Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE '..:..",V},' 7 .B. 2 NAUTICA SOUND f.k.a. KNOLLWOOD GROVES (PUD) MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-492 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board FROM: Tambri J. HeYden~~ ' Q Kle-;;~ Planning and Zoning Director ~~ , DATE: September 8, 1995 SUBJECT: Nautica Sound (Knollwood Groves) - MPMD 95-006 Revise access points and unit type (replace mult-family with single-family detached units) and reduce lot size and front, side and rear setbacks INTRODUCTION Kilday and Associates, agent for Meadows Groves, Inc. and R. Bradford Arnold, trustee, is requesting to approval to modify the previously approved master plan for the Knollwood Groves PUD (to be renamed to Nautica Sound), as described in the attached report (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-484). Nautica Sound is to be located on the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road. After staff review, requests for master plan modifications are forwarded to the City Commission, prior to forwarding to the Planning and Development Board, for a determlnation that the changes requested are either substantial in nature or not substantial in nature. This request went before the city Commission on August 15, 1995. At this meeting the Commission stated that a determination of nonsubstantial could be made only if the minimum lot size of those lots that were 4,000 square feet were increased to a minimum of 4,500 square feet (76 "Z" lots were affected) and if 13 "Z" lots that were a minimum of 4,500 square feet were increased to a minimum of 5,000 square feet. Lastly the applicant had to remedy the problems raised by the Utilities Department. Commission action was tabled to the September 5, 1995 meeting to allow the applicant to revise his drawings and submit the changes to staff t~ review. RECOMMENDATION Based on the applicant's compliance with the Commission's provisos, the City Commission, at their September 5, 1995 meeting removed the request from the table. with a unanimous vote, the Commission made a finding of no substantial change regarding the modifications requested. Since the request would subsequently be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for approval of the technical aspects within staff's comments, the commission agreed that because of the changes that had to be made in order to make a determination of no substantial change that the commission was conceding to a minimum building separation of 10 feet rather than 15 feet, no road connection to Hypoluxo Road and no minimum lot width. These concessions impact all staff comments, therefore it is recommended that this request be approved, subject to the attached staff comments in Exhibit "E" with the exclusions and revisions noted below. Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-485 with the following rewording of comments 1 - 5 and 7 and deletion of comment 8 (all other comments would still apply as written): 1. show and identify the appropriate setback dimension at the rear of all lots along the east and northwest property lines. Note: setback for residential buildings is the distance, measured perpendicular, from the property line to the closest home/covered patio (overhangs of less than 2 feet may encroach into a setback). The setback along the northwest property line shall be the same as required in the abutting zoning district. Considering the land located in Palm Beach County along the northwest property line is being annexed TO: Planning and Development Board -2- September 8, 1995 :i into the city at the R-1AAB zoning classification, it is recommended that the rear setback be 25 feet for all lots along property line where the subject development abuts residential property, proposed residential property or commercial property. The proposed 25 foot rear setback matches the rear setback for the R-1AAB zoning district. Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 or 20 feet shall be increased to 25 feet. of the three options available to the applicant for buffering along the northwest property line where the subject property abuts the C-3 (Community Commercial) zoning district, the applicant has agreed to comply with a hedge maintained at five feet, installed at a height of 24 inches and planted 24 inches on center. The setback required along the east property line where the subj ect property abuts the adj acent multi-family development shall be 40 feet as required by Chapter 2.5 - planned unit Development. It is recommended that parcels in the northeast corner of the project, that abut the adj acent unincorporated property, have a 40 foot setback. Therefore the setback along the entire east property line v-lill be 40 feet. Amend all plans I data and charts accordingly. [Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development, Section 9. B.] 2. "z" lot units shall have a minimum lot frontage of 40 feet and a minimum lot area of 4,500 square feet. Zero lot line units shall have a minimum lot frontage of 50 feet and a minimum lot area of 5000 square feet. There appears to be a discrepancy in the information (chart vs. drawing) that was supplied to verify the number of lots having a minimum size required by the Commission which needs to resolved. The allowed frontage of a lot when shaped by a cul-de-sac or the frontage of any other irregular shaped lot, shall be measured at the setback line, and shall be not less than 75% of the required lot frontage for the unit type. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 3. Establish the rear building setback for all double frontage lots as twenty (20) feet which shall be measured from the rear property line. Maintain proposed fifteen (15) foot rear building setback on all back to back lots and maintain proposed ten (10) foot rear building setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. No more than three of the same model type shall be built next to one another. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 4. Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot corner side building setback on all lots. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 5. Maintain a side pool and screen enclosure setback of twelve (12) feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen enclosures. Maintain the proposed seventeen (17) foot corner side setback for pools and fifteen (15) foot for screen enclosures on all back to back lots and other corner lots. Maintain the proposed ten (10) foot rear pool setback for back to back lots and maintain the seven (7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain the proposed five (5) foot rear screen enclosure setback fOl- all lots that abut a lake mai:1tenance easement r common grou~d or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. Page 3 TO: Planning and Development Board -3- September 8, 1995 7. It is recommended that the landscape buffer in Exhibit "B" be provided in a landscape buffer easement along the interior lot lines which abut the east, north (along the northern boundary of the northern entrance off of Lawrence Road), and west (along lots 261 287) perimeters of the proj ect. It is further recommended that the tree and shrub landscape material be native and the hedge material be native or moderate drought tolerant. To ensure the buffer develops to form a consistent shape, the tree and hedge buffer landscape material for the entire buffer easement shall be installed prior to the completion of the first house that has a landscape buffer easement located on the lot and/or prior to the completion of the proposed main access drive that is located at the northwest corner of the project. since the proj ect will be divided into two plats (a northeast plat and a southwest plat), an alternative to this timing of installation could be phasing by plat. Acceptance of this alternative will be determined with the forthcoming plat submittal or site plan submittal, which ever comes first. Small trees and large canopy trees within the buffer may count for the "no net loss" of trees that are required by the tree management plan. All material shall be located within the easement and trees shall not be placed on a property line. Size and type of plants shall be determined at site plan approval. The landscape buffer along the south perimeter of the proj ect, along Lawrence Road and along Hypol uxo Road shall be of the detail shown on the previous submittal. Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-295, 95-260 - delete comment 13 and 95-345. Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-316 - delete all comments and replace with the following: 1. Buildings shall maintain a minimum separation of ten feet. Police Department Memorandum No. 0156 - delete comment 2, No. 151 - delete all comments, except comment regarding telephone access for secured entrances would still apply. Building Division Memorandum No. 95-324, 95-287 and 95-270 would still apply. tjh Attachments xc: Central File A:NSoundMP PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-484 Agenda Memorandum for September 5, 1995 city commission Meeting TO: Carrie Parker city Manager fYl!=rr FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director DATE: August 31, 1995 SUBJECT: Nautica sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves PUD - MPMD 95-006 Revise access points and unit type (replace multi-family with s1nQle-fem11y detached units) and redue. lot size and front, side and rear setbacks (3rd review) NATURE OF REOUEST Kilday and Associates, agent for Meadows Groves, Inc. and R. Bradford Arnold, Trustee, is requesting to modify the Knollwood Groves master plan. The 111.82 acre project, proposed for a total of 424 single-family detached, zero.lot line and "Z" lot units, is zoned PUD and located on the east' side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road (see Exhibit "A" - location map). The original proposed revisions, plus changes proposed by the applicant in response to the conditions by the Commission (for determination of non-substantial change) are as follows (see Exhibit "B" - letter of request and proposed current revised master plan) : 1. Omit a road onto Hypoluxo Road from which two project entrances were planned to connect and replace it with a project entrance onto Lawrence Road. 2. Change the type of units and lot size from 150 single- family detached units on 6,000 square foot lots and 389 multi-family units to 267 zero lot line units on 5,000 square foot lots and 157 "z" lot line units on 4,500 square foot lots; a reduction in the total number of units from 539 to 424 (115). 3. Reduce the lot width from 60 feet to 40 feet for "z" lot units and to'50'feet for zero lot line units. 4. Reduce the front setback from 20 feet to 15 feet. 5. Reduce the side setback on interior lots from 15 feet to 10 feet. 6. Reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to one another. 7. Delete the day care center use (southeast portion of the project) and replace with a lake. BACKGROUND At the August 15, 1995 city Commission meeting the request for a master plan modification for the Nautica Sound project was tabled to the September 5, 1995 City Commission meeting. The request was tabled to give the applicant the opportunity to modify the master plan to the degree that the Commission would make a finding of non-substantial change with regards to the proposed modification as it relates to the current approved Knollwood Groves master plan (Exhibit "C"). Following the review of the master plan modification presented to the Commission on August 15r 1995 (Exhibit "D"), the Commission encouraged the applicant to increase the square foot area of at least 99 "Z" lots. Page 2 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound Exhibit "B" depicts the current revised master plan into which the applicant has incorporated changes that they request be deemed as non-substantial. Included with Exhibit "8" is a written description prepared by the applicant's agent that describes the changes that have been made to the plan. Following review of the plans submitted by the applicant's agent the afternoon of August 30, 1995, staff offers the following summary with respect to the changes the Commission encouraged, staffs review of the changes, and staffs review of the current revised plan as it relates to their original comments: 1. The Commission encouraged the applicant to increase the size of 76 "Z" lots from a minimum of 4,000 square feet to a minimum of 4,500 square feet and increase the size of 13 "z" lots from a minimum of 4,500 square feet to a minimum of 5,000 square feet. To achieve the larger lot size the applicant modified the internal road network system by reducing the number of cul-de-sacs from 11 to 7 which resulted in providing a loop road system with lots fronting on the loop road~. As evident by viewing the previous proposed mastei.plan (Exhibit "0") and the current proposed master plan (Exhibit "B"), significant changes have taken place in the north portion of the project including road configuration, type, size and layout of lots. A total of ten (10) lots were omitted from the project. It is difficult to determine whether the 99 "z" lots have increased in size as recommended by the Commission considering the areas of each lot are not specified on the plan. It should be noted that the tabular data indicates that the minimum lot size for "Z" lots has increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet; however, the lot frontage remains 40 feet. Therefore, there is not sufficient information to verify that the 13 "Z" lots 'that the Commission intended to be increased to 5,000 square feet and included with the 4,500 square foot "Z" lots has been provided. To ensure that the proper balance of 5,000 square foot lots is included with the 4,500 square foot "Z" lots, the plan should specify the total area within ~ach of the proposed 159 "Z" lots. 2. With respect to staff's review of the new plans regarding original comments that would create a significant impact on the layout of the project and general review comments, the fOllowing is offered (see Exhibit "E" staff comf!\ents): Engineering - Increase the width of the proposed Meadows Boulevard from 60 feet wide to 80 feet wide. The applicant revised the lot layout along the north side of the proposed right-of-way to provide 80 feet of right-of-way width. Additional comments are set forth in Engineering Division Memorandums 95-332, 95-295 and 95-260. utilities - Relocate the proposed lift station to better serve future developments adjacent to the proposed project and omit deadend utility lines in cul-de-sacs. This concern has been addressed by the omission of several cul-de-sacs as a result of the new loop road system and the plans show a lift station site acceptable to the utilities Department. Page 3 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica sound The letter from the applicant indicated that the developer and the city's utilities Department have agreed on the location and size of the proposed lift station shown on the current revised plan (based on utility drawings not included with the submittal, but submitted to and veiwed by the utility Department) . At this time the utility Department has no objection to the plan. Fire Department - Provide an ingress/egress on HypoluKo Road and 15 foot separation between buildings. The applicant has not addressed these issues (see revised Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-316). Police Department - Provide access to the site .from Hypoluxo Road and install a north bound riQht turn lane into the site on Lawrence Road. These comments have been disregarded (see police Department Memorandum #0164). Planning Department - Provide an access to the project on Hypoluxo Road, show code required 40 foot setback along the east property line of the projec,t, ,~ncrease the lot size to 6,000 square feet, increase the' lot frontage to 60 feet, increase the front setback to 20 feet and provide 15 feet as the side setback or building separation for all interior lots. These comments reiterate comments made and approved on the previously submitted and approved master plans for Knollwood Groves. The applicant has not addresSed these issues. Addi tional comments are set forth in Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-485. Please note the revisions that led staff to recommend the proposed modifications be considered a substantial change are clearly identified in the recommendation on page 7 of this memorandum. The following text is from the previous staff report (Planning and zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-419) revised with data from the proposed plan, and is provided for your reference. on October 17, 1989 the city Commission approved on second reading Ordinance No. 89-36 rezoning the subject property from AG (Agriculture) and R-1AAA (Single-family Residential) to PUD with a Land Use Intensity of 4 1LUI = 4). The rezoning master plan was approved subject to staff comments and is provided in Exhibit "F". A master plan modification for the PUD was requested in January 1990. The request included reconfiqurinq the boundary between the mul ti-family and single-family pods, changing the single-family pod to zero-lot-l~ne units and establishing the following building and site regulations for the zero-lot-line, single-family units: lot frontage 50 feet, front setback 20 feet (on private streets), rear yard setback 10 feet and non-zero side setback 15 feet. On February 19, 1991 the city Commission made a finding of "no substantial change" for this request and on March 12,' 1991, the planning and Zoning Board approved this master plan modification, subject to staff comments. This master plan modification is provided in Exhibit "C" and is the current master plan. The exhibit also includes the conditions of approval regarding lot size, lot frontage and setbacks for the 150 single-family detached zero-lot-line units within the project. On April 5, 1994, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. R94-39 which entered Meadows Groves, Inc., f.k.a. Knollwood Groves, into an agreement to pay the City the sum of one hundred eight thousand five hundred fifteen dollars ($108,515) to be applied to the des1Qn and construction of tbe Hiner Road extension to Lawrence Road from its existing terminus east of Congress Avenue for the PUD' 5 projected impact on Hiner Road. The resolution also indicated that . , Page 4 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound the city supported the request of Rnollwood Grov.. for road/traffio impact fee credits to palm Beach County. This resolution agreed to recognize this payment of fees as commencement of the development, thereby vesting the 1991 PUD master plan. On August 2, 1994, the city Commission adopted Resolution No. R94- 106 accepting conveyance of the property required of the PUD for public recreation purposes. The 5.0 acre park site is located in the southeast corner of the project. The site is adjacent to an existing, undeveloped 4.02 acre public park site to which it will be combined to meet the recreation level of service needs of the neighborhood planning area that the PUD will impact. chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments, of development regulations states that chanQ8. developments shall be processed as follows~ the. city's land in planned unit Section 12. Changes in plans. "Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may be permitted by the planning and z,oni,ng Board upon application filed by the developer or his successbrs in interest, prior to the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall be within the sole discretion of the city Commission. Non- substantial changes as determined by the city Commission in plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the PUD classification." ANALYSIS staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of the City's land development regulations: Section 1. Intent and 'purpose. "A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is establ ished. It is intended that this district be utilized to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative, design, improved. living environment, orderly and economical development in the City, and the protection of adjacent and existing and future City development. The district is suitable for development, redevelopment and conservation of land, water and other resources of the City. Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable in size, location and character for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and coordinated units. Page 5 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound section 9. Internal PUD standards. B. INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone." The following analysis consists of evaluations corresponding with each significant issue: 1. Replacement of Hypoluxo Road connection with another entrance on Lawrence Road This change significantlY redistributes the traffic trips originally approved to be shared by Hypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road. As shown on the approved master plan in Exhibit "C", project access was planned for a new road onto Hypoluxo Road (a four lane road with median and turn lanes), requiring a crossing over the L.W:D.b. L-18 Canal, from which two project entrances were planned. Also planned was one entrance onto "Meadows Boulevard", a public collector which is to be extended by the developer to connect to Lawrence Road (currently a two lane road which is on the county's five year plan for widening to four lanes). Because of the desire to have a gated community, costs of which are a function of total entrances, and to avoid the cost of the canal crossing, the applicant proposes a new entrance onto Lawrence Road and one onto the extension of "Meadows Boulevard" which will link to Lawrence Road. This change concentrates project traffic onto Lawrence Road, and compounds the traffic problem associated with Lawrence Road as recently expressed by local residents in connection with the anticipated addition of those 1,680 approved, and partially constructed units on Lawrence Road. In response to this identified need, the county added the widening of this segment of Lawrence Road to the County's five year plan. From a design standpoint, it is desirable that where there is the ability for access on to two major thoroughfares, both should be utilized. This is also true from a public safety and public utility access standpoint, as well as for integrating streets with the surrounding road network. Staff comments from the public safety and public utility departments reflect a desire to work with the applicant regarding this issue, but it is noted that this comes,with an increased response time to emergencies. It also eliminates an opportunity to provide a road system that could provide an alternate route in the common event of an accident at the intersection of Lawrence Road and Hypoluxo Road. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the Hypoluxo Road connection not be eliminated. 2. Change in unit type, lot size, lot width and setbacks - Over the past ten to fifteen years, the PUD proposals within the City have included smaller and smaller lot sizes, with very large homes and increased lot coverages (decreased permeabili ty), built closer and closer to property lines. These small lots with narrow building separations have posed ever-changing problems for emergency personnel who must park large vehicles on narrow streets and maneuver emergency equipment within tight openings between buildings. Page 6 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica sound Also, an increasing problem with small lots with narrow frontages and shallow front building setbacks, is parking. Driveways on these lots are not deep or long enough to accommodate more than one, in some cases two personal vehicles, not to mention guest vehicles. In addition, most families have at least two vehicles, so vehicles are parked continually within the street, which causes a reduction in road width, and within swales or over sidewalks which is unsightly and causes costly damage to both. The area of the city over the past five to ten years that has seen the most PUD approvals is the Lawrence Road corridor. This area has become a monoculture of developments comprised of 5,000 and 4,000 square foot lots, yet it is probably the remaining area within the city where larger lots and homes could be developed compatible with the larger lots and homes which spot the area and preceded the newer development. This issue was discussed at a recent Commission workshop at which the Commission recognized the link that housing choices have on economic development opportunities. At that meeting, a minimum 6,000 square foot lot size was discussed to begin to diversify the types of new homes 'that are being built. Regarding the requests to reduce the lot width from 60 feet to 40 feet and 50 feet for the "Z" lots and Zero lots, reduce the front setback from 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback on interior lots from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to one another, staff recommends that the 60 foot lot width remain in connection with the 6,000 square foot lot area. Therefore, the reduction in front, side and rear yard setbacks will not be needed based on the lot size. 3. staff has no objection to omitting the day care center site and replacing it with a lake. 4. utility design - Among the changes not specifically outlined in the applicant's request is a significant alteration in utility system design. As detailed in the utilities Department comments, utility systems in adj acent projects were designed to integrate with the utility system in Nautica Sound through the location'of'gravity sewers and lift stations. The lift station location proposed by the applicant violates comprehensive Plan POlicy 1.14.3 which requires that utility sites (parcels dedicated to the city for lift stations) serve the project and surrounding land uses, as a condition of the project approval. The lift station location proposed is not .efficient as it would forc~the City to eventually construct additional lift stations which the City mU8t maintain. The letter from the applicant indicated that the developer and the City'S utilities Department have agreed on the location and size of the proposed lift station shown on the current revised plan (based on utility drawings not included with the submittal, but submitted to and veiwed by the utility Department). The several dead-end water mains proposed in the cul-de-sacs can be looped, but may result in the loss of a few lots. Lastly, it is important to note that lot size drives the type of utility deSign. The utility Department notes that even if looping of the utility system is agreed to, the small lot size and narrow lots lend to an inefficient design of double-barrelling piping in cul-de-sacs, which also will cost the City more money to maintain as compared to other projects with the same density. Page 7 Memorandum No. 95-484 Nautica Sound As evident from comparing the previous plans with the current revised plans, cul-de-sacs have been omitted, lot type, size and location have changed; however, a utility plan was not submitted for this review. RECOMMENDATION On Tuesday, July 25, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review the previous master plan modification reque.t. The Board r.comm.n~ed that the Commission find the changes "substantial". From the above analysis, the basis for this recommendation is that (a) the relocation of one of the entrances from Hypoluxo Road to Lawrence Road causes additional trips to be placed on ~awrence Road and compromises pUblic safety (better response times, and an alternate emergency route are achieved if the Hypoluxo Road connection was not omitted), (b) the reduction in lot width and lot area intensifies the project from the standpoint of efficiency of land area, causing the potential for parking problems and overall congestion, (c) the change in unit type/lot size is contrary to the recent Commission consens~s to attract a variety of housing choices which is known to have a'direct link to economic development potential and (d) the applicant has not addressed the 40 foot setback that is required along the east property line where the subject property abuts the multi-family project to the east, which could cause a significant change in the lot layout presented at this time. If this request is determined to not be a substantial change, it is recommended that approval be granted subject to the applicable, attached staff comments in Exhibit "E" - Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-485, Engineering Division Memorandum Nos. 95-332, 95-295 and 95-260, Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95- 316, Police Department Memorandum #0164, Building Division Memorandum No. 95-324. It should be noted that this recent submittal excluded 7 of the B drawings (elements) required for review of a Master Plan Modification, and particularly, to enable review of the affects on the master plan of all proposed changes. TJH:meh Attachments xc: Central File .,NAUTICAI.DOC E X H I BIT "A" , ' " LOCATION MAP NAUT/CA SOUND (KNOl WOOD GROVES PUD) ~-:--;- "-... ........ j 03 == f . ....- .- '/- -. ( . , A"l~ "UCI LUI: '"" ~ -~---. (''''TO", SE:J:"E:S " - JD q.Q R"lAA LITO Oves" .or: ~___ E X H I BIT "B" , , 1m I, 0 liil ,Ii! ~ i q 1"" · ~ I nJL.J--/~-~tl-- tJ~.iL..=..m ~~\' \ ~d<><0Jl)r-:i-ih'1 In -p 1 E ~ , t .' W", . \\~)f'". LI I ~- I : ~ \' I" (I) II 1 . ,I: '(. 'I t' . _ -. I' \ , m ~l! . I . :I!,~,.~.L ..::-~.) :,.,.....'.. J l~ 0 i' .' I' 'I . . . ... . ..1 ...... ~'\' ,II 1'1 ' r . l3 ~".-["" ' ~ \' 'i , II,.! '~I ~.~. ~---------- ~~\' ~~~~~\ 'I; m!~ iiI i I'.,.....,.;~ I i! I ~" - ,.\l r:..:. 1~ld :II " " ': .' _ _ ... I \' \ ~\ ~ I. I ~. .!lJ', ~ i ~:I\,l.., , " i _J ... .~.~". i "'1" I · -c l, 8, \~" . ",.~.. \ ~ '~m/' ~p,~\I G \ i " I ~ 1 i I'll! 'l' · , I ir\"' .... , ' , , ' .' 'Wi''''';' ,I I , I I!'; I, M-i Itt" ,:, \ ........ ..... '" . i ;.. I. · · : : ~'I i.++1 ~ y-/ I ~ < " ; , 'i Ie:: \ L 0 " I!\!ll !P " ! ' ! {I Iri : : ::: ~____ ---jil ~1 :: I II" ,1 ~i'\ll ,. i "U'II~ .0, ,! \ \ 21 II' : ~ l:l~ _'..~~ --___~,j:j ;: WJ :;! " & ~l ,a; 'j~ ~i\61Ii~ n \ . i. \ .1, ~ . ,'1.'1 '1.. ., -- · ~ ...-' -- \,1; i / I ~.., I "' I " ~ -~. '. ,i. J ~'. I'l"'" .,.~ . .J V ..," II , : (;1;' ;~....., ,,.,:'.. ,. "l'" ,I; , , . ,,,.- - - ~~;m~'l f:'. -' - - - -'as\ I l{ " I'; l'r ,'I)?t?~i"...":.'---'oJ~JI'~/'~" "~.""I"'''~'; -[+Yf.- - I.,: : I . I. " 7 I I "'" ~rn, .. ...... - -. · · 1,1\ Ifl .t.r. I I · · I 'I I : I. t, ,~' . "f"r:"~l ;:=-:. ~' ..'_.. .. -. - . - Iril ... (.. .. I I . ,." .' . ",., ........ ........'" f:"- . .. , · · . , ".' , .... . ,. "'.. ....' . \. '. ',,, I .. ..'....n....- . 'Ii.'" 11,' ~\. .., I '..'.' . ,... '~l i om R"'''''! I ~ I L..!- ... ~: 1~ I I I I I I: I I I' ..11:, ~ ' . '. '..', . IL'.,..., ". I"'. -,..j , U. I I I L " , " I I;,' '~~ '.",.~'.'.,,,I.. · \~\~.' \118'1 i ~I'l' ..t"~.~'~{~ li'T'TIT,t,t, I I Ii':" : I '~ .. I" , n"\ \.7&: I II; I' I ~ I . " _.....] ) I I I " " ." , :~ ,', . ~ ,--,' -' . .. .... II 2; \ .. ' ~~ ~ ~ '. " " ' . l.#.A" .'.' ",' ~ ....... l'l~ " ::;- ,..~~ ' ~.. -,Tll:- . ~';.r;: .. ~l:; 'T. ... ..:.iall ,- I, ,~~ ~, ,,__. ' " I '-:\----'1:1.. I :-wi ~lr ':' , · · · I ,I', , 1 1 .~.' a I '" ~ ') ~"-~, ~J -..... ", /' I!!I I .. . I I , . ' I, i-r- ,; ....., I.n"' , t~' ~... ~./ . ...., .'1;a. l'\~ " ,'t I ..__lll. r- ~ ;: rr-~'" r' ~7 : I ..~~, " ,I J :~~. "l: _ ' I ( I ___I..... I' I, L~....J .;... I I' ,-' I _ ....',_ ~ . . ~l....-.-! ~r- -..,' I ....~.~ ,>-:,.~,;..' '.' . ". " '. . 1 r-.j I. -..., I !- ~ :.' '-"" .: " , i ~ ~i I'.t' · ilW' :si D :.~ ':' :i EPl{~I~C \.1:... .....: \1. , ~ I! II( .',.\": Jr:t: 1 ~ ,.. ;,' ~ .. ...~. I . Ii. ,.~".." ...., _GC l' .' ,. I' \1 I '. , . .,' , II'-.. , . I' ,!" ~ I: ~ ~ l\ .' ' ~ I I I. I ~. ~. I 4.. l' Ii l~: I " : ~. Ji .\; " ~ !~:~ . Jt. I ,. Ii-' , .,t __'_.._:__...J__' ""i, :' :i.t- - l._ t.:.'~: ~: ...\' ~ r. , !o. .f l ," I' q"" , .4 · · I ., L.J ' -,...... .,,, ~, u' )\\,\~I~' i I .~. ;::.j '. ",;,..':.!L'.. ~ ~ ~ ~L~ ~.~.~ =9, lE::':t:i. t ~, ~~I,~:L . ~ ,':; '1 ~I,: ... , !l U~!~ "I' A' -r."". .- .. '1-' ~. ~ ~~_... "-'". I ~h\ . _..n_.....! "l.~' I V' , I I . . . . . ~l:.I:' - -~ ';\:-~i:"'; -'I :1: ::[ ~IJ~, -:Jt~ . ~ . " .- . ~ ..' I 1;1 .'-'::--=-=1 -'" -- .. > - - - . J:L · ~ ~,'l~ 'j,:J 'j "I"! ~~l "K~fjr.'~ 'I', 'j .;,; ~, :~.: i' ~ e '9 i~i .... ;'il'''\ Ii' I ~ i q ~,,\ . ~!iI . I ,\ - - - .- , I \AI ~ "" ' . ~. !I.:lI _:r: .&1!IOl.....ru~"...~~;~...:~~ .~- ...... "', .".. ~~l~}_ ~tl ~ Ii.- ._ __ ....... . .... ." E~'l!' - .- _. ~~!: ' II""" .... ...R ~. '::=='~-. ..11 '''-1111 :,..~"" -" , ." " .,,,.,- _. " .' . . .' \\\;\\ ~~i \ ;; \\\\ \\\i~~ \\~\ \~\\ ,; \i' '\\\ ,\,~ -~ It\ 'l" \\'\ \\ 'll \W \\\, ,\ \\ \ii\ ~\\', \\ t-\\ \"1 s, -\\, 1\\ \\ ,1, ~ ; ~ Hi . \\ · ,,\\,\ ':' ,"i, A '\ \ ~,l\\ ' '\ S, .1 \ ~\\\'\'\ \~ . \ ~~~' \\ \,' ~ '\ Ii l1 ~'1' .' ~ 1 \ " ~ \\, i~ \~ ill ~ \\ ,\ ~ \ \.." \\, ~ \\ \\ \ .' -'1 \q~ i .\' Ii , ~\ \ ..~..i \\ \ .0 h\' '\ .. I" ~ U!\ \ \ ' ti \:, 3 t \ \ ,~ en \: \. . ~ \ \\\ \" \ -.' \ \ , '\' \ \ \ ~ 11 · ~ 'iit\\' \ \~ \ g . . ". \ ' \ \ .il, \ i i \\\'\ltif'l~'\ t \ 1\,\ , \. f' .~\' \\'\ \1 i~~\~~ \ \1 ~ \\l\\\t\\\ \\ \\ \\\\ \~~ \\\~ ~ \\\\ ~~ r\\ ~ \~\~ ~\ ~ "\i', ~\,~ i\ ~\ 1\~\\\ \\\\ \\\"',\ \\ \\\\, \\\\ ,\,,\ ~ \~ ~n \'\ \ \i~J' \~..~, \. h ' I llll U~ '1\ tI\ ,,'- \.\ \ \.' .\, l if ~ 'i" \ \\.~ \\1\ hI ,~\~l I, \\, "i\ t\\ \ \~ \~ l,t . $~ \, \ l~\' \t. \~\ \~,\\ \i \\\ h~ i~\' \ ~~ i\ \ " \ h\ \'\' \~\\ \\ \\' \\' ~\\\ ~ Ii 'i , "' \l,' \131 \ ~\\ It it t \ \~..i \'1 I. \1 ' I :I" I . II \l\~\~fa \\,~..\\ J1\,\\\ I I ~ \ ~ \ I \\ ~/'. yi. ; ! ,; . 'I ... '-<-, ~, Kilday It Aaeoclat.. Lendacepe Archlteots/Pllnner. 1651 Forum PIece Suite 100A Weat Palm eeach, Florida 33401 (4071 689-6622 · FIx: (407t 689.2682 August 30, 1995 Ms. Tambn Heyden, Planning Director Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Admlnl.trator City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Nautlca Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up Our File No: 1020.13 Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag, Attached please find twelve revised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15. 1995. For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Included with this resubmlttalls a Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the Interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks. This amended plan should address the major concerns of members on the City Commission. The following Is an overview of the modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan. 1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet. In turn. the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from 89 to 59 lots. The number of lots In the 5,000 to 6.000 square foot range has been Increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424 which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of 539 units. The breakdown between zero and "ZII lots has also been altered. There are now 21 more zero lot line units than pr~viously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have been eliminated. ' 2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upslze the facilities to accommodate a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The 11ft station is located In the southwest corner of the top portion of the site. In ord~r to provide a more amenable plan for the City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated. Ms. Tambri Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 30, 1995 Page 2 In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Halllhan regarding this Issue and I believe the attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant material will be native and, as Indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design. Attached with this letter Is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached or If you need any additional Information please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you In advance for your past time and future consideration for this project. Sincerely, ~I~ Karyn I. Janssen Kilday & Associates, Inc. cc: Alan Fant, GL Homes Larry Portnoy, GL Homes Rick Elsner, GL Homes Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble " , 00, J> !~ ~- >> C) Ii C) '- C) '- J> l~ >> () ~~ () {\\ fl' Z t. ~~ Z -\ / ~ r --\ --\ ~ ~ --\ C) C) ~~ N ~ tl' 1~ 7\) r C) a r -\ CJ 1~ r --\ ~ C - ti Z 1~ c {\\ ~ ~ --\ ~ - ~ ., (j) -\ i ~ CJ) 1 ... l i~ Ii ta' , / , ' ~ ~ QI I i QI I i E X H I BIT "0" I\'~ 'II (') c ~ m ~ ~ )> ~ :n -0 ~ 1~~ ~r~~ u.:~ ........ - II II , . \ \ .\ I i I I . ~ll.Rll.. . ~ll \. ~ ~.~ \ . I' ;'Iilal 'Ill~ I' "a .n'~l\ IU I Ilit I I' ,. r: I I , ,\m..._..._..._-~........--ua- ~._._.__._---=-.__.'._'.-:1f."" _..~ . 'I . . ;,.-.-.-.--'-'----'-'--: : r. ' ,\ ., I I \ " '. , . "- I ! . _..-:~.u-.-".. _u.__' 1 Ii. ~ \ - ." · I (\ ~~~~, . ~ i,l~ ) I 1 \ il ' i I , I ~ ' '-- ~l .' 1'1\,\\ r\ \\\ l\. \ r [ I t ili\\}tjUl,oH, 'II .. _, i\ \~, ~~~~"'.'11111 iKnoRwood Groves PUD II ~ . .. I'~I .:! Il~~~ton 8ea~ FL 1 .',. ... ", . ','..;, ..1, 6,. nlan,.' . :_~~_~. ~... ,of- .' r. ".. \ ' " , I I '---" 1\ \\ \1 i\ I ;I t1:i1l \\\\ ,\11 \ \ 'Die City of t.Boyn ton 13eac/i : ,. 100 'r.. 'ADY"'D" 'At,-, ""ukllGrd' '1',0. 'BD{J'" 'Boy",.," 'BtllC~. ~(otii.J JJ425-0J 10 l 'j,y :HiJf[: ,,, 0 i J ; J.,., II 1 :/:U: '-oI0i) 711,;"59 OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR Harch 13. 1991 Attnl Hs. Anna Cottrell Urban Design studio 2000 'aIm Beach Lak.. Blvd. Suite 600, The Concourse West Palm Beach, Fl 33409-6582 REI Knollwood Groves Master Plan Modification - rile No. 570 Dear Ms. Cottrelll Please b~ advised thet the City Commission at their February 19, 1991 meet in; made a finding that the changes requested in the pod boundaries, acce.. points and unit type for the above-referenced project were not substantial in nature. Regarding the modifica- tions to the approved setbacks, lot size and lot width, the City Commission made a determination of no substantial change based on your consent to caaply with the following minimum standardsl # 1. 6,000 square foot lot size 2. 60 foot lot width 3. 20 foot front yard setback 4. 15 foot aide yard setback on the non-zero lot line 5. 15 foot rear yard setback 6. An 8 foot pool and screen enclosure setbilck The Planning and Zoning 80ard at their Harch 12, 1991 meeting made a final determination on this request, including compliance with the minimlllll standards stated above, by approving this modification to the Knollwood Groves PUD master plan, subject to the attached staff oomments. Tke.e' comment. shall b. addre..ed on the submission plans for pr.lim~nary plat approval. Pursuant to Appendix 8-Planned Unit Developments, Section 10.8.3. approval of this master plan modification and PUD zoning will expire on September 12, 1992 if a preliminary plat has not been submitted. An extension to the master plan approval for a maximum pertod of one year, may be ftled not later than 60 days after the expiration of the master plan, November 12, 1992 (Chapter 19, Section 19-92 of th., Code of Ordlnano..>> . Ixtenslona mu.~ ~a '1184 with 'he .lann1", D.p.r~8nt Dr submi tting a letter of extension for review by the Concurrency Review 80ard and the Planning and Zoning Board. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at (407) 738-7490. Very trUly yours, d.\..,,-tIJ~~ -i~ CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP Planning Director CC:frb Encs eCI Technical Review Board ,.., ..... P( (b '\.. E X H I BIT "D" , , 'Ill I, ,-u It ' - I 111' 'I' ., I r 11'11 : JrJl. ~~~._~1~._~11___1t__f~}- ~- --- - --== =-;:. "'~~!\ ~N~~~--::\j-l~~ \)l\~ f', ~l'1 t !lim , ' .:"- If.'.': mIl L..... L ....JJ _~ - I \ ~ \ ill \ ' 11lall I. \ I "1:1"/ · It. ..IT."....., l\ III III' lili I ~Il tl.. :!. · J : "t ~.lJ..~ ' I ,~.' .. , ) '\ ~ ~ I I ;1 ~4'1 \; :!i ~ "i; "i;~f: .;:.;: ~:";'~ ~/;~;'B~ & ~ \ \\ I , t:ti Ii 1 ~.---- ""__r______~I ":"S~'''' .~~ l\~~ci; Ii.. :;1 ...... .'] "~ ,~', ~:~! ,I ~I' i 'I-r--;--f:" ~ ., t I' ~I ';, \ .:.;-;~, m' ~ II '~ I :~. ~ - -.. I 1 :1 \r-~ ',";\ . \~ " \' :. ,-', i'l' ~I t I . ~::'" ~""'_.J"""'..i ~\'~ : . \ ill I! 3 ~,~ \ \'-~"":i~~~'~ ,:...- i . .', .,I,UL"..... \ It lit Ii '1111 ,,::, -:: _.~ .. . .'. /' ,',.: .:. '., -~ ,II .. 'I ," , ) I"~l \ l~, ::. 1" I j.', .' ~ I ....." -~.~. 1\. .-1 II ,', , i~I~l\Ii~ ~1 -,::~"'" ;', '-:::::";--;1\':\\-' \ I II!', t It, In 'I ) "l~ r-, ' · I , ' ~ ' !I '. r I. ~I. . 110 IJl ~ !, i I:: H~- '~:l-i-flli---j "-'lilftT~ ~ 'I r, i~li~l~i !il ,\i\~~ 'Ii ~;t \l,'ift!'"l! \;1 \ , I' I 11\' :. . I . '. -.... l~: I ': ~,- - I ":~, II . 6J i , ' ,,\ . I I h;1!,lkc,'",<, ::]::::. I ',' --_"'" I I ::. . h:~ ,\! ., ~"l'" . I ,~.~ .::1.~'1;,. ""'I" ~r '1; -"117' J:'. ..,' · : I ' .,,' ....... ,"i-' "" ~,' '.,. 1" --""~ ~. -" I , . ~ 'i:i'~" . ,;.r,.i'lii..,. ._-~ ~..., I"i\' . ~:,"_':'l,,,,:~,~,,,,,",,~111 1,' \ ~~t. I ii 1 . ~/~::1a .;'.'::: -':F.':~ ,.. - ~;-- . 1-=- - .,:::1: ';,::~ : :.~ : :: : :: ;~:: :~;~, \', , \. '\' - H I I, 1 ,. It I ' (r......~....., !;:::~ ..... ,.... -- ... ..',. - ~'I 't , , I \ I "\I\\~~~'~' -ro "'~ ..:" tai l:lI]l~:T:t:;~""'; ,n.:" . 11' ('-J'-V :J'-f:": ==:.:::::.: ~ . I laill( I " , . ",.~. ." . . .,. . . r" . ; C!IJII'" .. .. --! .' ,n ::. ..., I , · '(', '1'1' · · · · · · · · , .' 1 ".,t~':1 · ;! 1\1! '.. \.< 'i~.~.,' .' '.~. · -' i IJIIi\ i .Hit: ',_: ~ I , r~ ~ ~ ,I,.'~~t'l"\' \ "'I' /,"". .' , .' .' .,. ~ !. .,-. ~II i': ..' I .,. · · · · I ' I' I ; ,~t ,\~~~~" "~:'~f~'\%: . . .:~~:'i;.lll8~'~.~/~~"",t:~~ JI't:~:, ~'I'_~-~l::K":~~ ,I ::~j~'~~::l:~;.1,: I i: ~.: I ~ i-'~ . ... . -,: ,~s ~ 1 .:1 ~. ." · .. t:l; : Ulr"'Il ~.. .. .--r., ff;:: ,.' ~~;' ~lC .. , . ,~ '. ., '" .,. ., / ~ .,.'. . ." '.J'",", ... . ..' +:l!' I .. !'tW, · ;'., "'f"'" ~ 10' 1 ;. I ~... t ,'" . ,'.. ,~, ~'...:: & ,"-~:'" ..~~:.. :~.,~' ~: .1.',,' ::.,.. :,... . -: I ..... I ~l' ~~;tI" ~... Ev.l~~':%:' ;.\ I ,'a:2 ,.----- . .-. -4-4l: i;...;... 1 .... ---,', i .~ .: '111M · l< ~ ~~","I}.' .~.) \"...~" ...,'" III III \ :i., !L&rl~l1~ '~; n,,~'\ ",', a I ~ ; .q~ .!T/ <,., \~ I~' J' ~ if;"" I .' ..&I__t:. I cli ~ '( .___~ . ".. . VA .......'" .\ I,' .' 1-1. .' ,~' I : """..l ....' '~I "I ~ t';.~11o-i..(Il'" "?( P-'..3~~ ~t:' It' ...::: re... +:P.~ I ~,': ~!"'~i' ,:~ . ". ,..... .1\ :, s..\ I ", .... i \ U ,'. I ~ " I'" ';" ' I ,II' \ . :t. · " I I , Q. l' l r'" ... i~, · Ja · 1 .. . I .. .~ . s: ~ 'i ~~'O. I!l\'\~' .ii. !l-!- ,. ~.. '1,":..:4.11. -H1.1l+: ,~. "~;;.:~ ;:,,~ \ i., ,"",i, ~ m~ :;1'\ ~~~ :t:u~l--~l--~\I:: ~ t~'!II~~iI:~--_~_f~\1 \~~~ ~ \l\M,J. ~~ ~llm ~i ~:. ~ 'I :t /; ~__...-. j-.-. -.-. ..~..~-1.~., ..~J,,~ .~_ ~.~ · UI, :. .I:\11.! I · . · .l,'}' 'J~i;' :: ~ ::' I ql'\ ~ " '~l..::.IJi ~i~ . ['C~t:. ~ ;' : ':t' :1:' (;_ :J'~;~'~~~7'~~ :~'~: : ~ i;;~;t~;;1. ~~. ~ \ ~ I, l .t' L- .~ - ..I:. ~'N~i:n - .[:.E 1:1- ri~N': - ..., I I.' 1(;k,1 ~ ............ ~_......_. - -- ''\ -':. .. ~ T II! 1~! ,i, rT. ip i' i' ~ ~ q 1\) 1I1~ J Iii I g ~ ~ & I ! l~i'l i I ili! ~ . i Id j ", 11!,t1' \ , " !l LJ I> . . · ' ill I) "1 ! 1.1 .: \ g .1" r!~ 'I !! I - - ~rl; , '~:',J' _g ~ -: I \ . ~ Ii IlIhl!i ni il'l ' I~f~ ~~ III~ li111ci,,1 ! ;~r''''l' OI'lii .,lllt FH i- RAUTICA SOURD r.IIA. laoll.... Gr.'" P.U.D. flom\Dn '...rh. noru'" .......r tt. ". .-- IU\IMY It .......... ,eM"". ..........',/f..ftM" l>>.,~ (wr' ,.... = ~... ,...h. ........a ..to. c.a" ......21 .,..:(~O'I "'-2":: tA" ........ ,'\ ~ ~ l'l~ ~ ~ ~ \ ,~ \' \\t \\ ~:: : \' a:' ,~, ~\\ W\ -:\ \\ \\ \ \\- l l'i\- k' ~ vY, \\ :\\\;.l ,,1\ I'i~\'-' \' i\'~ ~ti "\',\\ l~~\~\'\ ~\1 " .! il' \" ~ \" '1 . ,'\\ ,\ \~t \tll, ~ \X"~ \\ \\ \... \\\ ?oi\ ~ \ \ \ :lti 1\ 9- 11' \\ '. \,.\ ~ ii\ f 0'\'-' ,'" \~~t ~ \' \ \\ -i,\ \\' \ ,I, .. -\'\' >, \;\ \ ~\\..\ \, ,\ .\; ~. ,-, ' 4 . \,,9. ..,:: i" , 0 ~ ;;...... _~ l~, ~\\ \ \l~ . 9."\ l' 1 ? i \ 1 ~ \ \ ~ - \ ~ 2 !l. ~ 4' ~ . G G9- 0 _ ~ \~ i~ \ ~ i\ \r ~ ~ s. \% \i ~ ~ \\ ~\ ~ ~j ,'i!!' ,i . ~ ~U ,\' ~ ~ j 1 ~ 1" ~ . \'- ~ " !l ~ (JI ~ \ \ ~ - \ ~ \ \ . ~ ~ ~ ~~t~'t i ~~ ~ ,; _ _ _ p'l" 3 n" . _ , ' i . --\t 19:~, \ I ~ i l" '.. ~ ~ ~ I ill;':."" l"i _ m' -' ,it \ S { t \\l~ \ \ : \~'\ i\\ \\\\ \ \tl~\~i \\ 9.'\\\\ i\\\ \~\ \~\\ \~\\\~\ \\~ ,\\\\~ ~i\\\\ t,\ ~, 1\ \~l\ 'Xl\' \).1-\,. '\\\1 \\\' \\\~ l' \~ \1I~ · i\ i" \ ~~l \, l' \l\l\~\ a\ '\' \t.~,l '\'\ ~.. \~ ill l~'\ \\ v' , . \~ ' · · \' .'\ 1\ ,\\\ \ \ \ 1. \\~ ", V l'lt \\Ll \\ ,,"J, h. \ it ~\\ \\ . W' \l' \\\,'~" " \\." l,,\' \' ~\\ \ i' r "\ Ii \ \" \ \ \i.'\ \'1' \~\\ t', "l ~" \ '"\ \ '\, ~, t\" ",.\ .~, I~I'\ i ~~ II \ \' \'\ i_it \~ \\\ \\ \ 1 ", t" , \ ,\\1' 'i\\ \t .\l " \" t ,~ ~ _ ".1 \_~ ~ \ it il \ \ \;' i \\~ ," ~, \f · t \ Ii l .... ..." , .. -.~ "" .,' ,.. . PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-485 FROM: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning, ~1rector 4?f::Jt4'a- Michael E. H~~1 zoning and site ~nistrator TO: SUBJECT: August 31, 1995 Nautica Sound - MPMD 95-006 Master Plan Modification (Request to amend the previously approved PUD master plan to o~it the day care use, modify access points, change the type of units and lot size from 150 single-family detached units on 6,000 square foot lots and 389 multi-family units to 267 zero- lot-line units on 5,000 square foot lots and 157 "Z" lot-line units on 4,500 square foot lots, and reduce the front setback front 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to one another.) - (3rd review) DATE: 1. Show and identify the appropriate setback dimension at the rear of all lots along the east and northwe,st property lines. Note: , , setback for residential buildings' is the distance, measured perpendicular, from the property line to the closest structure (overhangs of less than 2 feet may encroach into a setback). The setback along the northwest property line shall be the same as required in the abutting zoning district. Considering the land located in Palm Beach County along the northwest property line is being annexed into the City at the R-1AAB zoning classification, it is recommended that the rear setback be 25 feet for all lots along property line where the subject development abuts residential property, proposed residential property or commercial property. The proposed 25 foot rear setback matches the rear setback for the R-1AAB zoning district. Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 or 20 feet shall be increased to 25 feet. A further requirement along the northwest property line where the subject property abuts the C- 3 (Community Commercial) zoning district is that a 5 foot high masonry wall, landscaped chain-link fenc~ or some other equivalent 5 foot tall buffer be provided. It is recommended that either the buffer easement plan proposed by the applicant or identified in comment number 7 of this memo be accepted for this required buffer. The setback required alon9 the east property line where the subject property abuts the adJacent multi-family development shall be 40 feet as required by Chapter 2.5 - planned Unit Development. It is recommended that parcels in the northeast corner of the project, that abut the adj acent unincorporated property, have a 40 foot setback. Therefore the setback along the entire east property line will be 40 feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. [Chapter 2~5 - Planned Unit Development, section 9. B.] 2. Redesign plan to show all lots which have a minimum lot frontage of sixty (60) feet and a minimum lot area of six thousand (6rOOO) square feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 3. Change the front bUilding setback from the proposed twenty (20) feet at the garage and fifteen (15) feet at the building to twenty (20) feet for both garage and building for all lots. Establish the rear building setback for all double frontage lots as twenty (20) feet. Maintain proposed fifteen (15) foot rear building setback on all back to back lots and maintain proposed ten (10) foot rear building setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. Page 2 Memorandum # 95-485 Nautica sound MPMD 95-006 4. 5. Change the side building setback for the non zero side of the zero- lot-line units from the proposed ten (10) feet to fifteen (15) feet and specify a fifteen (15) foot building separation setback between the sides of all "Z" lot units. Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot corner side building setback on all back to back lots, however, establish a 20 foot corner side setback on all other corner lots. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. change the side pool and screen enclosure setback from twelve (12) feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen enclosures to fifteen (15) feet for the non zero side of the zero-lot-line units and specify a fifteen (15) foot side pool and screen enclosure separation for all "Z" lots. Maintain the proposed seventeen (17) foot corner side setback for pools and fift..n {1!} foot for screen enclosures on all back to back lots; however, establish a 20 foot corner side setback on all other corner lots. Maintain the proposed ten (10) foot rear pool setback for back to back lots and maintain the seven (7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain the proposed five (5) foot rear screen ,enolosure setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 6 . Show on the plans all off-site roadway improvements proposed and/or required as a result of the city's evaluation of the traffic conditions. 7. It is recommended that a dense landscape buffer be provided along the interior lot lines of the project and that the material be located within a landscape buffer easement. It is further recommended that the tree and shrub landscape material be native and the hedge material be moderate drought tolerant. To ensure the buffer develops to form a consistent shape, the tree and hedge buffer landscape material for the entire buffer easement shall be installed prior to the completion of the first house that has a landscape buffer easement located on the lot and/or prior to the completion of the proposed main access drive that is located at the northwest corner of the project. The dense landscape buffer shall be shown on the plans and be depicted as a grouping of 3 to 5, eight foot tall smalL tr,ees (silver buttonwood or yellow elder) then approximately 30 feet away a grouping of 4 to 5, eight foot tall multi-stem (wax myrtle) shrubs. Incorporated into the recommended buffer shall be one, eight foot tall canopy tree (mahogany or oak) spaced 70 to 80 feet on center. The buffer shall also have a continuous 2 foot tall hedge (chalcas or Florida privet) extending along the entire property line; however, the hedge may. form a meandering. shape as viewed from above. The continuous hedge shall be maintained at 6 feet tall. The 8 foot tall bUShy shrub plant and other trees described above may count for the "no net loss" of trees that are required by the tree management plan. Note; the perimeter buffer landscape design proposed by the applicant (see Exhibit "B" Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-484) is acceptable; however, all material shall be located within the easement and trees shall not be placed on a property line. If this landscape design is approved, the plans shall be modified to show the landscape material. It is further recommended that the specie and size recommendations identified above be incorporated into the applicants' proposal. 8. Revise the plans to show a Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress to the project. The Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress was originally approved for the project to divert trips to adjacent roadways. Page 3 Memorandum # 95-485 Nautica Sound MPMD 95-006 9. Submit for review typical lot drawings showing the approved setbacks for all lots. 10. The following comments are still valid which relate to those sheets (drawinqs) provided with the previOUS submittal (but are absent from the current revised master plan): On sheets 4 of 8, 6 of 8 and 7 of 8, remove from note #3 the text "or building"; On sheets 6 of 8 and. 7 of 8 amend the text shown on the perimeter detail drawings, at the rear landscape easement to read as follows: "width of landscape buffer easement and other easements, where applicable."; On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 change the title of the perimeter landscape buffer easement detail drawing to "Perimeter lots"; Amend the double asterisk note found on sheet 6 of 8 to read as follows: "Subject to rear perimeter landscape buffer easement and other easements, ,where applicable."; , # On sheet 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from Accessory BUilding note #3 the following text "pergolas and gazebos". Also define trellis as "A free standing structure maximum height of 6 feet located only behind the front building setback line with a configuration having a height and length and no depth (example - similar to a fence."; and On sheet 6 of,8 move the 15 foot corner side setback symbol to the corner of the building; 11. Specify on the master plan that 30 feet is the maximum height of the residential and recreation structures. 12. Submit for review all sheets and data that where included with the previous submittal. 13. It is recommended that all trees required by the tree management plan be shown planted in either a landscape buffer easement, common ground, or added to the required lake planting material. It is further recommended t-hat' the master landscape plan include a tabular summary of the trees required for the tree management plan and that they are shown and identified with a distinguishable symbol on the plan. 14. Establish setbacks for structures proposed for perimeter common ground (e.g~ bus stop pavilion and decorative fences). 15. Indicate on note (D) that six (6) is the maximum height of the entry feature. 16. Please note that association documents are required for the project. The documents are reviewed by staff and the legal department and required prior to final plat approval. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5 Planned Unit Development, Section 2. D.] 17. A revised master plan reflecting all staff comments and conditions approved by the City Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Dept. prior to initiating the platting process. MEH:dim xc: Central File .'K.ut-te..ID! DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-345 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning & Zoning Director jW~h(lAam ~ukill, P.E. ~~Eng~neer FROM: DATE: September 8, 1995 RE: NAUTICA SOUND I have met with the agents for subject project and reached agreement on the following two items: 1. The 8' bike path on Lawrence Road was a suggestion from the City Comp Plan not a condition based in the LDR, and probably will serve no useful purpose because it extends neither north nor south from Nautica Sound. However, a sidewalk is required. 2. The applicant will provide pedestrian access to the north so as to accommodate walkers to a new elementary school a short distance east of Nautica Sound if and when one is built. They will include in their POA documents an obligation to construct a sidewalk/bikepath to their property line prior to the opening of the school. The School Board, the County and/or the LWDD will have to extend the access from Nautica Sound as they collectively see fit. WVH:ck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager C:NA1JTK'A.SNO ... ... -~~. ".", ~ ~ ~ ~,W r~ ill" U) r..-------, ~] II \, . ! i Ij Ll'" '. ; ',I t...__.._~~~.J ji PLM,F'IIi'iG sIND I ".~~JPH!.ilLt~~L. ..f!7'''L- ! DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BNGINBBRING DIVISION MBMORAMDUM RO. I. I I , , ' ,. \'", Ii: A\~l .; 1111..,.,) 1\, , --rA' 95-332 , . ',~!" ~1 _..,..._.,_..7( ,_, ! ~ . ~.".. 1- - j n TO: Mike Haag Zoning/Site Administrator , , FROM: ~m Hukill, P.E. ~ Engineer DATE: August 31, 1995 RE: NAUTICA SOUND - THIRD REVIEW We have today received a revised plan of proposed Nautica Sound and have reviewed it solely for determination as to whether it is a major modification of the originally approved document. In our opinion it is a major modification because no access is provided onto Hypoluxo Road, thus greatly increasing traffic at the other two access points. However, we have no technical objection to this change. Many conditions of our previous reviews have been incorporated, some have not. All uncorrected conditions will require attention. ~ WVH:ck (':N^ 1/S1I1INIURU .' , TO: FROM: RS: ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-295 August 9, 1995 AUG I 0 1995 Mike Haag _ite evelopment Administrator m V. Hukill, P.R. Engineer NAUTICA SOUND - SBCOHD RBVIBW PLANNING AND ONING DEPT. We have again reviewed subject development and have the following to offer: A. B. c. D. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T., Palm Beach County, S.F.W.M.D. and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. The 40, 50 and 60 foot right-of-way details conform with the City's required minimum pavement widths (11' per lane measured from the center of valley curb). Proposed Meadows Boulevard detail is not acceptable. Chap. 6, Art. 4, Sec. 10C, pg. 6-11. Specify the proposed street names within the development including the "proposed Meadows Boulevard" (Meadows Boulevard is the loop road in the Meadows development and cannot be used again). Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 100, pg. 6-14. Proposed Meadows Boulevard is a collector road and therefor requires an 80 foot right-of-way. Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. lOB, pg. 6-11. E. Provide an eight foot bicycle, pedestrian path along Lawrence Road in conformance with the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, pg. 66. In specific response to Ms. Janssen's August 2 letter and specifically Engineering Division memo 95-260, we submit the following: 1. Acceptable F. 2. Please comply. No commitments have been made for a 60 foot right-of-way, and it must be 80 feet as required in the Land Development Regulations. "0 '. " '...... .... "--, ... " " . . Engineering Division Memo 95-295 to Mike Haag RE: Nautica Sound - Second Review August 9, 1995 Page Two 3 . Acceptable 4 . Acceptable 5. The Lawson and Noble certification refers to sections of the Code of Ordinances repealed April 4, 1995. Please comply with our note 5, (95-260). 6. Acceptable if statement is correct. 7. Acceptable 8. Acceptable to use single 8 foot bike path. 9. Acceptable 10. Acceptable 11. Acceptable 12. Please comply , I 13. Unresolved WVH:bh XC: Ken Hall A.IlAVTICA.1 '" ......,... ................ ", '", , ". '. , Ms. Tambrl J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 4 4) Details for all signs will be submitted during the Site Plan Review process. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM - 95-311 1) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project showing a minimum separation of 10 feet between buildings. A 10' separation between zero lot line units Is an Industry standard for most municipalities In South Florida. The proposed houses meet all City Building codes and fire rated codes for buildings with a 10' separation. 2) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off of Lawrence Road and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard. In response to the Minor Road issue, the aforementioned information obtained from Palm Beach County and Rossi, Malavasi should address this concern. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM" 95-125 , , No comments to respond to. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-260 In regard to the following comments: 1) Developer understands that site plan review and approval are required and It has been so noted on plan pursuant to Planning and Zoning Department's comments. 2) The south road, Meadows Boulevard, exists to the east as a 60' right-ot- way. An initial meeting held on May 22, 1995, with the City Engineering Department indicated that the continuation of the 60' right-of-way would be acceptable. All required turn lanes and other improvements can be adequately provided within the 60' right-of-way. 3) South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District acceptance will be acquired prior to Engineering approval. 4) There are no signs proposed In any County rlght-ot-way. 5) The developer's engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply with aU City Codes and Standards and a copy ot this letter has been attached for your review. Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 5 6) The appropriate parking spaces and handicap parking spaces have been provided for the recreation area and are shown on the Site Plan. 7) Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat approval. 8) Two (2) four foot wide sidewalks are shown on either side of Meadows Boulevard. An eight foot wide bike path Is shown on the south side of the entranoe road Into the project. The north side of the entry road does not provide any connections to uses within or adjacent to the .project. Palm Beach County allows developers to combine two 4' wide sidewalks Into one 8' wide bikepath. Therefore, the developer requests that the City review this eight foot wide bike path similar to what Is allowable in Palm Beach County. This bike path will connect Lawrence Road with the bus stop and the recreation area located within the central area of the site. The 50' right-of-ways located within the project have four feet wide sidewalks shown on either side of these rlght-of-ways.' , I 9) Soil borings have been completed and a copy of the Soil Boring Study has been attached to the resubmittal package. 10) A map indicating the location of the soil borings has also been provided and is attached to the Soil Boring Study. 11) The developer agrees to comply with this request. The south road, Meadows Boulevard, will be constructed prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. However, this is contingent upon the fact that no other access points will be required, including no access point off of Hypoluxo Road. 12) An easement onto Hypoluxo Road right-of-way for future sidewalk/bike path access to schools is being addressed subject to Florida Power & Light (FPL) approval. Such an easement, if approved by FPL, will be located in either the northeast or northwest corner of the site and will be encumbered by the FP&L easement. 13) The impact on Lawrence Road of the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entrance has been reviewed by our traffic consultant. The redistribution of trips will not negatively effect the capacity of Lawrence Road now or In the year 2000, which Is the estimated build-out of the project. Therefore, no expanslcm of Lawrence Road Is required In conjunction with this project. Attached Is a letter from the traffic consultant on this Issue. In response to the last comment, the developer has made contact with the School Board regarding the relocation of the power line and we are awaiting their response. In response to comments from the TAC meeting, the developer has decided to use both steel and concrete poles. With the use of these poles, there are no anchors or tie downs necessary. Therefore, additional easements for these poles will not be required. " DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-260 TO: FROM: Mike Haag, zoning/Site Administrator William HUkill, P.B., City Bngineer July 26, 1995 NAUTlCA SOUND - MASTBR PLAR MODIFlCA~IOHS ill ..iI1/. ' .m: " .. "'- t,' DATE: PlANNING AND ONING DEPt (' - RE: We have reviewed subject plan for proposed changes in access points, unit types, setbacks and lot/house sizes. Our comments are as follows: 1. Accees points - acceptable 2. Unit types - elimination of multi-family units acceptable 3. Setbacks - not acceptable 4. Lot and house sizes - not acceptable Taken as a group, these modifications represent a major master plan modification. Other conunents: t I 1. Site plan review & approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2, pg. 4-1 2. South road is a collector road by both PBC and FOOT standards (see FS 334.03(4)) and must be dedicated to City of Boynton Beach. Required ROW is 80'. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. lOU, pg.6-1S 3. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 4. County road entrance sign requires PCB approval 5. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.SA, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF, pg.23-8 6. Provide parking facility for recreation area including Hie stall. Chap.2, Sec.IIHI6e(12), pg.2-108 7 . Establish deed restrictions providing for a property owners association to pay for the operation of a street light system wi~hiQ the development. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.S, Art.V, Sec.2A4, pg.S-9 a. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.11A, pg.6-3 9. Provide soil borings. Chap.a, Art.III, Ala(3), pg.8-2 10. Provide a map indicating the location of the soil borings. Chap.a, Art.III,A1a(4), pg.a-3 11. Construct (to completion) the south road prior to issuance ot tirst Certificate of Occupancy. Development Dept., Engineering oiv. Memo No. 95-260 Re: Nautica Sound - Master Plan Modifications July 26, 1995 Page #2 12. Provide easement onto Hypoluxo Road ROW for future sidewalkjbikepath access to schools. 13. Cause actual construction to commence on widening of Lawrence Road from L-19 canal to Hypoluxo Road prior to issuance of initial Certificate of Occupancy. You may fund design/construct the road outriqht or IOU may arrange with the County to move the pro]ect to it your initial C.o. by fronting the cost for repayment in the scheduled construction year. If you construct it yourself, you may wish to obtain credits toward the cost for the road impact fees you will owe. The power line relocation should, be coordinated with adjacent property owners as well as the School Board, which owns an elementary school site a few hundred feet east on Hypoluxo. Perhaps the entire line can be relocated to the north property line to the shopping area at Congress Avenue. WH/ck C:NAUSOUND.MOD , '.. ... !: i, r: en It: it .! I :! I t 'I n w m .. ...... , I I ,... ....' .. . f j ',i j" ., , r'I:~ I ,~'" FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-316 TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: August 8, 1995 WDC Nautica Sound (AKA: Knollwood Groves) Lawrence Rd & Hypoluxo Rd MPHD 95-006 RE: BUildings should maintain a minimum separation of fifteen feet ( 15 I ) . An additional entrance on Hypoluxo Road would reduce the response time to the northern third of this project. The connection to Meadows Boulevard and extension of the roadway to Lawrence Road will greatly improve response time to this project. It should be noted that until Miner Road is completed to Lawrence Road, response time to thi~ development will extend over required limits (Miner Road construction has been delayed again). )1 (7 " · ~.0- 2~c.{.l'n-v.. --t-tu.. ' Cc ~Vl/71JA:A' ~-1(~ d Attachment: security Gates cc: chief Jordan FPO II steve campbell File I ) ~ l.~:t/ c; -5/ 7 ~ Wil 1am D. Cavanauqh, FPO lAMic{ S.oRdLC~ ik:1~ I~- - {I ! 4t1(~~ (}ft {/~t( jlY:b :, "\-'.i{-(r.~--rf fi--ilr-~.~J I! ;:1 :Ii .. I '......i~~J I " 1 ,,', I I.. I .~ ~-'.-'i:i.iJTrm\ir. f;tlO .' _.., Z'~!:1!U'l !~!TT. "11oV-' BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 31 AUGUST 95 NAUTICA SOUND - 3rd SUBMITTAL' MEMO #0164 ~;""''''''''''...) ... J have reviewed the above plans (3rd S!!P!:!JiPIlt) affit FR~ll m~Q.~~in my comments made on two previously submittcd mcmorandum~:E~~9.~.!;,d::,yq~,~i11 fi9Hp~rlBs of those carl icr Inemorandulns .:. .";-' .-:;0.';' .;: .... . . l/ t ~'~~;:;::~":'" 'i~"",,:/'. :,i'-:. . (~) .. .. <?~\ ~~ . ~ ' >~ ~ \',\ r;~:9 RCSPCClfUIIY.~ U 1"'~";"::~:~::::"'W r'::":":"':, "':"<,:, 74 ~ " f ',' :' :",'" J . ./ ,? " Sgt. M~n.1 If:Hlfris rJ Policc DepaI1mcn~, . /':~,'1l:~ (::::::::;::::;,;~.:!;;:] ({if } ~~ d"'" ~ ~.~.,::.....".\::.,:::>,. t:::::,:,:"".,.,' " ..:,......;.. . ... ~:f.,.'<:;~\l ~~~ It>j;;> ., \''>., R '. ,""" ~ """",. " ...,..~...:::::...:::=. t..~:..7"....~. . "';~ ...:<'~......~.~.~.. \\':::\:::~.....o;...,R.q.. II"""''''}'' ),z~"..: f.[:::.). (i'C'" .....,'Y,y~::,~ '\) r... :+ 1 \. .~., I- ... t j' $? ~ '..mp.>.."" "'., lj' }" ""oY^.,w* :t..:~ ... ""'l:':::-:::~;::::"'::"} J " f;":::~:~::' "~:':" ",~::::.::::;2) n .;;........................6. J. f"'''''''}'') I <,w",.w,'..( ,[:::.~.::;~) , ' "...."'.',..,"".. f..l BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 8 AUGUST 95 NAUTICA SOUND - 2ND REVIEW , , MEMO #0156 I have reviewed the 2nd submittal Of~,!J,~!i~lf~d\iif~ii.iia<'t~~:::~Q,!,1lments that were supplied. It seems that my original suggestions !~:)9j~:~Yblop',Tent ",=p1;9;4~Dred. I still maintain the following' <} ..'" t.. ^",,;;::;.' l ./ ,. . ,Jr" C'd":::''''''' ':'.,./ .::.;:,',......:~), I. Regarding the controlled 6nirhpce/exits, the developer (G.C;,.,l1bibes of Florida) has an attached I?tter describing,.!fee lrlies o~meehanism~ ofgate~ eonirii~n\~es. The first, SO~ System(S...en Operable ~~~tcnill feel IS not somethmg that IS not Y~voll\ble; both on a pollee stand point and the prospdHiVlf residents. Police respond to calls tf\4.~,,*,uire a silent response (burglaries in progress, prowler calls, suspicious persons calls, etc.) tH'ilt activation of a siren at the cntrance would notr.p, PP.,P-,rt apPjr, ~en$.io, fI,' OfC~'~mtlli.' AIS~"'::f:::WP,.U"',}d not think that residents would appreciate the pqll.ce.,.(~d fir I ijcp~\jinent ,!!.~.Y.9ing t ir ari~~1 by sounding their sirens. The second ree~ajriii~9~a~~,on !f~"KP:~x ~ ~'(key"~ntry st~~/)ThiS is an antiquated method of access to a g\1led:,:tohun\JJliy~~.:ltequth gthe cltyUb : lUntam omster keys to all gated communities is futile and supplying ell cry 'police officer and fire personel with a key is out of the question. Maintaining QP.c"ma.ter key requires the response to the P~. i"'~ <::: epartment to obtain the key first, and then tJ,.the::9i>inmunity. This is not a "timely" respol1' ' r emergency vehicles. The third recommendatiQp.jJ'emote System" is not explained tho,r~,tlg J}/ enough. It allows the city personal to remain irt"lfip~r:y~hicles when entering the comm~P!~9.",~ut docs not explain how, or who activ.ates the gate ~~~~ia'ih~ I OIiginally sugg~s~ed a ~rst'p1 t~).t~is similar to this; a~d is cun.cntly beIng excepted an t}j~t'l~:tler..,,~ated commUnitIes o(:t~',\:l~j The system works wIth telcphone accessibility. Thc dispat~~~~~,J1Q.l~ee ;t"'l" dlJfi~~}n!'in thc telephone number for tho gate and upon radioins that they (police r,rca[lj h ~:'tri~~ at tho gate, the dlspatehel' then telephones the number to the gate, theret aett,:fati thlfgate for entrance. This matter needs to be clarified. 2. As stated in comments, the width of the existing bridge on Lawrence Road and Meadows Blvd entrance would have to be widened for a right turn/deceleration lane. As consistent with other developments on Lawrence Road, deceleration lanes have been required. I don't see why the other entrance to the development on Lawrence Road should require a deceleration lane and not Meadows Blvd. Respectfully, Sgt. Marlon Harris . , BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN. PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SOT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT 25 JULY 95 NAUTICA SOUND , , MEMO #151 """""""1 I have reviewed the above listed plans aJ)4:::r.CC9niffi~d.iFihe..fQUpwing: .",;".~,:..::>::;:;\ ,\" I I ~:-r ~,~::::;:,":< -The entrances/exits are "card ~~rl1~I;e~;;;:""'1 would re6~'~~~d;:,that a tclephone access also ~~( -:..........".;.".. ".;,..',1. ..~...~.. be supplied for police and;,f,e emergency access. Ifnot, sorpetijiiig comparable to this will ~ ., ,', . be needed for emergenCY';:4e~SS. ';::",.,.,J~:::::,:,:::::;\ ,.. .. 1~ "~>, -Regarding thc south ~~ira:n'ge to the development. on Lawren~, RJAd, I would recommend a deeclleration. right ha6U"fUril lane. I believe this lane construetMtt Might interfere with the bridge that crosses the canal. The plans show a decelleration. rigHt hand tum lane for the north entrance/exil""'!llJ, d, :Jhi, S ShOt I,d ::a, ,.,!IQ ,ap, P, 1~'f'QrJ",~~ soutll" ,ntr,~nc,'" ,e/eXit. L)t .' l' )) ~\ -Due to thc density~i5i~ed p ~~iil~~~ oft ';s::d~~'lopm t. I ~J:~nglY believe that an entrance/exit is nee el1::fr.om Hyn lUXt'f-Roid. ,i e distafite :om::.:.botlLtlfojected entrances/exits (Lawrence Road and Meadows Blvd(?)) arc a great distance from the northern roadways in the develonl.J1Cn~::J Emergency response to these roads wi~'fequire excess time. thereby requiring a HYPd~~xo Road entrance/exit. This developn#NWalso in the extreme nOl1hel1~ and western ~,~!~ of the city and a great distance fro~".~:~~.,:tle'arest fire station and nollce coverage. ' /''''-''~ ~;::, ,.."". .. t ~,d"':"<~~ :>':;'/"""'\ ') \l, \.~ .,.':\0 If )).,. "'1\', J) ';'>''-. t; """ .:,'" ,..:' "":~~,:.,.l l",~;:;;."'", r,:::} ...~.;~~::;::~~':\~:~:.~':""'H"" l l ') \.:.:.:,:;--,.:, \.,."'~ {l .;".~ '::',;:> (i l l ~\ \. . \ ~ . . " t/ i { , ~ ,.<>:;:'::':::::>:~ " t..l "'.1 Respectfully, Sgt. Marlon Harris Police Department . ~,......... ........ --,..- .. BUILDING ,DIVISION MBMORANDUM NO. 95-324 li;,'.1 ffi ~ rE n \Y111 ill <III' .'."'-','.-""J ' .1 ',. I ) i I I ,. It.... 'I .. , -. "-..-' -.,.--- I' . '1'11""1 '\~, 1 . I I " 'I '\IIi ~ , ; I"r:.". !.':r.~~: August 31, 1995 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director " FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Building Official TRe COMMBNTS - NAUTICA SOUND - 3rd SUBMITl'AL RE: When I reviewed the plans for Nautica Sound's first two submittals, there were 8 sheets. Since most of my comments addressed sheet 6 of 8 and only one sheet was submitted on the 3rd submittal, I cannot determine if the new changes in lot size and count addressed my first comments. Therefore, my first and second comments are attached and should be met before permitting. A~~'~' AN : bh Attachments/2 xc: William V. Hukill, P.E. NAUTICA BUILDING DIVISION MBMORANDUM NO. 95-287 August 9, 1995 From: Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoni~g Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official To: Re: NAUTICA SOUND Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal East side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road After reviewing the above referenced documents, it is particularly noted in the printed documents that the Building Division comments have been met as related to signs and setbacks. Please note that the details for signs are not on the plans, only in the written documentation. 1. Details for signs must be included in the final site plan documents. , 2. The 15 Ft. setbacks shown on the right corner lots on Page 6 of e, is not measured from the corner of the building and, therefore, poses a problem for the following lots: 30, 46, 69, 77, ge, 110, 147 and 169. This could be rectified if the building was switched to the opposite side or have dimensions corrected for approval. ~ Al N bol I AN:mh Att. Plans cc: William V. Hukill, P.B., Department of Development Director Il:NIlOTZCIl.TRC BUILDING PIVISION MBMORANDUM NO. 95-270 August 2, 1995 From: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building'Offlcial Master Plan Modification - 1st Review Nautica South f/k/a Knollwood Groves (PUD) To: Re: The Building Division has reviewed the above plans and have the following comments: 1. The side setbacks for screen enclosures for Z lots as noted on Note #2, Page 4 of 8 is confusing. To avoid problems at permit time, it should be detailed on Page 6 of 8 and Page 7 of 8. 2. Project identification signs are limited to two with a total of 250 Sq. Ft. maximum. 3. Entrance signs,should not exceed 32 Sq. Ft. and 6 Ft. in height. . 4. Details for all signs must be submitted. AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.S., Department of Development Director Il.lllIl.UTlCl't.Tac AUG-15-1995 14:48 Board Ilf'County Commissioners >- Ken L. Foster, Chainnan Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol ^. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee 22222222222222222 407 478 5770 P.02/02 County AdministratOr Robert Weisman Department of engineering ilnd Public Works August 15, 1995 Ms. Tambr1 Heyden, Director Boynton Beach Planning and Zon1ng Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: KNOLLWOOD GROVES Dear Ms. Heyden: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received and reviewed a traffic impact study for the project entitled Knollwood Groves. The earlier approved project had proposed access on Hypoluxo Road and Meadows Boulevard. The proposed project will have access on Lawrence Road and Meadows Boulevard. The resulting redistribution of traffic is subject to the Traffic Performance Standards, in Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development Code. The traffic study addresses this redistribution of traffic with a build-out of 2000. The Traffic Division has determined the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding thi s determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~J;~ Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer File: TPS. Mun. - Traffic Study Review g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn50 l'An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer" @ p,lntDd"~ ~(J~ lIf<f)(it Box 21229 Wesl Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 6S4-4000 TOTRL P.02 .! SEP-12-'95 TUE 12:37 ID:KILDAY & RSSOC TEL ND:407-689-2592 **12134 P02 ...- ,.... ~ u ..,.............~~ NAU"nCA SOUND P.U.D. LOT COMPARISON STUDY 'Z' LOT UNBS ZBRO LOT UNB UNI'l'S PROPOSED REVISED PROPOSED REVlSEO 8-Q-95 e-~-es 8-2.QS 8-28--95 4,000 - 41~ 76 0 0 0 4,500 - 4.999 13 59 .' 0 0 5,000 . 5,999 64 71 ,.-' 96 112 ..- 6,000 . 8,;;Q 1; 16 / 73 74 ....... 1,000 + 16 11 " 77 81 ..... TOTAL 1S8 157 248 267 KIJ/Odd\Cnautloa.IOS ) l..,. \ ,... '. , I' ......---' '. - ,. .... ----- j SEP 12 '95 TUE 12'37 ID:KILDAY & ASSOC TEL ~D:407-689-2592 tt034 P03 ~-. -. - - I , I N . -..... e - . 5,000 , -,- ., 'I ,"~1l~..__..lL1 III ~ ! - .,_.. .1 :11 i' ",--,~',,' .." 1 t ..,-,.,.. , 1 111 ~ ! ~ !ll .-.. :1 .. ........- . ; J ~ jiJ --.----.- .. II -.-............'" I II ~ i -.--.....,..--...... .! -.... , 111 (., , ntY"'J ... III ..,.,.- ........ :T Ii ...__,...,1.4 ,....' .1' I , , .--.......-.--..-...-. i j \ ! .....",. ! ..-............ " -, , i p ! '11 OQCL,,,....,, l . -.., I II 1fJ, I" -4----.-,.-.- t , ~_.,-- .. ;11] 'll. ----i. .___"'" ; 11 r: I :j ----4t-----'-" " " :1 , , ., "V+lC~ c?ol.JnJ "'Zr:.....o .~o+!:? -rpt I....., ,IA...L'r~ - ' t:I.W"_..~:-:(_1.v..r:.-f...,-' ....__......_.u._ .... .6./1_~q....~__.., ___..L,Q~,I - 16,,1,_2. I 'Z-"? ~5 1"2.", '?3, .. ,..lO<P -.Jko... I l~.~ - \ ~q j Tz)~ L- \ '3) - I~~~L... ",,1:2.'1_::, \ '\-'" I u.t9 . \,5\- \ ~~,~".l~.9..:-, 1 f.s,"at . \..,01 . \'1.~ "J74":,,JJ.5...4_LLL:D B, ~,~Ol lcr~~..~,,,,lq.~..: l'f8 I ?-Of J ~~JZt;?J._.& ..'~J.l.J..,2l2 , '2.1 If - 2/~ 2'24/ '2"2'7, Z ";2&f_~_ 2."30. ~3'2- 1. ~B..I ?:~J_.21 ~ - '2#, :z.~ J" ~54 ~58 - 2.~, I ".._., ,"__.___ (." f <1'1 C} - 1-0+=. t ~ , 34 I'_~ i.+,~l_~~ I 610.- ~.., I 11. -,4 1...ft2-1'-'~~ ~ l~ I L~~'/..I.::1.3,~,LI~ 1\81 , t~Co, \ q -a II~_ , 202 ... '204. 2.0~"i4 ~lo, ,ZL6,,~,..2'2!e ,'231. 24S1 '4-48 I ~2J-I'_ "2.lal - 2.J.s" , ~ t.L."'~ ~o ~ -;..1 t.:k.';i..t-2~ r' zB - 32, ~!5 0# .3(o/:3B,~,4ft?:,~ SS {' foB -70~ 75,~ ,ft~_,._..5~..- B7, IO~:, /21 -12.~,,__,.L?;o-4 J?J8, 150'1 15"1-/59.,.1 wt/:~(('5, J l.7../t,9J .1711 11.'1, -..L~.J .i~ 2. J le'l-/S5.; J67~1'11, ~~,,~eLZ/7, ,2/9- '22'3; 22'5 - LzllJ ,23~ 2'-11. 1if.21 -;z.~1, 2'11. 2S~ ,255-25tC m*L L ! : ~,-~.~ SEP-1?-'95 TUE 12:18 ID:KILDAY & ASSOC TEL HO:4@7-689-2592 0034 PiZ14 - - - ~ ' I I 'I I. iil " --'.",- ': : .., ~... .., . ~.. . . : I ~CD I ii . i _..... , I I __.,-5 I : ; .. I ! 5f~ ~- " , I "..-, : , 7. .. . -..--.-.. ! , i ........,.... , i ---., f I ! (,(a90 , '.h.. .. , ; , 'N Cl Llt1 c:.PI , '"Z' kO'- -rn b1Jl.ail 0v1 -h4-':1~q ... ,~ '"IDI A- L u>iS o1.D,.~~2.'l.:L, ~~" ~~-f 3"?1" M.J I "?'t:-S - ~~, ~~-=- 3i.1L(P_)..~l.oC1-=-_~~ =- 6fiC(Q '., L-~ 2,("ra,. ~ J..L:,?- J.~, '2.-" 5 - ~b , ~ - ~J-I_2.~ ,..' ~I-' . ~ I~ '~,7.~ ,~2...~^, ,?~5 ... ~~~ I 34~ ~?~.J-.?l5D .. ~5 2,- 2f3 .,:~ ,~':15__-:_.~O~ 1 'TOTAL ,~,(P,qqq ~ 2~'1:,?](2",.')..1!t, '2.e8 , ~~, ..~ "J.. '1...,l.~~4.~~!:f.4' .. 04r; I *', ??1,,'_~~~~_+,2~~ I ?el, ?rf!:h- 4?-4...,... _______..._'. 1 ~ 1"DTA L. r [~. I I i ~ j,i_:: , it I i '7; "00, + ~ ~ , 1'1 I i 1 tl 1;1 ~..,.,~---_...._.,' -- , W ~ III III Ii . I i ~ j -"..',----.----". i:l " ! i ! i . ~ t ~ , ,! it; i 'j L.o+~ .27,3.~,~e7L'!l~.~1 ?J( 8 I 35'5. ,357 - ~8 I 3fD~7 , 38'2 I 392- LLnrtt~_Le_,___,.__.__.,_"..,,_ ,._~~ ~ -----:- !Ill' 1- :,,:,,1 i~ r&, i. "I '1' l:J U1J b i ~ ,~ SEP 2'~ l\J~:1 ; ., i U J \ l txJ , PLANNING AND -. ~ ZONING OEPT. " September 15, 1995 The City of Boynton Beach Planning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 t ..A.~"t " :::::r-' >( C ( 11 - la/v')f-L-' '--f/~~ To whom it may concern, Property Reserve, Inc. is the owner of Club Meadows Apartment community in Boynton Beach. We have owned and managed this apartment community for several years. We are appalled by the recent information we have received concerning the proposed road extension adjacent to our property. Our community is composed of young families who will suffer due to the increased crime, traffic and noise this absurd proposal will bring. Extending Meadows Boulevard will create more problems than good not only for our apartment community but also for the Meadows. We propose another alternative by adding another roadway thru Hypoluxo Road. This roadway can handle the additional traffic without negatively affecting the Meadows. We stongly suggest that you reevaluate the city's position on th is matter. Sincerly, , IIL~~ Marie Specht Senior Property Manager cc: TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL RICH TIPPETS CHRIS CHRISTENSEN 100 Meadows Circle . Boynton Beach, Florida 33462 . 407/969-1224 "An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000 AUG-10-1995 14:09 22222222222222222 407 478 5770 P.02/04 I .... 1."'- Walter H. Keller. Inc. MIll .... Consulting Engineers and PlanMers JUly 19, 199.5 Mr. Dan Weisberg, PE. TrUfic Divillion Department of Eng:i.ncering and Publit: Works Department Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 RECEIVED J {l L 2 1 1995 Re: Traffic Study Addendum. Knollwood Groves (Nautlca Sounll~c ENG. TRAFFIC DIV. Dear Mr. Weisberg: Per our telephone discussion this date, I have prepared an estimate of vested t1ips for the Knollwood Groves developmem. The estimate is provided in Table 1, below. Table 1 . Vested TrI~ Generatton Estimate Trip Gcneratif.lD AM PM Land Use Size Unit Daih In Out In Out Residential . . Single Family 150 Du's 1.500 30 85 100 56 Attached Units 389 Du's 2.723 25 12A 122 65 Subtotals 539 Ou's 4,223 55 209 221 121 Non-Residential : Day Care 6,000 SF 478 36 31 37 43 Less Pass-By Credit of 10% "" 48 4 3 4 4 430 32 28 33 39 Net Vested Trips ::: 4,653 88 237 254 160 Sowte: Anna Cottrell Letlf:f dated Marcil 14, 1994 Walter H. Ketler. Inc. The land use mix and vested status is based on two (2) documents: Anna Cottrell letter to Cha2in and Armstrong dated March 14, 1994; and Boynton Beach Agenda Memorandum No. 94-120 by J. Scott Miller dated April 5, 1994. The Anna Cottrell letter identifies the prior land use mix of 150 single family dwelling units, 389 multi-family units and a 6,000 sf day care center which produced 4,505 extemal trips per day. A!'pllrendy, the prior study retained a portion of the trips internally and therefore Table 1 is slightly higher. The Boynton Beach Agenda Memorandum indicates the development's vested status. tr~~ Walter H. Keller. PE.. AICP President Fla PE ;# 20703 WHKJus attaclunems 1a90 University Drive, Suite 304 - F>,Q, Box 9740. Coral springs, Flcrlaa ~"O7'~ (305) 755-3822 . (BOO) eSa-ee92 . FAX (305) 7SS-3Saa AUG-10-1995 14:10 22222222222222222 407 478 5770 P.03/04 .... . -- ..... .J1J+-16-'95 FRJ 15:20 JD*ILDPlY & ASSO:: TEL NO:2 **523 Pel ~ "'" ,~ v t()W,\~ BASEIiART & COTTRI!LL,INC, PLANNKRS IS32 Old Olceechoboe Road. Suite 101 Weat Palm Btaoh. FL 33409 "O'-~..()()048 PAX 40'''"'-2009 March 14, 1994 Chapla and Armstron. 1201 Ooora. BUlh Boulevard Delta)' BolCh. FL 3348'-7203 Attn: Jamea BaJlcrano RE: KNOLLWOOD GROVES PUU/TRA};'}'IC GENERATION RA TItS Dear Jim: In anawer to your fax query today regarding traffic generatlon and unit counts at KnollWOOG: ..sln,le famny unitS eencratc an averaee of ten trips per day pcr unit; .multi..family units icnerate an average or seven trips per day per unit: ~the traffie aeneration for the day care center represented an opportunit)l to -capture. some of the traffic indicated for the resid!nti21 us-e, thereb)' .m,ctivel)' reducing the total or the external tripa from lb. thrM uses comblncdi -Knottwood Qroves was approved for 1'0 sIngle family units, 389 multi-family units. and a 6.000 square foot day care center, producing a total of ~SOS~xternal average trips per day; -the County considers the 4,505 external trips vested underrhe County's Traffic Performanot Standard; - the increase In the number ot single rarnily units and the deletion of the da)' care center will require a decrease In the number of multi-family units to 2] 5 In order to achieve an equivalency In the number of trips. This Is calculated as foUows: 300 sinlle family multiplied by 10 trips =3.000 external trip. 4,50.5 vested trips mInus the 3,000 proposed for single family leavea I,SO! vested trips available for multi-family 1,'0' divided by 7 ulps per day for multl.ramlly =215 I hope this helpJ, Call mo if you wane to discuss this. Sincerely, ~ ~~~OSL Anna Cottrell. AJCP PrmelpaJ -,. -- ., I '_FUN" ~r:!!(. ~~ . t~l~1.1iB~~ AUG-10-1995 14:10 - . .... ... 22222222222222222 407 478 5770 P.04/04 r' .1 JU-J-1_-'gs FRr 1S:;' .D. ..LDj:W & ASSOC TEL NO:2 #523 P02 . '-' u AGENOA MIiMORANl)UM NO. 94-120 April I. 1." x. LEGAL B.1 Proposed Ordinance No. 094- RE: Knollwood Groves Amendment of RezonIng Development Order The Boynton Beach City Commission on October 11, 19ae approved Ordinance No. ee-36 which approved a rezoning of Knollwcod's property from AG (agriculture) and R1 AM (single family residential) to planned unit development (F!lUD) subjeot toth. comments of the Planning & Zoning Soard (dared September' 2, 1SS9) and staff; and Inoluding a condition that the applicant pay a mOl!etary amount ror the improvemfmt of the roed .ystom In tho area. Pleas& see Agenda Memorandum dated Septembor 13. 1989 from Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director, to GecrgQ Hunt, Interim City Manager for further detail.. Under tho proposed agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Knollwood Groves, Inc., Knollwood would pay to the City the amount of $108,515 for the design and constrUCtIon or the missIng link. In return the City would ralease KnOllwood from its financlal obligation for roadway Improvements in the area. rtquest roadJtraffie fee impact credits from Palm Beach County, ana vest the Knollwood Grove Development. In order to effeotuate thla proposed agreement the City must first amend the conditions of approval for the PUO as set forth in Ordinanee 89-36 concerning roadway improvementst and that the payment 01 $106,515 to the City shall cons.titute the commencement or development, thereby vestll"lg this development. Should the Cfty Commission approve the execution Of the agreement with Knoitwood Groves then It would be in order rOf the Oity to approve first reading of thl& {,)rdinan~e providing for amendment or tho eondition$ or approval for the PUO for KnOflWOOd Groves, Inc. concernIng l'Oa~way Improvements, 1\1. suggested that consideration of this ordinance be addressed After the reaolutlon, conoernin; thta 8ubjoet matter. ~- ~COII Miller City Manege, ~!~~_4_ TOT'lL P.04 S-1MONS & WHITE, ~C. Engineers · Planners · Consultants August 3, 1995 Mr. William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 / RE: Nautica Scund PUD Lawrence Road Traffic Issues Dear Mr. Hukill: Pursuant to comments from the City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department, the following is a review of the effect on Lawrence Road of the reallocation of vested trips for the above referenced project in light of the proposed development plan which eliminates a previously approved Hypoluxo Road access. Lawrence Road has a daily capacity of 13,400 trips per day. The 1994/1995 volumes established by Palm BeaQh County for Lawrence Road from Hypoluxo to Gateway is 7,866 trips per day. Based on a 1991/1992 volume of 7,750 trips per day, a three year historical growth rate of .45% (or less than 1%) is applicable. Utilizing this historical growth rate, in the year 2000, which is estimated to be the buildout of the Nautica Sound project, Lawrence Road will have a volume of 8,308 trips per day. It is proj ected that the Nautica Sound proj ect will generate a total of 4,340 trips per day. Approximately 3,650 of these trips will reach Lawrence Road util1.zing either the main entrance or Meadows Boulevard. Pursuant to the Traffic Report prepared by Walter H. Keller, Inc., 2,348 trips will head south on Lawrence Road and 1,302 trips will head north. Based on a year 2000 volume of 8,308 trips per day, this will establish a total maximum volume of 10,656 trips, which is less than the current Lawrence Road daily capacity of 13,400 trips per day. Although no major project significantly impacts this link, a substantial amount of capacity remains available for approved but unbuilt development until Lawrence Road is widened to a four-lane section scheduled as assured construction by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1997/1998. 4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415 Telephone (407) 965.9144 Mr. William Hukill, P.E. August 3, 1995 - Page Two Therefore, the additional trips reallocated to Lawrence Road by the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entry will not negatively affect the current capacity of Lawrence Road nor projecting it to the ultimate buildout of the Nautica Sound project of the year 2000, will not negatively impact the road in the future. Sincerely, RFR/jp cc: Rick Ellsner Collene Walter ,'''\>'- ...c.. ~P; 111-1( Walter H. Keller, Inc. - - .... Consulting Engineers and Planners July 10, 1995 Mr. Rick Elsner, PE., Director of Land Development G.L. Homes of Florida 1401 University Drive, Suite 200 Coral Springs, Florida 33071 Re: Traffic Study - Knollwood Groves Boynton Beach, Florida Dear Mr. Elsner: Per your request of June 19, 1995, an updated Traffic Study has been prepared for the above subject property. The property was previously vested for traffic concurrency by the City of Boynton Beach. Because the site plan is proposed to be modified, an updated Traffic Study is required to verify that the proposed site plan revision does not generate additional non-vested traffic. Additionally, the geometric requirements at the project's access points need to be established. This letter documents the Traffic Study and site access requirements. Site Location and Development Proposal Knollwood Groves is located south of Hypoluxo Road and east of Lawrence Road in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. The site occupies approximately 120 acres. The City of Boynton Beach previously vested this site for 4,505 vehicle trips. Under the current proposal, 434 single family residential units and recreational uses are proposed. Two access points are proposed to serve the site: a main entrance on Lawrence Road approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road; and a connection to Meadows Boulevard approximately 500 feet west of the eastern property line. Additionally, the missing link of Meadows Boulevard, a two (2) lane sixty (60) foot right-of-way, is proposed to be constructed, connecting to an existing roadway perpendicular to the existing Meadows Boulevard at the eastern property boundary, continuing along the southern portion of the site, with termination at the southwest portion of the property at Lawrence Road. Trip Generation. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment The trip generation analysis projects the 434 single family dwelling units will produce 4,340 daily trips, an amount less then the prior vesting of 4,505 daily vehicle trips. Table 1, below, provides the trip generation results for daily and peak hour conditions. Table 1 - Trip Generation Trip Generation AM PM Land Use Size Unit Daily In Out In Out Single Family 434 Du's 4,340 75 213 264 142 Source: Walter H. Keller, Inc. ITE 5th Edition continued...... 1890 University Drive, Suite 304' P.O. Box 9740 . Coral Springs, Florida 33075 (305) 755-3822 . (800) 286-6692 . FAX (305) 755-3866 IlL!! WT, Mr. Rick Elsner, PE., Director of Land Development July 10, 1995 Page Two The project's trip distribution is estimated to be 30% north, 30% east and 40% south. Project traffic was assigned to the roadway network based upon the project's internal loadings, access points and trip distribution. Figure 1 (see page 3), depicts the project's peak hour turning movement volumes for each project entrance and the daily project traffic loadings for surrounding roadways. The project traffic loading (daily and peak hour) was added to the existing Lawrence Road traffic volume to ascertain future traffic conditions. With the completion of the missing link. of Meadows Boulevard, additional non-project traffic will also be added to the roadway. The non-project traffic associated with this condition was estimated to be 750 vehicles per day. Table 2, below, provides the future traffic volume estimates for Lawrence Road and Meadows Boulevard. Table 2 - Future Traffic Estimate Daily Pk Hr AM AM PM PM Roadwayl No. LOS D 94-95 Proj Daily LOS D Pk Hr Proj AM Pk Hr Proj PM Location Cap AADT ADT Total Cap Vol Vol Total Vol Vol Total Lawrence Rd N of Proj N. Entl'. 2L 13,400 7,004 1,302 8,306 1,310 672 86 759 672 122 794 S of Proj N. Entl'. 2L 13,400 7,866 612 8,478 1,310 755 41 796 755 91 846 S of Proj S. Entl'. 2L 13,400 7,866 1,736 9,602 1.310 755 115 870 755 162 918 Meadows Blvd W of Proj E. Entl'. 2L 13,400 750 · 1,315 2,065 1,310 72 87 159 72 123 195 E of Proj E. Entl'. 2L 13,400 750 · 1,302 2,052 1,310 72 86 158 72 122 194 Source: Walter H. Keller, Inc. Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Div. · - Estimated non-project traffic associated with completion of missing link. Figure 1 depicts the project's peak hour turning movements. The non-project peak hour turning movements associated with Meadows Boulevard completion were also reviewed at the south project entrance. This traffic component adds 13 southbound lefts and 17 northbound rights in the AM peak hour and 19 southbound lefts and 45 northbound rights in the PM peak hour. Geometric Design Requirements at Project Access Points Site geometric requirements were developed after field review of site conditions and a review of project traffic volumes and non-project traffic. The following geometric designs are recommended. North Project Entrance: · Southbound Through and Left Turn Lanes · Westbound Left and Right Turn Lanes · Northbound Through and Shared Right Turn Lane continued..... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 o .~~ .~ ~ 0 ~~~ ~.::J.;"I. -.s 7)~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ o<'~ ~ ~ , ' ' ~ ~~ .; $ --------------' \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ul \- - CS) \_------- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \<<') \~ \- ~ ~ ';::) <5 r~ ~QU~.1Me\ ~ +\ ~i ..;~ !!dll ~.\ ~w i~ ~~ ~8 ~ \;: '\ '\ '\ \ \"1S ~ \~ Lf)\~ _ 0 <<')..1 ~ -' ~ ~ ,~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ..- ------------ Cfi, L' l tot'l ?;l9 I I (/) C Q) E (l) b 2 ~ .c ~ ? \-" 41)9- (1)~ ~~ -0 (!)Q) ".0' 00: 0' !~ 'O~ c:i Sti ..---------------- - / / {,' (' e t!'f<)'( I' ;' / /{, 'V, I) J- ('.t-. i!'l- t '-<. f- L~ 4;J- t: 1 {- i . hL~ Lit.? d ,~d..?t. t'tL - ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059 TO: 1~~KriaemA. Parker, City Manager V~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer March 6, 1995 ...i I", i ill FROM: DATE: ~'I ,r. . RE: TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between' NW 22nd Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County to be 7972 trips. The current FOOT Level of Service Manual defines the threshold traffic level for LOS D for 2 lane undivided streets as 13,400 trips. Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in the County system is not seriously considered mittl LOS D is reached. Lawrence Road is a County road. The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS D is reached. Well over 1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as follows: l Lawrence Oaks 178 units I- Nautica I 177 units i- Nautica II 197 units I- -MeaEiowwubd Gd)ve ( CI kt:r Kno 11 wooda;....h<<;. 539 units Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuilt units, est. L-- Sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est. i-- Jonathan's Grove 32 units 1.-' Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est. J- Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est. J...- Citrus Park 113 units TOTAL 1680 unoccupied units The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972 trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000 trips. LOS 0 will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680 future units are occupied. Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059 Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road March 6, 1995 Page #2 We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue collected from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on Lawrence Road. If we a..ume 1600 dwelling units have generated those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500 per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000, representing a total at build-out of $5,OOO,OOOt generated by these developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.) and those who don't (schools). Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS 0 is reached, action can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS 0, which is adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along Lawrence Road. WVH!ck C:LAWRENCE.LOS xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Ken Hall, Engineering Aide Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner TASLE 1A LEVEL or SERVICE D Teet 1 Alternate Peak Hour: AnT Tilt 1 LOS D LOS D l.OS D r^CILIT~ l'\'PII 8'l'ANDI\I\D C'l'AHDARD 8TAND"-I\D 2 lanell undl...ldel! 1,220 13 . 400 1,030 3 1,_",u two-way 1,280 14 r 000 1,080 2 lanoll one-way 1,600 17 , 600 2,650 J lanes a:1lll-way 2,460 Z7 , 000 4,000 4 lanee undl\" Lcled 2,140 2JrS20 1,770 .. lane.. tit v.~docl 2, "0 29,400 2,210 5 laneB d Lv ldGd 2,670 29,400 2,210 6 lanai di-vlde" 4,100 45,000 3,330 8 lanes dlvided 5,070 55,800 4,170 4 1,'"98 eJCpreuway 6,070 61S, 900 3,450 I lanee expL'8111way t,100 t03,400 5,110 8 lone~ expresswar 12,130 131,900 G. 890 10 lane. a~pr...way 15,170 112.300 8,610 Soureel ?DOT Level oe Service K4null, Generalized Dally Level of Service ~axLmum Volumea, Group C and Croup 1, and G.~erallzed Peak Hour/Peak DirectLonal Level Of ServLce Haxlmum volumel, Group A and oroup 1 tar ur~.nL&.d ar... (Aprt1 1992). ~O~ the O.t.ll.d ~naly.l. tOt Alternate Teet One. Level ot serviee 0 ,hall be the Sum of th~ crLtlcal VOlume. ot one thoueand f~u~ hundred (1,.00) 1n accordance wIth the Planning Method in the 1985 Manual. TABU 18 LRVEL 0' SIRVICE B ".It 1 Alternate Peak HQur felt 1 LOS E LOS E LOD B FACIl.nr Type STANDNU) STAHDAltD STANDARD 2 lafl~1I u nd 1') l.:1ec! 1. 370 15,000 1,280 3 lanfl!l t'Jo-~lay 1,450 15,700 1,340 2 lanes one-way 1 , 760 19 , 300 3,120 3 lanes one-way 2,660 29,JOO .,&70 4 lanen undlvldec1 Z , 350 25,800 a,080 4 l-snleD d Lv tried 2,930 32,200 2,'00 IS lanoo tlo,o-"ay 2,\130 32,200 2.600 6 1 ~n.ay divldt:d 4.440 48,800 3,e90 8 hoes divided 5,550 60,400 4,870 4 lanl!s expreuGway 6,500 14 , 000 3,710 6 laneR exprc88way 9,780 111, ZOO 5,560 0 la"~~ exp~cs8way 13,0'0 1"',200 7,410 10 lene. .np~...w.r 11,310 1 as, 300 11,260 Sour~el FDOf Level of Service Hanual, Ceneralized Dally Level of $ervice lIa;eimut,' Volume., Group C anct Croup 1, and Oeneuu'zect 'nit "our/Peak D!.:ectional Level of Service Maximum Velum.., Croup A and Group Uor ~rb~nlz.d er... lApr1119t2). i',)!L' t:ho D..,t:aUQd .nalf.i.8 for r..Lt-Qa.-natu T....t One. Lavel of Servlce E shall be the Sum ot th~ Critical Volumas of one thouaand fly. hund~ed (1,500) 1n accordance with the P hr."!n; Hethod 1" the 1985 Kanual. The Level of Serv1ce Standard. for Te.e Z are Level ot ..rvlce B 1n ~abl. la. TOTAL P. 02 t.1.emll:Sn\.a~y ~"-IlUU"'O ~G" ...,v".... "'''S..''. Hlgh School. pe~ 1reeO aq.et. 599.50 . ..i -, L"'- t, ~ ' - Kilday & AaocIlItee Landscape Architectsl Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 t: r,Hj tl N n'.l f,!t!ld ~ [".,~-"-'<.~.."-~._=_.."~,, ~ CC"'1 0 (\ SO'rJ Inn' -iu":; v l: l!'~ d Ii:; r. '). L ._-~,=...;; ( n H u.] ~ U ~. J..! 1t ~~b r - r/l, ~ ~/rrftl( '}f7l!c.~-vr August 30, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Nautica Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up Our File No: 1020.13 Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag, Attached please find twelve revised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15, 1995. For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Included with this resubmittal is a Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks. This amended plan should address the major concerns of members on the City Commission. The following is an overview of the modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan. 1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet. In turn, the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from 89 to 59 lots. The number of lots in the 5,000 to 6,000 square foot range has been increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424 which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of 539 units. The breakdown between zero and "Z" lots has also been altered. There are now 21 more zero lot line units than previously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have been eliminated. 2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upsize the facilities to accommodate a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The lift station is located in the southwest corner of the top portion of the site. In order to provide a more amenable plan for the City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated. Ms. Tambri Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 30, 1995 Page 2 In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Hallihan regarding this issue and I believe the attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant material will be native and, as indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design. Attached with this letter is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project. Sincerely, ~I~ Karyn I. Janssen Kilday & Associates, Inc. cc: Alan Fant, GL Homes Larry Portnoy, GL Homes Rick Elsner, GL Homes Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble 0--; T 0:\ ~~- ~0-~ ~~t ~~\ .6.0 v<.0'i -Q! Sa~ 4.~~ -Z ~ 'i ~i ~~ D \ \ \ -" ~ \ .:\ , IV 'C -- . - 'C ",1' ..< .J <t - -- - -- ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ - -- -- <.0 ';f, Q) - 't- 't- - - :; -Z ~ ~ - -- ~ - - J J - -- 't- 't- Q 0 ~ J 0 - - -- N of- ~ 0 N 't- -- 0 ~ - r ~ - -- ~ ~ -? 0 CZ .6. -::> -- ~ - - - -- ( ~! ~~ ~\ -'Ii ~i .~ - -- ~ ,- -- ( t \~ \\ -'I%, ~~ - --~------------------ -~--- Kilday It AuocIatee Landscape Architectsl Planners 1561 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 August 2, 1995 -"/'VI) C- ex ~d3~"rt4-.. "~~ '-0.11,( , /l-vDr-F/,,,,uV;' Ms. Tambri J. Heyden, Planning Director Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: Nautica Sound F.K.A. Knollwood Groves PUD Minor Master Plan Modification - Technical Review Committee Follow-up Our Project No.: 1020.13 Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag, Attached please find twelve (12) sets of revised plans addressing those issues raised at the TRC meeting of July 25, 1995, and subsequent items included in the TRC comments memorandums issued by each reviewing department. For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves PUD. Included with this application is a master site plan which reflects the layout of individual lots, blocks (pods), the interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks, and maximum building envelopes for each lot. This plan should address the major concerns of members at the TRC meeting. The following is a recap of the comments included in the TRC comments letters and how they have been addressed by the project team in this resubmittal. POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-151 1) The developer has researched the availability of different systems to allow 24 hours access to the site and a letter summarizing his findings is attached. As requested, there are options which are comparable to a telephone access system. The developer intends to install a system which will permit 24 hour access to the project. 2) A south entrance deceleration lane is not feasible due to the location ar width of the existing bridge over the canal and adequate right-of-way complete the necessary construction is not obtainable. Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 2 3) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off of Lawrence Road and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard. The Meadows Boulevard connection will decrease response time as it provides for a secondary east-west corridor south of Hypoluxo Road, which is the northern limits of the City. The developer has committed to constructing and dedicating Meadows Boulevard prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy for Nautica Sound, subject to no Hypoluxo Road access. The developer understands the Fire Departments concern regarding response time, especially in regards to the Minor Road issue. Tanya McConnell, at the Palm Beach County Engineering Department, Roadway Production Division confirmed that Minor Road, from Congress Avenue to Lawrence Road, is scheduled for the Summer of 1996. The City of Boynton Beach is responsible for this construction and has entered into a design contract with Rossi, Malavasi, Engineers. All required right-of-way has been acquired and the road is currently being designed. Construction of this link should commence at the same time as construction of Nautica Sound. Once constructed, Minor Road, together with Meadows Boulevard, should provide for a decreased response time to this community. This project has already made a monetary commitment toward this construction. I have confirmed with Rossi, Malavasi that they intend to have 90% complete plans prepared by the end of August for City review. All indications are that this portion of Minor Road will be constructed on schedule. RECREATION AND PARK MEMORANDUM - 95-345 1) The Recreation dedication requirement calculation has been shown on the Master Plan (page 3 of 8). 2) The five recreation elements consisting of a swimming pool, recreation building, tot lot, basketball court and tennis courts have been shown on the Site Plan (Sheet 4 of 8). Thirty-one (31) parking spaces have also been shown with the appropriate handicap spaces necessary. 3) One-half credit for private recreation has been provided. This calculation is shown on the Master Plan (Page 3 of 8). 4) The five acre public park has been dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach is shown in the southeast corner of the site and has been indicated on all the appropriate plans. Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 4 4) Details for all signs will be submitted during the Site Plan Review process. FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM - 95-311 1) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project showing a minimum separation of 10 feet between buildings. A 10' separation between zero lot line units is an industry standard for most municipalities in South Florida. The proposed houses meet all City Building codes and fire rated codes for buildings with a 10' separation. 2) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off of Lawrence Road and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard. In response to the Minor Road issue, the aforementioned information obtained from Palm Beach County and Rossi, Malavasi should address this concern. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-125 No comments to respond to. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-260 In regard to the following comments: 1) Developer understands that site plan review and approval are required and it has been so noted on plan pursuant to Planning and Zoning Department's comments. 2) The south road, Meadows Boulevard, exists to the east as a 60' right-of- way. An initial meeting held on May 22, 1995, with the City Engineering Department indicated that the continuation of the 60' right-of-way would be acceptable. All required turn lanes and other improvements can be adequately provided within the 60' right-of-way. 3) South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District acceptance will be acquired prior to Engineering approval. 4) There are no signs proposed in any County right-of-way. 5) The developer's engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply with all City Codes and Standards and a copy of this letter has been attached for your review. Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 5 6) The appropriate parking spaces and handicap parking spaces have been provided for the recreation area and are shown on the Site Plan. 7) Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners association to pay for the operation of a street light system within the development at the time of plat approval. 8) Two (2) four foot wide sidewalks are shown on either side of Meadows Boulevard. An eight foot wide bike path is shown on the south side of the entrance road into the project. The north side of the entry road does not provide any connections to uses within or adjacent to the project. Palm Beach County allows developers to combine two 4' wide sidewalks into one 8' wide bikepath. Therefore, the developer requests that the City review this eight foot wide bike path similar to what is allowable in Palm Beach County. This bike path will connect Lawrence Road with the bus stop and the recreation area located within the central area of the site. The 50' right-of-ways located within the project have four feet wide sidewalks shown on either side of these right-of-ways. 9) Soil borings have been completed and a copy of the Soil Boring Study has been attached to the resubmittal package. 10) A map indicating the location of the soil borings has also been provided and is attached to the Soil Boring Study. 11) The developer agrees to comply with this request. The south road, Meadows Boulevard, will be constructed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. However, this is contingent upon the fact that no other access points will be required, including no access point off of Hypoluxo Road. 12) An easement onto Hypoluxo Road right-of-way for future sidewalk/bike path access to schools is being addressed subject to Florida Power & Light (FPL) approval. Such an easement, if approved by FPL, will be located in either the northeast or northwest corner of the site and will be encumbered by the FP&L easement. 13) The impact on Lawrence Road of the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entrance has been reviewed by our traffic consultant. The redistribution of trips will not negatively effect the capacity of Lawrence Road now or in the year 2000, which is the estimated build-out of the project. Therefore, no expansion of Lawrence Road is required in conjunction with this project. Attached is a letter from the traffic consultant on this issue. Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 6 In response to the last comment, the developer has made contact with the School Board regarding the relocation of the power line and we are awaiting their response. In response to comments from the TRC meeting, the developer has decided to use both steel and concrete poles. With the use of these poles, there are no anchors or tie downs necessary. Therefore, additional easements for these poles will not be required. PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM - 95-394 1) The stated notes have been added to Sheet 4 of 8. 2) The Site Plan has been amended to identify the perimeter setback dimensions proposed for the project. 3) Association documents will be provided at the appropriate time. 4) A five foot wide limited access easement has been shown on the Site Plan along the west side of Lawrence Road and on the north side of the proposed Meadows Boulevard. 5) On the Conceptual Landscape Plan a five foot high buffer hedge planted two feet on center at the rear of the lots that abut the C3 Commercial zoned property located in the northwest corner of the project has been shown. 6) On the Site Plan, Sheet 4 of 8, the location of the zero lot line sides of the buildings for all lots have been shown. 7) A note such as the one added for the Minor Master Plan Modification for Nautica has been added to the Site Plan and it reads "Refer to Building Chart above for front setbacks". 8) The rear setbacks for lot numbers 45, 58, 97, 124 and 168 have been marked with an *. The building setback shall be 15', the pool setback shall be 10' and the screen enclosure setback shall be 8'. This is consistent with the "back to back" setbacks that have been established for this site. 9) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of a proposed 40' x 100' and a 50' x 100' lot. The request for these lot sizes indicates only a minimum lot size and is consistent with what was requested, approved, and currently under construction at Nautica located just south of this project on Lawrence Road. The average lot area for all lots within the project is 6,102 s. f. The zero lots have an average lot area Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 7 of 6,719 s.f. with over 61% of the zero lots over 6,000 s.f. "ZI1 lots have an average lot area of 5,200 s.f. 19% of the "Z" lots are over 6,000 s.t. 10) The two products proposed for this site are similar to the approved products found at Nautica. The additional five feet of building setback allows for a prominent architectural feature to be located close to the street rather than the garage and the building located on the same plane. This will diminish the effect of the 16' wide driveway and will improve the appearance of the building and the lots in total. 11) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for a review of the proposed side building setback for the non-zero side of the zero lot line units for 10'. 12) Again, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the proposed 10' side pool setback and 12' screen enclosure setback which are consistent with those proposed and approved on the Nautica Site Plan. The proposed 17' foot corner side setback for pools and 15' for screen enclosures have been maintained and are so noted on the plan. The proposed 10' rear pool setback for IIback to back" lots and the seven foot (7') rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract have been maintained. The eight foot (8') rear screen enclosure setback for all back to back lots has been maintained and the five foot rear screen enclosure setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract have also been maintained. There is a note on the Site Plan which discusses prohibited encroachments within easements. 13) At this time, the developer's engineer has been in contact with Palm Beach County Engineers regarding off-site roadway improvements that are required. The County is requesting the right and left hand turn lanes into the northern entrance of the property and the left hand turn lane into the southern entrance of the property. If further roadway improvements are required, they will be addressed at that time. 14) The approved Master Plan on file does not indicate any perimeter landscape requirements and the PUD section of the Code also does not require any perimeter landscape buffers. The developer is providing these landscape easements to improve the aesthetic character of the site on his own accord and not because it is a requirement of the City; therefore, the developer would like to install them on a "lot by lot" basis since they are not a requirement of the City. This minimizes damage to plant material as Ms. Tambri J. Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 2, 1995 Page 8 if it is installed prior to building construction, it is very difficult to protest and maintain it. These landscape easements will be irrigated by each lot which will promote it's survivability. 15) The original Master Plan anticipated an access and median opening onto Hypoluxo Road. Since the median opening has not been provided as originally anticipated, the developer will provide a straight-thru access by extending Meadows Boulevard to the existing stub of Meadows Boulevard on the southeast corner of the project. I would appreciate an opportunity to review this response letter and the revised plans with you prior to the August 15, 1995, City Commission meeting. If you have any questions or concerns in regards to these plans or any other items contained herein, please do not hesitate to contact me immediately. Sincerely, K~V1 \~ Karyn I. Janssen cc: GL Homes of Florida, Inc. Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble KIJjcdd\cheyden.802 - LN\\' . . . . . . . . ..... Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS July 10, 1995 City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310 Attn: Mr. William Hukill, P.E. City Engineer Re: NAUTICA SOUND L.N. & W. Project 95-181 Dear Mr. Hukill: The master plan is in compliance with Appendix C, Article 8, Section 4 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances for the master plan requirements. If y~ve any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. ./ 1\ S)t1cerel , \ . U ' RWL:jhj cc: Collene Walter JHJ\LAND\95-181\HUKILL.710 LAWSON, NOBLE & WEBB,INC. 420 Columbia Drive. West Palm Beach, FL 33409. (407) 684-6686. Fax (407) 684-1812 LAWSON, NOBLE & ASSOCIATES 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, SUite 9. Port SI, Lucie, FL 34986. (407) 878-1700. Fax (407) 878.1802 07/28./Sis 07:05 r'.10. '?2'~ [;':: ,- G.L. HOMES OF FLORIDA July 27, 1995 City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Dept. 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 3 10 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Anention: Mr. Mike Haag Re; Nautica Sound Dear Mr. Haag, I have been in contaCt with one of our subcontractors (EDL - Electronic Door Lift) who Installs the operating equipment for our gated communities to question them abom mechanisms that could be installed at the gate to allow emergency vehicles or Ci1y workers 24 hour access into the communlty According to Mr. Jack Trout with EDL, there are three different systems which can be installed to aJlo\.\- the 24 hour access. They are as follows: 1. SOS System (Siren Operable System): This system is activated by the sound of a siren when an emergency vehicle approaches the gate, This system will automatically open the gate, therefore, all personal will remain in their vehicles, 2. Knox Box: This is a key entry system. The City would have a master key which would allow City personal to get out oftbeir vehicles and unlock (open) the gates, 3. Remote System: This is the eX2ct same system which is used on automatic garage door opening systems. This system would allow City personal to remain in their vehicles when entering the community. ~ 40 I UNIVmSl1Y DRIVE · 3U~TE 200 . CO:<AL SPRi~GS. FU:)RIDA 33071 . 2C5-753.: 73C' . p,,\ = 3::;5- 15J,":~: ~ 07/28/95 07:04 t~CI, ';:'2;:' :I,:) : -- Mr. Mike Haag July 27,1995 Page 2 Please review these three options and should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact Jack TrolJt with EDL His phone number is (305) 97:2-9300, I think one or a combinanon offfi'o of the above mentioned systems would guarantee the City 24 hour access into the communtty, S~' cere I, Yours, ,::" .4/# .:::.zd...--- Rick E. Elsner, P.E, cc: By way of facsimile Mr, Bill Cavanaugh, City Fire Department Mr. Skip Milot, City Utilities Department Sgt. Marlon Harris, City Police Department (~~,) 3-75 - (.,\ 85 Co Ilene W. Walter, Kilday & Associates (...t>7) ~8'l -~S"l'2. SIMMONS & WHITE, INC. Engineers. Planners · Consultants August 3, 1995 Mr. William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE~ Nautica Sound PUD Lawrence Road Traffic Issues Dear Mr. Hukill: Pursuant to comments from the City of Boynton Beach Engineering Department, the following is a review of the effect on Lawrence Road of the reallocation of vested trips for the above referenced project in light of the proposed development plan which eliminates a previously approved Hypoluxo Road access. Lawrence Road has a daily capacity of 13,400 trips per day. The 1994/1995 volumes established by Palm Beach County for Lawrence Road from Hypoluxo to Gateway is 7,866 trips per day. Based on a 1991/1992 volume of 7,750 trips per day, a three year historical growth rate of .45% (or less than 1%) is applicable. Utilizing this historical growth rate, in the year 2000, which is estimated to be the buildout of the Nautica Sound project, Lawrence Road will have a volume of 8,308 trips per day. It is proj ected that the Nautica Sound proj ect will generate a total of 4,340 trips per day. Approximately 3,650 of these trips will reach Lawrence Road uti llzing either the main entrance or Meadows Bouleva1:'d. Pursuant to the Traffic Report prepared by Walter H. Keller, Inc., 2,348 trips will head south on Lawrence Road and 1,302 trips will head north. Based on a year 2000 volume of 8,308 trips per day, this will establish a total maximum volume of 10,656 trips. which is less than the current Lawrence Road daily capacity of 13,400 trips per day. Although no major project significantly impacts this link, a substantial amount of capacity remains available for approved but unbuilt development until Lawrence Road is widened to a four-lane section scheduled as assured construct ion by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1997/1998. 4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415 Telephone (407) 965-9144 Mr. William Hukill, P.E. August 3, 1995 - Page Two Therefore, the additional trips reallocated to Lawrence Road by the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entry will not negatively affect the current capacity of Lawrence Road nor projecting it to the ultimate buildout of the Nautica Sound project of the year 2000, will not negatively impact the road in the future. Sincerely, I , RFR/jp cc: Rick Ellsner Collene Walter HYPOLUXO ROAD 7,888 1,302 442 9.810 13,400 c < o a: U.I o Z LLI ~ ~ ..J SITE 1.866 2.348 442 10.666 13,400 ", LEGEND 7 ,866 EXISTING 1994/1995 VOLUME 2.348 PROJECT ASSIGNMENT FROM REDISTRIBUTION 442 BACKGROUND GROWTH TO 2000 10,856 TOTAL TRAFFIC 13,400 THRESHOLD VOLUME NAUTICA ~CU"-l D SOIL-S. 2EPo2... ( GL BOMES 1401 UNIVERSITY DRIVE SUITE 1300 CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33071 AT'l'N: MR. RICK ELSNER ( .... TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 ILLUSTRATIONS Introduction Geotechnical Investigation Irrigation Ditches Test Pits/Deleterious Soils Quantities Estimations Exclusions Environmental Observations Closing FIGURE FIGURES ILLUSTRATIONS Geotechnical Data - Auger Borings Standard Penetration Test Borings Test Pits Analytical Results Aerial/Boring Layout 2 3 4 5 ~ PAGE 1&2 2&3 3&4 4 4&5 5 5&6 PAGES 1-6 7-14 15&16 17&18 19 Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. CAROL DREW PRESIDENT ASDEL KARIM-CONRADO, P,E. VICE PRESIDENT Ma y 24, 1 9 9 5 GL Homes 1401 University Drive Suite #300 Coral Springs, Florida 33071 Attn: Mr. Rick Elsner RE: Meadowood Groves - Section #7, Township #45, Range #43 - Palm Beach County, Florida 1.0 INTRODUCTION ( Per your request, and in have completed the tasks meeting. accordance with your authorization, discussed on May 18, 1995 during we our The tasks discussed were multi-faceted and entailed a geotechnical soil investigation, machine dug test pits, recommendations for development methods and procedures, and environmental concerns encountered during the completion of the above tasks. Testing procedures were engineering practice and in accordance applicable ASTM with accepted local and AASHTO Standards. 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Scope of Work: A total of 23 - 10' Auger Borings, Borings, 8 - 20' Standard Penetration Tests, and test pits were advanced to the depths and at the on the attached reports. 4 - 20' Auger 5 machine dug locations noted SUMMARY As can be seen from the attached boring logs, the majority of the foundation soils consists of a Brown medium fine sand. ~ -1- 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, FL 33458. (407) 575-0012 820 8th Street. Unit #4 . Lantana, FL 33462 . (407) 547-7260 The water table was noted ~s occurring approximately 3' to 5' feet below existing ground elevation immediately upon completion of borings. Based on the "blow count" of the Split Spoon Sampler, the foundation soils are generally in a "loose to medium" state of relative density. Due to the relative density of the foundation soils, the following recommendations are made to achieve a mini- mum soil bearing value of 2,500#/FT.2. RECOMMENDATIONS Standard preparation procedures of clearing, grubbing, compaction, and filling will ensure a suitable foundation for 1 or 2 story structures having a footing width of 18" to 34" set 12" to 24" below finished pad elevation designed for pearing values not to exceed 2,500#/FT.2. The clearing method selected by groves must include the removal the contractor for the of all subsurface root existing systems. ( Based upon our experience in developing farm land, a soil pulverizer with a depth capacity of 18" to 24" may be used to mix the top and underlying soils. This alternate grubbing method would be dependent on our approval of an on-site test strip prepared with the equipment to be used. This alternate grubbing method does not apply to canal banks, berms, areas of vegetation, abandoned crops, or areas of the site where the topsoil exceeds a 6" thickness. It should be noted that, to be in County Building Codes, each building individually upon completion of site outs and design. accordance with Palm Beach pad will have to be tested work and final building lay- All deleterious soil (i.e. trash, silt, muck, etc.) encountered during site development will require excavation. Development includes, but is not limited to, building pads, roads, utilities, and swimming pools. The required depths and off-sets of the excavations will be determined through testing of the deleterious soil in situ. 3.0 IRRIGATION DITCHES Observations: Silt deposits 6" to 18" thick were encountered in \- -2- ( t~e bottom of all irrigation canals. BERMS/SPOIL BANKS The canal berms/spoil banks are contaminated with vegetation and roots structures. SUMMARY The silt deposits encountered in the bottom of the irrigation ditches is not suitable as structural backfill. Prior to back- filling"the irrigation ditches, excavation (desilting) of silt and vegetation deposits would be required. Berms/spoil banks are contaminated with vegetation to the point that use of this material as canal or structural backfill is pre- cluded. RECOMMENDATIONS ( Materials excavated from the irrigation ditches, berms, and spoil banks would be suitable as backyard fill, landscaping berms, green areas, etc. When placing as yard fill, the material should be placed five (5) feet beyond setback lines established for the project. This setback should include areas that permit cabana, pool, spa, porch, and patio construction. 4.0 TEST PITS/DELETERIOUS SOILS The three test pits excavated in the vicinity of the former operations area in the southwest quadrant of the subject property revealed granular soils free of organic deposits to a depth of five feet. The two test pits excavated in the backfilled pond area on the eastern property line revealed trash, wood, and concrete debris 2' to 4' below existing ground elevations. The debris is underlain by organic soils to 5' below existing ground elevations. Deleterious soils were encountered in borings B-1 and F-4. B-1 had top soil to a depth of 2' underlain by 2' of Brown medium fine sand and silty marl (cohesive) to a depth of 4', F-4 had a l' ( -3- ( strata of Brown medium fine sand and silty marl (cohesive) at 3' to 4' below natural ground. SUMMARY Whereas the insitu trash and debris deposits excavate, quantity estimations for excavation requirements, based upon thickness and extent and debris, were unattainable. were difficult to limits and backfill of the buried trash Based upon review of an aerial photograph flight dated 1979, the two grids B-1 and F-4 used to have drainage canals within their boundaries. The drainage canals have since been backfilled. RECOMMENDATIONS All buried trash, debris, and organic deposits will require excavation. Backfilling of the excavation should be accomplished using a clean, suitable fill material placed in one-foot lifts, each lift being compacted with a Vibratow III or equivalent vibrating roller. ( The extent of deleterious soils encountered in Grid B-1 and F-4 should be identified with isolation auger borings. Excavation of these soils will be required. However, they may be mixed with a clean, suitable fill material and returned to the excavation in one-foot lifts, each lift being compacted with a Vibratow III or equivalent vibrating roller. 5.0 QUANTITIES ESTIMATIONS Fill Requirements: Quantities estimations of fill requirements for backfilling irrigation ditches, excavations, and bringing the site to finished grade should be established by surveyed cross-sections prior to commencement of development procedures. Additionally, it should be noted that county regulations require that 90% of all fill generated during lake excavations be used on site. 6.0 EXCLUSIONS Note should be made that this investigation may not depict variations that possibly exist intermediate of the attached boring l -4- locations or in untested areas of the property. become evident, this office must be contacted to preliminary recommendations based upon on-site testing of the variant conditions. Should variations re-evaluate our inspection and/or Note should be made that "proper consideration by the owner or contractor shall be given for the protection of the adjoining buildings and properties, prior to the commencement of work". Any pumping action of the soils "soft spots" encountered during grubbing or compaction procedures must be brought to the immediate attention of the geotechnical engineer for further evaluation and/or testing. 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBSERVATIONS During the excavation of Test Pit #5, a strong odor was detected in the soil and groundwater. The odor detected was akin to a degraded diesel fuel or creosote compound. l Subsequently, a groundwater sample was collected pit and analyzed by a Gas Chromatagram (GC) constituents. Refer to Figure 3 Page 15 & 16 of for complete analytical results. from for the the test petroleum Appendices The results of the GC petroleum scan were below detection limits. However, it is our opinion that the soils in this area have been impacted by contaminants and should be futher investigated. Whereas the contamination at Test Pit #5 is not petroleum related (special waste), the possibility exists that these soils may be determined to be hazardous. Samples of the soil and groundwater at Test Pit #5 should be collected and analyzed per EPA Methods 8080 Organochlorine pesticides, 8150 Chlorinated herbicides, 604 Phenols and the 13 priority pollutants as defined by the EPA. 8.0 CLOSING Geotechnical investigations are based local engineering experience, and cost of our knowledge and belief, the conclusions drawn thereof, represent tion. upon anticipated land use, consideration. To the best information presented and all the available informa- l -5- l_ A.I.M. Engineering & Research, Inc., appreciated the opportunity to conduct the requested investigation at the subject site. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we may be of future service to you, please feel free to contact us at (407) 747-1351. Sincerely, P.E. AKC/lr . Enclosures' ( -6- Authorization for publication of statements. conclusions. or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. ( ( Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 REPORT OF"U08RS "PR~ Meadowood CUENT GL Bomes SAMPLED BV Groves - Section #7. Township 4S. R~nqp ~41 - Palm Be; county, Flor DD/EC/QVDATE LOCA11OH DEPTH A-1 - Center of 0'-2' 2'-3' 3'-6' 6'-10' A-2 - Center of 0'-2' 2'-3' 3'-6' 6' -1 0' A-3 - Center of 0'-6" 6"-1 ' 1 '-3' 3'-6' 6' -1 0' B-1 - Center of 0'-2' 2'-4' 4'-6' 6'-10' B-2 - Center of 0'-2' 2'-15' 15'-20' * 5/20/95 JOB NO. 95-331 DESCRIPTION Water TABLE Tan medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 2' Tan medium fine sand Dark Brown.medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 2~' .....~ IAt\Ov"-- ?\... Top soil Grey medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 5' Dark Brown medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand, fJ~~ f"O sil ty, cohesive material - ~~ ~ \)l.CS::: Brown medium fine sand Light Tan medium fine sand 4' Dark Brown medium fine. sand Tan medium fine sand Grey medium fine sand 2~' Immediate Wa~er Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) Thne Sol Baring T...,. Representative oIlIIId Apply to lt1e Exact LocatiOn lIIId DePth of the Boring. AuthOnzabon tor J)l1bllclllloo1 of ...... conclusions. or elClrllClS from or regarding our reportS is reserved pending our written approval. FIGURE 1 PAGE 1 ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter. Florida 33458. 575-0012 I'II:.nm I OF AUGERS ~ Meadowood Groves - Section i7. Township 4S. R~nq~ i41 - Palm Bee .cLIENT GL Homes county, Flor:i SAllPLEDBY DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 JOB NO. 95-331 LOCAnON DEPTH DESCRIPTlON Water TABLE B-3 - Center of 0'-3' Tan medium fine sand 3'-5' Brown medium fine sand 5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 3.6' Soil C~ ~ O':;:'~~ 0'-8" Top 811-2' Light Tan I!Iedium fine sand 2'-3' Dark Brown medium fine sand 3'-6' Brown medium fine sand 6'-10' Tan medium fine sand 5' 0'-3' Tan medium fine sand 3'-6' Brown medium fine sand 6'-10' Tan medium fine sand 4 ' ~,.~~ o6,,t. d> 0'_611 Top Soil 6"-10' Tan medium fine sand 4~' 0'-3' Tan medium fine sand 3'-4' Dark Brown medium fine sand 4'-10' Brown medium fine sand 5.4' C-1 - Center of C-2 - Center of ( C-3 - Center of D-1 - Center of ( * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) TheM Soi Boring TMtS are ReprnenCalIve of and Apply to ltIe Exlld LocatiCln and 0ePlh of the Boring. AutI'lonzatJon lot pubIIc:ation of statements. conclusions. or ell1rlldS tram or regarding our reportS is rn8fVeCl pendinO our written approval. ~ .. ___._FIGUR~ 1 PAGE._2__.___ Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 Groves - Section 17. Township 4~. RnnqP i41 - Palm Be county, Flor DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 JOB NO. 95-331 Water TABLE REPORT OF AUGERS PROJECT Meadowood CUENT GL Homes SAMPLED BY LOCATION DEPTH D-2 - Center of 0'-3' 3'-4' 4'-7' 7'-20' 0-3 - Center of 0'-6" 6"-1 ' 1 '-4 ' 4'-6' 6'-10' D-4 - Center of 0'-6" 6"-1' 1 '-4 ' 4'-6' 6'-10' D-5 - Center of 0'-8" 8"-3' 3'-4' 4'-10' D-6 - Center of 0'-2' 2'-6' 6'-10' I \_- DESCRIPTION Tan medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 5' C'1~ OL~IC-eo IV c.~ Top Soil Tan medium.fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 4.6' ~e OI:.>t,.M) IW c.~ Top Soil Tan medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Brown medium Eine sand Tan medium fine sand 5' ~ 'Ol:>f-GD \.v' Top Soil c.~ Tan medium fine sand Brown & Tan medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 5' Tan medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 5' * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) TheM Soil Boring THIS.. R~ 01 and Af}fJtf to ltIe Exact Locdon and Depth of Itle Boring, Auttlonzallon for publication of stalementa. cancIusions. or extrlICtS tram or regarding our reportS is reserved pending our written approval. FIGURE 1 PAGE 3 Ar ALL TERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 REPORT OF AUGERS PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section #7. Township 4,. R~nq~ CUENT GL Homes SAMPLED BY DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 JOB NO. i4l - Palm Be county, FloI 95-331 WIlIer TABLE LOCATION DEPTH DESCRIPTION E-1 - Center of 0'-2' Tan medium fine sand 2'-3' Dark Brown medium fine sand 3'-5' Brown medium fine sand 5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 5.6' E-2 - Center of 0'-1' Grey medium fine sand 1'-3 ' Tan medium fine sand 3'-5' Dark Brown medium fine sand 5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 4.6' E-3 - Center of 0'-4' Tan medium fine sand ( 4'-5' Brown medium fine sand 5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 4.6' .- E-4 - Center of 0'-4' Tan medium fine sand 4'-6' Brown medium fine sand 6'-20' Tan medium fine sand 5 ' CI'\V ro~ DI'::1'LU) E-5 - Center of 0'-6" Top Soil IN 6"-4' Tan medium fine sand 4'-6' Brown medium fine sand 6'-10' Tan medium fine sand 5.2' ( * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) TheH Soil Boring Testa ... RepraentaliYe of and AfII)ty to Ih8 Exact Lccalion and ~ of the Boring. Autnonzalion tor publication of statements. c:anc:tusionS. 0( exncrs from 0( regllldin9 our f8PCl'lS is res8lV8d pending our written apptOY8l, FIGURE 1 PAGE__L_____________ Ar ALL TERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section ~7. Township 4S. R~nqp i41 - Palm BE CUENT GL Homes county, FlOl SAMPLED BY DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 .JOB NO. 95-331 Water TABLE REPORT OF AUGERS LOCAnON DEPTH E-6 - Center of 0'-4' 4'-5' 5'-7' 7'-10' F-l - Center of 0'-2' 2'-6' 6'-10' F-2 - Center of 0'-6" 6"-6' 6'-20' F-3 - Center of 0'-2' 2'-7' 7'-10' F-4 - Center of 0'-3' 3'-4' 4'-10' \ - DESCRIPTION Tan medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 5.1' Tan medium.fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 4.3' D I '::> t... cJtI\ ()Q- Top Soil Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 4.5' Grey medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand 4 ' Tan medium fine sand Silt $"QvJU~ #JI.KIIV~ Tan medium fine sand 5.6 t * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) ThMe Soil Boring rem are R....ntative of and Apply to ltle Exacll.oCIIllOn and Depth of lt1e EIclIing. AuthoriZallon for pt IblIc:aliott of statementS. c:ondusiOns. Of' elClr8ClS from Of' regarding our reports is reseMlc:l pending our written approval. FI.GJ1R~ 1 PAGR 5 - ------------ Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road. Jupiter, Florida 33458. 575-0012 REPORT OF AUGERS PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section CUENT GL Homes SAMPLED BY OO/EC/QVDATE #7. Township 45. R;!nqp 5/20/95 JOB NO. i41 - Palm BE County, FlOl 95-331 Water TABLE LOCAnON DEPTH DESCRIPTION P-S - Center of 0'-3' 3'-5' 5'-6~' 6~'-10' Tan medium fine sand Grey medium fine sand Brown medium fine sand Tan medium fine sand, yellow tint 5.6' F-6 - Center of 0'-6' 6'-10' Tan medium-fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand 5.5' .- " * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) These Sol Boring T.... .. ~ of II1d /4fJply to the Exact LacdOn II1d Depctr of the Boring. AulnotiZaIion lot pc IbIIclIlion of ItaI8fMntI. canc:tuaions. or exnclS from or regarding our NPOfIS is ~ pending our Millen apptOVaI, FIGURE 1 PAGE 6 Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Rorida 33458 · 575-0012 PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section #7, Township #45, Range *43 LOCAnON Located on Plan - A-1 \, DEPTH t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 46 49 50 CUENT GL DAILUR SAMPLER DATA 2' Semple IA~!OW. DEPTH No. .". Fool "'-... t 4-:> 2 6-5 3 C;_C; .. 6-5 5 C;_h 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 so BORING NO. A- 1 U"-b" DESCRIPTION op.....--a ffrown med~um t~ne sand, trace/roots 6"-5' Brown medium fine sand I _ ~- 8-9 Q-Q 5'-20' Tan medium fine sand o "'7 7-7 h_7 7-7 =- Homes JOILNO. 95-331 SG/EC/DV WATlRTAIIU 2~' DATE 5/22/95 Split Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 ,.,.. Sol BorIng T_.. ~ 01_ /IfIrJlf Ill.. EDCt LocatIan'" 0epIb 01.. Boring. AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBlICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM ~_~~~ OUR REPORTS IS RESERVeD P!ND!NG OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. - - Palm Bee County, FJ Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Jadiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 PROJECT ea owoo roves - Sect1.on , Towns 1.p 45, Range *4 - Palm LOCATION Located on Plan - B-3 BOAlNG NO. B-3 County, DEPTH ~..JftOII 0# IlATIIUL s.:- .:,~ DEPTH 1 0"-6" Brown med1.um f1.ne sand, trace/roots L-4 1 2 -.1 ~.1 2 3 c::: II 3 4 ;)-;) 4 5 6-5 5 8 c:::._7 8 7 6"-7' Brown medium fine sand l-tJ 7 a 6-6 8 9 R_R 9 10 1-0 10 11 -g- -9 11 12 . r [- II U,2 13 T2- 1 113 14 I u- ~ 14 15 9-9 15 18 R_Q 18 17 ::1-() 17 18 8-7 18 11 7 .7 19 20 7'-20' Tan medium fine sand o c. 20 21 21 22 22 23 ~ 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 21 21 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 :M 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 3i 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 41 49 I 50 50 M d d G #7 h' # 3 Seal Fl, co ~ ~ Cl.4 N ~ =: o ~ 1-4 r:.. CUEHT GL DfIUSI SAMPlER DATA 2' Homes J08.NO. 95-331 SG/EC/OV WATlRTA&8 21s' DATE 5/22/95 Split Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 TheM Sol BalIng T_.. ~...~ oIn ~ to.. ex.ct LacatIon'" o.plh of ltle BolIng. AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBl.JCATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCWSJONS OR EXTRACTS FROM _ _....._ na af:l.:l.&at"\aIt2.NlD ~~ r~ ,.~~e'D\1ef'\ f'!I~..__._ _.._ ......~LI ...ft..""..... Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 .-o.ET ea owoo roves - ec ~on , owns ~p , ange - Palm LOCATION Located on Plan - C-l BORING NO. C-1 County, DEPnf DESCRPTIOH 011 MATERIAL s.ntpIe BIoww DEPTH No. Per Foo 1 0'-6" Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots J-4 1 2 4-6 2 3 ~_'7 3 4 7 - I 4 5 6-b 5 6 6"-6~' Brown medium fine sand 7 ~7 6 7 \)-, 7 8 7-ff 8 9 6-7 9 10 '7 _Q 10 11 'j-';J 11 12 . 8-9 12 13 ---'-'- n13 14 1 " 114 15 10-- ~ 15 16 R_R 18 17 a 0 17 18 7-7 18 19 7-h 19 20 6~'-20' Tan medium fine sand 6-7 20 21 21 22 22 23 ~ 23 24 24 25 2S 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 36 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 48 49 50 50 M d d G s t' #7 T h' #45 R #43 Bea Fl \ CUI!HT GL DRILLER SAIIPLER DATA 2' Homes 0108. NO. 95- 33 1 SG/EC/DV WATERTMU 3' DATI! 5/22/95 Split Spoon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 ,..... Sol Bartng T_ ... ~ 01_ Af1pI'f to ... EllIIct LccalIan ..., DepIh 0I1tle BorIng. AUTHOAIZATJON FOR PUBlJCATION OF STATEIotENTS. CONCWSJONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PeNDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Ar ALL TERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836lndiantown Road. Jupiter. Rorida 33458. 575-0012 PROJECT ea owoo roves - ec .1on , Towns .1p , ange ,4 - Palm LOCATION Located on Plan - D-3 BORING NO. D-3 County, DEPnf DUCRlPTION OP IlATIIUL s.mple r:,~1 DEPTH , No. 1 0"-6" Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots .) '.) 1 2 6"-2' Grey medium fine sand 4-:) 2 3 5-5 3 4 6-4 4 5 s-s 5 8 2'-7' Brown medium fine sand A_~ 6 7 4-4 7 8 5-6 8 9 i._~ 9 10 7 --F, 10 11 ~_i 11 12 /-'d 12 13 . 8-9 13 14 'd-'d 14 15 q-8 15 18 i .., 18 17 '0-/ 17 18 1-6 18 19 7'-20' Tan medium fine sand ~. ,i;; 19 20 7-6 20 21 21 22 22 23 ~ 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 Z7 Z7 26 26 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 3t 39 .0 .0 41 41 .c2 .c2 43 43 44 44 45 45 48 46 47 47 48 48 4.. 49 50 50 M d d G s t' #7 h' #45 R # 3 Bea, Fl, c: .. ~ t! ~ II ('\ ~ c:l: - ... t! I- r:. CUeNT GL DRILLIR SAMPLER DATA 2' Homes J08.HO. 95-331 SG/EC/OV WA18ITAaU 4~' DATE 5/22/95 Split Spoon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 TheM Sol BorIng T_ .. ~1IatI... 01 Md AflPl'IIO .. Euct LocaIIon Md Oeplh 01.. Baring. AUTHOFUZATION FOR PUBUCATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRrTTEN APPROVAL Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Ronda 33458 · 575-0012 PROJECT ea owoo roves - ec ~on , owns ~p , ange - Pa m LOCAnON Located on Plan - D-4 BORING NO. 0-4 County, DEP1H DUCRPI'IOH 0# 1lA1IIUL s.m. ~~ DEPIH No. 1 J 'J 1 2 011_611 Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots q-::> 2 3 4-~ 3 . J-5 4 5 6"-5~' Brown medium fine sand 5-6 5 6 ~ ~ 8 7 1- 1 7 8 0-7 8 9 K_j:; 9 10 [-r.:; 10 11 0-: 11 12 . 7-1 12 13 6-1 13 1. fi-;; 14 15 .., t. 15 18 !j-I 18 17 7- 17 18 Q_e: 18 19 0- 19 20 5~'-20' Tan medium fine sand 6-E 20 21 21 22 22 23 ;::. 23 2. 2. 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 38 38 37 37 38 38 39 39 <<) 40 ., 41 42 42 43 43 .... .... 45 45 48 46 .7 .7 48 48 49 49 50 50 M d d G s t' .7 T h' #45 R #43 1 Beal Fl, .. .. CI c; IC g l'" CI Cl ~ ~ ~ rz CUI!NT GL DRILLER SAMPLER DATA 2' Homes. J08.NO. 95-331 SG/EC/OV WATDTAIIU 5' DAlE 5/22/95 Split Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 These Sol Borlng T.... ... ~1IatM 01 and AfJIItt tel .. Euct Locdon and Oeplh of ttle BorIng. AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM . """ ...~,.. ..."'....... All.... ..~__.....~ .-' .....,.........."" ......."'........ "'I '" ,............... .........""'..'&1 Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida S3458 · 575<<>12 PROJECT ea owoo roves - Sect~on , owns 1P , ange - Pa m LOCAnON Located on Plan - B-1 BORING liD. B-1 County, DEPTH DDGM'TIOH ex- 1lA1BIAL e.::- 910ft DEPTH 1 0"-6" Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots j-:J 1 2 5-6 2 3 h_C\ 3 4 r= "'7 .. S 6-6 5 6 6"-6' Brown medium fine sand C;-h 6 7 c " 7 8 s-::) 8 9 6-5 9 10 t;_e:: 10 11 0-0 11 12 4 5-::) 12 13 O-q 13 14 5-5 14 15 h_7 1S 18 {-O 18 17 6-6 17 18 r::;_h 18 19 6-5 19 20 6'-20' Tan medium fine sand t;_h 20 21 21 22 22 23 ;:, 23 24 24 2S 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 38 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 .4S 4S 48 48 47 47 . 48 ~ 49 .50 50 M d d G #7 T h' 145 R #43 1 Bea Fl, CLIENT GL DfIILLIR SAIIPLER DATA 2' Hom~s .I08.NO. 95-331 SG/ECIOV WATlllTMU! 4~' DATE 5/22/95 Solit Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 TbeH Sol BorIrII T_... ,.......... of MIl /IfIIJly 10 the ex.ct ~ Md ~ of 1M Boring. AUTHORIZATJON FOR PUBlICATION OF STATEMENTS. COHCUJSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDNJ OUA_RE~~I~ RESERVED PENt)~_~R WAJTT'EH APPROVAL. Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836lndiantown Road. Jupiter, Florida 33458. 575-0012 PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section #7, Township #45, Range #43 - Palm Bea LOCATION Located on Plan - F-3 BORING NO. F-3 County, Fl I s.::- Blows . DEPTH DUCAIPTIOH CW 1lAu.AL DEPTH """"" 1 J-:;) 1 2 4-1 2 3 8-H 3 4 0'-4' Brown medium fine sand l~ 4 5 4'- Unpenetrable (Wood) 5 8 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 . 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 18 18 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 ::P 23 24 t 24 25 25 28 28 Xl Xl 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 301 301 35 35 38 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 <10 <10 41 41 <f2 42 43 43 .. .. 45 45 <48 46 47 47 <48 <48 41 49 r 50 50 r .. CUENT GL DRlLLIR SAMPLER DATA 2' Homes JOILNO. 95-331 SG/EC/DV WATERT,uu 3' DATE 5/22/95 Split Spoon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 TheM Sol BorIng T_ .. Ret:nN.ltdva 01_ AfJ1Pk11D lie EDCI LOClIlIon and Deplh 01 the Baring. AUn<<)RJZATION FOR PU8UCATION OF STATEMENTS. CONClUSIONS OR EXTRAcTs FROM .~_ na aC'-2:,aDnIlalt: t'\f ID ae~.......~ I~ aec::~ DCIJf'taJt':l ^' 18 lalftt"P"'P'eU & BI"toI"ll_..... Ar ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Rorida 33458 · 575-0012 PROJECT ea owoo roves - ec ~on , owns ~p , ange - a m . LOCAnON Located on. Plan - F-6 BORING NO. F-6 County, DEPTH DBCIW'TION tJ'_~ SMlpIe sac.. DEPTH No. Per FoG 1 0' -1 ' Grey medium fine sand J-J 1 2 ::;-n 2 3 h_7 3 4 /-0 4 5 1 '-5 ' Brown medium fine sand 6-8 5 6 Q 1 11 6 7 5'-7' Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots I ~- II .,., 8 ll:l- II 18 9 10- Iq 9 10 o .0 10 11 (j-;1 11 12 . 7- 12 13 h_- 13 14 o-c 14 1S !::l-;. 15 18 A_'" 18 17 /- I 17 18 b- 18 19 7-E 19 20 b- 20 21 7'-20' Tan medium fine sand 21 22 22 23 ::> 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 'Z7 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 3S 3S 38 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 ., ., 42 42 43 43 .... .... 45 45 46 46 47 .7 46 48 49 49 I 50 50 M d d G s t' #7 T h' lt45 R ~43 P 1 Bea Fl CLENT GL DfaLLER SAMPLER DATA 2' Homes J08.NO. 95-33' SG/EC/OV WATERTA8LE 5' DAlE 5/22/95 Split Sooon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586 These Sol Boring T.... .. ~ 01 Md ~ to the Exet Locatian lIftd 0ecMh of the Boring. AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBUCATION OF STATEUENTS, CONClUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM f"\Q aC'nADf"\~ ~ let eer"W"'\PY'Pf"..... ",eC'lle''''''lel'\ "e...""...,..,.... tn \AIrt~.' ..ft"'..........'At Ar ALLiERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiar,toM't Road · Jupiter, Ronda 33458 · 575.0012 REPORT OF 'l'ES-r P:Ilft) DESCRIPTION #45. Ranqe ~43 - Palm Bea County, F JOB NO. 95- 3 3 1 Water TABLE PR~Meadowood Groves - Section #7. Townshio CUENT GL Homes SAMPLED BY OD DATE 5/20/95 LOCATION UEPTH GRID C-1 Northeast Corner of Garage Facility 0'-1' 1 ' -3 ' 3'-4' 4'-5' West side of Westernmost Shed 0'-1' 1 '-3 ' 3'-4' 4'-5' ( North side of Westernmost Shed o t -1 ' 1 '-3' 3'-4' 4'-5' ~ Grey medium fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand 4' Grey medium fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand 4' Grey medium fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand Dark Brown medium fine sand Light Brown medium fine sand 4' * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) TheM Sol Sortno T_ .. RepI........ 01 w1d ,.., to IN EllAICl L..ocdOn .nd DepIh olIN Boring. AuttrorIza1Ion for P'~ 01............ ~or.... tram or ~ our rwpons is.-wd pending our wnaen approval. FIGURE 3 PAGE 15 Ar ALL TER RA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. 836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012 REPORT OF TEST PITS PAO,IECT Meadowood Groves - Section It 7, Townshi 0 CUENT GL Homes SAUPLEDSY DO DATE 5/20/95 LOCAnON DEPTH DESCRIPTION ~45. Range t43 - Palm Bea County, F JOB NO. 95-331 W.. TABLE GRID P-3 North Pit, Centerline of Grid 0' -11 11-2.5' 2.5'-4.5' 4.5'-6' 6'-7' Top Soil Tan medium fine sand Concrete,.Wood, & Trash Muck and Sand Grey medium. fine sand 3.5' South Pit, Centerline of Grid 0' -1 ' 1'-2.5' 2.51-4.5' 4.5'-5.5' 5.5'-6' Top Soil Tan medium fine sand Concrete, Wood, & Trash Muck Grey medium fine sand 4 ' ( tAte. (AJ/V::) -, /-CA:>' (tJI P<f) tj DO I. lP s.~ '240,OCO e.. ~ p..~'" ~ O! '2. ~ (,00, ~ 1.1 ~'f 1.:1, , ~ * Immediate Water Table (ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE) TheM Soil Boring Teem are ~ 01 and ~ to the Exact Location and Depth of the Boring. Autnorization for publIc:ation of statements. c:cncIuIlons. Of' extnICII from or regarding our reportS is reserved pending aur written approval. FIGURE 3 PAGE 16 "... 1 ...tvedl ral"Z5m TCICJ_ CIlIP. I!PClIT ra/24/95 12:42:45 REPORT AlM INGINI..ING & REstARCH TO 836 I NO I AIlTCMI RtW) ~ITER. fL 33458 407.747-13~1 FAX 407.S47-1Z44 ATTEN DARYL DREW eLllNT AIM SNU'LES ..i c:o.AIlT AI" IIOJIlUIJIfG & ItISEAIICH flACILITY 836 INDIAlTCMI Rag UtTER. FL n4~ WOK [D GL 1 . lIOYNTCII TAKlN OSIZ3/93 TUIIS ell ENY TYPE LIClUID P.O. , NIA INVOICl! W1der seDIIrat, cover IMPlI! IDI!II1'IFlCATICII II GL 1 2i NrTIU) IIU.1e U MUN X ltiCOVERY . LCS V! RPO . LCS r \ l PIEPAIlEO TOXIKON WlST PALM lEACH BY 1860 OLD OKfECHOBEf RD. t401 WEST PALM &!ACH. fll 33409 HitS 1e86278 QAt 910"oa ATTEN YAR JUC PHONE (.401> 478-4<<13 FAX 478.0214 WIlIIrk Ordw . 95.05-117 COITACT JOlIN TEST CGDES and MMES UMd tlft thfs workorder ~ EXTRACTlON- GC PIT ik.HI P!TIlOt.!tJt SCAlI BY GC FIGURE 4 PAGE 17 ,.. 2 ...i Wid: 05123195 ( SAMPLE .10 Gl.1 FltACT 1011 gJ4 TI!ST CODE ~ NNt! peTIOle. SCAlI IT GC Oat. & Time Collected 05123195 category LIQUID ( ~,- TOXIUII CXIIP. IEPOIT .....l ts ." s.ple AllALYT! RESUl T Miner.l spirits Motor Oi l G..ol'ne J(M'O...... Diesel/Fuel NO. 2 Jet A NO.4 'uel Oil 110. 6 Fuel Oil Pet. Cont..tnant 11.0.5. Total Petroleu. Hydroe.r~ DITeCTION LIMIT 0.50 .aiL Not.. .nd Oefinition. for this Report: fXTlACTEO DATI RUN AJtAL YST INSTRUMENT OS/23/95 ~/~/95 Sf PI NO NO NO ND lID II) NO lID NO NO work 0IWr . 95-05-117 N.O.S. a Not Otherwi.e Specified NO a C~( s) not ~taeted above dtttlCt f on l 1., t CCMENTS HYDROCARBON RANGe: C7-C]4 FIGURE 4 PAGE 18 y r S ~al -"" '~ J:> ..J C"'l ;:l _ : ~2--~ ;> .Po ,~ <J' .., -:; C"'l :;> ~ c z ... -<. "1 ~ .., ." =: .-- ~ , , "- ,.\ ,.... f - ! ~ l ::; \ FIGURE 5 PAGE 19 .~_. ..:;l" -::,' ,~. \. ' -.: ':., _;' _ .::r -" 00 rn rn 0\Vl rn rn J! 3 I 1995 PLANNING AND ,)) ZONING DEPT. G.L. HOMES OF FLORIDA July 27, 1995 City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Dept. 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P,O,Box310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Attention: Mr. Mike Haag Re: Nautica Sound Dear Mr. Haag, I have been in contact with one of our subcontractors (EDL - Electronic Door Lift) who installs the operating equipment for our gated communities to question them about mechanisms that could be installed at the gate to allow emergency vehicles or City workers 24 hour access into the community, According to Mr. Jack Trout with EDL, there are three different systems which can be installed to allow the 24 hour access. They are as follows: 1, SOS System (Siren Operable System): This system is activated by the sound of a siren when an emergency vehicle approaches the gate, This system will automatically open the gate, therefore, all personal will remain in their vehicles. 2, Knox Box: This is a key entry system, The City would have a master key which would allow City personal to get out of their vehicles and unlock (open) the gates. 3. Remote System: This is the exact same system which is used on automatic garage door opening systems. This system would allow City personal to remain in their vehicles when entering the community, 1401 UNIVERSITY DRIVE. SUITE 200 . CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33071 . 305-753-1730 . FAX #305-753-4509 Mr. Mike Haag July 27,1995 Page 2 Please review these three options and should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact Jack Trout with EDL. His phone number is (305) 972-9300. I think one or a combination of two of the above mentioned systems would guarantee the City 24 hour access into the community. S~;2L- Rick E. Elsner, P,E. cc: By way of facsimile Mr. Bill Cavanaugh, City Fire Department Mr. Skip Milor, City Utilities Department Sgt. Marlon Harris, City Police Department Collene W. Walter, Kilday & Associates KIld8y & Aaoclatea Landscape Architects/ Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 July 10. 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Nautica Sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Minor Master Plan Modification Application Our Project No.: 1020.13 Dear Ms. Heyden. Please accept and process the attached information for a Minor Master Plan Modification to the previously approved Knollwood Groves P.U,D., now known as Nautica Sound, located on the east side of Lawrence Road. north of Gateway Boulevard and south of Hypoluxo Road. We are submitting this Minor Master Plan Modification application on behalf of G.L. Homes of Florida II Corporation, contract purchasers of the property, and Meadowwood Groves. Inc. and R. Bradford Arnold, Trustee, owners of the property, The latest master plan approved on February 19. 1991 reflected a total of 539 units which were comprised of 150 detached units and 389 multi-family units, The proposed master plan reflects a total of 434 units comprised of 246 Zero Lot Line detached units and 188 "Z" Lot Line detached units. The overall master plan has been revised to delete 1 05 units from the original approval. There are two product types proposed, one a Zero Lot Line product which utilizes a minimum of 5,000 s.f, lot and the other a "Z" Lot product which utilizes a minimum of 4,000 s.f, lot. Details of typical units, setbacks, and open space areas are included with this application, The site is divided into two development pods, one pod will utilize the Zero Lot Line lot and the other pod will utilize the "Z" Lot Line lot. As noted above, the approved project originally included multi-family units. Today we are proposing to build a community composed of 1 00% single-family units, Therefore, the entire project today is all fee simple ownership whereas the previous approval could have been developed as a rental community. Of the 539 units approved in 1991, 28% were zero lot while 72% were multi-family. The proposed Nautica Sound P.U.D, incorporates 434 total units where 57% are Zero Lot Line. the larger 5,000 s,f. unit and 43% are "Z" Lot units, the 4,000 s,1. unit, Access for the P.U.D, remains as previously approved with an entrance off Meadows Boulevard and an additional entrance off Lawrence Road, The extension of Meadows Boulevard to Lawrence Road has also been maintained. Meadows Boulevard will be a 60' right-of-way and will be publically dedicated with this approval. A central loop road has been designed within the project to answer those concerns voiced from the Fire Department at the preliminary meeting to discuss this project. A fifty foot minimum turning radius has also been maintained throughout the site. Ms. Tambri Heyden July 10, 1995 Page 2 Pursuant to conditions of the previous approval, a 5 acre public park site is proposed and the land has been dedicated to the City in the southeast corner of the site and adjacent to Meadows Boulevard. A private community recreation facility of 3 acres in size has been incorporated in the interior of the site which will include a minimum of 5 amentities, The current approved plan for Knollwood Groves has no proposed landscape buffers, and only one setback has been identified on the west side of the property adjacent to the previously approved multi-family, The proposed plan for Nautica Sound will incorporate landscape buffers surrounding the entire perimeter of the project with the smallest buffer being 15' wide. The previously approved plan consisted of 22 acres of open space. The proposed master plan for Nautica Sound reflects a total of 30,97 acres of open space which amounts to a 70% increase in the amount of open space proposed. Attached with this letter is a comparison of impacts for the project. You will note that in all areas, this project will reduce impacts from that previously approved, especially in areas of water and sewer capacity and population. Attached with this application is a full traffic statement which will be reviewed and approved by both the City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County priorto the Technical Review Committee Meeting. Also included with this submittal are conceptual engineering plans, landscape plans, and typical lots, If you have any questions or concerns in regards to this applicaiton or if you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me, Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project. Sincerely, ,{CtL-tltl I dtlt[0~1~ Karyn I. Janssen Kilday & Associates, Inc. Enclosures KIJ/cdd\cheyden. 710 cc: Alan Fant; GL Homes Larry Portnoy; GL Homes Rick Elsner; GL Homes Walter Keller; Walter Keller & Associates, Inc. Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble Received By: Date: ~-I ~~ u.O_ WO:~ '1"1 a.. + \.J a.. - z~ ~I-- Ien ()~ o I-- ::> z a.. w-l en~ ~ w~ 0: 0:- W o..~ en CO 0: ::> ::> en z z -I o ~ I-- 0 Z 0: >- a.. o a.. CO ~ I-- I-- e: en ~ ~ B ~ z o en 0: ~ a.. ~ o o I-- () ~ ~ o ~ e: 0 a.. I-- () W a e: a.. g~ " >- + <D 2: :J en <D '- - () c:tl C\I CD ,- ,- ,- ~ CD f'o.. ,- ,- ,- <D C>> c:tl <D '- () ~ <D - iJ) c:tl - o I-- ro 0> 0> ,- 1.0 o ,- I CD co 0> CD 0> CD '-+('1) + ' v ('I) v CD co CDvO ,-C\I 0> ('I) 1.0 00> o 1.0 CD ,-('1) C <D "E c:tl C) - en ::> o - '- o - "'0 C c:tl <D en :J _ o >- ..c= c E ~ c:tl OLL 1--.,6 'S .CDg Q) "~~ ID Cc en <D .- __ en ::> I--c-l--'- o<:J (5 ~ 55 <D .~ (5 -I ..c E ~ ~-Ie~~ ~ o 0 I~~~~ ~ en :~ C ::> 0> c <D ~ o c:tl - o I-- o en 'U'-~ <Do__ ..c_--' ()-'U c:tl .- <D :t::8:t:: c:tl ..c ,- Q) x E Q)w,- (j) Q) a.. en ~'-~ ..cQ::> () c:tl:~ "'0 :t::..o<D c:tl .- :t:: ..c ,_ <D X E <DW,- (j) <D a.. en ~ o ~ 1.0 co ,- I o v ('I) X..f "~ II c en :J _ vI- ~~ o ,- en ~ o ~ 1.0 o 1.0 v () ~ I- o a.. C) o 1.0 ('I) CD- C\I I xll~ enOC) -:J a.. 0 'UC)CD v 0 ,-- ('I)f'o..f'o.. vC\l'- ,- o x II a.. _en 0 C) :Jo..o 'UC)('I) LO 0> 0 - ('I)f'o..LO LOC\lV ,- "'0 C c:tl E <D o '- <D ro ~ o a.. C) o o o ,- C\I I x II 0 a.. _en 0 C) :Jo..o 'UC)0 vOCD ('I) 0 - VC\l~ o x II a.. enoC) -:J a.. 0 'UC)O 0> 0 CD_ C')Of'o.. LOC\lO ,- "'0 c c:tl E <D o '- <D ~ <D en en c o en '- <D a.. ('I) co C\I I en c o CDC') V ~C\lC\lC') <DC\lVV a.. en c o ~ <D a.. LO CD o v <DOLO+ ,;;,. C\I I ::;.' I ,- LO -.OC\lLO ,- en c oC')COO> enCDC\lC') Q5C\1LOLO a.. en c o en '- <D a.. ~ ('I) v <DO>LO+ ,;;,.,- I ::;..OLO -.OC\lLO ,- t5 "'0 o~ 'U~ 0>1- -() 0> oc:tl C ,- en 'U-..c :t:: o :J-<Dc:tl :;::::;Eenoen " c:tloc..c:J<D(i) :J ~ <D <D ..cO <D - 0.. 0 en en <D 0"'0 :J,--Q) 0.. <D . 0 Q) Q)..c c ..c..c 0.. :s en ~ "E ~ '- en 0> c:tl <D'-<D<Dc-+=ro Z 2co 0..0 <D'U "Q) en~> <D ..... C C <D .- "'0 -'-'00 -c o'U-eno..~c:tl zC5-Q5~<Den I c:tl 0 0..C\I en c c'UCO.... cO o <D I~ "'0 0 ,- "_- '- '- C\I Q) () ro ... .- 0 . N - ~:J-C\l:=<D:J :J 0" en en''+:; '- () o..()c<D:JOc:tl oc:tl:Jro<DEo a.. 5 0 "~ ~ c:tl C "'0 ,_ 0 "'0 - _ 0 <D - C '-<D () ,- _ c:tl en .- <D ro ()E:Jrn>-- <D en ~-" <D - :J '0' 0 c ~ ~ ~ 0.. 0..'- C oQ) CD 0 0 0 . LO ..c _ a.. NAUTICA SOUND, P.U.D. Projected Population Calculations 1990 Census of Boynton Beach Total Population 46,194 Aqe Population % of Population 0-20 21 - 54 55 + 9,721 18,204 18,269 21 39 40 434 d.u.'s x 2.5 persons per household 1085 Persons Aqe = 228 Persons 423 Persons 434 Persons 0-20 21 - 54 55 + .21 x 1085 .39 x 1085 .40 x 1085 = = TOTAL 1085 Persons Above based on % of population age brackets, as determined by 1990 Census counts. L 1990 Census of Population and Housing 040 Florida 050 Palm Beach County 140 Tract 58.03 Total population.............................................. -- SEX Male. Female. . AGE Under 5 years. 5 to 17 years. 18 to 20 21 to 24 25 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85 years and over. Median age........ Under 18 years.......... Percent of total population, 65 years and over.............., Percent of total population. HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households... Family households (families). Married-couple families.... Percent of total households. Other family, male householder. Other family, female householdel'. Nonfamily households... ........,.. Percent of total households. Householder living alone......,. Householder 65 years and over. Persons living in households. Persons per household........ GROUP QUARTERS Persons living in group quart('['s... Illstitutiollalized persons....... Other persons in group quarters. RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN White-. Black. Percent of total population. American IlIdil1l1, Eskimo, 0[' Aleut.. Percent of total population. Asian or Pacific Islander...... Percent of total population. Other race.................... Hispanic origin (of any race). Percent of total population. years. . years. . . . . . . years. years. years. years. . years. . years. . . . L Page 1 6,189 3,004 3,185 433 679 180 342 2,334 674 296 351 597 221 82 35.6 1,112 18.0 900 14.5 2,671 1,826 1,486 55.6 101 239 845 31. 6 634 162 6,074 2.27 115 115 o 5,401 644 10.4 3 0.0 81 1.3 60 386 6.2 1990 Census of Populat_ _., Al_ousing 0'0 Florida 160 Boyn~on Beach city Total population...........,............,..................... SEX Hal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r...l.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AGE Under 5 y.ars..........................................,.......... 5 to 17 year............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 t,o 20 y.ars......................,............................. 21 to 24 year.................................................... 2S 'to 44 year........... I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 to 54 years................................................... 55 to 59 years................................................... 60 to 64 years...................,........""....."".""..".""..... 65 to '74 y.ars................................................... 75 to 84 years................................................... 85 y.ars and over.............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hedian ag.............................................. . . . , , . . . . . Under 18 years...................................................... P.rc.nt of total population...................................... 65 years and over.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percent of total population...................................... HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE To~al households.................................................... P_ily households (f_ilies)..................................... Harried-couple f_ilies....................................... Perc.n~ of total households................................ Ot.her t_ily, .ale householder................................ Other f_ily. feaale householder.............................. Monf_ily households.................. . .... .... ........ .. .. .. . . .. Percent of total households................................ Householder living alone......................... .... . . . . . . . . . Householder 65 years and over. .... ... .. ... . .. . ..... . . . . .. . . Persons living in households..................................... Per.ona per household...................""......""......".. . " . " . . . CROUP QUARTERS Persons living in group quarters................................. Institut.ionalized persons........,............................ Ot.her person. in group quart.ers..........".. " . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN ,. 'Whi te. . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . " . . " . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . " . . " . . . . . " Black. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . " . Percen~ of total population................................... Aaerican Indian. Bskimo, or Aleut................................ Perc.nt. of total populat.ion................................... A.ian or Pacific Islander......................................... P.rcen~ of total population.................................... Other rac.............................................................. Hispanic origin (of any rac.)...............................,.... Percent. of tot.al population................................... , , Page 1 46,194 21,575 24,619 2,695 5,710 1,316 1,980 12,544 3,680 1,890 2,382 6,527 6,044 1,426 42.7 8,405 18.2 13,997 30.3 20,292 12,983 10,363 51.1 696 1,924 7,309 36.0 6,090 3,856 45,608 2.25 586 515 71 35,912 9,296 20.1 52 0.1 290 0.6 644 3,124 6.8 ,-,. LATEST APPROVAL PermUted Uses In a pun District, buildings, or structures, or land, or water shall be used only for the following purposes: A. Single-family dwellings; B. Two-family dwellings or duplexes; C. Multiple-family dwellings, townhouses, garden apart- ments and cluster housing; D. Private, nonprofit clubs, community centers, civic and social organization facilities; E. Private parks, tennis courts, playgrounds, putting greens, golf courses, driving ranges and other recreation facilities; F. Public utility buildings, structures, and facilities necessary to service the surrounding neighborhood; G. Houses of worship, schools, nursing homes, nursery schools, kindergartens and hospitals; H. "Neighborhood" commercial uses which are deter- mined at the time of zoning to pun, to be compatible with the existing and future development of adjacent and nearby lands outside the pun; 1. Other uses of a nature similar to thOle listed, after determination and recommendation by the planning and zoning board, a determination by the governing body at the time of zoning that the use or uses are appropriate to the pun development; J. Permitted uses for a pun District shall be specified in the application for zoning of land to pun classifica- tion. K. Prohibited use. Any structure more than forty.five (45) feet in height and more than four (4) stories. L. Home occupations consistent with appendix A, section 11.D. are permitted without the necessity of being specified at the time of zoning to P.U.D. COrd. No. 8945, ~ 4, 12-5-89) PRESENT SUBMITTAL Permitted Uses In a POD District, buildings or structures, or land, or wa:e~ shall be used only for the following purposes: A. Single-family dwellings; B. Two-family dwellings or duplexes; C. Multiple-family dwellings, townhouses, garden apartments and cluster housing; D. Private, nonprofit clubs, community centers, civic and social organization facilities; E. Private parks, tennis courts, playgrounds, putting greens, gold courses, driving ranges and other recrea:io~ facilities; F. Public utility buildings, structures, and facilities necessary to service the surrounding neighborhood; G. Houses of worship, schools, nursing homes, nursery schools, kindergartens and hospitals; H. "Neighborhood" commercial uses which are determined at the time of zoning to PUD, to be compatible with the existing and future development of adjacent and nearby lands outside the PUD; I. Other uses of a nature similar to those listed, after determination and recommendation by the pla~~ing and development board, a determination by the governing body at the time of zoning that the use or uses are appropriate to the PUD development. J. Permitted uses for a PUD District shall be specified in the application for zoning of land to PUD classification. K. Prohibited use. Any structure more than forty-five (45) feet in height and more than four (4) stories. L. Home occupations consistent with Chapter 2, Section 11,D. are permitted without the necessity of being specified at the time of zoning to PUD. 1. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-421 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and zoning Director FROM: Michael E. Haag Zoning and site Administrator DATE: August 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Nautica Sound - MPMD 95-006 Master Plan Modification (Request to amend the previously approved PUD master plan to omit the day care use, modify access points, change the type of units and lot size form 150 single-family detached units on 6,000 square foot lots and 389 multi- family units to 246 zero-lot-line units on 5,000 square foot lots 188 "Z" lot-line units on 4,000 square foot lots, and reduce the front setback front 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to one another.) 1. Identify the appropriate setback dimension at the rear of all lots along the east and northwest property lines. The setback shall be the same as required in the abutting zoning district. considering the land located in Palm Beach County along the northwest property line is being annexed into the city at the R-lAAB zoning classification, it is recommended that the setback of the lots along this property line where the subject development abuts residential or proposed residential land have a 25 foot rear setback. The proposed 25 foot rear setback matches the rear setback for the R-lAAB zoning district. Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 feet will be increased to 25 feet. A further requirement along the northwest property line is to have the setback for the lots number 22 to 29 that abut the C-3 Community commercial zoning be changed from the proposed 25 feet to 30 feet. Thirty feet is the setback required for property C-3 zoning when it abuts a residential zoning district. The setback required along the east property line is 40 feet this setback matches the setback of the adjacent multi-family project. It is recommended that the setback along the northeast property line be established at 40 feet. Therefore the setback along the entire east property line will be 40 feet. [Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development, Section 9. B.] 2. Redesign the zero-lot-line and "Z" project to show single- family lots with a minimum lot frontage of sixty (60) feet and a minimum lot area of six thousand (6,000) square feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 3. Change the front building setback from the proposed twenty (20) feet at the garage and fifteen (15) feet at the building to twenty (20) feet for all lots. Establish the rear building setback for all double frontage lots as twenty (20) feet. Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot rear building setback on all back to back lots and maintain the proposed ten (10) foot rear building setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 4. Change the side building setback for the non zero side of the zero-lot-line units from the proposed ten (10) feet to fifteen (15) feet and specify a fifteen (15) foot building separation setback between the sides of all "Z" lot units. Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot corner side building setback. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. Page 2 Memorandum # 95-421 Nautica Sound MPMD 95-006 5. Change the side pool and screen enclosure setback from twelve (12) feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen enclosures to fifteen (15) feet for the non zero side of the zero-lot-Iine units and specify a fifteen (15) foot side pool and screen enclosure separation for all "Z" lots. Maintain the proposed seventeen (17) foot corner side setback for pools and fifteen (15) foot for screen enclosures. Maintain the proposed ten (10) foot rear pool setback for back to back lots and maintain the seven (7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain the proposed five (5) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly. 6. Show on the plans the off-site roadway improvements required as a result of the City's and/or Palm Beach County's evaluation of the traffic conditions. 7. It is recommended that a dense landscape buffer be provided along the interior lot lines of the project. It is further recommended that the tree and shrub landscape material be native material and installed prior to the completion of the first house that has a landscape buffer easement located on the lot. The dense landscape buffer shall be shown on the plans and be depicted as clumps of 6 to 8, eight foot tall canopy trees (mahogany or oak) then approximately 30 feet away a clump of 6 to 8, seven gallon size bushy (wax myrtle) shrubs. The buffer shall also have a continuous hedge (florida privet) running along the entire property line i however, the hedge may form a meandering shape from above. All of the tree and/or shrub material shall be maintained uncut and the hedge material shall be maintained at 5 to 6 feet in height. The bushy hedge material plants may count for the no net less of trees as described in the forester's memorandum no. 95-356. 8. Revise the plans to show a Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress to the project. The Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress was original approved for the project to divert trips to surrounding roadways. 9. On sheets 4 of 8, 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from note #3 the text "or building". 10. On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 amend the text shown on the perimeter detail drawings, at the rear landscape easement to read as follows: "Width of landscape buffer easement and other easements, where applicable." 11. On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 change the title of the perimeter landscape buffer easement detail drawing to "Perimeter lots". 12. Amend the double asterisk note found on sheet 6 of 8 to read as follows: "Subj ect to rear perimeter landscape buffer easement and other easements, where applicable." 13. On sheet 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from Accessory Building note #3 the following text "pergolas and gazebos". Also define trellis as "A free standing structure maximum height of 6 feet located only behind the front building setback line with a configuration having a height and length and no depth (example - similar to a fence." Page 3 Memorandum # 95-421 Nautica Sound MPMD 95-006 14. On sheet 6 of 8 move the 15 foot corner side setback symbol to the corner of the building. 15. Please note that association documents are required for the project. The documents are reviewed by staff and the legal department and required prior to final plat approval. [Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development, Section 2. D.] 16. A revised master plan, which reflects all staff comments and conditions approved by the City Commission and the Planning and Development Board, shall be suhmitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning Department, prior to initiating the platting process. MEH:dim xc: Central File a:Nautice.SDZ \ KllUy It Aaoclat.. Landscape Architectsl Planners 1551 Forum Place Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592 August 30, 1995 Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Nautica Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up Our File No: 1020.13 Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag, Attached please find twelve revised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15, 1995. For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P,U.D. Included with this resubmittal is a Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks, This amended plan should address the major concerns of members on the City Commission, The following is an overview of the modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan. 1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet. In turn, the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from 89 to 59 lots. The number of lots in the 5,000 to 6,000 square foot range has been increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424 which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of 539 units. The breakdown between zero and "Z" lots has also been altered, There are now 21 more zero lot line units than previously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have been eliminated. 2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upsize the facilities to accommodate a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The lift station is located in the southwest corner of the top portion of the site. In order to provide a more amenable plan for the City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated. Ms. Tambr; Heyden Mr. Mike Haag August 3D, 1995 Page 2 In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Hallihan regarding this issue and I believe the attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant material will be native and, as indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design. Attached with this letter is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project. Sincerely, ~I~ Karyn I. Janssen Kilday & Associates, Inc. cc: Alan Fant, GL Homes Larry Portnoy, GL Homes Rick Elsner, GL Homes Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble I ~ \ ~ l ~ \ lD - -- IITie City of '.Boynton '.Beac/i .' @.,OO'r.,'"'''Y''''''''.StIllr.'&1""vard .., , _ P.O. ~o.{JIO · , r.. ". ,_'" 'lI/Jy",.." '1f(lUli, 'J(ori4.l JJ.,25-0JIO '::':'" " ",' . l"jty;H;u:(: .407}iJ.,.81 U -__ :1":U: ,..,Oil iJ6,US9 OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR March 13, 1991 Attn: Ms. Anna Cottrell Urban Design studio ~OOO Palm Beach Lat.. Blvd. Suite 600, The Concourse West Palm Beach, Fl 33409-6582 RE: Knollwood Groves Master Plan Modification - File No. 570 Dear Ms. Cottrell: Please bu advised that the City Commission at their February 19, 1991 meeting made a finding that the changes requested in the pod boundaries, access points and unit type for the above-referenced project were not substantial in nature. Regarding the modifica- tions to the approved setbacks, lot size and lot width, the City commission made a determination of no substantial change based on your consent to comply with the following minimum standards: 1. 6,000 square foot lot size 2. 60 foot lot width 3. 20 foot front yard setback 4. 15 foot side yard setback on the non-zero lot line 5. 15 foot rear yard setback 6. An 8 foot pool and screen enclosure setbilck The Planning and Zoning Board at their Harch 12, 1991 meeting made a final determination on this request, including compliance with the minimum standards stated above, by approving this modification to the Kn01lwood Groves PUD master plan, subject to the attached staff comments. These comments shall be addressed on the submission plans for preliminary plat approval. Pursuant to Appendix a-Planned Unit Developments, Section 10.a.3, approval of this master plan modification and PUD zoning will expire on September 12, 1992 if a preliminary plat has not been submitted. An extension to the master plan approval for a maximum period of one year, may be filed not later than 60 days after the expiration of the master plan, November 12, 1992 (Chapter 19, Section 19-92 of the. Code of Ordinances). Ixt.nllon. mu.t b. til.d with the P1annin9 Department bY SUbmitting a letter of extension for review by the Concurrency Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Board. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at (407) 738-7490. Very truly yours, c.t..~tI11"_ -t~ CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP Planning Director CC: f rb Encs cc: Technical Review Board ...., ''1 ~ (b t\. 1<6 ~ J _", '1 I \i fI! .. if!1 ~l I ~ l~ ~i 1'\ ~ ~\_,=!,t~:~,:~.vtl",i'~, ~ i~L=~" ~\\Ir ~ " ", " · ". ---~----~ ~....,,- '=-" ~t<i\ '~\__f'\~-i '::-.~P ;jr "'r- ~~,. \\1\' r l~\ :\ m'i~ ':\ ,.,' ~JJ "\ "",'r-;" 1\ ~,"', ~\l\ : : e,; : P \~\i: GLl ;.: \ \' ~l' \ \ ~,.~ \ ' \\~\i\ \ \ I . ," I'" · .: ,~:. · 1:1: ~tl:i ~- . \ \ l ,lla Q 1_ ( "..\ ]l\iF Lt' -') I ~.a\ ..\.~ . :" I ", .:;~: . \ · " .... v ,.' ". ,I' i " ,.: ~.. ,~.. :""C' ...~.. .~. ~.; .... ,.,. .". .., II \' r \\ I · ~)i. ~I(\~. : i: :r;;':/;'Vl;'\ n ',; ,;,;;' ~ ;~~ J~ ~ \; ~ \\ \ I .\\' ~ ~ =- · )~.~ .., \ ~. ~ ii-'- 'c'--' , __~--...- ,'''>Y~ o. \ ." ...... rh · ~ "". ". ,.,.' ...,; \. . 0<i.,'P-:' i ~ ,~..,,~,>., \ [---., ~ . 1\ ,.,":' ~ ". \ '\ ..~ \X:-1 ~:" \\,\~. \' \ i'..~. ~l ~.. . ,',." ~. .,~ ~';"'-' \ ,I 'II \;1 II ...,' 'Wy). . / 't" . \ 'il \,! ~\\~~ \ -_!;-~:"~-:t~;-~' -. ':'~l~r~ ~ :~..,~ ,:, ~i~:;,'~ \~~,\\\ U\ Wi" . \ ",', : 1\ ~~ ' I"" \ " ~ ~ " ' -it. \ ' ....' ..' ' , ,/," ~ ... "~ ,a . .. h\ ~'_ '. J< ." ,,' ,..' ,',,"." . ' d \11' ' ~ I~'\ ;~ . ~ <'-1--;::0" '" ' .....' i i\;n-:- \'~ l~ ~\ \~ t\\"'!.!. \\~ h r'a \ \ \ , . ":. ~: ~ '."":,,,..' ',;. .;;,' II II\- i: F~~t '" 1\\ \\'\'\\~~ ~:~ ,....' .'~ _H .,~ ,~., · 'C 11>.\" ," , ' .....,. . . . .. ' ,\,'" ~ " ". \\/./ \ \' ~,. 1\ ~\ \ ' . ;\'~~"~ ,;h. :___'\ . if ::f: :, ~r""~ 1:-:" '. '\L i · ;~\ I \ ~\ ~: \\.'~~~ :=~";~i*-J:~:t:I:, 3{'i~' (!).'~C1~i1jj: Jl~!tP1J:fJ:1!1. ~~~\ \, \ ~i ~~. .... . ,,; ','1.,; \. ., ,,'.. ,,,' _ . '-' . ~ -' .... , ..' " ;i, ,U,~,j,,;\"'" ' " , , " ,." I~ ." ./..... I'" ':'f.:t"~ ~;"".><' ~ ,"'" .."- ~ ,....,""'. . - ,- ' -'- . -= . -""011' ," \ ' , ~". _....!" . p ~'r .pi ': \ '. .,,, . ,c'':''':'; .." ,.". ' .'" (,'n'1" ,"IT' ",\,',' ,," " ,,' ,\ _~\I . \ ~ \~\-'/?X~"" ., _:.':_ i \': E:l:EQ - "1:>1 ~ .,"':: \": ~:,,:,". 0 .~'~.. .~.~... OJ" · .\"lltfY,~\.'i \ ' \'~ ';;i;\'''' . .' .' , ' "",,- p':' ''',' ' ''''~ ~. I ' "nl ", .' .,."". . ., ~ \. tllQ ....~. . .,..... r ' "'\' \ .... ,.,-,/.'" "'., . ;,.,." i:; ,-.. .:~ ''i- ."t, i ." ' ., \ I ,,'\I : \;\ \~~'~' . <~;;.;:,;>. . >~:"",,'~l~~~:~ 7r::'<)J~', ~,,~~~~-:~ ~~~;0~:;" \ \; ~\\ ~\~~ .t', ',''$i' .:'...; ." .\ /,~,".' .' .....Il~ "" ;;,,, ~. i" ".', Ir;;" ...\ : 'c ..\' ;~ " ~.. <; ~~ . . ,'-, .~,~,)~,;:,., /. . '.' u __ .;,.;' '~~l:; j~ :". .. .,:\ ...... .: ;r .j' ", 'l\~'\\\ ~t ,\ ' ~~.,~' 7i11'a'" ,'. / i\ l~\ \ \ '\"ll--! :~. ~ r-'l"\t\~ \ \-.-;: \~~~\l::JI"\ ~'\ ~~ \ ~/''''-,:.Jjl 'lrk.-~/ ~\;", ~ ~' 1 .,~ 'ill. 'c,.. \ : · .~" ':>' .z1", ~t \ .-.-1 ~ ~ .. ~ ' ,\, (, i' .' \ r;~' ~b;. I' --~, -~ ' ! " II \ ~ ~,' I '0: , c'-- .... ~ " \ .1' ~ ,\,~'~~J~" :, 7--;-0- ~ ,..-\11 _...,,/1 ',.?i . \, ,>>-' ,,' · ,:" .' .I-'-W TO'" ,,~..' · ,'. ':.' -' ':., . ,\ . ~ i>>"~O'" \ ,. ...-',.,.... " " I'" .. '" ."."..,. ~'1 .' · ~'" ", ~ ~ ',~ ~~ . (\\\ . :: ~\i-tll J ,,~ ~ " ~.:,...'1ii: ~ \ ,;: · y~ }\r-",' ~ .~:\3 :.;.7 ~ ':~, .'""; ~ \ , '" \\. \\ , ... ~ ' . . , ~ '-' . '1':0" ' . ~" ~ ~ ' ~ ~ \ \ ~~\ ~ ~~i~ 'y\ \'\~ i\~;:' ~r.- :. .....-- __,-1.~,r.: 1,\ ',; '. ,~,,\;'\ ~~ ,~~,: ;..1' I \t\\:, " " * ,..." '. ,\I .'" ;;.-_ .r, ~1 .;, \::, ,:\.'\'::'" --- __J · '\ .,'. ,4 \ ~., I , (, _ . ~.. co.!. ,..,,,.\ ~v' . . . . . , ' . . .... · ''', ,... ;r:n.f.f. .",..,' "" ,ill.' . J J"'~; \\H~ \ \'\ /.ffintr;;:-'I:~'--;~--~:-:~-:;~-~-::~'~~~~:~;~1~~'r~I~'~oo;'~;i'ff:~-[J-~/l~~~l :,.\~\\!\\ \ ~,,~"J:4 d~LJ,'.' ~\'.: · · : ' .~.~'~.~ .~ .:f; .1;;'; ; , · .. " ;.;; ';.; ; .; ;V; ;; · ,"If' , ~ ,I I- U - '--~C -- - · ' --' ">' . t'" , i\\ .' i'" .-,,! P .m'~"""~ ,-,,"~...._-' ' ...,'<"~\. 1,\ /\ 1\ ~t~. ,"' r " \ \ II ~ ~o i\~ i ~ ~ i' " \' . l\I' ~ t \ :a III 11'1 II i\ :\\i\ : 't'> 5 Z .8'" " w' ~~ ~ \j!. II! ~ ..~. - \. Ii'" r- 0 0 ~ .' ...\ · I ~ \, - .... "\ ,.". m u .. fi 'I ' " ,~. · · 1...f ~;f:\~ ., " ~ ,~ ' ,,' . :>- . ,,;.' 6 )% L '" ' '. .,--- - - '" ' . I o -, ,~ \ <. ' ,~" ,\ \ ' o - 'l'i'G'!$6 ttli~'\ vtl\\\ $ , Y~ i;~; l~ii U~ \'i'~ \ ':l ~H~~l.lb~~~\i V!~! -H; ["\ .h~ . .._~ h!l \ li.i ,s,~'ll" · t~lt n \'i~4 lli~i' _ \'l I tit \ \.~ L~it lit'r\ 1 .t <.t S~!i\i .t 1 " ~. · . "l . I i i ~\\dJOY " A"IDC\O... LandScape ArChl,.ct,/PIOt\rt.U '5~' for\.lrT' place !loull- \Ou/t. we1-' po'lTI e.ocp, FlOrlOO ~~ (401) 1j6q_~S-::2 ofOJI:{40i\ f 1Il1l'flCl801J1ID ,$.l. Ka.Il..... G..... p.1l.D, cOol<<: ~ ~ I)a\(' \.lr..n kt~ . <no t~:"~I~~-1:~ .,,~.~ .--- R<"yn\on }W\\ch flondtt "'8~\ l'r ~11 r ...'al) --- Z lJl'" VI!..)..... '?; 0"- Cr-O .... Q _.Jo'" :J g. 5. ~ ~~ C' ~ 0 ~ y, ~.g I ~.-g o tI _:l I ~ .'0 Oft u. I Z -s - !: ~?:: ~ ()\ ~. ~ ~ : " ~. ;;:t :l I? ~,~ -:. CO :;-".)- , ~ 0 ?. a; 1 (t ~ 9-;~ g ~~ o~i i:g~ g":~ o.o.~ _c .,. .~ n :f ~ g f .'t ... :r:!CJf ~~ ~ 0. " .. .. I -0 _. ~ ~ ~ " :.;c it Co 0.1 .,. ~ 5 0. . ~~ ~." 0. _ , - -.:. \11 ~ o '7 ~ .. - ~ a III ~ ~ g ~'~ ~ ~ 3 ~.:) a::: ,'0 ';:'" : [ v' , ~ .11 ==- ~ ~ . , .. , 0. ~~ S ~ J .::. _0' ? ' % 9' ;;; ~ , 0. , , a , c 3 ~ , " , 0 -'0. g ~ ,., ~ ,., 3 '" ~ ~ rf ~ CD ~ ~ ~3,3 .... " 0 '" c 0'< 0 n", . lIlI _ _ " c =; ., "" ft;::;'<l !'to. Q. __3- 0.... 0 .... ~~: 3 ~;;~b e:.~~! .&~if:: 0_. '" lfl~ ~ ...... :1) g.<~.g ("\ _ =CL 1fr 3'-< 0 >:ga gOo.;: ~l3~ ~~i3 6'~~m VI _'" t) f\o ,,~ 30. .. ~ on < ~ g- 11 ~ ...:.&:sQ.. J3J ~?; 0. ~ "'!ii~ '" It\ c " D ~ ~ :> " ~ Q. Q ft. , 0. :7 ;:73 :r3 g ~ ~ ~ ~. - ~ :). ~ It ~ ~ ~.~: \ h3~S' .a ~~ g ~ ~ lit''': 0' ~ ~ ~ -<'2.:!.'& g ~ ~.!II ~ ~ i 9- ~ a cr2.E.. g ~~~ ~ ,go 3" Z ~ :-a ~ ;; a~~ o~~ :a", .. .. ",,- ..o.a -~~ ",~r . :l _' -" .. 0383 ,. .. :70 o .. a ;'~ 1~a. :l~ :5 '" 3 .. " 0.-0 -<> ~ o....g .. .,." Q.. c ;:. ... ='< 2. ~ 3 " '. ",' .. ., ~ ~ III ~ a o <;:. % 0. ;; "'l!: .. - it" " 0. 0. 00 m- co. _.~ ~.tI ~ ~ ..:I" (')~ 7C a~ ~.. i~ .~ ~.. o~ ~~ /i:"- S'. "':7 n5: ai ~iA c. "'.. 0.'" <0 "!" ;;.., ;~ 0. ~o. -~ ",0 ..-. a~ oc: 0.. ~~. .. o !. a= 0. ;ig' -n cag ,," " ~ ~ " C a.~ .. ",0. .. ~!. 0.- ~,,- .... q .. .. ~ 3 ~ % Q :7 0. a. 3 .. ~ " <:. ~ 3' '" .. .. c;: " ~ o 0. ;; ~ CT .. o 6' . .. "- l> .. D <:. ;; 3 ~ .. ~ ~~~~I~ci'~ ~ ~:2=~~~ ~ '2 ~~g g~'2. ~ 3 () 0 U'l.... :e .., 11 ,:J a:1~>~ :e ~ ~~.. ~ ~ :i' .~I" .. ~ N-g.~ Q :- ~~I~ I~ U'&.~ ,,-,,- ~ " '" o o c n -< n ~ ,., Cl o :0 ~ Z 1> C -\ o 1> (f) o 2 o '1J t: 9 (f) -\ 1> b 1> iQ o (f) g*,~ ~a:1!' ~ n'~ .&'f~ ~f.~ ~'P%: 2>.., 'tl gHI "':....~ ig'~ ;~.~ ---l"\ < 9..lS f "'i ~ '< Q 0 V't '" !:- f: tit g ~ :70 .. .... -~ "':l Q ~ -.. "'i! ;; .. ii .. "l N ,., '" o gS _VI "" c 5:~ 3'S' ~ ~. '~ ~ S'VI ~'g 30 .. OD :>C "g " .. ~o ",0. -a: 00. "'- !O.. "" .. g; ~ 3 5' 3' c 3 ilo 8 (; e: .. ~ o ;; 8 B g ~ NN:O"'f"""~ lj; -0 . . 0. 0 -. ~~ :0 J:J [o~1fZ ~ :z ,., '" 3'" ..., 0 Z ~ C ~ .. ~g,a.~ ~ '" :0 0. ~ > ~ n c I E ~ n :- ~ ti:g.-"!il ~ 3 ." ;;- ,., 0 ... VI .. .. _t~o5'~ ~'" 0 - , '" . % i __C\ Cl '" VI " '" ~ o-~(JlI 0'0 erO ottOO o::_~~gc; '" ..8 ~ 5 '< c: ~ n. g .. g~:~ :H~ ~C~.... ..- g en 2t't"" ~ '0 ~ "" ':7 2,$ ~ '" 0 ~ ~o .. t~~~ .. g"3 ~.; 0" ~~);:la ii'~ ., ~ :7 n [~gtD i ii" 5" CD n" :5 m 0. :> 0.:.., a ~s ~ ~ '< '" ~~ig~ 0" -Q.'PS ~ a &. ~. .. '0" .. ,., .. " -" . .!1.S 3'1. .. -0. .. 0. o \) 0 0 .. 2.g''72 ~~~g""~ I: 0 0>" H : a~ 3 ~.i;:. ~ _0. ~'t~g ,,0 ,., .g !;-: ~-< n. ~- 3..~ "'00 Q. _ tJ -05' ... i'~ ~ ~a~ i:;1.-1g t'~~6 '7~"~ _" "",.a ~ " !:: ~c 9.0 ~~g~. " g~-c."C ;2.&' ~ J'C 1 &..8 -a "0 "'" It-. III ".. 0.- o e . ~:::r. ~ ~aA._ fI, 3'C ~o _~:I .. -0. 0 i~. ..- 3';- f: -;; II "g~Ci g= ".. ~~o' ~"'=~ .gs..a[ ~:J~ ~ 3 ,,' 0 ~g ;l"~ i;:~i' i-.c t.. :,.~ ~ ~~2 i.~ '-I a ~". ~ i e. ~ -, jiH " - {.a ln~ Ii: :- :;;-< "- p% ~~ l= 113:,- : D ..-::~ .. h~.~ i-no. y [till i~~~~ ~i ; :-'0: ~~: g:- ..- la ...." ~.& :: 0 _.0 0.., a Ii. '-'::3= ~! "-0 e~", l~l~ "r' c::_. ~3 .' CII ~ 12.:.j g i;1 m i~ a "a!\ ~ -or ooi ~ -& p~ ~ 0 I" t...." [I !i';r ,!f ' r w,- lz, ~ gQ J:J iio a oil> lu" " h 1_ .3: i'S;[[ :::'~ '7-~ ~ .. 0 i . :7 ~ ft,. II .~Oi'~ a:::1i . 0..... ." 00. .7:> ..,2 -- o~'O d: '7 .z < ",0 ~ ~.&'." 3- .00 ... 0.":< t ~~g1 o -1!.~ _z, ... .. o -~ It .- ,-," <;>'2. ..-t;a.. ): . lS:",S!. .!! S'~ .3 __ : ~ :ri "- ty;' 0"00.- ,,- .. ~~= .., ,i ~~fi 0.0 , g.~Q.g ,&'!3' ,,0 I.~[~ . ~ c., 0 ~.. ~o ~ !:~~a ~ "- "-.. ;; .. ;; 3 "'~ .- 0..., Z ~:&.~ =:< _3 ;; "0 . 0.., CA"' ;:.: Dotr~ 0. < ~o. !~.g~ . ~!!. . ~. ~']: ~ ..'" ... 5'Q 0 " 0 .. .. .. ~. S" ~.i~ a. :-0 ~~ ..,.. ." ~ 1:- __0 " t 0- ~ ... ~lt_ a" ~i;'g~ 00'- ;[i :>'0. a a."g:>> s: .. c: ~ 3 0' - .'" "- ~ .. :i[ "30. 0:7 ~'a a. o~::=o .. a:- 0 ~ :;Q~ --~g: -.. _i5:- .. < 3 n ..,- i;a=' [.S: II! ~!.I "rrCTfr 0. 2:2.- ::.< 2- . ~ eM 3' ~:.a .,.~.i- ~ " .. C 3':~~ g: !-< t 3 ;; .. a> co l"~ 0:" ~-~ ~ 00... ~~l~' Et~ ... 0 1~;Z :S' 0 [[ nn'" 1 .. ,,0 .. e C co ~~~ "P."" ~Q." ~ ~:~~ 00 ~ a ~~~ "'~ gi 5'.. go .. it ~::: n n _..n ~ 0 .. o' o ca... :>. ....:) '" lQ ;:;. . .. 0. 0. " e --- ~ ;:'0..:: 0."- 1:-::;~ 0." ii' ~ ~ :;~ go.~ .. 2- ?> , .. .. 0. 0 '< .2- " ~ 0. ~ '& :: ~ 3' 1iCC;-'" g o~ "-o~ .. :3i 0 " ..0 3 '< ~ 25' i i~ 0- ~o. .-- 3- ~= 0. ~i S" 0. " " ":7 ;; ~ " . .. !l :o;tI ~ li .-~_._~~----------_....- -_.- - "! r o ~U; " " I .1: 0' ~~ s.~ g-3 S:!" ~'8 3~ 2:5 3 ;; " 3;; oS!. i~ n" g..< g~. 0. - "'- ~ 2- .. N' .. .. q 2. ~o..o>:",~q 8 ~ '" ." (}'I....'" uo q ~~ ~ a S!. 7 '" o "'... -,;;:~"; o ...t...... 0 ~ .. a: .. .. 2. '" q '" o .. .. c;: 0. o ,.. .. & ~ ~ ~ .. " o ,,- ~ 0. . 3 :f 3' c: 3 N o o .. f ~ ii' "- 9- !!. E X H I BIT "E" J;A