The URL can be used to link to this page

TRAFFIC STUDY ,.:., tl ' MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES, P.A. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS March 23, 1987 Alan Miller, Vice President G.N.M. Associates 70 South Congress Avenue Suite 201 Delray Beach, Florida 33445 RE: Traffic Report For The Proposed Lawrence Groves Residential Community Located On The Eastside Of Lawrence Road & About 0.5 Miles South Of Hypoluxo Road In Palm Beach County MDDN Project #87-018 Dear Hr. fUller: I am pleased to submit subject project. The report findings and recommendations. the Traffic Impact Analysis outlines the evaluation and Report for the summarizes the I appreciated the service. Please advise required on this report. opportunity of providing this traffic engineering if further information and/or clarifications are Sincerely, ~~.A/~~~ Daniel N. Murray, P.E.~ {.Lr:.... 0 '~"",~e.. o <c'.;- ~::, ., 1-~; MERRITT ISLAND OFFICE, 100 PARNell STREET · MERRITT ISLAND. FLORIDA 32953 · (305) 459-2905 CORPORATE HDQTRS.: nOI-A. W. PALMETTO PARK ROAD. SUITE 302-A. BOCA RATON. FLORIDA 33433. (305) 391.MDOM MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC It1PACT ANALYSIS REPORT ON THE LAHRENCE GROVES RESIDENTIAL COHHUNITY LOCATED ON THE EASTSIDE OF LAWRENCE ROAD ABOUT 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF HYPOLUXO ROAD IN PALM BEACH COUNTY MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES Prepared By: clJ~~~7 0/h Daniel N. Murray, P.E. Date MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENT ---------------- ---------------- Page Introduction..................................................1 Site Location Map -- Figure #1................................2 Planning Data................................................. 3 Trip Generation and Distribution..............................3 Traffic Assignment............................................4 Trip Distribution Percentages -- Figure #2....................5 Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #3........................6 Existing + Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #4.............7 Existing + Development + 50% Background Daily Traffic -- Figure #5.....................8 Full Land Use Build-Out Daily Traffic -- Figure #6............9 Development Access AM Peak Hour Traffic Figure #7.........11 Development Access PH Peak Hour Traffic Figure #7A........12 AH Peak Hour Traffic Figure #8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 PM Peak Hour Traffic Figure #9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Highway Capacity Analysis....................................15 Highway Link Capacities -- Figure #10........................16 Existing Highway Geometries & 5 Year Highway Improvements Figure # 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Traffic Performance Standards Category Evaluations...........18 Traffic Performance Link Categories -- Figure #12............19 Comparison Of Existing Zone To Proposed Project..............20 Fair Share Traffic Impact Fees...............................20 Required Highway Improvements................................21 Appendix "A" -- Highway Capacity Analysis MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES INTRODUCTION ------------ ------------ A 48 acre parcel of property located on the eastside of Lawrence Road & approximately 0.5 miles south of Hypoluxo Road is being proposed as a PATIO-HOME & DUPLEX UNIT residential commumity. The development site plan has been identified as "LAWRENCE GROVES". The project has a main access onto Lawrence- Road directly opposite the Fox Hollow development and a future connection to the east thru Meadows 300 Development. For additional background information and details, reference should be made to the Site Location Map -- Figure #1. To ensure that the traffic flow and safety issues are properly addressed, the City of Boynton Beach requires that a current traffic impact analysis & report be undertaken to address the traffic generated by the proposed development and its effect on the adjacent highway links & intersections. As a result Murray - Dudeck & Associates, Traffic Engineering Consultants have been retained by the developer to investigate and determine the traffic impacts created by the proposed Lawrence Groves residential community. In conducting the traffic study, it was necessary to evaluate the existing highway network and their associated traffic volumes. Then the development traffic had to be determined and assigned to the surrounding highways. Consideration of adjacent trip attractions and trip productions was important in examining the development trip patterns. Traffic data from Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of Transportation was utilized. Also, the map & graph data published by the Area Planning Board was used. Furthermore, an inventory of the adjacent highway network was undertaken. Likewise, detailed 24-hour machine counts & peak hour intersection turning movement counts were taken in conformance with City data collection requirements. -1- c .. .. I .. I ... .. Z I ; ... ~ ! I . I e ~ = I .. I ~ ~ ~ o o I-) ~ ~ p:: ~ :3 ~ ~ ...:l ~ S ~ H ...:l ~ rLl .~~ ,~ ~ .~ I " ...:l ~ o p:: ~ ~ 0. P-i .~ ~ o p:: ;:I:: ~ rLl ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES PLANNING DATA ~============ The Traffic Engineering Impact Analysis was based on the site plan prepared by MSM Architects & Planners. Specifically, the site plan reflects a proposed residential community of patio homes & duplex units. The following data describes the site data of the development: ........... .............. ...... ......... ....... .................. ........... ...... ............ ........ ............ ................ Site acreage.................................48 acres patio hOQes/ zero lot........................103 dwelling units duplex units.................................128 dwelling units Recreational Racquet Club Facility..........2 tennis courts 1 swinuuing pool Access 8. Residential collector street thru the property b. Direct access onto Lawrence Road c. Possible future access onto Congress Avenue, thru Meadows 300 internal roadway system .................. ..... .... .... ....... ....... .... ....... ... ...... ............... .............. ......... ....... .............. ...... Other pertinent data that was researched and evaluated includes the inventory of the highway links adjacent to the site & within the zone of influence. Likewise, the traffic activity at the adjacent intersections within the 1.5 mile zone of influence was recorded during the peak periods. Trip Generation and Distribution -------------------------------- -------------------------------- In determining the trip generation development, it was necessary to use Institute of Transportations Engineers Edition Puhlication. Based on this data computations were nade: rate for the subject the recently published Trip Generation--Third sources the subsequent ................................................................. ................................................................ . TYPE OF FACILITY UNIT SIZE TRIP nATE DAILY TTIIPS duplex pa tio homes 128 d.u. 103 d.u. 7 trips.d.u. 10 trips/d.u. 896 trips/day 1,030 trips/day ........................ ..... .................. .... ......... ..... ... ... ... ...... .... ........ .................. ...... .............. TnIP DEDUCTImJS racquet club 2 courts 44.3 trips/court 89 trips/day ............................................................... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. RESULTING EXTERNAL TRIPS ~ 896 + 1,030 - 89 c 1,837 trips/day . ........... ................ ............... .... .................. ............ ....... .... ....... ............ ..... .... .............. -3- MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES To determine a realistic traffic distribution pattern it is essential to undertake a careful review and evaluation of the surrounding developments within the zone of influence and to relate this data to HOME BASE TRIP PURPOSES: Work Trip = 30% Shopping Trip = 18% School Trip = 10% Social/Recreational Trip = Business Trip Other 21% = 12% 9% = Also, the characteristics of the highway links were reviewed to estimate the most logical route selection. Based on the previously indicated factors, a compilation of trip percentages was derived as displayed in the Trip Distribution Percentage -- Figure #2. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ------------------- ------------------- By utilizing the trip distribution percentages indicated in Figure #2, the development traffic on each affected highway link within the area of influence can be determined. The computations are depicted in the Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #3. So that the existing traffic conditions and the resulting impacts due to the development can be properly evaluated, it is necessary to determine the daily traffic levels on ALL HIGHWAY LINKS within the zone of influence. This data is depicted in the Existing + Development Daily Traffic -- Figure #4. Since a realistic build-out for the project is 3 years, it is important to evaluate the estimated background traffic, which are trips to be generated by other approved projects. Standard practice within Palm Beach County is to reflect the 50% estimated background traffic. This data is depicted in the Existing + Development + 50% Background Daily Traffic -- Figure #5. As a special requirement of the City of Boynton Beach, it was necessary to evaluate the traffic conditions, assuming full land use development. Thus, the Palm Beach County calculated full-build out daily traffic data & the development daily traffic for Citrus Glenn & Lawrence Groves are depicted in Figure #6. -4- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES ============================= Figure #2 A NORTH I 5% 2% Melaleuca 1% 1% Lane 7% 2% 2% 1% Lantana 1% 2% 2% Road 5% 4% 2% 6% 5% 5% -- HVDoluxo 2% 8% 28% Road 15% 8%Y 45% Jog Road SITE 55% 5% 10% Hiner Road 10% 45% 15% 5% 2 30% 10% --- 5% Old Boynton Beach Rd. 5% 5 C1 :.....c: /, 5% 20% 10% Bovnton Beach -c: Road 10% 10% 1% Y 5% Lawrence 4% Road 5% 2 Ave. Nilitary Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 -5- MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT DAILY TRAFFIC _===========ac=========== Figure #3 t NORTH 93 37 Melaleuca 18 18 Lane 129 37 37 18 Lantana 18 37 37 Road 92 74 37 110 92 92 ~ HVDoluxo 37 147 514 Road 275 147' 827 Jog Road SITE 1010 92 184 Miner Road 826 184 275 92 2 551 18~ ~92 Old Boynton Beach Rd. 92 92 92 367 183 Bovnton Beach 183 184 184 R 18 92~ Lawrence 73 Road 91 2 Ave. oad Military Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 -6- c .. to: I z OIl IIIl i . ... .. I ~ t: 0 I ..a ... . ~ I .. I = ... I ~ .. cog ... ... .. ~N I fI) i i ... ~O) .. ~ ... ... WI I ... ..a ... ..c ",I.) ~ 11>'" 0-"" .. roO"" ...... ..c ~ ~. UJ:I.) lOCtoo ~~~ ,\ ..... ..... ",.:I"" U1..J Ul~..c ........ ...>. .....c :~... ~~ ... - 0 0- Il> '" 0# 0# N N I ... ~ ,.:I too ... ~ a I coo co,.... .i .CD ~ NN : i N~ 11~ . I 0). co. .... .. , I I Nan ....an ....0) NN ... ... I i ~ , ..... N'" NC'? coeD ...... I I NO) 0)('\1 NC'? ('\IN ...... I \ ----" ... ... ..... .. .. r,;.... u '^ .. ..... c .. . . , i .. "".. ~ .. 0'" ~ .. ... . z c .. ... .. '^ ..... .0 u .,.... , +'" Moo .. CIO'" "'. ... ao .... '" E~ ...- ... . .., .... .." f= g\ Clt-o c: .. ~ ... ...0 ~:a ...... .. .. .... ... . ...... ...J1l ...... .. . .. .. , IIIC lloIQ lloI. .. 1:\ \ +Q ,...... . .00 ug N ....... e. lID"'" ..., ... I . 0.: '" ..., ...u i ... ..., I 11)"" "Gl N - ...'" o.Gl ~ ,.... ""C ..~ '" (II) ... ." ... ..., po C"I ~- CD,.... "'0 o.~ .,,~ ...- , ' , ..~ .. .... ........ C\II:::t tIt- ..~ ..... ON IID~ ...- .,,;: 0'" .,,::: 1If- (11):: o a:> ...~ (11)"" iii (II)~ CO'" ~~ ..,.... CD~ ...CO (Of),.... ... (I) ~ NN lID'" S~ ...~ I ~ ~ ; .... ...-.1:.... \.. :It . ~.l t.J"...........t \..~'~"'''':;,':~ '"'. .' ~:r~~~~ ~~(,~,MJ__ _ ' , 1 ~ -e." . i'i ~" -..... I" M ~ i .~ .. -" ~ 1 "I I "Eo ~ ' - ~'~ \-:- oW" ~ l . ~ ~ ~ ' t';\ ~ I~ ~ ~' \ ,. . " ~~ \. ~ ~ .." CO OX> :i - . ~ ~, ' ff~"- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~\ft~~,.. ~~ '.~~~!~ .~ I b'lI" '; : .. "~~J: "~i<';' 1 ~, -, i -Fi ~ ~. ...1'" ....:, ,. 0, ~ 1?1~lL ... . ,.,:G..~ ~ " i'i\'.l, 'ta . ',I, ~~.' ',"- :1, ~~ ~ ~~~\:~)\~ ~~'~....~~:: ~~~ :; .., : ~-' ._ '~I'~'Ia..z ~"r..~_;Uilll~ i '_ ~ i ;~E,,~ ~~ Irrt. V-:-.: .~~..~~~~ ~l; ... ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ .., I~ - ---:..'~ 5'11' ~~ ~f; ~~ If " I 0:2"'~ . ~ N.... &I)~ 0;; ~ r-i, l ' - N ~ ... - ... ...... ~; hii~,'1 '-'re i-' ~:! ~ ;I~~~~~~~= }_' i~ ~~ .... 01 ~ C\II~ N C"I Na- N ~ CD::: ... _ ...- co,.... CD~ :r~ ..... CIl"'" CO~ ...'" ...~ C'\I- ~~ k. , It;. '-.. ~ Il1lL ,... ~O~ ... CD CO' ..ot> C'\I~ ~ ..... ~\i -CD CO~ ...... C'\I~ C'II~ i ~ ... ,.... o : 0. ::: .. I'l ...""" C'II-- C'II'" ..~ Cf)a- ...::. 0'" .00- ..... (11)- ...... Cf)~ ..0 ... ..... ,... 0-0- "'~ ""-------- i ~ ..... 00\ 0'" c..... 0\ '" ..... 0<<> 0... 0_ 0\ .... . . \.. . ,l~", 'll ~ .,; . _ r. ':;- - I, ..... ~ :i ;:. i ~ . ~ ..., I!IlWl ~~ , I ~aJ ' ~ g i : p;~ . ,.." 00 ,I ltj g~ I ~; ,~;.. li~- ~ ~jJ li- ~~! I"j, ~ !.:oo - ~ ~ .~~' ! ill h . ~~ lil~. ,-m~~~ ~ 1t ,d,IW ~ .~~t '\ ~ !'~fhI \~ !il ~ II 0:;- ~'~~Ip~. l~'~~: ~ ~~ igr~ 1l~!6..' e1~ ~.... i Ii, ((aiilfik ~ ' " dJ .. h_l..:' 1...~jf.1 ,I ......-=: 'ijjjI1!J!j~j~ ~!i'lfJn ~ ~ , ,'~ ~~ l!a! z . ....... 001'\ 000 001 ,.."" ~ ,.." o on 000 001 M _ N ,.." O~ OGO Olt'l GO"" 11'\ ,.." o~ OClO OClO ........ "!. ,.." ,.." ON Olt'l Olt'l 00 0.... ON 11'\01 ...- ..."" ~ ,.." ON Oll'\ 0.... 0_ ,.." N Olt'l OClO 0111 N..... N I ,...., Oll'\ 00\ 0... 00_ ... I fro '~r I ~- ~ ~ - \. - t""-" . I ,. r. ~ \... f---- ~ ;.~ ~ ___ r( ~.. J '~., r--' I ~JIL....1 i""'lll i I ....... 000 ....... 0.... O~ ....... 0..... 00\ OlD ell 0... 0.... N It'l_ O- M 0- ..., ,L , ~f ,.... . I .... II'l It ... I I , I ~ ."\ ,-'l>. I...~r, ..... 000 Oa> 0.... N_ .., d' T ",. ..... 0... 0... 00') ... ..... 0') ..... Oll'\ 00\ 0... lI'\..... lI'\ ....... 0&1'\ Olt'l 001 ClO..... .... ..... 00\ 0.... 0..... .... .... ..... OM 0.... ON ClO..... ~ ....... 00 0.... 0'" lI'\... ... ..... .... o ell 0., 0"" .. l"l MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES To compute the average peak hour turning counts development access and the adjacent intersection, necessary to utilize the peak hour rates indicated in Trip Generation Publication. The results are depicted as at the it was the ITE fo11O\"s: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: AM Peak Hour Calculations Facility Unit Trip Rate Hourly Traffic In Out patio homes 103 0.21 0.55 12 vph 64 vph 22 vph 57 vph --- -- 34 vph 121 vph duplex 128 0.09 0.50 .."""""""""" ....""".."""".."""""" ..."""""....""" ....."".. ......"" """""""""..".."..""""" ..."""" ..."""..".." ..."""""" ...""...."".."" PM Peak Hour Calculations duplex 128 0.50 0.24 0.63 0.37 Hourly Traffic -------------- In Out 64 vph 31 vph 65 vph 38 vph --- --- 129 vph 69 vph Facility Unit Trip Rate patio homes 103 """"..""".." .........""" ..."""""".."""""" ....""" ....""" ......"""" ".. ... ... .............. ........ ....." ........ .................... The peak hour traffic at the project access is shown in the M1 & PM Development Access Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure #7 & 7A. Likewise, the existing and the development peak hour turning counts at the adjacent intersections are indicated in the AM Peak Hour Traffic -- Figure #8 & PM Peak Rour Traffic -- Figure #9. -10- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT ACCESS AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC =========================-============= Figure #7 NORTH IVDO UXO . 14 (15) ~ (54) Y ~ "'(67) Lawrence Groves A- -t( 46 (19) (55)(12) 6 8 Y -4 ~ 26 ( 3 ) ~8 ~ ~ A- 8", 26 26 '20 (16) CITRUS LEGEND (55) 6 ~ 20 GLENN ****** Y -4 ... 60 ~ 17 Cit 17 Hou (16) (16) Law Pea H 1 Rd A I Miner Rd. rus Glenn AM Peak r Turning Traffic rence Groves Am k Hour Turning Traffic -11- MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT ACCESS PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC R====================================== Figure #7A IVDO UXO . . 50 (58) ~(31) Y .... ~ ( 38) Lawrence Groves .. ~ 27 (71) (31) (7) 22 28 Y ~ ~15 (13) ~28 ~ ~ .. 28 .... 15 15 12 (58) CITRUS LEGEND (31) 22 ~ 12 GLENN ****** Y ~ ~35 ~ 64 Cit 64 Hou (58) (58) Law Pea H 1 Rd NORTH A I Miner Rd. rus Glenn AM Peak r Turning Traffic rence Groves Am k Hour Turning Traffic -12- i ~ z .. ! I " 0L- e ~.... \ ,-j~ "" .... ;z ~ Ie ~~.... !i'~""l +-...i ,," .-;~ ~a~ ,..,t:sj ....~ --. 9 le) "~-. ~ 12 ,.., ... .... .... ~--+ ... :;!~~ .... ..... ..... .... .....g- ~~ $5'18l'" +-~~ .... .c--""'-" .... N.... I .... .... a~:~ ~ ~ii "lll~ ~ 1; C .... ... II"l .... ..... II"l """'''''''' "--0;. I j~'a~ +-~~ ~~fl..-...c .... ... I o~~-=: ~ ~( ~:a -. is i :"... f III , c a: .. .. III i ~ u ~ ; . i ; e rc i . ! s .... .... .... ~ f ... ... c :8 I, 0... .OIl ...... : ...... ~.... II. &.. ;/ 5 ~ + .. .. .. '" c co .... ...:1: ... ... II fI ... .... ... II ~ ~: .. ! i I ... I CO) l ~ ~ ... .... /~~I~" '1,1' &; >~.... ..: j rilm:tJi ::- C~i-U' ~"'rt~fd-.'":."'_-' fh ,rom ~1~~ I ~:I~....t. .', fi t:'?: - ~. ~ : ~~~' ~,~~'gIli - ~ t= f n 0 -,- ~ .. ." -' ~ ?l-i~~ 0J01)~ 1.J1 ~ f1. 1.. - '~o ~--.... - I " -: ~ j' \\ i '(" ~ l 0 ~ ----.'_ 4.~ j I I i-J p ~~ \~. . "~ ~, ~\"b c~~'~ r, ~ r:;.~ ~1a~' I _' .- ifr" " :;~..i[- Iilti ~ ~' ,,' ..:< II Ii L. II , _"J:. ~... - "1 I' ~ J'" '(D1!:~ii'" . n. ~ ~ ":j-' .U!li,4;- .l J II I ...,.. I J ~~~ -f..'I ~ · . ';.. l:' ~ ~ ~t.. ~," ~L!.r: ,-- '!.... ( ._n ~I ~~~i-l ~~ 'i~P'~i' ~ 'd I . E ~~ -.p~ Ai~; 2,,1& h ' : ~ -..." ~~:~ :;~\ ;r':r.: rl~~' . ,;~. - ~. ~ .J, "'''1m' ~~m\ tJltw., - -- - :::E:. 'Ill i'"'i. , . Hi i '~i JI :-anI . :::;.: " ~~' eo hAt j,,- - J Ji! ."m~\ mI. , J - ~~ ;-.!. ~ ~l.L ' '~ ; . r'}\"""" ~,>ll " ."OW ....., ,1~~ ~' " : iiI1[,11"" i 'll, I I .i~~~h:..JII~~'-1rr :c = r.: .. -~ ~I:" '~i'~a < . --.J ,E :~~:fu~ri' ~_ ,J.." J ,i ~~~~ .~~~f\;~j!~~~~.i.~ ~ ~ J~:d}~ .~. ~ _ ~~ur ~.~ 'I ~U.k " ~h- ~. - ~'i'-, i. I It~' ~1?;Iii'h ,,~,' rJ I. 17;.~... 1 ;~1~ ./, ..-i '_~tI ._-, ~ ~~', !@~;;.r~, t (~imr~ 'JlJ r- ;r;-. -.I ~l' . ~1 ~ : "I- II l' ":'I"IlC 'J ~ u. F,.'.J::-~ .. ~ I )I I ;, =~;; ~ -II" '.I>>~.' " f--- .: I ~o~ --, . . I ~:i~ . ~ ;. r- f+ t. ': i III a: .l~": "~I" ~_.lJ]~,,.1 . I ...1- \ f-_. 10 ~ i ~ a +--:::0 ~~ \, ~,' li,"';J ~l'-li:~ .)\.~}~.~ I .-l _.... I L./i~.4 ~ :\t~' ;J.I ~ < ~ ... ... ::lg 3 S ~ ~ ~ ......... ~ --+ ~ f r ~ ~ -+ :;;/ ~I ~ . ~ -.;0. ,,~ ::;- .... ~~ e ........ ---~-<~-~_._----_.__.--~--.._.,.-_._--~---"-..._--- i , z ... ~ ~ AL-o ... If!... ,.. ~Rf\ :=~~ !:=: , : ( '"':Q--' ~ i ~ - -= ~ go c eo: . , I . Z 0 E ~~'"' - I · ~ lit . t ~ ~.:; ... N - ... .. - "'::J ~ , Nl ... ~ .-~~ ~ i:fR ~ N r .. - i .... ; '"' i~ --+ ...... ~ rc -' . E ~ ! .. ~ s ~ 0 . cJ~ E' ~~ '"' do.... e ......... ,~ ~ S +-ij ~ .t ~ .-""" S,;~.~ ~ 1t:f ~~=: ......~~..,:;; ~~K~ ;J' ~~ ; '-"l ... ~ ~ I \ ... 'i.. .... ~,.' mHtflfilll~ : - f-.( '.' I_~. mnl~~ I .' !l..~~, -~~f1~14.t4 -~ .~. - II' n tr--- ~~ . 5 ~~ . '... '~~ ::J - 1. ., ..~ ' .. :: . ~FI~lt7h..>J;j{k .., -. -.-....Q.~ . I- ,~ ; ~.- ~_, ;.; ~ ~...._ ,~./:- Qifi. ~l~'/' '1" ' r. ~ :rilL.. L. ;;:700.'.' _ . '" '_ ~{l;; . ~ .. - - _Ilm ~ J I U r--. II U )'1' ~ it . - - tJ, . ;: r;; i~=r.'l':. " .'~I " " . I 'II' ~i'!wc:e~ ..... . ,. ';It' ,!,;j ~ ;:: "'~'!!Uli.~ III' I, .I'-r I' J l . t' -r~'loJ~ · , .. ~ ~ 2 c ~~~~~ _.. LJlJ) :~l~--.~ ~""<:~ II ~ ~Jj _ j:j '1,)1: I'~'; ,~! '. ~f?:~ !Iii ~ '..,-l..!i! ~ ~2 · tJI ~ ~\ T "I~';:C -. +1. ;,. ;::--L.'~I:it~'::i. ~Q : i1 I~.::~~r.. -~. j~1 L..."Ii"',..."., r.1'" C' ~ -w- - ~..l:I:;:E:. '~'~il: >-., . j~ 7~lJl :10; ~ . ~ ~. f;;( L f~ I ~ i . --:it,.l ~ ~' -I"': = T, ;~,'K ~;j~;"'; ~ '~ ;;. = ~E ~ ~l ~~ : ~ J~ -- ~I\ 1:.. r}j,iJj y I'~.' ~ !1~~ ~ c , T:', , r j.. ..~ ;I':.r:.., l .... '.'il'. :F~ I ~ fl}t~ I ~ :: ~. ': ~J., '. r- 71. ~ I1lJtlrr t~~' !~1!' ~I i' ~:'r-;, I - ,~u. f ~l'... " . III ,~lUl IJ no.r- ~ 1\.... II~ I ,,~\~ _ T '1;~" I :II: '~~L;. ..r.;x." - I"" . - -. ;. ... 'S' ~ '. II n ~ i!'ii;bllll, ~ji;-'f!!;1 I. ....u I .J~':l" "" . II'_~ '~;;"'''''H r--- ~t, 1 1~14~~~,..,:;.1 1.11 . ~', !~ij1hillt.1 f1~I~!r~ t- ..~- n' ~t ll~~ . 1""- P.r !!'i{!!~ , t;! II 17~-I~::-' 01. oo ~', ~.. '," -- . . J Is~ ; : ~f' . ..,- i... ': '"' , ... ,; 'f-f~ :J~I . , ~, - \ ~_.;o Q ~~! ~~~ ~'i( 1t~11:' tH~J I ' I i .....~....t....$l.-+--!:!::::....;::~... '1,~.~~i~~~'~j' I __ 1 1..1 io',";l':. ;\t~' . ,ll~ i tH~c ~~ g~~~ ~ f. r :s;i :52 ~~-. ~~!It:l N """' "'""'" ,... ": $-. ~! ~ '"" .... .... ...... "" ~~ ~ -L-:=:...... '~~L :=:~ a..:a...J ~ ~ r"" '1 N--. ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~-. ~ i~ '"'" I ... ... I u ... ... ... f a: foo ... .. .. 6 l III . o c.J .;J/, ...... II .. ..... l. ~..... '!f a: +foo .. 00 00 " r: r: 0 ... ...= ... ... .. II .;J/, ... ...111 ~ Jl3l. '"' ~ ~ '" '" ...... MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ------------------------- ------------------------- To determine the level of service of the adjacent highway links, which the subject project will impact, it is essential to examine the highway carrying capacity. Reasonable and acceptable traffic movement can be achieved if the roadway sections are operating at or above level of service "D". Based on Palm Beach County criteria, for a 2-lane undivided highway a total of 11,500 vehicles per day results in "D" service, for a 4-lane divided highway the figure is 27,600 vehicles per day, for a 6-lane divided highway the figure is 41,400 vehicles per day. Furthermore, to achieve the optimum expected traffic flow it requires that all links operate at level of service "c" or better, which is 10,000 vehicles per day for a 2-lane undivided highway, 24,000 vehicles per day for a 4-lane divided roadway, 36,000 vehicles per day for a 6-lane divided roadway. A careful examination of the daily traffic figures shown in Figure #4 was made so that the highway link capacities could be determined. Under the existing traffic levels & current highway geometrics a number of links are below acceptable level of service, as depicted in the Highway Link Capacities -- Figure #10. However, by incorporating the roadway improvements, as indicated in the PALM BEACH COUNTY 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM & shown in Figure #11, sufficient capacity will exist. Details of the link capacity analysis are depicted in Figure #10. Lastly, the highway link capacity with the 5-Year Work Program Highway Geometries and with full build-out of the land use would result in most links being excessively over-capacity. Most links would be at Level of Service "E" as indicated in Figure #10. To determine the peak hour impacts, it is necessary to evaluate the traffic movements at the critical adjacent intersections within the 1.5 mile zone of influence. The specific intersections and corresponding traffic movements are shown in Figure #8 & #9. By utilizing the Transportation Research Circular #212, the Critical t-lovement Analysis" methodology, a determination of the actual level of services can be made. The analysis as shown in Appendix "A" clearly substantiates that these intersections will operate at an acceptable level of service when the development traffic & Citrus Glenn traffic impact is generated, assuming the 5-year Work Program Improvements are implemented. I -15- MURRAY-DUDECK . ASSOCIATES EXISTING HIGHWAY GEOMETRICS & 5 YEAR HIGHWAY I~WROVEMENTS --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- Nelaleuca 2L A NORTH Figure #11 2L(4L) 6L I 2L 5L Lane 4L 2L(4L) 4L 4L 4L Road 2L 4L 2L 2L(4L) 4L 4L 4L Road 2L 4L 2L 4L SITE 2L(4L) 2L Minor Road 2L 4L 2L 2L 22 Ave. 2L(4L) 2L(4L) 2L(4L) Lantana 2L 4L 2L(4L) Jog Road Old Boynton Beach Rd. 2L Bo nton Beach 4L 4L Road 4L La"Trence Road 2L(4L) Military Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 LEGEND ****** 2L Existing Highway Laneage (4L) Proposed Highway Laneage -17- MURRAY-DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS CATEGORY EVALUATIONS -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Since the City of Boynton Beach requires the traffic impact analysis to be in conformance with the Palm Beach County criteria, it is necessary to conduct a TRAFFIC PERFOR}1ANCE ANALYSIS. As mandated by Palm Beach County, all highway links. within the influence area of traffic impact have to be analysed to determine if there are critical traffic capacity constraints. Specifically, when the existing daily traffic is over level of service liD" on any link and the development significantly impacts the traffic level, then the project is a Category "A". Likewise, when the link total daily traffic exceeds level of service "D" and the development significantly impacts the traffic level, then the project is a Category liB". Thus a detailed analysis of the daily traffic on the affected links within the traffic zone of influence was undertaken. The results are depicted in the Traffic Performance Standard Evaluation -- Figure #12. Based on this evaluation the following comments are offered: #1 In analyzing the daily traffic under the criteria in Category "A" on all affected links, the results indicated that the project is not flagged as a Category "A" project. Therefore, this project DOES NOT have to committ to offsite roadway improvements, before even being considered a viable project submission. #2 In reviewing the daily traffic under the criteria in Category "B" on all affected links, the results indicated that the project is not flagged as a Category liB" project. Therefore, the need to consider density reductions is not necessary. #3 An examination of the daily traffic in conjunction with the Category "c" requirements, substantiates that the proposed development at full capacity is a Category "c" Project. The PHASING requirement is such that no phase impacts a thoroughfare greater than 2,000 trips/day on a 2-lane undivided highway and 4,800 trips/day on a 4-lane divided highway. Obviously, this project does not generate that intensity of traffic, thus phasing is not required. -18- MURRAY -DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC PERFOR}1ANCE LINK CATEGORIES =================================== Figure #12 t NORTH NSE NSE Helaleuca NSE NSE Lane HE NSE NSE NSE Lantana NSE NSE NSE Road NSE HE HE NSE HVDOluxo NSE NSE ME Road HE SI Jog Road NSE SITE t-1iner Road SI ME Miner Road SI ME NSE 2 SE Old Boynton Beach Rd. NSE NSE NSE SE NSE Bovnton Beach NSE HE HE NSE Road NSE Lawrence Road 2 Ave. Military Trail Congress Avenue 1-95 LEGEND ****** NSE No Significant Effect t-ffi Minor Effect SE Significant Effect SI Significant Impact -19- MURRAY-DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES COMPARISION OF EXISTING ZONE TO PROPOSED PROJECT ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ The project site is currently within the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County. Based on the Land Use Plan in the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan this property has a land use category of MEDIill1 MEDIUH HIGH RESIDENTIAL, which has a standard density of 8 dwelling units/acre. The proposed development is 4.81 dwelling units/acre, which is approximately a. 40% reduction in the density. An analysis of the traffic depicted in Figure #4 and the capacity findings shown in Figure #10, verifies that the increased traffic will not change the level of services. However, such an increase will reduce the quality of traffic flow and cause some minor increases in the delay, which can be assumed to result in some increased adverse conditions under the existing zoning. Thus, the proposed development is a positive improvement from the standpoint of reducing the allowable traffic impacts under current zoning. ~\ FAIR SHARE TRAFFIC D1PACT FEES ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Based on the Palm Beach County Ordinance #85-10, developers are required to pay a fair share fee for impacts created by their development traffic. This ordinance has established fee rates for various type of land development activity. The following calculations depict the land development categories, the dollar rate, and the total fee assessment: . ......... ........... ............. ........ ........ .... ... ......... .... ......... ........ ............ ........ ........ .... ...... .......... Duplex Units Units Fee Rate/Unit Cost ------------- 103 d.u. $804/d.u. t,82,812 128 d.u. $562/d.u. $71,936 ------- ------- $154,748 Type of Land Developl'lent Patio-Homes ......... .... ... ............ ....... .......... .... .......... ...... . ...... ..... .... ...... ... ... ........ ......... .... ...... ...... .... -20- MURRAY-DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES REQUIRED HIGHWAY I~WROVEMENTS -============================ To determine if any highway improvements are necessary to maintain a reasonable level of traffic flow and safety, detailed link capacity analysis and critical lane intersectional analysis were undertaken. Also, it is important to take into consideration the S-Year Work Program in Palm Beach County, since major capacity improvements will be occurring within the zone of influence of the proposed project. Recognizing all these issues, the following improvements are recommended: A. INTERNAL COLLECTOR ROADWAY I}WROV~lENTS a. At first cross-access from Lawrence Road 1. 100 foot left turn storage lanes for northbound & southbound directions on the Collector Road 2. 100 foot right turn lane for southbound direction on the Collector Road b. At second cross-access from Lawrence Road by the recreational facilities 1. 100 foot right turn lane on the Collector Road 2. 100 foot left turn lane on the Collector Road B. DIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS @ the main development access onto Lawrence Road 1. westbound thru-right turn lane 2. westbound left turn lane 3. southbound left turn lane 4. northbound right turn lane C. INDIRECT ACCESS I~WROVL~ENTS 1. construct southbound left turn lane on Lawrence Road @ Miner Road 2. re-construct drainage structure @ canal just north of Miner Road to accomodate three travel lanes D. REQUIRED SIGNING & PAV~fENT NARKINGS 1. shall conform with the Hanual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 2. all intersections should have stop signs & stopbars E. CmWLIANCE TO SIGHT TRIANGLE CRITERIA -21- MURRAY -DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES With the aforementioned transportation improvements, the traveling public will not be adversely affected by the traffic generated by the subject development. Furthermore, the traffic impact fee of $154,748 should be applied toward any INDIRECT ACCESS IMPROVEME~~St because they are mitigating transportation problems which will substantially benefit non-development traffic. -22- MURRAY-DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES APPENDIX "A" ----------- ----------- HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ------------------------- ------------------------- Level of Service AM PM I) Military Trail & Hypoluxo Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic E E b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic C B c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic C C II) Congress Avenue & Hypoluxo Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic B D b. Existine + Development Peak Hour Traffic B D c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic C D III) Lawrence Road & Old Boynton Beach Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic B A b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic B A c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic C A IV) Lawrence Road & Hypoluxo Road a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic A A b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic B A c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic B B V) Lawrence Road & 22ND Avenue a. Existing Peak Hour Traffic A A b. Existing + Development Peak Hour Traffic A A c. Existing + Citrus Glenn + Lawrence Grove Peak Hour Traffic A A MURRAY-DUDECK II ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. AM PlIT DATE OF OOUNTS: 3/9/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 104 CRITICAL filS VOL 882 CRITICAL E/W VOL 826 CRITICAL SUM 1708 ..................................... LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND HOV WIDTIl RI. 12.0 L.. 12.0 LEIT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 27 219 286 NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 .- LANE GECMETRY SOUI'HBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTIl MOV WIDTIl WESTBOUND HOV WIDTIl RI. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RI. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RI. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 220 430 18 LOCAL BUSES (IIHR) o o o o 16 528 52 104 198 54 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .SS .SS .85 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITIl OVERLAP) BOTH TIlRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 ('PEDS/HR) NIS :4. EN : 4 . PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. CYCLE LENGTIl : 80 SECONDS GIC - NB & SB THRU :.34 GIC - EB & WB THRU :.3 PHASING CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUI'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 605 537 695 301 LEFT 34 277 20 131 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOOJ'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 27 220 16 104 CAPACITY 152 95 288 0 NEED PHASE? NIA HIA N/A NIA MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOV&fENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. PM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ..........*.*....**..*...*........ LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 103 ,CRITICAL NIS VOL 976 CRITICAL E/W VOL 719 CRITICAL SUM 1695 **....**..**......................... .. NORTHBOUND HOV WID'IH LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HOV WIDlli HOV WIDTH LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND HaV WIDTH RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOOI'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEIT 73 168 35 177 THRU 483 262 262 392 RIGHT 155 33 33 171 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING NIS EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGlli G/C - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITII OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOV&IENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 765 353 353 675 LEFT 91 211 44 223 LEFf TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPtrr VOLUME 73 , 168 35 177 CAPACITY 305 0 0 245 NEED PHASE? NIA NIA NIA NIA .1 ~ .. MURRAY-DUDECK &: ASSOCIATES r_ CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST.+DEV. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 67 CRITICAL NIS VOL 606 CRITICAL Elw VOL 498 CRITICAL SUM 1104 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOtn'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH HOV WIIym MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOtn'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFI' 27 222 16 104 THRU 219 430 529 200 RIGHT 317 20 58 67 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACl'OR NORTIlBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING NIS EN PEDESTRIAN ACl'IVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB TIlRU GIC - EB &WB THRU :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH WRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH WRNS PROTECl'ED (WITII OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 327 282 367 165 LEFT 34 279 20 131 LEFT TIJRN CHECK NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 27 222 16 104 CAPACITY 150 64 273 0 NEED PHASE? NIA NIA N/A NIA MURRAY-DUDECK a ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV'. PM PHI' DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 ..******************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 63 CRITICAL HIS VOL 628 CRITICAL E/W VOL 411 CRITICAL SUM 1039 ************************************* LANE GE<J1ETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WID'IH MOV WID'IH MOV WID'IH MOV WID'IH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 73 . 176 35 177 THRU 483 262 265 393 RIGHI' 172 37 37 194 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NOR'IHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIl G/C - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTII TURNS PROTECTED (WITIl OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) THRU -RIGHT LEFT CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND 407 91 INPlIT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 73 301 NIA SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 187 188 363 221 44 223 LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 176 35 177 0 0 238 N/A NIA N/! MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+UWRENCE AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATIJRATION 67 CRITICAL NIS VOL 609 CRITICAL E/W VOL 499 CRITICAL SUM 1108 ..................................... NOR11IBOUND LANE HaV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 3 L..12.0 4 S 6 NORTHllOOND LEFT THRU RIGIIT 27 219 317 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 .- LANE GECJiF:I'RY SOtffHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND HOV WIDlli HaV WIDTH HaV WIDTH RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 104 203 75 224 430 20 16 S30 58 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WIlli OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (wITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (IPEDS/HR) HIS :4. EN : 4 . PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. CYCLE LENGlli : 80 SECONDS GIC - NB & SB THRU :.34 GIC - EB & WB THRU :.3 PHASING CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGIIT 327 282 368 172 LEFI' 34 282 20 131 LEF1' TIJRN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 27 224 16 104 CAPACITY ISO 64 262 0 HEED PHASE? NIA NIA NIA NIA MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES .. . CRITICAL MOVEMENT .ANALYSIS MILITARY TRAIL & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE PH PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/9/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 64 CRITICAL N/S VOL 640 CRITICAL EN VOL 413 CRITICAL SItI 1053 ..................................... LANE GECI1ETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE HOV WIDm HOV WIDm HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 10'. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 4 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 73 185 35 177 THRU 483 262 268 393 RIGHT 172 37 37 199 TRUCKS (%). LOCAL BUSES ('/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOOfHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING N/S EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENG'rn GIC - NB & SB THRU Gle - EB & WB THRU BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUHES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND 407 91 THRU -RIGHT LEFT INPUT VOLUHE CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 73 301 NIA SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 187 190 366 233 44 223 LEFT TIJRN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 185 35 177 0 0 235 NIA NIA NIA MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOVFMENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. AM Plfl' DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 64 CRITICAL HIS VOL 461 CRITICAL E/W VOL 602 CRITICAL SUM 1063 ..................................... NORTIIBOUND LANE HOV WIDTIi 1 R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 3 Too 12.0 " L.. 12.0 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 103 252 48 TRUCKS (X) 2 2 2 2 NORTIiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND HIS :4. E/W PEDESTRIAN ACI'IVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - HE & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU PHASING LANE GECl'fETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTIi R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 133 311 24 171 528 32 143 692 89 LOCAL BUSES (*/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR F ACI'OR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTH TURNS PROTECI'ED (WITIi OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECI'ED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (IPEDS/HR) :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOVF.MENT NORTHBOUND 158 129 THRU -RIGHT LEFr INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 103 72 NIA SOlITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 332 435 195 215 180 167 LEFr TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 171 143 133 348 229 0 H/A NIA H/A MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES ....... . CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS OONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. PH PHI' DATE OF OOUNTS: 3/5/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATIJRATION 80 CRITICAL lIS VOL 702 CRITICAL E/W VOL 624 CRmCAL SUM 1~26 ..................................... NORTHBOUND LANE HOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 3 T..12.0 4 L.. 12.0 5 6 LEIT TIiRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 317 687 68 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING NIS E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - HB& SB THRU GIC - EB & WE THRU '. LANE GECliETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH MaV WIDTH HOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 'r.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 229 583 42 153 482 45 204 394 35 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WIni OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) :4. :4. 1. 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVFmNT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND nnm -RIGHT 432 303 248 367 LEFT 399 192 257 288 LEIT TURN CHECK NORTImOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUf VOLUME 317 153 204 229 CAPACITY 118 0 0 146 NEED PHASE? NIA HIA HIA tl/A MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV. AM PlIT 'DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 65 CRITICAL N/S VOL 461 CRITICAL E/W VOL 614 CRITICAL SUM 1075 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 5 i TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND. SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFI' 103 171 149 133 THRU 252 528 710 316 RIGHT 95 65 178 48 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR F ACI'OR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 N/S :4. E/W :4. PEDESTRIAN ACI'IVITY 1. CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS G/C - NB & SB THRU : .34 G/C - EB & WB THRU :.3 PHASING BOTH TURNS PROTECI'ED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY t10VEmNT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGlIT 158 332 447 199 LEFT 129 215 187 167 LEFI' TURN CHECK NORTI:lBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPtIT VOLUME 103 171 149 133 CAPACITY 72 348 224 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV. Ptl PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE Tl SATURATION 81 CRITICAL N/S VOL 702 CRITICAL E/W VOL 639 CRITICAL SUM 1341 ************************************* NORTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 3 Too 12.0 4 L.. 12.0 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 317 687 137 TRUCKS (~) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOmm WESTBOUND PHASING N/S EN PEDESTlUAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTII G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB r., lill THRU LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NOV iHDTIJ tlOV mDTH HOV HIDTII R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 229 602 84 153 482 95 207 404 70 LOCAL BUSES (~/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (lVITH OVERLAP) BOTI! TURNS PROTECI'ED (\HTH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HP.) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY NOVEMENT NORTIIBOUND SOUTII~OUND EASTBOUND \ffiSTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 432 303 254 379 LEFT 399 192 260 288 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTIiBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 317 153 207 229 CAPACITI lIB 0 0 136 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A N/A N/A MURRAY -DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOV~ ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENGE AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/5/87 **....*......*........*....*.*...* LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION fl6 CRITICALN/S VOL 462 CRITICAL E/W VOL 625 CRITICAL 8ll1'l 1087 ...............................*..... LANE GECttETRy NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MaV WlDTIi HaV HIDllI HaV WIDTH HOV WlDTIi 1 R.. 12.0 R. . 12.0 R. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTIIBOUND . SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 103 171 149 135 THRU 257 530 723 320 RIGHT 102 65 178 48 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 N/S :1.. E/W :4. PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. CYCLE LENGTIi : 80 SECONDS G/G - NB & SB THRU :.34 G/G - EB & WE THRU : .3 PHASING BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (l"ITH OVERLAP) BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 ('PEDS/DR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOVDIENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HESTBOUND nmu -RIGHT 161 333 455 201 LEFT 129 215 187 170 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND \1ESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 103 171 149 135 CAPACITY 70 343 220 0 NEED PHASE? N/A H/! H/! N/! \ \ , MURRAY-DUDECK a ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOVEMErIT ANALYSIS CONGRESS AVE. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAl'/RENCE Ptl PlIT DATE OF CO~'TS: 3/5/87 ..***********************.****.... LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 82 CRITICAL Jl!S VOL 707 CRITICAL E/W VOL 646 CRITICAL SUM 1355 ***************************.********* NOR'fHT'.>OUND LANE tlDV UIDTH 1 R.. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 3 T.. 12.0 4 Loo 12.0 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 317 691 141 TRUCKS (7.) 2 2 2 2 NORTIIBOmm SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING HIS EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTII Gle - HB ~ sn THRU Gle - EB t. lom THRU LAtTE GEOUETP.Y SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTP.,omm mv HIDTH HOV WIDTH .MaV \ITDTH R. . 12.0 n.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 ,TRAmc VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOID1D 236 616 84 153 489 95 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 207 412 70 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TUm~s PROTECTED (InTI: OVERLAP) nOTIl nr:'J1S P~OTEcrED (IITTl' OVERUP) o - 99 (i'PEDS/IIR) CRITICAL LANE VOLU:res DY tlOVEHENT NORTIIBOUND 435 399 THRU -RIGHT LEFf . NORTIiOOIDm 317 III NIA INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? SOUTIlBOUND EASTBOUND ~lESTBOUND 308 259 388 192 260 297 LEFf TURN CHECK SWI'!iDOUND EASTBOUND UESTBOUND 153 207 236 0 0 128 HIA N/A tJ " MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEHENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ..........*.....*................. LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 62 CRITICAL N/S VOL 566 CRITICAL E/W VOL 558 CRITICAL SUM 1124 ................*.................... LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORniBOUND HOV WID11i RTL 12.0 LEFT 11iRU RIGHT NORTHBOUHD 33 39. 11 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE GE<JmTRJ sOUTHBOUND f.ASTBOUND HOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH WESTBOUND HOV WIDnI iTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND liESTBOUND 12 93 38 130 271 71 57 348 61 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACfOR .85 .85 .85 .85 PHASING H/S : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED EN : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECI'ED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. {) - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 60 SECONDS G/C - HB & SB THRU : .4 G/e - EB & WB THRU : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BJ MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTIIBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 138 566 558 184 LEn' 0 0 0 0 LEn' TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 33 130 57 12 CAPACIlY 378 670 649 371 NEED PHASE? NO HO HO NO . - ~ -. . MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST. PH PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ..******************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4B CRmCAL NIS VOL 329 CRITICAL E/W VOL 543 CRITICAL SUM 872 ...********************************** LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 fiORTHBOUND HOV WID'Ill RTL 12.0 LANE GE<>>mI'RY SOtTI'HBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDlll K>V WIDTH WESTBOUND K>V WIDTH RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND 49 247 158 PEAK HOUR FAcroR .85 .85 .85 .85 WESTBOUND 543 o WESTBOUND 49 593 NO RTL- 12.0 RTL 12.0 LEFI' THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND 42 125 28 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOOTHBOUND EASTBOUND TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 90 136 49 LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) o o o o 130 166 21 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING NIS E/W PEDFSTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGlll GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT THRU -RIGJIT LEFI' NORTHBOUND 233 o SOUTHBOUND 329 o LEFI' TURN CHECK SOUTIlBOUND 90 567 NO EASTBOUND 536 o INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 42 535 NO EASTBOUND 130 375 NO MURRAY-DUDECK Ir ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST. +DEV. AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 65 CRITICAL N/S VOL 608 CRITICAL E/W VOL 560 CRITICAL SUM 1168 ************************************* LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFI' THRU RIGHT NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 NORTHBOUND 33' 45 11 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 PHASING NIS EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFT INPlIT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? I NORTHBOUND 146 o NORTHBOUND 33 348 NO LANE GEOMETRY SOlITHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MQV WIDTH WESTBOUND MQV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 12 93 40 136 295 77 59 348 61 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS!HR) 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND \oIESTBOUND 608 560 186 0 0 0 LEFI' TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 136 59 12 664 647 371 NO NO NO MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST .+DEV. PM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 50 CRITICAL N/S VOL 354 CRITICAL E/W VOL 550 CRITICAL SUM 904 ************************************* LA!\E NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 RTL 12.0 LANE GEOMETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOlITHBOUND EASTBOUND :wESTBOUND LEIT 42 93 136 49 THRU 152 151 166 247 RIGIIT 28 52 21 164 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 2 0 .85 SOlITHBOUND 2 0 .85 EASTBOUND 2 0 .85 WESTBOUND 2 0 .85 PHASING Nls E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVI1~ CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WE THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFi NORTHBOUND 265 o INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 42 517 NO : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECI'ED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .4 : .44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOlITHBOUND 354 o LEIT TURN CHECK EASTBOUND 550 o WESTBOUND 550 o SOlITHBOUND 93 540 NO EASTBOUND 136 369 NO WESTBOUND 49 593 NO ~ MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES ," '. .... " *. '. CRITICAL MOVDfENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 68 CRITICAL N/S VOL 656 CRITICAL E/W VOL 563 CRITICAL SUM 1219 ..................................... LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NOR11iBOUND MOV WIDTII RTL 12.0 LANE GElJoiETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WID11i MOV WIDTII RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 LEFT 11iRU RIGHT NORTIfBOUND 33 53 11 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTIIBOUND EASTBOUND 143 321 84 61 348 61 WESTBOUND 12 93 42 NORTIiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 PHASING H/S: 1. NEITHER 'IURN PROTECTED EN : 1. NEITHER 'IURN PROTECfED PEDESTRIAN ACfIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 (fPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTIi : 60 SECONDS G/C - NB & SB THRU :.4 G/C - EB & WB THRU :.44 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 155 656 563 189 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFI' 'IURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTIiBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 33 143 61 12 CAPACITY 315 656 645 371 NEED PHASE? NO NO NO NO .. . MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & OLD BOYNTON BEACH RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAlolRENCE PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 53 CRITICAL filS VOL 382 CRITICAL E/W VOL 567 CRITICAL SUM 949 ..................................... LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFi THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORl1iBOUND MOV WIImJ RTL 12.0 NORTHBOUND 42 187 28 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 LANE GECliE'TRY SOlTI'HBOillm EASTBOUND HOV WlImJ MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 RTL 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 49 247 171 97 166 56 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 143 166 21 PEAK HOUR F ACl'OR .85 .85 .85 .85 PHASING N/S: 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED EIW : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY: 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGI'H : 60 SECONDS GIC - NB & SB THRU :.4 GIC - EB & WE THRU :.41. CRITICAL LANE VOLUHES BY HOmfENT NORTHBOUND 307 o THRU -RIGHT LEFI' INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 42 498 NO SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 382 567 559 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 97 143 49 505 362 593 NO NO NO MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVDmNT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 54 CRITICAL HIS VOL 273 CRITICAL E/W VOL 611 CRITICAL SUM 884 ..................................... LANE GE(}fmy NORTIiBOUND SOtrI'HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE HOV WIDTII MOV WIDTIi HOV WIDTIi HOV WIDTII 1 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 2 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND . LEIT 44 113 162 68 TIiRU 81 74 763 291 RIGHT 24 8 56 123 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR "NORTHBOUND 4 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .85 EASTBOUND 4 0 .85 WESTBOUND 4 0 .85 PHASING NIS EN PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTIi GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED (WITIi OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 ('PEDS/HR) 11iRU -RIGHT LEFI' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND 128 56 INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 44 526 NIA SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 90 524 186 145 208 87 LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 113 162 68 495 249 0 NIA NIA NIA " MURRAY -DUDECK & ASSOCIATES \ , , . CRITICAL HOVDfENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 45 CRITICAL N/S VOL 328 CRITICAL E/W VOL 406 CRITICAL SUM 734 ..................................... NORTHBOUND LANE MOV WIDnI 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 LEFT THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND . 87 151 35 TRUCKS (%) 4 4 4 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING LANE GECJiITRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND HOV WID11I HaV WIDTH HaV WIDTH R.. 12.0 JIT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 .... TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND lJESTBOUND so 82 8 41 398 42 87 552 80 LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) o o o o PEAK HOUR F ACI'OR .85 .85 .85 .85 N/S :4. E/W :4. PEDESTRIAN ACI'IVITY 1. CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS Gle - NB & SB THRU :.34 Gle - EB & WB THRU :.3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (~'ITH OVERLAP) BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOVDmIT NORTHBOUND SOtmiBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 226 100 281 354 LEFT 111 102 52 III LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOtmiBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPlIT VOLUME 87 80 41 87 CAPACITY 518 414 0 100 NEED PHASE? NIA NIA NIA NIA -- - ---. ._._-,._",.._-~-,_._._----- -- - .. ~---,..,~.__.--_._._-_._------,._--_. ----~ , MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOVmENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST. + DEV. AM PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATIJRATION 60 CRITICAL N/S VOL 356 CRITICAL E/W VOL 632 CRITICAL SUM 988 ************************************* NORTIiBOUND HOV WIDTH LANE GE<MEl'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH HOV WIDTH LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT. 12.0 L.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT TIiRU . RIGIIT 54 92 81 113 77 15 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 162 763 69 WESTBOUND 78 291 164 NORTIiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU TRUCKS (%) 4 4 4 4 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED OHTIi OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTIiBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGIIT 211 94 532 200 ff LEFT 69 145 208 100 -':"' LEFT TIJRN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPlIT VOLUME 54 113 162 78 CAPACITY 523 427 249 0 NEED PHASE? N/A N/A NIA N/A , . MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+DEV. PM PlIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 52 CRITICAL NIS VOL 402 CRITICAL E/w VOL 449 CRITICAL SUM 851 ************************************* LANE NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 RT. 12.0 1.. 12.0 LEIT THRU RIGlIT NORTHBOUND 93 157 89 TRUCKS ( %) 4 4 4 4 NORTHBOUND SOtITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/w PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH GIC - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU LANE GEOl1ETRY SOtITHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 1.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 1. . 12.0 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 1.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 80 94 15 LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o 41 398 59 123 552 107 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 BOTH TIJRNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVD-tENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 300 115 291 354 LEFT 119 102 52 158 LEFT TIJRN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNn INPUT VOLUME 93 80 41 123 CAPACITY 506 354 0 83 NEED PHASE? N/A NIA N/A H/A . MURRAY -DUDECK Ie ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVDfENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE B SATURATION 63 CRITICAL HIS VOL 400 CRITICAL E/W VOL 643 CRITICAL Sttl 1043 ..................................... HOR'mBOUND LANE MOV WID11I 1 RT. 12.0 2 L.. 12.0 3 4 5 6 LANE GFnfETRY SOtITHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND MOV WID11I mv WIDTH MOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES HORTIIBOUND SOUTIlBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 65 113 162 85 THRU 104 81 763 291 RIGHT 105 15 72 164 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 4 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .85 EASTBOUND 4 0 .85 WESTBOUND 4 0 .85 PHASING Nls E/w PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENG11I Gle - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU :4. :4. 1. : 80 SECONDS : .34 : .3 BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WI11I OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVF..RLAP) o - 99 ('PEDS/HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTIlBOUND EASTBOUND '-'ESTBOUND TURU -RIGHT 255 99 534 200 LEFr 83 145 208 109 LEFr TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 65 113 162 85 CAPACITY 519 391 249 0 NEED PHASE? NIl. NIl. NIl. NIl. . MURRAY-DUDECK & ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & HYPOLUXO RD. EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWP.ENCE Pl1 PIIT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/10/87 ........***..*..******.*****.**.** LEVFJ.. OF SERVICE B SATURATION 56 CRITICAL NIS VOL 428 CRITICAL E/W VOL 489 CRITICAL SUM 917 ...********************************** LANE GEOMETRY NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTII MaV WIDTII MaV w'IDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 R. . 12.0 2 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 3 L. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12.0 4 L. . 12.0 5 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFI' 100 80 41 149 TIlRU 164 107 398 552 RIGIIT 103 15 70 107 TRUCKS (1.) LOCAL BUSES (I/HR) PEAY. HOUR FACTOR NORTIlBOUND 4 0 .85 SOUTHBOUND 4 0 .85 EASTBOUND 4 0 .85 WESTBOUND 4 0 .85 HIS :4. E/W :4. PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. CYCLE LENGTII 80 SECONDS Gle - NB & SB THRU :.34 GIC - EB & WB TIlRU :.3 PHASING BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITII OVERLAP) BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) o - 99 ('PEDS!HR) CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVB1ENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 326 130 298 354 LEFI' 128 102 52 191 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND S01.lTHBOUND EASTBOUND \o.'ESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 100 80 41 149 CAPACITY. 493 333 0 72 NEED PHASE? NIl. NIl. N!A N/A , - MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES '"., ... CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND. AVE. EXIST. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 19 CRITICAL NIS VOL 211 CRITICAL E/W VOL 122 CRITICAL Sltf 333 ..................................... NORTHBOUND LANE HOV WID11l . 1 R.. 12.0 2 T. . 12.0 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND . LEIT 0 THRU 98 RIGHT 90 TRUCKS (%) NORTHBOUND 2 SOlTI'HBOUND 2 EASTBOUND 2 WESTBOUND 2 LANE GECJffiTRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HOV WID11i HOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 Loo 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOOl'HBOUND EASTBOUND 75 0 175 0 o 0 LOCAL BUSES (ilIHR) o o o o PHASING NIS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1. NEITIiER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CYCLE LF..NG11i : 60 SECONDS GIC - NB & SB THRU :.5 G/C - EB & lI.'B THRU : .25 WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 L. . 12.0 WESTBOUND 102 o 43 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 117 210 0 51 LEFT 0 94 0 122 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 0 75 0 102 CAPACITY 695 772 495 495 NEED PHASE? NO N/A NO NO . MURRAY-DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL HOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND. AVE. EXIST. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 27 CRITICAL H/S VOL 322 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 468 .................*.*...*.*........... LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 LANE GEOMEI'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HOV WIDTIi MeV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND HOV WIDTIi R. . 12.0 1.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND HOV WIDnI NORnmoUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT o 208 123 58 167 o LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o o o o WESTBOUND 122 o 73 NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .S5 PHASING HIs :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED EN : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 ('PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 60 SECONDS G/e - NB & SB THRU :.5 Gle - EB & WE THRU : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY HOVEMENT HORTIiBOUND SOUTIfBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 249 200 0 87 LEFT 0 73 0 146 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTIlBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPlIT VOLUME 0 58 0 122 CAPACITY 703 662 495 495 NEED PHASE? NO N/A NO NO I, _ MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT EXIST.+DEV. PM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 31 CRITICAL N/S VOL 393 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 539 ************************************* NORTIIBOUND MOV WIDTIl R. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND . o 247 123 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTII G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGHT LEFI' INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 296 o NORTHBOUND o 682 NO LANE GE<JiEI'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDlH MOV WIDTII T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 122 o 92 77 188 o LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 225 0 110 97 0 146 LEFI' TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 77 0 122 623 495 495 NIA NO NO ", . MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES - CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFT THRU RIGHT EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE PM PIU DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 .................................. LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 35 CRITICAL NIS VOL 459 CRITICAL E/W VOL 146 CRITICAL SUM 605 ..................................... NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 T.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND o 290 123 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOillt'D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING NIS E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGnl GIC - NB & SB THRU GIC - EB & WB THRU THRU -RIGHT LEIT INPUT VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? LANE GECJ1ETRY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDliI MOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 122 o 113 89 211 o LOCAL BUSES (IIHR) o o o o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 : 2 . HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PF~S/HR) : 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND 347 o SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 253 0 135 112 0 146 LEIT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 89 0 122 580 495 495 N/! NO NO NORTHBOUND o 659 NO MURRAY -DUDECK. ASSOCIATES I- CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFT TIIRU RIGHT NORTIIBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EXIST .+DEV. AM PHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 22 CRITICAL N/S VOL 253 CRITICAL E/W VOL 122 CRITICAL SUM 375 ************************************* NORTHBOUND MOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 Too 12.0 NORTHBOUND o lOB 90 TRUCKS (%) 2 2 2 2 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY CYCLE LENGTH G/C - NB & SB THRU G/C - EB & WE TIIRU THRU -RIGHT LEFT INPlTI' VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 129 o NORTIIBOUND o 659 NO LANE GEOMEl'RY SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDlll MOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOUND MaV WIDTH R.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SOUTIlBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 102 o 48 93 211 o LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) o o o o o o o PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED 1. 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) 60 SECONDS : .5 : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 253 0 57 117 0 122 LEFT TIJRN CHECK SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 93 0 102 762 495 495 N/A NO NO Ie MURRAY -DUDECK a ASSOCIATES CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LAWRENCE RD. & 22ND AVE. LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 LEFi' THRU RIGHT NORTHBOUND SOUTIiBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EXIST .+CITRUS+LAWRENCE AM fHT DATE OF COUNTS: 3/4/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 25 CRITICAL NIS VOL 301 CRITICAL E!W VOL 122 CRITICAL Sttl 423 ...********************************** NORTHBOUND MOV WID'I1i R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 NORTHBOUND . o 120 90 TRUCKS (X) 2 2 2 2 LANE GE(JoIFJ'RY SOt.Tl'HBOUND EASTBOUND MOV WIDnI HOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFFIC VOLtIHES SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 113 251 o LOCAL BUSES U/HR) o o o o o o o PHASING NIS :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/w : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1. 0 - 99 (IPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENG1lI : 60 SECONDS GIC - NB & SB THRU : .5 GIC - EB & WB THRU : .25 CRITICAL LANE VOUlHES BY MOVEMENT THRU -RIGHT LEFl' INPlTf VOLUME CAPACITY NEED PHASE? NORTHBOUND 144 o NORTHBOUND o ~19 NO SOUTHBOUND 301 142 EASTBOUND o o WESTBOUND HOV WIDTH R. . 12.0 Loo 12.0 WESTBOUND 102 o 54 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .85 .85 .85 .85 WESTBOUND 64 122 WESTBOUND 102 495 NO LEFT TURN CHECK SOUTHBOUND 113 750 NIA EASTBOUND o 495 NO