LEGAL APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
OF THE
CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
rn
Oft I 8 iqqn
PLANNING AND
Z HI OEPl
APPLICANT:
Frank Pinto - Hills at Lake Eden PUD
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Burlison Gentrv
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: 12/17/96
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: ReQuest for site plan approval for perimeter wall and
buffer landscapina. common area landscapina. aated entry. preserve area fencina and
sianaae.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Northwest corner of Seacrest Boulevard and
Gulfstream Boulevard (SE 36th Avenue)
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
TH IS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission
having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the
applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner
consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2.
The AppKcant
'L HAS
HAS NOT
established by sUbstan?1 competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3 The A~~nt's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions marked as "include" in
Exhibit "e" hereto.
DENIED
4. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
5. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with
the terms and conditions of this order.
...".."
...-
JriC\
, .
o,,1i&'~
LOGA\:\U'\l Nv~r
H\LLS OF LAKE E.OE.N
> . . ., ,'-. .."""':" '. ~I!" ~"1 ... .... ,- ~. 7r-
.:~... .~~'\11' .l-" [\ 1/ f J//U('b ~~ ~ ~,
~..~ ~ "C :1, 61 II " ,,~ ' r a
. "t ':; .. - -. fIf1f4.fj I II', ~ - f'~
. ~.l;<:;;. " 6d-J;t-r{ 711 'I I :-:&' ~Lill ISJ . 7'JI1fr'
F.... ,::m'" "",.~ ~~ J/I If. 'Jl+f H~I~~I ~~ · .~ttl'" - ..
1\" ~ '1' dl "w en --' - I I .jr~~" ", it
\\ ,I~I t' r\l,T.'8: jli ~~ I \ \ u;l ::::. - ,,.:::::;-. · ,';' · ~
\ \1"'J ," ,,~-J: F' : 'I 0f, I. ll, -,-' .J~ r
;,;l\ ,'-:,J! ~, ~'l/fh,.. ~:.' . ~ ~,'~ r · nrr
\' . :' ! IIH a _ ~. . liii;J1? I IFf" \ \ \ ',~
: ; ~r\ ~ h ~~~ l:-- _ \ ,//11 ;TJCo ~w..'C - ~J I \ \ . r ..
t:. /I' & l ' r _ j.J. - r ,II ·
! 01.~~~ ~~ r,.., ~__ ~:: ' I NflT1t 11:;- ~ I. r 11:.. F- 1 I r 'J
_ _ j _ ~ fl -' " / ~I '
, _ ~.:; ....,:: 'I 0 :n.l!I-R"'" ._ . _ . ., 1 n
, __-~ T ,~ . f.' ,.. ,.' t . - ~.,....r\. -: ~: \. 'n \ t
\ ' i . ./., F . ' "T. -
\ ;;.~~"";::-- ; 4 ~'-' ~t. . . \ \ .' ~- - 'ff!/ .- ' . ,$ 'J~
'\ S\:\\.'~.:,~,J"'I',\l.~,\. ~" 'f '.... l- ;:\:'\ I, I 't,~"" - F[~W: ': "' _J!" I. '~
\ \ ." \-1- r , ,I I I " r "\'
\ I~~~\
"~ {'\'~~'\~' IJ ~_' I \ \.\~.... ~. .. .-- - ....:.., -1"\ ~, ,.- ,
\'" ..,'. _~ 7', 1"'1 ~ _ '" -f ,t:- r \ .r!
, I' e.:. ..;1~"~~ltc ;:.: '.:j.J -.. '....
, i:" .\: \. C. ~ _ I _ _ ... .- "'i-', · .' TP'" "IJ.
~. t ..:: 'L"TT1 ......~... r:::JI'l.~")).. ~..c
, .. : 1 1 ~ .' V I 1 ' - . ...... ,. ...
': - -,.' . ....-.
. I N - ,.,~ ".'
;' ~/I ' . 1/ /:::" ..: :'. r ~--
_' c ~_ - - . " r
,~: .~ "\ t. , ...-'.d.""'"
~ " l-n~-
J;jiio .' ; I _~'1 ..:\1 ,I II" 'r-
e !! I II; , I '-. '\l~f''''.''' il ~ II) ... .....- -
,/ I r,',/, J~.;'.~1';"-' ~ . '......~'':T) ~ "\ \ \ ~ '-", -: 1-\\; \0::3,::~llT-Q;l
f. ., _ : - . . en r ,';:Il;lll ~ ::111" ,,,..
,,/ ll/;,~ h1./'., i 1.... "'!,' .., ; ~&l.$, ~~~~;~ -:"'. · - -~ '" 0"
~ _ 1 . "*' ',' . <<,,~.--L _, , - ...~ l'~ ~ ,flA
I . '.' ,,. . ,*",,,," r II · ol' c , .. ...
. , ~ .. "'<il' ~ {If'''' . . .
lIlli.' In! ~ ;' ~~ "~~I;~if.~$~~ a1!~ ,. ~~~ ,M
,-,,I! ;.'-q .~~ . .~ ~ -~
h/~ l Fr/}/,.,'.. . :~;~~ \ (Il'~ (; T"'~ ~\~~~
~~' " \\ '.. J' :, ~ ,'(\ .-" ,.-
, 1\ .' \,r-'.
. ','/' ,)>, " ..\ if ',I ~\ l \'\ -
, ; t ',,{. ~\ I \. \ ,- ", '.....----/-------------
.. -
--
,
~ ......
EXHIBIT "C"
'IfttIJ1 'W!1
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Hills at lake Eden
File number: NWSP 96-011
Reference: The plans consist of 7 sheets identified as 2nd Review. New Site Plan. File #NWSP 96-011 with a November
27. 1996 Planning and ZoninQ Department date stamo marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECTull
PUBLIC WORKS
r . NnNF
UTILITIES
Comments: I
1, A capacity reservation fee will be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission ~
approval, or upon request for the Utilities Director's signature of the HRS/DEP
permit applications. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or
{~~r: ?R-~.:trFn
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
[ . ".Ir IN I-
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comments: /
2, It appears that the revised drawings do show a scaled drawing for proposed /
entrance wall signs. However, the sign panel as shown appears to exceed the
maximum area of 32 square feet as provided for in Chapter 21, Article IV, Section
1 D of the land Development Regulations and must be reduced in size accordingly.
PARKS AND RECREATION.
Comments: /
3. Since the number of residential units has been reduced from 62 to 56 single family /
units, the recreation dedication requirement is: /
56 single-family units x .0180 acres/d.u. = 1,01 acres.
.4 r:~fi:l.n in li~11 of land r/
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
5. As specified in note 22 of the master plan, show with a distinguishable symbol on
the site landscape plan the location, size and specie of the existing trees required J
to remain on the site. Also indicate, on the landscape plan, whether the tree is being
relocated or a new tree is replacing a tree that cannot be relocated. The quantity
of existing trees to remain on the site shall be documented on the landscape plan.
The quantity of trees to remain shall be consistent with the determination made by
the City Commission on February 20, 1996.
= =
DEPARTMENTS INCLU))E REJECT
6. A City of Boynton Beach Building permit shall be required to remove, relocate and /
or replace trees at the subject project. /
7. Place a note on the drainage plan and landscape plan, within the tree preserve V
areas, indicating the location of the tree preserve fence that shall be installed
consistent with the location specified in the tree management plan. I
8. A City of Boynton Beach building permit'shall be required to install the preserve area .J
fencing.
Page 3
Hills at Lake Eden
File No.: NWSP 96-001
~'-'
." .."
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
9, Correct the inconsistency between the taupe background color for the wall signs
identified on the submitted plans and the Rushmore (Behr-C40-30) color shown and j
specified on the color elevation drawings. Where applicable, identify on sheet 6 of
7 the color code and manufacturer of the taupe color proposed on the plans for the
background color of the wall signs, [LOR, Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7,
0,1.]
10. The total area of undisturbed preserve area shall not be less than 1.29 acres as )
indicated on sheet 1 of 7 of the current submittal or as approved by the city
forester/environmentalist. The 1,29 acres may include the required Fire Department
access area. Submit a copy of the preserve area management plan approved with
the master plan/rezoning for staff to determine where the exact location of the fence
was approved (on tract line vs, inside the tract line).
11. For clarity in depicting the area where the platted lots abut the undisturbed preserve j
area it is recommended that a dimensioned typical section view drawing of the area
be added to the landscape plan. Identify and include in the section view drawing the
following improvements proposed: the edge of the buildable area of the homes, the
buildable area for pools and screen roof enclosures, the preserve area tract line, the
proposed fence (type and height) and the undisturbed preserve area.
12. Amend the typical Swinton Avenue landscape plan to show, dimension and label the
approved rear building setback of 29 feet from Swinton Avenue and include a
symbol that represents the required 25 foot rear setback for pools and screen roof j
enclosures, All setbacks are dimensioned from the property lines and shall match
the dimensions on the approved master plan. Omit the incorrect rear setback
reference of +/- 9'.
13. As discussed at the TRC meeting, the applicant shall provide a utility easement j
along the south side of the main entrance to the project. Show on the drainage and
landscape plans the location, type and size of the easement. Where applicable,
remove trees from the easement.
14. Specify on sheet 6 of 7, the color name, color code and manufacturer proposed for )
the colors of the wall sign. [LOR, Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7,8.2.]
15. Identify on the plan, the dimensions of the proposed wall sign. The dimensions of )
the wall sign shall comply with the sign code regulations. [Chapter 21- Signs, Article
IV, Section 1 and 7]
16. It is recommended that the proposed wall signs be approved administratively, /
subject to the signage complying with the sign code regulations and the sign
specifications listed in the community design plan.
17, Identify on the drainage plan the height of the berms proposed along the north, east ~
and south property lines, Also, add to the landscape plan the proposed berms and
indicate the slope of each berm,
18, It is recommended that the 40 watt fluorescent light fixture proposed to illuminate the ,j
walls sians be around mounted and directed towards the face of each wall sign.
MEETING MINUTES
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
JANUARY 14, 1997
for the downtown. However, Mr. Rosenstock disagreed because there are conflicting interests between
CRAB and the Planning and Development Board. He pointed out that landscaping is part of the plans that
are presented to the Planning and Development Board. He does not see the need to "spin off" another
board just to handle landscaping.
Ms. Heyden reminded everyone of the Community Appearance Board which existed to review landscaping.
That board was eliminated to cut out that layer, and landscape review responsibilities were given to the
Planning and Development Board.
Mr. Rosenstock was not in favor of saving any board if there was a way to accomplish what needs to be
done in accordance with State Statutes relative to laymen's participation in community government. It is the
City Commission's responsibility to determine the necessary boards. He suggested workshopping a review
of all of the boards to determine if there are conflicting authorities. Those conflicts should be eliminated.
Mayor Taylor said the City Commission will be addressing this issue. Approximately 60 days ago, a decision
was made by the Commission to leave the CRAB board in existence. However, that was before anyone
perceived this problem. The CRAB board handles the entire CRA area.
Consensus
There was a consensus of the board that the Planning and Development Board should handle anything that
has to do with planning and development in the City.
B. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department
1. Final Disposition of Last Meeting's Agenda Items
a. The Boulevard Center Land Use Amendment/Rezoning/Comprehensive Plan Text
Amendment was postponed at the City Commission. It will go forward on January 21.
b. The Quantum Park Use Approval to amend the list of permitted uses to allow cosmetic
manufacturing was approved. The reference to jewelry manufacturing was deleted.
c. With regard to the master plan modification that was an amendment to the DRI to
change the use of the lots BGlls interested in to allow industrial use and research and
development, the Commission dropped the condition regarding Note #4 on the master plan.
However. prior to the next future change to a commercial lot. the applicant must come before
the City with a use matrix that would be submitted as a regular DRI amendment.
d. The master plan for Orchard Landing was unanimously approved subject to all staff
comments.
e. The site plan for the Hills at Lake Eden was approved subject to all staff comments and
the Planning and Development Board's recommendations.
f. The time extension for Whlpowill Arms was denied.
Ms. Heyden reminded the members that the LDR workshop was held, but the group left the meeting before
5