No preview available
 /
     
AGENDA DOCUMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-274 Agenda Memorandum for June 20, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager ........-;::;-'J I L FROM: Tambri J. Heyden I r-r Planning and Zonin Director DATE: June 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves PUD - NWSP #95-003 Recreation, entry wall signage and landscaping Please place the above-referenced request on the June 20, 1995 City com~ission agenda under D loym nt Plans. (J.-<Jl..<-.J DESCRIPTION: This s a request for site plan approval for Sausalito Groves, I ated the on the west side of Lawrence Road, approximately 400 eet north of Gatewway Boulevard. Sausali to Groves was annex into the city earlier this year. The submittal includes constr ction of entry wall signage, guardhouse, private recreation (cl bhouse, tennis court, shuffleboard court, swimming pool and pi nic area) common area lake plantings, buffer landscaping and entry feature landscaping. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1 vote, recommended approval of this request subject to all staff comments (utilities Department Memorandum #95-169, Fire Department Memorandum #95-264, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-170, Building Division Memorandum # 95-150 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum #95-245), with the. exception of Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum #95-260. The Recreation and Parks Department has determined that the picnic area proposed, which is one of the five recreational amenities to be provided to receive half credit towards the recreation fee, is not sufficient enough to be considered as one~~8 the five amenities because it will most likely not be used~ options offered by the Recreation and Parks Department are a covered pavilion for about four picnic tables and a barbecue pit for group picnics or a shaded, landscaped quiet area with a meandering sidewalk, connecting to the sidewalk on Lawrence Road, and two benchesi This information has been relayed to the developer, however commitment to one of these options was not yet received prior t the date of this memorandum. An update will be provided at the C mmission meeting. TJH:dim Attachment k--~. --jv ~ qL ~ r-iJ a:CCAllenMe.Sau 7.B.2 Sausalito Groves New Site Plan PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-258 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION June 8, 1995 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project Name: Sausalito Groves Applicant: Four Waves at Sausalito Place Ltd. Agent: H. P. Tompkins Jr. Location: The west side of Lawrence Road approxi-mately 400 feet north of Gateway Boulevard File No. : NWSP #95-003 Land Use Plan Designation: Moderate Density Residential (MDR) Zoninq Designation: PUD (Planned Unit Development) with an LUI of 5.0 Type of Use: Duplex units with private recreation facili- ties. Number of Units: 164 Duplex Units Square Footage: Site area Building Area: 31.517 acres 2,438 square feet Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning District: North - Nautica PUD (single-family homes) South - Gateway Boulevard and farther south is a mobile home park in unincorpo- rated Palm Beach County. South- east Single-family homes located in unin- corporated Palm Beach County. East Lawrence Road and farther east are Lawrence Lake PUD (single-family homes) and undeveloped land located in unincorporated Palm Beach County. West A mobile home park located in unin- corporated Palm Beach County. Existing Site Characteristics: Wooded land presently being cleared Proposed Development: Si te plan approval is requested for proj ect signage, guardhouse, a private recreation facili ty, to include tennis court, shuffle board court, pool, clubhouse and picnic area; associated parking and landscaping; and common area, lake area and buffer landscaping. I Page 2 Site Plan Report staff Report Memorandum #95-258 Sausalito Groves Concurrency: All levels of service were certified or ex~ empted (traffic only) at time of master plan approval which took place in Palm Beach County prior to January 1995 annexation into the City. Driveways: The recreation amenities are served by three parking areas. Each parking area has a two- way entrance from the private local streets within the PUD. Parking Facility: The recreation parking facility requires and will provide 38 spaces including two (2) handicapped accessible spaces. Landscaping: The parking facilities, the entrance gates, the perimeter of the PUD and the perimeter of the lake edge will fully meet code require- ments when staff comments are incorporated into the plans submitted for permit. Building and Site Regulations: Building and site regulations will be met when all department comments are incorporated into the plans submitted for permit. It should be noted that the recreation comment needs to be incorporated or additional fees are required. Community Design Plan: The clubhouse and guardhouse are of a Span- ish/Mediterranean style with an liS" tile roof and earth tone stuccoed walls. Darker earth tone raised stucco bands and fascia form the . accent color. Windsurf blue decorative lou- vers and shutters also accent these struc- tures. Signage: Two wall signs are proposed at each of the PUD's entrances at Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard. The entrance signage is illuminat- ed by ground mounted fluorescent fixtures. The color of the wall that the signs are mounted to will match the earth tone color of the walls of the recreation building. Indi- vidual aluminum letters, with a teal finish, are to be mounted on the wall. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS: Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding this request. DEPARTMENT ATTACHED MEMORANDUM Public Works utilities Fire Police Engineering Division BUilding Division Parks & Recreation Forester/Environmentalist Planning and Zoning N/A 95-169 95-264 N/A 95-170 95-150 95-260 N/A 95-245 ~ Page 3 Site plan Report Staff Report Memorandum #95-258 Sausalito Groves The above Department comments may be addressed on the permit set of drawings. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. a:SauaStf.Rpt 3 \ .oYAL MAI"OIl MOetU HONE ,.... .~puwnu~ .._~ ._ I""U... ..............."e.c.t . _ "'0 'J' '~7' I 0S' - , 1 ~s ~1 , : :: r; '~I '; : '::' ;.~ .:: ": ~ ~: ':1 '-;'; 'f;1)?/V- >.. '" 1 ~~ ~ r II r h . ~ ~ r 11 I h r i h r 11 ~ " I I:/~); / / m t'- .:f~~. - -- - -- - - - - - - '-- - -- - ibF-d ~",'J;;f//' -'-" . i t 12 I.~ ~ ",,--"""""'0"""" . . _.. . ..0"""'" . - "" I..:. ' ; I' l I-:M ....... ,-;... .. ... OJ_'''''''''' .'. ..... ... ... """0 ... 0...0'0'.'- . ""', ~>. \ _: ~ r~k lJ, ~ A Ir. ~ iI ;"i !~I- - if- ~~ I ':'P51 I;=~ ,FFt ~==-- ~\, "'\ "~-~ 1-: ~~___f :JJ~: ~_1 _: ; \ ~ ~ _~:JJ", I :~' _~ ~ '\', 1 " . ~ 'I ' · , "'~ --:' : , . .... ~ i I! .. I I - I I !L i I . ~ i I ... u;J;;J.J 1..-_: ~ ~ J, l=~ ! ' i : : 'I-. ~ , ~~ I ....-rr f~ II-" - I I k' i ..~.~~~~'~~~~.,..~ ~~j/J! l' ! I ! : ~ : _' I \ :~ - . Il":'.", ~,/ __oS, I l.-!.cl 1 I~ 'I : i-I : '- ~ ~____ :lI' I ./ 17 _.>' I,-c. I I ~ .....- D.' I !: t'~ ~.._........ · -1 I S I I I ~ " I i I ~: i ::.- w l I I ~ · I:l..-I. ", I, i I ! :.::l I. II I ,~l i i l~ljrt8:'l - iT - ~.. t ,', (jf'I;_-.:..cn-1 ;,~ 1 II ~ \i I '- ~ ~ I I ,/,/ S . I" . \ .,. ">,," ! -11 .1 I a I :< a '--L-:Il;,';;to w ./J. ~;':. -1 \,' " I '. \ ','" i "'UT I ' 'i . 'I ~: .. I , , I ~I- \\\ I '-, .1/, =.I... . i I II -: \ '- ~ I: \ . -__. ..:. ,i@l '/' (:[:f.:j; / 'FOJ,- 'I :; -' \ :~ - A \ i~ I ~~/I~' Yh~(~~:/~)'~" I . : I; 1 I\~: ~ .j (~, I:'~'~ Ii ; 'I ,: i,:11 ( ~ e h, i~ '\ / /' ....[ill i 1b. ill ~ c:', Ii ( 1'1 ."tf(~', ., ; '.. ''hJ! ',--. = iil'i Illi. ~ il! / 9~; '\ :'-:'i. '.. :I: 1 :,~ - i I; I J~~.;:.:;. 1/ ! I ...]]! I '~: " I I ~ , Ii :.0 'iI w"'l:;q i I~'i ~ :' ~ I ; '- ~ ~ 'I; T I I WI. a ,; I : I .=. " ~l I ~' \ . I ! ':::-..i. 1~fo"'" ..".- I : I ~ I i ~ I ; t I -.:. i_--=- ^ ~ 1':- II i II-. ~ I I I \' . I" ! IT - -= -.l - - '" - , I' \I ~' 7-... I V ~' - t I' I. \ \\ ~. /!~ I L o..;;L..';: ': I · :c III i' " t :~~" \\\J~ 11J!J S i : 1"-)') / --;-J il :i 1\., I : U'I: .. ,~..~~J - _!:I~~S0~J),' ~ ~ II !il \ I I I 1L -",. ..,,,,> ~ ,...'.-.--.-.-.......-..-...~~:II::: "'- I:' ; \ " . i5 - I' __ _ _.1 \ , C i ~ I J I " =. ~ 1) U ' ~~ ~', " 1 i i 11'1 ~ ~~...... '! I , N" w ;;11; ii ~ ~:I ',:", l l~.~J.l.:. :~. . ....:........L:~............................... - ...~~ :.- 4 j - I -- - -. - -- ~-- ---'~;:, ;. , i. ," "'" . ..... "f -"" .... :.:'"":: ..... .......... .......:._.. .. .0... IJ'35" . ~ ~ . .., m.. '0_" . LAwauoalCWO ' . ... "'........_ .... "" .................................. .~" ...:0:.. , 'I ..------..... U - u" -- .. u u ....---.... ....... ......., .., . ~ I -'~ :.J, ~ . \11l.H' t ,h ... . . i ~ WWi""" 1", . 1 . I i ~i 'I I ! I \ , 01~L__~~~ ~...,.. . ~~ PI.A(J l~~. \ ~ ~ . I · ...",...(( L( -. - , i . i / i ! i i i ; (<~~ ,1 i ~ ~ ; I ..................... i I ~ I , i I / i I i I / I , f I ,--- i I . , . I I . ; i I I , i ' - i : --+--L ; i , I , j , I . ; , I . ; , I . ; , I . ; I I : ; I l___':___ ; , i , i i I I-----~ ; I , '; 1 I ; I .\ i I I I 1 ; , \ I 1 ! I t \ \ i \ \ . , , , i I \ i \ \ l ! \ \ \ ~---'-" \ \ '-I- I \ \~ \ I \ \ \ I I \ I \ \\\ I I l \- t I - l~\ . I I l........- t \ \ 1!!rZ .. \ lAWl.1ICI aCMD SA\JL\LltO ft.A.CI LAWUNCI ROAD l!'ITay PLA~a . s0~ ..~~ s;l\ ~ ~......--- .......-....-...--- ..."',.. 5 . i ""'.'-.""'1. . .'-f....... . ............ ) ~ 0 r . :: ' 0"'_'0'_' ........ "'_'. A' ........ ...... I I .. ...-..--- -.'- , I i II, I 'I Ii i I ! i J I ! I II J i ! ! I il i I c I I i I . I I ;, I I I d; I ; '----- . L____ - - -------------------------- .-.............-.-.-.-... ... -,- -'- ... ... ... ... - ! t i , i i i i i i ; ; i i i i II . I I II II I~ ,. ..... !1!111111!!iiiili I , Iii I )Il~ I. t I I I ~ Jii;ir "I:,.n D' ~I I".. . J . , ... \ , '",. ~.~~ '. ~\U~' ~~M _ _.. ..... ..... aOcvnn _ . AI. 1IfTAI. . _ 1Uft'I.. IOU....,... ..... &oM....... lI'I'IIDIr , c, MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95-169 TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & ZOnin~D' ector John A. Guidry,' / Director of Utili lies \\ May 23, 1995 \J FROM: Date: SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves, Site Plan Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. No trees are permitted within utility easements, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). 2. No structures or appurtenances shall be allowed in utility easements, (App. C, Art. VIII, Sec. 9). 3. Please provide a copy of the plat with Utility Easements shown to the Utility Department for review. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File ? FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-264 WDC TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: May 22, 1995 RE: Sausalito Place (FKA Sausalito Groves) NW Corner Lawrence Rd & Gateway Blvd NWSP 95-003 We have no objection to what plans have been presented. It should be noted that NO water system plans have been presented. Fire hydrants are required to be no further than 200' to the center of a building. rJ~ < William D., r.,-:-.~" ".' m ~~ ~ a W ~~ : ,.J) , .~ IS ; n If '~') 1/' f; il. . d!; : d 'I: 23: 1001; ~ !..!0; " 'H.."""" i _._.,:"," .';8f__.. '. ..... ~ ""PL.A..c.::. ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-170 DATE: May 24.1995 TIl.;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR. FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 ~ SUBJECT: SAUSALITO GROVES - RECREATION AREA - 2nd REVIEW The following comments/recommendations are submitted for yourrevicw. If any of the code comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request a variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter 23, Section 3B (parking lots) ofthe city's Land Development Regulations. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but arc not limited to the following: Site lighting, Paving, Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control Devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D.. and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. COMMENTS 1, We recommend that the plan be forwarded to the P&D Board for their consideration. KRHlkrh c: William Hukill. Dev. Dir. sausrec.2rv ~ -~-'-----~--- , r: [71 [:--;---___ ., I J Ii ].;7 1':"1 ,-::::-r "-. .' . t ( i -? ~ " ~ q ~,....u oS. BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-150 May 23, 1995 From: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Milt Duff, Chief Plans Check Inspector To: Re: Sausalito Groves, Recreation Site Plan 631 feet west of Lawrence Road on Gateway Blvd. With reference to subject project, the Building Division offers the following comments which must be met at time of permitting: 1. State Handicap Code must be met. 2. Signs, if any, must be site approved and comply with the Boynton Beach Sign Code. The project can be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board. }n:.ll. :V ~ . Milt Duff MD:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director ,..... _0 ;. \ -,~-, , , .. /. \ \ \c, '23 . , Ti \ ' :;'L.:;:'il.{ '_J~' ~-- J I!"" ,.,.., . r:: .,,'. . -~~~~. ~\ A:SAtlSALIT.TRC 10 RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-260 TO: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator John Wildner. Parks Superintendent fJ Sausalito Groves PZLANNING AND ONING DEPt FROM: RE: DATE: June 9, 1995 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the revised master plan for Sausalito Groves. Discussions with the representative for the developer indicate that they plan to increase the level of private recreation provided in the family picnic area. They will be coordinating with this department prior to building permit to insure that they still qualify for one-half credit for private recreation provided. JW:ad II PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-245 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Site and Zoning Development Administrator DATE: June 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Site Plan Project: Location: Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan Sausalito Groves - Re~reation Site Plan Northwest corner Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road H.P. Tompkins, Jr. NWSP 95-003 Agen t : File No.: The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first review or new comments as a result of the second review. Compliance with these comments will not substantially alter the layout of the site improvements or design of the building. The second category is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics and function of the project. All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the Building Division for permits for the proposed project. I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. On the site plan identify and label the property lines of the recreation site, satellite parking area, recreation area and lake area. If these areas are a part of a larger plat identify on the plans the tract designation and perimeter. 2. Add to the tabular data the following: a) Parking requirements for the recreation site: List all facilities and identify the area of each. Calculate the required parking spaces for each and show calculation on the drawing. Note: Parking space computations shall be consistent with the parking ratios identified in the zoning code. b) Total parking spaces required and provided. 3. Dimension the width of the three ingress/egress access points to the parking areas. Note: The minimum width allowed for two-way access is 20 feet. 4. Specify on the elevation view drawings of the site wall, recreation building and guardhouse the color name, color designation or number and manufacturer's name of the colors proposed for each exterior material, exterior feature or product shown on the drawings. 6. Provide a note on the planting list that specifies that fifty (50%) percent, as required, of the total number of shrubs and trees required are native species. I~ Page 2 2nd Site Plan Review Sausalito Groves NWSP 95-003 7. Modify the landscape plan and plant list to indicate the trees that are required between the edge of the vehicle use area (parking lot) and the abutting right-of-way. show the trees spaced forty (40) feet on center along the right-of-way. To ensure the trees are properly spaced, show on the plan a typical forty (40) feet on center dimension. Use a distinguishable symbol to identify the. required trees on the plan. Provide a separate category on the plant list to identify the required trees. 8. Identify on the plans the length of the proposed site wall along the Lawrence Road, Gateway Boulevard and the internal roadway frontage of the project. 9. To properly evaluate whether the location of the proposed landscape material shown on the plans is acceptable, show on the landscape plan the location, type and size of all existing and proposed easements, including the location of overhead lines. 10. Show on the landscape the required vehicle use area screening (trees and shrubs) for the handicapped parking spaces located east of the recreation building. 11. Show and dimension on the landscape plan the line-of- sight triangles required on both sides of all ingress/egresses to parking facilities, and on both sides of the site's proj ect entrances at Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard. Also, specify the size of the unobstructed cross visibility space required within the triangular areas. 12. Add a statement to the landscape notes that indicates the code required spacing of plant material takes precedence over the quantity of plant material specified on the plans. 13. Please clarify whether the name of the project is Sausalito Place or Sausalito Groves. The plans and application contradict each other. Amend all documents accordingly. 14. Platting is required to develop the property. II RECOMMENDATIONS 15. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be used instead of shredded cypress mulch. 16. It is recommended that a sidewalk connection be made between the proposed cul-de-sac located west of the satellite parking spaces and the sidewalk located on the east side of the satellite parking spaces. NOTE: If recommendations are approved, they shall be incorporated into the working drawings required for permits for the project. MEH:dim xc: Central File a:2comBaU8.Mem 13 tOCATION f\ ~AP SAUSALITO GROVES r- __~J,.~ T1: . ~~.'I;? '<;~ 1[...- ~/TTTlr I TI I' -. . y I'~':)G oJ~ :,,;, ~ uc: 14 IFm'2:>.\ '\ f\ll r ,""" mlml'- ~\ ,'r' :ldi r t.. ~7 ' )-' (;:.w.~'...2:', V ' I ~ (cJrJ ~ I ./);\: ~ -~-[ J ) /. " , uJr _ ___ _ t ., l.b.:.:s. j? (;-,41'1'" I. 1. ~t:1 A ~ ,.._-~~ '/--1 . -r.=J~'dD-\.' ',=-- 8';'1 : I~ ," / ) ~L -:-", ~ ~: ~T,'tW~1 :.; -1'8 t:.r.' r~/jl1~ "eOV~TON t\: ~ 't1- ~ ~ ~t\th ! = I~JJ _ ~ " :..' T ~ r J,l ., I rTn~' r..".-r- , I' ';-r~ -Lnr'f'l"':" ''-: ~ I' '. ." I I::: . ~ 'j" ,~L J~.. U ,: I: ~c.'-L- NURSERIES' !. ';: :(/: ;>' r i::"'fl:<,' r i i - \ : E II ~ .,-Llf:~~~~,~l~~~; ,~.. L~~4~O ";~~US ~~~:.::i~ u ~ .. ; ; , h_ ---. SITE ~ ~ ~ ~ R1AA ~ ". TO- ,~ ..' ~. :....~ i'- - = - .~ i::CiJiitJiN$!!:::l r 11).~!Jl ~-: I: :.:.:.:........:.:.:.Q:P.tc:JSt.R~.:.:.:.:.:..' l < ~~>-::II i f. -.', . 1:1::::;:1:~:iijJ:I;:~::\::;1'::;1 U:,' ~ ~ G I . <:j .r'\ f(; , ' ",,,' b l:::= ~ I., - H ',~. i.-lUL ~ -:.:-. ~:~ n~,I, F l1;r, I: ~ I..... .JU I.:.".... . - · ... ~ "T-l ~[l /'~:" \11 ;~] I; CiJrn ~.lll!I.II!1111111111111," ], I [}i L'i "l · ~ r" J: U IF':=O~"'..J . '.. iI! 9! n , '. ~k-'-'.I! 16T"I:"lil,1 \ll~ .'" ,.~~,_f+~:,:",,;;u:::';"i:~ --- ';;'Eil fiiii\]( , ~"'[i-~"':'.TTI -V"r, OIlImtffittllf1~~: ..~I\I -<,,, 1111 1'1., II ri"i"f,n nr II 'I' rr I I T I.'! ITI TTJl: ~::aul I :::i,1 I 1Il,L ~ I T r"iz;r-n lJ "~IL rTTTTm ,_ ct. I ~. i 11JlLDJ I · · 'f=f '" u~ ttl:L11D : n n T 1 ' ,R1=€'.' E J1 /, , , [,-lITIJ r:r ~ .. l-h'1 nn" I:, ~~ . ;~~~lIn~!: - "" ~.____"_., m omm9JNIn~FL~;;.;lJr.D _u___~".," 'I -~T{'Y~;-:() .,': '":''!'Pl'-: '_ Tn~ j 17 j' !tr~T;:'.{[I'"JH.lE ,~ ".."r,; . '(..J. I ! II ,.t... ~. _ .. i '_~--, :.-:-rr r ;f'itL!E . ," r-r, .'. '''' 11 ILlJLI'~'1 . .:: .'.- I~"n;r:'"'''' . ~ r' . I - -T O' 1/8 MILES ./'/ j I' , I' . .}:. ~'!""""-i . .~'J't~- "2. ffi. .~.' -1 .1 I LIJ_.LJ ,.' }., I '-! . -1 -11 . J ~Hff' r-~-' . f" .. .. 1 '!) Isr I. j . , '" C) I ,_1 . . - .1. . :iT-. " . I '0 4( >0. . 800 FEET V rlq~":"; 1f2:"~F-~::;~wiHHUIL i! i :'~'JU . : I [~] ~ l~~'--- _.I-=1~ - - :~: r :~ ~ ::j t..- . " I , i ii, I '"r ~ ~ I-- r--. f- ~ 'e': I- I ~ c ""'" IT 111 ---~....;J X. LEGAL A. 1, 2, 3 cc: Planning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-380 Agenda Memorandum for January 3, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. HeYden'~.t Planning and Zoni~Director DATE: December 28, 1994 SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves (a.k.a. - Epstein Property) Annexation/Land Use Amendment/Rezoning - second reading of ordinances Please place the above referenced items on the January 3, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading. DESCRIPTION: At the December 20, 1994, City Commission meeting, a public hearing for the change in the zoning application from R-1 to PUD for Sausalito Groves, requested by the applicant, was held, as well as first reading of the ordinances to annex, amend the future land use and rezone. The requests were approved on first reading, subject to the fourteen (14) minor conditions listed on page 4 of planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-370, dated December 15, 1994. The applicant has agreed to the conditions and the rezoning ordinance has been modified to incorporate these conditions, as Exhibit "B". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these ordinances for second reading. tjh Attachments A:SGrvOrd2 X. LEGAL B.l, 2, 3 cc: Planning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-370 Agenda Memorandum for December 20, 1994 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie parker City Manager~ ~~~e ~ Planninq and Zo ing Director FROM: DATE: December 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves (Epstein Property) ANNX 94-003, LUAR 94-003 (Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning) please place the above-referenced rezoning request on the December 20, 1994, City Commission aqenda under Public Hearings and place the Sausalito Groves annexation, land use amendment and rezoning ordinances under Legal, Ordinances - First Reading. NATURE OF REOUEST This is a request to rezone a 31.517 acre parcel of land located apprOXimately 632 feet west of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road and approximately 412.95 feet north of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road (see attached location map - Exhibit "A"). The property is currently in unincorporated Palm Beach County, but is in process for annexation into the City. The current County land use and zoning are HR/8 (High Residential - maximum density eight dwelling units per acre) and RH (Multi- family Residential). The proposed .land use is Moderate Density Residential, allowing a maximum gross density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning is POO, Planned Unit Development, with an LUI (land use intensity) of 5.00. The zoning category originally proposed was R-1, Single-family Residential, allowing a net density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre (see attached Exhibit "B" for original staff report dated June 10, 1994, which among other things, describes the adjacent land uses). BACKGROUND As part of phase II, group I of the City'S annexation program which included the Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Heartland Health Care Center and Greentree plaza I properties, Sausalito Groves was reviewed by the Commission for land use amendment and rezoning on June 21, 1994 for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). At the June meeting, the property owner's representative stated that they objected to the proposed R-l, Single-family Residential, zoning designation, as it would not allow duplexes to be built and therefore, disregarded their Palm Beach County approval for a 164 duplex unit (82 residential bUildings) project. Palm Beach County's approval was received in Hay of this year to better market the property for sale. At the June meeting, staff pOinted out that the R-1 zoning district was selected to honor the property owner's Palm Beach County density approval of 5.2 dwellings per acre. Staff also pOinted out that the only City zoning category that would allow both the density and duplexes desired was PUD, Planned Unit Development, which requires a master plan to be approved as part of the zoning. It was agreed that a PUD rezoning application and master plan would be subsequently filed by the applicant to rezone the property to PUD, after the R-l zoning was approved. The applications, as presented at the June meeting, were transmitted to DCA. After receiving a favorable response from TO: Carrie Parker -2- December 15, 1994 DCA, adoption at first reading of the ordinances for annexation, land use amendment and rezoning was scheduled before the Commission on October 3, 1994. At that commission meeting, action on the Sausalito Groves ordinances was tabled and continued to be tabled until December 6, 1994, when it was stricken from the agenda. Action was tabled due to the property owner objecting again to the proposed zoning to R-1. While the applications were being reviewed by DCA, an application for rezoning to PUD was not received by the City and the property owner had entered into a purchase contract with a developer who wished to develop the property for duplexes. The developer is Four Waves Enterprises, Inc. who is currently building Princeton Place within the Windward PUD - scheduled for annexation public hearings next month. Since october, staff has met with the developer, the property owner's attorney and the developer's land planner to reach a compromise relative to the zoninq of the property and to ensure a level of comfort with the concept of a duplex project. To th~t end, staff initiated readvertising and renotification to property owners within 400 feet of the Sausalito Groves development (the developer has agreed to pay for" the cost of readvertisinq and renotification) and offers the attached POD master plan for ~ Commission consideration (see attached Exhibit "B"). ANALYSIS The attached master plan drawings, originally approved by Palm Beach county, have been revised by the applicant to include master plan information required by the City and to comply with City regulations and other area PUD'S within the City, to the greatest extent possible, without decreasing the density approved by the county. MINIMUM LOT SIZE, SETBACKS, AND LOT FRONTAGE - There are no minimum lot sizes, setbacks or frontages for PUDs. Each POD is evaluated separately and such development restrictions are established by submitting a master plan. The minimum lot size proposed for Sausalito Groves is 4,400 square feet. The smallest PUD lot size approved to date, within the City, is 4,000 square feet and was recently approved for the Boynton Nurseries PUD, immediately north of Sausalito Groves. The City's duplex zoning district (R-2) requires 4,500 square feet. The front building setback proposed is 15 feet (20 feet to the garage to provide a driveway that will satisfy the City's parking space requirements). This is the same front setback approved for Boynton Nurseries. The rear building setback proposed varies, but is no less than 12.5 feet. Boynton Nurseries was approved for no less than 10 feet. The minimum side setback is 7.5 feet; 10 feet is required in the R-2 district. The Lawrence Lake approval allowed a side setback of no less than 7.5 feet; Boynton Nurseries was approved at 10 feet. Regarding screened enclosures, the side setback will be no less than 7.5 feet and the rear setback no less than 5 feet. This is similar to Boynton Nurseries. The City'S PUD regulations do require that the setbacks for the PUD perimeter lots abutting another zoning district shall be the same as required in the abutting zone. The master plan complies with this requirement, with two exceptions, along the west PUD boundary, which abuts the Royal Manor mobile home park where the rear setback is 25 feet; Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet. The second exception is along the southeast PUD boundary, which abuts 11 homes on 1/2 acre lots on Floral Drive, where the rear setback of the north lots is no less than 125 feet and the side setback is 25 feet. Here Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet. TO: Carrie Parker -3- December 15, 1994 The PUD regulations also state that the setback for the PUD perimeter lots abuttinq a public right-of-way shall be the same as the front setback required in the zoning district the PUD most closely resembles. This would be the R-2 district which requires a 25 foot front setback. sausalito Groves is proposing a 25 foot setback from the public rights-of-way (Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard). RECREATION FACILITIES - Sausalito Groves is planning to provide private recreation to receive half credit towards the City's parks and recreation dedication requirement. The balance will be satisfied in fee equal to an amount equivalent to the value of 1.48 acres. The five private recreation amenities will be a clubhouse, pool, tennis courts, shuffleboard court and picnic area geared to an adult market. The City has a minimum size for each of these amenities which Sausalito Groves meets with the exception of the shuffleboard court and swimming pool. Parking is also required and provided, with a deficiency of one parking space. STREETS - Fifty foot wide rights-of-way are proposed which will be private due to secured entrances. The project entrance off of Lawrence Road is shown to have a gatehouse and the entrance off of Gateway Boulevard is shown to have a card qate. The rights- of-way taper out to 80 feet wide at the secured entrances. This is acceptable, provided they are security code activated systems for 24 hour access by police and fire personnel. The street pavement widths shown are 20 feet; the city requires a minimum of 22 feet. street lights will be provided. Although a cross-section is not provided, fifty foot wide rights-of-way are adequate to provide swales for pretreatment of drainaqe, required by the City, and sidewalks wh~ch are proposed on both sides of the street. A sidewalk will also be provided on Lawrence Road along the project frontage, as required. It is uncertain at this time whether water and sewer will be within the right-of-way or within an easement along the front of the lots. Cul-de-sac sizes are adequate for fire and sanitation vehicles and limited access easements are proposed along the PUD street frontages, as required. TRAFFIC - A copy of the traffic study submitted to Palm Beach County in April was provided to staff yesterday. It indicates that no additional trips will be generated beyond what the property was vested for under a previous approval and is concurrency exempt. It also states that no additional turn lanes at the project entrances or internal roadway intersections are warranted. However, it is not known whether Palm Beach County required additional turn lanes for safety reasons. staff is in the process of getting that information from Palm Beach County. LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS - The property is currently an old orange grove. Tree preservation is proposed where determined feasible by the City Forester at time of preliminary plat approval (the next step in the process after annexation). Littoral zone plantinqs are proposed around the water management tract, as required. Perimeter PUD buffers and buffers along public and private rights-of-way are proposed. These buffers are proposed within easements and not within a separate tract as was approved for Boynton Nurseries and woolbright Place. However, one difference is that these buffers are not separate from required rear setbacks. The buffers along the private rights-of-way will be ten feet wide. The buffers along the public rights-of-way will be fifteen feet wide (increased from ten feet at the request of staff) with a six foot high wall, trees planted 30 feet on center and a hedge. The buffers along Royal Hanor mobile home park and Boynton Nurseries are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet TO: Carrie Parker -4- December 15, 1994 on center and a hedge. The buffers along the Floral Drive lots are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet on center, to include a five foot high chain link fence with a hedge (integrated fence/hedqe combination proposed at the request of staff) . RECOMMENDATION The developer has worked diligently with staff to produce the proposed master plan. In the spirit of compromise to further the goals of the City's annexation program, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the attached sausalito Groves master plan for rezoning to PUD, subject to the following conditions which shall be noted on four sets of revised master plan drawings, prior to preliminary plat submission: 1. Indicate that the existing rights-of-way for Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road are consistent with the ultimate right-of-way, since the riqht-of-way dedication is complete. 2. Secured entrances shall install a security code activated system. ~ 3. Site plan approval shall be required for the private recreation area, security system, common area landscaping, buffers, and project signaqe. 4. Delete reference to "pad area". 5. Safe corners shall comply with Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting, Article X, Section 7 of the city's Code of Ordinances. 6. Additional turn lanes shall be provided at project entrances if Palm Beach county required them as part of their approval of the project. 7. The number of recreation parking spaces required is 25.12 (i.e. - 26) and provided is 25. 8. street pavement width shall be a minimum of 22 feet on all internal rights-of-way. 9. Correct the dimension of the front, minimum building setback of 15 feet, so it corresponds to the details and chart provided. 10. Indicate that the landscape buffer easement on the perimeter lot detail is five feet and add lot 92 to those identified as perimeter lots. 11. Add lots 1, 20, 84 and 86 to those identified as right-of- way lots. (Lots 1 and 84 are also corner lots and lots 20 and 86 are also perimeter lots.) 12. Add lots 124 and 125 to those identified as corner lots. 13. Indicate that the three foot easement on each lot is for drainage and maintenance of the building overhang. 14. Provide a survey of the property. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:SausGRez X. LEGAL B .1 cc: Plan ORDINANCE NO. 094- Ij AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE EPSTEIN (A. K.A SAUSALITO GROVES) PROPERTY (NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD) ANNEXING CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED TRACTS OF LAND THAT ARE CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LIMITS WITHIN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THAT WILL, UPON ANNEXATION, CONSTITUTE A REASONABLY COMPACT ADDITION TO THE CITY TERRITORY, PURSUANT TO A PETITION OF THE OWNER OF SAID TRACT OF LAND, REQUESTING ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE I, SECTION 7 (32) OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AND SECTIONS 171.044, AND 171.062(2), FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING THE PROPER LAND USE DESIGNATION AND PROPER ZONING OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE REFLECTED IN SEPARATE ORDINANCES TO BE PASSED SIMULTANEOUSLY HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION. II 'I i II WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach requires the development of an Annexation Program; WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach, through the ~. . Annexation Program, has identified adjacent properties that are the subj ects of agreements for water service with the City; WHBREAS, said agreements for water service are also Ii considered voluntary petitions for annexation pursuant to Florida Statutes, which can be executed by the City of Boynton Beach at any time such properties are eligible for annexation according to Florida Statutes; WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach hereby exercises its I option to annex the following tracts of land as hereinafter I I described, in accordance with Article I, Section 7 (32) of the 'i Charter of the City and Section 171.044, and 171.062(2) Florida Statutes: and WHEREAS, said tracts of land lying and being within Palm I I I Beach County are contiguous to the existing City limits of the I II / City of Boynton Beach, Florida and will, upon its annexation, constitute a reasonably compact addition to the City d territory. NOW, THEREPORE, BB IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CODISSION OP THB CITY OF BOYNTON BBACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to Article I, Section 7 (32) of the Charter of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida and Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, the fOllowing described unincorporated and contiguous tracts of land situated and lying and being in the County of Palm Beach, Florida, to wit: Tracts -A- and -8-, Sausalito Groves, Plat Book 60, Page 44 according to the public records of Palm Beach, Florida, less South 4.30 feet for Road R/W. Containing 31.34 acres more or less, and subject to easements, reservations or R/W of record. Together with Lawrence Road R/W abutting east thereof and Gateway Boulevard R/W abutting South thereof. are hereby annexed to the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, and such land so annexed shall be and become part of the City with the same force and effect as though the same had been originally incorporated in the territorial boundaries thereof. Section 2: That Section 6 and 6(a) of the Charter of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to reflect the annexation of said tracts of land more particularly described in Section 1 of this Ordinance. Sect ion 3: That by Ordinances adopted simultaneously herewith, the proper City zoning designation and Land Use category is being determined as contemplated in Section 171.162(2) Florida Statutes. Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 6: This Ordinance shall not be passed until the same has been advertised for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, as required by the City Charter and Section 171.044, Florida Statut~s. S~ction 7: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding the corresponding amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S.,; or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding the corresponding amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order 21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if during th~ 2l-day period no petitions are filed challenging the corresponding Plan amendment. Once issued, the Notice of Intent shall be attached hereto as Exhibit .A. and made a part of this ordinance by reference. S~ction 8: Specific authority is hereby given to codify this Ordinance. S~ction 9: This Ordinance, after adoption, shall be filed with the Clerk of . the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. FIRST READING this day of SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this , 1994. , 1994. day of CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mayor Vice Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Commissioner Commissioner ATTEST: City Clerk (Corporate Seal) : EPSTAX_ORC ORDINANCE NO. 094- X. LEGAL B.2 cc: Plan I, II I' II " AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE EPSTEIN (A.K.A. SAUSALITO GROVES) PROPERTY (NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD) AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 OF SAID CITY BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY BY ADOPTING THE PROPER LAND USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND DESIGNATION IS BEING CHANGED FROM HIGH RESIDENTIAL 8 TO MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use Element by Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act; and WHEREAS, certain tracts of land more particularly described hereinafter are being annexed by the City in accordance with the application completed by the City for the owner of the following property, pursuant to the Annexation Program, by Ordinance being adopted simultaneously herewith; and WHBRBAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future Land Use Element of a Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, has been followed; and I I ,I II Commission deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of WHEREAS, after public hearing and study, the City said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the Comprehensive Plan as adopted by the City herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BB IT ORDAINED BY THB CITY COIOlISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section I: Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby amended to reflect the following: land is more particularly described as follows: Tracts .A. and "B", Sausalito Groves, Plat Book 60, Page 44. Less South 4.30 feet for Road R/W. Containing 31.34 acres more or less, and subject to easements, reservations or R/W I' , of record. Together with Lawrence Road R/W abutting east thereof and Gateway Boulevard R/W abutting South Section 2: That any maps adopted in accordance with the Future Land Use Element of said Comprehensive Plan shall be amended accordingly. Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding this amendment to be in compliance ~ in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S.,; or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding this amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order 21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if during the 21-day period" no petitions are filed challenging the amendment. Once issued, the Notice of Intent shall be attached hereto as Exhibit MAM and made a part of this ordinance by reference. FIRST READING this day of December, 1994. II SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this day of , 1994. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mayor Vice Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Commissioner Commissioner ATTEST: City Clerk (Corporate Seal) I ORDINANCE NO. 094- X. LEGAL A.3 cc: Planning AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE EPSTEIN (A.K.A. SAUSALITO GROVES) PROPERTY (NORTHWEST CORNER OF LAWRENCE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD) AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70 OF SAID CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN TRACTS OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM COUNTY RM (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton , 'I Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No. 91-70, l.n which a II Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, in accordance with its Annexation Program, is simultaneously herewith adopting an Ordinance annexing certain tracts of land; and I' I aforesaid Annexation Program, has heretofore filed a Petition, II WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach, in connection with pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, for the purpose of rezoning certain tracts of land consisting of 31.34 acres located adjacent to the municipal limits of said City, said land being more particularly described hereinafter, from RM Multi-Family Residential to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) L. U . I = 5, which requests that the 31.34-acre tracts be removed from the boundaries of the RM zone to allow for the processing of the rezoning application; WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BB IT ORDAINED BY THB CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: The following described land, located in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to-wit: I' ,I , ~ Tracts "A" and "B", Sausalito Groves, Plat Book 60, Page 44. Less South 4.30 feet for Road R/W. Containing 31.34 acres more or less, and subject to easements, reservations or R/W of record. Together with Lawrence Road R/W abutting east thereof and Gateway Boulevard R/W abutting South be and the same l.S hereby rezoned from RM Multi-Family Residential (Palm Beach County) to Planned Unit Development, (City of Boynton Beach) L.U.I = 5, in accordance with the Master Plan drawings prepared by Kilday & Assoc., #94-16, XR 88-22, last revised 12/13/94, on file in the Planning and Zoning Department and subject to the conditions listed in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 94-370 attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this Ordinance. A location map is attached hereto as Exhibit .B" and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City shall be amended accordingly. Section 3: All ordi'nances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding the corresponding amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S.,; or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding the corresponding amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order 21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if during the 21-day period no petitions are filed challenging Ij the corresponding Plan amendment. Once issued, the Notice of Intent shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part 'I 'I of this c .inance by reference. FIRST READING this day of , 1994. SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this day of , 1995. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mayor vice Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Corranissioner Corranissioner ATTEST: City Clerk (Corporate Seal) A:EPSTRZ.CRD Rev. 1212/94 12130/94 (Annexation Agrl II X. LEGAL B.l, 2, 3 cc: Planning PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-370 Agenda Memorandum for December 20, 1994 City Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker city Manager~ ~~ e ?vi Planning and Zo ing Director December 15, 1994 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves (Epstein Property) ANNX 94-003, LUAR 94-003 (Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning) please place the above-referenced rezoning request on the December 20, 1994, City Commission agenda under Public Hearings and place the sausalito Groves annexation, land use amendment and rezoning ordinances under Leqal, Ordinances - First Reading. . NATURE-OF REOUEST ( This is a request to rezone a 31.517 acre parcel of land located approximately 632 feet west of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road and approximately 412.95 feet north of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road (see attached location map - Exhibit "A"). The property is currently in unincorporated Palm Beach County, but is in process for annexation into the City. The current County land use and zoning are HR/8 (High Residential _ maximum density eight dwelling units per acre) and RM (Multi- family Residential). The proposed land use is Moderate Density Residential, allowing a maximum gross density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning is POO, Planned Unit Development, with an LUI (land use intensity) of 5.00. The zoning category originally proposed was R-1, single-family Residential, allowing a net density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre (see attached Exhibit "B" for original staff report dated June 10, 1994, which among other things, describes the adjacent land uses). BACKGROUND ( As part of phase II, group I of the City's annexation program which included the Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Heartland Health Care Center and Greentree plaza I properties, Sausalito Groves was reviewed by the Commission for land use amendment and rezoning on June 21, 1994 for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). At the June meeting, the property owner's representative stated that they objected to the proposed R-1, single-family Residential, zoning designation, as it would not allow duplexes to be built and therefore, disregarded their Palm Beach County approval for a 164 duplex unit (82 residential buildings) project. Palm Beach County's approval was received in May of this year to better market the property for sale. At the June meetinq, staff pointed out that the R-1 zoning district was selected to honor the property owner's Palm Beach County density approval of 5.2 dwellings per acre. Staff also pointed out that the only City zoning category that would allow both the density and duplexes desired was PUD, planned Unit Development, which requires a master plan to be approved as part of the zoning. It was agreed that a PUD rezoning application and master plan would be subsequently filed by the applicant to rezone the property to PUD, after the R-1 zoning was approved. The applications, as presented at the June meeting, were transmitted to DCA. After receiving a favorable response from TO: Carrie Parker -2- December 15, 1994 DCA, adoption at first reading of the ordinances for annexation, land use amendment and rezoning was scheduled before the Commission on October 3, 1994. At that Commission meeting, action on the Sausalito Groves ordinances was tabled and continued to be tabled until December 6, 1994, when it was stricken from the agenda. Action was tabled due to the property owner objecting again to the proposed zoning to R-l. While the applications were being reviewed by DCA, an application for rezoning to PUD was not received by the City and the property owner had entered into a purchase contract with a developer who wished to develop the property for duplexes. The developer is Four Waves Enterprises, Inc. who is currently building Princeton Place within the Windward PUD - scheduled for annexation public bearings next month. Since October, staff has met with the developer, the property owner's attorney and the developer'S land planner to reach a compromise relative to the zoning of the property and to ensure a level of comfort with the concept of a duplex project. To that end, staff initiated readvertising and renotification to property owners within 400 feet of the sausalito Groves development (the developer has agreed to pay for the cost of readvertising and renotification) and offers the attached PUD master plan for ( commission consideration (see attached Exhibit "B"). ANALYSIS The attached master plan drawinqs, originally approved by Palm Beach County, have been revised by the applicant to include master plan information required by the City and to comply with City regulations and other area PUD's within the City, to the greatest extent possible, without decreasing the density approved by the County. MINIMUM LOT SIZE, SETBACKS, AND LOT FRONTAGE - There are no minimum lot sizes, setbacks or frontages for PUDs. Each POD 1s evaluated separately and such development restrictions are established by submitting a master plan. The minimum lot size proposed for Sausalito Groves 1s 4,400 square feet. The smallest PUD lot size approved to date, within the City, is 4,000 square feet and was recently approved for the Boynton Nurseries PUD, immediately north of Sausalito Groves. The City's duplex zoninq district (R-2) requires 4,500 square feet. The front bUilding setback proposed is 15 feet (20 feet to the garage to prOVide a driveway that will satisfy the city's parking space requirements). This is the same front setback approved for Boynton Nurseries. The rear building setback proposed varies, but is no less than 12.5 feet. Boynton Nurseries was approved for no less than 10 feet. The minimum side setback is 7.5 feet; 10 feet is reqUired in the R-2 district. The Lawrence Lake approval allowed a side setback of no less than 7.5 feet; Boynton Nurseries was approved at 10 feet. Regarding screened enclosures, the side setback will be no less than 7.5 feet and the rear setback no less than 5 feet. This is similar to Boynton Nurseries. (. The City's PUD regulations do require that the setbacks for the PUD perimeter lots abutting another zoning district shall be the same as required in the abutting zone. The master plan complies with this requirement, with two exceptions, along the west PUD boundary, which abuts the Royal Hanor mobile home park where the rear setback is 25 feet; Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet. The second exception is along the southeast PUD boundary, which abuts 11 homes on 1/2 acre lots on Floral Drive, where the rear setback of the north lots 1s no less than 125 feet and the side setback is 25 feet. Here Sausal1to Groves is proposing 15 feet. TO: Carrie Parker -3- December 15, 1994 The PUD. regulations also state that the setback for the PUD perimeter lots abutting a public riqht-of-way shall be the same as the front setback required in the zoning district the PUD most closely resembles. This would be the R-2 district which requires a 2S foot front setback. sausalito Groves is proposing a 2S foot setback from the public rights-of-way (Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard). RECREATION FACILITIES - Sausalito Groves is planning to provide private recreation to receive half credit towards the city's parks and recreation dedication requirement. The balance will be satisfied in fee equal to an amount equivalent to the value of 1.48 acres. The five private recreation amenities will be a clubhouse, pool, tennis courts, shuffleboard court and picnic area geared to an adult market. The city has a minimum size for each of these amenities which Sausalito Groves meets with the exception of the shuffleboard court and swimming pool. Parking is also required and provided, with a deficiency of one parking space. STREETS - Fifty foot wide rights-of-way are proposed which will be private due to secured entrances. The project entrance off of Lawrence Road is shown to have a gatehouse and the entrance off of Gateway Boulevard is shown to have a card gate. The rights- of-way taper out to 80 feet wide at the secured entrances. This is acceptable, provided they are security code activated systems for 24 hour access by police and fire personnel. The street pavement widths shown are 20 feet; the City requires a minimum of 22 feet. street lights will be provided. Although a cross-section is not provided, fifty foot wide rights-of-way are adequate to provide swales for pretreatment of drainage, required by the City, and sidewalks which are proposed on both sides of the street. A sidewalk will also be provided on Lawrence Road along the project frontage, as required. It is uncertain at this time whether water and sewer will be within the right-of-way or within an easement along the front of the lots. Cul-de-sac sizes are adequate for fire and sanitation vehicles and limited access easements are proposed along the PUD street frontages, as required. TRAFFIC - A copy of the traffic study submitted to Palm Beach County in April was provided to staff yesterday. It indicates that no additional trips will be generated beyond what the property was vested for under a previous approval and is concurrency exempt. It also states that no additional turn lanes at the project entrances or internal roadway intersections are warranted. However, it is not known whether Palm Beach County required additional turn lanes for safety reasons. Staff is in the process of getting that information from Palm Beach County. LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS - The property is currently an old orange grove. Tree preservation is proposed where determined feasible by the City Forester at time of preliminary plat approval (the next step in the process after annexation). Littoral zone plantings are proposed around the water management tract, as required. Perimeter PUD buffers and buffers along public and private rights-of-way are proposed. These buffers are proposed within easements and not within a separate tract as was approved for Boynton Nurseries and Woolbright Place. However, one difference is that these buffers are not separate from required rear setbacks. The buffers along the private rights-of-way will be ten feet wide. The buffers along the public rights-of-way will be fifteen feet wide (increased from ten feet at the request of staff) with a six foot high wall, trees planted 30 feet on center and a hedge. The buffers along Royal Manor mobile home park and Boynton Nurseries are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet TO: carrie Parker -4- December 15, 1994 on center and a hedge. The buffers along the Floral Drive lots are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet on center, to include a five foot high chain link fence with a hedge (integrated fence/hedqe combination proposed at the request of staff) . RECOMMENDATION The developer has worked diligently with staff to produce the proposed master plan. In the spirit of compromise to further the goals of the City's annexation program, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the attached Sausalito Groves master plan for rezoning to POO, subject to the following conditions which shall be noted on four sets of revised master plan drawings, prior to preliminary plat submission: 1. Indicate that the existing rights-of-way for Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road are consistent with the ultimate right-of-way, since the right-of-way dedication is complete. 2 . secured entrances shall install a security code activated system. ( 3. Site plan approval shall be required for the private recreation area, security system, common area landscaping, buffers, and project siqnage. 4. Delete reference to "pad area". 5. Safe corners shall comply with Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting, Article X, Section 7 of the city's Code of Ordinances. ~ ' 6. Additional turn lanes shall be provided at project entrances if Palm Beach County required them as part of their approval of the project. 7. The number of recreation parking spaces required is 25.12 (i.e. - 26) and provided is 25. 8. Street pavement width shall be a minimum of 22 feet on all internal rights-of-way. 9. Correct the dimension of the front, minimum bUilding setback of 15 feet, so it corresponds to the details and chart provided. 10. Indicate that the landscape buffer easement on the perimeter lot detail is five feet and add lot 92 to those identified as perimeter lots. 11. Add lots 1, 20, 84 and 86 to those identified as right-of- way lots. (Lots 1 and 84 are also corner lots and lots 20 and 86 are also perimeter lots.) 12. Add lots 124 and 125 to those identified as corner lots. 13. Indicate that the three foot easement on each lot is for drainaqe and maintenance of the building overhang. 14. Provide a survey of the property. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:SausGRez ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-370 Agenda Memorandum for December 20, 1994 City Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker City Manager~ - - Z ~ L-jt.Y7 ?J ~iIVJ. ~ e Planning and Zo ing Director TO: DATE: December 15, 1994 SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves (Epstein Property) ANNX 94-003, LUAR 94-003 (Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning) Please place the above-referenced rezoning request on the December 20, 1994, city Commission agenda under Public Hearings and place the Sausalito Groves annexation, land use amendment and rezoning ordinances under Leqal, Ordinances - First Reading. NATURE OF REOUEST This is a request to rezone a 31.517 acre parcel of land located approximately 632 feet west of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road and approximately 412.95 feet north of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road (see attached location map - Exhibit "A"). The property is currently in unincorporated Palm Beach County, but is in process for annexation into the City. The current County land use and zoninq are HR/8 (High Residential - maximum density eight dwelling. units per acre) and RM (Multi- family Residential). The proposed land use is Moderate Density Residential, allowing a maximum gross density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning is PUD, Planned Unit Development, with an LUI (land use intensity) of 5.00. The zoning category originally proposed was R-l, single-family Residential, allowing a net density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre (see attached Exhibit "B" for original staff report dated June 10, 1994, which among other things, describes the adjacent land uses). BACKGROUND As part of phase II, group I of the City's annexation program which included the Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Heartland Health Care Center and Greentree Plaza I properties, Sausalito Groves was reviewed by the Commission for land use amendment and rezoning on June 21, 1994 for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). At the June meeting, the property owner's representative stated that they objected to the proposed R-1, single-family Residential, zoning designation, as it would not allow duplexes to be built and therefore, disregarded their Palm Beach County approval for a 164 duplex unit (82 residential bUildings) project. Palm Beach County's approval was received in May of this year to better market the property for sale. At the June meeting, staff pointed out that the R-l zoning district was selected to honor the property owner's Palm Beach County density approval of 5.2 dwellings per acre. Staff also pointed out that the only City zoning category that would allow both the density and duplexes desired was PUD, Planned Unit Development, which requires a master plan to be approved as part of the zoning. It was agreed that a PUD rezoning application and master plan would be subsequently filed by the applicant to rezone the property to PUD, after the R-1 zoning was approved. The applications, as presented at the June meeting, were transmitted to DCA. After receiving a favorable response from TO: Carrie Parker -2- Dec~mber 15, 1994 DCA, adoption at first reading of the ordinances for annexation, land use amendment and rezoning was scheduled before the Commission on october 3, 1994. At that Commission meeting, action on the Sausalito Groves ordinances was tabled and continued to be tabled until December 6, 1994, when it was stricken from the agenda. Action was tabled due to the property owner objecting again to the proposed zoning to R-1. While the applications were being reviewed by DCA, an application for rezoning to PUD was not received by the City and the property owner had entered into a purchase contract with a developer who wished to develop the property for duplexes. The developer is Four Waves Enterprises, Inc. who is currently building Princeton Place within the Windward PUD - scheduled for annexation public hearings next month. Since October, staff has met with the developer, the property owner's attorney and the developer's land planner to reach a compromise relative to the zoning of the property and to ensure a level of comfort with the concept of a duplex project. To that end, staff initiated readvertising and renotification to property owners within 400 feet of the Sausalito Groves development (the developer has aqreed to pay for the cost of readvertising and renotification) and offers the attached PUD master plan for Commission consideration (see attached Exhibit "B"). ANALYSIS The attached master plan drawings, originally approved by Palm Beach County, have been revised by the applicant to include master plan information required by the City and to comply with City regulations and other area PUD's within the City, to the greatest extent possible, without decreasing the density approved by the County. MINIMUM LOT SIZE, SETBACKS, AND LOT FRONTAGE - There are no minimum lot sizes, setbacks or frontages for PUDs. Each PUD is evaluated separately and such development restrictions are established by submitting a master plan. The minimum lot size proposed for Sausalito Groves is 4,400 square feet. The smallest PUD lot size approved to date, within the City, is 4,000 square feet and was recently approved for the Boynton Nurseries PUD, immediately north of Sausalito Groves. The City'S duplex zoning district (R-2) requires 4,500 square feet. The front building setback proposed is 15 feet (20 feet to the garage to provide a driveway that will satisfy the City's parking space requirements). This is the same front setback approved for Boynton Nurseries. The rear bUilding setback proposed varies, but is no less than 12.5 feet. Boynton Nurseries was approved for no less than 10 feet. The minimum side setback is 7.5 feet; 10 feet is required in the R-2 district. The Lawrence Lake approval allowed a side setback of no les8 than 7.5 feet; Boynton Nurseries was approved at 10 feet. Regarding screened enclosures, the side setback will be no less than 7.5 feet and the rear setback no less than 5 feet. This is similar to Boynton Nurseries. The City's PUD regulations do require that the setbacks for the PUD perimeter lots abutting another zoning district shall be the same as required in the abutting zone. The master plan complies with this requirement, with two exceptions, along the west PUD boundary, which abuts the Royal Manor mobile home park where the rear setback is 25 feet; Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet. The second exception is along the southeast PUD boundary, which abuts 11 homes on 1/2 acre lots on Floral Drive, where the rear setback of the north lots is no less than 125 feet and the side setback is 25 feet. Here Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet. TO: Carrie Parker -3- December 15, 1994 The PUD regulations also state that the setback for the PUD perimeter lots abutting a public right-of-way shall be the same as the front setback required in the zoning district the PUD most closely resembles. This would be the R-2 district which requires a 25 foot front setback. Sausalito Groves is proposing a 25 foot setback from the public rights-of-way (Lawrence Road and Gateway Boulevard) . RECREATION FACILITIES - Sausalito Groves is planning to provide private recreation to receive half credit towards the city's parks and recreation dedication requirement. The balance will be satisfied in fee equal to an amount equivalent to the value of 1.48 acres. The five private recreation amenities will be a clubhouse, pool, tennis courts, shuffleboard court and picnic area geared to an adult market. The city has a minimum size for each of these amenities which Sausalito Groves meets with the exception of the shuffleboard court and swimming pool. Parking is also required and provided, with a deficiency of one parking space. STREETS - Fifty foot wide rights-of-way are proposed which will be private due to secured entrances. The project entrance off of Lawrence Road is shown to have a gatehouse and the entrance off of Gateway Boulevard is shown to have a card gate. The rights- of-way taper out to 80 feet wide at the secured entrances. This is acceptable, provided they are security code activated systems for 24 hour access by police and fire personnel. The street pavement widths shown are 20 feet; the City requires a minimum of 22 feet. Street lights will be provided. Although a cross-section is not provided, fifty foot wide rights-of-way are adequate to provide swales for pretreatment of drainage, required by the City, and sidewalks which are proposed on both sides of the street. A sidewalk will also be provided on Lawrence Road along the project frontage, as required. It is uncertain at this time whether water and sewer will be within the right-of-way or within an easement along the front of the lots. Cul-de-sac sizes are adequate for fire and sanitation vehicles and limited access easements are proposed along the PUD street frontages, as required. TRAFFIC - A copy of the traffic study submitted to Palm Beach County in April was provided to staff yesterday. It indicates that no additional trips will be generated beyond what the property was vested for under a previous approval and is concurrency exempt. It also states that no additional turn lanes at the project entrances or internal roadway intersections are warranted. However, it is not known whether Palm Beach County required additional turn lanes for safety reasons. staff is in the process of getting that information from Palm Beach county. LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS - The property is currently an old orange grove. Tree preservation is proposed where determined feasible by the City Forester at time of preliminary plat approval (the next step in the process after annexation). Littoral zone plantings are proposed around the water management tract, as required. Perimeter PUD buffers and buffers alonq public and private rights-of-way are proposed. These buffers are proposed within easements and not within a separate tract as was approved for Boynton Nurseries and Woolbright Place. However, one difference is that these buffers are not separate from required rear setbacks. The buffers along the private rights-of-way will be ten feet wide. The buffers along the public rights-of-way will be fifteen feet wide (increased from ten feet at the request of staff) with a six foot high wall, trees planted 30 feet on center and a hedge. The buffers along Royal Manor mobile home park and Boynton Nurseries are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet TO: Carrie Parker -4- December 15, 1994 on center and a hedge. The buffers along the Floral Drive lots are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet on center, to include a five foot high chain link fence with a hedge (integrated fence/hedge combination proposed at the request of staff) . RECOMMENDATION The developer has worked diligently with staff to produce the proposed master plan. In the spirit of compromise to further the goals of the City's annexation proqram, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the attached sausalito Groves master plan for rezoning to PUD, subject to the following conditions which shall be noted on four sets of revised master plan drawings, prior to preliminary plat submission: 1. Indicate that the existing rights-of-way for Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road are consistent with the ultimate right-of-way, since the right-of-way dedication is complete. 2. Secured entrances shall install a security code activated system. 3. Site plan approval shall be required for the private recreation area, security system, common area landscaping, buffers, and project signage. 4. Delete reference to "pad area". 5. Safe corners shall comply with Appendix C - Subdivisions, Platting, Article X, Section 7 of the City's Code of Ordinances. 6. Additional turn lanes shall be provided at project entrances if Palm Beach county required them as part of their approval of the project. 7. The number of recreation parking spaces required is 25.12 (i.e. - 26) and provided is 25. 8. Street pavement width shall be a minimum of 22 feet on all internal rights-of-way. 9. Correct the dimension of the front, minimum building setback of 15 feet, so it corresponds to the details and chart provided. 10. Indicate that the landscape buffer easement on the perimeter lot detail is five feet and add lot 92 to those identified as perimeter lots. 11. Add lots 1, 20, 84 and 86 to those identified as right-of- way lots. (Lots 1 and 84 are also corner lots and lots 20 and 86 are also perimeter lots.) 12. Add lots 124 and 125 to those identified as corner lots. 13. Indicate that the three foot easement on each lot is for drainaqe and maintenance of the building overhang. 14. Provide a survey of the property. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:SausGRez NOTICE OF NOTICE LAND USE OF ZONING CHANGE CHANGE The Ci t"y of Boynton Beach proposes to annex, change the use of land, and rezone the area shown on the map in this advertisement. A public hearinq on these proposals will be held before the city Commission on December 20, 1994 at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter as the agenda permits. This pUblic hearing will be held in the City Commission Chambers in the City of Boynton Beach city Hall at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida. a ~ Ir W I ::5 T w ..J ~ ~ q Q ~ SITE CITY UMIT8- BOYNTON CANAL C-18 CD .. .... f\....... ,f. OLD BOYNTON ROAD ~ m o w m 00 !:i I; I:J91 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. REQUEST: Maurice Epstein, Trustee 31.34 acres at the northwest corner of Lawrence Rd and NW 22nd Avenue (Gateway Blvd.) ANNEXATION: Ordinance No. 094-38 (proposed) AMEND FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: ~ From - HR/8 High Residential 8 (County) To - Moderate Density Residential (City) REZONE: From - RM-SE Multi-Family Residential (County) To - PUD Planned Unit Development (City) PETITIONER: LOCATION: REQUEST: REQUEST: A copy of the app::'ication~nnexation, land use pl. amendment, and rezoning, and the legal descriptions are available for review by the publ ic in the planning and Zoning Department and in the Office of the City Clerk. All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearings in person or by attorney and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Planning and Development Board and City Commission with respect to any matter considered at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purposes, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. CMC/AAE ~ SUZANNE M. KRUSE, CITY CLERK CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR~DA ..N.Z'r'.TNIII....1l PUBLISH: BOYNTON BEACH ~EWS DECEMBER 2 and 13, 1994. c: City Mgr, City Attorney, City Commission, Planning, Files