Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS 7.e.I. Lawrence Lakes pun Master Plan Modification PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-401 FROM: Chairman and Members of the Planning and Developmept Board Tambri J. Heyden ~~ Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: August 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Lake PUD - MPMD 95-005 Second modification request (add two lots) INTRODUCTION Enrico Rossi, P.E. and agent for GRB Development and Construction, property owner of the Lawrence Lake PUD, located at the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 775 feet north of Gateway Boulevard, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Lawrence Lake PUD, as described in the attached report (Planning and Zoning Department memorandum no. 95-377). RECOMMENDATION At the August 3, 1995, City Commission meeting, the Commission made a finding of no substantial change regarding the modification requested. At that meeting, the agent presented a landscape plan for the open area which shows a tot lot and a landscaped bermed, buffer between the existing lots and new lot 33 to address some of the concerns of residents of Lawrence Lake who are displeased with this request since their view of the open area will be obstructed by two new homes, and the open area will be reduced in size by approximately half (see attached drawing). It is recommended that the Planning and Development Board approve this request, subject to staff comments referenced in Exhibit "0" and subject to implementation of the attached landscape plan. Since the new lots require replatting, the details of the tot lot and landscape plan will be determined at that time. TJH:dim Attachments xc: central File a:5tfRpr.2.Lllw ENRICO ROSSI, P.E. 625 Whispering Pines Road Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Phone (407) 478-7044 June 26, 1995 Tambri Hayden, Director of Planning CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Re: LA WRENCE LAKE P. U.D. "PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MASTER PLAN" Dear Ms. Hayden: Enclosed for the City'sreview and approval are twelve (12) sets of the referenced MASTER PLAN submitted on behalf of GRB Development & Construction, showing the proposed Modification by the addition of two (2) single family lots thereby, increasing the total approved dwelling units from 32 Lots to 34 Lots. The two (2) Lots were carved out of the provided "Green area" located along the North side of the entrance road. The "Recreation Fee" has been paid for 32 Lots, an additional fee for the two (2) additional lots to be paid upon approval. The present density of 2.40 units per acre would be increased to 2.55 units per acre which is considerably under the allowed 4.9 units per acre. This is also well below the densities of the surrounding projects. No permit modification from the South Florida Water Management District or the Health Department will be required. The infrastructure is in place to serve the additional lots. Water and sewer services are to be extended to serve Lot 34. Water and sewer is presently stubbed to Lot 33, which is being used for a temporary sales office. The required additional water and sewer capacity for two (2) lots is approximately 600 gpd which could readily be accommodated for in the existing overall water and sewer system. The additional drainage runoff is not significant and is readily absorbed by the disproportionately large retention pond. Approximately twenty (20) lots have a purchase contract or have been issued a "Certificate of Occupancy". , " :\~'--, . -'f)" "-r~n--~f t~--r~;' " \ W (iry ITt II, -'''''J! 'i ,: ;i\ ~__:....H"_""U- \'~llt. II . ~ ' - ~ ~ ;. '\: It: \';' : , -- (~ u . "\;\ ~'i .. )l", I, ,',,~'" v' ". Tambri Hayden Director of Planning CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH June 26, 1995 Page Two The additional estimated 20 trips per day to be generated by the addition of two (2) lots will not adversely affect the offsite roadways. Lawrence Road is presently at L.O.S. (Level of Service) "C" and it is anticipated that the level of service will not decrease over the one year life of the project. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 to the City for the processing fee. Very truly yours, ~~-'~ ~~ .0-~~~ Enrico Rossi, P.E. Agent for GRB Development & Construction /bg cc: Greg Berman GRB Development & Construction Company 33 Lawrence Lake Drive Boynton Beach, FL 33436 t."'j.,j~~L k>~o, ...... . . . ..~:~~ . .... : . ,~ ."'. l;~'I:.3."'.i.)~ '~ J.l\, .....:s,~,~.,.!{,Fi-.... ~Hiliifnt' ' i Ij..:.1~ ;,t, a,.;li,' '';''" ! f .~rr. =.:(" c'~ J;' ., t I' ~ '.. ~i~~.t~,.: ,'"... '. ..t "".{or" , :~"':': ~ .iL., "'"23 ." ,:'":,"'; ~,~~",,:.,~\";,.~'~~.:, : :.r~ ' : :,:~.:~', .. :,= , .... ! ~.- .. . " .,. ~ -;:-; " ,:".:: ~.;:;": ~ . . ~ .,. ~ . :..... .. ~ .';, :::.\: .~;.~. .' .~':.' '. :;.~~:. '-.' .' .... . .. '.'~ ~ .. T~; ~~i.~: . ,~. . ':~ ....... .... ,r- , , , 'J. .( '1' ..:~- : '1 'p_ , , -.': ", ...... . .;....... . ....! " ...... .." . . "j'; .:.r... . .: .~ ..... ~.' . ....,. . "':$ ." ........ r. ';. ~'."\ ~ . , . ~ ,'., '\"" /~~.' '..... " ~_ i.; '. .' ". ~.; .::.1-, .... ,.' :~ or. .~... 0-;-.'''' :",(. ..', I .:: ~'. '.~' ~~~.":;' :.~~';....: ..( ", ~-'::~-~'~::~:"~\.~~'-~' .,; ~!:~:~;';., .: ,'. r ~ .. J> . ': i-,( " ,', '~ ,1/1 ,'J>> ~,.,,,: :: ~'. .:~:. ,~~.".. ...~ ';'" 'j ..' ~ ....'.r..: ~." :::.~{t.::::'.'~:~ . r ~ -\ .\11 \II .'/~.. .:.::~: .' "......,.. ~ r. t ~ '1'1 L , . t. ~ r " _fI ,'J- \: ~ .- ~ c: ~ 11 r t z Q~~~' ~. 1 ~ 7" ~~\'.~ ~ ~. &, r t ,,~ H! J.; ~ ""? 1 ,,?mot ,,~.. Sontfo --, ~ Landscape Design, I~c. :L~~~E-':~~,~, ','..:;.r" ~''''''l't1 ',' O..;,..,;.,:..~~~ ~~ ,...1. < I ~! ~~ . <~ ...";.' ~. ", . .' .. .' ',' .~).~.. ... . -.....:.-~ , ::,:: X"~;~:;\>:~'~+:~ . .. '';". '~'j~;.:": .r.~.~':';~~~ ,,<,:.:~~~[~~~;,'~.~~~ '.' 'I. '.- : ~:~. '. ..~; '. ._. ~... I"' .,. ,"", i;:r~~ .:". ... .: . ~:; " . ." ~ . ;. e PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-377 Agenda Memorandum for August 1, 1995 City Commission FROM: Carrie Parker Ci ty Manager C ~ _ ~ (Jt)~ Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zonin , Director TO: DATE: July 27, 1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Lake PUD - MPMD 95-005 Second modification request (add two single-family lots an increase from 32 lots to 34 lots) NATURE OF REQUEST Enrico Rossi, P.E., agent for GRB Development & Construction, property owner, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan to add two (2) single-family lots. The addition of two lots \'1ill increase the total number of lots in the planned unit development (PUD) from 32 to 34. Find attached Exhibit "All - letter of request and proposed master plan. Lawrence Lake is a 13.34 acre, 32 lot, platted, Single-family, detached unit PUD located on the east side.of Lawrence Road approximately 775 feet nOl'th of Gateway Boulevard L-21 (see Exhibit IIBII - location map) . BACKGROUND The Lawrence Lake rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Commission on December 6, 1988. The master plan depicted a 33 lot development, however, during the platting process the total number of ll)ts and units was reduced to 32. On November 21, 1939, the City Commission approved the final plat for Lawrence Lake to subdivide the property into 32 lots and various other common area tracts. The land use designation of the property is Low Density Residential (LDR) which allows a maximum of...!...84 dwelling units per acre. The gross dens i ty of the 32 uni t PUD is 2.4 aweD lng units per acre. The 1 and use In tensi ty (LUI) rating of the development is 4.0. Applying the LUI standard ratios of the PUD ordinance, the maximum total permitted floor area for the entire project was established at 116,218 square feet. This total floor area would allow each of the 32 units a 3,631 square foot floor area. The minimum lot width, lot area and maximum lot coverage for the PUD are si~tty (60) feet lot wide, six thousand (6,OOD) square foot lot area and a maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent. All lots in the PUD front on an internal looped private road that has one ingress/egress to Lawrence Road. On August 4, 1992, the City Commission determined that a request to establish pool and screen enclosure setbacks, reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 20 feet and substitute a common area swimming pool for an open area was a non-substantial change. Exhibit IIC", the current master plan, illustrates the building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks and the present layout of the 32 lots. Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the city's land development regulations states that changes in planned unit developments shall be processed as follows: Section 12. Changes in plans. "changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the planning and development board upon application filed by the developel- or his successors in interest, prior to the expiration of the pun classification but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations 1n effect when the change or J Page 2 Agenda Memorandum Lawrence Lakes PUD MPMD 95-005 changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall be processed as for a new application for PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall within the sole discretion of the city Commission. Non-substantial changes as determined by the City Commission in plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the PUD classification." ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the city's land development regulations: Section 1. Intent and purpose. "A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district be utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the ci ty, and the protection of adjacent and existing and future city development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the city. Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable city regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In vie\"l of the substantial publiC advantages of planned unit development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. With respect to the subject request to add two (2) lots, it is determined that the new lots meet the established minimum lot frontage and lot area specifications. The density of the project will increase from 2.4 to 2.55 units per acre, however, the 2.55 uni ts per acre is less than the maximum 4.84 units per acre allowed within the low density residential land use classification. The two new lots, which increase the existing total lots from 32 to 34, will be developed consistent with the established 40 percent maximum lot coverage and established building, pool and SC1-een enclosure setbacks which are identified on the proposed master plan. No negative comments were received from the Utilities Department or the Engineering Division regarding availability of water and sewer service or the mitigation of storm water runoff. Therefore, the existing infrastructure is adequate to serve the additional lots and the additional drainage runoff will be handled by the existing large retention pond. The traffic statement provided by the applicant to address the additional trips generated by the new lots, has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic Division for evaluation for consistency with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance standards. It is dnticipated that the additional trips will not adversely affect the surrounding roadways. The lncrease in number of lots will require additional recreational ~' Page 3 Agenda Memorandum Lawrence Lakes PUD HPHD 95-005 fees to be paid in lieu of land dedication. Since no privatE:: recreational amenities exist within the PUD, no half credit was granted. As indicated in Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95- 237 (see Exhibit liD") replatting of the project is required. At the time of replatting, the additional recreational fees will be oHed. As previously mentioned, the original master plan approval included thirty-three (33) units and a private recreational facility (swimming pool and some other minor elements) that was subsequently amended to substitute the few recreational amenities proposed for an open area. None of the recreation was required, even the open area, since a minimum of five recreational amenities are required to receive half credit toward recreation requirements and five amenities could not be provided. RECOMMENDATION On Tuesday, July 11, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review this master plan modification request. The TRC recommends that the City Commission make a finding of "no substantial change" for the proposed modification, and that the Planning and DevE::lopment Board approve the request, subj ect to staff comments (see Exhibit liD" Forester/Environmentalist Memorandum No. 95-310, Development Department Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-237, Recreation & Park Memorandum No. 95-316 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-362). The basis for the recommendation is that the impacts (water, sewer, traffic, and recreation) are minimal and are even less when compared to the original master plan that had proposed 33 lots. JvIEH/dim xc: Central File a:l~wl.~~.Gtr/MIH ~ I" .,11"111.1' ... 11..t.,1 ",,, ...................! .......,.....,.., ..,..' ,....,.... ......., , ," '"'''''''' ....,." """",,,. ," I..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,.., :lld3 ~ j;1 ~r -0 ::Ub5 0-,-,-,-, ~Ul<n ia-~ . Z!T1 -I:u iij!T1 ::u }1"1 (1\0 re -(") ~~ Z J> ~ ~:Jo ~a ... .i:; ~ 0 ... a i := ~ ~ !~g '0 ~ ~?i .. ~~J ~ -4 '! ~ ~.li ~~- I I ::llll;l Ie - ,-0>4-- .~~ i~~ 1 ::Ig I 0" ~ ~~ I I . . : i t . .. i~~~$~~ :aV. ,. nI ~~~~iii .;: ~ . g ",..t.;: ,. ~ - '" r ,'::.-2~~':'; it:~ ~'iEi'i!lt~ a ~....- . nI :~8~tia~ ~~!~ IJJ 0 ~--4 l~ai---;- - ~ " '" 0 ~ .,. i'"'I '""'........ '"' lIli-;: ~ . ~ '6 ~:~~:~:..-!. :- ~ 9- -4 ~~i~2!;: 9, , ~ <5 z i9,~;~i'"if, ~ i.~ ..:!,,~_~Is I~:= . .. $ -";;.:! ~ ~l~ l!~i!l~i :i~~Ei! ~t! s~tl~~' I-- I ~~l :,i;:;s18t~ IlIj ~ 2 ~~ ,"-i.;:;- il -~ s:~ t;~ ...., ;:;!S;:\9,Ji " i :~;;:-- l' ~ I i ~ .,==Jji~1 l!l -'"9,- if , \\ ~~It)\ e' !i e III ~ ~ ~ . . :e 111' ~\ . iD \ , ;\ ~. \ \\ \ \\.,~ \ \ - \ '- ' " \ ' "'( ~\ II !; ... .. " llICl)O' , ,"I lli\'l\ \ h\. ~ I ~h": l ~i~th . 'w W - . .. - Silo un iQt Ii : aIr n iln \\l~lau l,"\i1i hi in .. l! i ~; HI nii \ ~ iui @i ;Ill l\\\\i~i it!\\\ r~ ~li\e 1::1 -Ii U ~le ;11 .. Q ~ ini l'~ ih ~i, ~ i\ li\ i i ~Ui lit I iiil 1', i .. l\ \\ a I t- !U liil i il\ 1I' '." l~ i i Ii . ij ai . ~ i-i i , ;'iit~t; i iii" S'i Gt~~~; ,\ iii ~.~j ~;Hl~ ; d! ~~~ ~~!i~~1 a6a un ~~, ' IU ~ da a-i ~\s~t\ '::l!lF $S~~tl \ ;;;; In i II , , i " !ibi;~ i li.li~ ;ii Gt~'~ \\ U fifi!i!i. Ii ,n un, !ili \ &iia n~) ~tF;:\ .... ;;~ iB> I \', \: I' ,: - . \~ r (' , I{ 11 \ .. N_OJ. 53' 33"E 331.82' ~ '. r- ~ ;~ \ \, ;t \ ' (l 1\ Ii: \ ~." \\ iiil \~ \ ~ \\ dl \ ~ ~\: \ I ~ \ ~ ~' iiil \_ " I I I I -t 70" I'll, ,,~~!' ., r . 0 4' ., '.: .i .... \ - ~ 'u, ' \ \ r'l~ \ 1', r ,\ ~\ ;It Ii \ ;:~\r\ e,. I Z \ \\,i 0 j 0 f, ,. l' ... \ e ~ i~, ~ \\ \~ \\~ h ' ~\ il \"' ft t~ \j \ r \ \, \ j .' \ Ii' \ I~"'I \-- \ ~ : ~\ \ I-'t'" , \; I h \r(" ; ~ .... it . \' ~ ~,~ I S 01.43.3~' 'n1o ' ~ ~. 't 'l' '''' ~ 1 \,. l ~ J. I t ~'~'\\\\9>IP8>~; ~ 0. 1.~! r'l ' . ~:~ ',i~8. U SSI~ .~ ~ .- t ,'~ 11- -; 1- Iii! e~ ~"~ ~:: ~::~ S , ," ~ z _.--', r----. //'\ N I .... / \ , I - \- ' ,! "", \ __- \ I / ''', ". ' ,_....,...... I W H = ~ m z m I ~ r :a z ~ ~ ;lI '" . I .0 ; g :;; o ~ <5 z <n I It) o ~~ i,)\JI ~lU ~ en \ \ . / 1(1\ ,I . ./ / 1" ~i {' VI m.. t -12 .I =J I:! VI ! o V, \, '" .,..t L~~-'~ \" ,: \ ""li \1Y~ '" nlN ,.0 IJJ . m ~~ ~.~" -4i: .. ,I i\ ~l , "'0 JJ o "t C (j n c ii~ ii ;9,- _t li~ ~i ..,,~ !I~ ~~i ; ii- ! . 'i ;.. II i i ! s i : I i i I III r ,. , ~ ~ ~Si 3: s:,~ ~ i!~l!~ ~ z~11 g) rn ~ 3:g)O"" ~ ~::u." 0 o ~ (1\ "tJ Z ~~~'3: S2(J)l>~~ sa (1\~~ -4 t8 '....1 ~ ~ rn ~ zo::o-o S'l ,.. ,- ~g -0 ):- (J)~r % ~ -~')> trl zZZ ~ 00 . e ~!rJ, 2 "'dt :~~ ~ 1\1 a~ en __ ..._::n "'-- ~!i~ ~ ~ ..---- :c J ( -- ~I~e. -=--1 i~i.l> I ,)!: ..J :3~=.=. ,- ~..- --, , - ~ I (Jl ! P';;;H=L, - i _. -~- _. -_.. ~'-=i" - 4 t project: LAWRENCE. LAJ{E." ," BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA. } Fk'",,;, r':"~'l \t~~i : ~ ~.. ..ti;, _ _ ~.. t -.::==-, \:\' f!D:'\l i;! €~~~ ',!' uu:?~ ,,; ~LJ~N l~. ~~il:a 1 uttb ;; I <1lJE1 ~ i "al!> . ~ e=s" ! for: G R B DEVELOPM1;NT &, CONSTRUCTION . '/ LCCATION M:\? LAWRENCE LAKE 1 -'--" I ;n;.rlITTlffi ' t I . -_._- ... .--- '~J I, C'ff: :' 1 ", I, { J1 . -: r- I "r* '\'" 'i l\- . '111' : . :.., t-- ~)i ----J II ~ f. ," , I I _I 1. " ..-' ..' ... lit,..", L L . ~o AG , -, '-~n 11'r- ': '1"'_1..J I' I . <' :7-=. .-.--:-~ I Puc LUI:4.0 Pl LUI I ti ~ "MEL~~ R1AA 4.~ .{ <<.IU ... , "SAUSALITO GROVES" PUO LUPS.O (, '~ c - /lo ; I I r " ' " \ ' . ~ [Ir/i~}.l',r,' I; ;l-ll~- / " ,I': i: ~Ir', !! ';, ; .0 1/8 MILES t I, i"1 I' ' '1 ", i=-..:: '"I' I / (~~-t; ,:rjHb;'\J~fj' ';!;j ~- ~ 1111 I I ,/ ...1. __I . 'J~""'~~ -'I"...'....:.: ',..:", . r~;! ' !:! 'I : I (...~..~: : ,( ~- ".0 .400. '800 FEE;T 1:7':, [) I, I " I Ifl j. , ".., _ , . d.... _ __ _ _ -7 C I... <) , .) -'. .,. I I ; 1/)' ~. ,;' /J'(' " , l', '.. ' J . ',-"' , } ...." ",' ,I. -' "< '~ 1 11I11I111I1I11I1I1I1I111I1I1I1I111I1I1I11I11I1I1I'IlIllll I 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IlUllllIlIlIlIlIllllltl I 1llIlIlIIlIIIlIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ;':';";'i~; '~'l'/.'~.llllllllllllllllll IIIII111I1111I1I1111I III 11111 I I II :U~ :;; ~ ~ l!! s: Cl ~lh~ ~ Ipc ~ ~aj~ ~ . j ~ E ;; :- ii ~ Is !\II ili Iz ~ i,! I!:= :;j' ~t! Ii=! :j lil '-i ? ~ . 1;1 , ~ ~ :~~~~~E~ o a~E:~aj~ '" !i~_l!-~'- > -Bi'Ui~ ~ ~':'8"'g~' ~i;::;h:~ i !:~~~!!~ ...2""'t"....~ ~ ..~i......' ~ ; ~;I:ii~il ===~=-Il! . . il'l-"'i=_ ~ i~~i~l~i ~ .:!!q~J.i II g~II-:stt;; C.:: :-!::!!~~ liP li5:lil ~-iih3i - :lils'pi. \:__ ! i lil -___.i!_ _ ,__ ' - -7'"---~~~2~03'~~~~_~~~i- ~K~ N~_2.~=:~~.-!(~_ : ri--. --,.- 10' 12!!t2o~~O .0' 18[' Rr i ~ r ::1 .~~~ ,: (~II;:lli' I I . :r t:. II 'I : l n r- ... ~ !.; 1;1 d ,IS: a ,Ii ~~I~ ~i ~ ~ m ~'I !;ll d"l ~ " (11\ ~Ii ::1' I , ~~!~; ,. ~ ,~ i j t ! ~~ ia it;. .. II~ _______- ._. "~_, _-;' .;~~, 0-' --, ---- ,,' 111'1"\ ~Ir~ e~ G;. '" ;: I I o! e/ ~ l ;; . ~ \ i \ i. ,~.\ I \ \ \~\" ('; ,,,', \' ~"'I:',/ ~.// I)""-'~~" ~!i ( ~'l, ... ~~ f \ - m4 J :j.' \ ::JL I, " I,; I,: If \, \':. PI z o 1'1 o 1'1 ~ F i 31 III j: iH U_I ~~ !ijI;~i I ij lil~ ~ i~ Ili'" -II Jij.;;; ~ ~:- ~ !I !i;1 hl! ~ii ;!!j;j;! :"e ~I!! =lil ~=~ ~J: ill III1llN a;;; i t;_ ~~i oil ,,=1 r:1:1~ IP ~ ~l!i Ih :::~1lI ~,,~\::~.. ?!!..~ ;:: ll:l: =,o:l! !! ?~:-i! 11;8 !;~ !;!:! !lli !a :::- I.;;; ~" I:I,:::"S: a --:;; ~1lI ~~ ii: iai: mE!!!!:-:~ lilt; .!is ~ · !;g 1=1;;; l;a"'''' Ii 1l: o....w ..,. Ct 8- i:S II !!! :-:;; ~~ I:: ~! ~~ a~ ~"" __ E~ .. ;;~~ F.~ ;;~;~ ; =a h a ;o;;o;~ ;o;;o;;O;j!;:- = i . I ~ ea! ~i ~~;.' ~ ~ ! - A e: ~~~~~ . ~: i~ i - . t;!: i ~ii ~ ;;~;~ ~~~i!i;; '----- .-.--.-- --~----'- I ~ I I"'il ii!i~ i~~i~! - "'"!il 1~!'1I I I I"";;; gO",;" U !_ . I~I! I e5~ =~! s~l;a I~,. r= ;;f ~~r, I' a .: s: ;; i! = ~I ~ to ! Ii 1) ~ N~. ;I:t~ !~~ ...~~ ;jI;ji; ~ilUI _9 ...-... :-~:-~~i: :::~ :=:c:=~o j';jI;!; j!;jI;~ji;ji;'" '....; ~ c ~.;.; !! _i ;;~~~: 8 a~;. "dd ~ ~ -'Rfr "rr :UOO 0-1-4 ~U1(J1 ~z=E , ", -I:u ffl'" :B~ ",0 rC -~ ~O Z )> :u -< ~3 ~ "0 ~.l' ~ 0 i~; i "0 ? ,. ... S z !I~ " '" ~F! 0 c.. ~ r'l :j .E 0 -~I z e!- -pl I ==1IIII1l:I ::: e :: Cl m Z m ii!~ ~I ~ '" ,. ,. r- - ::I .11 !:. z ~ii ~E ~ 0 5 ... m !SlaB il ; 1II fii" : I 'i ~ M 1Il II i ~ !S I i I fi [',~'" , ' t:,~;:7~',":, ~~:~ j . ~~~l (l>.r.t ; 'i;':!: ~ :' ,,'.-t t: o ;' i ,'1~ '.~:~..>>' !ltl:ftDi I" I Ca.. i ;ii~lii~ i J~15; ~ a~!81 ~ ~ 3:!I:~ ", ~ 0 )>:,;;, )> en 0 en "1 ----1~ cr~::!! m~ n :cq :Uch>. g.,,~c ~~O m glZZ < -I m ~glO r- PO l! :u"TJ 0 ~~s: ~ UI )>m -i en en 'zi ~ -i:-1 M g];E ~~-o ~ -z~ ZoZ p", U1c...' ~~)>~ E~ ~m !<!< :u~ ~~ ~~ ~~. N praj~~t: ILAWa(tjc~~Li;~K'E",.~ : _ '"" .,~ , ': ,,; ,IE!Q'INtC~,~p.~~tfi...,FJ.OR'P~." ~::;' ~'.: : I. :. t~I',:, . \ " , . 'for:', P/:T1lA.Cf'~-r!J::~~.;~i;p.f~ilLi::;; , : -. . '\.,' I.,' \., o ~ ~ ." n ~ (5 z en ~~ ~~ ,. o o ,. ... S z !I: ,. ". ~) I ~', y }I: '11 r- i~ ~ ~Eii ;~ I I gr;; i' I ~ ,.i,1 & ~ '}.t I ! f; ~t==1 G I ~ h~,~~, ~, n ~:w_~c:: ; \) H i~~~~ I n H ( : I :' .':, ~ I W n~ h 'j I: I ~ l!~e~~1 \~ Ir M.,.." ~ _{, 70,1' IW I: ~""?J ~ .~ !: ~~ ~ c.: :.: . '" J .. I ~ ~: I ;" r )1 I i' ~" I \, p \: d' : , I il ~ ~ ~ \ <D I' z lj ~ b:=. ----~ I ~I:' ~ !j-ti: ~ 1- ; .:0 I' ~ 1 ~ ~~:, h ~ 'I ~ L =.u. Ii ~ I'~ I ~, !l I f I I I g , 22' 'U I' ',: I W I .,', In,'i I i I. J I ?,l:' ,': l!i~ '; if J ~, <<; , , , i : ! I ill 8. :- . ~ · ;, i ,- .. I ': IliO,' IDO~' · I'.' , j' ;~ili~ I i lilll I'il.: . I Iii',! I Jihli .1 C! CD c: ... ... m '" I en o ... ... . ... o c..U1 -~~ ~ \ i ~. \ \ t ::::-:-___~ ;, , ----1 \ \ ,\:-~:" "" ,--,--, \, ,'" , --J I \< _-1, .'Iv r ,I ( , ~ ;t; /II'.. ' :ct lit IE. e." 11 z n m , N :~ L____In<.o ---=----~ I ll! , - I I ... : '--- -' lit I I ,.. (II III ... III ~ ~ ~, I ~ at ,jD .. '"'! '", '... i~ - --..s ,"" '-~o"" -. - 8se I ~'~ I)l l/ll:l i l'llilP; 1,..II:.:-:--ii..- !i -. ~_.~ ~2' 0 'l ': C! / l. _ ___ / ::l I, , I,: ':':':0. C' / ri-~J , -'---'-- ';;;--=---, lboq- , if! ~ I ~f::=.::...J I ~---; I Ui i ::.~"":.-=:::,-'" --"',.' a; j ~ =::.~-=~. ~ r I q .. ~ III ~ ;/.....--/1 j'" "/, i ,. co,,! - ; : '/ " III ~ . I " . ~ - ~I i '- ... ~ ... It' " .' " 9>...,',:\ 't'. ' ,1\ I' illr~,l~~II,lIJ . 'lllfl~ , " '. ;.H ", ' L,''', ,/"'." i' .,.. ',,; '.. 'J ~'_~..,...:~ .~~ r: .. iI I ----H- _ :~~ :~~ !~~ 5g Zz ~/II Ol'" . .. .. l. II V> ~~~i ~ ..0 ':'....":" "'" ~~-~ r D", ..0 '" ~ ~ ~ o C JJ JJ m Z ~ 3: )> (J') ~ m JJ -0 r )> Z ~;t.i\~~ 'i~Bjil "~lqki, '~ H.~ ',' !p< Q' ;.~~~~~! RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-310 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director OATE: July 12, 1995 r;. H.,. f::i i"-W ffi W FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist RE: Lawrence Lakes POO Addition of Two Single Family Lots The applicant should comment on how any existing trees or lakellittoral zone plantings will be effected by the two new lots. The project should continue in the normal review process. KH:ad r? DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-237 TO: Tambri J. Heyden ~lann.ng & Zoning Director , 'am Hukill, P.E. Engineer July 13, 1995 m .RN ~ 40,:/ @! / ~lW~W~E~~D ~J FROM: DATE: RE: LAWRENCE LAKES We have reviewed subject request for the addition of two residential units to the development and have no objections if the following conditions are met: 1. The subdivision is replatted to show added lots and other changes, if any. 2. The 8' bike path along the entry road is changed back to a 5' sidewalk. 3. The additional park fee in lieu of land dedication is paid for the two additional units. WVH/ck xc: Al Newbold Ken Hall C:LAWRLAKE.CHO I:>UJ,J!Il.l.L.L.~U LUl. ~~LllL.l.L. l.~V.l.~W OL. L.U~ DU.l..l.U.l.U,=/ LJ~J:JOl. L.l11~UL., 9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and conditions approved by the city Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the two new lots. 10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and Development Board, and City Commission review does not occur until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAR MEMORANDUM #95-377 VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS E cc: Dev, Plan, Util Agenda Memorandum for August 1, 1995 City Commission FROM: c~rrie Parker \~~ c~ty Manager ~~u _ ~'~ ~DIl- Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zonin Director TO: DATE: July 27, 1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Lake PUD - MPMD 95-005 Second modification request (add two single-family lots an increase from 32 lots to 34 lots) NATURE OF REQUEST Enrico Rossi, P.E., agent for GRB Development & Construction, property owner, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved master plan to add two (2) single-family lots. The addition of two lots will increase the total number of lots in the planned unit development (PUD) from 32 to 34. Find attached Exhibit "A" - letter of request and proposed master plan. Lawrence Lake is a 13.34 acre, 32 lot, platted, single-family, detached unit PUD located on the east side of Lawrence Road approximately 775 feet north of Gateway Boulevard ~ (see Exhibit "B" - location map). BACKGROUND The Lawrence Lak~ rezoning and master plan were approved by the City Commission on December 6, 1988. The master plan depicted a 33 lot development, however, during the platting process the total number of lots and units was reduced to 32. On November 21, 1989, the city Commission approved the final plat for Lawrence Lake to subdivide the property into 32 lots and various other common area tracts. The land use designation of the property is Low Density Residential (LDR) which allows a maximum of 4.84 dwelling units per acre. The gross density of the 32 unit PUD is 2.4 dwelling units per acre. The land use intensity (LUI) rating of the development is 4.0. Applying the LUI standard ratios of the PUD ordinance, the maximum total permitted floor area for the entire project was established at 116,218 square feet. This total floor area would allow each of the 32 units a 3,631 square foot floor area. The minimum lot width, lot area and maximum lot coverage for the PUD are sixty (60) feet lot wide, six thousand (6,000) square foot lot area and a maximum lot coverage of forty (40) percent. All lots in the pun front on an internal looped private road that has a-- ~ingress/egress to Lawrence Road. , , t:- 4.iD ~ ~ /;',:, On A.ugust 4, 1992, the City Commission ~ed that a request to establish pool and screen enclosure setbacks, reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 20 feet and substitute a common areatttl5wimming pool for an open area was a non-substantial change. Exhibi t '''ell, the current master plan, illustrates the building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks and the present layout of the 32 lots. Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the city's land develU:f)Illt::llL.. regulations states that changes in planned unit developments shall be processed as follows: Section 12. Changes in plans. "Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the planning and development board upon 3.pplication filed by t~e developer or his successors ~n interest, prior to the expiration of the PUD classification but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or wr'lW' ..., .., Page 2 Agenda Memorandum Lawrence Lakes PUD MPMD 95-005 changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall be processed as for a new application for PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall within the sole discretion of the City Commission. Non-substantial changes as determined by the city Commission in plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the PUD classification." ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the city's land development regulations: Section 1. Intent and purpose. "A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district be utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the city, and the protection of adj acent and existing and future city development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the city. Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable city regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. With respect to the subject request to add two (2) lots, it is determined that the new lots meet the established minimum lot frontage and lot area specifications. The density of the project will increase from 2.4 to 2.55 units per acre, however, the 2.55 uni ts per acre is less than the maximum 4.84 units per acre allowed within the low density residential land use classification. The two new lots, which increase the existing total lots from 32 to 34, will be developed consistent with the established 40 percent maximum lot coverage and established building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks which are identified on the proposed master plan. No negative comments were received from the Utilities Department or the Engineering Division regarding availability of water and sewer service or the mitigation of storm water runoff. ~nQ~O~~~O ~nQ existing infrastructure is adequate to serve the additional lots and the additional drainage runoff will be handled by the existing large retention pond. The traffic statement prOVided by the applicant to address the additional trips generated by the new lots, has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic Division for evaluation for consistency wi th the Palm Beach County Traff ic Performance standards. It is 3nticipated that the additional trips will not adversely affect the surrounding roadways. The increase in number of lots will require additional recreational Page 3 Agenda Memorandum Lawrence Lakes PUD MPMD 95-005 ~lP- fees to be paid in lieu of land dedication. Since no private recreational amenities exist wi thin the PUD, no half credit was ~ granted. As indicated in Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95- 237 (see Exhibit "D") replatting of the project is required. At the time of replatting, the additional recreational fees will be owed. .'U /f'Tf As previously mentioned, the original master plan approval~cluded thirty-three (33) units and a private recreational facility (swimmi~g/~~ol and some other minor elements) that was subsequently amendedtt8~~bstitute the few recreational amenities proposed for an open area. None of the recreation was required, even the open area, since a minimum of five recreational amenities are required to receive half credit toward recreation requirements and five amenities could not be provided. RECOMMENDATION On Tuesday, July 11, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review this master plan modification request. The TRC recommends that the City Commission make a finding of "no substantial change" for the proposed modification, and that the Planning and Development Board approve the request, sttbject to staff comments (see Exhibit "D" Forester/Environmentalist Memorandum No. 95-310, Development Department Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-237, Recreation & Park Memorandum No. 95-316 and Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-362). The basis for the recommendation is that the impacts (water, sewer, traffic, and recreationr are minimal and are even less when compared to the original master plan that had proposed 33 lots. MEH/dim xc: Central File .:l.wl.k...~r/... ENRICO ROSSI, P.E. 625 Whispering Pines Road Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Phone (407) 478-7044 June 26, 1995 Tambri Hayden, Director of Planning CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Re: LAWRENCE LAKE P.D.D. "PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF MASTER PLAN" Dear Ms. Hayden: Enclosed for the City'sreview and approval are twelve (12) sets of the referenced MASTER PLAN submitted on behalf of GRB Development & Construction, showing the proposed Modification by the addition of two (2) single family lots thereby, increasing the total approved dwelling units from 32 Lots to 34 Lots. The two (2) Lots were carved out of the provided "Green area" located along the North side of the entrance road. The "Recreation Fee" has been paid for 32 Lots, an additional fee for the two (2) additional lots to be paid upon approval. The present density ofi.40 units per acre would be increased to 2.55 units per acre which is considerably under the allowed 4.9 units per acre. This is also well below the densities of the surrounding projects. No permit modification from the South Florida Water Management District or the Health Department will be required. The infrastructure is in place to serve the additional lots. Water and sewer services are to be extended to serve Lot 34. Water and sewer is presently stubbed to Lot 33, which is being used for a temporary sales office. The required additional water and sewer capacity for two (2) lots is approximately 600 gpd which could readily be accommodated for in the existing overall water and sewer system. The additional drainage runoff is not significant and is readily absorbed by the disproportionately large retention pond. Approximately twenty (20) lots have a purchase contract or have been issued a "Certificate of Occupancy" . --,","'''' \ '::,--R' (r) - fi"'[--~n r;-\ \ ,t., I~ \)IJ__I~." ,...".:"1\' , 'il ~.._.._.. \! 1 .! , " I': ., l I . 'J (';". ~ ~ '.,1 I I ..~"'.'_"''' __. ~ .... ..., "WI Tambri Hayden Director of Planning CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH June 26, 1995 Page Two The additional estimated 20 trips per day to be generated by the addition of two (2) lots will not adversely affect the offsite roadways. Lawrence Road is presently at L.O.S. (Level of Service) "C" and it is anticipated that the level of service will not decrease over the one year life of the project. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 to the City for the processing fee. Very truly yours, -=,,' ~ .~~, Enrico Rossi, P.E. Agent for GRB Development & Construction Ibg cc: Greg Berman GRB Development & Construction Company 33 Lawrence Lake Drive Boynton Beach, FL 33436 1111111'1, ....111.... ", 1IIIIoll """ I : ; I II j ; i I I II . : 1 I I I II II I ~ " : III t: 1 : 111111 : If II I I . . I II I . . . 1 . 1111 II" II III II II II I I lilt II II If I . '.....11..... '.1t1l.11''':1'111I1111111111 1111:111'111'1111111'11111:11"::: project: LAWRENCEu LAKE -- ',-' , BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA. , , ' for: G R B DEVELOP~ & CoNSTRUCITON ~ q~.U~~ ':Hi :;; ; ~~.dii;1 ~I~gs e ... =~~8i::........ ~ I... ~ : !i~iiiii :i:~ ~ ! ~i~~il:i ld!~ l1; !: ~;;5ldj: j.: ~ ill =-9:' --:,., --'II.... .. :~~!H._ ~illli i '" ~_ill~__~ :; ~.I;.lilli 5il ;; ~ii!ii!l!i i~; ~ Ipl!l~i ~.~ :'! d.U;li 11~ ~ Eilli~i~ _H i :',P,!-! iJ. ;: lj~I5:, II-I ;; -=-I:lIlJi a', . .. ~ - . iil ~ ii:jhl I.i - lIl- i' ,= 'TI ", z (") ", 8:_~ ~ ~ r= 3 I ~ i . ,~ - - . ~ - ~r III! illi , ~ ~ji! Ii liE I 11111i!1 111111 a!1 III !~f ",I i i lui ;ri ill ~.. 1;= II' =Ii ~~ ..Ii ! ! nil ;; s,_ I s'l ' il 1=1 . . uai I, I Iii I =1 Iii hi i ~ .... II I I I I. !U Iii I IIi II I i ;11 I. i i J I 1 Ui J · ;;;;:Ii i i". Slili '.~SCi f iI; alii ;;;;1 ~ "I ~~/l /l/l/l/l~1 ,I 5i a J I E iii ;Si=il ;n ."P!:II I ~/l~/l 1Ii1i1" I . . & I i ;i ;lilili~ , !iU. Iiili li5 "e II II ~~/l/l II III uu, ..=iil Ins 55=51 I~ ~/l 1 ~a~ =h ~ ! :: :s :: I .0 ~:- ~(.oI)::ll ! .. i:1 II ~ Nr i I ". "'Or-r :noo hi ~I i I :;; O-lc;j !j~ J (; ~en ji~i 0 !i . ~ fa-=e ~~j :n 11- · I QI . Zm n I 0 ,II ::I 'a I z -1:0 .~ i .. en fflm ~.l . i i iili- ~~ ~~ ! , I fTIC i :! I I ~ rC i _n 3:fT1 !~ ~ ~:!. ZC ::lUIIl: l> :n ~ e~2 ~, ~ z:!!m" :uej ~ :D a . 9 i~~c ... - Om i n g) Z < I: ~ -f m ~ ~g)OI" ... ~ :u "T1 0 IJ 0 l> 1"1 "tJ Z ~~~I~ ~enj>m 8 = 1"1~~i~ ~ z", I C,)hm ~ z h::u "tJ l 1"1" .- ~Q-o)> fIJ cncnrZ ~ _i1:t> ~~z "'e... me.. C;ll~ C ~~""l>z t- _ ~~i!'i fTI ~I\> !:<.. en . :n- ~ ~5/T1 ~ . . (') ~ (J1 ~!. -=-' [';'>> (e,'.'-,'-.',. t,"-" ...".. r: n '",;, ~': '. ..-' ~ toO ~ r;-. "/~ _ .., .,... :"' , ~, i-_~-=, ; 1~U~1 . ;':;l.i~' . ~~L:l:7~ , ;:J.D~N . oa:z. . i~:7 " Jtl9E1iO: ;..lJ.{ ~;!.i i ~I So ~~ : e "i e CII ;;l ~ c.t . I ~ IIO,JO' , I.' Ilflll ,I'" · t 1'1 .: I t- t ~lh I ~ 1<11",/ I I " Ii" ( ;= ~ \ ~ I I ,.t L~~_._.: h ,: ----1 \ \ I "" 1 , ,CD \ '. \ 1___,_.... . .. .. - I w o ...-\ Will -, {;t' c.t . III '---'-1 "" I ... I I, _.J. \: \: " - . ~ r ,/ ( , ~ l; , " l:'~ ' .. . III ii. Z," ...c i1 z' n .. ,.. ~ ;'; w . "'t CII ~ . . ~, I ~ . ,,, ... "t ~ 1 , 1~11: fii' ~,.fia. , :>, ~& I .. '''', ' !l !, .~ . ~3~!~ J' ,!{ ~ ;- - '-H- _ ~lE 'CIt~ I~. ~n ~i -Ill .- o .. . I .. co , I . . I' I I I ! ; II i~ a :. q, I ": ;, i :; m I i rl , I HI I l~ I , it r- '1 I ! i I I 'Ii: I ' f; &iill I "l', I' ~~~e ~' , ...- I ", .i, t,.~l m:l ~ ~ ..: I ~jl ~ i: . " I,:g \: I [~ij: I ! : lij: ~ t . 8 It! ~ I.e . ~ il ~ I I' ~I II I ~ I I j Po' I I ~ IU In' l~ " if I ( liil I~ -. I' I' ... ;~~a ~~:.:~ ., :x C ., C (J n c 3: ): (J - n :x ., r ): :2 V N } .., .., 'WI ..., E X H I BIT "B" Lf.1CATION M1.\P LAWRENCE LAKE 1-'-- -- " L ~rr:,n-[TTlml.LIIIIT'. - .- '," t!llJ~IJ_i..L1 ~: '"j', o'rr~-:C'- 'II ~~ .~~'/P7>91mm~j~t'i,~L -I I g -~0-~' - T ~EDI-~ ~m'~&~~;!j~: I \~ iI~~ji) ~.'"lll~ ~~7. 6@ ,~'DC i-W::l~~'~ 0:r- ~~ ..., ..-J (. :, I = -~ -~ I I ,;:~ I ~ss~-=i .... I f I~' nTTlI '\ "v 1. ~A""''' 4. , . - ~~~::lIr;t~!(f '- ~-, ~ ~ = ='{ ~~ ~ ~~tt-t~,~ "BOYNTON '~'..~ ~n""e 1]' I NURSERIES" ~. ,>~.~~---t:'" ... l~' I L ,'.. ~ :~ . .' . t .:. J" I: : I ..~ '.- 1. r' ~~II. .r',_ L J '!"~~I"'"I [';""1' I _ _"', , I 1/ , 'r I;., I 'i I I : \ ~ --. ,.. ...- ... ""~" "i I IJI'(~~ i in!'] 1111, ~L: ~~,-~~J...~ 'I: :: '':;:UJ:;: f .' ~. . . .. .. - . . I ", u. --.. : I AG puc LUI: 4.0 .:::: ,...;; = = = = = IICITRUS GLEN a" = = PUC LUI:4.D ~ ~- ~ I~ ~ .=: , - ~~~ - = ,= '. -= - - Pl . LUI IIMEL U~LIlAL, . - . " c- i-- 1=0 "" - ~ ' -_':~ ~~J [.,~;t_l.l. ;.\ . -...' _ .-- _ _..' "'.' ..... -M "~ - ..:. ..............::::..::J:~: I ~ ~ ,,' l.. ~i . -=:iLL ~I"\'" V. . ,.. A IV" ~ q1AA j : . = U <J " J .;:-_:11, \. foJl=~ '. ,,:~g-.-J"'" . ..... .. "SAUSALITO GROVES" [-, PUO LUI:!5.D I I ill~ -,-- ----- . - 1 1 /J (? v,'v' T ,;:> "V - - --- ....... --- 1 - I ......,...........,........,. ~-- , ' ' : i. ; I' I r' , .... . ,) . I ' : I II r1, ~ Id.1:t' , (; . "y' - <J" .." ::"1.//,,,//,/1 f / ~~i ::i]H~;iJlL~iFl! I:;,; ~_~ :0.11111181 ,MILES ~ ,,1...1., .. ,_1_ ..' JAS"'~,"'t... -'"t.,. (..-.- -. r-.. " r",-"~,),,.J:! lal, " ,e:=..::<;~-:#0400.'800 FEET - f)" .~ I _', I ", t~ ,..'. P/A/IINIH6 pSP"" ., ,.., ..., .., .. E,X H I BIT "en I """, ,,"1"11,"'111 """ """......".1.....""....1111111" "'"'"""'"""'"" ....,,, """ ,'....'"" ",,, ,,,IIlIIIIIIUIIIII.IIllllllllltlllltlIHUIIIIIIIUIII ;";';~7'111'''/~'IIIIIIIIIIII''IIIIIIIIIII''II'IIII,,"''n'HH''~. ~ ;lillU!i eali\'" ; H!iHil ~ii! e i i"l~i~~'; I';;w ... i :;iiijull ~li~ ~ ;l .~t!~Hn ~;;~: l!l ! i;;al,;;;;'i': jlla ~ I i. ,.-~, -.... 5 ~ ;~;1~!~; -ii z ; i~I:..il Sj.1 ii ilii!iil. i~; ! li<:lIl!j :;1. i .:i!i!ii!' I-I! 1I i~II-J._ :;ili i :-lili!!!! :aj<< ? IjJI!!:'- ,-a i ;-115<<" .-, ; i~~P~' "l~, --. -~--_.-_. ..' ~ 10' - .. -, 9 " i I ~ i - - - I ~i i~ ~ ~iI i;~1 ~!~~ " i! Ii III h~. ~IIII ! .11 << ,== ....,! .._iii ~ ?! s~ II =~I' " ;1 = I- I' =,= i! ! ; i.. . ~I !: s j!' ~.. -. . =1 Ii =.. a :1 I~ II .~;; ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ! - !za- ~=~ ~ea:~~ ~ I .!! ~A~ ~~~~~s ~ I in ~ ! _ - i ~:~ :~~::'. i.... .......... . ~-. .- ~I! ~ai ii AAAi .i 11~ I! -- JiJa .1 !!I ~ii ~2 2221 .. ._~ IJ: ,I 111- Ii i~1 :i' I Illi ~I .Ii ~~I I. ===1 !i i~ll !ii li !!!~ It ~ - a=~ -:-l i I. 41. 1.1- 'i ~Ii I i ~~ ~. .Ii i as' IIi ,~ ..~ II ~~~_.. ; . ~~~ -- ~~~=~ 'I *' aU n ~~~~.~ _ . ~~~ gm ~5~!. II: '=1 !'I!I!I. \It ~ il I ~ :~:;I ~~~!I. ;sId-4 ~ ~ ~,.. "'0 ::nEb ~Cil~ (11-~ y>~~ fflfTl I~ fTlC ,e _0 ~~ z )> ~ ~hl j -1:- ! . i !J9 I i::i ;=1 n ~ .! i =11 a.- -? I ::1Il1l1ll i~.1 i i ~ !i .,\, JI · I I I I i ! · i II t.." ,~,r.:" .~~ ). ; ~:'';,'''' _" 7r~ ~ " . ;./;'" ~. " ..... ,Ii o ,I ':" . . ".---' lln2,' Jh8 '~1 II H.\ o ~ :;; ~ i (I) ~ \.t.I~ ~ ~~3: ~,! fTl so)>: , ~~g ~:,I ~::!! m;;' (') :0 0 ~d~ \~ rd~o ~ ~. i:~ ~ ~ ~ s: !3: fI) 1:> m ~saU);z i %a~ -I M~!;a ;g ~Q-o )> cn~1 Z -zl> ~~z fl)t...' ~~)>~ ~.. 61"1 4~ Ol N _ :0 '"'- ;:9 ~ $ ~i' l'J ~) ... o I (j) o ....... wUt ..~' ""t m , " \. \~ . \~ r (. ~ ~ - .-:'=;:" ----- r- \ . <0 f'" --- .- --- , ...<5 :_- ":. ~ . " ..... ,.q ~ i! I .. .- ~I ; (;i : , 1___,_1 }: 1;;:;;---' I- .... j J !~~ _ .-J ':1 '~_;-1 . J'" ' c; , ~ ./, :.:-- -J ,j"'- - -, fr -,) . -...: --::::- . _ 'I' _ J: i // (D I .. CD J: j ~ ,I ',-- _ __ _.' ~ _ J I !_ _ - S 01.43'31- W 496.09. I ----.!.- ,- :~~ . ..... ~~~ it ;; . . .. ~ II . , , . . , : i ; II :0 .. ~ il ;. i . \ At 1 \ ;\ Il~ t. ' \ -nt' :i, r l,--; . . " Ii! ;3 r \ !:r-;;~ i' \ \l .lr""~ ~ i... \ I' ~: I - I 1 t ~ Jt \ I} '~nii i t! ~..... t7 .,,' IW I, ,.,.,.!l:! ! !~ ~~o~~ II ,~ 1 \ \1 "~I ......." t t :. r- J ~~~l ii. \; . -:' \ '1 ;f ,; , ."-'</ h 0 \~ ... ". \ ;P'~IZ i \ ii (\ II 0 I;~i'" ( ~ Z I . I ~ ~;"c.a ( fl" Ii I \';~,: : I g \" D !:~ l ;, l.. I J, ", I i I \ I ' ,22' \ 'U":,;: \ . I \' \ . \,~(\ I f iil I, I' \ i : If '; I' "..' , pl'O;ect: U wliEN'citi:;t"AKel ,~.. .. , ':'''';' lB,.Q'f\'lI ' cm.:~~CH:,-,a:.OR1P~"'!;{: J ~J~,':': ", t3l: ;'~ ',' " "". to'",:"~,,,09.-q't:~:1~~<<~~III~', '. . :' . ... ",. . . ...~. ' . ~., ." . I. ' '.I' ~- .. t\lIm~'klfl fiG! j\;:!:. ,"':1: ~~,tI gU'~i ~ oii~ii .~~ ~\~ ~ H~' . ...n1H<~' : -< ~~'ll I . ~ ~ ; ~ i c. .,- ~ 'WI E X H I BIT "D" RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-310 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director nATE: July 12, 1995 r;.# l'oY ml . ::' W ~ rn We'" ' "-J ~ .' ....... ....- l. Plftl,f:!H\,.:,:,tlO "7 ZU,\;LlY',fT. r FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, F orester/Environmentalist RE: Lawrence Lakes POO Addldon of Two Single Family Loti The applicant should comment on how any existing trees or lakcl1ittoral zone plantings will be effected by the two new lots. The project should continue in the nOlD1al review process. KH:ad ~W' ..., ..., DEVBLOPMBRT DEPARTMENT ERGIRBBRING DIVISION MEMORANDUM RO. 95-237 TO: Tambri J. Heyden ~lann. g & Zoning Director , 'am Hukill, P.E. Engineer July 13, 1995 m u w ~ fn) ,Rt I .4 1995 IiI J PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT FROM: DATE: RE: LAWRENCE LAKES We have reviewed subject request for the addition of two residential units to the development and have no objections if the following conditions are met: 1. The subdivision is replatted to show added lots and other changes, if any. 2. The 8' bike path along the entry road is changed back to a 5' sidewalk. 3. The additional park fee in lieu of land dedication is paid for the two additional units. WVH/ck xc: Al Newbold Ken Hall C:LA WRLAKE.CHO TO: Timbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent #l Master Plan Modification: Lawrence ~es PUD FROM: RE: DATE: July 17, 1995 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification on Lawrence Lakes PUD. The following comments are submitted: 1. The number of single family lots has increased from 32 to 34 units. The new recreation dedication requirement is: 34 units x .0180 acres = .612 acres. 2 An adjustment of recreation impact fees already paid will be required. JW:ad ... ,., ..., .., PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-362 Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoni~~~rector Michael E. Haag~E~fJ' Site and Zoning df~elopment Administrator DATE: July 17, 1995 TO: FROM: SuBJECT: Lawrence Lakes - MPMD 95-005 (Master plan modification to add two single-family lots to the existing 32 lot single-family planned unit development) Please be advised of the following comments relative to the first review of the modified master plan for the above-referenced project: 1. Add the following as a note on the plan below the setback charts: Construction of buildings, screen enclosures and pools are subject to easement restrictions. 2. Indicate below the pool setback chart whether the setbacks are for above-ground, below ground or both above and below ground pools. Also indicate whether the listed setbacks apply to whirlpools, jacuzzies and/or hot tubs. '3. Add the following information on the plan within the building, screen enclosure and pool setback charts: Building setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.0' Screen enclosure setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.01 "- Pool setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.5' 4. For clarity ill determining the setbacks for the proj ect remove the typical house/lot drawing and notes. The drawing and notes are found in the upper left corner of sheet 1. The setback charts and accompanying notes identified 011 the plan, provide sufficient and concise information to allow the typical detail drawinq and notes to be removed from the plan. The typic~l detail drawing and notes are not current with the subj ect request. 5. On the master plan place a symbol on lot #34 indicating the south property line is the front of the lot. 6. Construct any improvements that may be required as a result of Palm Beach County's evaluation of the additional trips generated by the request. 7. with respect to the "Development Datal! Tabulation, the allowed density is 4.B4 units per acre, not 4.94. Correct the data accordingly. 8. Submit revised common area landscape plans for the area of the proposed two new lots. The revised landscape plans shall be submitted for permit review at the Buildinq Department. 9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and conditions approved by the City Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the two new lots. 10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and Development Board, and City Commission review does not occur until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission to set land value for purpose of calculating the recreation fee. There fore, .3 ince this L"eques t involves addi tl.onal fees Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-362 Lawrence Lakes MPMD 95-005 to be paid and since the property was sold within the past two years, it is recommended the land value be set us i119 the purchase price at the time of the most recent sale of the pun property. This will require the applicant to submit a copy of their purchaae contract. t-IEH: dim xc: central File A:I.AW.I.AIlIP'D .~ -- ---- TO: RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-316 m Timbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent P Master Plan Modification: Lawrence ~es PUD ~~~~W8E1!I:O FROM: RE: DATE: July 17, 1995 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the masterplan modification on Lawrence Lakes PUD. The following comments are submitted: 1. The number of single family lots has increased from 32 to 34 units. The new recreation dedication requirement is: 34 units x .0180 acres = .612 acres. 2 An adjustment of recreation impact fees already paid will be required. JW:ad ;::,UJJUI..L......l::U l.Vl. l-/l::l.UI..L... l.l::V..Ll::W a... ...Ul:: DU..L..LU..LU,::/ Ul::j,Jal.l.,.llll::Ul.,.. 9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and conditions approved by the city Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the two new lots. 10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and Development Board, and City commission review does not occur until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission to set land value for purpose of calculating the recreation fee. Therefore, since this request involves additional fees I~ ~.~ .""" -- 0/5/4'71t%' <<J[ _- ~ ~f 1M- ~ P /~~ ~~ _' /.L~~~ ~~ . ;~~ ~ /~;, ~ r . ~,/~ ~ r:tI'-P ~ 1f},t7PtJ _11crt'v pu(7~_ . ;d-v~r~~ 7B2 LAWRENCE LAKE (AKA LAKE GEORGE ESTATES) TIME EXTENSION \ \ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-128 FROM: chairman and Members Planning andp,velopment Board J1'rI.,b--U' Q .XJL0 .,/c,,,. Tambrl J. lI~eyde'h Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: May 5, 1994 SUBJECT: Lawrence Lake (aka Lake George Estates) - CNTE #94-001 Time extension (concurrency exemption and construction of required improvements) NATURE OF REOUEST Sonja Martin-Morgan of Tindus Investments, Inc., property owner of the Lawrence Lake PUD (aka Lake George Estates), located on the west side of Lawrence Road, approximately 600 feet north of Gateway Boulevard, is requesting a retroactive, plus a one year time extension to the Lawrence Lake PUD concurrency exemption (see attached location map and letter of request; Exhibit 11 A" and liB", respectively). The last (second) extension granted expired August 21, 1993. BACKGROUND On November 21, 1989, the city Commission approved the final plat for Lawrence Lake, a subdivision comprised of 32 lots for construction of 32 single family, detached units (see Exhibit "C" for a reduced copy of the preliminary plat). The subdivision and platting regulations allow a maximum of 21 months for completion of required improvements, which originally expired on August 21, 1991. A one year time extension for construction of the remaining, required improvements and concurrency exemption was granted by the City Commission which expired on August 21, 1992. However, prior to August, 1992, the original developer defaulted on his mortgage and the mortgagor foreclosed on the property. Subsequently, the mortgagor defaulted leaving the City without adequate surety. The current owner, Tindus Investments, Inc., purchased the property through the mortgage foreclosure sale and came before the Commission on May 5, 1992 to request approval to commence work pending the processing of a letter of credit and surety bond. The Commission granted the approval conditioned upon work being halted at the end of thirty days unless the bond was received. I On July 21, 1992, the owner came back before the Commission requesting approval .to make the first payment within ten days and pay the remaining amount by August 20, 1992, which the owner did. The Engineering Department issued a letter to the owner on January 11, 1993, indicating a time extension for the completion of required improvements through August 20, 1993. On September 7, 1993, the City Commission approved a reduction in the bond to $8,000. Of the $8,000 retained, $6,000 of the surety was to insure against damage to utilities during construction of homes and $2,000 was retained to insure completion of the remaining sodding of the recreation area (currently converted to a common area) and road rights-of-way. Prior to the September meeting, the owner submitted an engineer's certificate of completion, which if accepted would have vested the project indefinitely, without requiring further extensions. However, due to the remaining work to be completed, the certificate could not be accepted and an extension was not followed through until now. Section 19-92(e) of Chapter 19, Article VI of the Code of Ordinances states that requests for time extensions "may be filed not later than 60 days after the expiration of said certificate or TO: Planning and Development Board -2- May 5, 1994 exemption". It further states that "time extensions may be granted for any length of time which does not exceed one year". Historically, retroactive extensions have been granted under certain circumstances. ANALYSIS As indicated in the city's concurrency Management Ordinance, at the point when the 21 month time limit for completion of bonded improvements expired and construction ceased to proceed in good faith, in the judgement of the City's Engineering Department, the proj ect I s concurrency exemption was jeopardized. Specifically, the "A" category development order status of the plat, which is exempt from all levels of service becomes a "C1" category development order, exempt only for drainage, neighborhood parks and traffic. To date, much of the required infrastructure improvements are in place. Sodding of the common area, and landscaping of the common area, perimeter buffers, lake edges and littoral zones are partially complete. A central irrigation system permit was issued in 1992, but expired and was voided. Any irrigation in place under this permit has not received a final inspection, therefore it is not known whether any central irrigation is in place. Separate permits for irrigation of two of the three, existing home lots have been issued and have received final inspection. It is unlikely that these separate irrigation systems connect to the central system. At the September 7, 1993 city Commission meeting when surety was last reduced, irrigation design and sodding was discussed. The owner stated that sodding and irrigation of the lake edges (a 20 foot wide maintenance easement encumbering the lake tract, rather than the lots that back up to the lake) was intended to be provided on a lot by lot basis by the individual lot owners. At that time there was concern over postponing the sodding and irrigation of the lake edges due to the effect this might have on the stability of the unfinished, lake edges ( see Exhibit "D" for minutes of the September 7, 1993 meeting). RECOMMENDATION The Concurrency Review Board met on April 12, 1994 to discuss this request. The Board recommended that an extension be granted until August 21, 1994 (approximately four months). The basis for this recommendation was that the Board considered four months to be adequate time to complete the few remaining improvements. Exhibit "E" contains comments from the Board which, if an extension is approved, are recommended as conditions of approval (Engineering Department Memorandum No. 94-133 and Recreation and Park Department Memorandum No. 94-144). Briefly, these conditions require submittal of revised irrigation and landscaping plans for the lake and common areas, as well as abatement of blowing sand. Since revised irrigation plans and permits are necessary, the Planning and Development Board and City commission may want to reconsider installation of sod and irrigation on a lot by lot basis. Sod and irrigation around the lake could be installed simultaneously with the required landscaping which is installed at one time. Lastly, it should be noted that the Board recommendation for a four month time extension Memorandum No. 94-110, Department's concern extensions. was not unanimous. utili ties Department part of Exhibit "E", discusses the utilities wi th granting retroacti ve concurrency tjh Encs. xc: central File A:LLakeTex LOr.A1\ON MAP LAWRENCE. LA~f ~ES) {A.K.A. LAKE GEOB~ ES ~ -' ~~ " ~PQtJ"~ \ \ !~~r mmJtl~ ~'{\;\~~\h) i,~ l. __\,n. \ .- ~../ " >-,,; .... \ ': : \ ,. ., " ~. --- -' -~-~~ ,~I-~- i- .:to _---1-----.--.---.- - - . - ~,----"--_.~- ....ao'l"''1'ON ...::,,~:: ",u~se~,es" . ~..... ~y ... ''f ~-.,.\""". \, \\-> L.0\~fo \ .--- Q"\~~ -~ \""f Tindus Investments 1762 12th fairway Wellin&ton. fl. 33414 (407) 791-1464 City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425 Att: Tambri Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director Dear Mrs. Heyden; I own a piece of property on Lawrence Road, which is an approved PUD, consisting of 32 lots, called Lawrence Lakes Estates. It is my understanding that the exemption with respect to concurrency expired 8/21/92. I am presently in the process of selling my property on a purchase- option basis, and would like to retroactively extend this, just as soon as possible. I have spoken with Mr. Michael Rumpf on the matter, and he has told me that he didn't think this would be a problem. I would naturally like to take care of this just as soon as possible, and would appreciate hearing from you on the matter at your earliest convenience. You can reach me at the number above and the address above. Any additional information you may need, please call. Sin~~ -Y~~>~~~r"t ~ Sonja rtin-Morgan, Pres. '"\.....-J Tindu Investments, Inc. rn Apt:':.'. 00 EXHIBIT "e" 1:'- ('" .'r} i~ .~;) 1"1'\ PUBLIC ROAD' ~\,;. '! \ \ f' \\ \ \ ~ \ ~ I., :~i. 'It r \ \ , \ -----, '2 " WRENCE ROAD. A r: LA: . ..". J' ... "t. _.' '1 ~~j/':'\J,,~"I" \I. \ Of ,we. ,- ..,. .- ,~\T \.Itoll '.~~) '.,1'1 '~,; (;) f"\ ~-o ~r- ~~ CD~ - 'P'g~ gc~O ~~%-n ...{~ 0.... ~.,,~r- CP~O\~ ~<8~ to ~ '" rt' :r. rn ~. Sl:X3 Z., ~% - (i) " N ""rt'\.' tn~~rn ~fT\0l "" fT\ -40~r- ~.,,~ tn.,,- ". ~r-g" ~ ~ '"" rn %60~ .-." N~.~"'" ~:o oC: %. ~~ ~ 'i ~ I I -; .; ~'\ \ (1, ,r 4=- ,~ ' S~ \' -; l. . \'\' \ ~ '\' \\ · \ t ll~ \ ~\ ~\ ~\ r .. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY CCMtIe.-lON MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 ~ Mended Motion Mayor Pro Tem Matsq~ moved to add a length of twenty feet to the ordinance, as discussed at the last meeting. Mayor Hannening passed the gavel and seconded the motion. The Amended Motion failed 3-2. Vice Mayor Aguila and Commissioners Walshak and Katz cast the dissenting votes. A roll call vote on the original motion was polled by City Clerk Sue Kruse. The motion carried 3-2. Mayor Hanr.~ning and Mayor Pro Tem Matson cast the dis- senting votes. C. Resolutions 1. Proposed Resolution No. R93-131 Re: Reduction of Surety (Utilities and Public Improvements) for Lawrence Lakes (Located on Lawrence Road, North of Old Boynoton Road, South of School Site P) City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R93-131 by title only: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE REDUCTION OF SURETY IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000.00 TO TINDUS INVESTMENTS, INC., DEVELOPER OF LAWRENCE LAKES (A/K/A LAKE GEORGE ESTATES); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . Mr. Staudinger referred to the backup agenda material and recommended reducing the surety from $53,000 to $8,000 for the remaining work to be done on site. Commissioner Katz felt the developer is shirking his responSibility for main- taining the easement around the lake. He would like to hear from Mr. Finizio on this matter. Mr. F1nizio disagreed with the backup material attached to the agenda. He stated that when a developer is allowed not to sod the lake banks, some sandy areas are left and erosion washes all that material into "the lakes. There is no assurance that a private citizen is going to maintain and irrigate it, increasing the cost to the individual citizen. Should we allow this, we have no one to force to reconstruct the lake slopes in the future. He added that tt would be the responSibility of the developer's engineer, not City staff, to fonnulate the appropriate cost for the remaining improvement. Sonja Morgan, 1762 12th Fairway, Wellington, Florida, owns the property in question. She stated that the bond money was placed with the City for the completion of the roads and that she has complied with the list of improvements that was submitted by Enrico Rossi. Regarding the irrigation and sodding, she stated that the bank is sodded. The irrigation system is designed with each individual lot. To put an irrigation system in prior to construction on those lots would be foolish. Machinery rolling over it would tear it up. This was not what the bond was placed for. There is no erosion problem. t - 22 - . MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING . BOYNTON BEACH, FLORiDA ~- SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 Enrico Rossi, Engineer of this project, stated that in most projects he has done, the sodding or irrigation was never part of the bond issue. He said the intent of the deve~oper was to sod as the houses are developed. Motion Vice Mayor Aguila moved to retain $8,000 and release the balance, as recommended by Mr. StaUdinger. Mayor Pro Tern Matson seconded the motion, which carried 4-1. Commissioner Katz cast the dissenting vote. 2. Proposed Resolution No. R93-132 Re: Authorize Execution of Proposed Funding Agreement Between the City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County for Old 80ynton ROld water ",tn Improvements (Knuth ROld to Militlry Trlil) City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R93-132 by title only: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THE CITY UF BOYNTON BEACH FOR THE FUNDING OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR OLD BOYNTON ROAD FROM MILITARY TRAIL TO KNUTH ROAD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion Commissioner Katz moved to approve Proposed Resolution No. R93-132. Vice Mayor ~ Aguila seconded the motion, which carried 5-0. 3. Proposed Resolution No. R93-133 Re: Abandonment of l Ten Foot Wide by 100 Foot Long Portion of the Right-of-Way on the South Stde of Old Dixie Highway - Titcomb Property City Attorney Cherof read Proposed Resolution No. R93-133 by title only: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ABANDONING A TEN (10) FOOT WIDE BY 100 FOOT LONG PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY; SAID PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A DISCLAIMER FOR SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; PROVIDING THAT THE ATTACHED DISCLAIMER BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motton Vice Mayor Aguila mov~d to approve Proposed Resolution No. R93-133. Mayor Pro Tern Matson seconded the motion, which carried 4-1. Commissioner Walshak cast the dissenting vote. - 23 - , .\ n GEE & JENSON MEMORANDUM .... . LEGAL C.l cc: Engineering Utilities Finance TO: J. Scott Miller, City Manager FROM: RE: W. Richard Staudinger, P.E., Interim City Engineer Lawrence Lakes - Surety Reduction DATE: August 20, 1993 **************************************************************************************************** The Engineering Department has coordinated departmental revisions for the referenced Surety Release. Only the Utilities Department and Engineering Department request any of the existing $53,000.00 in surety to be retained. The project has been completed to the satisfaction of Lake Worth Drainage District, Palm Beach County (off site improvements) and has been certified complete by the Engineer of Record, Rossi & Malavasi, on July 20,1993. Attached to this memo is correspondence evidencing these approvals and certifications. The City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department requests $6,000 of surety be retained to insure against damage to utilities during construction of homes. The Engineering Department is requiring $2,000 of surety be retained to insure completion of the remaining sodding of the recreation area and road right-of-ways. The applicant has surplied documentation indicating lake slope irrigation will be the responsibility of individual lot owners. All building permit applications for Lawrence Lakes Homes will be required to show compliance with this requirement before a building permit can be issued by the City. Therefore, the Engineering Department recommends reduction in the surety on Lawrence Lakes from $53,000 to $8,000, a total reduction of $45,000. This m should be on the September 07, 1993 City Commission Agenda for consi r (C4 W. Richard Staudinger, P.E. Interim City Engineer :jer 92-025/223 c: Vince Finizio P. Mazzella D.Jaeger .;CEIVED AUG 2 3 1993 en vMAMut:tfSOtr.cr: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-133 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: May 5, 1994 RE: Lawrence Lakes Lake George Estates Property Owner's Request for a Time Extension The Office of the City Engineer favorably recommends the granting of a four month time extension for the above referenced project based on the fact that the subdivision is substantially complete with the exception of required sodding, landscaping and irrigation, etc., however, as a condition of approval we request that the City Commission impose the following conditions of approval: I. The property owner and/or developer shall be responsible to abate unconfined emissions (blowing sand) by utilizing wetting operations, seeding and mulching techniques, including the installation of a silt barrier (screening) as may be required by the City Engineer to minimize public nuisances. 2. Landscape/irrigation plan (s) be submitted for all common areas and the former recreation area at the west end of the subject property. Should you require any additional information or assistance, please contact the undersigned at ext. 6282. ~~~~+ Ron W. Last, P.E. City Engineer VAF:RWL/ck C:LKGEORGE.EXT 00 - 5 19c)4 00 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. , d, ~k-~ 2~ ~ GItr:T :?J-,,- PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official William cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities Chief Field Insp. Vince Finizio, Deputy City Engineer FROM: Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer DATE: April 7, 1994 RE: Technical Review Committee Meeting, Concurrency Review Board Meeting & LDR Workshop #7 Tuesday, April 12, 1994 Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee and Concurrency Review Board will meet on Tuesday, April 12, 1994, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West Wing) to discuss the following: I. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans) Written comments (on legal sized paper) to be returned within 3 working days following the meeting (April 15, 1994). A. CONDITIONAL USE - TIME EXTENSION (See attached request) 1. PROJECT: Exxon (gasoline sales and convenience store) LOCATION: S.E. corner of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road DESCRIPTION: Request for a retroactive and second, one year time extension of the conditional use approval and concurrency certification which expired April 21, 1993. ,1'.~r1' B. CONCURRENCY EXEMPTION - TIME EXTENSION (see attached request) 1. PROJECT: Lake George Estates (aka Lawrence Lake) LOCATION: East side of Lawrence Road, approximately 650 feet north of Gateway Boulevard DESCRIPTION: Request for a retroactive and second one year time extension for construction of required improvements and concurrency exemption which expired August 21, 1992. II. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN A. None Technical Review Committee Meeting - April 12, 1994 April 7, 1994 Page 2 of 2 III. OTHER A. CODE REVIEW 1. Change in zoning code definition of motel apartments to delete limitation of not more than one-third of total units devoted to apartment suites, i.e., units having kitchens. (See attached request). B. LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WORKSHOP (Meeting to begin at approximately 9:45 a.m.) 1. Memorandum forthcoming from Tambri Heyden regarding workshop agenda and summary of last workshop. kl~~ Dorothy Moore Zoning and Si e Plan Reviewer DM/jm cc: MEMO ONLY J. Scott Miller, City Manager City Commission (5) Don Jaeger, Building Official Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief City Engineer Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director steve Campbell, Fire Department Bob Gibson, Public Works Ann Ford, Downtown Development Coordinator Central File Applicant Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner Project File Chronological File TRC File (Original) A:TRC4-12.JM Tindus Investments 176'2 l'2th fairway Wellil1&ton. ft. 33414 (407) 791-1464 City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425 Att: Tambrl Heyden Acting Planning & Zoning Director Dear Mrs. Heyden; I own a piece of property on Lawrence Road, which is an approved pun, consisting of 32 lots, called Lawrence Lakes Estates. It is my understanding that the exemption with respect to concurrency expired 8/21 '92. I am presently in the process of selling my property on a purchase- option basis, and would like to retroactively extend this, just as soon as possible. I have spoken with Mr. Michael Rumpf on the matter, and he has told me that he didn't think this would be a problem. I would naturall y like to take care of this just as soon as possible, and would appreciate hearing from you on the matter at your earliest convenience. You can reach me at the number above and the address above. Any additional information you may need, please call. ~ sonja~~{'W $to/$dt'''--" Tindu~:~ents, Inc. r Apt:~ I. w ~, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-362 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and zoni~~~rector Michael E. Haag~E~{-J Site and zonin~ ~gelopment Administrator DATE: July 17, 1995 FROM: SUBJECT: Lawrence Lakes - MPMD 95-005 (Master plan modification to add two single-family lots to the existing 32 lot single-family planned unit development) Please be advised of the following comments relative to the first review of the modified master plan for the above-referenced project: 1. Add the following as a note on the plan below the setback charts: Construction of buildings, screen enclosures and pools are subject to easement restrictions. ') "- . Indicate below the pool setback chart whether the setbacks are for above-ground, below ground or both above and below ground pools. Also indicate whether the listed setbacks apply to whirlpools, jacuzzies and/or hot tubs. . 3. Add the following information on the plan within the building, screen enclosure and pool setback charts: Building setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.0' Screen enclosure setback chart: 15.01 Lot 34 east side setback - Pool setback chart: Lot 34 east side setback - 15.5' 4. For clarity in determining the setbacks for the project remove the typical house/lot drawing and notes. The drawing and notes are found in the upper left corner of sheet 1. The setback charts and accompanying notes identified on the plan, provide sufficient and concise information to allow the typical detail drawing and notes to be removed from the plan. The typical detail drawing and notes are not current with the subj ect request. 5. On the master plan place a symbol on lot #34 indicating the south property line is the front of the lot. 6. Construct any improvements that may be required as a result of Palm Beach County's evaluation of the additional trips generated by the request. 7. with respect to the "Development Data" Tabulation, the allowed density is 4.84 units per acre, not 4.94. Correct the data accordingly. 8. Submit revised common area landscape plans for the area of the proposed two new lots. The revised landscape plans shall be submitted for permit review at the Building Department. 9. A revised plan, which reflects all staff comments and conditions approved by the city Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to replatting to add the two new lots. 10. Since platting does not require any review by the Planning and Development Board, and city Commission review does not occur until the end, no opportunity is available for the Commission to set land value for purpose of calculating the recreation fee. Therefore, since this request involves additional fees Ii MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 94 - 110 FROM: John A. Guidry, utilities Director TO: Tambri H~yden, Interim Planning Dir DATE: April l3, 1994 SUBJECT: Lake George Estates, (fka Lawrence Lakes) Request for retroactive extension of concurrency exemption As my staff members discussed at the T.R.C. meeting of April 12, 1994, this office has serious concerns regarding the pol icy of granting retroactive extensions for concurrency. As you know, the project in question was originally approved as an exempt project, and therefore did not undergo a full concurrency review for all categories. Currently, only three of the potential 33 homes are built. Water and sanitary sewer systems have been accepted by this office, and are operational. However, we are effectively reserving capacity for the un-built 30 homes without having collected a reservation fee, due to the exempt classification that was held by the development until August 2l, 1992. At $138. 60 per uni t, per year, this amounts to a lost revenue of $4,158.00 per year, or $8,3l6.00 for the two year period from August 1992 ~o August 1994, or $l2,474 for the three year period extending to August 1995. In discussing this issue at the T.R.C. meeting, there also appeared to be some concerns from other departments that could be rectified by not granting a retroactive extension, and instead re-evaluating the pro ject in I ight of concurrency requi rements . Given the classification system in section 19-83 of the Code, the time limit for constructing all required improvements stated in sect. 19- 88(b)(3), the definition of an EI project in sect. 19-83(b)(5), and the definition of expiration in sect. 19-88(c)[d.l], we can no longer consider this project as an exempt, incompleted project. It must either be deemed to have all required improvements completed and accepted, or it must apply for a new development order and concurrency certification. Thank you for your consideration of this complex matter. refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella office. Please of this JAG/PVM bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Skip Milor File ~~~\i~ I '\ "n if\' \. 1 ~ c- RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT 194-144 FROM: Tambri Heyden, Acting Planning & Zoning Director Ll- Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist ~~I~ Lake George Estates - Time Extension TO: RE: DATE: April 13, 1994 I concur with the TRC that the above project concurrency exemption be granted a time extension. The required improvements that have not been completed include: 1. A lake planting and maintenance plan, including irrigation. 2. A common areas landscape plan in originally approved project. The requirement was part of this plan. conjunction with the 50% native species KH: ad oorn 00