AGENDA DOCUMENTS
, '
MEMORANDUM
.
"
TO:
Mr. Craig Livingston
FROM: James J. Golden, Interim Planning Director'
DATE: August 7, 1990
SUBJECT: Lighthouse Square Marina (f/k/a) Water's Edge Marina
Site Plan Modification - File No. 529
With respect to the above, please be advised of the following:
I. A revised landscape plan was not submitted which corresponds
to the new layout and design shown on the site plan. The
exterior furnishings and pedestrian amenities required in
the Central Business District must be shown on the landscape
plan (Section 7.5-57.l.J of the CBD Landscape Regulations
and Section 19-60 (b)(5) of the Code of Ordinances).
2. Details on project entry signs have not been provided
(Section 6.E.6 of Appendix A-Zoning and Section 19-60(b)(6)
of the Code of Ordinances).
3. Revised elevations and a revised floor plan for the proposed
changes to the layout and design of the dry boat storage
building and the increase in square footage from 35,OB9
square feet to 36,450 square feet have not been provided.
In addition, the proposed changes to the dry boat storage
building will require a modified conditional use
application, as Section ll.2.C.5 of Appendix A-Zoning states
that liThe Building Department shall not issue a building
permit unless such permit conforms in every respect to the
conditional use as approved by the City Commission".
4. Provide a typical pole elevation on the blueprint drawings'
for the pedestrian and parking lot lighting fixtures
proposed. Specify type of energy efficient lighting
required and illumination levels (item no. 26.d on site plan
checklist, Section 19-60 (b)(5) of the Code of Ordinances
and Design Requirements of Article X - Parking Lots).
5. Parking space calculations were not properly delineated on
the application form and site plan drawing. Correct
calculations are as follows:
USE CALCULATION * SPACES
1 Boat Storage 1 space per 4 boats 55
(220 boats)
Restaurant 1 space per 2.5 seats BO
(200 seats)
Raw Bar 1 space per 2.5 seats 80
(200 seats)
2 Retail/Office 1 space per 200 sq. ft. 173
Complex gross floor area
(34,568 sq. ft. )
Marina 1 space per boat 37
(37 slips)
3 TOTAL
425
x.65
= 277
1
TO: Mr. CLdig Livingston
Aug. 7, 1990
~
1 Calculation was approved by the City Commission, as dry ~oat
storage is not listed in Appendix A - Zoning (pursuant to
Section 11.H.l2 of Appendix A). ,
2 Includes lighthouse retail and harbor master (Section
ll.H.l6.d(3) of Appendix A-Zoning).
3 The number of required parking spaces can be reduced by 35
percent in the CBD.
PARKING PROVIDED (ON SITE) = 179 spaces
BRIDGE PARKING (OFF-SITE) = 100 spaces
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 279 spaces
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 277 spaces (approximate)
NOTES:
(1) Parking spaces provided on the south side of Casa
Lorna right-of-way have been reserved for existing
businesses and are not proposed to be utilized for
this project.
(2) At the TRB meeting, the developer indicated that
there may be one or more charter boats utilizing
the marina. Additional parking would be required
for the charter boats beyond the 277 spaces
outlined above (Section ll.l6.e(11) of Appendix
A-Zoning).
(3) Loading spaces cannot encroach roadways or access
aisles. Three spaces were required on previous
site plans and should be provided on this site
plan (Section ll.J of Appendix A-Zoning).
6. Construction of the proposed parking lot within the future
right-of-way for Boynton Beach Boulevard, prior to the
construction of the bridge, will require the following:
a) A license agreement from the governmental entity that
currently has jurisdiction over the existing
right-of-way.
b) A lease agreement for that portion of the parking lot
that is proposed on the property which lies north of
the existing right-of-way, owned by Janet Hall. The
lease agreement must be approved by the community
Redevelopment Agency after review and recommendation by
the Technical Review Board (Section 6.E.4.c(2) and (3)
of Appendix A-Zoning).
c) Compliance with FDOT comments contained within the
attached correspondence dated July 31, 1990.
7. The tri-party agreement concerning construction of the
future bridge and the parking area underneath is currently
being reviewed by FOOT. Preliminary discussions with FOOT
indicate that they are considering abandoning the tri-party
agreement in favor of an alternative solution. Final
comments concerning the tri-party agreement will be
formalized when the response from FOOT is received.
8. The conditions of the previous variance approval for the
fire lane and the backing of cars into Casa Loma Boulevard
must still be met (provide a note concerning fire sprinklers
and standpipes and show detail for integration of park with
cul-de-sac).
9. License agreements must be approved by the city Commission
for the utilization of public rights-of-way (N.E. 6th Street
and Casa Lorna Boulevard) for parking and other purposes!
?
TO: Mr. Craig Livings~on
~
Aug. 7, 1990
~
10. Easement to be dedicated to connect Cas a Lorna Boulevard to
Ocean Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard via the 'private
street system.
11. On site utilities must be located underground (Section 6.E.3
of Appendix A-Zoning). A note should be placed on the
construction plans stating the above.
12. The Environmental Review Permit must be submitted to and
approved by this office prior to issuance of a building
permit. '
13. Elevation and floor plan drawings should be referenced to
location of buildings on the site plan.
14. The engineering drawings do not correspond to the site plan
drawing with respect to the loading zones on the south side
of Casa Lorna Boulevard.
15. The ultimate right-of-way line for the extension of Boynton
Beach Boulevard and the construction of the bridge should
remain on the site plan drawing for reference purposes and
to coordinate future construction drawings for the bridge,
if approved.
16. A loading space was deleted from the plans that was required
in connection with previous approvals. Please modify plans
to restore missing loading space (Section ll.J of Appendix
A-Zoning) .
17. The proposed site plan modification must include a statement
from a Florida Registered Traffic Engineer or, if necessary,
a revised traffic impact analysis which addresses compliance
with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of the Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
Considering that this project was approved for 4,796 trips
per day prior to implementation of the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance, any intensification which results
in a net increase of 500 or greater additional trips per day
will require compliance with the Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance.
lB. An additional $~OO is required for the site plan
modification or Conditional Use modifictation ($300 total).
A $125 fee is required for the height exception.
b+J~
JJG:cp
A: CRAIG
3
,--~~g LIvingston
Aug. 7, 1990
,/
\ ,
} Calculation was approved by the City Commission, as dry boat
st~rage is not listed in Appendix A - Zoning (pursuant to,
Section 11.H.12 of Appendix A). , ~
2
Includes lighthouse retail and harbor master (Secti~n
ll.H.l6.d(3) of Appendix A-Zoning).
';
J' The number of required parking spaces can be reduced by 35
percent in the CBD.
, .~
I '
/ PARKING PROVIDED (ON SITE) = 179 spaces
BRIDGE PARKING (OFF-SITE) = 100 spaces
i'...A 279
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = spaces
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 277 spaces (approximatel
Parking spaces provided "n t~~
Lorna right-Ot-'~ '~\ \\\~, '
'NOTES:
-t J()
, : ~ ~t\\ '~~~\\\'.. · \\\f
'. . .~~
..
", ~
. .
. .
..
. ~
. .'. ,. ~ ~ ,', ,
.
\~r the charter bo~re ~--
TO: lllr. Craig Ll vingston
Aug. 7, 1990
,~
~ Calculation was approved by the City Commission, as dry boat
st6rage is not listed in Appendix A - Zoning (pursuant to~
Section 11.H.12 of Appendix A). ~ ~
2 Includes lighthouse retail and harbor master (Secti~n
11.H.16.d(3) of Appendix A-Zoning).
'I
3' The number of required parking spaces can be reduced by 35
percent in the CBD.
:, f
i'
PARKING PROVIDED (ON SITE)
BRIDGE PARKING (OFF-SITE)
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED
=
179 spaces
100 spaces
=
':. ,.-'"'
=
279 spaces
277 spaces (approximate)
=
'NOTES:
{1')
Parking spaces provided on the south side of Casa
Lorna right-of-way have been reserved for existing
businesses and are not proposed to be utilized for
this project.
(2) At the TRB meeting, the developer indicated that
there may be one or more charter boats utilizing
the marina. Additional parking would be required
for the charter boats beyond the 277 spaces
outlined above (Section 11.16.e(11) of Appendix
A-Zoning) .
I,
'"
~-<
(3) Loading spaces cannot encroach roadways or access
aisles. Three spaces were required on previous
site plans and should be provided on this site
plan (Section 11.J of Appendix A-Zoning).
6. Construction of the proposed parking lot within the future
right-of-way for Boynton Beach Boulevard, prior to the
construction of the bridge, will require the follo~ing:
a) A license agreement from the governmental enti~y that
currently has jurisdiction over the existing~
right-af-way.
,
b) A lease agreement for that portion of the parking lot
that is proposed on the property which lles north of
the existing right-of-way, owned by Janet Hall. The
lease agreement must be approved by the Community
Redevelopment Agency after review and recommendation by
the Technical Review Board (Section 6.E.4.c(2) and (3)
of Appendix A-Zoning).
c} Compliance with FOOT comments contained within the
attached correspondence dated July 31, 1990.
7. The tri-party agreement concerning construction of the
future bridge and the parking area underneath is currently
being reviewed by FOOT. Preliminary discussions with FOOT
indicate that they are considering abandoning the tri-party
agreement in favor of an alternative solution. Final
comments concerning the tri-party agreement will be
formalized when the response from FOOT is received.
8. The conditions of the previous variance approval for the
fire lane and the backing of cars into Casa Lorna Boulevard
must still be met (provide a note concerning fire sprinklers
and standpipes and show detail for integration of park with
cul-de-sac).
9. License agreements must be approved by the City Commission
for the utilization of pUblic rights-of-way (N.E. 6th street
and Casa Lorna Boulevard) for parking and other purpose8!t
?
'ro:
Mr. C~aig Livingston
1
Aug. 7, 1990
c
,
Lorna Bou1evard\to
via the, 'private
Easement to be dedicated to connect Casa
Ocean Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard
street system.
11. On site utilities must be located underground (Section G.E.3
of ^ppendix ^-Zoning). ^ note should be placed on the
construction plans stating the above.
10.
12.' The Environmental Review Permit must be submitted to and
approved by this office prior to issuance of a building
permit.
13. Elevation and floor plan drawings should be referenced to
location of buildings on the site plan.
14. The engineering drawings do not correspond to' the site plan
drawing with respect to the loading zones on the south side
of Cas a Lorna Boulevard.
15. The ultimate right-of-way line for the extension of Boynton
Beach Boulevard and the construction of the bridge should
remain on the site plan drawing for reference purposes and
to coordinate future construction drawings for the bridge,
if approved.
16. A loading space was deleted from the plans that was required
in connection with previous approvals. Please modify plans
to restore missing loading space (Section 11.J of Appendix
A-Zoning) .
17. The proposed site plan modification must include a statement
from a Florida Registered Traffic Engineer or, if necessary,
a revised traffic impact analysis which addresses compliance
with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of the Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
considering that this project was approved for 4,796 trips
per day prior to implementation of the Municipal .
Implementation Ordinance, any intensification which results
in a net increase of 500 or greater additional trips per day
will require compliance with the Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance.
lB. An additional $~09 is required for the site plan
modification or Conditional Use modifictation ($300 total).
A $125 fee is required for the height exception.
h+J~
JJG:cp
A: CRAIG
:3
\,
,
\
If PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-270
(AGENDA MEMORANDUM)
TO: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
FROM: James J. Golden, Interim Planning Director
DATE: August 16, 1990
SUBJECT: Lighthouse Square Marina
The revised site plan reviewed by the Technical Review Board
included the following changes to the previously approved site
plan:
1. Significant changes to the parking lot layout and
design within the future right-of-way for Boynton Beach
Boulevard. These changes were made in connection with
a permit issued by the Florida 'Department of
Environmental Regulation to mitigate destruction of
mangrove habitat. NOTE: Conversations with FDOT
indicate that the new design of the parking lot within
the bridge right-of-way would not be compatible with
the future bridge design and that the original design
is subj ect to change. Therefore, it appears likely
that most, if not all, of these parking spaces would be
lost if a bridge is built at this location. The loss
of these parking spaces would result in a deficiency of
parking spaces that would be required by the City's
zoning ordinance, as this plan provides for only two
surplus parking spaces.
2. Changes to the approved Conditional Use for the dry
boat storage building which include an increase in
square footage from 35,089 to 36,450, an increase in
the east/west dimension from 260 to 275 feet and a
westward shift in the footprint of this building by
approximately 20 to 25 feet. BOrE: Although the
measured dimension on the new plan is 275 feet, the
architect shows this dimension as 270 feet. It was
also assumed that the scale of the site plan remains
one (l) inch equals 40 feet, as a scale was not
provided on the revised site plan drawing.
3. Increase in square footage of the retail on the south
side of the dry boat storage building from 6, 313 to
6,750.
4. Change in the layout and design of the harbormaster
building and an increase in square footage from 3,750
to 4,000.
5. Changes in the layout and design of the restaurant
including the addition of a second floor and an
increase in seating by 25. NOTE: Although the
addition of the second floor appears to have increased
the square footage of this building, the exact increase
cannot be determined, as the square footage for this
building has not been shown on the site plan.
6. A change in the layout and design of the entire retail
frontage on the north side of Casa Loma Boulevard.
These changes include the creation of two buildings of
nearly equal size instead of the larger and smaller
retail buildings previously approved and the
elimination of the freestanding raw bar. The seating
in the raw bar was increased from 50 to 200.
PM90-270
-2-
August 16, 1990
7. A change in the layout and design of the retail
lighthouse, including a request for a 20 foot height
exception, as outlined in the attached correspondence
in Exhibit "A".
B. Elimination of 3 boat slips on the north side of the
inlet. However, the total number of slips is still
shown as 37.
Copies of the approved and proposed site plans are provided in
Exhibit "B".
The Technical Review Board determined at the August 6th meeting
that the revised site plan was incomplete and should not be
forwarded to the Downtown Review Board until the applicant was
able to submit the missing items. The items which were missing
included, but were not limited to, the fOllowing:
1. Amended Conditional Use application
2 . Details on project signs
3. Landscape plan
4. Revised elevations for the dry boat storage
building
5. Colored elevations for all buildings
6. Traffic statement pursuant to the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance
7. Application fees
B. Various details concerning on-site utilities
Further details concerning the above-referenced list of missing
items are provided in the staff comments in Exhibit "C". It
should be noted, however, that the attached "courtesy" comments
have not been completed as of this date and therefore should not
be construed to be conditions of approval.
k-f-~
ES $. GOLDEN
JJG:frb
Encs
A:PM90-270
EXHIBIT "A"
siteworks architects & planners, inc.
. . . . .
July 27, 1990
Mr. James Golden
Planning Department
City of Boynton Beach
100 Seacrest Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Re: Lighthouse Square Marina
Dear Mr. Golden;
In researching the historical data for the design of the light-
house for the above referenced project, we have discovered that
almost 95% of all lighthouses along the east coast of the
United states and the Gulf of Mexico are significantly higher
than the 45' height allowed in the City of Boynton Beach. The
lighthouse serves as a beacon to not only mariners but in our
case will signify the center of our marina area and Central
Business District.
With this in mind, we respectfully request a height exemption
be granted to construct the lighthouse to a height not to
exceed 65'. In reviewing the City Ordinances, specifically
Appendix A-Zoning Section 4 F. Height Limitations and
Exceptions, we request herewith that you place this application
before the City Commission to consider our exception.
The Code under Subsection 2 indicates that" Water, cooling and
fire towers, radio and television towers of commercial nature,
church spires, domes, cupolas, flagpoles, electrical and
mechanical support systems, and similar structures, and their
necessary mechanical appurtances may be erected within a
structure or on top of the structure, above the district height
limitations provided herein, after obtaining approval of the
city council based on their consideration of the standards for
evaluating exceptions to district height regulations set forth
in paragraph 3 below."
r
C~~'O
~~
~\~
~'U\.. 'O~,?\.
~~\\~\:>
V~
118 southeast 4th street boynton beach, florida 33435
407-737-9606
.
July 27, 1990
It is our opinion that a lighthouse would qualify as a similar
structure as mentioned in the above reference thereby
justifying this request. We further find that:
A. This height exception will not have an adverse effect
on existing and proposed land uses.
B. This height exception is necessary in order to function
as a beacon and identifying element for the CBD.
C. The height exception will not reduce light and air in
adjacent areas.
D. The height exception will not be a deterrent to the
improvement or development of adjacent areas, in fact we
feel this will bring attention to the Central Business
District and will stimulate development.
E. The height exception will not adversely affect property
values in adjacent areas, it will increase the value as
the area develops.
F. The height exception will not affect living conditions
in adjacent areas as it is not significantly near any
residential areas, and will improve the visual area it
is in.
G. This height exception will not grant a special privilege
to the owner and as a result of the Central Business
District redeveloping, the public welfare will be
greatly benefitted.
H. We list in geographical order our findings of similar
structures along the coast of the United States to
support this height exception.
If we can provide any additional information as part of this
request, please contact me at your convenience.
ston, AIA
EXHIBIT "B"
o
UJ
:>
o
cc
a.
C1..
<(
,
. .
........ : ;
...~....... :
r--1-.... ....::........l
~..~ .. ....... -....
.. .........\..:.......J .""..
: ...
!
Ii ;;;;'. - :
. '''0' .+.-}ulij..{.]!
.
.4.~
'\I'm 1\10' J.
~~NI
t:l
-
,'.
.
I
~
UliJ
[Illi]
t
; !j.
g I ~~! ·
Illi ~I.! i
:~!!!I! &! ~
!,..~. w,21
"~'~I F !
;.~: <{!C j
3 I
"
~
! i
J I
...,.
.11
I I I
I I I
Ii,,'
I I d
I I i'
-lliI
1!~h;J
---
-<
I
I
r
J
'..
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~,",'" 7",:,';.',.;f~,:
/"".::;,;;"
NO'
; ",';:~' ,;
/:
. '
Coor.din
/ TO:
FROM:
vincent FiniziQ, Adm.
Engineerin~_
~
Chr1stopher Cutro,
DATE:
February 27, 1991
SUBJECT: Lighthouse Square Marina
Request for Comments
It is my understanding that the Buildinq;4.~.~'
there might be problems with the proposed:p~:tn"
north side of the site, and told Craig LivingstQn:
parking would have to be reevaluated after;~ei4'p
the alteration of wetlands was issued. ' ,:;,:;~ry(,~
:. ; . /{~'~"'C:,j',~~;,~~~t::,,~~;.:,__.,_
Now that both DER and DERM have issued petmit's~:'t,(~~~~,r ,
the Building Department will review the re\t~.se4!':;.4-', "'~~'
determine if the proposed parking meets the,'pa.:t]($rig:;~i~de'.
requirements. I f the Building Department 's.;fin4.tA9':."?;~J:a,
positive, I believe that at most, there may,("be'a~Jl.~~+::tQr
administrative review of the plan to verify,,'th.atiK.;it " " e.ign
is not causing any problems for other dep.r.~.n..1;. "", "
;'. :: :.,...~.~ .:. \: ':'~:~~,:~~,~~:"):'~~tu:~';~~tJ
All in all, I doni t see this change as amajQ~;ta.
the original plan. If you have any'"' ' ,
item, please feel free to call me.
'.,f>. ~"', '""
CC/cmc
xc: Don Jaeger, Building Official
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Admin.
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
Richard Staudinger, Consulting
"
..
I
/
~ i~
~.
~
~
~
..q
~
~
t.J
~,
.i
~
~1;, ;'
~
:J ~l.
p
--l
--
~ .
~' ~'
--
rl
... ,.
..~~~......
t"~~" ...
..~ ."'.....
... ..
... ~,"~.""
-......~....
__.,......2..,.~
, 'o,/" ;a. ~ ~
......'
..... ...'" '"
"11>"""'~
.. ~ h '..
. .
.$-0
._~
.01
.
-
...,
&
~
'M
.'
r,
",
'"
0)
~,
~
\\j
.GO
;r
~ .~.
. .
.. ~ . .
...~-
. . .
,.~ . .
.... . .
, . .
.. " ~ ..
~
,- . . .
.." . .
.... . .
... ..
..~. . .
. . . .
~ . . .
.. . .
"'''~''...' . ...
.. ..... ..
" .....
.. w.......
..... ......
.. ~.. . .
~..Jl....'. .
9". ...
" -'""".~
~ "'". . . .
'" '
Ill... ...
.. .' . . .
II ,.. .' · ·
.. . ..'.
')10 ...))l ..
llf"" )I. . -.,..
. ,
. .--
"
..
.
. .
.. .. .
. ..
"
..
.. ..
~
.. .' .
"" .,..
... . .
.
.
.
.
"
.
.
.'
t
"
..
.
..
..
~
..
,.
~ .
,)l
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
:.
.
.
"-
.1Il
~
~
..
. ..
...,.. .. .
".. "" .. .
.... ...
.......
.."..~
.. · ~ t .
...,. . .
........ ...
.....~ ' ,
,~, ~..,
..,. ...),; ~
....~. ,,~
.",~. .
~ .'..)0 .
......" .
.... . .,.... ...
'Jt .
,. ~ ..,.. ,.
.. .-.... .... '"
'" ... .." ~
,!"," ..., II"
..
~
.
.
.
.N
,
!
'1..
.
.............-...
"
,>
.
\
.
"
~
. .
. '
~
S
~
.
.
.
. .
....
.
.
.'
.
.
.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #93-041
FROM:
J. Scott Miller
~~
Christopher Cutro
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
February 26, 1993
RE:
Casa Lorna Boulevard
As you requested, I have reviewed Richard Staudinger's-memorandum
regarding Casa Loma Boulevard and would like to add one more
alternative to the list.
When Lighthouse Square was proposed, it called for the
reconstruction of Cas a Loma Boulevard from the Intracoastal
Waterway to Orange Avenue. The street would have headin/backout
parking on the north and south side, as well as a turnaround,
specific areas for dumpsters and landscaping, drainage would be
improved and there would be new lighting. (See attached
drawing. )
In order to go forward with this improvement, a lease for 20 feet
on the northside of the street would have to be arranged with the
owners of Water's Edge Marina and someone would have to pay for
it.
Some general discussions indicate that George Culver, (the owner
of Two George's), and Janet Hall would be willing to share the
expense of the improvements. In addition, some contribution may
be warranted from Water's Edge to clean up their parking problems
with charter and commercial fishing boats.
If there was a desire to be creative with TIF monies, we could
pay for the improvements and have the adjacent property owner
reimburse the TIF funds at no interest or a low interest rate.
If this alternative were undertaken, Two George's could complete
their expansion to 150 seats (which has been a major
administrative problem since I arrived here), Janet Hall could
pursue her development (Seamist Centre), and we could resolve the
problem of the charter fishing boats at all three locations on
Casa Loma Boulevard.
A final positive point is that Craig Livingston has indicated
that the plans for the improvements to Casa Loma Boulevard are
completed and could be bid out very quickly.
I would suggest that, if the City Commission feels an urgency to
repair Casa Loma Boulevard, that it be added to the resurfacing
list with a stipulation that Casa Loma Boulevard be done last.
At the same time, I would ask that the City Commission authorize
Richard Staudinger and me to pursue this alternative and try to
finalize an agreement prior to the improvements to Casa Loma
Boulevard.
CC/jm
Att.
A:CASALOMA.JM
~~
I~
'-
11
~
11 -
~
o
~
~
I __
r
~!5o
Xf\~
ll!1Il~
~ I _
~
~
=-=-\
...
....I
. ~
J
o
~ ~.
1> ~
r ~.
!f .
o
m .
r
~
~~--
... .
f\
111
~
ffi
E
lG
~
~
r
\
r----
\ -
,-
~~~I'i~
I~F'i !
! ;
..
-'~~~lii~~
~&~mm~~
\11 !i!iJj
='::Cl'Cl't+
t++........
11:......
~II''''
286.ss'
~uh\n\iiii
l~
~
; ~i i
r Iftr
~ )>~
- ~~
~ ~!I
i I~
~ to
:t: II
~ :1
l> i\l ~
~ ~;
~ ~~
~ i;~
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY