Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER AGENDA MEMORANDUM April 18, 1995 VI. PUBLIC HEARING A. Main Street Car Wash Rezoning Application for Land 'Use Amendment/Rezoning At the Planning and Development Board meeting there was some concern regarding what seemed to be conflicting City staff recommendations from the Planning Department and Downtown Development. The current adopted Downtown Community Redevelopment Plan was approved in 1988 and does state that car washes are an unsuitable use for the area, however, Redevelopment staff, along with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council are In the process of writing a new plan which will be presented to the City Commission shortly. Additionally, this use Is currently In place and because of its popularity, a safety factor needs to be considered as cars are now stacking back to Boynton Beach Boulevard. If the City Commission wishes to approve this request, the applicant has agreed that the following conditions may be permanently placed on the approval: 1. The lot to be purchased shall not contain any expansion of the existing car wash building. Additional canopies may be installed on the site, as well as a shed for storage only, provided the shed meets all set back and building site plan code requirements. Traffic lanes and parking lot area will be the primary uses of this property. 2. A buffer wall with landscaping will be constructed along the entire northern property line to shield this use from the adjacent residences. 3. A "menu" type board sign showing the types of services and the amount of each service would be allowed on the interior of the property to let the cars in line know what services are available prior to entering the car wash and a directional sign at the current, existing driveway cut would be allowed. 4. If the owner wishes to expand the existing car wash building, an alternate location would need to be found at that time, as it would not be permitted on this site. Utilizing these conditions, it is our recommendation that the approval of this request would not jeopardize the goals and objectives the City has for the downtown, the Boynton Beach Boulevard gateway entrance or harm the adjacent residential neighborhood. ~~ Carrie Parker City Manager cc: Planning Development Utilities I.~ rn IfJrn n w ~ r"=::il ". r:'.- '-_,:_"'_." f'l! .I Lilli' , f , i Iii .~~.... .:, ~~ f P ~t. I I ../' pcfl.\ ~ VrfP" t~ ~D)e, ~... J>~f CirV (;~. I c} \' f~~l ICf~ f1) o'plI"' 1 ;10 ._J:P lJ ~ p pflj" CP:jc Attachment June 22, 1995 >EI=. ~'TMENT OF DE ELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION 100 East Boynton Beach Bl~. P. o. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 h~. : ~\JUMf I-{ ~~\~ C' " :~ 'j'~'lf~-' ~f[f-O! '-;-- \ ~-,.._._<-<".._-"'"( I n 11 u)u,( ;1 ;ill , j U l ~ " 'J 1 f::j , i i ;"fu'l -riL. t i :I:t ~ :: &..-~";7"~~---J -,,_ :1 ~" I L"...j~ill~'" J"ND.\.L '\'\1 : ._.,..._._ZOlj1.t::.Q.QfEL~2l". Robert Fetrow Gator Engineering Services, Inc. 200 Knuth Road, Bays 214-216 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 RE : MAIN STREET CAR WASH Dear Mr. Fetrow: You asked my opinion today about three problems you were having while planning the site layout for subject car wash, as follows: Question 1. Can a new curb cut (driveway) be constructed on N.E. 1st Street near the north property boundary? Answer 1. Yes, but only if one of the other N.E. 1st Street driveways is eliminated. See attached copy of Land Development Regulations (LDR), Chapter 23, Article II, Paragraph H7, Page 23-9 which states "no more than two (2) driveways shall be permitted from any property." We have also attached pages 23-2, 3 and 4 which outline exemption and variance procedures. 1/ Question 2. Is the actual dividing line between the residential and commercial areas the east right-of-way line of N.E. 1st (Street; the west right-of-way line of N.E. 1st Street; or the center line of N.E. 1st Street? Answer 2. The Planning and Zoning Department administers LDR I Chapter 2, Zoning, so you should consult them. My opinion is I that it must be the center line of the street or a void, unzoned area would occur in the right-of-way. That means that if the right-of-way is abandoned or sold, it would have to be zoned from nothing, which is not allowed in the Comprehensive Plan, to perhaps two or more uses, depending on adjacent uses. However, I believe the actual question that needs a response relates to Chapter 2, Section 6, Paragraph C.3.b, Page 2-37 which requires a 30 foot minimum yard when abutting a residential district. Yard setbacks are consistently measured from property lines, not zoning district lines. -1tkj ~Lr /1- r1k: ~p.)J.AJ6 L/tV4: If,;,v ~ -??JIOOt.5 ~>I- t1Jt:<..SfJ!:6r nh<:' U:.o/5 S1~~ ~ .sy(JjcJ(. , ' ~ill)tNn"L ~pt. 71J~~!- 7J.I! /5 PM""', 'f7'H!: L.l!l//}.L ff.NA'- flJt CCNTPL ~f.- (II:- f~o, S~'t6"Aut. ()./~S P'Q" .....) Phone: (407) 375-6350 FAX: (407) 375-6090 Robert Fetrow RE: Main Street Car Wash June 22, 1995 Page Two Question 3. Is the proposed canopy over the new detailing area a building, therefor requiring compliance with stipulated setbacks? Answer 3. Yes. The LDR definition of building, Chapter 1, Article II, Page 1-10 defines a building as "AII construction built for the ... enclosure, shelter or protection of ... persons. II It further says "A building or structure shall include, but not be limited to, all construction specified in Chapter 2 ..." which includes Section 6, Paragraph C. 3.b., Page 2-37. Appeals to zoning interpretations (setbacks are part of the zoning regulations) are made to the Board of Adjustment. We have attached pages 2-96, 97 and 98 dealing with that board. We trust these responses will be helpful if perhaps not popular. Sincer~ly , g~/~4'4;f /1'-iA;/ . . William V. Hukill, P.E. Building Official WVH:bh Attachments XC: Carrie Parker, City Manager Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Michael Haag, zoning/Site Administrator CARltASH Art. II s. Clearance at major ~riveways. The minimum distance from the street right-of-way line at any major ingress or egress driveway to any parking stall or to any interior access aisle having direct access to such driveway shall be one hundred (100) feet. Intersections with county and state roads. Driveways which intersect streets owned and maintained by a governing body other than Boynton Beach must be permitted by the proper governing agency, prior to submission of plans for a building permit.".:'1'",,<,,' Number of driveways. No more than two (2)",drivq_YJ.f'1 shall be permitted from any property. Where . . properties abut more than one (1) public or private right-of-way, additional driveways may be permitted depending upon traffic volumes, but in no instance-l shall the number of driveways exceed two (2) on each :street. 6 . 7. I. Parking lot layout. 1. Dimensions. Parking lots shall be designed to meet or exceed the dimensional requirements for stalls, driveways and access aisles as provided for in city standards. 2. Access. Each parking lot or parking stall shall have sufficient access from a street, alley or other public or private way. Maneuvering and access areas shall be of sufficient size to permit vehicles to enter and exit the parking lot and parking stalls in a safe and efficient manner. In no instance shall parking lots be designed to allow vehicles to back out into any public alley or road rights-of-way, or segments of private streets which function as local or collector streets. J. Parking garages. Public or private parking garages shall comply with this chapter, with the Standard Building Code and with county-wide amendments thereto. Where appropriate, security systems may be required. K. Handicap requirements. All parking lots shall meet or exceed State Handicap Code requirements, and comply with the Standard Building Code and the county-wide amendments thereto. L. Parking lot striping. Parking stalls shall be delineated by double-line, painted stripes where parking stalls abut each other, which shall comply with city standards. M. Fire lanes. All shopping centers, retail office complexes and retail establishments in which the gross floor area of all buildings if fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet or greater shall have fire lanes along the AcSopeecS April 4. 1"5. OrcSinanee O'5-0~ ll.vi.ecS 23-9 Art. I, S2 B. When a change in building occupancy occurs as defined in the Standard Building Code; C. When a change in use occurs which results in additional parking being required as noted in Chapter 2, Section 11.H.16 of these Land Development Regulations; D. When compliance with the landscaping code is required; E. Reserved; F. When an existing parking lot is expanded by twenty-five (25) per cent or more in parking stalls beyond what was originally approved; and G. When any new parking stalls, driveways, access aisles or parking lots are proposed, these newly constructed areas must comply with the requirements of this chapter. section 3. Exemptions and variances';.' A. Exemptions. These regulations shall not be applicable under the following conditions: 1. When temporary office trailers are proposed where the public is not invited; 2. When temporary construction or storage trailers are proposed where the public is not invited; 3. When the parking of equipment or work vehicles or the storage of materials is proposed; and 4. When the number of parking stalls in an existing parking lot is expanded by less than twenty-five (25) per cent beyond what was originally approved and no building{s) is proposed to be enlarged or constructed, the existing portion of the parking lot need not comply with the requirements of this chapter. However, any newly constructed areas must comply with the requirements of this chapter. 5. When a multi-family residential project is proposed and is designed to include units containing garages served by driveways, then these units shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter. This exemption shall not apply to multi-family units that do not contain garages. 6. When proposed modifications or renovations would not increase the number of dwelling units in an existing residential project. B. Variances. 1. Variances authorized. The City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach may grant variances to any Adopted April 4. 1"5. OrdinAnce O'5-0Z aevl.ed 23-2 Art. I, 53 section of this chapter or any design standards referenced hereinafter by conducting a public hearing at which any party may appear in person, or through his duly authorized agent, to give testimony. a. Variances may be granted only when the granting -of same will not be contrary to the public interest, and where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter would result in an unnecessary hardship not created by the applicant or his predecessor in title, use or possession. 2. Variance procedure. A variance as herein authorized shall not be considered until a written application, and an application fee, as set by the City Commission by resolution, is submitted to the planning director, demonstrating the following: a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the physical or topographical features of the land or structures, which are not applicable to other lands or structures within the city; or b. That literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under the terms of this chapter; or c. That the special conditions and circumstances referred to in subsection a above do not result from the action of the applicant or his predecessors; or d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to other lands or structures in the city. 3. Granting variances; requirements. Before granting a variance, as authorized by this chapter, the City Commission shall find as follows: a. That the requirements for a public hearing have been met; b. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land or structure; c. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and Adopted April t. 1"5. Ordinance 0'5-01 Iteviaed 23-3 Art. I, 53 d. That a recommendation has been reviewed by the technical review committee of the City of Boynton Beach, and that the recommendation has been made a part of the public record. 4. Conditions. In granting a variance, the City Commission may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in order to conform with the intent of this chapter. Violation of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall cause the variance to become null and void. Section 4. Minimum standards. All areas proposed for parking or storage including those instances exempted in Section 3 hereinbefore shall be improved to provide a hard, dust-free surface in compliance with city requirements. Section 5. Pennitting. A. When required. A permit shall be secured from the director of development prior to the construction of any parking lot. The issuance of a permit shall not relieve any party from obtaining the necessary permits which may be required by the various state, federal or local government agencies which have jurisdiction over the proposed construction, including, but not limited to, permits for paving and drainage, lighting and irrigation. Final inspections of the parking lot for compliance with this chapter and other city code requirements and standards are required prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. B. Permit application. In connection with a request for a permit to construct a parking lot, the owner, or his authorized agent, shall submit an application which shall include, but not be limited to, information and materials as follows: 1. Permit fee; 2. A sealed survey, not older than six (6) months which shows existing elevations and/or contours; axisting easements or other encumbrances; existing structures and trees; and other topographical features. In addition, the survey must show elevations of adjacent properties and rights-of-way; right-of-way widths of adjacent roadways; paving; sidewalks; elevations; utility lines; and other features; 3. Location of parking and loading facilities including calculations for the number of parking stalls required and the number of parking stalls provided, Adopced April 4. 1"5. Ordiaeace O'5.0~ Ilevieed 23-4 56 f. Bingo halls. 3 . SUilding and" site regulaeions~~ No building or portion thereof shall be erected, constructed, converted, ,established, altered, enlarged or used unless the premises and buildings shall comply with the following regulations: Minimum lot frontage Minimum lot area Maximum lot coverage (building) Minimum front yard Minimum side yard (interior lots) Minimum side yard (corner lots) Minimum rear yard 75 feet 15,000 feet 40 percent Maximum structure 20 feet None (see Notes a and b) 15 feet street side (see Note b) 20 feet (see Notes b and c) height 45 feet, not to exceed 4 stories a. Where rear access is not available from a public street or alley, a side yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet shall be provided on,9!1~.._s;.4~. When abutting a residential zon~, side,. " O:r';'i rear yards shall be thirty (30Lfeet'iiii-',..,. Where rear yard access is available from a lic street or alley, rear yard may be decreased by one-half the width of such street or alley, but in no case shall a rear yard be less than ten (10) feet. b. c. 4. Off-street parking As set forth in Section 11.H hereinafter. s. Repair and service of merchandise: The repair and service of merchandise for household customers shall be permitted as either an accessory or principal use, for any merchandise which is typically sold in the C-3 district, excluding rebuilding or refinishing of any type. 6. Exterior display and storage of merchandise. Exterior display of retail merchandise shall be permitted, provided that such merchandise is owned by the operator of the business occupying the building, and is the same type of merchandise that is typically sold within the building. Exterior storage of merchandise shall be for a length of time which, on a daily basis, shall not exceed eighteen (18) hours. Exterior storage or display of motor vehicles and boats, excluding wrecked motor vehicles, shall also be permitted to the extent that same is integral to Adopeed April 4. 1995, Ordinance 095-02 Ilevieec! 2-37 Art. II BOARDING AND ROOMING HOUSB - A building other than hotel or motel providing lodging and where meals are or are not served for compensation. BOATBL - Yachtel. BRIDGB - A structure, including supports, erected over a depression or an obstruction, such as water or a highway or railway, and having a track or passage-way for carrying traffic as defined in chapter 316 or other moving loaas. BuILDING - All construction built for the suppo;t',<'e1'lSiQ~ii' shelter or protection of chattels, ,persons,ani.malsort~.;:,.l~;. The w<?rd "building" shall include t:he.word-"s~~~~ur~" ap.g~~""l anyth1ng constructed or erected Wh1Ch requiresperman~~~";~..lC1ca on the ground or anything attached. to such., a .b\1.ildin~'.(). structure.. A building or., structure"tshall include;" 'butz;ii.o' '., < limited'to,' all., construction speci~ied;~in Chapter 2 of~the'~:C:i.tyf:si Land Development Regulations. BUILDING AREA - The portion of a lot remaining after the required setbacks have been provided. Buildings may be placed in any part of the building area, but limitations on the percentage of the lot which may be covered by buildings may require open space within the building area. BUILDING FACADB - That portion of the exterior elevations of a building extending from grade to the top of the parapet wall or eaves and the entire width of the building elevations. BUILDING FRONTAGB bay. BUILDING OFFICIAL - The official in charge of the Building Division or his authorized representative. - The main entrance side of a building or BUILDING, PRINCIPAL - A building in which is conducted the main or principal use of the lot on which said building is situated. BUILDING SETBACK LINE - A line delineating the minimum allowable distance between the property line and the building. BUILDING SITE - A portion or parcel of land considered as a unit, devoted to a certain use or occupied by a building or group of buildings that are united by a common interest or use, and the customary accessories and open spaces belonging to the same. BULK STORAGB, SALE, OR DISTRIBUTION - The receiving, transfer or storage of unpackaged goods or materials at a premises, or the subsequent sale or transfer of such goods or materials from the premises in a packaged or unpackaged form. Also, the storage, receiving or transfer of goods, commodities or materials in units which are larger than the units which are typically distributed or sold from the premises. Where bulk storage is not permitted, Adopted April 4. 1995. Ordin.nee 095-02 Ilevi.ed 1-10 SlO safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance. b. The board of adjustment may prescribe a reasonable time limit within which the action for which the variance is required shall be begun or -completed or both. c. Under no circumstances except as permitted above shall the board of adjustment grant a variance to permit a use not generally or'by special exception permitted in the zoning district involved or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this ordinance in the zoning district. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district and no permitted use of lands, structures, or buildings in other zoning districts shall be considered grounds for the authorization of a variance. d. Variances to lot area and maximum densities specified in comprehensive plan. Where variances to lot area requirements are requested, and such a variance, if granted, would cause the density to exceed the density shown on the future land use map of the city's comprehensive plan, the density created shall be construed to be in conformance with the comprehensive plan, if the board of adjustment finds that the variance meets the conditions set forth in this section for granting same, and the variance would only allow for the construction of a single-family detached dwelling. ~.- REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS. In exerc1s1ng its powers, the board of adjustment may, upon appeal and in conformity with provisions of this section, reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of any zoning ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant to this ordinance, and may make any necessary order, requirement, decision, or determination, and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer from whom the appeal is taken. The concurring vote of four (4) of the members of the board shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision, or determination of any such administrative official or to decide in favor of the applicant on any matter upon which the board is required to pass under this section. D. APPEALS FROM DBCISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL. Appeals to the board of adjustment may be taken by any person aggrieved or by any officer, board, or Bureau of the governing body affected by any decision of an Adoptad April t. 1"5. Ordinanca 0'5-02 Itaviaad 2-96 510 administrative official under any zoning ordinance enacted pursuant to this ordinance. Such appeal shall be taken within thirty (30) days after rendition of the order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed from by filing with the officer from whom the appeal is taken and with the board of adjustment a notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof. The appeal shall be in the form prescribed by the rules of the board. The administrative official from whom the appeal is taken shall, upon notification of the filing of the plans, papers, or other materials constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. Due public notice shall be given in accordance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. E. STAY OF WORK AND PROCEEDING ON APPEALS. An appeal to the board of adjustment stays all work on the premises and all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from, unless the official from whom the appeal was taken shall certify to the board of adjustment that by reason of facts stated in the certificate, a stay would cause imminent peril of life or property. In such case, proceedings or work shall not be stayed except by a restraining order which may be granted by the board of adjustment or by a court of record on application, on notice to the officer from whom the appeal is taken and on due cause shown. F. HEARING OF APPEALS. The board of adjustment shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal, give public notice thereof, as well as due notice to the parties in interest, and decide the same within a reasonable time. Upon the hearing, any party may appear in person, by agent or by attorney. Applicants shall be required to file a proper form (supplied by the city clerk) and a current certified survey accompanied by a fee as adopted by resolution of the City Commission. For procedural purposes, an application for a special exception shall be handled by the board of adjustment as for appeals. G. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any decision of the board of adjustment, or any officer, department, board, commission, or bureau of the governing body, may apply to the circuit court in the judicial circuit where the board of adjustment is located for judicial relief within thirty (30) days after rendition of the decision by the board of adjustment. Review in the circuit court shall be either by trial de novo, which shall be governed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, or by petition for writ of certiorari, which shall be governed by the Florida Appellate Rules. The election of remedies shall lie with the appellant. Adop~.d April 4. 1"5. Ordia.ace D'5-01 ..vi..d 2-97 510 H. WITHDRAWAL OR DENIAL OF APPLICATION: 1. Upon the denial of an application for relief hereunder, in whole or in part, a period of one (I) year must run prior to the filing of a subsequent application affecting the same property or any portion thereof. 2. Upon the withdrawal of an application, in whole or in part, a period of six (6) months must run prior to the filing of a subsequent application affecting the same property or any portion thereof, unless, however, the decision of the board is without prejudice; and provided that the period of limitation shall be increased to a two-year waiting period in the event such an application, in whole or in part, has been twice or more denied or withdrawn. 3. An application may be withdrawn without prejudice by the applicant as a matter of right; provided the request for withdrawal is in writing and executed in a manner and on a form prescribed by the board and filed with the board at least one (1) week prior to any hearing scheduled concerning the application; otherwise, all such requests for withdrawal shall be with prejudice. No application may be withdrawn after final action has been taken. When an application is withdrawn without prejudice, the time limitations for re-application provided herein shall not apply. Section 11. Supplemental regulations. A. RESERVED. B. CLUSTER DEVELOPMENTS. A cluster of groups of two (2) or more single-family structures may be permitted in all residential districts with the following requirements: All cluster housing development plans shall be submitted to the planning and development board as a planned unit development. C. NURSERY AND/OR OTHER PRESCHOOL FACILITIES: 1. Day care and other preschool facilities shall comply with the state health department and all other regulatory agency requirements. 2. The building height, setbacks, parking and total floor area shall be governed by the applicable zoning district. A4opte4 April t, 1995. Or4inance 095-01 aevi..4 2-98 ISTUDIO~ SITE PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PRESENTATION GRAPHICS June 27, 7995 City of Boynton Beach LANDSCAPE REVIEW DIVISION RE: Main Street Car Wash Landscape Plan Our Ref# 95026 Dear Sir/Madam, Attached you will find the'landscape plan for the proposed addition to the above referenced project. In accordance with the code requirements the plan should reflect a quantity of plant material consisting of at least 50% natives. You will note that the required hedge along NE tst and NE 2nd has been shown as Murraya paniculata; while this is not a native species it is shown as a drought tolerant plant in the SFWMD Xeriscape guide. In consideration of this and also because this species currently exists along the NE tst Street property line we request it's acceptance as the required hedge material. In addition we have specfied Cocoplum, a native, for the hedge material in excess of the code requ i rem en ts. Due to the location of paving within the proposed development expansion all of the existing material within that area will need to be removed from the site. The following is a cost comparison justification for the removal of existing plant material: Costs of demolition of plant to be removed - - 7 Ficus Benjamina 72-74' $700 - 3 Queen palm 4' - 3 Bougainvillea 4' - 7 Scheff/era - 7 Queen palm 7 A' - 7 Areca palm - 7 Mahogany - 7 Cycad - 7 Bamboo clump - unknown vine - 2 Bougainvillea 5' - 7 Gardenia - 7 Draceana continued on page 2 700 700 25 25 700 725 75 25 20 700 25 2.S. Total $795 STUDIO 32 7 CHELSEA LANE BOYNTON BEACH flORIDA 33462 VOICE AND FAX 407 - 433-2160 ISTUDIOm SITE PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PRESENTATION GRAPHICS City of Boynton Beach Main Street Car Wash page 2 Value of plant material in excess of code requirements - - 4 Swientenia mahogany 14' $500 ($125 per tree over code size requirement) - 193 Liriope 675 - 4 Ixora 28 - 1 Alpinia zerumbet 35 - 2 Crinum lily 80 - 3 Allamanda 150 - 3 Bougainvillea 150 - 35 Annuals 70 - Cocoplum 2BQ total $1,968 As you can see the cost of the plant material proposed in excess of the code requirements more than doubles that of the demolition cost of the existing material. I trust that the attached plan will meet with your approval. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Chuck Mucciolo, RLA STUDIO 32 7 CHELSEA LANE BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA 33462 VOICE AND FAX 407 - 433-2160 fJJie City of r.Boynton r.Beacn 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bea& 'Boulevard P.O. 'Bo'(310 'Boynton 'Beadt., ~foritfa. 33425-0310 City:Jfafl: (407) 375-6000 ~;U: (407) 375-6090 July 3, 1995 Jim Zenage 201 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33445 RE: Main Street Car wash - File No. MSPM 95-004 New Site Plan Acceptance - Site Plan Review Application & Submittal Documents Dear Mr. Zenage: On June 29, your submittal for Site Plan Review of the above- referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been determined that the submittal is substantially complete and accepted for further processing. A Planning and Zoning Department staff member will be responsible for the review and coordination of your site plan through the remainder of the Site Plan Review process. The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review will be available to you on July 28, 1995. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (407) 375-6260. Very truly yours, '/<"'*0 ~ri J. Heyden ~ning and Zoning TJH: jms a:latAcptLtr.ma1n Director jfmeri.ca's gateway to tlU (julfstre.am @ Ik IF (g [g1 ~[N]@~[N]~~G%~[N]@ ~~G%~~~~~~ ~[N]~ August 11, 1995 city of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33436 Attention: Mike Haig RE: Resubmittal of Revised Engineering Plans for Main street Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton Beach, FL. Dear Mike: As per your request, this letter is being submitted to inform your department that no changes are required to the previously submitted site plan review/conditional use application form for the revised site plan submittal for Main street Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton Beach, FL. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me. 200 Knuth Road, Suite 214 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33436 · (407) 736-7047 Fax (407) 736-7099 %e City of 13oynton 13eac/i 100 'E. 'Boynttm 'BUUh 'Boukvara P.O. 'Bo~31O 'Boynton 'BUUh, 1'forUla 33425.0310 City:Jfafl: (407) 375-6000 1'M: (407) 375-6090 July 27, 1995 Mr. Jim Zenage 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Initial Review Comments - Main Street Car Wash File No. MSPM 95-001 Dear Jim: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submitted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meet1nq schedule). A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans. We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and a checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review. !JI.mema's (jateway to the (julfstream Mr. Dan DeCarlo Main Street Car Wash Site September 19, 1995 Page 2 application was considered by the CRAB Committee, there was discussion regarding the future use of this site. My client indicated the potential of constructing a storage building on this site. In order to save my client additional time and money in the future, we would like to amend our plan to indicate a future storage building on this site now. This is a minor amendment that which will have no effect on either the number of employees or the operation of the car wash facility. The storage building use was specifically addressed as a permitted use in the memo of Ms. Carrie Parker, City Manager, at the time of the Rezoning and Land Use approval. Please let me know what if anything I need to do today in order to get some recognition of this proposed potential use tonight. KJKJcdd\cdecarlo.919 cc: Jim Zengage 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartf P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'B~ 'JWriIJa 33425-0310 City:Haf[: (407) 375-6000 'JJU: (407) 375-6090 July 3, 1995 Jim Zen age 201 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33445 RE: Main Street Car Wash - File No. MSPM 95-004 New Site Plan Acceptance - Site Plan Review Application & Submittal Documents Dear Mr. Zenage: On June 29, your submittal for Site Plan Review of the above- referenced project was reviewed for completeness. It has been determined that the submittal is substantially complete and accepted for further processing. A Planning and Zoning Department staff member will be responsible for the review and coordination of your site plan through the remainder of the Site Plan Review process. The next step in the review process is for the Technical Review Committee to review the submittal for compliance with the review standards identified in Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 8 and all applicable sections of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. The results of the review will be available to you on July 28, 1995. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (407) 375-6260. Very truly yours, " Y;?r,~,~ / '. I' ~C~ . rt,//... ~ri J. Heyden ~ning and Zoning TJH: jrns a:latAcptL~r.maln Director 51 me rica 's (jateway to tfu (julfstream @ ~ u (Q) [g1 ~[N]@~[N]~~[g1~[N]@ ~~[g1~~(Q;~~9 ~[N](Q; August 11, 1995 City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33436 Attention: Mike Haig RE: Resubmittal of Revised Engineering Plans for Main street Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton Beach, FL. Dear Mike: As per your request, this letter is being submitted to inform your department that no changes are required to the previously submitted site plan review/conditional use application form for the revised site plan submittal for Main street Car Wash at 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. in Boynton Beach, FL. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me. 200 Knuth Road, Suite 214 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33436 . (407) 736-7047 Fax (407) 736-7099 %e City of tJ3oynton tJ3eacli 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bead;' '1JoulevQn{ P.o. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Buuli., 1'forUfa 33425.0310 City 1fa1[: (407) 375-6000 1'JU: (407) 375-6090 July 27, 1995 Mr. Jim Zenage 201 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Initial Review Comments - Main Street Car Wash File No. MSPM 95-001 Dear Jim: The City of Boynton Beach has completed its first review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Attached are comments made by the reviewing departments during their initial review of your project. In order to complete the review process, the site plan and documents must be amended to comply with these comments within 90 days of the date of this letter. (If amended plans are not submi tted in 90 days, a new application fee will be required.) When there are comments made by the reviewers that you feel are not applicable to the approval of the project or will be addressed separately and you have not amended the plans to comply with the comment(s), you must prepare written explanation for each comment stating why the comment is not applicable and return the explanation with the amended plans and documents. After amending the plans and documents, please submit twelve (12) complete sets (including surveys) of the plans to the Planning and Zoning Department. When the amended plans and documents have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department, they will be distributed to the reviewing departments for second review and recommendation to the appropriate boards for approval or denial (see attached meeting schedule). A recommendation for denial will be made if there are major comments that have not been addressed on the resubmitted plans. We have also enclosed for your convenience an approval schedule and a checklist that contains information regarding the second submission of the plans and documents for review. 5tmerica's (jateway to tIU (julfstream Kllcley & Aaocletee Landscape Architectsl Planners 1561 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach. Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 5EP 2 I 1995 m@mowrn PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1995 TO: Mr. Dan DeCarlo, Assistant Planner City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department FROM: Kieran J. Kilday VIA FAX: 407-375-6090 RE: Site Plan Review - Main Street Car Wash Site OUR PROJECT NO.: 900.2 ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- I am sorry for the delay in getting this memo to you. This memo contains the information we discussed by telephone last week. There were three topics discussed which are: 1. Site Plan Review Comment No. 3 on your memo of September 12, 1995. This comment refers to vines which were proposed on the south side of the planned buffer wall. Since the time of this comment, the plans have been amended and resubmitted to include a Cocoplum hedge along the entire south side of the wall. As the vines are no longer planned to be placed in this location, this comment should be deleted. 2. Staff Recommendation No. 5 on your memo of September 12, 1995. This recommendation which you have informed me was not a condition but a suggestion concerned the planting of vines on the north side (exterior) of the buffer wall. As I explained to you by telephone, the wall is to be built two feet (2') within my client's property line. There is an existing six foot (6') chain link fence already constructed and in place on the adjacent owner's property line. Therefore, there is no way to maintain any planting between the wall and the chain link fence on the north side of the property line. For that reason, my client is unable to comply with your suggestion. It is my understanding that this is not a condition and no further action needs to be taken. Please let me know if I'm wrong. 3. At the Planning Commission, I added a new request concerning the potential of a small storage building in the area which is hatched at the northeast corner of the existing car wash building. This area previously contained parking spaces which have been removed to meet code requirements. At the time that the