REVIEW COMMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-217
Agenda Memorandum for
May 16, 1995 city Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
city Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden '~
planning and Zoning Director
DATE: May 11, 1995
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROGRAM - PHASE 2, GROUP 2:
Application #2-Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates
Application #3-Carriage Gate Condominium
Application #4-Lawrence Oaks
Ordinances for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan
Amendment, and Rezoning
Please place the above-referenced items on the May 16, 1995 City
Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, First Reading.
DESCRIPTION: You will recall that the above-referenced properties
are being annexed as Phase 2, Group 2 of the city's Annexation
Program. The City Commission approved the applications for these
properties on January 17, 1995, therefore approving for transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the respective
proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The DCA conducted
a summary review of the proposed amendments and finding no need
for a comprehensive review, advised the City on April 12, 1995 to
continue processing them through the adoption of ordinances.
You will also recall that there were originally four (4) properties
being processed in this phase of the Annexation Program. Excluded
from the above list is Application #I-Windward PUD, which has been
separated from this group as a result of pending litigation. The
litigation involves the validity of the water service/annexation
agreement, which is the primary mechanism used in the Annexation
Program. Whether Application #1 is processed further will be
determined through the outcome of the court proceedings.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that these ordinances be approved
on First Reading.
TJH:mr
Attachments
HISCX:F2G20RDS,AGH
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-253
Agenda Memorandum for
June 6, 1995 city Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
City Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden /~
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: May 31, 1995
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION PROGRAM - PHASE 2, GROUP 2:
Application #2-Royal Manor Mobile Home Estates
Application #3-Carriage Gate Condominium,,/
Application #4-Lawrence Oaks
Ordinances for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan
Amendment, and Rezoning
Please place the above-referenced items on the June 6, 1995 city
Commission meeting agenda under Legal - Ordinances, Second Reading.
DESCRIPTION: You will recall that the above-referenced properties
are being annexed as Phase 2, Group 2 of the city's Annexation
Program. The city Commission approved the applications for these
properties on January 17, 1995, therefore approving for transmittal
to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the respective
proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The DCA conducted
an summary review of the proposed amendments and finding no need
for a comprehensive review, advised the City on April 12, 1995 to
continue processing them through the adoption of ordinances.
You will also recall that there were originally four (4) properties
being processed in this phase of the Annexation Program. Excluded
from the above list is Application #1-Windward PUD, which has been
separated from this group as a result of pending litigation. The
litigation involves the validity of the water service/annexation
agreement, which is the primary mechanism used in the Annexation
Program. Whether Application #1 is processed further will be
determined through the outcome of the court proceedings.
RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends that these ordinances be
approved.
TJH:mr
Attachments
MIICX..2G20aDI.AGM
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-210
FROM:
Carrie Parker
city Manager
Tambri J. HeYden~~
Planning and ZonirrG"Director
TO:
DATE:
May 8, 1995
SUBJECT: Population estimates for Royal Manor and Carriage Gate
annexations
As requested, upon the upcoming annexation of Royal Manor and Carriage
Gate (developed communi ties), the City I s population is proj ected to
increase as follows:
Census
Tract
Number
u.s.
. Census
Tract
PPOC
Dwelling
Units
Population
Estimate
Approximate
5';; Permanent
Residents
Approximate
Permanent
Residents
Roval Manor Mobile Home Park
58.04
1. 73
437
756
40~.
302
CarriaGe Gate
60.03
1. 72
88
151
98%
147
ANNEXED PERSONS
BEBR 1994 ESTIMATE
+ 449
48,848
REVISED POPULATION ESTIMATE
49,297
These figures are only estimates as we can only guess what the seasonal
population status is at these projects, and realize that this BEBR
estimate is for 1994 (we should be receiving the 1995 estimate within
two months).
TJH:dim
xc: Central File
a:PopBst.mem/TJH
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
C
cc: Plan, Dev, Util
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Cf~-olrJ
Agenda Memorandum for
January 17, 1995 city Commission Meeting
FROM:
Carrie Parker,
city Manager
Tambri J. Heyden, ~~
Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
January 12, 1995
SUBJECT:
Carriage Gate Condominiums (ANNEX #94-008)
Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2
Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning
Please place the above-referenced items on the January 17, 1995
City Commission meeting agenda under Public Hearing.
DESCRIPTION: The subject property, which is located on the south
side of Old Boynton Road, immediately west of the Heartland Health
Care Center, is to be annexed pursuant to the Annexation Program
and specifically, pursuant to an agreement for water service and
annexation. The Carriage Gate Condominiums were constructed prior
to 1990, and consist of 88-condominium units designed as "carriage"
style homes. The respective agreement for water service and
annexation was authorized in 1983. Pursuant to this agreement,
staff recommends that this property be annexed, reclassified to
High Density Residential from High Residential 8 in the County, and
rezoned to R-3 (Multi-family Residential) from RM-SE (Multi-family
Residential-Special Exception).
For additional information on the Carriage Gate Condominium
applications please see Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum
No. 94-377.
Approval of these applications will allow the proposed Land Use
Element amendment to be transmitted to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DCA). Following their preliminary review,
ordinances will be adopted, the DCA will conduct a review for
compliance determination, and once found in compliance, the
ordinances will become effective (21 days following compliance
determination). The total review process takes approximately 8
months.
Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan and Annexation Program, staff
recommends that these requests be approved. The supporting
analysis is provided within Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 94-377.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Development Board recommended
approval of this Plan amendment and rezoning by a 7-0 vote.
TJH:mr
Attachments
ANZ2:CARRIAGI,AGM
~
~
7.A.4.
Annexation program Application #3
Carriage Gate condominium
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-377
TO:
Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board
THRU:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director
Michael W. Rumpf, senior Planner~
FROM:
DATE:
January 4, 1995
SUBJECT:
Carriage Gate Condominiums (File No. 94-008)
Application #3 - Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2
Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning
INTRODUCTION
You will recall the City's current efforts to annex western
properties through the Annexation Program, and that the last phase
(Phase 2-Group 1) included Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves,
Sausalito Groves, Heartland Health Care center, and the Greentree
Plaza I shopping plaza. On october 18, 1994 the City Commissi6n
directed staff to continue implementing the annexation program by
annexing the next group of eligible properties, which are
identified as Phase 2-Group 2. You will also recall that eligible
properties are defined as those contiguous properties whose owners
have previously consented to annexation through the agreement for
wate; service with the City. The Carriage Gate Condominiums are
one of four (4) eligible proj ects now being recommended for
~ annexati,~n4 " ~~~'A"~..vk~ {~~, ~y~~, ,
1k · fVr. ~AiifAGE~~ONDOMi:iIUMS / - {J f a '- ./ L~:!~~
Carriage Gate is located on the south side of Old Boynton Road,
immediately west of the Heartland Health Care Center (see
Attachment "A"). This development consists of 8S-condominium units
designed as "carriage" style homes. This project is built and
occupied, and the majority of the units were sold between the years
of 1990 and 1993.
DELIVERY AND CAPACITY OF URBAN SERVICES
The providers of major ur,ban services (e. g. Police, Fire, and
Public Works) reviewed th~ proposed annexationl for impact on
service delivery, and only the Fire Department would request
certain expenditures if Carriage Gate were annexed (see Attachment
liB") . It should be noted that the subject properties are all
within the service area (range) of Fire Station #3, Fire Station #3
has superior service capability compared to the corresponding
county station (with respect to response times, staffing, and
equipment), and no deficiencies currently exist or are anticipated
in the near future. The potential expenditures would simply allow
the City to maintain superior back-up service to this geographical
area, without assistance from the remaining stations. In general,
such expenditures would enable Station #3 to respond simul taneously
to three (3) emergency calls (Fire Station #3 is currently capable
of providing full service to two (2) concurrent emergency calls),
the potential tax revenues from all four properties would provide
the funds necessary for the potential expenditures.
NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS
Those affected by this proposed annexation have been notified via
direct contact with the representative of the condominium
association, the courtesy notice which was sent to the condominium
I
association, and through the official rezoning notice which was
mailed to all owners within Carriage Gate. It is suspected that
the opinions of the owners regarding annexation are mixed; however,
specific comments have not been communicated to staff.
APPLICATION CONTENTS AND REVIEW SUMMARY
This request for Carriage Gate Condominium consists of an
1
,.,
....,
ap~ication for annexation and land use plan amendment/rezoning.
AS' this property is being annexed in accordance with the annexation
program, staff has completed the applications, and the
corresponding application fees were waived.
Additional information on these applications is found on the
following page and is in the form of an abbreviated summary. This
summary includes a brief outline describing the property, the
application, adjacent land uses, the availability of facilities,
the basis on which it is found consistent with the comprehensive
Plan, other pertinent information, and staff I s recommendation.
Attachment "B" summarizes data in this report as well as provides
information relative to service delivery and fiscal impact.
~
2
KEVIEW SUMMARY - CARRIAGE GATE ~uNDOMINIUMS
llZ.E.i.
9.70 acres
LOCATION:
South side of Old Boynton Road, opposite Nickels Boulevard.
EXISTING LAND USE:
PROPOSED LAND USE:
High Residential 8 (County
High Density Residential (10.8 du/acre)(City)
EXISTING ZONING: RM-SE - Multi-family Residential with Special Exception.
PROPOSED ZONING: R-3 - Mulit-family Residential J {c , .)
CURRENT USES: An 88 unit, two-story condominiwn community. ~#\it0(1J ,,\j~ \1\\
PROPOSED USE: No change proposed. ~4 \~(5 ();-v\\ ~ er{~V
ADJACENT LAND USES ~
: LAND USE ZONING
Old Boynton Road N/A N/A
single family homes MRS RS
Heartland Health Care Center. HDR R-3
Oakwood Lakes Condo. HR8 RS-SE
North:
Farther North:
East:
South and West:
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Consistency with the Future Land Use Plan - Consistent
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map does recommend land use classifications for
this and other properties adjacent to the City. Through th~, C~m~re~ens~~~~~~,_ this
area was earmarked with the High Density Residential ~~f~MftR~ed on
accessibilty, the commercial uses to the east and south, proximity to the Boynton Beach
Mall, pnd the relatively high density developments within this vicinity west of Knuth
Roa~~'~~~~he~~At~~~~~posed land use cl~ssification is appropriate for Carriage
Gate~~tik~evet~t~[s a gross densit~reater than 9 units per acre. Lastly,
the existing and proposed classifications are reasonably co~~r~!.~'p the County's and
the City's classifications allow 8 dwelling units per acref'~a~~-dwelling units per
acre, respectively.
Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies - Consistent
Since the land use classification is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan, the
existing development, which is consistent with the proposed classification, is
compatible with adjacent land uses, and since annexation would be consistent with State
law, this land use amendment is consistent with all goals, objectives and policies
witin the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several issues that should be
addressed, as they describe characteristics of this site, indicate consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, and/or fulfill requirements of the Florida Department of Community
of Affairs with respect to the review of plan amendments.
Selection of Zonin2 District
The R-3 zoning district is being proposed as it is the district that corresponds with
the High Density Land Use Classification, and is consistent with the existing, multi-
family development on the subject property.
Annexation
This request for annexation, which is in accordance with the City's annexation program
established pursuant to Policy 8.10.4, is consistent with Florida Law.
Availabilitv of Facilities
Florida Administrative Code requires that the availability of, and impact upon public
facilities be analyzed. Given that the proposed land use classification is comparable
to the County's classification, this land use plan amendment would have no additional
impact upon the existing availability of public facilities beyond that generated (or
allowed to be generated) by the County's land use classification.
Impact upon Historical/Archeolo2ical Resources
I
Not applicable
Impact upon Native Habitats or other Environmental Resources
Not applicable
Flood Zone: "B"
Consistency with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan
The proposed designation represents a reasonably comparable land use classification to
the current, Palm Beach County land use classification.
3
..
RECOIltWIDATION "'!.l ~ ~
The Planning and :ning Department reco...ends~\r~~S apPlic~o~ submitted in
connection with the Annexation Program be approved based, in part, on the following:
1. The subject property is contiguous to the corporate limits; ~ -, V7 ~Jt:; ~
2. The subject property lies within the City's Reserve Annexation Area;
3. The annexation of this property is consistent with the City's Annexation Program;
and
4. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
MIS CIX: AXP2G24n . REP
~~y
1/0
4
ATTACHMENT nAn
LOCATION MAP
~Cl
,.." \-.---- .
-~
.-
I' "L ,\ I
~~~r.'""'..J.. ~~
--- ,..---
!~--~..-
, ,
~I
~\
~\
-----
~,
1(\
~
~
~
J
-.~
.\ I'--
,
,
\
t' <
, : \Ui
I ,\;'
) , ~\
: : l lU
, ,'tI,
~ ~l
. :1 <q I
, ..JI
I 'i
, 01
I II
\ I
I .
~....
L~-
~ (j) Ef
II'" ';~
1]- -~
fl.1
o
l"
8DO'
,
""
aJ"PLI~.ATION 13 _ CARRIAGE GATE CONDOMINIUM
s-
~
.."
ATTACHMENT "B"
SUMMARY TABLE
,
C\I
~
~
0
~
-
C\I
~~ .
r.LI
~~ H
O~ ~
~ <
~ E-t
Z tf)>t
0 ~I
H
E-t
~
~ ~U)
Z r.LI
Z Z
'< Z
<
~
~
tf)
0
~
0
~
~
.
:c
o
r-t
OJ
.Q
0 0
Ca1 Or-t 0
U 0 0 Oru 0
t-l Z Z ..~ ..
...:l Os:: 0
0 Ms:: M
ca. *ru *
(;) M
0.-4 M III
~ OttJ lfIr-t M
tIJ~ ..+J MrU ..
~t-l 0-'" .. ~ M
~~ O~ MS:: 0\
~ NttJ O\S:: N
*0 *ttJ *
t-l
i:I
Z
~ .
ca.~
~ . 0 0 0 0 0
~ca. Z Z Z Z
~ . *
i:I
.
~
.
tIJ 0 ClO
~ 0 CO ~ \0 \0
...:l~ \0 \0 M
rc(:z: 0 M ~ III ('I")
.. ..
H~ \0 .. .. .. N
E-4:> N .... N
Z~ * N M III ....
~~ * * * ....
E-4 *
0
ca.
~
a
...:l~ \D ClO ~ ~ ClO
0 ClO
rc(~ r0- M \0 M CO
t-lZ lfI 0\ ~ .. ..
~~ .. .. .. .... ('I")
ro- CO ....
~~ ~ 0\ M III III
E-4~ * . * N ~
. *
0
ca.
~
Q:Z;
WO
~~ CO
CO \D N N 0
Hj III III ~ III 0
E-4::>> .... ('I") ro- ro- ..
tlJca. N
~o
~ ca.
'W 'W ..c:: 'W
fJ1 S to S to ....
E-t ClO N
t-l CO ClO ro- ClO ....
~ ro- ('I") .... ..
.... ~ ~ ....
~ ~
tIJ ro- .... 0 0 CO
~ . . . .
~ . N III 0 \0
U 0\ ~ ClO .... ~
rc( .... N
~
1-1
rU ^
ca. ^
^
>t OJ to i tIJ
E-4 +J ~ ...:l
~ ru ru 1-1 rc(
~ C) 0 0 E-4
ca. s:: 0
0 OJ OJ rU '0 E-4
~ tJl tJ X 1-1
Po. ru s:: rU
.... OJ .-t :J
1-1 1-1 rU '0
1-1 ~ >. s::
rU rU 0 ....
U ...:l ~ ~
to
OJ
+J
o
s::
OJ
OJ
tIJ
iC
o
MO
III 0
M ..
"0
IDMO
lfINN
N.....
..*
ID
\01
III fJ1
*tlJw
~~
I~::>>
::>>E-4
ClJE-4t-l
~t-li:l
::>>i:lZ
:z::z:~
~Wca.
:>ca.~
~~~
~r:4
...:l
...:l...:lrc(
rc( rc(~ E-t
::>> t-l
:z; ca.
~ t5
i:Ii:Ii:I
r:4~r:4
~~~
t-lt-lt-l
E-4E-4E-4
tIJtIJtIJ
~r:4~
...:l...:l...:l
r=(r=(r=(
E-4E-4E-4
000
E-4E-4E-4
7
>.
U
=
Q)
~
.~
III
Q)
1-1
..-t
~
=
0
III
~
Q)
III
1-1
0
ll-l
~ ~
Q) ..-t
..
III >.
::l ..-t
.~ Q)
~ >
~ ..-l
..
.. ~
0 ..-t
d Q)
1-1
III
.. III
.~ ..
E .~
~ E
Q) Q)
".d
Q) ..
..-t
p.~
a d
o ~
U
~
0>.
Ln 1-1
o
ll-l..
o III
I
1Il..-t
Q)
::l Q)
..-t 1-1
~ al
>
..
Ul Ul
Q):l II)
. 0 ~,.....
,........-f ..dClO
~ Q...-t .....
Q)OO ..d..-t
. .. ca. ll-l U ......
,..... Q) ..-l
~ ..-t Ul ..d ~
Q)Q.'al :JQ)
"aUl >
Q)O"Q) .0
..-t U U U :J 1-1
P. Q)I-I OQ.
S Ul '~::l ..-t 90
0-'00 ..-t",
U .~ I-l Ul 0
S Q.- ~ ~
e Q) ta O.~
N.-tO ~d
>'N,Q.-t ::l
"N~O d
S .~-g .~~ 5
o >< Q...c .... 1-1
UQ.S4J ..-l0 ll-llll
Q.OQ) d.. ~.o
.dalUEI::l Q)"""..-t
U...... >. ::lQ)UliAo
~ 1-l.~,Q .-t>-'I
Q) >. 0 CIO Q) al ..-l .~ Ul
llQ.. ..-t -' '0 > -' S Q)
ElS~~ ~.~ Q)~ ~
,.;..j 0 11). Q..-t .-t I-l >.1-1
~ud..... SQ. -:!Q)I-l
ca. Q) 0 .~ '" Ul 0 >.
.dUll-l u.. ><d....
du 0 .-t alOUl..-l
.~~o Q).::l -'UIU
Q)C7\Q) S N
.-t llQ C7\ co.-t .. Q) d
al r-lal ,Q. U,QQ)O
> S .-t.. al 0 .. Q) '0
0.-1 EI.-tM 1-l0M'~0::l'tl
I-l al 0 .~ C7\ al C7\ C7\ 0 Ul ..-f Q)
Q. ca. I-l :E C7\ Q. ~ C7\ I-l .-t U Ul
p. ~ ..-tElC7\....Q.aldal
~ >. co 0 ..0 .~ ,Q
,Q~d .u_ ~..-f>.
co -,.~ Q) Q) ~ ~ '0 Ul
d.-tal"..-f~~.-t"SQ)Q)
~ al '0 al 0 000 0 "::l
d> I-lCll:l ClI:l"Q)Ud
~ e.::: ~>< ~ ~ ><'0 ~ e ~
p.doaS.-t.-taSQ)S-'Q)
da.::l E-4aSaSE-4....-lUll-l
o al d > > as.. d
I-lO>' >...-fUlOd
'tIt1OQ) "Q)Q)"OQ)uo
Q) d Q. '0 I-l.-t.-t l-l Q. .~
II) ..-l Q) Q),Q,Q Q) as Ul Q) ..
~ d d Ul a.al al Q.l-l.~,Q U
,QOOalO><><O".d Q)
NUl,Ql-laSaSl-l><..O.-t
Ul I-l ca.....ca.I:I:l..........-t
~1-lQ)Q) 0
~Q)Q.::l U
oa.d~ Q)
Q)'tI0> I I ..
UI-l Q)Q)Ul Ul
dal'tll-l-'~ L ~
~~~><~~ 0
:ldalal dl '0
al .~ ,Q .. Q) Q) al ~ ..-l
~~ COU:EI-I .-t
..-tald ~ 0
.. .. P. al '.-l Q) ..-f:J Ul
al al 0 ..-l I-l l-l ~ '0
ca."I-l:l >'d
. Ul Ul d as ~ 0 .~
.... 'Q)U~ ClI:l~
..-l ..-l .. ..
d d Ul 0
=::l=::ll:l:lca.
~
Ul
Q) ..
.-t '.-l
~ S
><
al~
.. Q)
..
Q) Q)
.d.-t
.. Q.
S
o
u
"""".....-..-."......, ,......
....NM..;t
Ul
Q)
..
o
:z
o
e
-
..
.~
S
~
s
-
CIO
..0
Ln
iAo
]
al
o
S
-
..
'.-l
S
~
III
-
.....
..;t
..-t
al
j
,.....
Ln
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-11
January 13, 1995
FROM:
City Manager
TO:
Rescue
SUBJECT: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES
WEST OF LAWRENCE ROAD
After a thorough review of the fire and emergency medical needs
of the properties west of Lawrence Road being considered for
annexation, and the fire and emergency medical capability of Fire
Station *3 which would serve the area versus the capability of
Palm Beach County Station *41 now serving the area, we have
concluded Boynton Beach Fire Station *3 provides superior
equipment, more personnel, and quicker response times.
To clarify the memorandum submitted to Michael Rumpf of the
Planning Department on August 18, 1994, the request for
additional equipment and personnel is not to provide basic fire
and emergency medical service, but to enhance our backup
capability without relying on backup from Stations *1 or *2
initially. Our present capability will result in a higher level
of service to those areas including Palm Shores, but an
improvement in our backup capability will reduce the possibility
of delays if all units are out on calls.
FJ/lmb
RECEIVED
t~N\
~CY~,
~~\{}~\ {\\~;)t
') \ ~\dJ\ G~
0~ ~~'I'{\ , ,
~ \'V "'VL.>- V
) . . f~ Y ,1\2 '
, ,..x, " ,V\ Vv......
'J . _~"'\. ,"'\'-' f '.
.JJ.t,~ 13 1995
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE