The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS DEVE. PMENT SERVICES DEPARTMEJ\ PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 97-377 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki, Acting Senior Planner DATE: July 7,1997 SUBJECT: Phenix Project (BGI Industries facility) Community Design Plan Appeal- 1st review staff comments CDPA 97-002 The following are 1st review comments for the above referenced project: 1. It is recommended that the selected species of the landscape buffer have the following specifications: . Spacing - 2 feet o.c. . Height at the time of planting - 2.5 feet . Height to be maintained after reaching maturity 6 feet . Dense foliage, as approved by City Forester . 100 percent species will be native to Florida. xc: Central File J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BGI\CDPA\1st rev staff comments cdpa bgi-overhead doors. doc PROJECT NAME: BGI AT QUANTUM PARK (PHENIX PROJECT) LOCATION: NE CORNER OF GATEWAY BLVD & QUANTUM BLVD. COMPUTER ID: BGI I FILE NO.: CDPA 97-002 I TYPE OF APPLICATION: COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN APPEAL APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: BGI INDUSTRIES, INC. BGI INDUSTRIES, INC. PHONE: ATT: GONZALO RA V AGO FAX: PHONE: (954) 566-9002 ADDRESS: FAX: (954) 566-7799 ADDRESS: 2601 E. OAKLAND PARK BLVD #101 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33306 DATE: SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL 6/30/97 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 717/97 PUBLIC NOTICE: ADMINISTRATIVE TRC MEETING: 6/30/97 TRC MEETING: 7/8/97 RESUBMITTAL DATE: 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 7/22/97 MEETING: CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 7/25/97 COMMENTS: S:\FORMS\PROJECT TRACKING INFO CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Commission Meeting Dates in to City Manager's Office Meeting Dates in to City Manager's Office 0 May 6, 1997 April 25, 1997 (noon) 0 July I, 1997 June 20, 1997 (noon) 0 May 20, 1997 May 9, 1997 (noon) 0 July IS, 1997 July 3, 1997 (Thursday noon) 0 June 3, 1997 May 23, 1997 (noon) 0 August 5, 1997 July 25, 1997 (noon) 0 June 17, 1997 June 6, 1997 (noon) 0 August 19, 1997 August 8, 1997 (noon) IZI July 25, 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the July 25, 1997 City Commission meeting under Consent. The Planning and Development Board, with a 7-0 vote, recommended approval subject to all staff comments in Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval (see attached). For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 97-376. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: BGl at Quantum Park (phenix Project) AGENT: Gonzalo Ravago OWNER: BGl Industries, Inc LOCATION: Northeast comer of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Request to appeal the Community Design Plan regulations to allow overhead doors on the east elevation of the building facing Gateway Boulevard. PROGRAM IMP ACT: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A -If~ ~ ,p ead's Signature City Manager's Signature Development Services ~~~~ Planning and Z ing Direc \ \CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\BGl\CDP A \Agenda Item Request.doc EXHIBIT "D" Conditions of Approval Project name- BGI Industries facility (Phenix Project) File number: CDPA 97-002 Reference" Aletter of request dated June 30 1997 . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: No response UTILITIES Comments: No response FIRE Comments: No response POLICE Comments: No response ENGINEERING DMSION Comments: No response BUILDING DIVISION Comments: No response P ARKS AND RECREATION Comments: No response FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: No response PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. It is recommended that the selected species of the landscape buffer have the following specifications: . Spacing - 2 feet o.c. . Height at the time of planting - 2.5 feet . Height to be maintained after reaching maturity - 6 feet . Dense foliage to achieve a continuous visual screen . 100 percent of the species to be native to Florida. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 2. NONE ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 3. To be determined. MINUTES PLANNING AND DEVELlJt'MENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 22, 1997 Description: Gonzalo Ravago BGllndustries, Inc. Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard (Lots 34A, 348. 35, 36. 37, and 38 in Quantum Park) Request for site plan approval to construct a 160,033 square foot cosmetic and perfume manufacturing facility containing corporate offices on 18.345 acres of land in Quantum Corporate Park. Agent: Owner: Location: Jose Diaz with HIT\! Corporation, 8700 West Flagler, Miami, Florida, had no objections to any of the staff conditions. Mr. Aguila wanted comment 49 to be a requirement, not a recommendation. He did not want cypress mulch to be used on this project. Mr. Diaz agreed not to use cypress mulch. Motion Mr. Rosenstock moved to approve the request for site plan approval for BGllndustries, Inc. at Quantum Park to construct a 160,033 square foot cosmetic and perfume manufacturing facility containing corporate offices on 18.345 acres of land in Quantum Corporate Park, located at the northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard (Lots 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37, and 38 in Quantum Park) subject to all staff comments and subject to cypress mulch not being used. Vice Chairman Golden seconded the motion, which carried 7-0. B. Appeals Community Design Plan Appeal Description: BGI at Quantum Park (Phenix Project) Gonzalo Ravago BGI Industries, Inc. Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard Request to appeal the Community Design Plan regulations to allow overhead doors on the east elevation of the building facing Gateway Boulevard. 1. Project: Agent: Owner: Location: 4 -~ _.._--,"---- --.----------.- MINUTES PLANNING AND OEVELOP~ENT BOARD MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA JULY 22, 1997 Mr Rosenstock said the existing Code prohibits the use of overhead doors on private and public thoroughfares. He inquired about their use in industrial parks. Ms. Heyden advised that the Community Design Plan prohibits overhead doors on certain streets in the City. A list of these streets and the reasons for prohibiting overhead doors on those streets is stated in the Community Design Plan. Gateway Boulevard is one of those streets because it is a major thoroughfare, is heavily traveled. is one of our major arteries, and because of aesthetics. Since the Community Design Plan has been written. master plan modifications have been filed for Quantum Park. There ar~ now some industrial lots on Gateway Boulevard in Quantum Park. The subject parcel. which is a combination of a number of lots. had master plan designations of office and industrial. Since the applicant had combined lots. he does not have to go through an appeal. It was not the intention to exclude overhead doors on all public and private rights-of-way in the City. The intention was to exclude them on certain rights-of-way based on location and major arteries. Chairman Wische pointed out that the overhead doors will be facing a public/private street: however. they are set back 300 feet from the road with a five foot berm and a six foot high hedge on top of the berm. Therefore, no one will be able to see them. Vice Chairman Golden felt the Code requirement is a good requirement. However. in this case. very good screening was provided. Therefore, he had no problem with this request. Mr. Rosenstock agreed. Motion Vice Chairman Golden moved to approve the request to appeal the Community Design Plan regulations for BGI at Quantum Park to allow overhead doors on the east elevation of the building facing Gateway Boulevard. subject to the proposal submitted by the applicant and staff comments. Mr. Rosenstock seconded the motion, which carried 7-0. A. Public Hearing Zoning Code Variance/Parking Lot Variance 1. Project: Agent: Owner: BGllndustries, Inc. at Quantum Park Susan Delegal Holland and Knight BGI Industries, Inc. 5 ----- ----~---- l-. rv OF BOYNTON BEAC~L PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, July 22. 1997 TIME: 7:00 P.M. PLACE: Commission Chambers 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Introduction of Mayor, Commissioners and Board Members. 3. Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson 4. Agenda Approval. 5. Approval of Minutes. 6. Communications and Announcements. A. Report from the Planning and Zoning Department 1. Final disposition of last City Commission meeting agenda items. 7. Swearing in of witnesses. 8. Old Business None 9. New Business A. PUBLIC HEARING Zonina Code Variance/Parkina Lot Variance 1. PROJECT: BGI Industries, Inc. at Quantum Park AGENT: Susan Delegal Holland and Knight OWNER: BGI Industries, Inc. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard (lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B. 35, 36, 37 and 38 in Quantum Park) Page 2 of 5 Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda, July 22, 1997 DESCRIPTION: Request for a zoning code variance and parking lot variance from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 7.H.3 - Accessways. and Chapter 23, Article 11.H.7 - Number of Driveways. for an additional accessway beyond the two (2) accessways allowed by code. Conditional Use 2. PROJECT: Enterprise Rent-A-Car AGENT: Dee Monette Gil Hyatt Construction OWNER: Harry Hamilton, trustee LOCATION: 1009 North Federal Highway DESCRIPTION: Request to raze an existing building and construct a 528 square foot modular building/trailer with parking and landscaping for automobile leasing on a .17 acre lot. Abandonment 3. PROJECT: Enterprise Rent-A-Car AGENT: Dee Monette Gil Hyatt Construction OWNER: Harry Hamilton, trustee LOCATION: 1009 N. Federal Highway DESCRIPTION: Request to abandon a 20 foot wide strip of land just west of lots 3 and 4 of Block 1 of the Lake Addition to Boynton Beach subdivision in connection with the Enterprise Rent-a- Car conditional use request. 4. PROJECT: Polio Tropical at Shoppes of Boynton AGENT: David S. Drobner, Esq. OWNER: Draper and Kramer of Florida, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda, July 22, 1997 lOCATION: Northeast corner of Congress Avenue and Quantum Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Request to abandon a portion of a 15 foot wide utility easement. B. APPEALS Administrative Appeal 1. PROJECT: Boynton Commons PCD AGENT: Joe lelonek land Design South OWNER: Bill and Elsie Winchester lOCATION: Southwest corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue DESCRIPTION: Request for an administrative appeal to significantly modify the previously approved building elevations of the Boynton Commons PCD shopping center. Community Desion Plan Appeal 2. PROJECT: BGI at Quantum Park (Phenix Project) AGENT: Gonzalo Ravago OWNER: BGllndustries, Inc. lOCATION: Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Request to appeal the Community Design Plan regulations to allow overhead doors on the east elevation of the building facing Gateway Boulevard. C. USE APPROVAL 1. PROJECT: Shoppes of Woolbright PCD AGENT: Robert N. Hochberg Page 4 of 5 Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda, July 22, 1997 OWNER: Home Depot LOCATION: North side of the intersection of Woolbright Road and S. W. 8th Street. DESCRIPTION: Request to amend the list of Shoppes of Woolbright PCD permitted uses to include vendor carts. D. SITE PLANS New Site Plan 1. PROJECT: BGllndustries, Inc. at Quantum Park AGENT: Gonzalo Ravago OWNER: BGllndustries, Inc. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard (lots 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 in Quantum Park). DESCRIPTION: Request for site plan approval to construct a 160,033 square foot cosmetic and perfume manufacturing facility containing corporate offices on 18.345 acres of land in Quantum Corporate Park. 2. PROJECT: Auto Care Centers of America, Inc. (Heise PC D) AGENT: Anna S. Cottrell OWNER: Westlake Hardware, Inc. LOCATION: Approximately 160 feet south of the southeast comer of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road DESCRIPTION: Request for site plan approval to construct a 18,530 square foot retail complex to include minor automotive repair retail uses on 3.63 acres of land. 3. PROJECT: Palm Beach Realty Investors, Inc. at the Boynton Commerce Center PID AGENT: Richard Ahrens Page 5 of 5 Planning and Development Board Meeting Agenda, July 22, 1997 OWNER: Boynton Commerce Center Limited Partnership LOCATION: South terminus of Corporate Drive DESCRIPTION: Request to construct a 35,715 square foot multi-tenant building on a 2,88 acre vacant lot within the Boynton Commerce Center PID. E. SITE PLAN TIME EXTENSION 1. PROJECT: Healing for the Nations Church AGENT: Vincent DeLalla LOCATION: West side of Seacrest Boulevard, approximately 335 feet north of Mission Hill Road. DESCRIPTION: Request for a one year time extension of the site plan approval granted on July 16, 1996 to July 16, 1998 for construction of a 6,888 square foot church located on 1.006 acres. D. OTHER NONE 10. Comments by members 11. Adjournment NOTICE ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S.286.0105) THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (561) 375-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLE ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. J:\SHRDA TA\Planning\SHARED\WP\AGENDAS\P&D\7 -22-97.doc DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM #96-355 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION JULY 22, 1997 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name: Phenix Project (BGI Industries facility) Applicant: Gonzalo Ravago of BGI Industries, Inc. Location: Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard (lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 in Quantum Corporate Park). FileNo.: NWSP 97-016 Land Use Plan Designation: Industrial (I) Zoning Designation: Planned Industrial Development (PID) Type of Use: Cosmetic and perfume manufacturing Number of Units: Not applicable Square Footage: Site Area: Building Area: 18.345 acres 160,033 sq. ft. Surrounding land uses and Zoning: (see Exhibit "A" - location map) North - undeveloped lots zoned PID Page 2 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-355 BGllndustries, Inc. South - Gateway Boulevard right-of-way and farther south is a retention area for Quantum Corporate Park East - Undeveloped land zoned R1-AAA. West - Right-of-way of Quantum Boulevard, and farther west are undeveloped lots zoned PID. Existing Site Characteristics: The site is undeveloped and contains mature vegetation consisting of several trees located mainly along Quantum Boulevard. The largest and the most dense concentration of the landscape material is on Lot 38 (corner of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard). The predominant specie of the existing trees, according to the enclosed tree survey is Slash Pine. The survey of the property indicates also several utility boxes located within the 15 foot wide utility easement extending along the portion of the perimeter of the site abutting street rights-of-way. Proposed Development: The developer is proposing construction of a 160,033 square feet, cosmetic and perfume manufacturing facility to be located on lots 32, 33, 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38 in Quantum Corporate Park. The site will contain: . production/warehouse facility - 136,205 square feet . office area - 23,828 square feet . employee parking - 307 parking spaces . guest parking - 36 display spaces Due to the high concentration of the valuable landscape material (native Slash Pine), the southernmost part of the parcel will remain in natural state (see Exhibit "B" - proposed site plan). The site plan indicates future expansion of the proposed manufacturing facility, however, this expansion is not the subject of this site plan approval consideration. Concurrency: Page 3 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-355 BGllndustries, Inc. a. Traffic Concurrency for traffic was addressed, when the Quantum Park PID was master planned, through a comprehensive traffic study evaluated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. In order for staff to determine whether the project complies with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, the anticipated number of average daily trips per day was requested to be provided, which was received. Staff has determined that the project complies with the approved traffic study. b. Drainage- Insufficient drainage information has been submitted by the applicant, thus precluding staff from certifying compliance with the City's drainage levels of service. Although typically conducted at site plan stage, staff is recommending that this review requirement be postponed to time of permit review. Driveways: There are three driveways proposed to the property: . one from Gateway Boulevard (15 foot wide, one-way, access only limited to delivery vehicles), . two from Quantum Park - the southern 24 foot wide access driveway with a median island is designed to serve primary clients and guests of the facility : the northern, 24 foot wide access driveway will serve mainly employees, as it is located in close proximity to the main employee parking. The number of driveways per developable parcel in a PID is limited to two. Therefore, a zoning variance application was requested and submitted to seek relief from this code limitation. The approval of this site plan is subject to granting the zoning variance by the Planning and Development Board. Parking Facility: There are 337 on-site parking spaces to be provided for the facility. With anticipated employment of 310 persons, the City's Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2 - Zoning requires 233 parking spaces in addition to parking spaces for visitors (the number of spaces is not regulated by code, but is determined by the petitioner). The amount of parking spaces for visitors has been specified as 24, which is 10 percent of the required employee Page 4 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-355 BGI Industries, Inc. Landscaping: parking. Arguably, it is a reasonable number for visitor parking. Therefore, it is recommended that the total of 257 parking spaces are required for this site. According to the submitted site plan, the required loading zones are fronting Gateway Boulevard, which is a public right-of-way. It constitutes a violation of the zoning code and a variance application seeking relief from this requirement was submitted. The approval of this site plan is subject to granting the zoning variance by the Planning and Development Board. The required landscape of the site will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. It has to be noted that the petitioner will conserve and maintain a large part of the existing on site landscaping that will amount to a significant excess of landscape material on the site and increase visual attractiveness of this part of the Quantum Corporate Park. Building and Site Regulations: Building and site regulations will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. Community Design Plan: The proposed structure has a character of an industrial/office complex. It consists of a production/warehouse facility and office building. The office part is fronting the main access driveway to the complex. This driveway is terminated with a circular turn-about providing a covered drive-up to the main entrance of the office complex. The production and warehouse part of the complex is located north of the office facility. Being located on the intersection of two major streets Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard, the site has a very prominent exposure. Therefore, the quality of the architectural design of the complex is of utmost importance. The office part is a two story structure, finished with a combination of stuccoed exterior wall, glass wall panels and windows, and is covered with a slopped roof. Both office and factory parts of the building are connected with a covered walkway. The production facility is finished with a combination of a white and beige stucco and is covered with a flat roof. The modular exterior walls are decorated with a combination Page 5 Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum #97-355 BGllndustries, Inc. of fenestration (windows and glass blocks), corrugated metal veneer, decorative niches, metal grills and overflow scuppers. In respect to overhead doors, the building elevation fronting Gateway Boulevard, which is a public street, contains these doors. An administrative appeal from the Community Design Plan was requested and submitted and needs to be considered by the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission. The approval of this site plan is subject to approval of the appeal. Signage: Submitted sign proposal is consistent with approved Quantum Corporate Park sign program and relevant provisions of the Land Development Regulations contained in Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan and Chapter 21 - Signs. Proposed signage will fully meet the code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Division recommends approval of this site plan request, subject to the comments included in Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval. The TRC recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. xc: Central File J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\BGIINWSP\sITE PLAN STAFF REPORT-bgLdoc EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "c" EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: BGI Industries, Inc. at Quantum Park File number: NWSP 97-016 Reference: The plans consist of 1 I sheets identified as 2nd Review. New Site Plan. File #NWSP 97-016 with a June 30, 1997 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: 1. All dumpster and compactor locations for the above location meet the approval of the Public Works Department. The builders should be advised to have locking pins on all dumpster locations with doors, to secure doors open and closed. Also to be noted, on the day of refuse pickup it is the responsibility of the store manager to have the gates open. UTILITIES Comments: 2. Palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utilities easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. (Sec. 7.5-18.1) 3. Dept. of Health permits will be required for the water system serving this project, and may be required for the sewer, depending upon final design configuration. Both plans must be approved by this office. (Sec. 26-12) 4. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the city code requirement of 1500 g.p.m. on site (LDR Chap. 6, Art. Sec. 16), or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater. (Sec. 26-16(a)) 5. A capacity reservation fee will be due for this project upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size. (Sec. 26-34(E)) 6. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the city shall be included within utilities easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the city. (Sec. 26- 33(a)) 7. Please indicate that all points on the building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant, by showing said hydrant on the plans. (LDR Chap. 6, Article IV, Sec. 16) If this is not achievable due to building Page 2 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT size3, a variance may be required. 8. Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one. (Sec. 26- 207) 9. City water may not be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. (Comp Plan policy 3C.3A) 10. Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform with all rules of the city and the South Florida Water Management District. This certification shall include a statement that the Master Drainage system for Quantum Park has sufficient capacity to accommodate the drainage flows from this facility without excessive discharge. (LDR Chap. 4, Sec. 7F) 11. The waste stream from the manufacturing process must meet the city's pretreatment requirements. A sampling point must be provided to allow monitoring of this waste stream. (Sec. 26-143, 26-147) FIRE Comments: 12. The stabilized ground connecting the south parking lot to the east service area should be paved to provide more effective truck access. POLICE Comments: 13. Recommend the median of Quantum Boulevard, at the major ingress/egress of the site be corrected to accommodate vehicle movement from the opposing parcel (Motorola). The median needs to be cut to allow a better turning radius for vehicles making a left turn out of the driveway of Motorola. 14. Recommend the existing median opening on Gateway Blvd., at the truck entrance, be closed so no turns are allowed for eastbound traffic. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 15. Catch basins shall be located in grass area. [Chapter 23, Article II.F.] 16. Need details showing pavement sections and curb types prior to issuance of building permits. [Chapter 23, Article I, Section 5.BA.] Page 3 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 17. Traffic control marking and signage needed at all ends of islands where traffic is leaving parking areas (stop signs and stop bars). Also, striping and signage needed around entrance island. [Chapter 43, Section 7.B.2.] 18. Handicap spaces need to be signed and striped in accordance with Florida Accessibility Code and current city standards. [Chapter 23, Article ILK.] 19. Street name signs are needed at exits to Quantum Boulevard. Need detail prior to issuance of building permits. [Chapter 6, Article III, Section 13.] 20. On sheet CI-2 need to show size and type of pipe run from S-36 to existing catch basin. Also, same needed from structure S-13 to S-15 and from S-15 to existing catch basin. [Chapter 4, Section 7.F.1.] 21. Swale detail needed on proposed swale area. [Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.] 22. Detail or note needed for area on plans called out for stabilized ground. (Need stabilization requirements). [Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.F] 23. Median alterations on Quantum Boulevard need dimensions of removal and extensions as well as pavement markings needed and pavement sections including curbing. [Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10. Y.] Also, details needed on entrance road offN.W. 22nd Avenue. 24. Site lighting needs to conform with LOR Chapter 23, Article ILA.I. Submit proposed photometrics prior to issuance of building permit. 25. Indicate invert elevations of the three existing stormwater structures (within the road R/W). 26. At the N.E. comer of site add "Do Not Enter" sign and appropriate pavement striping to prevent vehicles entering the one-way truck exit. [Chapter 23, Article II.B.1.] 27. Show 6" thick sidewalk thru all three driveways. [Chapter 23, Article II.P.] 28. Provide appropriate fire lane markings and signage at the drop-offf'Future Parking" area and along the access route to the service area and south parking lot [Chapter 23, Article II.M] 29. Provide an Engineer's sealed certification that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc. including, but not limited to, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 30. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the city's code Page 4 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, pavmg, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencIes such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD, L WDD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. Chapter I, Article I, Section 6.A. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 31. At time of site plan review building and site signage is required to be submitted and reviewed for compliance with the applicable code regulations. Please note structural drawings, wind load calculations and electrical data are not required at time of site plan review but rather at time of permit review. The submitted plans are incomplete with respect to the following sign specifications that are not totally identified on the plans; setback dimensions for the project identification sign, size of the site sign structure, size of the sign face of all signs, height of the site sign, location of the building signage with respect to the roof line, form of illumination of all signs, color of all sign faces and color of the finish surface of the site sign structure. Quantum Park has an approved sign program that governs specific aspects of the slgnage m the park. The backlit project identification sign shown on Sheet Al-l does not comply with the internally illuminated fluorescent lamp type of sign illumination which is approved for the park. The building signage shown on Sheet A3-1 may be prohibited by the code if the signage is above the roof line. The size of the non-word depiction (logo) may have to be reduced in size if it is larger than 20% of the sign erected. Amend the plans to show compliance with the previous stated deficiencies and the following regulations or omit all signage from the plans and file a subsequent site plan for sign approval. [Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article IV, Section 5 and Section 7; Chapter 9- Community Design Plan, Sign Code, Article IV, Section 5 and Section 7; Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10.1.] 32. Building and Site Signage A) Project Identification Sign (site) 1. Dimension setback from property lines - minimum 10 feet. 11. Dimension area of sign face - maximum 52.682 square feet. iii. Identify style of lettering - no limitation. iv. Dimension the height of the sign structure - maximum 7 feet. v. Quality allowed - maximum I on site (see sign program for additional project identification signage). VI. Illumination - Specify that the sign is internally illuminated with fluorescent lamps. vii. Colors (sign structure and face of sign) - Comply with the colors identified in the approved sign program (see attached). INCLUDE REJECT Page 5 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS viii. Design (sign structure and face of sign) - Comply with the design depicted in the approved sign program (see attached). B) Directional Signage (site) I. Dimension setback from property lines - Minimum 0 feet. 11. Dimension area of sign face - Maximum 4 square feet. iii. Dimension the height of the sign structure - Maximum 3 feet. IV. Quantity allowed - Maximum 4 (show location of all proposed). v. Identify style of lettering - Limited to one (1). VI. Illumination - None approved. V11. Colors (sign structure and face of sign) - Comply with the design identified in the approved sign program (see attached). viii. Design (sign structure and face of sign) - Comply with the colors identified in the approved sign program (see attached). C) Building Signage I. Location - Mounted to any face of any structure. 11. Dimension the size of all proposed signs - Maximum total area all signs 630 square feet. iii. Height of sign - Not allowed above the roof line (show the roof line at the location of the proposed two (2) wall signs). iv. Quantity - No limit (total area shall not exceed maximum allowed sign area). v. Design- . Limited to one (1) style of lettering (identify letter style) . Limited to one (1) type of sign (identify type of sign). . Non-word depictions (logo) - maximum size not to exceed 20% of sign erected (dimension size of all logos). . Specify type of illumination. . Colors - Limited to two (2) colors plus black and white for all building signage with the exception on non-word depiction signage which has no color limitation. To ensure consistency in sign colors specify all colors by identifying color name, color code and manufacturer. 33. The site plan and other plan view drawings of the site do not indicate the location of the handicapped accessible entrance to the office building and the proposed sidewalk to be located within the abutting right-of-way. Amend the plans to identify the location of the accessible path including specifying the width and grade elevations of the path consistent with the regulations of the Accessibility Code. [Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2.III (1) thru (4)]. 34. The 36" x 48" drawings included with the submittal exceed the maximum document size of 30" x 42". Therefore, reduce the size of the landscape plan and surveys accordingly. [Department of Development Policy Manual - Document Quality; page A-4] INCLUDE REJECT Page 6 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 35. The plans indicate large quantities of alcohol are being used and stored on site. The working drawings for these areas shall comply with the applicable occupancy classification regulations identified in the building codes. Permit plans for the proposed project shall comply with the applicable Building, Energy and Handicapped Codes. [Chapter 20 - Building, Housing and Construction Regulations] 36. Indicate the finish floor elevation of each structure on the floor plan drawing or identify the finish floor elevation within the building footprint of each structure shown on the site plan. The floor elevation shall comply with the minimum standards referenced in the code. [Chapter 20 - Building, Housing and Construction Regulations, Article VII] PARKS AND RECREA nON Comments: None FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 37. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 38. Submit a copy of the survey containing a clause stating that the property was abstracted for all easements, right-of-ways and utility lines (abstracted survey) prior to Issuance of building permit, as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.A.3. 39. On the Site Plan indicate and dimension the required by code building setback along 22nd Avenue (Gateway Boulevard), as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.l. 40. On the Site Plan indicate and dimension all proposed building setbacks, as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.l. 41. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.l requires that a site plan will illustrate all proposed buildings and structures. The submitted site plan indicates structures being proposed for the site, however, no information regarding height, exterior dimensions and setbacks of these structures is provided. Include this information for: . cooling tower, . water treatment facility, if applicable, Page 7 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS . guard house, . water feature located north of the office building, . bridge to the existing wooded area located south of the development, and any other structure to be erected on the site on a set of permit drawings. All proposed structures have to be in full compliance of the City Code, otherwise, an additional submittal for a major site plan modification may be required (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 9.C.3). 42. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.l requires that all proposed buildings will be labeled in respect to their proposed use. Indicate the use of a building attached to the southern elevation of Cosmetics Factory. 43. Provide dumpster enclosure details, as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J. and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3. 44. Include a copy of the landscape plan drawn to the same scale as the site plan, as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.1. 45. Prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting provide a presentation board containing samples of all major exterior building materials as required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.D.I. 46. All exterior finishes shall be identified by a manufacturer's name and code number. Prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting provide a copy of elevations containing this information. 47. For consistency, coordinate locations of all proposed structures on site plan and landscape plan. 48. On the Landscape Plan, amend the tabular summary of the planting material to include a "landscape material required by the code" category. Also, provide relevant calculations for this category. . For the landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way and along abutting properties, provide perimeter distances of the parcel for which the landscape buffer material is being calculated (Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code). Apply an appropriate ratio of one tree every 40 feet and/or one shrub every two feet. . For required parking area interior landscaping apply appropriate ratio of required landscape material (Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code, Section 5.G). . For peripheral landscape buffer select landscape material in INCLUDE REJECT Page 8 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS accordance with approved design guidelines. Note: In selection of the required landscape material follow planting specifications included in Land Development Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Sections 3,4 and 5. 49. Incorporate the above calculation into the tabulation of the landscape material provided for the site. Note, that the native requirement is fifty percent of the required landscape planting (Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.4.6). 50. Amend the landscape specifications of the peripheral greenbelt as per approved design guidelines. 51. On the landscape plan indicate all existing and proposed easements and lighting poles as to avoid potential conflicts with the utility lines and proposed structures. 52. Within the plant listing specify mulch to be used as a ground cover. Note that it is a policy of the City not to allow Cypress mulch as a ground cover, as Cypress tree is considered to be to valuable to be shredded for mulch. Use another type of mulch, such as Eucaliptus or Melaleuca. 53. An environmental review permit will be required for the proposed use, prior to issuance of the building permit. 54. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7,D.1 reqmres that architectural submittal shall contain all floor planes of all buildings proposed for the site. The submittal does not contain floor plans of office buildings, covered walkways, guard house and the second story of the manufacturing building. Prior to Planning and Development Board meeting provide the required floor plans and elevations of the guard house building. 55. Submitted elevations of the proposed complex do not match floor plans in respect of length, openings and distances between various parts of the complex. For consistency, eliminate discrepancies and provide elevations and floor plans matching each other. 56. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.2 requires that signage information consistent with Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 10. I, Chapter 21 - Sign Code, Article IV, Section 7 and the approved sign program for Quantum Corporate Park is provided at the time of site plan submittal. If the signage information will not be submitted prior to Planning and Development Board meeting, another formal submittal will be required and be reviewed by the Planning and Development Board prior to sign permits being issued for the proposed INCLUDE REJECT Page 9 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS development. 57. Any rooftop equipment will have to be screened from view at a distance of 600 feet. If such equipment is planned, indicate its location and the height of the equipment above the top of the parapet wall or mansard roof . Provide elevations of the structure showing the roof top equipment and the required screening (all reduced to a small scale) and draw in on these elevations the Iines-of-sight connecting the highest point of the equipment with the eye level from a distance of 600 hundred feet from the building (LDR, Chapter 9, Section II.E). If necessary, provide architectural details of screening structures. 58. Indicate location of all loading zones and a size of a typical loading zone (12 feet by 35 feet) in accordance with the PID design standards (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.l). 59. All service areas shall be screen from public view by a buffer wall or a vegetative buffer, as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plan, Section 1O.C.l and Chapter 7.5, Article II - Landscape Code. 60. On the Landscape Plan and Site Plan provide "visibility triangles" at each point of access to the proposed development in accordance with Land Development Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H. 61. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 9 - Community Design Plans, Section 11.J prohibits overhead doors to be located within elevations of buildings facing N.W. 22nd Avenue (Gateway Boulevard). No building permit will be issued until the appeal form this code requirement will be considered and granted by Planning and Development Board and the City Commission. 62. The code limits the number of accessways to a developable parcel to no more than two. (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 7.H.3 - Accessways and Chapter 23. Article II.H.7 - Number of Driveways. The site plan indicates the total of three accessways to the site. No building permit will be issued until the submitted variance application from these code requirements will be considered and a zoning variance granted by Planning and Development Board and the City Commission. 63. Provide a traffic analysis of accessways in respect to anticipated peak hour trips and average daily trips generated by the site, as required by Land Development Regulations, Chapter 1, Article II - Definitions: Major Driveway. Note that if any accessway will generate trips in excess of 250 trips in any single hour or 1000 trips per 24 hour day, this accessway will INCLUDE REJECT Page 10 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 DEPARTMENTS be considered a major driveway and be required to provide a "throat" of 100 feet. 64. Provide a unity oftide document for all lots being combined for the site. 65. In accordance with Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 7.E, amend your site plan tabulation to include the following: A. vehicular use areas (excluding sidewalks) 8, other paved areas (paved areas other than vehicular use area) C. total lot coverage (total lot coverage is a sum of building coverage and all hard surface pavement coverage) D. height of the guard house 66. It is recommended that all references to the future expansion of the complex be considered to be of an informational nature only, and a formal major site plan modification will be required, if the submittal will trigger such modification (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Section 9). 67. Prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting submit 8Y:z" by 11" copies of the site plan, landscape plan and elevations. 68. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 7. H.2 requires that parking calculations in Planned Industrial Developments are based solely on employment and not on square footage of the buildings even when the proposal consists of several different uses. Amend the required parking calculations in accordance with the above quoted section of the code. 69. Exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, etc. shall be screened from public view by a buffer wall or continuous vegetative buffer as required by the Landscape Code (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 9, Section 10.C). 70. Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 7. H.11 prevents location of off-street loading facilities fronting a public right-of-way. The submitted site plan indicates such loading facilities east of the warehouse section of the complex and fronting N.W. 22nd Avenue (Gateway Boulevard). No building permits will be issued until the Planning and Development Board and City Commission consider and grant a zoning variance from this requirement. This code deficiency could not have been predicted by staff until the formal site plan submittal was turned in. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS INCLUDE REJECT Page 11 BGI Industries, Inc. File No. NWSP 97-016 71. To be determined. \.-11 Y IVIIVI I II "":,\ ~ 72. To be determined. Ibme s:\projects\cond of appr\ 9.B.2 COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN APPEAL BGI at QUANTUM PARK (PHENIX PROJECT) DEVELL . )MENT DEARTMENT SERVll .S PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 97-376 Staff Report For Planning and Development Board Meeting, and City Commission Meeting TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, AICP Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki---1' V Acting Senior Planne~ DATE: July 18, 1997 SUBJECT: BGI at Quantum Park (Phenix Project) - CDPA 97-002 (overhead doors) NATURE OF REQUEST Susan Delegal of Holland & Knight LLP, agent for BGllndustries Inc., owner of the property located at the northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map), is requesting approval of a Community Design Plan appeal to allow overhead doors, located on the elevation of the proposed manufacturing building, to face Gateway Boulevard. This appeal has been submitted in connection with a concurrent site plan approval request for a 160,033 square foot manufacturing/office complex to be located on the subject site, comprised of lots 34A, 34B, 35, 36, 37 and 38, within the Quantum Corporate Park PID (see Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan and Elevations). BACKGROUND The proposed industrial complex combines several functions: . Manufacturing . Research . Storage/warehousing . Office . Supporting facilities . Employee recreational areas The storage/warehousing section of the BGI complex is located in the eastern section of the factory building and its elevation, containing overhead doors, is facing Gateway Boulevard. I Page 2 Memorandum No. 97-376 BGI- overhead doors ADAP 97-002 Gateway Boulevard is listed in Section 11.J of Chapter 7 - Community Design Plan of city's land development regulations, as one of the city streets along which building elevations fronting these streets shall not display overhead doors. Gateway Boulevard, as its name implies when it was renamed as such in the early 1990's, is a major entrance to the city. For this reason, it was included among many of other streets in the city as one which the city desires closer architectural scrutiny and higher standards. ANALYSIS The longitudinal shape of the parcel in conjunction with its location on the corner of two major city streets, provides high visibility of the site (the combined length of two street frontages of the parcel accounts for 2/3 of the total length of its perimeter). In addition, the multi-functional industrial complex design is dictated by operational requirements to meet the efficiency standards for manufacturing. This limits the design flexibility, as it relates to reconfiguration of design schemes. The petitioner was informed about code requirements during pre-application meetings. However, the above-mentioned inflexibility due to industrial function, in conjunction with the peculiar characteristics of the site, precluded any reconfiguration that would fully comply with the code. In order to alleviate the overhead door visibility problem, the architect has prepared a site visibility analysis of the area concern showing incorporation of extensive buffering and screening measures (see Exhibit "C" - Analysis of Overhead Doors Visibility). Along Gateway Boulevard a 5-foot high continuous berm with a 6-foot high hedge on the top of this berm is proposed. As shown on the diagram, the visibility of the overhead doors will be eliminated from any point on Gateway Boulevard. The degree of visibility is aided by a proposed building setback, measured from the Gateway Boulevard, of approximately 300 feet. RECOMMENDATIONS The petitioner has made an extraordinary effort to fully screen the overhead doors from view from Gateway Boulevard. In addition, the property has shape hardships contributing to its high degree of visibility. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request, subject to the conditions of approval included in Exhibit "0". xc: Central File J:\SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BGI\CDPA \staff report-overhead doors bgLdoc ~ EXHIBIT IIAII 3 LOCATION MAP UM PABIC- 'I I, I.j ~ l .;f}:__ I; .'--.. I, ,I ... .1, If I 1 5- ! -'If ~ -- '--, ., --. r 11 --~ ,; I -j.... ..~.. ~~ l:J ~ ,- ~-- - .. 10..": J~ -~W1' //i _-:--i '*1 -- -::.-!n i' t=., ;/ 1~1 I, . I, ~ :J' ; :: ~~. - ~II !~:::." . - I ~.Jt,.. EOU&UlMG (AMIf. (-II , --.--................. ......__.-.a_._._ --....-..,....... : __.....~.-.,.~___(lIl:lft.... -~-~...- . ...............-..... """_"CIJOI'''__ . ~""_I__"" ...~. .0...."'-............... . =i.~~:~~~-w:..._ "'STER PL.Ul ...ENO..ENT NO. 6 JULY I. 1996 . tC'\'S____________ =~.._.N..--.-...A-.at..--" MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGEND hr_..t....t...J' .,. I....,.' T KEY PLAN 0- o_~ D'r.c:."...tc-.rc_ Offlc:t/lillel orflc./I1D orriclta "'dunr~c" "'......~6D/OI'r_ ......t.... ... R6D/CoIIl Go~~.'ilu'__ ....,Met SlIO'lC P...R....... ..... ...2 "'er.. '" AC'I''' 13.5 An.. 1157 "er.. 'OJ Aert. 2]1 Aer,. 21.5$ Acr.. 2311 Aern 11535 Acr.. :U.IIAcrU 240.lle,.. JatO Acr.. 100 Ac,.. 4000 Au.. 4113 AC", 1Ill.- Q QUANTUlA ASSOCIATES National Clly Cenler 115 Wesl Washington SI. Indianapolis. IN 46204 (317) 636-1600 ')ti;b'7 - ~(Q "C,l.,,\ .0 1/8 III" 'I '0 400. 800 FE~T N ;/)7- '17 5',- 3,. \-5 I.( ) EXHIBIT "B" . L / i I.' ~~ \\ \~ i~' 51 ~ ~ ~ '< ~ , 'I 'i \\ \i~ ~\ \ \\ \h \\\\ \~\r\ ~ \\ \\\ \\\\ ~\\\\l i\ \\ " t~~t~\\ ~~~~\ \\ \\ ~ !h'li91 Hlln \' t15 , . .' . . \ !') ....~...---~~~ III UI (J> ib o hi ~ j\ I (J> :j 111 m r 111 -j ~ f~ ! ,1 , 1 II I' I II II I!II' li 1~~lt ! i ! I II I ~~! :l'"?~ t t! * \ m I! ~ II ~ I m' m m -j 6 z m I> (J> -j (J> :::; m m r m -j ~ ~ II o ~ ~ II g ! I ' ! Ii I III I III ~ 1118 I I 1118 I I 1118 I II 1118 I p- I . II _ 1_' ~l I . Ji I -. .I I . I . c o ,. \l () o ~ ~~ i: f E 111 (P -, (J> :::; 111 111 I'- m -j '- ~l I E III (J> -j (J> :::; 111 111 r m =' () ~ III II ~ ~II ~ III II j~ j\ t~ f ~.") B.G.I. Induslries IUI 1._, _. _. ~ a..~._l.. "' ani' '" 'd,!.'lMt-:tn, 0...(, l'Iil ~!!-m-^R~ 8 EXHIBIT "C" ~ I I fiiiiJim llIIIUJlIH III _...{~ ....v.......--w........,......- lIa'.I1llnpUl "I'll'S I 6 >- 0 i ~ III I- Z i :! <l: ~ II ;;; >- 0 :::l I- III III ~ !1: \ r I- ~ :! ~ l ~ ;;; :, .\ "- i? III "- "I, U ~ Q o. m \ ,,-' ~ u: i ij1; I-J r I. ~ I l'~~ ~ J. U~ ~II r i 9 m "IZ ~l i J b i ~, 'I: ~l ~ C fa EXHIBIT "0" II ______ EXIllBIT "D" Conditions of Approval Project name- BGI Industries facility (Phenix Project) File number: CDPA 97-002 Reference: Aletter of request dated June 30. 1997. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS Comments: No response UTILITIES Comments: No response FIRE Comments: No response POLICE Comments: No response ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: No response BUILDING DIVISION Comments: No response PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: No response FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: No response PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. It is recommended that the selected species of the landscape buffer have the following specifications: . Spacing - 2 feet o.c. . Height at the time of planting - 2.5 feet . Height to be maintained after reaching maturity - 6 feet . Dense foliage to achieve a continuous visual screen . 100 percent of the species to be native to Florida. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS 2. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS 3. To be determined. /6 DEVELOPMENT ORDER CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: BGllndustries, Inc. at Quantum Park (Phenix Project) APPLICANT: BGI Industries, Inc. APPLICANT'S AGENT: Gonzalo Ravago AGENT'S ADDRESS: 2601 E. Oakland Park Blvd. #101, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306 DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Community Design Plan Appeal LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Northeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "B" with notation "Included". 4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other DATED: City Clerk J:\SHRDA T A\Planning\sHARED\WP\PROJECTS\BGI\CDPA\DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc 13