Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE , .:=,..1..1). . ,~". ' 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bu1& 'BoukrKmf P.O, 'Bo1;.310 'Boynton 'Buu.li, %mtfa 33425-0310 City ?fail: (4()7) 375-6000 ~JU: (4()7) 375-6090 19, 1995 Karyn Janssen Kilday and Associates 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Nautica Sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves PUD - File No. MPMD 95-006 (Master Plan Modification to revise access points and unit type (replace multi-family with single-family detached units) and reduce lot size and front, side and rear setbacks) Dear Karyn Janssen: As the applicant for the above-referenced project, enclosed is your rectified copy of the modified master plan approved by the Planning and Development Board on October 27, 1995. This is being sent to you for your files as it has been rectified and staff comments have been addressed, and accurately represents the approved master plan for Nautica Sound. Sincr,ly, , -=~~ Q~ Tambri J. Heydehi' Planning and Zoning Director Attachment TJH:bme c:mpapprov.nat .54.numas (jateway to tfie (jui/stream "03/08/96 13 ~ 26 U407 433 0874 CH I P CARU;ON laJ 002 ,. Richard W. Carlson, Jr., Esq. 2377 Crawford Court Lantana, FL 33461.2511 Phone (407) 433-0172 TeJecopler (407) 4)).0874 xc: ~y~ -dr!:;t;, / '.:f,!Jt i ~ '. :JjL~~ ./}; -' ~ ~>r~ March 8, 1996 , VIA TELECOPIER & U.S. MAIL No's 375-6011 , (954) 771-4923 James Cberof, Esq., City Attorney Josias & Goren 3099 East Commercial Blvd., Suite Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33308 200 Re: The 300 Properties Association v. City of Boynton Beach - Termination of Tolling of Time for City to Respond Dear Jim: Please refer to your November 9, 1996, facsimile letter to me. It appears that settlement negotiations are not proceeding in an appropriate. Accordingly, you have ten days from the date of this letter to respond on behalf of the city. My client has directed that we place some time limit on settlement discussions. After we spoke Tuesday evening and aqreed to talk wednesday morning, I tried to reach you all day Wednesday. I did not get any response from anyone. Yesterday you called me three times, and I returned your calls once; and, based on your last message that you would call after five, waited for that call. We have exchanged calls this morning, and you indicated you would be out all next week. I left a message to try my office as well as car phone but I will be out all afternoon. My client bas grown more concerned about why the City desires to keep an option open to extend the road. Given the history of this situation and other decisions of the City, I cannot give them a good answer. My client's position is steadfastly that there needs to be permanent closure or something extremely close to such. My lanquaqe of a compelling public need will satisfy my client. Anything short of that leaves the likelihood of a future connection too great. Based upon your comments to the Ci ty Commission Tuesday evening, I suggest you send me some language to 1 13~27 '6'40. ...3 0874 CHIP CARLSON raJ 003 define what this means to you for inclusion in the settlement aqreement so that we may review it in your absence next week. We cannot 90 through the fire drill that we went through on Tuesday and expect good results. My hope is that this can be resolved. I am confident that once you and the city staff get into a thorough review of the Verified complain~ and, if settlement is not reached before the Court enters a show cause order, the Petition for, Writ of certiorari, you will recognize the merits of my client's position and the seriousness of the situation. Recall in our last meeting> that nobody in the City knew the Nautica sound Park is shown in the Comp Plan as being at Lawrence Road, or that the Comp Plan does not show a Meadows Boulevar.d connection to Lawrence Road. It only shows a bicycle or pedestrian connection. . I believe with these realities finally impressed upon everyone the matter will get resolved. If not, the courts can decide. ely, Carlson, Jr., Esq. e: The 300 properties Association 2