-l-AA zoning
d1str1ct (east), A comparison of the principle development
The Hills at Lake Eden
-9-
November 9, 1995
walking distance LOS) and tiered, With respect to being tiered, the
LOS for those planning areas with original LOS less than the targeted
standards (2,5 acres per 1,000 persons and 1/2 mile walking distance)
improves with time (planning periods) as planned parks are built. The
subject property is within Neighborhood Park Planning Area #17, which
had original (1987) standards of 1.2 acres per 1,000 persons and 1
mile walking distance, as indicated on Table 2 of the Recreation &
Open Space Support Document (see Table #2 in Exhibit "E"). To improve
this acreage deficiency within Area #17, with the goal of eventually
attaining the target acreage LOS of 2.5, the City had assumed
development of the Girl Scout Park by the 1995 planning period. As
this neighborhood park has not been constructed, the LOS adopted for
the 1995 planning period is not acheived. The City'S Comprehensive
Plan precludes the approval of any development if concurrency is
jeaporidized. As a consequence of this deficiency, if new development
within this area is to be approved, the City must take immediate
actions that either increase the surplus of neighborhood park
resources or lower the adopted level of service, Alternative actions
to increase the supply of parks within this park planning area
include: 1) commit to initiating the construction of Girl Scout Park
prior to issuing development permits for the subject project; or 2)
successfully implement Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.7.1 which intends
to provide a park alternative within Planning Area #17. Policy 5.7.1
reads as follows:
"By 1992, the City shall negotiate with St, Joseph's School in an
attempt to formulate, at a minimum, a policy regarding the
temporary use of the School's recreation facilities by adjacent
residents" .
r----
It should be noted that the need for future neighborhood park
resources within this planning area also continues to rise, and
specifically as a result of the inability to receive the anticipated
park dedication from the development of the Seacrest Scrub natural
area (which was instead acquired through a joint City/County effort) .
Although development of the Girl Scout Park would provide park space
sufficient to meet LOS until the Year 2000, it is now projected that
the LOS to take effect in the Year 2000 will be further unattainable
as a result of the public acquisistion of the Seacrest Scrub property.
A third alternative to this deficiency, unrelated to park supply, is
the lowering of adopted standards. The adopted levels of service
could be changed through the comprehensive plan amendment process, and
if so directed, staff would recommend the LOS be revised to reflect
both the current construction plan for the Girl Scout Park project,
and the loss of the planned dedicated, S. Seacrest Boulevard site from
the data and analysis within the Recreation and Open Space Support
Document. This alternative to amend the levels of service standards
through the resceduling of the Girl Scout Park project is the
recommended alternative of the Recreation and Parks Director (see
Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum #95-521 in Exhibit "0") ,.
Lastly, it should be noted that the analysis of neighborhood parks
within the Comprehsive Plan excludes tho~e developments which contain
private recreation amenities generally equivalent to a neighborhood
park. Therefore, if private recreation facilities were provided
within the subject project, the future residents would be directly
supplied with recreation resources, and this project could be
certified for concurrency for neighborhood parks.
Roadway Capacity Analysis: As indicated in the section above titled
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant
was reviewed by Palm Beach County who determined that the project
would meet the requirements of the Palm Beach Countywide Traffic
Perfomance Standards Ordinance. The County does not comment on local
design issues such as the circulation plan proposed in the master plan
which limits ingress/egress to N. Swinton Avenue.
111
The Hills at Lake Eden
-10-
November 9, 1995
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant has satisfied a unique requirement on the development of
this property by preserving slightly over the minimum percentage of
native habitat existing on-site, Also, although the lot sizes
proposed are smaller than both that required by the current zoning
district and existing within adjacent residential areas, the lots are
larger than lot sizes approved within several projects approved within
the newlr aevevoping areas of the Citro By allowing this aesign the
Citr i. n effect providing an incent ve for the preservation of
nat ve scrub habitat which action furthers Comprehensive Plan Policy
4.3.3 while the project, as claimed by staff within this report, is
also consistent with Objective 1.15.
Pursuant to Section 10.9.2, Chapter 2.S-Planned Unit Developments of
the Land Development Regulations, the Planning and Development Board
shall determine (and advise the City Commission) whether that plans,
maps and documents subbmitted meet the requirements for LUI standards,
unified control, locational and POD standards and establish that:
a) The tract for the proposed PUD is suitable in terms of its
relationships to the city comprehensive plan and that the
area surrounding the proposed PUD can continue to be
developed in coordination and substantial compatibility with
the PUD proposed, including overall dwelling unit density
and peripheral transactions iri such density;
b) That the desirable modifications of general zoning POD
regulations as applied to the particular case, justify such
modification of regulations and meet to at least an
equivalent degree the regulations modified, based on the
design and amenities incorporated in the site development
plan; and
c) That increased open space is provided for the occupants of
the proposed PUD and the general public, and desirable
natural features indigenous to the site are preserved in the
development plan presented.
The LUI and unified control documentation have been submitted with the
application materials. The city attorney's acceptance of the unified
control documentation is forthcoming. The remaining requirements as
outlined above have been met or will be satisfied if this project is
approved subject to those outstanding comments included within
Attachment "D", and if the City appropriately address the deficiency
in neighborhood parks using one of the alternatives described by
staff, or an alternative action which is also consistent with city
concurreny regulations.
Based on the analysis and discussions contained herein, this request
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development
Regulations (subject to staff comments), and compatible with current
and future uses of surrounding properties and would not create an
isolated district unrelated to adjacent or nearby properties.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Hills at Lake Eden POD
rezoning request, subject to staff comments within Exhibit "D".
TJH:mr
Attachments
xc: Central File
MISCX:LEDEN.REP
1!-
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
, - ~ ~ - -' ,/7 'I , 'f '-1- ',' 'r' - , -T - _ ' I' . , ._ ." ,
LOLATION MAP
HILLS OF LAKE EDEN
ION
- .5 :EZONI
/9
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
In
conUllued ... Table 2. Llstlna or Boynton Beach Nalural Resource Sites
Site oeo~ Area in Swnmary
, Location Acres Evaluatioa AnnaWioa
lP- 41 45 2{) 2 l4.4 . Ronda Scntt. pIP"" 4i_ltMd p~ of CouAly ,i.. "5co.-
. -
43-46-05-3 ] 1 80)lRI8A 711I St s.w... IiRdaRae,.1I IIII;i. wtaI 'J..
20 21.8 C Narrow bind: apparendy mostly Bruiliaa Pepper.
21 42-46-01.1 60.2 X Development ia propeu. County sile '"Eco-85 Hunter's
Run Oolr.
22 4'''''.0&01 44-' X Cle.and. 1<<.... la BUD'" Run development .
23 43-46-04 7.. C ClearecI and lbudaaecl Florida Scrub; I rew oakl and
herbaceous planll naWn. Soudl 01 County sile "Bco.29
Seacrest Scrub.,
24 43-46-04-4 8.1 C Pine F1atwoods ecotane with Florida Scrub, previously
cleared smps, beavtIJ re.powa wida vines. Near County
slle '"Eco 29 W SeacRSt Scrub.. Endanlaed spedes aolal I.
2$- 43-46-04.3 SO.4 A Rorida Scrub and ecolOne wilb PIne Flatwoods. County
slle ''Eco 29 SeacJesI Scrub.. Endanlered species toCIIl2.
26 43-46-04-2 11.0 C Mangrove about 2 KIa: 8 acreI pusy rudenI; more Ihan
112 developed.
27- 43-45-)4 4..5 B Beach and SInDd (0CC8I face of dune) willi expected species;
dune baet is Jaodscaped, rates ..D.. Preservatioa of Ibe
Beach and SIrInd ccosys&eml iD their nadve sw.e u fll U
this remain. is recommended. u it is the only such siLe in
&he Cit)'. Sa OIlS .... sea pape lie procecleCt by sWO law.
Endanlerecl species ... I,
28- 43-45.33.3 2.9 A Mangrove wida ,boat 1 acre disturbed. (Aerials overlap:
site appears oa secdmI 33 IDd 34.) MaDpove procecdon
llw.
29- 43-45-33.2 6.0 A Manpove havia, wes&a1I border qf dlswrbed Swamp wllh
intermixed omameaw exotics. (Aerials overlap; sile
appears oa section 33 IDCl 34.) Manpove procection law.
30- 43-45-22-] 23..5 A. Manpoye: site proposecI for CARL acquisition Manifoye
proteCtion law. .
31 43-45-15 5.8 D Mature pl.adn, 01 tropical ornamental.. Former
horticultural prdea eta deve10pinenL
31 43-45." 4.3 C Disturbed Florida Scrub. cleared pISSJ ruderaJ west of
FedenJ Hwy; cleared east of hipwlY.
31 43-45-15-4 10.0 X Cleaml. Approved for Bood Open Spa purchase.
34 Not ill Cicy; witbdran from inveaaary.
35 43-45.16-1 11.0 B Cleared and partially releneradn, Florida Scrub. Count)'
site "Eco-35 Bo)'1l" 20 Ave.l St.. IWed "BOO due to
endanlered species. OIbawlse much disturbed. Enclanlered
species total 1.
36- 43-45.]],1 12.2 B Disturbed Ronda Scrab. Count)' site'1!co-29 N Boynton
Wara Tower". Endan&ered species lisu .1 species.
37- 43-45-09-4 12..5 A. Rorida Scrub. COUDlJ site "Eco-36 c Rosemary Scrub".
43-45-09 Endangered species IDaI 8.
38 12.4 0 Abandoned maDlO grove and diswrbed Florida Scrub.
39 43-45-22 3.1 0 Abandoned mango JIO'"'.
40 43-45-22 4,3 B Area of secondary growth of black and white mangroves
due to tidal floodinl and deposition. BoundecI or trayersed
by roadways, Uu1e apparent tidal flushinl-
Sowce: Walter H. Keller Jr,. Inc.
-24-
1]
Table 2. Listing or Boynton Beach Nllanl Resource Sites
She oeopaphic Area in Swnmary
" Locadon Acre. !vaJuauon ~doa
1 43-4,-oa.l 88.6 B Pine Flatwoods .. disturbed PF; pond wilb emer,lnt
ve,ltation. East of HIp Rid,. COWlcry Club. Lift Station
1717 is located hem.
2 .. 3.of 5 -08. 2 29,1 X Restdendal c1evelopmeDlIn propeu.
3 43.45-01.1 52.4 X Cleared.
4.8.- 43-4'.11.1 141.8 A Florida Scrub. CO.1f Sire "&0-81 QuanbUD NE Scrub".
West of IUgbridgo Id.; Pan 01 the sire is in the Quanblm
Part DRJ deYe1~t. Poniaas la Boyntoa Beacb and
Count)'.
4.b. 43-4'.16-3 A Disturbed Floridl Scrub corridor. Couat)' site "Eco-36'
Quantum RA.'" Jau&o".
4,c. 43-45..20.2 A1 Rescricte4 ICe.... Soutb ponton of Quantum DRI
development.
~. "''''5-..2 40.1 A Flortda Scrub. eOU8l)' she "!c0-36 Quantum Hllh Risk".
Part of Quantum PlItt development bocb east UId west of
Hlpridp Rei.: I'OId clearing aad development In progress.
Composite of ~ siteS tow 9 listed endanlered
species.
6- 43-4'.16-5 19.0 A Florida Scrub wilb diaurbecI border. COWley sire '"Eco- 34. '
Rollin. Oreca ScrU-. Eadanlered speciea total 8.
,. 43-4'.21-1 9,6 A Floridl Scrub. CoaalJ site MEco.32. Glluy Scrub".
Endangered species ... 9.
8 43-45-20.1 11.2 B Florida Scrub sire willi scrub oats of shrub and smaU b'ee
size disturbed b7 tniII and disblrbecl borden alan. RR and
(.9' ri.bts-of-wa,. COUDly lite Ml!co_32 Industrial
Scrub".
9 43-4'.20-4 6.2 D Dense SWIcI of MelaJeaea (M,'tJleuclI quillq"'lIulIitl).
Australian pine (CtUIIGriIUJ 'fulsfll/olitl). and Brazilian
pepper (ScAlII" rcrebilltltJfoll..J. IIId area of grassy and
ruderaI species.
10 43-45-30.1 21.6 D A mb of Melaleuca IDd ocher exOlics.
11 43-4'.20.' 11.1 D ~~.~oo*~w~w~~~~
12- 43-4'.29.1.&$.33a2 A 3 parcels, Disturbed ~. Flatwoods. Florida Scrub, and
opeIIlJ'ISS1 with rudenI species. Corridor. wesaem border
of (. 9', Eco-31 BoJaIOll 711I St Scrub rtpt 01 way. Su
lext narndv8 for addido... 'nfonnatioq,
13- 43-4'.32.1. .2.4U1tII A South of Woolbrilk Roael. ~ne Flltwoods and open
grassy: disturbed bJ pevious clartn. II II'OlDId level II1d
miry of ruderaI species. COlDley site "Eco-1O N 195-RR 23
Rd Corridor". No oa-sir.e visiL Endangeted species total 1.
14- 43-4'-32-3 24.1 A A continuation 01 lira 113. CouDIy site '"Eco-1O S 195-RR
23 Rd Corridor". No oa-sire visit.
15- 43-46-0'.1 1.0 B Small disturbed Pme Flatwoods ecotone wilb Florida
Scrub. CaJoosa Part.. Cireel Cor preservation due to location
within a public park.
16 43-45.31-1 22.4 C Disturbed Pine Flatwoocls with exotic weeds. Seen only
from Congress Ave.
17 43-45-31.2 11.6 X Already Developed.
18 43-4'.30.2 17.4 X Already Developed.
continued ...
.23-
,,~
--.. IJ....~ v
.~~ 0 .~ rJ/~.. ~) .~~A~~ ~~
, r'l' ~ 1 d./~ i-a Il1J
~1' /-:lff' - j~.-fl I i' Jlla ~
:-.:>J.. ~/,' ~' I
r' ri Lrr./fJ ~\ j!~' (~, , I
v\... ~ ~ I ..J II I..l
'@ ~ Jm~ ,.:;0; , -11
r- \D, /gp >. . · ) .J I=1T
. T .J :-;, ~ I -L.. 1" J~ ~
IA lV-tl. tf'l, i!t I
i' L' _ ~I" I ~ I
~r- llr~c "~fl-~ ~1I lill ~ :,,3~
1.11. . III !\ II _ I ~
--- -_....J _______ .......... ~.." ~
o ----, rr= -.- -':'1 r ~=::.-'- =--.- -.
~; \:1" - I~ ~j
I I UII... - 7'" _gil' --_~
U · n I..;::~ 11-' r
~,- ~I ~ -: '- 1- !
~ I I~
I ~ Ie J Ir ( '~ .": -1, L'
~ -.J IL.........: Jd ; ~ -l
,\"iJI "'~L U ' I '",
! II ~ u..l - I .
.... ~"............. - II I
=.~::=:" ~ r ..:.. UfM)' I~ L_
W_N.WaIIr...-. .!' ~ ,\, p._ ._....
=-===:o- S'~-lJJ I'""'Y .,r- ~'. to ~ &
IGrt: sur.... lII1'SlIlII /If un- ~ ~3~ ::5l ~ \ . ~
IlnGIIIIIl'IIIII ~ :.-~~ - ---.- ~..- 13 ._1- III: I&- t
-- ~.r .r- ~-.
-' t J' J...I~ . ,":.z.' ~2~e 9
I\" :)"] ~ '.:::::,)( ';:=~.
. Q \ ll.IIPlf/. IFIll -
~,j · r- C~I
Gi) :r~~ t....-t/L IT h. ~ 1fT! I i \
II ~G((j ~~. r~= ~--- ~i11 '- 2'
J, _~..__ _' II 1 -..-.. l' II -= J=:1' ,DI8
f& 'd~' ~ ,- t tJ ~r--r-1
..,. ~ ~ [ · ro J!I H I
,~ n- J~ m n. 15 w=
.'~ Q U \ ~~'I~ 20 ~ go
, ~ If - I ~.-.
. ~ ~ ~2~~~.' . .,~;, ~~r
l. ~ I <:\ lE& I
, \J 0 0 .\ tfl . ~
"L I I: ..... l) <..:J :::::s
,,-9.__-11.._ .______
CITY fF BOYNTfJi BEACH
LtltMa
E!J - IlAfUIW. IlIIC:1URC1 AMAa
. - "'ftlIUllll~
llIn"INCI NUWI..
.- '..MTIDIITU
IN 'UIUC CMNI....
~.
~
23
~_..-J"
-.-
-2S-
UL T8' H. 1CElJ.B'.II..
""-"14 h~-- , '1-
"", JrJltlll "":..
,I./.
ATTACHMENT "E"
EXCERPT FROM RECREATION & OPEN
SPACE ELEMENT:
TABLE 2 - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
NEEDS ANALYSIS (REVISED)
44
.1
t2
0
...
.
.
...
...
...
:s
:0
~
..
...
...
...
...
...
i . j ...
...
I f s
...
! ..
I
j ..
...
i .
i
...
.
...
..
..
...
...
':':1
. ..
-..
A.
,HI
1
...
..
,:
... ... ... ... ~ ... 1ft
, .. ... ..
... .. :0 S j .. :
.. .. ... ..
... .. .. ... .. ...
. 8 0 8 .. 8 8 '" ... 8 8 .. t:
, , I . !: N .. ..
ci ci ci 0 0 ... 0 .; .; ..
... - - ... -
... ~~. SIlO '" 1"" ~ ... ~ 'P! ~ . ... .~~ ~
... ... .
"'.... o. "'"S .. ... .....! .. N .ftN!! ..
...
:: - - .. -
! 8 8 8 ... 8 8 8 0 ~ ~ ~ ... ~ 0 ~
iI .. , ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 .- , f
... .. ... ... .. ...
I - -
51 J! 0 ~ ~ ! S ~ ... l!18 1 ! S~I I
... ...
... .; ..: .. .. " ... .tN'; .; . . , . ~
... .. .. ... ... ... ....'"
... - ... ...
-
:! 8 8 8 I 8 8 8 E 8 8 ~ E 8 8 8
.. G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci .
0
- -
. 0 ~ '" .. 0 ~ .. , S 511= i S 511= I
... ... ... .. ... ...
, .. 0 :; .. ci ... .. "00 ,;. ..cio .;
... .. .. .. ...
- -
... S ~ 5 I I 8 8 I 8 8 I I I I I
, .; 0 . . .; . . . . . ~
...
... - - - - -
.. ~pp~ ... .. ~ IS ... ... lIS 1= ... I ~~ 1=
... ... .. ... f N
... 0 =- .... 0 ~ ...... 00 ... :: 0. J
.. .. ..... : .. ... '"
... .. - .. '- - - -
... ~ ~ ... ~ 8 8 ... ~ 8 8 lit ~ 8 8 ...
iI .. .. ... ...
0 = ci . . ... . . .,; .. c' .; .,; ~
... ...
...
- -
~ 0 ~ ... :: ~ '! ... ... '1= 1 :: , ~I! 1
... '! '! .
s ! .. ... . . , . ... =' . I
... ... . ... ... .. :: ...... . . ... ...
.. -
. , c ~ ... 8 8 ~ ;: 8 8 ~
I , . . I ~
ci .,; .. . 0 !
... .. ... ...
. ~ c ~ . 8 ~ 0 8 S! ~
, , , . . ,
. ... ci ... ...
~ I
... ~ 8 ! '~ 8 ~ i 8 ~ 1 I 8 ~ I
:: ~
... .- 0 ... wi ... . wi .. 0
...
- - -
S ~ ~ I ~ ~ 5!5! ~ = ~ I~ I 0 ~ ~~ I
...
... ci . . ~ .... 0 III 0 ~
... 0.... ...
.. .. .. ...
= ~ ~ 8 I ~ 8 8 , 8 8 8 , 8 8 8 .
...
0 ci .; 0 ci ci 0 0 0 0
c ~ , , a ~ 8 III ... 8 8 lit ... 8 8 '" I
'! ." ": ." '!
0 ... ci 0 ... 0 0 oft
... .. ...
... - - ...
.. ~ 15 ~ ~ '18 ~ . , I' I . 'I' I .
~ ... ...
... ~ ....... .. .... 0 .. ..... 0 =
... .. ... - ... .. ...
.. - - ..
~ 8 I . 0 ~ .. 8 ~ ... ." 8 ~ ..
, . St ... 51 ...
0 0 ... wi ... 0 ... wi ... 0 t:
...
0 8 ; ~ 8 8 .. 8 8 8 i 8 8 8
, I 51
ci 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 II
- .., - N
.. 8 ~ 8 ~ 81a '" ~ ~ 5!~ I ! ~ ~~ I
:!! ..
ci 0 i .... ci ... :l ...: 0 .. ;1 ci
-
.E Jj .E )j E )j .E Jj ..
. !I . II . j .. . I' ~J
OJ I i j! II .. II OJ U
. . j =
.. . Ii Ii .. . ~ I Ii Ii
to: Ie , J: '; I
...11 t IIi ! !I ! !!
! ~ if ill ! !! ..
ill .~.;
ii gl ... il !II !Ii i! gl gl !Ii ~l:
! oX gi !I:I i:
.. I ... ':..~
r
i
..
9
4~
.
3
.::
."
,
:;
i
.
i
..
::
.
I
1
il
II
t:!
IJ
!t
..:.=:
;s~
)11
trie
~lsl
...1.1
Ii:!
!tgi
li!J
jssi
i-I
iJ..)J
""1113
iij g
..... ..
~ t" I a
1I .. j-; .
. ~: -J!
~..... ...
i~~!i
8:S.~ 1
.. u.
~lt.J
!f~.I.
&0 .~:!
3.!''; .. j
WS--u
liI:"':-
..-.c
&....-:]
l~j~!
I!; j i
-~,~.,
"'lC .. if
~!~..I
';:JIX~
... 0 .~..
0"0 .
.. ..
~!::.
I." \t c..
t:;":2
-ua...
=~... ~~
. ....a
"CI....._
I =;.:: I
::J l! .. .I
u~s
P:!i~
..~ =-
~ O'l"'~
., ~-e! =
:.g J ! ..
.... :: '5... ';
h'p.
at:.!!
I I . I .
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-533
TO: Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
-<:,.' ~ 11-
Kevin J. Hallahan. Forester/Environmentalist CJ rr-
RE:
HlUs of Lake Eden
Staff Dlleu.lon of Environmental Report. Submitted by Applleant
November 16, 1995
DATE:
HISTORY OF PROJECT:
The project is comprised of two contiguous land parcels both listed in the Pabn Beach County
inventory of natural resource sites. These sites are also listed in the City Comprehensive Plan,
Conservation Element. The parcels are described in this inventory as foUowing:
Item #
GeolJ'llphic Area in Acres
Location
s~
Evaluation.
Annotation
23
43-46-04 7,8
C
Cleared and abandoned
Florida Scrub;a few oaks
and bc:rbaceous plaots n:rnam.
25
43-46-04-4 8.7
C
Pine flatwoods ecotone with
Fbma Saub, prevbJsly cleared
strips, heavily regrown with
vines (detrimental)
Endangered species = I
(gopher tortoises).
This compilation of properties was actually field evaluated in 1987 by Grace Iverson and Daniel
Ausstin. from Florida Atlantic University. These experts in the biological sciences fields designated
tbe tetter "C" (summary evaluation) to both sites due to the invasion of exotic vegetation and past
clearing practices (annotation). The definition ofa "e" in the inventory is:
poor examp~!(ofF1orida native vegetation). This evaluation of exotic vegetation intrusion. including
detrimental woody vines crawlingtkilling the existing native vegetation continued unchecked for
nearly nine years, The acreage size of both sites (area in acres) is the total size of each property inside
the property boundaries. It does not indicate the number of acres within the property whicb contains
the poor example of native vegeteation as described in the annotation. The purpose of the natural
~
resource sites iaveDtory wu to field evaluate" A" rated sites in the County which could be pun:hued
by Palm Be.oh Couey uader . eavironmeDtllIy .'llIidve lecta bond ref'erendum, These two sites
failed to be considered because of the poor example (quality) of native veletation,
The City comprehensive plan, conservation element policy 4.41 pg, 68 provide for "micro-preserves
which may be required oriented to preservation of a minimwn 25% of all native plant communities
which occur on site". The current project tree survey, together with the project environmental
assessment indicates the progressive decline since 19870f these poor example sites to a total of only
4.2 acres of viable scrob, The 25% acreage set aside of this parcel would require only a 1.05 acre
micro-preserve. This micro-preserve area continues to be a declining poor example "C" site located
on the tops of the scrob ,ridges (2). The preserve management plan for the project oudines the
techniques to protect the micro-preserve during construction and thereafter under the direction of the
homeowner association. The appUcant indicates two micro-preserves of approximately 2 acres total.
The Micro-Preserves and MaDagement Plan:
The endangered species (gopher tortoises) populations have been removed from the micro-preserves
under permit from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. The micro-preserves contain
only vegetation but may become a future site for scroh jays when properly maintained in accordance
with the management plan. The topography of the micro-preserves will not be altered and there will
be no drainage into these areas. A fence win encircle the micro-preserves with protective signage
attached in the rear of each lot reminding the homeowner that the preserve area is protected by the
association.. The micro-preserves are located on the tops (highest elevation) of both scrub ridges
which prohibits water sheet flow from intruding into the sites from adjacent homes.
Conclusion:
The supporting docwnents from Pahn Beach County in addition to the unchecked intrusion of exotic
vegetation into a poor example site, over nine years time provides an accurate description of the
micro-preserves, These facts should be considered as part of the project evaluation when deciding
whether the applicant bas met the environmental requests of the City.
KH:ad
Attachments
~/r-f
Policy 4.3.9
Policy 4.3.10
Objective 4.4
Policy 4.4.1
~ JpOliCY 4.4.2
Policy 4.4.3
Policy 4.4.4
clearing practices that destroy native
Florida ecosystems in whole or in part prior
to approval by the City. .
Subsequent to Plan adoption, policie.
reqardino the pre..rvation of nattve habitat
and endanqered or threatened epec!e. ahall
alao apply to any property whicb i. owned or
acquired by the City.
Within one year of Plan adoption, the City
shall have prepared a program for the
preservation of "A" rated sites. This
program Ahall be coordinated with property
owners and developers of "A" rated sites.
The' city shall, to the maximum extent
feasible, protect all re.aining areas of
substantial native Upland and watland
vegetation and eli.inate unde.irable exotic
tree specie..
Jf Cognizant of prior development approvals or
other vested rights, the City shall require
subsequent to Plan adoption, a detailed
flora and fauna survey on any "8 or C" rated
site subject to a develop.ent proposal and
any site greater than 10 acres in size.
Based on survey results, micro-preserves may
be required oriented to preservation of a
minimum 25\ of all native plant co..unities
which occur on-site. Habitat shall be
preserved with intact canopy, understory and
ground cover:
SUbsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land-
development regulations such that outright
preservation of eXisting, non-exotic trees
on any existing vegetated site shall be
preferred ove~ "cut and realacen
preservation tecHniques. -
SUbsequent to Plan adoption, the city shall
continue to enforce and, where appropriate,
improve upon existing subdivision or other
development regulations which require
shoreline vegetation buffer strips, restrict
the amount or location of site Clearing,
maintain natural drainage flows and require
the removal of on-site exotic tree species.
Subsequent to Plan adoption, establish
criteria for requiring a buffer zone of
native upland vegetation around wetlimd and
deepwater habitats which are preserved,
68
~D
II
.
1.l"QU.lLIn lITIS 011 TBI IftyufORT or IIlTIn ICOSYSTIIIS
TIlT 10 LOClTID VITaIII JIUJIICIP.lLITIIS
HuniciDality No. Sit.. Icoli tel
Boca Raton 11 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, 21, 22, 66 ,
67, 80
Boynton Beacb ., 29, 31, 32, 34, 3&, '70, 8'7
Delray Beacb 5 24, 26, &1, 69, 83
Juno Beach 1 53
Jupiter 6 54, 55, 59, 61, 99, 101
Lake Park 1 44
Lantana 2 41, 88 (39 gone)
Itangonia Part 1 74
Pala Beacb Gardens '7 51, 75, '76, 94, 96, 9'7, 99
Royal Pala Beacb 1 107
Tequesta 2 61, 63
Vest Palm Beacb 2 93, 108 (43 gone)
NOTE: This list does not include recent or proposed annexations: tbis inforaation
will be obtained tbrough examination of proposed annexation maps and
discussions with municipal staff members.
~
';';'
~/
1:>"
;~~
~
'-
, "
-~ 0
,,'" A'
;:;n 0
""" '"
_n
~ 0
"
0
~
_ CO
,,: ~
::>
.I:>
A' -
-.
m N
n -
<;
z
-.- 73 .. 73 'UCT~ l;NOSCJlPi,;',UJ 73:.'. rl.'3' 7i'- "'3' ~-=.r
_ _ - - - - - - - - -c;. - ~ -I HI - - - - - - - - -rC'
;;~1 ~ ~I. . i~ ~:I. ~ · ~ ! I
, .__~'___2",::~!,-,!,,:,:"~L'~__~_: I ~j_!(J 'j
~ ...,". ...~.. ". ..., /.0
~~~~~1. \ ~ so 8S' 85 I 65
\~.0:: ",~"" I 1111'
~'\~ "
~~,~: \ '- " - :
I",
~f" .,' \--
~..5.." iI~' ~!~~: ,
N ~ l~ r~~~~]i~ ~ :
.~ '~ t~~ I: .;:<.~" i k~"'" 1 I
~ _ _ ~~ ~ _ _ 10:~~_ 1"~'-~' K~ ~; I
BLOCf( 'I ~~o /
, 70' 65' 65. I 65' 65' 70'
;...l.'~._'-.~ I: ~
&~ ~ roACl D ,n."" "n['.AI'ON.... ,.
. ~ !.. : I'm- --'-I-~"*. . ~E !!~i~i
. I:. ~ ~ ~ · ~ ~J!;:
.'~ ~ l ~ OS' 65' 65' e5' 6S' 45' ~ 0 \0 I~~~i~~~
_ ..o....z..'"
~~ __ ~ ~..Ut~CD~~7~~~~
"\ -.-.--TRAC'O(-----.---..---.-.---..-..---..-.-- ...oizi. wO -VI
,.,. c.....-n.at UI~
~.~~;:r=~~ :i:i=:;!.
a _v '~ ~ ~'III!~" ~~:I~i r:
~,=~= -~~1'~-"!='~_ ~.'J'Ji~.~~.:: -- ~gi
SO. 39 ' I :3 - E 687 30 aii"
._0_ _'_'_'_'_'_"L_o_._._._.___._._o~.~._._._o_._._.SE.AC~I;SR~W' BL VD, _.~.1 ~ ~~d-
E.'IT'NG 'C' A5'HA T'AY T ,'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-' 0,' r ~~
.. .. !~ J~!ii ; ~ -~D~lA't~ UTATU 1M, u. PO" ., ~ rr -1.1 nTH Avl ~J'iN"~1 u"m, . ~
'" o. o. cr .,fIIIJ . . ,--.-. '. ; z' .
"'0" _ .1.;..= ;!"~..!" .... ON! "I. :.
~ lr. ~;; a'T1 !.,.;ii - I;~'r !i!Ill;:ili~:f' . '~
~!:l:= (/) D~..!~ '~.'_Ifl' ,.....,-.....1-.-..-1 nli:;:"
~. _ ~r: ;; -t ;::~'j; ': Ii ;;11" ;1.;: i!-,I'" r= f,:,!ul ,.
.. 21>i Ii. ^' ::~. i; . . ;i ~, !gl~i I!,' iim!~!~!1 i 5
= ,. .. fTl .. . ~ 1- nm II .!.li=....I~
'" ;::;; t l> I O;;:'~ ; :.:;i ~ II. ! iu:1i d: ill:':: 5
'" ~ /I. ~ .. ~ . . ,'D.!.U Iii.., ·
Ii: g ~,. . Ii. - '. : ; lib j - Ii:E'- U II f
'" ~z 0 1,,1,' II : !i. f_ 10 11 10...li. ';E E
-; i ~ Ii_1m ',., _ · I :i 2ijlll~1 Jii!t.it:1 ip! I ,1=1
~ . . '., t. II!" n.l, 61.,
< Il .. -; . . j: Ii'" .I~ -I'.n,. i,'t:. .!E
~ _ 0 i :: I; : - i l . ;",.,:: '1. .':.':1 I -= lIe..
~. I - ~; !i~i;!i rr!~: Ii: i',.:Ig. · I.I~" I Ir.~l
. it~! s' 'I~I-I.I!::;. j' 1- ~-[.. . 'I ;;
_ ~ '!I : f~ ~~!h!l.= ;':g~ =11 1::;;.1 : .fi~ ! J I: ii:Jiii::
~ !i ; '~ ~;~ ~i:h ~ -! :~ ;~:ffil ~!~ i! ~ r{;rii~~
- I i r fl .... ~ :: --. t ~ Iii; "j;~~
u: '7
"'" '
,-
~ z
CO
Ii <q
i -0J
COo
CO
0
'-.1\0
V1 m
n
iT1 i
..
~
<; (f)
'"
~ CO
CO
~ .
z.;z:: VI "'0 m N
.. m
%.1'"'>0 CO
~ -'" A
-., :;
~;.Z .I:>
-" '" CO
I""lgJloVl
zm -
'0:1,,"0
~~
~t"'l-.n ~ :::;:
I::_ZO
_m>> '"
"0 Z
';:z..~~ !: 0J
'"'... N
" ~
~,-('"\ '-J
000-
!!i;i; N
~:t~z: Q)
- ~~,..,
~.
00---
~u"~:'
~ g
'~
'-
65
65'
65'
80'
:;
"
..
.
11111~~~'
fs:::-\.~~' l~~ ~ ~ t-: Z .,,,
_ _ - - - - - - - - co CO Ln '0
~ -0 '-J Q) q
0J <DO
.1:>0 Q)O
65'
65 '
80
o
:\:
r
.
t ~
n ~."""J>r
5~r~--~~
~ %~Vl'-';;o,
!ai.i;n~
~ ;._.....z ...
- ~::~:;g
UI ... ... ~
. 0 ~
. :~:~~i
o a :;~;f;~~
u : -Q"'~'"
z I~;.~~
co mCa~::o
~ (f) i~:~~~:
.".,... n","",=
..b. O_o::I~_..1"1
lJ1 .~z .. g~-*,5 Z
Nl:D~ !.....r.'"
lJl 0'1_ Z ...Q . .,,-
N . 11 ~ 'i~
I O~ ;!::::
0-....0....
fT1 -....~ ~, z~
~_. oaVlO_
rrl VI .o~...,;
8 : z
z
bolE.
~!i.~1
_I.;;.
'10- .
I:~!!~
I~i.;:
i~..i:i
lil.~~
.:I,l:zo
Iii -,.
:.jii
~ ;il~!
~ii;!:
.5.-. ~ ,I
::.:jj II[
;.-~.- J.!-
it;!~ i;:.;;
i
Il'-.:
,,' ~.
.....t~
,
~
o
z
:;$. rJ)
N
o
z
'"
o
z
~m i J !m I i -
........ ! : ,... I . ......
: ':: . · i'" I =
:":: ! I.!!' !
.1:: _ . ...
!!!!l Ii i
..... a i .
. 1'5
I ! ..
'" ii:
'"
2 ..-
00
s'
~ .i.E %!:
! 1m ..z
,.
. ...: ~.
'"c
. ..... .-
......
..~
i ...t ~I
f m' ~:::
i
..
-
-2
ZGl
n
l>
2
(/
~ ~ I;;;
...
...'
0 Ii
~
..
N
~- ...
..
.- ~
..
1
r-Cl
)>1Tl
ZZ
t~." o~
~=o cn-.<
~ C
~CDCD :::ern
NI"10 <z
: ~)( rr1Cl
..;tl\,l -<-
Iv "-z
...."'" zm
~ G'l1Tl
, ::D
. --.--.--
/(j IUOL LJI.,~
(/1 U......
W · ;0
~ Q ~ ~
1 ~'''''''' ",.".<ct, ;(-
('I UEACIl COU'"
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
PLANNING & REAL ESTATE
3320 FOREST HILL BOULEVARD, SUITE C.331
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406.5813 ' ..it fl)1 t i'r~ i~'
(407) 434.8020 FAX (407) 434-8187
1'-- .-..--. -----.--
~ rn@~,uwrnoo
Pl^NNltIG Arm
ZONING DEPT.
November 21, 1995
Michael Rump, Senior Planner
The City of Boynton Beach
Plennlng end Zoning Oepllrtment
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Re: Impact Analysis for the Hills of lake Eden PUD, For the City Commission Meeting of 11.21.96
Olt8r Mr. Rumpf!
This statement Is provided in fulfillment of Chapter 235.193, Section 2, Florida Statutes to ensure that
public education facilities are coordinated with plans for residential development,
The School District places its school construction priorities in areas that facilitate the achievement of
racial balance In public schools. The School District does not support approval of development where
the anticipated effect on the racial balance of public schools In the area Is negative, and/or where public
facilities will not be available concurrent with development. Based upon the anticipated negative effect
of a development on racial balance in public schools, educational facilities (defined as "public facilities"
Florida Statutes 163.3164(2311 will not be provided in the area of the development concurrent with the
development (see F.S. 163.3177(10)(hl).
This impact statement addresses the concerns of the School District of Palm Beach County as they
specifically relate to the anticipated impact of the construction of 62 single family dwelling units within
The Hills of Lake Eden PUD located at the west side of the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and
Gulfstream Boulevard.
A study was conducted utilizing demographic multipliers for Palm Beach County to estimate the number
of students which would be generated from this type of development. Information was not received
regarding the number of bedrooms found in those types of dwelling units. For the purpose of this
analysis it is assumed that all 62 single family dwelling units will consist of 3 + bedroom units. The
Planning and Real Estate Department estimates 25 elementary, 11 middle, and 10 high school students
will be generated by the project.
The geographic area in which these proposed dwelling units will be located is presently served by
Forest Park Elementary School, Congress Middle School, and Atlantic High School (see Note 1).
Following is a breakdown of current membership for the 1995-96 school year and current permanent
capacity for each school.
An Equal Education Opportunity Provider and Affirmative Action Employer
~~
Forest Park
Elementarv School
Congress
Middle School
Atlantic
Hiah School
Current Membership
Current Permenent Capacity'
733
601
1,295
1,364
2,230
1,920
Students generated from this development will further overcrowd the assigned elementary end high
schools In the' are8.
This development, as well as other developments, may be subject to a possible boundary reassignment.
Reassignment will be considered at School Board public hearing In January 1998 for the 1998.97
school year. The developer Is requested to contact School Boundaries Section In October 1995 for the
recommended school assignment for this development.
The School District will continue to actively pursue a policy of providing adequate school facilities for
all children of Palm Beach County. .
Prepared By:
7A 'H::I-.;?L ~.~
Harry R, FIV r
Planning Specialist
Planning & Real Estate Department
NOTE 1:
Attendance boundaries are reviewed annually and are modified to accommodate the
opening of new schools and/or School District policies dealing with overcrowding
and/or racial balance.
. Current Permanent Capacity does not include portable classrooms.
cc: Linda H. Hines
Ann H. Skakandy (SAC 274AI
File
O.ta: Nov......... 21. 11111 No. 01 p.g.. q> 2-
To: Mlchaal Rumpl From: H."y Fl.
Co. City 01 Boynton Baach School District 01 PBC
o."t. Planning. Zoning Phona 407/434.B020
Fax 4071375-6090 Fa.407/434-81B7
H:\data\wp51 \doclhfix\drc\lkeden,bb
~
1
[I" OF DELIA' IEA[H
p~l~':8~P1
~ J.n...'Y 11, 1_
100 N.W, 11t AVENUE. D!LRA'f BEACH, FLORIDA 334" . .07/2..,.7000
1993
TamDrt J. Heyden. OIr8CtOf'
Planning and Zoning
100 el.t Boynton Beach Blvd,
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0320
RE~ Hili. of uk. Elt.n PUD (REZN 95-002)
'T,..".o AnaI,.I. of the Qui' Stream Blvd. ExMMloft
Deer Tambrf,
In response to my prev10us letter to you regarding the above referenced
project, the agent for the project. Burl Gentry, submme<l tramc Inronnatlon
related to the development Itself snd to the proposed extension of Gulf
Stream Boulevard. However, the analysis that was provided Is not sufficient
to detsnnin. what the Mure distribution of tnIfflc would be with or without the
extension, and cannot be used as a basis to delete the Item from our
COmprehenalve PI.n.
As you know I Delray and Boynton residents In the ....a do not support the
eJdension, nor did our Planning and Zoning Board see . compelling need for
Its Installation, I reaHze that the project Is scheduled for your Commission's
cOnsideration next week. It will take several weeks for us to have our own
traffic analysis conducted and the results presented to our Board. We do not
wish to create additional delays for the developer. I would prefer to have the
analysis completed, however, Ir your City Commission detennines that the
project should move forward without the extension, I doubt that our Board or
Commlu.lon would obj.d.
[j, cerely, L
. ~ ~ W:7
Diane Dominguez j
Director of Planning and Zonln
* ---.-"..,
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS
~
%e City of
13oynton 13eac/i
~- 100 ~ 'BoyntDtI '&III:Ii. 'Bt1Ui'4wnl
'P.O. ~JI0
'Boynton 'Bead&, %nitI4 J3425-0J10
City!Jldl: (401) 31S~
:TJU: (407) 37U090
VIA FAX - (407) 272-7741
January 10, 1996
Mr, Burl Gentry
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. Sox 343
O.l~.y ...ah, PL 33444
RE: Hills at Lake Eden POD - File No. REZN 95-002
Dear Mr. Gentry:
I have recently received several valid questions regarding the
derivation of the location and size of the preservation tracts
you propose for the above project. In discussing these questions
with the city manager, we determined that it would be prudent to
have you and your environmentalist provide staff responses to
these questions, prior to the January 16, 1996 City Commission
meeting, since staff does not have the answers to these specific
questions to defend the designated preservation areas. These
questions are as follows:
1. December 1995 photographs (xerox copy attached) taken from
the adjacent property to the north indicate that there are a
substantial number of trees along the project's north
property boundary which are not identified on the attached
flora survey submitted to staff, Why are these trees not
included on the survey?
2. Various maps dated 1965, 1968, 1970, 19B3, 1984 and 1989
from Palm Beach County's Department of Environmental
Resources Management indicate that the west section
(approximately 1/3) of the subject property was cleared.
Why does the flora survey depict approximately 1/4 of the
determined, remaining preservable area to be located within
this area previously cleared?
3. Why was a portion of the area to be designated as
preservation area selected from the previously cleared area
if the flora survey locates few existing trees in this area?
~mttUa's (jateway to tfU (juifstream
L/l
TO: Mr. Burl Gentry
-2-
January 10, 1996
4. What do the double circled numbers on the flora survey
represent? There appears to be no reference to this symbol
in the key on the survey.
Sincerely,
~~.Q.~~~
Tambri J. Hey[en ~
Planning & Zoning Director
tjh
Attachments
xc: Kevin Hallahan, City Forester
Cheryl Carpenter, C & N Environmental Consultants _
via fax - (407) 744-2887
A:HLkEdEnv
/-1
.-", '- :..-
..~ ....:..~. ':'~~'. k -
.~'..~..?'.
.........~. ~ ,f _." :"J: .',
"
,<.,:...,:; I'J.;'~"t"f.cy.~" .. ..
,:~':. L;~~.~'.-i'T:'._:..S~~~. ..
.: .,' .,.'~
. . :...
u
...... i
~ ~ """.
, .~.,
..---. . ,_..L.::-..4l:.._
'"".
"-"
.'..........
/~
-
'.
I. ;-,
-
j i
.~ 1
..
~ ;;, 1 0
, ... i >..
~ ~I
, .. .~
. ~
'~ 0
; ., ::E"
- i ~ <(W
,
" w....
0::1
1-...
~i
-1-
::>~
C)O
S
--
-/._" ""
~'. .I
~.'" ~
-:0. ~__~..s.'" ::~~
...::--... .'J:',
:; \r;~\', 0
r ) I.....,., "....
___. ,..,....r::.. "._. j
...... ....... :......'- ~_~~ -..f",; (..... .
....--: . ,. ../' I ~~I'''''
'. "@>.p'............-'....I/., ..Ia~..
. -."..
--. - . (j)--r-..o' G
01, '-./ (, ~ _
r.. "'-.. - ' , ".J ~.
-- ' ..- / ~ J
'- -"- ...
-~:- --- -,'
-- ~"-"- - .---
--:~--.~ "_ _ J
. ~ ---~ - ..-
:- --- -:.:=- - --:- - -.:..-.~ -. ~ j -
-~- - -- ---~ ~h
" -- ~f~
/ v /
..
Q
- ..
.. 0'"
jQ"''''-
..-
w~=~j m
!~~j)>o t-"
S .. · .....oQ
G"'!~O .
-... '"
"''"!~W VtN
.. '" '"
"'0 ...0 .....4I't
5=~."'! !;
;:~~.. /;lot
l:l~~d !i
~;;Q .;:2 w;:
5~Sn: =~
.;;.~!:!:!ll" tiC
~!5......l5-i ,"0
i..: ..
i!..
;::~
g:;:;
!!l ....'l"
- ;!"'iJ:
Slldlll_JIi
!77~:~~
~u 4.~'"
-,--'-'-'-'--
o
'O^18
I
I
1-
I~
_.' /'.1
--~,-..:::::..
"
---..",,-
/;-'
'A
-.
0'1
o
"
<0
~,
.,.
i
I
--,\.~--'"
,...- 'tl 0' "
.. ...."
.. ~.:;;. ~
..~ ~r' ~.
.. .... ~~,. \
r.~~: ~ ~l ~ =.... =- '
..... Q ~ ~-..,a - ,.Jet ":
.,N'!!4" ~~.. ~ ::'''@ ,
~ @ .~~ --:~,.- \ I
~t!!? ~ -- ---. :'"_.~... ,
~ ~,
..../
..
~
I~
.",
'-.
'\
:. '. N:i ~
~ -./-,
o ''':--e'.,g'-: . ~:....
-e"" '_
. ..,
'^!
'c
::.
'-,
I
I
:J,~-
,.. .o. ,
, -
"'a" . "--
w
w
0
N
<0 I/"l
N
b I/"l
V
If) .
0'1
CO
Z
1"1
0
<0 ~
~
. O'
010
001
b",,,
O'lI/"lCO
I I .
7"
"
-
.to
/~)
~,@ 1i:
.'oJ
.
..-
!;....~
:!.
~
"......--
-~~
,-
w
en
ex)
:z
. LZ' 191
.90'0991
_L?.I~.S;
en
/~
J
i
~"
;~\~
-4':':''''
~ .;
:;"
~
..
..
i
"\
11\
~ "
~ ~ ~!:-
oK
'.
~ 0 ...
0 Z or
- <( '"
'. u ~
i I:)Z :
:. z-
.. ...
a: ...
WI:) ....
~ z ~~~~~
> l!: o~ :~~
!i w ffi~ i:::S
.. w
z .. ;:) '..
.. >-fn ~:;:
0 ....
t- ..~ a: ......0
g .-0 l!l!
.... ffi~
.... :.I:f
tl a- I:)..J
.. ..'"
.. ..
g "
.1' tIl~ ..
Q. ,';!; Q
--':I
~ a ~ "
1 II '-
III fI j ,
~ .. :::::
~ ~ <I' :;
· ..4 .
"
Ifl
Z
o LL lLJ.
-0
I- V)
U<<:rc;r
w'
cn-w
'{9
IJ...~Z
o ,<(
Za:::
...,.
'w
-:1: c.
I-Vl-
C
WLL <0 (
'0"'_
Z u
a::: 0_
ww-
IZI)
I- 0:: Vl ~
oz:
lLU~:
o O(
.1- (
o:::~
W
Zen",
a:::
owz
.U:1:0
co 1--
I-
owou
.zw
Q..Vl<l(/)
o
N
<0
~
N
-.r
.
0'1
co
(/)
<0
N
f'..
N
h
~
co
~
co
N
.
co
co
(/)
E X H I BIT
IIJII
ratf
EXHIBIT "Jll
Administrative Conditions
proj ect name: Hills at Lake Eden (fka Rollingwood) - Master plan review
comments (3rd review) for a 56 lot single-family subdivision proposed for
rezoning from R-1AAB to PUD
File number: REZN 95-002
Reference: 3 sheets prepared by Gentry Enqineerinq and Land Surveying, Inc.,
identified as 3rd submittal with Planning and Zoninq Department January 3,
1996 date stamp markinq
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE I REJECT
I PUBLIC WORKS NONE I I I
Comments:
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. The water and sewer lines crossing between lots
17 & 18 of block 3 (as shown on sheet 3) will
require at least a 30-foot wide easement in order
to maintain the minimum 10-foot setback from
homes, and the 10-foot horizontal separation
between water and sewer mains as required by the
Palm Beach Health Unit.
2. A capacity reservation fee for this project
totalling $8,593.20 will be due within 30 days of
City Commission approval of the site plan, or
upon request for Utility Department signature on
the water and sewer line permit applications to
the Health Unit. [Section 26-34(E)]
3. Construction of the off-site 12-inch diameter
water main extension on Seacrest Boulevard shall
extend to the City's 16-inch main on Mission Hill
Road. The developer shall be responsible for the
design and construction cost of the off-site
main, and will be granted appropriate credits
towards his water capital facilities charges.
[Section 26-34(A)]
I FIRE NONE I I I
Comments:
POLICE
Comments:
4 . The plans call for an emergency access and
utility easement gate, from S. Seacrest
Boulevard, with telephone access code. The
Police Department requests the same type of
gate/telephone access gate for the main
entrance/exit on Swinton Avenue.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
5. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local
and collector streets. Chap. 6, Art. III, Sec.
11A, pg. 6-3.
6. Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap. 23,
Art. IIB2, pg. 23-7.
Page 1 of 5
/.~
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE ! REJECT !
7. Sidewalk is still required along Swinton,
although the note on the drawings previously
cited has been removed. Chap. 6, Art. III, Sec.
11A, pg. 6-3.
8. All plans submitted for specific permits shall
meet the City's code requirements at time of
application. These permits include, but are not
limited to the following; site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and
traffic control devices. Permits required from
agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD & LWDD and
any other permitting agency shall be included
with your permit request.
9. Site plan review and approval required. Chap. 4,
Sec. 2, pg. 4-I.
10. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required.
Chap. 8, Art. I, Sec. 2, pg. 8-I.
11. The citation in Note 6, Sheet 1 of 3 , should be
changed to Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sect lOT
12. Note 10 does not clearly specify that the POA is
responsible for perpetual maintenance of Tracts C
and D.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
13. The tree preservation area easement shown as
Tract C and Tract D shall be fenced off from the
remainder of the lots before any construction on
site and no owner of lots, including the
preservation easement, can build, construct,
install, or have installed patios or any
appurtenances within said easement.
14. The setbacks for screen enclosures are for
enclosures with screen roofs only; no hard roofs
will be permitted unless it complies with the
setbacks for the main structure.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
15. Since the number of residential units has been
reduced from 62 to 56 single family units, the
recreation dedication requirement is:
56 single-family units x. 0180 acres/d.u. = 1.01
acres.
16. The developer has indicated he does not wish to
apply for one-half credit for private recreation
provided.
Recommendations:
17. Recommend cash payment in lieu of land.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
18. The applicant should include the Preservation
Area Management Plan dated November 1995
(document A) as part of the Homeowner Association
documents.
Page 2 of 5
/:/-
I DEPARTMENTS
19. The Preservation Area Management Plan should be
referenced on the master plan as comment #18 and
all procedures outlined in document A will be
completed by the applicant prior to turning the
preserve areas over to the Homeowner Association.
(Reference document A, #4.0, page 7).
20. The applicant shall install a six foot high
black, vinyl-coated chain link fence around the
perimeter of the preserve areas (inside boundary)
and place "Natural Area Preserve" signs on the
fence at the rear of each lot adjacent to the
preserve. (Reference document A, #4.0 A, page 7
and #8.0, page 12). The location of this fence
shall be indicated on the master plan.
21. The applicant will add a note to the master plan
stating that no permits, determined by the
Development Director to be unsuitable for, or
causing any intrusion into the natural area
preserves will be permitted. This comment will
prohibit abutting lot owners from applying to the
City of Boynton Beach to construct any
improvement to the lot which intrudes into the
preserves. (See Building Division Memo No. 96-
011) .
22. The paragraph #5 described on #10.0 page 13 of
document A shall be included as a note on the
master plan.
23. The tree survey indicates a total of 211 trees on
the site. The tree preservation code #81-21
should be reviewed by the applicant to address
the removal, relocation, and replacement of these
trees. The code will allow removal of trees
located within the buildable areas and roadways.
The three (3) landscape buffer areas (not
preserves) should be recipient areas for the
appropriate trees. The no net loss of trees
should be quantified and indicated on the
landscape plan. The management plan for the
landscape buffer areas should be compiled similar
to the preserve areas management plan.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
24. Identify the location, size, specie, spacing and
planting specifications for the landscape
material proposed for tracts A, B, C, D and E.
It is recommended that a row of trees and hedges
be shown along the Swinton Avenue and Seacrest
Boulevard frontage of the project. The tree-
scape shall be enhanced with a meandering
continuous hedge row, The trees shall be at
least eight (8) feet in height at planting,
spaced no more than 40 feet on center and be an
evergreen specie with a moderate drought
tolerance classification (prohibited plant
species are not allowed). The hedge material
shall be at least 24 inches in height at
planting, spaced no more than 24 inches on center
and be an evergreen specie with a moderate
drought tolerance classification (prohibited
plant species are not allowed). The landscape
plan shall include tree preservation areas as
well as the location of landscape material
required to comply with the tree management plan.
[Chapter 2.5, Section 11. B. and C. of the City's
Land Development Regulations]
Page 3 of 5
~7
I INCLUDE ! REJECT !
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE ! REJECT !
25. Change the text in note #3 of the master plan by
omitting the word width and insert the word fronta e.
26. Show on sheet 1 of 3 a ten (10) foot setback from
the north property line to the leading edge of
the sign shown north of the main ingress/egress.
Also, add a note indicating that the signage will
comply with the sign code.
27. It is recommended that the maximum building
height be limited to 30 feet (two stories), to
minimize impact to the adjacent residential
neighborhoods having a 25 foot height limit
rather than the proposed 35 feet. Thirty feet,
rather than 25 feet, is recommended to recognize
flexibility in unit design for cathedral
ceilings.
28. Correct the LUI table regarding LUI ratios. The
table specifies the LUI of 5, however the table
uses ratios for a LUI of 4. Correct all data and
computations accordingly.
29. A street connection shall be made to Seacrest
Boulevard at either S.E. 35th Avenue or S.E. 36th
Avenue or extend S.W. 36th Avenue and make a
connection to the extended right-of-way (latter
requires coordination with the City of Delray
Beach - comprehensive Plan Policy 2.2.9. Any
additional street connection shall align with
roads in adjacent subdivisions and in the general
vicinity - Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.9)
[Appendix C, Article X, Section 10.D.] If this
comment is deleted by the Commission, the
applicant shall file a comprehensive plan
amendment to Policy 2,2.9.
30. Provide a copy of unified control documents that
have been approved by the city attorney.
31. Since platting does not require any review by the
Planning and Development Board, and City
Commission review does not occur until the end,
no opportunity is available for the Commission to
set land value for purpose of calculating the
recreation fee. Therefore, since this request
involves additional fees to be paid and since the
property was recently sold, it is recommended the
land value be set using the purchase price at the
time of the most recent sale of the PUD property.
This will require the applicant to submit a copy
of their purchase contract.
32. To show the proper front setback omit the off-set
shaped buildable area shown at the front of lots
24 and 30. The front setback extends across the
entire front of the lot at a distance of 21 feet
from the front property line.
33. Check the scale (1" to 40') of the distance
between the rear of the buildable area of the
buildings in block 2 and the rear property line.
The setback chart indicates this distance to be
41.5 feet, however the space scales approximately
37.5 feet.
Page 4 of 5
~~
I DEPARTMENTS
34. The plans identify area A, C, D and E as tracts,
however the plans show these areas with a symbol
that is generally used to represent an easement.
Correct this believed contradiction. Even though
the home owners' documents includes language to
eliminate improvements in these easements,
installation of fences with signs around the tree
preserve easement and deed restrictions that
restrict lot owners from making improvements in
the easements, it is believed that these areas do
not qualify as easements. Therefore, restore
these areas as tracts owned and maintained by the
homeowners' association.
35. Show on the plan a fence with access gates
encompassing the tree preservation areas. The
location of the fence shall be within the
boundary of the preservation areas and the type
and height of fence shall be delineated on the
plan. It is recommended that the access gates be
off-set from the private right-of-way to allow an
area for a vehicle without blocking the right-of-
way.
36. It was previously agreed to by the applicant that
the emergency access would be modified to provide
an improved surface for one-way egress onto
Seacrest Boulevard. The added egress would
disperse on-site traffic and allow emergency
ingress/egress. Modify the plans to show the
egress.
37. Submission of a rectified master plan showing
compliance with the conditions of approval for
the project will be required to be submitted to
the Planning and Zoning Department, in
triplicate, prior to platting and site plan
review of the project. A survey shall be included
with the rectified master plan drawings.
TJH/dim
a:ComDept.Hil/p&d
Page 5 of 5
foq
I INCLUDE I REJECT I
E X H I BIT
ilK II
70
FROl1
GEt..JTRY ENG I NEER I NG &
S. INC. PHONE NO.
407 272 77~1
P02
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
\ 6 i'
; \li;"\ ._ \
\ L-~-, i{i,,;\'i'l\;:it~ i;\)ii'--'~ ~-'-
\ zbt,lIN(tQfJj;_.....,.....-
I......,,',.,"~.................,...,~,..."''"''''''''...
Member
Florid2 Society of
Professlonill Li!II1d SUNP.ynr'J>
P.O, BOX 243
DELRAY BEACH. flORIDA 33447
PHONE: 272-1924
Member
American Society of Civil Engineers
American COngress Of Surveying & Mapping
January 12, lq96
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning ~ Zoning Di~ectar
City o~ Boynton Bea~h
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. SOl< 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425-0310
Re: Hills at Lake tden PUO ~ ~ile No. REZN 95-002
Response to January 10, 19q6 letter rRr.Rived via Fa~
1/11/96
Dear Ms. Heyden,
ln response to your above mentioned lettmr reQarding the Hills
at Lak~ Eden PUD. I understand you have several que$tions regarding
the ~lora ~nd ~.una survey and t~e survey indicating the loc~tic" o~
the viable scrub areas on th@ subject property.
J +ep l t,h,..
~uaatidn& pOGAd in your letter p~lmay1ly ~elate to the
in~Qvprg~~~ion o~ thG cubjgct survey and our responses durino
m~oti"9Q wi~h thg Ci~y Q~~~+~ 1n~luding M~. kmvin ~allahan.
FQrOc~G~/Envi~onm~nt~lig~, Mv_ Mike ~_a9, Sita & Zoning
Adminic~~~~c~, M~. Ch~vlgg c. ~vad~vick, DlvOctcv =~ Racraalion L
P~~k8, Mr. 3amQG ChQr=~, City Ae~~rn=y ~nd loc~l concgrngd citi2gn~
including t~e ~esidente o~ the Lake ~de" pvcperty, West o~ the
subject petition,
Mr.. Willi.m ~Qkl.r .nd ha~ ~cn, owne~~ 0+ the
P~QP.~ty SQut~ o~ t~e ~ubject pr~pe~ty ~nd other concerned citizen9,
71
FRCtt1
GE~nRY HIG I NEER 1 NG &
). I NC, PHm~E ~jO.
407 272 7741
P04
in the area. In the questions you posed was wMy was the presB~ve
a~ea loeateo in tnis a~ga previously cleared?, i~ you will note in
the ~i~ld or on ou~ su~vey this area previously cleared naG bee~
invaded by numerous species within the las~ 10-15 ye.~8 8inc. o~r
previous survey, with the majority o~ tha naw scrub oak bQ1ng in thm
Northerly portion o~ said previously claa~.d area and the n~w slash
pine in the previously cleared area. ~allg primarily in the central
~r.a o~ the previously cleared a~ea and the Southerly portion o~
this area previously cleared is dominated by Florida Holly.
Gche~~lera and othsr exotic Bpecies. As most environmentalist a~d
arboric~ would tall you the inva.iva .pacta. ar~ dominant ovar tha
CCYub ~~kG an~ .laGh pina And you CAn und.rct~nd ~~~~ ~h~ la~k 0+
acrub in thic arDA wa~ +o~ ~ki= raa=on
inva~iv. dominance over
~~~Dr =pDeio=). I ~.al you undar~~~nd, ~hQ dGvglopQr ~ppr=eia~o~ tho
voquirQmQn~ to p~~~arYD an a~8a aqual ~o or 9rea~eY than 25~ o~ ~he
area o~ exi~ting viable scrub. We have mentioned to bo~h Ke~in
~~ll.~.n~ ~Q~..~.r/EhvirQnm.n~.li.t end o~her e~e~~ membere during
our ei~e pl~n review, that we will ~eloc.~e existing .c~ub tc
in-~il1 ~he propo$ed preeerVB areas and a pro~es5icnal arborist will
be re~pqn5ible ~or the relocation and maintsnancw c~ th& r~lcc.t.d
5crub in these areas.
4
'7~
FROM
GENTRY ENGINEERING &
;), INC, PHONE tm.
407 272 7741
P01
We ev~luated the submittal covering the v1abl~ 5rruh ~rRa on
the subject p~ope~.ty ~nd we related the proposed pre~prvs areas to
this survey and we ~ound o~ t~e proposed ~rp.~p.yve areas, 73.351.
falls within the area o~ vi.ble serub ~nd as WA mpntioned previously
t~D rcmaini~g areas o~ ~roposed preserve ~hall be in-;illed by
I"'sloc:at.ing axist.ing scrub or pl~nting o~ nurRFH'"Y quality scyub of
.imilar spec:ias aG the existing scrub on t~is property to in-~ill
th. 1.3 a~re preserve which will exceed th. minimum requirement o~
1.05 .~r.. ;or thi& prQP.~~Y.
3> A= wo mantionad in ~ha prDvioua r.C~nn~8 to Item no. 2. the
dev=lop~~ has t~iod lo work wi~h tha o"vivDnmgnt~l i.au.~ concerning
oaid ~ree~, he has att&mp~od ~o ~~tia~y ~na ~~jn;ning proporty
Qwner'~ concBrn~, ne ~~5 made ths noca==~vy Cor~Gctiono to =atis.y
th. City o~ Boynton, including Kevin ~allahan~
Fcre~ter/Envirchm.nt<<li5t end we ~ave gon~ nver the issuas as
outllnad in this third qu..~icn. In the develcp~~~ ~~~pmpt to
e~tis~y all conce~ns, hg h.& r~duced the totel numb~~ ~~ 10ts to 56
and 1nc~gasQd the &lz~ o~ the pe~1met8~ lot~ R~5p.ntially ~o eatis~y
both Gta~f comments and the comments ~~om the adjoining p~opRr~y
owne~$. In ~Qga~d to tne pyoposed p~eserve ~~e~5, T think it has
5
rft/-
FR'Jt'l
GENTRY Et~G ] NEER ] NG &
S. HK. PHONE ~m.
407 272 7741
P01
been ODvious, in bc~h ~he plans WD h&ve ~ubmitt.d and OUY
conver5at1on with ~hm eta~~ du~ing TRC raviDWS, _5 well aa the
anvi~onmen~~l ~epo~t and tree m&~aem~n~ plan that the idg.l
location ~or the prooervB ar... was ~he ~np o~ ~hQ 8~lstinQ ~idges
an~ 1~ you will recall you did r.~ui~e _ le~te~ ~Yom ma ~t&ting WD
wuuld not allow stQ~m dralnaSB ~~ ~u~ into ~h~ pyeseyyg ~~D~S. It im
obvious, that by placing th~ ~reeerve area8 at the top c~ the
exi5tins ridges that the storm dYalnag8 would naturally be diyeetgd
~w~y from the preseyYQ a~eas. Ou~ next concern wae the axieting
viable scrub ayeas and it is obv10US when looking at cur eurvey
Bubrn1tted to t.h. City, th.at the SCt'"ub ...eam on the Western portion
o~ the propert.y in the are. previously e'p.~Yed, did have a high
cor.centration of invasive species, ~uch as Flnrida Holly, which had
p~evented the sc~ub oak ~Yom $p~eading in the South hal~ and po~t10n
of the NQrth hal~ as indicated on our tree survey. In our meet1ng
with the sta-Ff and Kevin Hallahan, that nw" intention was to
relocate healthy scrub into the tree pre5erve arga as necessary to
exceed the minimum 2Sr. pY9SerVQ re~uirement and it is obvioua sinee
the ~~@sBrve aye. equals 1.3 acres and the minimum '5~ o~ the viable
~crub are~e equals only 1.05 acr8. t~at th. pressrve area will
contain an e~~ess o~ viAble s~yub greater than the minimum
6
I
'1~
FROM
GENTRY H~GINEERING &
:J. INC. PHONE m.
407 272 7741
P01
".S1quirClmDnt ~c: we; "::\v~ rlil:H':lj~~l:Id in OUr mGlIlat.ino_
4) In yo,.",," -1'=(",,11' I.:h <:jut:ac:tion, ....l:Il~t.ing t.o t.h.. inFcY"m.at.ion
providCld ~o KClv~n ~~ll~M~n, ~crg&~..r/EnvironmCln~.alic:~. ~~ o=t.~bli~h
~he ~...o.~ Q~ viable Bc".ub on ~hs C1ubjClc~ p~~~o....~y ~nd thQ l~"'ggy"
~ircl.. .nv.l~p.d poeke~B c~ scrub eurrounded by inVA~iv~ ~~~r.i~~ 0"-
pock.~. Qf inv..ive ~pecieB Burl'"ounded by .crub, t"e 8m811e". ~i".~l~
with the number contained therein ind1c.~.. an area de~ignation as
~e~9~enced to th~ calc~1_ti~n5 provided t.o K~vin Hallahan on A
sepa~ate sheet whiCh was attaehed to said suY"vey and this ~epre8Bnts
the calcula~ions ~C~ viable 8cY"ub arQae ae r81ated tc the Fl~ln
location. We will ca happy to provide Y"evi~md copims ~OY" betteY"
reFe...~nce to the ciY"cles as r8~errQd to in this item to hAlp
eliminats conTumion TOr the proper 1nterp~Gtation o~ both the su~vey
sketch and the a~@a calculations p~ovid8d to the City o~ Boynton
8eac:h.
We apprm~iate you~ giving us the oppoY"tunity to respond to you~
qwa&tion~ in youY" letter o~ January 10th. The develope~, F~ank Pinto
has contacted s8ve~al dY"boY"ist who a~e ~~miliar with t~@es s1mil~r
to those found at this location and it Is understood, that the ~1nal
land~cap1ng plan ~or the pl'"e"~rv~ areas will include the required
in-fill planting, t.hoat wit.h propet" malnt;u1ant;;;I'! .'t.IHi irr-iQcltian will
7
"In
Extended Page " 1
b. &~~~...~~1 tg p~rpetually ..t.bl1.h the pr...rv.. whi~h will b.
unique both to this property and the City o~ Boynton SQach.
I~ you should have any qusstions regarding th~ abovQ, plgasQ
contact my office.
81ncsrsly,
e
,..,7
J":lt~--16-'36 TUE 10:31 AN C+t;i ENV CONSUl""TAt.nS INC 407744-2:387
C&N
Ii~w~ rim~ dno.
9J~(;.9 *(~() 1 ~~ 'f-kO *:Lax (4 ,.,.
P.02
I
!
,
(
,
!
January 16. 1996
VIA FAX
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 ::~t Boymon Beach Boulevard
P,O, Box 310
Boyrlton ~. Florida 33425-0310
\ ,')1
:\:'~, '.- ':. .!.. : \ I':
\lJuL n nU
~ _-<_--1
, , . PLANNING AND
ZONING 1)f!.L.,.~n"~ '
.,,~~~~"- .
Rc: Hills at Lake Eden PUD - File No. REZN 95-002
Response to January 10, 1996 Letter to Burl Gentry
Deal' Ms. Heyden:
I was retained by Mr. Frank Pinto, owner of the proposed Hills at Lake Eden pun,
to a!tdress the protection of gopher tortoises ((;Qpherus polyphemus) on his property in July
199~:, Due to the poor quality of the habitat and the :si~e of the proposed preservation areas,
TOIl' Stice. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (PGFWFC), and I agreed that
the l;lest option for the long term survival of the gopher tortoise population was to relocate
the' ortoises off-site to a restocking area with suitable habitat and a viable population. To
sect re a gopher tcnoise reiocation permit, I conducted an environmental assessment and
gop ler tortoise burrow survey on the Hills at Lake Eden parcel.
Terry Walker. C&N Botanist. and I surveyed the entire parcel. The site was so
ove"g1'Own and infested with exotic vegetation and nuisance vines that many areas were
lmpassable without cutting with fl machete. The oak scrub which dominated the native areas
of ue parcel was senescent due to lack of fire management and the canopy closed and
{IV€ "grown with vines. Very little ground cover existed, therefore, virtually no forage base
for Ithe tortoise population existed except in the cleared survey cuts and in small areas in the
noc'hwest portion of the site. Most of the tortoise burrows were located along the cleared
su["ey lines, the only areas with grasses and Forbs neceisary as food resources for the
toroises. An environmental assessment conducted in December 1988 by George G. Gentile
and Associates, and reviewed pdor to survey, indicated that Ms. Stella Rossi had visited the
sitE: and observed at that time that the "overgrown condition of the site had caused the gopher
torloises and other animals to leave" _ This was supported by George Gentile's findings of
abandoned gopher tortoi5e burrows. "Brazilian pepper (SchinlJ.f t2rebinthifolius) dominated
the souttlern portion of the site and was scattered thrcoughout the site" in 1988 at the time of
thL! report. A large stand of BrazlUan pe,pper also occurred along the west and south
rJV
JAI~ -- 1 6--96 TUE 112,: 32 AM C+N EN'.J CONSlIL T At-lT S I tIC 4eJ774<l2887
P.eJ3
r
bCl.ndary of the site. Other exotics :'Iuch as mango (Mangifera indica), ficus (FiCl~
bC:I:/amina), and schefflera (Brassia aatnophyUa) had become established on the site. It is
alsl~ inreresting to note that the assessment stated that the best of the scrub occurred in the,
nonhwest portion of the site.
In conducting my assessment, I reviewed Palm Beach County's Environmentally
Ser.~itive Lands Map and found that the site was designated as "C" quality habitat and not
slated for preservation by the County. My research further indicated that the south and
we~ tern portions of the site had been cleared of vegetation prior to 1968 as evidenced by the
douinance of exotic. weedy, nuw.nce species in these areas. 'rhe Coalition for Wildlife
Hahitat considered purchasing the site in 1985, but declined.
EIght years have passed since the Gentile assessment was conducted. Over this
period of time, the site has continued to be unmanaged. Scrub is a fire dependent
COl1:lfnunity. Without fire management E:wety 5-10 years, scrub succeeds into xeric oak
han'mock, a senescent community which no longer provides habitat for specie:! characteristic
of ~Il)rub. With fire suppre5sion, faunal and flora species such as gopher tortoise, scrub jay
(Ap:!/elocoma coerulescens coerulesulls), pawpaw (Asimina reticulata), sand pine (Pinus
dal:sa), and herbaceous ve,getation can no longer persist. Fire returns the habitat to earlier
suo::essional stage, in effect, rejuvenating the scrub community. Mechanical management
(seJ'~ctive clearing) can also achieve some of the beneficial effects of fire, as evidenced by
the :~leared survey lines supporting herbaceous vegetation species and gopher tortoise
burrows observed during the 1995 survey. The long term result of exotic species infestation
and fire suppression is habitat degradation. The site currently provides very little value as
hab: tat for wildlife. Without management, the site will continue to degenerate into a dense
ul1dl~rstory of Brazilian pepper, vines, and other inV8!Jive exotic plant species such as Surinan
chenry (Eugenia uniflora). All characteristic scrub species will be lost. Most of the oak
sew!) has already aChieved senescence and exists as xeric oak hammock.
In response to Question 112, regarding the west section (approximately 1/3) of the
subJ ,~t property which was cleared prior to 1968. "Why docs the Oora survey depict
apP'foximatl3ly 1/4 of the determined remaining preservable area to be located within this area
pre'/,lously cleared?" As the 1988 Gentile Environmental Assessment indicated, the
nOrllwest portion of the site which was previously cleared was in effect mechanically
man:lged to set the successional clock back to scrub. Enough of the seed SOurce survived
clearing to become established throughout this section of the property. Exotic vegetation
OCC\':rS in this area and even dominates the perImeter of the site in this area, however, exotic
vegttation OCcurs throughout the site. The areas dominated by native scrub vegetation are
opel and have a viable ground cover, shrub, and canopy component. With removal of exotic
vegc:![ation and c..ontinued management, the area will naturally revegetate with scrub species.
Thk is evidenced by the abundance of pawpaw, IJjlk grass (Pit)"QPsis gram;Tlifolia), sand pine,
and :lther species characteristic of scrub which now occur in the cleared survey lines and
wl:Jidl aIe recruIting in the cleared area in the east portion of the site. Pictures of these areas
are ,: ttached.
2
'1Q
In. response to Question 113: "Why was a portion of the area to be designatM as
pre~ ervation area ~electcd from tbe preViQU31y cleared area. if the flora survey locates few
exi~;'ing trees in this area?" As Stated in the 1988 assessment, the best scrub occurs in the
nOf1.hwest portion of the site. The soils and seed source necessary for scrub occur at tile
ridfle line in the west portion of the site,. Much of the area currently supports open, healthy
s.cn b with no dash or scrub pine canopy. Most of the gopher tortoises were located in thig
are;;,. Admittedly, some of this area is dominated by exotic vegetation, but remnant 9crub
spel:ies continue to persist in this area. With exotic vegetation removal and cominued
mal:!agement, this area will revegetate as healthy scrub without the competition of invasive,
faSI.,growing, exotic plants and nuisance vines. At Sugar Sand Park in Boca Raton, J used a
bulldozer to lightly scrape out overgrown areas of oaks, saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), and
Bra.dlian pepper. These areas successlully revegetated in scrub species within a two year
period (see attached photographs). As long as the seed source and suir.able soils are presem,
scn b has the ability to reestablish itself, and with continued management, will persist over
timl: to provide habitat for a wide array of scrub and other wildlife species which occur in
Sowh Plorida.
If you have any further quesrions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely.
C&N ENVIRONMENTAL CONSU TANTS, INC.
c~~~.
President/Sr. Biologi9t
CMC/aj
Att;chment
co: Mr. Prank Pinto
95-(142
3
~o
rlli IU
,...-...-:!. .....1 - ~ )..
Fax: ,5US426':)t>63
~::i1' G.t r:;a;"~TILE
'.-.-
Rug_os 16:58
" AS;g C.'
r'10 N
1
'T"~-'u ;-'".:to .....
, "
__.i
.'
george g. gentile & assoCfcttes, inc.
landscape arChitects/planner,
~~.ul\d--
Deotmber 6, 1988
^d~ir \I Brady
19~3 s. Oongress AV$hue
Wes~ palm Beach, rlorlda 33406
Attl~nt ion: Lee s tarky, V10e Prfl.J.dent
Re: Boynton Beach Environmental Asees$ment
Dea1' Lee:
The fOllowing .to the ebv,ironmental asses.ment for the .%5 acre
t)arc:el 01 land located between Seacl"est noulevar~ and Swintoh
Avenu& along the southern bOundary of the ojtv of 8ovnton ~e.eh,.
kno\IJ':'\ to ()ur office 8.11 GU~t.h'._1n Height.. After a.v.Z"a~. eJ t.
1nsp~ctio~e and analyses, our office hle deter~jntd the Op.o1t~c
tYPOJ of eaO$ystems tound on th~s s1te. T.hese eoosyet.mg !nolud&
the! 'L"Udl.ile &peCitfl, p1ant epee!,. and eO,l1 tYPQ8. We h~ve .J80
dete;:'rllin~d th" most tunct lona! and env1ronlnenta.l1y Sound loeo Bon
fo>: the 3 t 78.:t ~cre pre.e,rved are, (25~ ot thenat1ve pJan~
COIlHI11,tn.1ties) ,
The, '\111c!lite on this ejte inolude. seve&'aJ varjet.109 ot small
mammi~ls .1nt'ludJng raccoon., rabbIts, Opo85um., m.1ce anc3
squ.1I'l"elD~ severltl tyPes 01 b.bde 1nolU<ung swa1.1ows/ wt"en8,
dove!!, wood peoker~, mockingbird., and several ditterent r~ptjles
an~ E~phJb1~n. such as QOuthe~n r!ngne=k ~nak.., OOUthern black
l"aee2:s, box turtles. l:h:al'dg, atnd trcge. Dur1ng- our :t'Qeoareh
reg~r:!jng the w11dllte, ou~ Qtt~~. eontacte4 Stella Rosel ot the
Coal1 ~lo1'1 tor Wild} f.flo Habitat, Three year. ~go I !:l1e Coil.! tion
~la9 t'dnkihC1 of PUtlChas1ng the tilte. Dur1ng this time Mrs. RnscJ
v!situd the sit. .nd observ,,~ s1m~lar w.11dlJfe. She observed at
that ~fm,. gophG~ tortojse and a ~rlY fox residing on thfR ejtQ,
HOWtlV'Hl"', 'she felt th~t ~h. overgro....n OondJ.t.ton of thQ s,tte e.aUID.c.t
tha9~ anhu!I.l. to leave j , which 1s l:"e.fntol'ced bV OUt' .find.1nge of
ftb~~dch~d go~her torto11e hO~G6.
Th~ Ifu,et~rn t:wo-thj~ds of the property is dominated by a Plh~
.Fl~twcl,od plant Oommunity. A d1.t1nct ecotonft or eonhQQt1ni :!Ilone
11~k$ the f14twoods to the SC~~b Plant Com~Uhlty wh10h do~j~ate6
the N~~tern th!rd of th~ property. The ~O~~ of tho ~crub Ja In
th~ ftorthwe~t port1on.
-
??J
F' w
JAN-16-96 TUE 10:34 AM C+N ENV CONSULTANTS INC
!!'
40774.....;:::887
P.06
HILLS OF LAKE EDEN
PIIOTO 3:
DISTURI3ED seRUU
tJ o~ WQ. ~ t "Se e.....\-i Q ""
if
0.-1
---- 1
\:
.,~J
" ,
~
SUGAR SAND PARK Boca Raton, Florida
SCRUB RESTORA nON
S?3
407744~887
P.08
J8~-16-96 TUE 10:36 AM C+N ENV CONSULTANTS INC
r.:~:'::~~"~p~:,..~' ,r'v,' ,~,
h ,;~r~ ."j.~,'~ ',.- .
.. ..-t
SUGAR SAND PARK Boca Raton, Florida
SCRUB RESTORATION
(j'tL
E X H I BIT
.. L II
9.C;
>
t-3
t-'
~
t't:l
t't:l
t:::l
t't:l
Z
::s:
t't:l
t't:l
t-3
tr.l
t-3
::r::
H
tr.l
(")
~
H
t-3
t't:l
~
H
>
:::3:3::::::::::3::::
~ ~ bt;. t;. t;. t;. t;"
.... .... ......... ..... ..... ..... .....
e!eeeeee
Basaases
m ~tJrn t1 HI ~ ~
" 0 ......... ro t1 0 0
I1n<DdllO""
s:: .... CD t1 ::s
on::s " HI PI
"OCOa.C::,,< 11t1
s:: < PI PI "< 0 ro
I1IDPlt1I1P1::SPl
fDtlt1O,C,t1"
DtCDm c,PI
::rIG II) (Q
fDct ro
....
lQ
::r
"
?'7"'"7"7""~__-"
----............~..:...~
OJ OJ ~"~.~, ~_ ~. ~.
>: >: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::l
~...... .....~. ~- 1-'- 1-'".....
S~333333
c...cccccc
aaSEl8E1aa
en..............ent1H1..............
" 0 ............ ro ti 0 0
tirt~OdlJOrtrt
C ......ro t1 ::J
nn::s rtHlPl
rt 0 (Q "< "< ti ti
C~ PlPI"<oro
t1 ro PI ti t; PI ::s PI
rotit1o..o..t;rt
PI ro 00 0.. PI
::r (Q PI (Q
roro ro
....
(Q
::r
"
*
::r::
H
t-'
t-'
tr.l
* :I- * *
N....~t-Jt-JO'\O'\
UI o. 01 01' 0 .
0.... 0
Hl'O 0........ HI HI HI 0
CDmot.JCD CD CD 0
CD'" CD CD CD
"omt1lrtrtrTOO
~~~ ~
"PI" PI
t1 t;
II) CD
~
I
~
* *
t-Jw,........t-Jt-J\O\O
01U1.001010.
CD 0
HI'C 0 HI HI HI HI 0
CD CD OCD CD CD CDO
CD 11 CDCDCDCD
rtn 00 rtrtrtrtoo
~~CD ~
rtPlPl PI
tin t;
ro ::r ro
HI 00 HI
ro .... ro
CD 0.. CD
rtCD rt
t1t
II)
CD
"
HI
CD
CD
rt
W01t-'-"]""NO"I~
O1W', 0,...01'
CD t1l 0
HI'O 0 0
{DCDOHJHlHlHlO
CDt; CIlCDCDCD
rtnmaCDCDCDCIl
CD.orrrtrt"1O
::s~ c
rtlll PJ
t'l Ii
II CD
::r:
......
........
I-'
CIl
~
I
.....
I
~
* *
""w""""""t-J-..JCD
0101- 0010101-
01 0
HI'C 0 HI HI HI HI 0
CDCDOCDCDCDCDO
CDt1 CDCDCDro
rTnmrTrtrTrtrn
~~CD ~
rtPlPl PI
t1n t1
ro ::r (1)
~
rt
t"'
P!
;;.r
CD
HI
II
/J
rt
Hl tI1
CD 0..
CD CD
rt ::l
't:l
o
t:1
HI
ro
CD
rt
Him
CD ....
CDC,
rTCD
ZZ::d::tlZZ::tl:;tl
o 0 I 100 I I
::J ::J ...q-'::l ::l ,... ,...
(J)'I(DCDII
8n$:~oo~~
30lI! 00 to
'03 33
P!'O "0'0
liP! !.\JP!
PJIi ~Ii
trP! ~PJ
........tr IJ'tr
CD ~ ~........
III 111 CD
o
o
3
'0
P!
Ii
.....
Dl
o
::l
* * * :I-
t-J~""'-..Jt-Jt-JO'\...,
010' 01010'
t-J..... 01
HI'C 01........ HI HI HI 0
roCDOt-JCD CDro 0
CDt1 CDCDro
rTnOOHlrTrTrtoo
~~m ~
rtPlrT PI
t1 t1
(J) CD ro
III
Hln HI
CD ::r ro
(1) ro
rtoo rT
......
0..
ro
~
I
~
I
:t:'
Q6.~
~
I
.....
I
e
tv
C
f-'.
~
0..
1-"
::s
lQ
PI
::s
0..
en
1-"
rt
ro
!-1
ro
~
~
PI
rt
/-'.
o
::J
00
E X H I BIT
"M II
9("
I
40'
~
~,
q)
~
~."
, ~
~ ~
~
~
,
" '
0\
"l
~
~
~
P~4/:J~5E/)
t ..(~sEttVE tts T;(IlC_L.__,.__.._
~41 J4SPHALr p,4V'el1~Nr.
~
O~
- -~ ~..:;... ". ;..... ,.--,:.,: -~"",;".;,':"""".'\1
""'.", . ': . - ...,.
/ .:,jjjj,-';f':~ :,,;i:qii:':'; ,;:,"1:;:(. . ~ I
, ~::;: ":,: ':'~;:'~,,::, ..,.,:,;.:.;~.:~':: '\j:>~'"{i!: ~
... ,.",....,..~ '..~.. '~'I" ., . , ,.... ~
.t":.... ~;"'.' ;,,~,.:;.\.~~~.:....i;t~:'..:..i..'.>-l: ""
;( ~ \;, '",U#j' ":{'Il' 4"- j.;~~"~I.::..t~,'~~'''':;1
!e;~.:;~ij'~';'::, ":';;~:~.:'::i;,,~f~,;r~[!(~~t{~~~
89. 20 47"W '
lId. ()()'.~ D
;i-;! ~~.(.4"'~~i'~~ht:~.1-i(j~. ~~~'''': ~~,., 0 'I...:.
~jf!t~~ir..1!Xi~~if~~0.s:~:..~ :~~t~;.~;;fi:;.. '.
,,, );:;.' 0 r. .2.'"., ." .,~ '"
~:." . .,' ,,,., " ~;~.....:.~~; .~,'" :-~. ',: ,./
~ . f ,:". :-1.:' ~
:;1Ui;(:~a;I2{t::;i,1:;:,:."
. , , .... " ..' ." ,
..
\}?~:~~~.~;~), ~~':~ri,f~::~'r-:;~1{~Y~~!::;:~;~:; ~
.,'h e,z;;.:...'r:3..,,'.:'~;.' .:; .J~I'"
.~;:,;':,\:};1JjJ~~!,;~:)~'.
~
..
~
..
II
11)
t I' J ~,'ti1~, \~ 'f~J::'i~~)':~~~it-.;::i"~,,,":-..:k'.~-i" .
. '.~'..,.l. ,'of. .L~' r.~' 4 ... ~.:: '" ';-i~ .~~~.f~J '. ~...'~. ~ ',_. .
-0 '.,/ '.'" ,.'f ..",till" ,(.' "4,~~ (':\ -:;'._~4.::
),::,,'1./ 7::4;7.'- n, . !'
,'. l"I.L:.~_~.i:(> "'~'l".~'~~",'_f tI:" 'r" .
Z;;!~~;Gt{~~~~J~;:;;"~~'~
. ,
H'
/'
, ; ...' '-:' -', ,,', ,', - ~,". , ~
~ :of-' 1;, j ,"~'" ' '~... ~ .I J "j
", .~;. :'.:',::' ~'" ~ ,~,"...,~ 4':~..1".:.. o\:'~J. J
i:Lt?,r._5 :~
," :~
~ .. ~...
.!i.... :
. . .'"
,.'
J "','
" .
-'90_
..
//().oo
~ t!9'ZO,~17" W.
:...-.....
:~ ~:.
':1
",
.L.''?,r;,_ ~~ ,;' ;.~I
,;....,,< ',:' .: .:',:. "::'1 ",~.: ~
':'~~~i~~,la5~Jl;c> 8'J)~.
5cJ:J
TI<A c r
Z+' ASf>JlAt. r p.AVet1cNr
?
A
IY 0'''45'52''
"
!o5.00'
~
~
,
~
~
K
~
~
~ ~
,
, ~
" ~
.~.. ~
'l'<~
( POOL t SCAEEN
3.5'o!
~
..-
~-
;IJI:?\
r(,~~~~ )
/
rct)lj
\~
.tI'F II
S89D 411 Z'''' W
"
i !
9'1
..
{
,
I
..
c
"
G:~..';. ':"';- .~. ...~.:,.-:'~:. ;:(::,,:~:.\:
'f' "O!'r..:J .. .. .... ',-.- ..;;,.....-..Ji,. ..~..I>"'- ....'lil......... .\.
/.~.:.r;...~~:...~... 7 I ....~~;'~ .;l':.~...:.....(<lo\':
... "" .",-:"". J,' J._....,...r-:..,clo,J. ~ j,l..
,~,~,~...~.~~:..II....tI.:....:~,~~,~:~~' _:<;.." )-'~
^.;;".:.iJf~::;~'~" ~~;;~f :,I'~:~~:'tp~~".~". :~'; ~.
\)....~\f..:... "'"."'':',''''. ",...~~- tif,;:~I!"','" ;:l-.a....
... .' ,. t ......-.,....-. ~T ,.' -. .,,,t.1.,;: . -" ,'.
'. 'II~'\:::".J", ':ll";'" i..}ol~" ',;~,r;\\: ~n
I'~ ,I:~:.~:':',:-!;l:~ .J:~~.:I.:r:.~.q)....'~....."~ ..i~ :'rl..:
, "':., .~~ ,...-4........: "..:<00.....1: ~....'".t..~~~.. ,;:'.!~
., .;:.'~;;;.l ",~\ t,~'r.i:":~.. ~ ........~.~~...~ ~ ,i.,' '.~_ .",,\:~ :; .
," S89';ZO'4-7"
, ' '/~.~()" .
.-9"'.' _. ..../,.." . .,..
I~~I ....~r.'.C~"\I~.....-... ..' .~~.4.o:'i~';.-!:'d.!J
,.: ~ '''i'.,~~~~~:;;.1:~~';;.~~i~~f-~t~~.'~'.;I: ',.
:s):r::i:i5:~~~.?p;,;;:,-<~:~!: "1~:~:i~;;;~~'
~':"':)d:'frit.?r[;O~11!::....:.'tl' ,:: ~
.. .,.. __.'J'II",-~ ~ ' . .:......"".~.....~.t.:-. ',; \'
In. Ilf"~r,.. ~t..,.;c...k't'..,":\;-. '1.J~ ....':':~:~., .:-' ':. .
'I." '~'13[~,,:Z;~r~;'~!' .:..fI,..... :...)~...,!:.:..~ ,
\'11. l.~' .. y. .",. "".01 ""~.;,,,... "1']. :..;. '..
'\'J!~f;~~ .~~~l~~~'~:'.. ....~~.' ,,~~,,~'~:;~t:-~ ::.'::
..~ti.:i.~c;r~.~~..~~~~~",?~.~~:.;a.~~~..,...,.~~
:.ft~~~""'~J:~.~t'.:~,~. <'~-." ic"~'~t:-~'"l,
~~"'~';'" :-:2.~~; ~"l",:;.:.:..:' .'.:.,...(,,~
~
\i
"
..
..
/'
~
'\:
~
~
~
~
~
~
""
~
C\.l
I ;, i'''. ' ~" .r! ".,'.. " "<,:~'.i.'l":.,:,;, ;. ,~., I
~ .:.::ii~A,~.;l;...'.j:r.';1(~:(;:\,'
,~,.,"', ;',,' ~L 0. ' I,.: (I: P, . . ~
~:;i~~~i~~:;:~;;~~;;~;l'r';;:.
fl)
~
\)
~.
\9
r
..
.
"'l
,.
II
0\
If)
~
~
'<
}~:::'':L:'i' ~~'=::f:~
. ." ':',....v ,. ..-; ,;.,/
~~}~:; ~~::.;.~:I~~.(~: <:~.; '~~..~.!.-,
~ ,~,,::'J.',.,:.:.':.,..:~.;.~,~,,:..~.:.:,,',_,'.."~'....,.......,. ,':' I .
'... ~ ;:... ~~. .;..~..:,.t'..~~\
"
,
I'
~I;:~~;;;};~;:~.;i:~;~<
\i'I :.;' ..J""'~"O"'::~/::~iA' ~ ;~ .,.,
~.:.\,.; .' ,,',,' ~'.~~ I ',,'.~t,.
"S"'tr'...J ".' ":"'j~'~" ...., .\., '.
. :,!~ I.<~'.~:...~.~;(;i -:~.'..:" ~"'."_'
I ..,..... I .! r.....'...... .:. ...:.....!I.~~..:-".
,'f ...~~~~.::~ ~,".I:;_'._..'
~~, .:-4"'//0.
.=, ;'t~:;~/.~'~.~':~~!:.1 ... " ." ...,".
.... "".. .",\;,1: .
'-' ... -..' .
""I"";':f~O r' 7'
:'-1 :"~,'. ':~: .:-
40'
~'.~:
".~\.:
, .,.'
,.~ . I
';:;~~:.' ./#P/CA rES'.
. ~ .':'~ ,e-.<"N r~!i
p
es,7 '
---r
lO5'
20'
I
. I
~ml ..
I MI". 12.5' 6LD& SET8""IC) VI /
J
------------.-----. ---------.... -/
/
r7 -- - - - - - :J?~~fiti~E-,~SJfi~~~ ,. - -- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
f
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
If)
~
.
~
\0
Lf)
(Q
I. z
0
0 If) -
I~ (" (Q l-
c:t
>
0:
W
(/)
~- w -t
- 0:
a..
W
~ W
0:
U t-
O Lf) U1
-'
CO \0 \0
-
0
111
(Q
If)
(Q
If)
\0
If)
~
r-'--
. ".
""I
-T
G'~
.
U1
~
.
Ln
\Q
LO
\0
LO
\0
LO
\0
LL
I-
U
<{
0:::
I-
If)
~
E X H I BIT
II Nil
,,q
....,
'W
j
I
I
22.S'
,., II'C
o
1\I
~
~
~~
)...
J..-.
~ ~
~ ~
~I ~ k:
~ ,~
~I ~ {V)
" ~ lj
I, ~
~ ~ ~
>- "" "
" ~ ~
~
....
....'
40'
,_~ .. ".//.?~()O' . ,
, ,T)j{::.~~<: ,; :-':,:~',:.:" ...,r ,'~T/.,:.~::";',,J I.
r~~.y '...._~. r.'" '_.......~,~..., '.'" ~
~..~~);~::~f "i. . '.,..;. '. ":' ....,::r_~i~~".
,:,:1-.01...,26, ,',. ..~";..-,,..ff)!
','2;,i.fi~t:~':i~~:5 :'ij~' ':_':~~J,',~:~;~~i:i~f::.:~~ I
. . , '. .....'.... )'1...:..:.'~I.dr'~ .~......),_~..~:..ol :';<..: r. ...,....:.ft.-4... I I
. ::.-;..i.l;o:\':"F',,:," .....I~ '!.;:'. ,:. ..~;,....!.~:!.\\:...~........ '~1~~
,00
-rt'(,t:/C"'" &
EI'1~RGcNC.Y Ac::ceS$ ..
A,NI> (/T/~/TY U/JEI'1EIVT ~
,; : 'ir. '@j;""" ~";,:,., ':'l:;;7?~;(1."li":~~ ,,':',:. ,
...' . .. '....~'.f.;.:-~...."'..". ,'F..,.. ..-~, ....'-,
~~~r~i~[fj~fff;i1~~
,PO
., '.f.~,d7,'i"'~ ~,'~"I'."\;""'.''''
,,\.i'! Ji, ..,. .-.;liti,~..~~~.~HA. ,.,...."'...........~.~ :',.
. ..\L1;,':."..~':' " ..,:.t:;~'I'.:....~....:i'~;(~..,.., .,'... .
I :~~.-\t!~....~~:.'.~ :~~',~':.ll;\~..:&~.i-...'...ii l,t..V":'UW":. '
. .:;~;~;1~~11t}~j~~it~
.. ....1-. .-,....' :-:...I...r,(~.-I"~'.~;,;.t",)",=-,J'..,,\ '.
II
J' ,.;, i::'.~~""; ".\'" ":','~.,;',::--'.~'':', ~",,,:,'...I
';'i;~;;8:~~':2:':f;'iFFI
...., .....-.,...... :.......".. '... ,.-.....(.'
.".~~;~i:/<:.:'~i..:::' . ~<';:~<,>::'~:.:':::, '
\J
II \)
lor 24",-"" .'-J;,-,;: ;';:.~' :.;': ~..
\ :., : I ',' ;'~~\r' ~,";". '.~.'
I I ,.~
.":""1. .'.., ~:; , . . '..' :..
"':'7.5D' 51DE' s~r:.
. . " . f'tP.,,::':"
".-.- .-.~-:... :~..' ~...,.'
" ,
~.dT. 23,
l_ '. .,~ ~
....
"
."., :
.. . I'
, '
" . ~. " .
, "
,\.... r
": .:i
~. ;....!.:. -:":''-' ~
!.,~,.. I:.".. ...:....,......~.:,~. ...~..;:,~!~~~.[~_~:.....;:~.: .
I'
,. ~~"'. ',., ".::";~:'.~'i:~<P~:::>;"~~'':-:
/ ':""~""~'~2:"~:~:-:":'''~'''"
~.C/'I " .;z ...'.t:....~:~>(r
." ._. '(...1
, . ~r 4 ,f ,~:,:~I .~.~..:.,:~.
it Or,P.i~"o.s'c.l>');!,' :.-':
f.LAIN A&E. ,t!;/9,g/'1c".vr
'.-1'
. 7.5" Ttl'; "_
,'.' ".'....r .'.... L .
. . ". }.,., ".,.:. "
21"',: ,~.:~~". '"
)..
v
~
JR-
~
~I
~ I ~
~~ II~
'8
I
...
....
~
\--. ,
~ ~
~ ':\
~' ~
.... '\
~
v
L-'~
BJIU>HJG
,.50~
----." I
, OL ~
. SCREEN
\ 3.~O'
3; I
~I
~I
~
~I
~I
~I
VJ
~I
~I
~,
'I
h.
~
.~ ~
~
: ~
.~
0\ V)
~
'\:l
V\
Q/\
~
""
~
,~
~ ~
t
~ml
] , ~UILDI~G SETBACKS,
1
l
l
I
I
~
l
~~
,I
~k
.. ~
~ Id
~ l:
I' \u
f~ ~
~~
~ ,
~ ~
~I,
~
~
~
ItO,.~ BLOCK --
I--- ---- -'
1- 9 1
21-28 1 -
36-49 1
1-12 2
11-19 1
]0-34 1
.-
,
~---~:- 1 - ,-_.
I - ---
I (: ~
.. ~ ... ,
"''It\'
~
I ~ ~r~
,~~ ~
I ~~~
!
I
"-
1tJ~ ~
~ I~~
~ ~ ~
,~ .
~ ~
t ~~
~ ~'
~ ~q)
~ ~It
~q,~,",
~ ~
~I~
~
'\tt
\,
Q
51 leet I .
Pr-oposed '.lsE' ' S i. "\ I,.
2. Building soec; riT,')l:j'lf.
81 ng 1 e-fami 1, :-!we 1 1 i Ilg
Over-al J height 0f 'iL'iPl'
Max inum Dens j t)o a J t ()L~(?'
Pl"oposed Ilene; i t. y 'C II. '.'
3. Mi ninum Lot wi dtt, ~ 63.
Minlnum Lot a..-ea '" /.,7:
lots which shall be as
4. Accessor-y str uctut-es s~
Section 4. B of the Ci t,
Development Regulatior"'.
5. Fences shall comp\-', l-Jit'
of the City of Boynton
Regulations.
6. Sidewalk shal J cO[lfon~
the Ci ty 0-4= Boynton Be,'
7. The utility set'vices sl
8. A minimum 2 - q'~18' ~
each lot.
9. All uti I i ties ate avd i '
appl"opl"iate agencies.
10. Tl"act A, Tl"act 8, Tt-ac'
sha I) be owned and rna i .
Association.
11. The pl"esel"vatfon at'ea
mininum preser-vation f"
the site anrl c;hMI' be
completion of the ltE".-
12.PY'esently there is ,0'
22nd Stl"eet in Oel,~)
Boynton Beach, a 101 'f) ,
side of Swinton Aver-. I'
the West side of, Se:l i'
sidewalk is .-equi .-<'d '
of Swinton AvenJe.
13. Accessory bu i I d i ng~, ;
t~,pp constl"ucti jl I not
feet in flcx:w iH'E'3 cH"
may be erected t(1 rl r"
the side pr-ope.t, ! il
fl"om the side pl'npr:,'
feet fnJln the "'T~,:1' f)'
Y' i ghts ar-e abd dgC'd,
14.Fences, hedges and, ),\
height, above rlnic;\I!'
except that fr-(](T1 I tiC'
maxinum height stl,'!ll
fences al"e constnlct"
plan appFoval adjac~'
consistent with thi<:'
eighteen (t8l ind'ps
pUl"poses,
~~ I
F1W'IT
---- - r-
22. 'iO t t
22, sn ['
I
r
I
,15. '.1 l'
'jn~ ii
\
\
.1
TRACT G - 20' EMERGENCY
ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT
m
liLI'
1--
(f)
W
0:::
U
<t
W
if)
rn~ ~5(' ~~~~ ~~\E~S'( lHREE: "t3tfEU I
AAI:J\rrLlNt "NO/OR AT LEASi mREE (3) FEEl
3=' .....1;..' LINE PROVIDING NO fA<;FJJl'NT RIGHTS hRf
~, 5 FEt.lCE;~ SHALL COt.lPLI NHI1 CHAPTER;>, c:
OF BOYNTON BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT RE'
AND WAllS SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX (6) FE
FINISHED GRADE. ON RESIDENTIAL ZONES
BUILDING liNE TO THE FRONT LINE THE ~.
IE FOUR /41 FEET, WHE~ WALLS OR FENLE
AS PART OF A SUBDIVISION OR SITE PLA~
PUBLIC RIGHT-Of-WAY. CONSISTENT WITH
SETBACK OF A t.ll NIt.lUI.l EIGHTEEN 118\ n.
FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES.
5. SIDEWALKS SHALL CONFOR~ TO CHAPTER 6
CITY OF 80YNTON 8EACH LAND DEVELOPME~
~ 7. THE UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE PROVIOl
8 A MINI~UM TWO 9'X18 PARKING SPACES ~.
o
........
f"..-
CO
<D
o
........
1-
w
J
c.:t
X
r"0
o
........
o
o
.--------
j
]
(.f)
"-.
~J
~'I
I
,
,
ll'l
~
a..
t')
co
a..
(/)
\.J..I
I-
<{
l-
(/)
W
~<{
<{-
WO::
0::
I-W
U>Z
o
u..N
-.J
:::>
t9
EACH LOT,
O. AlL UTILITIES ARE AVAILABLE AND WILL
APPROPRIATE AGENCIES
IO.TRACT A AND TRACT E:
SHALL BE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AN
THE PROPOSED PLAT BUT SHALL
ADJACENT LOT WITH RIGHTS LII.lI
11TH SAID AREAS BEING AN EASE
tHESE AREAS SHALL BE RELEGATE
ASSOCIATION,
TftACt II
SHALL BE DEDICATED TO rHE HOMEOWNERS
FEATURE AND LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
lftACT C AND TRACT D:
SHALL 8E TREE PRESERVATION AR~AS AND
OF THE ADJACENT LOTS WI1H THE SA~E Fl
tRACT A AND TRACT E. EXCEPT THESE AFI
AS PERPETUAL RESERVES TO BE MAINTAIN'
STATE EXCEPT FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
'RESERVE AREAS AND THE NECESSARY REV
SPECIES FROM SAID AREAS AS OUTLINED
FOR SAID AREAS
TRACT F:
SHALL BE A ROADWA. fRACT AND DEDICA!
ASSOCIATION FOR ROUTINE OPERATION AI.
THE ROADWAYS AND THf ~TORM DRAINAGE
TRACT G:
SHALL BE THE EMERGENCY ACCESS AtJD \II
SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE HOMEOWNEP
OPERATION. MAINTENANCE AND EMERGE tIC
II.THE PRESERVATION AREA SHALL COVER"
MINIMUM PRESERVATION Of THE EXISTIN
12~IRREGULAR SHAPED LOTS SHALL COMPLY
SECTION 4. G OF THE BOYNTON BEACH Il
IJ.MININUM LIVING AREA OF RESIDENTIAl.
I..ENTRY SIGN ~UST BE SETBACK MIN, 10
IS.NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, EXCErl I'
ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES SHALL BE L0(
16.S11E PLAN APPROVAL IS REOUIRED ,-I>I
[XCEP) ION OF THE SINGLE F AM I L'f H(,.I;
IMPROVEMENTS REV1EwfO AND APPROVEI
PROCESS,
17.A LEGALLY CONSTITUTED MAINTENhNC'
REQUIRED TO BE APPAnvF.D PRIOR 10 I,
o SHALL
BE CONS I
TED AS r
MENT Atl!
o TO THE
[E
SE TBACK Cll,\R r
BUILDING SETBACKS:
LOTS
BLOCK
FRONT
SIDE ADJACENf
TO SIREET
'2 5 FT
1-6
9
21 FT
21 FT
i\ I
---1--
\ /
\-/
y
7\
, \
--/-' \ [J
II
--------- "f--
II
10-16
17
21 FT_
21 FT
~I
II
5
18-24
25
21 FT
21 FT,
IJ
W
S
26-28
29
21 FT
21 FT
30-43
21 F T
--r2 ~. -1-1 I
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
January 16. 1996
I. OPENINGS:
6:30 P,M.
A. Call to Order - Mayor Jerry Taylor
B. Invocation - Rev. Johl') Block. 81. Mark Catholic Church
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Commissioner Sid Rosen
O. Agenda Approval:
1. Additions. Deletions. Corrections
2. Adoption
II. ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. Accept resignation from Helen Voelxen. Alternate Member. Advisory Board on
Children & Youth
B. Accept resignation from Rhennle K. Givhan. Municipal Firefighters' Pension Board
C, Appointments to be made:
APPOINTMENT LENGTH OF TERM
TO BE MADg BOARD EXPIRATION DATE
IV Matson Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Ait Term expires 4/96 TABLED
II Bradley Cemetery Board Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Comm Redev Adv Board Reg 1 yr Term to 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Code Enforcement Board Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Reg Term expires 4/97 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Reg Term expires 4/97 TABLED
IV Matson Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 2 yr term to 1/98 TABLED
III Jaskiewicz Education Advisory Board Stu Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
Mayor Taylor Education Advisory Board Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
II Bradley Adv Brd Children & Youth Alt Term expires 4/96
III Jaskiewicz Education Advisory Board Reg Term expires 4/96
IV Matson Education Advisory Board Reg Term expires 4/97
Mayor Taylor Municipal Firefighters' Pension Fnd Term expires 4/97
III. CONSENT AGENDA
Matters in this Section of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manager
for "Consent Agenda" approval of the action Indicated In each Item. with all of the
accompanying material to become a part of the Public Record and subject to staff
comments.
A. Minutes
1. Regular City Commission Meeting Minutes of January 2. 1996
B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved In the 1995-96 Adopted
Budget
1
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. ~6-015
TO:
Carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. HeYden'~/l
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
DATE:
January 11, 1996
SUBJECT:
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the
January 16, 1996 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (5)
current development project:
sets of plans for the following
Master Plan - Rezoning
- Hills at Lake Eden
REZN 95-002
Note:
Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and
Zoning Department following the meeting.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
TJH:bme
Attachments
a:transHIL.JAN/P&D
(
!!o::
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-743
Agenda Memorandum for
January 2, 199G City Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyderr~~~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: December 29, 1995
SUBJECT: Hills at Lake Eden PUD (REZN 95-002)
Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (POD)
The above-referenced item is on the table under Public Hearings
for the January 2, 1996 City Commission Agenda,
DESCRIPTION: Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying Inc., agent for
Newport Properties, Inc., property owner, is proposing to change
the zoning on 15.45 acres of property located on the west side of
the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard,
from R-1-AAB (Single Family Residential) to Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w/LUI=5). The
proposed Hills at Lake Eden PUD provides for the construction of
62 single family detached homes with a gross density of 4.0 units
per acre. The future land use classification will remain as Low
Density Residential, and continue to limit the area to a maximum
gross density of 4.84 units per acre.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department, the Forester
and the City Attorney met with the applicant today at which time
the applicant presented a revised master plan showing, among
other things, a reduction of six units, an increase in some of
the building setbacks and an increase in lot size accomplished by
incorporating the preservation areas as easements on private lots
rather than separate dedicated tracts. Therefore, since there
was not time for staff to review and comment on all the changes,
it was agreed to postpone this matter before the Commission to
the January 16, 1996 meeting. The applicant will be submitting
complete revised plans on January 3, 1996, which will be
distributed to the Technical Review Committee for further
comments. These new comments will be forwarded to the Commission
for the meeting on the 16th. Attached is the applicant's letter
requesting postponement.
TJH:arw
Attachment
xc: Central File
c:CCAgdmem.Hil
FROM GENTRY ENG I NEER I NG )1- L, S, ] NC. PHONE NO,
4137 272 7743 -
P131
Gentry Enlineerinl and Land Surveying, Inc.
P,O. BOX 243
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447
PHONE: 272-1924
Mer'l'lber
American SOl:iety of Civil t:nginllar!':
Am@l'ican Congr@ss af SUn/eying &. Mapping
Member
~Iorida Society of
Professional land Surv~yors
December 28. 1995
Ms, Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Directo~
City of Boynton Be~ch
100 E. Boynton Eeacn Rlvd-
Boynton Beach. Fl. 33425-0310
Re: Hills at Lake Eden
Dear Ms- Heyden.
aR yon hav~ r~qu~st~d, we are forwarding to you OUr request
for po~tponQmQne of th~ City Council P~b1ic Hearing for ~ho rQ~oning
pPtition for the Hills ~t Lake Eden, PUD, presently scheduled for
hhA J~nuary 2, 1996 City Council meeting. We reBpec_~ully reque~t
that the meeting b@ rQscheduled to the next City Council meeting
wh~~~ T und~rs~and bo b~ held on January 16, 1996.
If you should havp- any questions regarding the above, plcaGc
contact my office,
Sincerely,
INC.
c.c. f'ranJ<: pinto
,'._\":;:\"""" -
\ II'! L !
i-I
j --
I H 1\
tl ,\;,
,I I- \'
,"-' -
I I
\~ iI'
, II
\ ., ) CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
, ,,',,':11 .. \ EGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
:.' \! , . - .,--_. AGE N 0 A
/},
;!}~/.n. Ji.C.-;;r
'-
December 19, 1995
6:30 P.M.
I. OPENINGS:
A. Call to Order - Mayor Jerry Taylor
B. Invocation - Rev Hank Ackermann - Boynton Beach Congregational Church
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Matson
D. Agenda Approval:
1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections
2. Adoption
II. ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. Appointments to be made:
APPOINTMENT LENGTH OF TERM
TO BE MADE BOARD EXPIRA TION DATE
IV Matson Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
II Bradley Cemetery Board Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Children & Youth Adv Brd Alt Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Comm Redev Adv Board Reg 1 yr Term to 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Code Enforcement Board Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Reg Term expires 4/97 TABLED
IV Matson Adv Brd Children & Youth Reg Term expires 4/97 TABLED
I Rosen Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 1 yr term to 1/97 TABLED
II Bradley Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 1 yr term to 1/97 TABLED
III Jaskiewicz Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 2 yr term to 1/98 TABLED
IV Matson Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 2 yr term to 1/98 TABLED
Mayor Taylor Board of Zoning Appeal Reg 2 yr term to 1/98 TABLED
I Rosen Board of Zoning Appeal Alt 1 yr term to 1/97 TABLED
II Bradley Board of Zoning Appeal Alt 2 yr term to 1/98 TABLED
III Jaskiewicz Education Advisory Board Stu Term expires 4/96 TABLED
IV Matson Bldg Brd of Adj & Appeal Alt Term expires 4/96
III. CONSENT AGENDA
Matters in this Section of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manllger
for "Coneent Agenda" approval of the aotlon Indioated in each item, with all of the
accompanying material to become a part of the Public Record and subject to staff
comments.
A. Minutes
1. Special City Commission Meeting Minutes of December 4, 1995
2. City Commission/Chamber of Commerce Workshop Meeting Minutes of Dec. 4, 1995
3, Regular City Commission Meeting Minutes of December 5, 1995
B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1995-96 Adopted
Budget
1
1. Approve manhole structural repair at NE 8th Avenue and NE 26th Avenue with
Underwater Unlimited Diving Services, Inc.
2. Approve piggy-backing City of Pompano Beach's Annual Contract for Water Meters
and Parts
3. Approve replacement of Submersible Well Pumps & Equipment with Atlantic
Environmental Systems, Inc. for one year
4. Approve East Water Treatment window replacement utilizing existing contractor/M8R
Construction, Inc.
5. Approve annual contract for Aquatic Plant Control with Lake & Wetland Management
6. Co-op Anhydrous Ammonia - The Cooperative Purchasing Council of Palm Beach
County awarded the bid to Tanner Industries, Inc.
C. Resolutions
1. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Water Service Agreement - Thomas G.
Kane for property located at 3645 North Federal Highway, Delray Beach
2. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of service contract
between the City of Boynton Beach and TFP Inc. for the computerized photo imaging
system in the Police Department
3. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Rosemary Scrub Joint City/County
Acquisition Project Resolution endorsing grant award agreement and grant award
calculation
4. Proposed Resolution No. R95-
Rosemary Scrub
RE: Addendum III to Conceptual Approval for
D. Approval of Bills
E. Payment ot Bills - November 1995
F. Approve expenditure tor returning Communications Center to City Hall
IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESENTATIONS:
A. Announcements
B. Presentations
1. Representative Sharon Merchant
2, Presentation ot Holiday Parade Awards
3. Proclamations
a) Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, Day. January 15, 1996
b) Shrine Hospital Days - February 3rd - February 14th
2
V. BIDS:
None
VI. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 PM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA
PERMITS
A. PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Hills of Lake Eden PUD POSTPONED TO JANUARY 2, 1996
Burlison A. Gentry - Gentry Engineering & Land SUNeying, Inc.
Newport Properties, Inc.
Northwest corner of S.E. 36th Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard
REZONING - Request for zoning and master plan approval to
construct 62 single-family detached homes on 15.45 acres of land in
connection with a rezoning from R-1-AAB (single-family residential)
to Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 5 (PUD with
LUI=5).
B. PROJECT NAME: Miner Road TABLED TO DECEMBER 19, 1995
AGENT: Richard Harris for Condor Investments of Palm
Beach County
City of Boynton Beach
Road between High Ridge Road and 1-95
ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of a 54 foot wide
portion of the Miner Road right-of-way east of High Ridge Road
OWNER:
LOCA TION:
DESCRIPTION:
C. PROJECT NAME: Miner Road
AGENT: Richard Harris of Scott, Royce, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A.
OWNER: City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County
LOCATION: Miner Road between High Ridge Road and 1-95
DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of three parcels that
comprise the Miner Road right-of-way east of High Ridge Road.
D. PROJECT NAME: Newport Place PUD (f.k.a. Stanford Park PUD)
AGENT: Donald E. Hearing
OWNER: Newport Place Associates Ltd.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Hypoluxo Road and Northwest 7th Court
DESCRIPTION: FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING - Request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Low
Density Residential to High Density Residential for a 23 acre, existing
planned unit development (PUD) and a 1.59 acre tract and to rezone
the 1.59 acre tract from R-l-AAB (single-family residential) and the
PUD to Planned Unit Development (PUD w/LUI=5) to add a 120 bed
assisted living facility.
E. PROJECT NAME: Newport Place
AGENT: Donald E. Hearing
OWNER: Newport Place Associates Ltd.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Hypoluxo Road and Northwest 7th Court
DESCRIPTION: PARKING LOT VARIANCE - Request for relief from the City of
Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 23 .
Parking Lots, Article II. Section H.7 "Number of OrlvewaYI" to allow
two (2) additional driveways onto Northwest 7th Court.
F. PROJECT NAME: Cedar Ridge PUD and High Ridge Commerce Park PID (buffer
easement)
Richard Harris of Scott, Royce, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P,A.
Condor Investments of Palm Beach County, Inc,
South perimeter of Lots 15, 16. 17 and 18 within the High Ridge
Commerce Park PIO
DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of a 25 foot wide buffer
easement.
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCA TION:
1
G. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Distribution Center (Miner Road Access Control
Easement)
Richard Harris at Scott. Royce, Harris. Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A.
Waste Management at Florida
North perimeter at Lots 18 and 19 at the Boynton Beach Distribution
Center
DESCRIPTION: ABANDONMENT - Request tor abandonment of 5 foot wide access
control easement.
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCA TION:
H. Conduct a public hearing concerning the issuance at bonds tor Clipper Cove
VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE:
INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 3 MINUTE PRESENTATIONS
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
A. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED
APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 19, 1995
AGENT: Interplan Practice, Ltd.
OWNER: Papa Johns USA
LOCATION: Northeast corner at N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPE APPEAL: Request for a landscape code appeal to
overhang a required landscape strip with bumpers of parked cars.
B. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED
APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 19, 1995
AGENT: Interplan Practice. Ltd.
OWNER: Papa Johns USA
LOCATION: Northeast corner of N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: NEW SITE PLAN: Request for site plan approval to construct a
1.142 square foot take-out pizza store on .22 acres
C. PROJECT NAME: High Ridge Commerce Park PID
AGENT: Joseph D. Handley. Craven Tompson & Associates, Inc.
OWNER: Waste Management at Palm Beach
LOCATION: High Ridge Commerce Park PID Lots 15. 16, 17 and 18 (South side
at Commerce Road. approximately 304 teet east at High Ridge
Drive)
DESCRIPTION: USE APPROVAL - Request to establish within the High Ridge
Commerce Park PID exterior truck and solid waste container storage
as a permitted use.
D. PROJECT NAME: Waste Management at Palm Beach - South
AGENT: Joseph D. Handley. Craven Tompson & Associates, Inc,
OWNER: Waste Management at Palm Beach
LOCATION: High Ridge Commerce Park PIC Lots 15,16, 17 and 18 (South side
ot Commerce Road, approximately 304 teet east of High Ridge
Drive)
DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN MODIFICATION - Request to amend the previously
approved site plan to add land area to construct additional exterior
paved truck storage and an expanded exterior container storage
yard.
E. PROJECT NAME: Tara Oaks PUD
AGENT: Kieran J. Kilday, Kilday & Associates, Inc, for Pulte Home Corp.
OWNER: Tara Oaks Development Company
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth Road extended
DESCRIPTION: MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION - Request to amend the previously
approved PUD master plan to revise direct access points, alter the
location and type of private recreation, change unit type from
apartments to townhouses. establish perimeter buffer easements
and certain setbacks, enlarge size of residential Pod 1 and church
parcel and reduce open space and retention area of Pod 2.
IX. NEW BUSINESS:
A. Items for discussion requested by Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Matson
1. Purple Heart Way
2. Public Transportation
3. It's Better in Boynton Campaign
B. Consider request for a block party on White Hall Way - December 31, 1995 from 9:00
P.M. to 2:00 A.M.
X. LEGAL:
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-46 RE: Land Use Amendment - School Board of
Palm Beach County (Poinciana Elementary School Project)
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-47 RE: Rezoning - School Board of Palm Beach
County (Poinciana Elementary School Project) Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-48 RE: Rezoning - School Board of Palm Beach
County (Poinciana Elementary School Project)
B. Ordinances - 1 st Reading:
None
C. Resolutions
None
D. Other
XI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
None
XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
XIII. OTHER:
XIV. ADJOURNMENT:
NOTICE
IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY,
MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE/SHE WilL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR
SUCH PURPOSE, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROOEEDING IS MADE.
WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED,
(F,S. 286.0105)
THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO
AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY
THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT
JOYCE COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY.FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR
ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST.
l/iI" OYN'?1-
l ...
11..1.. - "
~~. ~ ~,~.E
''<'/.; ")
...).. V'
f]1ie City of
tJloynton 'Beac,n
:
100 '!:. ~ ~ 'BtJuUrxml
~.O. 'kt,JIO
~~:FfmW4 JJ425.0J10
City!JfJlil: (407) J7UOOO
!FJtX: (<<J7) J7S-4090
"MON. lUIS-WED. THUl\ FRI.
@0@@~
FACE THE FAX
DATE:
;1 47/7)
t i
FROM:
1'1. Rv /'7?!'
,
TO:
/1/7--- ~
/'I/,,: r 'C--n /( r;'~ ~
FAX NO. OF RECIPIENT (305-) '1.26.- 9(; G?
IE : - ';-(,rL:. J~ b-.!'.; <"a~ ~ / 6 7'.- b -s;__ <~ 6.J:;4 n;.. ..,
,
?3~D.
TOTAL' of PAGES
INCLUDING COVER SHEET: ~
~'s (jauWGy to tM (julfstTUJ.m
1/21/1gSS 12:48
407-243-7221
(; 1 1"( lit- lJI:.IJ.'A Y
[IT, IF DElAAY BEAtH
DURAY'"CH
~
'II I! Novemw21, 1QOS
PAGt. Ell
100 N.W. 1.. AVENUE. DELRAY BI!ACH, FLORIDA 314.. . 407/243.7000
oom
~ 0 WI ~
1993
Tambrt J. Heyden, Director
Planning and Zoning
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425~320
NOV21mi
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
~E: Hili. of Lake Ed... PUD (RezN 95-002'
Exten.'on of Ou.tream Boulevard
Dear Tambrl,
At last night's meeting of the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Board, the Board
discussed the proposed extension of Gulfstnaam Boulevard between Swinton Avenue
and Seacrest Boulevard. As you'd noted in your letter of November 2nd, there Is a
policy in your city's Comprehensive PI.n that supports this extension. Defray Beach's
Comp Plan al80 discuse. ihe extension, and Indicates It as .. eo' CIty colJector on the
future street network. The extension Is not shown on the County's Thoroughfare Plan,
There was testimony from the president of the Seacrest Property Owners Association
opposing the connection, and most of the Board members indicated that they did not
feel the extension is necessary. However, since it Is included in the Comp Plan, they
are reluctant to dismiss it altogether without additional snalysis. There was not enough
time betwssn the receipt 01 your request and the Board's meeting to conduct any kind of
traffic analysis that would dearty support a deletion of the policy.
At this time, we llIquest that a decision regarding the provision of right-of-way for the
potential roadway be defened until such time that additional analysis can be conducted.
You might want to require that the applicant's traffic engineer prOVide such an analysis,
Wh ich could then be reviewed by staff from both of our departments.
Thank you for soliciting our Inj)ut, and I appreciate your Commission's considenilticn of
OlAr request.
Sincerely;.. ~
DI~~~
Director of Planning and ~ng g
Q) PmM CIn 1fM1fJI-d"'"
THE EFFORT ALWAYS MA.TTERS
rn
I d",
~c ~ r;k ~A/
r~ ,k?:
gui/i~ ~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEEnNG
AGENDA
November 21, 1995
I. OPENINGS:
A, Call to Order - Mayor Jerry Taylor
B. Invocation - James E. Henry - Encouragement (Par.kalein) Minittri..
C. Pledge of Allegiance to the F!ag led by Mayor Jerry Taylor
D. Agenda Approval:
1, Additions, Deletions, Corrections
2. Adoption
II. ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. Appointments to be made:
APPOINTMENT
TO BE MADE
Mayor Taylor
IV Matson. .
II Bradley
IV Matson
II Bradley
IV Matson
IV Matson
IV . Matson
Mayor Taylor
II Bradley
IV Mallon
Mayor Taylor
BOARD
Board of Adjustment
BleIg Brd of Adj & Appeal
Cemetery Board
Children & Youth Adv Brd
Ubrary Board
Comm Redev Adv Board
Code Enforcement Board
Adv Brd Children & Youth
Board of Adjustment
Board of Adjustment
Children & Youth Adv Brd
Recreation & Parks Brd
LENGTH OF TERM
EXPIRATION DATE
Aft Term expires 4/97
Alt Term expires 4/96
Alt Term expires 4196
All Term expires 4/96
Alt Term expires 4/96
Reg 1 yr Term to 4/96
Alt 1 yr Term to 9/96
Reg Term expires 4197
Reg Term expires 4/96
Reg Term expires 4/98
Reg Term expires 4/97
Reg Term expires 4/97
6:30 P.M.
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
TABLED
B. Authorization to submit state grant in the amount of $43,500 to aid in DUI enforcement
for purchase of two pollee cruisers, and two in-car camera systems
C. Reallocation of Sewer Renewal and Replacement Funds for lift station telemetry & pump
replacement of master stations
III. CONSENT AGENDA
Matters in this Section of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manager
for "Consent Agenda" approval of the action indicated in each item, with all of the
accompanying material to become a part of the Public Record and subject to staff
comments.
A, Minutes
1. Regular City Commission Meeting Minutes of November 7, 1995
2. City Commission Workshop Meeting Minutes of November 9,1995
B. Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1995-96 Adopted
Budget
1
1. Extension of one year for the bid for Annual Supply of Sodium Hydroxide from Jones
Chemicals, Inc. for the Utilities Department
2. Approve renewal of local manpower maintenance contract for the Martin Luther King
Boulevard target area
C, Resolutions
1, Proposed Resolution No. R9S- RE: Authorize execution of Agreement for
Wastewater Service outside the city limits for Colonial Estates, Inc. located west of
Military Trail, north of Flavor Pict Road
2. Proposed Resolution No. R95-
work at the Vinings PUD
3. Proposed Resolution No. R95. RE: Release of surety and final acceptance of
SW 8th Street thru Woolbright Place pce and Woolbright Place Plat 1
RE: Release of surety for excavation and fill
4, Proposed Resolution No. R9S. RE: Temporary easement and agreement for
Beach Restoration Project (Ocean Ridge Shore Protection)
5. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Water Service Agreement for property
owned by Robert F. Griffith, Jr" and Gene Moore, III. for proposed Mariner Health
Care Facility located along Lawrence Road, north of Old Boynton Road
D. Approval of Bills
E. Payment of Bills - October 1995
F. Approve authorization to dispose of records. Golf Course
G. Consider approval of reconstruction of the Sanitary Sewers on South Atlantic Drive & 300
Block of NE 9th Avenue in the amount of $50,411.00 piggybacking Palm Beach County
bid for Insituform Southeast, Inc.
H. Approve purchase of a Toro Groundsmaster rotary mower off state contract in the
amount of $12,055 for the Golf Course
I. Approve cart path overlay of blue course at the Golf Course off Palm Beach County
Asphalt Paving contract in the amount of $13,000
J. Approve redesignation of NW 13th Avenue between NW 1st Street and Seacrest
Boulevard as a one-way (eastbound) street
IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS. PRESENTATIONS:
A. Announcements
None
B. Presentations
1. Presentation by Representative Andrews of $2,500 check for Historical and
Architectural Survey Grant
2. Plaque presented by Myra Jones to the City of Boynton Beach from the Anti Drug
Fighters
v. BIDS:
None
VI. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 PM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS
2
A. PROJECT NAME: Miner Road TABLED
AGENT: Richard Harris for Condor Investments of Palm
Beach County
City of Boynton Beach
Miner Road between High Ridge Road and 1-95
ABANDONMENT - Request for abandonment of a 54 foot wide
portion of the Miner Road right-of-way east of High Ridge Road,
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
B. PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Hills of Lake Eden PUD
Burlison A, Gentry - Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying, Inc.
Newport Properties, Inc,
Northwest corner of S.E. 36th Avenue arid Seacrest Boulevard
REZONING - Request for zoning and master plan approval to
construct 62 single-family detached homes on 15.45 acres of land in
connection with a rezoning from R-1-AAB (single-family residential)
to Planned Unit Development with a land use intensity of 5 (PUD with
LUI=5).
C. PROJECT NAME: Poinciana Elementary School
AGENT: Jon C, Hansen
OWNER: The School Board of Palm Beach County
LOCATION: Multiple parcels west of Seacrest Boulevard, between N.W. 11th
Avenue and N. W. 13th Avenue
DESCRIPTION: REZONING - Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential to Public and
Private GovernmentaVlnstitutional and rezone from R-1-A (single-
family residential) and R-2 (single and two-family dwelling) to Public
Usage.
VII. PUBLIC AUDIENCE:
INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 3 MINUTE PRESENTATIONS
VIII. DEVE~OPMENT PLANS:
A. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED
APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 21, 1995
AGENT: Interplan Practce, Ltd.
OWNER: Papa Johns USA
LOCATION: Northeast corner of N.W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: LANDSCAPE APPEAL: Request for a landscape code appeal to
overhang a required landscape strip with bumpers of parked cars.
B. PROJECT NAME: Papa Johns TABLED
APPLICANT REQUESTED TO BE TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 21, 1995
AGENT: Interplan Practice, Ltd.
OWNER: Papa Johns USA
LOCATION: Northeast corner of N,W. 7th Court and Boynton Beach Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: NEW SITE PLAN: Request for site plan approval to construct a
1,142 square foot take-out pizza store on ,22 acres
IX. NEW BUSINESS:
A, Consider request from Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Advisory Board to
hold meetings on an "as called" basis
B. Consider approval of request from Fraternal Order of Eagles to hold a fund raiser to
benefit the Make-A-Wish Foundation of South Florida on December 9, 1995
3
, t
X. LEGAL:
A. Ordinances - 2nd Reading. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-40 RE: Amendments to Boynton Beach General
Employee.' Pension Plan regarding Investment guidelines
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095.41 RE: Amendments to Boynton Beach Rrefighter
Pension Plan regarding Investment guidelines
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095.42 RE: Boynton Commons rezoning from C-3 to
Planned Commercial Development
B. Ordinances. 1 st Reading:
1. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-
Zoning Appeals
3. Proposed Ordinance No. 095-
C. Resolutions
RE: Abolishment of Board of Adjustment
RE: Creating a new board entitled Board of
RE: Amend 45' height limitation
1. Proposed Resolution No. R95- RE: Authorize execution of agreement between
the City of Boynton Beach and the School Board of Palm Beach County reference
drainage at the Poinciana School project
D. Other
1. Code Enforcement Uen Reduction for Ms. Carmen Virgil et al
XI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: .
XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
XIII. OTHER:
XIV. ADJOURNMENT:
NOTICE
IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAl ~Y DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY
MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR
SUCH PURPOSE, HEJSHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE.
WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
(F.S. 286.0105)
THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO
AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EaUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY
THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY, PLEASE CONTACT
JOYCE COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR
ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST.
4
PLANNING AND ZONING DBPARnmNT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-669
Agenda Memorandum for
November 21, 1995 City Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker, City Manager
FROM: Tambri Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director I dltf
DATE: November 16, 1995
SUBJBCT: Hills at Lake Bden POD (RBZN 95-002)
Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (POD)
Please place the above-referenced items on the November 21, 1995 City
Commission meeting agenda under Public Hearing.
DBSCRIPTION: Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying Inc., agent for
Newport Properties, Inc., property owner, is proposing to change the
zoning on 15.45 acres of property located on the west side of the
intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard, from R-1-
AAB (Single Family Residential) to Planned Unit Development with a
Land Use Intensity of 5 (POD w/LUI=5). The proposed Hills at Lake
Eden POD provides for the construction of 62 single family detached
homes with a gross density of 4.0 units per acre. The future land use
classification will remain as Low Density Residential, and continue to
limit the area to a maximum gross density of 4.84 units per acre.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this request for rezoning to
Planned Unit Development be approved based on the collection of staff
comments included within Exhibit "D" of the attached staff report
(Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-648), and contingent
upon the incorporation of the additional comment indicated in the
attached memorandum (No. 95-533) from the City'S Environmentalist/
Forester which requires that fencing be installed and maintained
around the two (2) preserves and that this management feature be
incorporated into the applicant's Tree Preservation Plan. The Tree
Preservation Plan was submitted to staff after comments had been
formulated which caused the absence of this fencing requirement to be
originally overlooked by staff,
With respect to application of the Comprehensive Plan, this proposed
rezoning/master plan, attention is drawn to two comprehensive plan
issues which warrant action by the City Commission. The two issues
include the Comprehensive Plan recommendation to extend Gulfstream
Boulevard from Seacrest Boulevard to Swinton Avenue, and the current
deficient status of neighborhood park acreage within the project's
vicinity. These two issues relate to direct conflicts with
the plan and, as a consequence of approving the plan as presented,
amendments to the Plan may be necessary. The staff report describes
these issues in detail and includes alternative recommendations to
address those direct conflicts with the plan.
Lastly, the Planning and Development Board, by a unanimous vote,
forwards this request to the City Commission with a recommendation for
denial. The recommendation by the Planning and Development Board was
based on the small setbacks and anticipated excessive lot coverages,
which the Board felt was incompatible with adjacent properties.
TJH:mr
Attachment
MISCX:LBDBN.AGM
7.A.l
HILLS OF LAKE EDEN PUD
PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-648
TO:
Chair.man and Members
Planning and Development Board
Tambri J. HeYden,~
Planning and Zoning Director
THRU:
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
DATE:
November 9, 1995
SUBJECT:
The Hills at Lake Eden (REZN 95-002)
Request to Rezone to Planned Unit Development
INTRODUCTION
Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying Inc, agent for Newport Properties,
Inc., property owner, is proposing to change the zoning on 15.45 acres
of property located on the west side of the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard (see attached location map in
Exhibit "A"), from R-1-AAB (Single Family Residential) to Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w/LUI=5), The
proposed Hills at Lake Eden PUD provides for the construction of 62
single family detached homes with a gross density of 4.0 units per
acre (see attached copy of reduced master plan in Exhibit "B"). The
future land use classification will remain as Low Density Residential,
and continue to limit the area to a maximum gross density of 4.84
units per acre.
PROCEDURE
Pursuant to the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9
(Administration and Enforcement), when a rezoning request does not
require an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, staff analysis is not
required to include an evaluation of the project using the eight (8)
criteria under Section 9(C) (7). Since this request is only for
rezoning, the above-described analysis is not required. The analysis
conained herein evaluates the performance of the proposed master plan
and include selected portions of the above-described criteria which
pertain to impact upon municipal services, and consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and adjacent neighborhoods.
ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING
The land uses and zoning in the surrounding area varies and are
presented in the table that follows:
Direction
Zoninq
Land Use
North
R-2
St. Joseph's Church/School
East
n/a
Seacrest Boulevard
Farther east
R-I-A
Single family homes
Southeast (Delray Beach)
R-l-AA
Vacant
Southwest (Delray Beach)
R-l-AA
Lakeview Baptist Church
West
n/a
N. Swinton Avenue
Farther West
R-l-AAB
Single family homes
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (see proposed master plan - Attachment "B")
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from R-1-AAB
(Single-Family Residential) to Planned Unit Development with a Land
Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w/LUI=5). As defined within Chapter 2.5-
Planned Unit Developments of the Land Development Regulations, a
"planned unit development:
The Hills at Lake Eden
-2-
November 9, 1995
Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole
in a single development operation or an approved programmed
series of development operations for dwelling units and related
uses and facilities;
Includes principal and accessory uses and structures
substantially related to the character of the development itself
and the surrounding area of which it is a part;
Is developed according to comprehensive and detailed plans which
include streets, utilities, lots, building sites and the like and
site plans, floor plans and elevations for all buildings except
for single family homes intended to be located, constructed,
used, and related to one another, and detailed plans for other
uses and improvements on the land related to the buildings;
Includes a program for full provision, maintenance, and operation
of such areas, improvements, facilities, and unit development,
but will not be provided, operated, or maintained at public
expense."
Due to intended differences between PUD developments resulting from
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical design tailored to the
specific site, submittal of a site development master plan is required
at the time of request for zoning to PUD. This master plan is
attached to the zoning of the land and sets forth specific guidelines
for future development of the parcel.
The proposed use of the PUD is detached single-family dwellings. The
dwelling units are to be located on 62 platted lots, fronting on a
private roadway of which access is to be limited to N. Swinton Avenue,
The site contains common property which includes two preservation
tracts. The uses proposed for the site, and the acreage and percent
devoted to each, are as follows:
Single-family lots: 467,874,32
(square feet)
10,74 acres
69,52%
Common property
including
preservation area:
96,731.33
(square feet)
2.22 acres
14,37%
Private
right-of-way:
108,396.35
(square feet)
2,48 acres
16.11%
Total
673,002.00
(square feet)
15.44 acres
100.00%
The 15.4-acre site with 62 single-family units yields a gross density
of 4,01 units per acre. The following building and site regulations
proposed for the project are as follows:
Minimum lot area:
6,727.50 square feet
Minimum lot frontage:
not all specified on plan
47 lots at 63.75 feet
15 irregular-shaped lots at 30 feet
Minimum lot width:
63.75 feet
Minimum building setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
22.5 feet
7,5 feet (both sides)
12.5 feet
7.5 feet
The Hills at Lake Eden
Maximum lot coverage:
Maximum structure height:
Maximum net density:
Pool and Screen enclosure:
Front setback:
Side setback:
Rear setback:
-3-
November 9, 1995
None. From the proposed LUl, staff
has determined a maximum floor area
of 4,327.89 square feet, However,
unlike lot coverage, floor area
excludes garages, screened
enclosures, pools and storage
areas.
35 feet
5.77 units/acre
22.5 feet
7.50 feet (both sides)
3.50 feet
The building and site regulations of the current zoning on the
property (R-1-AAB) are as follows:
Minimum lot area:
Minimum lot frontage:
Minimum building setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
Minimum living area:
Maximum lot coverage:
Maximum structure height:
Maximum net density:
Screen enclosure setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
Pool setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
Note: above ground pools
9,000 square feet
90 feet-regular lots
67.5 feet-irregular-shaped lots
25 feet
10 feet (both sides)
12.5 feet
25 feet
1,800 square feet
35 percent
25 feet
4.84 units/acre
25 feet
10 feet
12.5 feet
8 feet
25 feet
8 feet (both sides)
12.5 feet
8 feet
shall comply with the building setbacks,
Utilities:
Sewer - The developer is proposing to serve the site with an eight (8)
inch sewer line to be linked with two (2) existing sanitary sewer
mains located on the east side of Seacrest Boulevard and on the west
side of N, Swinton Avenue. The connection with the main on Seacrest
Boulevard will be made just north of S.E, 35th Avenue, and the other
at the intersection of N. Swinton Avenue and S.W. 34th Avenue.
Water - The developer is proposing to serve the site with an eight
(8) inch water line to be linked with an existing six (6) inch main
located on the west side of N, Swinton Avenue, and with a twelve (12)
inch water main to be installed by the developer along the west side
of Seacrest Boulevard, The connection with the main along N, Swinton
Avenue will be at the intersection with S.W. 34th Avenue, and the
other to be connected at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and
S.E. 35th Avenue.
The Hills at Lake Eden
-4-
November 9, 1995
Drainage:
A conceptual drainage scheme has been provided which includes a
network of grass swales and catch basins that are located in the 40
foot wide private right-of-way. The grass swales provide pretreatment
of the stormwater prior to entering the drainage infrastructure.
Concurrency certification for drainage is required at time of master
plan approval. There is insufficient information to certify for
drainage concurrency at this time.
Access and Internal Traffic Flow:
The internal road network consists of a 40 foot wide private right-of-
way with 24 feet of asphalt pavement, Each dwelling unit has direct
access to the internal road with no direct access to Seacrest
Boulevard or N. Swinton Avenue. The project has a single ingress/
egress onto N. Swinton Avenue, The access point is located in the
northwest corner of the project and provides two lanes for each
ingress and egress, The project entrance is gated and includes a gate
house. In lieu of ingress/egress onto Seacrest Boulevard, emergency
access into the project is provided for fire, emergency rescue and
police vehicles from Seacrest Boulevard. The entrance limited to
emergency use is a 20 foot wide tract of land dedicated for emergency
access between lots 27 and 28. The roadway meanders along the sides of
the natural terrain which includes two prominent ridges that run in
the north and south directions near the center of the project, The
road forms a loop around twelve lots located in the east portion of
the project and returns to the entrance at N. Swinton Avenue,
Recreation:
No private recreation facilities are proposed for this project, and as
a consequence, the developer will pay the full parks and recreation
fee as required by the City's Land Development Regulations when
partial credit is not awarded in connection with the provision of
minimum private facilities, This fee is to be paid when the project
is platted, which will contribute toward public park improvements to
serve this vicinity. For a specific review of public recreation
facilities within this area, please refer to the section below titled
COMPATIBILITY OF REZONING WITH PUBLIC FACILITIES-Neighborhood Parks.
Topography, Soils and Vegetation:
The topography of the site features two prominent ridges running north
and south near the center of the site. The grade elevations of N.
Swinton Avenue at the north and south ends of the site are 14,67 feet
and 14,90 feet, respectively, The grade elevations of Seacrest
Boulevard at the north and south ends of the site are 22.06 feet and
27,45 feet, respectively. The elevation of the site increases from
the adjacent right-of-way elevations to an elevation of 32 feet along
the north-central portion of the site and 27 feet along the south-
central portion of the site. With respect to soil characteristics,
the soil borings performed at the site indicated medium-fine sand to a
depth of 15 feet.
Information relative to the environmentally-sensitive characteristics
of the subject site is provided below under the section
ISSUES/DISCUSSION.
Schools:
Pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policy 8.22.1, staff notified the Palm
Beach County School Board of the subject request, and provided them
with the information on the proposed residential project necessary to
conduct an analysis of the impacts of future residents on the racial
balance of affected schools. A response from the school board had not
been received at the time of report completion.
ISSUES/DISCUSSION
A) CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Provided below are complete, or excerpts of objectives and policies
taken from the Comprehensive Plan that are applicable to the proposed
request. These objectives and policies were taken from the Future
Land Use, Traffic Circulation, and Conservation Elements.
The Hills at Lake Eden
-5-
November 91 1995
Policy 1,17.8: "Maintain and improve the character of existing
single-family and lower-density neighborhoods I by preventing
conversions to higher densities. II
(For an analysis of the applicability of Policy 1,17,81 see the
examination below under CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND
USE PATTERN.)
Objective 1,15: IIEncourage planned development projects which
are sensitive to characteristics of the site and to surrounding
land uses, and..."
Policy 1.16.2: IISubsequent to Plan adoptionl modify the land
development regulations to allow planned unit developments up to
the maximum density shown on the Future Land Use Planl if all
other Comprehensive Plan policies and development regulations are
complied withl and the proposed PUD is compatible with
surrounding land uses. II
See analysis below under CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND
USE PATTERN-Gross Density for application of Objective 1.15 and Policy
1.16.2.
Policy 1.11.14: "Subsequent to Plan adoptionl modify the land
development regulations to provide for open space preservation by
requiring the preservation of 25% of all "A"I "BII, and IICII rated
sites of 10 or more acresl as designated in the Conservation
Element Support Document.", II
Objective 4,4: liThe City shalll to the maximum extent feasiblel
protect all remaining areas of substantial native upland and
wetland vegetation...1I
Policy 4.3,3: "The City shall establish a Density Bonus program
or other incentives in the City Plan and/or appropriate support
regulations to preserve natural areas; II
Policy 4.4,1: ".. .the City shall require subsequent to Plan
adoptionl a detailed flora and fauna survey on any IIBII and "C"
rated site subject to a development proposal and any site greater
than 10 acres in size. Based on survey resultsl micro-preserves
may be required oriented to preservation of a minimum of 25% of
all native plant communities which occur on-site, Habitat shall
be preserved with intact canopYI understory and ground cover."
For purposes of identification and preservation, all native habitat I
or Florida Scrub areas within the County have been rated on a relative
scale from "A" (highest quality or of most importance to biological
corridors) to I'DII (lowest quality or not representative of ideal scrub
habitat). Florida Scrub is a desert-like native ecosystem dominated
by sand pinel several species of oaksl saw palmettol other shrubs I and
provides habitat and food for recognized fauna such as the Gopher
Tortoisel Florida Scrub Jay and Eastern Indigo snake. The
Comprehensive Plan Conservation Support Document includes a map and
list of these natural areas which have also been adopted into the
Conservation Element (see attached Table #2 and map in Exhibit IIC")
As indicated on Table #2 of the Conservation Support Document I the
subject property is a "C" rated sitel and as required pursuant to
Policies 1,11,14 and 4.4.11 a minimum of 25% of the property occupied
by the environmentally sensitive ecosystem (as defined by a current
flora and fauna survey) must be preserved. The preserve for this
project is proposed as two similarly sized IImicro-preserves" which
total 1.28 acres. This total represents 32% of the total scrub
habitat which is indicated as being 4.2 acres in the applicant/s
environmental assessment (flora and fauna survey). The only
II observed" animal specie on the site is the Gopher Tortoisel and all
tortioses have already been properly relocated through the required
permitting process of the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission.
Although the character of the natural area present on this site The
The Hills at Lake Eden
-6-
November 9, 1995
warrants only a "~CO designation, and consists of only a total of 4.2
acres, the Comprehensive Plan still requires that a minimum of 25% of
such "CO rated ecosystems be preserved. The location of the two (2)
areas proposed to be preserved by the applicant, which are consistent
with the recommendation within the environmental assessment, are along
the higher elevations of the site, atop the site's two natural ridges,
Surrounding the preserve tracts are proposed residential lots near the
center of the project. Within these upland areas of the site are the
least disturbed habitat exhibiting features of the greatest quality
relative to the entire site. Furthermore, the higher elevations
naturally provide sun exposure and hydrologic conditions apparently
necessary for the continued existence and growth of typical Florida
scrub. With respect to staff review of these preserves, the City's
environmentalist/forester concurs with the location and size of the
proposed preservation tracts (see Recreation and Parks Department
Memorandum #95-517 within Attachment "D").
Lastly, the level of natural degradation of the Florida scrub could be
further increased as a result of impacts from development activities
and abuse by owners of adjacent properties unless properly managed,
including permanent preservation without encroachment of any
buildings, proper site design relative to drainage which is reflective
of the preserve areas and their sensitive characteristics, the regular
removal of exotic plant species, and by preventing the dumping of
garbage, trash or vegetative matter into the preserve. If such
preserves are not kept free of exotic and invasive plant and tree
species, as well as other of debris, this non-renewable native
ecosystem will continue to degrade. These practices and other
appropriate mechanisms to protect the preserve should be established
within the project's tree management plan, documented and demonstrated
within subsequent construction drawings, and ultimately incorporated
into the project's maintenance rules and regulations. Such a tree
management plan was submitted at the time of finalizing this report
and is pending review by the city's environmentalist/urban forester.
Objective 2,2: liThe City shall implement the future Traffic
Circulation Plan on a priority basis and shall coordinate same
with the City's Future Land Use Plan, II
Policy 2.2.9: "The City shall cooperate with Delray Beach and
support efforts to extend S. 36th Avenue (Gulfstream Boulevard)
between Swinton Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard."
The Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element and Support
Document recommend the extension of S. 36th Avenue from Seacrest
Boulevard to N. Swinton Avenue, and specifically recommends
coordination between the City and the City of Delray Beach as
necessary to support this project. However, the proposed master plan
proposes the development of that area over which this road would be
extended, Although the logical reason for this road extension is the
connection of two (2) county collector roads (Seacrest Boulevard and
N, Swinton Avenue) and the extension of a city collector which
provides direct access to U.S. 1, the support document contains no
narrative which specifically explains or justifies this
recommendation. The City of Delray Beach was notified of this issue;
however, staff had not received comments prior to completing this
report, It should be noted that if the City approves the proposed
master, staff should be directed to process a comprehensive plan
amendment to remove this recommended improvement from the Traffic
Circulation Element,
B) CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND USE PATTERN
As indicated above, land uses that abut the proposed project include
the St, Joseph's Church and School (north), Seacrest Boulevard (east),
vacant residentially-zoned property and the Lakeview Baptist Church
within the City of Delray Beach (south), and Swinton Road (west), The
only two built residential areas immediately adjacent to the project
are to the east and west, and consist of single family detached homes
within the R-1-AAB zoning district (west) and the R-1-AA zoning
district (east). A comparison of the principle development
The Hills at Lake Eden
-7-
November 9, 1995
characteristics of the adjacent neighborhoods with those of the
proposed master plan and with the zoning regulations of the existing
and adjacent zoning districts are indicated in the following two
tables:
Table #1
COMPARISON OF TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NEIGHBORHOOD LOT DIMENSIONS LOT AREA NET DENSITY VALUE
West (R-1-AAB) 100'x 165' 16,500 sqft 2.05 du/acre $150,000
East (R-1-A) 73'x 130' 9,490 sqft 3.5 du/acre $74,000
Proposed PUD 65'x 110' 7,150 sqft 5.77 du/acre >$150,000
Note: Price for project units obtained from appllcant
Table #2
COMPARISON WITH ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
DISTRICT LOT FRONTAGE LOT AREA LIVING AREA SETBACKS (f/r/s)
R-1-AAB (west) 90' 9,000 sqft 1,800 sqft 25' 25' 10'
R-1-A (east) 60' 7,500 sqft 1,250 sqft 25' 25' 7.5'
Proposed PUD 65' 7,150 sqft 1,800 sqft 22.5' 7.5' 7.5'
Note: Table #2 represents mlnlmum requlrements of the respectlve zonlng dlstrlct, and those
measurements typical within the proposed project.
The subject project exhibits characteristics relatively typical of
most larger projects reviewed by the City over the past five years, as
the proposed project has relatively small lots, side and rear setbacks
10 feet or less, and units with a living area ranging between 1,800
and 2,000 square feet. Whereas the area of the dwelling unit, and
front setback (of the proposed project) is comparable to the minimum
required within the existing zoning district, the lots, and
particularly the side and rear setbacks are significantly smaller and
shorter than the minimum required within the R-l-AAB zoning district.
The Hills at Lake Eden PUD master plan would meet only one (1) of the
above-selected design standards of the existing (R-l-AAB) zoning
district (living area), and two (2) standards of those minimum
requirements of the lesser stringent, R-I-A district which borders the
subject property to the east (lot frontage and living area) ,
With respect to evaluating the proposed project's compatibility with,
or impact upon values of adjacent properties, staff has considered the
consistency of the request with the maximum density of the Low Density
Residential land use classification, the consistency with
Comprehensive Plan Objective 1,15 and Policy 1.16.2, and current
factors which predominantly determine land values within the adjacent
neighborhoods and impacts of the proposed project. As the project
proposes a density less than the maximum density allowed within the
Low Density Residential land use classification, 4,84 units per acre,
the project would be consistent with the Future Land Use Map which is
the predominant residential classification within the area surrounding
the subject property and, specifically consistent with Comprehensive
Plan Objective 1.15 and Policy 1.16.2 (see CONSTENCY WITH APPLICABLE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES above). These Comprehensive Plan
recommendations generally allow for planned unit developments up to
the maximum density of the corresponding future land use
classification and in particular, when combined with a site with
unique characteristics (e.g. scrub habitat) .
As the proposed project would meet or exceed most development
restrictions of the R-I-A district, the subject request and master
plan would have no negative impacts upon this area to the east. As
for the neighborhoods west of N, Swinton Avenue, these homes are
The Hills at Lake Eden
-8-
November 9, 1995
located on Lake Ida, the L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal, or "finger" canals of the
E-4 Canal, The proximity of these homes to such water courses has
been a prinicple factor in the establishment of this neighorhood's
relatively high-valued real estate. Although the proposed master
plan contains smaller lots and shorter setbacks than typical within
this waterfront subdivision, the size and intended price of the
planned units (in excess of $150,000), the quality of the project
produced by unique features related to buffering, varying topography,
security (i.e. locked entrance gate, limited or single point access,
etc.), will all produce a project with character which will likely be
incapable of negatively affecting the remaining adjacent residential
properties. Further reinforcing this assumption is that which is
indicated within the Future Land Use Support Document, which states
that it does not appear that lot size affects the cost of single
family housing in current projects as much as the floor area,
features, and type of construction of the unit. Therefore, the lot
sizes proposed, which are smaller than those of the surrounding
single-family neighborhoods, will not likely have a negative effect on
the property values of adjacent and nearby properties, However,
regarding the differences in setbacks and lot frontage of the R-l-AAB
district to the west and the subject PUD, staff is recommending that
the front building setback be reduced from 22.5 feet to 21 feet, the
rear building setback be increased from 7.5 to 9 feet, the rear screen
enclosure and pool setback reduced from 3.5 feet to 5 feet and the lot
frontages of the irregularly-shaped lots be increased from 47.81 feet
to 63.75. These recommendations are more in line with recent PUD
approvals and are more sensitive to rear structures adjoining or
abutting properties and the preserve are.
Furthermore, specifically consistent with Objective 1.15 is the design
of the project. Having the effect of both minimizing the project's
impact upon adjacent properties and affects of adjacent properties
upon this planned community, is the inward orientation of the units,
and the placement of a landscaping buffer on those sides of the
property that abut adjacent roadways and residential neighborhoods,
However, with respect to circulation design, which will likely be
considered an attribute to future project residents (due to increased
security), this design will require all project traffic to use N.
Swinton Avenue. The traffic study determined that all roadway levels
of service would be maintained despite added traffic from the proposed
project; however, all of the 620 daily projected project trips would
be limited to N. Swinton Avenue rather than being lessened through the
provision of access onto Seacrest Boulevard. At the cost of an
additional gated entrance, project traffic could be better distributed
within this residential area, therefore reducing the volume of traffic
required to traverse the N. Swinton Road corridor and the adjacent
residential areas. Two possibilities are recommended to address this
in lieu of complying with Comprehensive plan 2,2.9 regarding extending
S. 36th Avenue adn adding an entrance onto the extended road. They
are adding an entrance onto Seacrest Boulevard that aligns with S.W,
35th Avenue or one that aligns with S.W. 36th Avenue which is
signalized.
C) COMPATIBILITY OF REZONING WITH PUBLIC FACILITIES
At the time of master plan approval, a review for concurrency
certification must occur for drainage, neighborhood parks and traffic
facilities. Concurrency certification is issued after the
determination that adopted levels of service standards are currently
met, and will be maintained despite impacts of the proposed project,
The facilities, along with the respective evaluations, are as follows:
Drainage: The project engineer has indicated on the master plan
ultimate compliance with drainage regulations of both the City and
South Florida Water Management District; however, as previously the
master plan is deficient of necessary drainage details which have been
requested from the applicant.
Neighborhood Parks: The levels of service standards (LOS) for the
twenty (20) neighborhood planning areas are twofold (acreage LOS and
The Hills at Lake Eden
-9-
November 9, 1995
walking distance LOS) and tiered. With respect to being tiered, the
LOS for those planning areas with original LOS less than the targeted
standards (2.5 acres per 1,000 persons and 1/2 mile walking distance)
improves with time (planning periods) as planned parks are built, The
subject property is within Neighborhood Park Planning Area #17, which
had original (1987) standards of 1.2 acres per 1,000 persons and 1
mile walking distance, as indicated on Table 2 of the Recreation &
Open Space Support Document (see Table #2 in Exhibit "E"). To improve
this acreage deficiency within Area #17, with the goal of eventually
attaining the target acreage LOS of 2.5, the City had assumed
development of the Girl Scout Park by the 1995 planning period, As
this neighborhood park has not been constructed, the LOS adopted for
the 1995 planning period is not acheived. The City's Comprehensive
Plan precludes the approval of any development if concurrency is
jeaporidized. As a consequence of this deficiency, if new development
within this area is to be approved, the City must take immediate
actions that either increase the surplus of neighborhood park
resources or lower the adopted level of service, Alternative actions
to increase the supply of parks within this park planning area
include: 1) commit to initiating the construction of Girl Scout Park
prior to issuing development permits for the subject project; or 2)
successfully implement Comprehensive Plan Policy 5,7.1 which intends
to provide a park alternative within Planning Area #17. Policy 5.7.1
reads as follows:
"By 1992, the City shall negotiate with St. Joseph's School in an
attempt to formulate, at a minimum, a policy regarding the
temporary use of the School's recreation facilities by adjacent
residents".
It should be noted that the need for future neighborhood park
resources within this planning area also continues to rise, and
specifically as a result of the inability to receive the anticipated
park dedication from the development of the Seacrest Scrub natural
area (which was instead acquired through a joint City/County effort) .
Although development of the Girl Scout Park would provide park space
sufficient to meet LOS until the Year 2000, it is now projected that
the LOS to take effect in the Year 2000 will be further unattainable
as a result of the public acquisistion of the Seacrest Scrub property,
A third alternative to this deficiency, unrelated to park supply, is
the lowering of adopted standards, The adopted levels of service
could be changed through the comprehensive plan amendment process, and
if so directed, staff would recommend the LOS be revised to reflect
both the current construction plan for the Girl Scout Park project,
and the loss of the planned dedicated, S. Seacrest Boulevard site from
the data and analysis within the Recreation and Open Space Support
Document. This alternative to amend the levels of service standards
through the resceduling of the Girl Scout Park project is the
recommended alternative of the Recreation and Parks Director (see
Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum #95-521 in Exhibit "D")
Lastly, it should be noted that the analysis of neighborhood parks
within the Comprehsive plan excludes those developments which contain
private recreation amenities generally equivalent to a neighborhood
park. Therefore, if private recreation facilities were provided
within the subject project, the future residents would be directly
supplied with recreation resources, and this project could be
certified for concurrency for neighborhood parks.
Roadway Capacity Analysis: As indicated in the section above titled
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant
was reviewed by Palm Beach County who determined that the project
would meet the requirements of the Palm Beach Countywide Traffic
Perfomance Standards Ordinance. The County does not comment on local
design issues such as the circulation plan proposed in the master plan
which limits ingress/egress to N. Swinton Avenue,
The Hills at Lake Eden
-10-
November 9, 1995
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant has satisfied a unique requirement on the development of
this property by preserving slightly over the minimum percentage of
native habitat existing on-site, Also, although the lot sizes
proposed are smaller than both that required by the current zoning
district and existing within adjacent residential areas, the lots are
larger than lot sizes approved within several projects approved within
the newly devevoping areas of the City. By allowing this design the
City is in effect providing an incentive for the preservation of
native scrub habitat which action furthers Comprehensive Plan Policy
4.3.3 while the project, as claimed by staff within this report, is
also consistent with Objective 1.15.
Pursuant to Section 10.B,2, Chapter 2.5-Planned Unit Developments of
the Land Development Regulations, the Planning and Development Board
shall determine (and advise the City Commission) whether that plans,
maps and documents subbmitted meet the requirements for LUI standards,
unified control, locational and PUD standards and establish that:
a) The tract for the proposed PUD is suitable in terms of its
relationships to the city comprehensive plan and that the
area surrounding the proposed PUD can continue to be
developed in coordination and substantial compatibility with
the PUD proposed, including overall dwelling unit density
and peripheral transactions in such densitYi
b) That the desirable modifications of general zoning PUD
regulations as applied to the particular case, justify such
modification of regulations and meet to at least an
equivalent degree the regulations modified, based on the
design and amenities incorporated in the site development
plani and
c) That increased open space is provided for the occupants of
the proposed PUD and the general public, and desirable
natural features indigenous to the site are preserved in the
development plan presented.
The LUI and unified control documentation have been submitted with the
application materials, The city attorney's acceptance of the unified
control documentation is forthcoming, The remaining requirements as
outlined above have been met or will be satisfied if this project is
approved subject to those outstanding comments included within
Attachment "D", and if the City appropriately address the deficiency
in neighborhood parks using one of the alternatives described by
staff, or an alternative action which is also consistent with city
concurreny regulations.
Based on the analysis and discussions contained herein, this request
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development
Regulations (subject to staff comments), and compatible with current
and future uses of surrounding properties and would not create an
isolated district unrelated to adjacent or nearby properties.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Hills at Lake Eden PUD
rezoning request, subject to staff comments within Exhibit "D",
TJH:mr
Attachments
xc: Central File
MISCX:LEDEN.REP
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
LOCATION MA~
,
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN - PUD
",11' , Fl='\ikfrhE~f)/ ;1 '~f)--Ir · .....- .~
{.~c ~ ,,'0 ~~ ~~~ ~ 1:P I C /:'1 R ~ r--==- -~ ~- .~~~U~fcrT~~'l\i
: _ ~5~V )~~ ~ \" ~ ~'rJ / PUC IiI
-', .<\.'1 ~ v ^~ vv:.1::-i.}-. I .' I :1.U1 · - - . -- -- ---'"lr
~_. ~. \ )J<).~~ / :- ~ - . -.I,' ~ . j _~
! 1/ ~ ~~,.:~~\;;/-; I :: .~ ~ ~ ).. ~ -.-'". ..... C I . I ~ -
;{.1 ~'X__' v~\.... -:- ~<< , r:-~ - "
l~7 ",\.~Ynx~(,(~; :r11 \ -= t t ]:' ~ ~t5 I:Lul~~~&:ft
. .12 y ~/~.?,.c~ ~ y r -t w r- ( I J n I ~ r /
,: ..tf~~y~. .~ "- ~," ! Po I"l r
, . tJ i Y'J ~ ~ "-. I L -, co/,E. , L : ~;'PIl -J PI J D .. ,,...,,-r r^'1 r-. 7":"
'~_t~t .I Jl YO\.'- ,0 )): '.,.... ~ " '/ 'l~m r--: - LU :6.. ii' I I~' - n .
\.1 I - - 1 J - ~ __~_i A IfJttJ - ~~ In h~ JII+
..L II ' m - ." r,r ~ IE
I r 1-\ \. . I ~ ~. ~~ I 'I I 3': ... ~ I \ I rn = _ , 'L I' I / I i
,l,~ -:,' 'T1-- ,r-<,j' I II")';
I ~ - ,-- ~~.( 1 1 I I I L ' R r{ ~
_ ~ l ....... . :Or i. _ '}. -.., : ~ "I, ~. i ---"- -'- - 7 101..... ~1 r ,r ,
"., wAa"""A't' ) , E ' ,....... ..-+-- -- (''''''''' /
...., --~'----r-- rT, I ! ill f I 1'\). IJ,' -11 -4- ->- I..IIO~~ '. r,r
~ Ie' ~ r-#' II H '-L1 -- .--+- - r"1 /
'\, \" '~~1.'~!.1 Ifl} 'L:=-! :' . ~"IJ~ ~ ~ --- f--+- ~ f- l~ ~ PI~ ~ rj' I 'I I
~I '0-. ~n T ,Ill . ~'JI C -- ~l..' ~) rt. . I
"'\ ;i J.I=t ~,l r"'l~I~_~1~ '~,: i all; 111 'rJ- \~: ~:rc:;~ ~ ~ L II , I
;t A) I ~:'/ [j.\~)Jj - ~'/ 1/; lfI~#iFtL ~ 1 : ~ff1 ~~ - - - ~-I-." -~, - ~ L
\ ,):-. f, IEJ;lQJ~,:, ~ '/I'lf1r Tl 'RJHf' -1.. . T/~- f -1-J.,lT:;Yt
,I I ( ~.-:- _ ~ - t · ~ ~-:.J :' ... I I 1fT I r _.::.:.:,...,- -- 1 11 1 III J ~~
) ___., -1 .. ~ ._~.l............... I " trff T LJ ._- -- -- - 1'1
';':"'.~~! _ -----1 -jT--~----r--" : i ~ .." -lJ f--- -~- -
";''!'-'-'f~';- rT~ ;rr~Jt' L_._ I fl I / ::l r 1 ; ~ _ I - IT I
. . . . . . Yo ---: ~LI 1 J . .1 : f I I Till ,-"-,......0- - ( 4-+1 ~ --f _ -
. ..t. · ,.. ~,- =- ,I) .1 I I - L ~ '= ~~
I _ . _.__~ . IJ " T I I 0 I I ....-- f--
. · . . - 'n'l~-~ - . Jl! ~ 1> ~I--'I
. I. 1'1'1 I '(]"1--I' I i~' , \ Ii'.' ...'"')"lc _ -::=f-- -+- I r.. ~ I l LJ f-. bI
, .~ .' 1 .... J~ -L i -- ITl r-r- -+-
J" - 0- ~ ,'1. './ / '"\ I rt, '- 'I-< c....., h { ~ ._ I
---- '1 ~~;.; I :.... ~ 7 cE: :"ill:~ ~~( ~ =H:.r If(.1 \ \ ~:= ~ T
\ .' J,: f/ ., .- -<' - -~r~ nr" I II IITH'"
._J:,:/W N ~ '=ic =-'~:f>,II, ~y~~- FI'lAA I
\\PUl[ R /' J /J . ~: /";~ -- , I .
',~ " I /~ I r - TTl _ _c-
d ..- E,:' I I I
,- - , i '7/~r""f..l I
C 1/!/~~7"~."'.(~~0:",,,. ':~.-.E:i.nz.~ Ji ~ 1 E -- ,-,r::::"'P
I / ~ 1 ,~ ~ - .~H::. ' t' --+----1 ~.~ I, J~
/''1/// J . >:t '..... yl r I- -< ';::sI~ ~ = ;,,, ;
'/ ;1111 Ii .... 7fn~ "iT' I~ ~ ..."" .~ ~ N D T
___~ '1/1;~0~'~'!)DJ!J :f/"i'(ir. Ij~.i. c:~v
'/I,~, ' - .' :r'-' I I I I IU U I l' ~
" ';:;g) ft~:':' ; .' ,:{t'f Ii r. . = -:1 .. I' ~
'."~ ~I./!;;,)I ,:':\ . '. ;:. \ 'I T~ ~ \T'"( .-~- \ \ ~ ~!
1 'l ~ , .' _'. ~ /.(..~'-;;'- ~ \.-__.[ I- :
, . filiI.' . ~ , i i ~ \ I .
I , A ~~:/ 1/ 'Q ",:":,, \ :'::~~~!L~\ ~j-+ -' j J
1/ /) II '-'-- :---- ',' .~._~-- <'.;\ \+ . ~
- : J ' \\t-'O 1/8 MILESV
,I I 'ill. \.: ~ . r r. \t "I" I
/?~.' ''/4 I ..... ,/ " .ffi' J.' '~LI==m:E' 1\11 . I. -'
/' /./ .1/ f (:'.:;....:: 'fJ- ~ I~ -- '- 1-->---' t 0 .400. 8~~N~~t;.T o~Pr. 11-9;
!/I-~-' J~t-=jl~~ __ __', 1~~WJ=1 q~~l-~Rr+E-o~rrir- 7111-
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN
~ ""4JO,c1~
-
.-
.: \L~ !.' ~I ~i oi<"~h ~hh!il i.i.~ /
. t ....li l t:. nil z-!J"'~ '& ! 1-.1I -I
~ t ~ ~ 3 ~j & ! ~~ , i !i!;i! l~~IJl ~ il~fi-
IJ ! ~!3 ~i ~i ~ l Uk ih ~1=6;!i ~!;6h~ -1'~iHl;~
13 ~ ~ I'~l ~i ~_!1 ~ ~,k Hi ;j~-l~;~ iHll~i hi:~I!
i - i t i" 1~1 - Q! -~ p1b ~k .;'"_.i f.!~ l! ~
i-I' 1 Ra ~~~i ~! ~l~ i~! li~ .i~~ ~~ I!Sj1t! ~~~~~l.i
2- ~ '. ~ ~B !ti f~lp . ~I -.3flti~~J5 I~i~'f~ 11;~I.j!
!; t- !'Q~~!i~.~i slil ~ dl 1~!~ii!~I~ ill!l~i !~I~'sIl
n _1!t1.1l"'Jd'5) 8' 1i~1 l~!Jh~~-, 'fti!"lt .Jh::n~1
~rl i~i\;~~;~i!iji !Ii~ Cl:~ ~.l!~~:~~!~:~f;; ~lt~fll1;~
Ii iljtjii~i~;ii~i!\~~ .~!~l~li~i!ili!:~il!ll~~~liitcl~! .
"IPl~2122ii6 1-!.'~-~d~[2~ll,pr!iB~!h 'i hUll
!I ~il,!:ii ~~~~i!~j~i~~l~l!lJ~iijti~i~!!~!!l;ifJ~!!li!~j;i
- -- ~ , \
--., , ..-
- . -
i ~ ~
. ~ . I:
E ~ " ~ ~
'~ . .
.. "':...
~ ' ~.~
-
:...
~ ~r_.... ~
'r i ~:>#~
\0.", ""~"
~""'" ~ "\<'-0-" """"""
I,,~~ ~~ "<'"" Q,,#l.J.r .....
'~'''k7 ~"'" '.$'.
.<;: ~~?
NJ -..... 'CI.'
l4.I '\ ~ ~ ~1.'o.1Y~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 16 'P'IP ,~S'
~ ri~~t}~:.._< ~
l ~ ~
~~~~ 2
-=.~
--1; ..~
\.:
~~
. I ~ ~
~ !.:! ~ X ~i: i ! ~ ~
L.. m ~ I ~ i H
! : ~ ~ I i. ~:~
I ~
~ i ; · ,I:
: ('7S''''' .r, '" ~ ~ .. . i I I ,. .. I
S'1~x.tS'.P #rI~"'J.S""'7d#, II',2t ;fH'; -" .~ 1_1 ~..:. c;.~~'\r!
..:::::' -~~"'*''1IlI;;:;;;;-I;IN;;AI':--- -- _J - "--'--.. ./ I .'" ~ ;.s. ~
,::J.",,,w''''_ -'7...-!"'... "",-,"~I"":'" _ } _ - III I'~ ft
_ (""'NY.(;1I;>> tT;I#It'AS'7M(;1 .JS7J>1.?",,",s7 ~i"- : ~ ~
. ~ I..'~ iL
...n,." Y. '0,"#.(;,",(1 S . -----.1.~ ;
.. _ -t- -t, - - -,H;WPn-; .-r;'"'''' ,.IJINI'. iT .li.' -..' -:! ~.' ii,' ~.
~ .. ~ (~.7./"';""'" .-W.UKY7) ill
;: ~ .-:lP.rU%>Y"''''''''' F'7..1 ".i'u ..t::>n~ ::l:." S
li :I'! ~. "~~; ~~ I{rtfr..~.,. ,,,;. ,t' II~I" \~l;:\: ~li'~~X~~ I ~ to.'" l c ~I
ffiie ~I'l j!~ ~ ,. W\i:' !>~l (;1~t~~~' ~'(i?7~' ~ " ~ '. Idi!
~ ~~ . !lll~irl' ~ ~~ ~ '~~~~~~' ',,' , ,: ,. 'l( ~~~p;
!~~iii:(~i i ~ ~~. ,~ ~~lr~ ~5~~: :....~~i ~. nil ~
~:~~'l=I~~I!l~ ~~, i~ ..~ . ~.::.it ", l~ ", ~l . ~
i:U:"'!!l' ! ll(,... 'II . ... '0:,. A - ~ ,< , -.... .' ", m
BEI~i_"1 l~~:~,.,...-' -- Nt... .SJ,'i? '7"'~'f,~~_J;~9N,n'-..OS'zzt-;" ~'~ '>l'~~,""".~~: U
~~~m I !i! ~ :I~--:-:- ./. - 'fI''''=~.-::::'..,''''' - j -. ~u 4; -' ........'\:-{(~' ---: l: ;!~;i
nh i ~' . :~;:~:~j " I l' ~~. 51 ~
~!~. ~ ~'.>H"". '4 T I "K ,'litl l:t~'1II\~ ,:j' I;~:i
~: i ! ~ ~ ;~~~'.~ ~ 1 ; :~i~\bI . .. ': .".,.. i: il~~~
! Pili "'.. " ~"~f.... - ;~. .Qt~ '~.,",.~ttI. ," " J1.~~l~ I ,," ~ "; liU~~
:~, ~ i'.'.'" ~.~ " .t;;'<;;(;1'7f? I ...:~~...,';'Yt..,..:h Ji~ii
! ~ : '" '1) i' :n i ." t 8 ~.. -..: ~ iQ W
~. i" ' \~ ,I ... (n.YY IVp'~I#_rJi1~.. ;;~,) . 1''<I~':'' :>:tIi. '''''''',' i:l wim-z
;; .. :: _I ~ '" po , ~ I \3. ~ ,.. . 1~'f ~~_F.::'" I
~ ~ I · .. t ~ ... d" ..J::1I'~~ I - \:. ", -. . ",\:. . ..i
:~ II S _: ; '.'l::,.'~ ' . _" ,r, ~. _' -"';;.t:~.-""f:: : I .'
~. ~ ~.. ~ B ~ t~ f! ;~i. r. ,11,1"7Illl'lil~:~;t~, g~~~~ t~ ~'~.' c',:t~ ~ ~
~ ~ I i. ~ ~ : f.-~ ~ ,i . ",F~ '. :n> ; '. !' ~ ~ ~~ ,,~ ;s
_ _ l! ,........ ' . ",'0 .~;,~~.. "f .. ~ ~ "I
..' 0= .= ~: ,~ d' ...;;, "..... : ~ .. "",',Yo""; ~ , :,. ~ ~ ~ ~ "
~u~.. -,' .... "\;""}l" -.t<til"""
1- m:! ~.~ ,r", - _ · ,\.: u.,...... d _ . . _ :::~.:.. - ~ i ',." ", ~ ~~~ !
~ !: ~ .: ~ \ ...... ' . ;. t ..' I" ~H
! i ! c :: /.J!"'NIA_ ~-r~N..r". ..~ ,,,.r,,,,;.- "'. ~ . ' ~~ \ ~ ~
.. .. :I t . -~ -. - . . ,f ,"..~/.~r.p ^' . ,,~ ..'" <t ~ ~
c c ..... 8 ., ... .. ' . I' " i.. ~... ~
~ .,- . ,'.' '",. ~ ".,' ~ .. .,N'."*- II/""S'''. I'.., .. ~'!~~'
... I "ll -" .. ',H '-, "~~~H
~ .~~ '~II'" ~I~J: ~;~I~ ..... Iii - 'F . .11, ~-.. .:~i.n~i
:- \ .. ~g: .. ~Dl ~ ' ~ ~ .. ~ ~ "
, ~ ,~,,t] - :!~ . . l~h~:Io.-
~.. .~ ;~M, H~ 1 c 01 ~~ 1/"'~t"
lcQ . :~ ,.;.,. ~';l~ f ll" ,n <::, ~
~.. ~~ ~ ~;.V.'.4'N.." "Ioi~"
_ . .:.}.< ',/1 ,,~.r ,".,<' .,~.\i . J"~l:i~~~
<l( ./oJ -~s"" ';." 1-..,... '.1<,:.' '.1 ,,,,-, -i .,. ~
~ ~. (- _~MW;: ":'~;~.'" ~~":,:~jjill)l j~~:- '. ?~*
a~ ~ '
l~~ ;
~ .
/;01 \ !
. fl/U: : ,-" '-':--"'~ .-.. ':''1''-1\' . -'7' _':' ~I i l~ . ~ l~
\ . _ .,;r -<,_"fYI'" .IJI(,II"'" (.I'<,.,.'~ i. la ----..::: · "
h -l .,. ./ ';,JV.1M';'AIt"., ~ 7;--"",;'$'1" ..1 - fI#~,~tI~~ .1.0 . . ~
~ ir1 . /-. "'.,.,_"'" .,.:1'. ~:>_.J .,,';.; ..,. ".... ~ ~~
~.... l ~ \!t. .11.'1 ''''(lV.."." f', ,I . " . ,(;1'SS'."'''' i".t ~
~{~,lt~~~I.ll.II':lll"" .. ,~_"'. ,~
..~:.-' ) Il ~ -IIN""".-...,p UP:>:>... ..a""'7..&~ .()f':r':!f. .......~""~_[i. . ~,. ,----,---". --",,-
~. I ........., ~V;YJ .=--.... ._ -------....-.--- --...a J .-="0 r.,rrl_
...~ '. '-:>>"~_" .f1'.,;~s'7~ "".." -:;;:;;r-,' /y.#S'.U-PN , .~' r="~z.",,.,..r/II-#'Y.n.~ ~l-- ~I
& ..,.~..."'- ~""'fI7-V I"4tI f JII'*? .~ '#7#..1.... I"'" ",""',-1 ~ -..I-
,'-j""--"'-~ -.....,;;;"1;/ . ,...",., .-/ ;-"...'" "",p.JKI,N; 1;1- - - ~ I - t
~ !I. v- ...M.....,..- J...,.~_.w ..-....".., 7. ~ '::JF~~ - . .' - ~II /-
'\ ~I ( , rm'U ''''''8,.-) ,
~;.z ) I) ~t ~.- J''''' ",,,.-u,,,,..s K;/I;.ul"? ~I'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~Z ~
~ ~-
10\
~
~
" ~
~~ ~
~~.' ~
~! ~~
~ '(~ ~ 1I
~.. ~
.,,, I..
~~; ~,
i ~
.. ~
~
olI.
ClO ;
z~ :'i
0: . fI'I
wCl 2!
Wz!;/-
z>...~
a~51
z a:d~
W~"'''
>1/) >-
0::0 il
I-z ;;:
ffi:s C
Cl
~
y'/2Y IN,Z
~"I 'Y' ~z "n/)
~':#":!~ !'!!:...~~ ~
.~~- _ ~t
. \ ,..-
~
EXHIBIT "C"
EXCERPTS FROM CONSERVATION ELEMENT:
TABLE #2 - LISTING OF BOYNTON BEACH
NATURAL RESOURCES SITES
FIGURE #4 - NATURAL RESOURCES (MAP)
Table 2. Listing of Boynton Beach Natural Resource Sites
continued ...
Site Geographic Areain Summary
# Location AcJeS Evaluation
19* 43 4 S 29 2
20 43-46-05-3
21 42-46-01-1
22 43-45-06-1
23 43-46-04
24 43-46-04-4
25* 43-46-04-3
26 43-46-04-2
27* 43-45-34
28* 43-45-33-3
29* 43-45-33-2
30* 43-45-22-3
31 43-45-15
32 43-45-15
33 43-45-15-4
34
35 43-45-16-1
36* 43-45-33-1
37* 43-45-09-4
38 43-45-09
39 43-45-22
40 43-45-22
l4,4
21.8
60.2
44.5
7.8
8.7
50.4
11.0
4,5
2,9
6,0
23,5
5.8
4.3
10.0
11.0
12,2
12,5
12.4
3,2
4.3
A
'"' -
C
X
X
C
C
A
C
B
Source: Walter H, Keller Jr., !nc,
Annowion
A
Plorida StRl~, FJ, di8turbed. P3rt of County site "Ii~o
:J1 BOYRSOR 7m St SCRIIli", ~ndaRg8F8d &))KiM sotal 7,
Narrow band; apparently mostly Brazilian Pepper,
Development in progress, County site "Eco-85 Hunter's
Run Golf'.
Cleared. Located in Hunters Run development ,
Cleared and abandoned Florida Scrub; a few oaks and
herbaceous planlS remain, South of County site "Eco-29
Seacrest Scrub".
Pine Flatwoods ecotone with Florida Scrub, previously
cleared strips, heavily re-grown with vines. Near County
site "Eco 29 W SeacRSt Scrub". Endangered species total 1,
Florida Scrub and ecotone with Pine Flatwoods, County
site '"Eco 29 Seacrest Scrub", Endangered species total 12.
Mangrove about 2 acres; 8 acres grassy rudera1; more than
If]. developed.
Beach and Strand (ocean face of dune) with expected species;
dune back is landscaped, rates "D", Preservation of the
Beach and Strand ecosystems in their native state as far as
this remains is recommended. as it is the only such site in
the City, Sea oalS and sea grape are protected by state law.
Endangered species tocal 1.
Mangrove with about 1 acre disturbed, (Aerials overlap;
site appears on section 33 and 34,) Mangrove protection
law,
Mangrove having western border of disturbed Swamp with
intermixed ornamental exotics. (Aerials overlap; site
appears on section 33 and 34,) Mangrove protection law,
Mangrove: site proposed for CARL acquisition Mangrove
protection law.
Mature planting of tropical ornamentals, Former
horticultural garden under developmenL
Disturbed Florida Scrub, cleared grassy ruderal west of
Federal Hwy; cleared east of highway,
Cleared. Approved for Bond Open Space purchase.
Not in City; withdrawn from inventory.
Cleared and panially regenerating Florida Scrub, County
site "Eco-35 Boynton 20 Ave-l St". Rated "B" due to
endangered species. otherwise much disturbed. Endangered
species total 7.
Disturbed Florida Scrub. County site "Ec0-29 N Boynton
Water Tower", Endangered species lislS - 2 species,
Florida Scrub, County site "Eco-36 c Rosemary Scrub",
Endangered species toIa1 8.
Abandoned mango grove and disturbed Florida Scrub.
Abandoned mango grove.
Area of secondary growth of black and white mangroves
due to tidal flooding and deposition. Bounded or traversed
by roadways, liule apparent tidal flushing,
A
A
D
C
X
B
B
A
D
D
B
-24-
Table 2. Listing of Boynton Beach Natural Resource Sites
Site
#
I
2
3
4,a,*
4,b.
4,c.
9
Geographic Area in Summary
Location Acres Evaluation
43-45-08-1 88.6 B
43-45-08-2
43-45-07-1
43-45-17-1
5*
43-45-16-3
43-45-20-2
43-45-16-2
6*
43-45-16-5
43-45-21-1
43-45-20-1
7*
8
43-45-20-4
10
11
12*
29,7
52,4
141.8
40.1
19,0
9.6
11.2
6,2
A?
43-45-30-1 21.6 D
43-45-20-5 17,1 0
43-45-29-1 >>.Jj2,l A
13*
43-45-32-1, -2,4&9ll..O A
14*
43-45-32-3
43-46-05-1
15*
16
43-45-31-1
43-45-31-2
43-45-30-2
17
18
continued ..,
24.1
7,0
22.4
17.6
17.4
x
X
A
Anooration
Pine Flatwoods aad disturbed PF; pond with emergent
vegetation, East of High Ridge Country Club, Lift Station
#717 is located here:.
Residential development in progress.
Cleared.
Florida Scrub, Co.ty Site "Eco-87 Quantum NE Scrub",
West of Highridge Rd.; Part of the site is in the Quantum
Park DRI developIDCDL Portions in Boynton Beach and
County.
Disturbed Florida Scrub corridor, County site "Eco-36
Quantum RR-I95 Route",
Restricted access. South portion of Quantum DRI
developmenL
Florida Scrub. CoUllty site "Ec0-36 Quantum High Risk",
Part of Quantum Park development both east and west of
Higbridge Rd.; road clearing and development in progress,
Composite of QUlIDtum sites total 9 listed endangered
species.
Florida Scrub with disturbed border, County site "Eco- 34, .
Rolling Green Scrub", Endangered species total 8,
Florida Scrub. County site "Eco-32, Galaxy Scrub",
Endangered species 10tal 9.
Florida Scrub site with scrub oaks of shrub and small tree
size disturbed by trails and disturbed borders along RR and
1-95 rights-of-way. County site "Eco-32 Industrial
Scrub" ,
Dense stand of Melaleuca (Mdaleuca quinquenervia),
Australian pine (Casaarina equisetifolia), and Brazilian
pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and area of grassy and
ruderal species.
A mix of Melaleuca and other exotics,
Fonner Pine Flatwoods now crowded with weeds.
3 parcels. Disturbed Pine Flatwoods, Florida Scrub, and
open grassy with rudcra1 species, Corridor, western border
of 1- 95, Eco-31 Boynton 7th 5t Scrub right of way, ~
text narrative for additional infonnation,
South of Woolbrirht Road. Pine Flatwoods and open
grassy; disturbed by previous clearing at ground level and
entry of ruderal species. County site "Ec0-70 N 195-RR 23
Rd Corridor", No on-site visiL Endangered species total 1.
A continuation of site #13, County site "Ec0-70 S I95-RR
23 Rd Corridor". No on-site visiL
Small disturbed Pine Flatwoods ecotone with Florida
Scrub, Caloosa Park. Cited for preservation due to location
within a public park.
Disturbed Pine Flatwoods with exotic weeds, Seen only
from Congress Ave,
Already Developed.
Already Developed.
A
A
A
A
B
D
A
B
C
X
X
-23-
I""ll 0 .~~. rj:) =A~;:~~
r---1 ~'1 .V l.) C:;, ..-, FIGURE .4 - NATURAl RESOURCES
i . f~".. ..... d./~ '2 . ~~
~- - -"t~i1~)~ ]f.=1 ~.. rB! ~
L-r 1~:JbI- ~ iry~. · ~ ~ }3-
l~- e. _ _{b:{,! ~~";?~-;;:; 38 !3
;- - - -:"\ ('i' -J !:=tll
i -1--' 1211 ~ 1/ _. 't 2J
- L \.lY i ~ry Ii "ih _ I 13lr---'
,~- --~d=/U (/ J -~ J~ ' I
l~ n-\v~,:J nt(( ~l I
,\y J~ /' ~lOO 7E:t=~ f
i n \'r [J;f- --t ' 1'- 2 a-l-J
1~"_"Jt~~I: ~I _-1]
f] ---l~-l- --"~~ ~~ =-~ ,~~I
r i i ,,+ ~ - - 7' '" - -;1 ..0
u LJ~ I - ~<-Ij Ilr
q /- rmL- ~ ~ I - "7 ~ - 1+ /1
I' 1 ~I 1 ijj
r rij: ~ Cfl! I ,~.. nW- ! L
~- - I ~ 'j
ID ~ !J.L,'7 ';f--'" ->- -... U I/J! .~l,
r~'~-n7~ ~~12 - 1r-=.J1
· r'" . f i-f- ~"L_
118~-J~ 18 r.,~,\,~.. ~/( .-
I ,..... f/I'....,IIJ'"'1\\' 27 c
IQre :i~MN~~~:- I ~~__ _ ~ ~ _~.~ \\-t- /; G
b=_ -,. 7"3 I ilcL8At;H II: 31T f':'
'-e. ' ,..-- r::l.1 .:/ . .
I :;'L rr-2J II' !J"! 29
I~:;, -J ~'::.:.~~ @II __ / Ii
:0 \, ll.l iP-lfl,'? \-'J:I 1 .nL~4
l:~,i , ~' ,~-
I r;.,;'i:) =:"rfu1'7r~ , 07 ~ ~L;
flUi -~~ r{}= ~q~ ~JliW 27
21 ---;;;..., I '--jl - ~ L........Jl .:JI
. 18 c.....J ~~~=~ "i'i~' ' II E'-- 1==l , ~ ~
~~6~. LCf~~ -;- r [':mV Jff=r1 ' - ..., :
~~~ ~~~I{ T~ D. 15 rl E --!
I~v :"_ n'fD e> ~i1 20 rj L . ~gJIi 111:1r:1~ ~
r;-=- ?~--.;- 22 .n ~ '/ t-/~ l' "LJBlf
I :7 .~~r~ G(V~, ~~~~ \'V 23 26 k-1~
I \1 Q . j bJ , '~ ...._
l. i:J \ <:'I i~ ~
~ UnO .\ uy l (P- .:... ~ __ ~
~9___]____:______~_~__~~ 1---
LEGEND
~ - NATUFIAL RESOURCE AREAS
22 - NATUFIAL RESOURCE
REFERENCE NUlA8ER
. - A & B RATED SITES
IN PUB~IC OWNERSHIP
Scuta: ~ cI ECIlIY''''' ", Palm
Ileac:I\ CounIy, Phase III Rapa1.
'-_ and MIn..ur ,_.
WI'. H. KelIor ok.. Inc.
AdditionII r..._ by Or. Otoc:.
'-101'I. Sept_ 1l1811.
-25-
lW.. TBl H. 1CEllBl.JI.. IN: .
~tllw e.,~ I'Jnwn
cr.J.$r~ FJrJ,*
ATTACHMENT "D"
STAFF COMMENTS
Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No, 95-636
TO: Tambri J. Heyden'~ / .
Planning and Zonin~ctor
FROM: Michael E, Haag
Site and Zoning Administrator
DATE: November 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Hills at Lake Eden (fka Rollingwood) - Master plan review
comments (2nd review) for a 62 lot single-family
subdivision proposed for rezoning from R-1AAB to PUD
File No. REZN 95-002
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the review
of the master plan for the above-referenced project:
1. Omit note 12 on sheet 1 of 3 and show on sheet 1 of 3 the
appropriate type and size sidewalk required along the
Seacrest Boulevard and Swinton Avenue frontage of the
project.
2. Identify the location, size, specie, spacing and planting
specifications for the landscape material proposed for
tracts A, B, C, D and E, Specify on the master plan the
individual sizes of each tract, [Chapter 2,5, Section
11, B, and C. of the City's Land Development Regulations]
3, Amend the lot and block configuration shown on sheet 2 of
3 and 3 of 3 to match the lot and block configuration
depicted on sheet 1 of 3.
4.
Ei ther omit notes 4 and 5 or notes 13 and 14,
information is repeated in both sets of notes.
The
5. Specify on the master plan the minimum lot frontage
proposed for the project. Considering that there are
irregular shaped lots in the development, it is
recommended that a note be added to the setback chart
indicating that irregular shaped lots shall comply with
Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 4. G, of the City's Land
Development Regulations, This zoning code regulation
allows the lot frontage of irregular shaped lots to be
75% of the minimum allowed lot frontage at the front set-
back line, It appears that the minimum lot frontage for
regular shaped lots in the project, excluding corner lots
and other irregular shaped lots, is 63.75 feet. Therefore
using 63,75 feet as the minimum lot frontage, 47.81 feet
would be the minimum lot frontage required for all
irregular shaped lots at the proposed 22.5 feet front
setback line. This comment is primarily to address the
lot frontage of the following irregular shaped lots that
are located in Block 1: lots - 9, 10, 20, 21, 28, 29, 35
and 36, Show and dimension on the master plan a minimum
lot frontage of 47.81 feet at the proposed 22.5 feet
front setback line for the above listed irregular shaped
lots. A method of obtaining a minimum lot frontage of
47.81 feet for the irregular shaped lots would be to
adjust the lot frontage of the adjacent regular shaped
lots that are larger than the minimum 63,75 feet. The
minimum lot frontage shown on the plan for the above
listed lots is approximately 30 feet at the front setback
line,
6. Add to the master plan the minimum living area of the
proposed residential units.
7 . The following changes are proposed to the requested
setbacks shown on the master plan:
i. Reduce the front building setback from 22.5 feet to
21 feet.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-636
Hills at Lake Eden
ii. Increase the rear building setback from 7,5 feet to
9 feet.
iii. Increase the rear screen enclosure and pool setback
from 3.5 feet to 5 feet.
8, To ensure that the total floor area for the 62 dwelling
units does not exceed the maximum floor area allowed for
the requested LUI of 5 specify on the master plan, within
the setback chart, that the maximum floor area per lot
excluding floor area identified as garage, screen roof
enclosure and storage area shall not exceed 4,327,89
square feet,
9, On the setback chart found on sheet 1 of 3, within the
category front setback, omit the front setback dimension
for lots 9, 10, 20, 21, 28, 29, 35, and 36 of block 1 and
insert the text lIsee planll.
10. Specify six (6) feet as the maximum height for the fence
with concrete columns and entry signage proposed for the
west property line of the site, Please note; the minimum
setback for wall or entry signs is ten (10) feet from the
adjacent property lines. Specify on the master plan the
setback for both entrance signs.
11, Specify on the setback chart found on sheet 1 of 3 that
the front setback for pools and screen enclosures shall
match the front setback of the building.
12. It is recommended that the maximum building height be
limited to 30 feet (two stories) to minimize impact with
adjacent residential neighborhoods having a 25 foot
height limit rather than the proposed 35 feet. Thirty
feet, rather than 25 feet, is recommended to recognize
flexibility in unit design for cathedral ceilings,
13. Correct the LUI table regarding LUI ratios, The table
specifies the LUI of 5, however the table uses ratios for
an LUI of 4. Correct all data and computations
accordingly,
14. Place a note on the master plan that indicates no
building or structure shall be placed in an easement of
record.
15, A street connection shall be made to Seacrest Boulevard
at either S.E. 35th Avenue or S.E. 36th Avenue
(signalized) or extend S.W. 36th Avenue and make a
connection to the extended right-of-way (latter requires
coordination, which is pending, with the City of Delray
Beach - Comprehensive Plan Policy 2,2.9. Any additional
street connection shall align with roads in adjacent
subdivisions and in the general vicinity - Comprehensive
Plan Policy 1.3.9) [Appendix C, Article X, Section 10.D.]
If extension of S.W. 36th Avenue is not approved,
Commission should direct staff to amend the comprehensive
plan,
16. Show on the master plan how vehicular traffic will be
separated from pedestrian traffic along existing and
proposed rights-of-way. Show sidewalks on both sides of
the streets internal to the proj ect. [Chapter 2.5,
Section 10. A. 3. e. and Chapter 6, Article III, Section
11. of the City's Land Development Regulations]
17. The land use classification for the site is Low Density
Residential (LDR) which allows a maximum of 4,84 dwelling
units per acre. The master plan indicates the maximum
density allowed is 4.87. Correct the plan accordingly.
Page 3
Memorandum No. 95-636
Hills at Lake Eden
18. Place a note on the master plan that indicates site plan
review approval is required for all improvements with the
exception of the single-family homes and the specific
improvements reviewed and approved as part of the
platting process. The following improvements will
require site plan approval; signage, landscaping,
perimeter fence with concrete columns and gate house.
19, Provide a copy of the City approved unified control
documents.
20, The subj ect property is wi thin Neighborhood Park Planning
Area #17 which, due to the lagging construction of the
Girl Scout Park, is currently" deficient" of neighborhood
park acreage sufficient to meet the adopted level of
service standard (LOS), 2.5 acres per 1,000 residents,
for the current planning period, Since land development
orders are not to be issued if related to a deficiency of
LOS, if the City approves this request, the City should
also simultaneously determine whether it will
1) commit to the construction of Girl Scout Park prior
to issuing development permits for the subject
project;
2) successfully implement Comprehensive Plan Policy
5.7,1 which would increase the park supply using
adjacent private resources; or
3) lower the current adopted acreage standard for Park
Planning Area #17 for the 1995 planning period
through the comprehensive plan amendment process
(to be processed in accordance with the next
scheduled transmittal date for large-scale
amendmen t s) .
21. Please note: A legally constituted maintenance associ-
ation document is required to be approved prior to final
plat approval. [Chapter 2.5, Section 11, D. of the
City's Land Development Regulations]
22. Since platting does not require any review by the
Planning and Development Board, and City Commission
review does not occur until the end, no opportunity is
available for the Commission to set land value for
purpose of calculating the recreation fee. Therefore,
since this request involves additional fees to be paid
and since the property was recently sold, it is
recommended the land value be set using the purchase
price at the time of the most recent sale of the PUD
property. This will require the applicant to submit a
copy of their purchase contract,
23. Submission of a rectified master plan will be required to
be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, in
triplicate, prior to platting and site plan review of the
project.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
c:2RevCom.Hil
RECREATION & PARKS MEMORANDUM NO. 95-521
TO: Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner
FROM:
Charles C. Frederick, Director of Recreation & Parks
0~
DATE:
November 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Recreation & Park Open Space Element: Girl Scout Park
Reference: Neighborhood Planning Area #17
Per our discussion regarding the Level of Service (LOS) for Neighborhood Planning Area #17 as
listed in Table #2, I recommend that for the 1995 planning period the LOS be amended to remain at
the LOS as shown for the 1987 planning period.
This recommendation is based on the current status of Girl Scout Park. This neighborhood park site
was originally projected to be developed by 1995 and would have changed the LOS in Table #2 for
the 1995 planning period. As the park site has not been developed and as there are currently no funds
available to develop the site, the LOS for the 1995 planning period for Neighborhood Planning Area
# 17 cannot be achieved; therefore amendment is necessary.
CCF:cm
TO:
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-517
'f~~:-:: ~
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist .f<:J ~
~lM~N\NG ~Nl)
ZONING I)EPl.
RE:
Hills of Lake Eden
Environmental Comments & Reports Completed by the Applicant
DATE:
November 8, 1995
Site Plan Comments:
This site was reviewed as an environmentally sensitive area requiring a 25% set aside preserve
acreage based upon 1) a tree survey, 2) environmental assessment, and 3) Tree Management Plan.
The completed tree survey and environmental assessment reports indicate a total of 4.2 acres of
scrub/slash pine habitat of which 25% (1.05 acres) is required as an on-site preserve. This acreage
location is recommended in the environmental assessment to be" located near to top of the ridges (2)
to maintain the scrub component of the vegetative structure which has higher potential for this
occurrence of protected species..." (pg. 10). The remaining document for the applicant to submit is
the Tree Management Plan. This document will outline the specific criteria for the preserve areas and
landscape buffer tracts for proper management. The purpose of the document is to assure the City
and future homeowners of the development that the integrity of these preserve areas will remain in
tact throughout the project.
City Comprehensive Plan Requirements:
The required flora and fauna survey (environmental assessment) was completed and required the
relocation of four (4) gopher tortoises off the site. The 25% preserve acreage will encompass the
environmentally sensitive plant species maintained by the Tree Management Plan,
Master Plan:
The Master Plan indicates the preservation tracts ("C", "D") and landscape buffer tracts ("A", "B",
"E") which comprise 14% of the total 15.4 acre site. The location, size and configuration of these
areas are in agreement with the environmental assessment and tree survey. The landscape buffer
areas will be comprised of relocated scrub vegetation from the improvement areas of the proj ect. The
existing voids in the preserve areas will be planted with containerized scrub vegetation. All areas will
be managed in accordance with the Tree Management Plan before, during and after site development.
Summary:
The original site of8.7 acres was deemed by the Palm Beach County survey (1989) of environmental
areas to be a "C" quality of plants/annuals. It is described in the survey as "having previously cleared
strips and heavy re-growth of (destructive )vines". The rapid nature of exotic vegetation growth since
this time has inundated increasing acres ofthe total15.4 acres in the project. The developer has taken
the appropriate steps to comply with the City environmental requirements.
Recommendations:
The project continues to be reviewed by the City for development compatible with the reports
attached with this memorandum.
KH:ad
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
PLANNING AND
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR ZONING DEPT.
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
II SEPTEMBER 95
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN 2nd SUBMITTAL MEMO#OI65
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-252
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner. Parks Superintendent jJ
Hills at Lake Eden: Revised Master Plan
muwmfn)
JJ'I - 6 I99S ~
TO:
RE:
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPt
DATE:
June 6, 1995
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the revised master plan for the Hills at Eden
Lake. The following comments are submitted:
1 . Recreation dedication requirement:
62 single family units x .0180 acres/d.u. = 1.116 acres.
2. Recommend cash payment in lieu of land,
3. The developer has indicated he does not wish to apply for one-half credit for private
recreation provided.
JW:ad
September 19, 1995
'(D] II @ II B WI IIfnl
UO SEP' 9 1995 0.
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-347
To:
PLANNING AND
'~'--~~PT.
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
HILLS OF LAKE EDEN POD - MASTER PLAN REVIEW
Re:
After reviewing the plans for the above project, please reference
my 5/30/95 Memorandum No, 95-160 to Michael Haag (copy attached) ,
Comments No. 2 and No, 3 are still a problem:
1. Give the frontage of Lots 1, 6, 7 & 12 of Block 3, Lots
1 & 10 of Block 1, Lots 8, 9 & 16 of Block 2, Lots 1,
9, 10, 19, 20 & 24 of Block 4.
2, Show all easements and their type, Also show sidewalks
and landscaping for the common area,
The number has changed and the project, consisting of four blocks
before, now has only two blocks,
Lots 1, 10, 20, 29 & 35 of Block 1 needs to have setbacks
approved from all property lines shown on the plans, Screen room
or screen enclosures with hard roofs shall comply with the
building setbacks. Sidewalks should be on both sides of the
road,
AN:mh
Attachments:
Copy of Memorandum No. 95-610
Plans
cc: William v, Hukill, P,E" Department of Development Director
A:LAKI!I!DI!N.TRC
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-160
May 30, 1995
TO:
Michael Haag, Site & Zoning Administrator
FROM:
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
RE:
HILLS OF LAKE EDEN P.U.D.
The Building Division has reviewed the above referenced project
and need the following items addressed before this project has
final approval.
1. Show the building, pool and screen room setbacks.
2. Give the frontage of Lots 1,6,7 & 12 of Block 3, Lots 1
& 10 of Block 1, Lots 8,9 & 16 of Block 2, Lots
1,9,10,19,20 & 24 of Block 4.
3. Show all easements and their type. Also show sidewalks
and landscaping for the common area.
~ 7//
A{~ -;'~~J!v/
/
AN:ck
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
C:LAKEEDEN .TRe
3,
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO, 95-34.8,~
_~mU
., .'_'., O'!'_~...:.'
TO:
Tamb~1;::' Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
September 12, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN - MASTER PLAN REVIEW
We have reviewed subject master plan and have no objection to City
Commission consideration subject to the following conditions:
A. The master plan is subject to the provisions of Chapter
2 of the LDR Sec.8C, pg.2-80.
B. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.11A, pg.6-3
C. Provide stop signs in accordance with the "Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices". Chap.23, Art.IIB2,
pg.23-7
D. Several corner lots have insufficient access as pointed
out in Memo 95-169. This must be resolved prior to plat
approval.
E. Remove Note 12 from documents as sidewalk is required
along Swinton (see May 3, 1986 memo). Chap.6, Art.III,
Sec.11A, pg.6-3
F. Remove Note 13 as Note 4 cover accessory structures.
G. Remove Note 14 as Note 5 covers fences.
Several other reminders are herewith supplied to the applicant to
guide future work effort:
H. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the
City's code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to the following;
site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping,
irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required
from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD & LWDD and any
other permitting agency shall be included with your
permit request.
I. Site plan review & approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2,
pg.4-1
J. Excavation and/or fill permits will be required. Chap. 8,
Art.I, Sec.2, pg.8-1
WVH:ck
C:LAKEEDEN .MPR
fJ1ie City of
'Boynton 'Beacfi
.',; (,,) r W
i j I' I L; .J
t.
" I . ) I-
i d
fl,,1
q
i.
~
r\f"!d
: 'TL:.J'!'!::
1 00 ~. 'Boynton 'Beadi. 'Boultvartf
P.D, 'lJo~310
'Boynton 'lJuu.!i, ~forUfa 33425-0310
City 1lali: (407) 375-6000
~;u: (407) 375-6090
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
September 25, 1995
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. Box 243
Delray Beach, Florida 33447
Attention: Burlison A. Gentry
Re: Hills at Lake Eden - Driveways
Dear Mr. Gentry:
We have reviewed your proposed detail entitled "Typical Driveway
Details for Corner Lots" and are a bit underwhelmed by it's
accessibility and convenience. Please be reminded that minimum
local street right-of-~ay width is 50 feet, not 40 feet as
depicted, with a waiver to 42 feet possible if LOR Chapter 6,
Article III, Section 11, page 6-3,4 is met. Be further reminded
that each lot must provide parking space for two cars.
Very truly yours,
C:TY ~F BOY~T.O O~Nr . A;H( FLORIDA
/?d~~~4Z*c:~(
William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
WVH:ck
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
C:LAKEEDEN.DWY
JIf mPrir.a 's (;ateuJau to tIU Guffstream
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
?l~
\
P.O, BOX 243
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447
PHONE: 272-1924
Member
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Congress of Surveying & Mapping
Membe
Florida Society 0
Professional Land Surveyor:
September 20, 1995
fD)m
UlJ SEP 2 5 1995
m 0 WI ~ r'
Mr. William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
City o~ Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425-310
...., ~
,
ENGfNEERfNG
Re: Hills at Lake Eden, P.U.D.
Dear Mr. Hukill,
We are providing herewith a typical sketch ~or the
cul-de-sac type lots ~or driveway detail ~or the Hills at
,
Lake Eden, P.U.D. Master plan, as you have requested. Please
note the driveways shall be radial to the central curve at
the street intersection which will provide a proportional
distribution ~or the roadway ~rontage as well as providing
maximum sighting in both directions ~or the proposed
driveways into the local street.
I~ you should have any questions, please contact my
o~~ice.
Sincerely,
~N~E
Q Burl ison A. Ge
INC.
.-
sr; :ToSePI-I tl/V,fCH AND CLClYlcNrAlty'
5eHlJlJ~ P,(~Pc,fTY.
1;, 5 .t! ' - 0
. ";;':~,,':-.,;.J!l
'?' 0 r' z, I . '~::.;.
..)'.\<.~.
.a~,5.'
';;,;.i ::::"'""~~~1;: i;~{
%;'()'"k'" 3fi> . \"'. '0'{
:.~. .:>,,:.~ ~/~,:":~'I."~ t~~~f'. ~L ..
, ...,.' . ,......f.:..~\.iRr{;; (.,
,:::::~.:. ..~ .:.'r}i.f.:~:;;~~: :.:{
.... . . 'r "!J:?iit:.. .. . ,
'. '., .....\::.' "'F1"':',! '. .1
........ H";"\~., '':~::ij~: 'ii. ,.
\) .: .t'. .~;: ~ , ..~.~~~:.~ .'i.l. ~.',
" . .:, '.. '',<;If,;r.iI''J.l .
, ",:,,::~,~:'f';~;}.~;~~~(:,'
I
. ;
,:,I:-\~' .
J
<":~: > :.'... .~;;)~{~.~~~.
(p S ,. 00" -'01
~~
~-
~'c
~~
A.~'
Jot J'
P ~\
,. 11 .m Ii . 00
a..: -r/(Ac.-r &
\ ~l1eRc.GNCY Ac::ceSS ..
~ " AI'/) vT/~/ 1Y EAJEIYEIVT ~
". ,.......
,
~
t'.
,
tn
\3
'. "'," ,~'oo:"J;"!'7.'
...r.;....~;,;..~.: .t}./.. lir.r.:~~.~~~~ \~~'~~..~.,"ii'!f,.;}-:.:--.:. ,'oft" .
~p~~~~ ;;::~\.~.~~~~~~~;~:.:.. .'.'.:~t... '.\ ~:.,:.~~:<,~::,. ;'. \.
.~l-i('~:"';.~ :t:....;...............! ,. .".' . . \r)
.,r;~;;~:~.+~~~.~~:';~';. .\':.:~~~ .~~ .~.~:~.:.....~~.~~~:?~ .V'~ '.:' .' .
.... , .'t...~t...........:.... .'.' . .."..,. ...,....
1~:~~f!if;~:~.t:~'~ ....::;:~;: \:~'.' .... .,'. .. ::~~': .:': " rt\
.~;:;,." ",- =4\t',,"I\"~~~- " .., ..M . -"
. :<;~~'::~~:;;;~.j.; :7.. ~l:.:\.:'.:;~'.~...~: ..>~<;:... .~.
h.
.'. .' .';::::.'.:;-:'~:. O;:~.';~?'t~:;~.
, ... ..~:~~.~;,.;~~~.~. ..;:~;~';,,'V\/.
589"ZO'47'"
III!.,~()'..~. .
. t ... ......I.'\J:
,PO
N
fC/lL'E,' / #::~.
,
~
ry"P/c'#C. b)RlyEN"AY tOe-TAIL
p~~. C"tt?/eA/E~ L.t?r..s
~1f11:rcCT,' /I/LL5 ;4T L,4"t"E EtJ,E/V
I
~!
'~
a. I
"t ~l
~\13~
\. Q ~
~ ~~I
~ ~JQ
'-...t
(. , I
(J ~ \<.j
~ GI
'^ ~
~ ~
~ -I
~ I
~
"">
~
" .
~~
~~
~\-.
~n
'~~
~~
1(\
GENTRY ENGINEERING &
LAND SURVEYING, INC.
P.O. ~OX 243 .
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA.33444
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT, NO, 95 - 296
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning Dire or
FROM:
John A, Guidry, Utilities Director
DATE:
September 12, 1995
SUBJECT: Hills of Lake Eden PUD - Master Plan
2nd submittal
We offer the following comments on this application:
1) The lot numbers shown on sheet 1 of the plan do not always correspond to the
lot numbers shown on sheets 2 & 3,
2) The water and sewer lines crossing between lots 17 & 18 of block 3 (as shown
on sheet 3) will require at least a 30-foot wide easement in order to maintain the
minimum 10-foot setback from homes, and the 10-foot horizontal separation between
water and sewer mains as required by the Palm Beach Health Unit,
3) A capacity reservation fee for this project totalling $8,593,20 will be due within
30 days of City Commission approval of the site plan, or upon request for my
signature on the water and sewer line permit applications to the Health Unit,(Section
26-34(E))
4) Construction of the off-site 12-inch diameter water main extension on Seacrest
Boulevard shall extend to the City's 16-inch main on Mission Hill Road, The
developer shall be responsible for the design and construction cost of the off-site
main, and will be granted appropriate credits towards his water capital facilities
charges, Based upon the capacities of an 8-inch vs. a 12-inch line, the developer
will receive approximately 66 % of the line's cost towards his water capital facilities
charges, (Section 26-34(A))
We have no objections to this project proceeding to the City Commission, Please
refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella or Skip Milor of this office,
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Skip Milor
File
100 1:. 'Boynton 'Buzdi tJJoukflQ.T'({
'1'.0. ~310
'Boynton 'lJuzdi,11mitfa 33425-0310
PHONB: (407) 375-6281
FAX: (407) 375-6357
~W1~bN8E~~D
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
November 8, 1995
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. Box 243
Delray Beach, Florida 33447
Attention: Burl Gentry
Re: Hills at Lake Eden - Drainage
Dear Mr. Gentry:
Thanks for your quick response to our meeting earlier today. We have
the following comments on your letter:
Paragraph 1. Drainage certification must document compliance with
all codes, ordinances, laws, rules and regulations. Simply
referring to SFWMD and Boynton Beach Engineering Department (which
no longer exists) is a good start, but is not complete. You
indicated inclusion of SFWMD, LWDD and City permits, but actually
submitted only a SFWMD General Permit without including the special
conditions referred to thereon and a LWDD letter containing
provisions which you did not document.
Paragraph 2. You are correct that we discussed your proposal for
40' local street rights-of-way but you are incorrect in stating
that those rights-of-way are consistent with "the City's
requirements" (see LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section lOB, page 6-
11) which requires 50 feet with mountable curbs and 60 feet with
swales. Your. roads are not limited access roads, they are local
streets (see LDR page 1-22). The issue of R-O-W width will be
decided as a policy matter by the City Commission, not by
administrative waiver.
Thanks again for your speedy action. We look forward to receiving the
corrections outlined herein at the earliest possible time.
V~~~ ,truly y~urs, / . '
Ie> (~/t?'t,/ /jz{ ~~/~('
William Hukill, P,E.
City Engineer
WVH/ck
xc: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
C:LAKEDEN
~rica 's (jatt:way to tfu (julfstream
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TO: File
FROM: ltfJRfram Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
DATE: November 8, 1995
RE: HILLS AT LAKE EDEN - DRAINAGE
Gentry came in today and delivered an old Rollingwood master plan
(Project 702) which he claims was permitted by SFWMD some years
ago. He agreed to promptly forward to us a copy of the SFWMD
permit and a written description of his drainage plan for Hills at
Lake Eden. He also will certify code compliance
WVH/ck
xc: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
C:LAKEEDEN
ATTACHMENT "E"
EXCERPT FROM RECREATION & OPEN
SPACE ELEMENT:
TABLE 2 - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
NEEDS ANALYSIS (REVISED)
'"
i
i
~
I
il
;.:."
..
.. ..
-...
..Q >
'" ..
....'"
..
:I
~
~
j
...
...
1
j
-a
...
..
z
'8
...
..
of
~
j
'"
:l
~
o
....
...
...
CIO
...
...
...
.o
..
'"
...
..
...
.,
..
....
...
..
...
2
.
CIO
...
.o
'"
..
.,
....
...
..,
'"
..
..
N
o
'"
o
CIO
...
o
.,
...
.,
.o
...
.
...
...
o
..
...
....
..
.
....
...
.,
....
;J
.
'"
s
o
o
....
....
.o
...
s
.,
..
.
....
o
.
'"
....
...
o
o
.
III
...
":
...
.,
8
o
-
85:8
.nN~
::
8
o
o
...
..;
8
o
2
.0
8
o
-
000
"''''...
..=~..;
... -
8
o
o
...
o
..
8
o
8
o
8
o
~
o
8
o
8
o
-
000
"':~~
.......,
...
~
o
8
o
8
o
8
o
o
....
...
8
ci
:1:
..;
8
ci
8
ci
i
..;
8
o
~
o
8
ci
8
ci
~ '- I ~
'0: ... . : .. ... ~
&.E!li5i~
A. ...... ..
1~~~!~!
> ..,... 8 ...
lot... :;!l! 1iI-
~~A.~:::S~
..
c
o
..
.... lot
... ..
~'"
0'"
'" N
00
:5
o
~
...
8
o
'"
...
ci
~
o
'"
...
ci
'"
...
o
....
~
...
~
o
III
o
~
o
~
...
~
o
o
'"
...
.,
...
..
.,
.,
.,
....
g:
...
~
..
...
Go
.o
...
...
CIO
.,
;1;
...
...
'"
.o
...
...
o
o
....
.o
Go
..
o
.
..
...
...
.
.,
....
.,
...
...
.,
...
o
...
o
.,
i
'"
...
~
:;;
8
o
8:i:5:
"''''CIO
...
:5
ci
~
..;
8
o
o
...
.0
8
o
,..
000
.",..
":N4
.. -
8
o
~
.,
8
o
8
o
8
o
,..
000
....",...
ONO
-
8
o
8
o
.....
~~~
........
-
~
o
8
o
,..
800
on .,
ON-o
... -
:5
o
s
....
8
o
~
...
8
o
8
o
o
...
..
8
o
8
o
8
o
8
o
;.: ..
..i'8;EiJ!
Zo... 0 1~ oi;:;
ot'fl.. c
2....8~l;1l;~
241~..."O"::
", .. t... lil'" 8 ",...
g:.f~:!",,3...3~
...
8
..;
8
ci
~
...
8
o
'"
...
ci
~
Cl
",
...
o
'"
...
o
on
....
..;
~
...
o
'"
ci
8
o
",
....
...
8
8
o
....
...
ci
...
N
o
'"
...
...
~
:::
....
~
'"
~
.,
...
Go
.
.
...
'"
...
..
CIO
'"
.o
i
;1;
...
..
'"
...
...
.o
...
...
...
...
o
~
<:>
...
:a
. ~
.o
'"
.,
'"
...
...
...
~
'"
o
'"
...
...
o
...
o
<II
'"
...
...
:J
..
8
o
,..
~ snit
"'NeD
...
~
..
,..
~Sl8
ff'lN4
..
8
o
s
.
8
o
iSl2S:~
":N"'OO
....- ....
8
o
.....
000
........
.........
... -
8
o
8
o
8
..;
,..
s:fs:~
";N";
-
8
o
8
o
.....
000
~~~
........
-
8
.n
8
o
,..
S:S:8
~N~
8
o
-
<:>
...
...
8
o
~:1:~
HOO
8
o
,..
8
o
8
o
~
...
8
o
8
ci
Cl
~
...
8
o
;; .
:; ..-:o..J!
... ~ 1 ; :: :g ~ ..
:i~~~~E:i!;:;
&1j~~1~J
....-a"" Sl ""
Sl .. .. ... l;I !l! ~ iii ...
~:~:!...~...3~
....
9
....
....
ci
~
...
~
...
o
",
ci
8
ci
8
o
'"
...
o
s:
o
:1:
..;
:1:
..;
:1:
o
:1:
ci
8
o
....
....
...
o
'"
o
'"
...
ci
8
o
:1:
o
,
...
...
"!
~
..
~
o
o
...
..;
8
ci
00'"
., '" ...
HOC
~
o
8
o
8
o
I
o
~
N
8
ci
o
~
...
8
o
.E ..
:: _-:o..J~
..~1~.::l!~..
o ... (J 0 :i! --
..Zot ..:c..c
~&lj~~i~J
...... .. .. -a "'" Sl ...
...s..~..wocn....
;g:~:!:3...3~
....
..
N
~
o
...
...
N
800
..;~:
...
...
o
'"
~
..
'"
...
.,
.,
~:i::i:
CIO....",
...
'"
Go
.
~
o
",
...
....
..
~
.
'"
...
...
.~
o
.,
....
.,
..
,.. ....
~:i:2:i:~
.-4N.ftcici
N
;1;
...
...
8
o
",
.o
...
...
.....
000
~~o:
.o...."
N _
...
...
",
....
~
o
o
~
o
:g
o
....
~
'"
o
N
'"
..
..
~~~
-
8 8
o ci
...
'"
.,
'"
.,
~
o
...
...
..
...
,..
000
~1t'I..:t
..... ...
-
'"
o
'"
.,
~
on
...
o
.,
8
ci
i
",
...
~
~
,..
:i:~
NE;
'"
N
ci
:5
~
o
'"
o
~
o
8
o
",
...
o
~
o
:1:
..;
o
'"
..;
o
",
o
o
'"
ci
8
c:i
",
....
o
'"
o
~
o
8
o
o
'"
o
..
o ..
"'...
~:5
.... c
o 0
...
... ... ..
lii-==
~ 50 G)
.. 0 ..
......<
.,
~
~
...
..
....
'"
~
...
...
~
.!
i
~
...
..
....
...
..
o
..
c
o
..
lot
..
""
..
~
1!
...
:18
"0
Ill...
'-
.....
Sf:
'fl~
j",
-aN
...
:~
filii
>
, c...
........
;: '5.:::
.....
:l:'~
~1::
, c
!! If''' ::
l!"'~ll
a]l.8
a""
~'g.8B
00
!I of":::
tlj!l!'"
-a::l :.
1"'11I1
!:!'5oS
i!!c..:l
,s......os
""':=-
is!!.8
"g:liiB
.!!l:l;I",
~ t c :3
'5 e.B ~~
~ i B...
.. 5:' .
.....<:1 c
5....e.s
.i:I- .... 5.u
.. c....c '"
..... 0 ..~
g!l':=!j&.
... IS .... 8,
.......
.:2i.....~
!l e.ot Ill?
c,o ..IS ~
3J~Gi]
"'5"''''
;;a:'!:.t'
.u.-4 Q) ...
8,...... Gl'"
...
5 II C
If! "'~E
...~....t)
." 0 ItJ I).....
Q) a..... ~ G.I
iO"am."
.. ...
.. ClD ..
... t) c........
",z::;:~",
.....~~....CI)
.ti ~:.i~
-"'0 'GIo4
0"2'52l
.. ClD ...
c:~ :!~.,
J'" 104 c."
k<Q)$
o .. C
.... CJ c: Q)....
::;1'" ~~
Q) ......c
~ tI III lot....
III lili" a
'5l! :.8
..0.:2.c
~... .... 0
... td c:...
... "'$
.. Gl ..
......... ...
II e 8 "'...
.:= ""of oS t
.. c j ..
~~ -;..a ~
!.,... .,
iI.. Q) >-
"c "
CD a. G.I >
1S.e:iIS~
. I I I I
I
..
'"
.,
...
lit
...
..
~
...
~
...
~
lit
on
..
~
...
lit
..
.,
~
...
~
.,
c:i
~
'"
lit
'"
'"
....
lit
N
.,
g
....
C I T Y 0 F
PLANNING &
BOY N TON B E A C H
DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
AGE N D A
DATE:
Tuesday, November 14, 1995
TIME:
7:00 P.M.
PLACE:
Commission Chambers
100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Introduction of Mayor, Commissioners and Board Members,
3. Agenda Approval.
4. Approval of Minutes.
5. Communications and Announcements,
A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
1} Final disposition of last month's agenda items.
6, Old Business:
None
7. New Business:
A, PUBLIC HEARING
Rezoninq
1 ,
PROJECT:
Hills of Lake Eden PUD
AGENT:
Burlison A. Gentry
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc
OWNER:
Newport Properties, Inc.
LOCATION:
Northwest corner of S.E. 36th Avenue and
Seacrest Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
Request for zoning and master plan approval to
construct 62 single-family detached homes on
15.45 acres of land in connection with a
rezoning from R-1-AAB (single-family
residential) to Planned Unit Development with
a land use intensity of 5 (PUD with LUI=5) .
2. PROJECT NAME: Poinciana Elementary School
AGENT:
Jon C. Hansen
OWNER:
The School Board of Palm Beach County
LOCATION:
Multiple parcels: west of Seacrest Boulevard,
between N.W. 11th Avenue and N.W, 13th Avenue.
DESCRIPTION:
Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential
to Public and Private Governmental/
Institutional and rezone from R-1-A (single-
family residential) and R-2 (single and two-
family dwelling) to Public Usage.
Page 2
Planning & Development Board
Meeting Agenda
November 14, 1995
8. SITE PLANS
A. Master Plan Modification
1. PROJECT NAME: Tara Oaks PUD
AGENT:
Kilday and Associates
OWNER:
Bill Ray Winchester
LOCATION:
Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and Knuth
Road extended
DESCRIPTION:
Request for approval to modify the previously
approved master plan to change access P?ints,
recreational amenties, unit type from
apartments to townhouses and use acreage
9. Comments by members
10. Adjournment
NOTICE
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE
TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED, (F,S, 286,0105)
THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE
NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO
PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY
CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT
LEAST TWENTY (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE
CITY TO REASONABLE ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST.
xc: Central File
a: AgPDmtgll . 14
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-648
TO:
Chair.man and Members
Planning and Development Board
~
THRU:
Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
DATE: November 9, 1995
SUBJECT: The Hills at Lake Eden (REZN 95-002)
Request to Rezone to Planned Unit Development
INTRODUCTION
Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying Irl~~agent for Newport Properties,
Inc., property owner, is proposing to'~ange the zoning on 15,45 acres
of property located on the west side of the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard (see attached location map in
Exhibit "A"), from R-1-AAB (Single Family Residential) to Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w/LUI=5). The
proposed Hills at Lake Eden PUD provides for the construction of 62
single family detached homes with a gross density of 4.0 units per
acre (see attached copy of reduced master plan in Exhibit "B"). The
future land use classification will remain as Low Density Residential,
and continue to limit the area to a maximum gross density of 4.84
units per acre.
PROCEDURE
Pursuant to the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9
(Administration and Enforcement), when a rezoning request does not ..ljV~
require an amendment to the Future Land Use Map, staff analysis is not ~~- v
required to include an evaluation of the project using the eight (8~ ~.
criteria under Section 9(C) (7), Since this request is only for ~'Q
. _ ~ above-described analysis is not required.-but ra.ther . ~
1k ~ mph:lOize the evaluat~ dlJ1 the performance of the ,ro.}./ ~
proposed master plan and include selected portions of the above- w~~ a~
described criteria which pertain to impact upon municipal services, ~.
and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and adjacent ~~
neighborhoods , ~
. ,..r,
fi:.16-
ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING
The land uses and zoning in the surrounding area varies and are
presented in the table that follows:
Direction
Zoninq
Land Use
North
R-2
St. Joseph's Church/School
East
n/a
Seacrest Boulevard
Farther east
R-I-A
Single family homes
Southeast (Delray Beach)
R-l-AA
Vacant
Southwest (Delray Beach)
R-l-AA
Lakeview Baptist Church
West
n/a
N. Swinton Avenue
Farther West
R-l-AAB
Single family homes
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (see proposed master plan - Attachment "B")
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from R-1-AAB
(Single-Family Residential) to Planned Unit Development with a Land
Use Intensity of 5 (PUD w/LUI=5). As defined within Chapter 2.5-
Planned Unit Developments of the Land Development Regulations, a
The Hills at Lake Eden
-2-
November 9, 1995
"planned unit development:
Is land under unified control, planned and developed as a whole
in a single development operation or an approved programmed
series of development operations for dwelling units and related
uses and facilities;
Includes principal and accessory uses and structures
substantially related to the character of the development itself
and the surrounding area of which it is a part;
Is developed according to comprehensive and detailed plans which
include streets, utilities, lots, building sites and the like and
site plans, floor plans and elevations for all buildings except
for single family homes intended to be located, constructed,
used, and related to one another, and detailed plans for other
uses and improvements on the land related to the buildings;
Includes a program for full provision, maintenance, and operation
of such areas, improvements, facilities, and unit development,
but will not be provided, operated, or maintained at public
expense."
Due to intended differences between PUD developments resulting from
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical design tailored to the
specific site, submittal of a site development master plan is required
at the time of request for zoning to PUD. This master plan is
attached to the zoning of the land and sets forth specific guidelines
for future development of the parcel,
The proposed use of~the PUD is detached single-family dwellings. The
dwelling units ar~located 2F 62 platted lots, fronting on a private
roadway of which access is~~mited to Swinton Avenue, The site
contains common property which includes two preservation tracts. The
uses proposed for the site, and the acreage and percent devoted to
each, are as follows:
Single-family lots: 467,874.32
(square feet)
10.74 acres
69,52%
Common property
including
preservation area:
96,731.33
(square feet)
2.22 acres
14.37%
Private
right-of-way:
108,396.35
(square feet)
2.48 acres
16,11%
Total
673,002.00
(square feet)
15.44 acres
100.00%
/I
Jf~ . . !.
The 15.4-acre site with 62 single-family units yields a~ensity of~ft~'
4.01 units per acre. The following building and site regulations~tdr
the project are as follows:
Minimum lot area:
6,727.50 square feet
Minimum lot frontage:
not all specified on plan
47 lots at 63.75 feet
15 irregular-shaped lots at 30 feet
Minimum lot width:
63.75 feet
Minimum building setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
22.5 feet
7.5 feet (both sides)
12,5 feet
7.5 feet
The Hills at Lake Eden
-3-
November 9, 1995
}J~~ r -~.J/-Lp.w;r~ J..u/~
.~~-
Maximum lot coverage, .aNe.~~, a maximum floor
area of 4,327,89 square feet~.
~:;t;: ~-v-VL .~"~~~
Maxi~um structure h.eig~t '''1ft. ~~e~~ ~~ ~. ~,~
~lLt ....'l~ t\i.-+- lP"""sr+,.. ~" G'--t:~~~~~ Ah;::,~M a.--) .~ ~
Pool and Screen enclosure: C: t'J ~ -~ 7" ~ '\J I -> '
Front setback: 22,5 feet
Side setback: 7.50 feet (both sides)
Rear setback: 3.50 feet tr!t:. -tle- f~ .
The building and site regulations of the '~zoningAdi8;~~ (R-
1-AAB) are as follows:
Minimum lot area:
1;1' ~ 1.f)",{"lA...I" o~~ t
,{( Ill-I w-t-~ (, -./
9,000 square feet.
Minimum lot frontage:
90 feet-regular lots
67.5 feet-irregular-shaped lots
Minimum building setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
25 feet
10 feet (both sides)
12,5 feet
25 feet
Minimum living area:
1,800 square feet
Maximum lot coverage:
35 percent
Maximum structure ht.: 25 feet'
o (L -MaxllllUlTtj(~T'l~; ty' 1. . g 1. un.i ts/ acro .
"'" - ~ '"_ .J1"i'- ~ J - 1.:__ J ~.-W I ~.
Screen enclosure setbacks: C'_n~
s:f) Front ~5~ilcH 'Co bUlldlng :r:ron'C setback ~
iP- Side (0 simil:1r to Lu.i.ldlng ::>lue :::;eLLacJr
Side (corner) V.S -simil~~ to building corT'lpr setback
Rear 8 feet
-s;~~aktHdt:flg fronc:::;eLba.c]~
8 feet (both sides)
12,5 feet
8 feet
shall comply with the building setbacks.
Pool setbacks:
Front
Side
Side (corner)
Rear
Note: above ground pools
Utili ties:
Sewer - The developer is proposing to serve the site with an eight (8)
inch sewer line to be linked with two (2) existing sanitary sewer
mains located on the east side of Seacrest Boulevard and on the west
side of N. Swinton Avenue. The connection with the main on Seacrest
Boulevard will be made just north of S.E. 35th Avenue, and the other
at the intersection of N, Swinton Avenue and S,W. 34th Avenue,
Water - The developer is proposing to serve the site with an eight
(8) inch water line to be linked with an existing six (6) inch main
located on the west side of N. Swinton Avenue, and with a twelve (12)
inch water main to be installed by the developer along the west side
of Seacrest Boulevard, The connection with the main along N. Swinton
Avenue will be at the intersection with S.W. 34th Avenue, and the
other to be connected at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and
S.E. 35th Avenue.
Drainage:
A conceptual drainage scheme has been provided which includes a
network of grass swales and catch basins that are located in the 40
foot wide private right-of-way. The grass swales provide pretreatment
of the stormwater prior to entering the drainage infrastructure. to
~~t .tOrlll w"~~vew~~e _m_ - --
U/'IA~/1o/1!.lff (k ~ I .1.. ~ ~~
Access and Interna Traffic FIOW~ r~ /U-fi ~ ~
.~-~~
~~.~,.~;;r;o~ ...~.
The internal road network consists of a 40 foot wide private right-of-
The Hills at Lake Eden -4- November 9, 1995
way with 24 feet of asphalt pavem~~t. )1ac~dwelling unit has direct
access to the internal road but~'~~o'~ran~~acrest Boulevard or
N, Swinton Avenue. The project has a single ingress/egress onto N.
Swinton Avenue, The access point is located in the northwest corner
of the project and provides two lanes for each ingress and egress.
The project entrance is gated and includes a gate house, The roadway
meanders along the sides of the w 1 lncludes two
prominent ridges that run' e north and south directions near the
center of the project.. he road forms a loop around twelve lots
~c~te~t~~~~:~~e~~i~~tggEW~~~~~IV@j~~~j~~~~~~~B;
( for fire, emergency rescue and police vehicles from seacrest'''~
~ Boulevard, The entrance limited to emergency use is a 20 foot wide /
\~__~ract of land dedicated for emergency access between lots 27 and 28, _.--//
Recreation:
No private recreation facilities are proposed for this project, and as
a consequence, the developer will pay the full parks and recreation
fee as required by the City's Land Development Regulations when
partial credit is not awarded in connection with the provision of
minimum private facilities. This fee is to be paid when the project
is platted, which will contribute toward public park improvements to
s~~y~vi~in~ty. ,For a specific review of public :ecreation ,
~.r-facltllt_~e.wwlthln thlS area, please refer to the sectlon below tltled
~MPIITTBILITY OF REZONING WITH PUBLIC FACILITIES-Neighborhood Parks.
, -
Topography, Soils and Vegetation: ~~/.J?L hi- ~ ~
The C'OBteLlr line~ BRQT.m on rnp pla'i'il 'H'{di&;.tll -!Ti uneven sLufacc ',Jith
_~two prominent ridges running north and south near the center of the
site. The grade elevations of N. Swinton Avenue at the north and
south ends of the site are 14,67 feet and 14.90 feet, respectively.
The grade elevations of Seacrest Boulevard at the north and south ends
of the site are 22.06 feet and 27.45 feet, respectively, The
elevation of the site increases from the adjacent right-of-way
elevations to an elevation of 32 feet along the north-central portion
of the site and 27 feet along the south-central portion of the site.
With respect to soil characteristics, the soil borings performed at
the site indicated medium-fine sand to a depth of 15 feet.
Information relative to the environmentally-sensitive characteristics
of the subject site is provided below under the section
ISSUES/DISCUSSION.
Schools:
Pursuant to Comprehensive plan Policy 8,22.1, staff notified the Palm
Beach County School Board of the subject request, and provided them
with the information on the proposed residential project necessary to
conduct an analysis of the impacts of future residents on the racial
balance of affected schools. A response from the school board had not
been received at the time of report completion.
ISSUES/DISCUSSION
A) CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
Provided below are complete, or excerpts of objectives and policies
taken from the Comprehensive Plan that are applicable to the proposed
request. These objectives and policies were taken from the Future
Land Use, Traffic Circulation, and Conservation Elements,
Policy 1.17.8: "Maintain and improve the character of existing
single-family and lower-density neighborhoods, by preventing
conversions to higher densities,"
(For an analysis of the applicability of Policy 1.17.8, see the
examination below under CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND
USE PATTERN.)
Objective 1.15: "Encourage planned de~pment projects which
are sensitive to characteristics of the site and to surrounding
land uses, and...n
The Hills at Lake Eden
-5-
November 9, 1995
Policy 1.16.2: nSubsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to allow planned unit developments up to
the maximum density shown on the Future Land Use Plan, if all
other Comprehensive Plan policies and development regulations are
complied with, and the proposed PUD is compatible with
surrounding land uses.n
See analysis below under CONS~TENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND
USE PATTERN-Gross Density for application of Objective 1.15 and Policy
1.16.2.
Policy 1.11.14: nSubsequent to Plan adoption, modify the land
development regulations to provide for open space preservation by
requiring the preservation of 25% of all "An, "Bn, and ncn rated
sites of 10 or more acres, as designated in the Conservation
Element Support Document.. ..n
Objective 4,4: "The City shall, to the maximum extent feasible,
protect all remaining areas of substantial native upland and
wetland vegetation",n
Policy 4,3.3: nThe City shall establish a Density Bonus program
or other incentives in the City Plan and/or appropriate support
regulations to preserve natural areas; n
Policy 4.4.1: ".. .the~c ty shall require subsequent to Plan
adoption, a detailed f a an fauna survey on any "B" and nc"
rated site subject to a evel~ent proposal and any site greater
than 10 acres in size, Based~n survey results, micro-preserves
may be required oriented to preservation of a minimum of 25% of
all native plant communities which occur on-site, Habitat shall
be preserved with intact canopy, understory and ground cover."
For purposes of identification and preservation, all native habitat,
or Florida Scrub areas within the County have been rated on a relative
scale from nAn (highest quality or of most importance to biological
corridors) to nD" (lowest quality or not representative of ideal scrub
habitat), Florida Scrub is a desert-like native ecosystem dominated
by sand pine, several species of oaks, saw palmetto, other shrubs, and
provides habitat and food for recognized fauna such as the Gopher
Tortoise, Florida Scrub Jay and Eastern Indigo snake. The
Comprehensive Plan Conservation Support Document includes a map and
list of these natural areas which have also been adopted into the
Conservation Element (see attached Table #2 and map in Exhibit nc,,)
As indicated on Table #2 of the Conservation Support Document, the
subject property is a "C" rated site, and as required pursuant to
policies 1.11.14 and 4,4.1, a minimum of 25% of the property occupied
by the environmentally sensitive ecosystem (as defined by a current
flora and fauna survey) must be preserved. The preserve for this
proj ect is proposed as t;,~o ,~l ~ similarl~sized "micro-preserves n
which total 1,28 acres~ eprese~~of the total scrub habitat
h., which is indicated as being fourd'!) 9,cres in the applicant' s
iG,j/)i.iJ. cnvil?~-a-l---a-s-se68l11eIlL-\Tlora and fauna suryey). The only
f nobserved" animal specie on the site -hilD bceru5the Gopher Tortoise, and
all tortioses have already been properly relocated through the
required permitting process of the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish
Commission. . ;,6J:L
Although the character of the natural area present on this site~
warrants only a I'C" designation, and consists of only a total 0 4
acres, the Comprehensive Plan still requires that a minimum of ~ of
such "C" rated ecosystems be preserved. The location of the two (2)
areas proposed to be preserved by the applicant, which are consistent
with the recommendation within the environmental assessment, are along
the higher elevations of the site, atop the site's two natural ridges.
Surrounding the preserve tracts are proposed residential lots near the
center of the project, Within these upland areas of the site are the
least disturbed habitat exhibiting features of the greatest quality
relative to the entire site. Furthermore, the higher elevations
naturally provide sun exposure and hydrologic conditions ap~aL~llLly
The Hills at Lake Eden
-6-
November 9, 1995
necessary for the continued existence and growth of typical Florida
scrub. With respect to staff review of these preserves, the City's
environmentalist/forester concurs with the location and size of the
proposed preser,{i3-ti~ tracts (see Recreation and Parks Department
Me~oran~~~__~~~within Attachment "D").
Lastly, the level of natural degradation of the Florida scrub could be
further increased as a result of impacts from development activities
and abuse by owners of adjacent properties unless properly managed,
~ including~ permanent preservation without encroachment of any
buildings, proper site design relative to drainage which is reflective
of the preserve areas and their sensitive characteristics, the regular
removal of exotic plant species, and by preventing the dumping of
garbage, trash or vegetative matter into the preserve, If such
preserves are not kept free of exotic and invasive plant and tree
species, as well as other of debris, this non-renewable native
ecosystem will continue to degrade. These practices and other
appropriate ~e~hanisms to protect the pres~e should be established
within thef~~eSmanagement plan, documented and demonstrated within
subsequent -s.i t 9 or cO:Q,S"tI;.:y.,ction drawings, and ultimately incorporated
into the proj e<:t' s~c~ rules ~d ~eg_ulations, s:l.vcL A. ~ "-'~
plt- #"7t--Y ;(HJ;'rJ.M.,~ I/:f ~ +1 ~ of.Jf,~ ( \..-1 ~ ~ 5 rt'1(7r,w-{- tJ.-v-;L " 5 pry.~iJ
Objective 2.2: "The City shall implement the future Traffic~v.'tPt..
Circulation Plan on a priority basis and shall coordinate same r ?,,,, 'fI"
with the City's Future Land Use Plan." L)J
n-r~5fv.,
Policy 2.2.9: "The City shall cooperate with Delray Beach and
support efforts to extend S. 36th Avenue (Gulfstream Boulevard)
between Swinton Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard."
The Comprehensive plan Traffic Circulation Element and Support
Document recommend the extension of S. 36th Avenue from Seacrest
Boulevard to N. Swinton Avenue, and specifically recommends
coordination between the City and the City of Delray Beach as
necessary to suppor~ thi.S project, However, the proposed master plan
proposes the devel~ent of that area over which this road would
r lQ]"ig:Ally be extended. R ~hguld be l1.otc:J LhdL LlLLo :road ifflpro~v'Cfh~llL
1/ ~projp("'t i~ not ..Lucluded wlthln the Palm Beach CuuuLy 'fhoroughfa:re
. y. ~t:-.~af-wa-YPre-teet~ Although the logical reason for this
~~~ road extension is the connection of two (2) county collector roads
~:JP (Seacrest Boulevard and N, Swinton Avenue) and the extension of a city
J\) collector which provides direct access to U.S. 1, the support document
~?,. contains no narrative which specifically explains or justifies this
~ recommendation. The City of Delray Beach was notified of this issue;
however, staff had not received comments prior t~ completing this
report, M - ff; -#-~/> /f'1f:.., -/-./7
~+~ k ~ ~.~~/ VV(J q.4"~ .~-
~~,.~~ ~~#~~a.~
B) CONSISTENCY OF REZONING WITH ESTABLISHED LAND USE PATTERN ~~
As indicated above, land uses that abut the proposed project include
the St, Joseph's Church and School (north), Seacrest Boulevard (east),
vacant residentially-zoned property and the Lakeview Baptist Church
within the City of Delray Beach (south), and Swinton Road (west). The
only two built residential areas immediately adjacent to the project
are to the east and west, and consist of single family detached homes
within the R-1-AAB zoning district (west) and the R-1-AA zoning
district (east). A comparison of the principle development
characteristics of the adjacent neighborhoods with those of the
proposed master plan and with the zoning regulations of the existing
and adjacent zoning districts are indicated in the following two
tables:
The Hills at Lake Eden
-7-
November 9, 1995
Table #1
COMPARISON OF TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NEIGHBORHOOD
West
LOT DIMENSIONS
LOT AREA
NET DENSITY
VALUE
100'x 165'
16,500 sqft
2.05 du/acre
3.5 du/acre
5.77 du/acre
$150,000
$74,000
>$150,000 *
~ e6..(1n~;;'
o/A
,. ~
(
East
73'x 130'
9,490 sqft
7,150 sqft
Proposed PUD
65'x 110'
T bl #2
a e ~ n I+H.L-i,
COMPARISON WITH ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS' ~
DISTRICT LOT FRONTAGE LOT AREA LIVING AREA SETBACKS (f/r/s)
R-1-AAB (west) 90' 9,000 sqft /1; 800 sqft 25' 25' 10'
R-1-A (east) ~'l 7,500 sqft ( 1,250 sqft 25' 25' 7.5'
Proposed PUD "55)/' 7,150 sqft "'-1, 8 0 0 sqft J 22.5' 7.5' 7.5'
Note: Table #2 represents mirt],mum requirements of the res~_ zoning district, and those
measurements typical within the proposed project.
fl
The subject project exhibits characteristics. relatively typical of
most larger projects reviewed by the City over the past five years, as
the proposed project has relatively small lots, side and rear setbacks
10 feet or less, and units with a living area ranging between 1,800
and 2,000 square feet. Whereas the area of the dwelling unit, and
front setback (of the proposed project) is comparable to the minimum
required within the existing zoning district, the lots, and
particularly the side and rear setbacks are significantly smaller and
shorter than the minimum required within the R-l-AAB zoning district. . ~
The Hills at Lake Eden POD master plan ~~ld meet only o~~ ~
above-selected design .standards o~l~pxi1sting"-fR---r=r0sJ3) zoning ~
district, and two (2) ~L'&fiaa"ra-s<5 t ose minimum requirements of the f.s
lesser stringent, R-I-A district which borders the subject property to
the east,
With respect to evaluating the proposed project's compatibility with,
or impact upon values of adjacent properties, staff has considered the
consistency of the request with the maximum density of the Low Density
Residential land use classification, the consistency with
Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.15 and Policy 1.16.2, and current
factors which predominantly determine land values within the adjacent
~orhoods and impacts of the propose~oject.~
(As the project proposes a density less than the maximum density
allowed within the Low Density Residential land use classification,
4.84 units per acre, the project would be consistent with the Future
Land Use Map which is the predominant residential classification
within the area surrounding the subject property and, specifically
consistent with Comprehensive Plan Objective 1.15 and Policy 1.16.2
(see CONSTENCY WITH APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES above) .
These Comprehensive Plan recommendations generally allow for planned
unit developments up to the maximum density of the corresponding
future land use classification and in particular, when combined with ~ _A~/
site with unique characteristic~ (e.~, s~abitat)_. iNi~ r .~'-'
Based on the relati~' co~~t;:)J;:)iJ~~he pro~ect with the foCm..d
residential area to ~-~ast, and l~~k of icc~a8 onto 8o~oroot _.~
BOuleva~ the subject request and master plan would have no negative
impact upon this area. As for the neighborhoods west of N, Swinton
Avenue, these properties are all located on Lake Ida, the L.W.D.D. E-4
Canal, or Ilfingerll canals of the E-4 Canal, The proximity of these
homes to such water courses has been a prinicple factor in the
establishment of this neighorhood's relatively high-valued real
Gestate. Although the proposed master plan contains smaller lots
. shorter setbacks than typical within this waterfront subdivision,
p The Hills at Lake Eden ,_ t' - 8 - November 9, 19 5
t"'7. .~~. .. - ~A . ".r:,. nl--Ci;7 . ~ ~(f} ~,..
~ . t{)I-A-<U/(J....~ rrd-.~ 4~.1.
I.../() t-::
~ ~14)~''w)
~" .'~
'. ,~" , ~~!:;Of '-<.D ~
'4wn-~ ~r; " (J # ~~yJ l~
size and intended price he planned units (in excess of $150,000), ~~
the quality of the projec produced by unique features related to ~~~~
buffering, varying topog aphy, security (i.e. locked entrance gate,h d-tl.J
limited or single point access, etc,), will all produce a project with~ '
character which will l'kely be incapable of negatively affecting the d~~
remaining adjacent re idential properties, Further reinforcing this. :k11>~~
assumption is that w ich is indicated within the Future Land Use 7.1~
Support Document, w ich states that it does not appear that lot size r~f
affects the cost 0 single family housing in current projects as much .
as the floor area, features, and type of construction of the unit,
Therefore, the 10 sizes proposed, which are smaller than those of the
surrounding sin e-family neighborhoods, will not likely have a
v negativ~E!ffec on the property values of adjacent and nearby
~{f propertles"
,{$~.~ Furthermore, specifically consistenl~with Objective, ,t.,1~~~p the design
'.J' J)'f. of the proj ect , Having the ~fect ~ both minimi:i~~mpact upon
,/ adj acent properties QD ~n~ propoged prQj '8~, :md to fl,il1iFRil<H!l any
~' ~~fects of adjacent properties upon this planned community, is the ~
inward orientation of the units, and the placement of a landscaping ~
buffer on those sides of the property that abut adjacent roadways and' ~
residential neighborhoods, ~
~/r~
However, with respect to circulation design, which will likely be ~.
considered an attribute to future project residents (due to increased 'L;~
security), this design will require all project traffic to use N. {~,~
Swinton Avenue. The traffic study determined that all roadway levels ~s~
of service would be maintained despite added traffic from the proposed 4
project; however, all of the 620 daily projected project trips would ~
be limited to N. Swinton Avenue rather than being lessened through the ~
Pdrod~i~ionlof acdcess onto Seacr~st Boulefvf~rd. Aldt bthebcost odf,an 'b d ~
a ltlona gate entrance, proJect tra lC cou e etter lstrl ute
within this residential area, therefore reducing the volume of traffic ~f'
. .' ~:~~~~~i~~ ~~:~:r~-1t.;h~~ ~d~~~_:~~~ i~~~
\V'-'l~ot~ ~ ~ ~v- ~;:r;-:--tJ .:J,.LJ} ~-c4 t~
C) , C6MPATIBILITY OF REZONING WITH PUBLIC 'ACILI IES J.u' '0.)7
At the time of master plan approval, a review fq concurrency I~
certification must occur for drainage, neighbor~ood parks and traffic'~ 47.:
facilities. Concurrency certification is issu~d after the ~i
determination that adopted levels of service standards are currently ,~
met, and will be maintained despite impacts ot the proposed project. ~?~
The facilities, along with the respective ev~luations. are as follows, ~
Drainage: The project engineer has indicated on the master plan '4!.
ultimate compliance with drainage regulat,~bns of bO!E_AtP~.gAt~~9d ,~
South Florida Water Management District; "however ,U4-tttYEr"~e~ is d-u...
deficient of necessary drainage details/Which have been requested from ~
the applicant. ~h
~
Neighborhood Parks: The levels of s~rvice standards (LOS) for the ~
twenty (20) neighborhood planning ateas are twofold (acreage LOS and
walking distance LOS) and tiered. ,iWith respect to being tiered, the fltD
LOS for those planning areas with/original LOS less than the targeted ~
standards (2.5 acres per 1,000 persons and 1/2 mile walking distance) ~
improves with time (planning peiiods) as planned parks are built. The ~4
subject property is within Neighborhood Park Planning Area #17, which ;~
had original (1987) standards of 1.2 acres per 1,000 persons and 1 -h'-A.
mile walking distance, as iIidicated on Table 2 of the Recreation & .:.~~
Open Space Support Document (see Table #2 in Exhibit "E"), To improve u.fj~
this acreage defiCienC,y, within Area #17, with the goal of eventually ~..,
attaining the target acreage LOS of 2.5, the City had assumed
development of the Girl Scout Park by the 1995 planning period. As
this neighborhood park has not been constructed, the LOS adopted for ~
the 1995 planning p~riod is not acheived. The City's Comprehensive ~~. T.
Plan precludes th~.approval of any development if cQncurrency is . ~
j eapor'1dized. As" a consequence of this deficiency, if new development ~
within this area is to be approved, the City must take immediate
actions that either increase the surplus of neighborhood park
resources or/lower the adopted level of service. Alternative actions
The Hills a~/' Lake Eden -9- November 9, 1995
/
/~/J
./~K/ 5: >,f.,-# 0., ~ n)JJ_~ h-/~ ~ ~ .?f~'~
,- r~~u ~l.~ _ -+ ~'7) . -:. 11- _ ..I ,/ L. ./J...... W',-K. 5,W 3~A
U-tA 4Ae- 6--. ~~/~' ~ 'T"kVr "~,' ',II 5""3~ '.',~
~"i7, M. ~ ~ ~.'/Hf/'- 'W (" wh".JhJl
to increase the supply of parks within this park planning area
include: 1) commit to initiating the construction of Girl Scout Park
prior to issuing development permits for the subject projecti or 2)
successfully implement Comprehensive Plan Policy 5,7.1 which intends
to provide a park alternative within Planning Area #17. Policy 5.7.1
reads as follows:
i
"By 1992, the City shall negotiate with St, Joseph'7School in an
attempt to formulate, at a minimum, a policy regarding the
temporary use of the School's recreation facilities by adjacent
residents" .
It should be noted that the need for future neighborhood park
resources within this planning area also continues to rise, and
specifically as a result of the inability to receive the anticipated
park dedication from the development of the Seacrest Scrub natural
area (which was instead acquired through a joint City/County effort) ,
Although development of the Girl Scout Park would provide park s~P. ...
sufficient to meet LOS until the Year 2000, it is now project~/ hat
the LOS to take effect in the Year 2000 will be further unatt i~l a
a result of the public acquisistion of the Seacrest Scrub pro ert ,-,.
------
A third alternative to this deficiency, unrelated to park supply, is
the lowering of adopted standards, The adopted levels of service
could be changed through the comprehensive plan amendment process, and
X if so directed, staff would recommend the LOS be revised to reflect
, both the projected timing of the Girl Scout Park project, and the
~~~~f the planned dedicated, S. Seacrest Boulevard site from the
): J.,...rCiata and analysis within the Recreation and Open Space Support
~orcr Document. This alternative to amend the levels of service standards
~~v through the resceduling of the Girl Scout Park project is the
recommended alternative of the Recreation and pa~ Director (~. \
Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum #9t:7n EXhibit~
Lastly, it should be noted that the analysis of neighborhood parks ~
within the Comprehsive Plan excludes those developments which contain
private recreation amenities generally equivalent to a neighborhood
park. Therefore, if private recreation facilities were provided
within the subject project, the future residents would be directly
supplied with recreation resources, and this project could be
certified for concurrency for neighborhood parks.
~
\9..
Roadway Capacity Analysis: As indicated in the section above titled
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant
was reviewed by Palm Beach County who determined that the project
would meet the requirements of the Palm Beach Countywide Traffic I
_ t~~~t~mance Standards Ordinance. The County d~not comment on ~~
~7s~~~rr~ation plan proposed in the master plan which limits
I ingress/egress to N. Swinton Avenue.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS ~ j~~~
The applicant has satisfied ~iqUe requirement on the development of
this property by preSerVing~V~~: the minimum percentage of native
habitat existing on-site. Also, although the lot sizes proposed are
smaller than both that required by the current zoning district and
existing within adjacent residential areas, the lots are larger than
lot sizes approved within several proje~ts approved within the newly
devevoping areas of the City. ctn6 that ~ allowing this design the
City is in effect providing an incentive for the preservation of
native scrub habitat which action furthers Comprehensive Plan Policy
4.3.3 while the project, as claimed by staff within this report, is
also consistent with Objective 1.15.
'f
Pursuant to Section 10.B,2, Chapter 2.5-Planned Unit Developments of, ,eGo
the Land Develo~ent Regulations~the Planning and Development Board~
shall determin~ that plans, maps and documents subbmitted meet the
requirements for LUI standards, unified control, locational and PUD
standards and establish that:
The Hills at Lake Eden
-9-
November 9, 1995
...1
a) The tract for the proposed PUD is suitable in terms of its
relationships to the city comprehensive plan and that the
area surrounding the proposed PUD can continue to be
developed in coordination and substantial compatibility with
the PUD proposed, including overall dwelling unit density
and peripheral transactions in such density;
b) That the desirable modifications of general zoning PUD
regulations as applied to the particular case, justify such
modification of regulations and meet to at least an
equivalent degree the regulations modified, based on the
design and amenities incorporated in the site development
plan; and
c) That increased open space is provided for the occupants of
the proposed PUD and the general public, and desirable
natural features indigenous to the site are preserved in the _
development plan presented. ~ 1 ~~ ':;:/:::f
The LUI and unified control documentation ha~~ submitted with the~_,
application materials, The g.ity attorney~7:'c;c;~he remaining -~
requirements as outlined above have been met or will be satisfied if ( ~V
this project is approved subject to those outstanding comments .~
included within Attachment "D", and if the City appropriately addresses
the deficiency in neighborhood parks using ~ one of the alternatives
described by staff, or an alternative action which is also consistent
with city concurreny regulations.
Based on the analysis and discussions contained herein, this request
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development
Regulations (subject to staff comments), and compatible with current
and future uses of surrounding properties and would not create an
isolated district u~ated to adjacent or nearby properties.
Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Hills at Lake Eden PUD
rezoning request, subject to staff comments within Exhibit 'j)".
Attachments
xc: Central File
MISCX:LEDEN.REP
,M\(S;'~l,
C I T Y
PLANNING &
o F BOY N TON B E A C H
DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
AGENDA
DATE:
Tuesday, May 14, 1996
TIME:
7:00 P,M,
PLACE:
Commission Chambers
100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida
1, Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Introduction of Mayor, Commissioners and Board Members,
3, Agenda Approval,
4, Approval of Minutes.
5. Communications and Announcements,
A, Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
I} Final disposition of last meeting's agenda items,
6. Old Business:
None
7. New Business:
A, PUBLIC HEARING
Conditional Use
1. PROJECT NAME: St, Joseph's Episcopal Church and
School
AGENT/
APPLICANT:
Jerome F. Milord
OWNER:
St. Joseph's Episcopal Church and
School
LOCATION:
3300 South Seacrest Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
Request to construct a 7,591 square
foot new library, art and lecture
building, housing a preschool
facility, and a 299 square foot
addition to the Classroom #5
building in place of the demolished
library and lecture/art buildings.
Rezoninq
2, PROJECT NAME: Hills at Lake Eden, PUD
AGENT:
Burl Gentry
APPLICANT/
OWNER:
Newport Properties, Inc.
LOCATION:
15.45 acres located at the west side
of the intersection of Seacrest
Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard
Page 2
Planning & Development Board Meeting
Agenda for May 14, 1996
DESCRIPTION:
Request to amend original rezoning
conditions to reduce the required
minimum unit size to be constructed
in the PUD from 2,400 to 1,800 air-
conditioned square feet and reduce
the required average size of the
units to be constructed in the PUD
from 2,600 to 2,400 air-conditioned
square feet,
Land Use Amendment/Rezoninq
3 .
PROJECT NAME: The Boynton Beach
Development Corporation
Community
(CDC)
AGENT:
APPLICANT/
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
B, SITE PLANS
New Site Plan
Law Office of
Allen Wm, Martincavage, Sr,
The Boynton Beach Community
Development Corporation (CDC)
Three parcels totaling 0.339 acre at
2191 Seacrest Boulevard (southwest
corner of Gateway Boulevard and
Seacrest Boulevard)
Request to amend the land use from
Moderate Density Residential to
Office Commercial and to rezone from
R-1 (Single Family Residential) to
C-1 (Office/Professional)
1. PROJECT NAME: Nautica Sound
(FKA Knollwood Groves PUD)
AGENT:
APPLICANT/
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Karyn I, Janssen
Kilday and Associates, Inc,
Alan Fant,
GL Homes of Boynton Beach II
Corporation
Northwest corner of Lawrence Road
and the LWDD L-19 canal,
Request for site plan approval of
private recreation, common area
landscaping, and project signage for
a 424 unit, single-family
residential PUD,
2. PROJECT NAME: Knuth Road PCD service Station
AGENT: Kieran Kilday
Kilday and Associates, Inc.
APPLICANT: Andrews & Copans Gas & oil Company,
Inc.
Page 3
Planning & Development Board Meeting
Agenda for May 14, 1996
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Bill R, Winchester, Elsie A.
Winchester individually, Elsie A.
Winchester as Trustee, Ruby A,
Winchester, The Winchester Family
Partnership, Ltd.
Southwest corner of Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Knuth Road
Request for site plan approval to
construct a convenience store with
gasoline sales and car wash on 1.13
acres,
Maior Site Plan Modification
3. PROJECT NAME: Boynton Beach Mall
Department Store F
AGENT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Cormac C. Conahan, Esq,
Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods &
Goodyear
DeBartolo
Inc.
Properties
Management,
Boynton-JCP Associates, Inc, Ltd., a
Florida limited partnership
801 North Congress Avenue
Request to amend the previously
approved site plan to construct a
162,502 square foot department store
with parking structure.
4. PROJECT NAME: The Vinings at Boynton Beach - Phase
II
AGENT:
APPLICANT\
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
C . OTHER
Discussion
CCL Consultants, Inc,
Boynton Beach II Limited
Partnership, a Florida limited
partnership, and its assigns
East side of
approximately
Woolbright
S,W, 8th Street,
1900 feet north of
Request to amend the previously
approved site plan to increase the
number of apartment buildings from
12 to 16, omit building types III
and V, add a volleyball court and
reconfigure other recreation
amenities, alter building types II
and IV, add a building type VI and
reconfigure the parking and access
areas.
Page 4
Planning & Development Board Meeting
Agenda for May 14, 1996
1. Change to Environmental Regulations to codify
Comprehensive Plan policies regarding preservation
areas for environmentally sensitive land.
2, Change to Community Design Plan to no longer
disallow drive-through windows facing rights-of-way
provided landscape buffer and building design
criteria are met,
9, Comments by members
10, Adjournment
NOTICE
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS
MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE
MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS
MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH
THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F,S, 286,0105)
THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES
WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE,
PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY, PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE
COSTELLO, (407) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE
PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLE ACCOMMODATE
YOUR REQUEST,
xc: Central File
a:agP&Dmtg.514
C I T Y 0 F BOY N TON B E A C H
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
AGE N D A
TIME: 9:00 A.M.
DATE: Tuesday, June 27, 1995
PLACE: Conference Room "C", 2nd Floor, West Wing
1. Introduction
2. Old Business
NONE
3. New Business
A. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
Master Plan
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Parkinq Lot Variance
2 .
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
3,
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Hills of Lake Eden PUD (Second Submittal)
Northwest corner of S.W, 36th Avenue and
Seacrest Boulevard
Request for PUD master plan approval of sixty-
two (62) single-family platted lots with
private roads and landscape tracts in connec-
tion with a rezoning from R1AAB to PUD.
Taco Bell
Northeast corner of Woolbright Road and S.W.
8th Street
Request for relief from Chapter 23-Parking
Lots, Article II, Section H, 5. to allow the
distance between the edge of a driveway
located on the east of S.W. 8th Street and the
first parking space or access aisle located in
the Shoppes of Woolbright PCD be reduced from
the require one hundred (100) feet to thirty
(30) feet.
Farm Stores
Northwest corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and N,W, 7th Court.
Request for relief from Chapter 23-Parking
Lots, Article II, Section H. 3, to allow the
distance a driveway located on the west side
of Boynton Beach Boulevard is located from
N. w, 7th Court intersection be reduced from
the required one hundred eighty (180) feet to
seventy-three (73).
AND
Request for relief from Chapter 23-Parking
Lots, Article II, Section I. 1 to allow the
back-up distance for one-way, nin( ,~^\
degree parking to be reduced from the
twenty-seven (27) feet to nineteen (
Page 2
TRC Agenda
June 30, 1995
NOTE:
Items A, 1, 2, and 3 - Written comments (on legal sized
paper) and plans/documents are to be returned to the
Planning and Zoning Director no later than 5:00 P.M. on
Friday, June 30, 1995 (three working days following the
TRC meeting).
B, REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
RECEIVED
Conditional Use Approval
1.
PROJECT:
McDonalds/Amoco Restaurant and Convenience
Store
LOCATION:
Southeast corner of the Intersection of Con-
gress Avenue and Woolbright Road
DESCRIPTION:
Request for conditional use approval to
construct a 3,431,91 square foot building for
a combination gas station/convenience store
with drive-through restaurant.
New Site Plan
2 .
PROJECT:
LoDolce Warehouse
LOCATION:
Lot 10, Lawson Industrial Park (S,W. 14th
Place)
DESCRIPTION:
Request for site plan approval to construct
two warehouse buildings totalling 12,000
square feet on a .97 acre vacant lot.
4, Other Business
A, Find attached TRC schedule for the second half of 1995.
B, At 11:00 PM, a representative from the Palm Beach County school
system will present the modifications proposed for the poinciana
Elementary School. Plans will be hand-delivered by the school
system representative, prior to the TRC meeting, to all TRC
members, for courtesy review.
5. Comments by members
6. Adjournment
The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where
necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to
participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity
conducted by the City. Please contact Joyce Costello, (407)375-6013 at least
twenty-four (24) hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City
to reasonably accommodate your request.
MEH:dim
. ,'I'IlCMM'I'G.63D
c
I T Y 0 F BOY N
TECHNICAL REVIEW
AGE
TON
COMMITTEE
N D A
B E A C
MEETING
H
DATE:
Tuesday, May 23, 1995
TIME:
9:00 A,M,
PLACE:
Conference Room "C", 2nd Floor, West Wing
1, Introduction
2. Old Business
NONE
3. New Business
Master Plan
A, LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
.....
L..
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
3,
PROLTECT:
LOCl~.TION :
DESCRIPTION:
Citrus Park (Citrus Glen II PUD)
East side of Lawrence Road, approxi-
mately 1,750 feet north of Gateway
Boulevard
Request to modify the previously
approved master plan to reduce
existing screen enclosure (screen
roof) setbacks, 3 feet to 6 feet
rear setback and 15 feet to 13 feet
side setback and establish the
following pool setbacks: front 22
feet, rear 8 feet, side (interior)
15 feet, side (zero lot line) 2
feet, side (corner) 18 feet, from
residence 5 feet and from residence
(with shear wall) 3 feet.
Woolbright Place PUD - Pod land 3
East side of S.W,
approximately 2250
Woolbright Road
8th street I
feet north of
Request to modify the previously
approved master plan to increase and
change the type of uni ts in POD 1
from 90 multi-family units to 108
single-family, detached zero lot
line units, provide private
recreation in POD 1, and develop POD
3 into a park rather than 16 duplex
units.
Hills of Lake Eden PUD /
Northwest corner of S.W. 36th Avenue
and Seacrest Boulevard
Request for PUD master plan approval
of sixty-two (62) single-family
platted lots with private roads and
landscape tracts in connection with
a rezoning from R1AAB to pun.
f( k'rL ___) 'r>t tH - ito fYlvr- t!ci:: 51Jf- ,-t, 5" bC)irr)' <::k fc-,
~ 'f ?t(,~ Q P'1 e:~-f +-1..,+ /r il Ct;cOc -
fVl~n;fr)vh1 :<
! Go,,! c.r f -z.. - G-cv- f' /'~'7j'",- r
.'
~.,{, L ~..'\. e... -
h':J
/....., < s~ 0 CG -I / .,1= 'r:;~ r
;20 5 c '^ 5 p'l':!<- - Lf2: ~
I Ii c~<?
Gc .JL <"-~ -
u "Ck,~~
7 ,A. 2
REZONING
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN, PUD
AJu;~ : ""- S"-Jfl--~ a.~.J M~CI,CK0'" 1f ('7"''''-'~ ('"I..;
/'1/; rtCNt :
Aju'. {~ 7 c.lc-~ y
SecoYlcO. :
K<:;,.sc-Y'I S-/ec K
I
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-240
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
71..JOL--t4-...-
Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning and Zoning Director
. ~
M1chael W. Rumpf
Senior Planner
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJDCT:
May 9, 1996
The Hilla at Lake Dden POD (REZN 95-002)
Reque.t for Modification of Rezoning Conditions
INTRODUCTION
On March 19, 1996, the City Commission approved the Hills at Lake Eden
PUD, which action rezoned 15,45 acres of property located immediately
west of the intersection of Gulfstream Boulevard and S. Seacrest
Boulevard (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map) from R-1-AAB Single Family
Residential to Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity of 5
(PUD w/LUI=5), This request was submitted by Burl Gentry of Gentry
Engineering & Land Surveying Inc" agent for Newport Properties, Inc"
property owner, and included a master plan for 56 single family
detached dwelling units at a gross density of 3,6 units per acre,
The Hills at Lake Eden PUD was approved subject to numerous conditions
which regarded, in part, access, preservation of sensitive lands,
buffering and landscaping, and the minimum and averaqe dwelling unit
sizes. A description of the original project and analysis, and the
conditions on which the rezoning was approved, are contained within
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-648. In part, as an
attempt to maximize compatibility of property values of the subject
project with those of the residential area to the west, the City
Commission established, with which the applicant consented, conditions
that the minimum unit size be no less than 2,400 square feet (air
conditioned), and average unit size be no less than 2,600 square feet
(air conditioned). The applicant now requests that the required
minimum and average dwelling unit size be changed to 1,800 square feet
and 2,400 square feet, respectively, Since this request would
represent a major change to the original zoning conditions, it must be
processed similarly to a new application for Planned Unit Development.
DESCRIPTION
As indicated in the applicants letter of request in Exhibit "BII, the
applicant's request to reduce both the required minimum and average
dwelling unit sizes is in response to information received from
various specialists (e.g. land developers, realtors, and marketing
consultants) who advised the applicant/developer that the subject
conditions would produce dwelling units that require sales prices
which exceed the optimum price range for this geographic area. It is
also stated within this letter that the requested minimum and average
sizes would enable the construction of units with characteristics
which represent a necessary compromise between the higher home values
within the Lake Eden Estates area, and the relatively lower home
values found east of Seacrest Boulevard within the Barret Heights
Estates Subdivision, The City's development regulations do not
establish average unit size per zoning district; however, the
requested minimum living area of 1,800 square feet is equal to the
minimum required in the original zoning district, R-1-AAB, Single
Family Residential.
The following tables where extracted from the original staff report
and revised to reflect changes made to the PUD including lot sizes and
frontages resulting from the subsequent reduction to 56 units from 62
units. The tables compare relevant development characteristics of the
adjacent neighborhoods with those of the approved master plan and
compare the relevant zoning regulations of the existing and adjacent
zoning districts with comparable design characteristics of the Hills
at Lake Eden PUD.
~
Page 2
May 9, 1996
Table #1
COMPARISON OF TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NEIGHBORHOOD LOT DIMENSIONS LOT AREA NET DENSITY VALUE
West (R-l-AAS) 100' x 165' 16,SOO 8qft 2.05 du/acre $150,000
East (R-1-A) 73' x 130' 9,490 sqft 3.5 du/acre $74,000
Subject PUD 65' x 111' 7,215 sqft 3.6 du/acre >$150,000
(gross)
Notes: 1) Value of proJect units obta1ned from tax roles and appl1cant's market data; 2)
"LOT DIMENSION" and "LOT AREA" exclude the 4 large (odd shaped) lots located primarily at
project's perimeter, which exceed appx. twice the size of the smallest lot; and 3) Lot sizes
in PUD include six different variations/dimensions (excluding the 4 odd shaped lots) and the
lot dimensions above for the PUD represent, or are nearly similar to (since some lots vary
slightly due to corner location), those most seen in the PUD (24 of 56 lots). It should also
be noted that these dimensions also represent the smallest lots in the PUD.
Table #2
COMPARISON WITH ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
DISTRICT LOT FRONTAGE LOT AREA (MIN) LIVING AREA SETBACKS (f/r/s)
(MIN) (MIN)
R-1-AAB (west) 90' 9,000 sqft 1,800 sqft 25' 25' 10'
R-1-A (east) 60' 7,500 sqft 1,250 sqft 25' 25' 7.5'
Subject PUD 65' 7,215 sqft 1,800 sqft 22.5' 7.5' 7.5'
Notes: 1) Table #2 represents minimum requirements of the respective zoning district and
those smallest measurements within the approved PUD; 2) the 4 large (odd shaped) lots are
also excluded from the analysis in Table #2); and 3) "LIVING AREA" for "SUBJECT PUD"
represents that currently requested.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATION
This report is concluded with a list of general points which summarize
the impact of the proposed change in unit size conditions, the
similarity of the Hills at Lake Eden PUD with the surrounding areas,
and an estimate of real impact of the requested reduction in average
and minimum unit sizes. Staff provides the following statements and
generalizations:
1) The impact on adjacent properties of the change in the average
unit size of 200 square feet (from 2,600 square feet to 2,400
square feet) is likely immeasurable;
2) The change in minimum unit size to 1,800 square feet represents a
change of the smaller units equal to the minimum unit size
permitted in the original conventional zoning district, R-1-AAB,
Single family residential;
3) While the smallest units may be 1,800 square feet, or less than
the average size of 2,400 square feet, nearly an equal number of
units will be in excess of 2,400 square feet (in order to
maintain the required minimum size) ;
4) It is estimated that the maiority of units within the nearest
subdivision with the highest property values, Lake Eden Estates,
range between 2,000 square feet and 3,300 square feet in size,
and contain smaller units which are less than 2,000 square feet;
5) The lot sizes within the Lake Eden Estates Subdivision range
between 19,000 square feet and 34,000 square feet; however, if
canal rights-of-way are excluded from this tabulation, the range
in lot sizes is reduced to 10,000 square feet and 28,000 square
feet, and the majority of lots (40 out of 62) are less than
13,000 square feet;
Although the above points suggest that there may be some merit to the
applicant's request to adjust the minimum and average unit sizes, no
formal market study has been submitted to conclude that construction
of units under the original conditions will yield homes that are out-
priced with the market of the area. Therefore, at this time, staff
cannot support this request, Since proximity to Seacrest Boulevard
3
Page 3
May 9, 1996
and the neighborhood across from it have been identified as the
factors most significantly impacting what the market will bear, a
"pod" plan overlaying the master plan, which would cluster smaller
units closer to Seacrest Boulevard and larger units closer to Swinton
Avenue, warrants investigation,
Attachments
MISCXIII:LEDEN2ND.REP
4
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
~
I
..
,\
II
;1
Ij
:'rJU\l R
_...:.~ E
I
r~
.-i.,
1 .
w
~
.~
EXHIBIT "B"
REQUEST FOR
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
1
Gentry Engineering and land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. BOX 243
DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33447
PHONE: 272-1924
Member
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Congress of Surveying & Mapping
Member
Florida Society of
Professional land Surveyors
Ap r i 1 2, 1996
ill
M'R - 2 199)
@
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Director OT Planning and Zoning
City OT Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton S..ch Blvd.
P.O. 90)( 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425-0310
Re: Hills at Lake Eden, P.U.D.
Dear Tambri,
Following our previous conversation, we are enclosing herein our
petition to modiTY the previously approved Planned Unit Development
rezoning Tor the project known as the Hills at Lake Eden. As you and
I discussed, the developer is in agreement to provide satisTaction OT
all conditions oT approval with the exception oT the agreed minimum
square Tootage oT 2,400 S.F. under air, the developer wishes to
maintain the previously existing zoning condition oT'l,800 S.F. under
air minimum. The second condition that covered the average square
Tootage under ~ir OT 2,600 S.F., the developer is proposing an
average square Tootage OT 2,400 S.F. under air.
As we have discussed, the developer has consulted with realtors,
marketing consultants and local land developers and he has been
advised that with the inTluence oT the surrounding area that the
originally agreed upon condition, as previously discussed would be
R
, ,"
\1\
'\
,-
\.
/
J
'7
_v
f! :/) ~ 9)
\8/,( , <' "
.(), 0 L
,j/ '\ ~/. ~c'~
Iv' f) ()<! p"7 7 Al
\ l>"
ISLAND POND
ANNEXATION, LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT/REZONING
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT
f1r r
e1 )
CtJf#
MEMORANDUM
December 1, 1989
TO:
Chairman and Members, Planning and Zoning Board
FROM:
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
THRU:
RE:
Requests for Annexation, Future Land Use Element
Amendment/Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Text
Amendment submitted by siteworks Architects & Planners,
Inc. for John T. Loos (Island Pond Planned Unit
Development) - File No. 351
INTRODUCTION
Siteworks Architects & Planners, Inc., agent for John T. Loos,
property owner, is proposing to annex into Boynton Beach an 18.59
acre tract of land located at the northwest corner of South
Congress Avenue and the L.W.D.D. L-28 Canal (see attached copy of
location map in Exhibit "A"). The property is currently zoned AR
(Agricultural Residential) and is overgrown with exotics.
Accompanying this request for annexation are requests to amend
the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan to show
annexed land as "High Density Residential" and to rezone this
property to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use
Intensity=5(PUD w/LUI=5). The proposed Island Pond PUD provides
for the construction of 186 multi-family units with a gross
density of 10 units per acre (see attached copy of master plan in
Exhibit "B"). In addition, at the direction of the Planning
Department, the applicant has submitted an application for an
amendment to the text of the 1989 comprehensive Plan, which was
adopted on November 7, 1989. This application is necessary to
amend Section 8.d of Volume No. 1 of the Support Documents of the
Comprehensive Plan. The language for Section 8.d currently reads
as follows:
8.d. Unincorporated Parcels South of Silverlake Estates
These parcels should be annexed and placed
in the Low Density Residential land use category.
Development of these properties should generally
be limited to single-family detached dwellings,
so as to be compatible with the one-story condo-
miniums which lie to the south and the single-
family subdivision lying to the north.
Approval of the proposed amendment to Section 8.d would be
necessary to allow for the issuance of a Development Order
pursuant to Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes, since the
proposed Island Pond Planned Unit Development is not consistent
with this section of the adopted comprehensive Plan.
PROCEDURE
These applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, text amendment, and
rezoning are being processed consistent with State Statutes and
Boynton Beach Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows:
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 2
December 1, 1989
1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Compre-
hensive Planning and Land Development
Regulation Act.
2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of
Ordinances and Resolutions.
3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and
Contraction Act.
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A,
Section 3A5(e): Boundary and Zoning.
5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures
for Annexation.
7. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A,
Section 9C: Comprehensive Plan Amendments/
Rezonings.
8. Boynton Beach Ordinance #86-54: 1986 Compre-
hensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
9. Boynton Beach Ordinance #89-38: 1989 Compre-
hensive Plan.
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Paraphrasing, these regulations require review by the City
Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, public hearings
before the Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission, review
by the Department of Community Affairs, and Commission adoption
of ordinances to annex, amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use Element/Text and rezone. These procedures take approximately
8 to 9 months to complete.
CURRENT LAND USE AND ZONING
As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned
AR (Agricultural Residential). The land use and zoning in the
surrounding area varies and is presented for your information in
the table which follows:
Direction
Jurisdiction Zoning
Land Use
North
Boynton Beach PUD
Silverlake
Estates
(single-family)
East
Boynton Beach R-3
Golfview Harbour
(townhouses)
South
Boynton Beach C-3
Manor Care
(nursing home)
Southwest
Boynton Beach R-3
Chanteclair Villas
(condominiums)
West
Palm Beach County AR
Vacant
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 3
December 1, 1989
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Provided below is a list of specific objectives taken from the
1989 Comprehensive Plan which are relevant to this annexation
request. These objectives were taken from the Future Land Use
Element and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
Objective 1.15 Encourage planned development pro-
jects which are sensitive to charac-
teristics of the site and to surround-
ing land uses, and mixed-use projects
in locations which are appropriate, and
utilize other innovative methods of
regulating land development.
Objective 1.16 By June 1, 1990, or when mandated by
state statute, regulate the use,
density, and intensity of land use,
by requiring that all land develop-
ment orders be consistent with the
Future Land Use Plan and other
applicable policies of the Compre-
hensive Plan.
Objective 1.17 Minimize nuisances, hazards, and other
adverse impacts to the ge~eral public,
to property valuesr and to residential
environments by preventing, or mini-
mizing land use conflicts.
Objective 1.19 By June 1, 1990, allow a range of land
uses for which the area, location, and
intensity of these uses provide a full
range of housing choices, commercial
uses, employment opportunities, recre-
ation and open space opportunities,
and public uses for both existing and
projected populations, provided that
all other comprehensive plan policies
are complied with.
Objective 2.1 Subsequent to Plan adoption, the City
shall provide a transportation network
based on the following minimum level
of service standards:
. Level of Service "c" or better under
daily and peak hour conditions on all
unspecified City local and collector
highway facilities.
. Level of Service "c" for average
daily and LOS "D" for daily peak
season and year-round peak hour
conditions on all non-specified
facilities.
Objective 8.10 By 1991, the City shall develop a
method to directly notify adjacent
municipalities of pertinent land
use amendments, rezonings, and
annexations that are proposed in
the city. This Objective may be
replaced if Palm Beach County is
successful in providing a system
of recording and analyzing land
use changes on a county-wide basis
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 4
December 1, 1989
or by possible future policy
of the City to inform adjacent
municipalities of changes in
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Objective 8.11 By 1991, the City shall address
all identified existing land use
conflicts and interjurisdictional
incompatibilities by notifying
the involved adjacent municipal-
ities or Palm Beach County of the
conflicts as well as the signifi-
cance or magnitude of the conflicts.
By 1992, the involved entities
shall jointly develop a method
of mitigating the conflict.
It should be noted that adoption of the ordinances to implement
the concurrency requirements of the 1985 growth management legis-
lation (Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes), whereby adequate
infrastructure must be available to accommodate proposed growth,
is required to occur by June 1, 1990. If the ordinances to amend
the Future Land Use Element and rezone this property are adopted
prior to this date, then conformance with the concurrency
requirements will not be mandated.
In addition to the above, there are three policies in the 1979
Comprehensive Plan and the 1986 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and
Appraisal Report concerning annexation which have been superceded
by the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Although these policies have
been superceded, the analysis required by these policies does
provide information which is useful to evaluate the costs vs.
benefits of annexation. These policies and the information that
results from the analysis is provided below:
Policy 1 - "Annex only property which is reasonably
contiguous to the present municipal
boundaries."
The Loos property is contiguous with the present corporate limits
along its entire north, east, and south property boundaries
(approximately 3,210 feet or 84% of its entire boundary). In
addition, this property exists as a vacant pocket in an area
which has been developed for urban land uses.
Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the
preparation of a study evaluating
the fiscal benefits of annexation
versus the costs of providing
services."
Accompanying this memorandum as Exhibit "C", you will find an
analysis of the cost to the City of annexing this parcel and the
dollars returned to the City in taxes.
Policy 3 - "Annex only properties which are
of sufficient size to provide
efficient service and on which
urban development is anticipated."
As previously indicated, the Loos tract is approximately 18.59
acres in size. It is anticipated that this parcel will
experience urban development for the following reasons:
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 5
December 1, 1989
1. The availability of public utilities within the
Congress Avenue right-of-way.
2. The existence of this parcel as a coun~y pocket in a
developed portion of the Reserve Annexation Area, and
3. The recent improvements and widening of the Congress
Avenue right-of-way in the vicinity of the parcel.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (see copy of master plan in Exhibit "B")
The applicant is proposing to rezone from AR (Agricultural
Residential) to a Planned unit Development with a Land Use
Intensity=5(PUD w/LUI=5). The uses proposed in the PUD and the
acreages devoted to each are as follows:
LAND USES
ACRES
Multi-Family Residential
Private Recreation
Retention Area
Parking Area/Landscaping
Road Right-of-Way
5.46
2.55
2.20
6.00
2.38
TOTAL
18.59
The master plan provides for the construction of 186 multi-family
dwelling units. The maximum building height has not been
indicated on the master plan, but would be limited to two stories
based on the proposed language for the comprehensive Plan Text
Amendment. The multi-family dwellings are grouped into two
square-shaped clusters. The private recreation facilities are
distributed throughout each building cluster.
concerning roadways, an 80 foot wide collector road is shown
along the north property boundary adjacent to Silverlake Estates.
This road is required pursuant to Article X, section 10 of
Appendix C-subdivisions & Platting, to provide proper access to
the undeveloped parcels which lie to the west. In addition, the
developer's traffic engineer is recommending that a northbound
left turn stacking lane be constructed on Congress Avenue at the
main project entrance and separate right and left turn lanes be
provided at the main driveway egress onto Congress Avenue.
INFRASTRUCTURE
Water Distribution System
The developer is proposing to serve the site by connecting to an
existing 16 inch water main located on the west side of Congress
Avenue. The on-site system will provide two stubs at the west
property boundary to provide future service to the vacant
property to the west.
Sewage Collection System
The developer is proposing to serve the site by connecting to an
existing 36 inch force main located on the west side of Congress
Avenue. The on-site system will include a stub at the west
property boundary to provide future service to the vacant
property to the west.
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 6
December 1, 1989
Private Recreation
The developer is requesting a 50 percent credit toward payment of
his parks and recreation fee pursuant to Article IX, section 8 of
Appendix C-Subdivisions & Platting. In order to qualify for the
50% credit, the developer must provide five recreation items that
meet the criteria of the ordinance and are approved by the Parks
and Recreation Department. Since the details shown on the master
plan are not complete, further information on these facilities
must be provided at the time of site plan approval in order to
qualify for the 50 percent credit.
Topography, Soils and Vegetation
The on-site elevations vary within a range between 8 and 15 feet.
There is a substantial quantity of muck and peat existing on-site
which must be removed prior to development. The site is covered
with invasive plant species including Melaleuca and Brazilian
Pepper which must also be removed prior to development.
Drainage
A conceptual drainage scheme has been provided which includes a
network of swales and catch basins to collect the storm water
runoff and divert it to a retention area (lake) within the
eastern housing tract. The overflow from the lake will be
diverted to the L.W.D.D. L-28 Canal. It appears that the
conceptual drainage scheme submitted can meet the requirements of
the City's subdivision regulations, parking lot regulations and
the requirements of the storm water permitting agencies.
Schools
Comments from the Palm Beach County School Board have not been
received. It should be noted, however, that on october 1, 1989,
Palm Beach County adopted an impact fee ordinance which includes
the payment of impact fees for schools which the developer will
be required to pay at time of permitting.
Roadway Capacity Analysis
As a result of the adoption of the new Growth Management
Legislation, it is appropriate to review all rezonings and/or
Comprehensive Plan amendments on the basis of infrastructure
capacity. This is particularly important when attempting to
analyze whether or not the thoroughfare plan as adopted provides
enough capacity to meet the needs of any request which will
intensify the level of land development, thus potentially
creating more traffic than the system was designed to carry.
The traffic analysis submitted by the developer was subjected to
review by Palm Beach County at the request of the City. The
basis for review by the City is the 1989 comprehensive Plan
(Ordinance 89-38). The Levels of Service (LOS) set forth in the
1989 Comprehensive Plan are outlined below:
Level of Service "c" or better under daily
and peak hour conditions on all unspecified
City local and collector highway facilities.
Level of Service "c" for average daily and
LOS "0" for daily peak season and year-round
peak hour conditions on all non-specified
arterial facilities.
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 7
December 1, 1989
The comments submitted to the City from Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering in Exhibit "C" of this report indicate that the
project creates a significant impact on the four-lane section of
Congress Avenue adjacent to Hunter's Run (between the L-28 and
L-30 Canals). The County is recommending that only insignificant
project traffic (300 trips per day or less) be allowed to impact
Congress Avenue south of the site until construction of road
improvements to 6 lanes has begun (scheduled for Fiscal Year
1991-1992 by Palm Beach County). The County also prefers that
the project derive its primary access from the collector road
shown on the north boundary of the site and that direct access
onto Congress Avenue be restricted to right turn in/right turn
out only. According to the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
Department, this will avoid two median cuts in close proximity
(within 250 feet of each other) on Congress Avenue.
ISSUES/DISCUSSION
Section 9.c.7 of Appendix A, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances,
requires the evaluation of plan amendment/rezoning requests
against criteria related to the impacts which would result from
the approval of such requests. These criteria and an evaluation
of the impacts which would result from the proposed development
are as follows:
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be con-
sistent with applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies. The Planning Department shall
also recommend limitations or requirements
which would have to be imposed on subsequent
development of the property, in order to
comply with policies contained in the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezoning would not be consistent with Area 8.d of
the Land Use Problems and opportunities section of Volume No. 1
of the Support Documents of the Comprehensive Plan which reads as
follows:
8.d. Unincorporated Parcels South of Silverlake Estates
These parcels should be annexed and placed
in the Low Density Residential land use
category. Development of these properties
should generally be limited to single-family
detached dwellings, so as to be compatible
with the one-story condominiums which lie to
the south and the single-family subdivision
lying to the north.
The applicant has submitted an application to amend the language
in the text of the Comprehensive Plan for Area 9.d as follows:
These parcels should be annexed and placed in
the High Density Residential land use category.
Development of these properties should generally
be limited to multi-family dwellings limited to
two stories with adequate buffers to the north
and east.
The proposed rezoning would also not be consistent with the
language for Section V, Land Use Supply, Demand, and Location
Requirements of the Future Land Use Element (Volume No.1,
Support Documents) under the subsection entitled "supply and
Demand for Land for Rental Apartments". The relevant paragraph
reads as follows:
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 8
December 1, 1989
Rental apartments and condominium apartments
should ideally be located near arterial roads,
and major intersections, since these locations
have the highest degree of accessibility, and
are most easily served by mass transit. If
multiple-family dwellings are to be located
near single-family neighborhoods, height and
setback limitations should be utilized in
order to minimize land use conflicts. There
are a number of parcels described in Section
VIII where such height and setback requirements
are recommended. Multiple-family dwellings
should not, however, be permitted within
neighborhoods which are already developed
primarily for single-family housing. Rede-
velopment for multi-family housing should only
be permitted in neighborhoods where a signifi-
cant amount of vacant property can be assembled,
or where the existing housing is characterized
by major deterioration.
As previously noted in the section of this memorandum entitled
"Comprehensive Plan", the requirements for concurrency pursuant
to the 1985 growth management legislation will not apply to this
project if the ordinances are adopted prior to June 1, 1990.
In addition to the policies contained within the City's
Comprehensive Plan, the proposed land use category requested
(High Density Residential with a maximum gross density of 10.8
dwelling units per acre) is inconsistent with the Palm Beach
County Future Land Use Atlas, as outlined in the correspondence
from Palm Beach County in Exhibit "c" of this memorandum.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be con-
trary to the established land use pattern,
or would create an isolated district unrelated
to adjacent and nearby districts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual property owner as contrasted with
protection of the public welfare.
As outlined in the policy for section 8.d of Volume No.1 of the
Support Documents of the Comprehensive Plan and the section
concerned with supply, demand, and location of rental and
condominium apartments, the proposed rezoning to a Planned Unit
Development consisting of two story multi-family units would not
be compatible with the one-story condominiums which lie to the
south and the single-family subdivision lying to the north.
However, the proposed rezoning would not create an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, as there is
existing residential-zoned property in the general vicinity which
is occupied by multi-family housing, including the Villas of
Chanteclair and the Golfview Harbour townhouses. The primary
issue, in this particular instance, is the proximity of the
multi-family housing with a two story building height to the
existing single-family detached homes which lie to the north and
the one-story condominiums which lie to the south. As to whether
the proposed rezoning would constitute a grant of special
privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the
protection of the public welfare, the answer to this question
would be yes, based on the proposed density and two story
building height.
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 9
December 1, 1989
c. Whether changed or changing conditions
make the proposed rezoning desirable.
There has been no significant change in conditions in the
vicinity of this property which would make the proposed rezoning
desirable.
d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be
compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and other public facilities.
The proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems,
roadways and other public facilities, subject to the staff
comments and those from the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
Department in Exhibit "c" of this memorandum.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible
with the current and future use of adjacent and
nearby properties, or would affect the property
values of adjacent and nearby properties.
As outlined in the policy for Section 8.d of Volume No. 1 of the
Support Documents of the Comprehensive Plan and the section
concerned with supply, demand, and location of rental and
condominium apartments, the proposed rezoning to a Planned Unit
Development consisting of two story multi-family units would not
be compatible with the one-story condominiums which lie to the
south and the single-family subdivision which lies to the north.
Concerning the economic impact of this development on adjacent
and nearby properties, the potential impact is difficult to
evaluate. However, it appears likely that there would be some
affect on the property values in the adjacent Silverlake Estates
Development and, to a lesser degree, on the Villas of
Chanteclair. The basis for the impact on property values in
these communities would be the loss of privacy that would result
from the residents living on the second floor of Island Pond
looking down into the windows and yards of the houses in these
two developments.
f. Whether the property is physically and
economically developable under the exist-
ing zoning.
Under the existing Agricultural-Residential zoning in Palm Beach
County, the property could be utilized for a variety of
agricultural or conservation purposes. Also permitted are
single-family dwellings on a minimum lot area of 5 acres.
If annexed and developed as a Planned Unit Development consisting
of single-family detached homes with a Low Density Residential
land use category, consistent with current Comprehensive Plan
policy, the property could be developed for a maximum of 89
dwelling units.
Accompanying this memorandum as Exhibit "D", you will find a copy
of an analysis prepared by the project engineer, Enrico Rossi,
which compares the site development costs (including muck removal
and infrastructure improvements) if Island Pond is developed as a
90 unit zero lot line planned unit development, compared to the
cost of developing a similar project (Citrus Glen) without the
substantial muck removal cost. The analysis indicates that the
site development costs for a zero lot line unit at Island Pond
would be approximately $20,286, compared to $9,516 for a zero lot
line unit at citrus Glen. Also included in Exhibit "D", is a
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 10
December 1, 1989
cost estimate for the total site development costs for the
proposed Island Pond multi-family residential development. The
total cost is $1,233,125, which represents a cost of $6,630 per
unit.
Assuming that the per unit site development cost of $20,286 for a
single-family detached home at Island Pond is correct and the
land cost per unit is $3,039 (based on a total assessed land
value of $270,450 and assuming a low density residential land use
category which would allow a maximum of 89 units to be developed
on this property), the total cost of an improved single-family
lot would be $23,325. For comparison purposes, the average
assessed value of an improved lot in the Silverlake subdivision
is approximately $35,000. Considering that the market value of
the homes within the Silverlake subdivision ranges between
$170,000 and $260,000 (depending on lot size, number of bedrooms,
square footage, waterfront, etc.), a cost of $23,325 for an
improved single-family lot would not appear to be unreasonable.
Based on ~he above, it would appear that the property is
physically and economically developable under the current
Comprehensive Plan policy for single-family detached homes
developed under the Low Density Residential land use category.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale
which is reasonably related to the needs of
the neighborhood and the City as a whole.
Due to the proposed density and two-story building height, it is
arguable as to whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which
is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the
City as a whole. Approval of this rezoning request for a high
density residential multi-family development would also set a
precedent for similar land use and zoning on the two vacant
parcels which lie to the west in Palm Beach County.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere
in the City for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed.
Multi-family housing is currently allowed within all R-3
(Multi-Family Residential) Districts and within portions of
certain planned unit developments where the master plan has been
approved for such housing. The remaining supply of vacant land
zoned for multi-family housing is somewhat limited, as the City
progresses toward buildout. However, there is vacant land
available in the City within both the R-3 zoning district as well
as planned unit developments for multi-family housing, including
the following planned unit developments: Quail Run, Congress
Lakes, Melear, Knollwood Groves, and Cedar Ridge Estates. The
remaining R-3 zoned parcels which are still vacant lie east of
Interstate 95, with the exception of the Casa Blanca project at
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road, which is currently
under construction. A detailed analysis of the supply and demand
of multi-family housing is contained within the Future Land Use
Element Support Documents (Volume No.1) of the Comprehensive
Plan. Based on the above, it can be concluded that there are
adequate sites available elsewhere in the City for the proposed
use.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Department recommends that the requests for Future
Land Use Element Amendment, Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Text
Amendment submitted by Siteworks Architects & Planners, Inc., for
John T. Loos should be denied. This recommendation is based on
the following summary of findings contained within the staff
report:
TO: Chairman & Members, Planning & zoning Board
SUBJECT: Request for Annexation - Island Pond, Page 11
December 1, 1989
1) The proposed development is not consistent with the policies
for Area 8.d and Section V, Land Use Supply, Demand and
Location of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element
Support Documents, Volume No.1.
2) The close proximity of the proposed two story multi-family
dwellings to the existing one story single-family detached
dwellings and condominiums would result in reduced privacy
in these communities and may have a negative impact on
property values in these communities.
3) The property could be developed for a maximum of 89 single
family detached dwelling units.
4) The proposed development is not of a scale which is
reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the
City as a whole.
5) Approval of this request, including the proposed text
amendment, would set a precedent for similar land use and
zoning on the two vacant parcels which lie to the west which
are under separate ownership.
6) There are adequate sites available elsewhere in the City
where this type of housing can be constructed.
PROJECT APPROVAL
If it is the desire of the Planning and zoning Board to recommend
approval or the City commission to approve this annexation, it is
recommended that approval be contingent upon the following:
1. That the property reflect a "Low Density Residential" land
use category and a large lot, single-family residential
zoning category (R-1AAB is recommended, as the minimum lot
area of 9,000 square feet most closely resembles the average
lot size found within the Estates of silverlake).
2. Staff comments, except for those comments that exclusively
concern approval of the master plan for the multi-family
PUD.
3. Denial of the request for the text amendment.
rt~
AMES e;. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Encs
AnnexIsI