AGENDA DOCUMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-274
Agenda Memorandum for
June 20, 1995 city Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
........-;::;-'J I L
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden I r-r
Planning and Zonin Director
DATE: June 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves PUD - NWSP #95-003
Recreation, entry wall signage and landscaping
Please place the above-referenced request on the June 20, 1995 City
com~ission agenda under D loym nt Plans.
(J.-<Jl..<-.J
DESCRIPTION: This s a request for site plan approval for
Sausalito Groves, I ated the on the west side of Lawrence Road,
approximately 400 eet north of Gatewway Boulevard. Sausali to
Groves was annex into the city earlier this year. The submittal
includes constr ction of entry wall signage, guardhouse, private
recreation (cl bhouse, tennis court, shuffleboard court, swimming
pool and pi nic area) common area lake plantings, buffer
landscaping and entry feature landscaping.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board, with a 6-1
vote, recommended approval of this request subject to all staff
comments (utilities Department Memorandum #95-169, Fire Department
Memorandum #95-264, Engineering Division Memorandum #95-170,
Building Division Memorandum # 95-150 and Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum #95-245), with the. exception of Recreation
and Parks Department Memorandum #95-260. The Recreation and Parks
Department has determined that the picnic area proposed, which is
one of the five recreational amenities to be provided to receive
half credit towards the recreation fee, is not sufficient enough to
be considered as one~~8 the five amenities because it will most
likely not be used~ options offered by the Recreation and
Parks Department are a covered pavilion for about four picnic
tables and a barbecue pit for group picnics or a shaded, landscaped
quiet area with a meandering sidewalk, connecting to the sidewalk
on Lawrence Road, and two benchesi This information has been
relayed to the developer, however commitment to one of these
options was not yet received prior t the date of this memorandum.
An update will be provided at the C mmission meeting.
TJH:dim
Attachment
k--~. --jv ~
qL ~ r-iJ
a:CCAllenMe.Sau
7.B.2
Sausalito Groves
New Site Plan
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-258
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
June 8, 1995
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Project Name:
Sausalito Groves
Applicant:
Four Waves at Sausalito Place Ltd.
Agent:
H. P. Tompkins Jr.
Location:
The west side of Lawrence Road approxi-mately
400 feet north of Gateway Boulevard
File No. :
NWSP #95-003
Land Use Plan
Designation:
Moderate Density Residential (MDR)
Zoninq
Designation:
PUD (Planned Unit Development) with an LUI of
5.0
Type of Use:
Duplex units with private recreation facili-
ties.
Number of
Units:
164 Duplex Units
Square
Footage:
Site area
Building Area:
31.517 acres
2,438 square feet
Surrounding Land
Uses and Zoning
District:
North -
Nautica PUD (single-family homes)
South -
Gateway Boulevard and farther south
is a mobile home park in unincorpo-
rated Palm Beach County.
South-
east
Single-family homes located in unin-
corporated Palm Beach County.
East
Lawrence Road and farther east are
Lawrence Lake PUD (single-family
homes) and undeveloped land located
in unincorporated Palm Beach County.
West
A mobile home park located in unin-
corporated Palm Beach County.
Existing Site
Characteristics:
Wooded land presently being cleared
Proposed
Development:
Si te plan approval is requested for proj ect
signage, guardhouse, a private recreation
facili ty, to include tennis court, shuffle
board court, pool, clubhouse and picnic area;
associated parking and landscaping; and common
area, lake area and buffer landscaping.
I
Page 2
Site Plan Report
staff Report
Memorandum #95-258
Sausalito Groves
Concurrency:
All levels of service were certified or ex~
empted (traffic only) at time of master plan
approval which took place in Palm Beach County
prior to January 1995 annexation into the
City.
Driveways:
The recreation amenities are served by three
parking areas. Each parking area has a two-
way entrance from the private local streets
within the PUD.
Parking Facility:
The recreation parking facility requires and
will provide 38 spaces including two (2)
handicapped accessible spaces.
Landscaping:
The parking facilities, the entrance gates,
the perimeter of the PUD and the perimeter of
the lake edge will fully meet code require-
ments when staff comments are incorporated
into the plans submitted for permit.
Building and Site
Regulations:
Building and site regulations will be met when
all department comments are incorporated into
the plans submitted for permit. It should be
noted that the recreation comment needs to be
incorporated or additional fees are required.
Community Design
Plan:
The clubhouse and guardhouse are of a Span-
ish/Mediterranean style with an liS" tile roof
and earth tone stuccoed walls. Darker earth
tone raised stucco bands and fascia form the
. accent color. Windsurf blue decorative lou-
vers and shutters also accent these struc-
tures.
Signage:
Two wall signs are proposed at each of the
PUD's entrances at Lawrence Road and Gateway
Boulevard. The entrance signage is illuminat-
ed by ground mounted fluorescent fixtures.
The color of the wall that the signs are
mounted to will match the earth tone color of
the walls of the recreation building. Indi-
vidual aluminum letters, with a teal finish,
are to be mounted on the wall.
REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS:
Below is a list of those departments that have comments regarding
this request.
DEPARTMENT
ATTACHED MEMORANDUM
Public Works
utilities
Fire
Police
Engineering Division
BUilding Division
Parks & Recreation
Forester/Environmentalist
Planning and Zoning
N/A
95-169
95-264
N/A
95-170
95-150
95-260
N/A
95-245
~
Page 3
Site plan Report
Staff Report
Memorandum #95-258
Sausalito Groves
The above Department comments may be addressed on the permit set of
drawings.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of this site
plan request, subject to the permit plans for the project being
amended to show compliance with staff comments and the applicable
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
a:SauaStf.Rpt
3
\
.oYAL MAI"OIl
MOetU HONE ,....
.~puwnu~
.._~
._ I""U... ..............."e.c.t
. _ "'0 'J' '~7' I 0S' -
, 1 ~s ~1 , : :: r; '~I '; : '::' ;.~ .:: ": ~ ~: ':1 '-;'; 'f;1)?/V- >..
'" 1 ~~ ~ r II r h . ~ ~ r 11 I h r i h r 11 ~ " I I:/~); / /
m t'- .:f~~. - -- - -- - - - - - - '-- - -- - ibF-d ~",'J;;f//' -'-"
. i t 12 I.~ ~ ",,--"""""'0"""" . . _.. . ..0"""'" . - "" I..:. '
; I' l I-:M ....... ,-;... .. ... OJ_'''''''''' .'. ..... ... ... """0 ... 0...0'0'.'- . ""', ~>.
\ _: ~ r~k lJ, ~ A Ir. ~ iI ;"i !~I- - if- ~~ I ':'P51 I;=~ ,FFt ~==-- ~\, "'\ "~-~
1-: ~~___f :JJ~: ~_1 _: ; \ ~ ~ _~:JJ", I :~' _~ ~ '\', 1 "
. ~ 'I ' · , "'~ --:' : , .
.... ~ i I! .. I I - I I !L i I . ~ i I ...
u;J;;J.J 1..-_: ~ ~ J, l=~ ! ' i : : 'I-. ~
, ~~ I ....-rr f~ II-" - I I k' i
..~.~~~~'~~~~.,..~ ~~j/J! l' ! I ! : ~ : _' I \ :~ -
. Il":'.", ~,/ __oS, I l.-!.cl 1 I~ 'I : i-I : '- ~
~____ :lI' I ./ 17 _.>' I,-c. I I ~ .....- D.'
I !: t'~ ~.._........ · -1 I S I I I ~ " I i I ~: i ::.- w
l I I ~ · I:l..-I. ", I, i I ! :.::l I. II I ,~l i
i l~ljrt8:'l - iT - ~.. t ,', (jf'I;_-.:..cn-1 ;,~ 1 II ~ \i I '- ~ ~
I I ,/,/ S . I" . \ .,. ">,," ! -11 .1 I a I :< a '--L-:Il;,';;to w ./J.
~;':. -1 \,' " I '. \ ','" i "'UT I ' 'i . 'I ~: ..
I , , I ~I- \\\ I '-, .1/, =.I... . i I II -: \ '- ~ I:
\ . -__. ..:. ,i@l '/' (:[:f.:j; / 'FOJ,- 'I :; -' \ :~ - A
\ i~ I ~~/I~' Yh~(~~:/~)'~" I . : I; 1 I\~: ~
.j (~, I:'~'~ Ii ; 'I
,: i,:11 ( ~ e h, i~ '\ / /' ....[ill i 1b. ill ~
c:', Ii ( 1'1 ."tf(~', ., ; '.. ''hJ! ',--. =
iil'i Illi. ~ il! / 9~; '\ :'-:'i. '.. :I: 1 :,~ - i
I; I J~~.;:.:;. 1/ ! I ...]]! I '~: " I I ~ ,
Ii :.0 'iI w"'l:;q i I~'i ~ :' ~ I ; '- ~ ~
'I; T I I WI. a ,; I : I .=. "
~l I ~' \ . I ! ':::-..i. 1~fo"'" ..".- I : I ~ I
i ~ I ; t I -.:. i_--=- ^ ~ 1':- II i II-. ~ I
I I \' . I" ! IT - -= -.l - - '" -
, I' \I ~' 7-... I V ~' - t
I' I. \ \\ ~. /!~ I L o..;;L..';: ': I ·
:c III i' " t :~~" \\\J~ 11J!J S i : 1"-)') / --;-J il
:i 1\., I : U'I: .. ,~..~~J - _!:I~~S0~J),' ~ ~ II
!il \ I I I 1L -",. ..,,,,> ~ ,...'.-.--.-.-.......-..-...~~:II::: "'- I:'
; \ " . i5 - I' __ _ _.1 \ , C
i ~ I J I " =. ~ 1) U ' ~~ ~', " 1 i
i 11'1 ~ ~~...... '! I , N" w ;;11; ii ~ ~:I ',:", l
l~.~J.l.:. :~. . ....:........L:~............................... - ...~~ :.- 4 j - I -- - -. - -- ~-- ---'~;:, ;. ,
i. ," "'" . ..... "f -"" .... :.:'"":: ..... .......... .......:._.. .. .0... IJ'35" . ~ ~
. .., m.. '0_" . LAwauoalCWO ' . ... "'........_ .... "" .................................. .~" ...:0:..
, 'I ..------..... U - u" -- .. u u ....---.... ....... ......., .., .
~ I -'~ :.J, ~ . \11l.H' t ,h ... . .
i ~ WWi""" 1", . 1 . I
i
~i
'I
I
!
I
\
, 01~L__~~~
~...,.. . ~~ PI.A(J
l~~.
\
~
~ .
I ·
...",...((
L(
-. -
,
i
.
i
/
i
!
i
i
i
; (<~~
,1 i ~ ~
; I .....................
i I ~
I , i I
/
i I
i I
/ I
,
f I ,---
i I .
, .
I I .
;
i I I ,
i ' -
i : --+--L
;
i , I ,
j , I .
; , I .
; , I .
; , I .
; I I :
; I l___':___
; ,
i ,
i
i I I-----~
; I ,
'; 1 I
; I .\
i I
I I 1
; , \
I 1
! I
t \ \
i \ \
. , ,
, i I \
i \ \
l ! \ \
\ ~---'-"
\
\ '-I-
I
\ \~
\ I \
\ \
I I
\ I
\
\\\ I
I
l \-
t I -
l~\ . I
I
l........-
t
\
\ 1!!rZ ..
\
lAWl.1ICI aCMD
SA\JL\LltO ft.A.CI
LAWUNCI ROAD l!'ITay PLA~a
.
s0~ ..~~
s;l\ ~ ~......--- .......-....-...---
..."',..
5
. i ""'.'-.""'1. . .'-f....... . ............ ) ~ 0 r .
:: ' 0"'_'0'_' ........ "'_'. A' ........ ......
I I .. ...-..--- -.'-
, I
i II, I
'I
Ii
i I
! i
J I
! I
II J
i
!
!
I
il
i
I c
I I
i I
. I
I ;,
I
I
I
d;
I ; '----- .
L____ - -
--------------------------
.-.............-.-.-.-... ... -,- -'- ... ... ... ... -
!
t
i
, i
i
i
i
i
i
;
;
i
i
i
i
II
. I I
II
II
I~ ,. .....
!1!111111!!iiiili I
, Iii I )Il~
I. t I
I
I ~ Jii;ir
"I:,.n
D' ~I
I".. . J
. ,
...
\
,
'",.
~.~~ '.
~\U~' ~~M
_ _.. ..... ..... aOcvnn _ . AI. 1IfTAI.
. _ 1Uft'I.. IOU....,... ..... &oM.......
lI'I'IIDIr
,
c,
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 95-169
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden,
Planning & ZOnin~D' ector
John A. Guidry,' /
Director of Utili lies \\
May 23, 1995 \J
FROM:
Date:
SUBJECT:
Sausalito Groves, Site Plan Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
1. No trees are permitted within utility easements, (Sec. 7.5-18.1).
2. No structures or appurtenances shall be allowed in utility easements,
(App. C, Art. VIII, Sec. 9).
3. Please provide a copy of the plat with Utility Easements shown to the Utility
Department for review.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
?
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-264 WDC
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Fire Department
DATE:
May 22, 1995
RE:
Sausalito Place (FKA Sausalito Groves)
NW Corner Lawrence Rd & Gateway Blvd
NWSP 95-003
We have no objection to what plans have been presented.
It should be noted that NO water system plans have been presented.
Fire hydrants are required to be no further than 200' to the center
of a building.
rJ~
<
William D.,
r.,-:-.~" ".' m ~~ ~ a W ~~
: ,.J) , .~ IS ; n If
'~') 1/' f;
il. . d!;
: d 'I: 23: 1001; ~ !..!0;
" 'H.."""" i
_._.,:"," .';8f__.. '. .....
~
""PL.A..c.::.
ENGINEERING MEMO # 95-170
DATE: May 24.1995
TIl.;. T AMBRI HEYDEN, P&Z DIR.
FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AIDE PHONE: 407-375-6283 ~
SUBJECT: SAUSALITO GROVES - RECREATION AREA - 2nd REVIEW
The following comments/recommendations are submitted for yourrevicw. If any of the code
comments disallow the applicant to develop the site as submitted, the applicant may request a
variance thru the planning department as stipulated in Chapter 23, Section 3B (parking lots) ofthe
city's Land Development Regulations. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's
code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but arc not limited to the
following: Site lighting, Paving, Drainage, Curbing, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Traffic Control
Devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T., P.B. County, S.F.W.M.D.. and any
other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request.
COMMENTS
1, We recommend that the plan be forwarded to the P&D Board for their consideration.
KRHlkrh
c: William Hukill. Dev. Dir.
sausrec.2rv
~ -~-'-----~---
, r: [71 [:--;---___
., I J Ii ].;7 1':"1 ,-::::-r
"-. .' . t ( i -? ~ "
~
q
~,....u oS.
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-150
May 23, 1995
From:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Milt Duff, Chief Plans Check Inspector
To:
Re:
Sausalito Groves, Recreation Site Plan
631 feet west of Lawrence Road on Gateway Blvd.
With reference to subject project, the Building Division offers
the following comments which must be met at time of permitting:
1. State Handicap Code must be met.
2. Signs, if any, must be site approved and comply with
the Boynton Beach Sign Code.
The project can be forwarded to the Planning and Development
Board.
}n:.ll. :V ~ .
Milt Duff
MD:mh
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
,..... _0
;. \ -,~-,
, , .. /. \
\ \c, '23
. , Ti \ '
:;'L.:;:'il.{
'_J~' ~-- J
I!"" ,.,.., .
r:: .,,'. .
-~~~~.
~\
A:SAtlSALIT.TRC
10
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-260
TO:
Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator
John Wildner. Parks Superintendent fJ
Sausalito Groves
PZLANNING AND
ONING DEPt
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
June 9, 1995
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the revised master plan for Sausalito Groves.
Discussions with the representative for the developer indicate that they plan to increase the level
of private recreation provided in the family picnic area. They will be coordinating with this
department prior to building permit to insure that they still qualify for one-half credit for private
recreation provided.
JW:ad
II
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-245
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Michael E. Haag
Site and Zoning Development Administrator
DATE:
June 8, 1995
SUBJECT:
Site Plan
Project:
Location:
Review - 2nd Review - New Site Plan
Sausalito Groves - Re~reation Site Plan
Northwest corner Gateway Boulevard and
Lawrence Road
H.P. Tompkins, Jr.
NWSP 95-003
Agen t :
File No.:
The following is a list of comments regarding the second review of
the above-referenced project. It should be noted that the comments
are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list
of comments that identify unresolved comments either from the first
review or new comments as a result of the second review. Compliance
with these comments will not substantially alter the layout of the
site improvements or design of the building. The second category
is a list of recommendations I believe will enhance the aesthetics
and function of the project.
All comments and recommendations can be rectified on the plans at
time of permitting if the site plan request is approved. The
applicant must understand that additional comments may be generated
upon review of the documents and working drawings submitted to the
Building Division for permits for the proposed project.
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. On the site plan identify and label the property lines of
the recreation site, satellite parking area, recreation
area and lake area. If these areas are a part of a
larger plat identify on the plans the tract designation
and perimeter.
2. Add to the tabular data the following:
a) Parking requirements for the recreation site:
List all facilities and identify the area of each.
Calculate the required parking spaces for each and
show calculation on the drawing. Note: Parking
space computations shall be consistent with the
parking ratios identified in the zoning code.
b) Total parking spaces required and provided.
3. Dimension the width of the three ingress/egress access
points to the parking areas. Note: The minimum width
allowed for two-way access is 20 feet.
4. Specify on the elevation view drawings of the site wall,
recreation building and guardhouse the color name, color
designation or number and manufacturer's name of the
colors proposed for each exterior material, exterior
feature or product shown on the drawings.
6. Provide a note on the planting list that specifies that
fifty (50%) percent, as required, of the total number of
shrubs and trees required are native species.
I~
Page 2
2nd Site Plan Review
Sausalito Groves
NWSP 95-003
7. Modify the landscape plan and plant list to indicate the
trees that are required between the edge of the vehicle
use area (parking lot) and the abutting right-of-way.
show the trees spaced forty (40) feet on center along the
right-of-way. To ensure the trees are properly spaced,
show on the plan a typical forty (40) feet on center
dimension. Use a distinguishable symbol to identify the.
required trees on the plan. Provide a separate category
on the plant list to identify the required trees.
8. Identify on the plans the length of the proposed site
wall along the Lawrence Road, Gateway Boulevard and the
internal roadway frontage of the project.
9. To properly evaluate whether the location of the proposed
landscape material shown on the plans is acceptable, show
on the landscape plan the location, type and size of all
existing and proposed easements, including the location
of overhead lines.
10. Show on the landscape the required vehicle use area
screening (trees and shrubs) for the handicapped parking
spaces located east of the recreation building.
11. Show and dimension on the landscape plan the line-of-
sight triangles required on both sides of all
ingress/egresses to parking facilities, and on both sides
of the site's proj ect entrances at Lawrence Road and
Gateway Boulevard. Also, specify the size of the
unobstructed cross visibility space required within the
triangular areas.
12. Add a statement to the landscape notes that indicates the
code required spacing of plant material takes precedence
over the quantity of plant material specified on the
plans.
13. Please clarify whether the name of the project is
Sausalito Place or Sausalito Groves. The plans and
application contradict each other. Amend all documents
accordingly.
14. Platting is required to develop the property.
II RECOMMENDATIONS
15. It is recommended that melaleuca mulch be used instead of
shredded cypress mulch.
16. It is recommended that a sidewalk connection be made
between the proposed cul-de-sac located west of the
satellite parking spaces and the sidewalk located on the
east side of the satellite parking spaces.
NOTE:
If recommendations are approved, they shall be
incorporated into the working drawings required for
permits for the project.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
a:2comBaU8.Mem
13
tOCATION f\ ~AP
SAUSALITO GROVES
r- __~J,.~ T1: . ~~.'I;? '<;~ 1[...- ~/TTTlr I TI I'
-. . y I'~':)G oJ~ :,,;, ~ uc:
14 IFm'2:>.\ '\ f\ll r ,""" mlml'-
~\ ,'r' :ldi r t.. ~7
' )-' (;:.w.~'...2:', V ' I ~
(cJrJ ~ I
./);\: ~ -~-[
J ) /. " , uJr _ ___ _
t ., l.b.:.:s.
j? (;-,41'1'" I. 1. ~t:1
A ~ ,.._-~~ '/--1 . -r.=J~'dD-\.'
',=-- 8';'1 : I~ ," / ) ~L -:-", ~ ~: ~T,'tW~1
:.; -1'8 t:.r.' r~/jl1~ "eOV~TON t\: ~ 't1- ~ ~ ~t\th ! = I~JJ _ ~
" :..' T ~ r J,l ., I rTn~' r..".-r- , I' ';-r~ -Lnr'f'l"':" ''-: ~ I' '. ." I I::: . ~
'j" ,~L J~.. U ,: I: ~c.'-L- NURSERIES' !. ';: :(/: ;>' r i::"'fl:<,' r i i - \ : E II ~
.,-Llf:~~~~,~l~~~; ,~.. L~~4~O ";~~US ~~~:.::i~ u ~
.. ; ; , h_ ---. SITE ~ ~ ~ ~
R1AA ~ ".
TO- ,~ ..' ~.
:....~ i'- - = - .~ i::CiJiitJiN$!!:::l
r 11).~!Jl ~-: I: :.:.:.:........:.:.:.Q:P.tc:JSt.R~.:.:.:.:.:..' l
< ~~>-::II i f. -.', . 1:1::::;:1:~:iijJ:I;:~::\::;1'::;1 U:,' ~ ~ G I
. <:j .r'\ f(;
, ' ",,,' b
l:::=
~ I., - H ',~. i.-lUL ~ -:.:-. ~:~ n~,I, F
l1;r, I: ~ I..... .JU I.:.".... . - · ... ~ "T-l ~[l /'~:" \11
;~] I; CiJrn ~.lll!I.II!1111111111111," ], I [}i L'i "l
· ~ r" J: U IF':=O~"'..J . '..
iI! 9! n , '. ~k-'-'.I! 16T"I:"lil,1 \ll~ .'" ,.~~,_f+~:,:",,;;u:::';"i:~
--- ';;'Eil fiiii\]( , ~"'[i-~"':'.TTI -V"r, OIlImtffittllf1~~:
..~I\I -<,,, 1111 1'1., II ri"i"f,n nr II 'I' rr I I T I.'! ITI TTJl:
~::aul I :::i,1 I 1Il,L ~ I T r"iz;r-n lJ "~IL rTTTTm ,_ ct. I ~. i 11JlLDJ I
· · 'f=f '" u~ ttl:L11D : n n T 1 '
,R1=€'.' E J1 /, , , [,-lITIJ r:r ~ .. l-h'1 nn" I:,
~~ . ;~~~lIn~!: - "" ~.____"_., m omm9JNIn~FL~;;.;lJr.D
_u___~".," 'I -~T{'Y~;-:() .,': '":''!'Pl'-: '_ Tn~ j 17 j' !tr~T;:'.{[I'"JH.lE
,~ ".."r,; . '(..J. I ! II ,.t... ~. _ .. i '_~--, :.-:-rr r ;f'itL!E
. ," r-r, .'. '''' 11 ILlJLI'~'1
. .:: .'.- I~"n;r:'"'''' . ~ r' . I - -T
O' 1/8 MILES
./'/ j I' , I' . .}:. ~'!""""-i . .~'J't~- "2. ffi. .~.' -1 .1 I LIJ_.LJ
,.' }., I '-! . -1 -11 . J ~Hff' r-~-'
. f" .. .. 1 '!) Isr I. j
. , '" C) I ,_1 . . - .1. . :iT-. " . I
'0 4( >0. . 800 FEET
V rlq~":"; 1f2:"~F-~::;~wiHHUIL
i! i :'~'JU
. : I [~]
~
l~~'---
_.I-=1~ - -
:~: r
:~
~
::j
t..-
. "
I , i
ii,
I
'"r
~ ~
I-- r--.
f- ~ 'e':
I-
I
~ c ""'"
IT 111
---~....;J
X. LEGAL
A. 1, 2, 3
cc: Planning
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-380
Agenda Memorandum for
January 3, 1995 city Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. HeYden'~.t
Planning and Zoni~Director
DATE: December 28, 1994
SUBJECT: Sausalito Groves (a.k.a. - Epstein Property)
Annexation/Land Use Amendment/Rezoning - second reading
of ordinances
Please place the above referenced items on the January 3, 1995
City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second
Reading.
DESCRIPTION: At the December 20, 1994, City Commission meeting,
a public hearing for the change in the zoning application from
R-1 to PUD for Sausalito Groves, requested by the applicant, was
held, as well as first reading of the ordinances to annex, amend
the future land use and rezone. The requests were approved on
first reading, subject to the fourteen (14) minor conditions
listed on page 4 of planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No.
94-370, dated December 15, 1994. The applicant has agreed to the
conditions and the rezoning ordinance has been modified to
incorporate these conditions, as Exhibit "B".
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these ordinances
for second reading.
tjh
Attachments
A:SGrvOrd2
X. LEGAL
B.l, 2, 3
cc: Planning
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-370
Agenda Memorandum for
December 20, 1994 city Commission Meeting
TO:
Carrie parker
City Manager~
~~~e ~
Planninq and Zo ing Director
FROM:
DATE:
December 15, 1994
SUBJECT:
Sausalito Groves (Epstein Property)
ANNX 94-003, LUAR 94-003
(Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning)
please place the above-referenced rezoning request on the
December 20, 1994, City Commission aqenda under Public Hearings
and place the Sausalito Groves annexation, land use amendment and
rezoning ordinances under Legal, Ordinances - First Reading.
NATURE OF REOUEST
This is a request to rezone a 31.517 acre parcel of land located
apprOXimately 632 feet west of the intersection of Gateway
Boulevard and Lawrence Road and approximately 412.95 feet north
of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road (see
attached location map - Exhibit "A"). The property is currently
in unincorporated Palm Beach County, but is in process for
annexation into the City.
The current County land use and zoning are HR/8 (High Residential
- maximum density eight dwelling units per acre) and RH (Multi-
family Residential). The proposed .land use is Moderate Density
Residential, allowing a maximum gross density of 7.26 dwelling
units per acre. The proposed zoning is POO, Planned Unit
Development, with an LUI (land use intensity) of 5.00. The
zoning category originally proposed was R-1, Single-family
Residential, allowing a net density of 7.26 dwelling units per
acre (see attached Exhibit "B" for original staff report dated
June 10, 1994, which among other things, describes the adjacent
land uses).
BACKGROUND
As part of phase II, group I of the City'S annexation program
which included the Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Heartland
Health Care Center and Greentree plaza I properties, Sausalito
Groves was reviewed by the Commission for land use amendment and
rezoning on June 21, 1994 for transmittal to the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA). At the June meeting, the property
owner's representative stated that they objected to the proposed
R-l, Single-family Residential, zoning designation, as it would
not allow duplexes to be built and therefore, disregarded their
Palm Beach County approval for a 164 duplex unit (82 residential
bUildings) project. Palm Beach County's approval was received in
Hay of this year to better market the property for sale.
At the June meeting, staff pOinted out that the R-1 zoning
district was selected to honor the property owner's Palm Beach
County density approval of 5.2 dwellings per acre. Staff also
pOinted out that the only City zoning category that would allow
both the density and duplexes desired was PUD, Planned Unit
Development, which requires a master plan to be approved as part
of the zoning. It was agreed that a PUD rezoning application and
master plan would be subsequently filed by the applicant to
rezone the property to PUD, after the R-l zoning was approved.
The applications, as presented at the June meeting, were
transmitted to DCA. After receiving a favorable response from
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
December 15, 1994
DCA, adoption at first reading of the ordinances for annexation,
land use amendment and rezoning was scheduled before the
Commission on October 3, 1994. At that commission meeting,
action on the Sausalito Groves ordinances was tabled and
continued to be tabled until December 6, 1994, when it was
stricken from the agenda. Action was tabled due to the property
owner objecting again to the proposed zoning to R-1. While the
applications were being reviewed by DCA, an application for
rezoning to PUD was not received by the City and the property
owner had entered into a purchase contract with a developer who
wished to develop the property for duplexes. The developer is
Four Waves Enterprises, Inc. who is currently building Princeton
Place within the Windward PUD - scheduled for annexation public
hearings next month.
Since october, staff has met with the developer, the property
owner's attorney and the developer's land planner to reach a
compromise relative to the zoninq of the property and to ensure a
level of comfort with the concept of a duplex project. To th~t
end, staff initiated readvertising and renotification to property
owners within 400 feet of the Sausalito Groves development (the
developer has agreed to pay for" the cost of readvertisinq and
renotification) and offers the attached POD master plan for ~
Commission consideration (see attached Exhibit "B").
ANALYSIS
The attached master plan drawings, originally approved by Palm
Beach county, have been revised by the applicant to include
master plan information required by the City and to comply with
City regulations and other area PUD'S within the City, to the
greatest extent possible, without decreasing the density approved
by the county.
MINIMUM LOT SIZE, SETBACKS, AND LOT FRONTAGE - There are no
minimum lot sizes, setbacks or frontages for PUDs. Each POD is
evaluated separately and such development restrictions are
established by submitting a master plan. The minimum lot size
proposed for Sausalito Groves is 4,400 square feet. The smallest
PUD lot size approved to date, within the City, is 4,000 square
feet and was recently approved for the Boynton Nurseries PUD,
immediately north of Sausalito Groves. The City's duplex zoning
district (R-2) requires 4,500 square feet.
The front building setback proposed is 15 feet (20 feet to the
garage to provide a driveway that will satisfy the City's parking
space requirements). This is the same front setback approved for
Boynton Nurseries. The rear building setback proposed varies,
but is no less than 12.5 feet. Boynton Nurseries was approved
for no less than 10 feet. The minimum side setback is 7.5 feet;
10 feet is required in the R-2 district. The Lawrence Lake
approval allowed a side setback of no less than 7.5 feet; Boynton
Nurseries was approved at 10 feet. Regarding screened
enclosures, the side setback will be no less than 7.5 feet and
the rear setback no less than 5 feet. This is similar to Boynton
Nurseries.
The City'S PUD regulations do require that the setbacks for the
PUD perimeter lots abutting another zoning district shall be the
same as required in the abutting zone. The master plan complies
with this requirement, with two exceptions, along the west PUD
boundary, which abuts the Royal Manor mobile home park where the
rear setback is 25 feet; Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet.
The second exception is along the southeast PUD boundary, which
abuts 11 homes on 1/2 acre lots on Floral Drive, where the rear
setback of the north lots is no less than 125 feet and the side
setback is 25 feet. Here Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet.
TO: Carrie Parker
-3-
December 15, 1994
The PUD regulations also state that the setback for the PUD
perimeter lots abuttinq a public right-of-way shall be the same
as the front setback required in the zoning district the PUD most
closely resembles. This would be the R-2 district which requires
a 25 foot front setback. sausalito Groves is proposing a 25 foot
setback from the public rights-of-way (Lawrence Road and Gateway
Boulevard).
RECREATION FACILITIES - Sausalito Groves is planning to provide
private recreation to receive half credit towards the City's
parks and recreation dedication requirement. The balance will be
satisfied in fee equal to an amount equivalent to the value of
1.48 acres. The five private recreation amenities will be a
clubhouse, pool, tennis courts, shuffleboard court and picnic
area geared to an adult market. The City has a minimum size for
each of these amenities which Sausalito Groves meets with the
exception of the shuffleboard court and swimming pool. Parking
is also required and provided, with a deficiency of one parking
space.
STREETS - Fifty foot wide rights-of-way are proposed which will
be private due to secured entrances. The project entrance off of
Lawrence Road is shown to have a gatehouse and the entrance off
of Gateway Boulevard is shown to have a card qate. The rights-
of-way taper out to 80 feet wide at the secured entrances. This
is acceptable, provided they are security code activated systems
for 24 hour access by police and fire personnel.
The street pavement widths shown are 20 feet; the city requires a
minimum of 22 feet. street lights will be provided. Although a
cross-section is not provided, fifty foot wide rights-of-way are
adequate to provide swales for pretreatment of drainaqe, required
by the City, and sidewalks wh~ch are proposed on both sides of
the street. A sidewalk will also be provided on Lawrence Road
along the project frontage, as required. It is uncertain at this
time whether water and sewer will be within the right-of-way or
within an easement along the front of the lots. Cul-de-sac sizes
are adequate for fire and sanitation vehicles and limited access
easements are proposed along the PUD street frontages, as
required.
TRAFFIC - A copy of the traffic study submitted to Palm Beach
County in April was provided to staff yesterday. It indicates
that no additional trips will be generated beyond what the
property was vested for under a previous approval and is
concurrency exempt. It also states that no additional turn lanes
at the project entrances or internal roadway intersections are
warranted. However, it is not known whether Palm Beach County
required additional turn lanes for safety reasons. staff is in
the process of getting that information from Palm Beach County.
LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS - The property is currently an old orange
grove. Tree preservation is proposed where determined feasible
by the City Forester at time of preliminary plat approval (the
next step in the process after annexation). Littoral zone
plantinqs are proposed around the water management tract, as
required. Perimeter PUD buffers and buffers along public and
private rights-of-way are proposed. These buffers are proposed
within easements and not within a separate tract as was approved
for Boynton Nurseries and woolbright Place. However, one
difference is that these buffers are not separate from required
rear setbacks.
The buffers along the private rights-of-way will be ten feet
wide. The buffers along the public rights-of-way will be fifteen
feet wide (increased from ten feet at the request of staff) with
a six foot high wall, trees planted 30 feet on center and a
hedge. The buffers along Royal Hanor mobile home park and
Boynton Nurseries are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet
TO: Carrie Parker
-4-
December 15, 1994
on center and a hedge. The buffers along the Floral Drive lots
are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet on center, to
include a five foot high chain link fence with a hedge
(integrated fence/hedqe combination proposed at the request of
staff) .
RECOMMENDATION
The developer has worked diligently with staff to produce the
proposed master plan. In the spirit of compromise to further the
goals of the City's annexation program, the Planning and Zoning
Department recommends approval of the attached sausalito Groves
master plan for rezoning to PUD, subject to the following
conditions which shall be noted on four sets of revised master
plan drawings, prior to preliminary plat submission:
1. Indicate that the existing rights-of-way for Gateway
Boulevard and Lawrence Road are consistent with the ultimate
right-of-way, since the riqht-of-way dedication is complete.
2.
Secured entrances shall install a security code activated
system.
~
3. Site plan approval shall be required for the private
recreation area, security system, common area landscaping,
buffers, and project signaqe.
4. Delete reference to "pad area".
5. Safe corners shall comply with Appendix C - Subdivisions,
Platting, Article X, Section 7 of the city's Code of
Ordinances.
6. Additional turn lanes shall be provided at project entrances
if Palm Beach county required them as part of their approval
of the project.
7. The number of recreation parking spaces required is 25.12
(i.e. - 26) and provided is 25.
8. street pavement width shall be a minimum of 22 feet on all
internal rights-of-way.
9. Correct the dimension of the front, minimum building setback
of 15 feet, so it corresponds to the details and chart
provided.
10. Indicate that the landscape buffer easement on the perimeter
lot detail is five feet and add lot 92 to those identified
as perimeter lots.
11. Add lots 1, 20, 84 and 86 to those identified as right-of-
way lots. (Lots 1 and 84 are also corner lots and lots 20
and 86 are also perimeter lots.)
12. Add lots 124 and 125 to those identified as corner lots.
13. Indicate that the three foot easement on each lot is for
drainage and maintenance of the building overhang.
14. Provide a survey of the property.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:SausGRez
X. LEGAL
B .1
cc: Plan
ORDINANCE NO. 094-
Ij
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING THE EPSTEIN (A. K.A SAUSALITO
GROVES) PROPERTY (NORTHWEST CORNER OF
LAWRENCE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD)
ANNEXING CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED TRACTS OF
LAND THAT ARE CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY
LIMITS WITHIN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THAT
WILL, UPON ANNEXATION, CONSTITUTE A
REASONABLY COMPACT ADDITION TO THE CITY
TERRITORY, PURSUANT TO A PETITION OF THE
OWNER OF SAID TRACT OF LAND, REQUESTING
ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE I, SECTION
7 (32) OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AND SECTIONS
171.044, AND 171.062(2), FLORIDA
STATUTES; PROVIDING THE PROPER LAND USE
DESIGNATION AND PROPER ZONING OF THE
PROPERTY SHALL BE REFLECTED IN SEPARATE
ORDINANCES TO BE PASSED SIMULTANEOUSLY
HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK
OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDA, UPON ADOPTION.
II
'I
i
II
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton
Beach requires the development of an Annexation Program;
WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach, through the
~. .
Annexation Program, has identified adjacent properties that
are the subj ects of agreements for water service with the
City;
WHBREAS, said agreements for water service are also
Ii
considered voluntary petitions for annexation pursuant to
Florida Statutes, which can be executed by the City of Boynton
Beach at any time such properties are eligible for annexation
according to Florida Statutes;
WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach hereby exercises its
I option to annex the following tracts of land as hereinafter
I
I described, in accordance with Article I, Section 7 (32) of the
'i Charter of the City and Section 171.044, and 171.062(2)
Florida Statutes: and
WHEREAS, said tracts of land lying and being within Palm
I
I
I Beach County are contiguous to the existing City limits of the
I
II
/
City of Boynton Beach, Florida and will, upon its annexation,
constitute
a
reasonably
compact
addition
to
the
City
d
territory.
NOW, THEREPORE, BB IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CODISSION OP
THB CITY OF BOYNTON BBACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: Pursuant to Article I, Section 7 (32) of the
Charter of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida and Section
171.044,
Florida
Statutes,
the
fOllowing
described
unincorporated and contiguous tracts of land situated and
lying and being in the County of Palm Beach, Florida, to wit:
Tracts -A- and -8-, Sausalito Groves,
Plat Book 60, Page 44 according to the
public records of Palm Beach, Florida,
less South 4.30 feet for Road R/W.
Containing 31.34 acres more or less, and
subject to easements, reservations or R/W
of record. Together with Lawrence Road
R/W abutting east thereof and Gateway
Boulevard R/W abutting South thereof.
are hereby annexed to the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, and
such land so annexed shall be and become part of the City with
the same force and effect as though the same had been
originally incorporated in the territorial boundaries thereof.
Section 2: That Section 6 and 6(a) of the Charter of the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to reflect
the annexation of said tracts of land more particularly
described in Section 1 of this Ordinance.
Sect ion 3:
That by Ordinances adopted simultaneously
herewith, the proper City zoning designation and Land Use
category is being determined as contemplated in Section
171.162(2) Florida Statutes.
Section 4:
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 5:
Should any section or provision of this
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 6: This Ordinance shall not be passed until the
same has been advertised for two (2) consecutive weeks in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, as required by the City Charter and Section 171.044,
Florida Statut~s.
S~ction 7: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be
the date a final order is issued by the Department of
Community Affairs finding the corresponding amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to be in compliance in accordance with
Chapter 163.3184, F.S.,; or the date a final order is issued
by the Administration Commission finding the corresponding
amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter
163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order
21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if
during th~ 2l-day period no petitions are filed challenging
the corresponding Plan amendment. Once issued, the Notice of
Intent shall be attached hereto as Exhibit .A. and made a part
of this ordinance by reference.
S~ction 8: Specific authority is hereby given to codify
this Ordinance.
S~ction 9: This Ordinance, after adoption, shall be
filed with the Clerk of . the Circuit Court of Palm Beach
County, Florida.
FIRST READING this day of
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
, 1994.
, 1994.
day of
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
: EPSTAX_ORC
ORDINANCE NO. 094-
X. LEGAL
B.2
cc: Plan
I,
II
I'
II
"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING THE EPSTEIN (A.K.A. SAUSALITO
GROVES) PROPERTY (NORTHWEST CORNER OF
LAWRENCE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD)
AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 OF SAID CITY BY
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY BY
ADOPTING THE PROPER LAND USE OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND DESIGNATION IS
BEING CHANGED FROM HIGH RESIDENTIAL 8 TO
MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; PROVIDING
FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use
Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use Element by
Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, certain tracts of land more particularly
described hereinafter are being annexed by the City in
accordance with the application completed by the City for the
owner of the following property, pursuant to the Annexation
Program, by Ordinance being adopted simultaneously herewith;
and
WHBRBAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future Land Use
Element of a Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes, has been followed; and
I
I
,I
II Commission deems it in the best interest of the inhabitants of
WHEREAS,
after
public
hearing
and
study,
the
City
said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the Comprehensive
Plan as adopted by the City herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BB IT ORDAINED BY THB CITY COIOlISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section I: Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby
amended to reflect the following:
land is more particularly described as follows:
Tracts .A. and "B", Sausalito Groves,
Plat Book 60, Page 44. Less South 4.30
feet for Road R/W.
Containing 31.34 acres more or less, and
subject to easements, reservations or R/W
I'
,
of record. Together with Lawrence Road
R/W abutting east thereof and Gateway
Boulevard R/W abutting South
Section 2: That any maps adopted in accordance with the
Future Land Use Element of said Comprehensive Plan shall be
amended accordingly.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4:
Should any section or provision of this
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be
the date a final order is issued by the Department of
Community Affairs finding this amendment to be in compliance ~
in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S.,; or the date a
final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding
this amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter
163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order
21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if
during the 21-day period" no petitions are filed challenging
the amendment.
Once issued, the Notice of Intent shall be
attached hereto as Exhibit MAM and made a part of this
ordinance by reference.
FIRST READING this
day of December, 1994.
II SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this day of
, 1994.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
I
ORDINANCE NO. 094-
X. LEGAL
A.3
cc: Planning
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING THE EPSTEIN (A.K.A. SAUSALITO
GROVES) PROPERTY (NORTHWEST CORNER OF
LAWRENCE ROAD AND GATEWAY BOULEVARD)
AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-70 OF SAID CITY BY
REZONING CERTAIN TRACTS OF LAND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM
COUNTY RM (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT;
AMENDING THE REVISED ZONING MAP
ACCORDINGLY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
,
'I
Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No. 91-70, l.n which a
II Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida, in accordance with its Annexation Program, is
simultaneously herewith adopting an Ordinance annexing certain
tracts of land; and
I'
I aforesaid Annexation Program, has heretofore filed a Petition,
II
WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach, in connection with
pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A-Zoning, of the Code of
Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, for the purpose of
rezoning certain tracts of land consisting of 31.34 acres
located adjacent to the municipal limits of said City, said
land being more particularly described hereinafter, from RM
Multi-Family Residential to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
L. U . I = 5, which requests that the 31.34-acre tracts be
removed from the boundaries of the RM zone to allow for the
processing of the rezoning application;
WHEREAS,
the City Commission deems it in the best
interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the
aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BB IT ORDAINED BY THB CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: The following described land, located in the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to-wit:
I'
,I
, ~
Tracts "A" and "B", Sausalito Groves,
Plat Book 60, Page 44. Less South 4.30
feet for Road R/W.
Containing 31.34 acres more or less, and
subject to easements, reservations or R/W
of record. Together with Lawrence Road
R/W abutting east thereof and Gateway
Boulevard R/W abutting South
be and the same l.S hereby rezoned from RM Multi-Family
Residential (Palm Beach County) to Planned Unit Development,
(City of Boynton Beach) L.U.I = 5, in accordance with the
Master Plan drawings prepared by Kilday & Assoc., #94-16, XR
88-22, last revised 12/13/94, on file in the Planning and
Zoning Department and subject to the conditions listed in
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No 94-370 attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this Ordinance. A
location map is attached hereto as Exhibit .B" and made a part
of this Ordinance.
Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the
City shall be amended accordingly.
Section 3:
All ordi'nances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4:
Should any section or provision of this
Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: The effective date of this Ordinance shall be
the date a final order is issued by the Department of
Community Affairs finding the corresponding amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan to be in compliance in accordance with
Chapter 163.3184, F.S.,; or the date a final order is issued
by the Administration Commission finding the corresponding
amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter
163.3184, F.S. The notice of compliance becomes a final order
21 days following the issuance of the notice of compliance if
during the 21-day period no petitions are filed challenging
Ij the corresponding Plan amendment. Once issued, the Notice of
Intent shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part
'I
'I of this c
.inance by reference.
FIRST READING this
day of
, 1994.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
day of
, 1995.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
vice Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Corranissioner
Corranissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
A:EPSTRZ.CRD
Rev. 1212/94
12130/94
(Annexation Agrl
II
X. LEGAL
B.l, 2, 3
cc: Planning
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-370
Agenda Memorandum for
December 20, 1994 City Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
city Manager~
~~ e ?vi
Planning and Zo ing Director
December 15, 1994
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Sausalito Groves (Epstein Property)
ANNX 94-003, LUAR 94-003
(Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning)
please place the above-referenced rezoning request on the
December 20, 1994, City Commission agenda under Public Hearings
and place the sausalito Groves annexation, land use amendment and
rezoning ordinances under Leqal, Ordinances - First Reading. .
NATURE-OF REOUEST
(
This is a request to rezone a 31.517 acre parcel of land located
approximately 632 feet west of the intersection of Gateway
Boulevard and Lawrence Road and approximately 412.95 feet north
of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road (see
attached location map - Exhibit "A"). The property is currently
in unincorporated Palm Beach County, but is in process for
annexation into the City.
The current County land use and zoning are HR/8 (High Residential
_ maximum density eight dwelling units per acre) and RM (Multi-
family Residential). The proposed land use is Moderate Density
Residential, allowing a maximum gross density of 7.26 dwelling
units per acre. The proposed zoning is POO, Planned Unit
Development, with an LUI (land use intensity) of 5.00. The
zoning category originally proposed was R-1, single-family
Residential, allowing a net density of 7.26 dwelling units per
acre (see attached Exhibit "B" for original staff report dated
June 10, 1994, which among other things, describes the adjacent
land uses).
BACKGROUND
(
As part of phase II, group I of the City's annexation program
which included the Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Heartland
Health Care Center and Greentree plaza I properties, Sausalito
Groves was reviewed by the Commission for land use amendment and
rezoning on June 21, 1994 for transmittal to the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA). At the June meeting, the property
owner's representative stated that they objected to the proposed
R-1, single-family Residential, zoning designation, as it would
not allow duplexes to be built and therefore, disregarded their
Palm Beach County approval for a 164 duplex unit (82 residential
buildings) project. Palm Beach County's approval was received in
May of this year to better market the property for sale.
At the June meetinq, staff pointed out that the R-1 zoning
district was selected to honor the property owner's Palm Beach
County density approval of 5.2 dwellings per acre. Staff also
pointed out that the only City zoning category that would allow
both the density and duplexes desired was PUD, planned Unit
Development, which requires a master plan to be approved as part
of the zoning. It was agreed that a PUD rezoning application and
master plan would be subsequently filed by the applicant to
rezone the property to PUD, after the R-1 zoning was approved.
The applications, as presented at the June meeting, were
transmitted to DCA. After receiving a favorable response from
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
December 15, 1994
DCA, adoption at first reading of the ordinances for annexation,
land use amendment and rezoning was scheduled before the
Commission on October 3, 1994. At that Commission meeting,
action on the Sausalito Groves ordinances was tabled and
continued to be tabled until December 6, 1994, when it was
stricken from the agenda. Action was tabled due to the property
owner objecting again to the proposed zoning to R-l. While the
applications were being reviewed by DCA, an application for
rezoning to PUD was not received by the City and the property
owner had entered into a purchase contract with a developer who
wished to develop the property for duplexes. The developer is
Four Waves Enterprises, Inc. who is currently building Princeton
Place within the Windward PUD - scheduled for annexation public
bearings next month.
Since October, staff has met with the developer, the property
owner's attorney and the developer'S land planner to reach a
compromise relative to the zoning of the property and to ensure a
level of comfort with the concept of a duplex project. To that
end, staff initiated readvertising and renotification to property
owners within 400 feet of the sausalito Groves development (the
developer has agreed to pay for the cost of readvertising and
renotification) and offers the attached PUD master plan for (
commission consideration (see attached Exhibit "B").
ANALYSIS
The attached master plan drawinqs, originally approved by Palm
Beach County, have been revised by the applicant to include
master plan information required by the City and to comply with
City regulations and other area PUD's within the City, to the
greatest extent possible, without decreasing the density approved
by the County.
MINIMUM LOT SIZE, SETBACKS, AND LOT FRONTAGE - There are no
minimum lot sizes, setbacks or frontages for PUDs. Each POD 1s
evaluated separately and such development restrictions are
established by submitting a master plan. The minimum lot size
proposed for Sausalito Groves 1s 4,400 square feet. The smallest
PUD lot size approved to date, within the City, is 4,000 square
feet and was recently approved for the Boynton Nurseries PUD,
immediately north of Sausalito Groves. The City's duplex zoninq
district (R-2) requires 4,500 square feet.
The front bUilding setback proposed is 15 feet (20 feet to the
garage to prOVide a driveway that will satisfy the city's parking
space requirements). This is the same front setback approved for
Boynton Nurseries. The rear building setback proposed varies,
but is no less than 12.5 feet. Boynton Nurseries was approved
for no less than 10 feet. The minimum side setback is 7.5 feet;
10 feet is reqUired in the R-2 district. The Lawrence Lake
approval allowed a side setback of no less than 7.5 feet; Boynton
Nurseries was approved at 10 feet. Regarding screened
enclosures, the side setback will be no less than 7.5 feet and
the rear setback no less than 5 feet. This is similar to Boynton
Nurseries.
(.
The City's PUD regulations do require that the setbacks for the
PUD perimeter lots abutting another zoning district shall be the
same as required in the abutting zone. The master plan complies
with this requirement, with two exceptions, along the west PUD
boundary, which abuts the Royal Hanor mobile home park where the
rear setback is 25 feet; Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet.
The second exception is along the southeast PUD boundary, which
abuts 11 homes on 1/2 acre lots on Floral Drive, where the rear
setback of the north lots 1s no less than 125 feet and the side
setback is 25 feet. Here Sausal1to Groves is proposing 15 feet.
TO: Carrie Parker
-3-
December 15, 1994
The PUD. regulations also state that the setback for the PUD
perimeter lots abutting a public riqht-of-way shall be the same
as the front setback required in the zoning district the PUD most
closely resembles. This would be the R-2 district which requires
a 2S foot front setback. sausalito Groves is proposing a 2S foot
setback from the public rights-of-way (Lawrence Road and Gateway
Boulevard).
RECREATION FACILITIES - Sausalito Groves is planning to provide
private recreation to receive half credit towards the city's
parks and recreation dedication requirement. The balance will be
satisfied in fee equal to an amount equivalent to the value of
1.48 acres. The five private recreation amenities will be a
clubhouse, pool, tennis courts, shuffleboard court and picnic
area geared to an adult market. The city has a minimum size for
each of these amenities which Sausalito Groves meets with the
exception of the shuffleboard court and swimming pool. Parking
is also required and provided, with a deficiency of one parking
space.
STREETS - Fifty foot wide rights-of-way are proposed which will
be private due to secured entrances. The project entrance off of
Lawrence Road is shown to have a gatehouse and the entrance off
of Gateway Boulevard is shown to have a card gate. The rights-
of-way taper out to 80 feet wide at the secured entrances. This
is acceptable, provided they are security code activated systems
for 24 hour access by police and fire personnel.
The street pavement widths shown are 20 feet; the City requires a
minimum of 22 feet. street lights will be provided. Although a
cross-section is not provided, fifty foot wide rights-of-way are
adequate to provide swales for pretreatment of drainage, required
by the City, and sidewalks which are proposed on both sides of
the street. A sidewalk will also be provided on Lawrence Road
along the project frontage, as required. It is uncertain at this
time whether water and sewer will be within the right-of-way or
within an easement along the front of the lots. Cul-de-sac sizes
are adequate for fire and sanitation vehicles and limited access
easements are proposed along the PUD street frontages, as
required.
TRAFFIC - A copy of the traffic study submitted to Palm Beach
County in April was provided to staff yesterday. It indicates
that no additional trips will be generated beyond what the
property was vested for under a previous approval and is
concurrency exempt. It also states that no additional turn lanes
at the project entrances or internal roadway intersections are
warranted. However, it is not known whether Palm Beach County
required additional turn lanes for safety reasons. Staff is in
the process of getting that information from Palm Beach County.
LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS - The property is currently an old orange
grove. Tree preservation is proposed where determined feasible
by the City Forester at time of preliminary plat approval (the
next step in the process after annexation). Littoral zone
plantings are proposed around the water management tract, as
required. Perimeter PUD buffers and buffers along public and
private rights-of-way are proposed. These buffers are proposed
within easements and not within a separate tract as was approved
for Boynton Nurseries and Woolbright Place. However, one
difference is that these buffers are not separate from required
rear setbacks.
The buffers along the private rights-of-way will be ten feet
wide. The buffers along the public rights-of-way will be fifteen
feet wide (increased from ten feet at the request of staff) with
a six foot high wall, trees planted 30 feet on center and a
hedge. The buffers along Royal Manor mobile home park and
Boynton Nurseries are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet
TO: carrie Parker
-4-
December 15, 1994
on center and a hedge. The buffers along the Floral Drive lots
are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet on center, to
include a five foot high chain link fence with a hedge
(integrated fence/hedqe combination proposed at the request of
staff) .
RECOMMENDATION
The developer has worked diligently with staff to produce the
proposed master plan. In the spirit of compromise to further the
goals of the City's annexation program, the Planning and Zoning
Department recommends approval of the attached Sausalito Groves
master plan for rezoning to POO, subject to the following
conditions which shall be noted on four sets of revised master
plan drawings, prior to preliminary plat submission:
1. Indicate that the existing rights-of-way for Gateway
Boulevard and Lawrence Road are consistent with the ultimate
right-of-way, since the right-of-way dedication is complete.
2 .
secured entrances shall install a security code activated
system.
(
3. Site plan approval shall be required for the private
recreation area, security system, common area landscaping,
buffers, and project siqnage.
4. Delete reference to "pad area".
5. Safe corners shall comply with Appendix C - Subdivisions,
Platting, Article X, Section 7 of the city's Code of
Ordinances. ~ '
6. Additional turn lanes shall be provided at project entrances
if Palm Beach County required them as part of their approval
of the project.
7. The number of recreation parking spaces required is 25.12
(i.e. - 26) and provided is 25.
8. Street pavement width shall be a minimum of 22 feet on all
internal rights-of-way.
9. Correct the dimension of the front, minimum bUilding setback
of 15 feet, so it corresponds to the details and chart
provided.
10. Indicate that the landscape buffer easement on the perimeter
lot detail is five feet and add lot 92 to those identified
as perimeter lots.
11. Add lots 1, 20, 84 and 86 to those identified as right-of-
way lots. (Lots 1 and 84 are also corner lots and lots 20
and 86 are also perimeter lots.)
12. Add lots 124 and 125 to those identified as corner lots.
13. Indicate that the three foot easement on each lot is for
drainaqe and maintenance of the building overhang.
14. Provide a survey of the property.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:SausGRez
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-370
Agenda Memorandum for
December 20, 1994 City Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker
City Manager~
- - Z ~ L-jt.Y7 ?J
~iIVJ. ~ e
Planning and Zo ing Director
TO:
DATE:
December 15, 1994
SUBJECT:
Sausalito Groves (Epstein Property)
ANNX 94-003, LUAR 94-003
(Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning)
Please place the above-referenced rezoning request on the
December 20, 1994, city Commission agenda under Public Hearings
and place the Sausalito Groves annexation, land use amendment and
rezoning ordinances under Leqal, Ordinances - First Reading.
NATURE OF REOUEST
This is a request to rezone a 31.517 acre parcel of land located
approximately 632 feet west of the intersection of Gateway
Boulevard and Lawrence Road and approximately 412.95 feet north
of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Lawrence Road (see
attached location map - Exhibit "A"). The property is currently
in unincorporated Palm Beach County, but is in process for
annexation into the City.
The current County land use and zoninq are HR/8 (High Residential
- maximum density eight dwelling. units per acre) and RM (Multi-
family Residential). The proposed land use is Moderate Density
Residential, allowing a maximum gross density of 7.26 dwelling
units per acre. The proposed zoning is PUD, Planned Unit
Development, with an LUI (land use intensity) of 5.00. The
zoning category originally proposed was R-l, single-family
Residential, allowing a net density of 7.26 dwelling units per
acre (see attached Exhibit "B" for original staff report dated
June 10, 1994, which among other things, describes the adjacent
land uses).
BACKGROUND
As part of phase II, group I of the City's annexation program
which included the Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Heartland
Health Care Center and Greentree Plaza I properties, Sausalito
Groves was reviewed by the Commission for land use amendment and
rezoning on June 21, 1994 for transmittal to the Department of
Community Affairs (DCA). At the June meeting, the property
owner's representative stated that they objected to the proposed
R-1, single-family Residential, zoning designation, as it would
not allow duplexes to be built and therefore, disregarded their
Palm Beach County approval for a 164 duplex unit (82 residential
bUildings) project. Palm Beach County's approval was received in
May of this year to better market the property for sale.
At the June meeting, staff pointed out that the R-l zoning
district was selected to honor the property owner's Palm Beach
County density approval of 5.2 dwellings per acre. Staff also
pointed out that the only City zoning category that would allow
both the density and duplexes desired was PUD, Planned Unit
Development, which requires a master plan to be approved as part
of the zoning. It was agreed that a PUD rezoning application and
master plan would be subsequently filed by the applicant to
rezone the property to PUD, after the R-1 zoning was approved.
The applications, as presented at the June meeting, were
transmitted to DCA. After receiving a favorable response from
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
Dec~mber 15, 1994
DCA, adoption at first reading of the ordinances for annexation,
land use amendment and rezoning was scheduled before the
Commission on october 3, 1994. At that Commission meeting,
action on the Sausalito Groves ordinances was tabled and
continued to be tabled until December 6, 1994, when it was
stricken from the agenda. Action was tabled due to the property
owner objecting again to the proposed zoning to R-1. While the
applications were being reviewed by DCA, an application for
rezoning to PUD was not received by the City and the property
owner had entered into a purchase contract with a developer who
wished to develop the property for duplexes. The developer is
Four Waves Enterprises, Inc. who is currently building Princeton
Place within the Windward PUD - scheduled for annexation public
hearings next month.
Since October, staff has met with the developer, the property
owner's attorney and the developer's land planner to reach a
compromise relative to the zoning of the property and to ensure a
level of comfort with the concept of a duplex project. To that
end, staff initiated readvertising and renotification to property
owners within 400 feet of the Sausalito Groves development (the
developer has aqreed to pay for the cost of readvertising and
renotification) and offers the attached PUD master plan for
Commission consideration (see attached Exhibit "B").
ANALYSIS
The attached master plan drawings, originally approved by Palm
Beach County, have been revised by the applicant to include
master plan information required by the City and to comply with
City regulations and other area PUD's within the City, to the
greatest extent possible, without decreasing the density approved
by the County.
MINIMUM LOT SIZE, SETBACKS, AND LOT FRONTAGE - There are no
minimum lot sizes, setbacks or frontages for PUDs. Each PUD is
evaluated separately and such development restrictions are
established by submitting a master plan. The minimum lot size
proposed for Sausalito Groves is 4,400 square feet. The smallest
PUD lot size approved to date, within the City, is 4,000 square
feet and was recently approved for the Boynton Nurseries PUD,
immediately north of Sausalito Groves. The City'S duplex zoning
district (R-2) requires 4,500 square feet.
The front building setback proposed is 15 feet (20 feet to the
garage to provide a driveway that will satisfy the City's parking
space requirements). This is the same front setback approved for
Boynton Nurseries. The rear bUilding setback proposed varies,
but is no less than 12.5 feet. Boynton Nurseries was approved
for no less than 10 feet. The minimum side setback is 7.5 feet;
10 feet is required in the R-2 district. The Lawrence Lake
approval allowed a side setback of no les8 than 7.5 feet; Boynton
Nurseries was approved at 10 feet. Regarding screened
enclosures, the side setback will be no less than 7.5 feet and
the rear setback no less than 5 feet. This is similar to Boynton
Nurseries.
The City's PUD regulations do require that the setbacks for the
PUD perimeter lots abutting another zoning district shall be the
same as required in the abutting zone. The master plan complies
with this requirement, with two exceptions, along the west PUD
boundary, which abuts the Royal Manor mobile home park where the
rear setback is 25 feet; Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet.
The second exception is along the southeast PUD boundary, which
abuts 11 homes on 1/2 acre lots on Floral Drive, where the rear
setback of the north lots is no less than 125 feet and the side
setback is 25 feet. Here Sausalito Groves is proposing 15 feet.
TO: Carrie Parker
-3-
December 15, 1994
The PUD regulations also state that the setback for the PUD
perimeter lots abutting a public right-of-way shall be the same
as the front setback required in the zoning district the PUD most
closely resembles. This would be the R-2 district which requires
a 25 foot front setback. Sausalito Groves is proposing a 25 foot
setback from the public rights-of-way (Lawrence Road and Gateway
Boulevard) .
RECREATION FACILITIES - Sausalito Groves is planning to provide
private recreation to receive half credit towards the city's
parks and recreation dedication requirement. The balance will be
satisfied in fee equal to an amount equivalent to the value of
1.48 acres. The five private recreation amenities will be a
clubhouse, pool, tennis courts, shuffleboard court and picnic
area geared to an adult market. The city has a minimum size for
each of these amenities which Sausalito Groves meets with the
exception of the shuffleboard court and swimming pool. Parking
is also required and provided, with a deficiency of one parking
space.
STREETS - Fifty foot wide rights-of-way are proposed which will
be private due to secured entrances. The project entrance off of
Lawrence Road is shown to have a gatehouse and the entrance off
of Gateway Boulevard is shown to have a card gate. The rights-
of-way taper out to 80 feet wide at the secured entrances. This
is acceptable, provided they are security code activated systems
for 24 hour access by police and fire personnel.
The street pavement widths shown are 20 feet; the City requires a
minimum of 22 feet. Street lights will be provided. Although a
cross-section is not provided, fifty foot wide rights-of-way are
adequate to provide swales for pretreatment of drainage, required
by the City, and sidewalks which are proposed on both sides of
the street. A sidewalk will also be provided on Lawrence Road
along the project frontage, as required. It is uncertain at this
time whether water and sewer will be within the right-of-way or
within an easement along the front of the lots. Cul-de-sac sizes
are adequate for fire and sanitation vehicles and limited access
easements are proposed along the PUD street frontages, as
required.
TRAFFIC - A copy of the traffic study submitted to Palm Beach
County in April was provided to staff yesterday. It indicates
that no additional trips will be generated beyond what the
property was vested for under a previous approval and is
concurrency exempt. It also states that no additional turn lanes
at the project entrances or internal roadway intersections are
warranted. However, it is not known whether Palm Beach County
required additional turn lanes for safety reasons. staff is in
the process of getting that information from Palm Beach county.
LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS - The property is currently an old orange
grove. Tree preservation is proposed where determined feasible
by the City Forester at time of preliminary plat approval (the
next step in the process after annexation). Littoral zone
plantings are proposed around the water management tract, as
required. Perimeter PUD buffers and buffers alonq public and
private rights-of-way are proposed. These buffers are proposed
within easements and not within a separate tract as was approved
for Boynton Nurseries and Woolbright Place. However, one
difference is that these buffers are not separate from required
rear setbacks.
The buffers along the private rights-of-way will be ten feet
wide. The buffers along the public rights-of-way will be fifteen
feet wide (increased from ten feet at the request of staff) with
a six foot high wall, trees planted 30 feet on center and a
hedge. The buffers along Royal Manor mobile home park and
Boynton Nurseries are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet
TO: Carrie Parker
-4-
December 15, 1994
on center and a hedge. The buffers along the Floral Drive lots
are five feet wide with trees planted 30 feet on center, to
include a five foot high chain link fence with a hedge
(integrated fence/hedge combination proposed at the request of
staff) .
RECOMMENDATION
The developer has worked diligently with staff to produce the
proposed master plan. In the spirit of compromise to further the
goals of the City's annexation proqram, the Planning and Zoning
Department recommends approval of the attached sausalito Groves
master plan for rezoning to PUD, subject to the following
conditions which shall be noted on four sets of revised master
plan drawings, prior to preliminary plat submission:
1. Indicate that the existing rights-of-way for Gateway
Boulevard and Lawrence Road are consistent with the ultimate
right-of-way, since the right-of-way dedication is complete.
2. Secured entrances shall install a security code activated
system.
3. Site plan approval shall be required for the private
recreation area, security system, common area landscaping,
buffers, and project signage.
4. Delete reference to "pad area".
5. Safe corners shall comply with Appendix C - Subdivisions,
Platting, Article X, Section 7 of the City's Code of
Ordinances.
6. Additional turn lanes shall be provided at project entrances
if Palm Beach county required them as part of their approval
of the project.
7. The number of recreation parking spaces required is 25.12
(i.e. - 26) and provided is 25.
8. Street pavement width shall be a minimum of 22 feet on all
internal rights-of-way.
9. Correct the dimension of the front, minimum building setback
of 15 feet, so it corresponds to the details and chart
provided.
10. Indicate that the landscape buffer easement on the perimeter
lot detail is five feet and add lot 92 to those identified
as perimeter lots.
11. Add lots 1, 20, 84 and 86 to those identified as right-of-
way lots. (Lots 1 and 84 are also corner lots and lots 20
and 86 are also perimeter lots.)
12. Add lots 124 and 125 to those identified as corner lots.
13. Indicate that the three foot easement on each lot is for
drainaqe and maintenance of the building overhang.
14. Provide a survey of the property.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:SausGRez
NOTICE OF
NOTICE
LAND USE
OF ZONING
CHANGE
CHANGE
The Ci t"y of Boynton Beach proposes to annex, change the use of
land, and rezone the area shown on the map in this advertisement.
A public hearinq on these proposals will be held before the city
Commission on December 20, 1994 at 7:00 P.M or as soon thereafter
as the agenda permits. This pUblic hearing will be held in the
City Commission Chambers in the City of Boynton Beach city Hall at
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida.
a
~
Ir
W
I
::5
T
w
..J
~
~
q
Q
~
SITE
CITY
UMIT8-
BOYNTON CANAL C-18
CD
.. ....
f\....... ,f.
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
~ m
o w m
00
!:i I;
I:J91
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
REQUEST:
Maurice Epstein, Trustee
31.34 acres at the northwest corner of
Lawrence Rd and NW 22nd Avenue (Gateway Blvd.)
ANNEXATION: Ordinance No. 094-38 (proposed)
AMEND FUTURE LAND USE PLAN:
~
From - HR/8 High Residential 8 (County)
To - Moderate Density Residential (City)
REZONE:
From - RM-SE Multi-Family Residential (County)
To - PUD Planned Unit Development (City)
PETITIONER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
REQUEST:
A copy of the app::'ication~nnexation, land use pl. amendment,
and rezoning, and the legal descriptions are available for review
by the publ ic in the planning and Zoning Department and in the
Office of the City Clerk.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearings in
person or by attorney and be heard. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision of the Planning and Development Board and City
Commission with respect to any matter considered at these meetings
will need a record of the proceedings and for such purposes, may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based. CMC/AAE
~
SUZANNE M. KRUSE, CITY CLERK
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR~DA
..N.Z'r'.TNIII....1l
PUBLISH: BOYNTON BEACH ~EWS
DECEMBER 2 and 13, 1994.
c: City Mgr, City Attorney, City Commission, Planning, Files