AGENDA DOCUMENTS
7.e.I.
Lawrence Lakes pun
Master Plan Modification
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-401
FROM:
Chairman and Members of the
Planning and Developmept Board
Tambri J. Heyden ~~
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
August 4, 1995
SUBJECT:
Lawrence Lake PUD - MPMD 95-005
Second modification request (add two lots)
INTRODUCTION
Enrico Rossi, P.E. and agent for GRB Development and Construction,
property owner of the Lawrence Lake PUD, located at the east side
of Lawrence Road, approximately 775 feet north of Gateway
Boulevard, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the Lawrence Lake PUD, as described in the attached
report (Planning and Zoning Department memorandum no. 95-377).
RECOMMENDATION
At the August 3, 1995, City Commission meeting, the Commission made
a finding of no substantial change regarding the modification
requested. At that meeting, the agent presented a landscape plan
for the open area which shows a tot lot and a landscaped bermed,
buffer between the existing lots and new lot 33 to address some of
the concerns of residents of Lawrence Lake who are displeased with
this request since their view of the open area will be obstructed
by two new homes, and the open area will be reduced in size by
approximately half (see attached drawing). It is recommended that
the Planning and Development Board approve this request, subject to
staff comments referenced in Exhibit "0" and subject to
implementation of the attached landscape plan. Since the new lots
require replatting, the details of the tot lot and landscape plan
will be determined at that time.
TJH:dim
Attachments
xc: central File
a:5tfRpr.2.Lllw
ENRICO ROSSI, P.E.
625 Whispering Pines Road
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Phone (407) 478-7044
June 26, 1995
Tambri Hayden, Director of Planning
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re: LA WRENCE LAKE P. U.D.
"PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MASTER PLAN"
Dear Ms. Hayden:
Enclosed for the City'sreview and approval are twelve (12) sets of the referenced MASTER
PLAN submitted on behalf of GRB Development & Construction, showing the proposed
Modification by the addition of two (2) single family lots thereby, increasing the total
approved dwelling units from 32 Lots to 34 Lots. The two (2) Lots were carved out of the
provided "Green area" located along the North side of the entrance road. The "Recreation
Fee" has been paid for 32 Lots, an additional fee for the two (2) additional lots to be paid
upon approval.
The present density of 2.40 units per acre would be increased to 2.55 units per acre which
is considerably under the allowed 4.9 units per acre. This is also well below the densities
of the surrounding projects. No permit modification from the South Florida Water
Management District or the Health Department will be required.
The infrastructure is in place to serve the additional lots. Water and sewer services are to
be extended to serve Lot 34. Water and sewer is presently stubbed to Lot 33, which is being
used for a temporary sales office. The required additional water and sewer capacity for two
(2) lots is approximately 600 gpd which could readily be accommodated for in the existing
overall water and sewer system. The additional drainage runoff is not significant and is
readily absorbed by the disproportionately large retention pond.
Approximately twenty (20) lots have a purchase contract or have been issued a "Certificate
of Occupancy".
, " :\~'--, . -'f)" "-r~n--~f t~--r~;'
" \ W (iry ITt II, -'''''J! 'i ,:
;i\ ~__:....H"_""U- \'~llt.
II . ~ ' - ~
~ ;.
'\: It:
\';' :
,
-- (~
u . "\;\ ~'i
.. )l",
I, ,',,~'" v' ".
Tambri Hayden
Director of Planning
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
June 26, 1995
Page Two
The additional estimated 20 trips per day to be generated by the addition of two (2) lots will
not adversely affect the offsite roadways. Lawrence Road is presently at L.O.S. (Level of
Service) "C" and it is anticipated that the level of service will not decrease over the one
year life of the project.
Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 to the City for the processing fee.
Very truly yours,
~~-'~ ~~
.0-~~~
Enrico Rossi, P.E.
Agent for GRB Development & Construction
/bg
cc: Greg Berman
GRB Development & Construction Company
33 Lawrence Lake Drive
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
t."'j.,j~~L k>~o,
...... . . .
..~:~~ .
.... : .
,~
."'. l;~'I:.3."'.i.)~ '~
J.l\, .....:s,~,~.,.!{,Fi-....
~Hiliifnt' '
i Ij..:.1~ ;,t, a,.;li,' '';''"
! f .~rr. =.:(" c'~ J;'
., t I' ~ '.. ~i~~.t~,.: ,'"...
'. ..t "".{or" , :~"':':
~ .iL., "'"23 ." ,:'":,"'; ~,~~",,:.,~\";,.~'~~.:,
: :.r~ ' : :,:~.:~', .. :,= ,
....
! ~.-
.. .
"
.,. ~ -;:-; "
,:".:: ~.;:;": ~
. . ~ .,.
~ . :..... .. ~
.';, :::.\: .~;.~.
.' .~':.'
'. :;.~~:.
'-.'
.' ....
. .. '.'~ ~ ..
T~;
~~i.~:
. ,~. . ':~ .......
....
,r- ,
,
, 'J.
.(
'1'
..:~- :
'1 'p_
, ,
-.': ",
...... . .;.......
. ....!
"
......
.." .
. "j';
.:.r... .
.: .~
.....
~.' .
....,. .
"':$
." ........
r. ';. ~'."\ ~
. , . ~
,'.,
'\""
/~~.'
'.....
"
~_ i.; '.
.' ".
~.; .::.1-, ....
,.' :~
or. .~...
0-;-.''''
:",(.
..', I
.:: ~'. '.~' ~~~.":;' :.~~';....: ..(
", ~-'::~-~'~::~:"~\.~~'-~'
.,; ~!:~:~;';., .:
,'.
r
~
..
J>
. ': i-,(
" ,', '~
,1/1
,'J>>
~,.,,,:
:: ~'. .:~:. ,~~."..
...~
';'" 'j
..'
~ ....'.r..: ~."
:::.~{t.::::'.'~:~ .
r
~
-\
.\11
\II
.'/~.. .:.::~:
.' "......,..
~
r.
t
~
'1'1
L
, .
t.
~
r
"
_fI
,'J-
\: ~
.- ~
c: ~
11
r
t
z
Q~~~'
~. 1 ~ 7"
~~\'.~ ~
~. &,
r
t ,,~
H! J.;
~
""? 1 ,,?mot ,,~.. Sontfo
--,
~
Landscape Design, I~c.
:L~~~E-':~~,~,
','..:;.r" ~''''''l't1 ',' O..;,..,;.,:..~~~ ~~ ,...1.
<
I ~!
~~
. <~
...";.'
~. ", .
.' .. .'
','
.~).~.. ... . -.....:.-~
, ::,:: X"~;~:;\>:~'~+:~
. .. '';". '~'j~;.:": .r.~.~':';~~~
,,<,:.:~~~[~~~;,'~.~~~
'.' 'I. '.- : ~:~.
'. ..~;
'. ._. ~... I"' .,.
,"", i;:r~~
.:". ...
.:
. ~:;
" .
." ~ .
;.
e
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-377
Agenda Memorandum for
August 1, 1995 City Commission
FROM:
Carrie Parker
Ci ty Manager C ~
_ ~ (Jt)~
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zonin , Director
TO:
DATE:
July 27, 1995
SUBJECT:
Lawrence Lake PUD - MPMD 95-005
Second modification request (add two single-family lots an
increase from 32 lots to 34 lots)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Enrico Rossi, P.E., agent for GRB Development & Construction, property
owner, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master
plan to add two (2) single-family lots. The addition of two lots \'1ill
increase the total number of lots in the planned unit development (PUD)
from 32 to 34. Find attached Exhibit "All - letter of request and
proposed master plan.
Lawrence Lake is a 13.34 acre, 32 lot, platted, Single-family, detached
unit PUD located on the east side.of Lawrence Road approximately 775
feet nOl'th of Gateway Boulevard L-21 (see Exhibit IIBII - location map) .
BACKGROUND
The Lawrence Lake rezoning and master plan were approved by the City
Commission on December 6, 1988. The master plan depicted a 33 lot
development, however, during the platting process the total number of
ll)ts and units was reduced to 32. On November 21, 1939, the City
Commission approved the final plat for Lawrence Lake to subdivide the
property into 32 lots and various other common area tracts.
The land use designation of the property is Low Density Residential
(LDR) which allows a maximum of...!...84 dwelling units per acre. The gross
dens i ty of the 32 uni t PUD is 2.4 aweD lng units per acre. The 1 and use
In tensi ty (LUI) rating of the development is 4.0. Applying the LUI
standard ratios of the PUD ordinance, the maximum total permitted floor
area for the entire project was established at 116,218 square feet.
This total floor area would allow each of the 32 units a 3,631 square
foot floor area. The minimum lot width, lot area and maximum lot
coverage for the PUD are si~tty (60) feet lot wide, six thousand (6,OOD)
square foot lot area and a maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent.
All lots in the PUD front on an internal looped private road that has
one ingress/egress to Lawrence Road.
On August 4, 1992, the City Commission determined that a request to
establish pool and screen enclosure setbacks, reduce the front yard
setback from 25 feet to 20 feet and substitute a common area swimming
pool for an open area was a non-substantial change. Exhibit IIC", the
current master plan, illustrates the building, pool and screen
enclosure setbacks and the present layout of the 32 lots.
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the city's land development
regulations states that changes in planned unit developments shall be
processed as follows:
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the planning and development board upon
application filed by the developel- or his successors in
interest, prior to the expiration of the pun classification
but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are
in accord with all regulations 1n effect when the change or
J
Page 2
Agenda Memorandum
Lawrence Lakes PUD
MPMD 95-005
changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the
comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed
change. Substantial changes shall be processed as for a new
application for PUD zoning. The determination of what
constitutes a substantial change shall within the sole
discretion of the city Commission. Non-substantial changes as
determined by the City Commission in plans shall not extend
the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the PUD
classification."
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the city's land development regulations:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the ci ty, and the protection of
adjacent and existing and future city development. The
district is suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the city.
Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable city regulations to the same degree that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
vie\"l of the substantial publiC advantages of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable
in size, location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
coordinated units.
With respect to the subject request to add two (2) lots, it is
determined that the new lots meet the established minimum lot
frontage and lot area specifications. The density of the project
will increase from 2.4 to 2.55 units per acre, however, the 2.55
uni ts per acre is less than the maximum 4.84 units per acre
allowed within the low density residential land use classification.
The two new lots, which increase the existing total lots from 32 to
34, will be developed consistent with the established 40 percent
maximum lot coverage and established building, pool and SC1-een
enclosure setbacks which are identified on the proposed master
plan.
No negative comments were received from the Utilities Department or
the Engineering Division regarding availability of water and sewer
service or the mitigation of storm water runoff. Therefore, the
existing infrastructure is adequate to serve the additional lots
and the additional drainage runoff will be handled by the existing
large retention pond.
The traffic statement provided by the applicant to address the
additional trips generated by the new lots, has been forwarded to
Palm Beach County Traffic Division for evaluation for consistency
with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance standards. It is
dnticipated that the additional trips will not adversely affect the
surrounding roadways.
The lncrease in number of lots will require additional recreational
~'
Page 3
Agenda Memorandum
Lawrence Lakes PUD
HPHD 95-005
fees to be paid in lieu of land dedication. Since no privatE::
recreational amenities exist within the PUD, no half credit was
granted. As indicated in Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-
237 (see Exhibit liD") replatting of the project is required. At
the time of replatting, the additional recreational fees will be
oHed.
As previously mentioned, the original master plan approval included
thirty-three (33) units and a private recreational facility
(swimming pool and some other minor elements) that was subsequently
amended to substitute the few recreational amenities proposed for
an open area. None of the recreation was required, even the open
area, since a minimum of five recreational amenities are required
to receive half credit toward recreation requirements and five
amenities could not be provided.
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, July 11, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met
to review this master plan modification request. The TRC
recommends that the City Commission make a finding of "no
substantial change" for the proposed modification, and that the
Planning and DevE::lopment Board approve the request, subj ect to
staff comments (see Exhibit liD" Forester/Environmentalist
Memorandum No. 95-310, Development Department Engineering Division
Memorandum No. 95-237, Recreation & Park Memorandum No. 95-316 and
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-362). The basis
for the recommendation is that the impacts (water, sewer, traffic,
and recreation) are minimal and are even less when compared to the
original master plan that had proposed 33 lots.
JvIEH/dim
xc: Central File
a:l~wl.~~.Gtr/MIH
~
I" .,11"111.1' ... 11..t.,1 ",,,
...................! .......,.....,.., ..,..' ,....,.... ......., , ," '"'''''''' ....,." """",,,. ," I..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,..,
:lld3
~ j;1
~r
-0
::Ub5
0-,-,-,-,
~Ul<n
ia-~
. Z!T1
-I:u
iij!T1
::u
}1"1
(1\0
re
-(")
~~
Z
J>
~
~:Jo ~a ...
.i:; ~ 0
...
a i :=
~
~
!~g '0
~
~?i ..
~~J ~
-4
'! ~
~.li
~~-
I
I ::llll;l Ie
- ,-0>4--
.~~
i~~
1 ::Ig
I 0"
~ ~~
I I
. .
: i t
. ..
i~~~$~~ :aV. ,.
nI
~~~~iii .;: ~ . g
",..t.;: ,.
~ - '" r
,'::.-2~~':'; it:~
~'iEi'i!lt~ a
~....- . nI
:~8~tia~ ~~!~ IJJ
0 ~--4
l~ai---;- - ~ "
'" 0 ~
.,. i'"'I '""'........ '"' lIli-;: ~ . ~ '6
~:~~:~:..-!. :- ~ 9- -4
~~i~2!;: 9, , ~ <5
z
i9,~;~i'"if, ~ i.~
..:!,,~_~Is I~:=
. .. $ -";;.:! ~ ~l~
l!~i!l~i
:i~~Ei! ~t!
s~tl~~' I-- I
~~l
:,i;:;s18t~ IlIj ~ 2 ~~
,"-i.;:;- il
-~ s:~ t;~ ....,
;:;!S;:\9,Ji "
i :~;;:-- l' ~ I i
~ .,==Jji~1 l!l
-'"9,- if ,
\\
~~It)\
e' !i
e III
~ ~
~
. .
:e
111'
~\ .
iD \ , ;\
~. \ \\ \
\\.,~ \
\ -
\ '- '
" \ '
"'(
~\ II
!;
...
..
"
llICl)O'
, ,"I lli\'l\
\ h\. ~
I ~h":
l ~i~th
. 'w W - . .. -
Silo un iQt Ii : aIr n iln \\l~lau l,"\i1i
hi in .. l! i ~;
HI nii \ ~ iui @i ;Ill l\\\\i~i it!\\\
r~
~li\e 1::1 -Ii U ~le
;11 .. Q ~ ini
l'~ ih
~i, ~ i\ li\ i i ~Ui lit I iiil
1', i .. l\ \\ a
I t- !U liil i
il\ 1I' '." l~
i i Ii . ij
ai . ~
i-i i , ;'iit~t; i iii" S'i Gt~~~; ,\
iii ~.~j ~;Hl~ ; d! ~~~ ~~!i~~1
a6a un
~~, ' IU ~
da
a-i ~\s~t\ '::l!lF $S~~tl \
;;;; In
i II
, ,
i " !ibi;~ i li.li~ ;ii Gt~'~ \\
U fifi!i!i. Ii ,n
un, !ili \
&iia n~) ~tF;:\
....
;;~ iB>
I
\',
\:
I'
,:
- . \~
r
('
,
I{
11
\ ..
N_OJ. 53' 33"E 331.82' ~ '.
r- ~ ;~
\ \, ;t
\ ' (l
1\ Ii:
\ ~." \\ iiil \~
\ ~ \\ dl
\ ~ ~\:
\ I ~
\ ~ ~' iiil \_
" I I I I
-t 70" I'll, ,,~~!'
., r . 0 4' .,
'.: .i ....
\ - ~ 'u, '
\ \ r'l~
\ 1', r ,\
~\ ;It Ii
\ ;:~\r\
e,. I Z
\ \\,i 0 j 0
f, ,. l' ...
\ e ~ i~, ~
\\ \~ \\~
h ' ~\ il
\"' ft t~
\j \ r
\ \,
\ j .'
\ Ii'
\
I~"'I
\--
\ ~ :
~\ \ I-'t'" , \;
I h \r(" ;
~ .... it . \'
~ ~,~ I
S 01.43.3~' 'n1o ' ~
~. 't
'l' '''' ~ 1
\,. l ~ J.
I t
~'~'\\\\9>IP8>~; ~ 0.
1.~! r'l '
. ~:~ ',i~8. U
SSI~ .~ ~ .-
t
,'~
11- -; 1-
Iii! e~
~"~ ~::
~::~ S
, ," ~
z
_.--', r----.
//'\ N I ....
/ \ , I
- \- ' ,!
"", \ __- \ I /
''', ". ' ,_....,...... I
W H
= ~
m
z
m
I ~
r
:a z
~ ~
;lI '"
.
I
.0
;
g
:;;
o
~
<5
z
<n
I
It)
o
~~
i,)\JI
~lU
~
en \
\
. /
1(1\ ,I
. ./ / 1"
~i {'
VI m.. t
-12 .I
=J I:!
VI !
o
V,
\,
'"
.,..t L~~-'~ \"
,:
\
""li
\1Y~
'" nlN
,.0
IJJ .
m ~~
~.~"
-4i:
.. ,I
i\
~l
,
"'0
JJ
o
"t
C
(j
n
c
ii~ ii
;9,- _t
li~ ~i
..,,~ !I~
~~i ;
ii- !
. 'i ;..
II i i
! s i
: I i
i I
III
r
,.
,
~
~
~Si 3: s:,~
~ i!~l!~
~ z~11
g) rn
~ 3:g)O""
~ ~::u." 0
o ~ (1\ "tJ
Z ~~~'3:
S2(J)l>~~
sa (1\~~ -4 t8
'....1 ~ ~ rn
~ zo::o-o
S'l ,.. ,-
~g -0 ):-
(J)~r %
~ -~')>
trl zZZ
~ 00 .
e ~!rJ, 2
"'dt :~~ ~
1\1 a~ en
__ ..._::n "'--
~!i~ ~
~ ..----
:c
J
(
--
~I~e. -=--1
i~i.l> I
,)!: ..J
:3~=.=.
,- ~..- --,
, - ~
I (Jl !
P';;;H=L, - i
_. -~-
_. -_..
~'-=i"
-
4
t
project:
LAWRENCE. LAJ{E." ,"
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA.
}
Fk'",,;, r':"~'l
\t~~i : ~
~.. ..ti;, _ _
~.. t -.::==-,
\:\' f!D:'\l
i;! €~~~
',!' uu:?~
,,; ~LJ~N
l~. ~~il:a
1 uttb ;;
I <1lJE1 ~
i "al!> .
~ e=s" !
for: G R B DEVELOPM1;NT &, CONSTRUCTION
. '/
LCCATION M:\?
LAWRENCE LAKE
1 -'--"
I ;n;.rlITTlffi '
t I . -_._- ... .---
'~J I, C'ff: :' 1 ",
I, { J1 . -: r-
I "r* '\'" 'i l\-
. '111' : . :.., t--
~)i ----J II ~
f. ,"
,
I
I
_I
1.
" ..-' ..' ... lit,..", L L . ~o
AG
, -, '-~n 11'r-
': '1"'_1..J I'
I . <' :7-=. .-.--:-~
I
Puc
LUI:4.0
Pl
LUI I
ti ~
"MEL~~
R1AA
4.~ .{ <<.IU ... ,
"SAUSALITO
GROVES"
PUO
LUPS.O
(, '~
c - /lo
; I I r " ' " \ '
. ~ [Ir/i~}.l',r,' I; ;l-ll~-
/ " ,I': i: ~Ir', !! ';, ; .0 1/8 MILES
t I, i"1 I' ' '1 ", i=-..:: '"I' I
/ (~~-t; ,:rjHb;'\J~fj' ';!;j ~- ~ 1111 I
I ,/ ...1. __I .
'J~""'~~ -'I"...'....:.: ',..:", . r~;! '
!:! 'I : I (...~..~: : ,( ~- ".0 .400. '800 FEE;T
1:7':, [) I, I " I Ifl j. , ".., _ , . d.... _ __ _ _ -7 C
I...
<) ,
.)
-'.
.,. I I ;
1/)'
~. ,;'
/J'('
" ,
l', '.. ' J
. ',-"' ,
} ...." ",'
,I. -'
"<
'~
1 11I11I111I1I11I1I1I1I111I1I1I1I111I1I1I11I11I1I1I'IlIllll
I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IlUllllIlIlIlIlIllllltl
I 1llIlIlIIlIIIlIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
;':';";'i~; '~'l'/.'~.llllllllllllllllll IIIII111I1111I1I1111I III 11111 I I II
:U~ :;;
~ ~ l!! s: Cl
~lh~ ~
Ipc ~
~aj~ ~
. j ~ E ;;
:- ii ~ Is
!\II ili Iz
~ i,!
I!:=
:;j'
~t!
Ii=!
:j lil
'-i
? ~ .
1;1
, ~
~ :~~~~~E~
o a~E:~aj~
'" !i~_l!-~'-
> -Bi'Ui~
~ ~':'8"'g~'
~i;::;h:~
i !:~~~!!~
...2""'t"....~
~ ..~i......' ~
; ~;I:ii~il
===~=-Il!
. . il'l-"'i=_
~ i~~i~l~i
~ .:!!q~J.i
II g~II-:stt;;
C.:: :-!::!!~~
liP li5:lil
~-iih3i
- :lils'pi.
\:__ ! i lil -___.i!_ _ ,__ '
- -7'"---~~~2~03'~~~~_~~~i- ~K~ N~_2.~=:~~.-!(~_
: ri--. --,.-
10' 12!!t2o~~O .0'
18[' Rr i ~ r ::1 .~~~
,: (~II;:lli'
I I . :r t:. II 'I :
l n r- ... ~ !.; 1;1 d ,IS:
a ,Ii ~~I~ ~i ~ ~ m ~'I !;ll d"l ~ "
(11\ ~Ii ::1' I , ~~!~; ,. ~ ,~
i j t ! ~~ ia it;. .. II~
_______- ._. "~_, _-;' .;~~, 0-' --,
---- ,,' 111'1"\
~Ir~ e~
G;. '"
;: I I o! e/
~ l ;;
. ~ \ i \
i. ,~.\
I \ \
\~\"
('; ,,,', \'
~"'I:',/
~.// I)""-'~~"
~!i ( ~'l,
... ~~ f \
- m4 J
:j.' \
::JL I, "
I,;
I,:
If
\,
\':.
PI
z
o
1'1
o
1'1
~
F
i
31
III
j: iH U_I ~~ !ijI;~i I ij lil~ ~
i~ Ili'" -II Jij.;;; ~ ~:- ~
!I !i;1 hl! ~ii ;!!j;j;! :"e ~I!!
=lil ~=~ ~J: ill III1llN a;;; i
t;_ ~~i oil ,,=1 r:1:1~ IP ~
~l!i Ih :::~1lI ~,,~\::~.. ?!!..~
;:: ll:l: =,o:l! !! ?~:-i! 11;8
!;~ !;!:! !lli !a :::- I.;;;
~" I:I,:::"S: a --:;; ~1lI
~~ ii: iai: mE!!!!:-:~
lilt; .!is ~ · !;g 1=1;;;
l;a"'''' Ii 1l: o....w ..,. Ct
8- i:S II !!! :-:;;
~~ I:: ~! ~~
a~ ~"" __
E~ .. ;;~~ F.~ ;;~;~ ; =a
h a ;o;;o;~ ;o;;o;;O;j!;:- = i
. I ~ ea! ~i ~~;.' ~ ~ !
- A e: ~~~~~ .
~: i~ i - .
t;!: i
~ii
~ ;;~;~
~~~i!i;;
'----- .-.--.-- --~----'-
I
~
I
I"'il ii!i~ i~~i~!
- "'"!il 1~!'1I I
I I"";;; gO",;"
U !_ . I~I! I
e5~ =~! s~l;a I~,.
r= ;;f ~~r, I'
a .: s: ;;
i! =
~I ~
to !
Ii 1)
~
N~.
;I:t~
!~~
...~~
;jI;ji;
~ilUI
_9
...-... :-~:-~~i:
:::~ :=:c:=~o
j';jI;!; j!;jI;~ji;ji;'"
'....;
~
c
~.;.;
!!
_i
;;~~~:
8
a~;.
"dd
~ ~
-'Rfr
"rr
:UOO
0-1-4
~U1(J1
~z=E
, ",
-I:u
ffl'"
:B~
",0
rC
-~
~O
Z
)>
:u
-<
~3 ~ "0
~.l' ~ 0
i~; i "0
?
,.
...
S
z
!I~ "
'"
~F! 0
c..
~
r'l :j
.E 0
-~I z
e!-
-pl
I
==1IIII1l:I
::: e :: Cl
m
Z
m
ii!~ ~I ~ '"
,.
,.
r- - ::I
.11 !:. z
~ii ~E ~ 0
5 ...
m
!SlaB il ; 1II
fii" : I
'i ~ M
1Il II i
~ !S I
i I fi
[',~'" , ' t:,~;:7~',":,
~~:~ j . ~~~l
(l>.r.t ; 'i;':!:
~ :' ,,'.-t t:
o ;' i ,'1~
'.~:~..>>'
!ltl:ftDi
I" I Ca.. i
;ii~lii~
i J~15;
~ a~!81
~
~ 3:!I:~
", ~ 0 )>:,;;,
)> en 0 en "1
----1~
cr~::!! m~
n :cq
:Uch>.
g.,,~c
~~O m
glZZ <
-I m
~glO r- PO
l! :u"TJ 0
~~s: ~
UI )>m
-i en en 'zi
~ -i:-1
M g];E
~~-o ~
-z~
ZoZ
p",
U1c...'
~~)>~
E~ ~m
!<!< :u~
~~ ~~
~~. N
praj~~t: ILAWa(tjc~~Li;~K'E",.~ : _ '"" .,~
, ': ,,; ,IE!Q'INtC~,~p.~~tfi...,FJ.OR'P~." ~::;'
~'.: : I. :. t~I',:, . \ " ,
. 'for:', P/:T1lA.Cf'~-r!J::~~.;~i;p.f~ilLi::;; ,
: -. . '\.,' I.,' \.,
o
~
~
."
n
~
(5
z
en
~~
~~
,.
o
o
,.
...
S
z
!I:
,.
".
~)
I ~', y
}I: '11
r- i~ ~ ~Eii ;~
I I gr;; i'
I ~ ,.i,1 &
~ '}.t
I ! f; ~t==1 G
I ~ h~,~~,
~, n ~:w_~c:: ;
\) H i~~~~ I
n H ( :
I :' .':, ~
I W n~
h 'j I:
I ~ l!~e~~1 \~
Ir M.,.." ~
_{, 70,1' IW I: ~""?J ~
.~ !: ~~ ~ c.: :.:
. '"
J ..
I ~ ~:
I ;" r )1
I i' ~"
I \, p \:
d' :
, I il ~ ~ ~
\ <D I' z lj ~
b:=. ----~ I ~I:' ~ !j-ti: ~
1- ; .:0 I' ~ 1 ~
~~:, h ~ 'I ~
L =.u. Ii ~ I'~
I ~, !l
I f
I I
I g ,
22' 'U I' ',:
I W
I .,',
In,'i
I i
I. J
I ?,l:' ,':
l!i~ ';
if J
~,
<<;
,
,
,
i
:
! I
ill
8. :-
. ~
· ;, i
,- .. I ': IliO,'
IDO~' · I'.'
, j' ;~ili~ I i lilll
I'il.: . I Iii',!
I Jihli .1
C!
CD
c:
...
...
m
'"
I
en
o
...
... .
...
o
c..U1
-~~
~
\
i ~.
\ \ t ::::-:-___~
;,
, ----1 \
\ ,\:-~:" ""
,--,--, \,
,'" ,
--J I \<
_-1, .'Iv
r
,I
(
,
~
;t; /II'.. '
:ct
lit IE.
e."
11
z
n
m
, N :~
L____In<.o
---=----~
I ll!
, - I
I ... :
'--- -'
lit I
I
,..
(II
III
...
III
~
~
~,
I
~
at
,jD
..
'"'!
'",
'... i~
- --..s
,"" '-~o""
-. - 8se
I ~'~ I)l l/ll:l
i l'llilP;
1,..II:.:-:--ii..-
!i -. ~_.~
~2' 0
'l ': C!
/
l. _ ___
/ ::l
I, ,
I,: ':':':0. C'
/ ri-~J
,
-'---'--
';;;--=---,
lboq- ,
if! ~ I
~f::=.::...J
I ~---;
I Ui i
::.~"":.-=:::,-'"
--"',.'
a; j
~ =::.~-=~.
~
r
I
q
..
~
III
~
;/.....--/1 j'" "/, i
,. co,,! - ; :
'/ " III ~ . I
" . ~ - ~I i '- ...
~
... It' "
.' " 9>...,',:\
't'. ' ,1\ I' illr~,l~~II,lIJ
. 'lllfl~
, " '. ;.H ", '
L,''', ,/"'." i' .,.. ',,; '.. 'J
~'_~..,...:~ .~~ r: ..
iI
I
----H- _
:~~
:~~
!~~
5g
Zz
~/II
Ol'"
.
..
..
l.
II
V>
~~~i ~
..0
':'....":" "'"
~~-~ r
D", ..0
'"
~
~
~
o
C
JJ
JJ
m
Z
~
3:
)>
(J')
~
m
JJ
-0
r
)>
Z
~;t.i\~~
'i~Bjil
"~lqki,
'~ H.~
',' !p< Q'
;.~~~~~!
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-310
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
OATE:
July 12, 1995
r;. H.,. f::i i"-W ffi W
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist
RE:
Lawrence Lakes POO
Addition of Two Single Family Lots
The applicant should comment on how any existing trees or lakellittoral zone plantings will be
effected by the two new lots. The project should continue in the normal review process.
KH:ad
r?
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-237
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
~lann.ng & Zoning Director
, 'am Hukill, P.E.
Engineer
July 13, 1995
m .RN ~ 40,:/ @!
/
~lW~W~E~~D ~J
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
LAWRENCE LAKES
We have reviewed subject request for the addition of two
residential units to the development and have no objections if the
following conditions are met:
1. The subdivision is replatted to show added lots and other
changes, if any.
2. The 8' bike path along the entry road is changed back to
a 5' sidewalk.
3. The additional park fee in lieu of land dedication is
paid for the two additional units.
WVH/ck
xc: Al Newbold
Ken Hall
C:LAWRLAKE.CHO
I:>UJ,J!Il.l.L.L.~U LUl. ~~LllL.l.L. l.~V.l.~W OL. L.U~ DU.l..l.U.l.U,=/ LJ~J:JOl. L.l11~UL.,
9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and
conditions approved by the city Commission and the Planning
and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the
Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the
two new lots.
10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and
Development Board, and City Commission review does not occur
until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR
MEMORANDUM #95-377
VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
E
cc: Dev, Plan, Util
Agenda Memorandum for
August 1, 1995 City Commission
FROM:
c~rrie Parker \~~
c~ty Manager ~~u
_ ~'~ ~DIl-
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zonin Director
TO:
DATE:
July 27, 1995
SUBJECT:
Lawrence Lake PUD - MPMD 95-005
Second modification request (add two single-family lots an
increase from 32 lots to 34 lots)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Enrico Rossi, P.E., agent for GRB Development & Construction, property
owner, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master
plan to add two (2) single-family lots. The addition of two lots will
increase the total number of lots in the planned unit development (PUD)
from 32 to 34. Find attached Exhibit "A" - letter of request and
proposed master plan.
Lawrence Lake is a 13.34 acre, 32 lot, platted, single-family, detached
unit PUD located on the east side of Lawrence Road approximately 775
feet north of Gateway Boulevard ~ (see Exhibit "B" - location map).
BACKGROUND
The Lawrence Lak~ rezoning and master plan were approved by the City
Commission on December 6, 1988. The master plan depicted a 33 lot
development, however, during the platting process the total number of
lots and units was reduced to 32. On November 21, 1989, the city
Commission approved the final plat for Lawrence Lake to subdivide the
property into 32 lots and various other common area tracts.
The land use designation of the property is Low Density Residential
(LDR) which allows a maximum of 4.84 dwelling units per acre. The gross
density of the 32 unit PUD is 2.4 dwelling units per acre. The land use
intensity (LUI) rating of the development is 4.0. Applying the LUI
standard ratios of the PUD ordinance, the maximum total permitted floor
area for the entire project was established at 116,218 square feet.
This total floor area would allow each of the 32 units a 3,631 square
foot floor area. The minimum lot width, lot area and maximum lot
coverage for the PUD are sixty (60) feet lot wide, six thousand (6,000)
square foot lot area and a maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent.
All lots in the pun front on an internal looped private road that has
a-- ~ingress/egress to Lawrence Road. , , t:- 4.iD ~ ~ /;',:,
On A.ugust 4, 1992, the City Commission ~ed that a request to
establish pool and screen enclosure setbacks, reduce the front yard
setback from 25 feet to 20 feet and substitute a common areatttl5wimming
pool for an open area was a non-substantial change. Exhibi t '''ell, the
current master plan, illustrates the building, pool and screen
enclosure setbacks and the present layout of the 32 lots.
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the city's land develU:f)Illt::llL..
regulations states that changes in planned unit developments shall be
processed as follows:
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the planning and development board upon
3.pplication filed by t~e developer or his successors ~n
interest, prior to the expiration of the PUD classification
but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are
in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or
wr'lW'
..., ..,
Page 2
Agenda Memorandum
Lawrence Lakes PUD
MPMD 95-005
changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the
comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed
change. Substantial changes shall be processed as for a new
application for PUD zoning. The determination of what
constitutes a substantial change shall within the sole
discretion of the City Commission. Non-substantial changes as
determined by the city Commission in plans shall not extend
the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the PUD
classification."
ANALYSIS
Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the city's land development regulations:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the city, and the protection of
adj acent and existing and future city development. The
district is suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the city.
Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable city regulations to the same degree that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot basis. In
view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable
in size, location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
coordinated units.
With respect to the subject request to add two (2) lots, it is
determined that the new lots meet the established minimum lot
frontage and lot area specifications. The density of the project
will increase from 2.4 to 2.55 units per acre, however, the 2.55
uni ts per acre is less than the maximum 4.84 units per acre
allowed within the low density residential land use classification.
The two new lots, which increase the existing total lots from 32 to
34, will be developed consistent with the established 40 percent
maximum lot coverage and established building, pool and screen
enclosure setbacks which are identified on the proposed master
plan.
No negative comments were received from the Utilities Department or
the Engineering Division regarding availability of water and sewer
service or the mitigation of storm water runoff. ~nQ~O~~~O ~nQ
existing infrastructure is adequate to serve the additional lots
and the additional drainage runoff will be handled by the existing
large retention pond.
The traffic statement prOVided by the applicant to address the
additional trips generated by the new lots, has been forwarded to
Palm Beach County Traffic Division for evaluation for consistency
wi th the Palm Beach County Traff ic Performance standards. It is
3nticipated that the additional trips will not adversely affect the
surrounding roadways.
The increase in number of lots will require additional recreational
Page 3
Agenda Memorandum
Lawrence Lakes PUD
MPMD 95-005
~lP-
fees to be paid in lieu of land dedication. Since no private
recreational amenities exist wi thin the PUD, no half credit was ~
granted. As indicated in Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-
237 (see Exhibit "D") replatting of the project is required. At
the time of replatting, the additional recreational fees will be
owed. .'U /f'Tf
As previously mentioned, the original master plan approval~cluded
thirty-three (33) units and a private recreational facility
(swimmi~g/~~ol and some other minor elements) that was subsequently
amendedtt8~~bstitute the few recreational amenities proposed for
an open area. None of the recreation was required, even the open
area, since a minimum of five recreational amenities are required
to receive half credit toward recreation requirements and five
amenities could not be provided.
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, July 11, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met
to review this master plan modification request. The TRC
recommends that the City Commission make a finding of "no
substantial change" for the proposed modification, and that the
Planning and Development Board approve the request, sttbject to
staff comments (see Exhibit "D" Forester/Environmentalist
Memorandum No. 95-310, Development Department Engineering Division
Memorandum No. 95-237, Recreation & Park Memorandum No. 95-316 and
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-362). The basis
for the recommendation is that the impacts (water, sewer, traffic,
and recreationr are minimal and are even less when compared to the
original master plan that had proposed 33 lots.
MEH/dim
xc: Central File
.:l.wl.k...~r/...
ENRICO ROSSI, P.E.
625 Whispering Pines Road
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Phone (407) 478-7044
June 26, 1995
Tambri Hayden, Director of Planning
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re: LAWRENCE LAKE P.D.D.
"PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MASTER PLAN"
Dear Ms. Hayden:
Enclosed for the City'sreview and approval are twelve (12) sets of the referenced MASTER
PLAN submitted on behalf of GRB Development & Construction, showing the proposed
Modification by the addition of two (2) single family lots thereby, increasing the total
approved dwelling units from 32 Lots to 34 Lots. The two (2) Lots were carved out of the
provided "Green area" located along the North side of the entrance road. The "Recreation
Fee" has been paid for 32 Lots, an additional fee for the two (2) additional lots to be paid
upon approval.
The present density ofi.40 units per acre would be increased to 2.55 units per acre which
is considerably under the allowed 4.9 units per acre. This is also well below the densities
of the surrounding projects. No permit modification from the South Florida Water
Management District or the Health Department will be required.
The infrastructure is in place to serve the additional lots. Water and sewer services are to
be extended to serve Lot 34. Water and sewer is presently stubbed to Lot 33, which is being
used for a temporary sales office. The required additional water and sewer capacity for two
(2) lots is approximately 600 gpd which could readily be accommodated for in the existing
overall water and sewer system. The additional drainage runoff is not significant and is
readily absorbed by the disproportionately large retention pond.
Approximately twenty (20) lots have a purchase contract or have been issued a "Certificate
of Occupancy" .
--,","''''
\ '::,--R' (r) - fi"'[--~n r;-\ \
,t., I~ \)IJ__I~." ,...".:"1\'
, 'il ~.._.._.. \! 1
.! ,
" I':
., l
I
.
'J (';". ~
~ '.,1 I
I ..~"'.'_"''' __.
~ ....
..., "WI
Tambri Hayden
Director of Planning
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
June 26, 1995
Page Two
The additional estimated 20 trips per day to be generated by the addition of two (2) lots will
not adversely affect the offsite roadways. Lawrence Road is presently at L.O.S. (Level of
Service) "C" and it is anticipated that the level of service will not decrease over the one
year life of the project.
Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 to the City for the processing fee.
Very truly yours,
-=,,' ~
.~~,
Enrico Rossi, P.E.
Agent for GRB Development & Construction
Ibg
cc: Greg Berman
GRB Development & Construction Company
33 Lawrence Lake Drive
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
1111111'1, ....111.... ", 1IIIIoll """
I : ; I II j ; i I I II . : 1 I I I II II I ~ " : III t: 1 : 111111 : If II I I . . I II I . . . 1 . 1111 II" II III II II II I I lilt II II If I .
'.....11..... '.1t1l.11''':1'111I1111111111 1111:111'111'1111111'11111:11":::
project: LAWRENCEu LAKE -- ',-' ,
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA.
, , '
for: G R B DEVELOP~ & CoNSTRUCITON
~ q~.U~~ ':Hi :;;
; ~~.dii;1 ~I~gs e
... =~~8i::........ ~ I... ~
: !i~iiiii :i:~ ~
! ~i~~il:i ld!~ l1;
!: ~;;5ldj: j.: ~
ill =-9:' --:,., --'II....
.. :~~!H._ ~illli i
'" ~_ill~__~
:; ~.I;.lilli 5il
;; ~ii!ii!l!i i~;
~ Ipl!l~i ~.~
:'! d.U;li 11~
~ Eilli~i~ _H
i :',P,!-! iJ.
;: lj~I5:, II-I
;; -=-I:lIlJi a',
. .. ~ - . iil
~ ii:jhl I.i
- lIl- i' ,=
'TI
",
z
(")
",
8:_~
~
~
r=
3
I
~
i
. ,~ - - . ~ -
~r III! illi , ~ ~ji! Ii liE I 11111i!1 111111
a!1 III
!~f ",I i i lui ;ri ill
~.. 1;= II'
=Ii ~~ ..Ii ! ! nil ;; s,_ I
s'l ' il 1=1 . . uai I, I Iii I
=1 Iii
hi i ~ .... II I I
I I. !U Iii I
IIi II I i ;11 I. i i
J I
1 Ui J · ;;;;:Ii i i". Slili '.~SCi f
iI; alii ;;;;1 ~ "I ~~/l /l/l/l/l~1 ,I
5i a J I E
iii ;Si=il ;n ."P!:II I
~/l~/l 1Ii1i1" I
. .
& I
i ;i ;lilili~ , !iU. Iiili li5 "e II
II ~~/l/l II III
uu,
..=iil Ins 55=51 I~
~/l
1
~a~ =h ~ ! :: :s :: I .0
~:-
~(.oI)::ll ! .. i:1 II ~
Nr i I ".
"'Or-r
:noo hi ~I i I :;;
O-lc;j !j~ J (;
~en ji~i 0 !i . ~
fa-=e ~~j :n 11- · I QI
. Zm n I 0
,II ::I 'a I z
-1:0 .~ i .. en
fflm ~.l . i i
iili-
~~ ~~ ! , I
fTIC i :! I I ~
rC i
_n
3:fT1 !~ ~ ~:!.
ZC ::lUIIl:
l>
:n ~ e~2 ~,
~
z:!!m"
:uej ~ :D
a . 9 i~~c
... - Om
i n g) Z <
I: ~ -f m
~ ~g)OI"
... ~ :u "T1 0
IJ 0 l> 1"1 "tJ
Z ~~~I~
~enj>m 8
= 1"1~~i~
~ z", I
C,)hm
~ z h::u "tJ l
1"1" .-
~Q-o)>
fIJ cncnrZ
~ _i1:t>
~~z
"'e... me..
C;ll~ C
~~""l>z
t- _ ~~i!'i fTI
~I\> !:<.. en
. :n-
~ ~5/T1 ~
. . (')
~ (J1 ~!. -=-'
[';'>> (e,'.'-,'-.',.
t,"-" ..."..
r: n '",;,
~': '. ..-' ~ toO ~
r;-. "/~ _ .., .,...
:"' , ~, i-_~-=,
; 1~U~1
. ;':;l.i~'
. ~~L:l:7~
, ;:J.D~N
. oa:z. .
i~:7 "
Jtl9E1iO:
;..lJ.{
~;!.i
i
~I
So
~~ :
e "i
e CII
;;l ~
c.t
. I
~
IIO,JO'
, I.' Ilflll
,I'" ·
t 1'1 .:
I t-
t ~lh I
~
1<11",/
I I
" Ii" (
;= ~
\ ~ I
I ,.t L~~_._.: h
,:
----1 \
\ I "" 1 ,
,CD \ '.
\ 1___,_....
.
..
..
-
I
w
o
...-\
Will
-, {;t'
c.t
.
III
'---'-1
"" I
... I
I, _.J.
\:
\:
"
- . ~
r
,/
(
,
~
l;
,
" l:'~ '
.. .
III ii.
Z,"
...c
i1
z'
n
..
,..
~
;';
w
.
"'t
CII
~
.
.
~,
I
~
.
,,,
...
"t
~
1
, 1~11: fii' ~,.fia.
, :>, ~& I
.. '''', '
!l !, .~
. ~3~!~ J' ,!{ ~ ;-
- '-H- _
~lE
'CIt~
I~.
~n
~i
-Ill
.-
o
..
.
I
..
co
,
I
.
.
I'
I
I
I
! ;
II i~
a :.
q, I ":
;, i
:; m
I i rl
, I HI
I l~
I ,
it
r- '1
I ! i
I I 'Ii:
I ' f; &iill
I "l', I' ~~~e
~' , ...-
I ", .i,
t,.~l m:l
~ ~ ..:
I ~jl ~ i:
. "
I,:g \:
I [~ij:
I ! : lij: ~
t . 8
It! ~ I.e
. ~ il ~
I I' ~I
II
I ~ I
I j Po'
I I ~
IU
In'
l~ "
if I (
liil I~
-.
I' I' ...
;~~a
~~:.:~
.,
:x
C
.,
C
(J
n
c
3:
):
(J
-
n
:x
.,
r
):
:2
V
N
}
.., ..,
'WI ...,
E X H I BIT "B"
Lf.1CATION M1.\P
LAWRENCE LAKE
1-'-- -- "
L ~rr:,n-[TTlml.LIIIIT'. - .- '," t!llJ~IJ_i..L1 ~:
'"j', o'rr~-:C'- 'II ~~ .~~'/P7>91mm~j~t'i,~L
-I I g -~0-~' - T ~EDI-~ ~m'~&~~;!j~:
I \~ iI~~ji) ~.'"lll~ ~~7. 6@ ,~'DC
i-W::l~~'~ 0:r- ~~ ...,
..-J (. :, I = -~ -~ I I ,;:~
I ~ss~-=i .... I f I~' nTTlI '\ "v
1.
~A""''' 4.
, . - ~~~::lIr;t~!(f '-
~-, ~ ~
= ='{ ~~ ~ ~~tt-t~,~
"BOYNTON '~'..~ ~n""e 1]' I
NURSERIES" ~. ,>~.~~---t:'" ... l~' I
L ,'.. ~ :~ . .' . t .:. J" I: : I ..~
'.- 1. r' ~~II. .r',_ L J '!"~~I"'"I [';""1' I
_ _"', , I 1/ , 'r I;., I 'i I I : \ ~
--.
,.. ...- ...
""~"
"i
I IJI'(~~
i in!']
1111, ~L: ~~,-~~J...~
'I: :: '':;:UJ:;:
f .' ~. . . .. .. - . .
I ", u. --..
: I
AG
puc
LUI: 4.0
.::::
,...;;
=
=
=
=
=
IICITRUS GLEN a" =
=
PUC LUI:4.D ~
~-
~
I~
~ .=:
, -
~~~
-
=
,=
'. -=
-
-
Pl .
LUI
IIMEL
U~LIlAL, .
- .
" c-
i--
1=0 "" -
~ '
-_':~ ~~J [.,~;t_l.l. ;.\ . -...' _ .-- _ _..' "'.'
..... -M "~
- ..:. ..............::::..::J:~: I ~ ~
,,' l.. ~i . -=:iLL
~I"\'" V. .
,.. A IV" ~
q1AA
j : . =
U
<J
" J
.;:-_:11, \.
foJl=~
'. ,,:~g-.-J"'"
. ..... ..
"SAUSALITO
GROVES"
[-,
PUO
LUI:!5.D
I I
ill~
-,-- -----
.
-
1
1
/J (? v,'v' T ,;:> "V
- - --- ....... --- 1 - I ......,...........,........,. ~--
, ' ' : i. ; I' I r' ,
.... . ,) . I ' : I II r1, ~ Id.1:t' , (; . "y' -
<J" .." ::"1.//,,,//,/1 f / ~~i ::i]H~;iJlL~iFl! I:;,; ~_~ :0.11111181 ,MILES
~ ,,1...1., .. ,_1_ ..'
JAS"'~,"'t... -'"t.,. (..-.- -. r-..
" r",-"~,),,.J:! lal, " ,e:=..::<;~-:#0400.'800 FEET -
f)" .~ I _', I ", t~ ,..'. P/A/IINIH6 pSP""
., ,..,
..., ..,
..
E,X H I BIT "en
I """, ,,"1"11,"'111 """ """......".1.....""....1111111" "'"'"""'"""'"" ....,,, """ ,'....'"" ",,,
,,,IIlIIIIIIUIIIII.IIllllllllltlllltlIHUIIIIIIIUIII
;";';~7'111'''/~'IIIIIIIIIIII''IIIIIIIIIII''II'IIII,,"''n'HH''~.
~ ;lillU!i eali\'"
; H!iHil ~ii! e
i i"l~i~~'; I';;w ...
i :;iiijull ~li~ ~
;l .~t!~Hn ~;;~: l!l
! i;;al,;;;;'i': jlla ~
I i. ,.-~, -.... 5
~ ;~;1~!~; -ii z
; i~I:..il Sj.1
ii ilii!iil. i~;
! li<:lIl!j :;1.
i .:i!i!ii!' I-I!
1I i~II-J._ :;ili
i :-lili!!!! :aj<<
? IjJI!!:'- ,-a
i ;-115<<" .-,
; i~~P~' "l~,
--. -~--_.-_. ..'
~ 10'
-
..
-,
9
"
i
I ~
i
- - -
I ~i i~ ~ ~iI i;~1 ~!~~ "
i! Ii III h~. ~IIII !
.11 << ,== ....,! .._iii ~
?! s~ II =~I'
" ;1 = I-
I' =,= i! ! ;
i.. . ~I !: s
j!' ~.. -. .
=1 Ii =.. a
:1 I~ II
.~;; ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~
! - !za- ~=~ ~ea:~~
~ I .!! ~A~ ~~~~~s
~ I in ~
!
_ - i
~:~ :~~::'.
i.... ..........
.
~-.
.- ~I! ~ai ii AAAi
.i 11~ I! -- JiJa
.1 !!I ~ii ~2 2221
.. ._~ IJ: ,I 111-
Ii i~1 :i' I Illi
~I .Ii ~~I I. ===1
!i i~ll !ii li !!!~
It ~ - a=~ -:-l
i I. 41. 1.1-
'i ~Ii I i ~~
~. .Ii i as'
IIi ,~ ..~ II ~~~_..
; . ~~~ -- ~~~=~
'I *' aU n ~~~~.~
_ . ~~~ gm ~5~!.
II: '=1 !'I!I!I. \It
~ il I
~ :~:;I
~~~!I.
;sId-4
~ ~
~,..
"'0
::nEb
~Cil~
(11-~
y>~~
fflfTl
I~
fTlC
,e
_0
~~
z
)>
~
~hl j
-1:-
! .
i
!J9 I
i::i
;=1 n
~
.! i
=11
a.-
-?
I
::1Il1l1ll
i~.1 i i ~
!i .,\,
JI · I
I I I
i ! ·
i II
t.." ,~,r.:"
.~~ ). ; ~:'';,''''
_" 7r~
~ " . ;./;'"
~. " ..... ,Ii
o ,I ':"
. . ".---'
lln2,'
Jh8
'~1 II
H.\
o
~
:;;
~
i
(I)
~
\.t.I~
~
~~3: ~,!
fTl so)>: ,
~~g ~:,I
~::!! m;;'
(') :0 0
~d~
\~ rd~o ~
~. i:~ ~
~ ~ s: !3:
fI) 1:> m
~saU);z i
%a~ -I
M~!;a ;g
~Q-o )>
cn~1 Z
-zl>
~~z
fl)t...'
~~)>~
~.. 61"1
4~ Ol
N _ :0 '"'-
;:9 ~ $
~i' l'J
~)
...
o
I
(j)
o
.......
wUt
..~'
""t
m
,
"
\.
\~
. \~
r
(.
~
~ - .-:'=;:"
-----
r-
\ . <0
f'" ---
.- ---
, ...<5
:_- ":.
~
.
" .....
,.q
~ i!
I
..
.-
~I ; (;i :
, 1___,_1
}: 1;;:;;---'
I- .... j
J !~~ _ .-J
':1 '~_;-1
. J'" '
c; , ~ ./, :.:-- -J
,j"'- - -, fr -,) . -...: --::::-
. _ 'I' _ J: i
// (D I .. CD J: j ~
,I ',-- _ __ _.' ~ _ J I !_ _
- S 01.43'31- W 496.09.
I
----.!.- ,-
:~~ .
.....
~~~
it
;;
.
.
..
~
II
.
,
,
.
.
,
:
i ;
II :0
.. ~ il
;. i
. \ At
1 \ ;\
Il~
t. '
\ -nt' :i,
r l,--; .
. " Ii! ;3
r \ !:r-;;~ i'
\ \l .lr""~
~ i...
\ I' ~: I -
I 1 t
~ Jt
\ I} '~nii i
t! ~.....
t7 .,,' IW I, ,.,.,.!l:!
! !~ ~~o~~ II
,~ 1
\ \1 "~I ......." t
t :. r- J ~~~l
ii. \; . -:'
\ '1 ;f ,; , ."-'</
h 0 \~ ... ".
\ ;P'~IZ i
\ ii (\ II 0
I;~i'" (
~ Z I .
I ~ ~;"c.a (
fl" Ii
I \';~,:
: I g
\" D !:~
l ;, l..
I J, ",
I i
I \
I '
,22' \ 'U":,;:
\ . I
\' \ .
\,~(\
I f iil
I, I'
\ i :
If ';
I' "..'
, pl'O;ect: U wliEN'citi:;t"AKel ,~.. ..
, ':'''';' lB,.Q'f\'lI ' cm.:~~CH:,-,a:.OR1P~"'!;{:
J ~J~,':': ", t3l: ;'~ ',' " "".
to'",:"~,,,09.-q't:~:1~~<<~~III~', '. . :'
. ... ",. .
. ...~. ' . ~., ." . I. ' '.I' ~- ..
t\lIm~'klfl
fiG! j\;:!:. ,"':1: ~~,tI
gU'~i
~ oii~ii
.~~ ~\~
~ H~' .
...n1H<~'
: -< ~~'ll
I . ~ ~ ; ~ i c.
.,-
~ 'WI
E X H I BIT "D"
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-310
TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
nATE:
July 12, 1995
r;.# l'oY ml . ::' W ~ rn
We'" ' "-J ~
.' ....... ....- l.
Plftl,f:!H\,.:,:,tlO "7
ZU,\;LlY',fT. r
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, F orester/Environmentalist
RE:
Lawrence Lakes POO
Addldon of Two Single Family Loti
The applicant should comment on how any existing trees or lakcl1ittoral zone plantings will be
effected by the two new lots. The project should continue in the nOlD1al review process.
KH:ad
~W'
..., ...,
DEVBLOPMBRT DEPARTMENT
ERGIRBBRING DIVISION MEMORANDUM RO. 95-237
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
~lann. g & Zoning Director
, 'am Hukill, P.E.
Engineer
July 13, 1995
m
u w ~ fn)
,Rt I .4 1995 IiI
J
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT
FROM:
DATE:
RE: LAWRENCE LAKES
We have reviewed subject request for the addition of two
residential units to the development and have no objections if the
following conditions are met:
1. The subdivision is replatted to show added lots and other
changes, if any.
2. The 8' bike path along the entry road is changed back to
a 5' sidewalk.
3. The additional park fee in lieu of land dedication is
paid for the two additional units.
WVH/ck
xc: Al Newbold
Ken Hall
C:LA WRLAKE.CHO
TO:
Timbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent #l
Master Plan Modification: Lawrence ~es PUD
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
July 17, 1995
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification on Lawrence Lakes
PUD. The following comments are submitted:
1. The number of single family lots has increased from 32 to 34 units. The new recreation
dedication requirement is:
34 units x .0180 acres = .612 acres.
2 An adjustment of recreation impact fees already paid will be required.
JW:ad
... ,.,
..., ..,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-362
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoni~~~rector
Michael E. Haag~E~fJ'
Site and Zoning df~elopment Administrator
DATE: July 17, 1995
TO:
FROM:
SuBJECT: Lawrence Lakes - MPMD 95-005 (Master plan modification to add
two single-family lots to the existing 32 lot single-family
planned unit development)
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the first review
of the modified master plan for the above-referenced project:
1. Add the following as a note on the plan below the setback
charts: Construction of buildings, screen enclosures and
pools are subject to easement restrictions.
2. Indicate below the pool setback chart whether the setbacks are
for above-ground, below ground or both above and below ground
pools. Also indicate whether the listed setbacks apply to
whirlpools, jacuzzies and/or hot tubs.
'3. Add the following information on the plan within the building,
screen enclosure and pool setback charts:
Building setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.0'
Screen enclosure setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback -
15.01 "-
Pool setback chart:
Lot 34 east side setback - 15.5'
4. For clarity ill determining the setbacks for the proj ect remove
the typical house/lot drawing and notes. The drawing and notes
are found in the upper left corner of sheet 1. The setback
charts and accompanying notes identified 011 the plan, provide
sufficient and concise information to allow the typical detail
drawinq and notes to be removed from the plan. The typic~l
detail drawing and notes are not current with the subj ect
request.
5. On the master plan place a symbol on lot #34 indicating the
south property line is the front of the lot.
6. Construct any improvements that may be required as a result of
Palm Beach County's evaluation of the additional trips
generated by the request.
7. with respect to the "Development Datal! Tabulation, the allowed
density is 4.B4 units per acre, not 4.94. Correct the data
accordingly.
8. Submit revised common area landscape plans for the area of the
proposed two new lots. The revised landscape plans shall be
submitted for permit review at the Buildinq Department.
9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and
conditions approved by the City Commission and the Planning
and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the
Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the
two new lots.
10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and
Development Board, and City Commission review does not occur
until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission
to set land value for purpose of calculating the recreation
fee. There fore, .3 ince this L"eques t involves addi tl.onal fees
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-362
Lawrence Lakes
MPMD 95-005
to be paid and since the property was sold within the past two
years, it is recommended the land value be set us i119 the
purchase price at the time of the most recent sale of the pun
property. This will require the applicant to submit a copy of
their purchaae contract.
t-IEH: dim
xc: central File
A:I.AW.I.AIlIP'D
.~
-- ----
TO:
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-316 m
Timbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent P
Master Plan Modification: Lawrence ~es PUD
~~~~W8E1!I:O
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
July 17, 1995
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification on Lawrence Lakes
PUD. The following comments are submitted:
1. The number of single family lots has increased from 32 to 34 units. The new recreation
dedication requirement is:
34 units x .0180 acres = .612 acres.
2 An adjustment of recreation impact fees already paid will be required.
JW:ad
;::,UJJUI..L......l::U l.Vl. l-/l::l.UI..L... l.l::V..Ll::W a... ...Ul:: DU..L..LU..LU,::/ Ul::j,Jal.l.,.llll::Ul.,..
9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and
conditions approved by the city Commission and the Planning
and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the
Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the
two new lots.
10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and
Development Board, and City commission review does not occur
until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission
to set land value for purpose of calculating the recreation
fee. Therefore, since this request involves additional fees
I~
~.~
."""
--
0/5/4'71t%' <<J[ _- ~ ~f 1M- ~
P /~~
~~
_' /.L~~~
~~ . ;~~
~
/~;, ~ r . ~,/~ ~
r:tI'-P ~ 1f},t7PtJ _11crt'v pu(7~_ .
;d-v~r~~
7B2
LAWRENCE LAKE
(AKA LAKE GEORGE ESTATES)
TIME EXTENSION
\
\
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-128
FROM:
chairman and Members
Planning andp,velopment Board
J1'rI.,b--U' Q .XJL0 .,/c,,,.
Tambrl J. lI~eyde'h
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
May 5, 1994
SUBJECT:
Lawrence Lake (aka Lake George Estates) - CNTE #94-001
Time extension (concurrency exemption and construction
of required improvements)
NATURE OF REOUEST
Sonja Martin-Morgan of Tindus Investments, Inc., property owner of
the Lawrence Lake PUD (aka Lake George Estates), located on the
west side of Lawrence Road, approximately 600 feet north of Gateway
Boulevard, is requesting a retroactive, plus a one year time
extension to the Lawrence Lake PUD concurrency exemption (see
attached location map and letter of request; Exhibit 11 A" and liB",
respectively). The last (second) extension granted expired August
21, 1993.
BACKGROUND
On November 21, 1989, the city Commission approved the final plat
for Lawrence Lake, a subdivision comprised of 32 lots for
construction of 32 single family, detached units (see Exhibit "C"
for a reduced copy of the preliminary plat). The subdivision and
platting regulations allow a maximum of 21 months for completion of
required improvements, which originally expired on August 21, 1991.
A one year time extension for construction of the remaining,
required improvements and concurrency exemption was granted by the
City Commission which expired on August 21, 1992. However, prior
to August, 1992, the original developer defaulted on his mortgage
and the mortgagor foreclosed on the property. Subsequently, the
mortgagor defaulted leaving the City without adequate surety. The
current owner, Tindus Investments, Inc., purchased the property
through the mortgage foreclosure sale and came before the
Commission on May 5, 1992 to request approval to commence work
pending the processing of a letter of credit and surety bond. The
Commission granted the approval conditioned upon work being halted
at the end of thirty days unless the bond was received.
I
On July 21, 1992, the owner came back before the Commission
requesting approval .to make the first payment within ten days and
pay the remaining amount by August 20, 1992, which the owner did.
The Engineering Department issued a letter to the owner on January
11, 1993, indicating a time extension for the completion of
required improvements through August 20, 1993. On September 7,
1993, the City Commission approved a reduction in the bond to
$8,000. Of the $8,000 retained, $6,000 of the surety was to insure
against damage to utilities during construction of homes and $2,000
was retained to insure completion of the remaining sodding of the
recreation area (currently converted to a common area) and road
rights-of-way. Prior to the September meeting, the owner submitted
an engineer's certificate of completion, which if accepted would
have vested the project indefinitely, without requiring further
extensions. However, due to the remaining work to be completed,
the certificate could not be accepted and an extension was not
followed through until now.
Section 19-92(e) of Chapter 19, Article VI of the Code of
Ordinances states that requests for time extensions "may be filed
not later than 60 days after the expiration of said certificate or
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
May 5, 1994
exemption". It further states that "time extensions may be granted
for any length of time which does not exceed one year".
Historically, retroactive extensions have been granted under
certain circumstances.
ANALYSIS
As indicated in the city's concurrency Management Ordinance, at the
point when the 21 month time limit for completion of bonded
improvements expired and construction ceased to proceed in good
faith, in the judgement of the City's Engineering Department, the
proj ect I s concurrency exemption was jeopardized. Specifically, the
"A" category development order status of the plat, which is exempt
from all levels of service becomes a "C1" category development
order, exempt only for drainage, neighborhood parks and traffic.
To date, much of the required infrastructure improvements are in
place. Sodding of the common area, and landscaping of the common
area, perimeter buffers, lake edges and littoral zones are
partially complete. A central irrigation system permit was issued
in 1992, but expired and was voided. Any irrigation in place under
this permit has not received a final inspection, therefore it is
not known whether any central irrigation is in place. Separate
permits for irrigation of two of the three, existing home lots have
been issued and have received final inspection. It is unlikely
that these separate irrigation systems connect to the central
system.
At the September 7, 1993 city Commission meeting when surety was
last reduced, irrigation design and sodding was discussed. The
owner stated that sodding and irrigation of the lake edges (a 20
foot wide maintenance easement encumbering the lake tract, rather
than the lots that back up to the lake) was intended to be provided
on a lot by lot basis by the individual lot owners. At that time
there was concern over postponing the sodding and irrigation of the
lake edges due to the effect this might have on the stability of
the unfinished, lake edges ( see Exhibit "D" for minutes of the
September 7, 1993 meeting).
RECOMMENDATION
The Concurrency Review Board met on April 12, 1994 to discuss this
request. The Board recommended that an extension be granted until
August 21, 1994 (approximately four months). The basis for this
recommendation was that the Board considered four months to be
adequate time to complete the few remaining improvements. Exhibit
"E" contains comments from the Board which, if an extension is
approved, are recommended as conditions of approval (Engineering
Department Memorandum No. 94-133 and Recreation and Park Department
Memorandum No. 94-144). Briefly, these conditions require
submittal of revised irrigation and landscaping plans for the lake
and common areas, as well as abatement of blowing sand. Since
revised irrigation plans and permits are necessary, the Planning
and Development Board and City commission may want to reconsider
installation of sod and irrigation on a lot by lot basis. Sod and
irrigation around the lake could be installed simultaneously with
the required landscaping which is installed at one time.
Lastly, it should be noted that the Board recommendation for a four
month time extension
Memorandum No. 94-110,
Department's concern
extensions.
was not unanimous. utili ties Department
part of Exhibit "E", discusses the utilities
wi th granting retroacti ve concurrency
tjh
Encs.
xc: central File
A:LLakeTex
LOr.A1\ON MAP
LAWRENCE. LA~f ~ES)
{A.K.A. LAKE GEOB~ ES ~ -' ~~ " ~PQtJ"~
\ \ !~~r mmJtl~ ~'{\;\~~\h) i,~
l. __\,n. \ .-
~../ "
>-,,; .... \
': : \
,.
., " ~. --- -' -~-~~
,~I-~- i- .:to
_---1-----.--.---.- -
- . - ~,----"--_.~-
....ao'l"''1'ON
...::,,~:: ",u~se~,es"
. ~..... ~y ... ''f ~-.,.\""".
\, \\-> L.0\~fo
\
.---
Q"\~~
-~
\""f
Tindus Investments
1762 12th fairway
Wellin&ton. fl. 33414
(407) 791-1464
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425
Att: Tambri Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Dear Mrs. Heyden;
I own a piece of property on Lawrence Road, which is an approved PUD, consisting of 32
lots, called Lawrence Lakes Estates. It is my understanding that the exemption with respect to
concurrency expired 8/21/92. I am presently in the process of selling my property on a purchase-
option basis, and would like to retroactively extend this, just as soon as possible.
I have spoken with Mr. Michael Rumpf on the matter, and he has told me that he didn't
think this would be a problem. I would naturally like to take care of this just as soon as possible,
and would appreciate hearing from you on the matter at your earliest convenience. You can reach
me at the number above and the address above. Any additional information you may need, please
call.
Sin~~
-Y~~>~~~r"t ~
Sonja rtin-Morgan, Pres. '"\.....-J
Tindu Investments, Inc.
rn
Apt:':.'.
00
EXHIBIT "e"
1:'-
('"
.'r}
i~
.~;)
1"1'\
PUBLIC ROAD'
~\,;.
'! \ \
f' \\
\ \ ~
\ ~
I.,
:~i.
'It
r
\
\
, \
-----,
'2
"
WRENCE ROAD. A
r: LA: . ..". J' ...
"t. _.' '1 ~~j/':'\J,,~"I" \I.
\ Of ,we. ,- ..,.
.- ,~\T \.Itoll
'.~~)
'.,1'1
'~,;
(;)
f"\
~-o
~r-
~~
CD~
-
'P'g~
gc~O
~~%-n
...{~
0....
~.,,~r-
CP~O\~
~<8~
to ~ '"
rt' :r. rn
~.
Sl:X3
Z., ~%
- (i) "
N ""rt'\.'
tn~~rn
~fT\0l
"" fT\
-40~r-
~.,,~
tn.,,- ".
~r-g"
~ ~ '"" rn
%60~
.-."
N~.~"'"
~:o
oC:
%.
~~
~
'i
~
I
I
-;
.;
~'\
\ (1,
,r 4=-
,~ '
S~ \'
-; l. .
\'\' \ ~ '\' \\
· \ t ll~
\ ~\ ~\ ~\
r
.. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY CCMtIe.-lON MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 7, 1993
~
Mended Motion
Mayor Pro Tem Matsq~ moved to add a length of twenty feet to the ordinance, as
discussed at the last meeting. Mayor Hannening passed the gavel and seconded
the motion. The Amended Motion failed 3-2. Vice Mayor Aguila and Commissioners
Walshak and Katz cast the dissenting votes.
A roll call vote on the original motion was polled by City Clerk Sue Kruse. The
motion carried 3-2. Mayor Hanr.~ning and Mayor Pro Tem Matson cast the dis-
senting votes.
C. Resolutions
1. Proposed Resolution No. R93-131 Re: Reduction of Surety
(Utilities and Public Improvements) for Lawrence Lakes (Located
on Lawrence Road, North of Old Boynoton Road, South of School
Site P)
City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R93-131 by title only:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
APPROVING THE REDUCTION OF SURETY IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000.00 TO TINDUS
INVESTMENTS, INC., DEVELOPER OF LAWRENCE LAKES (A/K/A LAKE GEORGE ESTATES);
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
. Mr. Staudinger referred to the backup agenda material and recommended reducing
the surety from $53,000 to $8,000 for the remaining work to be done on site.
Commissioner Katz felt the developer is shirking his responSibility for main-
taining the easement around the lake. He would like to hear from Mr. Finizio on
this matter. Mr. F1nizio disagreed with the backup material attached to the
agenda. He stated that when a developer is allowed not to sod the lake banks,
some sandy areas are left and erosion washes all that material into "the lakes.
There is no assurance that a private citizen is going to maintain and irrigate
it, increasing the cost to the individual citizen. Should we allow this, we
have no one to force to reconstruct the lake slopes in the future. He added
that tt would be the responSibility of the developer's engineer, not City staff,
to fonnulate the appropriate cost for the remaining improvement.
Sonja Morgan, 1762 12th Fairway, Wellington, Florida, owns the property in
question. She stated that the bond money was placed with the City for the
completion of the roads and that she has complied with the list of improvements
that was submitted by Enrico Rossi. Regarding the irrigation and sodding, she
stated that the bank is sodded. The irrigation system is designed with each
individual lot. To put an irrigation system in prior to construction on those
lots would be foolish. Machinery rolling over it would tear it up. This was
not what the bond was placed for. There is no erosion problem.
t
- 22 -
.
MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
. BOYNTON BEACH, FLORiDA ~-
SEPTEMBER 7, 1993
Enrico Rossi, Engineer of this project, stated that in most projects he has
done, the sodding or irrigation was never part of the bond issue. He said the
intent of the deve~oper was to sod as the houses are developed.
Motion
Vice Mayor Aguila moved to retain $8,000 and release the balance, as recommended
by Mr. StaUdinger. Mayor Pro Tern Matson seconded the motion, which carried 4-1.
Commissioner Katz cast the dissenting vote.
2. Proposed Resolution No. R93-132 Re: Authorize Execution of
Proposed Funding Agreement Between the City of Boynton Beach and
Palm Beach County for Old 80ynton ROld water ",tn Improvements
(Knuth ROld to Militlry Trlil)
City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R93-132 by title only:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN PALM BEACH
COUNTY AND THE CITY UF BOYNTON BEACH FOR THE FUNDING OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR
OLD BOYNTON ROAD FROM MILITARY TRAIL TO KNUTH ROAD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Motion
Commissioner Katz moved to approve Proposed Resolution No. R93-132. Vice Mayor ~
Aguila seconded the motion, which carried 5-0.
3. Proposed Resolution No. R93-133 Re: Abandonment of l Ten Foot
Wide by 100 Foot Long Portion of the Right-of-Way on the South
Stde of Old Dixie Highway - Titcomb Property
City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R93-133 by title only:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
ABANDONING A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE BY 100 FOOT LONG PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY; SAID PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A DISCLAIMER
FOR SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDING THAT THE ATTACHED DISCLAIMER BE RECORDED IN THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motton
Vice Mayor Aguila mov~d to approve Proposed Resolution No. R93-133. Mayor Pro
Tern Matson seconded the motion, which carried 4-1. Commissioner Walshak cast
the dissenting vote.
- 23 -
,
.\
n
GEE & JENSON MEMORANDUM
.... . LEGAL
C.l
cc: Engineering
Utilities
Finance
TO:
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
FROM:
RE:
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Interim City Engineer
Lawrence Lakes - Surety Reduction
DATE:
August 20, 1993
****************************************************************************************************
The Engineering Department has coordinated departmental revisions for the referenced
Surety Release. Only the Utilities Department and Engineering Department request any
of the existing $53,000.00 in surety to be retained.
The project has been completed to the satisfaction of Lake Worth Drainage District, Palm
Beach County (off site improvements) and has been certified complete by the Engineer
of Record, Rossi & Malavasi, on July 20,1993. Attached to this memo is correspondence
evidencing these approvals and certifications.
The City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department requests $6,000 of surety be retained to
insure against damage to utilities during construction of homes. The Engineering
Department is requiring $2,000 of surety be retained to insure completion of the remaining
sodding of the recreation area and road right-of-ways.
The applicant has surplied documentation indicating lake slope irrigation will be the
responsibility of individual lot owners. All building permit applications for Lawrence Lakes
Homes will be required to show compliance with this requirement before a building permit
can be issued by the City.
Therefore, the Engineering Department recommends reduction in the surety on Lawrence
Lakes from $53,000 to $8,000, a total reduction of $45,000. This m should be on the
September 07, 1993 City Commission Agenda for consi r
(C4
W. Richard Staudinger, P.E.
Interim City Engineer
:jer
92-025/223
c:
Vince Finizio
P. Mazzella
D.Jaeger
.;CEIVED
AUG 2 3 1993
en vMAMut:tfSOtr.cr:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-133
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
May 5, 1994
RE:
Lawrence Lakes Lake George Estates
Property Owner's Request for a Time Extension
The Office of the City Engineer favorably recommends the granting
of a four month time extension for the above referenced project
based on the fact that the subdivision is substantially complete
with the exception of required sodding, landscaping and irrigation,
etc., however, as a condition of approval we request that the City
Commission impose the following conditions of approval:
I. The property owner and/or developer shall be responsible to
abate unconfined emissions (blowing sand) by utilizing wetting
operations, seeding and mulching techniques, including the
installation of a silt barrier (screening) as may be required
by the City Engineer to minimize public nuisances.
2. Landscape/irrigation plan (s) be submitted for all common areas
and the former recreation area at the west end of the subject
property.
Should you require any additional information or assistance, please
contact the undersigned at ext. 6282.
~~~~+
Ron W. Last, P.E.
City Engineer
VAF:RWL/ck
C:LKGEORGE.EXT
00 - 5 19c)4 00
~
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
, d,
~k-~ 2~
~ GItr:T :?J-,,-
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities Chief Field Insp.
Vince Finizio, Deputy City Engineer
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
April 7, 1994
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting, Concurrency Review Board
Meeting & LDR Workshop #7
Tuesday, April 12, 1994
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee and Concurrency
Review Board will meet on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, at 9:00 A.M. in
Conference Room "C" (West Wing) to discuss the following:
I. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
Written comments (on legal sized paper) to be returned within 3
working days following the meeting (April 15, 1994).
A. CONDITIONAL USE - TIME EXTENSION (See attached request)
1.
PROJECT:
Exxon (gasoline sales and convenience
store)
LOCATION:
S.E. corner of Congress Avenue and
Woolbright Road
DESCRIPTION:
Request for a retroactive and second,
one year time extension of the
conditional use approval and concurrency
certification which expired April 21,
1993.
,1'.~r1'
B. CONCURRENCY EXEMPTION - TIME EXTENSION (see attached
request)
1.
PROJECT:
Lake George Estates (aka Lawrence Lake)
LOCATION:
East side of Lawrence Road,
approximately 650 feet north of Gateway
Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
Request for a retroactive and second one
year time extension for construction of
required improvements and concurrency
exemption which expired August 21, 1992.
II. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN
A. None
Technical Review Committee Meeting - April 12, 1994
April 7, 1994
Page 2 of 2
III. OTHER
A. CODE REVIEW
1. Change in zoning code definition of motel apartments to
delete limitation of not more than one-third of total
units devoted to apartment suites, i.e., units having
kitchens. (See attached request).
B. LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WORKSHOP
(Meeting to begin at approximately 9:45 a.m.)
1. Memorandum forthcoming from Tambri Heyden regarding
workshop agenda and summary of last workshop.
kl~~
Dorothy Moore
Zoning and Si e Plan Reviewer
DM/jm
cc: MEMO ONLY
J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
City Engineer
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Ann Ford, Downtown Development Coordinator
Central File
Applicant
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner
Project File
Chronological File
TRC File (Original)
A:TRC4-12.JM
Tindus Investments
176'2 l'2th fairway
Wellil1&ton. ft. 33414
(407) 791-1464
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425
Att: Tambrl Heyden
Acting Planning & Zoning Director
Dear Mrs. Heyden;
I own a piece of property on Lawrence Road, which is an approved pun, consisting of 32
lots, called Lawrence Lakes Estates. It is my understanding that the exemption with respect to
concurrency expired 8/21 '92. I am presently in the process of selling my property on a purchase-
option basis, and would like to retroactively extend this, just as soon as possible.
I have spoken with Mr. Michael Rumpf on the matter, and he has told me that he didn't
think this would be a problem. I would naturall y like to take care of this just as soon as possible,
and would appreciate hearing from you on the matter at your earliest convenience. You can reach
me at the number above and the address above. Any additional information you may need, please
call.
~
sonja~~{'W $to/$dt'''--"
Tindu~:~ents, Inc. r
Apt:~ I.
w
~,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-362
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and zoni~~~rector
Michael E. Haag~E~{-J
Site and zonin~ ~gelopment Administrator
DATE: July 17, 1995
FROM:
SUBJECT: Lawrence Lakes - MPMD 95-005 (Master plan modification to add
two single-family lots to the existing 32 lot single-family
planned unit development)
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the first review
of the modified master plan for the above-referenced project:
1.
Add the following as a note on the plan below the setback
charts: Construction of buildings, screen enclosures and
pools are subject to easement restrictions.
')
"- .
Indicate below the pool setback chart whether the setbacks are
for above-ground, below ground or both above and below ground
pools. Also indicate whether the listed setbacks apply to
whirlpools, jacuzzies and/or hot tubs.
. 3.
Add the following information on the plan within the building,
screen enclosure and pool setback charts:
Building setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.0'
Screen enclosure setback chart:
15.01
Lot 34 east side setback -
Pool setback chart:
Lot 34 east side setback - 15.5'
4. For clarity in determining the setbacks for the project remove
the typical house/lot drawing and notes. The drawing and notes
are found in the upper left corner of sheet 1. The setback
charts and accompanying notes identified on the plan, provide
sufficient and concise information to allow the typical detail
drawing and notes to be removed from the plan. The typical
detail drawing and notes are not current with the subj ect
request.
5. On the master plan place a symbol on lot #34 indicating the
south property line is the front of the lot.
6. Construct any improvements that may be required as a result of
Palm Beach County's evaluation of the additional trips
generated by the request.
7. with respect to the "Development Data" Tabulation, the allowed
density is 4.84 units per acre, not 4.94. Correct the data
accordingly.
8. Submit revised common area landscape plans for the area of the
proposed two new lots. The revised landscape plans shall be
submitted for permit review at the Building Department.
9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and
conditions approved by the city Commission and the Planning
and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the
Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the
two new lots.
10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and
Development Board, and city Commission review does not occur
until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission
to set land value for purpose of calculating the recreation
fee. Therefore, since this request involves additional fees
Ii
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 94 - 110
FROM: John A. Guidry, utilities Director
TO: Tambri H~yden, Interim Planning Dir
DATE: April l3, 1994
SUBJECT: Lake George Estates, (fka Lawrence Lakes)
Request for retroactive extension of concurrency
exemption
As my staff members discussed at the T.R.C. meeting of April 12,
1994, this office has serious concerns regarding the pol icy of
granting retroactive extensions for concurrency.
As you know, the project in question was originally approved as an
exempt project, and therefore did not undergo a full concurrency
review for all categories. Currently, only three of the potential
33 homes are built. Water and sanitary sewer systems have been
accepted by this office, and are operational. However, we are
effectively reserving capacity for the un-built 30 homes without
having collected a reservation fee, due to the exempt
classification that was held by the development until August 2l,
1992. At $138. 60 per uni t, per year, this amounts to a lost
revenue of $4,158.00 per year, or $8,3l6.00 for the two year period
from August 1992 ~o August 1994, or $l2,474 for the three year
period extending to August 1995.
In discussing this issue at the T.R.C. meeting, there also appeared
to be some concerns from other departments that could be rectified
by not granting a retroactive extension, and instead re-evaluating
the pro ject in I ight of concurrency requi rements . Given the
classification system in section 19-83 of the Code, the time limit
for constructing all required improvements stated in sect. 19-
88(b)(3), the definition of an EI project in sect. 19-83(b)(5), and
the definition of expiration in sect. 19-88(c)[d.l], we can no
longer consider this project as an exempt, incompleted project. It
must either be deemed to have all required improvements completed
and accepted, or it must apply for a new development order and
concurrency certification.
Thank you for your consideration of this complex matter.
refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella
office.
Please
of this
JAG/PVM
bc: Peter Mazzella
xc: Skip Milor
File
~~~\i~
I '\ "n
if\' \. 1 ~
c-
RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT 194-144
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Ll-
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~I~
Lake George Estates - Time Extension
TO:
RE:
DATE:
April 13, 1994
I concur with the TRC that the above project concurrency exemption
be granted a time extension. The required improvements that have
not been completed include:
1. A lake planting and maintenance plan, including irrigation.
2.
A common areas landscape plan in
originally approved project. The
requirement was part of this plan.
conjunction with the
50% native species
KH: ad
oorn
00