REVIEW COMMENTS
OCT-10-1990 13:54 FROM Treasure Coast R.P.C.
TO
84077387459
P.04
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COl1NC~ ~ r') r?
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW ~~~ \: ,~r I., e;~~ ;~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ~.i, :~, ",,-" '.<:.,~:~ ~
\" q~} ~ r t.l TO
.:~ tJ ~~'....~. 'J
Backqround ~v, n, n; '!"'r ir:.J,\ -no NS
t'~";,, ...' ; IiV
On January 10, 1990, the Department of Communit.y A.ffairs
issued a notice of intent to find the ADOPTED comprehansivQ
plan for the City of Boynton Beaeh not: in eomplianoe,
pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S. As part of t.hi~ finding,
the city plan was found to be inconsiaten~ with th~ Regional
Plan. The amendment propos.d by ~8 city is not rQla~ed to
a StipUlated Set't1ement Agreement beeween the Ci1:yand the
DCA.
The City of Boynt:on Beach ilS oonsidering one amendltent 1:0
t:h& Futu:t:'e Land 0'8$ ElemQnt. The locaeion of the property
unde1" eonsidQJ:at.ion is shown on the acco:Jftpanying map, and
the numb9;'t' of a.cres and proposed changes in la.nd use
designations a~e as follows:
'CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
DRAFT COKPREHENSlVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
FUTt11tE LAND USE MAP
1
8:3.9
Current
Land ose
DesiCJI1at1on
~LOW-Medium
Dens1t:.y
Residential
proposed
Land use
Desi9nation
Low Density
Residential
ADDroximate Location
Northwest corner of
Lawrence Road and the
L.W.D.O. L-21 Canal
Amend.
No.
Approx.
Aoreaqe
*county designation
Evaluation
The proposed amendment has been reviewed in acoordanoQ with
the requirements of Chapter 163, F.8.: Council' G review
procedures; and Council's adopted RQ9'iona1 Comprehenl&:;ive
Policy Plan. The followinq evalua-t:ion is offe2:ed as a
result of that review.
This prop&rty has been proposed for annexation and is
currently occupiQd by a plan~ nursery. The annexation and
chanqe in land use to incorporate 'the property onto the
.Boyn1:on Boaoh Future Land 11l1e Map would allow low denslt:.y
rQsidontial dovQ~opmene at 4.B4 units per ~cre in accordance
with t.he ci~y'c adopted compl"ehensive plan. under the
curren~ Co'Un~y designation, the western portion ot the
propert:y (approximately 21 acres) could be developea at up
to ~hroe dWQllinq uni~~ per acre and the eastern portion at
I
OCT-10-1990 13:54 FROM Treasure Coast R.P.C.
TO
84077387459
P.03
Reco.mmendation
Council should adopt the conclusion outlin&d above and
approve its transmittal to the state DepartmAnt of Community
Affairs in fulfillment of the requirement:s of ~h. 19~O-9J.
contract with the Department of Community Affairs.
~~..
Attachments C~, :\ k ~ '
.. ~'l\"drr.! \0
v:'; t,I.,:' l.., .J
,~~ "1"V'~~S
Vq'tnifr,\,~iHvn '
11~~uJ ,
2
OCT-10-1990 13:54 FROM
Treasure Coast R.P.C.
TO
84077387459
P.05
- ~ ~T"
r'. .'~"'" ~". ,'1 .t... ~" t
t-,:: ,;:; j,:\ V?G f.
;, " .', ,::' \:., ..' :.J
.'.,' ... ",./. I:'~
up 1:0 five dwellinCJ uni.ts per aore. The pX"~~~JW'n~
reprQSon~. an increase in a.~lowable density of aRf)~Kfrer.'~iS
27 dwelling- unit:e. 'til /;ill
The proposed low densi1:y residential land use designation
appe~r. to be compatible with the surrounding sinqle family
dwelling units and mobile homes, and lanC1 desiqnated as
.edium density residential to the south. Centralized water
a.na sewer services are aval1al)le to the property and the
developer will be required to d.edicate 8creaqe for
recreation in accorC1ance with the City's adopted
comprehensive plan. No building- permits will be issued
unless l~entified roadway improvements are in the County's
Five-year Transportation Improvement Proqram or developer
commitments have been assured.
The County has expressed some concern that this proposed
annexation may not meet the compactness provisions of ~Q
State law (171.031, F.S.) regarding annexations (sQe
attached letter dated April 18 from Dennis R. Foltzt AICP,
Planninq Director). However. the proPQrty is wi i:hin the
City's future annexation area and is also wiehin the Ci~ylQ
utilities service area.
Obiections. Recommendationg for Modification. agd Commen~s
Pu1:u.re Lallil Us. 1l1..1Ult.
A. Objeo~ions
Nonll!
8. C01lllllQn't$
None
Conclusion
Based on
does not
policies
Plan.
the information provided, the proposed amendment
appear to be in conflict or inconsistent with the
contained in 'Clle Req10nal Comprehensive POlicy
2
OCT-10-1990 13:55 FROM Treasure Coast R.P.C.
TO
84077387459
P.06
#!
..
~.
f!!! r\ -
o~ "
/ Y" '~
..1 ~--. V...
... . \\,:~-1-. t~ l ':."'~
'- ~';r ...", "~ '~
Vi , ' "5' v""
#<..>" '. ....' {::,,. (.......-~
... P' ..". -Io~
I (;J. ':':J':U> ..
\;i/'I
1601) 2,(00 ':Dao
.. rEET
4181"
... . ... . . "or __ ...- . _ .
DEJfSITV, BOliUS EQU.VAlE:rn T.O 9~88 OWELUN~, UN.rS._
)",R' ACRE UA X fMU ftit. :'ftlL~t:D FOR' Ab.OLt. CONGREifATE
t..hli~.e ~A'C"UiitS.iN' lOW AND MOOE>>ATE: ,O~ffSlTY
f1E'SWE'NTtAl lAND USE--CATEGOAf~tf~~lF 'APPROVED--
~A$ A CONDITIONAL USE.
u
a..
0:::
+>
(I)
III
o
U
Ol>
L
::l
(I)
III
QJ
L
t-
E
o
0:::
LL
U)
If)
1"1
-
(S)
(J'I
(J'I
-
I
(S)
-
I
t-
U
o
.
. .. ...
Ii!!i!I :orrv .
I _
o
LJ~U7
-_.. - ,.
400
I.
.
\1
800
I
4000
.. ~Ml<\]
. ' .' . ~ '.' , ,. ...::t ..l
otFF.ERENT LAN~, USE tAIEnO,RY.I~N T"AT.SHOW~
:ON MAP AP.'UE~ '(A"S IN[Uri~TED 'IY:~itB,QEVIAl'IO"7:'
IE ~bE MiD, DEVEL'(}PMEHT,CONPLrES wrht,.uJ:1~'-'"
(f\' ~ '" r8SSJBICttO'''.'A'flQ RECfOUB'INAlIOltLOF PAReli(~;
"SP~CIFrEti rNTEXT OF F.IJ'tURE. LAND USE A"NO _...J
.. - .. . ..
.- ; COASt ^l'M^ffAOEl.fE~t~'~tEMENTS~ . - -. - 7' --
- L: ., --.- , ,_ ,. ~ ------...__'L _-. _J
f' ... -... ~-----.__.. ~- ~_.~. ~~- ~..__._.~.~ _ _~__. ~
t'.:.:I . Co.NSEriVA TION.,O'lIUn.~.Y._PI$TflJCJ:-=US'i--:-~ND!
'~i>r: V ELOP~ENT ,Of. PFlQPER1Y. ~1H.m~E,CT-=tOJ. __~.. _,
:n~CQMMENOATI()HS, CONtAINED IN, qOfi~If;'VATlq~j
, . '.- __ 1" .. ,__....
.AND COAS1Al -...tA.NAGE....ENT ElEMENTS.,_ I '
I .' I'
' ~~~~I~i. ,H'~~ ~";~'S~~,;=~~~S~~'E~~I~L~'~I~~T.ED ~.~l'\
:COASTAl AREA AS SEV,ORTH U+~\GOAS1Al '.
MANAGEMENT ElENENt. MAX- 20.0tO.U.iACRE
...' .
..
',...1
....'t
MIXED U8E
oM
o
t-
r-
(S)
a..
(J'I
If)
~
r-
CO
1"1
r-
r-
(S)
~
CO
MAP J<EY
~ .. .. ..
RESIDENTIAL
.. - .. -.. ----- '..~ ...
. ... _4 _ .
LP.W' DE f\JS tlY ,'(LDR)_..
. ,
'--M":X 4. J .... 0.t(1 A~RE '
, '.
I ", a... '.. . .. ,. _..'-:. :'.
,MQDE"~T: ,O~N8n:V ,(~~R)
. ' LMAlT .2'0 D,U.I"CRl '. '
.
----- --... .~ . '" "- -, ... ;,-
~EDtUM ,f'EN~fT~., ~(A#0lt)
::' ,MAX 1.68 O.U.! A Ol1e ',' .'
." I . .".. ~ "..J. ...:.. ._'a_.~.......
lHlQU, OI;USITX : ~OfI?R)...,~
' "'l\k ~O.& IJi.O.1AOlfE "
,
... .... .. -'--
. ~
~
'.
f
o
.
1
fa
~
III
; l,;UMMI:.HGtAL"
WA-, OFrJCE ;foc~ . ' ..
, ' ,
- -...--"'-.-.-......- _k_ - .-:irT--'-' ._..
iii -'t.OCAL PETA.Jl. l'tq~C) .
... ..' -::p .. -- f-::~"".- -.
m QI!NEhAl 'rj~C)r
E -1~~U~tiu~l,~.;' \.' !
-'''''' -, .~.. \ \:
~'OlHE'R : ',' , ..-
'AO~IC~~ ~~6 -".~t~)~ 0
.'" .;" .. -.-. '., . ~ , .
:RICRe'ATlONAL ' . on',
'-~ -_.-.... ...- . . ......" - .
:a. . _..
P..UOltt. & PRIVATE... . .. ,(pP,~I)_
'00 v E IltfMe N"'A i.J ;NST.;1(j'nb~J
:~. .. -..: --<-f:t
t
13 : 57 FROM
Treasure Coast R.P.C.
TO
w
'3
o
o
c:::::l
l::::l
~
c::::::I
=
~
==
=
t::=
=
=
c::
=
c::
RUG
".1
RIU.s
lilt ,
t
a
J
.
.
11
'.
e
.,
.,.
..
-
MftA
~
a:lNIIIW,.1IOtI
.....
-
i J..
,~t,;
I'fTANA
)
!
f>>
c.
~
Q
cr:
-'
f=
a::
G
:31
84077387459
P.08
~ , OV PIP':m A~ES
If. ; OU PM I AOfIII!a
~ , ou l'm'I UI AC!lEZ
~ 1 au ~ , .0 -'C1l!iS
", ~VJllllll ACRE
lol ~u ... .1:2_
'-3 DU PIR ACR&
~.. ~u ...." AC:on=
Sol eN lID ACIlI!
"'I au...&emS
..,. au NIt J.CM
c=-cw.
INOUSnI&&.
AIiiRIClL~~
MlRlCUL1'l&aI.~
SlIlI!a.t4 AGRICUl.1\M
....., R!;AUTIClN
,~ -1lI.t.L~
~'nOtt
:mlms~AMO "'tI!1,lC
\ITlI.l'f1I! MII~'"
I~
;
~ .,
~
Q:
~
~
e
Proposed City of aoyntcD Beach Plan lmI.enc:bllen't
Jilal,m hach CCIW1t.y ?ut:::ure Land t7s@ !tap
5
o,I/r
TOTAL P.08
,~;.~~,.
11
.---
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
of\
~'1 ';!';
\
ROSSI AND MALA V ASI ENGINEERS. INC.
PROPOSED 83.85 ACRE P.U.D.
FOR BOYNTON NURSERIES, INC.
RESPONSE TO, QUESTIONS:
"LAND' USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION"
II. MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION h-(6); h-(7)
ITEM h-(6) COMPARISON OF WATER DEMAND
Under existing & proposed zoning
Existing Zoning:
proposed Zoning:
Agricultural at 0.2 D.U./Ac.
P.U.D. Residential at 4.79 D.U./Ac.
DOMESTIC NEEDS
Existing Land Use:
83.85 Ac. x ".2 D.U./Ac. = 16.77 D.U.(S.F.)
17." D.U. x 45" gpd = 7,65" gpd
Proposed Zoning:
Single Family Pod II All 64 D.U. x 45" gpd = 28,8"0 gpd
Single Family
Zero Lot Line Pod " BlI 100 D.U. x 35" gpd = 35,000 gpd
Townhouse Pod "ClI 88 D.U. x 3"0 gpd = 26,400 gpd
Multi-Family Pods liD & Ell 15" D.U. x 300 gpd = 45,000 ~
TOTAL 135,20" gpd
SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE DOMESTIC WATER DEMAND
Existing Zoning:
7,650 gpd or 5.31 gpm x 2.5 = 13 gpm
Proposed Zoning: 135,200 gpd or 93.75 gpm x 2.5 = 234 gpm
,
,
ROSSI AND MALA V ~Sl ENGINEERS. INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
MINIMUM FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
Existing Zoning:
500 gpm (Sing~e Family)
Proposed Zoning:
1,500 gpm (Multi-Family)
The above outlined water demands are to be provided by the existing city 16"
water main along Lawrence Road.
ITEM h-(7) COMPARISON OF SEWAGE FLOWS UNDER EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING.
Refer to Water Demand H- (6) for determining sewage flows under the proposed
zoning, i.e., 135,000 gpd.
135,000 gpd = 94 gpm x 2.5 = 235 gpm
Therefore, additional required pump capacity in the existing City Lift Station
No. 319 is 235 gpm. This Master Lift Station was to have been originally
designed to accommodate these designed flows.
There is-an existing gravity sewer with stubouts on a 2. foot utility easement
along the east property line of the subject property designed to serve the
proposed P.~.D.
Existing zoning at 0.2 D.U. per acre would generate a sewage flow of 7,650 gpd
....... -~....
83.85 ACRE P.U.D~ AT BOYNTON BEACH
PALM BEACH COUNTY
DRAINAGE STUDY
PREPARED BY: ROSSI AND MALAVASI ENGINEERS, INC.
DECEMBER 1989
~
I\JC\
I
\V
TOTAL AREA
LAND USE
LAKE (WATER SURFACE)
PERVIOUS AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA
PRESERVED AREA
BUILDING AREA
83.85 AC.
5.50 AC.
51. 99 AC.
21.46 AC.
4.90 AC.
13.00 AC.
,"
':
, '
.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINS
APPROXIMATELY 83.85 ACRES OF LAND AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTH
FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY AND WITHIN THE C-16
DRAINAGE BASIN.
THE PROPOSED SITE CONSISTS OF 402 SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY
HOMES.
THE RECEIVING WATER BODY IS THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT
CANAL L -21.
THE DESIGN STORMS FOR THE PROPOSED SITES ARE:
3 YEAR, 24 HOUR
6.25 INCHES
25 YEAR, 72 HOUR
12.00 INCHES (IN 24 HOURS)
100 YEAR, 72 HOUR
15.00 INCHES (IN 24 HOURS)
SINCE THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE C-16 CANAL BASIN
THE ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE IS 62.6 C.S.M.
POTENTIAL SOIL ABSTRACTION
AVERAGE POST DEVELOPMENT PERVIOUS GROUND EL.
WET SEASON GROUND WATER ELEVATION
DEPTH TO WATER TABLE
TOTAL PROJECT AREA
PERVIOUS AREA
COMPACTION FACTOR
0.75 X 10.99 X 51.99
= 35.71 A.F.
12
35.71
S = X 12 = 5.11 INCHES
83.85
18.00 N.G.V.D.
14.00 N.G.V.D.
4 r .0" FEET
83.85 ACRES
51.99 ACRES
25%
STAGE - CUMULATIVE STORAGE CALCULATIONS
VERTICAL STORAGE AREAS
AREA NO. 1
STORAGE AREA (LAKES)
5.50 AC.
STARTING STORAGE EL.
14.00 FEET
AREA NO. 2
STORAGE AREA (ROADS & PRESERVED AREA) 22.37 AC.
STARTING STORAGE EL. 17.00 FEET
LINEAR STORAGE AREAS
AREA NO. 1
STORAGE AREA (LAKE BANKS) 3.04 AC.
LINEAR STORAGE FROM EL. 14.00 TO EL. 16.50
VERTICAL STORAGE FROM EL. 16.50 ON UP.
AREA NO. 2
STORAGE AREA (LOTS) 39.94
LINEAR STORAGE FROM EL. 16.50 TO EL. 18.50
VERTICAL STORAGE FROM EL. 18.50 ON UP.
STAGE
VERT.
AREA
1
VERT.
AREA
2
LIN.
AREA
1
LIN.
AREA
2
TOTAL
14.00
15.13
6.22
0.78
7.00
16.50
13.75
3.80
17.55
17.00
16.50
5.32
2.47
24.29
18.50
24.75
33.56
9.88
39.94
108.13
DISCHARGE COMPUTATIONS & OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE SIZING
MAINTAINED WATER EL. 14.00
ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE
62.6 C.S.M.
83.85 X 62.6 = 8.20 C.F.S.
640
IMPERVIOUS AREA - 31%
1ST INCH OF RUNOFF
1/12 X 83.85 = 6.99 AC. FT.':::::+EL. 15.13
THE ORIFICE FORMULA USED IS: Q = A x cd x
't 2 qh.'
WHERE:
Q
=
DISCHARGE
A
=
AREA OF ORIFICE IN SQ. FT. = 0.99
CD
=
0.61
.H
=
HEIGHT BETWEEN CENTROID OF "V" NOTCH AND
WATER ELEVATION.
CENTROID EL. 14.75
STAGE DISCHARGE
14.00 0
~2 ,
15.13 0.99 x 0.61 x x 32.17 x (15.13 - 14.75) = 2.99 C.F.S.
~2 t
16.50 0.99 x 0.61 x x 32.17 x (16.50 14.75) = 6.41 C.F.S.
17.00 0.99 x 0.61 x ~2 x 32.17 x (17.00 14.75)' = 7.27 C.F.S.
18.50 0.99 x 0.61 x ~2 x 32.17 x (18.50 14.75)' = 9.38 C.F.S.
. .
1
,PROJECT NAME . :
REVIEWER . . . . . .
PROJECT AREA . . . . .
GROUND STORAGE . . . .
TERMINATION DISCHARGE
DISTRIBUTION TYPE . . .
RETURN FREQUENCY . . .
RAINFALL DURATION
24-HOUR RAINFALL
REPORTING SEQUENCE
STAGE STORAGE
(FT) (AF)
14.00 .00
15.13 7.00
16.50 17.55
17.00 24.29
18.50 108.13
S C S
PRO G RAM
83.85 ACRES P.U.D - BOYNTON BEACH
S. WEISS.
83.85 ACRES
5. 11 INCHES
10.00 CFS
SFWMD
3.00 YEARS
1-DAY
6.25 INCHES
STANDARDIZED
QISCHARGE
(CFS)
.00
2.99
6.41
7.27
9.38
- - - - - - R E S E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (I N) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
.00 .00 .00 .0 .0 . 0 .0 .0 . 0 14.00
4.00 .28 .00 . 0 .0 . 0 . 0 .0 . 0 14.00
8.00 .86 .00 .0 .0 . 0 .0 .0 . 0 14.00
10.00 1. 33 .02 2.3 .1 .1 . 0 . 0 .0 14.02
11.00 1.68 .08 6.8 . 5 .5 . 0 . 2 . 1 14.07
11.50 1. 99 .16 14.6 1.1 1.1 . 0 . 4 . 3 14.15
11.75 2.93 .52 123.1 3.6 3.6 .0 1.0 .7 14.37
12.00 4.10 1.16 215.7 8.1 8.0 . 1 2.5 1.7 14.93
12.50 4.56 1.44 49.5 10.1 9.9 .2 3.8 3.3 15.44
13.00 4.79 1. 60 26.7 11.2 10.8 . 4 4.1 4.0 15.59
14.00 5.11 1.82 16.8 12.7 12.0 .7 4.5 4.4 15.75
16.00 5.50 2.09 11. 3 14.6 13.1 1.5 4.9 4.8 15.91
20.00 5.95 2.42 7.0 16.9 13.7 3.2 5.1 5.0 15.99
24.00 6.25 2.64 4.8 18.5 13.6 4.9 5.1 5.1 15.98
. SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 16.00 FEET AT 20.25 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS 5.1 CFS AT 20.25 HOURS
. '.
S C S
PRO G RAM
~PROJECT-NAME
REV I EWER . . .. ..
PROJECT AREA . . . .
GROUND STORAGE . .
TERMINATION DISCHARGE
DISTRIBUTION TYPE
RETURN FREQUENCY
RAINFALL DURATION
24-HOUR RAINFALL
REPORTING SEQUENCE . .
83.85 ACRES P.U.D - BOYNTON BEACH
S. WEISS.
83.85 ACRES
5.11 INCHES.
10.00 CFS
SFWMD
25.00 YEARS
3-DAY
12.00 INCHES
STANDARDIZED
.
. .
STAGE STORAGE DISCHARGE
(FT) (AF) (CFS)
14.00 .00 .00
15.13 7.00 2.99
16.50 17.55 6.41
11.00 24.29 7.27
18.50 108.13 9.38
- - - - - - R E S E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (F,T)
.00 .00 .00 .0 .0 . 0 .0 .0 .0 14.00
4.00 .29 .00 . 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 14.00
8.00 .58 .00 . 0 . 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 14.00
1 2 .~ 00 .88 .00 . O' .0 .0 .0 .0 . 0 14.00
16.00 1.17 .00 . 3 .0 . 0 .0 .0 .0 14.00
20.00 1. 46 .03 .9 . 2 .2 .0 . 1 .0 14.03
24.00 1.75 .09 1.4 . 6 . 6 .0 .2 .2 14.09
28.00 2.18 .21 3.0 1.5 1.3 .2 .5 . 4 14.20
32.00 2.60 .37 3.7 2.6 2.2 .4 . 9 . 7 14.35
36.00 3.03 .57 4.3 4.0 3.2 . 8 1.3 1.1 14.50
40.00 3.46 .79 4.9 5.5 4.2 1.3 1.8 1.5 14.67
44.00 3.88 1.03 5.3 7.2 5.2 2.0 2.2 2.0 14.83
48.00 4.31 1.29 5.7 9.0 6.2 2.8 2.6 2.4 14.99
52.00 4.85 1. 64 9.5 11.4 7.7 3.7 3.2 2.9 15.21
56.00 5.95 2.42 22.5 16.9 11. 9 5.0 4.5 3.8 15.74
58.00 6.86 3.12 34.8 21.8 16.0 5.8 5.8 5.1 16.25
59.00 7.54 3.65 52.2 25.5 19.2 6.3 6.6 6.2 16.58
59.50 8.14 4.14 83.3 28.9 22.3 6.6 6.9 6.7 16.79
59.75 9.94 5.67 516.0 39.6 32.8 6.8 7.4 7.1 17.06
60.00 12.18 7.65 672.0 53.5 46.6 6.9 7.7 1.5 17.27
60.50 13.06 8.45 134.6 59.0 51. 8 7.2 7.9 7.8 17.47
61.00 13.51 8.86 70.5 61. 9 54.4 7.5 8.0 8.0 17.53
62.00 14.12 9.43 43.0 65.9 57.6 8.3 8.1 8.1 17.59
- - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
64.00 14.87 10.11 28.2 70.7 61.1 9.6 8.2 8.1 17.65
.
68.00 15.73 10.92 17.0 78.3 84.0 12.3 8.3 8.2 17.71
72.00 16.31 11.46 11.4 80.1 65.0 15.1 8.3 8.3 17.73
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 17.13 FEET AT 72.00 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS 8.3 CFS AT 72.00 HOURS
~ .
; ,
PROJECT NAME
REVIEWER . . . .
P~QJ ECT AREA
GROUND STORAGE . . .
TERMINATIONDISCHARGE
DISTRIBUTION TYPE
RETURN FREQUENCY
RAINFALL DURATION
24-HOUR RAINFALL . . .
REPORTING SEQUENCE . :
83.85 ACRES P.U.D - BOYNTON BEACH
S. WEISS.
83.8 ACRES
5.11 INCHES
10.00 CFS
SFWMD
100.00 YEARS
3-DAY
15.00 INCHES
STANDARDIZED
STAGE STORAGE
(FT) (AF)
14.00 .00
15.13 7.00
16.50 17.55
17.00 24.29
18.50 108.13
DISCHARGE
(CFS)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
- - - - ".. - R E S E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
.00 .00 .00 . 0 . 0 .0 .0 . 0 .0 14.00
4.00 .37 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 14.00
. 8.00 .73 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 . 0 .0 14.00
12.00 1.10 .00 .2 . 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 14.00
16.00 1. 46 .03 1.1 . 2 .2 .0 .0 .0 14.04
20.00 1. 82 .11 1.9 .8 .8 .0 . 0 .0 14.12
24.00 2.19 .22 2.6 1.5 1.5 .0 . 0 .0 14.24
28.00 2.72 .42 4.9 3.0 3.0 .0 . 0 .0 14.47
32.00 3.25 .68 5.8 4.7 4.7 .0 . 0 .0 14.16
36.00 3.79 .97 6.5 6.8 6.8 .0 .0 .0 15.08
40.00 4.32 1.29 7.1 9.0 9.0 .0 .0 .0 15.39
44.00 4.85 1. 64 7.6 11.5 11.5 .0 .0 .0 15.10
48.00 5.38 2.01 8.0 14.0 14.0 .0 .0 .0 16.03
52.00 6.06 2.50 13.2 17.5 "11.5 .0 . 0 .0 16.47
56.00 7.44 3.57 30.5 25.0 25.0 .0 .0 .0 11.01
58.00 8.58 4.51 46.6 31. 5 31. 5 .0 . 0 .0 17.12
59.00 9.42 5.22 69.3 36.5 '36.5 .0 .0 .0 11.21
59.50 10.11 5.87 110.1 41. 0 41. 0 . 0 .0 .0 11.28
59.15 12.42 1.87 616.5 55.0 55.0 .0 . 0 .0 11.42
60.00 15.22 10.45 810.9 73.0 73.0 . 0 .0 .0 17.71
60.50 16.32 11.41 113.2 80.1 80.1 .0 .0 .0 11. 91
61.00 16.89 12.00 90.6 83.9 83.9 .0 .0 .0 18.05
62.00 17.66 12.12 55.1 88.9 88.9 .0 . 0 . 0 18.15
1
- - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - -
RAIN ACCUM. BASIN ACCUM. ACCUM. INSTANT AVERAGE
TIME FALL RUNOFF DISCHGE INFLOW VOLUME OUTFLOW DISCHGE DISCHGE STAGE
(HR) (IN) (IN) (CFS) (AF) (AF) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (FT)
64.00 18.58 13.60 36.1 95.1 95.1 .0 .0 .0 18.26
68.00 19.66 14.63 21. 8 102.2 102.2 .0 .0 .0 18.39
12.00 20.39 15.32 14.6 107.0 107.0 .0 . 0 .0 18.48
SUMMARY INFORMATION
MAXIMUM STAGE WAS 18.48 FEET AT 12.00 HOURS
MAXIMUM DISCHARGE WAS .0 CFS AT .00 HOURS
study of
THE AVAILABILITY OF FACILITIES AND THE IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT:
DISTRICT PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
BOYNTON NURSERIES
Prepared by
Planning Department., city of Boynton Beach
March 6, 1990
The following analysis of the availabi1 i ty of parks and
recreation facilities throughout the city was based on a current
peak population of 54,909 persons within the City, and the needs
analysis of parks and recreation facilities utilized in the
city's 1989 Comprehensive Plan.
NeiGhborhood Parks
The proposed planned unit development includes an on-site
recreation area that would satisfy the standards of a public
neighborhood park, 3.S defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan
and current Subdivision and Platting Regulations. Such standards
and requirements include the size of the recreation area(s), type
of recreation facilities, and the availability of the park to all
residents.
District Parks
Based on the standard for district parks of 2.5 acres per
1000 persons, and the City's current and planned district park
inventory, a surplus of district park space is projected through
the Year 2000. Since there currently is a surplus of district
park acreage that totals nearly 15 acres, and that this proposed
residential development is projected to increase the City's
population by only 924 persons, this development would have a
minimal effect on the availabili ty of district park space (see
attached analysis of district park needs) .
Recreation Facilities
Of the seventeen recreational facility categories that have
level of service standards assigned to them for purposes of needs
analysis, one category, boat ramps, is currently deficient by one
facility, and when the projected population of Boynton Nurseries
is included in the analysis, a second category, combination
ballfields, becomes deficient by one facility.
The future need for additional recreational facilities was
anticipated. The Recreation and Open Space Support Document of
the City's 1989 Comprehensive Plan includes proposed sites for
addi tiona1 ramp development, including a third site located on
the Intracoastal Waterway that was recently purchased by the
City. As for ballfield development, in addition to several
dedicated park sites that are targeted for possible future
ballfield use, the planned North District Park is scheduled for
completion by mid-1991 (phase 1) and will include one combination
and one regulation ballfield.
nTSTRTCT PARK NF.F.nS ANA1.SYSTS
1.OS: 2.5 ACRF.SI
1000 PF.RSONS
1qR7
Curn.ml. A1Ia1ysis
12n1/cW
A1Ia1ysis For
ROYTll.o1l Nurs~ri~s
CU1T~1Il. n~lIIaTIlI : 12.1 . 25 B7.27 BQ.5R
Ci l.y AmI COllTll.y
Supply (Wi I.1d1l Cil.y): 1 B .10 1 B .10 1 B.10
P1 aTlTI~ll :4.cT~ag~ : - - -
Sc:hdol Fac:\; 1 i l.i ~s
Wi I.1d TI l.ll~ c: i l.y 1. i lid l.s : 1:1.00 1:1.00 1:1.00
To l.a 1 Suppl,y
Wi I.1d TI 1.11~ C i l.y 1.illli l.s: 126. 10 126. 10 1 26. 10
n~ric:il.(-) Or Surplus: 2.R5 -11 .17 -B.4R
Allj aC:~III. Supply: 26.00 26.00 26.00
To l.a 1 n~ r i c: i l. ( - )
Or Surplus: 2R.RS 1 4 . R:1 12. .'12
1___
C:olllpar~
___1
-C:urr~1Il. Pl-'.ak Popnlal.ioTl-
-Prlljl-'c:l.l-'ll Popnl al.i III 1 or ROYTll.ll11 Nursl-'ril-'s
(400 ll.l1'S {( 2..11 pl-'rSllTlS pl-'r ll.n.)-
-Tol.al cIi sl.ri c:1. park aCTl-'agl-' acllll-'ll si1lcl-' 4/l/R7
S4 ,qOq pl-'rSOTIS.
q24 pl-'rSOT1S.
o ac:rl-'s.
..,
~
..,
...
.....
oC
'"
oC
..,
~
...
...
...
::::
~
u
oC
....
'"
~
...
oC
...
...
u
...
...
r
.~
.... ....
'" ...
,~ ~
....
~ '"
._.;;iI:
~ ~
p.~ -= <0
:~ ~~:5~
..~>~ ~-=+-'~
<.:) c= 4.1 ,:: ~
L~] ~'g
.... .
"'0 0--
~U'J+..J
U =.......
...~ '-'
.,...., a. qJ
o ....~
a-. = .~
... '" '"
.... .
0-..... ~
u:J +..J 0-.
..=: -;:; on ....,
o..qJ-<_
~........ C'...,
'" ...
'" '"
."l'7
~;:::
.. -~
~J:
""
COO
--
""
--
""
....
~~ .;'
... ...~
po tao .....-4
-_....... 0
'" .... ...
cta.. f&l
...
....-
o .
'"
~
~.
..,
....
:i:
....
....
'"
U
~ ....
~ .~
... -~
....~
.. ."
'" '"
ui ~
'-' ..
"' ...... c-
~~~
. ." -
-I"""'" q"I-_
." "" ...
..., ""
oC
en ~
~.= r-
~cn~
,.."" -
4...1 41 -_
.- ""='...
U ."
..,
""
"" COO
....... --
... C>_
. ""
(IJ ~-_
Q.c~
....-
o .
....
..
4J =:I ......
....~ '-'
;; ~~
u .. ...
'" '"
,..
.. ....
... .~
.~~
"" ...
.., ...
~
COO
""
-
....-
o .
~ ....
~ "<j
... .~
....-
.. '"
'" '"
....
o
...
'"
.~
~
~.
..,
,..
~.~ ;:..
~:5~
U..-I IEJ
... ..
...
'j ""
4...1;:::: ~
'" '"" .
"" .. ...
... '"
....
_:;:;...~ l'7
.~ ~;:::
.~ ~-~
'" .... ...
.".... ...
...
.-1::
COO ...
"" .
'"
'"
~7Cl1~ "";~
I
""";c::>>
I
-: I roIi:
I
""I""
1-
~:::
~'~
"" - ""
""
i
....,i=~~'-Cl,
--I' ~ ~
-I
I-
i
......'It'-
Ii'
t
I
i
~ c:::tICJ""
I
I
I
I
Cllt- _
I ...,
c;;)c::II_.......,c::::Ic:::t.___..-CICl
!
CII,:!;...o .=;
\,QP'1_CJ'~c
":
t
i i I:
...""lcq_I_.......,....,_r-.la.nCl'l...I,..,.,..,., I """"'1'_1'- ~
I-~I-"'" -I .......,......., ~
I . I .
--rl-------~----~--
i I i
;::: .... Q "" .... .... _ C> . "'1:;::
I
i
!
C;-ie-
~le:>
.......i
. iC"'ol c:::t..-
I ""
I i-
...... CI!C"ot <:III....... CI
I .....1 I
""I
__ic:::t CI
I
I
I ClI:"",;_
Ie:>
."
,
i
"'ie:>
I
!
i-
I
~~ICQ~~
""i
~~c:ro~
LM M I'-
7 ~ ~ ~l7 ~ :r 7
~ I 7;7~
""~COO
, . .
-ic:::t~
I
.,,1_ ~
""I N
c::::I CI:c:::t
... C> ."
-;
...._ o;:rootc::ar.a Cl'I_~"'" CIQ
~I- --
..,
9
CI <:::I CI CI \CI ClI iCII C;t CI CI c:J ClI c:::t ClI ;
CI c:. ic:J c::t I CI CJ c::t c:::t c::. c:J c::>> c:::. CI c:::t
~ ~:~ ~l~ ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
--,--1---:--------: .
- -:- ~l- -!::: - - - - - --
:5 i I ! ~ Z; III)
= I I -.... 1oO:~ ~
::. IrA ""I.~ g ~:~ ~
d- i'i1i ~ ~~':;: ~ ; '" ~;;: i~ ~ ~ ~....
0_ ...., u",o """'_.....ICIIU....O
- -a. ~~ _~~~Q.~""~=
__ -~ 0 a.. .... _ _I.... ICI ...-4 _ 0 0
:::~..,~==:tVl::: :::i.c~~-:; ~_~~
.....,... ___1_"" ..u.........a.:::::: --
~~;~...=:~:~~;~~i~~.~i
.: = CA = .i 3 i ~ ~:~ ! ;: ;: ~ 8 ~ -= a; :!.
g~g
'" e:> e:>
"..,,~-..
-----
.~
~
'-'
...
...
--
~
.=
....
'-'
..,
<
...
....
...
...
.
o
....
1
,
,
L-: :
...-'-
...
...
...
.
o
u
..
....
...
...
...
'"
co
:il
....
...
...
'"
::::
..
..
.,.
~
..-
~
i
."
e:>
...
...
N
'"
~
....
....
....'"
co ....
.....
....
..
...co
00
"'....
....j;.
"'0
0",
-
...
.....
...~
...
... -
...-
.......
"'...
-
..-
...""
g.~
""-
..""
...~
.. -
~~
....
... -
...-
.... .,.
.....
....~
........
-~
....
~~
...~
........
-E:-
..
...
... ..
...""
... ...
... '"
...
8...
....
... ...
....
...
... '"
"'0;;:
.. .....
00
a::
00
",,~
.....
.......
o~
..
.......
....0
- ...
.....,.
... ..
........
...
o
-.~
...0
........
...
.....
0,""
.....
o'
MEMORANDUM
October 6, 1989
TO:
Betty Boroni, City Clerk
FROM:
James J. Golden, Senior City Planner
RE:
TRANSMITTAL OF LAND USE AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS
SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 1, 1989
Accompanying this memorandum you will find a copy of the
application and related documents for the following:
1. Boynton Nurseries Annexation, Land Use Element Amendment and
Rezoning (includes checks in the amount of $500 and $900,
respectively, plus a check in the amount of $9.75 for
postage) .
2. Island Pond Annexation, Land Use Element Amendment and
Rezoning (includes checks in the amount of $500 and $1,000,
respectively, plus $62 for postage).
The public hearing dates for the above applications have not yet
been established by the Planning and Zoning Board and city
Commission. After these dates have been established, legal
advertisements with maps will be prepared by the Planning
Department and forwarded to your office upon completion.
~f-~
JJG:frb
Encs
MEMORANDUM
10 october 1989
TO:
All Department Heads
FROM:
Carmen S. Annunziato
Planning Director
RE:
Boynton Nurseries - Annexation - File No. 349
Accomnpanying this memorandum you will find a Departmental Review
Form which must be completed in order to provide the information
required as part of the Commission's annexation policy. Also,
attached is a location map for the property requested to be
annexed.
Please complete this form and return it to me by Friday, November
17, 1989 for inclusion in the public hearing proceedings.
~ ~.;h
CARMEN S. ANNUNZIATO
/bks
cc: Central File
OCT-10-1990 13:53 FROM Treasure Coast R.P.C.
TO
84077387459
P.02
TREASURE
"VAST REGI01lAL PLANNING 'I.;) ~\~"t
.' .. ~. A "I, Q
\i .j ',' ..~ " of
\.;.., ,./ 't"'~ \
0: '; \1\1' 'e,.,! \ !\'Me.
;;;'.':" ,;"~\\v\'iJ
AGENDA~~\~BIA
MEMORANDUM:
To:
Council Members
Prom:
Staft
Da te:
October 19, 1990 Council Keetinq
SUbject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Adopted Amendment to ~& 'ci~y'o~ Boyn~on Baach
Comprehensive Plan
rn't.roduction
Pursuant: to the Rogional Planninq Counoil's contract with
the Stat$. Depaxtlll-ani: of COllDlUnity Aff~ir. (DCA), t.he council
mu~t reviaw comprQhensive plan amendaen~s after their
adoption. The City of Boyn~on Beach has submitted a.dopted
amond1'llentc to the DCA, which in 'turn is seeking cOWIci1 ' s
COmmGlnts.
CounQil'. review of the information provided by the DCA is
to focus on t=he consistenc;::y ot the propOSed amenaments with
~he Reqional Comprehensive po11cy plan (RCPP) developed
pursuan1: to section 186.507, Floric1a S1:atutes. A written
report, conta.ining a d.e~erm1nat1on Of consistency with the
Reg-tonal P~an 1s to be provided to the DCA within 30
calenaar days ot receipt Of the plan, elements, or
amendments.
Evaluation
Staff has completed a review of the adopted comprehensi ve
plan amendment to the City of Boynton Beach's comprehQnsive
plan for consistency with the RCPP. Council raised no
objections or C01'IU1lents in the review report prepared in
conjunction with the review of ~he City'S draft
comprehensive plan amendment.
Conclusion
The adopted amendment appears 'to be basically CONS:rSTEN'1'
with the qoals and policies oon~ained in ~e Reqional
Comprehensivg Policy Plan.
1
\
\
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of
property described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development
Boynton Nurseries
Owner
Same as above.
Area of Subject Property 3 r 652 r 506 Sq. Ft. or 83.85 Acres
Estimated Present population
3
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units 1
Existing Use
Commercial Nurserv
Proposed Use
Will remain in same use until sold and
rezoned for a low density residential development.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel ~s
a result of this annexation? Yes No vr
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a resul~
of this annexation? Yes No ~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments: The above reflects the area at present but with the
development into residential will require revaluation depended
upon the number of homes constructed
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk Finance City Engineer
Planning Police
Bldg. Official
Utilities Fire
./ Personnel and
Public Works Library Purchasing
Management Data Parks &
Services Processing Recreation
Please return this form to the City P1anner'~ Office as soon as
possible.
Attachment: Location Map
Planning Department 8/89
RECEIVED
Reviewfm
OCT 16 l~b::J
PLANNING DEPT.
-
-
II
I
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of
property described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development
Boynton Nurseries
OWner
Same as above.
Area of Subject Property 3.652.506 Sq. Ft. or 83.85 Acres
Estimated Present population
3
Estimated Number of Existing Housing units 1
Existing Use Commercial Nurserv
Proposed Use Will remain in same use until sold and
rezoned for a low density residential development.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as
a result of this annexation? Yes No xx
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result
of this annexation? Yes No xx
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerp Finance City Engineer
Planning Police
Bldg. Official
Utilities Fire
Personnel and
Public Works Library Purchasing
Management Data Parks &
Services Processing Recreation
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as
possible.
Attachment: Location Map
Planning Department 8/89
Reviewfm
. !
. ."
MEMORANDUM
October 23, 1989
TO:
Betty Boroni, City Clerk
FROM:
James J. Golden, Senior City Clerk
RE:
Newspaper Advertisements for Land Use
Amendment Applications
Accompanying this memorandum you will find newspaper
advertisements for the two land use amendment requests submitted
to the Planning Department on the October 1, 1989 deadline.
Please note that the map ad for Island Pond includes the phrase
TEXT AMENDMENT in the title. The Planning Department recently
made a determination that an additional application for a
Comprehensive Plan text amendment was necessary and must be
included in order for this project to be approved. This
application will be submitted in the near future and forwarded to
your office shortly thereafter.
It is recommended that these applications be advertised as
follows:
Notice to Property Owners - at least 30 days prior to Planning
and Zoning Board public hearing.
First Map Ad - at least 15 days prior to Planning and Zoning
Board public hearing.
Second Map Ad - at least 6 days prior to Planning and Zoning
Board public hearing.
Third Map Ad - at least 7 days prior to City Commission public
hearing.
The above schedule exceeds statutory requirements and is
consistent with past city policy for these applications. Also
note that both of these applications include annexation and
should be advertised for four consecutive weeks, consistent with
Chapter 171.044,F.S.
The attached advertisements are to be used for both the
notification to the surrounding property owners and for the
newspaper advertisements. The newspaper advertisements are to be
placed in the "Local News" section of the Palm Beach Post. It
would be permissible for the newspaper to retype these
advertisements, provided that the headlines are no less than
eighteen (18) point letter size and the advertisements occupy not
less than one-quarter (1/4) of a standard newspaper page.
~.,,~ ? );JL
UJamesfJ. Golden
JJG:cp
Encs.
-NOTICE OF LAND USE CHANGE
NOTICE OF ZONING CHANGE
The City of Boynton Beach proposes to annex, change the use of
land and rezone the land within the area shown in the map in this
advertisement.
A public hearing on these proposals will be held before the
Planning and Zoning Board on December 12, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. at City
Hall in the Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard,
Boynton Beach, Florida.
A public hearing on these proposals will also be held before the
City commission on December 19, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon
thereafter as the agenda permits, at City Hall in the Commission
Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach,
Florida.
Q ~#
I i
~=l;~~
>---1 ~~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Tim Cannon
Acting Planning Director
DATE: November 9, 1989
FROM: Betty S. Boroni
City Clerk
RE: Annexation Applications
Attached please find copies of the following two annexation notices
which were mailed to property owners within 400 feet today. These
ads will be published in The Post on November 26, December 5 and 11,
with being scheduled to be heard by the Planning & Zoning Board on
December 12.
1. Boynton Nurseries
2. Island Pond
x!7~~'
Betty S oroni
BSB/smk
Attachments
cc: City Manager
fior,.-
-
1U?CEI~)'o.
ri 1'_
___ k -
. NOlI ~.
9 j.\f .'.
. PLA ,.;.1;(~
/, lVNlf"G'
~r
.--
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Tim Cannon
Interim Planning Director
DATE: February 9, 1990
FROM: Betty S. Boroni
City Clerk
RE: Planning & Zoning Board
Meeting of March 13, 1990
Forwarded herewith please find a copy of the notice as re-advertised
for Boynton Nurseries. This is scheduled to be mailed to the property
owners within 400 feet today, to be advertised in The Post on
February 25 and March 4, and to be heard by the Planning & Zoning
Board on March 13.
Also attached is a copy of the notice for the abandonment application
for the median in Boynton Lakes. This is scheduled to be mailed on
February 21, to be advertised in the Boynton Beach News on February
22 and March 1, and to be heard by the Planning & Zoning Board on
March 13.
BSB/smk
Attachments
cc: City Manager
RECEIVED
t= fa 9 1990
PLANNING DEPT.
-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HERT~BY GIVEN that the Planning & Zoning Board of
the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, will conduct a PUBLIC
HEARING at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, March 13, 1990, at City
Hall Commission Chambers, Boynton Beach, Florida to consider
a request for REZONING covering the parcel of land described
as follows:
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION:
APPLICANT/
OWNER:
AGENT:
PROJECT NAME:
PROPOSED USE:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
TIle South one-half (S I) of the Southwest
quarter (SW 1) of th Northeast quarter (NE
i): the Southeast qua ter (SE 1) of
Northeast quart r (NE ) and the South one-
half (8 I) of t e . t east quarter (NE 1),
13, TOIillship 4f.i uth, Range 42 East, Palm
Beach count~ -(,1 ida.
Boynton ~~~~ries, A Florida General
partner(2l~p
etf~~~' Menendez, M.S.M. Design Group &
og~ ~ Saberson, Attorney at Law
Bo nton Nurseries
Planned Unit Development for 400 units
(de t:Clched and attached)....li th I,l~ i u,," f-~
~~,-,r ~a1 frlci-1i ti~s -for rt:>s-j dents use.
8355 Lawrence Road,
Boynton Beach, Florida 33436
REZONING from AR (Agricu1ture/Residential-
Palm Beach County) to PUD (Planned unit
Development - City of Boynton Beach) vllth
LUI = 4
A PUBLIC HEARING vdll be held by the City Commission or the
City of Boynton Beach on the above request on March 20,
1990 at 6:30 P.M. at the Commission Chambers, or as soon
thereafter as the agenda permits.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said
hearings in person or by attorney and be heard. Any
person who decides to appeal any decision of the Planning &
Zoning Board or City Commission with respect to any matter
considered at these meetings \'lj 11. need a record of the
proceedings and for such purpose, may need to enSllre that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based.
BETTY S. BORONI, CITY CLERK
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLISH: THE POST
February 25 and March 4, 1990
p/rezone mas
cc: City Manager
Mayor & City commission
City Attorney
File
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning & Zoning Board of
the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, will con<1uct a PTlRLIC
HRARING on, Tuesday, MARCH 13, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. at city
Hall Commission Chambers, 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.,
Boynton Beach, to consider an application to ABANDON A
LANDSCAPED MEDIAN WITHIN ^ PUBTJIC RIGHT-OF-WAY submi tted by
City of Boynton Beach, the owner, P. O. Box 310, Boynton
Beach, Florida 33425, on a parcel of land more particularly
described as follows:
A raised continuous 1andscapA0 median 504 feet in length, 12
feet in width located centerline ()[ the 80 foot public
rights-of-way, Boynton Lakes Boulevard, situated within Plat
#1, Boynton Lakes, a P.P.D., in Section 8, Township 43
south, range 43 east as duly recorded in the records of Palm
Beach County, Book 40, pages 127 thru 130. Said median (not
shown on Pl at-. (locument) begins at a point 25 feet east of
the east right-of-Hay of: Congress Avenue and extends a
distance of 504 feet along the centerline of Boynton Lakes
Boulevard, a public rights-of-way.
A PUBLIC HP.I\RING will be held by the city Commission of the
City of Boynton Beach on the above request on MARCH 20, 1990
at 6:30 P.M. at City Hall Commission Chambers, or as soon
thereafter as the agenda permits.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said
hearings in peu;nn or by attorney and be heard. Any person
who decides to appeal any decision of the Planning & Zoning
Board or City Commission with rAspect to any matter con-
sidered at these meetings will need a reconl or the pro-
ceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a
verhatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the l'.estimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based.
BETTY S. BORONI
CITY CLERK
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PUBLISH: BOYNTON BEACH NEWS
FEBRUARY 22 & MARCH 1, 1990
sIb/ABANDON. 12
I
'f
t
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-226
FROM:
J. Scott Miller, city Manager
Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director -rc
James J. Golden, Senior city Planner
TO:
THRU:
DATE:
July 11, 1990
RE:
Boynton Nurseries - Comprehensive Plan Amendment
In response to your memorandum dated July 9, 1990 concerning the
above-referenced plan amendment, the proposed schedule for the
adoption of ordinances is outlined below:
July 17, 1990
First reading of ordinance to annex.
August 7, 1990
First reading of ordinances to amend the Future Land Use Element
and rezone.
August 21, 1990
Second reading of ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use
Element and rezone.
By copy of this memorandum, I am requesting that the City
Attorney prepare ordinances for first reading of the ordinances
to annex, amend the Future Land Use Element and rezone. The
ordinance to annex must be advertised for four consecutive weeks
pursuant to Chapter 171.044 F.S.
The Planning Department will prepare a map advertisement which is
required for the land use amendment prior to second reading. The
map advertisement will be forwarded to the City Attorney for
review within the next several days.
Attached you will find a copy of the recommendations from Walter
H. Keller concerning the changes to the applicant's traffic
phasing schedule. These recommendations should be incorporated
in the ordinance to rezone to PUD.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require any
additional information.
Q~ II Ii
//...v..f.:....
J. GOLDEN
JJG:cp
Encs.
cc: City Attorney
City Clerk
Roger Saberson
'I ',"
/ / i
/ /1" .... '
(ilL "
J
'/
\
, .\
\ "
. I
. \ i
"
.~
,. j
eX
~'- t
.j
~ ~ . \
".')~ -- ~ ~'):~<" '.
'i ~.::
" _:~ :;'~ ':i..~~-"- ~~
:; ". ~ '~)::~ ,}t ~;
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2740 CENTERVIEW DRIVE' TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399
BOB MARTINEZ
G__
July 2, 1990 .
THOMAS G. PELHAM
Secretary
The Honorable Gene Moore, Mayor
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Dear Mayor Moore:
The Department has completed its review of the proposed
comprehensive plan amendment for the City of Boynton Beach, which
was submitted on December 28, 1990. Copies of the proposed
amendment have been distributed to appropriate state, regional
and local agencies for their review and their comments are
enclosed.
The Department has no objections, recommendations or
comments, pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010, Florida Administrative
Code. Upon receipt of this letter, the City of Boynton Beach has
60 days in which to adopt the ~roposed amendment, adopt the
amendments with changes, or not adopt the amendment. The process
for adoption of amendments to local comprehensive plans is
outlined in s.163.3184, Florida statutes, and Rule 9J-11.011,
Florida Administrative Code.
within five working days of the date of adoption, the City
of Boynton Beach must submit the following to the Department:
Five copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments;
A copy of additional changes not previously reviewed;
A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any,
which were not included in the ordinance; and
A statement indicating the relationship of the additional
changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and
Comments Report.
~\
...1
. ....~,
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. RESOURCE PLANNING AND-~NAbEJ~Q
CITY '~;U'i~.(:Xi~'S CFFICE
. hl"..tS '\,. ~_f~.
---..-.--------
..
'WI
The Honorable Gene Moore
July 2, 1990
Page Two
The above amendments and documentation are required for
the Department to conduct the compliance review, make a
compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of
intent.
As a deviation from the requirement above, you are
requested to provide one of the five copies of the adopted
amendments directly to the Executive Director of the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council. The regional planning councils
have been asked to review adopted amendments to determine local
comprehensive plan consistency with the Comprehensive Regional
Policy Plan. Please forward these documents to the regional
planning council concurrent with your transmittal to the
Department. Your cooperation is appreciated in this matter.
If you would like the Department to participate in the
pUblic hearing for amendment adoption, such request should be
received by the Department, certified mail, at least 14 days
prior to the scheduled hearing date.
If you have any questions, please contact me or Robert
Pennock, Plan Review Administrator, at (904)487-4545.
Sincerely,
~oto ev 1- q. M Cur-e-
Robert G. Nave, Director
Division of Resource Planning
and Management
RGNjtfw
Enclosures: Review Agency Comments
cc: Timothy P. Cannon, Office of the Planning Director
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
II<.-
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building. 3900 Commonwealth Boule,'ard . Tallahassee. Florida 32399
Tom Gardner, Executive Director
':,fR
-~. .--,...
. -. I f'~
. ;:: ~ 1
.. : i ~ i J
~
- "
":::>>-:0;.0
, .::~ (I
SUREJ:..U G:= LCC.~.~
I RESOURCE Pu..NI'~l;'jG
~
April 6.1990.
Mr. Ralph Hook
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning
27~O Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Hook:
, I
I.
Staff of the Department or Natur~l Resources have reviewed
the proposed comprehensive plan amendments for the City of
Boynton Beach and have no comnlents.
J;?J~en
Assistant Executive Director
DED/mpp
Administration Beaches and Shores Law Enfol'Cemenr Marine ResouH'es Recreation and Parks Resoul'Ce \Ianas.;ement State Lands
Boh Martinez Jim Smith
r;'u\lernor ~rer"n. Ul St.-If'
Boh Butterworth Gerald u..wis lilln Gallaf.:her
AlrornC'\' C.cner..1 SI..If' (.(Jnlplrol!cr St;\lt" Ire..,u",
DOl Ie Conner
(.ummi......unrro( -\j(TKuhtlre
Bett\' Castor
(:(Jmmt\\'f.~t'r or b"lUCtll'f,n
~.'-
;Ii<.
'~'"
.' ,
. . \
'- !
I'
'ttttI11
,.,
Board of Count~. Commissionc.'rs
J
County Administrator
J,III "'inlt'r,
C.Hnl J, "!nHllli'l. \. 'h.\irl1l,\Il
J..:.Hl'1l T, .\I.Ul'lI", \ ill' l'h,lir
CMol :\, Ht1hl'rr-..
Hon Ho\\ an!
C.Hole Phillips
April 16, 1990
Mr. Ralph K. Hook
Bureau of Local Planning
state of Florida
Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
RE: Palm Beach County I s Review Comments for the proposed Com-
prehensive Plan Amendment of the City of Boynton Beach
Dear Mr. Hook:
, !
(
The Department of Planning, zoning and Building has coordinated
the review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment of the
Ci ty of Boynton Beach, Florida. The proposed amendment was
reviewed for: 1. consistency with the county comprehensive plan
goals and objectives, 2. compatibility of land use, and 3.
compliance with county environmental protection policies.
The Department reviewed. this proposal when it entered the annexa-
tion process. A letter was sent and addressed to Mr. James J.
Golden on November 28, 1989 ~ Boynton Beach has attached this
letter to the packet of documents submitted to the state in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 63 and 1ab1ed it Exhibit
"E".
The County staff comments enumerated in the letter sent to Mr.
Golden still hold and are as follows:
1. PLANNING DIVISION: Karyn Wa1ega, Planner
The Planning Division is concerned whether the proposed
annexation is "compact" as defined by section 171.031, F.S.
The annexation projects westward from the existing city
boundaries and the area of contiguity thereby expanding an
existing finger area of municipal land in a serpentine
pattern.
300 I Hh Street. WEST P-\l.\\ BEACH. FLORIDA H~06. (..07) {,<1j--lOOl
......
-~. ~':" r;flnfed un fP-( -Ic/~rt c'a~,-"
Mr. . Ralph K. Hool.
April 16, 1990
Page 2
The proposed annexation appears to be located wi thin the
city's future annexation area.
This property was a site Specific Proposal which was part of
the 1989 Comprehensive Plan Process. During the Site Specific
Proposal Process, the applicant was able to request a land
use for his property other than the land use shown on the
proposed land use map. The land owner of this proposed
annexation requested a land use designation of High Residen-
tial 8 (allowing a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per
acre) on the 60 acre parcel and Medium'Residentia1 5 (allow-
ing a maximum density of 5 dwelling units per acre) on the
20 acre parcel. However, the Board of County Commissioners
denied the request for the following reasons: a) the propos-
ed, increased densities were found incompatible with the
surrounding land uses and b) a higher density on the site
would not be consistent with the County's policy to protect
natural resources as a natural ecosystem appeared to be
located in the southwestern 1/3 of the site.
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT:
tal Analyst
Bob Kraus, Environmen-
, I
"
This property is not in a We11fie1d Protection Zone nor is
it listed as environmentally sensitive land. most of the
property is presently used for agricultural purposes. The
southwestern portion of the property appears to remain heavily
vegetated. Any native vegetation should be preserved and
used in future site plans.
3. FIRE-RESCUE: Kathy Owens, Special Projects Coordinator
.
This proposed annexation would decrease the level of service
to residents if annexed" into Boynton Beach. Current fire
protection is delivered from station 51 which is 3.5 miles
away; Boynton Beach's station is over twice that distance,
8 miles necessitating .a nearly 16 minute response time.
Also this property is adj acent to a county area and is an
isolated parcel to the west of Lawrence Road.
'Mr.' Ralph K. Hook-"
April 16, 1990
Page 3
....,
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT:
Planner
Diana Newcomer, Criminal Justice
Staff has reviewed this proposal and has made the following
comments:
1. The site is vacant property bounded by Lawrence Road to
the east, vacant property (Palm Beach County) to the
south and north and residential (Palm Beach County) to
the west.
2. The site is located in Charlie 1 and the areas to the
north and south of the site are serviced by the
Sheriff's Office.
3. Easy access to the site for Boynton Beach is via Lawrence
Road. There currently are no roadways through this
property to the residential area on the west side.
Residential access for the Sheriff's Office is via
Military Trail.
4. Al though contiguous with Boynton Beach across Lawrence
Road, the location and dimensions of the site augment
pre-existing serpentine boundaries on the east side of
Lawrence Road.
, ,
(
Of the above observations, the greatest concerns are items 2
and 3. If Boynton Beach annexes the property, a mixed service
area will be created. This creates a potential hazard for
emergency responding units. Even though the area being
annexed is vacant property, the future land use is for low to
medium residential. Thus, policing responsibilities will
increase creating an even greater hazard for responding
units.
From a law enforcement perspective, we feel that proposals
supporting the creation of mixed service areas is not in
line with good po1icincj practice. We would encourage the
City of Boynton Beach to adopt boundaries that eliminate
both mixed services and serpentine boundaries.
5. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Alan Ennis, Development Review
Engineer
This proposal would probably meet County Traffic Performance
Standards although it is a significant project as proposed.
6. UTILITIES: C. Tim Russell, Director, Engineering Division
This area is outside the PBCWUD service area.
comments.
No other
r. r.--
(,: I I
.~\
~ ~~.;
\~. ~ ,~/
...":<'....~!-_~~~~>.:,...
Mr. Palph IbOk
Dept. of Cbnun. Affrs.
Bureau of Local planning
2740 Centerview Dr.
Tallahassee, FL 32399
FLORIDA OEP A RTIvlE NT OF STATE
Jim Smith
Secretan' ot State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
R.A, Gray Building
500 South Bronough
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
Director's Office Telecopier Number (FAX)
(904) 488-1480 (904) 488-3353
.-.. -
", '" . .
l..,.:-o-......
Apr il 9, 1990
\ ....
~-
- ,
~,;' i"\
IJ 'Jr \..OC~L
"ii'-1';'Sl, . c\.M~\'{\N.G
~RCE. j
Re: Historic Preservation ~view of the City of B:>ynton Beach's
Oomprehensive Plan Amendment Bequest
Dear Mr. IbOk:
In accordance with this agency's responsibilities under. section 267.061,
Florida Statutes, and the provisions of sections 163.3177 and 163.3178,
, t Florida Statutes, and O1apter 9J-5, Florida ldministrative Cbde, we have
( reviewed the referenced OOcLJnents to determine if data regarding
historic resources have been given sufficient consideration in the
request to amend the Boynton Beach Comprehensive plan. 'tt1e proposed
revision to the Future Land Use element, an annexation and designation
of a 83.85 acre parcel frem "Agriculture PB" to "Agriculture" land use
category, was checked thoroughly to see if histor ic resources \<>Quld be
in any way crlversely impacted with the implementation of this change.
'tt1e projected area prop::>sed for land use change was also checked using
the Florida Master Site File-U.S.G.S. quad maps to verify the lack of
historic resources within the acreage boundary.
The result of our review indicates that the currently proposed amendment
will have no effect on the Hb11ywood historical resource inventory, and
thus, this CITlendment is of no concern to this agency.
However, the problem areas identified in our original plan review of the
State of Florida's requirements as promulgated in Chapters 163.3177 and
163.3178, F.S., and O1apter 9J-5, F.A.C., regarding the identification
of known historical resources within their specified area of
jur isdiction and for the establishment of policies, goals and objectives
for historic preservation within the City of B:>ynton Beach still need to
be crldressed. As far as the Division of Historical ~sources is
concerned the Boynton Beach Cbmprehensive plan is still minimally
consistent, and meets the historical preservation requirements of local
government planning.
Archaeological Research
Aorida Folklife Programs
Historic Preservation
Museum of Florida History
, I
'.
....
...,
If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to
contact Louis Tesar or Lee A. Luis of the Division's compliance review
staff at (904) 487-2333.
Sincerely,
"'/~, ~-
, .
~ -
orge w~~rcy, Director
Division of Historical Resources
, ,
j
r~/ppr
~~LOKIDA
-==/
1
-to
... DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
. IIVl G. WATTS
~ KalETAIn'
-
7RO Southwest 24 street
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33315-2696
Telephone: (305) 524-8621
May 15,
....,
o:JL:Rr:.-..
R~s -,-.U ,J,:: . ~_
1'390 OURC- "'I t.v'_Atl
<; r-~ \.
. 'vi~tN.q
:j':'i.j
, ~.
...
"",q/f
V
" .'
~ ....- :
Mr. Ralph Hook
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
p~wlItID
. 18 19jO
, ,
(
Re: Department of Transportation Review
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
0Mst0n of Resource
P1aMlng and Managamenc
Dear Mr. Hook:
~s requested in your letter of March 29, 1990, the
DepartmenL has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan of the City of Boynton Beach.
We have no objection to the proposed amendment but, would
appreciate consideration of the enclosed comment.
Sincerely,
~ep'E'
District 4 Director
Planning & Programs
.w fir
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Patrick McCUe
Mr. Gus Schmidt
Mr. Mike Tako
John Anderson
Mr. Ralph K. Hook~
April 16, 1990
Page 4
'WI
7. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT: Richard Roberts,
Assistant Director
This proposed annexation will cause a negative fiscal impact.
MSTU #2: -$1,066.04
Library: -$ 151.26
The total Ad Valorem loss is $1,217.30.
The annexation request has been made by the property owner;
however, first and second reading of the annexation has not yet
occurred. The proposed land use for the property is low density
residential allowing a maximum density of 4.84 dwelling units per
acre in the City of Boynton Beach. This density is inconsistent
with the County's Low Residential 3 category (allowing a maximum
of 3.0 dwelling units per acre) designated on 20 acres of the
proposal.
Please be advised that these comments represent staff analysis and
not the position of the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you
for considering our comments, and please feel free to contact this
office if you should have any questions.
, ,
~ Sincerely,
~QM;n(.
\
Dennis R. Foltz, A CP
Planning Director
File: IG/CPARDCA. BB
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Jan Winters, County Administrator
Bob Weisman, Assistant County Administrator
Donna Kristaponis, Executive Director P Z & B
Richard Morley, Principal Planner
Patsy Kallman, Principal Planner
Karyn Wa1ega, Planner
City of Boynton Beach
!:~B OF AGF..NCY:
~ESPONSIBLE DIVISION/BUREAU:
NAME OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DATE PLAN RECEIVED FROM DCA:
RE0UIRED RETURN DATE FOR COMMENTS:
Department of Transportation
District 4 Planning
City of Boynton Beach
April 2, 1990
May 18, 1990
ELEMENT: Future Land Use - Future Land Use Map PAGE ~
RULE DEFICIENCY:
9J-5.006(3)(c)3
Ch. 163.3177(10)(h)
163.3194(1) (b)
163.3202(2) (a)
~omment
I
, ,
I,
~his Department has no objection to ~he proposed Future Land Use
Map Amendment. The only state facility affected is SR-804, Boynton
Beach Boulevard. It is noted that a 3-block section (approximately)
between Old Boynton Road and Industrial Avenue is only 4LD. Most of
Boynton Beach Boulevard is 6LD. Correction of this constraint which
creates significant reduction of LOS is on neither the State's Five
Year Work Program (FY 90/91 - 94/95) or the County's Five Year Road
Construction Program.
We concur with the Planning staff's comment to the effect that
building permits should not be issued by the City until contracts have
been let for required improvements including the 6 laning on a portion
of Boynton Beach Boulevard. (SR-804) between Old Boynton Beach Road and
1-95 and that C.O.'s not be issued until roadway capacity is available
to serve the impacts of development.
REVIEWED BY: J.W. Anderson, Jr., AICP
PHONE: 407-837-5290
REVIEWED BY:
PHONE:
REVIEWED BY:
PHONE:
. ..
:"IE !'J'>lOOt f:Jn,' kC
':IF PA,~ BEACH COU:olTV !:LO~l')A
'~J MlU.s
'\.'O<:""llI"":',or',, :
.. ~"..Y1lS
(;IK).....-rH ~A:-.;-\OEME:'OT t,,;t,;:-, TF:R (41l1~.~=1!
SJO ~ 8O\:LE\'ARO. ~\:m: :lllI~
PALM lJF..o\CH C"oAROt:\'S. nORm" ;.a.nOo4:.'7::
{oj~
, ll:04CH ~
. .
... . ..... ..." . .
. .. .
February 15, 1990
RE: Impact Anal)'Sis - Proposed Boynton Nurseries PL'D,. &ynton Beach
This statement is provided in fulflllme:1t of Chapter 235.193, Section 2. Florida Statutes to
ensure that public education facilities are coordinated with pLa."1S for residential
development. I t addresses the concerns ot the Palm Beach County School Board as they
specific<illy relate to the anticipated impact ot the construction of 162 single family and
238 multi-family dwelling units located an 83.85~ acres within a proposed pun ~9r BoyntQ:1
Beach Nurseries me. on Lawrence Road south of Hypoluxo Road. ~
A study was conducted utilizing demographic multipliers for Palm Beach County to
estimate the number of students which would be generated from this type of development.
No information was received regarding the number of bedrooms found in these types of
dwelling units. For the pw'1X)Se of this analysis it is assumed that all single famil~. units
will consist ot 3+ bedrooms and, all multi-family, units will consist of 3 bedrooms. The
GroWth Management Center estimates 77 elementary, 67 middle and 64 high school
. stUdents will be generated by the project.
TIle geographic area in which these proposed dwelllni units will be located is presently
served by Galaxy Elementary, Congress Middle, and Sanwuces High School (see note 1).
Following is a breakdown tor each school's projected peak membership for 1989-90 and
current permanent capacity.
GaLaxy
ElementarY
. Congress Santaluces
Middle School High Scheel
Projected Peak Membership
Current permanent Capacity
901
623
1,044
1,356
2,476
1.954
S rodents generated from this development in this area will further overcrowd the assigned
elementmy and senior high schools in the area.
The construction of this development will not have an adverse impact on School Board
efforts to racially balance area schools.
"!"he Sdl001 Board will continue to actively pursue a policy of providing adequate school
facilities for all the children ot Palm Beach County.
0:ote 1 - Attendance boundaries are reviewed annua'uy and are modified to accommodate
the opening ot new schools and/or School Board policies dealing with overcrowding and/or
racial balance.
cc: City oC Boynton Beach
Boynton NurSeries. .Inc.
William V. Hukill
Howard Johnson
File
9
p ~/ rf i
....
~
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
Twin Towers Office Bldg.
Bob Martinez, Governor
· ~~~~~t1~" Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
~ f - I;: ::. ". '.' ".
m. .''It-;''''~raaDu.;..sr,gel2I)' '..'~: John Shearer, ^~si'tanr Secretar\'
;~~ \'.~-~!J .
1":'\,/.' ~- ~-:'
J'Cif\ l k........' .,~-
Mr. Bob Nave I
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning
2470 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32399
BUREAU OF LOCA:-
RESOURCE PL.AN~Nu
May 18, 1990
RE: City of Boynton Beach, Proposed Amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan.
Dear Mr. Nave,
In accordance with Chapter 9J-11 and 9J-5 F.A.C, the Department of
Environmental Regulation has reviewed the amendments to the Boynton
Beach Comprehensi ve Plan. We concur wi th the Boynton Beach
Planning Staff recommendations that approval of this rezoning be
contingent upon the infrastructure improvements and other condi-
tions outlined in Item A and Exhibit E (in Section 6A2) of this
amendment package. We have no further comments concerning these
amendments.
If you have any questions about my response, please call me at
(904) 487-2498.
SinCere1Y,~ /~
. ~~
John Outland
11<
:..: , ";:";~';fr~;~ ~~~-:~:--~~,::~r~. ~~
id' ; ;:.:.'~~ ~,._~~~..... ,.....~,.;u~
:~ st. ItJde
.-
~
'>
~~
.~
~
~.~.1
\~
j.:.:l
" t
-..4
-.\..c
';j
.:~
.... ,\
c.i'~
.......
" ,
. ,-:.~ .
. l..,~~~~..:~~
"
....-1'"
:~.'1l'
.'
-...;
.> ,:.
, ~.
;.~
martin
, ~:;r~fJrr ::::'~;':~";~:7~r:c~:~J
. .',,- -. '''~~.,::,,~~~i~';'-;';--a~~~.~-''''''
.~'
treevure
cOCJ:t
regional
planniQg
council
April 5, 1990
.3 ""' '7 - . .... '. _
r:::.s._~-...) .~..: ::_::.,.'.~J\G
Mr. Danny Clayton
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of state Planning
2740 Centerview Drive
The Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, FL 12399
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Local Government
Comprehensive Plan Document
Dear Mr. Clayton:
This to acknowledge receipt of the following comprehensive
planning document.
One Proposed Amendment to the Future Land Use Map,
City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
This document was received by our office on April 2, 1990.
Pursuant to section 163.3184(4), Florida statutes, written
comments will be submitted to you by May 18, 1990.
If you have any quescions, please do not hesitate to call
me.
Sincerely,
T~.~::-:CP
Planning Coordinator
TLH: 1b
3228 s,..... man!n downs blvd,
sulle 205 . p.o. bOll 1529
palm e"V, florlda 34990
phone r4Q71~~~!t~ .: . ".'.'"
treOlure
::;~'~~itlft"":'~"~~;:~- COeOlg.tonal
'.,,"'.~: :-": - / "l . . :~ ./ :;' ....:.~ .~~: . ..... ~..,'. .:: .": _ '.
. ..<f'o.-. '; flaa ~- ;~;;;"~'~""~v,""'.:;;~....:. '.....,,- -" I
.'f . ..', . '..it -'pianniQg
council
. ,,"'-
~..
I ~.'
,-
0-
j.<
.~.
r....f..
t"
f t::.
,. r-
~-l'
....
t:'
~..
F
~ -
-t
1
.' -p--
r
i~
'[f
;.
~t
:~
"
&
"to.:.
''f:
r t.:
f r
r ;'0.
f, "',
~ ~.
.... "".
..1'"
~ ",
tf
El
f l"'V
tt
.......
..~
--.
, r~
;~,-
PP./. (
w
fr\ ~r:"'-~I" ~~...,.,' ~r.L' '-
) n :... r' . '" I, i; !tt;~ ',~
, .. I... \ 't, ~. , ! ~ F ;' ': ~
;::' Ir ~~~---~ L..:o-;
.,...; ~ (,
"\- ....~ -,' .
· L1 . .. .
'" I,",
....,. "I
fl." Y Z~ 199:.
May 18, 1990
BUREAU OF LOCA~
RESOURCE PLANNiNG
;
I
Mr. Danny clayton
Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of state Planning 2740 centerview Drive
The Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, FL 32399
subject: City of Boynton Beach Local Government Comprehensive
Plan Amendment
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida statutes, the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council reviewed the proposed amendment to the Future
Land Use Element of the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive
Plan at its regular meeting on May 18, 1990.
Comments were approved by Council for transmittal to
Department of Community Affairs pursuant to section
Florida Statutes, for consideration by the City
adoption of the document.
the state
163.3184,
prior to
Evaluation
The proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Element has been
reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 163,
Florida statutes, Council's review procedures, and Council's
adopted plans and policies. Enclosed is a copy of the full
staff report to Council. The report was formally adopted by
Council at its regular meeting with no revisions.
If you need additional information or have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call.
DMC: 1b
Enclosure
cc:
Timothy Cannon
--_.
:a221 I.W. martin downs blvd.
1U1t. 205 . p.o, box 1529
palm city, florid a 30&990
<< __. .fI"oL'r.
.~.,*- ..~.-..
.. r-i,1 .?- ,.~T' II. J I I ~ =J.. r~...'.'...l~".iik...ft ..i'
l!!. L!.J 1m, ,'~ I ,.~ ~.. . J J.... if:' c.. ...,.N.......:".~ 0.'
B~ D~' ~REE~RI~;tJR . ..L. d ..,{ .....i
'. ,.. ',. N .J7TMST
,2 QJ S = ~ "'/i'''f:'~ J .' .. .. LEGEND .'
!l ,,~u1' '''S'f ,.... Co - ~-"1 l 'mj 18 .'
"- -- -.;- I.\~~Z I 8 ti ~ I/~ '~ ~Z.L 0 :::: ~ ~ E::!:~E
'l' r--' .r '''' , ~ , DU PQ ,.0 ACllES
5" ~. = l . iL'a. L.& 0 2' l' ou "It ACll!
C - . r ',2 O\J PElt AC::lc
i I.~ 3 ',3 au PElt ACIlE
~ - en n ~ c::: 5 :;.5 DU PEA AC!lE
I fo. 3'" ~ > --,. ,& j 5? "2 ... au PER ACIlE
~ 'r - - :l" ....... "'2 au ~ AC"!E
qKE CTia"' l ~,oe ~ ~N GJIilN, ::~ ~ ~. :':":::/oCRE
. ;=:.1 . ~ RD ~ (.,~'l ; c::: IND lNOlJmlIAL
~ .~1J ~J~: I- ;J ~ ~. ~ -.' "~'l '~~~ S~~OH
9 ~ '" t::"T Jtr'" e :. ~ ~ '""" c::: CII =-utClAL "ECRUnOH
~. r.1J r71 S '''~T' c::: C0H8PVAT1ON COHlIEilVAT1ON
... ;l or ~ U c::: INST ..."nmoNAL AHO P".UC
:'1 .1. n r.: Co ~ "I I:: UIT ~ ANa TIlAHSPCItTATlOIl
""ELA EUCA I IN 181 ~ ..:J fJ - '-n': ."r>'
l.z. '; Co 12. I ,r PAM ~.: ! ..:.. .... " ':..'
~ I e ID. \ I~~~ ~~II~ 2TH <d.
tJ { . ~.I.AVE
11lr ..Ii
~/T.^ ~~s~i"
J~ -:..., i
(/ ':4 .
,..~1' rll .
"lJ It
~,.~c 11'1 L "OCEAN .IaIE.
II' '.i;
~ s I 111":;; .~.'
J I.. -.
(A !! ~
.r c ~ -H i
" J I I
R 0 r-;..., 7'\-
~J =-tJP'I~C.~r.
J ..~ .r ~ ....
4::]. \~ J .... 0
- -.:--"i. ;
.ar .. 1r
.
...
~ ~1i
~ r
oM .-.m~ J
.-?" .....
......... ... ...... ....
proposed City of Boynton Beach Plan Amendmen't
Palm Beach County Future Land Use Map
'z.
rroMA'J~
I< - l..!.l
r; LZ'.'
S' -
, ...... t.;
"-='
~~NA
&l' Ib : I _: iJ"
I
~ (. S-,
l'....T
RO
L::.
-
f '\ ~ l.
I ~~\
~ I !
--
I AWl"
I 3
I
~~'
$
-
~
~ S'
c
'C:i
1 c:: '"I
· tty s
j J.. 1.
?
,.
'MillER RD .
"V
S"
HYPOlUXO
S
~. s
.....
Q
tr
~
I' ~
>
C(
%: c.; ~ 3
S
_~ 1-
"-.3
~ S'
~
SU8,,"T
41' -, I
~ P~O~ERTY
S~ :l 1 L-..,
~ z. 5 I
~
r IL 5-
r-?
e
~',.
"'
....:-1
4
.~...:
'0
tAl
. 11..
. ~J1.J..1 V
1& ~
L~
1
-.
.
!
L
...
L
"\I~
3
-
~.
..
~ .....-
i1 ,..-.J
!
. I
J
~
~
.. ct
~
':" .....
:: ~
';,
..'
.:'
....
\
....
~
.....
<t)
~
l::)
~
~
Q::
.....
~
'" I
t
}
t
r
I
,
(
.,
I
s
j
-.I
j
)
d.
~.
2mIDL-O-J
.
.
.
..
, I
I,
~
,<:)
<!l' .
Proposed City of Boynton Beach Plan Amendment
Boynton Beach Future Land Use Map
(see next page for map key)
e:
. .
'. .
,
I
"
Mr. Ter~ L. Hess
April 18, 1990
Page 2
The annexation projects westward from the existing city
Doundaries and the area of contiguity thereDY expanding an
existing finger area of municipal land in a serpentine
pattern.
The proposed annexation appears to De located wi thin the
city's future annexation area.
This property was a Site Specific Proposal which was part of
the 1989 Comprehensive Plan Process. During the Site Specific
Proposal Process, the appl icant was able to request a land
use for his property other than the land use shown on the
proposed land use map. The land owner of this proposed
annexation requested a land use designation of High Residen-
tial 8 (allowing a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per
acre) on the 60 acre parcel and Medium Residential 5 (allow-
ing a maximum density of 5 dwelling units per acre) on the
20 acre parcel. However, the Board of County Commissioners
denied the request for the following reasons: a) the propos-
ed, increased densities were found incompatible with the
surrounding land uses and b) a higher density on the site
would not be consistent with the County's policy to protect
natural resources as a natural ecosystem appeared to De
~ocated in the southwestern 1/3 of the site.
2.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT:
tal Analyst
BOD Kraus, Environmen-
This property is not in a Wellfield Protection Zone nor is
it listed as environmentally sensitive land. most of the
property is presently used for agricultural purposes. The
southwestern portion of the property appears to remain heavily
vegetated. Any native vegetation should De preserved and
used in future site plans.
3. FIRE-RESCUE: Kathy Owens, Special projects Coordinator
This proposed annexation would decrease the level of service
to residents if annexed into Boynton Beach. CUrrent fire
protection is delivered from Station 51 which is 3.5 miles
away: Boynton Beach's station is over twice that distance,
8 miles necessitating a nearly 16 minute response time.
Also this property is adj acent to a county area and is an
isolated parcel to the west of Lawrence Road.
5
. .
~
Mr. Terry L. Hess
April 18, 1990
Page 4
'WI
.,
. .
This area is outside the PBCWUD service area.
comments.
No other
7. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT: Richard Roberts,
Assistant Director
This proposed annexation will cause a negative fiscal impact.
MSTU #2: -$1,066.04
Library: -$ 151.26
The total Ad Valorem loss is $1,217.30.
The annexation request has been made by the property owner:
however, first and second reading of the annexation has not yet
occurred. The proposed land use for the property is low density
residential allowing.a maximum density of 4.84 dwelling units per
acre in the City of Boynton Beach. This density is inconsistent
with the County's Low Residential 3 category (allowing a maximum
of 3.0 dwelling units per acre) desiqnat~d on 20 acres of the
proposal.
Please be advised that these comments represent staff analysis and
not the position of the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you
for considering our comments, and please feel free to contact this
office if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Dennis R. Foltz, AICP
Planning Director
File: IG/CPARTC. BB
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Jan Winters, County Administrator
Bob Weisman, Assistant County Administrator
Donna Kristaponis, Executive Director P Z & B
Richard Morley, Principal Planner
Patsy Kallman, Principal Planner
Karyn Walega, Planner
City of Bqynton Beach
7
;
"' .
The County has expressed some concern that this proposed
annexation may not meet the compactness provisions of the
state law (171.031, FS) regarding annexations (see attached
letter dated April 18 from Dennis R. Foltz, AICP, Planning
Director). However, the property is within the City's
future annexation area and is also within the City's
utilities service area.
Ob;ections. Recommendations for Modification. and Comments
Future Land Use Blement
A. Objections
None
B. Comments
None
Conclusion
, ,
'.
Based on
does not
policies
Plan.
the information provided, the proposed amendment
appear to be in conflict or inconsistent with the
contained in the Regional Comprehensive Policy
Recommendation
Council should adopt the comments outlined above and approve
their transmittal to the state Department of Community
Affairs in fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 163,
Florida statutes.
Attachments
,
,.,
..,
'j
" I
,!
\J
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Members
AGENDA ITEM 5C1
From: Staff
Date: May 1~, 1990 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review -
Amendment to the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan
Introduction
, ,
~
Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (FS), the Council must be
provided an opportunity to review and comment on
comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. The
City of Boynton Beach has submitted a proposed amendment to
the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA), which in
turn is seeking Council's comments.
Council's review of the information forwarded by the DCA is
in the context of the relationship of. the proposed
amendments to the regional policy plan developed pursuant to
Section 186.507, FS. If a conflict with adopted plans or
polices is identified, the regional planning agency is to
specify any objections and may make recommendations for
modifications. Council also provides informal comments to
the local government through a spirit of cooperation, and
technical assistance on matters related to the proposed
amendments. These advisory comments are aimed at providing
coordination between the local and regional comprehensive
plans.
Backaround
On January 10, 1990, the DCA issued a notice of intent to
find the ADOPTED comprehensive plan for the City of Boynton
Beach not in compliance, pursuant to Section 163.3184, FS.
As part of this finding, the ci ty plan was found to be
inconsistent with the Regional Plan. The amendment proposed
by' the City is not related to a Stipulated Settlement
Agreement between the City and the DCA.
'f .f~'~
MEMORANDUM NO. 073
July 30, 1990
TO:
J. Scott Miller
FROM:
Jim Cherof, City Attorney
RE:
Boynton Nurseries - Rezoning
Boynton Nurseries - Future Land Use Amendment
1990,
JAC/ras
Ene.
cc: Jim Golden, Interim City Planner
..
RECEIvED
.fI$ilfa
~. ..
I 'LANNING DEPi..
-
. ; -~ --, ,....'..........,~.,".... ..""....~
-
II
II
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
I
I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 OF SAID CITY BY
AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY BY
ADOPTING ~~:: PROPER LAND USE OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY, WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND
DESIGNATION IS BEING CHANGED FROM PALM
BEACH COUNTY LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING
REPEALING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
.Beach, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Land Use Plan and
as part of said Plan a Land Use Element by Ordinance No.
89-38 in accordance with the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, a certain parcel of land more particularly
I described hereinafter is being annexed in accordance with
the application by Roger G. Saberson, agent for Boynton
I
~urseries, a Florida general partnership, into the City by
,Ordinance being adopted simultaneously herewith; and
WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a Land Use
Element of a Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163,
,Florida Statutes, has been followed; and
I WHEREAS, after public hearing and
Commission deems it in the best interest
study, the City
of the inhabitants
of said City to amend the aforesaid Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan as adopted by the City herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby
amended to reflect the following:
That the Land Use of the following described land shall
be designated Low Density Residential. Said land is more
particularly described as follows:
I
The South one-half (Sl/2) of the
Southwest quarter (SW1/4) of the
Northeast quarter (NE1/4); the Southeast
quarter ( SE 1/4 ) 0 f Northeas t quarter
1
(NE1/4) and the South one-half (Sl/2) of
the Northeast quarter (NEl/4) of
Northeast quarter (NEl/4), all in
Section 13, Township 45 South, Range 42
East, Palm Beach County, Florida.
Together with that portion of the
Worth Drainage District Canal L-21,
abuts the South property line of
subject parcel of land.
Lake
that
the
Section 2:
That any maps adopted in accordance with
the Land Use Element of said Comprehensive Plan shall be
mended accordingly.
Section 3:
All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
onflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4:
Should any section or provision of this
rdinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
Ifompetent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall
Inot affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
I
Section 5:
This Ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this
day of July, 1990.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
day of
, 1990.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Corporate Seal)
I
2
ORDINANCE NO. 90-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF SAID
CITY BY REZONING A PARCEL OF LAND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, WHICH IS
BEING SIMULTANEOUSLY HEREWITH ANNEXED TO
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH BY ORDINANCE
AS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) W/LUI
= 4; PROVIDING FOR PHASING CONSISTENT
WITH TRAFFIC STUDIES; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING
PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
'Beach, Florida, has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 80-19
in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida, is simultaneously herewith adopting an
Ordinance annexing a parcel of land more particularly
described herein into the City limits of said City; and
WHEREAS, the owners and agent of the property have
requested the above mentioned zoning classification; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best
interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the
aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1.
That the following described land,
located in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, to wit:
The South one-half (S1/2) of the
Southwest quarter (SW1/4) of the
Northeast quarter (NE1/4); the Southeast
quarter (SE 1/4) of Northeast quarter
(NE1/4) and the South one-half (S1/2) of
the Northeast quarter (NE1/4) of
Northeast quarter (NE1/4), all in
Section 13, Township 45 South, Range 42
East, Palm Beach County, Florida.
Together with that portion of the Lake
Worth Drainage District Canal L-21, that
abuts the South property line of the
subject parcel of land.
be and the same is hereby rezoned from AR (Agricultural
Residential) Palm Beach County, to PUD W/LUI = 4.
Section 2.
That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of
the City shall be amended accordingly.
Section 3.
Development of the property shall be in
phases consistent with the traffic study findings submitted
attached hereto as composite Exhibit "A".
and
I
I
Section 4.
That
all
ordinances
or
parts
of
ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby
repealed.
Section 5.
Should any section or provision of this
ordinance or portion hereof, any paragraph, sentence, or
word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, or should any Section of this Ordinance not become
effective for any reason, such decision shall not affect the
remainder of this ordinance.
Section 6.
This ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this
day of July, 1990.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
day of
, 1990.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
~wct&
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
MEMORANDUM
To:
Council Members
AGENDA ITEM 5C1
From: Staff
Date: May 18, 1990 Council Meeting
Subject: Local Government comprehensive Plan Review -
Amendment to the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan
Introduction
Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (FS), the Council must be
provided an opportunity to review and comment on
comprehensive plan amendments prior to their adoption. The
City of Boynton Beach has submitted a proposed amendment to
the State Department of community Affairs (DCA), which in
turn is seeking Council's comments.
Council's review of the information forwarded by the DCA is
in the context of the relationship of the proposed
amendments to the regional policy plan developed pursuant to
Section 186.507, FS. If a conflict with adopted plans or
polices is identified, the regional planning agency is to
specify any objections and may make recommendations for
modifications. Council also provides informal comments to
the local government through a spirit of cooperation, and
technical assistance on matters related to the proposed
amendments. These advisory comments are aimed at providing
coordination between the local and regional comprehensive
plans.
Backaround
On January 10, 1990, the DCA issued a notice of intent to
find the ADOPTED comprehensive plan for the City of Boynton
Beach not in compliance, pursuant to Section 163.3184, FS.
As part of this finding, the ci ty plan was found to be
inconsistent with the Regional Plan. The amendment proposed
by. the City is not related to a stipulated Settlement
Agreement between the City and the DCA.
.,
~
....,
"
The City of Boynton Beach is considering one amendment to
the Future Land Use Element. The location of the property
under consideration is shown on the accompanying map, and
the number of acres and proposed changes in land use
designations are as follows:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Amend.
No.
Approx.
Acreaae
CUrrent
Land Use
Desianation
Proposed
Land Use
Desianation
ADDroximate Location
1
83.9
* Low-Medium
Density
Residential
Low Density
Residential
Northwest corner of
Lawrence Road and the
L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal
* County designation, annexation request has been made.
Evaluation
The proposed amendment has been reviewed in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter 163, FS; Council's review
procedures; and Council's adopted Regional Comprehensive
Policy Plan. The following evaluation is offered as a
result of that review.
This property has been proposed for annexation and is
currently occupied by a plant nursery. The annexation and
change in land use to incorporate the property onto the
Boynton Beach Future Land Use Map would allow low density
residential development at 4.84 units per acre in accordance
wi th the ci ty' s adopted comprehensive plan. Under the
current County designation, the western portion of the
property (approximately 21 acres) could be developed at up
to three dwelling units per acre and the eastern portion at
up to five dwelling units per acre. The proposed change
represents an increase in allowable density of approximately
27 dwelling units.
The proposed low density residential land use designation
appears to be compatible with the surrounding single family
dwelling units and mobile homes, and land designated as
medium density residential to the south. Centralized water
and sewer service is available to the property and the
developer will be required to dedicate acreage for
recreation in accordance with the City'S adopted
comprehensive plan. No building permits will be issued
unless identified roadway improvements are in the County's
Five-year Transportation Improvement Program or developer
commitments have been assured.
The County has expressed some concern that this proposed
annexation may not meet the compactness provisions of the
state law (171.031, FS) regarding annexations (see attached
letter dated April 18 from Dennis R. Foltz, AICP, Planning
Director) . However, the property is within the City's
future annexation area and is also within the City's
utilities service area.
Ob;ections. Recommendations for Modification. and Comments
Future Land Use Blement
A. Objections
None
B. Comments
None
Conclusion
Based on
does not
policies
Plan.
the information provided, the proposed amendment
appear to be in conflict or inconsistent with the
contained in the Regional Comprehensive Policy
Recommendation
Council should adopt the comments qut1ined above and approve
their transmittal to the state Department of Community
Affairs in fulfillment of the requirements of Chapter 163,
Florida statutes.
Attachments
................., I "'''~n.II~.'.
,.--.. ~
~t.- \ ;:
~
S I
'" i
i 'l. r:J
BL,aI
~l ~
~
~
~ ~.....
.....
~' '(
JJ.
~. ..
~ 'ODD' ~
\-~ ~r. I
~~ If .
.
~
.
.. . ~:
~I I
1[1 ~-"1
8,
)
...J
7 _
I r-
-W;1
~ # 1=0 ..u
~ -A ~~~ ffilm
-~: ~'.... ....
wL-t:L-J l
~I
r
-
-
Ill'
I , I
I
~
-.
I
I
~
~
-
-
a~
-
-...,
Ii==
I
I
I
I
I
; a..~Tp-
T. , 1 " G I
i i ~ M ~ 01
U __J!.' ! r;-
-
~
~
r~
a
~
-1
.. t &~'
='""'1 J;.;
g B
,
::ill
~ ~ ~
~
,<:)
I e(l _~
,I~
(
I.
-.
=-
,...
I
I
I
-- I
~
I I I
I
III
~
~
~
~
.'.!~.
"tiI::!"'~.'I~"
i:;w::i: ~::
",. t.(
I' . ~.
I' . .
.' .
I I, ::li:!"
Ei!:! .. I,.
':! :..
:1: !.
. :
'.:.:.:-:.:.:': .
Proposed city of Boynton Beach Plan Amendment
Boynton Beach Future Land Use Map
(see next page for map key)
~.~.
~ D \,.1
7f ."
.-
.',
w
==
--
==
-,
00
a
~
.'1-
SUBJeCT-
PROpeRTY
~
-
"
I I
I I r
IL
I
I
.,
1{ ~
~
~
.~
.,- -
, ,--."
.
.
"
'.
."!:
,.
. .'
T 1"1
";H
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
,,,,-
.....
.....
't:.:
.:.:.:.:.:.:
::::::::::::
::::i!i::;::
Ji=i:i:i:i:
:~i~:~~iii:i
::::::::::::
::::=:::::::
............
;i:i:i:i:i::
......
.:....
......
i:i:i:
::::::
......
......
....,.
......
.....
.....
.:.:.
......
......
:c::::
! ~ . "!:
e....:. :.:.:;:.:::: ::'. ::.:;:::: I.:.' .........."..
iii :!!:::i:!:!:iii:!:!=ii!l!i!i:i .:
:ii~ ;:;i;i:!:!:i=i:!:!:i=!:i=i:!il '.' "
:::. ::::::::::::::::::i:i:i:::!::: :'. .:
. :::!i:i::ii:i:::
ii::i:~::i::::: .
il::::::::!:::!: . .::.
ii:t::;:::;:!:;: :i:::
il!:!:!:::!:!:!:! ::.:. . .
':':':':':':':':'. ......
:::::::!:::!:::!:::. ":::!: .
:si::::::::::::::::i::.,' .'.
immiiimmmmmmm
: . :::::::::::::::::::::::::;:;:i=
."
....
.'
.:,:.:.:.:.:.'
..",........rn...
'.',
.',
::: ::: ;:
i:! ::: i: :
i:: i:: .:: .
,'. a.:.i .
. ":::"~ :'
.::::::::::::: .r.
0:'
.'
t:"1
.,:.
:ii!.'ii!l: .....:..........::
.'
.:..... .....!ii...:... .:
'.':':' ...:......m... :.
i . :i:!'" ::
: :::::::: i:!: :: :;
. : iti:i::: it:: :i :t
': :: :iisii=! if:! :i: ii
: i :.:.:.:. !:!i i!i i:i
.-. .: :=:::: :.:.:.:.:..:.:- :::
.:. '.' ;. ... .............. :::
. ::. Ii~~.....
.;
::::::::::::::: ::
.'
i:i i:.
.'. .'
.-. .',
.'. .'.
.-. .'.
.:. i::
.',
:!:::!:::::!::= :::
.~.
. . .'. ................:.:
...._ ._ I
....
.:.'
.... .
::
'.
....
:t:.
....
'.:
'.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. :
. .
. :
01':'
.....
'.'
'.'
".'
....
....
.:.:
:!:~
::::
::=:
.1
-
-----~_.~-----
..----
L -
Mr,. Terry L. H~
April 18, 1990
Page 3
~
"
4.
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT:
Planner
Diana Newcomer, Criminal Justice
Staff has reviewed this proposal and has made the following
comments:
1. The site is vacant property bounded by Lawrence Road to
the east, vacant property (Palm Beach County) to the
south and north and residential (Palm Beach County) to
the west.
2. The site is located in Charlie 1 and the areas to the
north and south of the site are serviced by the
Sheriff's Office.
3. Easy access to the site for Boynton Beach is via Lawrence
Road. There currently are no roadways through this
property to the residential area on the west side.
Residential access for the Sheriff's Office is via
Military Trail.
4. Al though contiguous with Boynton Beach across Lawrence
Road, the location and dimensions of the site augment
pre-existing serpentine boundaries on the east side of
Lawrence Road.
Of the above observations, the greate~t concerns are items 2
, and 3. If Boynton Beach annexes the property, a mixed service
area will be created. This creates a potential hazard for
emergency responding uni ts. Even though the area being
annexed is vacant property, the future land use is for low to
medium residential. Thus, policing responsibilities will
increase creating an even greater hazard for responding
units.
From a law enforcement perspective, we feel that proposals
supporting the creation. of mixed service areas is not in
line with good policing practice. We would encourage the
City of Boynton Beach to adopt boundaries that eliminate
both mixed services and serpentine boundaries.
5. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Alan Ennis, Development Review
Engineer
This proposal would probably meet County Traffic Performance
standards although it is a significant project as proposed.
6. UTILITIES: C. Tim Russell, Director, Engineering Division
6
Mr. Terry L. E s
April 18, 1990
Page 4
This area is outside the PBCWUD service area.
comments.
No other
7. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DEPARTMENT: Richard Roberts,
Assistant Director
This proposed annexation will cause a negative fiscal impact.
MSTU #2: -$1,066.04
Library: -$ 151.26
The total Ad Valorem loss is $1,217.30.
The annexation request has been made by the property owner;
however, first and second reading of the annexation has not yet
occurred. The proposed land use for the property is low density
residential allowing a maximum density of 4.84 dwelling units per
acre in the City of Boynton Beach. This density is inconsistent
with the County's Low Residential 3 category (allowing a maximum
of 3.0 dwelling units per acre) designat~d on 20 acres of the
proposal.
Please be advised that these comments represent staff analysis and
not the position of the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you
for considering our comments, and please feel free to contact this
office if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
0~~1f ~
Dennis R. Foltz, AICP
Planning Director
File: IG/CPARTC. BB
cc: Board of County Commissioners
Jan Winters, County Administrator
Bob Weisman, Assistant County Administrator
Donna Kristaponis, Executive Director P Z & B
Richard Morley, principal Planner
Patsy Kallman, Principal Planner
Karyn Wa1ega, Planner
City of Boynton Beach
7
\ .' \
..
"""
..
<3f!lOWTH MANAGEMENT CENTl!R
WILLIAM V, HUKILl.. .
A4;1ISTANT
SUPIFllNT'ENOENT
THE SCHOOL iOAAD
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
3930 FICA BOULEVARO. SUITE 3004
PALM 8IACH, GARDENS. Ft. '~41Cl-4272
407.eZ401239
May 7, 1990
Mr. Terry Hess. Planner
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
3228 S.W. Martin Downs Boulevard, Suite 205
P.O. Box 1529
Palm City, Florida 34990
RE: City at Boynton Beach
Proposed Amendment To Future Land Use Map
Dear Mr. Hess:
I am attaching for your review, the School Board's comments
on the proposed Boynton Nurseries pun in Boynton Beach.
This development is located OIl' the parcel which is under
consideration for amended land use in the City of Boynton
BeaCh.
Sincerely,
I~
Howard Johnson, . tant Director
Growth Management Center
HJ;dg
cc: City of Boynton Beach
William V. Hukill
File
8
WPD3\DOC\5ITE.Pl.N
I
:.if. ~.':HOOI fl():\~O
'Jt= l)A..M BEPOf COUNTY. !=LO~\l')A
, >4QYIJ\S; MlI..l,S
~L.'<:I'l'N"":"or....:
\t "':.,cH("l~1
l;lItlWHI \tA:\'.\GEME:';T (,;t;~ T~:I~ (4()7-(l~.7=
:J93O IleA OO\.;LE:\'ARO. !Il\;:n: :lOl14
1\l\l.~f BF..o\CH (;1\ ROE:\'S. nORmA J3ol1tl-'1:r.::
f1!Q'
....... ~
iw C
~~Q~j"
8I;.-.cH ~/
February 1 S~ 1990
RE: Impact Anal}"Sis - Proposed Boynton Nurseries PtJD~ Roynton Beach
This statement is provided in fulfillment of O'.apter 235.193. Section 2. Florida Statutes to
ensure that public education facilities are coordinated with plans for residential
development. I t addresses the concerns of the Palm Beach County School Board as they
specifically relate to the anticipated impact of the cODStruction of 162 single family and
238 multi-family dwelling units located on 83..85+ acres within a proposed pun for Boynton
Beach Nurseries Ine. on Lawrence Road south -of Hypoluxo Road. .' ~ ..
A study was conducted utilizing demographic multipliers for Palm Beach County to
estimate the number of students which would be generated from this type of development.
:..jo information was received regarding the number of bedrooms found in these types of
dwelling units. For the purpose of this analysis it is assumed that all single family units
will consist of 3+ bedrooms and. all mu1ti-f~y. units will consist of 3 bedrooms. The
Growth Management Center estimates 77 elementary, 67 middle and 64 high school
- students will be generated by the project.
The geographic area in which these proposed dwelllnl units will be located is presently
served by Galaxy Elementary~ Congress Middle. and Santaluces High School (see note 1).
Following is a breakdown tor each school's projected peak membership for 1989-90 and
current permanent capacity.
GaLax.y
Elementary
. Congress
MIddle School
Santaluces
High Scheel
Projected Peak Membersbip
Current Permanent Capacity
901
623
1.044
1 ~356
2~476
1,954
Students generated from this development in this area will further overcrowd the assigned
elementary aad senior high. schools in the area.;
The construction of this development will not have an adverse impact on School Board.
efforts to racially balance area schools.
:he School Board will continue to actively pursue a policy of providing adequate school
facilities for all the children of Palm Beach County.
Note 1 - Attendance boundaries are reviewed annually and are modified to accommodate
the opening of new schools and/or School Board policies dealing with overcrowding and/or
racial balance.
cc: City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Nurseries. .Inc.
WIlliam V. Hukill
Howard Johnson
File
9