CORRESPONDENCE
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
AGENDA MEMORANDUM
April 18, 1995
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Main Street Car Wash Rezoning Application for Land 'Use Amendment/Rezoning
At the Planning and Development Board meeting there was some concern regarding what
seemed to be conflicting City staff recommendations from the Planning Department and
Downtown Development. The current adopted Downtown Community Redevelopment
Plan was approved in 1988 and does state that car washes are an unsuitable use for the
area, however, Redevelopment staff, along with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council are In the process of writing a new plan which will be presented to the City
Commission shortly. Additionally, this use Is currently In place and because of its
popularity, a safety factor needs to be considered as cars are now stacking back to
Boynton Beach Boulevard. If the City Commission wishes to approve this request, the
applicant has agreed that the following conditions may be permanently placed on the
approval:
1. The lot to be purchased shall not contain any expansion of the existing car wash
building. Additional canopies may be installed on the site, as well as a shed for storage
only, provided the shed meets all set back and building site plan code requirements.
Traffic lanes and parking lot area will be the primary uses of this property.
2. A buffer wall with landscaping will be constructed along the entire northern property line
to shield this use from the adjacent residences.
3. A "menu" type board sign showing the types of services and the amount of each
service would be allowed on the interior of the property to let the cars in line know what
services are available prior to entering the car wash and a directional sign at the
current, existing driveway cut would be allowed.
4. If the owner wishes to expand the existing car wash building, an alternate location
would need to be found at that time, as it would not be permitted on this site.
Utilizing these conditions, it is our recommendation that the approval of this request would
not jeopardize the goals and objectives the City has for the downtown, the Boynton Beach
Boulevard gateway entrance or harm the adjacent residential neighborhood.
~~
Carrie Parker
City Manager
cc: Planning
Development
Utilities
I.~ rn IfJrn n w ~ r"=::il
". r:'.- '-_,:_"'_." f'l!
.I Lilli' , f , i Iii
.~~.... .:, ~~ f
P ~t. I I ../'
pcfl.\ ~ VrfP" t~
~D)e, ~... J>~f
CirV (;~. I c} \'
f~~l ICf~ f1) o'plI"'
1 ;10 ._J:P
lJ ~ p pflj"
CP:jc
Attachment
June 22, 1995
>EI=. ~'TMENT OF DE ELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
100 East Boynton Beach Bl~.
P. o. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
h~. : ~\JUMf
I-{ ~~\~
C'
" :~ 'j'~'lf~-' ~f[f-O! '-;--
\ ~-,.._._<-<".._-"'"( I n 11 u)u,(
;1 ;ill
, j U l ~ "
'J 1 f::j
, i i ;"fu'l -riL.
t i :I:t ~
:: &..-~";7"~~---J -,,_ :1
~" I L"...j~ill~'" J"ND.\.L '\'\1
: ._.,..._._ZOlj1.t::.Q.QfEL~2l".
Robert Fetrow
Gator Engineering Services, Inc.
200 Knuth Road, Bays 214-216
Boynton Beach, FL 33426
RE : MAIN STREET CAR WASH
Dear Mr. Fetrow:
You asked my opinion today about three problems you were having
while planning the site layout for subject car wash, as follows:
Question 1. Can a new curb cut (driveway) be constructed on N.E.
1st Street near the north property boundary?
Answer 1. Yes, but only if one of the other N.E. 1st Street
driveways is eliminated. See attached copy of Land Development
Regulations (LDR), Chapter 23, Article II, Paragraph H7, Page
23-9 which states "no more than two (2) driveways shall be
permitted from any property." We have also attached pages 23-2,
3 and 4 which outline exemption and variance procedures.
1/ Question 2. Is the actual dividing line between the residential
and commercial areas the east right-of-way line of N.E. 1st
(Street; the west right-of-way line of N.E. 1st Street; or the
center line of N.E. 1st Street?
Answer 2. The Planning and Zoning Department administers LDR
I Chapter 2, Zoning, so you should consult them. My opinion is
I that it must be the center line of the street or a void, unzoned
area would occur in the right-of-way. That means that if the
right-of-way is abandoned or sold, it would have to be zoned from
nothing, which is not allowed in the Comprehensive Plan, to
perhaps two or more uses, depending on adjacent uses. However, I
believe the actual question that needs a response relates to
Chapter 2, Section 6, Paragraph C.3.b, Page 2-37 which requires a
30 foot minimum yard when abutting a residential district. Yard
setbacks are consistently measured from property lines, not
zoning district lines.
-1tkj ~Lr /1- r1k: ~p.)J.AJ6 L/tV4: If,;,v ~
-??JIOOt.5 ~>I- t1Jt:<..SfJ!:6r nh<:' U:.o/5 S1~~ ~ .sy(JjcJ(.
, ' ~ill)tNn"L ~pt. 71J~~!- 7J.I!
/5 PM""', 'f7'H!: L.l!l//}.L ff.NA'- flJt CCNTPL ~f.- (II:- f~o,
S~'t6"Aut. ()./~S P'Q" .....)
Phone: (407) 375-6350
FAX: (407) 375-6090
Robert Fetrow
RE: Main Street Car Wash
June 22, 1995
Page Two
Question 3. Is the proposed canopy over the new detailing area a
building, therefor requiring compliance with stipulated setbacks?
Answer 3. Yes. The LDR definition of building, Chapter 1,
Article II, Page 1-10 defines a building as "AII construction
built for the ... enclosure, shelter or protection of ...
persons. II It further says "A building or structure shall
include, but not be limited to, all construction specified in
Chapter 2 ..." which includes Section 6, Paragraph C. 3.b., Page
2-37. Appeals to zoning
interpretations (setbacks are part of the zoning regulations) are
made to the Board of Adjustment. We have attached pages 2-96, 97
and 98 dealing with that board.
We trust these responses will be helpful if perhaps not popular.
Sincer~ly ,
g~/~4'4;f /1'-iA;/
. .
William V. Hukill, P.E.
Building Official
WVH:bh
Attachments
XC: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Michael Haag, zoning/Site Administrator
CARltASH
Art. II
s.
Clearance at major ~riveways. The minimum distance
from the street right-of-way line at any major
ingress or egress driveway to any parking stall or to
any interior access aisle having direct access to
such driveway shall be one hundred (100) feet.
Intersections with county and state roads. Driveways
which intersect streets owned and maintained by a
governing body other than Boynton Beach must be
permitted by the proper governing agency, prior to
submission of plans for a building permit.".:'1'",,<,,'
Number of driveways. No more than two (2)",drivq_YJ.f'1
shall be permitted from any property. Where . .
properties abut more than one (1) public or private
right-of-way, additional driveways may be permitted
depending upon traffic volumes, but in no instance-l
shall the number of driveways exceed two (2) on each
:street.
6 .
7.
I. Parking lot layout.
1. Dimensions. Parking lots shall be designed to meet
or exceed the dimensional requirements for stalls,
driveways and access aisles as provided for in city
standards.
2. Access. Each parking lot or parking stall shall have
sufficient access from a street, alley or other
public or private way. Maneuvering and access areas
shall be of sufficient size to permit vehicles to
enter and exit the parking lot and parking stalls in
a safe and efficient manner. In no instance shall
parking lots be designed to allow vehicles to back
out into any public alley or road rights-of-way, or
segments of private streets which function as local
or collector streets.
J. Parking garages. Public or private parking garages shall
comply with this chapter, with the Standard Building Code
and with county-wide amendments thereto. Where
appropriate, security systems may be required.
K. Handicap requirements. All parking lots shall meet or
exceed State Handicap Code requirements, and comply with
the Standard Building Code and the county-wide amendments
thereto.
L. Parking lot striping. Parking stalls shall be delineated
by double-line, painted stripes where parking stalls abut
each other, which shall comply with city standards.
M. Fire lanes. All shopping centers, retail office
complexes and retail establishments in which the gross
floor area of all buildings if fifteen thousand (15,000)
square feet or greater shall have fire lanes along the
AcSopeecS April 4. 1"5. OrcSinanee O'5-0~
ll.vi.ecS
23-9
Art. I, S2
B. When a change in building occupancy occurs as defined in
the Standard Building Code;
C. When a change in use occurs which results in additional
parking being required as noted in Chapter 2, Section
11.H.16 of these Land Development Regulations;
D. When compliance with the landscaping code is required;
E. Reserved;
F. When an existing parking lot is expanded by twenty-five
(25) per cent or more in parking stalls beyond what was
originally approved; and
G. When any new parking stalls, driveways, access aisles or
parking lots are proposed, these newly constructed areas
must comply with the requirements of this chapter.
section 3. Exemptions and variances';.'
A. Exemptions.
These regulations shall not be applicable under the
following conditions:
1. When temporary office trailers are proposed where the
public is not invited;
2. When temporary construction or storage trailers are
proposed where the public is not invited;
3. When the parking of equipment or work vehicles or the
storage of materials is proposed; and
4. When the number of parking stalls in an existing
parking lot is expanded by less than twenty-five (25)
per cent beyond what was originally approved and no
building{s) is proposed to be enlarged or
constructed, the existing portion of the parking lot
need not comply with the requirements of this
chapter. However, any newly constructed areas must
comply with the requirements of this chapter.
5. When a multi-family residential project is proposed
and is designed to include units containing garages
served by driveways, then these units shall be exempt
from the requirements of this chapter. This
exemption shall not apply to multi-family units that
do not contain garages.
6. When proposed modifications or renovations would not
increase the number of dwelling units in an existing
residential project.
B. Variances.
1. Variances authorized. The City Commission of the
City of Boynton Beach may grant variances to any
Adopted April 4. 1"5. OrdinAnce O'5-0Z
aevl.ed
23-2
Art. I, 53
section of this chapter or any design standards
referenced hereinafter by conducting a public hearing
at which any party may appear in person, or through
his duly authorized agent, to give testimony.
a. Variances may be granted only when the granting
-of same will not be contrary to the public
interest, and where, owing to special conditions,
a literal enforcement of the provisions of this
chapter would result in an unnecessary hardship
not created by the applicant or his predecessor
in title, use or possession.
2. Variance procedure. A variance as herein authorized
shall not be considered until a written application,
and an application fee, as set by the City Commission
by resolution, is submitted to the planning director,
demonstrating the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist
which are peculiar to the physical or
topographical features of the land or structures,
which are not applicable to other lands or
structures within the city; or
b. That literal enforcement of the provisions of
this chapter would deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the terms of this chapter; or
c. That the special conditions and circumstances
referred to in subsection a above do not result
from the action of the applicant or his
predecessors; or
d. That granting the variance requested will not
confer on the applicant any special privilege
that is denied by this chapter to other lands or
structures in the city.
3. Granting variances; requirements. Before granting a
variance, as authorized by this chapter, the City
Commission shall find as follows:
a. That the requirements for a public hearing have
been met;
b. That the reasons set forth in the application
justify the granting of the variance, and that
the variance is the minimum variance that will
make possible the reasonable use of land or
structure;
c. That the granting of the variance will be in
harmony with the general intent and purpose of
this chapter, will not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the
public welfare; and
Adopted April t. 1"5. Ordinance 0'5-01
Iteviaed
23-3
Art. I, 53
d. That a recommendation has been reviewed by the
technical review committee of the City of Boynton
Beach, and that the recommendation has been made
a part of the public record.
4. Conditions. In granting a variance, the City
Commission may prescribe appropriate conditions and
safeguards in order to conform with the intent of
this chapter. Violation of such conditions and
safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which
the variance is granted, shall cause the variance to
become null and void.
Section 4. Minimum standards.
All areas proposed for parking or storage including those
instances exempted in Section 3 hereinbefore shall be improved to
provide a hard, dust-free surface in compliance with city
requirements.
Section 5. Pennitting.
A. When required.
A permit shall be secured from the director of
development prior to the construction of any parking lot.
The issuance of a permit shall not relieve any party from
obtaining the necessary permits which may be required by
the various state, federal or local government agencies
which have jurisdiction over the proposed construction,
including, but not limited to, permits for paving and
drainage, lighting and irrigation. Final inspections of
the parking lot for compliance with this chapter and
other city code requirements and standards are required
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
B. Permit application.
In connection with a request for a permit to construct a
parking lot, the owner, or his authorized agent, shall
submit an application which shall include, but not be
limited to, information and materials as follows:
1. Permit fee;
2. A sealed survey, not older than six (6) months which
shows existing elevations and/or contours; axisting
easements or other encumbrances; existing structures
and trees; and other topographical features. In
addition, the survey must show elevations of adjacent
properties and rights-of-way; right-of-way widths of
adjacent roadways; paving; sidewalks; elevations;
utility lines; and other features;
3. Location of parking and loading facilities including
calculations for the number of parking stalls
required and the number of parking stalls provided,
Adopced April 4. 1"5. Ordiaeace O'5.0~
Ilevieed
23-4
56
f. Bingo halls.
3 . SUilding and" site regulaeions~~ No building or portion
thereof shall be erected, constructed, converted,
,established, altered, enlarged or used unless the
premises and buildings shall comply with the
following regulations:
Minimum lot frontage
Minimum lot area
Maximum lot coverage
(building)
Minimum front yard
Minimum side yard
(interior lots)
Minimum side yard
(corner lots)
Minimum rear yard
75 feet
15,000 feet
40 percent
Maximum structure
20 feet
None (see Notes
a and b)
15 feet street side
(see Note b)
20 feet (see Notes
b and c)
height 45 feet, not to
exceed 4 stories
a.
Where rear access is not available from a public
street or alley, a side yard of not less than
fifteen (15) feet shall be provided on,9!1~.._s;.4~.
When abutting a residential zon~, side,. " O:r';'i
rear yards shall be thirty (30Lfeet'iiii-',..,.
Where rear yard access is available from a lic
street or alley, rear yard may be decreased by
one-half the width of such street or alley, but
in no case shall a rear yard be less than ten
(10) feet.
b.
c.
4. Off-street parking As set forth in Section 11.H
hereinafter.
s. Repair and service of merchandise: The repair and
service of merchandise for household customers shall
be permitted as either an accessory or principal use,
for any merchandise which is typically sold in the
C-3 district, excluding rebuilding or refinishing of
any type.
6. Exterior display and storage of merchandise. Exterior
display of retail merchandise shall be permitted,
provided that such merchandise is owned by the
operator of the business occupying the building, and
is the same type of merchandise that is typically
sold within the building. Exterior storage of
merchandise shall be for a length of time which, on a
daily basis, shall not exceed eighteen (18) hours.
Exterior storage or display of motor vehicles and
boats, excluding wrecked motor vehicles, shall also
be permitted to the extent that same is integral to
Adopeed April 4. 1995, Ordinance 095-02
Ilevieec!
2-37
Art. II
BOARDING AND ROOMING HOUSB - A building other than hotel or
motel providing lodging and where meals are or are not served for
compensation.
BOATBL - Yachtel.
BRIDGB - A structure, including supports, erected over a
depression or an obstruction, such as water or a highway or
railway, and having a track or passage-way for carrying traffic
as defined in chapter 316 or other moving loaas.
BuILDING - All construction built for the suppo;t',<'e1'lSiQ~ii'
shelter or protection of chattels, ,persons,ani.malsort~.;:,.l~;.
The w<?rd "building" shall include t:he.word-"s~~~~ur~" ap.g~~""l
anyth1ng constructed or erected Wh1Ch requiresperman~~~";~..lC1ca
on the ground or anything attached. to such., a .b\1.ildin~'.().
structure.. A building or., structure"tshall include;" 'butz;ii.o' '., <
limited'to,' all., construction speci~ied;~in Chapter 2 of~the'~:C:i.tyf:si
Land Development Regulations.
BUILDING AREA - The portion of a lot remaining after the
required setbacks have been provided. Buildings may be placed in
any part of the building area, but limitations on the percentage
of the lot which may be covered by buildings may require open
space within the building area.
BUILDING FACADB - That portion of the exterior elevations of a
building extending from grade to the top of the parapet wall or
eaves and the entire width of the building elevations.
BUILDING FRONTAGB
bay.
BUILDING OFFICIAL - The official in charge of the Building
Division or his authorized representative.
- The main entrance side of a building or
BUILDING, PRINCIPAL - A building in which is conducted the main
or principal use of the lot on which said building is situated.
BUILDING SETBACK LINE - A line delineating the minimum
allowable distance between the property line and the building.
BUILDING SITE - A portion or parcel of land considered as a
unit, devoted to a certain use or occupied by a building or group
of buildings that are united by a common interest or use, and the
customary accessories and open spaces belonging to the same.
BULK STORAGB, SALE, OR DISTRIBUTION - The receiving, transfer
or storage of unpackaged goods or materials at a premises, or the
subsequent sale or transfer of such goods or materials from the
premises in a packaged or unpackaged form. Also, the storage,
receiving or transfer of goods, commodities or materials in units
which are larger than the units which are typically distributed
or sold from the premises. Where bulk storage is not permitted,
Adopted April 4. 1995. Ordin.nee 095-02
Ilevi.ed
1-10
SlO
safeguards, when made a part of the terms under
which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a
violation of this ordinance.
b. The board of adjustment may prescribe a
reasonable time limit within which the action for
which the variance is required shall be begun or
-completed or both.
c. Under no circumstances except as permitted above
shall the board of adjustment grant a variance to
permit a use not generally or'by special
exception permitted in the zoning district
involved or any use expressly or by implication
prohibited by the terms of this ordinance in the
zoning district. No nonconforming use of
neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in
the same zoning district and no permitted use of
lands, structures, or buildings in other zoning
districts shall be considered grounds for the
authorization of a variance.
d. Variances to lot area and maximum densities
specified in comprehensive plan. Where variances
to lot area requirements are requested, and such
a variance, if granted, would cause the density
to exceed the density shown on the future land
use map of the city's comprehensive plan, the
density created shall be construed to be in
conformance with the comprehensive plan, if the
board of adjustment finds that the variance meets
the conditions set forth in this section for
granting same, and the variance would only allow
for the construction of a single-family detached
dwelling.
~.- REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS. In exerc1s1ng its
powers, the board of adjustment may, upon appeal and in
conformity with provisions of this section, reverse or
affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order,
requirement, decision, or determination made by an
administrative official in the enforcement of any zoning
ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to this
ordinance, and may make any necessary order, requirement,
decision, or determination, and to that end shall have
all the powers of the officer from whom the appeal is
taken. The concurring vote of four (4) of the members of
the board shall be necessary to reverse any order,
requirement, decision, or determination of any such
administrative official or to decide in favor of the
applicant on any matter upon which the board is required
to pass under this section.
D. APPEALS FROM DBCISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL. Appeals
to the board of adjustment may be taken by any person
aggrieved or by any officer, board, or Bureau of the
governing body affected by any decision of an
Adoptad April t. 1"5. Ordinanca 0'5-02
Itaviaad
2-96
510
administrative official under any zoning ordinance
enacted pursuant to this ordinance. Such appeal shall be
taken within thirty (30) days after rendition of the
order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed
from by filing with the officer from whom the appeal is
taken and with the board of adjustment a notice of appeal
specifying the grounds thereof. The appeal shall be in
the form prescribed by the rules of the board. The
administrative official from whom the appeal is taken
shall, upon notification of the filing of the plans,
papers, or other materials constituting the record upon
which the action appealed from was taken. Due public
notice shall be given in accordance with Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes.
E. STAY OF WORK AND PROCEEDING ON APPEALS. An appeal to the
board of adjustment stays all work on the premises and
all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed
from, unless the official from whom the appeal was taken
shall certify to the board of adjustment that by reason
of facts stated in the certificate, a stay would cause
imminent peril of life or property. In such case,
proceedings or work shall not be stayed except by a
restraining order which may be granted by the board of
adjustment or by a court of record on application, on
notice to the officer from whom the appeal is taken and
on due cause shown.
F. HEARING OF APPEALS. The board of adjustment shall fix a
reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal, give
public notice thereof, as well as due notice to the
parties in interest, and decide the same within a
reasonable time. Upon the hearing, any party may appear
in person, by agent or by attorney. Applicants shall be
required to file a proper form (supplied by the city
clerk) and a current certified survey accompanied by a
fee as adopted by resolution of the City Commission. For
procedural purposes, an application for a special
exception shall be handled by the board of adjustment as
for appeals.
G. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Any
person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any
decision of the board of adjustment, or any officer,
department, board, commission, or bureau of the governing
body, may apply to the circuit court in the judicial
circuit where the board of adjustment is located for
judicial relief within thirty (30) days after rendition
of the decision by the board of adjustment. Review in
the circuit court shall be either by trial de novo, which
shall be governed by the Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure, or by petition for writ of certiorari, which
shall be governed by the Florida Appellate Rules. The
election of remedies shall lie with the appellant.
Adop~.d April 4. 1"5. Ordia.ace D'5-01
..vi..d
2-97
510
H. WITHDRAWAL OR DENIAL OF APPLICATION:
1. Upon the denial of an application for relief
hereunder, in whole or in part, a period of one (I)
year must run prior to the filing of a subsequent
application affecting the same property or any
portion thereof.
2. Upon the withdrawal of an application, in whole or in
part, a period of six (6) months must run prior to
the filing of a subsequent application affecting the
same property or any portion thereof, unless,
however, the decision of the board is without
prejudice; and provided that the period of limitation
shall be increased to a two-year waiting period in
the event such an application, in whole or in part,
has been twice or more denied or withdrawn.
3. An application may be withdrawn without prejudice by
the applicant as a matter of right; provided the
request for withdrawal is in writing and executed in
a manner and on a form prescribed by the board and
filed with the board at least one (1) week prior to
any hearing scheduled concerning the application;
otherwise, all such requests for withdrawal shall be
with prejudice. No application may be withdrawn
after final action has been taken. When an
application is withdrawn without prejudice, the time
limitations for re-application provided herein shall
not apply.
Section 11. Supplemental regulations.
A. RESERVED.
B. CLUSTER DEVELOPMENTS. A cluster of groups of two (2) or
more single-family structures may be permitted in all
residential districts with the following requirements:
All cluster housing development plans shall be submitted
to the planning and development board as a planned unit
development.
C. NURSERY AND/OR OTHER PRESCHOOL FACILITIES:
1. Day care and other preschool facilities shall comply
with the state health department and all other
regulatory agency requirements.
2. The building height, setbacks, parking and total
floor area shall be governed by the applicable zoning
district.
A4opte4 April t, 1995. Or4inance 095-01
aevi..4
2-98
ISTUDIO~
SITE PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PRESENTATION GRAPHICS
June 27, 7995
City of Boynton Beach
LANDSCAPE REVIEW DIVISION
RE: Main Street Car Wash Landscape Plan
Our Ref# 95026
Dear Sir/Madam,
Attached you will find the'landscape plan for the proposed addition to the above referenced project.
In accordance with the code requirements the plan should reflect a quantity of plant material
consisting of at least 50% natives. You will note that the required hedge along NE tst and NE 2nd has
been shown as Murraya paniculata; while this is not a native species it is shown as a drought tolerant
plant in the SFWMD Xeriscape guide. In consideration of this and also because this species currently
exists along the NE tst Street property line we request it's acceptance as the required hedge material.
In addition we have specfied Cocoplum, a native, for the hedge material in excess of the code
requ i rem en ts.
Due to the location of paving within the proposed development expansion all of the existing material
within that area will need to be removed from the site.
The following is a cost comparison justification for the removal of existing plant material:
Costs of demolition of plant to be removed -
- 7 Ficus Benjamina 72-74' $700
- 3 Queen palm 4'
- 3 Bougainvillea 4'
- 7 Scheff/era
- 7 Queen palm 7 A'
- 7 Areca palm
- 7 Mahogany
- 7 Cycad
- 7 Bamboo clump
- unknown vine
- 2 Bougainvillea 5'
- 7 Gardenia
- 7 Draceana
continued on page 2
700
700
25
25
700
725
75
25
20
700
25
2.S.
Total $795
STUDIO 32
7 CHELSEA LANE BOYNTON BEACH flORIDA 33462
VOICE AND FAX 407 - 433-2160
ISTUDIOm
SITE PLANNING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PRESENTATION GRAPHICS
City of Boynton Beach
Main Street Car Wash
page 2
Value of plant material in excess of code requirements -
- 4 Swientenia mahogany 14' $500 ($125 per tree over code size requirement)
- 193 Liriope 675
- 4 Ixora 28
- 1 Alpinia zerumbet 35
- 2 Crinum lily 80
- 3 Allamanda 150
- 3 Bougainvillea 150
- 35 Annuals 70
- Cocoplum 2BQ
total $1,968
As you can see the cost of the plant material proposed in excess of the code requirements more than
doubles that of the demolition cost of the existing material.
I trust that the attached plan will meet with your approval. If you have any questions please do not
hesitate to call.
Chuck Mucciolo, RLA
STUDIO 32
7 CHELSEA LANE BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA 33462
VOICE AND FAX 407 - 433-2160
fJJie City of
r.Boynton r.Beacn
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bea& 'Boulevard
P.O. 'Bo'(310
'Boynton 'Beadt., ~foritfa. 33425-0310
City:Jfafl: (407) 375-6000
~;U: (407) 375-6090
July 3, 1995
Jim Zenage
201 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33445
RE: Main Street Car wash - File No. MSPM 95-004
New Site Plan
Acceptance - Site Plan Review Application & Submittal
Documents
Dear Mr. Zenage:
On June 29, your submittal for Site Plan Review of the above-
referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been
determined that the submittal is substantially complete and
accepted for further processing. A Planning and Zoning Department
staff member will be responsible for the review and coordination of
your site plan through the remainder of the Site Plan Review
process.
The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review
Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review
standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections
of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review
will be available to you on July 28, 1995.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (407) 375-6260.
Very truly yours,
'/<"'*0
~ri J. Heyden
~ning and Zoning
TJH: jms
a:latAcptLtr.ma1n
Director
jfmeri.ca's gateway to tlU (julfstre.am
@ Ik IF (g [g1 ~[N]@~[N]~~G%~[N]@ ~~G%~~~~~~ ~[N]~
August 11, 1995
city of Boynton Beach
Planning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
Attention: Mike Haig
RE: Resubmittal of Revised Engineering Plans for Main street
Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton Beach, FL.
Dear Mike:
As per your request, this letter is being submitted to inform
your department that no changes are required to the
previously submitted site plan review/conditional use
application form for the revised site plan submittal for Main
street Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton
Beach, FL.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel
free to contact me.
200 Knuth Road, Suite 214 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33436 · (407) 736-7047 Fax (407) 736-7099
%e City of
13oynton 13eac/i
100 'E. 'Boynttm 'BUUh 'Boukvara
P.O. 'Bo~31O
'Boynton 'BUUh, 1'forUla 33425.0310
City:Jfafl: (407) 375-6000
1'M: (407) 375-6090
July 27, 1995
Mr. Jim Zenage
201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Initial Review Comments - Main Street Car Wash
File No. MSPM 95-001
Dear Jim:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.)
When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submitted to the planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and
recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial
(see attached meet1nq schedule). A recommendation for denial will
be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on
the resubmitted plans.
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
!JI.mema's (jateway to the (julfstream
Mr. Dan DeCarlo
Main Street Car Wash Site
September 19, 1995
Page 2
application was considered by the CRAB Committee, there was discussion
regarding the future use of this site. My client indicated the potential of
constructing a storage building on this site. In order to save my client additional
time and money in the future, we would like to amend our plan to indicate a future
storage building on this site now. This is a minor amendment that which will have
no effect on either the number of employees or the operation of the car wash
facility. The storage building use was specifically addressed as a permitted use
in the memo of Ms. Carrie Parker, City Manager, at the time of the Rezoning and
Land Use approval. Please let me know what if anything I need to do today in
order to get some recognition of this proposed potential use tonight.
KJKJcdd\cdecarlo.919
cc: Jim Zengage
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartf
P.O. 'Bo~310
'Boynton 'B~ 'JWriIJa 33425-0310
City:Haf[: (407) 375-6000
'JJU: (407) 375-6090
July 3, 1995
Jim Zen age
201 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33445
RE: Main Street Car Wash - File No. MSPM 95-004
New Site Plan
Acceptance - Site Plan Review Application & Submittal
Documents
Dear Mr. Zenage:
On June 29, your submittal for Site Plan Review of the above-
referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been
determined that the submittal is substantially complete and
accepted for further processing. A Planning and Zoning Department
staff member will be responsible for the review and coordination of
your site plan through the remainder of the Site Plan Review
process.
The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review
Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review
standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections
of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review
will be available to you on July 28, 1995.
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (407) 375-6260.
Very truly yours,
" Y;?r,~,~
/ '. I' ~C~
. rt,//...
~ri J. Heyden
~ning and Zoning
TJH: jrns
a:latAcptL~r.maln
Director
51 me rica 's (jateway to tfu (julfstream
@ ~ u (Q) [g1 ~[N]@~[N]~~[g1~[N]@ ~~[g1~~(Q;~~9 ~[N](Q;
August 11, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Planning Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
Attention: Mike Haig
RE: Resubmittal of Revised Engineering Plans for Main street
Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton Beach, FL.
Dear Mike:
As per your request, this letter is being submitted to inform
your department that no changes are required to the
previously submitted site plan review/conditional use
application form for the revised site plan submittal for Main
street Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton
Beach, FL.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel
free to contact me.
200 Knuth Road, Suite 214 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33436 . (407) 736-7047 Fax (407) 736-7099
%e City of
tJ3oynton tJ3eacli
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bead;' '1JoulevQn{
P.o. 'Bo~310
'Boynton 'Buuli., 1'forUfa 33425.0310
City 1fa1[: (407) 375-6000
1'JU: (407) 375-6090
July 27, 1995
Mr. Jim Zenage
201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: Initial Review Comments - Main Street Car Wash
File No. MSPM 95-001
Dear Jim:
The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the
documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are
comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial
review of your project.
In order to complete the review process, the site plan and
documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90
days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not
submi tted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.)
When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not
applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed
separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the
comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment
stating why the comment is not applicable and return the
explanation with the amended plans and documents.
After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12)
complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and
Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been
submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be
distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and
recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial
(see attached meeting schedule). A recommendation for denial will
be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on
the resubmitted plans.
We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and
a checklist that contains information regarding the second
submission of the plans and documents for review.
5tmerica's (jateway to tIU (julfstream
Kllcley & Aaocletee
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1561 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach. Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
5EP 2 I 1995
m@mowrn
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 19, 1995
TO:
Mr. Dan DeCarlo, Assistant Planner
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
FROM:
Kieran J. Kilday
VIA FAX:
407-375-6090
RE: Site Plan Review - Main Street Car Wash Site
OUR PROJECT NO.: 900.2
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
I am sorry for the delay in getting this memo to you. This memo contains the information
we discussed by telephone last week. There were three topics discussed which are:
1. Site Plan Review Comment No. 3 on your memo of September 12, 1995. This
comment refers to vines which were proposed on the south side of the planned
buffer wall. Since the time of this comment, the plans have been amended and
resubmitted to include a Cocoplum hedge along the entire south side of the wall.
As the vines are no longer planned to be placed in this location, this comment
should be deleted.
2. Staff Recommendation No. 5 on your memo of September 12, 1995. This
recommendation which you have informed me was not a condition but a
suggestion concerned the planting of vines on the north side (exterior) of the
buffer wall. As I explained to you by telephone, the wall is to be built two feet (2')
within my client's property line. There is an existing six foot (6') chain link fence
already constructed and in place on the adjacent owner's property line.
Therefore, there is no way to maintain any planting between the wall and the
chain link fence on the north side of the property line. For that reason, my client
is unable to comply with your suggestion. It is my understanding that this is not
a condition and no further action needs to be taken. Please let me know if I'm
wrong.
3. At the Planning Commission, I added a new request concerning the potential of
a small storage building in the area which is hatched at the northeast corner of
the existing car wash building. This area previously contained parking spaces
which have been removed to meet code requirements. At the time that the