Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-652 TO: William Hukill Department of Development Director FROM: Tambri J. Heyden' /y IJ. Planning and Zoning Director DATE: November 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-429 Hills of Lake Eden - master plan fee refund and master plan approval by Commission Please recall that the $1,000 master plan fee paid to your office by the above-referenced applicant was for subdivision master plan approval for the property under conventional zoning. Staff conducted one review and therefore incurred cost to review this submittal. A refund of this fee by your department is within your discretion, however I can tell you that my department does not refund fees if the applicant has progressed far enough into the process such that departments, other than mine, have been involved in the review. I cannot refund the second fee that was paid because this covered review of a brand new application (rezoning), which also required a master plan to be submitted. Incidentally, there have been more than the customary two reviews of the master plan submitted under the rezoning. Therefore, if I had to calculate the city's cost to review and advertise this rezoning/master plan approval I am confident that the $1,500 collected would not cover our cost. I can offer you one more suggestion if you still feel the above is not fair. Since the fee schedule allows the pre-application plat fee (even though no pre-application was filed) to be credited to the plat fee, you could hold the $1,000 fee you collected and apply it to what they would owe when they submit for platting. Regarding your concern about the LDR omission of a reference within the master plan section to Commission approval of master plans, I still believe that LDR Chapter 1.5, Section 6 covers this to include Commission approval as the final authority to all Planning and Development Board decisions. Please realize that the current master plan is not affected by this omission and should not be confused with a subdivision master plan because the current master plan is a rezoning having its own procedure set forth in the PUD regulations and zoning code. TJH:dim XC: Carrie Parker Jim Cherof Swann Grady Central File a:RefundFee,Hil PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-005 FROM: Bill Hukill Department of Development Director Tambri J. Heyden ~~~ Planning and Zoning~irector Michael E. Haa~~ Zoning and Sit~_~lopment Administrator January 17, 1995 TO: THRU: DATE: SUBJECT: Hills at Lake Eden (fka Rollingwood) File No. SBMP 94-001 Subdivision Master Plan (48 single family lots - R lAAB) Please be advised of the following comments relative to the review of the master plan for the above-referenced project: 1. Show, on the master plan, a five (5) foot wide limited access easement along the property frontage on Seacrest Boulevard. omit the limited access easement at the emergency access. 2. Specify, on the master plan, the diameter or radius of the cul-de-sac. 3. Wi th a distinguishable symbol, identify the front of the following lots: Block 1 - lots 1 and 14, Block 2 - lots 7 and 8, Block 3 - lots 1 and 14, and Block 4 - lot 6 Note: The location of the proposed homes, on each lot, shall comply with the regulations specified in Appendix A-Zoning of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. 4. Submit, for review, a master landscape plan for the common area landscaping. 5. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the native habitat that occurs on the site, including intact ground cover, understory and canopy, is required to be preserved consistent with Chapter 7.5, Section 7.5-22 and Article IV, Code of Ordinances and Policy 4.4.1 and 4.4.2, Comprehensive Plan. Existing trees outside the preserved areas would also need to be preserved, moved or replaced on an individual basis. Contact the City Forest/Environmentalist, regarding implementation of this comment. Submit a copy of the tree survey to the Planning & Zoning Department. 6. A legally constituted maintenance association agreement is required for improving, perpetually operating, and maintaining all common facilities; including streets and open preservation space. These documents are subject to approval of the City's legal staff, and required prior to final plat approval. [Appendix C, Article VIII, Section 6.D.12.] 7. Submi t, for review, a traffic impact study. The traffic study shall identify the daily trips for the subject use. The study will be sent to Palm Beach County for their review for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance. page 2 Memorandum #95-005 Hills at Lake Lake Eden 8. Dead-end streets shall not exceed 1,320 feet in length: A street connection shall be made to Seacrest Boulevard at either S.E. 35th Avenue or S.E. 36th Avenue or extend S.W. 36th Avenue and make a connection to the extended right-of-way (latter requires coordination with the City of Delray Beach - Comprehensive Plan policy 2.2.9. Any additional street connection shall align with roads in adjacent subdivisions and in the general vicinity - Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.3.9) [Appendix C, Article X, Section 10.D.] 9. Provide sidewalks on both sides of the streets. [Appendix C, Article IX, Section 11] 10. Street, block and lot layout shall comply with Sections 1, 3 and 7 of Appendix C, Article X. a:memhills.smp 2