The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE Kilday &- AsaoCI..... Landscape Architectsl Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 HAND DELIVERED VIA COURIER City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 E Boynton Beach Blvd. DME September 2, 1994 PROJECT NAME Boynton Nurseries ATT Mike Haag PROJECT NUMBER 1020.7 WE TRANSMIT: [!] HEREWITH o UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING: ~ PRINTS 0 SPECIFICATIONS 0 ADDENDUM DTRACINGSISEPIAS [i] SUBMITTALS 0 CHANGE ORDER o SHOP DRAWINGS 0 Copy OF LETTER 0 THIS IS TRANSMITTED TO YOU: ACTION CODE: o FOR APPROVAL 0 FOR REVIEW & COMMENT o FOR YOUR USE 0 AS REOUESTED A REVIEWED B NOT REVIEWED C REVIEWED & NOTED o RESUBMIT E DO NOT RESUBMIT F RESUBMIT FOR FILES NO OF COPIES DATE DRAWING OR ITEM NO DESCRIPTION/REMARKS ACTION CODE 12 sets 9-2-94 94-42 Revised Site Plans for TRC Follow-up resubmittal for September 13, 1994 TRC Meeting SEP _ 2 \99A ~ ~ ~ ~ IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE COPIES TO WITH ENCLOSURE o o o o o FILE CODE SHOP DRAWING DIV SIGNED (J(i{) (1 i<-L {;Jt~U!( }/dcz-- f Collene Walter "'\. rrIie City of 'Boynton 'Beach 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartf P.O. 'Bo:t310 'Boynton 'Btadr., ~Corufa 33425-0310 City:Hall: (407) 375-6000 ~JU: (407) 375..(j()9() THE CITY ENGINEER October 6, 1994 G.L. Homes of Florida 1401 University Drive Suite '200 Coral Springs, FL 33071 Attention: Rick E. Elsner Re: Boynton Nurseries Dear Mr. Elsner: I was in City Manager Parker's office with Ms. Heyden when your letter arrived indicating that you were unable to receive answers from the Engineering and Planning Departments regarding proposed sales arrangements. We were both quite surprised, as we each separately felt your queries had been answered although, admittedly, you may have been dissatisfied with the answers. If our Engineering Department responses were unclear, we apologize. In order to resolve that, we provide herewith our specific answers as follows: 1. To the question "can we draw permits and begin construction of model homes right away?" Response: A Land Development Permit must be issued prior to constructing required improvements. Land Development Permit issuance is subject to final plat approval by the City Commission. (see Appendix C, Art. VIII, Sec. 9). 2. To the question "can we use existing nursery building( s) for our temporary sales operations?" Response: That is a matter involving possible change of use of the existing building and must be resolved elsewhere. 3. To the question "must we pave parking lots for our sales activities?" Response: Yes, when a change in building occupancy occurs, as is possible in #2 hereinbefore (Chapter 5, Art. X, Sec. 5-138(b)). There are exemptions under the conditions listed in Sec. 139, but in each temporary situation listed, the exemption occurs only where the public is not invited. Jf.nurica s (jateway to tlie (julfstream Board of County Commissioners Mary McCarty, Chair Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Burt Aaronson Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman DepanrrnentofEngineering and Public Works October 3, 1994 Ms. Tambri Hayden Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD Dear Ms. Hayden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed roadway improvements required for the original approval by the City of Boynton Beach in 1990 for the project ent itl ed Boynton Nurseri es PUD. The three roadway improvement_ have all been constructed or are presently under construction. Also, please note that my original letter dated September 8, 1994 had a typographical error. The proposed project should be identified as 376 single-family units. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684- 4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~:fr~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review h:\traffic\diw\boyn33b - b ,,,:',~ rn ~mOCT ~ n w ~ "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 Board of County Commissioners Mary McCarty, Chair Ken 1. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Burt Aaronson Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman October 14, 1994 Ms. Tambri Hayden Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD Deparbnent of Engineering and Public Works Dear Ms. Hayden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed roadway improvements required for the original approval by the City of Boynton Beach in 1990 for the project entitled Boynton Nurseries PUD. The three roadway improvements have all been const ructed or are presently under construct ion. Therefore, no phas i ng is required as a condition of approval for traffic performance standards. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684- 4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~_:u~. Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. Lindsey Walter, Kilday & Associates File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review h:\traffic\diw\boyn33c rnm . I OCT2 0 /99ll I ~ "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper Box 21229 West Palm Beachr Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 Kilday &- Assocl.t.. La ndscape Architectsl Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 December 7, 1994 Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: Rectified Master Plan Submittal Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. a.k.a. Nautica Our Project No.: 1020.7 Dear Mike, Attached please find four (4) rectified sets of the Master Plan for Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. Pursuant to our discussion, these plans have been amended to incorporate the final conditions approved by the Boynton Beach City Council at their October 18, 1994 Meeting. This Rectified Master Plan is being submitted concurrent with the final plat for Phase 1 of this project. Although these two applications will not be processed through the same City process, we waited to submit the Rectified Master Plan so that it could match the proposed plat to eliminate any further revisions to the plan. There were only minor adjustments made to the Rectified Master Plan package including increasing the public park site to the minimum 2.84 acres and deleting one unit as part of the final engineering of the project. It is my understanding that you will process this Rectified Master Plan and return an approved record copy to me for our files. If you have any questions or concerns in regards to these plans, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~~ Co Ilene W. Walter Kilday & Associates, Inc. cc: Rick Elsner; GL Homes Tracy Robb; Lawson & Noble Received By: Date: Board of County Commissioners Mary McCarty, Chair Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Burt Aaronson Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Robert Weisman Department of Engineering and Public Works September 8, 1994 Ms. Tambri Hayden Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310 RE: BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD Dear Ms. Hayden: ~ ~ "~l(; \./ .. ,\'-> . :." ~"./ ,\j J\,l-' f~~ " }~ '(.' ,.~ ';' Q ....."....""".~ \.." ~. \L:,,' ~'! b ' ' t' \.~ ~ \\.~ ," .1..0 1'<: jrr- ",,' <Jt' ~ ~~' ,;':' ~<.:~t,.l" , -.#" ,.. \ ';It) . . 1:'\:.:., .:\t!, ,,~"'- :..~ '\ ~ 1, ~Y" ~t' "'...~ ~ ...-:,~' \~....' '\ --:..,,,; The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic ~ ~~. Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding \ this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Proposed Approved Uses Size 60 acres 162 d.u. 238 d.u. Tota 1 Uses Size 176 d.u. Trips 420 1,620 1.666 3,706 ,I '\ ''1- L' land Use Single-Family Units Trips 3,760 Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~JY~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. Bill Hukill, City Engineer File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review ill m @ rn 0 w rn,rm SEP , 4 ir,"" i ~ h:\traffic\diw\boyn33 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 " \' ,...,/ V ~ ~,,'? ~,~F{)'. fL'1 sp.lI;.,m,rrO -, I, Kilday & Aaoclat_ Landscape Architects! Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 September 2, 1994 SEP _ 2 IQQA Ms. Tambri J. Hayden, Planning Director Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT. RE: Boynton Nursery PUD Minor Master Plan Modification - Technical Review Committee Follow-up Our Project No.: 1020.7 Dear Ms. Hayden and Mr. Haag, Attached please find twelve (12) sets of revised plans addressing those issues raised at the TRC meeting of August 23, 1994 and subsequent items included in the TRC comments memorandum issued by each reviewing department. For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously approved Master Plan for Boynton Nurseries. It is our understanding from the TRC meeting that the Master Plan prepared by MSM Design Group dated 2-22-90 that was approved by the City Commission was never finalized into a site plan and therefore, there are several outstanding conditions from the original approval that need to be addressed with this submittal. Included with this application is a master site plan which reflects the layouts of individual lots, blocks (pods), the interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks, and maximum building envelopes for each lot. This plan should address the major concern of those members at the TRC whose comments were based on not having a thorough understanding of the proposed layout of the project. The following is a recap of the comments included in the TRC comments letters and how they have been addressed by the project team in this resubmittal. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM The site plan has been duly noted to indicate vehicular circulation at both entries to the project. At each entry there will be three lanes provided, one ingress lane and two egress lanes, one of which is a right turn only. Arrows have been added to the plan indicated such. Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 2 RECREATION AND PARK MEMORANDUM - 94-310 Our office has discussed the issues identified in this memo with Mr. Hallahan. To address his comments, additional notes have been added to the landscape plan for the project addressing items 1-5. Due to the fact that Lawrence Road is not scheduled to be improved, item #6 does not apply. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 94-282 Included with this package is a layout for water and sanitary sewer lines serving this project. At this time, the utilities department cannot locate the water main on Old Military Trail. This project will tie into the existing main only if it is in close proximity of the property. Also, typical cross sections of the utilities within the 40' right-of-way and adjoining easements has been included so as to demonstrate ability to service all proposed utility lines. Included with this submittal are calculations supporting the sanitary sewer layout for 8", 10", 12", and 15" gravity mains. However, the Palm Beach County Health Department will need to approve upsizing the pipe system for elevation purposes. Otherwise, a lift station will be required. PARK RECREATION MEMORANDUM - 94-320 The project team concurs with the information included in this memorandum. The plans now reflect a 3.02 Ac. private park with a minimum of five (5) amenities as well as a 2.5 acre park site to be dedicated to the City located in the northeast corner of the project to allow for eventual consolidation with the Knollwood Grove property. A cash payment based on 0.866 will be made at time of plat. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 94-198 1) At this time, the project team does not have a final sign detail prepared for this project. A note has been added to the master site plan where the proposed entry signs are shown to note that all signage will be in compliance with the Boynton Beach Sign Code. At the time of preliminary plat application, sign details will be provided which comply with all Boynton Beach Sign Code requirements. 2A) The attached master site plan shows the layout of lots for the project which include minimum lot sizes and proposed setbacks as well as proposed common areas. Separate sheets within this package reflect typical lot layouts for proposed units as well as each type of lot (ie. perimeter, interior, backing up to a right-of-way, etc.) within the development. Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 3 2B) The conceptual landscape plan has been noted to reflect tree and shrub material that is proposed for the project. Specific plant materials have not been established at this time but ~ of materials and their minimum size requirements, which meet code requirements have been noted. 3) As part of the PUD application, the project team has proposed setbacks for each of the two unit types proposed for this development. Modifications have been made to the original setbacks proposed to address comments issued by the Building Department and the Fire Rescue Emergency Services Department. These revised setbacks are incorporated on the master site plan and typical lot details for this project. We understand that currently there are no projects incorporating a 40' wide lot within the City of Boynton Beach. There are three (3) communities in the unincorporated area of Palm Beach County within a three mile radius of this site, which do utilize a lot width of 40' or less. Two (2) of these communities are within Lake Charleston; the Kennedy Group project known as Charleston Shores, which incorporates a 36' wide detached single family lot, and Springfield, a Hovnanian Development, which incorporates a 38' wide single family lot. Also, at the intersection of 22nd Avenue North and Military Trail, Four Waves is developing a project called Princeton Place utilizing a 36' wide single family detached lot. It is the request of this project team to be allowed to go forth and present this project to the City Council for consideration of a 40' wide lot with the setbacks proposed. 4) A note has been added to the master plan and the master site plan has been duly noted to propose a 3' maintenance and drainage easement for each lot. 5) The pool screen enclosures proposed for this project will only be constructed with screened roofs, no hard roofs will be allowed. A note has been added to the setback tabular reflecting that. 7) A 1.5' roof overhang is typical for all lots in the development. The setback chart has been so noted. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM - 94-269 Boynton Nurseries PUD was annexed into the City of Boynton Beach in 1990 and has a valid development approval for 400 units. The project team has reviewed the Fire Department Memorandums in regards to annexation of property west of Lawrence Road. The project team understands the issues stated in the memo's, but they do not directly apply to this project as it is already within the Boynton Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 4 Beach service area. In regards to this specific project, a Fire Rescue Station is located on the intersection of Minor Road and Congress approximately 2.6 miles away from this site, approximately a 3 minute trip. Through access to the west would be better provided through an extension of Minor Road to Military Trail where it would not adversely effect the existing residents along Sun Up Lane and White Feather Road. As discussed at the TRC meeting, Old Military Trail (aka Sun Up Lane) exists only as a shell rock road approximately 10' in width to the west of this site. Old Military Trail is paved approximately 700' north of the northwestern property corner of this project. Therefore, a through-road for emergency access through this project will not provide an appropriate connection to properties to the west. A condition of the original approval was to provide stabilized fire access to Old Military Trail. The current plans have been modified to reconfigure this connection based on discussions at the TRC meeting. Construction of Minor Road between Congress Avenue and Lawrence Road is included in the Palm Beach County Five Year Plan (copy attached). This section of roadway is scheduled to be designed and constructed during fiscal year '94-95. This extension of Minor Road will allow for a reduced response time to the developments along Lawrence Road. The attached conceptual utility plans reflects a connection to adjacent water service lines on Lawrence Road to provide for acceptable fire flow. Also, these conceptual engineering plans and details provide for locations of fire hydrants. These fire hydrants will be located approximately 10' off back of pavement and on a shared property line between two lots, therefore, it will not be in the middle of the front yard. As discussed under engineering comments, the project team feels that ample on site parking is provided with each lot. Therefore, the occurance of vehicles being parked in the street should be minimal, if it occurs at all. Also, the site plan has been noted to reflect that a minimum 50' turning radius is provided at all intersections and a minimum 50'-120' centerline radius is provided on all curved roadways. All cul-de-sacs will have a minimum 90' pavement width within a 110' right-of-way to accommodate maneuvering of fire and rescue apparatus. The project team wishes to pursue a 40' x 100' lot size with a single family detached unit. The proposed setbacks for screened enclosures have been increased to be consistent with the building setbacks. Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 5 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 94-218 Based on discussions at the TRC meeting and the above referenced fire access issues, the stub road at the west end of the property has been eliminated. This corner of the property has been redesigned to include a continuous right-of-way which has a minimum centerline radius of 50' -120' which should be adequate to allow maneuvering by both public works trucks and fire and emergency vehicles. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 94-254 The following items have been addressed: 1) A revised survey which complies with City of Boynton Beach Land Development regulations is included with this resubmittal package. 2) The plans have been revised to reflect the loop road as an 80' collector roadway. All plans have been revised to reflect this 80' right-of-way and a typical section of this road is included in the resubmittal package. It is noted on the plans that this road will be dedicated publicly. A landscape easement is proposed within this section. 3) The future access denoted on the plan in the northeastern portion of the property has been eliminated at this time. This area is proposed as an open space/buffer which will serve as an adequate buffer between adjacent residential units in Pod B and the park site which is to be dedicated to the City. This open space buffer will remain within the Boynton Nurseries PUD. 4) The developers engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City codes and standards. 5) The developers engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City codes and standards. 6) The developers engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City codes and standards. 7) The road which serves Pod A, D and the recreation area has been increased to an 80' right-of-way to the point of entrance to Pod D to meet collector road standards. 8) A traffic statement has been provided to you under separate cover by Simmons & White Engineering. This statement was also forwarded to Dan Weisberg at Palm Beach County Engineering for their review. We are awaiting a sign off from Palm Beach County on this traffic report. Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 6 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 94-255 Pursuant to Appendix B, Planned Unit Development, Section 9, Internal PUD Standards, Item C - Oft Street Parking, the code states that 110ft street parking requirements shall in no event be less than two spaces per dwelling unit". This is reconfirmed in Section 11, Item H, Provision of Off Street Parking Spaces - 16A, "single-family and duplex dwellings, 2 spaces per dwelling unie. All units within the development will have at minimum a one (1) car garage. Based on previous developments of similar unit types, it is our experience that at least 60% of the units will have a two (2) car garage. Also, each unit will have a double wide driveway of 16' in width by 20' in length. The 16' width corresponds to the double wide garage door width of 16'. Therefore, in a situation where a unit has a single car garage, one of the required parking spaces is provided in the garage. A second space is provided within the 16' x 20' double wide driveway, which exceeds the 9' x 18' parking space minimum requirement. The majority of the homes will have a two car garage which could provide two parking spaces in the garage or, more realistically, one parking space will be provided in the garage and the second parking space will be provided within the 16' x 20' driveway (which exceeds the 9' x 18' parking space requirement). Realistically, two cars can be parked within the 16' x 20' double wide driveway, thereby providing essentially three parking spaces per unit for those with a single car garage and four parking spaces per unit for those with a double car garage. Therefore, the technical requirements of the code are met by providing two parking spaces per unit, one in the garage and one in the driveway adjacent to it. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 94-263 The following items have been or are being addressed: 1) Currently GL Homes is working with the Palm Beach County School Board who will be providing an impact statement for the project. 2) These items have been provided for on the conceptual engineering plans. 3) A note has been added to the conceptual landscape plan regarding perpetual maintenance and irrigation of public rights-of-way. Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 7 PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM The following issues have been addressed or are being commented on: .~/...t \)J 1) A general note has been added to the master plan drawing indicating that each residential dwelling unit will have two 9' wide x 18' long parking spaces. As previously mentioned under engineering comments, one space is being provided within the garage, the second within the adjacent driveway. The 16' x 20' driveway dimension exceeds the 9' x 18' dimension required for a parking space. 2) A master site plan has been included with this application which reflects the proposed street layouts for the project. 3) Also, the above referenced plan shows the lot and block layouts. 4) The previously approved master plan prepared by MSM Design Group based the LUI calculations on the gross lot area for the project. Therefore, the calculation being requested'will not be consistent with that utilized on the original master plan and which established the LUI rating of 4.00. By calculating the previously approved plan on a aross lot area but requiring this application to calculate the LUI data on a net lot area, we will essentially be comparing "apples to oranges", not "apples to apples". Therefore, to be consistent with the previous calculations, due to the fact that this is a minor master plan amendment to the previously approved project, the LUI calculations reflected on the attached plans continue to base their calculations on a gross lot area. 5&6) Again, the previously approved plan used an average floor area in completing the LUI calculations. It is my understanding there was no site plan or typical building plans provided at the time of the original approval. The proposed project has seven (7) Zero Lot Line unit types and eight (8) "Z" Lot unit types. Each unit can be accommodated on almost any lot within their appropriate pods. Therefore, there is no way to determine an accurate total floor area at this time. Therefore, the applicant requests to be permitted to calculate the LUI data based on an average floor area as previously approved. We have recalculated the average floor area to include the possibility of covered patios (which will count towards floor area) for these units. Covered patios are an option offered to a home owner. In past experience, typically 50% of the unit owners will opt for a covered patio. Therefore, the total FAR for this project has increased to 16.76 acres. The LUI data has been recalculated based on the new average FAR. Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 8 7) Additional sheets have been added to the master plan package which show the proposed typical setbacks for buildings, pools and screen enclosures for each unit type. There are two (2) sheets included, one reflecting typical setbacks for the zero lot line homes and one reflecting typical setbacks for the IIZII lot homes. 8) The master site plan included in this set reflects the proposed maximum building envelopes on all lots which meet the proposed setbacks. Also, property development regulations for all corner lots or irregular shaped lots, etc. have been included on this plan. The master plan and master site plan reflect a 25' building setback/landscape easement (fka. open space setback line) on the north and west property boundaries consistent with the original approved master plan. 9) The applicant is requesting consideration on a 5' open space setback line along the southern property line due to the fact the LWDD canal L-21 exists adjacent to our southern boundary. The additional 35' that must be dedicated for the canal as well as the 50' wide canal and a 5' open space setback creates an open space buffer of 90' adjacent to these lots. 10) The master site plan reflects sidewalk and bike path locations for the project. 11) The engineering cross sections provided in this package have been amended to reflect the 80' public road right-of-way required and the bike path shown on the outside of the loop road. 12) The plan has been so noted. 13) The plan has been so noted. 14) The plan has been so noted. 15) The landscape buffer proposed adjacent to Old Military Trail consists of trees and a hedge, and has been shown on the master landscape plan. 16) The master landscape plan has been amended to reflect symbols and notes for location and classification of species for proposed landscape material. Final landscape plans will be completed as part of the preliminary plat submittal. These final plans will reflect specific species for these minimum requirements as noted on the conceptual landscape plan. 17) The additional 35' required for the LWDD L-21 Canal will be dedicated by deed to the LWDD. Until this dedication occurs, the north property line of Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 9 the LWDD L-21 Canal continues to be the southern property line of this project as reflected on the attached survey. A note has been added to the plans reflecting the proposed location of the future southern property line following dedication of the additional right-of-way to LWDD. Again, due to the fact that all previous data was calculated on a gross site area, the current data calculation remains unchanged to continue for a consistent comparison between the previously approved and the proposed master plan. 18) Included with this application are necessary documents for the City Attorney regarding Unified Control. I spoke with Mr. Cherof in regards to the information he felt would be necessary to meet this requirement. Included with this package is a copy of the latest warranty deed, an agents authorization from the current property owner authorizing Kilday & Associates to proceed on their behalf and a letter from GL Homes the contract purchaser in regards to their intent for the property and future development. 19) At this time, there are no fences or walls proposed for this project. A note has been added to the conceptual landscape plan that all mechanical equipment such as air-conditioning units will be adequately screened with a 24" high hedge at time of installation to be maintained at a height that will completely screen the subject unit. All other mechanical or utility related items will also be adequately screened. 20) The plans have been so noted. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Earlier discussions with Kevin Hallahan indicated that due to the fact that no significant understory exists within the preservation area, he would not object to allowing passive recreation to occur underneath the existing canopy. Therefore, the applicant does not intend to fence off the preservation area as it will be used for passive recreation. 2) The plan has been so noted. 3) Typically, this developer dedicates all landscape buffers as an easement across the rear of individual lots. These buffer tracts are not dedicated to the homeowners association but to the individual property owner. 4) As previously aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of a proposed 40' x 100' lot. At this time, we realize no Ms. Tambri J. Hayden Mr. Mike Haag September 2, 1994 Page 10 other projects within the City of Boynton Beach have been approved with this lot size but there are several projects aforementioned in the immediate vicinity that are currently under construction and the applicant requests opportunity to pursue this product type. 5) The enclosed master site plan reflects the proposed building orientation for all corner lots. An attempt has been made to keep a consistent streetscape as discussed in the TRC meeting. 6) Generally, the purpose for screen enclosures is to screen in a backyard pool, therefore, the screen enclosure setbacks proposed will allow a backyard pool to be screened in. The proposed screen enclosure setbacks are noted on the master site plan. 7) The side setback proposed for pools from the non-zero lot line side has been increased to 12' . The side setback proposed for screened enclosures from the non-zero lot line side has been increased to 10'. 8) The proposed setbacks meet this recommendation. 9) The rear setback proposed for all "back to back" lots for pools has been increased to 7' and the rear setback proposed for "back to back" lots for screen enclosures has been increased to 5'. 10) On all "back to back" lots, the rear setback has been increased to 15'. On those lots adjacent to the projects perimeter, lakes or preserve area, a 10' rear setback is proposed. In no case will any building encroach within the 25' building setback/landscape easement. 11) The plan has been so noted. I would appreciate an opportunity to review this response letter and the revised plans prior to the September 13, 1994 Technical Review Committee meeting. If you have any questions or concerns in regards to these plans or any other items contained herein, please do not hesitate to contact me immediately. S/r~ty, c~kW~~e~ cc: GL Homes Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble LN~ . . . . . . . . . . ...... Lawson, Noble & Associates, Inc. September 2, 1994 City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Attn: Mr. William Hukill, P.E. City Engineer Re: BOYNTON NURSERY L.N. & A. Project 94-235 Dear Mr. Hukill: The master plan is in compliance with Appendix C, Article 8, Section 4 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances for the master plan requirements. 'Ie any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. RWL:zrp cc: Collene Walter ZRP\LANO\HUKU.902 Engineer. Planner. Surveyor. 420 Columbia Drive. West Palm Beach, FL 33409. PH. (407) 684-6686. FAX (407) 684-1812 590 NW, Peacock Blvd., Suite 10. Port SI. Lucie, FL 34986. PH, (407) 878-1700. FAX (407) 878-1802 LN~ . . . . . . . . . . ...... Lawson, Noble & Associates, Inc. BOYNTON NURSERY L.N. & A. PROJECT NO. 94-235 PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER CALCULATIONS NOTE: Furthest manhole at western portion of site will need to be 4' - 4.5' deep (depth varies based on size of pipe allowing for minimum cover). Based on preliminary evaluations of proposed elevations, the invert of this manhole will be between elevation 12.00 and 12.50 N.G. V.D. The following data was calculated for 8", 1 0", 12" and 15" sewer mains: PIPE PIPE SLOPES INVERT @ SIZE LENGTH FURTHEST M.H. @ WESTERN PORTION 8- 3050':t X 0.42% = 12.81 + 7.11* = 19.92 N.G.V.D. 10- 3050':t X 0.30% = 9.15 + 7.11 * = 16.26 N.G.V.D. 12- 3050':t X 0.24% = 7.32 + 7.11 * = 14.43 N.G.V.D. 15- 3050':t X 0.17% = 5.19 + 7.11* = 12.30 N.G.V.D. *Invert elevation at existing manhole at southeast entrance to Lawrence Road = 7.11 N.G.V.D. Based on the above calculations, a 15" gravity sanitary sewer main would be required to serve this project. If the 15" sewer system is not approved by the Palm Beach County Health Department, then an onsite lift station would be required. ZRP\lAND\94-235.CAl LIMITS ...........__.__...__........._____..___..__..........___.e________.______________________________..________-------.-.-----.- PROJECT DESIGN PROJECTS DESCRIPTION ROAD LAME CONST MILES MILES YEAR STATUS EXIIlln 15 FY 90191 DESIGN PROJECTS: Aus tral i an Ave Southem Bl't'd - PBIA 0.5 .i, 6 L 0.5 1.0 F ON HOUl- _I t PBC/FDOT Austral i an Ave Old Okeechobee - Palm Beech Lakes 2.0 .1, 6 L 2.0 4.0 F ON HOlD-6SX revi ew Fo lsOlll Rd/Cres twood sa 80 - Okeechobee B l't'd 1.5 .i, 2 L 1.5 3.0 1995 Under Design-prell.iMry Indiantown Road 130th Ave - Jupiter FanRI Rd 3. 1 .i, 4 L 3.1 6.2 1997 Under Desi;n-65X review Mf l f tary Traf l SW 18th St. - Palmetto Park Rd 1.1 .i, 6 L 1.1 2.2 F ca4PLETE Palmetto Park Rd - S. of Glades Rd 1.4 .1, 6 L 1.4 2.8 1996 ca4PLETE Mf lItary Trail S. of Glades Rd . Clfnt Moore Rd 3.0 .i, 6 L 3.0 6.0 F Awelt Consultant Selection Military Trail Clfnt Moore Rd - W. Atlantic Ave 3.0 .i, 6 L 3.0 6.0 F Aweit Consultant Selection Proaperi ty Fanns Rd PGA Bl't'd - Donald Ross Rd 2.5 .i, 5 L 2.5 5.0 F ON HOlD per Coo.rlty Engineer SUlni t B l 't'd Congress - E of Fla Mango 0.7 .i, 5 L 0.7 1.4 1994 CXl4PLETE Westgate Ave J~ Rd - CCngress Ave 3.5 .i, 5 L 3.5 7.0 1996 SnDY c:cMPLETE ---------.-. 10 PROJECTS 22_3 44.6 ROAD LAME CONST PtlOJECT LIMITS DESCR I PT I ON MILES MILES YEAR STATUS .------------------------..-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FY 91/92 DESIGN PtlOJECTS: 45th Street Turnpika Interchange Blue Heron Bl't'd 1-95 - AVenJe S Congress Ave Lantana - Lake Worth Flavor Pict Rd W of E-3 Canal - Military Trail Germantown Rd LInton Bl't'd . sw 10th St Northlake (Relfever) Military Trail - Garden Road Garden Road - Congress Ave Palmetto Park Road SW 9th Ave - U.S. 1 Royal Pal. Bch Bl't'd 40th Street - Orange Grove Bl't'd PtlOJECT LIMITS -----------------..----------.------------.-----.....------.-----.-.--.----.-.....----------------------------------------... FY 92/93 DESIGN PROJECTS: Iolles Canal Rd Bridge over North New Rfver Canal Congress Ave Blue Heron Blvd - Northlake Blvd Forest Hill Blvd South Shore Drive - sa 7 Gateway Bl't'd(NW 22nd)Mfl itery Trail' Congress Ave Jog Road Lake Worth Rd - Forest Hill Blvd Mellleuca Lane Jog Road - Military Trail Okeechobee Blvd Royal Pal.. Bch Bl't'd - sa 7 South Shore Blvd Big Blue Trace - Forest Hill Blvd Wellington Trace Greenview Trace - Big Blue Trace Westgate Avenue Military Trail - Congress Avenue Woolbright Road Congress AVenJe - 1-95 PROJECT LIMITS ..-...-..-.-..................----..........-..-.........-.-.--.-----.......-.---.--..-...--.--...---..-----......-.........- FY 93/94 DESIGN PROJECTS: Jog Road CLint Moore Rd - Linton Blvd Jog Road Boynton Bch Blvd - Lake Charleston Lake Worth Road South Shore Blvd - Wycllffe Lantana Road Military Trail, Congress Ave Miner Road Lawrence Rd . Congress Ave Royal Pal.. Bch Blvd Orange Grove Blvd. Persimmon Blvd I nterc:hange 1.2 .1, 6 L 2.0 .i, 6 L 0.5 .i, 2 L 0.6 IIi, 4/5 L 1.0 IIi, 2/3 L o . 7 .i, 213 L 1.2 III, 6 L 0.5 .i, 4 L 8 PROJECTS DESCRIPTION 0.5.1,3L 1.5 IIi, 213 L 1.5..1,6L 2.0 .i, 6 L 2.2I1i,6L 2.0 .i, 5 L 2.0 .i, 6 L 0.9 lIIi, 4 L 1.3 IIi, 4 L 1.5 IIi, 5 L 0.9 IIi, 6 L 11 PROJECTS DESCRIPTION 2.2 IIf, 6 L 2.3 mi, 4 L 2.9 Illi, 2/3 L 1.3 llIi, 6 L 1.0 mi, 213 L 0.5 IIi, 5 L 6 PROJECTS 0.0 1.2 2.0 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.2 0.5 0.0 2.4 4.0 1.0 1.2 2.0 1.4 2.4 1.0 STUDY COMPLETE . Pha.e I under Desililr'l-35X review FOOT Roadway - DELETED Under Design-65X complete DELETED Await ALignment Study Under Design-prel iraiMry Transferred to FOOT CXl4PLETE F 1996 F 1996 F F 1994 F 1993 7.7 15.4 ROAD LAME CONST MILES MILES YEAR STATUS 0.5 0.5 1994 Ctl4PLETE 1.5 3.0 1994 Under Design-prel illllMry 1.5 3.0 F Under Design-preliminary 2.0 4.0 1998 Under Desfgn-65X review 2.2 4.4 1994 Under Des i gn-prel illi Mry 2.0 4.0 F Under Deslgn-35X review 2.0 4.0 1994 Under Design-prellmi nary 0.9 1.8 1996 Under Des;gn-35X complete 1.3 2.6 1994 Under Design-65% review 1.5 3.0 1996 Under Design-35% complete 0.9 1.8 1997 Under Design-35X complete ------------ 16.3 32.1 ROAD LAME CONST MILES MILES YEAR STATUS 2.2 2.3 2.9 1.3 1.0 0.5 4.4 4.6 5.8 2.6 0.5 1.0 1997 1997 F F 1995 1997 Awaft Consultant Selection Awai t Consul tent Selection Await Consultant Selectfon Await Consultant Selection Await Consultant Selection Await Consultant Selection 10.2 18.9 en\ \ -\-w.)o.(d ~ ef\d Of '?eft DRAFT 1'''' (pfN (;,l"r f ' CIT~' of BOYNTON BEACH @.'."...'.' r-'._.;,~ '.~." '~ - - OFFICE 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33435.0310 1407) 734.8111 OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR March 23, 1990 Atty. Roger G. Saberson 110 East Atlantic Avenue Delray Beach, Fl 33444 RE: Boynton Nurseries - Rezoning to PUD - File No. 385 Dear Mr. Saberson: Please be advised that on Tuesday, March 20, 1990, the City Commission approved the above referenced rezoning request, SUbject to the attached staff comments as modified by the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board listed in Memorandum No. 90-058 from the Planning Department (see attached). With respect to items no. 2 and 7 in memorandum 90-e58, please be advised of the following: Item No.2 The traffic study prepared by K. S. Rogers, Inc.p dated March 8, \ 1990, as amended by the Addendum dated March 15, 1990 will require review and approval by the City Commission. This will be done prior to second reading of the ordinance to rezone the property. Item No.7 The barrier shall be two posts and a chain constructed to meet the requirements of the Fire and Police Departments. Please also note that, per the discussion at the public hearing, it will be necessary to show a barrier and/or buffer along Old Military Trail on the plat or site plan for this portion of the project. If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH TIMOTHY P. CANNON Interim Planning Director JJG:frb Encs A:Saberson MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 ", ~'~^-~~f"~~"i"d~;:-"~~~-^~-;:--~~^90.:o'~-h~; e by the ~dge. " ...., '''. , ~, , In connecti~ with item~~22, City Manager iller i \ this was the ~d of Moore~ Ellrich's bills n the \ r~radewinds set tl~ent. "'- \ ~.Receive and File onthl I I I i I Month~y Activity Reporf avai1ab~e by City Manage " -- ruling yet Motion Commissioner 'sche moved to app Dve the Con nt Agenda with the exception 0 item D.l., which ill be disc sed later in "'the meeting and 1 em #38 under "0. roval of ls." Commissioner Weine seconded the moti which car 'ed 5-0. BID~'~ None. ' -.-. --."-.------.."..---"" ._ _ 'M__.._'_...--.... PUBLIC HEARINGS , . ,..- --".~ -_. ~ ....--"'..--- - ~- - ~._--~ - ~-, '''<--.,~ A. project Name: Description: Boynton Nurseries (Continued to March 20, 1990) Delfin Menendez & Roger Saberson Boynton Nurseries Lawrence Rd. at the L.W.D.D. L-2l Canal, NW corner REZONING: Request for rezoning from AG (Agriculture) to a Planned Unit Development with a Land Use Intensity = 4 (PUD w/LUI=4). Agent: Owner: Location: Jim Golden, Senior Planner explained the Commission had pre- viously approved a low density residential land use category which is in the process of being reviewed by the State. Upon favorable response from DCA, Ordinances to annex, amend the Future Land Use Element and rezone can be prepared for first reading. The proposed Master Plan provides for construction of 400 dwelling units. Pods A and B are single family. Pods C, D and E will either be duplex or multi- family. Mr. Golden indicated there is a 2.84 acre private park located in the central portion of the PUD. The appli- cant will provide five recreational amenities and requests 50% credit for that park. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval, subject to staff comments with certain exceptions. The seven excep- tions are outlined in memorandum 90-058 from the Interim 11 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 Planning Director to the City Manager. Rather than the PZB vote being unanimous, Mr. Golden believed the vote had been 6-1. Mr. Golden went over the seven exceptions addressed on memorandum 90-058. Relative to point #3, he stated this concerned the issuance of building permits related to road improvements and this had been modified to correspond with the same conditions as the Target Shopping Center approval. Relative to point #4, concerning ownership documents for unified control, Mr. Golden remarked this information had been forwarded to the City Attorney. In connection with point #7, regarding the proposed barrier, Inspector Cavanaugh had indicated this would consist of two metal posts with a chain between them which could be cut or removed in an emergency. Mr. Golden indicated the developer intended to have a security guard gate system. Commissioner Wische asked why the Planning Dept. was insisting on having the collector road be public instead of private. Mr. Golden responded that comment was from the Fire, Police and Planning Depts. The Planning Dept.'s comment related to a policy in the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the Commission allowed the development to have a private security system, they would have to go with private roads as the City's Subdivision Regulations would not allow guardhouses or security systems on a public road. Vice Mayor Olenik asked if the Police and Fire Depts. would have a problem with the road being private from a logistics standpoint. City Manager Miller stated we would need an official request of the Homeowners' Association relative to the enforcement of speed limit signs and they would have to handle their own no parking signs within the development. The City has no obligation for maintenance. The Vice Mayor asked if staff had a problem with the recom- mendation of 2.84 acres for the park and then cash for the .535 acre. Interim Planning Director Cannon stated if you had the 2.84 acres plus the acreage which would need to be dedicated from the property to the north, you would have a sufficient neighborhood park. He felt 4 to 5 acres was needed to have a neighborhood park. Mr. Cannon thought people all along the Lawrence Rd. corridor would use the park. This is the last opportunity to get a public park along Lawrence Rd. Mayor Moore stated the only reason for making the developer pay money or set aside a park was because of the people that 12 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 would be coming in and who would ordinarily impact other park areas. If the developer is required to set aside land that they could othervise develop to accommodate the impact they are putting on the park system, he didn't know why it should be a public park. Mr. Cannon responded it was a Code requirement and discussion ensued. This park would be accessible off of Lawrence Rd. Attorney Roger Saberson, representing Boynton Nurseries stated they would be providing a 2.84 acre private recreation facility within the development. It is to be used by all the residents within the development, but would not be open to the public. As to the remainder of the park requirement, which was an additional 3.375 acres, they requested to be allowed (under the Subdivision Regulations), to pay a fee in lieu of the actual land setaside. Discussion ensued. Vice Mayor Olenik thought substantial new residential growth is taking place along the Lawrence Rd. corridor and City owned neighborhood parks are needed along the corridor which provide the additional amenities, the citizens want. The Vice Mayor was concerned that if this is a private park with limited amenities, the residents will have to use other City parks. The Vice Mayor requested clarification on memorandum No. 90-058 which said the developer would be making a cash payment to the City equivalent to the value of the remaining .535 acres. Mr. Saberson stated they would like to pay the fee required under the Subdivision Ordinance in lieu of pro- viding the actual land. They are willing to pay for 3.375 acres and provide a 2.84 acre park for private purposes shown on the Master Plan. Mr. Cannon estimated the value of the land in that area to be about $40,000 per acre. That would work out to about $135,000. Mr. Cannon indicated the Subdivision Regulations require a dedication of approxima- tely six acres per thousand in population. The developer would have the cption of getting half credit if they provide private recreation facilities but that would still leave approximately three acres to be dedicated. Mr. Cannon thought three options existed. The City could either take the money or they could require the full dedica- tion of 3.375 acres or the Commission could go with the PZB recommendation that the dedication be reduced by half an acre and that the developer pay $20,000 in cash to develop the park. The alternatives were considered. Discussion transpired on whether the Code required dedica- tion of six acres of land per thousand in population. Mr. Saberson referred to a copy of the City's Subdivision 13 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 Regulations which he had been provided and interpreted that the Code doesn't require that but rather that is a formula used. Either you dedicate the land or you pay a fee in lieu of the dedication, based on the acreage value of the land. Mr. Saberson referred to a section of the new Comprehensive Plan which he felt supported his interpretation. He didn't think there was any requirement in the Code specifically requiring a park. Reference was made to another policy in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Saberson stated the City had done a study of where they wanted to see parks in the future. They specifically identified properties for the location of neighborhood parks. The Boynton Nurseries pro- perty was not listed but the property immediately north was. Mr. Saberson felt the responsibility for the park was being shifted onto his property. Mr. Saberson felt the Subdivision Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan do not establish criteria to determine in what cases a landowner is to be required to dedicate a public park and in what cases payment in lieu could be made. Remarks were made by Mr. Saberson about whether the City could afford to adequately maintain the park. Reference was made by Mr. Saberson to other developments along the Lawrence Rd. corridor that had been permitted to have private recreation facilities and make a payment in lieu of providing a public park. He requested the same. Mr. Cannon made comments about the neighborhood park sites designated in the Recreation Element only addressing the areas East of Lawrence Rd. At the time that Element was prepared the Commission still had the policy that we were not going to annex West of Lawrence Rd. He stated that was why this particular site was not designated. Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director didn't feel this issue would have been so important if we had gotten the five acres across the street next to the school and had a school/park complex. With the loss of that, this situation has become even more critical. He believed in this case the land was more important than receiving the money. Mr. Frederick wanted this to be totally a public site. He thought an instance where the City might want to accept money in lieu of the land would be when the acreage was small or when there is already an existing public park next to a development. Then it would make more sense to take the money so the City could add amenities to an existing park site. Commissioner Weiner never wanted to see the City receive money in lieu of land for a public park. The land could be 14 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 put in the park bank to be developed as quickly as possible. She thought the neighborhood park concept was excellent and she hoped the Commission would support that concept in every respect. Vice Mayor Olenik suggested that allowing for up to 50% cre- dit, that up to three acres be allowed for the private park. This would still allow about three acres for a public park, with access along Lawrence Rd. It would be ideal if this could be along Boynton Nurseries north border because when Knollwood Groves comes in we might be able to get the dedi- cation of their land on the south and join the two together for a nice neighborhood park on Lawrence Rd. The Vice Mayor referred to losing the proposed school park at Citrus Cove and losing the park at the corner of 22nd AVe. and Congress. He was afraid that as land becomes more precious, the first thing to go is something like parks. Discussion took place with Mr. Saberson who didn't feel cri- teria to be used existed in the Ordinances. Mr. Saberson made remarks about past precedence in the City. City Attorney Cherof referred to a four part criteria to be con- sidered which is set forth in the Code under the Subdivision Section on page 2124. The copy of the Code recently purchased by Mr. Saberson did not have this reference. Discussion ensued. Mr. Saberson thought the criteria should have been established in the Comprehensive Plan and should not be done on an ad hoc basis. Discussion took place about the PZB recommendation. Relative to how much land would be required for park dedica- tion, Mr. Frederick clarified according to the Ordinance formula, they are required to provide 6.75 acres for public park property. They provided private recreation and met those needs, therefore they get half credit. Now they owe 3.375 acres of public land for parks. The staff recommen- dation was to provide that all in land at the site noted on the plan. The PZB recommended that only 2.8 acres of the 3.375 be provided in land and the remainder in cash. Since this was a PUblic Hearing, Mayor Moore asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to comment on the application. Maurice Rosenstock, 1 Villa Lane, Boynton Beach made com- ments about what is going on in Palm Beach County. There are already 200,000 residences approved that do not have to comply with the infrastructure that is supposed to be in place. There is a shortage of any type of public land. He encouraged the Commission to make it a policy to take the land, not the money. Once the City has the land in its bank, it can be developed in the future. 15 Kilday &- AIISOC;.._'" Landscape Architects! Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 VIA COURIER City of Boynton Beach Planning Department DAU August la, 1994 PROJECT NAME Boynton Nurseries ATT Gary Lanker & Tambri Hayden PROJECT NUMBER 1020.7 WE TRANSMIT: ~ HEREWITH o UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING: ~ PRINTS 0 SPECIFICATIONS 0 ADDENDUM DTRACINGSISEPIAS 0 SUBMITTALS 0 CHANGE ORDER o SHOP DRAWINGS 0 COpy OF LETTER 0 THIS IS TRANSMITTED TO YOU: ACTION CODE: o FOR APPROVAL 0 FOR REVIEW & COMMENT ~ FOR YOUR USE l1U AS REQUESTED A REVIEWED B NOT REVIEWED C REVIEWED & NOTED o RESUBMIT E DO NOT RESUBMIT F RESUBMIT FOR FILES NO OF COPIES DATE DRAWING OR ITEM NO DESCRIPTION/REMARKS ACTION CODE 1 2-20-90 OF I believe this is the latest approved plan for Boynton Nurseries \ -~V 1L L.o-I/' 0 \ q At'\- .-r..0 -5 JJ &- tJ v \~ Jl4 Jj~L ,ill m :" 1 8 1991 m PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE ----fI COPIES TO WITH ENCLOSURE o o o o o FILE CODE SHOP DRAWING DIV SIGNED ~Dl1lLtLLUu1~ / die) Collene Walter / MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 Mr. Jeffrey Peterson, 4403 White Feather Trail, Boynton Beach stated he was President of the Trail Bend Homeowners' Association. Their Association strongly supported accep- tance of the land in this case, rather than money and he explained. Mr. Peterson pointed out the intersection of Sunup Trail and Old Military Trail. He expressed concern about a shellrock road in his neighborhood being turned into a major access point for the residents of the new development. Mr. Peterson stated his Association was not against a breakable barrier but wanted assurance it would not just be a low shrub hedge. They wanted to make sure there was proper fencing and that the breakable barrier is maintained. He wanted a restriction made that there will be no access from that point, even for construction traffic. Vice Mayor Olenik asked if construction traffic could be restricted on Sunup Trail. Mr. Cannon thought it could be attached as a condition of the zoning and also a limited access barrier could be placed on the Plat along that por- tion of the property. The Vice Mayor asked about fencing around the proposed pro- ject. Mr. Delfin Mendendez replied they had not made up their mind yet on whether to fence the entire project in. The project has a long way to go toward site planning. Eventually they would have private roads and would have complete security around the parameter of the project, except those areas that have to have emergency access. If approved tonight, the Commission would not be approving a fence enclosed project. Discussion took place on when the park issue should be handled, at the present time or at the time of site plan approval. It was noted that normally the park land dedica- tion would take place at the time of final platting. Before Vice Mayor Olenik was willing to agree to the rezoning he wanted to hear the developer's representative indicate he agreed that at final plat approval, park land will be dedi- cated to the City. Mr. Saberson responded while he felt there were standards the City should have in the Ordinance and in the Comprehensive Plan that are not sufficiently clear, his client would be agreeable to dedicating the 2.84 acres on the condition that the City would provide a 60' landscaped buffer within the park along the north/so~th line and the east/west line and that the access would corne directly off Lawrence Rd., so they could still have their private streets. Commissioner Weiner thought the Planning Dept. memorandum referred to dedication of 3.375 acres for the park. Mr. 16 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 Saberson stated what he had referred to was the PZB recom- mendation. He thought when the Commission was discussing it the half acre was not a material concern. The Vice Mayor remarked he didn't have a problem with the half acre as long as the City got the land. Mr. Frederick was concerned with the 60' landscaped buffer. He hated to lock the City into a number without going into some type of design. The Vice Mayor thought some of the residents in the proposed development might like having access to the park. Discussion took place. Mr. Saberson reworded the statement and said they were asking for a reasonable buffer zone between the park and their project on the two property lines. Mr. Saberson indicated they would meet with Mr. Frederick in connection with the width and would come up with some type of landscape proposal and work it out. Other comments were made by Mr. Peterson. His Association was concerned with having a sufficient buffer between the edge of Sunup Tr~il and where the pavement would begin for the loop road at the west edge of the proposed development. His A~sociation ~ad suggested 60'. The property owner had agreed to 40'. Mayor Moore reminded Mr. Peterson that this was a rezoning application. Some of these issues would be addressed at the time of site plan review. The Vice Mayor suggested Mr. Peterson put his neighborhood's concerns in letter form to the City Manager. Those concerns could be addressed at the time of site plan review. Mr. Peterson made comments about a traffic light going into the school area and going into the development at the south entrance. The Vice Mayor noted the County handles traffic lights there. Mr. Peterson also requested there be a tree inventory of the valuable trees that are to be preserved in the western por- tion, so that future owners would be aware. An there was no further input from the audience, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. The Vice Mayor r~marked the PZB recommendation was subject to all staff com~ents with the exception of 7 points. Mr. Cannon stated the Commission had both the staff comments and the PZB recommendation in front of them. They could pick and choose or ev~n formulate their own conditions. Commissioner Weiner referred to page 5 of Planning Dept. memorandum No. 90-052 where the School Board indicated stu- dents generated by this project would overcrowd schools in the area. She thought this supported the argument that we need a high school in the City. 17 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 20, 1990 Motion Vice Mayor Olenik moved to approve the rezoning of the pro.- perty, subject to the Planning & Zoning Board's recommen- dations of March 13, 1990. Commissioner Wische seconded the motion which carried 5-0. r-' ~<<..", ..".....-..,...---''''-~-_.._--- ~~s~e Manag~t South (Continued to March 20, 1990) Pruitt & Pruitt, p.~~. - Dual Cou '" Boynton Industrial V-e~~ure East side of High Ridg~""~oad, between Industrial Way and Miner~Q. extended ABAN'DQNMENT: Reques t for th~~bandonmen t~" , of a por,t,ion of Commerce Park b~ve '.', Waste Manage~ent South ~. (Continued to"~rch 20, 1990) _ _"'- Pruitt & pruitt,"'~.A. - Dual County Surve~ors Boynton Industrial "v'\l~nture """. ,East side of High Ricrge Road, between ' , ''lQ.dUS. trial Way and Mine~~.gd. extended AB~ONMENT: Request for t~ abandonment of a l~ ft. by 20 ft. draina~easement ~.". D. projl9ct Name: Waste Mana~ment South "'-,-"" I (Continued to''''~arch 20, 1990) ""- ! Agent: Pruitt & pruitt~p.A. - Dual County Su~veyors l Owner: Boynton Industria~ enture l Location: East side of High Ri e Road, between I ""'" Industrial Way and Min ..... Rd. extended ;," Description: A~ANDONMENT: Request for bQe abandonment r "'-" ot,.,a. 5 ft. by 18 ft. utili t~easement \ Jim '~'~den, Senior Plan~'er,., addressed the three :;'~onments : at the ~me time and stated"''',~he purpose of the aband'oQments \ was to co~ine six platted lob~, for uni ty of ti tIe to ~:llow / for site pla~ approval. Staff~? P~B recommendations with i regard to the',abandonments and the....,.s~ te plan were for appro- I val, subject td'"staff comments. .. '\., \" " As this was a Publl~ Hearing, Mayor Moor'e" asked if there \iaS ~nyone present who wi~~ed to speak in favO'r"of...or in opposi- t'on to the application. As there was no pUb.~ic input, the PU IC HEARING WAS CLOSE ", ! ..." .... "" ( Commis 'oner Weiner moved to'~rove the three aba~aQnments. \ Commissi er Artis seconded the,~otion which carried ~70. " .. '....,'., "'. '.." ........"'... "\ Waste Management Sout~ Ron Dorris, AlA, PA - PTuitt & Pruitt, PA h...., ;"'" ',_. "''''~"__.,.......;............,.....,_,,.<,-,,/_- .............~,""'_ B. Project Name: ~. Agen t: ",,- Owner: Location: --. ""--.., Description: c.~ct Name: " '.... Agent: Owner: Location: " Description: "', D. 1. Projec L.__Agen t: 18 ,/'(9 ./ 5. ( 7.} ___ '---..7 b 1(2/2 ?vry PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-058 (AGENDA MEMORANDUM) TO: J. Scott Miller, City Manager FROM: Timothy P. Cannon, Interim Planning Director DATE: March 14, 1990 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Boynton Nurseries - Rezoning Please place the referenced item on the City Commission agenda for Tuesday, March 20, 1990 under Public Hearings. DESCRIPTION: Request submitted by Boynton Nurseries to rezone property located on Lawrence Road at L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal, northwest corner, from AG (Agriculture) to a Planned unit Development with a Land Use Intensity=4 (PUD w/LUI=4). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this request, subject to staff comments (see attached), with the following modifications: 1. That the hold harmless agreement referenced in the Fire Department memorandum be included on the plat documents and the homeowners' association documents. 2. That the applicant submit a revised traffic study which proposes that the project be phased. The required road improvements will be those which are recommended in this revised traffic study, subject to review and approval by the City. (It should be noted that it will be necessary for the City to bill the applicant for the cost of review of the developer's revised traffic study by the City'S traffic consultant). That the issuance of building permits for the residential dwelling units will be contingent upon the assurance of improvements in the County's five year Transportation Improvement Program or posting of surety for developer commitments, rather than being contingent upon the letting of contracts for the required roadway improvements. 3. That the City Attorney review the ownership documents to determine if the requirements for unified control have been met, pursuant to Section 6 of Appendix B - Planned Unit 'Developments, of-the Code of Ordinances. That the developer be allowed to dedicate 2.84 acres for a public park site instead of the 3.375 acres referenced in Item No.6 of the Planning Department Memorandum No. 90-053. The developer will make a cash payment to the City equivalent to the value of the remaining 0.535 acres required. 6. That the developer not be required to provide a publicly owned collector road as referenced in the Fire, Police and Item No.5 of the Planning Department Memorandum No. 90-053. The developer is requesting that the collector road be privately owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. That the design of the barrier to be used for emergency access purposes from the west be clarified by the Police and Fire Departments. This information will be provided to the City Commission at the March 20, 1990 Commission meeting. ~7d-~,~ TIMO Y P. CANNON - / /' / / / TO: PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-053 Chairman and Members Planning and Zoning Board THRU: Timothy P. Cannon jrC Interim Planning Director FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Assistant City Planner DATE: March 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Rezoning - File No. 385 Please be advised of the following Planning Department staff comments relative to the above-referenced request for rezoning to PUD: @.. 1. The private recreation facilities shall be bonded with approval of the first plat and completed within 21 months of approval of the first plat. Appendix C, Article XI, Section 5. 2. It is recommended that the applicant post a bond at the time of platting for 50% of the cost of providing pedestrian signalization to enable safer pedestrian movement from this project to Palm Beach County School "P" located on the opposite (east) side of Lawrence Road (Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.4.4). 3. Sidewalks/bike paths are required on all collector and local streets to provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian circulation. With respect to the small loop road in the southwest portion of the site, the Technical Review Board, at the prehearing conference on March 1, 1990, agreed to accept a pedestrian path in lieu of a sidewalk, to link the units fronting on the pod A loop road to the private recre- ation area. Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.11.9. and 2.4.4, Section 11, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision Regula- ations. 4. The width of the loop road in pod A has not been specified on the master plan. This width will have to be wide enough to accommodate (2) 11 foot lanes, swales for drainage, utilities, and any other necessary improvements. 5. The 80 foot collector road shall be a dedicated right-of-way consistent with Policy 1.3.8 of the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The remaining 3.375 acres required by the Subdivision Regulations for parks and recreation shall be dedicated in the northeast corner of the project for a neighborhood park, exercising the City's option of requiring land dedication, fees or a combination of both. Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.5.5 and Section 8, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision Regulations. 7. The availability of private recreation facilities to all residents of the PUD shall be specified consistent with Policy 5.5.3 of the Comprehensive Plan. 8. Approval of the rezoning to PUD is contingent upon approval of the annexation and land use amendment requests. ~ - 9. As was required of Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove, southbound right turn lanes are recommended at both project entrances. ;' / .~ planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-053 March 9, 1990, Page 2 // t 10. The fpllowing roadway improvements are required for approval of this request consistent with the 1989 City of Boynton ijeach Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 89-39) and Section 9.C.4.h(5) of Appendix A-Zoning: ~ o Project Entrances on Lawrence Road - Northbound left turn lane - Separate eastbound left turn and through/right tur~ iane o Six-laning of' Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard-.- -. to Miner Road* ~ o Six-laning of Congress Avenue from Miner Road, to Hypoluxo Road o Four-laning of Old Bdynton Road from Knuth Road to Lawrence Road* o Six-laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynton Road to I-95* * Improvements which are assured or are in the process of being assured either through the Palm "Beach County Transportation Improvement Program or developer commitments. In order for the traffic impact analysis to be considered complete, the applicant needs to show the "City that a 1992 buildout year is feasible and the analysis of projected conditions needs to"be expanded to all roadways impacted by the project assignment. In addition to this information, assurance of roadway improvements should be provided. ' Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway improvements would require the project to be scheduled for construction in the County Transportation Improvement Program, the.State Five Year Work Program or part of a Municipal Capital Improvement Program. The project may also be considered assured if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured through bonding with the City or County. Building permits for dwelling units cannot be issued for the proposed project until contracts have been let for the required roadway improvements as outlined above. Pursuant to policy 2.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the City can recommend to Palm Seach County that the developer's road impact fee payment be credited toward any of the roadway improvements listed above, subject to approval br Palm Beach County. " 'J ~. 11\ d~ .> ;j:tU-,v TAMBRI J. YDE TJH:frb Encs xc: Central File A:PM90-053 .. rrIie City of ~oynton ~each J'fc; If'.!- ~^,J'!.;7~ 100 'E. 'Boynton f}Jeadi. 'Boukvartf P.O. 'Bo;c.31O 'Boynton 'Btadr., ~Corufa 33425-0310 City:Hall: (407) 375-6000 ~fllX: (407) 375-6090 March 14, 1995 Kilday & Associates Collene W. Walter 1551 Forum Place suite 100 A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Rectified Master Plan Submittal Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. a.k.a. Nautica File No. MPMD 94-004 Dear Mrs. Walter: The rectified master plan for the Boynton Nurseries project has received final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee (TRC). A copy of the drawings have been transmitted to the Building Department for their review when issuing bUilding permits for the project. A copy of the drawings is available for your records. Please contact Doris Marttila at (407) 375-6260 to make arrangements for the pick-up of the drawings. Thank you for your cooperation during the master plan process of the development of the project. If you have any questions, please contact me at (407) 375-6260. Administrator l~~f)C f~ ~ fr~.t::: ,) ~65 ,/ ~ It< o L.,"~ J ': , '''\ MEH:dim cc: Central File &:Byn~~ur6.pl~/~H 5lmeru:a's (jateway to tfu (julfstream -- - ----- --------- -T1ie City 0:1" ":Boynton "23~~ach. @~ . - po" ~ - . I .. .g , :, ~ DI> 2:.. !Iro.JIn_.--.-.s-.r..-r4' !1'!'.O. .."",,-.$.10 ~B"~!P"'~ ~ ~ .!l$4RS-a3.1D Cteg:HiztIL ('-KIT.) 37S-6000 ~..PI.X: r40~ 37S-4OIPO FACSJ:H:J:LS TRANSH:E:SSI,:>N FAX NO: _~~~. a~~. ..f~' - L!~----",- ;{J. 0A'~A... h ? cj" - -2.s:- 7-.::2- /n.;:L." ./..h~J-- Yh~ /~. /..,.9'.s- _... .L3 ~ A/AA.#t ~.A' J '" ~ /?' tV: ~- LT ~~ ~~ ~------ ~, ___~~ :,..-/ _fi-?.&:-- h'A ~ P.A,-4~~ --I!,J4 r ~/ TO' Jl'ROM' DATE:' i'll:!:: NUMBER OJ:" PAGES .LNCX.UOING TH:r:S COVER lS.HB.J!!:"r' 02. . c: : FAXTR.AN lO; _ :frb j;l(nuon.:.a J ya.&e'f:POY t;O' tlie GuJ:fst,.Ubft [ TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT ** # COUNT ** f) ,,- *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATI KILDAY & AS:30 ON 1. D, ST ART TI ME DURATION #PAGES I COMMENT C, 3-14-95 3:02PM 1 ' 16" 2 TOT AL 0 : 01 ' 1 6" 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 rrIie City of 'Boynton 'Beach II?bJ~<r tit, 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Bouhvard P.O. 'BOi(310 'Boynton 'Beadi, %nitfa 33425-0310 City:Jfafl: (407) 375-6000 ~JU: (407) 375-6090 August 29, 1994 Mr. Dan Weisberg, Senior Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-21229 Re: Traffic statement Boynton Nurseries PUD Lawrence Road and LWDD, L-21 Canal Boynton Beach, Florida Dear Mr. Weisberg: Pursuant to the City Engineer's recommendation, we are forwarding the Traffic Impact Statement for the above-referenced project for review by Palm Beach County. Please review the attached Traffic Statement prepared by Robert F. Rennebaum, P.E. of Simmons & White, Inc., dated August 4, 1994, for conformity with the County's Traffic Performance Standard Ordinance. Please return comments regarding the traffic study to: Bill Hukill, City Engineer 100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Please provide a copy of the comments to: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Thank you for your prompt response. Haag Administrator 5:tI's:f~ic.nur o e A/lL- Iiv;:., "i !llmerica s (jateway to tlie (juCfstream rrIie City of 'Boynton $each /11-rJtW ;;1 e 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartf P.O. 'Bo;c310 'Boynton 'Beadi, %nitfa 33425-0310 City ~ (407) 375-6000 ~f4X: (407) 375-6090 ~/II:~ rJP-9 ,tf'tfJfS ~t.P t/Df" /ir1J& 6i2' August 29, 1994 Ms. Collene W. Walker - ~B9- 55J.J.. Kilday & Associates 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A West Palm Beach, FL 33401 RE: Boynton Nurseries - Master Plan Modification File No.: MPMD 94-004 Dear Ms. Walker, Please find attached the Technical Review Committee (TRC) comments regarding first meeting with staff of the master plan modification you requested for the above-referenced project. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (407) 375-6260. Administrator MEH/jj a;coCllllboyn.nur 2 5'lmema's (jateway to tlU (jutfstream MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 94 - 282 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning Directo FROM: John A. Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: August 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Master Plan Modification We offer the following comments on this project: 1) The package submtted to this office did not show any layout for water and sanitary sewer lines in the project, although mention was made in your cover memo of changes to the approved master plan. Please have the applicant provide drawing(s) indicating the proposed layout of the water and sewer systems for this PUD. The plans shall indicate appropriate looping of the water main, especially for POD A. (ECR II Sect. 9-G, Sect. 26-16 City Code). There is an existing water main north of the property in the right of way of Old Military Trail (aka Sun-Up Trail), to which the applicant can complete his loop. 2) The project engineer shall provide calculations in support of his sanitary sewer layout, demonstrating the feasibility of extending gravity sewer from Lawrence Road to the extreme west end of the project, if that is his intent. (Sec. 26-16 City Code) 3) Provide a typical cross-sectional view of the utilities within a 40-foot right-of-way and adjoining easement, so as to demonstrate serviceability of our proposed lines. We request this project not proceed to the City Commission until after we have had the opportunity to review and comment on the utility layout requested in the above comments. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. JAG/PVM bc: Peter Mazzella xc: Skip Milor File ill m m ~ n w rn ,m AUG I. 9 I("~' , ~' i~. ;_~ :,~ - ~\ E - 3 4 F k 1 ~: : :J 1 ? Id 1 (~ ;r \" rr l.'}J ~ ~ ,~ -: H ~: ''1: iT; I~ T '; ., .. 1 .,. l, "1: 11 v~, '. j , .c ; , .:.: ) FAX NO 4rJ7 :;75 ,62ge P. L MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 94 - 282 TO: FROM: Tambrl Heyden, Planning Directo /" John A Guidry. Utilities Director DATE; August 26, 1904 SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD. Master Plan Modification We offer the following comments on this project: 1) The package submtted to thjs office did not rthow any layout for water and sanitary sewer lines In the project! although mention was made in your OOVGr memo of changes to the approved master plan. Please have th~ applicant provide drawing(s) indicating the proposed layout of the water and sewer systems for this PUD. The plans shaJllndicate appropriate looping of the water main, especially for POD A. (ECR II Sect. 9-0, Sect. 26-16 City Code). There is an existing water main north of the property in the right of way of Old Military Trail (aka Sun-Up Trail), to which the applicant can complete his lOOp. 2) The project engineer shall provide calculations in support of his sanitary sewer layout, demonstrating the feasibi!lty or extending gravity sewer from Lawrence Road to the extrema west end of the project, if that is his intent. (Sac. 26-18 City Code) 3) Provide a typical cross~sectional view of the utilities withIn a 40-foot right-of.way and adjoining easement, so as to demonstrate serviceability of our proposed lines. We request this project not proceed to tha City Commission until after we have had the opportunity to review and comment on the utility layout requested in the above comments. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office. JAG/PVM be: Peter Ma~ella xc; Skip Milor File moo oom bl ~ 2 R IOO~ ! L_ PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #94-218 TO: Michael Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: TRC Review - Boynton Nurseries PUD DATE: August 24, 1994 The Public Works Department only concerns at the above site is that the stub road at the west end of the property does not provide a turn around. Backing of large trucks is very dangerous especially if vehicles happen to be parked in the street. Eichorst Works Director RElcr oom mO\VJrn @ 1I1 Jh 2 I /qqA PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-320 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director VIA: Charles C, Frederick, Director Recreation & Park (2. (y~ John Wildner, Superintendent of Parks W Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D. - Amended ~ter Plan FROM: RE: DA TE: August 26, 1994 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the Master Plan (amended) for the Boynton Nurseries P.U.D, The following information is submitted: 1. Park Land Dedication Requirement 376 single family units @ .018 acres each = 6.768 acres 2. Credit For Private Open Space A. The Park Land Dedication Ordinance provides for up to 1/2 credit for private open space if it provides a minimum of five (5) local park basic requirements. The developer has indicated he intends to apply for this credit. Before credit is given, the developer must indicate details regarding type, number, size, and location of the private recreation facilities (per sub-division code, section 8). B. Assuming half credit for private recreation facilities provided, (6.768 divided by 2), the developer is required to provide 3.384 acres. 3. Location The amended master plan shows that the 2.5 acres to be dedicated be located in the northeast comer of the development, adjacent to Lawrence Road and abutting the Knollwood Grove property to the north. This location will allow for eventual consolidation of public park property to be dedicated from the Knollwood Grove property if it is annexed and developed for residential use. These combined properties would ultimately provide a neighborhood park of approximately five acres which will comply with the level of service standards required in the parks and recreation element ofthe comprehensive plan. The remaining .884 acres required must be paid in cash at the time of plattin o WI rn JW:bjm u; 2 6 l00~ FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-269 WDC TO: Planning Departme~~ . Fire Department ~ August 29, 1994 FROM: DATE: RE: Master Plan Modification Boynton Nurseries Lawrence Rd Consideration of this project has brought to. mind several important points. Road Access: Miner Road has not been completed between Congress Avenue and Lawrence Road. without this link, service delivery is not up to specification. Further, an extension of Miner Road to Military Trail should be considered and given utmost priority at this time. Considering the length of time necessary to accomplish road connections, a proposed additional fire station is not out of line. Water for acceptable fire flow: A connection from the west boundary of this project to lines of the north and west may be necessary. Right of Way: The right of way within this project appears to present future conflicts, i.e.: fire hydrants in the middle of front yards and difficulty in maneuvering fire and rescue apparatus should any vehicle be parked in the street. Lot Size: Lot size especially the 40 x 100 foot type, may be so congested a fire operations will cause more harm than good. Setbacks around pools, in the 3 to 5 foot range, are especially hazardous after dark. The hours when most fire operations take place. Fire Sprinkler: Considering these new concepts in home buildings, the concept of a fire sprinkler system in single family residences is not far removed from reality. --:~;:::::: j.:i<:-/!/ (?d-4~~~/~ FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 94 - 456 TO: Mike Rumpf Deputy Chief J. N~ August 18, 1994 FROM: DATE: Re: Annexation of Property West of Lawrence Road The question of our Fire Department's ability to provide necessary EMS and fire suppression services, to those areas under consideration I'or annexation, is considerably more involved than simply including those areas into our current response charge. Given the nature of the areas under consideration, the age and neads of the EMS population and the types of structures involved (trailer park), the impact on our current department's ability to provide adequate services becomes controversial. Response times become more critical when combating fires in older trailers. Trailers can become fully involved in a matter of minutes. This is particularly true for older trailers which were built under less stringent fire code standards than those currently enforced. The majority of residents in the Royal Manor trailer park are older. They traditionally have more need for EMS services, response times for cardiac arrest, chest pain, shortness of breath, strokes, and seizures become critical. The distances and response times from our Fire Station No. three are in line with similar areas served by that station. A problem becomes appamnt when units from that station are unavailable due to other calls. The response time::; frjr back-up vehicles becomes unacceptable when these units must respond from either station one or two. Unless additional equipment and personnel are made available" the response times for these back-up units will fall below our standard of care. Delays generated by the necessity to respond with back-up vehicles will have adverse affects on both EMS patients and fire suppression. Until such time as a reliable fully, staffed ALS unit is available for all back-up responses to the proposed annexed areas, I can not endorse the proposed addition of this liability. ' d- ifJ (, If the city is considering an overall goal of annexing additional properties to include those areas west to Military Trail, and we wish to maintain the current standard of care now offered to all city residents, I would advise the following pian be implemented: 1. An additional ALS pumper be purchased to accommodate the immediate needs of supplying EMS and fire suppression coverage for those impending annexation areas. The full time staffing of this unit would require the hiring of three new fire personnel (one per shift).' 2. Formulate plans to develop impact fees and/or a bond issue to support the construction of a new fire station to provide coverage to those expansion areas west of Lawrence Road. The addition of this fire station would provide additional coverage to those areas requiri:lg ()ack-up support in all three current fire zones. With our current station locations and resources, any expc.nsion to the west will require a commitment to expand our department. c: Chief Jordan 3b(, -- FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-254 October 9, 1992 TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department RE: N.W. BOYNTON - . BOUNDED by"HYPOLUXO & N.W. 22ND AVE CONGRESS AVE. & LAWRENCE RD The City has committed to providing certain services in this area. Master and site plans have all reflected Fire Department input pertaining to roads and water service. Presently, research is being conducted pertaining to additional annexation in this same area. Fire Department staff have consistently placed a high priority on connective roads in this area. NOW, due to circumstances, planning and expectations have sunk to a critical level. Examples: KNOLLWOOD GROVES - request to modify impact fees for Miner Road. LAWRENCE GROVE - previously released from agreement to provide 60' right of way road connection with the meadows; ie Bedford Blvd. CITRUS GLEN - unfulfilled agreements with regard to Miner Road. Prior expectations by staff in the Fire Department w~re that Miner Road would be complete at approximately the same time Fire Station III was brought on line. It appears that several more years will pass before this will be accomplished. This situation is becoming untenable as response time elevates along with additional value in the area served. It. is the Department's position that NO EXCEPTIONS CONCERNING MINER ROAD BE MADE and that THE PROCESS TO ATTAIN A COMPLETED ROAD BE EXPEDITED. ~/0-- · William D. - 'WC/lmb j ,~ Attachment: Response time stats /\./ .<:~ ::;',o.J cc: Chief Allen 5bb -~~-- ---~-~----~-- -~--~ ~~ ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Tambri Heyden Director FROM: Sgt. James Cummings DATE: August 24, 1994 SUBJECT: Boynton Nursery ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ In reviewing the plans, I would request the following be added to the plans: 1. Right Turn Only arrows indicated on plans, indicating which lanes will be used for Right Turn Only (Southbound) onto Lawrence Road. JC:as A:\BOYNNURS.MEM rn mowrn ill AUG 2 4 1994 MEMORANDUM FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director Michael E. Haa~~ Zoning and sit:c::relopment Administrator August 26, 1994 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Master Plan Modification of 400 units to 376 units, change in type of units form 162 single-family units on 6,000 square feet lots and 238 multi-family units to 233 "Z" lot units on 4,000 square feet lots and 143 zero lot line units on 5,000 square feet lots, including other changes identified on the plans and letter describing the requested changes. File No. MPMD 94-004 Please be advised of the following comments relative to the first meeting with staff regarding review of the above-referenced requested master plan modification. 1. On the master plan drawing add a general note indicating each residential dwelling unit shall have two (2) nine (9) feet wide by eighteen (18) feet long parking spaces. On the typical detail drawings dimension the width of the driveway and identify the minimum width of the garage. (Appendix B Section 9 C.). 2. Show on the master plan the proposed street layout for each pod. (Appendix C Article VIII Section 4.C.I0.). 3. To properly evaluate the proposed setbacks, a plan showing lot and block layout is required. Note all setbacks are subject to the restrictions of easements. show on the master plan the proposed lot and block layout for each pod. Number each lot. (Appendix C Article VIII Section 4.C.l0.). 4. Add to the master plan the total acreage of the site after dedicating the new 80 foot road right-of-way (R-O-W), 10 foot road R-O-W at Old Military Trail, 35 foot R-O-W along LWDD canal-21 and the park site. Use this acreage for the Land Use Intensity (L.U.I.) calculations. 5. Considering that the buildable area for each lot would allow the maximum allowed floor area to be exceeded, provide floor area computations and data for each lot including the building proposed for the recreation area to ensure that the floor area for the project does not exceed the maximum allowed area per the land use intensity (L. U. I.) requirements. Verify the proposed maximum floor area of 12.13 acres is an accurate number. (Appendix B Section 4.). 6. Change the OSR, LSR and RSR L.U.I. calculations by omitting the assumed average floor area of 12.13 and substitute the actual floor area or insert the maximum allowed floor area. 7. Transfer the proposed typical setbacks (building, pool and screen enclosures) onto a sheet and add same to the set of master plan drawings. Below each drawing identify the lots they represent. 8. Add to the lot and block layout plan the proposed building setbacks for all corner lots, irregular shaped lots, lots that border the lakes, lots that border the recreation area, lots that border the perimeter of the project and lots that have frontage on two streets or provide detail setback drawings for each unique lot. Ensure that the building setbacks for all lots are clearly defined. page 2 Boynton Nurseries comments master plan modification 9. with respect to the setbacks for the lots located along the perimeter of the proj ect, depict on the master plan and typical detail drawings twenty-five (25) feet as originally recommended by staff. (Appendix B section 9.B.). 10. Add the sidewalk symbol to the master plan and lot layout drawings. The master plan indicates that there are no sidewalks in pod B, C and D. Whereas the typical road section drawings show all roads in the development have a sidewalk. 11. Modify the section drawing for the public road to include the bikepath shown on the master plan drawing. 12. Place the following note on the master plan: Site plan review approval is required for all improvements with the exception of the single family homes and the specific improvements review approved as part of the platting process. 13. Approval of an easement abandonment will be required prior to construction of a building that encroaches an existing easement. 14. consistent with city Commission approval (March 20, 1990) show and/or note on the master plan there will be two posts connected with a chain (to meet Fire and Police Department requirements) installed at the required emergency access on Old Military Trail. 15. On the master plan and/or master landscape plan show and label the material that will form the barrier and/or buffer required along the Old Military Trail frontage of the property, as part of the March 20, 1990 approval. 16. Add to the master landscape plan symbols and notes that represent the location and identify the type of specie for the proposed landscape material. (Appendix B Section 11.B.). 17. Clarify on the master plan whether the thirty-five (35) feet wide area of land located along the LWDD canal-21 will be an easement on the subject property or land dedicated to the LWDD. The survey indicates the 35 feet is an easement and the written data indicates the land will be dedicated to the LWDD. Correct the location of the south property line on all plans and data accordingly. (Appendix C section 4 C. 14.). 18. Submit for review by the City Attorney, ownership documents to determine if the requirements for unified control have been met, pursuant to Section 6 of Appendix B - Planned unit Development of the Code of ordinances. 19. Show on the master plan and/or master landscape plan the proposed location, height and materials for the following: Fences, Wells and Planting Screen (Appendix B Section l1.B.). 20. To be consistent with the proposed rear setback identified as (A) in the building setback data, change the note "25' open space setback line", identified on the master plan, to "25' building setback/landscape easement". Correct the pool and screen enclosure setbacks accordingly. page 3 Boynton Nurseries comments master plan modification RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. It is recommended that the preservation area be enclosed with a fence. Specify on the master landscape plan a four to five feet high fence around the preserve area. Also, specify that gates will be provided for controlled access. 2. It is recommended that a twenty-five (25) feet setback be shown and labeled around the perimeter of both park sites. 3. It is further recommended to create and show on the drawings a landscape tract (minimum width fifteen (15) feet) around the perimeter of the project. The tract should be used to install the proposed perimeter landscape material. The tract, landscape material and maintenance thereof shall be dedicated to the home owners association. 4. To be consistent with other Planned Unit Developments (PUD) located in the city, it is recommended that you modify your plans to show fifty (50) feet wide lot and fifteen (15) feet non-zero side setback as the minimum lot width and minimum non-zero side setback for all single family platted lots. However, the non zero side building setback may be reduced to ten (10) feet when the non zero side property line abuts a lake maintenance tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract and/or recreation area. 5. To be consistent with other PUD projects and buildings located in conventional zoning districts, it is recommended that all corner lots maintain front setbacks on both street frontages except that back to back corner lots or single corner lots may have a thirteen point five (13.5) foot corner side setback when the front setback remains in-line with the remainder of the houses on the street. The intent is to establish uniform setbacks. 6. It is recommended that the non zero side setback for screen enclosures be no less than fifteen (15) feet. However, the non zero side setback for screen enclosures may be reduced to five (5) feet when the non-zero side property line abuts a lake maintenance tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract and/or recreation area. 7. It is recommended that the non zero side setback for pools be no less than eight (8) feet. However, the non zero side setback for pools may be reduced to five (5) feet when the non-zero side property line abuts a lake maintenance tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract and/or recreation area. 8. It is recommended that the side setback for pools at the zero side be three (3) feet and the side setback for screen enclosures at the zero side be zero (0). 9. It is recommended that the rear setback for pools and screen enclosures be no less than eight (8) feet except that when the rear property line of a lot abuts a lake maintenance tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract and/or recreation area the rear setback may be reduced to five (5) feet. page 4 Boynton Nurseries comments master plan modification 10. It is recommended that the building rear setback be no less than fifteen (15) feet except that when the rear property line of a lot abuts a lake maintenance tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract and/or recreation area the rear setback may be reduced to ten (10) feet. 11. To eliminate the possibility of having to obtain approval of a variance for walls and fence heights, specify on the master plan the following information: a. Single family lots will comply with the wall and fence regulations identified in the city zoning code. b. Preservation area, landscape tract and lake maintenance tract maximum height of fencing is six (6) feet. c. Park site and recreation area maximum height of fencing located outside of the buildable area is six (6) feet. As agreed by the applicant at the August 23, 1994 technical review committee (TRC) meeting, corrected/resubmitted plans for the proposed master plan modification will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department no later than 12:00 A.M. september 2, 1994. The corrected plans will be distributed to the TRC staff for review and discussion at the September 13, 1994 TRC meeting. It is anticipated that the plans for the request will be accepted by the TRC and recommended to be forwarded to the City Commission on October 4, 1994 for a determination of non-substantial change. The commission will then forward same to the Planning and Development Board for final determination. a:boynnurs.pucc BUILDING DEPARTMEN'I MEMORANDUM NO. 94-19iS August 26, 1994 FROM: Tarnbri Heyden, Planning DireCl:O Don Jaeger, Building Official Al Newbold, Deputy Building Of icial TO: THRU: RE: TRC COMMENTS - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD - LAWRENCE RD. & LWDD, L-21 CANAL The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above described project and offers the following comments: 1. Details for the entry sign, in compliance with the Boynton Beach Sign Code, must be provided. 2. The Building Department comments for this project, dated February 2, 1990, must be addressed. They are as follows: A. Show the lot layouts on the plans, including lot sizes and setbacks, and proposed common areas, etc. B. The landscaping plan must identify all plantings and they must meet the minimum size requirements of the Landscape Code. 3. Planned Unit Developments permit a relaxation of the technical code requirements; however, the code requires that they resemble the nearest zoning which in this case is R-1 or above. None\of these residential zones will permit 40 foot wide lots or more t~an 45 percent lot coverage. \ 4. The proposed setbacks for for property maintenance, adjoining property owner. easement. the pools and screen enclosures do not allow either by the property owner or the Please provide a maintenance and drainage 5. Sometimes, screen enclosures are constructed with hard roofs and are enclosed at a later date. If the proposed setbacks are approved, the screen enclosures should only have screen roofs and should not be enclosed at any time. 6. Street lights and sidewalks along the school route on Lawrence Road should be mandatory. This issue needs to be addressed by the Planning or Engineering Department. 7. On the "0" lot line lots, roof overhangs cannot protrude more than two feet and compliance with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code is required. 4f~ Al New: 01 AN : bh NURSERY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-254 DATE: Mike Haag .0n'ngjSite Administrator . 'am Hukill, P.E. . ngineer August 19, 1994 TO: FROM: RE: BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION We have reviewed subject documents with respect to those items included in your memo of August 16, 1994, Part I, Section A, Description and offer the following comments: 1. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7, Par. 7.1 of Land Development Regulations, Part III, including, but not limited to, deeds, easements or other instruments recorded in 'public record. 2. Loop Road is a collector road by both Palm Beach County and Florida D.O.T. standards (see F.S. 334.03(4). Required R.O.W. is 80' (see Boynton Beach Code, Appendix C, Art. X., Sect. 10. Par. B). It will be a public road. 3. Dedicate R.O.W. (public) for access road to adjacent property. 4. Provide drainage calculations. 5. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards (see Chap. 5, Art. X & Appendix C). 6. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless adequate documentation is presented to support something different. 7. Road serving Pods A, D and the recreation area appears to exceed the maximum permitted ADT's (1500) and therefore is a collector to a point past Pod D requiring an 80' R.O.W to that point. 8. Provide Traffic Impact Statement. Approval of the master plan modifications by the Office of the City Engineer is subject to satisfaction of these conditions and consideration of the recommendation cited by Mr. Finizio on the attached list. WVHjck C:BNURSERY.COM xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer attachment: V. Finizio recommendations rn AlX' 1 9 1~L1 mID ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-255 TO: William Hukill, P.E. City Engineer FROM: Vincent A. Finizio Deputy City Engineer DATE: August 19, 1994 RE: Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. - Master Plan Modification I would suggest that the driveway widths depicted on plan attachments (15' wide) be widened to 18' to allow for the parking of two motor vehicles in each driveway. If this suggestion is adopted by the City Commission, it would abate the potential for numerous motor vehicles parking along the roadway and on grassed areas within this subdivision. VAF/ck C:BNURSERY.VAF (!~.. 1(1rf-JjJ(rJ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-263 TO: Mike Haag .zon'ng/Site Administrator . . Hukill, P. E. Engineer FROM: DATE: August 23, 1994 RE: BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION In addition to our comments contained in the August 19, 1994 memo to you (and attachment), we offer the following: 1. Developer to provide impact statement from Palm Beach County School Board. 2. Developer to comply with March 1, 1990 comments; a. Provide established centerline elevations for all adjacent streets and rights-of-way. b. Indicate the proposed layout of the lots and blocks. c. Indicate on plans utilities such as telephone, power, water, sewer, gas, etc. on or adjacent to the tract including a statement on plans, that all utilities are available and have been coordinated with all required utilities. Section 4.C.17. 3. Developer provide commitment for perpetual maintenance and irrigation of public rights-of-way. WVH/ck C:BNURSERY.PUD xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-310 TO: Tambri Heyden, Director Planning, Zoning, Community Improvement FROM: Kevin Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist I<~ 14 RE: Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. DATE: August 22, 1994 The applicant should prepare a statement to: I) IdentifY by survey the existing desirable trees on site to be preserved, relocated and replaced. 2) A tree management plan for the preserve area (2.5 acres) (docwnent). 3) The lakes must have a littoral and upland hardwoods planting plan. (5 lakes) (document). 4) The three perimeter buffer areas 40' (A), 25' (B), 5' (C) contains existing desirable trees. These trees should be addressed in a review of these areas for landscaping. 5) All public street R.O.W.'s must be irrigated and sodded with floratam sod. 6) If Lawrence Road is improved and contains a grassed median abutting this project the applicant must landscape/irrigate the area. KH:bjm <i_, AtXi 2,., rn ---....~....... -~........ .."-.o.-".......~.. .........IJ...JA......J....J.........LJ PROJl:::<":'l' 'l'l'l'LE: LJESCRIP'l'ION: 'l'Y PE : DA'l'E. REC I D: _ ~8 ! rJ nJv..'RSt'""'Rii!"-s , ~"'S1"E"~ <1>L",.. wt(1)l~ic.f4'Tio~ NEW SITE PLAN MAJOR SITE AMOUNT: FILl::: NU.: PLAN MODIFICA'l'ION RECEIPT NO. : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: COLORED ELEVATIONS REC'O: / (Plans shall be pre-assembled. The Planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The planning Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * j' APPLICATION & SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED -------BEN lED DATE: DATE OF LET'rER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW. DATE SENT: ~-9-1Y RETURN DATE: If-~6-7Y MEMO NUMBER: 1st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED Util. P.W. Parks Fire Police P~:S t= 7 MEMO # I DATE I "C" ~-,ty ).. I a- ..,1..(, I ~ _ '7~UL/~-,l I c..- ry:...1:J. D I - e,. I e..- ~-',}.hI1 I ~ I ~ Jr-~r / g.- ~.:lY I ~ Planning Building Engineer Engineer Forester PLANS MEMO # I DATE I ICe" / /~- ND 9~-/7r / ~~ I ~ ,. / 1- -F ,y.;t:l'}I' I rwl'-'YJ~ 9V-.3/o / $"U.?/I-'=.-.. ~t-. ~:r.Y" 1(~/' e....... DA'l'E OF ~EE.fltt: ~..t:y c- TYPE OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OF LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic Review App., dates of board mtgs. & checklist sent out wi comments NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) COLORED ELEVATIONS REC' D: MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM 2nd REVIEW. DATE SENT: MEMO #: RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL PLANS MEMO # / DATE /"R/D" PLANS util. / / Planning P.W. I / Building Parks / / Engineer Fire / / Engineer Police / I Forster MEMO # I DATE / / I I I /"n .':>:.' ,<:,./ .~ I_- I / / I LETTER TO APPLICANT REGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULE OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DATE APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A:TRACKING.SP rrIie City of 'Boyntl}n 'Beach 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvard P.O. 'Bo:t310 'Boynton 'Beacli., ~foritfa 33425-0310 City:JfD[[: (407) 375-6000 ~;U: (407) 375..(j()9() OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER October 10, 1994 G.L. Homes 1401 University Drive Suite 200 Coral springs, Fl 33071 Attention: Mr. Rick Elsner Re: Boynton Nurseries Dear Mr. Elsner: The Planning Department, upon investigation, did not have a preprinted schedule applying directly to the platting process. However, from the following information you should be able to rough out a schedule: 1. Technical Review Committee meetings are normally held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. The lead time for submission is 19 days, meaning 5 p.m. Thursday a little over two weeks prior to TRC. 2. Planning and Development Board meetings are normally held on the second Tuesday of each month. Any TRC approvals forwarded to that Board will take either two or four weeks, depending on time of month. 3. City Commission meetings are normally held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month. Any Planning and Development Board action will normally take one week to reach the Commission. As an example, if you were to submit documents required by TRC, Planning & Development Board and City Commission by Thursday, December 8th, they would reach TRC as early as Tuesday, December 27th. If they are approved by TRC on that date, they would reach the Planning and Development Board Tuesday, January 10, 1995 and the City Commission January 17, 1995. If any of the approval steps are not required, the total elapsed time is shortened accordingly. Conversely, if an applicant fails to comply with TRC comments he/she may have to resubmit corrected documents and reschedule with the TRC, thus delaying the process at least two weeks. .9l.merica's (jateway to tlie (jut/stream G.L. Homes, Attention: Mr. Rick.Elsner Re:,Boynton Nurseries October 12, 1994 Page #2 As you know, we are working to reduce the elapsed time required to get through the platting process, because as it stands now, the process described hereinbefore must occur twice, with the strong possibility of further delay at the Health Department approval stage. We will continue to keep you informed. Very truly yours, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA c:!/~~~~ William Hukill, P.E. City Engineer WVH/ck A: BNURSERY.SCH xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Peter Mazzella, Ass't to the Utility Director rrIie City of 'Boynton 'Beach 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvara P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Beadi, %nitfa 33425-0310 City!Jfa[[: (407) 375-6000 ~JfX: (407) 375-6090 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: Robert F. Rannebaum, P.E. Slmon & White, Inc. FAX NO: 965,-092E FROM: Mi}~e Haag Planning and Zoning Department FAX: 407-375-6090 DATE: September 30, 1994 RE: Traffic Impact Statement NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET 10 c:faxtrans .9lmericas gateway to tlie gulfstream (' ~~. ..// tl~ ~f,vll'" !..MrlONS & WHITE, Ihe. 00) / \ ~)rJ ~. v ~..... fJ \ 0'.& Engineers · Planners · Consultants ~ \jY\ .t>{ ~ )\ qO Q,' r\'to tf'-"v,j'-:, .~, \t ~r jlii'\' IP I ).l :f7 ;. 0' , ~\Y p9 \1/' "VT :\ ~ "J'V I{S\~ I)\.,)'v Q~Q,J, ~ V' C\\ ~1" I(~' ~ ~ ~~J ~~. fb \If ~ 1) I cl' o{:}> V J~f\ ~ (~v TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Y < ~ \'~ v)f7 V f~~ o~~ ~ v.~~376-Unit Residential Development 1'\1 ~ tJJ:>1.I (j':/ FKA Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D. t(>'Y pV)tJ ~~ Boynton Beach, Florida ?[S:Vf1 6:.-JfRA FA Y; f!5-1 ) 9"5"'- 09.,l,~ August 4, 1994 Job No. 94-72 SITE DATA ill ~@~aw ~ ,~- ~ tll IS ? c. ~. ~ PLANNING AND 0 ZONING DEPt The subject parcel is located on the west side of Lawrence Road approximately 1300 feet north of Gateway Blvd. and contains approximately 84 acres. Approximately 60 acres of the total is currently developed as a wholesale nursery with accessory office, storage and equipm~nt buildings. Although the existing nursery operations are currently being phased out for the proposed develapment~ the nursery riik5 been in full operation until recently. The property (formerly known as Boynton Nurseries P.U.D~) is also currently ~ested via the Palm Beach County Municipal Vesting List for a total of 400 residential units consisting of 162 5ingle-family detached units and 238 multi- family attached units. The revised scheme of development consists of 376 single-family detached units and no multi-family attached units to be built-out in approximately 1999. Site access is proposed via two driveway connections to Lawrence Road aligning with Citrus Glen Drive to the north and the entrance to Citrus Cove Community Elementary School to the south. For additional information concerning site location and layout, please refer to the site plan prepared by Kilday and Associates. PURPOSE OF STUDY This study will analyze the proposed development's impact on the surrounding thoroughfares within the project's radius of development influence in accordance with the Palm Beach County Land Development Code Article 7, Section 7.9 Traffic Performance Standards. The Traffic Performance Standards require that a proposed development meet two "tests" with regard to traffic. Test 1, or the Link/Buildout Test, requires that no site specific development order be issued which would, during the build-out period of the project, add project traffic at any point on any major thoroughfare link within the project's radius of development influence if the total traffic on that link would result in an average annual daily traffic or peak hour traffic volume that exceeds the adopted threshold level of service during the build-out period of the project. 4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415 Telephone (407) 965-9144 Traffic Impact Statement Job No. 94-72 August 4, 1994 - Page Two PURPOSE OF STUDY (CONTINUED) Test 2, or the Model Test, requires that no site specific development order be issued which would add project traffic to any link within the project"s model radius of development influence if the total model traffic on that link would result in an average annual daily traffic volume, as determined by the model, that exceeds the adopted level of service. For the purposes of this analysis, the construction contemplated in the Modified 2010 Plan shall be used. This study will verify that the proposed development's traffic impact will meet the above Performance Standards. TRAFFIC GENERATION The Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code Article 7, Section 7.9 (I) C - Traffic Performance Standards, APPLICABILITY, Subsection 2 (A) requires that for any application for a site specific development order on property on which there is a previous approval shall be subject to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards to the extent the traffic generation projected for the site specific development order exceeds the traffic generation of the previous approval. The generation rates and capture rates of the previous approval shall be updated to current pro forma traffic generation and pass-by rates and shall be used to calculate previous approval traffic. Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. is currently vested via the Palm Beach County Municipal Vesting List for a total of 400 residential units consisting of 162 single-family detached units and 238 multi-family attached units. The traffic currently vested to the site by the previous approval may be calculated as follows in accordance with the rates provided in Table 10.8-1 of the Palm Beach County Fair Share Road Impact Fee Schedule: 162 SinQle-Familv Units (Detached) 162 units x 10 tpd unit = 1620 tpd 238 Multi-Family Units (Attached) 238 units x 7 tpd unit = 1666 tpd TOTAL: 3286 tpd Traffic Impact Statement Job No. 94-72 August 4, 1994 - Page Three TRAFFIC GENERATION (CONTINUED) The traffic to be generated by the proposed 376-unit single- family residential development may be calculated in accordance with the above rate: 376 Sinole-Familv Units (Detached) 376 units x 10 tpd unit = 3760 tpd Reducing the 3760 tpd by the 3286 tpd currently vested to the site by the previous approval yields an increase in trips due to the revised scheme of development of 474 tpd: 3760 tpd - 3286 tpd = 474 tpd As stated in the SITE DATA portion of this report, an extensive wholesale nursery has been in operation on this parcel for many years. The o~iginal Traffic Impact Analysis for Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. prepared by K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer, Inc. dated December 26, 1989 (revised March 8, 1990 with Addendum dated March 15, 1990) did not take credit for vesting of trips being generated by the existing wholesale nursery operation. The Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code Article 7, Section 7.9 (I) C - Traffic Performance Standards, APPLICABILITY, Subsection 2 (B) allows that for any application for a site specific development order on property on which there is an existing use shall be subject to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards to the extent the traffic generation projected for the site specific development order exceeds the traffic generation of the existing use. The generation rates and capture rates of the existing use shall be updated to current pro forma traffic generation and pass-by rates and shall be used to calculate previous approval traffic. The previous approval traffic vested to the site by the existing nursery may be calculated as follows in accordance with the new trip generation rate for wholesale nurseries provided by Palm Beach County Engineering Traffic Division: Wholesale Nurserv (60 acres) 60 acres x 7 tpd acre = 420 tpd Traffic Impact Statement Job No. 94-72 Augus~ 4, 1994 - Page Four TRAFFIC GENERATION (CONTINUED) Because the previous approval vests 3286 tpd to the site and the site is concurrently vested with approximately 420 tpd via the existing use, credit for all vested trips shall be taken. The net increase in trips due to this Petition is therefore 54 trips per day: Total Proposed Trips Total Vested Trips from Previous Approval Total Vested Trips from Existing Use 3760 tpd (3286 tpd) ( 420 tod) Net Trips to be Addressed by this Analysis 54 tpd Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code Article 7, Section 7.9 (I) G - Procedure, Subsection 1 (C) (1) provides that amendments to residential projects generating fewer than 200 gross trips shall not be required to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. A brief review of the directly accessed link (Lawrence Road), however, reveals that adequate capacity is available to support the 54 additional trips per day and the project appears to meet the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards: LINK 1990/1991 1993/1994 HISTORICAL VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH A. LAWRENCE RD. 1. Hypoluxo Rd. to Gateway Blvd. 7952 7647 07- SITE RELATED IMPROVEMENTS The A.M. and P.M. peak directional distributions calculated as follows: hour turning movement volumes at the project entrances may and be P,?E TOTAL P.H.F. PEAK DIRECTIONAL DIRECTIONAL TRIPS HOUR DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION TRIPS (7- IN / OUT) (TRIPS IN/OUT) SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING (376 D.U.s) A.M. 3760 7.757- 291 267- / 74'Y. 76 I 215 P.M. 3760 10.587- 398 657- / 357- 259 / 139 Traffic Impac~ statemen~ .Job No. 94-72 Augus~ 4, 1994 - Page Five SITE RELATED IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED) As the peak hour turning movemen~ worksheet attached with this repor~ indicates, a left ~urn lane, south approach on Lawrence Road appears warran~ed at both project entrances based on the Palm Beach County engineering guidelines used in determining the need for turn lanes of 30 left ~urns or 75 right turns in ~he peak hour. No other site related improvements are recommended. CONCLUSION The subject parcel is vested for 3286 tpd from the Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. previous approval and for 420 tpd from the existing wholesale nursery. The revised scheme of development will result in a net increase of 54 trips per day over the to~al ves~ed traffic and therefore appears approvable with regard to traffic performance. The 420 trips per day vested by the existing wholesale nursery may be credited towards the required Fair Share Road Impact Fees for ~he equivalent number of single family residential uni~s, or the first 42 units calcula~ed as follows: 420 tDd existina 10 tpd/D.U. = 42 D.U.s SII~MONS & WHITE, IN\-. Engineers · Planners · Consultants I z / /4- 0 ~r r) L )../Q/ZTH ~Z{3~)-' PROJeCT / (D) . EA../TRAA./C€ Z7{2S~ ltr /4 48 0 (46) (Z~) (0) /-1 (#3) J SOUTH 4~(Z6) ---' PeOJc~r z(a) . cA../TRAAJCe :\j t30(SO) , Z7 0 (Z5) (a) lL ltr z-t /4 0 (91) ~6J) (t)) Lo(o) .-- 0 (()) .0(0) c/r.eu-s, 6 L €/t./ De J Vc L a (0) .. 0(0) t 0(0) cL€/JI?€AJr"LJey :5 C. 1-/00 '- LEGEA../O 43 A/Y)..P~ #'e J/tJLlj/Y)c (zeo) Rm.,o..e: #e Vc;LU/YJe" ~7~-c..IA.//r RES/OENT/AL L)C1/€LOPA16<.1i 9~-?'e .ere ~-~-.!J4- 4623 Forest Hili Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415 Telephone (407) 965-9144 . . ~ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC It TRANSPORTATION. PLANNING. ENGINEERING. LAND DEVELOPMENT l I I May 3. 1990 Mr. Timothy Cannon, ^clin!!. Din:clm City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Bench. Florida 33425-031 () Re: Traffic Impact Re\'iew - nn~'nton NlIl'scdc~ PVI> Ann: Mr. Jim Golden Dear Mr. Cannon: Per the City.s r~lluest the propos~d phasing plan fur the Boyntun Beach Nurserit:l\ PUt) has been reviewed. The proposal has be~n reviewed for confonmmce with the P:llm Beach Coumy Traflk Performance Smndanls in effect m the time of submittal. The proposed phasing of the Boynton Nurseries PUD should remain within 1 % of uvercapacity roadwaYl\ unlil such lime as Ihose roadways are improved il\ in Cunformance wilh the Palm Beach CUUIlIY Traffic Performance Standards. Huwever. based on the Applicant's traffic study the phasing schedule should be revised. The following schedule is :Ipplicahk: . The site may generate up to 61 % of total Irips (2,000) before improvement is required Oil Congress Avenue from NW 22m! Avenue to Old Boyl1lon Rmu.l. . · The site milY generate up to 70% of Iotal trips (2,300) befure impruvement is required on Cong.ress Avenue from Old Boymon Road 10 Buynrron Beach Boulevard. " · The site may generat~ lip to 79% of total trips (2,624) before improvement is relJuired on Old Boynton Roau from Knuth Road to Lawrence Road. · I ne site may generate up tn fi4% of towl trips (2,760) before improvement is required on Ilnyntnll Ilench Boulevard from Old Boynton Road to 1-95. Note this phase is /lased on the Applic:lllr's assignment to Old Boynton Road :\IId BoynlOn Beach Boulevard west of Old Boynton Road and a 10% drop-off rale. . If you h lYe InY quesllOl lease cOl1laclme at (305) 732-7~44. s:~ .', ~~r H. Kelle})r.. PE. AICP President 'RECEIVED ~ '0 i1990 1~~~nNG ~ePff.. . ~ 10211 W. S^MPLE ROAD, SUITE 201 · P.O. DOK 9740 CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822 · (107) 732-7814 (Palm Beacb) K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 1495 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (407) 964-7300 (FAX) 969-9717 March 15, 1990 Mr. Tim Cannon, Acting Director Planning Department City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE: Boynton NurseI'ies PUD Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Tim: Please accept this letter as an Addendum to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Boynton Nurseries PUD. At the Zoning and Planning Board meeting Tuesday evening, March 13, 1990, it was recommended that the issuance of building per- mits for this project be phased such that no phase will generate more than a l' impact on any roadway which has a total volume in excess of capacity. To meet this requirament, this office has prepared the following phasing schedule: '. A) The project shall be limited to that number of building permits which would generate not more than 2,210 trips per day until construction has commenced on the five laning of Old Boyn- ton Road, between Lawrence Road and Knuth Road. B) The project shall be limited to that number of building permits which would generate not more than 2,518 trips per day until construction has commenced on the six laning of Congress Avenue, from N.W. 22nd Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard. C) The project shall be limited to that number of building permits which would generate not more than 2,690 trips per day until construction has commenced on the six laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard, from 1-95 to Old Boynton Road. llJE<:~I"JEI) MAR J 5 1990 PLANNING DEPT. . .... ~_ ., ..' _" '. to. ' ,'.:" Mr. Tim Cannon, Acting Director Planning Department City of Boynton Beach March 15, 1990 Page Two - Boynton Nurseries PUD Addendum The generation rates used to calculate the maximum number of building permits issued shall be: , Single Family Units Multi-Family (Townhouse) , 9.9 trips per day/unit 5.6 trips per day/unit Addressing the request by Walt Keller that missing data from the Analysis previously submitted be provided, it is our contention that the AnalYSis, as submitted,' meets the City~s requirements. The roadway link. for whioh the additional information was re- quested all had project volumes which were less than 1. of capac- ity. As the project would be creating an insignificant impact on these links, there is was need to prOVide the additional informa- tion. If there is anything further that we may provide you, p,lease contact me directly. yours, KSR/jr CC: Mr. Bob Horner Mr. Roger Saberson Mr. Rick Rossi - .....~.-...~._..,'!~... --_.~ . .....- .......~_."'"'I~' ..-...__.._~........#... rrIie City of 'Boynton 'Beach TO: FAX NO: FROM: FAX: DATE: RE: 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boukvartf P.O. 'Bo~310 'Boynton 'Beadi, ~Corufa 33425-0310 City:Hall: (407) 375-6000 ~f,U: (407) 375-6090 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Robert F. Rannebaum, P.E. simon & White, Inc. 965-0926 Mi}\.e Haag Planning and Zoning Department 407-375-6090 octob€!r 3, 1994 Traffic Impact Review-Boynton Nurseries PUD NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET c:faxtrans 5lmerUa's (jateway to tfie (julfstream r I ,'t}'< ~ ~. "" ~.l? ~tv ..'I!'I 0,0' ti'/l 'I~ \,. ( ". , ~ \ r It" J~ ,I'l Ll- t~' r {) ~~ ttJ- e 5) ~.s fb4 flAPrP ~{,/ J;.tY', 'YJb" ~,tV J }:..~ l\J'~ ft vftlc, rV(cfrl~~ ~.t ~':>' (f,~v .M~ /->~\] ." r1~. \A,v-' ~~) fV ~ .l;ftiV' ev ~i"P ~1C'~1 jt'~ t'l ~,I A)~ F' t-tllr (l !\~~p~ ",;v' . (h}J.~ jp' a~f t'i r IJ)~ tf'~ 1,~e, I) ~r \J.s 't);J !)' Or VJ. . r IV' j,p I c;:oP ~ I">i > f, r t" V . ~ ,Qj 6.1) ,p t.r~~ /(.JK- fI1R~ t{iO 1'< 0,31 f,fJ;D (,'p fI;.,. J-!> i'~ ,I' IJr . ,...... ~ ~ vJl S .A1Ii~' I y1 :' IP." rl '3, p~ \.; I~,J<J \'Y ~V"I'( ~ bill''>, '",~ .If I./i' 'f: .*- II' IJ ~~ "b~"'" iVt ~i: rvI' '~t vJ~i I ~ q' Il.!" U ~t /! ~ ~,~,.. {~~ ~ \ . ~\r~' (rP 't',).. A"" 1~1' p.,; \1" Co if ~e. l~ i /\.].' .. . . "J' ? I .. ., Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC a: TRANSPORTATION · PIANNINO · ENGINEERlNO · LAND DEVELOPMENT " ... .. ~ . February 5, 1990 Mr. Tunothy Cannon, Acting Director City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Traffic Impact Review. Boynton Nurseries PUD Attn: Mr. Jim Golden Dear Mr. Cannon: As per your reqJest, the traffic impact study for the proposed Boynton Nurseries PUD residential devdopment prepared by K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer Inc. dated December 26. 1989, has been reviewed. The initial part of the review focuses on the technical merits of the study. Utilizing the results of this analysis, conformance to the City's Comprehensive ~lan is evaluated. Trip Generation The project proposes the construction of 400 dwelling units including 162 single family and 238 townhomes. A revised trip generation analysis indicates that the Applicant has overestimated the projected number of trips. Table 1 provides a comparison between the WHK and Applicant analysis. Table 1. Trip Generation Comparison Land Use WHK Analysis Single Family Townhouse Total Daily AM PM Size Units Tri E uation/Rate Tri s In Out In Out 126 DU Ln(T)=.94Ln(#DU)+2.6 1.269 238 DU Ln(T)=,84Ln(#DU)+2.6 1.335 400 DU 2,604 27 73 85 17 89 87 44 162 172 50 43 93 Applicant An~lysis Single Family' Townhouse Total 162 DU 238 DU 400 DU 10.00 7.00 1.620 1.666 3.286 Somce: Waller H. Keller Jr.. Inc. ITE Trip Generation Manual 4lh Edition K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer. Inc. The difference in the trip generation analysis is the source of traffic generation rates and/or equations. The Applicant utilizes those rates provided by Palm Beach County for use in the application of traffic impact fees. The WHK analysis is based on the equations provided in the 4th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Both of these sources are acceptable. 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD. SUITE 204 · P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRINGS. FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822. (407) 732--7844 (palm Beach) . . . ,I , . ., , . , ..... ... ,fol,: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. ~ Mr. Timothy Cannon February 5, 1990 page !Wo Trip Distributio" A trip distribution analysis was also performed as part of this review. The WHK- analysis is based on a five mile radius of influence and employment data provided by the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization. The results of the analysis indicate some difference with the Applicant analysis. A comparison of the results is provided on Table 2. Table 2. Trip Distribution Comparison Directic WHK A ticant North South East West 29.0% 34.0% 22.0% 15.0% 31.5% 26.0% 36.5% 6.0% Source: Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc Kimley-Hom Palm Beach County MPO Trip Assignment " Based on the anaLyses of trip generation and distribution, a trip assignment procedure was performed. Table 3 provides a comparison of the WHK and Applicant assignments. The Table indicates that even though differences were found in both the trip generation and distribution analyses the assignment volumes are comparable. In most instances, the WHK assignment is lower than the Applicant's assignment. Note, the Applicant does not address traffic on Boynton Beach Boulevard east of the intersection at Old Boynton Road. t Background Traffic The review's background traffic analysis is based on historical growth patterns in the area. Traffic count data from 1986 through 1989 was obtained from Palm Beach County and analyzed for average annual growth. Table 4 indicates annual growth rates between 8.6% to 15.1% on impacted roadways. The Applicant's study indicates similar results ranging from 7.4% to 14.5%. ~ .....-: . . ,It'f .. .. It " .. . . ".~ :'i /:,;'" . ..d; ~'. . ". , ~.::.~.. " , , . \ , . , =.. '..: :'\" .',.: ~" f lt~'j!~;... '''':~:~~ : '.,'. '".,.', ,.~~:.;,.,,;.:., ,.... ~ , ~ ~~. ~.,,"'. ~~~~.c. . .0- :~. .,..-.{~. -../~,..~~' . , . ~,~>{~!t :oj.(: ,',. .';,' . ~:.;f:;. t"'1'~:':' . . 1'1" Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc. Mr. Timothy Cannon February S. 1990 page three Table 3. Assignment Comparison Deslll LOS Roadwa From To T e Miner Rd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 260 329 NW 22nd Ave Military Trail Lawrence Rd 2L 13,100 156 296 Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 513 690 Congress Ave 1-95 4LD 30,000 212 164 Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd Knuth Road 2L 13,100 182 164 Knuth Road Congress Ave 4LD 30,000 182 164 Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 52 99 Boynton Beach Elvd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 6LD 46,400 125 328 Congress Ave Old Boynton Rd 6LD 46,400 112 296 Old Boynton Rd 1-95 4LD 30,000 101 Lawrence Rd Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 2L 13,100 1328 1117 Miner Rd Site Entrance 2L 13.100 1588 1381 Site Entrance NW 22nd Ave 2L 13.100 1016 1742 NW 2200 Ave Old Boynton Rd 2L 13,100 312 758 Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 156 493 Congress Ave Hypolulto Rd Miner Rd 4LD 30,000 221 262 Miner Rd NW 22nd Ave 4LD 30,000 26 66 NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 4LD 30,000 208 493 Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 4LD 30.000 156 427 Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. r K.S. Rogers. Consulting Engineer, Inc. .. .' . . , " " , , . . . .....-:::: "-oF' ,'\ ,..~',!. '\v"~~l.,..i~~,:';;.,~. ~~i~;f8.:';,';;<;;' -' >,')'~ "! ",~! ".".\!~(~,:iIb ";.'';''};;\,.~::r; ....-.,.~. .'.,.., , :" ~ . . ...' .. . l~' ~i'I .\ .'" ,\+' l .' .......', '" 4.....; : .~ . . " ..":'~':,,n:<. .:"."." ~ .....' . . :- ~< , Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc. Mr. Timothy Cannon February S, 1990 page four Table 4. HlstoraJ Trame Growth 1986 1987 1988 1989 Annual Roadway Link ADT ADT ADT ADT Growth NW 22nd Ave W of Congress Ave 4,566 6.347 7.386 8,025 20.2" E of 1-95 4,976 4,996 5,747 6,498 9.9~ Total 9,541 11 ,343 13,133 14,523 15.1 ~ Boynton Beach Blvd W of Congress Ave 22.486 22.442 24.945 21.365 7.2~ E of Congress Ave 24,087 27.021 30,854 31.972 10.3~ W of 1-95 34,354 38.510 41,022 43,886 8.3~ Total 80,917 81,913 96,821 103,223 8.6~ Lawrence Rd N of Boynton Beacb Blvd 3.703 4.386 5.486 8.680 32.0~ N of NW 22nd Ave 4,505 4.933 5,218 4,837 2.7~ N of Hypoluxo Rd 4.168 5,018 5,188 5,232 7.4% Total 12,376 14,331 15,892 18,749 14.4% Congress Ave N of Boynton Beach Blvd 21,532 26,046 25,704 29,808 10.1% S of Hypoluxo Rd 18,014 22.263 24.653 26,922 14.0% S of Lantana Rd 19.198 21,730 23.923 28.263 13.4% N of Lantana Rd Rd ' 20,717 26.304 31,206 31,850 15.7% S of 6th Ave 26,065 29.281 34,214 35,714 11.6% Total 105,526 125,624 139,700 152,557 W% Areawide Totals 208,311 239,211 265,546 289,052 11.5% Source: Walter H. Keller Jr.. IDe Palm Beach County Engineering and Public Works Florida Depanment of Transportation Total Traffic The total traffic r.nalysis provided in the Applicant's study is based on a 1992 build- out of the proposed project. However, throughout the early sections of the Applicant's r study, the project is proposed for a 1993 build-out year. For comparison's sake, the WHK total traffic analysis is based on a 1992 build out date. The results of the WHK total traffic assignment are provided on Table 4. The Table also shows the results are comparable in most instances where the Applicant provides a projected volume. However, many of the links in the project area are not analyzed by the Applicant. This is due to the Applicant's reference to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards U 1 % link test" as opposed to the Traffic Circulation Element Support Document of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Because of the missing data, conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan will be based on the WHK study projections of future traffic. .....-:: . .." - ,: ~;~G*ftc ' :,' .~'~i~'~~~w(," \;Ui.;.t\!" I't......~..- '~,,:-,i: -- -,.',. .... ~ . ~t' ~.~ .. , - 'fll.. ,'] . ~ ...(.~ ~..I. 1.0 . r , ' ~:'; ~.. . . , Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. . . ", Mr. Timothy Cannon February S, 1990 page five Table 5. Total Trame ComparisoD 1989 WHK WHK Appl Deslll LOS C Exlstlnl Back ProJ Total Total Roadway From To Type Cap Trafftc ADT ADT ADT _AnT Miner Rd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 . 312 400 260 972 NW 2200 Ave Military Trail Lawrence Rd 2L 13,100 6.412 3,365 156 9,933 10,617 Lawrellt:e Rd Congress Ave 2L 13.100 8,ms 4,212 513 12,150 13,682 Congress Ave 1-95 41.D 30,000 6,498 3.410 212 10,120 Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd Knuth Road 2L 13,100 11,383 3,726 182 15,291 15,023 Knuth Road Congress Ave 41.D 30,000 11,383 3,726 182 15,291 15.023 Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 9.448 3,093 52 12,S93 Boynton Beach Blvd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 6I.D 46,400 27,365 6,347 125 33.836 Congress Ave Old Boynton Rd 6I.D 46.400 31.972 7.415 112 39,499 Old Boynton Rd 1-95 41.D 30,000 43,886 10.178 101 54.165 Lawrence Rd HypoluAo Rd Miner Rd 2L 13,100 4,837 2,405 1,328 8,570 9,896 Miner Rd Site Entrance 2L 13,100 4.837 2.405 1,588 8,830 9.323 Site Enl,,:ance NW 220d Ave 2L 13,100 4,837 2,405 1.016 8,258 6,964 NW 22'id Ave Old Boynton Rd 2L 13.100 8.680 4,316 312 13,308 11,494 Old Bo:otoo Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 8,332 4,143 156 12.631 11,231 Congress Ave Hypolu, 0 Rd Miner Rd 4LD 30,000 26.912 11,816 221 38,949 Miner td NW 22nd Ave 4LD 30,000 26,912 11,816 26 38.754 NW 22zd Ave Old Boynton Rd 4LD 30,000 29,808 13,088 208 43,104 49.707 Old Bo~nton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 4LD 30,000 21.489 12,070 156 39,715 49,641 Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. K.S. Rogen. Consulting Engineer, Inc. Conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Generally. the City of Boynton Beach's Comprehensive Plan provides for LOS "Cn on collector and arterial roadways throughout the City. WS "0" is acceptable on some arterials including segments of I-9S. US 1, Boynton Beach Boulevard. NW 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue. According to the Traffic Circulation Element Support Documents of the Comprehensive Plan, once a roadway has exceeded its' LOS standard, traffic volume may only exceed the designated LOS capacity by S%. Table 6 shows that the proposed development will impact four overcapacity roadways: Old Boynton Road, Boynton Beach Boulevard. Lawrence Road and Congress A venue. Note that since the segment on Lawrence Road is within the allowed S% increment no improvements are required on that link. In contrast, the A}pUcant's report identifies improvements to NW 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue t ~- ~;, " .;,. . . t !~~:~;f\'~\"" ::,t;~:;"l . '.' '~~~~Il~~;:,.\,.~,'t~M4~~t;~W!'it.~:\}f~:,:t.,: :~~~l. ':;f1"~~"'''~'''\''~, .'.. i,~f~;:;'"':\"~~(:""'~"~: ,,~,. , '.+:\ ' , . . Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc. Mr. Timothy Canr~on February S. 1990 page six "rable 6. Conformance to Comprehensive Plan Standards Rev 1992 10S~ ProJ Total Review R08dwa From To ADT AD't. LOS Miner Rd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13100 13755 260 972 A NW 22nd Ave Military Trail Lawrence Rd 2L 13100 13755 156 9.933 A Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13100 13755 513 12,750 C Congress Ave 1-95 4W 36000 37800 212 10,120 A Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd Knuth Road 2L 13100 13755 182 15,291 D Knuth Road Congress Ave 4LD 30000 31SOO 182 15,291 A Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13100 13755 52 12,593 C Boynton Beach Blvd" Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 6LD 46400 48720 125 33,836 A Congress Ave Old Boynton Rd 6LD 46400 48720 112 39,499 B Old Boynton Rd 1-9S 4W 36000 37800 101 54,165 F Lawrence Rd Hypoloxo Rd Miner Rd 2L 13100 13755 1,328 8.570 A Miner Rd Site Entrance 2L 13100 13755 1,588 8.830 A Site Entrance NW 22nd Ave 2L 13100 13155 1,016 8,258 A INW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 2L 13100 13155 312 13.308 D Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13100 13155 156 12,631 C Congress Ave Hypolwto Rd Miner Rd 4LD 30000 31500 221 38.949 E Miner Rd NW 22nd Ave 4LD 30000 31SOO 26 38,754 E NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 4W 36000 31800 208 43.104 F Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 4W 36000 31800 156 39.715 F Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. City of Boynton Beach r Summary In order to meet the City's requirements the Applicant needs to show the City that a 1992 buildout year is feasible and to expand the analysis of projected conditions to all roadways impactr~d by the project assignment. In addition to this information, assurance of roadway improvements should be provided. Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway improvement would require the project to be scheduled for construction in the County Transportation Improvement Program, the State Five Year '''ork Program or part of a Municipal Capital Improvement Program. The project may &.Jso be considered assured if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured through bonding with the City or County. -- v.,~,~~;..:tf:;,:~':~"~~:-';'6~~:~~ ?\~,~,':j.t':~~~"(' ':',ij':', <<,:~..<iitj;;':i;i~*.:' ~'~''ir;;,\'i-~;,\t: '. ~,,''',l~,,'; .'<'.bifi:"'I'~" . ..;. ~.~f~~~:~:i: ~i : t:!( '~";.\,,,~1~'~: ,.::, ,~ft~.:~~~ :,;.,., '-". ~'\~:::! Y:.:~~:: "~';(>";>~:',,~ ';.. "':;~~;~~'~~' ',.~~"~' :;~~,<J",:,\,"':..~:1,~~~:,: . . . . ~ Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc. Mr. Timothy Cannon February S, 1990 page seven Based on the review analysis this would include Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard to Hypoluxo Road, Old Boynton Road from Lawrence Road to Knuth Road and on Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynton Road to 1-95. Upon the City's acceptance of the additional information, the project may be approve~ However, developement must coincide with the implementation of roadway improvements. Roadway improvements may be considered underway at the time of project letting. :~;{q"e'rion. p ase contact me al (305) 755-3822. Walter H. Keller J[:'., PE, AICP President WHKlus ---=-",=- -~ f- .,,--_....... K.S. ROGERS, CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. 14)5 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite F West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (407) 964-7300 (FAX) 969-9717 March 13, 1990 Mr. Tim Cannon Boynton Beach Pla~ning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Lawrence Road Dear Tim: Enclosed are three (3) copies of the revised traffic study for the Boynton Nurseries PUD. The revisions deleted reference to a 1993 buildout year. The stated buildout year for this project remains 1992. We have reviewed:i1e recommendations of the City's Traffic Con'- sultant. We agree with his request that this project's approval be tied to the construction of several roadways upon which this project is expect1dd to significantlY impact. We offer the fol- lowing information concerning proposed road construction in sup- port of the approval of this project: BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD, I-95 to Old Boynton Road - Palm Beach County is scheduled to widen this link according to testimony by Charlie Walker of the County Traffic Department at the Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 20, 1990. OLD BOYNTON ROAD; Lawrence Road to Knuth Road - This road is scheduled to be widened by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1991 - 92. CONGRESS AVENUE, Boynton Beach Boulevard to N.W. 22nd Ave - This road is scheduled to be widened by the developer - of Boynton West PUD (a County approved 1,012 unit ~~CII~v~1) on Boynton Beach Boulevard west of Military Trail~ ~ - construction Is expected to commence in 1991. CONGRESS AVEti UE, N. W. 22nd Avenue to Miner Road _ lNfll~ rn' - This road is ,scheduled to be widened by the i developerpLANNH~G DLP[. of the Shops of Boyntont construction is expected tq commence in 1990. - ----.-..~. ~ . ----..--.! ~~""'ii '~'\'~:rr.',~~~'f~"f'~:Z~""'W.f~r'" "1"7,,~.~~I~'~~.i-"""~~ T#""~~:,:;';f~,,'..,,!" \~~~Y~~~,,~-:1-~ ,~.;-..~ t~':~~"" . .. '. .... , .' . .' , ,,. .' .. . .. . * ....,rl;:.. Mr. Tim Cannon Boynton Beach Planning Department March 13, 1990 Page Two - Boynton Nurseries PUD We do, however ,:ake exception to the requirement to hold up the approval of thlL project until the section of Congress Avenue from Miner Road to Hypoluxo Road is widened. As agreed by the City's Traffic Consultant, this project is expected to generate an insignificant amount of traffIc (less than 1% of capacity) on that roadway link. We do not feel that it is reasonable to require a project that is creating an insignificant impact to shoulder the ful~ cost of widening that link of Congress Avenue. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, e:f;E~ KSR/jr Encl. CC: Mr. Bob Horner Mr. Rick R03si ~""'l"""""'1'f_'''''J'"~'''--'''''''''--'---''' --._- .-- - ..- ,. '"!!.~ ,...~.I! ,.~.", '~'~"'::~~::,,:,::::,,~!,!,'TJ' ~r .~.:;~:~,~; 'lIl\l!". , "~l~.,,,w.;:J "",." .""'" . rrIie City of r;Boynton r;Beach TO: FAX NO: FROM: FAX: DATE: RE: 100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'BouUvarti P.O. 'Bo:t310 'Boynton 'Beadi, %nitfa 33425.0310 City:Jfa([: (407) 375-6000 ~JU: (407) 375-6090 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Dan Weisberg, P.E. Dept of Engineering 478-5770 Mike Haag Planning and Zoning Department 407-375-609C september 30, 1994 Boynton Nurseries NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET /;/ c:faxtrans JtmerU:as qateway to tlie qui/stream -- 4. r: /..J) /:z:. f# September 8, 1994 Ms. Tambri Hayden Planning & Zoning Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.o. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD Department of Engineering and Public Works :oard of County Commissioners 1ary McCarty, Chair :en L. Foster, Vice Chairman :aren T. Marcus I :arol A. Roberts Varren H. Newell urt Aaronson 1aude Ford Lee Dear Ms. Hayden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impacts study for the project entitled Boynton Nurseries PUD, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The proposed project consists of 376 single-family residential dwelling units. The project is listed as a previous approval for 162 single-family dwelling units and 238 multi-family dwelling units. The project is also the site of an existing 60 acre nursery. The build-out is 1999. The proposed project will add 54 daily trips. The following tables shows the traffic associated with the existing, approved and proposed uses. ExistinQ and Approved Uses Land Use Size Nursery 60 acres Single-Family Units 162 d.u. Multi-Family Units 238 d.u. Tota 1 Proposed Uses Land Use Si ze Tri ps 1", Single-Family Units ~6 d.u..,) 3,760 The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traff)c Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions ~egarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Trips 420 1,620 1,666 3,706 r:\ (\ ~ ~ . " "l 0~ Sincerely, ill SEP , 4 i(\" ~ ill OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~y~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. ~) Senior Registered Civil Engineer - (~O1; t;78-5770 cc. Bill Hukill, City Engineer File: TPS - Mun. - Traffic Study Review rnmrnDwrn h:\traffic\diw\boyn33 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" ~ printed on recycled papar Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 /""10 ' .... . - -t- IP I .. ~ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. TRAFFIC It TRANSPORTAnON · PlANNING · BNGINEElUNG · LAND DEVELOPMENT t, ." . ~ . February 5, 1990 Mr. Tunothy Cannon, Acting Director City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Traffic Impact Review - Boynton Nurseries PUD Attn: Mr. Jim Golden Dear Mr. Cannon: As per your request, the traffic impact study for the proposed Boynton Nurseries PUD residential development prepared by K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer Inc. dated December 26, 1989, has been reviewed. The initial pan of the review focuses on the technical merits of the study. Utilizing the results of this analysis, conformance to the City's Comprehensive ?lan is evaluated. Trip Generation The project proposes the construction of 400 dwelling units including 162 single family and 238 townhomes. A revised trip generation analysis indicates that the Applicant has overestimated the projected number of trips. Table 1 provides a comparison between the WHK and Applicant analysis. Table 1. Trip GeDeratioD ComparisoD LaDd Use WHK ADalysis Single Family Townhouse Total Daily AM PM Size UDits Tri E uation/Rate Tri sID Out I D Out 126 DU Ln(T)=.94Ln(#DU)+2.6 1,269 238 DU Ln(T)=.84Ln(#DU)+2.6 1,335 400 DU 2.604 27 73 85 17 89 87 44 162 172 50 43 93 ApplicaDt ADalysis Single Family Townhouse Total 162 DU 238 DU 400 DU 10.00 7.00 1.620 1,666 3,286 t Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. ITE Trip Generation Manual 4111 Edition K.S. Rogers. Consulting Engineer, Inc. The difference in the trip generation analysis is the source of traffic generation rates and/or equations. The Applicant utilizes those rates provided by Palm Beach County for use in the application of traffic impact fees. The WHK analysis is based on the equations provided in the 4th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Both of these sources are acceptable. 10211 W. SAMPLE ROAD, SUITE 204 · P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRINGS. FLORIDA 33075-9740 (305) 755-3822. (407) 732-7844 (palm Beach) . . . " < . ~ < . , ~ "'IV .~ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. ., Mr. Timothy Cannon February S, 1990 page two Trip Distribution A trip distribution analysis was also performed as part of this review. The WHIC analysis is based on a five mile radius of influence and employment data provided by the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization. The results of the analysis indicate some difference with the Applicant analysis. A comparison of the results is provided on Table 2. Table 2. Trip Distribution Comparison Directic WHK A licant North South East West 29.0% 34.0% 22.0% 15.0% 31.5% 26.0% 36.5% 6.0% Source: Walter H. Kell~r Jr.. Ine Kimley-Hom Palm Beaeh County MPO Trip Assignment Based on the analyses of trip generation and distribution, a trip assignment procedure was performed. Table 3 provides a comparison of the WHK and Applicant assignments. The Table indicates that even though differences were found in both the trip generation and distribution analyses the assignment volumes are comparable. In most instances. the WHK assignment is lower than the Applicant.s assignment. Note. the Applicant does not address traffic on Boynton Beach Boulevard east of the intersection at Old Boynton Road. f Background Traffic The review's background traffic analysis is based on historical growth patterns in the area. Traffic count data from 1986 through 1989 was obtained from Palm Beach County and analyzed for average annual growth. Table 4 indicates annual growth rates between 8.6% to 15.1 % on impacted roadways. The Applicant's study indicates similar results ranging from 7.4% to 14.5%. ~ . . , , i~-'; ~ ,. . ... . - :. ',: ,;~" ~).~.' ',: . r ,;,::j!~~.~<~; ,~: ", ... .'i .",-"..,,":~,.:"'.;;i.;" . : ~.,~" ;...i'i. ~'Jl~~"" :~. ',' ~/~~-ti.?..\:, ~. . ...., .'.~ r..'", ~.. " . t',:~1t"..' ,- ~,~~!), " , , . \ Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. ., ~ Mr. Timothy Cannon February S. 1990 page three Table 3. Assignment Comparison Desill LOS Roadwa From To T e Miner Rd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 260 329 NW 22nd Ave Military Trail Lawrence Rd 2L 13,100 156 296 Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 513 690 Congress Ave 1-95 4LD 30,000 212 164 Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd Knuth Road 2L 13,100 182 164 Knuth Road Congress Ave 4LD 30,000 182 164 Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 52 99 Boynton Beach Blvd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 6LD 46,400 125 328 Congress Ave Old Boynton Rd 6LD 46,400 112 296 Old Boynton Rd 1-95 4LD 30.000 101 Lawrence Rd Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 2L 13,100 1328 1117 Miner Rd Site Entrance 2L 13,100 1588 1381 Site Entranee NW 22nd Ave 2L 13,100 1016 1742 NW 2200 Ave Old Boynton Rd 2L 13,100 312 758 Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 156 493 Congress Ave Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 4LD 30,000 221 262 Miner Rd NW 22nd Ave 4LD 30,000 26 66 NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 4LD 30,000 208 493 Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 4LD 30,000 156 427 Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. K.S. Rogers, Consulting Engineer, Inc. f .' . , . . . , . . , ~ ,\ '~"~'i-..:;.~ ~:":".,,~\2:.~~l:t , .~ ~',,.~~ ''''':';m:~{'t'~~'' ~. ~"i.;;,;:.:.;;<;;, " ", '.'~, ';;:'\;;~~::::'~'"rit ,,':'~~:'~<;;\~:fl""":"';"'"'' .:,,' ":' ~. '... . :' F ,.aJ'~' ";~,~:t".\_:' y"'-i ii ,.:.; f/>, ..,.:'~J:'- Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. ~ Mr. Timothy Cannon February S, 1990 page four Table 4. Historical Trafltc Growth 1986 1987 1988 1989 Annual Roadway Link ADT ADT ADT ADT Growth NW 22nd Ave W of Congress Ave 4,566 6.347 7.386 8.025 20.2% E of 1-95 4,976 4,996 5.747 6,498 9.9% Total 9,541 11 ,343 13,133 14,513 15.1 ~ Boynton Beach Blvd W of Congress Ave 22.486 22.442 24,945 27.365 7.2% E of Congress Ave 24,087 27,021 30,854 31,972 10.3% W of 1-95 34,354 38,510 41,022 43,886 8.3% Total 80,927 87,973 96,821 103,213 8.6~ Lawrence Rd N of Boynton Beacb Blvd 3.703 4.386 5,486 8,680 32.0% N of NW 22nd Ave 4,5OS 4,933 5,218 4,837 2.7% N of Hypoluxo Rd 4,168 S,018 5,188 5,232 7.4% Total 12,376 14,337 15,892 18,749 14.4% Congress Ave N of Boynton Beach Blvd 21,532 26,046 25.704 29,808 10.1% S of Hypoluxo Rd 18,014 22.263 24.653 26,922 14.0% S of Lantana Rd 19.198 21,730 23,923 28.263 13.4% N of Lantana Rd Rd ' 20,717 26.304 31.206 31,850 15.7% S of 6th Ave 26,()65 29,281 34,214 35,714 11.6% Total 105,526 125,624 139,700 152,557 U.9~ Areawide Totals 208,371 239,277 265,546 289,052 11.5~ Source: Walter H. Keller Ir.. IDc Palm Beach County Engineering and Public Works Florida Department of Transponation Total Traffic The total traffic analysis provided in the Applicant's study is based on a 1992 build- out of the proposed project. However, throughout the early sections of the Applicant's Ii study, the project is proposed for a 1993 build-out year. For comparison's sake, the WHK total traffic analysis is based on a 1992 build out date. The results of the WHK total traffic assignment are provided on Table 4. The Table also shows the results are comparable in most instances where the Applicant provides a projected volume. However, many of the links in the project area are not analyzed by the Applicant. This is due to the Applicant's reference to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards U 1 % link test" as opposed to the Traffic Circulation Element Support Document of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Because of the missing data, conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan will be based on the WHK study projections of future traffic. . .." . . , , . " ~ , :'~~;~;~f~'''''''' . :.t1't:~'.~,~~.;.. I; -;;r ~,-t'~;,. i'~\ ,~.'i\:;" 1"1(1,),.'- 7 ~ ....~:'t? J"::, ~:;;~; --\:_:'^' :..... ..' ..;" , - '." :')t... '":'" " .,~ J": ~ . '. '...... '-;.1." .,' . .;~ ~" Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. .... Mr. Timothy Cannon February S. 1990 page five Table 5. Total Trame ComparisoD 1989 WOK WOK AppI Desll' LOS C EDstlnl Back ProJ Total Total Roadway From To Type Cap Tratnc ADT ADT ADT _ADT Miner Rd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 . 312 400 260 972 NW 22:od Ave Military Trail Lawrence Rd 2L 13,100 6,412 3,365 156 9.933 10,617 LawrelJl:e Rd Congress Ave 2L 13,100 8,025 4,212 513 12,7SO 13,682 Congres,s Ave 1-95 4lD 30,000 6,498 3,410 212 10.120 Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd Knuth Road 2L 13,100 11,383 3,726 182 15,291 15,023 Knuth Road Congress Avo 4lD 30.000 11,383 3,726 182 15.291 15.023 Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 9,448 3,093 52 12,593 Boynton Beach Blvd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 6lD 46,400 27.365 6,347 115 33,836 Congress Avo Old Boynton Rd 6lD 46,400 31.972 7,415 112 39,499 Old Boynton Rd 1-95 4LD 30,000 43,886 10,178 101 54,165 Lawrence Rd Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 2L 13,100 4,837 2.405 1.328 8.570 9,896 Miner Rd Site Entrance 2L 13,100 4,837 2,405 1.588 8,830 9,323 Site Entrance NW 22nd Ave 2L 13,100 4,837 2,405 1,016 8.258 6.964 NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 2L 13,100 8,680 4,316 312 13,308 11,494 Old BoyntOn Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13,100 8,332 4,143 156 12,631 11,231 Congress Ave Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 4lD 30.000 26,912 11,816 221 38.949 Miner Rd NW 220d Ave 4LD 30,000 26.912 11,816 26 38,754 NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 4lD 30.000 29,808 13,088 208 43,104 49,707 Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 4lD 30,000 27,489 12,070 156 39,715 49,641 Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. K.S. Rogen, Consulting Engineer. Inc. Conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Generally, the City of Boynton Beach's Comprehensive Plan provides for LOS "c" on collector and arterial roadways throughout the City. LOS "D" is acceptable on some arterials including segments of 1-95. US I, Boynton Beach Boulevard, NW 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue. According to the Traffic Circulation Element Support Documents of the Comprehensive Plan, once a roadway has exceeded its' LOS standard, traffic volume may only exceed the designated LOS capacity by 5%. Table 6 shows that the proposed development will impact four overcapacity roadways: Old Boynton Road, Boynton Beach Boulevard, Lawrence Road and Congress A venue. Note that since the segment on Lawrence Road is within the allowed 5% increment no improvements are required on that link. In contrast, the Applicant's report identifies improvements to NW 22nd Avenue and Congress Avenue. r ....-:: ~:~ , .. . . " l\~:::;.~~;~:c:., " ;:i{'!<~j,~'i' ".(,~,~~~~,". ' ~. :t\..~.'t~i~lft~~';i;!~;':"ti~~:<:~i",.,i": ~~~,~ '?l";""'~~~~~.',"~~~". "f" '~-it\"f'~~-;; '....1.. '>,~~.>' ..' ,. . i.i/?~'~;:'~~~i.o"': ;"f~,' , . . Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. Mr. Timothy Cannon February S, 1990 page six "lable 6. Conformance to Comprehensive Plan Standards LOS ReVIeW 1991 DSln Stndrd 105~ ProJ Total Review Roadway From To Type Cap Cap ADT ADT LOS Miner Rd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13100 137.5.5 260 972 A NW 22nd Ave Military Trail Lawrence Rd 2L 13100 137.55 1.56 9.933 A Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 2L 13100 137.5.5 .513 12,7.50 C Congress Ave 1-9.5 4LD 36000 37800 212 10,120 A Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd Knuth Road 2L 13100 137.5.5 182 15.291 D Knuth Road Congress Ave 4LD 30000 31500 182 1.5,291 A Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13100 137.5.5 .52 12,.593 C Boynton Beach Blvd Lawrence Rd Congress Ave 6LD 46400 48720 125 33,836 A Congress Ave Old Boynton Rd 6LD 46400 48720 112 39,499 B Old Boynton Rd 1-9.5 4LD 36000 37800 101 .54,16.5 F Lawrence Rd Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 2L 13100 1375.5 1.328 8,.570 A Miner Rd Site Entrance 2L 13100 137.5.5 1,.588 8,830 A Site Entrance NW 22nd Ave 2L 13100 137.55 1,016 8,258 A INW 220d Ave Old Boynton Rd 2L 13100 137.5.5 312 13,308 0 Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 2L 13100 137.5.5 1.56 12,631 C Congress Ave Hypoluxo Rd Miner Rd 4LD 30000 31.500 221 38,949 E Miner Rd NW 22nd Ave 4LD 30000 31500 26 38,754 E NW 22nd Ave Old Boynton Rd 4LD 36000 37800 208 43,104 F Old Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd 4LD 36000 37800 1.56 39,715 F Source: Walter H. Keller Jr., Inc. City of Boynton Beach r Summary In order to meet the City's requirements the Applicant needs to show the City that a 1992 buildout year is feasible and to expand the analysis of projected conditions to all roadways impacted by the project assignment. In addition to this information, assurance of roadway improvements should be provided. Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway improvement would require the project to be scheduled for corjstruction in the County Transportation Improvement Program, the State Five Year Work Program or part of a Municipal Capital Improvement Program. The project may &Iso be considered assured if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured through bonding with the City or County. .... . Walter H. Keller Jr.. Inc. TRAFFIC II: TRANSPORTATION. PLANNING. ENGINEERING · LAND DEVELOPMENT May 3, 1990 Mr. Timothy Cannon. Acting Director City of Boynton Beach Planning Departmenl 100 East [3oynton Beach [3oulcvard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 . Re: Traffic Impact Re\'iew - Boynton NlII'sc,.ic~ I)UD Aun: Mr. Jim Golden Dear Mr. Cnnnon: Per the City's request the proposed phasing plan for the Boynton Beach Nurseri~s PUlJ has been reviewed. The proposal has be~n reviewed for COnfOnllanCe with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards in effect nt the time of submittal. The proposed phasing of the Boynton Nurseries PUD should remain within I % of overcapacity roadways until such time as those roadwnys arc improved is in Conformance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Pcrform:mce Standards. However, based on the Applicant's traffic study the phasing schedule should be revised. The following schedule is applicahk: · The site may generate up to 6 J % of IOtal trips (2.000) before improvemenr is required on Congress Avenue from NW 22nd Avenue to Old Boynton Road. . · The site may gcneratc up to 70% of total trips (2,300) before improvement is required on Congress A venue from Old Boynton Road to Boynton Beach Boulevard. . . · The site may generate up to 79% of total trips (2,624) before improvement is required on Old Boynton Road from Knuth Road to Lawrence Road. · I ne she may genera Ie up 10 f:4% of lotal (rips (2,760) before improvement is required on Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynron RO:ld to 1-95. Note this phase is hased 011 rhe Applicanr's assignment to Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach Boulevard west of Old Boynton Road and a 10% drop-off rate. . If you have any questio, lease conlaclmc at (305) 732-7R44. s:1dQ ~:r H. Kelle.!Jr.. PE. AICP President . 'RECEIVED ~ :0 i1990 I~~N.N& rt;sfiff.. ~ 10211 W. S^MPLE ROAD. SUITE 20<1 . P.O. BOX 9740 CORAL SPRlNGS. FLORlDA 33075.9740 (305) 755.3822 · (107) 732-7814 (Patm Beacb) I # ,......-... Mr. Tim Cannon Boynton Beach Pla~ning Department March 13, 1990 Page Two - Boyntoa Nurseries pun We do, however, take exception to the requirement to hold up the approval of this project until the section of Congress Avenue from Miner Road to Hypoluxo Road is widened. As agreed by the City's Traffic Consultant, this project is expected to generate an insignificant amount of traffic (less than 1% of capacity) on that roadway link. We do not feel that it is reasonable to require a project that is creating an insignificant impact to shoulder the full cost of widening that link of Congress Avenue. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, e:a;f;7 KSR/jr Encl. CC: Mr. Bob Horner Mr. Rick Rossi "T~lt't"',.;1''''~''~'':-'' "'I~l"__ '''.......",....._ ..........-..._.._ ....-..-~.- -_. -. -.. ~:~:~ '~'T'~:"!i'~~d'''l'~' .'t~ .~~:'1_~::~.'.~:~~~~1~~~~."~3'~:~~~:':~ ~'..;;:=.'~~_ ~~,,~. ~(~~PZ~~H'~:~fP.~,.:.~~d~~... '~'"~7 ~=,~~~~~.-..