REVIEW COMMENTS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Golden, Interim Planning Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden, Assistant city Planner
DATE: July 25, 1990
SUBJ: Resolution No. 90-BBBBB, Lawrence Grove replat
It has come to my attention that Hovnanian Companies has applied
for bUilding permits for "Z" lot homes within the Lawrence Grove
PUD. Further research informs me that on July 3, 1990, the city
Commission approved Resolution No. 90-BBBBB, a replat for
Lawrence Grove to specifically allow "Z" lot homes. A "z" lot
home is not allowed on the current, approved master plan for the
Lawrence Grove PUD. Before this replat can be recorded and
permits issued, a master plan modification needs to be filed
through our office for review and recommendation by the TRB and
approval by the City Commission and planning and Zoning Board.
It appears that the TRB had no knowledge of this request through
either the preliminary plat process or final plat process.
",' ..-}
-::;:r/# 77c..t1. tt (/ P~:&flt:./(-.
Tambri J. He~den (/
tjh
A: LawGrove
xc: -Mike Haag
see- RAN "DPr-rEP
Foe. De.4WIAlG
PlA-~':?05-e..5
10//190 IN
q;'L{BM l1ftD Foe PI LE-
~
I 0 -40Drz-~ ?Ofvl tvtrcN,S
kBove:.- LA! 0 MASilEf2- fLAtJ MODIACAJ7oJ
()J fr5 EVe:1e-- P( Leo)
ffLe *-070 (t:':~e Gr2<
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
MUNICIPAL STAFF
INCREASED INCREASED OTHER
DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL CAPITAL COMMENTS
Building Yes Yes See attached
Police No No See attached
City Clerk No No None
Library No No None
Fire No No See attached
Public Works Yes Yes See attached
Personnel and
Purchasing Yes Yes See attached
City Engineer No No None
Finance No No None
Park and Recreation No No See attached
Utilities Yes Yes See attached
Planning No No See attached
Forester/
Horticulturist No No See attached
City Attorney See attached
PALM BEACH COUNTY STAFF
Planning, Zoning
and Building
See attached
Traffic Engineering
See attached
BOYNTON BEACH STAFF COMMENTS
Building:
For this department, there is no
direct tie to evaluate budget im-
pact. However, any project of
size will impact needs for
people.
Police:
Developments of this size are
part of this department's over-
all growth plan.
Fire:
Consideration of extension of
Miner Road at earliest
convenience for proper access.
We currently use either 22nd
Avenue or Hypoluxo Road causing
some delay in response time.
Public Works:
The combined developments of
Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves
will result in the following ex-
penditures:
Salary increase:
3 x 18,268 = 54,804
Operating and Maintenance:
3 x 153 = 459
Capital Outlay:
1 rear loadpacker = 85,000
Personnel and Purchasing:
The Personnel and Purchasing
staff would be directly impacted
by this annexation contingent
upon how many additional em-
ployees, supplies and equipment
is needed by the rest of the
City. If we are told the total
numbers, we can respond with a
definite response.
Utilities:
The Utilities Department is
strictly revenue supported. As
such, anticipated revenues will
offset increased outlay for
salaries and operation and main-
tenance personnel. The developer
will have to pay all appropriate
capital facility charges and his
fair share of existing offsite
utilities.
MEMORANDUM
27 July 1987
TO:
File
. l" (.,):5
Carmen S. Annunz1ato, P ann1ng D1rector
FROM:
RE:
LAWRENCE GROVES
On July 21, 1987 the City Commission conducted a public hearing
and tentatively agreed to grant the requested public approvals.
Approval of this development is contingent upon meeting the
requirements of the memo from the Planning Director to the City
Manager dated July 24th and its attendant report, plus the memo
to the file from the Planning Director dated July 20th. These
documents must now be forwarded to DCA for plan amendment
purposes.
memo.bks
//'
,,/ ~.
MEMORANDUM
20 July 1987
TO:
File
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Gordon Letter of July 10, 1987 -
Citrus Glen/Lawrence Groves
After discussion with the City Attorney and Utility Director, the
conditions of approval requested in Mr. Gordon's letter were
modified as follows:
1. The project can go forward regardless of the ability of
the applicant or City to acquire the right-of-way
between this project and the Meadows PUD.
2. Only cash is acceptable for surity purposes regarding
the acquisition of the proposed right-of-way.
3. No credits against capital facilities fees are
recommended for costs associated with the proposed
acquisition of the right-of-way.
4. The project should be connected to the water system to
the east within 60 days of availability.
This information was discussed with Mr. Gordon on 7/15/87.
LAW OFFICES
BOOSE CASEY CIKLlN LUBITZ MARTENS McBANE 8c O'CONNELL
BRUCE G. ALEXANDER
FLETCHER N. BALDWIN, ill
JERALD S. BEER
WILLIAM R. BOOSE, III, P. A.
JOHN D. BOYKIN
PATRICK J. CASEY, P. A.
ALAN J. CIKLIN, P. A.
CORY J. CIKLIN
ANN I W. COLLETTE
ROBERT L. CRANE
B. JEANE CRIPPEN
MICHAEL M. GFESSER
MIKEL D. GREENE
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
KERRY A. GREENWALD
LYNDA J. HARRIS
DANIEL A. HERSHMAN
BRUCE G. KALEITA
CHARLES A. LUBITZ, P. A.
RICHARD L. MARTENS, P. A.
LOUIS R. McBANE, P. A.
CLAUDIA M. McKENNA
BRIAN M. O'CONNELL
PHIL D. O'CONNELL, JR., P.A.
JULlEANN RICO
WILLIAM G. SHOFSTALL, JR.
SUSAN WILLIAMS
OF COUNSEL
PHILLIP D. O'CONNELL, SR.
MICHAEL D. GORDON
NORTH BRIDGE TOWER I . 19TH FLOOR
SIS NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE
P. O. DRAWER 024626
WEST PAL.M BEACH, FLORIDA 33402,4626
(305) 832-5900
July 10, 1987
RECEIVED
.ILlL 14 1987
PLANNING DEPT.
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
200 South Seacrest Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re: Project: Citrus Glen/Lawrence Groves
Clarification of Staff Comments
Dear Mr. Annunziato:
In accordance of our meeting on June 26, held in preparation of the
public hearing held before the City Commission on June 21, 1987, I
respectfully submit proposed language clarifying the comments issued
by Staff which have been imposed as conditions for any approval of the
applications pending on the projects referred to above.
With reference to the Lawrence Grove application, I wish to confirm
that modifications to the proposed site plan establish a three-foot
landscape buffer along the collector road where double-frontage lots
exist, and that this modification was found acceptable to the Planning
Department and otherwise adequately responded to Mr. Jaeger's comment
in his memorandum dated June l6, 1987.
Comments issued in furtherance of the Lawrence Grove application by
John A. Guidry, Director of utilities, called for approval of the
project being conditioned upon the developer providing the funds to
pay all expenses associated with acquisition of a future right-of-way
between Meadows Tract and Lawrence Groves. It also Ilrecommendedll that
construction of the project not commence until acquisition of the
right-of-way has been finalized.
During our meeting on June 26, I attempted to clarify the intent of
your Department and the developer with regard to such conditions, and
propose the following language incorporated into the Staff's comments
for the purpose of clarification:
July lO, 1987
Page 2
"Approval should be conditioned upon developer providing
funding for the acquisition of right-of-way between the
"Meadows Tract" and nLawrence Groves" by the City of Boynton
Beach. Developer may satisfy this condition of approval by
posting cash bond, letter of credit, or equivalent, in an
amount equal to funding for acquisition and miscellaneous
related costs. The amount of funds required shall be based
on the appraised value of property which is subject to the
right-of-way taking."
"Developer may commence construction of the project,
notwithstanding acquisition by the City of the right-of-way
has not been finalized, providing the developer complete
utilities connections in accordance with the present site
plan and engineering plans submitted in furtherance of his
original application. Developer shall be obligated to
reconnect utility hook-ups to water lines established along
the subject right-of-way, upon notice by the City within
three (3) years from the date of the City's approval of
developer's application. The developer shall be entitled to
credits for the costs relative to acquisition and installation
of water lines to be constructed in such right-of-way.-
The final comment pertains to Staff's memo indicating that tree
management plans (for both projects) have not been submitted. I wish
to confirm that such plans have been revised and resubmitted (prior to
the Planning Commission hearing) in response to Mr. Hallahan's comments.
I respectfully request that, upon your review of the proposed
modifications set forth above, you contact the undersigned to provide
your comments and permit their finalization and incorporation into
Staff comments for further action.
I thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
7// If ~dcA--)
Michael ~:~~ordon
MOG/jmk
M E M 0 RAN DUM
June 16, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS, PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: REQUESTS FOR ANNEXATION, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT AND REZONING SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL D. GORDON
FOR GNM ASSOCIATES
INTRODUCTION
Michael D. Gordon, agent for GNM Associates, and contract
purchaser, is proposing to annex into Boynton Beach a 48.231 acre
tract of land located at the southeast corner of Lawrence Road
and the L-19 Canal (see Exhibit"A"). This property is currently
zoned AR (Agricultural Residential) and it is occupied by a
mature citrus grove in commercial production. There is a USDA
agricultural experimental station in the northwest corner of the
tract and a maintenance building in the center of the tract.
Paralleling this request for annexation is a request to amend the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan to show annexed
land as Low Density Residential, and to rezone this property to a
Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity=4 (PUD
w/LUI=4). The proposed PUD, to be named "Lawrence Groves",
provides for the construction of 231 fee simple units, including
103 zero lot line, single family, detached units and 128 duplex
units, with a gross density of 4.79 dwelling units per acre (see
Exhibi t "B").
PROCEDURE
These applications for annexation, amendment to the Future Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning are being
processed consistent with State Statutes, and Boynton Beach
Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions as follows:
1. F.S. 163.3161: Local Government Comprehensive Planning and
Land Development Regulation Act.
2. F.S. 166.041: Procedures for Adoption of Ordinances and
Resolutions.
3. F.S. 171.011: Municipal Annexation and Contraction Act.
4. Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Appendix A, Section 3A5(e):
Boundary and Zoning.
-2-
5. Boynton Beach Ordinance #79-24.
6. Boynton Beach Resolution #76-X: Procedures for Annexation.
7. Boynton Beach Ordinance #86-54: Comprehensive Plan Evaluation
and Appraisal Report.
These regulations have been listed for informational purposes.
Paraphrasing, these regulations require review by the City
Department Heads, newspaper advertisements, public hearings with
the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Commission and
Commission adoption of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land
Use Element and rezone.
CURRENT LAND USE AND REZONING
As previously discussed, this property is undeveloped and zoned
AR (Agricultural Residential). The land use and zoning in the
surrounding area varies and is presented for your information in
the following table:
DIRECTION
JURISDICTION
ZONING
LAND USE
North
Boynton Beach
AG
Undeveloped, com-
mercial, citrus
groves (Knollwood
Groves)
East
Boynton Beach
PUD w/
LUI=3.36
Meadows 300,
Planned Unit
Development
Palm Beach County
AR
Undeveloped farm-
land in commer-
cial production
South
Palm Beach County
AR
Whispering Pines
Mobile Park
6.69 du/ac
West
Palm Beach County
RS/PUD
Manor Forest,
single family
homes 4.58 du/ac
Palm Beach County
AR
Single family
homes on large
unplatted lots
FUTURE LAND USE AND REZONING
Hypoluxo Road forms the northern limit of the City's Reserve
-3-
Annexation Area and the City's Utility Service Area. Lawrence
Road forms the western limit of the City's Reserve Annexation
Area as set forth by the Commission's policy which is reflected
in the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report. It
is contemplated that all lands between Lawrence Road and Congress
Avenue to the south of Hypoluxo Road will eventually be annexed.
This proposal is a continuation of previous actions to close
unincorporated pockets in this portion of the reserve annexation
area.
The land use category requested, Low Density Residential, is
representative of that which exists to the east in the City and
is lower than that which exists to the south and west in Palm
Beach County. To the north, within the City, is the Knollwood
Groves property which has an agricultural land use designation.
As noted in the correspondence in Exhibit "c" from the Palm Beach
County Planning Department, the proposed land use is consistent
with the current development pattern and the future plans for
land use in Palm Beach County for this area.
Since the grove is in commercial production, there are many
mature citrus trees existing on site. It is recommended that the
existing citrus trees within the grove be preserved to the
greatest extent possible and incorporated as an amenity to the
proposed project as outlined in the memorandum from the
Forester/Horticulturist which appears in Exhibit "C".
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES
There are three policies in the Comprehensive Plan which address
annexations as follows:
1. "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
present municipal boundaries;"
2. "Annex property only after the preparation of a study evalu-
ating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost of
providing service;" and
3. "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to
provide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated."
In order to determine the consistency of the GNM Associates
request with the Comprehensive Plan Policies, each of the three
policies will be addressed individually.
Policy 1 - "Annex only property which is reasonably contiguous to
the present municipal boundaries."
-4-
GNM Associates' property is contiguous with present corporate
limits along the northern property boundary and approximately 720
feet of its eastern property boundary (39% of its entire
boundary). Its western boundary is coterminous with Lawrence
Road. In addition, this property lies in the path of urban devel-
opment.
Policy 2 - "Annex property only after the preparation of a study
evaluating the fiscal benefits of annexation versus the cost of
providing services."
In response to policy two, you will find in Exhibit "C", an
evaluation of the costs to the City of annexing this parcel and
the dollars returned to the City in taxes.
Policy 3 - "Annex only properties which are of sufficient size to
provide efficient service and on which urban development is
anticipated."
As previously reported, the GNM Associates tract is 48.231 acres
in size. It is anticipated that this parcel will experience
urban development for the following reasons:
1. The availability of public utilities within the
Lawrence Road right-of-way;
2. The existence of this parcel as a County pocket in a
developing portion of the Reserve Annexation Area, as
outlined in the correspondence from the Palm Beach
County Planning Department in Exhibit "C";
3. The efficiency of services to be provided when analyzed
in connection with existing property on Lawrence Road
currently in the City (Knollwood Groves), the proposed
53.60 acre Citrus Glen annexation, and the proximity to
developing properties within Palm Beach County; and
4. Recent and proposed improvements to the surrounding
road system, including the 4-laning of Hypoluxo Road, the
proposed 6-laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from
Congress Avenue to Military Trail, the proposed 5-laning
of Old Boynton Road from Knuth Dairy Road to Military
Trail, and the proposed 4-laning of Military Trail from
Old Boynton Road to Hypoluxo Road.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends that the applications
submitted by Michael D. Gordon, for GNM Associates, trustee, be
approved subject to the comments which accompany this memorandum
as Exhibit "C".
-5-
This recommendation is based in part on the following:
1. The parcel is contiguous to Corporate limits;
2. The parcel lies within a County pocket and it is in the
path of urban development.
3. The parcel is located within the City's municipal service
area;
4. The intensity of land use desired is appropriate for the
location;
5. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
policies for annexation;
6. The land use category requested must be considered as a
part of an overall strategy for annexation and it is
appropriate;
7. The zoning is consistent with the proposed use of the site;
8. The request will not impair the value or future use of lands
in the surrounding area; and,
9. The cost to serve versus the benefits received indicate a
positive return for the City.
Ca-- tJ"l ~
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
CSA:ro
cc City Manager
Technical Review Board
Central File
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carmen Annunziato, Director
Planning Department
FROM: Charles Fredrick, Director
Recreation and Park Department
DATE: November 10, 1987
SUBJECT: Lawrence Groves
Upon review of the subject development and applying the
land dedication ordinance for fees in lieu of land
$l7l,720 is due.
212 units @ .018/acre = 3.816 acres.
$45,000/acre purchase price x 3.816 AC = $171,720
~<rJ;;
Charles Fredric
CC: John Wildner
DOC:LAWGROV
CF:ad
M E M 0 RAN DUM
June 16, 1987
TO: CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS, PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
FROM: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO, PLANNING DIRECTOR
RE: LAWRENCE GROVES-STAFF COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Planning Department's comments in con-
nection with the above-referenced master plan.
1. Common area landscaping requires review and approval by the
Community Appearance Board.
2. Attached single-family units, entrance wall signage, and the
recreational amenities require site plan approval.
c- Ie ~.
CARMEN s. ANNUNZ~O
CSA:ro
MEMORANDUM
June 16, 1987
TO: Carmen Annunziato
City Planner
RE: April 1, 1987, Land Use Amendment Applications
I have reviewed the applications and legal documents
provided to me by your April 15, 1987 Memorandum dealing
with Boynton Beach Village Center, Lawrence Groves and
Citrus Glen. After evaluating the documents with regard to
their conformance with Section 6. F. 3 of Appendix A, and
Section 6 Appendix B Planned Unit Development Regulations
(requirements of unified control), I believe that all of
the documents provided establish that the unified control
requirements have been met.
( ~~.---L: 2 -
Raymond' A. Rea
City Attorney
RAR/ras
Enc. - Original Documents Attached
cc: City Manager
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
--~--~-_.._--_.__._-- ---'~-----'----'.'---_._-_._-,--~
,AEMORANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
DATE
May 11 1987
"'L~
FltOM
John Wildner
Parks Superintendent
!lU.J~CT
Lawrence Groves PUD
Further review of the Master Plan of the Lawrence Groves PUD indi-
cates considerable landscaping in medians and R.O.W. along public
streets within the sub-division.
The developer should be aware that the Parks Division does not
plan on providing landscape maintenance along these roads. A Home-
owners Association should be responsible for landscape maintenance in
both the common areas and the R.O.W. within this sub-division.
~ It/~
t510hn wildner
CC: Charles Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Dept.
File
JW: ad
l.j~\ ;
\, ': {...,....!.-.
rC'........>"',Y" ..
,.-'j
..........
,
~ .~"
:'/
;/
'- ~ ~,L.
"-~'~~ u...L ~'i[~ ~;,~:' i-,~t,C
" , .
~, 'C.'^,:' >it :,_;;' ~,\~Gr'
LLOhc "
FROM
I
--,
TO Carmen Annuziato, Planning Director
Sgt. Marlon Harris, Police Department
"..;:/-;.:.o.._",,:":~'_'--' '~"'" ,_..'.....1): "'- .....:.,.,.,___'*.~-.,...... '''..:;~,:;;:.T.':w$I-l'>".U''; - - ""'..::....;.;:"'".~:;., ~~..._.
...,,....;......,'.- ,."__......:<::'.~.,"':,.".'..;,~,.",.....::.-:--._'-OO._L. .':'-._''''''' ,._ ._...::. .-,,,"_~",~<' ..,~,",,':'~'AI.' ,"'''''''',S"' <::..-.!'\.,
....
SUBJECT:. Citrus G~e!l_~.,'L.<:~::~?<::e Graves Deve~.o.pm~n.!E;_.__..___.__
.DA TE:___O";> L1) 8]__
FO LO ..
In reviewing the plans for the above listed developments, there is a concern that no
plans were made for sidewalks or bicycle paths. Since this type of construction will
likely draw a "young family" purchaser and a high density population, there is no
place for pedestrian and bicycle travel other than in the roadways. Since there is a
planned recreation area, I would recommend sidewalks in front of the units built or
bicycle paths leading to the recreation area in order to assure safe travel of
children.
PLEASE PEPL Y TO -->
SIGNED
4f~~
_ _~__e~>>~.,__::M'.!'n..~.......-"""c-:>_~'__"~""~";~'IIt"'"..)!',._,..... '-J' ,..-
I
j
~ _ ....,.~,,;, ._....~'.'~=.,......-....~,,"'.i_..~~~":;;'~.;-~~:.;."v.:~..........;;;;;.----- ~
REPLY
~/~;-J
DA T:;"<4~/VJ2.~ _
SlGNED C U
__.-""- _.- -- 'V
Item 1/ F269 (~. Wneeler Group Inc. 1979
THIS COpy FOR PERSON ADDRESSED
.AEMORANDUM
....0..
Carmen Annunziato,
City Planning Director
John A. Guidry, C\ ~..-.
Director of Utilities ~
DATI:
May I, 1987
TO
"ILI:
SU8.J.CT
Preliminary Master Plan -
Lawrence Groves
We have the following comments on the subject plan:
1) Delete both water main interconnects to the Lawrence Road water
main between building sites. Relocate one interconnect to
follow the entrance road. The second interconnect must be to
the Meadows Tract to the east.
2) Design the lift station and applicable portions of the gravity
system to be deep enough and large enough to serve the parcel
to the southeast. Credits will be granted for oversizing the
lift station.
3) ~rcute the force main to follow the entrance road right-of-way.
4) The developer will have to pay his fair share of existing off-
site water and sewer mains.
5) Loop the water main in the cul-de-sac located in the southwest
corner of the project with appropriate valving.
6) We recommend the Community Appearance Board be required to review
the landscape plan in common areas and right-of-ways.
cmd
a..EMORANDUM
o
Cannen Annunziato. Planning Director
D"T~
May 1, 1987
"OM
,IL.
SUeJ_CT Citrus Glen and Lawrence Groves
Annexation
Transmi tted herewith are the departillenta.L review forms for the above
referenced projects.
cmd
Attachments
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
La"wrence Grove s
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
Area of Subject Property2,100,942.3
S Ft 48.231
q. . or
acres
Estimated Present Population 0
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use ..Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes X No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
LESS THAN I
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes X No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
See Below
Comments:
'!he Utility Department is strictly revenue supported _ As such,
anticipated revenues will offset increased outlay for salaries and operation and
maintenance personnel. '!he developer will have to pay all appropriate capital
facility charges and his fair share of existing off-site utilities
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
-
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
X
utilities
Fire
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
.~\EMORANDUM
j
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
OAT.
April 30, 1987
rfr
"'LE
"",OM
SU8J_CT
Master Plan Review:
Lawrence Groves
Lawrence Road
~ -0--,_, '~._~~
Don Jaeger
Chief Inspector
Building Department
The following comments are generated from the conceptual master plan
drawings submitted for preliminary review. The applicant should address
these comments prior to re-submittal.
1. Show all future, anticipated buildable areas.
2. Provide adequate pedestrian circulation throughout the site.
3. Landscaping for all common areas must be reviewed and approved by the
Community Appearance Board. All common landscaped areas and
landscaped areas in the right-of-way must be fully sprinkled.
4. There is a small parcel of land at the northeast section of the
property, just north of the L-19 Canal which is not contiguous to
the development. Indicate how the parcel will be treated when the
project is developed.
5. Conflicts on the Lawrence Road right-of-way dedication must be
resolved.
6. The recreation area will require a separate site plan review.
Consult Appendix A-Zoning, Section 11, H-16 e.12 of the Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances for parking requirements.
7. City Code discourages double frontage lots. If these lots are
approved, there must be an adequate buffer provided, meeting all
Code requirements, between the lots and the collector road.
8. In residential zoned districts, City Code provides that "where a
corner lot faces a different street than the remaining lots in
the block, then the front setback shall be maintained on both
streets".
Notes:
1. Street names and building numbers must be reviewed by the Building,
Fire, and Police Departments as well as the Post Office.
2. Entry wall signs must be submitted for staff and City Commission
approval.
3. Structure setbacks from property lines and distances between
buildings must comply with Table 600 of the 1985 Edition of the
Standard Building Code.
4. Permits must be secured from the South Florida Water Management
District and the Lake Worth Drainage District.
Don t;~ r-
DJ:bh
XC: E. E. Howell
,.tEMORANDUM
TO
Carmen Annunziato
Planning Director
l)AT~
April 30, 1987
FILl:
""OM
Kevin J. Hallahan
Forester J Horticul turist
SU8JWCT Lawrence Groves PUD
The applicant for the above project should be aware of the following:
1. Must provide a tree management plan for all the existing citrus trees
on the property.
2. The citrus trees shown on the plan to be preserved appear not to meet
the intent of the new Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan.
3. The applicant can meet with me to discuss these two issues at their
convenience.
~~:~/.J:Lu~
Kevin J. H lahan
KJH:ad
MEMORANDUM
To:
Car~en Annunziato. Planning Director~ll,~
John A. Guidry, Director of Utiliti~
June 4. 1987
Frol'l:
Date:
Subject:
Prelil'linary Master Plan (Revised) - Lawrence Groves
The subject plan indicates two interconnections with the existing 16"
water ~ain along Lawrence Road. In that the 16" water l'Iain is currently
fed only frol'l the south, the dual interconnect serves only to enhance
reliability of water supply in the event of an internal failure within
the subdivi15ion. Any problel'ls with the 16" water l'Iain between the
future ground storage tank in Miner Road and this site would leave this
entire subdivision, plus a few others, without dOl'lestic water or fire
protection.
A sil'lple rel'ledy to this dilel'll'la would be to interconnect the Lawrence
Groves water systel'l with the existing Meadows systel'l approxil'lately 600'
to the east. This action would effect an additional interconnect with
the 16" water ~ain along Congress Avenue and greatly enhance reliability
to Lawrence Groves and all other custol'lers along Lawrence Road and north
of Miner Road.
We realize that the City l'Iay have to condel'ln the future right-of-way
between the Meadows tract and Lawrence Groves 50 as to facilitate said
interconnect and also enhance access by fire and police. Cognizant of
this, we reco~l'Iend that approval of this project be conditional upon the
developer providing the funds to pay all expense associated with
acquisition of said right-of-way. We also recol'Il'lend that construction
of the project not cOl'll'lence until acquisition of the right-of-way has
been finalized in order to insure full protection to the future
residents of this subdivision.
dl'lt
xc: Peter Mazzella
Peter L. Cheney, City Manager
MEMORANDUM
May 4, 1987
TO: CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
FROM: TAMBRI HEYDEN, ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
RE: LAWRENCE GROVES-MASTER PLAN COMMENTS
Please be advised of the Master Plan comments for the
above-referenced request:
1. It is recommended that a pedestrian system Master Plan be
provided to allow for proper circulation between the housing
areas, recreation sites, and the future public, elementary
school to the south.
2. It is recommended that additional buffering be considered for
corner lots and double frontage lots, particularly those that
abut the collector road.
~ ~~({Jz.
TAMBRI HE DEN I
TH:ro
cc Alan Miller
Delfin Menendez
Rick Rossi
Central File
MEMORANDUM
April 23, 1987
TO: Carmen Annunziato, City Planner
RE: Annexation Requests; Lawrence Groves & Citrus Glen
Upon review of the subject properties consideration should be given
to providing a neighborhood park which will service these developments
as well as other residential areas currently developed or to be developed
in the immediate vicinity.
.,
As the School Board is considering purchase of an 18 acre site
between these developments and a 26 acre undeveloped parcel is adjacent
to the school site, an opportunity exists to acquire a portion of the 26
acre site, and with the cooperation of the School Board, develop a
school/park complex.
Acquisition and development funding for such a project would come
from the Land Dedication Trust Fund. The subject developments will be
required to provide fees in lieu of land per our subdivision regulations
which would be applied to these costs. Operation and maintenance costs
for the new park site would be funded from the general fund and would
add to the Park Divisions budget requirements. Exact annual costs will
depend upon final size and design and use of the site.
The development of school/park sites is consistent with our
comprehensive plan recommendations and goals.
c~~.
Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department
CCF:pb
Attachments
CC:
John Wildner, Park Supt. wIatt.
MEMORANDUM
14 April 1987
TO:
All Department Heads
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Citrus Glen Annexation
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a Departmental Review
Form which must be completed in order to provide the information
required as part of the Commission's annexation policy. Also
attached is a location map for the property requested to be
annexed.
Please complete this form and return it to me by Friday, May 1st
for inclusion in the public hearing proceedings.
c~ __ ift ~
CARMEN S. UNZIATO
jbks
Attachments
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN.
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner Citrus Glen - Knollwood Orange Groves, Inc.
Area of Subject Property 2,334,990.2 Sq. Ft. or 53.604 acres
Estimated Present Population 0
--
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use Undeveloped, mature citrus grove which is no longer
in production.
Proposed Use
250 unit PUD which consists of 132 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 118 duplex units
. .
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Engineer
City Clerk
Finance
Building Official
Planning
Police
~
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Utilities
Fire
Library
Public Works
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
S Ft 48.231
q. . or
acres
Area of Subject Property2,100,942.3
Estimated Present Population 0
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use '.Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel~a
result of this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
./
aN~:r
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as
this annexation? Yes
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Conunents:
(Attach
if~ent.space.)
Clty Englneer
City Clerk
Finance
Planning
Police
Building Official
utilities
Fire
,.
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED 'HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the anhexation of ,property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
Area of Subject Property2,lOO,942.3
S Ft 0 48.231
q. . r
acres
Estimated Present Population 0
.t
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use .'Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero'lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
..........
Would your Department need to increase the number
result of this annexation? Yes
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
of personnel as a
No
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
,
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
I
Cornments:The Personnel and Purchasing staffing would be directly
impacted by this annexation contingent on how many additional employees
supplies, and equipment needed by the rest of the City. If we are told
the total numbers we can respond with a definitere~ponse.
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
"
't
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Utiliti~s
Fire
Public Works
Library
,,.
Energy
~ Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
'-.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
S Pt 48.231
q. _ . or
acres
Area of Subject Property2,100,942.3
: ~stimated PreseTlt Population 0
l~stimated Nurnber of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use. Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes XX No
Estimated number of additional personnel required: 3
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes XX No
Estimated annual increase in salaried: 3 x 18,268 =
operating & maintenance: 3 x 153 =
capi tal outlay: 1 Rear Load Packer
54,804
459
85,000
Conunents:
The combined developments of Citrus Glen Annexation and
Lawrence Groves Annexation will result in the above noted expendi-
ture.
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
utilities
Fire
-
Personnel and
purchasing
Parks & Recreation
./
Public Works.
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
Area of Subject Property~,100,942.3
Estimated Present Populat~~'On 0
S Ft 48.231
q. . or
acres
Estimated Number of Exist~ng Housing Units 0
Existing Use . Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No X
Estimated number of additional personnel required: Now under consideration
as relat.ea-Tos-iiiTon 3---
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No X
Estimated annual increase in salaried:_~I_r~~~_E~~~~ed (station_.~______._
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Conunents:___Co~~~e!_~_tion of extension of Miner ~-"__,!~~arl iest convenienc~_foX_2!:oper
acces_~-=-._y'~e ~u~~__~IJ_~~~!1~~_Y~We ei ther 22nd Ave. ?r_Hypo~~o Rd.:~a1l5ing s~ delay
in response time.
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Building Official
Planning
Police
utilities
,/
/
Fire
"
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-tru~t~p.~
Area of Subject Property 2,100,942.3
Estimated Present Population 0
Sq.Ft. or 48.231
acres
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units
o
Existing Use Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit pun which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
4/30/87
..................
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes X No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Unknown
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes X No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Unknown
For this department, there is no direct tie to evaluate
Comments:
budget impact. However, any project of size will impact needs
for people.
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Police
X
Building Official
Utilities
Fire
"
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
.lV
Jt7
y{.j
r ~-. r-,"""'"'1 7~~~
i " , ., , ~ ,.~
...;,l '~~'''-_-''-'''' "0 "", .,j ",.." ,
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
APR r" 1981
Pl Pt""
~r~. ...
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
Area of Subject Property2,100,942.3
S Ft 48.231
q. . or
acres
Estimated Present Population 0
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No XX
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No XX
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Connnents:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
!p ~/!r7
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
Utilities
Fire
-
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
S Ft. 48.231
q. . or
acres
Area of Subject Property2,100,942.3
Estimated Present Population 0
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use -Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
~ frllY:w ~
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Engineer
City Clerk
Finance
Building Official
Planning
Police
Utilities
Fire
~
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
~
MEMORANDUM
14 April 1987
TO:
All Department Heads
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato, Planning Director
RE:
Lawrence Groves Annexation
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a Departmental Review
Form which must be completed in order to provide the information
required as part of the Commission's annexation policy. Also
attached is a location map for the property requested to be
annexed.
Please complete this form and return it to me by Friday, May 1st
for inclusion in the public hearing proceedings.
c.~ _ /~~
CARMEN S. AN NZIATO
/bks
Attachments
",,-, .;;. .- T Y' ~1f)'
R.."....,.. rl,,'." "....
r.'/'" l..j'i ~ r 1'1':-"
. ".' ,i.~, ""\.,, "-; .. '_'" ...lo.
.;lL.oI ~....,. ..-" .'.
,/ ..~ 1,......:~J~;
APR .1 i,;;; 1-:;'.)1
F~ ,\: ~:.~, ~ _ ..': ;...~~,~~'t::C.;-;~
__,__,_~"""'-' _~_M_____
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of proper~y
described herein will have on your department.
Lawrence Groves
Name of Development/Owner John and Anita Hezewyk, Co-trustees
Area of Subject Property2,100,942.3
S Ft 0 48.231
q. . r
acres
Estimated Present Population 0
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 0
Existing Use 'Undeveloped mature citrus grove currently in
commercial productivity.
Proposed Use
231 unit PUD which consists of 103 zero lot line,
single-family detached units and 128 duplex units.
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel ~ a
result of this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result ~
this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
City Clerk
~ (Attach
V Finance
if insufficient space.)
City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
Utilities
Fire
-
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Public Works
Library
Energy
Date Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
" >,.-,.., ",'
_ ~RS\~CE. Gf~O\jES
\-'\ _ ~t'rr & R~z.ON\NG
"'NN~~'" .t\ON/L"'NO \JS~ "'lJI~NO~---,-- ..- -'-
-- . ------------...-..-- -~ -~::};;:;;:<
_ . .'~. c.--------. -
67~ --
c. rilL. '- -,.
~:r-
.-- ,.<t-
\-- ~,"-
r-:~";
.--t:: ::--:
PM
\
, '
, \
" . . '.
~:'t:. \', ,A ;..... J ~, ~~: ::;....: ~ fl.L ~ '~
, ,"' H' " ·
,. pC' \' ,:-I~ ~~o <;y . ' ,- - '.
. ,(}, '<l ," r.' .' '0
IH\~rtiSDdf~\N ",'< '~
I ~~.. i -.""'~.
/',,0' 6sr~NN€.~\"E.O ~':
i crt \ \ c,' \ . . \.
Ii \ ~ ~r. \ ' \ r=:' L-S::::::~~
, \ . . ,,~ y- ,
\_ ",' ': \u~~
~o:, \ :,b\/ ,\\\9/ B ~,;-- \, L~j ~
'v; \. \ \, ~ \
i \.\ v--:'+ ,\ . " \ ~\ \'~-"='\ \
\ . ,\\+/1\ : ., \~~~"".=='"
/~, .' , \~' ~..-="" ...~~.
9 \. ~\" '\1 ~ \ ~d! ~;.;~ ~
-:;;J!~~ . ~~~'-~5'. : .\ Cv~'J..V--- Pk~
~-----------~'4 A /- -'\.: 6 I Q \
"t): ~,.,. I () I
. . - - ~
,A 5/7/85 ~
,~~/7 /-85 \u
;~.l.'-6'/18/8 5 ~
~,
2 "\/21/86 ~ .'
~~t;;I; ~~\:;:;:: \;::7;:;:-;':::-:-::'~~~;:::;:;-::~~~
_ r'';:;( \' .
~ 5 ~ 1 3 1 8 .6/J. \ ",,\LS~
- ',.F~ ,"';
- ' -",...-
? .\} ~ -
~ ~ --- --' ---
'-: f'
\~
", t=---:
-
- ,
,
'~AG
" \
\
.. i
- ~' ~ ~
N'C
p\JO N'C
,-\J\~
"Nle\.