REVIEW COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM ~
. hI' d' Ad" t t A)t'":' <D / I ';
TO: M1C ae Haag, Zon1ng an S1te m1n1S ra or
J ..., ~(jY!J""
~ /f)'''~ 'U~'
THRU: James Golden. Interim planning Director ,./,4,., /::'1 ,~~. \(:~;:-il'
1-":; '-> '- -,
I _ n L l': I' ~
r - "..
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant city Planner ~ AUG 2 S i990
--\
SUBJ: Lawrence Grove replat comments
tP B\Jil~m:s
o ~--'C"l
)-".. u~~1 I" (.(
tali BE~\.t\. ~'~,-
DATE: August 23, 1990
Please be advised of the following planning Department concerns
regarding the recent replat of Lawrence Grove. I appreciate the
opportunity to comment and hope that Hovnanian companies will be
receptive to a voluntary solution:
1. The four foot easement along the zero lot line, shown on the
master development plan, revised August 7, 1990, was not
indicated on the final version of the replat document.
2. The building setback language on the replat cover sheet,
under "Notes", item #2, states that the required side
setback is 10 feet. The setback stated is a minimum
setback. Secondly, this note implies that the side setback
for the non-"Z" lots is also 10 feet, when it is 15 feet.
Therefore, this note should differentiate between the side
setback for the two different types of lots.
3. The detail labeled, "revised lots and typical units"
on the master development plan, revised August 7, 1990, was
not approved as part of the recent replat. Hovnanian
Companies should be aware that the pools (and screen
enclosures) shown on this detail are inconsistent with the
latest master plan for Lawrence Grove and also the Zoning
Code (Section 11.E), requiring a minimum setback for such
improvements, of eight feet from any property line, which
the Building Department has applied to those PUDs where such
improvements are not otherwise governed by the project
master plan. Approval of anything less than eight feet
would require submittal of a master plan modification to the
Planning Department.
o rh
.d~ " ./~
Tambri J. H~den -
tjh
A: LawGrRep
xc: chron. file
File No. 008
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Haag, Zoning and site Administrator
THRU: James Golden. Interim planning Director # ..A.
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner
DATE: August 23, 1990
SUBJ: Lawrence Grove replat comments
please be advised of the following Planning Department concerns
regarding the recent replat of Lawrence Grove. I appreciate the
opportunity to comment and hope that Hovnanian Companies will be
receptive to a voluntary solution:
1. The four foot easement along the zero lot line, shown on the
master development plan, revised August 7, 1990, was not
indicated on the final version of the replat document.
2. The building setback language on the replat cover sheet,
under "Notes", item #2, states that the required side
setbacK is 10 feet. The setback stated is a minimum
setback. Secondly, this note implies that the side setback
fOl- the non-"Z" lots is also 10 feet, when it is 15 feet.
Therefore, this note should differentiate between the side
setback for the two different types of lots.
3. The detail labeled, "revised lots and typical units"
on the master development plan, revised August 7, 1990, was
not approved as part of the recent replat. Hovnanian
Companies should be aware that the pools (and screen
enclosures) shown on this detail are inconsistent with the
latest master plan for Lawrence Grove and also the Zoning
Code (Section 11.E), requiring a minimum setback for such
improvements, of eight feet from any property line, which
the Building Department has applied to those PUDs where such
improvements are not otherwise governed by the project
master plan. Approval of anything less than eight feet
would require submittal of a master plan modification to the
Planning Department.
n
-dtt.~~ ~. 2krd;;~
Tambri J. Hyden
tjh
A: LawGrRep
xc: ehron. file
File No. 008
to
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Golden, Interim Planning Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant city Planner
DATE: July 25, 1990
SUBJ: Resolution No. 90-BBBBB, Lawrence Grove replat
It has come to my attention that Hovnanian companies has applied
for building permits for "z" lot homes within the Lawrence Grove
PUD. Further research informs me that on July 3, 1990, the city
Commission approved Resolution No. 90-BBBBB, a replat for
Lawrence Grove to specifically allow "Z" lot homes. A "z" lot
home is not allowed on the current, approved master plan for the
Lawrence Grove PUD. Before this replat can be recorded and
permits issued, a master plan modification needs to be filed
through our office for review and recommendation by the TRB and
approval by the city Commission and Planning and Zoning Board.
It appears that the TRB had no knowledge of this request through
either the preliminary plat process or final plat process.
1:7 'Q ~~
d~~" W
Tambri J. ~yde
tjh
A: LawGrove
xc: Mike Haag
MEMORANDUM
TO: JIm Golden, Interim Planning Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant City Planner
DATE: July 25, 1990
SUBJ: Follow-up with code citations for Lawrence Grove replat
issue
This memorandum serves to support my argument regarding the
improper processing of the Lawrence Grove replat with code
citations which you may find helpful in pursuing this matter:
1. Appendix C - Subdivisions and Platting, Article XV, Section
3.C., page 2156. Although this section does not apply to
this issue, I feel it may have been misconstrued in favor of
not requiring a preliminary plat.
2. Appendix C - Subdivisions and Platting, Article XIII, page
2150. This language would prevail over any conflicting
language within Appendix C.
3. Appendix C - subdivisions and Platting, Article VII, Section
2, page 2094. The TRB members did not sign the final plat
that was processed.
4. Appendix C - Subdivisions and Platting, Article VI, Section
1.B., page 2092. Waiving the requirements of a replat at
minimum needed approval of the Planning and Zoning Board.
5. Appendix B - Planned Unit Developments, Section 11, page
2026. This section requires platting for all PUDs.
6. Appendix B - Planned Unit Developments, Section 12, page
2027. This section details the master plan modification
process.
7. Appendix B - Planned unit Developments, Section 13, page
2027. This section prohibits issuing a bUilding permit for
development in a PUD that does not conform to the approved
master plan.
In addition, the procedure that was followed for processing this
replat is inconsistent with the procedure that has historically
been followed and was followed by the former City Enaineer.
tjh
A:LawGrII
C7 ~
~~~~2~~ ~
,JI.!ne .26,1989
Tn'
,~ .
PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM:
FIRE DEPT. TRB REP.
RE:
MASTER PLAN CHANGES
CITRUS GLEN I & II
Aft~r due consideration of the
these parcels we wish to comment on
ltems.
Chan'de # 1
developments.
changes requested to
the following pertinent
Gener',')l:
Access through larger
Ch"':tn~le #2
Road to L3wr'ence
Interruption of proposed road from Miner
Road connecting at the public shool site.
rhE1n':3e tt3
close ~'linet' Road
Use of s,'c~cur'ity
entl'ance,
gates in Citrus Glen P-I to
Comment:3:
1 ,- I fat i.'Ci 1 1 P 0 s s i bl e the Fir' e D e par' t We? n t p n" f ':: t' s t ,)
have more than one way into and out of a larger development.
Should a traffic accident or storm rlisrupt access, another
means is availabl~ to service that portion of the community.
2- In particular the disruption of a connector from
l"iin':H' Road t'o Lawt'ence Road 'is of speciE!l concer'n. At
present Lawrence Road has only two (2) lanes with little or
no shoulder available to drive upon. Should an accident
c 1 0:3 e t h i:3 r' 0.3 din the Wi' 0 n 'd pI ace, man y h () m e:3 '3 n d the
pub1 ic school could only be reached by going miles out of
the way. Travel time would defeat the master plan of
s tat l' e, nth I' e e d n d the l' 0 a d way s con nee t 1 i'l 'd 1 t IN i t h t Iv~
parce13 on Lawrence Road.
3- Use of security gates to close off the main road
through citrus Glen poses further problems. Should the
,] ate s me e t n ,? w C i t y s t El 1"1 d .;Ii' d :";, the y s t ill d i s r' up t' by :3 eve r" ,:;J 1
mill u 'j e :"J i: h e I' '" ::' P 0 n :3 e t c, erne I" '~ e n c i e :3 i n t hl:3 de vel 0 pm e II t ,
xc: Dave Crockett, Deputy Chief
Willifm D. Cavanaugh, Fro I
P'd
~
:1
Building Department
Engineering Department
Utilities Department
Planning Department
Fire Department
Recreation Department
.. ".. ____........__..__..A.....
-~--............-..
STAFF COMMENTS
~
LAWRENCE GROVES
PRELIMINARY PLAT
See attached memo
See attached memo
See attached memo
See attached memo
Street names required
Median landscaping to be
maintained by homeowner's
association
. ~ ~/
~-.'
"'i"~ -
~
MEMORA.NDUM
~
'0
Carmen Annunziato,
Planning Director!
t '
~;
Don Jaeger
Building Department
II
DATI
.
February 8, 1988
,n.1
'1I0W
~
IUIJIO'
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL:
LAWRENCE GROVES
As a condition of preliminary plat approval, the following comments
should be incorporated into the related documents by the applicant:
1.- The building setbacks and the maximum buildable area for this
project, which the applicant p~oposed on the approved master
plan, should"be indicated on the plat documents. These setbacks
are: front - 201, side - 151 (non-zero side), rear - 15' and
corner side - 201. The maximum proposed puildable .rea is 45
..percent.
2. Lots 52, 99, and 151 should be adequately buffered, similar to
the other lots in the projece along the public right-of-way.
3. Trees must be a minimum of eight feet in height at the time of
planting.
4. South Florida Water Management District approval is required.
5 ;
6 '.
Si~ewalks must be provided along Lawrence Road.
[I' .
Al~ sidewalks must be ramped at intersections to allow for
handicapped accessibility.
7. A ~etail of the six foot buffer wall must be provided. Indicate
th~ dimensions of the columns and tie beam and the number and
size of the rebar.
8.
"
The Master Plan shows a sidewalk to the north of lot 19.
sidewalk is not shown on the Paving and Drainage Plans.
9. Planting areas in the public right-of-way and common areas must
be fully irrtgated in accordance with the Boynton Reach
Landscape Ordinance.
This
...
10. The typical roadway section on sheet 9 of 10 of' the Paving and
Drainage Plan and on page 2 of the Master Developmen~ Plan
indicates a 24 foot paved roadway section with 5 foot easements
on both sides of the road for drainage and utility purposes.
The plat drawing must be changed to allow for this condition
to occur.
NOTE:
1. The re~reation area, the site wall, and the proposed
subdivision signage require separate approval from the
City Commission.
.-...........
, .
, '.
. ," ".
.:.. ::..,..., ~I';'" ,,'
~.I> .
" -."";""
:~: .
" ,
,I.
i
, ,. .
, . \" ~/
.. . ~. '/
: ,:"~~.:y::..,
".~'J1
~ . . \~~,.:'
. . ,;.:.
. I
.
, '
,..~:. :,,:' .
I..
..
....
. "0 .
" '
.: ''OJ.
. .'
I. _. _
-
,c,,- · -
,:,....
, Memo 0 Carmen Annunzi to
REI ~reliminary Pl~t ~provall
lJawrence Groves
Februar~-8, 1988
Page Two
~
Z. Demolition permits are required to remove the existing
structures on the site.
The applicant's prompt compliance with the preceding comments will
insure a timely permitting process.
D1~e~11t'#.
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
II
II
"
':
if
,
,
"
'.
',\
.
I
.
,
'.
.....'~b -;';,;/';,' ,,',
.." .', .... ',. '.' .
'.~::' '~:::~~"\'::'.' . 't:.~..:.:: r::. .
, ,.'.., 'r
::::::::}1~;K,,;, ~;'p".;':-,i: ','
.. .... ,I. ..". 'i
"r::.'.;{ij:X::' ..' ;"~:':J:l'
",. '\"'~'"., ,.' l
.t~~Jj 0'{;~1' . 1
.. ,." . ..t-!
" ~: ' :{,
'. I...
" ""
.'
~,
"'f
'C
, , '
, , ,
": '::(
; r.:'
. ~y
::ti:,
'; J;;;:,
, ,
. ':: ~\:i';( '; ~,'L> '
':~f~
.....~
"';'~'
.'1~,
":,
. . ...., .'
",' ...... .
. \:I'>>::\,,~::,~:
.... :':~. :.-;-' ",/.
, ..' ~ '?):{t'~.:~? ~ ·
, :. : :: ~~:/~.;;:::,'
,,'
, '.:1
:J:'
..t
'~~,
, "
" ,
.. ~'
'>."
,",OJJ
. j~,
. . ...'
"
il :"
II'
o .
, '
,~ -
--1w. Ii.
,- ..
---
M E M 0 RAN DUM
February 3, 1988
TO: Mr. Jim Golden
Senior City Planner
FROM: Tom Clark
City Engineer
RE: Lawrence Groves
COMMENTS:-
1. Stabilized subgrade (50 p.s.i. F.B.V.) is required for roadway
construction.
2. Cross-sections of roadway should show relative locations of
the ditch bottom inlets.
3. A preliminary plan and cost estimate is required for the road-
way connection with Meadowbrook (to be bonded).
4. A cross-section thru the cul-de-sac is required.
5. Bike paths to be concrete.
6. A section thru Canal 19 is required to show improvements as
required by the L.W.D.D.
7. Definitive information should be shown for improvements for
private recreation facilities and cost to be included in the
cost estimate.
8. Street lighting should be shown for all streets including
Lawrence Road. Complete details are required except when the
lighting will be done by Florida Power & Light Company. Costs
for lighting in public R.O.W. to be bonded.
9. Road cross-section should show sod in the swale areas.
10. Traffic control devices and markings to be shown on plans.
11. Calculations for water stage elevations are required for
drainage (not just pipe sizing).
~ I
V ~~
- ffJ-
Clark
Tom
TAC/ck
~
MEMORANDUM
To:
Carmen Annunziato, Planning
Directorc ~
Ut i lit i e s '~~
From:
John A. Guidry, Director of
Date: February 3, 1988
Subject: TRB Review - Lawrence Groves, Preliminary Plat
We can approve this project, subject to the following conditions:
1. Several conflicts requiring the water main to cross under
storm drainage can be eliminated either by dropping the
drainage lines slightly, or constructing conflict manholes.
2. Water meters to the recreation site should be set at the
property line in sodded areas.
3. 311 Schedule 40 PVC casings are required on all locations where
the water services cross roadways.
4. Terminal manholes must be extended to reach all lots being
served. The service laterals should run from the lot line to
a gravity sewer in front of the parcel.
5. Add a gate valve at the force main leaving the lift station.
6. The City is currently revising its lift station specifica-
tions. The proposed station must meet these specifications.
7. Final pump selection will be approved by the City upon review
of the pump operating information, pump curves, and related
information. The maximum acceptable rpm for a pump of the
proposed size is 1800 rpm.
8. Install a wye instead of a tee at the pumpout connection. The
connection must have a 6" Kamlock fitting with a cap.
9. Show the off-site water connection to Meadows PUD. This off-
site improvement will be required.
10. The City cannot give credits, nor share in the increased cost
of deepening the gravity sewer and lift station to accommodate
the parcel to the east.
11. Realign the manhole in the roadway to the Meadows so as to
avoid disrupting future pavement.
12. Orange trees are shown on the proposed lift station site.
These trees are neither compatible with the intended use of
the site, nor are they likely to survive the necessary
excavation.
dmt
M E M 0 RAN DUM
February 3, 1988
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS,
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: LAWRENCE GROVES - STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in
connection with the above-referenced request for preliminary plat
approval:
1. Plans are to be submitted for off-site improvements.
2. In connection with future site plan approval for
the recreation area, please be advised that
Section 11-H.16.c of Appendix A, Zoning, contains
the parking requirements for recreation facilities.
L!~ .I~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIAT
CSA:ro
cc Central File
I
I
C. OK..l'rt1-A c-r- c ().J7
or f...A"-''O
t:>~ N
I /2. ~ ~
~
12./)00/ -4.r :-
tl'JO~A..I "2.
/ 0 0 ~ X ~I 31 10u/ ~ =
I) .] I 0 1 0 0 0
J
I
I
':" ,-'" :'" /' \
Cf~:~ ?O~Jg
,)e /(1;'
3,S.j- I <<4.
4'
'2. I 6 6,s~ I 2 00
__ -- --~L/'
( ':1/ L- 0 ~ f g r; r, z _~/
$".--..-....---'----.' .-
'2.../0 tl~€?,61
1
A(..I2.~A6~ =
'/8. '2..3/
C () oS 7 c) F l.'lA..l-:::l J ~ c-,d- cc:
4
'2-/66 S / 2GJ7
r~ 2:1 I
:::
k~~G/
1LcE'c::... .o<Ea:TG.-1~N :;:- . 0/8 ""'~ Q./Z vv:z:.-rs =-
/V~
.0(7(, '-A"<. v"'"' (. v~ () F
.II:J~<J3G~/V ;:-
~6 A'- X
:; :! (( \../
11
s~- ;I' 2.,J-". ()?
,.,-
.
~S-..5- 2.$'9. 0 7
J
--;y~
//, ~ ,~
(~/
3. 8/~ A<-
L /lw R-1'3)J L r:.- G R. 0 V (5.5
~ )/ t:/5 D (0 P '( oe LE- r-rff<- of ;R ;t-/vS /4 r j!A:-L r1<.0/1 To ,JVj
~
?
-' ,
1)- A'tFj>
,\:t
])J po
I
(Y
-~
, (' 0 L[e-L To /;Z /<0.A-[) 10 iJ (~ ? A-VC-1J To f>1--S" TLZ-j(;t/
P 1<- 0 P f::-IZ r 7 IJ CJ G{.AI f) /r.-j2 y.
.l/V (' 0 .J/).;/~ C. /'7- -I- O/V W j: Tit- /=- Vi T C1/-C r= S F rl3 Pc AN
A- f'> f I~ cO v -1" L /'=0 1<- T t f f: /? /:c- ;<- E /t-/";- I- C) A/ ~ j( L ..:-A-J
, l~ ( EA-.s c B !: /if) V.f- S 13/) Tlr/r T ~"1'=L [70/1/ II-If ~ /6# e
('oN ~A-- -f .AidS T !f/.~ l-+;; !=+-IV c( /2 L-~C2 fA :(:,R../3JtE/v /.5 /~o I~
!2!:I!< t3 k' T r cJ}v ,I=Jr {. J: L:r: r}: l5S .
j(oA-O Pt:;5!?t)./ /ur+L:rr~5 -~oA-t1 Co.AI)VEL!+O;(/ 10
It f;t-Dow s
,!1U5( 5vtf3ATT ?LJo)J5 FoR OFf--s'rl!:::. :rJ1fNovr:.J1SAJ/S