Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-217 Agenda Memorandum for May 16, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden '~ planning and Zoning Director DATE: May 11, 1995 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROGRAM - PHASE 2, GROUP 2: Application #2-Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates Application #3-Carriage Gate Condominium Application #4-Lawrence Oaks Ordinances for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment, and Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the May 16, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that the above-referenced properties are being annexed as Phase 2, Group 2 of the city's Annexation Program. The City Commission approved the applications for these properties on January 17, 1995, therefore approving for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the respective proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The DCA conducted a summary review of the proposed amendments and finding no need for a comprehensive review, advised the City on April 12, 1995 to continue processing them through the adoption of ordinances. You will also recall that there were originally four (4) properties being processed in this phase of the Annexation Program. Excluded from the above list is Application #I-Windward PUD, which has been separated from this group as a result of pending litigation. The litigation involves the validity of the water service/annexation agreement, which is the primary mechanism used in the Annexation Program. Whether Application #1 is processed further will be determined through the outcome of the court proceedings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that these ordinances be approved on First Reading. TJH:mr Attachments HISCX:F2G20RDS,AGH PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-253 Agenda Memorandum for June 6, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker City Manager FROM: Tambri J. Heyden /~ Planning and Zoning Director DATE: May 31, 1995 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROGRAM - PHASE 2, GROUP 2: Application #2-Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates Application #3-Carriage Gate Condominium,,/ Application #4-Lawrence Oaks Ordinances for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment, and Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the June 6, 1995 city Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading. DESCRIPTION: You will recall that the above-referenced properties are being annexed as Phase 2, Group 2 of the city's Annexation Program. The city Commission approved the applications for these properties on January 17, 1995, therefore approving for transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the respective proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The DCA conducted an summary review of the proposed amendments and finding no need for a comprehensive review, advised the City on April 12, 1995 to continue processing them through the adoption of ordinances. You will also recall that there were originally four (4) properties being processed in this phase of the Annexation Program. Excluded from the above list is Application #1-Windward PUD, which has been separated from this group as a result of pending litigation. The litigation involves the validity of the water service/annexation agreement, which is the primary mechanism used in the Annexation Program. Whether Application #1 is processed further will be determined through the outcome of the court proceedings. RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends that these ordinances be approved. TJH:mr Attachments MIICX..2G20aDI.AGM PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210 FROM: Carrie Parker city Manager Tambri J. HeYden~~ Planning and ZonirrG"Director TO: DATE: May 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Population estimates for Royal Manor and Carriage Gate annexations As requested, upon the upcoming annexation of Royal Manor and Carriage Gate (developed communi ties), the City I s population is proj ected to increase as follows: Census Tract Number u.s. . Census Tract PPOC Dwelling Units Population Estimate Approximate 5';; Permanent Residents Approximate Permanent Residents Roval Manor Mobile Home Park 58.04 1. 73 437 756 40~. 302 CarriaGe Gate 60.03 1. 72 88 151 98% 147 ANNEXED PERSONS BEBR 1994 ESTIMATE + 449 48,848 REVISED POPULATION ESTIMATE 49,297 These figures are only estimates as we can only guess what the seasonal population status is at these projects, and realize that this BEBR estimate is for 1994 (we should be receiving the 1995 estimate within two months). TJH:dim xc: Central File a:PopBst.mem/TJH VI. PUBLIC HEARING C cc: Plan, Dev, Util PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Cf~-olrJ Agenda Memorandum for January 17, 1995 city Commission Meeting FROM: Carrie Parker, city Manager Tambri J. Heyden, ~~ Planning and Zoning Director TO: DATE: January 12, 1995 SUBJECT: Carriage Gate Condominiums (ANNEX #94-008) Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2 Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning Please place the above-referenced items on the January 17, 1995 City Commission meeting agenda under Public Hearing. DESCRIPTION: The subject property, which is located on the south side of Old Boynton Road, immediately west of the Heartland Health Care Center, is to be annexed pursuant to the Annexation Program and specifically, pursuant to an agreement for water service and annexation. The Carriage Gate Condominiums were constructed prior to 1990, and consist of 88-condominium units designed as "carriage" style homes. The respective agreement for water service and annexation was authorized in 1983. Pursuant to this agreement, staff recommends that this property be annexed, reclassified to High Density Residential from High Residential 8 in the County, and rezoned to R-3 (Multi-family Residential) from RM-SE (Multi-family Residential-Special Exception). For additional information on the Carriage Gate Condominium applications please see Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-377. Approval of these applications will allow the proposed Land Use Element amendment to be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Following their preliminary review, ordinances will be adopted, the DCA will conduct a review for compliance determination, and once found in compliance, the ordinances will become effective (21 days following compliance determination). The total review process takes approximately 8 months. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan and Annexation Program, staff recommends that these requests be approved. The supporting analysis is provided within Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 94-377. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board recommended approval of this Plan amendment and rezoning by a 7-0 vote. TJH:mr Attachments ANZ2:CARRIAGI,AGM ~ ~ 7.A.4. Annexation program Application #3 Carriage Gate condominium PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-377 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director Michael W. Rumpf, senior Planner~ FROM: DATE: January 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Carriage Gate Condominiums (File No. 94-008) Application #3 - Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2 Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning INTRODUCTION You will recall the City's current efforts to annex western properties through the Annexation Program, and that the last phase (Phase 2-Group 1) included Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Sausalito Groves, Heartland Health Care center, and the Greentree Plaza I shopping plaza. On october 18, 1994 the City Commissi6n directed staff to continue implementing the annexation program by annexing the next group of eligible properties, which are identified as Phase 2-Group 2. You will also recall that eligible properties are defined as those contiguous properties whose owners have previously consented to annexation through the agreement for wate; service with the City. The Carriage Gate Condominiums are one of four (4) eligible proj ects now being recommended for ~ annexati,~n4 " ~~~'A"~..vk~ {~~, ~y~~, , 1k · fVr. ~AiifAGE~~ONDOMi:iIUMS / - {J f a '- ./ L~:!~~ Carriage Gate is located on the south side of Old Boynton Road, immediately west of the Heartland Health Care Center (see Attachment "A"). This development consists of 8S-condominium units designed as "carriage" style homes. This project is built and occupied, and the majority of the units were sold between the years of 1990 and 1993. DELIVERY AND CAPACITY OF URBAN SERVICES The providers of major ur,ban services (e. g. Police, Fire, and Public Works) reviewed th~ proposed annexationl for impact on service delivery, and only the Fire Department would request certain expenditures if Carriage Gate were annexed (see Attachment liB") . It should be noted that the subject properties are all within the service area (range) of Fire Station #3, Fire Station #3 has superior service capability compared to the corresponding county station (with respect to response times, staffing, and equipment), and no deficiencies currently exist or are anticipated in the near future. The potential expenditures would simply allow the City to maintain superior back-up service to this geographical area, without assistance from the remaining stations. In general, such expenditures would enable Station #3 to respond simul taneously to three (3) emergency calls (Fire Station #3 is currently capable of providing full service to two (2) concurrent emergency calls), the potential tax revenues from all four properties would provide the funds necessary for the potential expenditures. NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS Those affected by this proposed annexation have been notified via direct contact with the representative of the condominium association, the courtesy notice which was sent to the condominium I association, and through the official rezoning notice which was mailed to all owners within Carriage Gate. It is suspected that the opinions of the owners regarding annexation are mixed; however, specific comments have not been communicated to staff. APPLICATION CONTENTS AND REVIEW SUMMARY This request for Carriage Gate Condominium consists of an 1 ,., ...., ap~ication for annexation and land use plan amendment/rezoning. AS' this property is being annexed in accordance with the annexation program, staff has completed the applications, and the corresponding application fees were waived. Additional information on these applications is found on the following page and is in the form of an abbreviated summary. This summary includes a brief outline describing the property, the application, adjacent land uses, the availability of facilities, the basis on which it is found consistent with the comprehensive Plan, other pertinent information, and staff I s recommendation. Attachment "B" summarizes data in this report as well as provides information relative to service delivery and fiscal impact. ~ 2 KEVIEW SUMMARY - CARRIAGE GATE ~uNDOMINIUMS llZ.E.i. 9.70 acres LOCATION: South side of Old Boynton Road, opposite Nickels Boulevard. EXISTING LAND USE: PROPOSED LAND USE: High Residential 8 (County High Density Residential (10.8 du/acre)(City) EXISTING ZONING: RM-SE - Multi-family Residential with Special Exception. PROPOSED ZONING: R-3 - Mulit-family Residential J {c , .) CURRENT USES: An 88 unit, two-story condominiwn community. ~#\it0(1J ,,\j~ \1\\ PROPOSED USE: No change proposed. ~4 \~(5 ();-v\\ ~ er{~V ADJACENT LAND USES ~ : LAND USE ZONING Old Boynton Road N/A N/A single family homes MRS RS Heartland Health Care Center. HDR R-3 Oakwood Lakes Condo. HR8 RS-SE North: Farther North: East: South and West: CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Consistency with the Future Land Use Plan - Consistent The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map does recommend land use classifications for this and other properties adjacent to the City. Through th~, C~m~re~ens~~~~~~,_ this area was earmarked with the High Density Residential ~~f~MftR~ed on accessibilty, the commercial uses to the east and south, proximity to the Boynton Beach Mall, pnd the relatively high density developments within this vicinity west of Knuth Roa~~'~~~~he~~At~~~~~posed land use cl~ssification is appropriate for Carriage Gate~~tik~evet~t~[s a gross densit~reater than 9 units per acre. Lastly, the existing and proposed classifications are reasonably co~~r~!.~'p the County's and the City's classifications allow 8 dwelling units per acref'~a~~-dwelling units per acre, respectively. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies - Consistent Since the land use classification is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan, the existing development, which is consistent with the proposed classification, is compatible with adjacent land uses, and since annexation would be consistent with State law, this land use amendment is consistent with all goals, objectives and policies witin the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several issues that should be addressed, as they describe characteristics of this site, indicate consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and/or fulfill requirements of the Florida Department of Community of Affairs with respect to the review of plan amendments. Selection of Zonin2 District The R-3 zoning district is being proposed as it is the district that corresponds with the High Density Land Use Classification, and is consistent with the existing, multi- family development on the subject property. Annexation This request for annexation, which is in accordance with the City's annexation program established pursuant to Policy 8.10.4, is consistent with Florida Law. Availabilitv of Facilities Florida Administrative Code requires that the availability of, and impact upon public facilities be analyzed. Given that the proposed land use classification is comparable to the County's classification, this land use plan amendment would have no additional impact upon the existing availability of public facilities beyond that generated (or allowed to be generated) by the County's land use classification. Impact upon Historical/Archeolo2ical Resources I Not applicable Impact upon Native Habitats or other Environmental Resources Not applicable Flood Zone: "B" Consistency with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan The proposed designation represents a reasonably comparable land use classification to the current, Palm Beach County land use classification. 3 .. RECOIltWIDATION "'!.l ~ ~ The Planning and :ning Department reco...ends~\r~~S apPlic~o~ submitted in connection with the Annexation Program be approved based, in part, on the following: 1. The subject property is contiguous to the corporate limits; ~ -, V7 ~Jt:; ~ 2. The subject property lies within the City's Reserve Annexation Area; 3. The annexation of this property is consistent with the City's Annexation Program; and 4. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. MIS CIX: AXP2G24n . REP ~~y 1/0 4 ATTACHMENT nAn LOCATION MAP ~Cl ,.." \-.---- . -~ .- I' "L ,\ I ~~~r.'""'..J.. ~~ --- ,..--- !~--~..- , , ~I ~\ ~\ ----- ~, 1(\ ~ ~ ~ J -.~ .\ I'-- , , \ t' < , : \Ui I ,\;' ) , ~\ : : l lU , ,'tI, ~ ~l . :1 <q I , ..JI I 'i , 01 I II \ I I . ~.... L~- ~ (j) Ef II'" ';~ 1]- -~ fl.1 o l" 8DO' , "" aJ"PLI~.ATION 13 _ CARRIAGE GATE CONDOMINIUM s- ~ .." ATTACHMENT "B" SUMMARY TABLE , C\I ~ ~ 0 ~ - C\I ~~ . r.LI ~~ H O~ ~ ~ < ~ E-t Z tf)>t 0 ~I H E-t ~ ~ ~U) Z r.LI Z Z '< Z < ~ ~ tf) 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ . :c o r-t OJ .Q 0 0 Ca1 Or-t 0 U 0 0 Oru 0 t-l Z Z ..~ .. ...:l Os:: 0 0 Ms:: M ca. *ru * (;) M 0.-4 M III ~ OttJ lfIr-t M tIJ~ ..+J MrU .. ~t-l 0-'" .. ~ M ~~ O~ MS:: 0\ ~ NttJ O\S:: N *0 *ttJ * t-l i:I Z ~ . ca.~ ~ . 0 0 0 0 0 ~ca. Z Z Z Z ~ . * i:I . ~ . tIJ 0 ClO ~ 0 CO ~ \0 \0 ...:l~ \0 \0 M rc(:z: 0 M ~ III ('I") .. .. H~ \0 .. .. .. N E-4:> N .... N Z~ * N M III .... ~~ * * * .... E-4 * 0 ca. ~ a ...:l~ \D ClO ~ ~ ClO 0 ClO rc(~ r0- M \0 M CO t-lZ lfI 0\ ~ .. .. ~~ .. .. .. .... ('I") ro- CO .... ~~ ~ 0\ M III III E-4~ * . * N ~ . * 0 ca. ~ Q:Z; WO ~~ CO CO \D N N 0 Hj III III ~ III 0 E-4::>> .... ('I") ro- ro- .. tlJca. N ~o ~ ca. 'W 'W ..c:: 'W fJ1 S to S to .... E-t ClO N t-l CO ClO ro- ClO .... ~ ro- ('I") .... .. .... ~ ~ .... ~ ~ tIJ ro- .... 0 0 CO ~ . . . . ~ . N III 0 \0 U 0\ ~ ClO .... ~ rc( .... N ~ 1-1 rU ^ ca. ^ ^ >t OJ to i tIJ E-4 +J ~ ...:l ~ ru ru 1-1 rc( ~ C) 0 0 E-4 ca. s:: 0 0 OJ OJ rU '0 E-4 ~ tJl tJ X 1-1 Po. ru s:: rU .... OJ .-t :J 1-1 1-1 rU '0 1-1 ~ >. s:: rU rU 0 .... U ...:l ~ ~ to OJ +J o s:: OJ OJ tIJ iC o MO III 0 M .. "0 IDMO lfINN N..... ..* ID \01 III fJ1 *tlJw ~~ I~::>> ::>>E-4 ClJE-4t-l ~t-li:l ::>>i:lZ :z::z:~ ~Wca. :>ca.~ ~~~ ~r:4 ...:l ...:l...:lrc( rc( rc(~ E-t ::>> t-l :z; ca. ~ t5 i:Ii:Ii:I r:4~r:4 ~~~ t-lt-lt-l E-4E-4E-4 tIJtIJtIJ ~r:4~ ...:l...:l...:l r=(r=(r=( E-4E-4E-4 000 E-4E-4E-4 7 >. U = Q) ~ .~ III Q) 1-1 ..-t ~ = 0 III ~ Q) III 1-1 0 ll-l ~ ~ Q) ..-t .. III >. ::l ..-t .~ Q) ~ > ~ ..-l .. .. ~ 0 ..-t d Q) 1-1 III .. III .~ .. E .~ ~ E Q) Q) ".d Q) .. ..-t p.~ a d o ~ U ~ 0>. Ln 1-1 o ll-l.. o III I 1Il..-t Q) ::l Q) ..-t 1-1 ~ al > .. Ul Ul Q):l II) . 0 ~,..... ,........-f ..dClO ~ Q...-t ..... Q)OO ..d..-t . .. ca. ll-l U ...... ,..... Q) ..-l ~ ..-t Ul ..d ~ Q)Q.'al :JQ) "aUl > Q)O"Q) .0 ..-t U U U :J 1-1 P. Q)I-I OQ. S Ul '~::l ..-t 90 0-'00 ..-t", U .~ I-l Ul 0 S Q.- ~ ~ e Q) ta O.~ N.-tO ~d >'N,Q.-t ::l "N~O d S .~-g .~~ 5 o >< Q...c .... 1-1 UQ.S4J ..-l0 ll-llll Q.OQ) d.. ~.o .dalUEI::l Q)"""..-t U...... >. ::lQ)UliAo ~ 1-l.~,Q .-t>-'I Q) >. 0 CIO Q) al ..-l .~ Ul llQ.. ..-t -' '0 > -' S Q) ElS~~ ~.~ Q)~ ~ ,.;..j 0 11). Q..-t .-t I-l >.1-1 ~ud..... SQ. -:!Q)I-l ca. Q) 0 .~ '" Ul 0 >. .dUll-l u.. ><d.... du 0 .-t alOUl..-l .~~o Q).::l -'UIU Q)C7\Q) S N .-t llQ C7\ co.-t .. Q) d al r-lal ,Q. U,QQ)O > S .-t.. al 0 .. Q) '0 0.-1 EI.-tM 1-l0M'~0::l'tl I-l al 0 .~ C7\ al C7\ C7\ 0 Ul ..-f Q) Q. ca. I-l :E C7\ Q. ~ C7\ I-l .-t U Ul p. ~ ..-tElC7\....Q.aldal ~ >. co 0 ..0 .~ ,Q ,Q~d .u_ ~..-f>. co -,.~ Q) Q) ~ ~ '0 Ul d.-tal"..-f~~.-t"SQ)Q) ~ al '0 al 0 000 0 "::l d> I-lCll:l ClI:l"Q)Ud ~ e.::: ~>< ~ ~ ><'0 ~ e ~ p.doaS.-t.-taSQ)S-'Q) da.::l E-4aSaSE-4....-lUll-l o al d > > as.. d I-lO>' >...-fUlOd 'tIt1OQ) "Q)Q)"OQ)uo Q) d Q. '0 I-l.-t.-t l-l Q. .~ II) ..-l Q) Q),Q,Q Q) as Ul Q) .. ~ d d Ul a.al al Q.l-l.~,Q U ,QOOalO><><O".d Q) NUl,Ql-laSaSl-l><..O.-t Ul I-l ca.....ca.I:I:l..........-t ~1-lQ)Q) 0 ~Q)Q.::l U oa.d~ Q) Q)'tI0> I I .. UI-l Q)Q)Ul Ul dal'tll-l-'~ L ~ ~~~><~~ 0 :ldalal dl '0 al .~ ,Q .. Q) Q) al ~ ..-l ~~ COU:EI-I .-t ..-tald ~ 0 .. .. P. al '.-l Q) ..-f:J Ul al al 0 ..-l I-l l-l ~ '0 ca."I-l:l >'d . Ul Ul d as ~ 0 .~ .... 'Q)U~ ClI:l~ ..-l ..-l .. .. d d Ul 0 =::l=::ll:l:lca. ~ Ul Q) .. .-t '.-l ~ S >< al~ .. Q) .. Q) Q) .d.-t .. Q. S o u """".....-..-."......, ,...... ....NM..;t Ul Q) .. o :z o e - .. .~ S ~ s - CIO ..0 Ln iAo ] al o S - .. '.-l S ~ III - ..... ..;t ..-t al j ,..... Ln FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-11 January 13, 1995 FROM: City Manager TO: Rescue SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES WEST OF LAWRENCE ROAD After a thorough review of the fire and emergency medical needs of the properties west of Lawrence Road being considered for annexation, and the fire and emergency medical capability of Fire Station *3 which would serve the area versus the capability of Palm Beach County Station *41 now serving the area, we have concluded Boynton Beach Fire Station *3 provides superior equipment, more personnel, and quicker response times. To clarify the memorandum submitted to Michael Rumpf of the Planning Department on August 18, 1994, the request for additional equipment and personnel is not to provide basic fire and emergency medical service, but to enhance our backup capability without relying on backup from Stations *1 or *2 initially. Our present capability will result in a higher level of service to those areas including Palm Shores, but an improvement in our backup capability will reduce the possibility of delays if all units are out on calls. FJ/lmb RECEIVED t~N\ ~CY~, ~~\{}~\ {\\~;)t ') \ ~\dJ\ G~ 0~ ~~'I'{\ , , ~ \'V "'VL.>- V ) . . f~ Y ,1\2 ' , ,..x, " ,V\ Vv...... 'J . _~"'\. ,"'\'-' f '. .JJ.t,~ 13 1995 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE