CORRESPONDENCE
NOV ".
00
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-109
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~ukill' P .E., Director or Development
November 13, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
HILLS @ LAKE EDEN - FIRST SITE PLAN REVIEW
We have reviewed subject documents with respect to perimeter buffer landscaping and wall,
common area landscaping, gated entry, preserve area fencing and signage and have the following
comments:
Engineering Division - None
WVH/ck
C:LKEDENl
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN
PRESERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN
r~:::,.-",.~"""~~'",-___
!ii~! r~ m R a nfl R 'FEBRUARY 1996
!i..:'rH"'~l_~.. I rom
//i'~~,~~~/'J
' r7L~1','!l'!if'G!i.~
,_",~_",~:'Jtlli.nf.er. PREPARED FOR
NEWPORT PROPERTIES
.. .
.~ ..
Prepared By:
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
222 South U.S. Highway 1, Suite 201
Tequesta, Florida 33469
(407) 744-7420
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN
PRESERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A + 15.0-acre parcel located in Sections 4 and 5, Township 46 South, Range 43 East,
Palm Beach County, Florida, has been proposed for residential development and designated as
Hills at Lake Eden. The parcel was systematically surveyed for an environmental assessment
conducted in compliance with the City of Boynton Beach's Vegetation and Environmentally
Sensitive Lands Ordinance (Chapter 7.5, Article IV), and is therefore, compatible with the
definitions and provisions set forth in the ordinance. Field surveys were conducted in August
and September 1995 to: 1) identify, locate, and characterize alLnative vegetative communities
and wildlife habitat on the project site; 2) analyze the functional viability and quality of existing
habitat; 3) identify the presence of any flora or faunal species listed for protection by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission
(FGFWFC), or the City of Boynton Beach; 4) delineate areas with significant ecological value
for preservation; 5) identify areas of previous alteration or degradation; and 6) identify
surrounding land use and associated impacts. Data collected during the surveys was used to
target specific- species and habitats for future protection
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
A. Site Location
The Hills at Lake Eden development site is located between Seacrest Boulevard
and Swinton Avenue along the southern boundary of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
(Figure 1). The site is bordered on the north by St. Joseph's Elementary School and on the east
and west by residential developments. Lake View Baptist Church is located south of the parcel.
The site is surrounded by development and has been significantly impacted by exotic infestation
and human disturbance. The eenter of the site, although containing numerous native scrub
species, suffers from the lack of habitat management. The site is not identified as an "A"
quality site on the Palm Beach County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Map.
B. Soils
Soils include 5t. Lucie sand and Myakka sand. A little more than half of the
western portion of this site overlies St. Lucie sand. The Palm Beach county Soil Survey states
that this soil is nearly level to sloping, excessively drained, deep and sandy and is located on
'long narrow, dune-like coastal ridges. The water table is below a depth of 6 feet, and bu'ilding
development has few or no limitations. The soil on the eastern portion of the site is Myakka
sand, which is typical of pine f1atwoods. The Palm Beach County Soil Survey states that
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1
November 8, 1995
I-Il.uLS OF LAI(E EDEN
FIGURE 1:
, 81'1'[ LOCATION MAP
~'~:~i;;'.;.~:1~t:?;:..:'..../:. ',: .
Myakka sand is a nearly level, poorly drained, deep, sandy soil. It is in broad, flatwood areas
and the water table is within 10" of the surface two to four months in most years, 10" to 40"
for six months in most years, and recedes to below 40" during extended dry periods. A ridge
occurs north-south through the approximate canter of the parcel. A clear ecotone occurs from
east to west as the vegetative character reflects the change in the underlying soil profile.
C. Vegetative Communities
1. 411 - Disturbed Scrubby Flatwoods (4.0 acres)
The disturbed scrubby flatwood community is the highest quality habitat
on the parcel and has experienced minimal recent disturbance. Sand pine scrub, oak scrub, and
xeric oak hammock has been included in the scrubby flatwoods community due to the small area
of each habitat type and the dominance of slash pine (Pinus elliotti). The canopy is dominated
by slash pine which is generally open. Other canopy species include sand pine (Pinus clausa),
scrub live oak (Quercus geminata, Q. myrtifolia, Q. chapmanii), silkbay (Persea humilis), and
Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). The community transitions from the east up the ridge
from pine flatwoods to more xeric scrub communities. Historically, the ridge canopy was
mostly sand pine but human disturbance and clearing activities have resulted in a loss of most
of the sand pine. One large sand pine stiIl exists and several smaIl recruits were observed
nearby. The ,preservation areas comprise the highest quality scrub/scrubby flatwood areas
existing on the parcel.
Understory species include saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) , cabbage palm (Sabal
palmetto), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), rusty lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea), tarflower (Befaria
racemosa), tallowwood (Ximenia americana), pawpaw (Asimina reticulata), and pennyroyal
(Piloblephis rigia). Ground cover species include gopher apple (Licania michauxiz), prickly pear
cactus (Opuntia compressa), shiny blueberry (Vaccinium myrsinites), reindeer moss (Cladina
sp.), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), golden aster (Heterotheca subaxillaris), palafoxia (Palafoxia
feayi) , beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), and silkgrass (Pityopsis graminifolia). Wild grape
(Vitis sp.), earleaf acacia (Acacia sp.), areca palm (Chrysalidocarpus sp.), mimosa (Albizia
julibrissin), and umbrella tre~s {Scheffelera brassia actinophyLla) also occur in areas of former
disturbance near the edges of this community.
With management, much of this area will be restored to optimal conditions. Lack of fire
and other associated management has resulted in areas overgrown with extensive areas
overgrown with wild grape, greenbriar (Smilax sp.), and exotic vegetation resulting in numerous
dead canopy species.
With management, the preservation areas may provide habitat for numerous wildlife
species endemic to scrub habitat. All gopher tortoise burrows located in this parcel were
. excavated per FGFWFC Permit No. WR95198 and relocated off-site. The small cabbage palms
were initially considered to be scrub palmetto (Sabal etonia), but on close re-examination, the
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
3
November 8, 1995
fruit were determined to be too small measuring approximately 5-8mm instead of lOmm or
greater for the fruit of scrub palmetto.
2. Disturbed/Previously Cleared (+/-11.0 acres)
Investigation of aerial photographs from 1965 to present indicate that
approximately two-thirds of the site has been cleared of native vegetation at various times.
These areas include the southern and western portions of the parcel. The eastern 300 feet of the
parcel was recently cleared of all understory vegetation. The slash pine canopy remains intact.
The property was likely used for landscape nursery operations as indicated by the dense forest
of swiniam cherry (Eugenia uniflora) on the south portion of the site and exotic landscape
vegetation such as schefflera (Brassia actinophylla), mango, royal poinciana (Delonix regia), '
ficus (Ficus benjamina), areca palm, mimosa, castor bean (Ricinus communis), and other nursery
vegetation.
Brazilian pepper dominates large areas on the south and western portions of the parcel
, as well as most of the perimeter of the site. Scrub species occur sporadically, but are out-
competed by exotic vegetation. The remaining saw palmetto are overgrown with wild grape and
Brazilian pepper.
The preservation area includes a small portion of this community on the western extent
,
of the preserve. These areas will be restored per Section 6.0 of this plan.
D. Wildlife Use
Wildlife known to occur on this parcel include several species of mammals and
birds such as raccoon (Procyon lotor), cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), opossum
(Didelphis marsupialis), gray squirrel (Seivrus carolinensis), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura),
common flicker (Colaptes auratus), and mocking bird (Mimus polygLottos). Gopher tortoise
(Gopherus polyphemus) were observed on the parcel and commensal species could occur.
3.0 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY
" ..
A list of potentially occurring state and federally protected species was compiled prior
to field survey to develop specific survey methodology to accurately determine the presence or
site utilization of protected species (Tables I and 2). Plant and animal species determined to be
endangered, threatened, or of special concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and FGFWFC were evaluated for the potential of occurrence on the Hills at Lake Eden parcel
based upon known or expected population distribution and range, preferred habitat types, and
documented occurrence. A I isted species field survey was conducted throughout the parcel in
an effort to observe any sign of site utilization of protected species.
Weather conditions during the survey varied from rainy to sunny. Temperatures were
mostly in the high eighties to low nineties and wind speeds ranged from 5 to 10 mph. Survey
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
4
November 8, 1995
TABLE 1.
LISTED WlLDLIFE SPECIES POTENTIALLY OCCURRING ON THE
HILLS AT LAKE EDEN PARCEL.
Common Name
Scientific Name
FGFWFC
US FWS
Occurrence
Eastern indigo snake D,ymarcflon corm's couperi T T Possible
Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus SSC UR2 Observed
Florida pine snake Pi/uophis l7Ielanolellcus SSC UR2 Unlikely
Florida mouse Podomys floridanlls S5C'- UR2 Possible
Gopher frog Raila areola/a aesopus SSC UR2 Possible
Southeastern kestral Falco sparverius paulus T C2 Unlikely
Red-cockaQed woodpccker Picoides borealis T E Unlikely
Shcrman's fox squirrel Sciurus niger shermani SSC C2 Unlikely
Florida scrub jay AphefocolllCl coerulescens T T Unlikely
...., "..1
E = Endangcred
T=Threatcned
SSC =Species of special concern
UR2=Under review for listing
C2=A candidate for Federal listing
FGFWFC=Florida Game and Frcsh Water Fish Commission
USFWS=Unitcd States Fish and Wildlife Scrvice
TABLE 2.
LISTED PLANT SPECIES POTENTIALLY OCCURRING ON THE HILLS AT LA
EDEN PARCEL.
Common Namc Scicntific Namc FDA USFWS Occurrence
Curtiss milkwced Asclepias cllrtissii E Unlikely/Not observe
Four pctal pawpaw AsiminCl relramera E E Unlikely/Not observe
Scrub mint Conradil/Cl grell/dlffora E C2 Not observed
Prickly pear cactus Oplll/ria compressa T Present
,. "
Nodding pinwecd Lechea cemua E C2 Unlikely/Not observe
Scrub palmetto Sabaf elonia T Possible/Not observe
Wild pine Tiffandsia spp. T Present
"'. ~l
E = Endangcrcd
T=Thrcatcncd
SSC = Specics of special concern
UR2 = Undcr review for listing
FDA=F/orida Dcpartment of Agriculture and Consumer Services
USFWS=Unitcd Statcs Fish and Wildlife Service
hours varied throughout the day. Early morning surveys were conducted to document bird
utilization and late afternoon surveys facilitated observations for mammalian species. With the
exception of the gopher tortoise, prickly pear cactus (Opuntia compressa) and wild pine
(Tillandsia sp.), no other listed species were observed on the parcel.
Wildlife surveys indicated four (4) tortoises occurred on the parcel. These tortoises (2
males and 2 females) were captured and relocated in the preserve area at Big Cypress per
FGFWFC Permit No. WR95198 on September 8, 1995.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEVELOPER
The following management plan shall be used to govern all activities or concerns relating
to preservation areas and conservation easements noted on the development plan. The goal of
this plan is to assure the continued viability of all preservation areas and/or conservation
easements within the Hills at Lake Eden parcel. The developer and Homeowners Association
(HOA) will be responsible for the implementation of this plan through its contractors. No
alterations are permitted to this plan or within the preservation areas and/or conservation
easements without prior approval from the City of Boynton Beach. The objective of the Hills
at Lake Eden Management Plan is to ensure that the natural integrity of the preservation area
will remain undisturbed throughout construction activities and in perpetuity.
The sCope of the work is as follows:
-Designation of preservation areas and conservation easements
-Clearing, grubbing, and debris removal
-Excavation or fill activities
-Implementation of Management Plan
A. Designation of Preservation Areas and Easements
"-The owner or his assignee shall delineate all preservation areas and appropriately
mark these areas to prohibit encroachment during clearing and grubbing activities
(Attachment I). Appropriate rtlarkings shall include but not be limited to orange vinyl barrier
fencing attached to 5' 2 "x4 lumber installed 15' apart around the entire perimeter of the
preserve. All fenced areas shall be inspected by the City of Boynton Beach prior to clearing and
grubbing.
B. Clearing. Grubbing. and Debris Removal
To prevent damage to preserve vegetation during clearing and grubbing activities,
the perimeter of the preserve will be root-pruned to a depth of 4 feet at least 3 weeks prior to
clearing. The root-pruning will occur 2' outside the preserve boundary. Trees, shrubs, stumps,
etc. shall be disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Other domestic
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
7
November 8, 1995
debris and household trash shall be removed from the site and disposed of in an approved
landfill site.
C. Excavation/Fill Areas
Excavation/fill limits shall be marked by the owner or his assignee. Grade
changes adjacent to upland preservation areas will be engineered so that any cut or fill will not
encroach on any preservation areas or allow surface water runoff to sheet flow into or out of the
preservation area. Placement of the fill shall be accomplished by the contractors at the direction
of the owner or his assignee.
Prohibited activities in the preservation areas include but are not limited to: construction
or placing of building materials on or above the ground; dumping or placing soil or other
substances such as garbage, trash, and cuttings; removal or destruction of native trees, shrubs
or other vegetation unless previously outlined in the Hills at 'Lake Eden Management Plan;
excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, recreational vehicle use,
and any other activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion
control, or fish and wildlife habitat conservation or preservation. No alterations are permitted
within the preservation areas and easements without prior 'approval of the City of Boynton
Beach.
D. ' Drainage Calculations
See Attachment II.
E. Implementation of Management Plan
The following Management Plan has been designed to conform with all state,
county, and City of Boynton Beach gu idel ines wh ich are in place for the protection of listed
species and associated habitat allocated for the preservation areas.
5.0 MECHANICAL MANAGEMENT
... ...
A. Purpose
Mechanical management of vegetative communities in the preservation areas will
be implemented to maintain and enhance the habitat and wildlife values for plant and animal
species occurring within the preservation areas. While somewhat more intrusive and less natural
than fire as a management tool, mechanical measures have been successful in achieving the
ecological objectives of habitat management.
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
8
November 8, 1995
-""'<-..--..----.-------------,-----
B. Objectives
Beneficial results from mechanical management includes opening the canopy to
allow sunlight to penetrate the forest floor and increase herbaceous growth. This opening of the
canopy allows the regeneration of canopy species and decreases the density of overgrown
understory species to prevent succession to senescent scrub. Regularly implemented mechanical
management effectively arrests plant succession, maintaining the xeric oak/sand pine scrub in
a state most beneficial to indigenous wildlife species.
C. Mechanical Management Prescription
Mechanical methods of managing scrub habitat, although still experimental, will
be used in the Hills at Lake Eden preservation areas where burning is prohibited because of
safety constraints. This prescription minimizes adverse impacts whenever possible to protect the
ecosystem under management and maintain the natural integrity- of the preservation areas.
Mechanical management, though thought to be less beneficial than fire management, may
be implemented to achieve management objectives. In many instances, weather conditions,
droughts, smoke sensitive areas, or other considerations prohibit the use of fire as a management
tool. Mechanical management has been selected because it is more effective in opening up small
areas of overgrown vegetation and to achieve the management objectives. Mechanical
management · is considered more destructive to soil, seed source, and wildlife than fire.
However, periodic management may prevent the encroachment of woody perennials and maintain
young oak trees which are more susceptible to fire damage. Hand clearing alleviate soil and
seed source damage.
The xeric oak canopy in the preservation areas is closed and in need of selective thinning.
The understory is overgrown with exotic vegetation and prevents the sunlight from penetrating
the ground floor, effectively eliminating herbaceous growth. This also, reduces foraging area
and travel corridors for other wildlife species. The overgrown understory also effectively
prevents the successful reseeding of young oak and understory species in much of the
preservation area. Without some management, the scrub community will offer very little habitat
value for wildlife species. :. ..
The mechanical prescription for the Hills at Lake Eden preservation areas proposes to
use selective thinning for canopy species. Selective thinning by chainsaw of the canopy should
be implemented manually on up to ten percent (10%) of the oak scrub community to open up
the area for reseeding and to increase the quantity and quality of herbaceous ground cover. This
technique should be implemented approximately every 7-10 years. Minimal soil disturbance
should occur so as not to lose the native seed source. Exotic vegetation removal will comprise
the primary management component. Areas of extensive exotic removal will be re-planted with
containerized vegetation.
. C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
9
November 8, 1995
Track equipment will be discouraged in the preservation areas as root systems within the
oak community are especially sensitive to such compaction. All management will be
implemented and debris removed by rubber tired equipment or by hand (chainsaw). All other
native vegetation in the preservation areas will remain undisturbed and special care will be taken
to avoid disturbances to soils and sensitive ground cover species.
Selective thinning of dense oak should not occur in areas with exceptional growth of
Tillandsia species. With careful management, a mosaic of habitat types can be maintained and
protected for this unique values for the likely benefit of all the inhabitants.
6.0 HABITAT RESTORATION
Vegetation species for habitat restoration include, but are not limited to, the following:
Scrub palmetto (Sabal etonia) ..',
Cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto)
Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens)
Sand pine (Pinus clausa)
Sand I ive oak (Quercus germinata)
Zamia (Zamia floridana)
Chap mans oak (Quercus chapmanit')
Myrtle oak (Quercus myrtifolia)
Runner oak (Quercus minima)
Scrub mint (Conradina grandifolia)
Gopher apple (Licania michauxil)
Herbaceous material shall be installed using containerized nursery stock with trees planted
10' o.c. and understory planted 3' o.c. Spacing to mimic the natural plant association (Le.,
informal groupings with staggered heights and mixed species) will be attempted where possible.
No plant relocation will occur into the preservation areas. All planted material will be
containerized. The planting must be approved by the City of Boynton Beach prior to
installation.
" ..
7.0 LONG TERM MANAGEMENT
The Hills at Lake Eden preservation areas will be maintained as natural habitat in
perpetuity by the HOA. The prescribed management techniques will be implemented
approximately every 7-10 years to achieve the management objectives set forth in this plan. A
3' setback at the back-of-Iot will be sodded and/or planted in native vegetation and maintained.
The setback area will be mowed at regular intervals to prevent recolonization of weedy and
exotic species. Any proposed nature paths in the preservation areas also will be maintained at
regular intervals to provide safe access for members of the community.
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
10
November 8, 1995
- "- - - -~--_.__._- ._"-_.,."_.,,....__._-----~._._-_._--'"--~-
Prior to management activities, all required notices and necessary permits will be
submitted to the City of Boynton Beach. Every effort will be made to protect listed species and
other sensitive resources during implementation of the management plan.
A. Additional Management Techniques
1. Exotic/Nuisance Species Removal and Control
Any Brazilian pepper, Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia), melaleuca
(Melaleuca quinquenervia), or other exotic vegetation will be removed from the preservation
areas. Brazilian pepper should be removed from the preservation areas using the chemical
control described in the following section. Debris less than 8" in diameter (DBH) will be
chipped on site and used as mulch where needed. Vegetation debris larger than 8" DBH will
be hauled off site to an approved landfill.
2. Garlon 3-A@
Garlon 3-A- Tricolpyr (3,5,6 - Tricholoro-2-pyrid inxloxyacetic acid) will
be used by a licensed operator to eradicate Brazilian pepper trees in the Hills at Lake Eden
preservation areas. The trees will be cut-stumped. The cut surfaces will be sprayed or painted
with Garlon 3-A@ (undiluted). Garlon 3-A@ will be applied by a person licensed by the State
of Florida to (land Ie restricted chemicals. Every precaution will be used to contain the chemical
to the application site. The fallen trees will be removed via a haul route resulting in minimal
disturbance to soils and native vegetation remaining in the preservation areas.
3. Maintenance and Monitoring
After the initial Garlon 3-A@ treatment, the site will be monitored
quarterly for a period of one year by qualified environmental professional. .Regrowth stumps
will be cut and retreated with Garlon 3-A@ at a rate of 3ml per cut at 4-inch intervals. Regrowth
greater then one inch DBH will be cut-stumped and treated with Garlon 3-A@ at a rate of
Iml/inch DBH to ensure 100 percent eradication.
... ~
The preservation areas will be monitored quarterly for the first year for the re-emergence
of exotic species. All new growth will be hand removed.
At the end of one year (maintenance and monitoring period), a letter report will be sent
to the City of Boynton Beach to summarize the implementation and success of the Preservation
Area Management Plan.
If exotic species invasion continues, at this time, to be a problem, new eradication
techniques will be implemented in coordination with the City of Boynton Beach Environmental
Staff. The preservation areas will be monitored annually thereafter for a period of two years
if the eradication program is deemed successful at the end of the first year.
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
11
November 8, 1995
8.0 REPLACEMENT AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
The highest quality scrub habitat occurring on the Hills at Lake Eden site will be
maintained as viable habitat per the intent of Chapter 7.5, Article IV of the City of Boynton
Beach ordinance. All planted scrub material will comply with the requirement of the city
landscape ordinance. Proposed upland buffer areas on the project site will be available for
relocation of native plant species and enhancement as scrub oak habitat. Every effort will be
made to preserve protected plant species occurring on the project site. Additionally, use of
native plant species adapted to the xeric soils will be utilized for natural xeriscaping and
minimize future water consumption for preservation areas maintenance. Surface water
management plans will be designed to insure no runoff will occur into the preservation areas so
as to further ensure the long term integrity of the preservation areas.
Included in the enhancement program will be the clean up of the dump sites within the
preservation areas. Some heavy equipment will be required, ..but no track vehicles will be
employed. Established haul routes will be utilized in the removal of dumped materials.
The preservation areas will be surveyed prior to construction activities and designated
as a preservation area with surveyor stakes and protected by orange barrier fencing. Upon
project completion, the preserve will be fenced and signs will be posted along the perimeter of
the preservation areas behind every lot designating the area as a preserve area. Passive
. recreational features will be allowed within the preservation areas. A buffer comprised of sod
or native vegetation will be maintained along the 3' setback along the perimeter of the preserve
of the area on the Hills at Lake Eden site. A three foot high preserve fence will be installed
along the preserve boundary. The fence will consist of 1 "x4" heavy gauge wire attached to
green 6'metal stakes set two feet in the ground. The fence will be set one foot below grade to
prevent wildlife from burrowing under the fence. The fencing will be maintained in perpetuity.
9.0 PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES
The upland preserve areas will be maintained in perpetuity or throughout the history of
the project. The following activities are prohibited within the areas:
'. ..
*
Construction or placing of buildings, road signs not related to nature education
information, billboards or other advertising, utilities and drainage easements or
other structures on or above the ground.
*
Dumping or placing of soil or other substances or material as landfill or dumping
or placing of trash, waste, or unsightly or offensive materials.
*
Removal or destruction of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation with the exception
of exotic and/or nuisance vegetation removal.
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
12
November 8, 1995
*
Excavation, dredging, or removing of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock, or other
material substance in such manner as to affect the surface.
*
Surface use except for purposes that permit the land area to remain in its natural
condition.
*
Any improvements proposed for the back of lots that will change the natural
integrity of the preservation area.
*
Diking or fencing, and any other activities detrimental to drainage, flood control,
water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation or fish and wildlife habitat
conservation or preservation.
*
Acts or uses detrimental to preserve areas.
.. "
*
Surface water sheet flow into or out of the preserve area.
10.0 ENTITY RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGEMENT
The Hills at Lake Eden HOA will be responsible for the long term management of Hills
at Lake Eden preservation areas.
.
The purpose of the on-site preservation areas is to provide viable and functional habitat
for the endemic wildlife of this area and maximize the potential for long-term sustainability of
the oak/sand pine scrub habitat. Primary management is for endemic scrub wildlife currently
utilizing the site and vegetative health.
Management and maintenance of the preservation areas and easements will consist of
monitoring for plant health and invasion of exotic species, specifically, Australian pine,
melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper. Initial removal of exotic plants shall occur during clearing and
grubbing activities. Follow-up monitoring and exotic removal shall occur quarterly for the first
year. Stumps of exotic species shall be treated with an approved herbicide to inhibit regrowth
and shall be applied followihg"local, state, and federal guidelines.
Prohibited activities in the preservation areas include, but are not limited to construction
or placing of building materials on or above the ground, dumping or placing soil or other
substances such as garbage, trash, cuttings, removal or destruction of native trees, shrubs, or
other vegetation unless previously outlined in the Preservation Area Management plan,
excavation, dredging, or removal of soil material, diking or fencing, recreation vehicle use, and
any other activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control,
or fish and wildlife habitat conservation or preservation.
The City of Boynton Beach shall have the right to enforce the provisions of the Hills at
Lake Eden Preservation Area Management Plan through any available administrative or civil
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
13
November 8, 1995
proceedings which may result in penalties, appropriate revegetation and other remedies as against .
any person, corporation, or other entity in violation of any of the provisions of the Preservation
Area Management Plan.
11.0 TEMPORARY IRRIGATION
A temporary irrigation system will be installed within all restoration areas. New
plantings will be watered daily for a period of 60 days and weekly for an additional 60 days.
This will ensure survival of the newly planted vegetation.
12.0 FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
The Hills at Lake Eden HOA will be responsible for the financial obligation of the
preservation areas. Newport Properties will be responsible for initial implementation of the
management plan prior to and during construction. .. "
.', ....
C&N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
14
November 8, 1995
ATTACHMENT I
PRESERV A TION AREAS
.'. ..
ATTACHMENT II
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
" ..
,. "
F'II'HO
F,:l'>: ::.ciS4::f/X.I:.9
".100.; 07 15: 18
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. BOX 243
DCLRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447
PHONC: 272.1924
mbcr
Icrican Society or Civil Engineers
llrican Congress of Surveying &. Mapping
November 3, 1995
Florida Sc
Profe5sionaJ LllOd St
Mr. Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Parks und Rdcreation Dept.
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl.
.. "
33~25-0310
^ttn: Mike HQag, Site Developer ^dministr~tor
Planning and Zoning Dept.
Re: Hills at Lake Eden
. ,
Dear Kevln,
We are confirming by tllis letter that the conservation areas.
will be perpetually protected from storm runoff being directed
into the preserve areas both during construction and following
construction, after th~ single family homes have been built
to protect said areas in thefr natural state with the exception
of permitted maintenance and clearing of the prohibitive species.
If you should have any que8tion~ regarding the above,
please contact my offi~e.
Sincerely,
GENTRY ENGINEERING AND LAND SORVEY NG, INC.
~ ,/
A _"
lI. .
..,,/
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 17, 1996
()
to sub9K'ide a 2 acre parcel 'nto three lots for single-family
ho s. /
, /
-E.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Hills at Lake Eden PU 0
Burlison Gentry
Frank Pinto
Northwest corner of Seacrest Boulevard and Gulfstream
Boulevard (S.E. 36th Avenue)
New Site Plan - Request for site plan approval for perimeter wall
and buffer landscaping, common area landscaping, gated entry,
preserve area fencing and signage.
-
Mr. Gentry represented Newport Properties, the owners of the subject property. He
advised that the site plan reflects the recommendations and requests that the Commission
had made regarding the spacing and height of the trees. . The Planning and Development
Board requested additional buffering and a chain link fence in lieu of the fence with slats,
and he agreed to do that. There was also a request for return on the corners of the
southeast, southwest, and northeast sections to buffer the adjacent property, and he
agreed to do that. He said the developer is in agreement with the balance of the staff
comments.
Mayor Taylor asked how far the returns would go. Mr. Gentry said the Planning and
Development Board recommended 20, and he agreed to that.
Stella Rossi, 625 Whispering Pines Road, asked for additional trees on the south and
north buffer. She asked if the applicant is speaking to this. Mr. Gentry stated that what
was recommended was 2' on center, a 2" high hedge, along with the fence. The buffering
will be changed from slats to a hedge. Ms. Rossi did not think a 24" hedge is sufficient.
She stated that if this is the code requirement, the code is ancient. She asked the
20
-
:~ ~
'I "._~~. .n _ ._
o
MINUTES
CITY COMMISSION
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 17,1996
Commission to instruct the proper department to update the landscaping code. She has
seen other projects in the City which are not pleasing, have skimpy, non-native trees, and
the least amount of shrubs. Mayor Taylor advised that we will look into that.
Motion
Commissioner Tillman moved to approve Item IX.E, request for site plan approval for
perimeter wall and buffer landscaping, common area landscaping, gated entry, preserve
area fencing and signage, subject to all staff comments. Vice Mayor Jaskiewicz second
the motion.
Commissioner Bradley inquired about the hedge material. Mr. Gentry said it is a native
species, which will be planted at 24" and would be allowed to grow to 6'.
The motion carried 5-0.
Pr ject:
Ag nt/Owner:
Loc tion:
Desc 'ption:
Whi
Burto Metsch \
515-5 :8S.E. 4th Street \
Ti tension - Request for ~second one year time
tensi for concurrency and Sl pial"! "approval.
//
F.
(e
e
21
, ,
. .
------.--"--... ---._._-,-~
.' . .-
~~ by:
:r:; 'f il
~ '\"(J : .:ri ~ ;
f I
CITY Of BOYNTON lEACH &..tL i z;, ?~
~UEST fOR PUBLIC RECORD INFORM .-' ')N ~
-S~r\ WQ,,\S~
(Name)
(Address)
ed:
5& ( - ~77 - ~20D
M:- ~501 ~ qq /l~ !(i&1
I
(Phone #)
Ordinance No.
Resolution No.
Meeti". Minutes:
Meeti". & Date (Complete Set)
Meeti". & D;ate (Excerpt Only)
Verbatim Excerpt
(Subject to hourly charge @ Recording Secretary's Wage);
. ~ < -;J:t!d 1.k1 / ri~1 eA '
IYi).~.UJ/"A'tf-L~! ~ e \
. Olhon -~)-ec;\S\\-~ - 't\',ls oX L"'kL fJe,,-
~,<:) .~~ "'Ie ~ .-. .... ~ -./
('\v:,~~ ~\'(~ g.:s- ~D
. ,~/L
,~ j 1 ..'i" ."c:
,~,.,. n'l-'
,'/ ,?;> ,-
't
NOTICE:
1. You may inIped the,........ ~ without ch;arp un'- the...... . voIume......ed requires
exl'" clMcal . ......, allittance in which CaM you will be advised of a special service
e.......
2. Plain .... CGIMi.... be furniIhed upon pa,ment of 15( if the pIpII' II c:apied an one side, ;and 24M
if the ,..... II copied on bath .....
3. CopiIIaI ....oIIche .. be fwniIhed upon payment of 15( .. .... (copy an one side of the p;aper
only).
4. Certiflallon of documenbIdonI.....1 be charpd at $1.00 per document.
5. Used casMtte tapeilhall be fumilhed at a charp of $1.00 eKh.
Signature of Requesting Party
Date of Request
By Department Employee
Date Completed
S:\CC\WP\INfOllIQ.WfIO
~ 21, 1"5/IrIIIt
~
~
.----:JJ,~ ~^ '1 1 r /17. II -') I /) ~. 0 I L
~ flV"l1a.M ~ UNA. - 0\, l? b, j 2. '/, Iv 0 /1; 0 (-
7041 #- 8 ~ im..-e( ~~ ~ u;..; - s(,
6~ '0~- 3.(,2. ~ cJ~~~~
1n00 J~ ~ ~- : 3 (srJ ;;J ~
rr.fI~ 'fo - ;&t-k ~ .p~ ~ -/1>.-- ,
/'{; /'" (j . l 2 ~ J.U<;)-- )
-r-~' /., ',- S> ~.- (~'fs- ~ _ IOo~ ~ Arj
, ~ () It (/I'Uo.{
~W r~ a::t:r t,,7/ LckJ - 1if<7'L% f M
~ Il ~ ( ff.M. ( . 'a/ '")
/ uv-ax ,j'Iil;U ~ rr""lj fuq , g <!JJf &We. - 5 S-, LCf/o ~ M
.
.
.
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 19, 1995
Commissioner Rosen inquired about the distance between the ingresses and egresses. Mr. Hearing
explained that the proposed egress would be 250' from the entrance. The entrance to the new location
is approximately 160' from the existing location, then 300',200' and 200'. Commissioner Rosen feels
there are quite a few entrances and egresses based on the possible traffic flow in the future. There will
be traffic interruption based on the number.
After some explanation from the applicant with respect to how the service vehicles would circulate
through the site, Mayor Taylor was uncomfortable having trash trucks pulling up to the front door. He
would not have a problem with the southernmost drivebeing approved as an "egress only".
Motion
Commissioner Rosen moved to approve a request for relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 23 - Parking Lots, Article II, Section H.7, "Number of Driveways"
to allow two (2) additional driveways onto NW 7th Court, providing that the southernmost driveway
is an "egress only" driveway. Mayor Pro Tem Matson seconded the motion which carried 4-0.
Mr. Hearing thanked staff for the time and effort they expended on this application. They did a good
job and the applicant appreciates their help.
\
\\
17
~ __, _.~_. .n_____.__
- ~-----_._-_._----~_.~
-
.
.
t
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 19, 1995
V.
./
Mayor Taylor read a Procla
Days".
g February 14, as "Shr' -Hospital
VI.
PUBLIC HEARING:
. ' ,?-
A.
PROJECT: Hills of Lake Eden PUD
POSTPONED TO JANUARY 2, 1996
AGENT: Burlison A. Gentry - Gentry Engineering & Land Surveying,
Inc.
OWNER: Newport Properties, Inc.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of S.E. 36th Avenue and Seacrest
Boulevard
DESCRIPTION: REZONING ~ Request for zoning and master plan approval to
construct 62 singl~family detached homes on 15.45 acres of
land in connection with a rezoning from R-1-MB (single-family
residential) to Planned Unit: Development with a land use
intensity of 5 (PUD with LUI-5).
B.
l'
I
Palm B~ach County
Motion..
c.
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
Bryan, Barra &
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
/
"'-
,
9
,--
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
.
DECEMBER 19, 1995
not be recorded or provided to the applicant
eliminate the need for t e applicant to co
/
til the conditions are met. ApprovalJ3n that basis will
back before th" Commission. //
\ /
\
ey would agree to <;felete
\ . II
/
The molton
I
I
Mr. ~rris confjr
refer,nce to Com
Rolfyson.
pJ"torney C
record. E ibit "F" is a " t of the administr lve conditi s. This is a new !J rm prepared I) Ms.
Heyden and Mr. Hukill ich will atte t to simplify t Commission' review. When ''It)e
. devel ment order is prepar J the doc ent can be used as-',a check off to show "included" or
"reje ed"J and it will expedite t~e prep ation of the development order. 7
D.
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Newport Place PUD (f.k.a. Stanford Park PUD)
Donald E. Hearing
Newport Place Associates Ltd.
Southwest corner of Hypoluxo Road and NW 7th Court
FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING - Request to
amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from
Low Density Residential to High Density Residential for a 23
acre, existing planned unit development (PUD) and a 1.59 acre
tract and to rezone the 1.59 acre tract from R-1-AAB (single-
family residential) and the PUD to Planned Unit Development
(PUD w/LUI- 5) to add a 120 bed assisted living facility.
Donald HeMin&. larvlct-=-~ architect and land planner, r~~nti.. Newport Place, introduced Ron
Ehler, Managing and General Partner of Newport Place, and Steve Gillespie, Landscape Architect. He
summarized the request by noting that the staff report clearly outlines the request.
The applicant is requesting a reclassification of the land use on the property so that completion of the
campus master plan can be accomplished. To the west is High Point Country Club; to the north is
Hypoluxo Road; to the east are large-lot residential homes which are separated from NW 7th Court by
a platted landscape buffer preserve area which was put in place when the original PUD was approved
for Stanford Place. Newport Place intends to add an additional 12O-bed assisted living facility. This
will fill the gap in health care services provided at Newport Place. There is already an assisted adult
.
13
~
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 19, 1995
.
congregate living facility existing on site. This will add the assisted living facility which will provide
a greater level of services needed by the elderly. There is an existing nursing home located at the
extreme northwest of the property. In addition to the request for the reclassification of the land, the
applicant will be adding additional parking to the PUD which were not added in the past. Those areas
include Lots 7 and 8 on the east side of NW 7th Court. They will also be rezoned so that they are
consistent with the overall PUD master plan.
Mr. Hearing advised that the Land Development Regulations require that seven criteria be evaluated
for approval of an amendment, or rezoning of the Comprehensive Plan. The seven criteria are outlined
on Pages 4 through 7 of the staff report (Planning & Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-692).
Staff finds that each of the criteria have been met and the proposal is consistent with the criteria and
land use plan. A variance component involving access drives is included and will be discussed ,
following review of this request. Mr. Ehler has been in contact with the neighbors and all surrounding
properties in an effort to be a good neighbor. The applicant is unaware of any opposition.
Ms. Heyden explained that this request involves two issues - a land use and a rezoning. Lots 7 and
8 will be added. These lots were brought into the use to provide access to the PUD. They will be
added to the PUD and rezoned to PUD. The land use stays the same, but the density increases. With
the addition of Lots 7 and 8, the entire PUD is increasing by only 1.59 acres. This application is
considered a large-scale land use amendment, and as such, must be reviewed and approved by the
Department of Community Affairs. .
Staff recommends approval subject to the staff comments in Exhibit "F". In addition, the Planning and
Development Board also recommends approval.
MAYOR TAYLOR ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO
WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS REQUEST.
Mayor Pro Tem Matson said this property was useless for a very long time. About four years ago, Mr.
Ehler worked long and hard with Scott Miller and herself to turn this property into a burgeoning senior
center. They have done an exceptional job, and they are very visible in the community. They have
been very good neighbors. She was extremely pleased to approve this project.
MQtia.D
Mayor Pre Tem Matson moved to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map from Low
Density Residential to High Density ResidentiaHor a.23 acre existing planned unit development (PUD),
and a 1.59-acre tract at Newport Place, southwest comer of Hypoluxo Road and NW 7th Court, and
to rezone the 1.S9-acre tract from R-l-MB (single-family residential) and the PUD to Planned Unit
Development (PUD w/LUI- 5) to add a 12~ assisted living facility, including comments in Exhibit
"F". Commissioner Jaskiewicz seconded the motion.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz commended Ms. Heyden for the thorough and comprehensive investigation
she provided with regard to this request. Any questions or concerns she might have had were
addressed before she could think of them. The back-up material was excellent. ~
14
1 ~_
_ ..... .... -.-_.-.- .,-,.
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 19, 1995
.
Ron Ehler~ Managi~and General Partner of Newport Place, said the curvature of the road as
depicted on the map does not exist. The roadway ends at the end of the Newport Place owned
property, and there is a lift station and a small fence in the location of the dead end. In looking at the
size of the residential lots on High Ridge Road, Mr. Ehler pointed out that there are approximately six
lots. In a normal subdivision situation, if NW 7th Court were to be the road to serve the subdivision,
there would be 12 curb cuts (six on each side of the road). Because the applicant owns a 50' buffer
strip on the east side of the road, there are no curb.cuts and the applicant has provided a highly
vegetated buffer between the project and the homes on High Ridge Road. On the west side of NW
7th Court, there are only two curb cuts. With the two additional access drives requested, there would
be a total of only four curb cuts compared to conceivably having 12 curb cuts. Newport Place is the
only project located on this section. This tract of land is approximately 600' long, and has only two
curb cuts. By adding the additional two entrances, the properties can be segregated.
At the TRC meeting, only one staff department expressed concern, and that opinion was that the project
could be accomplished with only one access. The Planning and Development Board unanimously
approved the request with two curb cuts.
Ms. Heyden referred back to the map and pointed out that the undeveloped property could
conceivably be developed with 90 to 100 units.
Commissioner Rosen felt a sufficient case had been made for one additional entrance.
(
Commissioner Jaskiewicz questioned whether the center entrance would present a hazard with
emergency vehicles entering the project. Mr. Hearing used the map to show the entrances requested.
One entrance would be designated for the residence area, and the back entrance would be designated
for services. The applicant feels that if only one access point is approved, the center access would be
the preferable choice. He further requested that if only one access point is approved, the Commission
consider allowing an "egress only" in the southernmost location. This would permit the service
vehicles to service the site and then leave the project. Mr. Ehler added that one of the curb cuts
currently being counted is an "egress only".
Mayor Pro Tern Matson read from the Planning and Development Board meeting minutes of December
12, 1995, where it mentions the applicant's desire to use the driveway that staff wishes to eliminate as
the main entrance drive directly in front of the building. It points out that the entrance will be well
marked and maintained. It further states that because of the age of the clientele, there is greater need
for emergency service vehicles. Therefore, they would like to eliminate the possibility of "fighting"
with service vehicles when emergency vehicles are required. Mayor Pro Tern Matson feels that since
the applicant is requesting the two access points to provide a means of increased traffic circulation, she
does not see the reason for arbitrarily saying no. She feels the applicant has the right to develop the
property as requested, and sees no impact due to the fact that the road dead-ends. She would support
the request with the two additional driveways.
Commissioner Jaskiewicz said the Commission must also be concerned with the precedent which will
be set in this case. She will agree to the second driveway being "egress only". .
16
. . ~----------
'-
.
.
,
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, fLORIDA
DECEMBER 19, 1995
The motion carried 4-0.
E.
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT:
OWN ER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Newport Place
Donald E. Hearing
Newport Place Associates Ltd.
Southwest corner of Hypoluxo Road and NW 7th Court
PARKING LOT VARIANCE - Request for relief from the City of
Boynton Beach l:aAd Development Regulations, Chapter 23 -
Parking Lots, Article II, Section H.7 "Number of Driveways" to
allow two (2) additional driveways onto Northwest 7th Court.
Donald Hearjn~epresenting.NewporlPlace, advised that this is a companion to the previous request.
The City land Development Regulations within PUDs limit the number of access points that can be
provided to two (2). At the present time, two access points exist on the easterly portion of the Newport
Place master plan. The applicant is proposing that two additional access points be provided from NW
7th Court. Staff is recommending approval of only one additional access and has expressed concern
about the second access which would be located in front of the faCility.
At the Planning and Development Board meeting, discussion took place regarding approval of the two
access points. It is possible to make the project work with only one additional access; however, the
applicant feels circulation would improve with the addition of the two accesses. Staff has
recommended approval of only one additional access which will provide access to the rear of the
facility where most of the services take place. The applicant would like to have the two access points
in order to segregate the vehicular traffic associated with the customers from the traffic associated with
services. Mr. Hearing requested the Commission's consideration of approval of the two access
driveways.
Ms. Heyden advised that staff is recommending approval of the southernmost driveway, not the center
drive which is located in front of the building. The reasons for this decision involve the fact that tne
R-l-AA property in close proximity to this project is undeveloped at the present time. Staff has no way
of knowing how this property will be developed. If it becomes a subdivision, there will be multiple
access points. Staff feels it is in the City's best interest to limit as many fldditional access points onto
NW 7th Court as possible at this time.
In response to Mayor Taylor's question, Ms. Heyden advised that NW 7th Court presently dead-ends;
however, the possibility exists that it could extend through to Miner Road and have multiple street
connections to serve the undeveloped property.
Mayor Taylor questioned how the second access drive would affect the property to the south. Ms.
Heyden explained that the reason for the requirement in the Code is to limit access points so as not to
negatively impact the traffic on the road. Attempts are made to channel traffic to the access points so
that backlogs of traffic are on site, not on the road system.
MAYOR TAYLOR ANNOUNCED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
15
- ~=-~.' ~ ----.~.~_.~.__.----~-----_.~-~-----
, '. ",.,,~
::O~G'>-l--l --I -i or -l oC) U> --l rn-o-o:::o r :r>Nr (/)
11)>:::000 0 0 -i:r> 0 -l :::0 C 0 z;u:::om l> :::OOl>
:::>XO-l--l --I --I :r:z -I IO ;0 --I --IfTl-(/) Z fTlZZ -l
=-u>l>:r> P :r> mo :t> mc 11 ~ ::::OU><- 0 :r>-C] m ::c:
-$:u>rr r r ::::0 (J) r ;oZ l> r -<ml>O Z H
:DC () 0 n ;U-irn c OG'>C -0 t""
t""
11$:OZ::::O :r> -0 -03> fTl )> l1<fTlZ (J) 11 (f) r Ul
J rrlCrrl :::0 fTl fTl -0 3:: 3::" :::0 mm -; m om )> >
IZ3::(f) fTl :::0 :::0 fTl -0 -or n fTl p ::::0 - (f) - Z t-3
::>rrlU>CD- :r> < < m mO 0 ~ --l}>-}> }> -U>() t""
Tl--fTlO -:r> ;U :::00 < c;uQr n --l -0> CJ ~
TlG>--I:::om 0 0 0::::0 < <:::0 fTl 0 :::omI :::0 m :;:0 --I )> tr1
'I-< Z 11 e em ;0 .,., mJ>-I f1l ..-fTl -I tr1
'J)-f..o-; (/) Cf>")> 0 OCD U> I }> ()G) )> t::I
-l 11- U> C CC en 0 G) --10 .. tr1
Z
:::ooUJ )> :t> )> (f) (f) - " fTl tJ1..;o
"111], (f) r --I ::::0 ::::0 r -l I -<
-Tl Ol- fTl m m :t> pO fTl :E OJ ~-o ..
--lU>NZI1 P p ::::0 ::::0 - P ::::0 tJ1.
-l Qr rn fTlZ -< fTl cr
z:::uoro l> pC) (/) }> 3>' 0
CC:'fmo en ^ ()o~
3:()fT1 :::0 l> 0 ::0 .
co--lrl1 :::0 0 m 0
rTl C r }> )> fTl :iE (f) m
::D:::U-$::::O l> Z Z
rrlz-rn 01 (f)
QU>G'>r)> tJ1 01 010 (Xl f\.) Q) tJ1 O-I'V- ""J
11 -< .. . . 0J --I
0JC ~ (0 1'0 ""J V1 (N- ~ OI'VVllJ1 -<
\J0JZOI'V tJ1 ~ coo. V1 0::>1.0 OH'0 0
J> -mOl 0 ::::0
;::0 "Tl--l--lO> ")> :r> }>")> l> Pl> }> p}>Pl> I'V m
:ArrlU>}>' () () O() () (')() () (')()(')n (f)
-rrl ()UJ ::::0 ::::0 :::0 ::::0 ::::0 ::::0 :::0 :::0 ::::0 ::::0 ::::0 :::u (f)
Z-f-oIN m m rnm rrl mfTl m mrnrnrn 0
C)- mrn\.O (f) (/) Cf> U> (/) en U> en (/) U> (/) U> " rn
:::0 0 . Z
(/) f'V 0'1 --I
\J p:::oo
)>u>(/rn )>
()-l::OU>(f) ~ ~ V1 -VI -""-J r
mom-. 0 ~ O~ V1 tileD 0 OOJOl~
(/) :::u Oil 0 0 - .
.. -< rn. ""J -Vl '" ~CX> V1 VJ V1 V1
Z f'V co~ \0 I\.) """-J o.~~Q)
-l ~ ~ ~~ x ~~ x ~~~~
N }> 0 0 00 0 00 0 0000
r 11 11 " 11 11 .,., .,., " " 11 "Tl ."
N 0 (f) (/) (/) U> (f) en U> en (/) (f) (/) U>
~ ----
\J m --I --I --I -; --I -l --I --I -l-l-l-l
m r m m rnm rn mm m mrnmrn
;0 r
C z
Z G)
-; C
Z
-l
U>
V1
Q)
?:fie City of
tJ3oynton 1Jeacli
'~y7
100 'E. 'Bognton 'BeacIi 'Bou!.evart{
P.O. 'B~310
'Bognton 'Beadt, ;rforufa 33425-0310
City :J{aff: (561) 375-6000
;r.fU: (561) 375-6090
December 18, 1996
Burlison Gentry
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P. O. Box 243
Delray Beach, FL 33447
Re:
File No.:
Location:
Dear Mr. Gentry,
Hills at Lake Eden PUD
NWSP 96-011
Northwest Comer of Seacrest Boulevard and Gulfstream Boulevard
Enclosed is the City of Boynton Beach Development Order regarding Commission approval of
your request for site plan approval.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at
(561) 375-6260.
Sincerely,
~ ! -~ ~ #-
_-~l;:{-rJ,J~v'U \ J', / -;::'Jh-,'
_.-r ~.I
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH:dar
Attachment
xc: Central File
Frank Pinto
D:\SHARE\ WP\PROJECTS\HILLEDEN\NWSP\DEVORDER, WPD
5'l11UrUQ's qateway to tfu qulfstream
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-661
Agenda Memorandum for
December 17, 1996 City Commission Meeting
TO:
FROM:
Dale Sugerman
City Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP,&--JJ
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE:
December 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Hills at Lake Eden - NWSP 96-011
New Site Plan
Please place the above-referenced item on the December 17, 1996 City Commission
agenda under Development Plans.
DESCRIPTION: Burlison Gentry, agent for Frank Pinto, property owner, is requesting site
plan approval for perimeter buffer landscaping and wall, common area landscaping, gated
entry, preserve area fencing and signage at the Hills at Lake Eden PUD. The PUD is
located between Seacrest Boulevard and Swinton Avenue, immediately north of S,E. 36th
Avenue extended (Gulfstream Boulevard), For further details pertaining to this request,
please see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 96-641.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-0 vote,
recommends approval subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "C " - Conditions of Approval,
with the exception of rewording Comment No, 22 to delete the option of proving a wood
fence and deleting Comment No. 25 (the comment is now satisfied), In addition, the Board
recommends that the applicant construct a 20 foot long return of the entrance wall around
the northeast, southeast and southwest corners.
T JH:dim
Attachments
xc: Central File
D:ISHAREIWPIPROJECTSIHILLEDENINWSPICCAGENDA,WPD
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Hills at Lake Eden
File number: NWSP 96-011
Reference: The plans consist of 7 sheets identified as 2nd Review. New Site Plan. File #NWSP 96-011 with a November
27, 1996 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking,
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE ! REJECT !
PUBLIC WORKS
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. A capacity reservation fee will be required within thirty (30) days of City Commission
approval, or upon request for the Utilities Director's signature of the HRS/DEP
permit applications. The fee amount will be determined based upon meter size or
(~p.r: ?~_':tAn:::1\
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Comments:
2, It appears that the revised drawings do show a scaled drawing for proposed
entrance wall signs, However, the sign panel as shown appears to exceed the
maximum area of 32 square feet as provided for in Chapter 21, Article IV, Section
1 D of the Land Development Regulations and must be reduced in size accordingly.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
3. Since the number of residential units has been reduced from 62 to 56 single family
units, the recreation dedication requirement is:
56 single-family units x ,0180 acres/d.u. = 1,01 acres.
4 r:::l<:h in liAII of land
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALlST
Comments:
5. As specified in note 22 of the master plan, show with a distinguishable symbol on
the site landscape plan the location, size and specie of the existing trees required
to remain on the site. Also indicate, on the landscape plan, whether the tree is being
relocated or a new tree is replacing a tree that cannot be relocated, The quantity
of existing trees to remain on the site shall be documented on the landscape plan.
The quantity of trees to remain shall be consistent with the determination made by
the City Commission on February 20, 1996.
6. A City of Boynton Beach Building permit shall be required to remove, relocate and
or replace trees at the subject project.
7. Place a note on the drainage plan and landscape plan, within the tree preserve
areas, indicating the location of the tree preserve fence that shall be installed
consistent with the location specified in the tree management plan.
8. A City of Boynton Beach building permit shall be required to install the preserve area
fencing,
Page 2
Hills at Lake Eden
File No.: NWSP 96-001
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE ! REJECT !
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
9. Correct the inconsistency between the taupe background color for the wall signs
identified on the submitted plans and the Rushmore (Behr-C40-30) color shown and
specified on the color elevation drawings, Where applicable, identify on sheet 6 of
7 the color code and manufacturer of the taupe color proposed on the plans for the
background color of the wall signs, [LOR, Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.
D.1,}
10. The total area of undisturbed preserve area shall not be less than 1.29 acres as
indicated on sheet 1 of 7 of the current submittal or as approved by the city
forester/environmentalist. The 1,29 acres may include the required Fire Department
access area. Submit a copy of the preserve area management plan approved with
the master plan/rezoning for staff to determine where the exact location of the fence
was approved (on tract line vs, inside the tract line),
11, For clarity in depicting the area where the platted lots abut the undisturbed preserve
area it is recommended that a dimensioned typical section view drawing of the area
be added to the landscape plan. Identify and include in the section view drawing the
following improvements proposed: the edge of the buildable area of the homes, the
buildable area for pools and screen roof enclosures, the preserve area tract line, the
proposed fence (type and height) and the undisturbed preserve area,
12. Amend the typical Swinton Avenue landscape plan to show, dimension and label the
approved rear building setback of 29 feet from Swinton Avenue and include a
symbol that represents the required 25 foot rear setback for pools and screen roof
enclosures. All setbacks are dimensioned from the property lines and shall match
the dimensions on the approved master plan. Omit the incorrect rear setback
reference of +/- 9'.
~ As discussed at the TRC meeting, the applicant shall provide a utility easement
along the south side of the main entrance to the project. Show on the drainage and
landscape plans the location, type and size of the easement. Where applicable,
remove trees from the easement.
14, Specify on sheet 6 of 7, the color name, color code and manufacturer proposed for
the colors of the wall sign, [LOR, Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.B.2.}
15, Identify on the plan, the dimensions of the proposed wall sign, The dimensions of
the wall sign shall comply with the sign code regulations, [Chapter 21- Signs, Article
IV, Section 1 and 7]
16, It is recommended that the proposed wall signs be approved administratively,
subject to the signage complying with the sign code regulations and the sign
specifications listed in the community design plan.
17. Identify on the drainage plan the height of the berms proposed along the north, east
and south property lines. Also, add to the landscape plan the proposed berms and
indicate the slope of each berm.
18, It is recommended that the 40 watt fluorescent light fixture proposed to illuminate the
walls signs be ground mounted and directed towards the face of each wall sign.
19, To comply with the rezoning conditions of approval regarding the Swinton Avenue
and Seacrest Boulevard landscape specification change the height of the cocoplum
hedge material from eighteen (18) inches to twenty-four (24) inches at time of
planting,
20. Add to the landscape plans the location, type and size of the fence and berm
easement shown on the drainage plan along the north and south property lines. As
previously indicated, the easements shall be dedicated to the H.O.A. for perpetual
maintenance.
21. Show and specify on the landscape plan (sheet 3 of 7) the location and type of the
ground cover proposed for the fence and berm easement proposed along the north
and south property lines.
22, It is recommended that the proposed 6 foot height, black vinyl chain link fence with
black vinyl slats proposed along the south and a majority of the north property line
be replaced with either a solid wood fence painted a neutral color or a continuous
(2 foot on center, 24 inch tall at time of planting) native hedge and 6 foot tall black
vinvl chain link fence without slats.
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P. O. BOX 243
DELRA Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444
PHONE: 272-1924
MEMBER
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS
AMERICAN CONGRESS OF SURVEYING & MAPPING
November 27, 1996
MEMBER
FLORIDA SOCIETY OF
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425-0310
Attn: Mr. Mike Haag
Re: Hills at Lake Eden
File No. NWSP 96-011
Dear Ms. Heyden,
We are submitting this letter in response to Item No. 1 of the
checklist for the Hills at Lake Eden, stating that there are no
changes required to be documented on the application form originally
submitted for said Hills at Lake Eden Site Plan Application.
If you should have any questions regarding the above, please
contact my office.
Sincerely,
GENTRY EN
,~
~. ,
~~rl1S0n A. GentFY,
VEYING, INC.
~',
\
'~~!!7'
100 'E. tJJoynton tJJeadr. tJJouk'CltJrti
P.O. tJJo~310
tJJoynton tJJeadr., 7f,orU{a 33425-0310
City 1IJJl[: (407) 375-fj()()()
1"JU: (407) 375-6090
November 18, 1996
Burl Gentry
Gentry Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
P.O. Box 243
Delray Beach, Florida 33447
RE: Initial Review Comments - Hills at Lake Eden
File No. NWSP 96-011
Dear Burl Gentry:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for
the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments
during their initial review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended
to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans
are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are
comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the
project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply
with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why
the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and
documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets
(including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the
amended plans and documents have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and
recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meeting
schedule). A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that
have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans.
YlmerU;a5 (jateway to tne (julfstream
Page 2 of 2
Initial Review Comments
Hills at Lake Eden
File No. NWSP 96-011
Dates pertaining to the remainder of the review process including submittal of amended
plans and board and commission meetings, are identified on the attached Review
Schedule. The amended plans will be due by 5:00 P.M. on the amended submittal
deadline date identified on the Review Schedule. A checklist that contains information
regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review is attached.
If you should have any questions regarding the comments or the approval schedule,
please feel free to call Mike Haag, who is coordinating the review of your site plan for the
Planning and Zoning Department.
Very truly yours,
r-' '
-dtWvu y-. ~kJ
Tambri J. Heyden, AICP
Planning and Zoning Director
TJH:bme
Atts,
d IprOjeclllhilleden\1comhilLwpd
CHECKLlSI
The following list and information is provided as a checklist to ensure that the submittal of amended plans
and documents is substantially complete for review. Turning in this list and the appropriate plans and
documents will enable the submittal to be efficiently checked prior to being accepted by the Planning and
Zoning Department.
Project Name: Hills at lake Eden (File No. NWSP 96-011)
1. Submit an amended Site Plan Review/Conditional Use application form that reflects the changes
that were made as a result of amending the plans and documents to comply with the Code of
Ordinances and the Technical Review Committee comments. A copy of the original form with a
distinguishable symbol identifying the change(s) may be submitted or a completed new form with
the changes identified. If there are no changes required to be documented on the application
form, a letter from the applicant stating same must be turned in with the amended submittal.
2. Submit twelve (12) assembled and complete sets of plans and documents, including surveys that
show compliance with the Code of Ordinances and comments made by the Technical Review
Committee. Two (2) of the sets shall have the appropriate legible raised seal and signature of the
designer responsible for the drawing(s). Plans and documents shall be assembled in twelve (12)
individual complete packages with the title of the project on all pages and/or sheets and each
page or sheet numerically numbered such as the following example: 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.
3. Submit color photographs of the buildings on the site that are to remain in their existing condition
and photos of existing buildings that are located on the sites that abut the perimeter of the subject
property. The minimum size is 4" by 6". Each photograph shall be labeled to identify the location
of the existing structures with respect to the location of the proposed project. If the abutting
property is vacant photographs are not required.
4. Submit colored elevation view drawings - a colored duplicate copy of all drawings of the elevation
views of each side of all buildings and signage associated with the project. The colors shown and
described on the colored elevation views shall match the colors identified on the elevation
drawings submitted for site plan review. All exterior surfaces of the structure(s) shall be colored
and the color name, associated color code and manufacturer identified. The type of exterior
surface material shall also be identified on the drawing. The colored elevation drawings shall
have compass direction or title of the side of the building identified. The title block of the original
drawing shall be shown, The maximum size is 24" by 36". Do not submit on board of any kind.
5. Submit color samples as an example of the proposed colors. Each sample shall have attached
a label that identifies the color by name, color code and manufacturer. The colors should be
referenced from an established color chart.
6. Submit a 8 1/2" x 11" transparency of the landscape plan drawing and site wall including signs
to be used on an overhead projector at board meetings.
19~~ REVIEW SCHEl.JJLE
SECOND HALF
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
* PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
*
ORIGINAL AMENDED CITY COMM REDEV
SUBMITTAL PLANS *C.R.A.B. P&D COMMISSION AGENCY
DEADLINE DEADLINE MEETING MEETING MEETING & MEETING
May 31 Jul 15 Aug 12 Aug 13 Aug 20
Jun 27 Aug 9 Sep 09 Sep 10 Sep 17
Jul 26* Sep 09* Oct 07* Oct 08 Oct 15
Aug 23* Oct 07* Nov 04* Nov 12 Nov 19
~:l ~ec 1~ Ge: l~
Sep 25 Nov ..,. Dec 09
Oct 23 Dec 06 Jan 08, , 97 Jan 09, '97 Jan 16, '97
* DATE TO BE DETERMINED
NOTE: (1) TO FACILITATE THE PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST, IT IS RECOMMENDED
THAT THE APPLICANT SET-UP, BY APPOINTMENT, A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING WITH THE
DIRECTOR OF THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT (407) 375-6260 PRIOR TO THE
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE DATE. THE MEETING WILL ADDRESS CONCERNS REGARDING THE
TYPE OF SUBMITTAL, BOARD REVIEW SCHEDULE, SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, FEE,
APPLICATION FORM, AND TYPE AND NUMBER OF PLANS/DOCUMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO
BE SUBMITTED.
(2) IF A SUBMITTAL IS RECEIVED BY THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DEADLINE
DATE AND WITHIN TWO (2) WORKING DAYS FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL
DEADLINE, THE SUBMITTAL IS DETERMINED ACCEPTABLE FOR PROCESSING, THE
SUBMITTAL WILL FOLLOW THE APPROVAL SCHEDULE IDENTIFIED ABOVE. HOWEVER, IT
SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE ALLOCATES ONLY TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS FOR THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE
PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY WITH THE TRC COMMENTS GENERATED FROM
THE REVIEW OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS. TO KEEP THE REVIEW PROCESS
ON SCHEDULE THE AMENDED PLANS DEADLINE DATE IS STRICTLY ENFORCED. IT SHALL
ALSO BE NOTED, THAT PRIOR TO A PROJECT BEING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT, AND BEING PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD, THE PROJECT
SHALL BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE.
(3) APPLICATIONS WHICH REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT
ANALYSIS, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ORDINANCE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL REVIEW
TIME. NOTE: REFER QUESTIONS REGARDING TRAFFIC TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.
(4) THE ABOVE DATES MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
CONTACT THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY DATES.
%e City of
'Boynton 'Beach
'~~op'
100 'E. 'Boynton 'BuWt. 'BouUvanl
P.O. 'Bo~310
'Boynton 'Beadr., %mtfa 33425-0310
City 9UJIl: (407) 375-6()()()
~jU: (407) 375..(j(J!)()
October 21, 1996
Mr. Frank Pinto
320 S.E. 2nd Avenue, B6
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441
Re: Hills at Lake Eden PUD
(preserve area reduction)
Dear Mr. Pinto:
I have received a response from city administration regarding whether the 1.30 acre
preserve area approved at the time of the rezoning to PUD for Hills at Lake Eden can
be reduced administratively to 1.05 acres. Their response was that it could not and
would therefore have to be reconsidered by the City Commission (i.e. - a master plan
modification application would be necessary). As discussed with you last week, there is
a $500 filing fee, letter of submittal, and 12 sets of modified master plans required for
such a process which takes approximately 1 1/2 months to complete. For further
details regarding this procedure, you may contact Mike Haag of my office at 561-375-
6260.
Sincerely
L~ 7cv ~., )/hc\ oii e..
~{~I
r~ambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
T JH:dim
xc: Burl Gentry, P,E,
Mike Haag
Central File
D:\SHARE\WP\PROJECTS\lKEDEN\CORRES\PRESERVE.WPD
Jtmeriaz's gateway to tfu gutfstream