CORRESPONDENCE
,
.:=,..1..1). . ,~". '
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Bu1& 'BoukrKmf
P.O, 'Bo1;.310
'Boynton 'Buu.li, %mtfa 33425-0310
City ?fail: (4()7) 375-6000
~JU: (4()7) 375-6090
19, 1995
Karyn Janssen
Kilday and Associates
1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Re: Nautica Sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves PUD -
File No. MPMD 95-006
(Master Plan Modification to revise access points and unit
type (replace multi-family with single-family detached units)
and reduce lot size and front, side and rear setbacks)
Dear Karyn Janssen:
As the applicant for the above-referenced project, enclosed is your
rectified copy of the modified master plan approved by the Planning
and Development Board on October 27, 1995. This is being sent to
you for your files as it has been rectified and staff comments have
been addressed, and accurately represents the approved master plan
for Nautica Sound.
Sincr,ly, ,
-=~~ Q~
Tambri J. Heydehi'
Planning and Zoning Director
Attachment
TJH:bme
c:mpapprov.nat
.54.numas (jateway to tfie (jui/stream
"03/08/96 13 ~ 26
U407 433 0874
CH I P CARU;ON
laJ 002
,.
Richard W. Carlson, Jr., Esq.
2377 Crawford Court
Lantana, FL 33461.2511
Phone (407) 433-0172
TeJecopler (407) 4)).0874
xc: ~y~
-dr!:;t;, / '.:f,!Jt i ~
'. :JjL~~
./}; -'
~ ~>r~
March 8, 1996
,
VIA TELECOPIER & U.S. MAIL
No's 375-6011 , (954) 771-4923
James Cberof, Esq., City Attorney
Josias & Goren
3099 East Commercial Blvd., Suite
Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33308
200
Re: The 300 Properties Association v. City of Boynton Beach -
Termination of Tolling of Time for City to Respond
Dear Jim:
Please refer to your November 9, 1996, facsimile letter to me.
It appears that settlement negotiations are not proceeding in an
appropriate. Accordingly, you have ten days from the date of this
letter to respond on behalf of the city.
My client has directed that we place some time limit on
settlement discussions. After we spoke Tuesday evening and aqreed
to talk wednesday morning, I tried to reach you all day Wednesday.
I did not get any response from anyone. Yesterday you called me
three times, and I returned your calls once; and, based on your
last message that you would call after five, waited for that call.
We have exchanged calls this morning, and you indicated you would
be out all next week. I left a message to try my office as well as
car phone but I will be out all afternoon.
My client bas grown more concerned about why the City desires
to keep an option open to extend the road. Given the history of
this situation and other decisions of the City, I cannot give them
a good answer. My client's position is steadfastly that there
needs to be permanent closure or something extremely close to such.
My lanquaqe of a compelling public need will satisfy my
client. Anything short of that leaves the likelihood of a future
connection too great. Based upon your comments to the Ci ty
Commission Tuesday evening, I suggest you send me some language to
1
13~27
'6'40. ...3 0874
CHIP CARLSON
raJ 003
define what this means to you for inclusion in the settlement
aqreement so that we may review it in your absence next week. We
cannot 90 through the fire drill that we went through on Tuesday
and expect good results.
My hope is that this can be resolved. I am confident that
once you and the city staff get into a thorough review of the
Verified complain~ and, if settlement is not reached before the
Court enters a show cause order, the Petition for, Writ of
certiorari, you will recognize the merits of my client's position
and the seriousness of the situation. Recall in our last meeting>
that nobody in the City knew the Nautica sound Park is shown in the
Comp Plan as being at Lawrence Road, or that the Comp Plan does not
show a Meadows Boulevar.d connection to Lawrence Road. It only
shows a bicycle or pedestrian connection. .
I believe with these realities finally impressed upon everyone
the matter will get resolved. If not, the courts can decide.
ely,
Carlson, Jr., Esq.
e: The 300 properties Association
2