Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-484 Agenda Memorandum for September 5, 1995 city Commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager fYlI=.lr FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director DATE: August 31, 1995 SUBJECT: Nautica Sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves PUD - MPMD 95-006 Revise access points and unit type (replace multi-family with s1n91e-family detached units) and reduce lot size and front, side and rear setbacks (3rd review) NATURE OF REOUEST Kilday and Associates, agent for Meadows Groves, Inc. and R. Bradford Arnold, Trustee, is requesting to modify the Knollwood Groves master plan. The 111.82 acre project, proposed for a total of 424 single-family detached, zero.lot.line and "Z" lot units, is zoned PUD and located on the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypo1uxo Road (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The original proposed revisions, plus changes proposed by the applicant in response to the conditions by the Commission (for determination of non-substantial change) are as follows (see Exhibit liB" - letter of request and proposed current revised master plan): 1. Omit a road onto Hypoluxo Road from which two project entrances were planned to connect and replace it with a project entrance onto Lawrence Road. 2. Change the type of units and lot size from 150 single- family detached units on 6,000 square foot lots and 389 multi-family units to 267 zero lot line units on 5,000 square foot lots and 157 "Z" lot line units on 4,500 square foot lots; a reduction in the total number of units from 539 to 424 (115). 3. Reduce the lot width from 60 feet to 40 feet for "Z" lot units and to'SO feet for zero lot line units. 4. Reduce the front setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. 5. Reduce the side setback on interior lots from 15 feet to 10 feet. 6. Reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to one another. 7. Delete the day care center use (southeast portion of the project) and replace with a lake. BACKGROUND At the August 15, 1995 City Commission meeting the request for a master plan modification for the Nautica Sound project was tabled to the September 5, 1995 City Commission meeting. The request was tabled to give the applicant the opportunity to modify the master plan to the degree that the Commiesion would make a fincUn9 of non-substantial change with regards to the proposed modification as it relates to the current approved Knollwood Groves master plan (Exhibit "C"). Following the review of the master plan modification presented to the Commission on August 15, 1995 (Exhibit "0"), the Commission encouraged the applicant to increase the square foot area of at least 99 "ZI1 lots. f page 2 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound Exhibit liB" depicts the current revised master plan into which the applicant has incorporated changes that they request be deemed as non-substantial. Included with Exhibit "B" is a written description prepared by the applicant's agent that describes the changes that have been made to the plan. Following review of the plans submitted by the applicant's agent the afternoon of August 30, 1995, staff offers the following summary with respect to the changes the commission encouraged, staffs review of the changes, and staffs review of the current revised plan as it relates to their original comments: 1. The Commission encouraged the applicant to increase the size of 76 "z" lots from a minimum of 4,000 square feet to a minimum of 4,500 square feet and increase the size of 13 "z" lots from a minimum of 4,500 square feet to a minimum of 5,000 square feet. To achieve the larger lot size the applicant modified the internal road network system by reducing the number of cul-de-sacs from 11 to 7 which resulted in providing a loop road system with lots fronting on the loop roadq. As evident by viewing . I the previous proposed master'plan (Exhibit liD") and the current proposed master plan (Exhibit UBU), significant changes have taken place in the north portion of the project including road configuration, type, size and layout of lots. A total of ten (10) lots were omitted from the project. It is difficult to determine whether the 99 "Z" lots have increased in size as recommended by the Commission considering the areas of each lot are not specified on the plan. It should be noted that the tabular data indicates that the minimum lot size for "Z" lots has increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet; however, the lot frontage remains 40 feet. Therefore, there is not sufficient information to verify that the 13 "Z" lots that the commission intended to be increased to 5,000 square feet and included with the 4,500 square foot "Z" lots has been provided. To ensure that the proper balance of 5,000 square foot lots is included with the 4,500 square foot "Z" lots, the plan should specify the total area within each of the proposed 159 UZ" lots. 2. with respect to staff's review of the new plans regarding original comments that would create a Significant impact on the layout of the project and general review comments, the following is offered (see Exhibit "E" staff com~en ts ) : Engineering - Increase the width of the proposed Meadows Boulevard from 60 feet wide to 80 feet wide. The applicant revised the lot layout along the north side of the proposed right-of-way to provide 80 feet of right-of-way width. Addi tional comments are set forth in Engineering Division Memorandums 95-332, 95-295 and 95-260. utilities - Relocate the proposed lift station to better serve future developments adjacent to the proposed project and omit deadend utility lines in cul-de-sacs. This concern has been addressed by the omission of several cul-de-sacs as a result of the new loop road system and the plans show a lift station site acceptable to the utilities Department. ;z . . page 3 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica sound The letter from the applicant indicated that the developer and the city's utilities Department have agreed on the location and size of the proposed lift station shown on the current revised plan (based on utility drawings not included with the submittal, but submitted to and veiwed by the utility Department) . At this time the utility Department has no objeotion to the plan. Fire Department - Provide an ingress/egre.. on Hypoluxo Road and 15 foot separation between buildings. The applicant has not addressed these issues (see revised Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-316). Police Department - Provide access to the site from Hypoluxo Road and install a north bound right turn lane into the site on Lawrence Road. These comments have been disregarded (see Police Department Memorandum #0164). Planning Department - Provide an access to the project on Hypoluxo Road, show code required 40 foot setback along the east property line of the proj eC,t, ,!ncrease the lot size to 6,000 square feet, increase the' lot frontage to 60 feet, increase the front setback to 20 feet and provide 15 feet as the side setback or building separation for all interior lots. These comments reiterate comments made and approved on the previously submitted and approved master plans for Knollwood Groves. The applicant has not addressed these issues. Addi tional comments are set forth in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-485. please note the revisions that led staff to recommend the proposed modifications be considered a substantial change are clearly identified in the recommendation on page 7 of this memorandum. The following text is from the previous staff report (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-419) revised with data from the proposed plan, and is provided for your reference. On October 17, 1989 the city Commission approved on second reading ordinance No. 89-36 rezoning the subject property from AG (Agriculture) and R-1AAA $Single-family Residential) to PUD with a Land Use Intensity of 4 (LUI = 4), The rezoning master plan was approved sUbject to staff comments and is provided in Exhibit "F". A master plan modification for the PUD was requested in January 1990. The request included reconfiguring the boundary between the mul ti-family and single-family pods, changing the Single-family pod to zero-Iot-line units and establishing the following building and site regulations for the zero-lot-line, Single-family units: lot frontage 50 feet, front setback 20 feet (on private streets), rear yard setback 10 feet and non-zero side setback 15 feet. On February 19, 1991 the city Commission made a finding of "no substantial change" for this request and on March 12,' 1991, the Planning and Zoning Board approved this master plan modification, subject to staff comments. This master plan modification is provided in Exhibit "C" and is the current master plan. The exhibit also includes the conditions of approval reg-ardinli lot size, lot frontage and setbacks for the 150 single-family detached zero-lot-line units within the project. On April 5, 1994, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. R94-39 which entered Meadows Groves, Inc., f.k.a. Knollwood Groves, into an agreement to pay the City the sum of one hundred eight thousand five hundred fifteen dollars ($108,515) to be applied to the design and construction of the Miner Road extension to Lawrence Road from its eXisting terminus east of Congress Avenue for the PUD' s projected impact on Miner Road. The resolution also indicated that ~ . . page 4 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound the City supported the request of Knollwood Grov.. for road/traffic impact fee credits to Palm Beach county. This resolution agreed to recognize this payment of fees as commencement of the development, thereby vesting the 1991 PUD master plan. on August 2, 1994, the city Commission adopted Resolution No. R94- 106 accepting conveyance of the property required of the PUD for public recreation purposes. The 5.0 acre park site is located in the southeast corner of the project. The site is adjacent to an existing, undeveloped 4.02 acre pUblic park site to which it will be combined to meet the recreation level of service needs of the neighborhood planning area that the PUD will impact. Chapter 2.5, planned Unit Developments, of development regulations states that chanQ8s developments shall be processed as follows: the city's in planned land unit section 12. Changes in plans. "Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the Planning and zon:J,ng Board upon application filed by the developer or his successors in interest, prior to the expiration of the pun classification, but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the sole discretion of the City Commission. Non- substantial changes as determined by the city Commission in plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the pun classification." ANALYSIS staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the city's land development regulations: Section 1. Intent and purpose. "A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established. It is intended that this district be utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative. design, improved. living environment, orderly and economical development in the City, and the protection of adjacent and existing and future city development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the City. Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regUlations and other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-Iot basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. u- I page 5 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound B. section 9. Internal PUD standards. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone.1I The following analysis consists of evaluations corresponding with each significant issue: 1. Replacement of Hypoluxo Road connection with another entrance on Lawrence Road - This change Significantly redistributes the traffic trips originally approved to be shared by Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road. As shown on the approved master plan in Exhibit lIell, project access was planned for a new road onto Hypoluxo Road (a four lane road with median and turn lanes), requiring a crossing over the L.W:D.b. L-18 Canal, from which two project entrances were planned. Also planned was one entrance onto "Meadows Boulevardll, a public collector which is to be extended by the developer to connect to Lawrence Road (currently a two lane road which is on the county's five year plan for widening to four lanes). Because of the desire to have a gated community, costs of which are a function of total entrances, and to avoid the cost of the canal crossing, the applicant proposes a new entrance onto Lawrence Road and one onto the extension of "Meadows Boulevardll which will link to Lawrence Road. This change concentrates project traffic onto Lawrence Road, and compounds the traffic problem associated with Lawrence Road as recently expressed by local residents in connection with the anticipated addition of those 1,680 approved, and partially constructed units on Lawrence Road. In response to this identified need, the County added the Widening of this segment of Lawrence Road to the County's five year plan. From a design standpoint, it is desirable that where there is the ability for access oh to two major thoroughfares, both should be utilized. This is also true from a public safety and public utility access standpoint, as well as for integrating streets with the surrounding road network. Staff comments from the public safety and public utility departments reflect a desire to work with the applicant regarding this issue, but it is noted that this comes.with an increased response time to emergencies. It also eliminates an opportunity to provide a road system that could provide an alternate route in the common event of an accident at the intersection of Lawrence Road and Hypoluxo Road. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the Hypoluxo Road connection not be eliminated. 2. Change in unit type, lot size, lot width and setbacks - Over the past ten to fifteen years, the PUD proposals within the City have included smaller and smaller lot sizes, with very large homes and increased lot coverages (decreased permeability), built closer and closer to property lines. These small lots with narrow building separations have posed ever-changing problems for emergency personnel who must park large vehicles on narrow streets and maneuver emergency equipment within tight openings between buildings. ,-' i, . . page 6 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica sound Also, an increasing problem with small lots with narrow frontages and shallow front building setbacks, is parking. Driveways on these lots are not deep or long enough to accommodate more than one, in some cases two personal vehicles, not to mention guest vehicles. In addition, most families have at least two vehicles, so vehicles are parked continually within the street, which causes a reduction in road width and within swales or over sidewalks which is . , unsightly and causes costly damage to both. The area of the city over the past five to ten years that has seen the most PUD approvals is the Lawrence Road corridor. This area has become a monoculture of developments comprised of 5,000 and 4,000 square foot lots, yet it is probably the remaining area within the city where larger lots and homes could be developed compatible with the larger lots and homes which spot the area and preceded the newer development. This issue was discussed at a recent Commission workshop at which the Commission recognized the link that housing choices have on economic development opportunities. At that meeting, a minimum 6,000 square foot lot size was discussed to begin to diversify the types of new homes ~hat are being built. Regarding the requests to reduce the lot width from 60 feet to 40 feet and 50 feet for the "Z" lots and Zero lots, reduce the front setback from 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback on interior lots from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to one another, staff recommends that the 60 foot lot width remain in connection with the 6,000 square foot lot area. Therefore, the reduction in front, side and rear yard setbacks will not be needed based on the lot size. 3. Staff has no objection to omitting the day care center site and replacing it with a lake. 4. utility design - Among the changes not specifically outlined in the applicant I s request is a significant alteration in utility system design. As detailed in the utilities Department comments, utility systems in adj acent proj ects were designed to integrate with the utility system in Nautica Sound , through the location of gravity sewers and lift stations. The lift station location proposed by the applicant violates comprehensive Plan Policy 1.14.3 which requires that utility sites (parcels dedicated to the City for lift stations) serve the project and surrounding land uses, as a condition of the project approval. The lift station location proposed is not efficient as it would force the city to eventually construct additional lift stations which the City must maintain. The letter from the applicant indicated that the developer and the city's utilities Department have agreed on the location and size of the proposed lift station shown on the current revised plan (based on utility drawings not included with the submittal, but submitted to and veiwed by the Utility Department). The several dead-end water mains proposed in the cul-de-sacs can be looped, but may result 1n the loss of a few lots. Lastly, it is important to note that lot size drives the type of utility design. The utility Department notes that even if looping of the utility system is agreed to, the small lot size and narrow lots lend to an inefficient design of double-barrelling piping in cul-de-sacs, which also will cost the city more money to maintain as compared to other projects with the same density. ( Page 7 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound As evident from comparing the previous plans with the current revised plana, cul-de-sacs have been omitted, lot type, size and location have changed; however, a utility plan was not submitted for this review. RECOMMENDATION On Tuesday, July 25, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review the previous master plan modification request. The Board recommended that the Commission find the changes "substantial". From the above analysis, the basis for this recommendation is that (a) the relocation of one of the entrances from Hypoluxo Road to Lawrence Road causes additional trips to be placed on Lawrence Road and compromises public safety (better response times, and an alternate emergency route are achieved if the Hypoluxo Road 'connection was not omitted), (b) the reduction in lot width and lot area intensifies the project from the standpoint of efficiency of land area, causing the potential for parking problems and overall congestion, (c) the change in unit type/lot size is contrary to the recent Commission consens~s to attract a variety of housing choices which is known to hav~ a'direct link to economic development potential and (d) the applicant has not addressed the 40 foot setback that is required along the east property line where the subject property abuts the multi-family project to the east, which could cause a significant change in the lot layout presented at this time. If this request is determined to not be a substantial change, it is recommended that approval be granted subject to the applicable, attached staff comments in Exhibit "E" - Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-485, Engineering Division Memorandum Nos. 95-332, 95-295 and 95-260, Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95- 316, Police Department Memorandum #0164, Building Division Memorandum No. 95-324. It should be noted that this recent submittal excluded 7 of the 8 drawings (elements) required for review of a Master Plan Modification, and particularly, to enable review of the affects on the master plan of all proposed changes. TJH:meh Attachments # xc: Central File l.llAU'I'ICA1.DOC rI ,~:;;,_=--=_~ "'f'!!!i~;7.:;;j),~iJ;Jf~ . . ~~' \lrr=c ~~_; ~ -.~.C3 111~igf1;~li: ",e puP ,,'e' ": ( >if .<".,.~I1I' . ~"... Ii ~\ \ !j!;;"iQi'i! .....g"~i.. \..u'~ '\, ..' '.~%.~i;~~i*~~.0.~~w~~~ '..i ~. -,,--. ~. __L--- S'l '\ A '%;!M!~t.:~w/r!1.(,i/['{i''., B !S.P >>~J ~ ~ ",""""""~"~"'f'7'~'~f';~'1.!.;111'I'Ji( ~.~.! /~~~'I ~~. . . p, 1.--1 ~7!t.!X///X2Hf,fjii%v!j..~:z'f;;W4r1..Wi}%' \\) iT ~e:.t ~:\ '~ii-- '\\~Y<$,.~ \J;;t.i?i;\i)?Z~ft.rf(i*~-~~~~~{fffi~; f !;I! l~: .... .v~ ~~:2 ~)fff/&%~~'fj/lf/!!tf,(litj'/.~'f/j{ rjj::Jj~JlIfjfjf{pl' .ic- :1~ '\f~ s '~'i\~z;iM!j11ffl;;J'$.g,~'.Pf(}g#I!#Fl~,-1 f:i'N("Q~' ::~y' c.\r\ :: ~t~~ AG ~'l.l'j'.tI8~lrt0.1i_; l' \ ~~ ;~:~~~~~t;:: \\.\ d '.;1/~'ffP,?f,;1/.;,"f!.""'''~''''''''''''''''' .. \.~ ~, ,1 ,,"""; ,\ - · "1 \ . \ 1\11"-- "..."..,..,.... . .,' ' "L1-I~ .' '''''f' '\ -~ - " lil'..' ~ .~z::-'i~~ .J/<;:::"flll~l'[ la~' ~,~. -4j ?~\ """-- _ ~ ~..~" ... ' ~ . . ~ 1\\\ .:...'-- _ G ~ ~ _ tI1 f.;!" --.) B I," .~.. .'. ~ ~ . ~ 'TI1I ,.,,, i\\:\ "---'iSiIJ:,',~,~:;.. j ,~ . '. ~ 'T .... '\.. ;;.1; .. v . .,\-\ ;:..__- ~_ ~ OJ ..';': \l/~ II flS: ; ..;:". 'r . a .., ~ '\'\ ri'\'n T ...,.... ~_. c . p.pQ-- , '.1-- C~a:;' ... "....., ,,'I'lTmWI...... \.~\. ,< .'" ) .~ /'/ . ~~. . .',' " \ .,,, "" - ....</ ./ '" ~.-_. )-. .... ,/: ~. , . .' .. \~~l: \ ~ . ^' 'DD~S ~ '-~'\\' EC:':\':' ~; .\~~~1I1~~ . ,'\ ..v r ~-(I'" ,,'\....- c ,i \ , " ;' .-..c::-. ....- 1 \' fT\ J \- ~ ' . " ~ . ' .. ~ .,." . . -0' . " " ,,1/ .1 ..' / ~ '11"i;\~lillk~ ~/>/"'---::;;~~7~~' ,.\.G ;:.;:~::'.~.~~' A1~\ ~~ fl;JJ: .:I~_L'I c.- __, _ .to' ..' ,. v- g;:<; . p,.' ,/,." e-- :=\,. ~;t (~~~.;;I \\\q "" · v ." ." ~~~:. [':( _--- ;::c _ T ,;<--;: " A-:cr\ ~ .. c- \"U,..' : If . aOY N-rPI'II '- >.~:cc '..I!'~t:\' ,\ ::: ~~ . ~~::J '. \,.,.",1 ."US'l6tiSS'l'tiS6" ,:.~.,_:\{~~' \;;tl".\ ,!:,{'of'( \ ~ ~ ~ ~~'.~.')o//III .. ,'1< :, 1\ 1 ,\ \,;m' ." ~.. 9 ..""tiS\..' ~ ~. . puP _" c,-rAL.e GL-e..... 2" L.-- ',~ ~ -, ,:::-r;y L.U,~4.P puo \..U,,4.0 I"'}):- c.- -' ..__ '''J ~ ~ 0" iI-I)' f> . \ ~'\AA L k L '-= ~~. !,' U,:.-.l;::;: .... ~". .. ~~'~-'I ------.- ~..-\-- .- ~~-<'/\~ rf'l, I' - . .~ ~ ~;.1-r;...W''i q \ E..s~ puo r;l" ': ,( .\-J \ .~. '\/8 MIL ~ ~""...o l' [) \? ~ foG \ , \\ \ \ \ \ \ . \ I \ _\ ,'I .~'O 400.800 fEEl __- .. L -r.-a-r "'- Jf'/.a.., OLAN^J/N" ~ ~~.:, J, ~) \1 '\ ~~ ,~ . ,-OCA1\ON ~,AP NAU1"\CA SOUNO O<NOLWOOO GRO\JES pUO) pl. .- " sp.\.Jepr.~'''t'O Gf=\OVes" CURRENr REVISED MASTER Pl.J\N--.-u----:------------- -- u_u_-- ------- -... .-', ,- - , :::... ..-.----- ,------------- ....- ..~ ~~. ,:~~_..~ .Il"", ..~..r-7--;=----- '- ;;:- ,_e.~.,=~ .-~~. ~ -- -Ill /~.,.~... ~ :1::".':-' 1-:::----- -~--- - : ---... or ~-: ....------ -"4'- ,"",,"-- ----, --. I _ _ # - -~ t I~ r.';- m_~~, ,r~.yi-T~- - .~.. -,-F.','-;--- ',I ~ 'w (~ ,........ ' , ' , , . t. ,.....- V' ~ ~_ .--.: 1 -I . .. ::,r-- ,- : , ,.. ~.-- I ,1 ,~../". .. .....~......_ f .--., I';a-:,;o- .....: ,ll....'" ::.....- ,V' .-- .__:;:;"-... 11..-....' ~.... L.....;-....;,j::......:...ty< : :....- ~ .... ':';;-';':;_', I _.....: ' :~.. -..!"';r:-.- . . J : - 1 ~- ;:<" I ~...- ~~-, ~ .. .. " _J ,.....; .=..~ ~:: ,;r- r-;-;' L- ~; _' '. ~.....- I -.. ... ,I~- ----.!" ,...-;:.- ...,. ..,,~ ~ ....... I~ ~ ,_ ' . l _:=. I.. I:i........ ~" r.--=- ~~. __r- rJ..if.... .. ' ~ __~ :~~:Ii:..- 1-;11I-" ~ - ' . -.... ~'ID "6=;.....:.... ~ r;- "'!I- :,.. _ ..' .. _' IJ ..-...~. ~- I " .-,'. - / . ...- .. I I _ r---.-. 1.'- e::s.:...=::-nc:..........i1r...' i~..--~ t.?:-Ilu. ~J I ~ ':.- 1;.....01 , ;"r: ,:._. ~ t-;r ~~a::zr I ... I 1- . .~ ~I~~-' . ---~_.... I'" I _ ~ I_~_ ... .;..~ ~T ~ ~ n ~ : . ,.- I. V~.;: ~ "C:H" ,--~: tou-',{If]HH"F..\ ,: : I !!!E:r~ .....~ i ~ ,-TnT, .-,.1'" '.T ~: --, :""'; 15E!2'.::.:::r"- __.......--.. i ~ I I 1 1 -i-~ .. r -f t ~ r-l'\ - , I ____ _._.e__ I _, : 1 i-i'r l' ~T' - _ ' " I 1 . ," ~ I _: I : . .t. - . - - . ,J ' · J .-.. I _ -. ... .' '0 . -- - ~ '.. ~ - :' ,..: ~ · · .. -i. -::.' ,;..~, ~ l . ,-; __ " 0T:i' "'__:n.: . ,- n ','" ,- :"':1,,;",1 ' " " ~ ..' ..... n __ _, .,,______, _ _ ,;, , " II "-:= . (__._ ___ jf--'II' ,- .'~.... ~:T~.... J. l ~ " II i=" ~- iF-:'-- c!.} I - .r.~ : ~ !! 1-__ __ .__ -. l :~- ~- "'- -:,:,,,,,,,-~,,,,--,-, . . :r;" -- I~ _._.-:'~.. I. :. \_.... C-.~------ -, · .::1f" -,.-,;:':-" I .Z'~- -..=- "I 'i:, -', ' l"'=i ,;' '-......- . ,= 1 _____..:4J~='" . --~ .... mfil)\ ,l ==.. 11 -roO ,~, ' .; ....::._ I '-,,_ ,~' __,' -' ,~. .. ;!~il: ,.. 0 .. · .-- ___~ _ ___-- _ 18 ..~ ~ 1~1' I --=i ,. =_ ". . .. 0.,. ,,'T /' ,Do.." .. ......- , -. ,., . · ...............:m .. ___,.l:;',=.J= :... .1.1. . 0 0 o. ''', -.'. - .....' . - , · ' ; _ :: ~__~" .' .\:W, '_ '--::.::" ..11 ,:U.: ~) iL~,:'~ : - ..." '" : ~ ,. , I :s- o- ' . c:;;., ' .," '~' ~___ '~-.. r~"'-r" .... --:--' .." '";'"' ,.. · '1:':'-=- I I I 7.8 &c ." ._., _ ~ ~, _ -~l.~} ~ ~-~~--. .. \ . : h;-1' H~~ I n, - - III .i - , ,.----' -"..' " - .. .., -.' . - '-'---" . .. -. - I .1Ii': _ ) \ h--' .' '. \ 1 ~ ~. 04 , ::,. ..' :.. ~~ _ ~: ',_ r---~~ f!-a- ;:"",JA'. \, _ \ _ ----i ~ ~ i 'o?:::- ...s I. I ' _ ..., ~ J -o;;;-'i I: ",~r/' ~ - - r ....::.. ~:....l - .. . ~, ~~. I' .", I \ _.. : _ I ":11'::= I~! ~ . . ,- ....------ oJ "'=- ~. iii =-- . -' ,,'" .., ',~ '. ,,'..'~"" -..""., ,.. , ....."!!"J -.-' .. ." ~-' - ", -,' I -,.: "'"I....... ,_.' "'~' i- · i:~ . :'i r:-!i · ~ -.;r-=__..J ~ ,.... ~ ." :.: -',. ' . .....-- ' II ==-__.., ., _ _ _ _ _ .' : _., ^ ."" v' 'I 6 '" - . ., . " L.. ' , .. - 'f ... ......: . . - , I '. -:- · " .- --. .'.. n! p , . .. .- ." il ~ -j' - 1 LMi '2 - 6.33 &C. __ :?iJ.""., ,-: . .. " .;i~ 0 - ~I 0 , ,'_ __' , .. W ". · . . , : \ ,'- .." '\ ~ · 0 , ',- , - -, ,. ," - ' . ~ I V' . ~~~ I ,J~ -', ~~~~:--: ..,'. ~~\\\ - - --~~IJ - ; 11. ; '=' '-=--, ' . .. f~ _, ~ _ _.w..... ~ - :;0", , ~ ' .. ....:: _ I I - ... - \ I --: !.J . -~ : VJ: .. -"'"""'- - - ....:...... I. o "" , ,_,,' _, ,.-' '"'- _ _ _ -".." -- ~ ~l ._--l ' ,'- I ''--..J'' \~ I ,', _ .. :~. '/h~--" . ~ '11 -:-. :.11 I;'~ :: _ l~jr-.'!l1 : - Il_-J . i I: .. .. .' ... ".#~~..- ~.."...c I .. -: ::1 . Ii'. I · ' ttJ' ., ..",. ~~ :: = ! ' .- , _..." _,_, _ '.' .. _ -=-' ' 0....... -,,'V ..... ,->> ' ... ~ , .='-_ ." __., _, _ _.. ,.. _ _; ,=- .' .. 0 , ,.. - .ft I - ,- -- -Fill ,." 'oX . . ~. ..11:1.. ______J ~-.....--L. -- ----J~.L -.-:- - ..... ." D'#/'~~ aclICAlIO to 1M anl( II ~'~1- '~f" . - A,\ .//.t'L-... " ~ Ofo lIQ'IMIllMetllOI . .' __ ,""-- __" _.. "n'.. ," ... ,~~ ' . '. _ . .. . . u:: :C' : :l. x . :1: ,- · . · :1.\'<\ ,'~ ....' · ~~ ... .... ! =: . ~ --1 ~ ___l,=-h-' J,']: J:' __--. - .t:: .. 'E .. :LI'-,~"':'''' '" \ ,; .....-, .- .---. - - '~~-- -.- - '?~ ,- . ~. _-===".' ~ '; ,_,', ,_-:- ,~_:'1, '~' " ,~d~"'-....--..-..--A-,....,.::;-..;,;;-~'J "'" ==--=-...._. .!G q: ;I,...__~.::...""''I.UI.'- ~_-.1' ",..__ ....._-"..-~.-I =-~=- ~..",~~l.r""&.-Iltc:.-...-.'\ ,_~._... 'I _.--~ ...........,' -.- ",,-- --,- ~ _---------.. Jdl.-'.-- ...=~' .... r, - - \\ lil It \ · - I ~ \lip' \ \ 9. ~ ..\ ,~ ~ \\, ' : I ,,~ \~ \ ~ ll\ \ \\ \r ~ \I~" \~ \~ 0 ~\1 1 ...~, ," ~ il\ ~ \\ ~\ ~ t\ , .. "'. i \"" i Ul .\ , ,q, ~ ~\ ' . . _ _~. \\ \ .0 ...,'1 '4 ~ " t]Q \' ~ Ii 0 ~., en I ~ \ \ ; - ~ \ " \ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ 'ii % ~ i~tW \ \~ \ g . _ .' \ \ \ \ ., \. t . t. ~ \\\eni\,i~'\ t \1\'\ \ \' f\ .~\\ \\'\ V 1~1.\~~ \ \\ ~ \\~\\\\wl \\ \\ \\\\ \~~ W~ ~ \\\\ ~~ V\\ ~ \~\~ ! ft\ ~ \ \'~il ;\\t ~\ ~\ ,\~i\\ \X\\ \\\L~\\ ,\ \\\\ \\~\ ,\,,\ ~ \~ ~\i ll~~ \ \\~Jt \~'I'\ \. h ' , t'l' \\~ , 1\ ,,\ 'J\' \.\ \ ,\ .t ,\\ \ ~~ l' \~\\\ \\. \ \\1\ h' l~\~\ 'I \\',11\\ \;\\ \ ~~ \~ "l . I~ '1 \ l~ I \f. \'\ \\\\\ \~ \\\ ~l~ i'\' I '~~ .\ \ \' \ \t\ ~'\l \~\i,\~ \\' \\\ \~\\ \ 'i \\ ~ \ \\ I "31 ~\\ It h t \ \J,' \' i \ I ,So , " 'I . 1 1 \ nl ' \\~I~. ...~- \ ~ t : 11 ~ \ ~\ ,\~\ \p\\ \\. .. \ \ q' \\\\ \\'\I\~~ W.\' \\\\\ \\ ~ 0 \' i\ 1-' \ iil i ~'- \" . _ ~ \ ,,\ \ 4q\\ s \;H ~\ m \\\\ ., \t\, ~\I ~\~~ "t !\\ "" t \\ \.\ \\\\ \" III \1\1 l \n \, \\\' ,l, \\\' \~\\\ \ ~\l \ \ \\\\ I '. ,\, h\ I \-\', \\ \~'\ i\' \ ~l\'iS \' -\'t \1\ \ - . \ Ii ,\. 1\" ' .' ~~ \ .~ ~ \'i.(ASt~' i\\\..\\ ~l~\\\ 'J.. 'V;' , . ~ . I .. ! ~,~ k ..? " . /' \.,.i '4:......... ~ -.~.,. '\ Kilday & AaocIet.. Landscape Architectsl Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (4071 689-5522 · Fax: (4071 689-2592 August 30, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Ae: Nautica Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up Our File No: 1020.13 Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag, Attached please find twelve re'lised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15, 1995. For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Included with this resubmittal is a Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks. This amended plan should address the major concerns of members on the City Commission. The following is an overview of the modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan. 1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet. In turn, the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from 89 to 59 lots. The number of lots in the 5,000 to 6,000 square foot range has been increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424 which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of 539 units. The breakdown between zero and "Z" lots has also been altered. There are now 21 more zero lot line units than previously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have been eliminated. 2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upsize the facilities to accommodate a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The lift station is located in the southwest corner of the top portion of the site. In order to provide a more amenable plan for the City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated. Ms. Tambri Heyden Mr. Mike Haag . August 3D, 1995 Page 2 In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Hallihan regarding this issue and I believe the attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant material will be native and, as indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design. Attached with this letter is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project. Sincerely I ~I~ Karyn I. Janssen Kilday & Associates, Inc. , cc; Alan Fant, GL Homes Larry Portnoy, GL Homes Rick Elsner, GL Homes Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble 0...""":" "'r r- 0:\ ':)~~ o...\i-~ ~~t ~~\ ..::(0 ~~i \-"Zt:1 Z4.Q -z.-i2. U.)~ ~\ ~ --- D ( '1 \~ \\ -'Ii ~! \ ~ \ ~ \ ~ \ 'tl _ --- - --- - --- 1 i l ~ ~ - --- --- U> <J, U> - \- \- - :z :; -.::> ~ - --- ~ - - -i ~ - --- \- \- 0 0 -i ...,.) , ~ 0 - - --- oJ. ~ 0 \- --- 0 '!Z - \- '!Z - --- ~ ~ -? 'l <z -? --- Sl --- - - - 'i. - --- ~ ( ~ \~ ~\ -'i ~! ~ - ~ ~,.~------ - --- '1',"'111'" 1 1:1 pH lill':tlll- IIII!jI' rJ '11'1 \,.'lh'l 1111",). 1111 '1 .;. t,.J. r II, ,r .. . Hll,UI! III 11' Ii! It lilt il I.jl.i Iluti .1' : "'" J P l ~ lO : o'~ 'll~~:Di' "'~o'o'lJl IJ II Ii lij ". piHHh I i"WiiP ~ iPH I UH H"Ui; 1- "iil : n ;lll' i I i I ,I n I i,g ~ I i U I; \ i 'l::~ I I tIt t I fHi! ,!r ~ 1;~1 ~be:G~ec~ g;~~ ~ti &21~ 1 Ii U1:1r~U:~ 1:1>1: ! ~~~ \, uW ~...'" ~ !!."1r .1 ~ n j .. ~ i ~W-=:=:~E=~-----:':"'-'-:=l;-=_._._._._._---_._._--_. ; fi I' I · . . r ~, ! · I jl 1\: I if ~.' .' . i I, IL I~:...\ i ,I" ) .J \' ,I' niilll I n !, ~ '-.. ',. I \,ir; 1\,\ .v --- L -I ! I 1 - - .:===:::-:-:::-.:'.::::-:::-:t - - -- - . - J, I v \i\~ ( ~ fj) 1,& ~ II II . ~. i lJ ~'. ! ' · . i ,II . ~I ~!.;> J II, iJ' ! \ ---; I ~ · ! i n -} 'I Ii \', !I\. fJ tl\L._ I . il : \. ~.=._==..~,=.,..,...,.......,I....,.~w,... ~/ i Ii 1 ~- - I I l I . ~ Jiffillli Jilhl'~lili' ,BibB II! ,'I "ii . ! . p u ; P ii J . I! (' h iI Ii it I I 1III ~' "Ib I rnt~n~11 I " Iii r ~ f \ il Ii ~,nai II j a wi,. ~. I -~ I ~~ ! ~ <> '" 'll~~ ~~ ;l~:=~FL Groves PUD (") C ::0 ::0 m z -I ~ )> ~ "tI 5: z --,,-.---.-....-.-..----. ~-~..,-_._-~- - ---' it l~ jl . I ~ ~ U i\ Ii \~ \('\l \ ~~~ ,.--- 11\ -+? u.. ;:.::1:.... )0 '" ... Il' Q.. I' ;;1~~ ~,'" ~' liE ~ ~ ~ ~:'} ~ ~::; ~ c::. ":l ~ ~ -" ~ 1111-' . HI! Ii e j . = - t: l i . 3:~~ ~~~ Hf~~ ~ ~ . - I ,. ...,.... d:t:::=:t : I [W=dJ Ii +-{ ;; +i- t · ii t ;; I t t t 11 I It I. II ,I , 1 - I I J I I 11m 'I' ~ I m~I!. .~~ . -:.~ ~ ~J~ <:..., ,". '111'11'1 .,H, w J r l' f . ~.I -.;. \;:;;"1..,, . _ 'me City of 'Boynton t.Beacft t' @""DD'J:,..sOYN'''N'.3tGlft'AJukvarti . , ~a~~no · r. ,... .. , 'lI"YII/LIrI'8tllCli. 'J(orU.J JJ42S.0JJO '='.: p" ~r '.' ( 'jty ;1{iJJI: 1407) ;J4 ,II Jl _ 'J.U': {-IOi} TJI,Urg OFFICE OF THE PtAHNING DIRECTOR March 13, 1991 Attn: Ms. Anna cottrell .Urban Desiljln Studio 3000 Palm Beach L'~. Blvd. Suite 600, The Concourse West Palm Beach, .1 33409-6582 REa Kn01lwood Groves Master Plan Modification - File No. 570 Dear Ms. Cottrell: Please be advised that the City Commission at their February 19, 1991 meeting made a finding that the chanljles requested in the pod boundaries, acceS8 points and unit type for the above-referenced project were not substantial in nature. Regarding the modifica- tions to the approved setbacks, lot size and lot width, the City Commission made a determination of no substantial change based on your consent to comply with the followinljl minimum standards: 1- 6,000 square foot lot size 2. 60 foot lot width 3. 20 foot front yard setback 4. 15 foot side yard setback on the non-zero lot line 5. 15 foot rear yard setback 6. An 8 foot pool and screen enclosure setbi,ck The Planning and Zoning Board at their March 12, 1991 meeting made a final determination on this request, includinljl compliance with the minimum standards stated above, by approvinljl this modification to the Knollwood Groves PUD master plan, subject to the attached staU comments. These comment. shall be addressed on the submission plans for prelim~nary plat approval. Pursuant to Appendix B-Planned Unit Developments, Section 10.B.3, approval of this master plan modification and PUD zoninljl will expire on September 12, 1992 if a preliminary plat has not been submitted. An extension to the master plan approval for a maximum period of one year, may be filed not later than 60 days after the expiration of the master plan, November 12, 1992 (Chapter 19, Section 19-93 of the, Code of Ordinances) . *Ktlnlion. mu.c ~e '11.4 with 'hI .lann1n, Depart~'n' Dr SUbmitting a letter of Ixtendon for revhw by the concurrenor Review 80ar4 and thl Planning and Zoning Board. It you have any qUlstions reljlarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at (407) 738-7490. Very truly yours, (1.l."-4,l}lI.... --e:~ CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP Planning Director CCafrb Enes ee: Technical Review Board ~tb'~' ,Q J " . " \, \1\1\ iA.\ ... .;\: I'" ,'. iI"", ~\\ .It \ ".~,a"J.l. J; . \\ ~L. --:<~. ......~.". . .' .- ==>.~ 0f.:;(" ~'. . .' T-'fj?;,., :-:.:': - -::-' -'1'.. ~r ~.. \ ," \\\\~ ;.1\' ~ ~ i " . fr 'II ,,'" ~ \\1: 1t'1\ \\ ;1,... ~~\:\ '\ :,':~;-" "ex' y ','\i 'I 0;'" I '\ \;.~., ~ \ ~\\1 ~ \\ i\\\\\ i\~1~:' . ".,.~ ." '", ,.:,l_~Jl,o.'. \ \ \ i \ \l.},~"\ \ ',\ .' ., ..... . , " . ". ). \. : ': '. :.: .\ ." ....1 ~y,~,~, -" j '.,1 I' ' · ~I \. ~,' :: ~; :'f~';\ ': i;i';;;';1;;;;:;:: ~ :,~' . ~ j ~\ i\ \\ \ I ,\II ". I ,; . \. \ ,,' \\ \ \' · .... ".. \l II ~.." ~~'\ . ." IiL!.- .,....--1 ..,'---~ ,.,.L~~ J~ 1 LI' ~ ~:-:-- ~ 1 ~1 ~~ ..:.:~\ ':,. '\ [\~j . ~... ,4 ." · " ',.,..... , . .; ~"jG" _ . \ ~ -' ,"', ""'': I' IN' I' \ ,\ I.~>' . ,.\ -~ ,.",;,;).!., .1\ \\\ \ ~\ ~. '\':. \,:,' Ill.. ~'" I ~ ,," · \! \ \i' W ~ ~ \\~ __--!--~~ ,~~' ~ ).l , 1 1 1\;'~.' ''. \i \\\ \ \ :;\~"\ \ .,": \?F u . :\ :, · ,,: - <;;i ~l":" }I (~ ' '~~ II~\I:,' .. .\: i\'\\~ .' ' ~ \';' .7~"~'~' \ ~ \\1\ .' ,-,l~ Ii! \\ \" ~;~;\~I , ." ". ~/ ~ t" ' .' ',\p . \ ~ 'i'\ r!\ V::~' ' \"\ \\"'i.\~h ..\~ ~ \ \ ,~~. ~\ . ",;-.\-J "", . . . 4 ' ,,\; ,,- .1.t,~a. \1 .\~ . 'i"l'~~ A , .. ~, ".' ,. ~ ~ \\~' ~.I"" " .." .' ," .....'... \. \ \ , ~ \' ~ '.\' __ _ _ _ _.' . ,~i hi-f ili-o.. .' \\ \v-~,. \\i\ ;: \\ \i~ t fi ,\ i '\" , '. .\\ . .1 ~ " . , .1. _. . \\-\ '" .;:. \ :. J ' 'L j\ · - \ \1 J ',I \ \ . :';', !. \ ,\ \ " '. ':,:~~: ,; ,~I' :~;: ; . q\: I. 1\., l='--'';~~ ':::"1. -r:IDnJ ~ n-' 'r'f-r-f-'\:J1B--=="Ji\~\;\ ~ \ ~\ . p. . \\ li.~:-r: "'~""";:', ;;";::;~-l~: ,; :. :\J ~%_:,:,"~ ll:!-':'H:! ,.:i\" :. :j: '.~ ~ : ,~ : ..' ,\: ,: . " ,l: t..' t: t.h; ..' · ,\ y~\ \ \ ~ ,\. ~1\~1 \, ~. ,"'" ' I 11\. ,,'" ....--.' Jo "U,Ad.,L" " ' · · i~ ~I"'~'\ .:~. t t. ' _,'; ,/, ::"h ,:,'" =: l=~ 0' :-:;::. \ -::-:___~~~l\ -:~-_. :--~ r:;':~.- --~ - r T- - ____,0-- ~t -;-- "7~ \\ io;'\ . , 't"" .., '" r:. h ,. 1.10 .' .' ~'.''''>'-i ~ ,':;'= ." ":"" ' · ,'" ,,',.."H"f' " · " · " ,,, .. · ,- ...' , ,g.\ \ . .' ..... ~.' -'" 'I"""''''.'..... . ...,.. .~ ,.., '1.1.'....... 'J'" ..h.." i .f' ;'.:..\. ;,""". ~ J', ~ \'.._ <.....-.:;."~.:;,;, c,J: /~i o) \ 'n \~\Jr.,,\\\ \11'\ ,\\, ".' ,~',,' · 'id,.' \ \ ii ~ u\~' :J: ~ "\'~:\'" -..,;\ \ ,.,....'U.:.... 'j",'" ." ,I ' - .' l~~\\" ".' >,;;:;. :, ' " '" ,~,1~1!i' 1\'&' ~ i ;Y'; .. i. :ir!f..~':::.... "f... '1f c.:.. :. ,~~ . b~ :,2'1' \ .~ ~ .~\., "..' ..' ", _".' ",. ' ,.\ ",'<:IiI!' ,:' ~.,' J:'" 4.E." r< 'IT l'\c-" ,...,;;' "."" +A~': ~. c;:{~. P-:'f" ;: ~ \ a'<\ . \ \ \'~ . . ..,_: .,' , ' ~v/.--,:', : '11\:' ,,1\,'-'" "".... y.." ',' .,' " ., >;:. '. ,,,. .." ,-. .', . \ " ' .. . . .:: _" .~. \ ...- ~::, :l\ ~---"1-::tW~:r:t;~- ,l;.'..~"~}" . ".'. .. '... .. .' ,,' w' ,\ , . .. "" .", ,'. '.A"" ". / , ..". '," -- .' " " ... ,.. ...,.... · .' ,,~,;;'\ ;~ \ ~'i;'~~" . .',..~~~., / Iii ~~\ ----\,' ~. ~ (~-v'; ~~ ''\' :', I\\\;;'("'\~;' ~l , , .f~' f!-~-I- ,x / P '\' ~ .,"-...' 1\;1-.... ' · .,," It:~\ ,I , .,. ...,zJt..~- / ,.' JT'({"\ .. ' · \ ~'\~~~. II ~' ",- ~l:Lt \ h-\ ~\-- \.. J _ _ -lJri 9.?~~~~' ':~ \ \ "~l: .. d ' · ~l.!- ,; ',:: 11"...'<\ .! '-# . ':. '. c,.;. '. \1 , · . \ ~.."~ '," ;1"ft( .,; :!?-' . " · ~., <i\\".. .,.' ,M" ' 'I .' · .--., ,,'" ' ., ." .." '; r.z,..l.O~ \~'. <i'l l~~'~ \, ~~ . \ ." 1~w-:' \ \. , ~\ ~\I~"":'I\: .~, ......I.\..~., IN. ,,' ~~ \" "~J ,. . ' ...... .... ..,. "'" , ,~:,.\I'l'\"T ' .' N~'. ~ .. ~. ..,,\\ , . ". IP : 0- )1 ~\I I' nt -:t 1i.\'~ -~ .~~,,~ ,:~ ,"\- ~\. \ \ t ~:1": "'Q \\.. . .. .' ' .' .. , ,..I . ,.. .. .' ,\ ~ \\ ._ ~ ,!j;'~ \, ~ .;: 1I;i- .- ..-----.-..'- - · .,..':' :...... ..-- ..' · ". ... ~ ,~\' i .\ ~~~ i 'i ': "l!! (', · 't),' . t ~,~ ~\ . ~ t , , l' ~ L. " ." \ .,p.. >+'!: \ i. · . , ;: t. \~ \" · .:: "'.'. ',~ \\ \ \llI ~ t'" .Q. { \ ,~,.,., "., , ' ., . " · ,~. . :11:,lT.' .' :: I"'," ,,; \ \ l\ .~.. ;:.~ 0' . .. ::;;i;;;;;:..:::::;::::2:"'~'~" '~':::;",!L~~:;;~~"~:S:~~;' 'oi:!: rv (. ~ \\\ ~ \ \fZ]!j; ':mr-~':- :.: '.')":1-:: ~: ',: ':: :: :~t~"I~-"~~;\=t~'\-~1~:: j: ~:!:.!m'; ~ ',' ;;ttrrUH: ~~; ~ -'l~ \ ~~ ,______--------------"" " " " " " "1 .~ &t \... .1;: ...- - \,\' ;r-';;'-' =.--=--,. ,..-- ...-..... . . - . ...,.'_.' ~ . I, '-.., _ . · m'~' .-" --=~.-..-' \ <:::; .. \\1 l\ l!' ~\(~)~ .~. .Ii, ~ \\ \\ ~ VI to \\\ .'~ ,\ I\' \ III' ,,\ ',\;i ;0' \ill : \'\ 1 o . ,.,,, u' " .... ..... ..,I ". ~ : ~ . ^ Z " ~ ~ ,..\ .. I " \', f; , \ ," '\OO~ .' , ,,-,' .... \ '" " ' , . ~ I' ., \ .;.t}." '2 't~ ~ ~, · ~" !.--- .. .. (' '6~,'i. . . \ \ ' __0' . --- o \SlUD'O'-- - - ::-::J.~ ~:::::::;. rrfCrr""'''' ,~,. \ 0<"'" .'0" ~lWidl~" ,,, ~;~: ~~~ .'0'\' ". ,__.~~._.~' ,'O'! U,' "".\0' ;i.;;.'!:~t \tlt\a\ V~l\\\ 41- \\ ,~,,,;. )01'1. :t;..o'\ t'"'' " ~.-<' ^ .;~m~~.'t.~lm \t !"! o,~~ .ih\~ l.;l~ h;.1 lH\"' t !.l' It,. 'l~dt , .l!<"i .il:, ~ ~lt \~;l iH;\\ t \..~? ,lit- ~ i\~ ..t\ N~\~ 1 ~~1 ii, \\ t . . '1; . . l . 1"'- ~ VI ~ Vol ~J - ~ - 3g ~..~Q~.. ~ ~.~ ~ .. ~ .~ ~ I ~oi o Q" ., ~al~O~1 i .0, -.) - -~ ~~.~~~(.II ,~ ~ [~ "5 I ~. ~ 5 Q) ~ f'J ~ .~ ~~ ~ot '~I02.~~ .6; v.;f 00 i .0,,'" ;;0:: ~g g; g.5: IJl '3!:: Q. Q ~ 18 1: ..,;~ ~~ -'c.' ;~~ ~ ':T :J ~ .i ~ w ;~ cl~ H ~~ ~~ a~ 1 ~ 3."' ~~. j3 ~ ~g J1 g H , u ~ 0 "< s ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ P\' tI -.Co! ~ = ;AX II ": ~ ~ ~ ,.,.,. B VI 000. ~ ~ ,., ~ ~ o a a lD lD n n n a z ".. .. VI s. So .aai ,. :; .., II i i 9-, ~ .. 0'0'0 _ n Z U. Q ,. H~~ 10r- "'"i=d 0 '" C7 0 . ~!' ~ 2.E:; I: ~.J t. !'! ;:; ; ,:;; ~ s ~ . 0. 0. ~ 0 ~'l:: ia~ a- 0 & II; I,. f> 303 0 Q 0 ~- ol ~;a~~ a UI..a....;q~_f g- O , c: y'" :.; Q. ~:r g" ~~g! Q ~ _'-i'~'~ it <g .& a ., ~ i:: ~ ~ ! i-a 8 -" ..!" .. llo ~~ ~: 0 ~:ri~. , 2- ~l " ..," '" c _ C7 "'<; C;'C c: 0 . ~ 0'2.5. <>c C :;'.. ~ 5'~& .. c :7- ' n '" 0 ::. ~ -- 5' <> z o~~ .. 53 ,., "0 " g, S _.ft :ro. -" .... 0 C .. .. ,. VI'" " 0' ~JfC C7 !. goa~ I!I C " Z ,,-. ~ ll5' ~ 0 -0 003 CTn 0.- '" ". roj Rc ~ i 3~ H~ "'.. ~ ..:: " o -'" 03;; ;; ~ !'Iii' ~;t i~ c' -~ .. " .. !l .. 2! --" ~ .~ 3 ~o~m 3n:l C ! lQ UI _0 I) ..aCT Z z 3Q::~ -::2~ 0 ~ "'.... a VI 0" .. ..:1 ' , :7 3 ![o~ l :: ~ iA' !l ! ! :7 o g 3 a. " 0" CT C J"'" ,- - 3 g. a g " 3';;' C! 5 5, .. ~:; a 5'" .. is: ~;;s. ,.~,. ioi l , . ;1._ ii .. ...0- II ~ ~ a ~o.." g I ~ 3 .. t ,. P. _..'II 0.. 0 f '! 1:'"1 ~ ~-< " o~:. ~ - , .. .. ~ .. !O .. '. 3 .. .. ~ s g.::'1Il :E Q~!:l i. ~ ~ " .H'~ : :'fl!l I ~. 2! 2i.1" ~' g ill C ii-~ ~ :~g 2- d:8 ~ ",i~ .i !l.p- 0:;: ., 5. ~ Ill!! ~ :70. .. .... -.. ",;; '" s." "'~ 0' ~ q ~ ~ uo "! ..~ ~ U> "! ..~ 2l ~ ~ ~ NN%I)l.r-C !" '" ~~H~? ~ , . ;__1 fi fi J. -.H;_ ~ ~ ~ ~l: ~ 'i l __ e :;: : i la~:"i ~ ,g _0 1'i' t I" !l'j 'Ii~ i'" o! _,,"r. · 'i If !li~ Illi }jtl~ -j ~lii ii.~ liii II j::~~~ ~ i~!:; nJ~ :r:i !Itll ~j,III f!i I"'IIl ;tll ;~t~;' :1 !i~i;l~ I ... Illl " h _ .;r l,!~i t-li 19 !-ifll ' iiI II~ ;1 ~!i: :'"I! 1!lj! galt;!1 !ll t,~~! i: Ii. ,:r ~! l~~i a:1Ii," ,i- .. [f .~ J ~llll iii Q c: ... _ ". ~i'''' "HI ~fO Q 5'~[ ,i~ I" ~ !-~ 51~ !if f 1t8~ ;~I UOi~ [[ i-f ~iS.!~ ols s .. I...~ ga . i~"o.i itO'l g;;1r,:,q' '" Ai'll t,.:>. "i."'. .. ~_ ~ ~ !;'t 4i..!i 1 _0 -3 C' ... -~ '" i!-- .. 0 a 01 !l ~ 06 if f 11.: - ~' I ~ ~ 5"!I ; Q ~'R ~!!.. S a 1 0' <: 'l. io i "lOD :~: !(,w!l.~g l~ !~'. &H i;~"3 ....1 ai , 3 01 ;r:: _ ..1; Q }-.. ~ 11 ' -" · 3 I · ;1.' 1! lur '" ~ l!: j - o c z;; R' _ I-a i! ' ". A "'0 0\'''''' .. .. ~ f =t" .,,;-!" Ii l[~ 1-' .'0- o.~ I ~ " ~.. i ..,~1 if i J _~lI. :~l", ..~{l,,~jil, ". ~~ [~.j& Ii or: PI '':1.1 "1 ~~. . ;.- "- . lH .'1' i':ll .,' iH .' ~,l · " l ' "" o. ;;:1 l.l Ih " lP' · '. i~ ~_g 3' ~;".::!J' ~ ili'~~ <;i ii g .. Z .i' o ; l- ! ~ ;; a. "oS · - n g a" Q i- t_!1 :i fi:g, IQ.~ .. . 1 3 ::: S' ! ~ ;; ~ i !1 ~i ! ~ 1;:4~~C>C'l'"OXj ~o.Q.d" 0'1:' 9..:"" <~ w2.l- 3- Jtx-OO 0 L ,,~,,- 0", - :J:J ~ f J~,ti ,.'" 0",_ ~ IN -2,0 3 2.a~o XJ::t)OD & 0 0" ",0 ...'" " , ........ g !7 .. a: : g....; 2. .. 1 '" ~ .. .. ~ Z n ". ! II " f ~ i E ~ '" r'" - Z c; " ~ '" 0 1> VI , 0 0 "I N C C ,., n .., r- '" ... -\ 0 n ~ 0 0 " ... g~ ~ ..,VI c 8 1> a I _VI ;;;r:: 0 ~I '" 0'5 ~.~ ~ (j) 2. ~r , , 0 c ~ 3' P .' c C 0:'" 33 {5 :ro 5' (.II ~8 ~i'o cO 3~ 30 "'0 :rc " t: 3'll 0., ~ c ,," "ll 9 3- n'" o~ 0 ~o , ",0 (j) "'0' 0- (tr.' a- -\ ~.:c .,2- 1> '8 ~, !' .. H Z '" 0 .. 0- 0 "'- '" !' 2- C! 1> .. JO H' '" ~ 0 ... C! (j) 3 5' ~ I' I, i 3' ~ 0 ;.., a 0 .. 0 ., c 0 ~ 2: " J:1Il '" ;'NO ,., ~.~ ~ 3 !:: !'" ; ..8 , ~o ii'" "i I~ .li iff ..If jJ:; li~ oh -"CT !i~ii' . llj ..;l- 0- , a. "'0 :IJ ~ o U> m C i: ~ :IJ "'0 > Z } I n a c ~ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-485 FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning, ~1rector ~.~fdHd- Michael E. Haag . Zoning and Site 'nistrator TO: SUBJECT: August 31, 1995 Nautica sound - MPMD 95-006 Master Plan Modification (Request to amend the previously approved PUD master plan to omit the day care use, modify access points, change the type of units and lot size from 150 single-family detached units on 6 000 square foot lots and 389 multi-family units to 267 zero- l~t-line units on 5,000 square foot lots and 157 "Z" lot-line units on 4,500 square foot lots, and reduce the front setback front 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lqts that do not back to one another.) - (3rd review) DATE: 1. show and identify the appropriate setback dimension at the rear of all lots along the east and northwest property lines. Note: setback for residential buildings is the distance, measured perpendicular, from the property line to the closest structure (overhangs of less than 2 feet may encroach into a setback). The setback along the northwest property line shall be the same as required in the abutting zoning district. Considering the land located in Palm Beach County along the northwest property line is being annexed into the City at the R-1AAB zoning classification, it is recommended that the rear setback be 25 feet for all lots along property line where the subject development abuts residential property, proposed residential property or commercial property. The proposed 25 foot rear setback matches the rear setback for the R-IAAB zoning district. Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 or 20 feet shall be increased to 25 feet. A further requirement along the northwest property line where the subject property abuts the C- '3 (Community Commercial) zoning district is that a 5 foot high masonry wall, landscaped chain-link fence or some other equivalent 5 foot tall buffer be provided. It is recommended that either the buffer easement plan proposed by the applicant or identified in comment number 7 of this memo be accepted for this required buffer. The setback required along the east property line where the subject property abuts the adjacent multi-family development shall be 40 feet as required by Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development. It is recommended that parcels in the northeast corner of the project, that abut the adj acent unincorporated property, have a 40 foot setback. Therefore the setback along the entire east property line will be 40 feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. [Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development, Section 9. B.] 2. Redesign plan to show all lots which have a minimum lot frontage of sixty (60) feet and a minimum lot area of six thousand (6,000) square feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 3. Change the front bUilding setback from the proposed twenty (20) feet at the garage and fifteen (15) feet at the building to twenty (20) feet for both garage and building for all lots. Establish the rear building setback for all double frontaqe lots as twenty (20) feet. Maintain proposed fifteen (15) foot rear building setback on all back to back lots and maintain proposed ten (lO) foot rear building setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. Page 2 Memorandum # 95-485 Nautica Sound MPMD 95-006 Change the side building setback for the non zero side of the zero- lot-line units from the proposed ten (10) feet to fifteen (15) feet and specify a fifteen (15) foot building separation setback between the sides of all "Z" lot units. Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot corner side building setback on all back to back lots, however establish a 20 foot corner side setback on all other corner lots. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 4. 5 . Change the side pool and screen enclosure setback from twelve (12) feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen enclosures to fifteen (15) feet for the non zero side of the zero-lot-line units and specify a fifteen (15) foot side pool and screen enclosure separation for all "Z" lots. Maintain the proposed seventeen (17) foot corner side setback for pools and fifteen (15) foot for screen enclosures on all back to back lots; however, establish a 20 foot corner side setback on all other corner lots. Maintain the proposed ten (10) foot rear pool setback for back to back lots and maintain the seven (7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain the proposed five (5) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 6. Show on the plans all off-site roadway improvements proposed and/or required as a result of the city I s evaluation of the traffic conditions. 7. It is recommended that a dense landscape buffer be provided along the interior lot lines of the project and that the material be located within a landscape buffer easement. It is further recommended that the tree and shrub landscape material be native and the hedge material be moderate drought tolerant. To ensure the buffer develops to form a consistent shape, the tree and hedge buffer landscape material for the entire buffer easement shall be installed prior to the completion of the first house that has a landscape buffer easement located on the lot and/or prior to the completion of the proposed main access drive that is located at the northwest corner of the project. The dense landscape buffer shall be shown on the plans and be depicted as a grouping of 3 to 5, eight foot tall smali trees (silver buttonwood or yellow elder) then approximately 30 feet away a grouping of 4 to 5, eight foot tall multi-stem (wax myrtle) shrubs. Incorporated into the recommended buffer shall be one, eight foot tall canopy tree (mahogany or oak) spaced 70 to 80 feet on center. The buffer shall also have a continuous 2 foot tall hedge (chalcas or Florida pri vet) extending along the entire property line; however, the hedge may form a meandering shape as viewed from above. The continuous hedge shall be maintained at 6 feet tall. The 8 foot tall bushy shrub plant and other trees described above may count for the "no net loss" of trees that are required by the tree management plan. Note; the perimeter buffer landscape design proposed by the applicant (see Exhibit "B" Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-484) is acceptable; however, all material shall be located within the easement and trees shall not be placed on a property line. If this landscape design is approved, the plans shall be modified to show the landscape material. It is further recommended that the specie and size recommendations identified above be incorporated into the applicants' proposal. 8. Revise the plans to show a Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress to the project. The Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress was originally approved for the project to divert trips to adjacent roadways. Page 3 Memorandum # 95-485 Nautica Sound MPMD 95-006 9. Submit for review typical lot drawings showing the approved setbacks for all lots. 10. The following comments are still valid which relate to those sheets (drawings) provided with the previous submittal (but are absent from the current revised master plan): On sheets 4 of 8, 6 of 8 and 7 of 8, remove from note #3 the text "or building"; On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 amend the text shown on the perimeter detail drawings, at the rear landscape easement to read as follows: "Width of landscape buffer easement and other easements, where applicable."; On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 change the title of the perimeter landscape buffer easement detail drawing to "Perimeter lots"; Amend the double asterisk note found on sheet 6 of 8 to read as follows: "Subj ect to rear perimeter landscape buffer easement and other easements, where applicable."; On sheet 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from Accessory Building note #3 the following text "pergolas and gazebos". Also define trellis as "A free standing structure maximum height of 6 feet located only behind the front building setback line with a configuration having a height and length and no depth (example - similar to a fence."; and On sheet 6 of 8 move the 15 foot corner side setback symbol to the corner of the building; 11. Specify on the master plan that 30 feet is the maximum height of the residential and recreation structures. 12. 'Submit for review all sheets and data that where included with the previous submittal. 13. It is recommended that all trees required by the tree management plan be shown planted in either a landscape buffer easement, common ground, or added to the required lake planting material. It is further recommended that the master landscape plan include a tabular summary of the trees required for the tree management plan and that they are shown and identified with a distinguishable symbol on the plan. 14. Establish setbacks for structures proposed for perimeter common ground (e.g. bus stop pavilion and decorative fences). 15. Indicate on note (D) that six (6) is the maximum height of the entry feature. 16. Please note that association documents are required for the proj ect. The documents are reviewed by staff and the legal department and required prior to final plat approval. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5 Planned Unit Development, Section 2. D.] 17. A revised master plan reflecting all staff comments and conditions approved by the City Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Dept. prior to initiating the platting process. MEH:dim xc: Central File Il:Nllut.1ca.SD3 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. rm I 1m ,U Wlli i~ , ' ~I "'O~I.. ~~'J; I J h}U") 1 !YJi.) I , '. 95-332 \1,__,-4 TO: Mike Haag Zoning/Site Administrator ~~m Hukill, P.E. {l!1fItf! Engineer August 31, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: NAUTICA SOUND - THIRD REVIEW We have today received a revised plan of proposed Nautica Sound and have reviewed it solely for determination as to whether it is a major modification of the originally approved document. In our opinion it is a major modification because no access is provided onto Hypoluxo Road, thus greatly increasing traffic at the other two access points. However, we have no technical objection to this change. Many conditions of our previous reviews have been incorporated, some have not. All uncorrected conditions will require attention. , WVH:ck C:NAIJSOUNI),3lU> ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-295 August 9, 1995 FROM: Mike Haag Site Development Administrator ~~i~ ~. Hukill, P.E. [IfJlg\E~g1.neer NAUTlCA SOUND - SECOND REVIEW TO: RE: We have again reviewed subject development and have the following to offer: A. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City'S code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control .devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T., Palm Beach County, S.F.W.M.D. and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. B. The 40, 50 and 60 foot right-of-way details conform with the City'S required mini~um pavement widths (11' per lane measured from the center of valley curb). Proposed Meadows Boulevard detail is not acceptable. Chap. 6, Art. 4, Sec. 10C, pg. 6-11. c. Specify the proposed street names within the development including the "proposed Meadows Boulevard" (Meadows Boulevard is the loop road in the Meadows development and cannot be used again). Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 10Q, pg. 6-14. D. prop?sed Meadows Boulevard is a collector road and therefor requ1.res an 80 foot right-of-way. Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. lOB, pg. 6-11. E. Provide an eight foot bicycle, pedestrian path along Lawrence Road in conformance with the Traffic Circulation Element of the City'S Comprehensive Plan, pg. 66. F. In specific response to Ms. Janssen's August 2 letter and specifically Engineering Division memo 95-260, we submit the following: 1. Acceptable 2. Please comply. No commitments have been made for a 60 foot right-of-way, and it must be 80 feet as required in the Land Development Regulations. Engineering Division Memo 95-295 to Mike Haag RE: Nautica Sound - Second Review August 9, 1995 Page Two 3 . Acceptable 4. Acceptable 5. The Lawson and Noble certification refers to sections of the Code of Ordinances repealed April 4, 1995. Please comply with our note 5, (95-260). 6. Acceptable if statement is correct. 7 . Acceptable 8. Acceptable to use single 8 foot bike path. 9. Acceptable 10. Acceptable 11. Acceptable 12. Please comply , 13. Unresolved WVH:bh xc: Ken Hall A:NAUTICA.2 , I Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 4 4) Details for all signs will be submitted during the Site Plan Review process. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM - 95-311 1) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project showing a minimum separation of 10 feet between buildings, A 10' separation between zero lot line units Is an Industry standard for most municipalities in South Florida. The proposed houses meet all City Building codes and fire rated codes for buildings with a 10' separation, 2) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off of Lawrence Road and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard. In response to the Minor Road issue. the aforementioned Information obtained from Palm Beach County and Rossi, Malavasl should address this concern. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM.., 95-125 No comments to respond to. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-260 In regard to the following comments: 1) Developer understands that sit$ plan review and approval are required and it has been so noted on plan pursuant to Planning and Zoning Department's comments. 2) The south road, Meadows Boulevard, exists to the east as a 60' right-of- way. An initial meeting held on May 22, 1995, with the City Engineering Department indicated that the continuation of the 60' right-of-way would be acceptable. All required turn lanes and other Improvements can be adequately provided within the 60' right-at-way. 3) South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District acceptance will be acquired prior to Engineering approval. 4) There are no signs proposed In any County right-of-way. 5) The developer's engineer has ,certified that the drainage plan will comply with 'all City Codes and Standards and a copy of this letter has been attached for your review. '1Q , - Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 5 6) The appropriate parking spaces and handicap parking spaces have been provided for the recreation area and are shown on the Site Plan. 7) Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat approval. . 8) Two (2) four foot wide sidewalks are shown on either side of Meadows Boulevard. An eight foot wide bike path is shown on the south side of the entranoe road Into the projeot. The north side of the entry road does not provide any connections to uses within or adjacent to the 'project. Palm Beach County allows developers to combine two 4' wide sidewalks Into one 8' wide bikepath. Therefore, the developer requests that the City review this eight foot wide bike path similar to what is allowable in Palm Beach County. This bike path will connect Lawrence Road with the bus stop and the recreation area located within the central area of the site. The 50' right-of-ways located within the project have four feet wide sidewalks shown on either side of these right-of-ways.' I 9) Soil borings have been completed and a copy of the Soil Boring Study has been attached to the resubmittal package. 10) A map indicating the location of the soil borings has also been provided and is attached to the Soil Boring Study. 11) The developer agrees to comply with this request. The south road, Meadows Boulevard, will be constructed prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. However, this is contingent upon the fact that no other access points will be required, including no access point off of Hypoluxo Road. 12) An easement onto Hypoluxo Road right-of-way for future sidewalk/bike path access to schools is being addressed subject to Florida Power & Light (FPL) approval. Such an easement, if approved by FPL, will be located in either the northea~t or northwest corner of the site and will be encumbered by the FP&L easement. 13) The impact on Lawrence Road of the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entrance has been reviewed by our traffic consultant. The redistribution of trips will not negatively effect the capacity of Lawrence Road now or In the year 2000, which Is the estimated build-out of the project. Therefore, no expansion of Lawrence Road Is required In conjunction with this project. Attached Is a letter from the traffic consultant on this Issue. In response to the last comment, the developer has made contact with the School Board regarding the relocation of the power line and we are awaiting their response. In response to comments from the TRC meeting, the developer has decided to use both steel and concrete poles. With the use of these poles, there are no anchors or tie downs necessary. Therefore, additional easements for these poles will not be required. 7;rl DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-260 TO: Mike Haag, Zoning/Site Administrator William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer ill rn @ ~ a ~7 ~ 'ili'rj~i-' , ',: I - I U I : ' I FROM: DATE: July 26, 1995 NAUTICA SOUND - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATIONS PZLANNING AND ONING DEPT. (' --.. RE: We have reviewed subject plan for proposed changes in access points, unit types, setbacks and lot/house sizes. Our comments are as follows: 1. Access points - acceptable 2. Unit types - elimination of multi-family units acceptable 3. Setbacks - not acceptable 4. Lot and house sizes - not acceptable Taken as a group, these modifications represent a major master plan modification. Other comments: , 1. Si te plan review & approval required. Chap. 4, Sec. 2, pg. 4-1 2. South road is a collector road by both PBC and FDOT standards (see FS 334.03(4)) and must be dedicated to City of Boynton Beach. Required ROW is SO'. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. IOU, pg.6-15 3. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 4. County road entrance sign requires PCB approval 5. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.5A, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-S 6. Provide parking facility for recreation area including H/C stall. Chap.2, Sec.llH16e(l2), pg.2-l08 7. Establish deed restrictions providing for a property owners association to pay for the operation of a street light system within the development. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.l4, pg.6-4 and Chap.5, Art.V, Sec.2A4, pg.5-9 8. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.llA, pg.6-3 9. Provide soil borings. Chap.8, Art.III, Ala(3), pg.8-2 10. Provide a map indicating the location of the soil borings. Chap.S, Art.III,Ala(4), pg.8-3 11. Construct (to completion) the south road prior to issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy. Development Dept., Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-260 Re: Nautica Sound - Master Plan Modifications July 26, 1995 Page #2 12. Provide easement onto Hypoluxo Road ROW for future sidewalk/bikepath access to schools. 13. Cause actual construction to conunence on widening of Lawrence Road from L-19 canal to Hypoluxo Road prior to issuance of initial Certificate of Occupancy. You may fund design/construct the road outright or you may arrange with the County to move the project to fit your initial C.o. by fronting the cost for repayment in the scheduled construction year. If you construct it yourself, you may wish to obtain credits toward the cost for the road impact fees you will owe. The power line relocation should be coordinated with adjacent property owners as well as the School Board, which owns an elementary school site a few hundred feet east on Hypoluxo. Perhaps the'entire line can be relocated to the north property line to the shopping area at Congress Avenue. WVH/ck C:NAUSOUNO.MOD , FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-316 WDC "'-,'.'- ---..,---_...._--~ ~. 11. rI~ ,",,[n.~J~"_~ '=.~-~l ~I :: II ., I I '~ H 1<1 ;\"1 ;,,, ~. !.. . . ,...~'"-.-~_..I " .:" I'!~ .' .,,) 1 I , .; :. . ~1 ":, \ (J 'r~ I ~ r~Fj T ."Q7Yt , .....-... --.'......., TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: August 8, 1995 RE: Nautica Sound (AKA: Knollwood Groves) Lawrence Rd & Hypoluxo Rd MPMD 95-006 Buildings should maintain a minimum separation of fifteen feet ( 15 I ) . An additional entrance on Hypoluxo Road would reduce the response time to the northern third of this project. The connection to Meadows Boulevard and extension of the roadway to Lawrence Road will greatly improve response time to this project. It should be noted that until Miner Road is completed to Lawrence , Road, response time to this development will extend over required limits (Miner Road construction has been delayed again). ~ ~ttJ,' c;/?/ jc;5' will~avanaUgh' FPO G~ ~d ~iif ~L~ ~ 4If(~~ Attachment: Security Gates cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Steve Campbell File BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT I j-:') _t.@ -~-~ Wi ~ rn ~,. I u Illl b,l I" :J I IDfj5 PLMH,!I~lG P-ND u__ ZO!i!!i9.J2EPT. /t-rw-- . TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 31 AUGUST 95 NAUTICA SOUND - 3rd SUBMITTAL MEMO #0164 ::v....;:::;::~::::::.:::. I have reviewed the above plans (3rd sy,~!tt~) aryo f:::stiil m.!yp',!~in my comments made on two previously submitted memorandum~(::::~~Ji.,e.d:;:yqu ,Will figd p()pies of those earlier memorandums. /:::) ,:,~:::::::::~:::::;::::;:::,::/>:" "','"" t:::::,;/:::: "',;,:' ..l~1:(... ~:...~:...;::...;::::;~::. ~,:::;::,:!':,:::::::;~;:!: ~W~i::;:~;::::;::~~:: ~ . ". ~ ~~~...~.. ~. ~ ',::.:':::.' :::: !....,:~,:;:;::',,',',!,;.,:;,,';:..:::....,~:.::::..,':.':~,;:~:,':',,::;,::,'.,,:j:,:..;,;:,,:,:,.;,~,:,:;:::'~,:.' ',',",:,,:., ':.': tii;~:~:;;:;,:;:~:!::,::~ : ;' - ' ." c: :~::~::::;::::;::::;::;;;::;.;..:~ ::;':: ;::',;"";",,;,,):,,,1 :::.:..:.:..:~:::::::..:.:.::>:::~ \~) tru/) BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: T AMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 AUGUST 95 NAUTICA SOUND - 2ND REVIEW MEMO #0156 I have revicwcd thc 2nd submittal of ~~l!~i~lr~ou~~i,:iid;' t~,~,::CQ,!TIments that were supplied. It scems .that my original suggestions X~~:~!iJ~::::~9.yelop',rytent ~:9t:S:;,t~ored. I still maintain the folloWlOg: ,::,l:i}) ,C'",;,:':::::::::::::::::"';" {",:,;::;/ ,;,;:::;:,' ",/ 1. Regarding the controlled entrltpce/exits, the developer (G.L:~;,,1;f6i'nes of Florida) has an attached lettcr describing twee lyres of mechanisms of gated cont6~rihies. The first, SOS System(Siren Operable ~y~h~lTi~'I feel is not somcthing that is not (Ayo~~le; both on a police stand point and the prospcltiiV'c{ residents. Police rcspond to calls th~t.,~uire a silent response (burglaries in progress, prowler calls, suspicious persons calls. etc.) tHat activation of a siren at the entrance would not [8PPll9.'1 appr,4m$.i.~p of c~~n:~!~( Alsp,::f::W~~:ld not think that residents would appreciate the p<lli,ce".(-..dd fire) depatftnent ~.nOl~.~ing t&dir arriVal by sounding their sirens. The second recc)rjl'ffie4<\ationliflrKP:~x BQ~:::(kejrently Hstem)[ }This is an antiquated method of access to a ~ted::ci)fumutii4t::;:Reqilititig!the cityrtb tbaitttliit{nmster keys to all gated communities is futile and supplying every police officer and fire personel with a key is out of the question. Maintaining 9p,e,m!Jter key requires the response to the p~l~:'!flepartment to obtain the key first, and then t(hhe:::wmmunity. This is not a "timely" resp<m~#,f4r emergency vehicles. The third recommendatiq~,;,!:l~emote System" is not explained thqJ.;e.llgliblenough. It allows the city personal to remain iri'tn;pi~::'\:~hicles when entering the comm~p~:th",put does not explain how, or who activates the gate fuQ~tfdii\ I originally suggested a ~ys~ib tiJai':js similar to this; and is currently being excepted in tb~;:~Yver,,;~ated communities of'tb~:,!tbJ~:~:/The system works with telephone accessibility. The drspatqilF;r~,~.1,ice iiPd}jtf;;Jlam1Jin the telephone number for the gate and upon radioing that they (p61i'ce p'f(.'c'erl.1; h~V~, !.rri.y~a atthe gate, the dispatcher then telephones the number to the gate, thereb'y acttf'atihk ihe'i~atc for entrance. This matter needs to be clarified. 2. As stated in comments, the width of the existing bridge on Lawrence Road and Meadows Blvd entrance would have to be widened for a right turn/deceleration lane. As consistent with other developments on Lawrence Road, deceleration lanes have been required. I don't see why the other entrance to the development on Lawrence Road should require a deceleration lane and not Meadows Blvd. Respectfully, Sgt. Marlon Hanis BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 25 JULY 95 NAUTICA SOUND MEMO #151 I have reviewed the above listed plans a,~:::t.~~~~~~::ihe,,Jq.u.Qwing: ,,:,./;;::::~::::::;:::::::::;:::::\,:,,:,:>. :i: / "::;;/'" ,/:::::;:::::::> -The entrances/exits are "c~ CQtrti~:le:a". I w'o~ld reCQtlUri'endAl.1at a telephone access also be supplied for police an4,lfe emergency access. If n~t, sorpetlji:rt'g comparable to this will be needed for emergendY'::{lc~ss. .\.,.,.,.)::::"':.:."..:::. j'::: ;;,::;::,,:,. { ('. "'''''''::'\ -Regarding the south ~'6lral'i~e to the development, on Lawren4\,R~i\d, I would recommend a decelleration, right ha'~tnurn lane. I believe this lane construct}~~l &.fight interfere with the bridge that crosses the canal. The plans show a decelleration, right hand turn lane for the north entrance/exitrJ.tl.d.:J4~s shop~d::llt~ applr'fQr::t.~. sout~""~ntri:t~we/exit. 11.."""",):)1 L""",.,.,)(): 11 ..,..J.::: 11: .'\\ -Due to the density 4proJ~~ed pQp'iiIiitipQ oft6iS:;deVelopmMt, I stt&ngly believe that an entrance/exit is need.dd:::ft6rti Flypbiux6:::It~ad. tribe distafu:ek't.om:::::botli:::projected entrances/exits (Lawrence Road and Meadows Blvd(?)) are a great distance from the northern roadways in the develop,J,:J.l.ellt::J Emergency response to these roads ~~A;'t~Quire excess time, thereby requiring a Hypb~~.xo Road entrance/exit. This develoPnWl:i,Malso in the extreme northern and western Jimft,$ of the city and a great distance froOO th~,,:)k:l1rest fire station rt;;/) : Respectfully, Sgt. Marlon Harris Police Department BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-324 -:~ m~rno\Wrn~ lJ )-,-_.~~" !, If [\!'H:1 ~li;1('&.. I I, "' ,I . , ,..\, .. .... ..... .,.. .._.....,.,..-........,.'-...........-.-. 'I '"'' 1'1" '"'' ;.. j')! d I :',\.1 hi ,;.., f1 _ . :r.'i;:!1 '1 !J1:Tf. -P'fYL ... _.,~,.._...- ,......... ......... -- August 31, 1995 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official RE: TRC COMMENTS - NAUTICA SOUND - 3rd SUBMITTAL When I reviewed the plans for Nautica Sound's first two submittals, there were 8 sheets. Since most of my comments addressed sheet 6 of 8 and only one sheet was submitted on the 3rd submittal, I cannot determine if the new changes in lot size and count addressed my first comments. Therefore, my first and second comments are attached and should be met before permitting. ~ Al New l' AN: bh Attachments/2 XC: William V. Hukill, P.B. , NAUTICA BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-287 August 9, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re : NAUTICA SOUND Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal East side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road After reviewing the above referenced documents, it is particularly noted in the printed documents that the Building Division comments have been met as related to signs and setbacks. Please note that the details for signs are not on the plans, only in the written documentation. 1. Details for signs must be included in the final site plan documents. II 2. The 15 Ft. setbacks shown on the right corner lots on Page 6 of 8, is not measured from the corner of the building and, therefore, poses a problem for the following lots: 30, 46, 69, 77, 98, 110, 147 and 169. This could be rectified if the building was switched to the opposite side or have dimensions corrected for approval. AN:mh Att. Plans cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director A:IIAllTICA.TRC till BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-270 August 2, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Re: Master Plan Modification - 1st Review Nautica South f{k{a Knollwood Groves (POD) The Building Division has reviewed the above plans and have the following comments: 1. The side setbacks for screen enclosures for Z lots as noted on Note #2, Page 4 of 8 is confusing. To avoid problems at permit time, it should be detailed on Page 6 of 8 and Page 7 of 8. 2. Project identification signs are limited to two with a total of 250 Sq. Ft. maximum. 3 . Entrance signs,should not exceed 32 Sq. Ft. and 6 Ft. in height. 4. Details for all signs must be submitted. AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director A,IfAUTICA.TItC ~ . ~~ \~\ ltift'ltr- la!I;I,!t 11 ,1Id:l ,. , '1'\ '\nll'l. 1.ni1h1 ;'11.1 .; .. . IIUIU f 1111lhli .11., ,iuti ." ~ o :c ffi Z > I 3: > ~ :0 '1J ~ ijlill HI "'lh~iHiUIU uJUii h 1!l1 III Utili.; <.1 i P :: I i I r \ ! . .ag 1 \ i 'nl ( I ! ~ i i! P l: G l: ;: 18 ~ III g ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ II1I ,.\ m.m m i ~~~ i :hLUl...-.---u.- - -_._-----~..._..._..._~ ,--r "~! - : r---------------. ' i\ tiif :11 r c::!!)' I ~ J ~ \\1 , I " in! ~I\. ~. ' nllll "-- I Ir Ii . 1t 'C II c.'r if !1IE \1 i ~'\.I I ......... .- I ! I \i '\\ I _n____ - ::-::t:;.:==---!! ~ '----' I ,,~ ,I' '? i\ \~~~~ ~. ~,I~ :I! !I i W ~lL ~ Iii! II : \ @=,:~=,d~,="..u-,-.. ~ ~ \.II- ,', n -.- - -.-.-,-.' .- ~i i Iii Ie I ,./ I 1 tl ~ - t .~ . ~~ll tUUm' till I! Uil 11 ,~;~.~PiJII J U\,I{; it! ,1\ .~~~lljJI~.. III I 111 ,. !~ , H I: ,:::: I '" t I I Ie . . .. I' .. , . 'p' I' I II I ~ ~ , au" u i l- --er-- · II I, 'I '. !l it Ii ;: II ~.!! IHI lill i i i lL , · 1 .,.- t iV~ I l[+-] Inl I y,~ It- I ! 11 "f a I II 11 I i $' II ,It ( ~ ~ 'I!it Knollwood Groves PUD i~' Boynton Beach, FL Master Plan ilPII, 'I-Ii ~ ~ i i ~ I ~nU!ili e~ \ l"tit'll nmH -i- ~:J iH . 0..... -! -'