CORRESPONDENCE
'..:..",V},'
7 .B. 2
NAUTICA SOUND f.k.a. KNOLLWOOD GROVES (PUD)
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-492
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
FROM: Tambri J. HeYden~~ ' Q Kle-;;~
Planning and Zoning Director ~~ ,
DATE: September 8, 1995
SUBJECT: Nautica Sound (Knollwood Groves) - MPMD 95-006
Revise access points and unit type (replace mult-family
with single-family detached units) and reduce lot size
and front, side and rear setbacks
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for Meadows Groves, Inc. and R. Bradford
Arnold, trustee, is requesting to approval to modify the previously
approved master plan for the Knollwood Groves PUD (to be renamed to
Nautica Sound), as described in the attached report (Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 95-484). Nautica Sound is to be located on
the east side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet south of
Hypoluxo Road.
After staff review, requests for master plan modifications are forwarded
to the City Commission, prior to forwarding to the Planning and
Development Board, for a determlnation that the changes requested are
either substantial in nature or not substantial in nature. This request
went before the city Commission on August 15, 1995. At this meeting the
Commission stated that a determination of nonsubstantial could be made
only if the minimum lot size of those lots that were 4,000 square feet
were increased to a minimum of 4,500 square feet (76 "Z" lots were
affected) and if 13 "Z" lots that were a minimum of 4,500 square feet
were increased to a minimum of 5,000 square feet. Lastly the applicant
had to remedy the problems raised by the Utilities Department.
Commission action was tabled to the September 5, 1995 meeting to allow
the applicant to revise his drawings and submit the changes to staff t~
review.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the applicant's compliance with the Commission's provisos, the
City Commission, at their September 5, 1995 meeting removed the request
from the table. with a unanimous vote, the Commission made a finding of
no substantial change regarding the modifications requested. Since the
request would subsequently be forwarded to the Planning and Development
Board for approval of the technical aspects within staff's comments, the
commission agreed that because of the changes that had to be made in
order to make a determination of no substantial change that the
commission was conceding to a minimum building separation of 10 feet
rather than 15 feet, no road connection to Hypoluxo Road and no minimum
lot width. These concessions impact all staff comments, therefore it
is recommended that this request be approved, subject to the attached
staff comments in Exhibit "E" with the exclusions and revisions noted
below.
Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-485 with the
following rewording of comments 1 - 5 and 7 and deletion of comment
8 (all other comments would still apply as written):
1. show and identify the appropriate setback dimension at
the rear of all lots along the east and northwest
property lines. Note: setback for residential buildings
is the distance, measured perpendicular, from the
property line to the closest home/covered patio
(overhangs of less than 2 feet may encroach into a
setback). The setback along the northwest property line
shall be the same as required in the abutting zoning
district. Considering the land located in Palm Beach
County along the northwest property line is being annexed
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
September 8, 1995
:i
into the city at the R-1AAB zoning classification, it is
recommended that the rear setback be 25 feet for all lots
along property line where the subject development abuts
residential property, proposed residential property or
commercial property. The proposed 25 foot rear setback
matches the rear setback for the R-1AAB zoning district.
Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 or 20 feet shall be
increased to 25 feet. of the three options available to
the applicant for buffering along the northwest property
line where the subject property abuts the C-3 (Community
Commercial) zoning district, the applicant has agreed to
comply with a hedge maintained at five feet, installed at
a height of 24 inches and planted 24 inches on center.
The setback required along the east property line where
the subj ect property abuts the adj acent multi-family
development shall be 40 feet as required by Chapter 2.5 -
planned unit Development. It is recommended that parcels
in the northeast corner of the project, that abut the
adj acent unincorporated property, have a 40 foot setback.
Therefore the setback along the entire east property line
v-lill be 40 feet. Amend all plans I data and charts
accordingly. [Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit Development,
Section 9. B.]
2.
"z" lot units shall have a minimum lot frontage of 40
feet and a minimum lot area of 4,500 square feet. Zero
lot line units shall have a minimum lot frontage of 50
feet and a minimum lot area of 5000 square feet. There
appears to be a discrepancy in the information (chart vs.
drawing) that was supplied to verify the number of lots
having a minimum size required by the Commission which
needs to resolved. The allowed frontage of a lot when
shaped by a cul-de-sac or the frontage of any other
irregular shaped lot, shall be measured at the setback
line, and shall be not less than 75% of the required lot
frontage for the unit type. Amend all plans, data and
charts accordingly.
3.
Establish the rear building setback for all double
frontage lots as twenty (20) feet which shall be measured
from the rear property line. Maintain proposed fifteen
(15) foot rear building setback on all back to back lots
and maintain proposed ten (10) foot rear building setback
for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement,
common ground or recreation tract. No more than three of
the same model type shall be built next to one another.
Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
4.
Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot corner side
building setback on all lots. Amend all plans, data and
charts accordingly.
5.
Maintain a side pool and screen enclosure setback of
twelve (12) feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen
enclosures. Maintain the proposed seventeen (17) foot
corner side setback for pools and fifteen (15) foot for
screen enclosures on all back to back lots and other
corner lots. Maintain the proposed ten (10) foot rear
pool setback for back to back lots and maintain the seven
(7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake
maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract.
Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen
enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain
the proposed five (5) foot rear screen enclosure setback
fOl- all lots that abut a lake mai:1tenance easement r
common grou~d or recreation tract. Amend all plans, data
and charts accordingly.
Page 3
TO: Planning and Development Board
-3-
September 8, 1995
7. It is recommended that the landscape buffer in Exhibit
"B" be provided in a landscape buffer easement along the
interior lot lines which abut the east, north (along the
northern boundary of the northern entrance off of
Lawrence Road), and west (along lots 261 287)
perimeters of the proj ect. It is further recommended
that the tree and shrub landscape material be native and
the hedge material be native or moderate drought
tolerant. To ensure the buffer develops to form a
consistent shape, the tree and hedge buffer landscape
material for the entire buffer easement shall be
installed prior to the completion of the first house that
has a landscape buffer easement located on the lot and/or
prior to the completion of the proposed main access drive
that is located at the northwest corner of the project.
since the proj ect will be divided into two plats (a
northeast plat and a southwest plat), an alternative to
this timing of installation could be phasing by plat.
Acceptance of this alternative will be determined with
the forthcoming plat submittal or site plan submittal,
which ever comes first. Small trees and large canopy
trees within the buffer may count for the "no net loss"
of trees that are required by the tree management plan.
All material shall be located within the easement and
trees shall not be placed on a property line. Size and
type of plants shall be determined at site plan approval.
The landscape buffer along the south perimeter of the
proj ect, along Lawrence Road and along Hypol uxo Road
shall be of the detail shown on the previous submittal.
Engineering Division Memorandum No. 95-295, 95-260 - delete comment
13 and 95-345.
Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-316 - delete all comments and
replace with the following:
1. Buildings shall maintain a minimum separation of ten
feet.
Police Department Memorandum No. 0156 - delete comment 2, No. 151 -
delete all comments, except comment regarding telephone access for
secured entrances would still apply.
Building Division Memorandum No. 95-324, 95-287 and 95-270 would
still apply.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:NSoundMP
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-484
Agenda Memorandum for
September 5, 1995 city commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
city Manager
fYl!=rr
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: August 31, 1995
SUBJECT: Nautica sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves PUD - MPMD 95-006
Revise access points and unit type (replace multi-family
with s1nQle-fem11y detached units) and redue. lot size
and front, side and rear setbacks (3rd review)
NATURE OF REOUEST
Kilday and Associates, agent for Meadows Groves, Inc. and R.
Bradford Arnold, Trustee, is requesting to modify the Knollwood
Groves master plan. The 111.82 acre project, proposed for a total
of 424 single-family detached, zero.lot line and "Z" lot units, is
zoned PUD and located on the east' side of Lawrence Road,
approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road (see Exhibit "A" -
location map). The original proposed revisions, plus changes
proposed by the applicant in response to the conditions by the
Commission (for determination of non-substantial change) are as
follows (see Exhibit "B" - letter of request and proposed current
revised master plan) :
1. Omit a road onto Hypoluxo Road from which two project
entrances were planned to connect and replace it with a
project entrance onto Lawrence Road.
2. Change the type of units and lot size from 150 single-
family detached units on 6,000 square foot lots and 389
multi-family units to 267 zero lot line units on 5,000
square foot lots and 157 "z" lot line units on 4,500
square foot lots; a reduction in the total number of
units from 539 to 424 (115).
3. Reduce the lot width from 60 feet to 40 feet for "z" lot
units and to'50'feet for zero lot line units.
4. Reduce the front setback from 20 feet to 15 feet.
5. Reduce the side setback on interior lots from 15 feet to
10 feet.
6. Reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots
that do not back to one another.
7. Delete the day care center use (southeast portion of the
project) and replace with a lake.
BACKGROUND
At the August 15, 1995 city Commission meeting the request for a
master plan modification for the Nautica Sound project was tabled
to the September 5, 1995 City Commission meeting. The request was
tabled to give the applicant the opportunity to modify the master
plan to the degree that the Commission would make a finding of
non-substantial change with regards to the proposed modification as
it relates to the current approved Knollwood Groves master plan
(Exhibit "C"). Following the review of the master plan
modification presented to the Commission on August 15r 1995
(Exhibit "D"), the Commission encouraged the applicant to increase
the square foot area of at least 99 "Z" lots.
Page 2
Memorandum No. 95-484
Nautica Sound
Exhibit "B" depicts the current revised master plan into which the
applicant has incorporated changes that they request be deemed as
non-substantial. Included with Exhibit "8" is a written
description prepared by the applicant's agent that describes the
changes that have been made to the plan.
Following review of the plans submitted by the applicant's agent
the afternoon of August 30, 1995, staff offers the following
summary with respect to the changes the Commission encouraged,
staffs review of the changes, and staffs review of the current
revised plan as it relates to their original comments:
1. The Commission encouraged the applicant to increase the
size of 76 "Z" lots from a minimum of 4,000 square feet
to a minimum of 4,500 square feet and increase the size
of 13 "z" lots from a minimum of 4,500 square feet to a
minimum of 5,000 square feet. To achieve the larger lot
size the applicant modified the internal road network
system by reducing the number of cul-de-sacs from 11 to
7 which resulted in providing a loop road system with
lots fronting on the loop road~. As evident by viewing
the previous proposed mastei.plan (Exhibit "0") and the
current proposed master plan (Exhibit "B"), significant
changes have taken place in the north portion of the
project including road configuration, type, size and
layout of lots. A total of ten (10) lots were omitted
from the project. It is difficult to determine whether
the 99 "z" lots have increased in size as recommended by
the Commission considering the areas of each lot are not
specified on the plan.
It should be noted that the tabular data indicates that
the minimum lot size for "Z" lots has increased from
4,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet; however, the lot
frontage remains 40 feet. Therefore, there is not
sufficient information to verify that the 13 "Z" lots
'that the Commission intended to be increased to 5,000
square feet and included with the 4,500 square foot "Z"
lots has been provided. To ensure that the proper
balance of 5,000 square foot lots is included with the
4,500 square foot "Z" lots, the plan should specify the
total area within ~ach of the proposed 159 "Z" lots.
2. With respect to staff's review of the new plans regarding
original comments that would create a significant impact
on the layout of the project and general review comments,
the fOllowing is offered (see Exhibit "E" staff
comf!\ents):
Engineering - Increase the width of the proposed Meadows
Boulevard from 60 feet wide to 80 feet wide. The applicant
revised the lot layout along the north side of the proposed
right-of-way to provide 80 feet of right-of-way width.
Additional comments are set forth in Engineering Division
Memorandums 95-332, 95-295 and 95-260.
utilities - Relocate the proposed lift station to better serve
future developments adjacent to the proposed project and omit
deadend utility lines in cul-de-sacs. This concern has been
addressed by the omission of several cul-de-sacs as a result
of the new loop road system and the plans show a lift station
site acceptable to the utilities Department.
Page 3
Memorandum No. 95-484
Nautica sound
The letter from the applicant indicated that the developer and
the city's utilities Department have agreed on the location
and size of the proposed lift station shown on the current
revised plan (based on utility drawings not included with the
submittal, but submitted to and veiwed by the utility
Department) . At this time the utility Department has no
objection to the plan.
Fire Department - Provide an ingress/egress on HypoluKo Road
and 15 foot separation between buildings. The applicant has
not addressed these issues (see revised Fire Prevention
Memorandum No. 95-316).
Police Department - Provide access to the site .from Hypoluxo
Road and install a north bound riQht turn lane into the site
on Lawrence Road. These comments have been disregarded (see
police Department Memorandum #0164).
Planning Department - Provide an access to the project on
Hypoluxo Road, show code required 40 foot setback along the
east property line of the projec,t, ,~ncrease the lot size to
6,000 square feet, increase the' lot frontage to 60 feet,
increase the front setback to 20 feet and provide 15 feet as
the side setback or building separation for all interior lots.
These comments reiterate comments made and approved on the
previously submitted and approved master plans for Knollwood
Groves. The applicant has not addresSed these issues.
Addi tional comments are set forth in Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 95-485.
Please note the revisions that led staff to recommend the proposed
modifications be considered a substantial change are clearly
identified in the recommendation on page 7 of this memorandum.
The following text is from the previous staff report (Planning and
zoning Department Memorandum No. 95-419) revised with data from the
proposed plan, and is provided for your reference.
on October 17, 1989 the city Commission approved on second reading
Ordinance No. 89-36 rezoning the subject property from AG
(Agriculture) and R-1AAA (Single-family Residential) to PUD with a
Land Use Intensity of 4 1LUI = 4). The rezoning master plan was
approved subject to staff comments and is provided in Exhibit "F".
A master plan modification for the PUD was requested in January
1990. The request included reconfiqurinq the boundary between the
mul ti-family and single-family pods, changing the single-family pod
to zero-lot-l~ne units and establishing the following building and
site regulations for the zero-lot-line, single-family units: lot
frontage 50 feet, front setback 20 feet (on private streets), rear
yard setback 10 feet and non-zero side setback 15 feet. On
February 19, 1991 the city Commission made a finding of "no
substantial change" for this request and on March 12,' 1991, the
planning and Zoning Board approved this master plan modification,
subject to staff comments. This master plan modification is
provided in Exhibit "C" and is the current master plan. The
exhibit also includes the conditions of approval regarding lot
size, lot frontage and setbacks for the 150 single-family detached
zero-lot-line units within the project.
On April 5, 1994, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. R94-39
which entered Meadows Groves, Inc., f.k.a. Knollwood Groves, into
an agreement to pay the City the sum of one hundred eight thousand
five hundred fifteen dollars ($108,515) to be applied to the des1Qn
and construction of tbe Hiner Road extension to Lawrence Road from
its existing terminus east of Congress Avenue for the PUD' 5
projected impact on Hiner Road. The resolution also indicated that
. ,
Page 4
Memorandum No. 95-484
Nautica Sound
the city supported the request of Rnollwood Grov.. for road/traffio
impact fee credits to palm Beach County. This resolution agreed to
recognize this payment of fees as commencement of the development,
thereby vesting the 1991 PUD master plan.
On August 2, 1994, the city Commission adopted Resolution No. R94-
106 accepting conveyance of the property required of the PUD for
public recreation purposes. The 5.0 acre park site is located in
the southeast corner of the project. The site is adjacent to an
existing, undeveloped 4.02 acre public park site to which it will
be combined to meet the recreation level of service needs of the
neighborhood planning area that the PUD will impact.
chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments, of
development regulations states that chanQ8.
developments shall be processed as follows~
the. city's land
in planned unit
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD may
be permitted by the planning and z,oni,ng Board upon application
filed by the developer or his successbrs in interest, prior to
the expiration of the PUD classification, but only [after] a
finding that any such change or changes are in accord with all
regulations in effect when the change or changes are requested
and the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan in effect
at the time of the proposed change. Substantial changes shall
be proposed as for a new application of PUD zoning. The
determination of what constitutes a substantial change shall
be within the sole discretion of the city Commission. Non-
substantial changes as determined by the city Commission in
plans shall not extend the expiration of the eighteen month
approval for the PUD classification."
ANALYSIS
staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Chapter 2.5 of
the City's land development regulations:
Section 1. Intent and 'purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is establ ished. It
is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative, design, improved. living environment, orderly and
economical development in the City, and the protection of
adjacent and existing and future City development. The
district is suitable for development, redevelopment and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the City.
Regulations for Planned Unit Developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations and
other applicable City regulations to the same degree that they
are intended to control development on a lot-by-lot basis. In
view of the substantial public advantages of planned unit
development, it is the intent of PUD regulations to promote
and encourage development in this form where tracts suitable
in size, location and character for the uses and structures
proposed are to be planned and developed as unified and
coordinated units.
Page 5
Memorandum No. 95-484
Nautica Sound
section 9. Internal PUD standards.
B.
INTERNAL LOTS AND FRONTAGE. Within the boundaries of the
PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards shall be
required; provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard
requirements in accordance with the zoning district the
PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards
abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as
required in the abutting zone."
The following analysis consists of evaluations corresponding with
each significant issue:
1. Replacement of Hypoluxo Road connection with another entrance
on Lawrence Road This change significantlY redistributes
the traffic trips originally approved to be shared by Hypoluxo
Road and Lawrence Road. As shown on the approved master plan
in Exhibit "C", project access was planned for a new road onto
Hypoluxo Road (a four lane road with median and turn lanes),
requiring a crossing over the L.W:D.b. L-18 Canal, from which
two project entrances were planned. Also planned was one
entrance onto "Meadows Boulevard", a public collector which is
to be extended by the developer to connect to Lawrence Road
(currently a two lane road which is on the county's five year
plan for widening to four lanes). Because of the desire to
have a gated community, costs of which are a function of total
entrances, and to avoid the cost of the canal crossing, the
applicant proposes a new entrance onto Lawrence Road and one
onto the extension of "Meadows Boulevard" which will link to
Lawrence Road.
This change concentrates project traffic onto Lawrence Road,
and compounds the traffic problem associated with Lawrence
Road as recently expressed by local residents in connection
with the anticipated addition of those 1,680 approved, and
partially constructed units on Lawrence Road. In response to
this identified need, the county added the widening of this
segment of Lawrence Road to the County's five year plan. From
a design standpoint, it is desirable that where there is the
ability for access on to two major thoroughfares, both should
be utilized. This is also true from a public safety and
public utility access standpoint, as well as for integrating
streets with the surrounding road network. Staff comments
from the public safety and public utility departments reflect
a desire to work with the applicant regarding this issue, but
it is noted that this comes,with an increased response time to
emergencies. It also eliminates an opportunity to provide a
road system that could provide an alternate route in the
common event of an accident at the intersection of Lawrence
Road and Hypoluxo Road. Therefore, it is strongly
recommended that the Hypoluxo Road connection not be
eliminated.
2. Change in unit type, lot size, lot width and setbacks - Over
the past ten to fifteen years, the PUD proposals within the
City have included smaller and smaller lot sizes, with very
large homes and increased lot coverages (decreased
permeabili ty), built closer and closer to property lines.
These small lots with narrow building separations have posed
ever-changing problems for emergency personnel who must park
large vehicles on narrow streets and maneuver emergency
equipment within tight openings between buildings.
Page 6
Memorandum No. 95-484
Nautica sound
Also, an increasing problem with small lots with narrow
frontages and shallow front building setbacks, is parking.
Driveways on these lots are not deep or long enough to
accommodate more than one, in some cases two personal
vehicles, not to mention guest vehicles. In addition, most
families have at least two vehicles, so vehicles are parked
continually within the street, which causes a reduction in
road width, and within swales or over sidewalks which is
unsightly and causes costly damage to both.
The area of the city over the past five to ten years that has
seen the most PUD approvals is the Lawrence Road corridor.
This area has become a monoculture of developments comprised
of 5,000 and 4,000 square foot lots, yet it is probably the
remaining area within the city where larger lots and homes
could be developed compatible with the larger lots and homes
which spot the area and preceded the newer development. This
issue was discussed at a recent Commission workshop at which
the Commission recognized the link that housing choices have
on economic development opportunities. At that meeting, a
minimum 6,000 square foot lot size was discussed to begin to
diversify the types of new homes 'that are being built.
Regarding the requests to reduce the lot width from 60 feet to
40 feet and 50 feet for the "Z" lots and Zero lots, reduce the
front setback from 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback
on interior lots from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear
setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots that do not back to
one another, staff recommends that the 60 foot lot width
remain in connection with the 6,000 square foot lot area.
Therefore, the reduction in front, side and rear yard setbacks
will not be needed based on the lot size.
3. staff has no objection to omitting the day care center site
and replacing it with a lake.
4. utility design - Among the changes not specifically outlined
in the applicant's request is a significant alteration in
utility system design. As detailed in the utilities
Department comments, utility systems in adj acent projects were
designed to integrate with the utility system in Nautica Sound
through the location'of'gravity sewers and lift stations. The
lift station location proposed by the applicant violates
comprehensive Plan POlicy 1.14.3 which requires that utility
sites (parcels dedicated to the city for lift stations) serve
the project and surrounding land uses, as a condition of the
project approval. The lift station location proposed is not
.efficient as it would forc~the City to eventually construct
additional lift stations which the City mU8t maintain. The
letter from the applicant indicated that the developer and the
City'S utilities Department have agreed on the location and
size of the proposed lift station shown on the current revised
plan (based on utility drawings not included with the
submittal, but submitted to and veiwed by the utility
Department). The several dead-end water mains proposed in the
cul-de-sacs can be looped, but may result in the loss of a few
lots. Lastly, it is important to note that lot size drives
the type of utility deSign. The utility Department notes that
even if looping of the utility system is agreed to, the small
lot size and narrow lots lend to an inefficient design of
double-barrelling piping in cul-de-sacs, which also will cost
the City more money to maintain as compared to other projects
with the same density.
Page 7
Memorandum No. 95-484
Nautica Sound
As evident from comparing the previous plans with the current
revised plans, cul-de-sacs have been omitted, lot type, size
and location have changed; however, a utility plan was not
submitted for this review.
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, July 25, 1995, the Technical Review Committee (TRC) met
to review the previous master plan modification reque.t. The Board
r.comm.n~ed that the Commission find the changes "substantial".
From the above analysis, the basis for this recommendation is that
(a) the relocation of one of the entrances from Hypoluxo Road to
Lawrence Road causes additional trips to be placed on ~awrence Road
and compromises pUblic safety (better response times, and an
alternate emergency route are achieved if the Hypoluxo Road
connection was not omitted), (b) the reduction in lot width and
lot area intensifies the project from the standpoint of efficiency
of land area, causing the potential for parking problems and
overall congestion, (c) the change in unit type/lot size is
contrary to the recent Commission consens~s to attract a variety of
housing choices which is known to have a'direct link to economic
development potential and (d) the applicant has not addressed the
40 foot setback that is required along the east property line where
the subject property abuts the multi-family project to the east,
which could cause a significant change in the lot layout presented
at this time.
If this request is determined to not be a substantial change, it is
recommended that approval be granted subject to the applicable,
attached staff comments in Exhibit "E" - Planning and Zoning
Department Memorandum No. 95-485, Engineering Division Memorandum
Nos. 95-332, 95-295 and 95-260, Fire Prevention Memorandum No. 95-
316, Police Department Memorandum #0164, Building Division
Memorandum No. 95-324.
It should be noted that this recent submittal excluded 7 of the B
drawings (elements) required for review of a Master Plan
Modification, and particularly, to enable review of the affects on
the master plan of all proposed changes.
TJH:meh
Attachments
xc: Central File
.,NAUTICAI.DOC
E X H I BIT "A"
, '
"
LOCATION MAP
NAUT/CA SOUND
(KNOl WOOD GROVES PUD)
~-:--;- "-... ........
j
03
==
f .
....-
.-
'/-
-.
( .
,
A"l~
"UCI
LUI:
'""
~
-~---.
(''''TO",
SE:J:"E:S "
-
JD
q.Q
R"lAA
LITO
Oves"
.or: ~___
E X H I BIT "B"
, ,
1m
I, 0
liil ,Ii! ~ i q 1"" · ~
I nJL.J--/~-~tl-- tJ~.iL..=..m
~~\' \ ~d<><0Jl)r-:i-ih'1 In -p 1 E ~
, t .' W", . \\~)f'". LI I ~- I : ~ \' I" (I)
II 1 . ,I: '(. 'I t' . _ -. I' \ , m
~l! . I . :I!,~,.~.L ..::-~.) :,.,.....'.. J l~ 0
i' .' I' 'I . . . ... . ..1 ...... ~'\' ,II
1'1 ' r . l3 ~".-["" ' ~ \' 'i ,
II,.! '~I ~.~. ~---------- ~~\' ~~~~~\ 'I; m!~ iiI
i I'.,.....,.;~ I i! I ~" - ,.\l r:..:. 1~ld :II
" " ': .' _ _ ... I \' \ ~\ ~ I. I ~. .!lJ',
~ i ~:I\,l.., , " i _J ... .~.~". i "'1" I · -c
l, 8, \~" . ",.~.. \ ~ '~m/' ~p,~\I G \ i " I ~ 1 i
I'll! 'l' · , I ir\"' .... , ' , , ' .' 'Wi''''';' ,I I , I
I!'; I, M-i Itt" ,:, \ ........ ..... '" . i ;.. I. · · : :
~'I i.++1 ~ y-/ I ~ < " ; , 'i Ie:: \ L 0 " I!\!ll !P " ! ' !
{I Iri : : ::: ~____ ---jil ~1 :: I II" ,1 ~i'\ll ,. i "U'II~ .0, ,! \ \
21 II' : ~ l:l~ _'..~~ --___~,j:j ;: WJ :;! " & ~l ,a; 'j~ ~i\61Ii~ n \ . i. \
.1, ~ . ,'1.'1 '1.. ., -- · ~ ...-' -- \,1; i / I ~.., I
"' I " ~ -~. '. ,i. J ~'. I'l"'" .,.~ . .J V ..,"
II , : (;1;' ;~....., ,,.,:'.. ,. "l'" ,I; , , . ,,,.- - - ~~;m~'l f:'. -' - - - -'as\ I
l{ " I'; l'r ,'I)?t?~i"...":.'---'oJ~JI'~/'~" "~.""I"'''~'; -[+Yf.- - I.,: :
I . I. " 7 I I "'" ~rn, .. ...... - -. · · 1,1\ Ifl .t.r. I I · · I 'I I
: I. t, ,~' . "f"r:"~l ;:=-:. ~' ..'_.. .. -. - . - Iril ... (.. .. I I
. ,." .' . ",., ........ ........'" f:"- . .. , · ·
. , ".' , .... . ,. "'.. ....' . \. '. ',,, I .. ..'....n....- . 'Ii.'"
11,' ~\. .., I '..'.' . ,... '~l i om R"'''''! I ~ I L..!- ... ~: 1~ I I I I I I: I I I'
..11:, ~ ' . '. '..', . IL'.,..., ". I"'. -,..j , U. I I I L " , " I
I;,' '~~ '.",.~'.'.,,,I.. · \~\~.' \118'1 i ~I'l' ..t"~.~'~{~ li'T'TIT,t,t, I I Ii':" :
I '~ .. I" , n"\ \.7&: I II; I' I ~ I . " _.....] ) I I I
" " ." , :~ ,', . ~ ,--,' -' . .. .... II
2; \ .. ' ~~ ~ ~ '. " " ' . l.#.A" .'.' ",' ~ ....... l'l~ " ::;- ,..~~ ' ~.. -,Tll:- . ~';.r;: .. ~l:; 'T. ... ..:.iall ,-
I, ,~~ ~, ,,__. ' " I '-:\----'1:1.. I :-wi ~lr ':' , · · · I ,I', , 1 1 .~.'
a I '" ~ ') ~"-~, ~J -..... ", /' I!!I I .. . I I , . ' I, i-r- ,; ....., I.n"' ,
t~' ~... ~./ . ...., .'1;a. l'\~ " ,'t I ..__lll. r- ~ ;: rr-~'" r' ~7 : I ..~~, "
,I J :~~. "l: _ ' I ( I ___I..... I' I, L~....J .;... I I' ,-' I
_ ....',_ ~ . . ~l....-.-! ~r- -..,' I ....~.~
,>-:,.~,;..' '.' . ". " '. . 1 r-.j I. -..., I !- ~ :.' '-"" .: " ,
i ~ ~i I'.t' · ilW' :si D :.~ ':' :i EPl{~I~C \.1:... .....: \1. ,
~ I! II( .',.\": Jr:t: 1 ~ ,.. ;,' ~ .. ...~. I . Ii. ,.~".." ...., _GC l'
.' ,. I' \1 I '. , . .,' , II'-.. ,
. I' ,!" ~ I: ~ ~ l\ .' ' ~ I I I. I ~. ~. I 4.. l' Ii l~: I " : ~.
Ji .\; " ~ !~:~ . Jt. I ,. Ii-' , .,t __'_.._:__...J__' ""i, :' :i.t- - l._ t.:.'~: ~: ...\' ~
r. , !o. .f l ," I' q"" , .4 · · I ., L.J ' -,...... .,,, ~, u' )\\,\~I~'
i I .~. ;::.j '. ",;,..':.!L'.. ~ ~ ~ ~L~ ~.~.~ =9, lE::':t:i. t ~, ~~I,~:L . ~ ,':; '1 ~I,: ...
, !l U~!~ "I' A' -r."". .- .. '1-' ~. ~ ~~_... "-'". I ~h\ .
_..n_.....! "l.~' I V' , I I . . . . . ~l:.I:' - -~ ';\:-~i:"'; -'I :1: ::[ ~IJ~, -:Jt~ . ~ . " .- . ~ ..' I 1;1
.'-'::--=-=1 -'" -- .. > - - - . J:L · ~ ~,'l~ 'j,:J 'j "I"! ~~l "K~fjr.'~ 'I', 'j .;,; ~, :~.: i'
~ e '9 i~i .... ;'il'''\ Ii' I ~ i q ~,,\
. ~!iI . I ,\ - - - .- , I \AI ~
"" ' . ~. !I.:lI
_:r: .&1!IOl.....ru~"...~~;~...:~~ .~- ...... "', .".. ~~l~}_ ~tl ~
Ii.- ._ __ ....... . .... ." E~'l!' - .- _.
~~!: ' II""" .... ...R ~. '::=='~-. ..11 '''-1111 :,..~"" -"
, ." " .,,,.,- _. " .' . . .'
\\\;\\ ~~i \ ;;
\\\\ \\\i~~ \\~\
\~\\ ,; \i' '\\\
,\,~ -~ It\ 'l"
\\'\ \\ 'll \W
\\\, ,\ \\ \ii\
~\\', \\ t-\\
\"1 s, -\\,
1\\ \\ ,1,
~ ; ~ Hi . \\ · ,,\\,\ ':' ,"i, A '\ \
~,l\\ ' '\ S, .1 \
~\\\'\'\ \~ . \ ~~~' \\ \,' ~
'\ Ii l1 ~'1' .' ~ 1 \ "
~ \\, i~ \~ ill ~ \\ ,\ ~
\ \.." \\, ~ \\ \\ \ .' -'1 \q~ i
.\' Ii , ~\ \ ..~..i \\ \ .0
h\' '\ .. I" ~
U!\ \ \ ' ti \:, 3
t \ \ ,~ en
\: \. . ~ \
\\\ \" \ -.' \ \ ,
'\' \ \ \
~ 11 · ~ 'iit\\' \ \~ \ g
. . ". \ ' \ \ .il, \ i i
\\\'\ltif'l~'\ t \ 1\,\ , \. f' .~\' \\'\ \1 i~~\~~ \ \1 ~
\\l\\\t\\\ \\ \\ \\\\ \~~ \\\~ ~ \\\\ ~~ r\\ ~ \~\~ ~\ ~
"\i', ~\,~ i\ ~\ 1\~\\\ \\\\ \\\"',\ \\ \\\\, \\\\ ,\,,\ ~ \~ ~n \'\
\ \i~J' \~..~, \. h ' I llll U~ '1\ tI\ ,,'- \.\ \ \.' .\,
l if ~ 'i" \ \\.~ \\1\ hI ,~\~l I, \\, "i\ t\\ \ \~ \~ l,t
. $~ \, \ l~\' \t. \~\ \~,\\ \i \\\ h~ i~\' \ ~~ i\ \
" \ h\ \'\' \~\\ \\ \\' \\' ~\\\ ~ Ii 'i ,
"' \l,' \131 \ ~\\ It it t
\ \~..i \'1 I. \1 '
I :I" I
. II
\l\~\~fa
\\,~..\\
J1\,\\\
I
I
~ \ ~
\
I
\\
~/'.
yi.
; ! ,;
.
'I ... '-<-,
~,
Kilday It Aaeoclat..
Lendacepe Archlteots/Pllnner.
1651 Forum PIece
Suite 100A
Weat Palm eeach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-6622 · FIx: (407t 689.2682
August 30, 1995
Ms. Tambn Heyden, Planning Director
Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Admlnl.trator
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Nautlca Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D.
Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up
Our File No: 1020.13
Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag,
Attached please find twelve revised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning
issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15. 1995.
For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously
approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Included with this resubmlttalls a
Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the Interior right-of-way
configuration, pavement and sidewalks. This amended plan should address the major
concerns of members on the City Commission. The following Is an overview of the
modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan.
1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500
square feet. In turn. the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from
89 to 59 lots. The number of lots In the 5,000 to 6.000 square foot range has been
Increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424
which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of
539 units. The breakdown between zero and "ZII lots has also been altered. There are
now 21 more zero lot line units than pr~viously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have
been eliminated. '
2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the
City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upslze the facilities to accommodate
a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The 11ft station is located In the southwest
corner of the top portion of the site. In ord~r to provide a more amenable plan for the
City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 30, 1995
Page 2
In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a
proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have
spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Halllhan regarding this Issue and I believe the
attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant
material will be native and, as Indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design.
Attached with this letter Is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense
landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached
or If you need any additional Information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you In advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
~I~
Karyn I. Janssen
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
cc: Alan Fant, GL Homes
Larry Portnoy, GL Homes
Rick Elsner, GL Homes
Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble
"
,
00,
J> !~
~-
>> C) Ii
C) '- C)
'- J> l~
>> () ~~
() {\\
fl' Z t. ~~
Z -\ / ~ r
--\
--\ ~ ~
--\ C)
C) ~~
N
~ tl' 1~
7\)
r C)
a r
-\ CJ 1~
r --\
~ C
- ti
Z 1~
c {\\
~ ~
--\ ~ -
~ .,
(j) -\
i ~ CJ)
1 ...
l
i~
Ii
ta' ,
/
, '
~
~
QI
I
i
QI
I
i
E X H I BIT "0"
I\'~
'II
(')
c
~
m
~
~
)>
~
:n
-0
~
1~~
~r~~
u.:~
........ -
II
II
, . \
\ .\ I i
I I
. ~ll.Rll.. . ~ll
\. ~ ~.~ \ . I' ;'Iilal 'Ill~ I' "a
.n'~l\ IU I Ilit
I I' ,. r: I I
, ,\m..._..._..._-~........--ua-
~._._.__._---=-.__.'._'.-:1f.""
_..~ . 'I . . ;,.-.-.-.--'-'----'-'--: :
r. '
,\ ., I I
\ " '.
, .
"-
I ! . _..-:~.u-.-".. _u.__' 1
Ii. ~ \ - ." · I
(\ ~~~~, . ~ i,l~ ) I
1 \ il ' i
I
, I ~ ' '--
~l .' 1'1\,\\ r\ \\\ l\. \ r [
I t ili\\}tjUl,oH, 'II ..
_, i\ \~,
~~~~"'.'11111 iKnoRwood Groves PUD
II ~ . .. I'~I .:! Il~~~ton 8ea~ FL
1 .',. ... ", . ','..;, ..1, 6,. nlan,.'
. :_~~_~. ~... ,of- .' r. ".. \ '
"
,
I
I
'---"
1\
\\
\1
i\
I
;I t1:i1l
\\\\
,\11
\ \
'Die City of
t.Boyn ton 13eac/i
:
,.
100 'r.. 'ADY"'D" 'At,-, ""ukllGrd'
'1',0. 'BD{J'"
'Boy",.," 'BtllC~. ~(otii.J JJ425-0J 10
l 'j,y :HiJf[: ,,, 0 i J ; J.,., II 1
:/:U: '-oI0i) 711,;"59
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
Harch 13. 1991
Attnl Hs. Anna Cottrell
Urban Design studio
2000 'aIm Beach Lak.. Blvd.
Suite 600, The Concourse
West Palm Beach, Fl 33409-6582
REI Knollwood Groves Master Plan Modification - rile No. 570
Dear Ms. Cottrelll
Please b~ advised thet the City Commission at their February 19,
1991 meet in; made a finding that the changes requested in the pod
boundaries, acce.. points and unit type for the above-referenced
project were not substantial in nature. Regarding the modifica-
tions to the approved setbacks, lot size and lot width, the City
Commission made a determination of no substantial change based on
your consent to caaply with the following minimum standardsl
#
1. 6,000 square foot lot size
2. 60 foot lot width
3. 20 foot front yard setback
4. 15 foot aide yard setback on the non-zero lot line
5. 15 foot rear yard setback
6. An 8 foot pool and screen enclosure setbilck
The Planning and Zoning 80ard at their Harch 12, 1991 meeting
made a final determination on this request, including compliance
with the minimlllll standards stated above, by approving this
modification to the Knollwood Groves PUD master plan, subject to
the attached staff oomments. Tke.e' comment. shall b. addre..ed
on the submission plans for pr.lim~nary plat approval.
Pursuant to Appendix 8-Planned Unit Developments, Section 10.8.3.
approval of this master plan modification and PUD zoning will
expire on September 12, 1992 if a preliminary plat has not been
submitted. An extension to the master plan approval for a
maximum pertod of one year, may be ftled not later than 60 days
after the expiration of the master plan, November 12, 1992
(Chapter 19, Section 19-92 of th., Code of Ordlnano..>> .
Ixtenslona mu.~ ~a '1184 with 'he .lann1", D.p.r~8nt Dr
submi tting a letter of extension for review by the Concurrency
Review 80ard and the Planning and Zoning Board.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to call me at (407) 738-7490.
Very trUly yours,
d.\..,,-tIJ~~ -i~
CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP
Planning Director
CC:frb
Encs
eCI Technical Review Board
,.., .....
P( (b '\..
E X H I BIT "D"
, ,
'Ill
I,
,-u It ' - I
111' 'I' ., I r 11'11 :
JrJl. ~~~._~1~._~11___1t__f~}-
~- --- - --== =-;:.
"'~~!\ ~N~~~--::\j-l~~ \)l\~ f', ~l'1 t !lim
, ' .:"- If.'.': mIl L..... L ....JJ _~ - I \ ~ \ ill \ ' 11lall
I. \ I "1:1"/ · It. ..IT."....., l\ III III'
lili I ~Il tl.. :!. · J : "t ~.lJ..~ ' I ,~.' .. , ) '\ ~ ~ I I ;1
~4'1 \; :!i ~ "i; "i;~f: .;:.;: ~:";'~ ~/;~;'B~ & ~ \ \\ I
, t:ti Ii 1 ~.---- ""__r______~I ":"S~'''' .~~ l\~~ci;
Ii.. :;1 ...... .'] "~ ,~', ~:~! ,I ~I'
i 'I-r--;--f:" ~ ., t I' ~I ';, \ .:.;-;~, m'
~ II '~ I :~. ~ - -.. I 1 :1 \r-~ ',";\ . \~ " \' :. ,-',
i'l' ~I t I . ~::'" ~""'_.J"""'..i ~\'~ : . \ ill I!
3 ~,~ \ \'-~"":i~~~'~ ,:...- i . .', .,I,UL"..... \ It lit Ii
'1111 ,,::, -:: _.~ .. . .'. /' ,',.: .:. '., -~ ,II .. 'I ," ,
) I"~l \ l~, ::. 1" I j.', .' ~ I ....." -~.~. 1\. .-1 II ,',
, i~I~l\Ii~ ~1 -,::~"'" ;', '-:::::";--;1\':\\-' \ I II!', t It, In 'I
) "l~ r-, ' · I , ' ~ ' !I '. r I. ~I. . 110 IJl
~ !, i I:: H~- '~:l-i-flli---j "-'lilftT~ ~ 'I r, i~li~l~i !il ,\i\~~ 'Ii ~;t \l,'ift!'"l! \;1 \
, I' I 11\' :. . I . '. -.... l~: I ': ~,- - I ":~, II . 6J i , ' ,,\
. I I h;1!,lkc,'",<, ::]::::. I ',' --_"'" I I ::. . h:~ ,\! ., ~"l'"
. I ,~.~ .::1.~'1;,. ""'I" ~r '1; -"117' J:'. ..,' ·
: I ' .,,' ....... ,"i-' "" ~,' '.,. 1" --""~ ~. -" I
, .
~ 'i:i'~" . ,;.r,.i'lii..,. ._-~ ~..., I"i\' . ~:,"_':'l,,,,:~,~,,,,,",,~111 1,' \
~~t. I ii 1 . ~/~::1a .;'.'::: -':F.':~ ,.. - ~;-- . 1-=- - .,:::1: ';,::~ : :.~ : :: : :: ;~:: :~;~, \', ,
\. '\' - H I I, 1 ,. It I ' (r......~....., !;:::~ ..... ,.... -- ... ..',. - ~'I 't ,
, I \ I "\I\\~~~'~' -ro "'~ ..:" tai l:lI]l~:T:t:;~""'; ,n.:" . 11' ('-J'-V :J'-f:": ==:.:::::.: ~ . I laill( I
" , . ",.~. ." . . .,. . . r" . ; C!IJII'" .. .. --! .' ,n ::. ..., I , · '(', '1'1' · · · · · · · · , .' 1 ".,t~':1 ·
;! 1\1! '.. \.< 'i~.~.,' .' '.~. · -' i IJIIi\ i .Hit: ',_: ~ I , r~ ~ ~ ,I,.'~~t'l"\' \
"'I' /,"". .' , .' .' .,. ~ !. .,-. ~II i': ..' I .,. · · · · I ' I' I
; ,~t ,\~~~~" "~:'~f~'\%: . . .:~~:'i;.lll8~'~.~/~~"",t:~~ JI't:~:, ~'I'_~-~l::K":~~ ,I ::~j~'~~::l:~;.1,: I i: ~.: I
~ i-'~ . ... . -,: ,~s ~ 1 .:1 ~. ." · .. t:l; : Ulr"'Il ~.. .. .--r., ff;:: ,.' ~~;' ~lC
.. , . ,~ '. ., '" .,. ., / ~ .,.'. . ." '.J'",", ... . ..' +:l!' I .. !'tW, · ;'., "'f"'" ~ 10' 1
;. I ~... t ,'" . ,'.. ,~, ~'...:: & ,"-~:'" ..~~:.. :~.,~' ~: .1.',,' ::.,.. :,... . -: I ..... I
~l' ~~;tI" ~... Ev.l~~':%:' ;.\ I ,'a:2 ,.----- . .-. -4-4l: i;...;... 1 .... ---,', i .~ .: '111M ·
l< ~ ~~","I}.' .~.) \"...~" ...,'" III III \ :i., !L&rl~l1~ '~; n,,~'\ ",',
a I ~ ; .q~ .!T/ <,., \~ I~' J' ~ if;"" I .' ..&I__t:. I cli ~
'( .___~ . ".. . VA .......'" .\ I,' .' 1-1. .' ,~' I : """..l ....' '~I "I
~ t';.~11o-i..(Il'" "?( P-'..3~~ ~t:' It' ...::: re... +:P.~ I ~,': ~!"'~i' ,:~ . ". ,..... .1\ :, s..\ I
", .... i \ U ,'. I ~ " I'" ';" ' I ,II' \ . :t. · " I I ,
Q. l' l r'" ... i~, · Ja · 1 .. . I .. .~ . s:
~ 'i ~~'O. I!l\'\~' .ii. !l-!- ,. ~.. '1,":..:4.11. -H1.1l+: ,~. "~;;.:~ ;:,,~ \
i., ,"",i, ~ m~ :;1'\ ~~~ :t:u~l--~l--~\I:: ~ t~'!II~~iI:~--_~_f~\1 \~~~ ~ \l\M,J. ~~
~llm ~i ~:. ~ 'I :t /; ~__...-. j-.-. -.-. ..~..~-1.~., ..~J,,~ .~_ ~.~ · UI, :. .I:\11.! I · . · .l,'}' 'J~i;' :: ~ ::' I ql'\ ~
" '~l..::.IJi ~i~ . ['C~t:. ~ ;' : ':t' :1:' (;_ :J'~;~'~~~7'~~ :~'~: : ~ i;;~;t~;;1. ~~. ~ \ ~ I, l
.t' L- .~ - ..I:. ~'N~i:n - .[:.E 1:1- ri~N': - ...,
I I.' 1(;k,1 ~ ............ ~_......_. - -- ''\ -':. ..
~ T II! 1~! ,i, rT. ip i' i' ~ ~ q 1\) 1I1~ J
Iii I g ~ ~ & I ! l~i'l i I ili! ~ . i Id j ", 11!,t1' \
, " !l LJ I> . . · ' ill I) "1 ! 1.1 .: \
g .1" r!~ 'I !! I - - ~rl; , '~:',J'
_g ~ -: I \ .
~
Ii IlIhl!i ni il'l '
I~f~ ~~
III~ li111ci,,1
! ;~r''''l'
OI'lii
.,lllt
FH
i-
RAUTICA SOURD r.IIA. laoll.... Gr.'" P.U.D.
flom\Dn '...rh. noru'"
.......r tt. ".
.--
IU\IMY It ..........
,eM"". ..........',/f..ftM"
l>>.,~ (wr' ,....
= ~... ,...h. ........a ..to.
c.a" ......21 .,..:(~O'I "'-2"::
tA" ........ ,'\ ~ ~ l'l~ ~ ~ ~ \ ,~
\' \\t \\ ~:: : \' a:'
,~, ~\\ W\ -:\ \\ \\ \ \\-
l l'i\- k' ~ vY, \\
:\\\;.l ,,1\ I'i~\'-' \'
i\'~ ~ti "\',\\ l~~\~\'\ ~\1
" .! il' \" ~ \" '1 .
,'\\ ,\ \~t \tll, ~ \X"~ \\
\\ \... \\\ ?oi\ ~ \ \ \
:lti 1\ 9-
11' \\ '. \,.\ ~ ii\ f
0'\'-' ,'" \~~t ~
\' \ \\ -i,\ \\' \
,I, .. -\'\' >, \;\ \
~\\..\ \, ,\ .\; ~. ,-, '
4 . \,,9. ..,:: i"
, 0 ~ ;;......
_~ l~, ~\\ \
\l~ .
9."\
l'
1
?
i
\
1
~
\
\ ~ - \ ~
2 !l. ~ 4' ~
. G G9- 0
_ ~ \~ i~ \ ~
i\ \r ~
~ s. \% \i ~
~ \\ ~\ ~
~j ,'i!!' ,i . ~
~U ,\' ~ ~
j 1 ~ 1"
~ . \'- ~
" !l ~ (JI
~ \
\ ~
- \
~ \
\
. ~ ~ ~ ~~t~'t i ~~ ~
,; _ _ _ p'l" 3 n"
. _ , ' i . --\t 19:~, \ I ~
i l" '.. ~ ~ ~ I ill;':."" l"i
_ m' -' ,it \ S
{ t \\l~ \ \ : \~'\ i\\ \\\\ \ \tl~\~i \\
9.'\\\\ i\\\ \~\ \~\\ \~\\\~\ \\~ ,\\\\~ ~i\\\\ t,\
~, 1\ \~l\ 'Xl\' \).1-\,. '\\\1 \\\' \\\~ l' \~ \1I~ ·
i\ i" \ ~~l \, l' \l\l\~\ a\ '\' \t.~,l '\'\ ~.. \~ ill l~'\
\\ v' , . \~ ' · · \' .'\ 1\ ,\\\ \ \ \ 1. \\~
", V l'lt \\Ll \\ ,,"J, h. \ it ~\\
\\ . W' \l' \\\,'~" " \\." l,,\' \' ~\\ \ i' r "\
Ii \ \" \ \ \i.'\ \'1' \~\\ t', "l ~" \
'"\ \ '\, ~, t\" ",.\ .~, I~I'\ i ~~ II \
\' \'\ i_it \~ \\\ \\ \ 1 ", t"
, \ ,\\1' 'i\\ \t .\l " \" t ,~ ~
_ ".1 \_~ ~ \ it il \
\ \;' i \\~ ," ~, \f ·
t \ Ii l
.... ..." , .. -.~ "" .,' ,.. .
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-485
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning, ~1rector
4?f::Jt4'a-
Michael E. H~~1
zoning and site ~nistrator
TO:
SUBJECT:
August 31, 1995
Nautica Sound - MPMD 95-006 Master Plan Modification
(Request to amend the previously approved PUD master plan to
o~it the day care use, modify access points, change the type
of units and lot size from 150 single-family detached units on
6,000 square foot lots and 389 multi-family units to 267 zero-
lot-line units on 5,000 square foot lots and 157 "Z" lot-line
units on 4,500 square foot lots, and reduce the front setback
front 20 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side setback from 15 feet
to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet
on lots that do not back to one another.) - (3rd review)
DATE:
1. Show and identify the appropriate setback dimension at the rear of
all lots along the east and northwe,st property lines. Note:
, ,
setback for residential buildings' is the distance, measured
perpendicular, from the property line to the closest structure
(overhangs of less than 2 feet may encroach into a setback). The
setback along the northwest property line shall be the same as
required in the abutting zoning district. Considering the land
located in Palm Beach County along the northwest property line is
being annexed into the City at the R-1AAB zoning classification, it
is recommended that the rear setback be 25 feet for all lots along
property line where the subject development abuts residential
property, proposed residential property or commercial property.
The proposed 25 foot rear setback matches the rear setback for the
R-1AAB zoning district. Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 or
20 feet shall be increased to 25 feet. A further requirement along
the northwest property line where the subject property abuts the C-
3 (Community Commercial) zoning district is that a 5 foot high
masonry wall, landscaped chain-link fenc~ or some other equivalent
5 foot tall buffer be provided. It is recommended that either the
buffer easement plan proposed by the applicant or identified in
comment number 7 of this memo be accepted for this required buffer.
The setback required alon9 the east property line where the subject
property abuts the adJacent multi-family development shall be 40
feet as required by Chapter 2.5 - planned Unit Development. It is
recommended that parcels in the northeast corner of the project,
that abut the adj acent unincorporated property, have a 40 foot
setback. Therefore the setback along the entire east property line
will be 40 feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
[Chapter 2~5 - Planned Unit Development, section 9. B.]
2. Redesign plan to show all lots which have a minimum lot frontage of
sixty (60) feet and a minimum lot area of six thousand (6rOOO)
square feet. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
3. Change the front bUilding setback from the proposed twenty (20)
feet at the garage and fifteen (15) feet at the building to twenty
(20) feet for both garage and building for all lots. Establish the
rear building setback for all double frontage lots as twenty (20)
feet. Maintain proposed fifteen (15) foot rear building setback on
all back to back lots and maintain proposed ten (10) foot rear
building setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance
easement, common ground or recreation tract. Amend all plans,
data and charts accordingly.
Page 2
Memorandum # 95-485
Nautica sound
MPMD 95-006
4.
5.
Change the side building setback for the non zero side of the zero-
lot-line units from the proposed ten (10) feet to fifteen (15) feet
and specify a fifteen (15) foot building separation setback between
the sides of all "Z" lot units. Maintain the proposed fifteen (15)
foot corner side building setback on all back to back lots,
however, establish a 20 foot corner side setback on all other
corner lots. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
change the side pool and screen enclosure setback from twelve (12)
feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen enclosures to fifteen
(15) feet for the non zero side of the zero-lot-line units and
specify a fifteen (15) foot side pool and screen enclosure
separation for all "Z" lots. Maintain the proposed seventeen (17)
foot corner side setback for pools and fift..n {1!} foot for screen
enclosures on all back to back lots; however, establish a 20 foot
corner side setback on all other corner lots. Maintain the
proposed ten (10) foot rear pool setback for back to back lots and
maintain the seven (7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that
abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation
tract. Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen
enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain the
proposed five (5) foot rear screen ,enolosure setback for all lots
that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation
tract. Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
6 .
Show on the plans all off-site roadway improvements proposed and/or
required as a result of the city's evaluation of the traffic
conditions.
7.
It is recommended that a dense landscape buffer be provided along
the interior lot lines of the project and that the material be
located within a landscape buffer easement. It is further
recommended that the tree and shrub landscape material be native
and the hedge material be moderate drought tolerant. To ensure the
buffer develops to form a consistent shape, the tree and hedge
buffer landscape material for the entire buffer easement shall be
installed prior to the completion of the first house that has a
landscape buffer easement located on the lot and/or prior to the
completion of the proposed main access drive that is located at the
northwest corner of the project. The dense landscape buffer shall
be shown on the plans and be depicted as a grouping of 3 to 5,
eight foot tall smalL tr,ees (silver buttonwood or yellow elder)
then approximately 30 feet away a grouping of 4 to 5, eight foot
tall multi-stem (wax myrtle) shrubs. Incorporated into the
recommended buffer shall be one, eight foot tall canopy tree
(mahogany or oak) spaced 70 to 80 feet on center. The buffer shall
also have a continuous 2 foot tall hedge (chalcas or Florida
privet) extending along the entire property line; however, the
hedge may. form a meandering. shape as viewed from above. The
continuous hedge shall be maintained at 6 feet tall. The 8 foot
tall bUShy shrub plant and other trees described above may count
for the "no net loss" of trees that are required by the tree
management plan.
Note; the perimeter buffer landscape design proposed by the
applicant (see Exhibit "B" Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 95-484) is acceptable; however, all material shall
be located within the easement and trees shall not be placed on a
property line. If this landscape design is approved, the plans
shall be modified to show the landscape material. It is further
recommended that the specie and size recommendations identified
above be incorporated into the applicants' proposal.
8. Revise the plans to show a Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress to the
project. The Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress was originally approved
for the project to divert trips to adjacent roadways.
Page 3
Memorandum # 95-485
Nautica Sound
MPMD 95-006
9. Submit for review typical lot drawings showing the approved
setbacks for all lots.
10. The following comments are still valid which relate to those sheets
(drawinqs) provided with the previOUS submittal (but are absent
from the current revised master plan):
On sheets 4 of 8, 6 of 8 and 7 of 8, remove from note #3 the
text "or building";
On sheets 6 of 8 and. 7 of 8 amend the text shown on the
perimeter detail drawings, at the rear landscape easement to
read as follows: "width of landscape buffer easement and
other easements, where applicable.";
On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 change the title of the perimeter
landscape buffer easement detail drawing to "Perimeter lots";
Amend the double asterisk note found on sheet 6 of 8 to read
as follows: "Subject to rear perimeter landscape buffer
easement and other easements, ,where applicable.";
, #
On sheet 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from Accessory BUilding note
#3 the following text "pergolas and gazebos". Also define
trellis as "A free standing structure maximum height of 6 feet
located only behind the front building setback line with a
configuration having a height and length and no depth (example
- similar to a fence."; and
On sheet 6 of,8 move the 15 foot corner side setback symbol to
the corner of the building;
11. Specify on the master plan that 30 feet is the maximum height of
the residential and recreation structures.
12. Submit for review all sheets and data that where included with the
previous submittal.
13. It is recommended that all trees required by the tree management
plan be shown planted in either a landscape buffer easement, common
ground, or added to the required lake planting material. It is
further recommended t-hat' the master landscape plan include a
tabular summary of the trees required for the tree management plan
and that they are shown and identified with a distinguishable
symbol on the plan.
14. Establish setbacks for structures proposed for perimeter common
ground (e.g~ bus stop pavilion and decorative fences).
15. Indicate on note (D) that six (6) is the maximum height of the
entry feature.
16. Please note that association documents are required for the
project. The documents are reviewed by staff and the legal
department and required prior to final plat approval.
[Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5 Planned Unit
Development, Section 2. D.]
17. A revised master plan reflecting all staff comments and conditions
approved by the City Commission and the Planning and Development
Board, shall be submitted in triplicate to the Planning and Zoning
Dept. prior to initiating the platting process.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
.'K.ut-te..ID!
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-345
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
jW~h(lAam ~ukill, P.E.
~~Eng~neer
FROM:
DATE:
September 8, 1995
RE:
NAUTICA SOUND
I have met with the agents for subject project and reached
agreement on the following two items:
1. The 8' bike path on Lawrence Road was a suggestion from
the City Comp Plan not a condition based in the LDR, and
probably will serve no useful purpose because it extends
neither north nor south from Nautica Sound. However, a
sidewalk is required.
2. The applicant will provide pedestrian access to the north
so as to accommodate walkers to a new elementary school
a short distance east of Nautica Sound if and when one is
built. They will include in their POA documents an
obligation to construct a sidewalk/bikepath to their
property line prior to the opening of the school. The
School Board, the County and/or the LWDD will have to
extend the access from Nautica Sound as they collectively
see fit.
WVH:ck
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
C:NA1JTK'A.SNO
... ... -~~.
".", ~ ~ ~ ~,W r~ ill"
U) r..-------, ~]
II \, .
! i Ij Ll'"
'. ; ',I t...__.._~~~.J ji
PLM,F'IIi'iG sIND I
".~~JPH!.ilLt~~L. ..f!7'''L- !
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BNGINBBRING DIVISION MBMORAMDUM RO.
I. I
I ,
, '
,. \'", Ii:
A\~l .; 1111..,.,) 1\,
, --rA'
95-332 , . ',~!" ~1
_..,..._.,_..7( ,_, ! ~ . ~."..
1- -
j
n
TO: Mike Haag
Zoning/Site Administrator
, ,
FROM: ~m Hukill, P.E.
~ Engineer
DATE: August 31, 1995
RE: NAUTICA SOUND - THIRD REVIEW
We have today received a revised plan of proposed Nautica Sound and
have reviewed it solely for determination as to whether it is a
major modification of the originally approved document. In our
opinion it is a major modification because no access is provided
onto Hypoluxo Road, thus greatly increasing traffic at the other
two access points. However, we have no technical objection to this
change.
Many conditions of our previous reviews have been incorporated,
some have not. All uncorrected conditions will require attention.
~
WVH:ck
(':N^ 1/S1I1INIURU
.' ,
TO:
FROM:
RS:
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-295
August 9, 1995
AUG I 0 1995
Mike Haag
_ite evelopment Administrator
m V. Hukill, P.R.
Engineer
NAUTICA SOUND - SBCOHD RBVIBW
PLANNING AND
ONING DEPT.
We have again reviewed subject development and have the following to
offer:
A.
B.
c.
D.
All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's
code requirements at time of application. These permits include,
but are not limited to, the following: site lighting, paving,
drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control
devices. Permits required from agencies such as the F.D.O.T.,
Palm Beach County, S.F.W.M.D. and any other permitting agency
shall be included with your permit request.
The 40, 50 and 60 foot right-of-way details conform with the
City's required minimum pavement widths (11' per lane measured
from the center of valley curb). Proposed Meadows Boulevard
detail is not acceptable. Chap. 6, Art. 4, Sec. 10C, pg. 6-11.
Specify the proposed street names within the development
including the "proposed Meadows Boulevard" (Meadows Boulevard is
the loop road in the Meadows development and cannot be used
again). Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 100, pg. 6-14.
Proposed Meadows Boulevard is a collector road and therefor
requires an 80 foot right-of-way. Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. lOB,
pg. 6-11.
E.
Provide an eight foot bicycle, pedestrian path along Lawrence
Road in conformance with the Traffic Circulation Element of the
City's Comprehensive Plan, pg. 66.
In specific response to Ms. Janssen's August 2 letter and
specifically Engineering Division memo 95-260, we submit the
following:
1. Acceptable
F.
2. Please comply. No commitments have been made for a 60 foot
right-of-way, and it must be 80 feet as required in the Land
Development Regulations.
"0
'.
"
'......
....
"--,
...
"
"
. .
Engineering Division Memo 95-295 to Mike Haag
RE: Nautica Sound - Second Review
August 9, 1995
Page Two
3 . Acceptable
4 . Acceptable
5. The Lawson and Noble certification refers to sections of the
Code of Ordinances repealed April 4, 1995. Please comply
with our note 5, (95-260).
6. Acceptable if statement is correct.
7. Acceptable
8. Acceptable to use single 8 foot bike path.
9. Acceptable
10. Acceptable
11. Acceptable
12. Please comply , I
13. Unresolved
WVH:bh
XC: Ken Hall
A.IlAVTICA.1
'"
......,...
................
",
'",
,
".
'. ,
Ms. Tambrl J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 4
4) Details for all signs will be submitted during the Site Plan Review process.
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM - 95-311
1) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project
showing a minimum separation of 10 feet between buildings. A 10'
separation between zero lot line units Is an Industry standard for most
municipalities In South Florida. The proposed houses meet all City
Building codes and fire rated codes for buildings with a 10' separation.
2) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for
review of the project with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off
of Lawrence Road and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard.
In response to the Minor Road issue, the aforementioned information obtained
from Palm Beach County and Rossi, Malavasi should address this concern.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM" 95-125
, ,
No comments to respond to.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-260
In regard to the following comments:
1) Developer understands that site plan review and approval are required and
It has been so noted on plan pursuant to Planning and Zoning
Department's comments.
2) The south road, Meadows Boulevard, exists to the east as a 60' right-ot-
way. An initial meeting held on May 22, 1995, with the City Engineering
Department indicated that the continuation of the 60' right-of-way would be
acceptable. All required turn lanes and other improvements can be
adequately provided within the 60' right-of-way.
3) South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District
acceptance will be acquired prior to Engineering approval.
4) There are no signs proposed In any County rlght-ot-way.
5) The developer's engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply
with aU City Codes and Standards and a copy ot this letter has been
attached for your review.
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 5
6) The appropriate parking spaces and handicap parking spaces have been
provided for the recreation area and are shown on the Site Plan.
7) Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners
association to pay for the operation of a street light system within the
development at the time of plat approval.
8) Two (2) four foot wide sidewalks are shown on either side of Meadows
Boulevard. An eight foot wide bike path Is shown on the south side of the
entranoe road Into the project. The north side of the entry road does not
provide any connections to uses within or adjacent to the .project. Palm
Beach County allows developers to combine two 4' wide sidewalks Into
one 8' wide bikepath. Therefore, the developer requests that the City
review this eight foot wide bike path similar to what Is allowable in Palm
Beach County. This bike path will connect Lawrence Road with the bus
stop and the recreation area located within the central area of the site. The
50' right-of-ways located within the project have four feet wide sidewalks
shown on either side of these rlght-of-ways.' , I
9) Soil borings have been completed and a copy of the Soil Boring Study has
been attached to the resubmittal package.
10) A map indicating the location of the soil borings has also been provided
and is attached to the Soil Boring Study.
11) The developer agrees to comply with this request. The south road,
Meadows Boulevard, will be constructed prior to the Issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy. However, this is contingent upon the fact that no
other access points will be required, including no access point off of
Hypoluxo Road.
12) An easement onto Hypoluxo Road right-of-way for future sidewalk/bike path
access to schools is being addressed subject to Florida Power & Light
(FPL) approval. Such an easement, if approved by FPL, will be located
in either the northeast or northwest corner of the site and will be
encumbered by the FP&L easement.
13) The impact on Lawrence Road of the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road
entrance has been reviewed by our traffic consultant. The redistribution of
trips will not negatively effect the capacity of Lawrence Road now or In the
year 2000, which Is the estimated build-out of the project. Therefore, no
expanslcm of Lawrence Road Is required In conjunction with this project.
Attached Is a letter from the traffic consultant on this Issue.
In response to the last comment, the developer has made contact with the School
Board regarding the relocation of the power line and we are awaiting their
response. In response to comments from the TAC meeting, the developer has
decided to use both steel and concrete poles. With the use of these poles, there
are no anchors or tie downs necessary. Therefore, additional easements for these
poles will not be required.
"
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-260
TO:
FROM:
Mike Haag, zoning/Site Administrator
William HUkill, P.B., City Bngineer
July 26, 1995
NAUTlCA SOUND - MASTBR PLAR MODIFlCA~IOHS
ill
..iI1/. '
.m:
" .. "'-
t,'
DATE:
PlANNING AND
ONING DEPt
('
-
RE:
We have reviewed subject plan for proposed changes in access
points, unit types, setbacks and lot/house sizes. Our comments are
as follows:
1. Accees points - acceptable
2. Unit types - elimination of multi-family units acceptable
3. Setbacks - not acceptable
4. Lot and house sizes - not acceptable
Taken as a group, these modifications represent a major master plan
modification.
Other conunents:
t I
1. Site plan review & approval required. Chap.4, Sec.2,
pg. 4-1
2. South road is a collector road by both PBC and FOOT
standards (see FS 334.03(4)) and must be dedicated to
City of Boynton Beach. Required ROW is 80'. Chap.6,
Art.IV, Sec. lOU, pg.6-1S
3. Need SFWMD and LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
4. County road entrance sign requires PCB approval
5. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that
drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards.
Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.SA, pg.6-7 and Chap.23, Art.IIF,
pg.23-8
6. Provide parking facility for recreation area including
Hie stall. Chap.2, Sec.IIHI6e(12), pg.2-108
7 . Establish deed restrictions providing for a property
owners association to pay for the operation of a street
light system wi~hiQ the development. Chap.6, Art.III,
Sec.14, pg.6-4 and Chap.S, Art.V, Sec.2A4, pg.S-9
a. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.11A, pg.6-3
9. Provide soil borings. Chap.a, Art.III, Ala(3), pg.8-2
10. Provide a map indicating the location of the soil
borings. Chap.a, Art.III,A1a(4), pg.a-3
11. Construct (to completion) the south road prior to
issuance ot tirst Certificate of Occupancy.
Development Dept., Engineering oiv. Memo No. 95-260
Re: Nautica Sound - Master Plan Modifications
July 26, 1995
Page #2
12. Provide easement onto Hypoluxo Road ROW for future
sidewalkjbikepath access to schools.
13. Cause actual construction to commence on widening of
Lawrence Road from L-19 canal to Hypoluxo Road prior to
issuance of initial Certificate of Occupancy. You may
fund design/construct the road outriqht or IOU may
arrange with the County to move the pro]ect to it your
initial C.o. by fronting the cost for repayment in the
scheduled construction year. If you construct it
yourself, you may wish to obtain credits toward the cost
for the road impact fees you will owe.
The power line relocation should, be coordinated with adjacent
property owners as well as the School Board, which owns an
elementary school site a few hundred feet east on Hypoluxo. Perhaps
the entire line can be relocated to the north property line to the
shopping area at Congress Avenue.
WH/ck
C:NAUSOUND.MOD
,
'.. ...
!: i, r: en It:
it
.! I :!
I
t
'I
n w m
.. ...... ,
I I
,... ....' .. . f
j ',i j" .,
, r'I:~ I ,~'"
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-316
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Fire Department
DATE:
August 8, 1995
WDC
Nautica Sound (AKA: Knollwood Groves)
Lawrence Rd & Hypoluxo Rd
MPHD 95-006
RE:
BUildings should maintain a minimum separation of fifteen feet
( 15 I ) .
An additional entrance on Hypoluxo Road would reduce the response
time to the northern third of this project.
The connection to Meadows Boulevard and extension of the roadway to
Lawrence Road will greatly improve response time to this project.
It should be noted that until Miner Road is completed to Lawrence
Road, response time to thi~ development will extend over required
limits (Miner Road construction has been delayed again).
)1
(7 " ·
~.0- 2~c.{.l'n-v.. --t-tu.. '
Cc ~Vl/71JA:A' ~-1(~ d
Attachment: security Gates
cc: chief Jordan
FPO II steve campbell
File
I ) ~ l.~:t/
c; -5/ 7 ~ Wil 1am D. Cavanauqh, FPO
lAMic{ S.oRdLC~ ik:1~
I~- - {I !
4t1(~~ (}ft {/~t( jlY:b
:, "\-'.i{-(r.~--rf fi--ilr-~.~J
I! ;:1 :Ii .. I '......i~~J I
" 1 ,,', I I.. I .~
~-'.-'i:i.iJTrm\ir. f;tlO
.' _.., Z'~!:1!U'l !~!TT. "11oV-'
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
31 AUGUST 95
NAUTICA SOUND - 3rd SUBMITTAL' MEMO #0164
~;""''''''''''...) ...
J have reviewed the above plans (3rd S!!P!:!JiPIlt) affit FR~ll m~Q.~~in my comments made on two
previously submittcd mcmorandum~:E~~9.~.!;,d::,yq~,~i11 fi9Hp~rlBs of those carl icr
Inemorandulns .:. .";-' .-:;0.';' .;: ....
. . l/ t ~'~~;:;::~":'" 'i~"",,:/'. :,i'-:.
. (~) .. .. <?~\
~~ . ~ ' >~ ~ \',\
r;~:9 RCSPCClfUIIY.~ U
1"'~";"::~:~::::"'W r'::":":"':, "':"<,:, 74
~ " f ','
:' :",'" J .
./ ,?
" Sgt. M~n.1 If:Hlfris rJ
Policc DepaI1mcn~,
. /':~,'1l:~
(::::::::;::::;,;~.:!;;:] ({if } ~~
d"'" ~ ~.~.,::.....".\::.,:::>,.
t:::::,:,:"".,.,' "
..:,......;.. . ...
~:f.,.'<:;~\l ~~~ It>j;;>
., \''>., R '. ,""" ~ """",. "
...,..~...:::::...:::=. t..~:..7"....~. . "';~ ...:<'~......~.~.~.. \\':::\:::~.....o;...,R.q..
II"""''''}'' ),z~"..: f.[:::.). (i'C'" .....,'Y,y~::,~ '\)
r... :+ 1 \. .~., I-
... t j' $? ~ '..mp.>..""
"'., lj' }" ""oY^.,w*
:t..:~ ...
""'l:':::-:::~;::::"'::"}
J "
f;":::~:~::' "~:':"
",~::::.::::;2) n
.;;........................6.
J. f"'''''''}'')
I <,w",.w,'..(
,[:::.~.::;~) , '
"...."'.',..,"".. f..l
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
8 AUGUST 95
NAUTICA SOUND - 2ND REVIEW
,
,
MEMO #0156
I have reviewed the 2nd submittal Of~,!J,~!i~lf~d\iif~ii.iia<'t~~:::~Q,!,1lments that were supplied. It
seems that my original suggestions !~:)9j~:~Yblop',Tent ",=p1;9;4~Dred. I still maintain the
following' <} ..'" t.. ^",,;;::;.' l ./ ,.
. ,Jr" C'd":::''''''' ':'.,./ .::.;:,',......:~),
I. Regarding the controlled 6nirhpce/exits, the developer (G.C;,.,l1bibes of Florida) has an
attached I?tter describing,.!fee lrlies o~meehanism~ ofgate~ eonirii~n\~es. The first, SO~
System(S...en Operable ~~~tcnill feel IS not somethmg that IS not Y~voll\ble; both on a pollee
stand point and the prospdHiVlf residents. Police respond to calls tf\4.~,,*,uire a silent response
(burglaries in progress, prowler calls, suspicious persons calls, etc.) tH'ilt activation of a siren at
the cntrance would notr.p, PP.,P-,rt apPjr, ~en$.io, fI,' OfC~'~mtlli.' AIS~"'::f:::WP,.U"',}d not think that residents
would appreciate the pqll.ce.,.(~d fir I ijcp~\jinent ,!!.~.Y.9ing t ir ari~~1 by sounding their
sirens. The second ree~ajriii~9~a~~,on !f~"KP:~x ~ ~'(key"~ntry st~~/)ThiS is an antiquated
method of access to a g\1led:,:tohun\JJliy~~.:ltequth gthe cltyUb : lUntam omster keys to all gated
communities is futile and supplying ell cry 'police officer and fire personel with a key is out of the
question. Maintaining QP.c"ma.ter key requires the response to the P~. i"'~ <::: epartment to obtain
the key first, and then tJ,.the::9i>inmunity. This is not a "timely" respol1' ' r emergency vehicles.
The third recommendatiQp.jJ'emote System" is not explained tho,r~,tlg J}/ enough. It allows the
city personal to remain irt"lfip~r:y~hicles when entering the comm~P!~9.",~ut docs not explain how,
or who activ.ates the gate ~~~~ia'ih~ I OIiginally sugg~s~ed a ~rst'p1 t~).t~is similar to this; a~d is
cun.cntly beIng excepted an t}j~t'l~:tler..,,~ated commUnitIes o(:t~',\:l~j The system works wIth
telcphone accessibility. Thc dispat~~~~~,J1Q.l~ee ;t"'l" dlJfi~~}n!'in thc telephone number for tho
gate and upon radioins that they (police r,rca[lj h ~:'tri~~ at tho gate, the dlspatehel' then
telephones the number to the gate, theret aett,:fati thlfgate for entrance. This matter needs to
be clarified.
2. As stated in comments, the width of the existing bridge on Lawrence Road and Meadows Blvd
entrance would have to be widened for a right turn/deceleration lane. As consistent with other
developments on Lawrence Road, deceleration lanes have been required. I don't see why the
other entrance to the development on Lawrence Road should require a deceleration lane
and not Meadows Blvd.
Respectfully,
Sgt. Marlon Harris
. ,
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN. PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SOT. MARLON HARRIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
25 JULY 95
NAUTICA SOUND
, ,
MEMO #151
"""""""1
I have reviewed the above listed plans aJ)4:::r.CC9niffi~d.iFihe..fQUpwing:
.",;".~,:..::>::;:;\ ,\" I I ~:-r ~,~::::;:,":<
-The entrances/exits are "card ~~rl1~I;e~;;;:""'1 would re6~'~~~d;:,that a tclephone access also
~~( -:..........".;.".. ".;,..',1. ..~...~..
be supplied for police and;,f,e emergency access. Ifnot, sorpetijiiig comparable to this will
~ ., ,', .
be needed for emergenCY';:4e~SS. ';::",.,.,J~:::::,:,:::::;\
,.. .. 1~ "~>,
-Regarding thc south ~~ira:n'ge to the development. on Lawren~, RJAd, I would recommend a
deeclleration. right ha6U"fUril lane. I believe this lane construetMtt Might interfere with the
bridge that crosses the canal. The plans show a decelleration. rigHt hand tum lane for the
north entrance/exil""'!llJ, d, :Jhi, S ShOt I,d ::a, ,.,!IQ ,ap, P, 1~'f'QrJ",~~ soutll" ,ntr,~nc,'" ,e/eXit.
L)t .' l' )) ~\
-Due to thc density~i5i~ed p ~~iil~~~ oft ';s::d~~'lopm t. I ~J:~nglY believe that an
entrance/exit is nee el1::fr.om Hyn lUXt'f-Roid. ,i e distafite :om::.:.botlLtlfojected
entrances/exits (Lawrence Road and Meadows Blvd(?)) arc a great distance from the northern
roadways in the develonl.J1Cn~::J Emergency response to these roads wi~'fequire excess time.
thereby requiring a HYPd~~xo Road entrance/exit. This developn#NWalso in the extreme
nOl1hel1~ and western ~,~!~ of the city and a great distance fro~".~:~~.,:tle'arest fire station
and nollce coverage. ' /''''-''~ ~;::, ,.."".
.. t ~,d"':"<~~ :>':;'/"""'\ ')
\l, \.~ .,.':\0 If )).,.
"'1\', J) ';'>''-. t; """ .:,'" ,..:'
"":~~,:.,.l l",~;:;;."'", r,:::} ...~.;~~::;::~~':\~:~:.~':""'H""
l l ') \.:.:.:,:;--,.:, \.,."'~ {l .;".~ '::',;:>
(i l l ~\ \. . \ ~ . .
" t/ i { , ~ ,.<>:;:'::':::::>:~
" t..l "'.1
Respectfully,
Sgt. Marlon Harris
Police Department
. ~,......... ........ --,..- ..
BUILDING ,DIVISION
MBMORANDUM NO. 95-324
li;,'.1 ffi ~ rE n \Y111 ill
<III' .'."'-','.-""J
' .1 ',. I )
i I I ,. It....
'I ..
, -. "-..-' -.,.---
I' . '1'11""1 '\~, 1
. I I " 'I '\IIi ~
, ; I"r:.". !.':r.~~:
August 31, 1995
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
"
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
TRe COMMBNTS - NAUTICA SOUND - 3rd SUBMITl'AL
RE:
When I reviewed the plans for Nautica Sound's first two
submittals, there were 8 sheets. Since most of my comments
addressed sheet 6 of 8 and only one sheet was submitted on the
3rd submittal, I cannot determine if the new changes in lot size
and count addressed my first comments. Therefore, my first and
second comments are attached and should be met before permitting.
A~~'~'
AN : bh
Attachments/2
xc: William V. Hukill, P.E.
NAUTICA
BUILDING DIVISION
MBMORANDUM NO. 95-287
August 9, 1995
From:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & zoni~g Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
To:
Re: NAUTICA SOUND
Master Plan Modification - 2nd Submittal
East side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,300 feet
south of Hypoluxo Road
After reviewing the above referenced documents, it is
particularly noted in the printed documents that the Building
Division comments have been met as related to signs and setbacks.
Please note that the details for signs are not on the plans, only
in the written documentation.
1. Details for signs must be included in the final site
plan documents.
,
2. The 15 Ft. setbacks shown on the right corner lots on
Page 6 of e, is not measured from the corner of the
building and, therefore, poses a problem for the
following lots: 30, 46, 69, 77, ge, 110, 147 and 169.
This could be rectified if the building was switched to
the opposite side or have dimensions corrected for
approval.
~
Al N bol
I
AN:mh
Att. Plans
cc: William V. Hukill, P.B., Department of Development Director
Il:NIlOTZCIl.TRC
BUILDING PIVISION
MBMORANDUM NO. 95-270
August 2, 1995
From:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building'Offlcial
Master Plan Modification - 1st Review
Nautica South f/k/a Knollwood Groves (PUD)
To:
Re:
The Building Division has reviewed the above plans and have the
following comments:
1. The side setbacks for screen enclosures for Z lots as
noted on Note #2, Page 4 of 8 is confusing. To avoid
problems at permit time, it should be detailed on
Page 6 of 8 and Page 7 of 8.
2. Project identification signs are limited to two with a
total of 250 Sq. Ft. maximum.
3. Entrance signs,should not exceed 32 Sq. Ft. and 6 Ft.
in height. .
4. Details for all signs must be submitted.
AN:mh
cc: William V. Hukill, P.S., Department of Development Director
Il.lllIl.UTlCl't.Tac
AUG-15-1995 14:48
Board Ilf'County Commissioners >-
Ken L. Foster, Chainnan
Burt Aaronson, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol ^. Roberts
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Maude Ford Lee
22222222222222222
407 478 5770 P.02/02
County AdministratOr
Robert Weisman
Department of engineering
ilnd Public Works
August 15, 1995
Ms. Tambr1 Heyden, Director
Boynton Beach Planning and Zon1ng Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: KNOLLWOOD GROVES
Dear Ms. Heyden:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received and reviewed a traffic impact
study for the project entitled Knollwood Groves. The earlier approved project
had proposed access on Hypoluxo Road and Meadows Boulevard. The proposed project
will have access on Lawrence Road and Meadows Boulevard. The resulting
redistribution of traffic is subject to the Traffic Performance Standards, in
Article 7.9 of the Palm Beach County land Development Code. The traffic study
addresses this redistribution of traffic with a build-out of 2000.
The Traffic Division has determined the project meets the Traffic Performance
Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions regarding thi s
determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~J;~
Dan Weisberg, P.E.
Senior Registered Civil Engineer
File: TPS. Mun. - Traffic Study Review
g:\user\dweisber\wp50\tps\boyn50
l'An Equal Opportunity. Affirmative Action Employer"
@ p,lntDd"~ ~(J~ lIf<f)(it
Box 21229 Wesl Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 6S4-4000
TOTRL P.02
.! SEP-12-'95 TUE 12:37 ID:KILDAY & RSSOC
TEL ND:407-689-2592
**12134 P02
...- ,....
~
u
..,.............~~
NAU"nCA SOUND P.U.D. LOT COMPARISON STUDY
'Z' LOT UNBS ZBRO LOT UNB UNI'l'S
PROPOSED REVISED PROPOSED REVlSEO
8-Q-95 e-~-es 8-2.QS 8-28--95
4,000 - 41~ 76 0 0 0
4,500 - 4.999 13 59 .' 0 0
5,000 . 5,999 64 71 ,.-' 96 112 ..-
6,000 . 8,;;Q 1; 16 / 73 74 .......
1,000 + 16 11 " 77 81 .....
TOTAL 1S8 157 248 267
KIJ/Odd\Cnautloa.IOS
)
l..,.
\
,... '.
, I' ......---' '. - ,.
....
----- j SEP 12 '95 TUE 12'37 ID:KILDAY & ASSOC
TEL ~D:407-689-2592
tt034 P03 ~-.
-. - - I
,
I
N
. -.....
e
-
. 5,000 ,
-,- .,
'I
,"~1l~..__..lL1
III
~ !
- .,_.. .1
:11
i'
",--,~',,' .." 1 t ..,-,.,..
, 1
111
~ ! ~
!ll .-..
:1
.. ........- .
; J ~
jiJ
--.----.- ..
II -.-............'"
I
II
~ i -.--.....,..--......
.! -....
, 111 (., , ntY"'J ...
III ..,.,.-
........
:T
Ii ...__,...,1.4 ,....'
.1'
I
,
, .--.......-.--..-...-.
i
j
\
! .....",.
!
..-............ " -,
,
i
p ! '11 OQCL,,,....,,
l
.
-..,
I
II 1fJ,
I"
-4----.-,.-.-
t
, ~_.,-- ..
;11]
'll.
----i. .___"'"
; 11
r: I
:j
----4t-----'-" "
"
:1
, ,
.,
"V+lC~ c?ol.JnJ
"'Zr:.....o .~o+!:? -rpt I....., ,IA...L'r~
- ' t:I.W"_..~:-:(_1.v..r:.-f...,-' ....__......_.u._ ....
.6./1_~q....~__.., ___..L,Q~,I - 16,,1,_2. I 'Z-"? ~5 1"2.", '?3,
.. ,..lO<P -.Jko... I l~.~ - \ ~q j
Tz)~ L- \ '3) - I~~~L... ",,1:2.'1_::, \ '\-'" I u.t9 .
\,5\- \ ~~,~".l~.9..:-, 1 f.s,"at . \..,01
. \'1.~ "J74":,,JJ.5...4_LLL:D B,
~,~Ol lcr~~..~,,,,lq.~..: l'f8 I ?-Of J
~~JZt;?J._.& ..'~J.l.J..,2l2 , '2.1 If - 2/~
2'24/ '2"2'7, Z ";2&f_~_ 2."30. ~3'2-
1. ~B..I ?:~J_.21 ~ - '2#, :z.~ J"
~54 ~58 - 2.~,
I ".._., ,"__.___
(." f <1'1 C} - 1-0+=. t ~ , 34 I'_~ i.+,~l_~~ I 610.- ~.., I
11. -,4 1...ft2-1'-'~~
~ l~ I L~~'/..I.::1.3,~,LI~ 1\81 , t~Co,
\ q -a II~_ , 202 ... '204. 2.0~"i4
~lo, ,ZL6,,~,..2'2!e ,'231. 24S1
'4-48 I ~2J-I'_ "2.lal - 2.J.s" ,
~
t.L."'~ ~o ~ -;..1 t.:k.';i..t-2~ r' zB - 32, ~!5 0#
.3(o/:3B,~,4ft?:,~ SS {' foB -70~
75,~ ,ft~_,._..5~..- B7, IO~:,
/21 -12.~,,__,.L?;o-4 J?J8, 150'1
15"1-/59.,.1 wt/:~(('5, J l.7../t,9J
.1711 11.'1, -..L~.J .i~ 2. J le'l-/S5.;
J67~1'11, ~~,,~eLZ/7,
,2/9- '22'3; 22'5 - LzllJ ,23~ 2'-11.
1if.21 -;z.~1, 2'11. 2S~ ,255-25tC
m*L
L
! :
~,-~.~ SEP-1?-'95 TUE 12:18 ID:KILDAY & ASSOC
TEL HO:4@7-689-2592
0034 PiZ14
- - -
~ ' I
I
'I
I.
iil
"
--'.",- ': : .., ~... .., . ~.. .
. : I ~CD
I
ii
. i _.....
, I
I
__.,-5
I
:
;
.. I ! 5f~
~- "
,
I
"..-,
: , 7.
.. .
-..--.-..
!
, i
........,....
, i
---.,
f I ! (,(a90
, '.h.. ..
,
;
,
'N Cl Llt1 c:.PI
, '"Z' kO'- -rn b1Jl.ail 0v1
-h4-':1~q ...
,~ '"IDI A- L
u>iS o1.D,.~~2.'l.:L, ~~" ~~-f
3"?1" M.J I "?'t:-S - ~~, ~~-=-
3i.1L(P_)..~l.oC1-=-_~~
=- 6fiC(Q
'.,
L-~ 2,("ra,. ~ J..L:,?- J.~, '2.-" 5 - ~b ,
~ - ~J-I_2.~ ,..' ~I-' . ~ I~
'~,7.~ ,~2...~^, ,?~5 ... ~~~ I 34~
~?~.J-.?l5D .. ~5 2,- 2f3 .,:~
,~':15__-:_.~O~
1 'TOTAL
,~,(P,qqq
~ 2~'1:,?](2",.')..1!t, '2.e8 , ~~,
..~ "J.. '1...,l.~~4.~~!:f.4' .. 04r; I *',
??1,,'_~~~~_+,2~~ I ?el, ?rf!:h-
4?-4...,... _______..._'.
1 ~ 1"DTA L.
r
[~.
I
I
i
~
j,i_::
,
it I
i
'7; "00, +
~ ~ ,
1'1
I i
1
tl
1;1
~..,.,~---_...._.,' -- ,
W ~
III
III
Ii
. I
i ~ j -"..',----.----".
i:l
" !
i !
i
. ~
t ~
, ,!
it;
i 'j
L.o+~ .27,3.~,~e7L'!l~.~1 ?J( 8 I 35'5.
,357 - ~8 I 3fD~7 , 38'2 I 392-
LLnrtt~_Le_,___,.__.__.,_"..,,_ ,._~~
~ -----:-
!Ill'
1-
:,,:,,1 i~ r&, i.
"I '1' l:J U1J b
i ~ ,~ SEP 2'~ l\J~:1
; .,
i U J \
l txJ
,
PLANNING AND -. ~
ZONING OEPT. "
September 15, 1995
The City of Boynton Beach
Planning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
t ..A.~"t "
:::::r-' >( C (
11 -
la/v')f-L-'
'--f/~~
To whom it may concern,
Property Reserve, Inc. is the owner of Club Meadows Apartment community in
Boynton Beach. We have owned and managed this apartment community for
several years. We are appalled by the recent information we have
received concerning the proposed road extension adjacent to our property.
Our community is composed of young families who will suffer due to the
increased crime, traffic and noise this absurd proposal will bring.
Extending Meadows Boulevard will create more problems than good not only
for our apartment community but also for the Meadows.
We propose another alternative by adding another roadway thru Hypoluxo Road.
This roadway can handle the additional traffic without negatively affecting
the Meadows. We stongly suggest that you reevaluate the city's position on
th is matter.
Sincerly, ,
IIL~~
Marie Specht
Senior Property Manager
cc: TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL
RICH TIPPETS
CHRIS CHRISTENSEN
100 Meadows Circle . Boynton Beach, Florida 33462 . 407/969-1224
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229 (407) 684-4000
AUG-10-1995 14:09
22222222222222222
407 478 5770 P.02/04
I ....
1."'- Walter H. Keller. Inc.
MIll .... Consulting Engineers and PlanMers
JUly 19, 199.5
Mr. Dan Weisberg, PE.
TrUfic Divillion
Department of Eng:i.ncering and Publit: Works Department
Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-1229
RECEIVED
J {l L 2 1 1995
Re: Traffic Study Addendum. Knollwood Groves (Nautlca Sounll~c ENG. TRAFFIC DIV.
Dear Mr. Weisberg:
Per our telephone discussion this date, I have prepared an estimate of vested t1ips for the
Knollwood Groves developmem. The estimate is provided in Table 1, below.
Table 1 . Vested TrI~ Generatton Estimate
Trip Gcneratif.lD
AM PM
Land Use Size Unit Daih In Out In Out
Residential .
.
Single Family 150 Du's 1.500 30 85 100 56
Attached Units 389 Du's 2.723 25 12A 122 65
Subtotals 539 Ou's 4,223 55 209 221 121
Non-Residential :
Day Care 6,000 SF 478 36 31 37 43
Less Pass-By Credit of 10% "" 48 4 3 4 4
430 32 28 33 39
Net Vested Trips ::: 4,653 88 237 254 160
Sowte: Anna Cottrell Letlf:f dated Marcil 14, 1994
Walter H. Ketler. Inc.
The land use mix and vested status is based on two (2) documents: Anna Cottrell letter to
Cha2in and Armstrong dated March 14, 1994; and Boynton Beach Agenda Memorandum
No. 94-120 by J. Scott Miller dated April 5, 1994. The Anna Cottrell letter identifies the
prior land use mix of 150 single family dwelling units, 389 multi-family units and a 6,000
sf day care center which produced 4,505 extemal trips per day. A!'pllrendy, the prior study
retained a portion of the trips internally and therefore Table 1 is slightly higher. The
Boynton Beach Agenda Memorandum indicates the development's vested status.
tr~~
Walter H. Keller. PE.. AICP
President
Fla PE ;# 20703
WHKJus
attaclunems
1a90 University Drive, Suite 304 - F>,Q, Box 9740. Coral springs, Flcrlaa ~"O7'~
(305) 755-3822 . (BOO) eSa-ee92 . FAX (305) 7SS-3Saa
AUG-10-1995 14:10
22222222222222222
407 478 5770 P.03/04
.... . --
..... .J1J+-16-'95 FRJ 15:20 JD*ILDPlY & ASSO::
TEL NO:2
**523 Pel ~
"'"
,~
v
t()W,\~
BASEIiART & COTTRI!LL,INC,
PLANNKRS
IS32 Old Olceechoboe Road. Suite 101
Weat Palm Btaoh. FL 33409
"O'-~..()()048 PAX 40'''"'-2009
March 14, 1994
Chapla and Armstron.
1201 Ooora. BUlh Boulevard
Delta)' BolCh. FL 3348'-7203
Attn: Jamea BaJlcrano
RE: KNOLLWOOD GROVES PUU/TRA};'}'IC GENERATION RA TItS
Dear Jim:
In anawer to your fax query today regarding traffic generatlon and unit counts at KnollWOOG:
..sln,le famny unitS eencratc an averaee of ten trips per day pcr unit;
.multi..family units icnerate an average or seven trips per day per unit:
~the traffie aeneration for the day care center represented an opportunit)l to -capture. some of the
traffic indicated for the resid!nti21 us-e, thereb)' .m,ctivel)' reducing the total or the external tripa
from lb. thrM uses comblncdi
-Knottwood Qroves was approved for 1'0 sIngle family units, 389 multi-family units. and a
6.000 square foot day care center, producing a total of ~SOS~xternal average trips per day;
-the County considers the 4,505 external trips vested underrhe County's Traffic Performanot
Standard;
- the increase In the number ot single rarnily units and the deletion of the da)' care center will
require a decrease In the number of multi-family units to 2] 5 In order to achieve an equivalency
In the number of trips. This Is calculated as foUows:
300 sinlle family multiplied by 10 trips =3.000 external trip.
4,50.5 vested trips mInus the 3,000 proposed for single family
leavea I,SO! vested trips available for multi-family
1,'0' divided by 7 ulps per day for multl.ramlly =215
I hope this helpJ, Call mo if you wane to discuss this.
Sincerely,
~ ~~~OSL
Anna Cottrell. AJCP
PrmelpaJ
-,. -- .,
I
'_FUN" ~r:!!(. ~~ .
t~l~1.1iB~~
AUG-10-1995 14:10
- . ....
...
22222222222222222
407 478 5770 P.04/04
r'
.1 JU-J-1_-'gs FRr 1S:;' .D. ..LDj:W & ASSOC
TEL NO:2
#523 P02
.
'-'
u
AGENOA MIiMORANl)UM NO. 94-120
April I. 1."
x. LEGAL
B.1 Proposed Ordinance No. 094- RE: Knollwood Groves Amendment of
RezonIng Development Order
The Boynton Beach City Commission on October 11, 19ae approved Ordinance No. ee-36
which approved a rezoning of Knollwcod's property from AG (agriculture) and R1 AM
(single family residential) to planned unit development (F!lUD) subjeot toth. comments of
the Planning & Zoning Soard (dared September' 2, 1SS9) and staff; and Inoluding a
condition that the applicant pay a mOl!etary amount ror the improvemfmt of the roed
.ystom In tho area. Pleas& see Agenda Memorandum dated Septembor 13. 1989 from
Carmen Annunziato, Planning Director, to GecrgQ Hunt, Interim City Manager for further
detail..
Under tho proposed agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and Knollwood
Groves, Inc., Knollwood would pay to the City the amount of $108,515 for the design and
constrUCtIon or the missIng link. In return the City would ralease KnOllwood from its
financlal obligation for roadway Improvements in the area. rtquest roadJtraffie fee impact
credits from Palm Beach County, ana vest the Knollwood Grove Development.
In order to effeotuate thla proposed agreement the City must first amend the conditions of
approval for the PUO as set forth in Ordinanee 89-36 concerning roadway improvementst
and that the payment 01 $106,515 to the City shall cons.titute the commencement or
development, thereby vestll"lg this development.
Should the Cfty Commission approve the execution Of the agreement with Knoitwood
Groves then It would be in order rOf the Oity to approve first reading of thl& {,)rdinan~e
providing for amendment or tho eondition$ or approval for the PUO for KnOflWOOd Groves,
Inc. concernIng l'Oa~way Improvements,
1\1. suggested that consideration of this ordinance be addressed After the reaolutlon,
conoernin; thta 8ubjoet matter.
~-
~COII Miller
City Manege,
~!~~_4_
TOT'lL P.04
S-1MONS & WHITE, ~C.
Engineers · Planners · Consultants
August 3, 1995
Mr. William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
/
RE: Nautica Scund PUD
Lawrence Road Traffic Issues
Dear Mr. Hukill:
Pursuant to comments from the City of Boynton Beach Engineering
Department, the following is a review of the effect on Lawrence
Road of the reallocation of vested trips for the above referenced
project in light of the proposed development plan which eliminates
a previously approved Hypoluxo Road access.
Lawrence Road has a daily capacity of 13,400 trips per day. The
1994/1995 volumes established by Palm BeaQh County for Lawrence
Road from Hypoluxo to Gateway is 7,866 trips per day. Based on a
1991/1992 volume of 7,750 trips per day, a three year historical
growth rate of .45% (or less than 1%) is applicable. Utilizing
this historical growth rate, in the year 2000, which is estimated
to be the buildout of the Nautica Sound project, Lawrence Road will
have a volume of 8,308 trips per day.
It is proj ected that the Nautica Sound proj ect will generate a
total of 4,340 trips per day. Approximately 3,650 of these trips
will reach Lawrence Road util1.zing either the main entrance or
Meadows Boulevard. Pursuant to the Traffic Report prepared by
Walter H. Keller, Inc., 2,348 trips will head south on Lawrence
Road and 1,302 trips will head north. Based on a year 2000 volume
of 8,308 trips per day, this will establish a total maximum volume
of 10,656 trips, which is less than the current Lawrence Road daily
capacity of 13,400 trips per day. Although no major project
significantly impacts this link, a substantial amount of capacity
remains available for approved but unbuilt development until
Lawrence Road is widened to a four-lane section scheduled as
assured construction by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1997/1998.
4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415
Telephone (407) 965.9144
Mr. William Hukill, P.E.
August 3, 1995 - Page Two
Therefore, the additional trips reallocated to Lawrence Road by the
elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entry will not negatively affect
the current capacity of Lawrence Road nor projecting it to the
ultimate buildout of the Nautica Sound project of the year 2000,
will not negatively impact the road in the future.
Sincerely,
RFR/jp
cc: Rick Ellsner
Collene Walter
,'''\>'- ...c..
~P;
111-1( Walter H. Keller, Inc.
- - .... Consulting Engineers and Planners
July 10, 1995
Mr. Rick Elsner, PE., Director of Land Development
G.L. Homes of Florida
1401 University Drive, Suite 200
Coral Springs, Florida 33071
Re: Traffic Study - Knollwood Groves
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Elsner:
Per your request of June 19, 1995, an updated Traffic Study has been prepared for the
above subject property. The property was previously vested for traffic concurrency by the
City of Boynton Beach. Because the site plan is proposed to be modified, an updated
Traffic Study is required to verify that the proposed site plan revision does not generate
additional non-vested traffic. Additionally, the geometric requirements at the project's
access points need to be established. This letter documents the Traffic Study and site
access requirements.
Site Location and Development Proposal
Knollwood Groves is located south of Hypoluxo Road and east of Lawrence Road in the
City of Boynton Beach, Florida. The site occupies approximately 120 acres. The City of
Boynton Beach previously vested this site for 4,505 vehicle trips. Under the current
proposal, 434 single family residential units and recreational uses are proposed. Two
access points are proposed to serve the site: a main entrance on Lawrence Road
approximately 1,300 feet south of Hypoluxo Road; and a connection to Meadows
Boulevard approximately 500 feet west of the eastern property line. Additionally, the
missing link of Meadows Boulevard, a two (2) lane sixty (60) foot right-of-way, is
proposed to be constructed, connecting to an existing roadway perpendicular to the existing
Meadows Boulevard at the eastern property boundary, continuing along the southern
portion of the site, with termination at the southwest portion of the property at Lawrence
Road.
Trip Generation. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment
The trip generation analysis projects the 434 single family dwelling units will produce
4,340 daily trips, an amount less then the prior vesting of 4,505 daily vehicle trips. Table
1, below, provides the trip generation results for daily and peak hour conditions.
Table 1 - Trip Generation
Trip Generation
AM PM
Land Use Size Unit Daily In Out In Out
Single Family 434 Du's 4,340 75 213 264 142
Source: Walter H. Keller, Inc.
ITE 5th Edition
continued......
1890 University Drive, Suite 304' P.O. Box 9740 . Coral Springs, Florida 33075
(305) 755-3822 . (800) 286-6692 . FAX (305) 755-3866
IlL!!
WT,
Mr. Rick Elsner, PE., Director of Land Development
July 10, 1995
Page Two
The project's trip distribution is estimated to be 30% north, 30% east and 40% south.
Project traffic was assigned to the roadway network based upon the project's internal
loadings, access points and trip distribution. Figure 1 (see page 3), depicts the project's
peak hour turning movement volumes for each project entrance and the daily project traffic
loadings for surrounding roadways.
The project traffic loading (daily and peak hour) was added to the existing Lawrence Road
traffic volume to ascertain future traffic conditions. With the completion of the missing link.
of Meadows Boulevard, additional non-project traffic will also be added to the roadway.
The non-project traffic associated with this condition was estimated to be 750 vehicles per
day. Table 2, below, provides the future traffic volume estimates for Lawrence Road and
Meadows Boulevard.
Table 2 - Future Traffic Estimate
Daily Pk Hr AM AM PM PM
Roadwayl No. LOS D 94-95 Proj Daily LOS D Pk Hr Proj AM Pk Hr Proj PM
Location Cap AADT ADT Total Cap Vol Vol Total Vol Vol Total
Lawrence Rd
N of Proj N. Entl'. 2L 13,400 7,004 1,302 8,306 1,310 672 86 759 672 122 794
S of Proj N. Entl'. 2L 13,400 7,866 612 8,478 1,310 755 41 796 755 91 846
S of Proj S. Entl'. 2L 13,400 7,866 1,736 9,602 1.310 755 115 870 755 162 918
Meadows Blvd
W of Proj E. Entl'. 2L 13,400 750 · 1,315 2,065 1,310 72 87 159 72 123 195
E of Proj E. Entl'. 2L 13,400 750 · 1,302 2,052 1,310 72 86 158 72 122 194
Source: Walter H. Keller, Inc.
Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Div.
· - Estimated non-project traffic associated
with completion of missing link.
Figure 1 depicts the project's peak hour turning movements. The non-project peak hour
turning movements associated with Meadows Boulevard completion were also reviewed at
the south project entrance. This traffic component adds 13 southbound lefts and 17
northbound rights in the AM peak hour and 19 southbound lefts and 45 northbound rights
in the PM peak hour.
Geometric Design Requirements at Project Access Points
Site geometric requirements were developed after field review of site conditions and a
review of project traffic volumes and non-project traffic. The following geometric designs
are recommended.
North Project Entrance:
· Southbound Through and Left Turn Lanes
· Westbound Left and Right Turn Lanes
· Northbound Through and Shared Right Turn Lane
continued.....
~
~ ~
~ 0 0
o .~~
.~ ~ 0
~~~
~.::J.;"I.
-.s 7)~~
c ~ ~ ~
~ o<'~
~
~
, ' '
~ ~~
.; $
--------------'
\ ~
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Ul
\-
-
CS)
\_-------
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\<<')
\~
\-
~
~
';::)
<5
r~ ~QU~.1Me\
~
+\
~i
..;~
!!dll
~.\
~w
i~
~~
~8
~
\;:
'\
'\
'\
\
\"1S
~
\~
Lf)\~
_ 0
<<')..1 ~
-' ~
~
,~
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
..- ------------
Cfi, L' l
tot'l ?;l9
I
I
(/)
C
Q)
E
(l)
b
2
~
.c
~
?
\-"
41)9-
(1)~
~~
-0
(!)Q)
".0'
00:
0'
!~
'O~
c:i
Sti
..----------------
- / / {,' (' e t!'f<)'( I'
;' / /{, 'V,
I) J- ('.t-. i!'l- t '-<. f- L~ 4;J-
t: 1 {- i
. hL~ Lit.? d ,~d..?t. t'tL -
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059
TO:
1~~KriaemA. Parker, City Manager
V~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
March 6, 1995
...i I", i
ill
FROM:
DATE:
~'I
,r. .
RE:
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD
The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between' NW 22nd
Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County
to be 7972 trips. The current FOOT Level of Service Manual defines
the threshold traffic level for LOS D for 2 lane undivided streets
as 13,400 trips.
Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic
because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has
informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in
the County system is not seriously considered mittl LOS D is
reached. Lawrence Road is a County road.
The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can
be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS D is reached. Well over
1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as
follows:
l Lawrence Oaks 178 units
I- Nautica I 177 units
i- Nautica II 197 units
I- -MeaEiowwubd Gd)ve ( CI kt:r Kno 11 wooda;....h<<;. 539 units
Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuilt units, est.
L-- Sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est.
i-- Jonathan's Grove 32 units
1.-' Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est.
J- Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est.
J...- Citrus Park 113 units
TOTAL 1680 unoccupied units
The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the
entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many
units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic
from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972
trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all
unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level
of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000
trips. LOS 0 will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680
future units are occupied.
Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059
Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road
March 6, 1995
Page #2
We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue
collected from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on
Lawrence Road. If we a..ume 1600 dwelling units have generated
those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500
per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The
total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000,
representing a total at build-out of $5,OOO,OOOt generated by these
developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are
estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact
fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.)
and those who don't (schools).
Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning
for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS 0 is reached, action
can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane
undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS 0, which is
adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along
Lawrence Road.
WVH!ck
C:LAWRENCE.LOS
xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Ken Hall, Engineering Aide
Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner
TASLE 1A
LEVEL or SERVICE D
Teet 1 Alternate
Peak Hour: AnT Tilt 1
LOS D LOS D l.OS D
r^CILIT~ l'\'PII 8'l'ANDI\I\D C'l'AHDARD 8TAND"-I\D
2 lanell undl...ldel! 1,220 13 . 400 1,030
3 1,_",u two-way 1,280 14 r 000 1,080
2 lanoll one-way 1,600 17 , 600 2,650
J lanes a:1lll-way 2,460 Z7 , 000 4,000
4 lanee undl\" Lcled 2,140 2JrS20 1,770
.. lane.. tit v.~docl 2, "0 29,400 2,210
5 laneB d Lv ldGd 2,670 29,400 2,210
6 lanai di-vlde" 4,100 45,000 3,330
8 lanes dlvided 5,070 55,800 4,170
4 1,'"98 eJCpreuway 6,070 61S, 900 3,450
I lanee expL'8111way t,100 t03,400 5,110
8 lone~ expresswar 12,130 131,900 G. 890
10 lane. a~pr...way 15,170 112.300 8,610
Soureel ?DOT Level oe Service K4null, Generalized Dally Level of Service
~axLmum Volumea, Group C and Croup 1, and G.~erallzed Peak Hour/Peak
DirectLonal Level Of ServLce Haxlmum volumel, Group A and oroup 1 tar
ur~.nL&.d ar... (Aprt1 1992).
~O~ the O.t.ll.d ~naly.l. tOt Alternate Teet One. Level ot serviee 0 ,hall be the
Sum of th~ crLtlcal VOlume. ot one thoueand f~u~ hundred (1,.00) 1n accordance
wIth the Planning Method in the 1985 Manual.
TABU 18
LRVEL 0' SIRVICE B
".It 1 Alternate
Peak HQur felt 1
LOS E LOS E LOD B
FACIl.nr Type STANDNU) STAHDAltD STANDARD
2 lafl~1I u nd 1') l.:1ec! 1. 370 15,000 1,280
3 lanfl!l t'Jo-~lay 1,450 15,700 1,340
2 lanes one-way 1 , 760 19 , 300 3,120
3 lanes one-way 2,660 29,JOO .,&70
4 lanen undlvldec1 Z , 350 25,800 a,080
4 l-snleD d Lv tried 2,930 32,200 2,'00
IS lanoo tlo,o-"ay 2,\130 32,200 2.600
6 1 ~n.ay divldt:d 4.440 48,800 3,e90
8 hoes divided 5,550 60,400 4,870
4 lanl!s expreuGway 6,500 14 , 000 3,710
6 laneR exprc88way 9,780 111, ZOO 5,560
0 la"~~ exp~cs8way 13,0'0 1"',200 7,410
10 lene. .np~...w.r 11,310 1 as, 300 11,260
Sour~el FDOf Level of Service Hanual, Ceneralized Dally Level of $ervice
lIa;eimut,' Volume., Group C anct Croup 1, and Oeneuu'zect 'nit "our/Peak
D!.:ectional Level of Service Maximum Velum.., Croup A and Group Uor
~rb~nlz.d er... lApr1119t2).
i',)!L' t:ho D..,t:aUQd .nalf.i.8 for r..Lt-Qa.-natu T....t One. Lavel of Servlce E shall be the
Sum ot th~ Critical Volumas of one thouaand fly. hund~ed (1,500) 1n accordance
with the P hr."!n; Hethod 1" the 1985 Kanual.
The Level of Serv1ce Standard. for Te.e Z are Level ot ..rvlce B 1n ~abl. la.
TOTAL P. 02
t.1.emll:Sn\.a~y ~"-IlUU"'O ~G" ...,v".... "'''S..''.
Hlgh School. pe~ 1reeO aq.et.
599.50
. ..i -, L"'- t, ~ ' -
Kilday & AaocIlItee
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
t: r,Hj tl N n'.l f,!t!ld ~
[".,~-"-'<.~.."-~._=_.."~,, ~
CC"'1 0 (\ SO'rJ Inn'
-iu":; v l: l!'~
d Ii:;
r. '). L
._-~,=...;; ( n H
u.] ~ U ~.
J..! 1t
~~b r - r/l,
~ ~/rrftl(
'}f7l!c.~-vr
August 30, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Nautica Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D.
Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up
Our File No: 1020.13
Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag,
Attached please find twelve revised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning
issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15, 1995.
For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously
approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P.U.D. Included with this resubmittal is a
Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the interior right-of-way
configuration, pavement and sidewalks. This amended plan should address the major
concerns of members on the City Commission. The following is an overview of the
modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan.
1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500
square feet. In turn, the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from
89 to 59 lots. The number of lots in the 5,000 to 6,000 square foot range has been
increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424
which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of
539 units. The breakdown between zero and "Z" lots has also been altered. There are
now 21 more zero lot line units than previously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have
been eliminated.
2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the
City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upsize the facilities to accommodate
a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The lift station is located in the southwest
corner of the top portion of the site. In order to provide a more amenable plan for the
City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 30, 1995
Page 2
In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a
proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have
spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Hallihan regarding this issue and I believe the
attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant
material will be native and, as indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design.
Attached with this letter is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense
landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached
or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
~I~
Karyn I. Janssen
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
cc: Alan Fant, GL Homes
Larry Portnoy, GL Homes
Rick Elsner, GL Homes
Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble
0--;
T
0:\
~~-
~0-~
~~t
~~\
.6.0
v<.0'i
-Q!
Sa~
4.~~
-Z ~ 'i
~i
~~
D
\ \
\ -"
~ \ .:\
, IV
'C -- .
-
'C ",1'
..<
.J
<t
- -- - --
~ i
~
~ ~
~ - --
-- <.0 ';f, Q)
-
't- 't-
-
- :;
-Z
~
~ - -- ~
-
- J
J
- -- 't- 't-
Q 0
~ J
0 - - -- N
of-
~ 0
N 't-
-- 0 ~
- r
~ - -- ~
~ -?
0 CZ
.6.
-::>
-- ~
- - - --
(
~!
~~
~\
-'Ii
~i
.~
- --
~
,- --
(
t
\~
\\
-'I%,
~~
- --~------------------
-~---
Kilday It AuocIatee
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1561 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
August 2, 1995
-"/'VI) C-
ex ~d3~"rt4-..
"~~ '-0.11,( ,
/l-vDr-F/,,,,uV;'
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden, Planning Director
Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Nautica Sound F.K.A. Knollwood Groves PUD
Minor Master Plan Modification - Technical Review Committee Follow-up
Our Project No.: 1020.13
Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag,
Attached please find twelve (12) sets of revised plans addressing those issues
raised at the TRC meeting of July 25, 1995, and subsequent items included in the
TRC comments memorandums issued by each reviewing department.
For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the
previously approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves PUD. Included with this
application is a master site plan which reflects the layout of individual lots, blocks
(pods), the interior right-of-way configuration, pavement and sidewalks, and
maximum building envelopes for each lot. This plan should address the major
concerns of members at the TRC meeting.
The following is a recap of the comments included in the TRC comments letters
and how they have been addressed by the project team in this resubmittal.
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-151
1) The developer has researched the availability of different systems to allow
24 hours access to the site and a letter summarizing his findings is
attached. As requested, there are options which are comparable to a
telephone access system. The developer intends to install a system which
will permit 24 hour access to the project.
2) A south entrance deceleration lane is not feasible due to the location ar
width of the existing bridge over the canal and adequate right-of-way
complete the necessary construction is not obtainable.
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 2
3) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project
with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off of Lawrence Road
and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard. The Meadows
Boulevard connection will decrease response time as it provides for a
secondary east-west corridor south of Hypoluxo Road, which is the
northern limits of the City. The developer has committed to constructing
and dedicating Meadows Boulevard prior to the first Certificate of
Occupancy for Nautica Sound, subject to no Hypoluxo Road access.
The developer understands the Fire Departments concern regarding
response time, especially in regards to the Minor Road issue. Tanya
McConnell, at the Palm Beach County Engineering Department, Roadway
Production Division confirmed that Minor Road, from Congress Avenue to
Lawrence Road, is scheduled for the Summer of 1996. The City of
Boynton Beach is responsible for this construction and has entered into a
design contract with Rossi, Malavasi, Engineers. All required right-of-way
has been acquired and the road is currently being designed. Construction
of this link should commence at the same time as construction of Nautica
Sound. Once constructed, Minor Road, together with Meadows Boulevard,
should provide for a decreased response time to this community. This
project has already made a monetary commitment toward this construction.
I have confirmed with Rossi, Malavasi that they intend to have 90%
complete plans prepared by the end of August for City review. All
indications are that this portion of Minor Road will be constructed on
schedule.
RECREATION AND PARK MEMORANDUM - 95-345
1) The Recreation dedication requirement calculation has been shown on the
Master Plan (page 3 of 8).
2) The five recreation elements consisting of a swimming pool, recreation
building, tot lot, basketball court and tennis courts have been shown on the
Site Plan (Sheet 4 of 8). Thirty-one (31) parking spaces have also been
shown with the appropriate handicap spaces necessary.
3) One-half credit for private recreation has been provided. This calculation
is shown on the Master Plan (Page 3 of 8).
4) The five acre public park has been dedicated to the City of Boynton Beach
is shown in the southeast corner of the site and has been indicated on all
the appropriate plans.
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 4
4) Details for all signs will be submitted during the Site Plan Review process.
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM - 95-311
1) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the project
showing a minimum separation of 10 feet between buildings. A 10'
separation between zero lot line units is an industry standard for most
municipalities in South Florida. The proposed houses meet all City
Building codes and fire rated codes for buildings with a 10' separation.
2) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for
review of the project with only two (2) entrances to the project, the main off
of Lawrence Road and a secondary entrance off of Meadows Boulevard.
In response to the Minor Road issue, the aforementioned information obtained
from Palm Beach County and Rossi, Malavasi should address this concern.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-125
No comments to respond to.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM - 95-260
In regard to the following comments:
1) Developer understands that site plan review and approval are required and
it has been so noted on plan pursuant to Planning and Zoning
Department's comments.
2) The south road, Meadows Boulevard, exists to the east as a 60' right-of-
way. An initial meeting held on May 22, 1995, with the City Engineering
Department indicated that the continuation of the 60' right-of-way would be
acceptable. All required turn lanes and other improvements can be
adequately provided within the 60' right-of-way.
3) South Florida Water Management District and Lake Worth Drainage District
acceptance will be acquired prior to Engineering approval.
4) There are no signs proposed in any County right-of-way.
5) The developer's engineer has certified that the drainage plan will comply
with all City Codes and Standards and a copy of this letter has been
attached for your review.
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 5
6) The appropriate parking spaces and handicap parking spaces have been
provided for the recreation area and are shown on the Site Plan.
7) Deed restrictions will be established to provide for a property owners
association to pay for the operation of a street light system within the
development at the time of plat approval.
8) Two (2) four foot wide sidewalks are shown on either side of Meadows
Boulevard. An eight foot wide bike path is shown on the south side of the
entrance road into the project. The north side of the entry road does not
provide any connections to uses within or adjacent to the project. Palm
Beach County allows developers to combine two 4' wide sidewalks into
one 8' wide bikepath. Therefore, the developer requests that the City
review this eight foot wide bike path similar to what is allowable in Palm
Beach County. This bike path will connect Lawrence Road with the bus
stop and the recreation area located within the central area of the site. The
50' right-of-ways located within the project have four feet wide sidewalks
shown on either side of these right-of-ways.
9) Soil borings have been completed and a copy of the Soil Boring Study has
been attached to the resubmittal package.
10) A map indicating the location of the soil borings has also been provided
and is attached to the Soil Boring Study.
11) The developer agrees to comply with this request. The south road,
Meadows Boulevard, will be constructed prior to the issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy. However, this is contingent upon the fact that no
other access points will be required, including no access point off of
Hypoluxo Road.
12) An easement onto Hypoluxo Road right-of-way for future sidewalk/bike path
access to schools is being addressed subject to Florida Power & Light
(FPL) approval. Such an easement, if approved by FPL, will be located
in either the northeast or northwest corner of the site and will be
encumbered by the FP&L easement.
13) The impact on Lawrence Road of the elimination of the Hypoluxo Road
entrance has been reviewed by our traffic consultant. The redistribution of
trips will not negatively effect the capacity of Lawrence Road now or in the
year 2000, which is the estimated build-out of the project. Therefore, no
expansion of Lawrence Road is required in conjunction with this project.
Attached is a letter from the traffic consultant on this issue.
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 6
In response to the last comment, the developer has made contact with the School
Board regarding the relocation of the power line and we are awaiting their
response. In response to comments from the TRC meeting, the developer has
decided to use both steel and concrete poles. With the use of these poles, there
are no anchors or tie downs necessary. Therefore, additional easements for these
poles will not be required.
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM - 95-394
1) The stated notes have been added to Sheet 4 of 8.
2) The Site Plan has been amended to identify the perimeter setback
dimensions proposed for the project.
3) Association documents will be provided at the appropriate time.
4) A five foot wide limited access easement has been shown on the Site Plan
along the west side of Lawrence Road and on the north side of the
proposed Meadows Boulevard.
5) On the Conceptual Landscape Plan a five foot high buffer hedge planted
two feet on center at the rear of the lots that abut the C3 Commercial
zoned property located in the northwest corner of the project has been
shown.
6) On the Site Plan, Sheet 4 of 8, the location of the zero lot line sides of the
buildings for all lots have been shown.
7) A note such as the one added for the Minor Master Plan Modification for
Nautica has been added to the Site Plan and it reads "Refer to Building
Chart above for front setbacks".
8) The rear setbacks for lot numbers 45, 58, 97, 124 and 168 have been
marked with an *. The building setback shall be 15', the pool setback shall
be 10' and the screen enclosure setback shall be 8'. This is consistent
with the "back to back" setbacks that have been established for this site.
9) The applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of a
proposed 40' x 100' and a 50' x 100' lot. The request for these lot sizes
indicates only a minimum lot size and is consistent with what was
requested, approved, and currently under construction at Nautica located
just south of this project on Lawrence Road. The average lot area for all
lots within the project is 6,102 s. f. The zero lots have an average lot area
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 7
of 6,719 s.f. with over 61% of the zero lots over 6,000 s.f. "ZI1 lots have an
average lot area of 5,200 s.f. 19% of the "Z" lots are over 6,000 s.t.
10) The two products proposed for this site are similar to the approved
products found at Nautica. The additional five feet of building setback
allows for a prominent architectural feature to be located close to the street
rather than the garage and the building located on the same plane. This
will diminish the effect of the 16' wide driveway and will improve the
appearance of the building and the lots in total.
11) As aforementioned, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for
a review of the proposed side building setback for the non-zero side of the
zero lot line units for 10'.
12) Again, the applicant would like to proceed to City Council for review of the
proposed 10' side pool setback and 12' screen enclosure setback which
are consistent with those proposed and approved on the Nautica Site Plan.
The proposed 17' foot corner side setback for pools and 15' for screen
enclosures have been maintained and are so noted on the plan. The
proposed 10' rear pool setback for IIback to back" lots and the seven foot
(7') rear pool setback for all lots that abut a lake maintenance easement,
common ground or recreation tract have been maintained. The eight foot
(8') rear screen enclosure setback for all back to back lots has been
maintained and the five foot rear screen enclosure setback for all lots that
abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract
have also been maintained.
There is a note on the Site Plan which discusses prohibited encroachments
within easements.
13) At this time, the developer's engineer has been in contact with Palm Beach
County Engineers regarding off-site roadway improvements that are
required. The County is requesting the right and left hand turn lanes into
the northern entrance of the property and the left hand turn lane into the
southern entrance of the property. If further roadway improvements are
required, they will be addressed at that time.
14) The approved Master Plan on file does not indicate any perimeter
landscape requirements and the PUD section of the Code also does not
require any perimeter landscape buffers. The developer is providing these
landscape easements to improve the aesthetic character of the site on his
own accord and not because it is a requirement of the City; therefore, the
developer would like to install them on a "lot by lot" basis since they are
not a requirement of the City. This minimizes damage to plant material as
Ms. Tambri J. Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 2, 1995
Page 8
if it is installed prior to building construction, it is very difficult to protest and
maintain it. These landscape easements will be irrigated by each lot which
will promote it's survivability.
15) The original Master Plan anticipated an access and median opening onto
Hypoluxo Road. Since the median opening has not been provided as
originally anticipated, the developer will provide a straight-thru access by
extending Meadows Boulevard to the existing stub of Meadows Boulevard
on the southeast corner of the project.
I would appreciate an opportunity to review this response letter and the revised
plans with you prior to the August 15, 1995, City Commission meeting. If you
have any questions or concerns in regards to these plans or any other items
contained herein, please do not hesitate to contact me immediately.
Sincerely,
K~V1 \~
Karyn I. Janssen
cc: GL Homes of Florida, Inc.
Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble
KIJjcdd\cheyden.802
-
LN\\'
. . . . . . . . .....
Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc.
ENGINEERS. PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
July 10, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435-0310
Attn: Mr. William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
Re: NAUTICA SOUND
L.N. & W. Project 95-181
Dear Mr. Hukill:
The master plan is in compliance with Appendix C, Article 8, Section 4 of the Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances for the master plan requirements.
If y~ve any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
./ 1\
S)t1cerel , \
. U '
RWL:jhj
cc: Collene Walter
JHJ\LAND\95-181\HUKILL.710
LAWSON, NOBLE & WEBB,INC. 420 Columbia Drive. West Palm Beach, FL 33409. (407) 684-6686. Fax (407) 684-1812
LAWSON, NOBLE & ASSOCIATES 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, SUite 9. Port SI, Lucie, FL 34986. (407) 878-1700. Fax (407) 878.1802
07/28./Sis
07:05
r'.10. '?2'~
[;'::
,-
G.L. HOMES
OF FLORIDA
July 27, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Dept.
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 3 10
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Anention: Mr. Mike Haag
Re; Nautica Sound
Dear Mr. Haag,
I have been in contaCt with one of our subcontractors (EDL - Electronic Door Lift) who Installs the
operating equipment for our gated communities to question them abom mechanisms that could be
installed at the gate to allow emergency vehicles or Ci1y workers 24 hour access into the communlty
According to Mr. Jack Trout with EDL, there are three different systems which can be installed to aJlo\.\-
the 24 hour access. They are as follows:
1. SOS System (Siren Operable System): This system is activated by the sound of a siren when
an emergency vehicle approaches the gate, This system will automatically open the gate,
therefore, all personal will remain in their vehicles,
2. Knox Box: This is a key entry system. The City would have a master key which would allow
City personal to get out oftbeir vehicles and unlock (open) the gates,
3. Remote System: This is the eX2ct same system which is used on automatic garage door
opening systems. This system would allow City personal to remain in their vehicles when
entering the community.
~ 40 I UNIVmSl1Y DRIVE · 3U~TE 200 . CO:<AL SPRi~GS. FU:)RIDA 33071 . 2C5-753.: 73C' . p,,\ = 3::;5- 15J,":~: ~
07/28/95
07:04
t~CI, ';:'2;:'
:I,:) :
--
Mr. Mike Haag
July 27,1995
Page 2
Please review these three options and should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact Jack TrolJt
with EDL His phone number is (305) 97:2-9300, I think one or a combinanon offfi'o of the above
mentioned systems would guarantee the City 24 hour access into the communtty,
S~' cere I, Yours, ,::"
.4/#
.:::.zd...---
Rick E. Elsner, P.E,
cc: By way of facsimile
Mr, Bill Cavanaugh, City Fire Department
Mr. Skip Milot, City Utilities Department
Sgt. Marlon Harris, City Police Department (~~,) 3-75 - (.,\ 85
Co Ilene W. Walter, Kilday & Associates (...t>7) ~8'l -~S"l'2.
SIMMONS & WHITE, INC.
Engineers. Planners · Consultants
August 3, 1995
Mr. William Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE~ Nautica Sound PUD
Lawrence Road Traffic Issues
Dear Mr. Hukill:
Pursuant to comments from the City of Boynton Beach Engineering
Department, the following is a review of the effect on Lawrence
Road of the reallocation of vested trips for the above referenced
project in light of the proposed development plan which eliminates
a previously approved Hypoluxo Road access.
Lawrence Road has a daily capacity of 13,400 trips per day. The
1994/1995 volumes established by Palm Beach County for Lawrence
Road from Hypoluxo to Gateway is 7,866 trips per day. Based on a
1991/1992 volume of 7,750 trips per day, a three year historical
growth rate of .45% (or less than 1%) is applicable. Utilizing
this historical growth rate, in the year 2000, which is estimated
to be the buildout of the Nautica Sound project, Lawrence Road will
have a volume of 8,308 trips per day.
It is proj ected that the Nautica Sound proj ect will generate a
total of 4,340 trips per day. Approximately 3,650 of these trips
will reach Lawrence Road uti llzing either the main entrance or
Meadows Bouleva1:'d. Pursuant to the Traffic Report prepared by
Walter H. Keller, Inc., 2,348 trips will head south on Lawrence
Road and 1,302 trips will head north. Based on a year 2000 volume
of 8,308 trips per day, this will establish a total maximum volume
of 10,656 trips. which is less than the current Lawrence Road daily
capacity of 13,400 trips per day. Although no major project
significantly impacts this link, a substantial amount of capacity
remains available for approved but unbuilt development until
Lawrence Road is widened to a four-lane section scheduled as
assured construct ion by Palm Beach County in fiscal year 1997/1998.
4623 Forest Hill Boulevard, Suite 112, West Palm Beach, Florida 33415
Telephone (407) 965-9144
Mr. William Hukill, P.E.
August 3, 1995 - Page Two
Therefore, the additional trips reallocated to Lawrence Road by the
elimination of the Hypoluxo Road entry will not negatively affect
the current capacity of Lawrence Road nor projecting it to the
ultimate buildout of the Nautica Sound project of the year 2000,
will not negatively impact the road in the future.
Sincerely,
I
,
RFR/jp
cc: Rick Ellsner
Collene Walter
HYPOLUXO ROAD
7,888
1,302
442
9.810
13,400
c
<
o
a:
U.I
o
Z
LLI
~
~
..J
SITE
1.866
2.348
442
10.666
13,400
",
LEGEND
7 ,866 EXISTING 1994/1995 VOLUME
2.348 PROJECT ASSIGNMENT FROM REDISTRIBUTION
442 BACKGROUND GROWTH TO 2000
10,856 TOTAL TRAFFIC
13,400 THRESHOLD VOLUME
NAUTICA
~CU"-l D
SOIL-S.
2EPo2...
(
GL BOMES
1401 UNIVERSITY DRIVE
SUITE 1300
CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33071
AT'l'N: MR. RICK ELSNER
(
....
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
ILLUSTRATIONS
Introduction
Geotechnical Investigation
Irrigation Ditches
Test Pits/Deleterious Soils
Quantities Estimations
Exclusions
Environmental Observations
Closing
FIGURE
FIGURES
ILLUSTRATIONS
Geotechnical Data - Auger Borings
Standard Penetration Test Borings
Test Pits
Analytical Results
Aerial/Boring Layout
2
3
4
5
~
PAGE
1&2
2&3
3&4
4
4&5
5
5&6
PAGES
1-6
7-14
15&16
17&18
19
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
CAROL DREW
PRESIDENT
ASDEL KARIM-CONRADO, P,E.
VICE PRESIDENT
Ma y 24, 1 9 9 5
GL Homes
1401 University Drive
Suite #300
Coral Springs, Florida 33071
Attn: Mr. Rick Elsner
RE: Meadowood Groves - Section #7, Township #45, Range #43 -
Palm Beach County, Florida
1.0 INTRODUCTION
(
Per your request, and in
have completed the tasks
meeting.
accordance with your authorization,
discussed on May 18, 1995 during
we
our
The tasks discussed were multi-faceted and entailed a geotechnical
soil investigation, machine dug test pits, recommendations for
development methods and procedures, and environmental concerns
encountered during the completion of the above tasks.
Testing procedures were
engineering practice and
in accordance
applicable ASTM
with accepted local
and AASHTO Standards.
2.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Scope of Work: A total of 23 - 10' Auger Borings,
Borings, 8 - 20' Standard Penetration Tests, and
test pits were advanced to the depths and at the
on the attached reports.
4 - 20' Auger
5 machine dug
locations noted
SUMMARY
As can be seen from the attached boring logs, the majority of the
foundation soils consists of a Brown medium fine sand.
~
-1-
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, FL 33458. (407) 575-0012
820 8th Street. Unit #4 . Lantana, FL 33462 . (407) 547-7260
The water table was noted ~s occurring approximately 3' to 5' feet
below existing ground elevation immediately upon completion of
borings.
Based on the "blow count" of the Split Spoon Sampler, the
foundation soils are generally in a "loose to medium" state of
relative density. Due to the relative density of the foundation
soils, the following recommendations are made to achieve a mini-
mum soil bearing value of 2,500#/FT.2.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Standard preparation procedures of clearing, grubbing, compaction,
and filling will ensure a suitable foundation for 1 or 2 story
structures having a footing width of 18" to 34" set 12" to 24"
below finished pad elevation designed for pearing values not to
exceed 2,500#/FT.2.
The clearing method selected by
groves must include the removal
the contractor for the
of all subsurface root
existing
systems.
(
Based upon our experience in developing farm land, a soil
pulverizer with a depth capacity of 18" to 24" may be used to mix
the top and underlying soils. This alternate grubbing method
would be dependent on our approval of an on-site test strip
prepared with the equipment to be used. This alternate grubbing
method does not apply to canal banks, berms, areas of vegetation,
abandoned crops, or areas of the site where the topsoil exceeds a
6" thickness.
It should be noted that, to be in
County Building Codes, each building
individually upon completion of site
outs and design.
accordance with Palm Beach
pad will have to be tested
work and final building lay-
All deleterious soil (i.e. trash, silt, muck, etc.) encountered
during site development will require excavation. Development
includes, but is not limited to, building pads, roads, utilities,
and swimming pools. The required depths and off-sets of the
excavations will be determined through testing of the deleterious
soil in situ.
3.0 IRRIGATION DITCHES
Observations: Silt deposits 6" to 18" thick were encountered in
\-
-2-
(
t~e bottom of all irrigation canals.
BERMS/SPOIL BANKS
The canal berms/spoil banks are contaminated with vegetation and
roots structures.
SUMMARY
The silt deposits encountered in the bottom of the irrigation
ditches is not suitable as structural backfill. Prior to back-
filling"the irrigation ditches, excavation (desilting) of silt and
vegetation deposits would be required.
Berms/spoil banks are contaminated with vegetation to the point
that use of this material as canal or structural backfill is pre-
cluded.
RECOMMENDATIONS
(
Materials excavated from the irrigation ditches, berms, and spoil
banks would be suitable as backyard fill, landscaping berms, green
areas, etc. When placing as yard fill, the material should be
placed five (5) feet beyond setback lines established for the
project. This setback should include areas that permit cabana,
pool, spa, porch, and patio construction.
4.0 TEST PITS/DELETERIOUS SOILS
The three test pits excavated in the vicinity of the former
operations area in the southwest quadrant of the subject property
revealed granular soils free of organic deposits to a depth of
five feet.
The two test pits excavated in the backfilled pond area on the
eastern property line revealed trash, wood, and concrete debris 2'
to 4' below existing ground elevations. The debris is underlain
by organic soils to 5' below existing ground elevations.
Deleterious soils were encountered in borings B-1 and F-4. B-1
had top soil to a depth of 2' underlain by 2' of Brown medium fine
sand and silty marl (cohesive) to a depth of 4', F-4 had a l'
(
-3-
(
strata of Brown medium fine sand and silty marl (cohesive) at 3'
to 4' below natural ground.
SUMMARY
Whereas the insitu trash and debris deposits
excavate, quantity estimations for excavation
requirements, based upon thickness and extent
and debris, were unattainable.
were difficult to
limits and backfill
of the buried trash
Based upon review of an aerial photograph flight dated 1979, the
two grids B-1 and F-4 used to have drainage canals within their
boundaries. The drainage canals have since been backfilled.
RECOMMENDATIONS
All buried trash, debris, and organic deposits will require
excavation. Backfilling of the excavation should be accomplished
using a clean, suitable fill material placed in one-foot lifts,
each lift being compacted with a Vibratow III or equivalent
vibrating roller.
(
The extent of deleterious soils encountered in Grid B-1 and F-4
should be identified with isolation auger borings. Excavation of
these soils will be required. However, they may be mixed with a
clean, suitable fill material and returned to the excavation in
one-foot lifts, each lift being compacted with a Vibratow III or
equivalent vibrating roller.
5.0 QUANTITIES ESTIMATIONS
Fill Requirements: Quantities estimations of fill requirements
for backfilling irrigation ditches, excavations, and bringing
the site to finished grade should be established by surveyed
cross-sections prior to commencement of development procedures.
Additionally, it should be noted that county regulations require
that 90% of all fill generated during lake excavations be used on
site.
6.0 EXCLUSIONS
Note should be made that this investigation may not depict
variations that possibly exist intermediate of the attached boring
l
-4-
locations or in untested areas of the property.
become evident, this office must be contacted to
preliminary recommendations based upon on-site
testing of the variant conditions.
Should variations
re-evaluate our
inspection and/or
Note should be made that "proper consideration by the owner or
contractor shall be given for the protection of the adjoining
buildings and properties, prior to the commencement of work".
Any pumping action of the soils "soft spots" encountered during
grubbing or compaction procedures must be brought to the immediate
attention of the geotechnical engineer for further evaluation
and/or testing.
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL OBSERVATIONS
During the excavation of Test Pit #5, a strong odor was detected
in the soil and groundwater. The odor detected was akin to a
degraded diesel fuel or creosote compound.
l
Subsequently, a groundwater sample was collected
pit and analyzed by a Gas Chromatagram (GC)
constituents. Refer to Figure 3 Page 15 & 16 of
for complete analytical results.
from
for
the
the test
petroleum
Appendices
The results of the GC petroleum scan were below detection limits.
However, it is our opinion that the soils in this area have been
impacted by contaminants and should be futher investigated.
Whereas the contamination at Test Pit #5 is not petroleum related
(special waste), the possibility exists that these soils may be
determined to be hazardous.
Samples of the soil and groundwater at Test Pit #5 should be
collected and analyzed per EPA Methods 8080 Organochlorine
pesticides, 8150 Chlorinated herbicides, 604 Phenols and the 13
priority pollutants as defined by the EPA.
8.0 CLOSING
Geotechnical investigations are based
local engineering experience, and cost
of our knowledge and belief, the
conclusions drawn thereof, represent
tion.
upon anticipated land use,
consideration. To the best
information presented and
all the available informa-
l
-5-
l_
A.I.M. Engineering & Research, Inc., appreciated the opportunity
to conduct the requested investigation at the subject site. If
you have any questions regarding this report or if we may be of
future service to you, please feel free to contact us at (407)
747-1351.
Sincerely,
P.E.
AKC/lr .
Enclosures'
(
-6-
Authorization for publication of statements. conclusions. or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.
(
(
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
REPORT OF"U08RS
"PR~ Meadowood
CUENT GL Bomes
SAMPLED BV
Groves - Section #7. Township 4S. R~nqp ~41 - Palm Be;
county, Flor
DD/EC/QVDATE
LOCA11OH
DEPTH
A-1 - Center of
0'-2'
2'-3'
3'-6'
6'-10'
A-2 - Center of
0'-2'
2'-3'
3'-6'
6' -1 0'
A-3 - Center of
0'-6"
6"-1 '
1 '-3'
3'-6'
6' -1 0'
B-1 - Center of
0'-2'
2'-4'
4'-6'
6'-10'
B-2 - Center of
0'-2'
2'-15'
15'-20'
*
5/20/95
JOB NO.
95-331
DESCRIPTION
Water
TABLE
Tan medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 2'
Tan medium fine sand
Dark Brown.medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 2~'
.....~ IAt\Ov"--
?\...
Top soil
Grey medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand
5'
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand, fJ~~ f"O
sil ty, cohesive material - ~~ ~ \)l.CS:::
Brown medium fine sand
Light Tan medium
fine sand 4'
Dark Brown medium fine. sand
Tan medium fine sand
Grey medium fine sand 2~'
Immediate Wa~er Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
Thne Sol Baring T...,. Representative oIlIIId Apply to lt1e Exact LocatiOn lIIId DePth of the Boring.
AuthOnzabon tor J)l1bllclllloo1 of ...... conclusions. or elClrllClS from or regarding our reportS is reserved pending our written approval.
FIGURE 1 PAGE 1
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter. Florida 33458. 575-0012
I'II:.nm I OF AUGERS
~ Meadowood Groves - Section i7. Township 4S. R~nq~ i41 - Palm Bee
.cLIENT GL Homes county, Flor:i
SAllPLEDBY DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 JOB NO. 95-331
LOCAnON
DEPTH
DESCRIPTlON
Water
TABLE
B-3 - Center of
0'-3' Tan medium fine sand
3'-5' Brown medium fine sand
5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 3.6'
Soil C~ ~ O':;:'~~
0'-8" Top
811-2' Light Tan I!Iedium fine sand
2'-3' Dark Brown medium fine sand
3'-6' Brown medium fine sand
6'-10' Tan medium fine sand 5'
0'-3' Tan medium fine sand
3'-6' Brown medium fine sand
6'-10' Tan medium fine sand 4 '
~,.~~ o6,,t. d>
0'_611 Top Soil
6"-10' Tan medium fine sand 4~'
0'-3' Tan medium fine sand
3'-4' Dark Brown medium fine sand
4'-10' Brown medium fine sand 5.4'
C-1 - Center of
C-2 - Center of
(
C-3 - Center of
D-1 - Center of
(
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
TheM Soi Boring TMtS are ReprnenCalIve of and Apply to ltIe Exlld LocatiCln and 0ePlh of the Boring.
AutI'lonzatJon lot pubIIc:ation of statements. conclusions. or ell1rlldS tram or regarding our reportS is rn8fVeCl pendinO our written approval.
~ .. ___._FIGUR~ 1 PAGE._2__.___
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
Groves - Section 17. Township 4~. RnnqP i41 - Palm Be
county, Flor
DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 JOB NO. 95-331
Water
TABLE
REPORT OF AUGERS
PROJECT Meadowood
CUENT GL Homes
SAMPLED BY
LOCATION
DEPTH
D-2 - Center of
0'-3'
3'-4'
4'-7'
7'-20'
0-3 - Center of
0'-6"
6"-1 '
1 '-4 '
4'-6'
6'-10'
D-4 - Center of
0'-6"
6"-1'
1 '-4 '
4'-6'
6'-10'
D-5 - Center of
0'-8"
8"-3'
3'-4'
4'-10'
D-6 - Center of
0'-2'
2'-6'
6'-10'
I
\_-
DESCRIPTION
Tan medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 5'
C'1~ OL~IC-eo IV
c.~
Top Soil
Tan medium.fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 4.6'
~e OI:.>t,.M) IW
c.~
Top Soil
Tan medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Brown medium Eine sand
Tan medium fine sand 5'
~ 'Ol:>f-GD \.v'
Top Soil c.~
Tan medium fine sand
Brown & Tan medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 5'
Tan medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 5'
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
TheM Soil Boring THIS.. R~ 01 and Af}fJtf to ltIe Exact Locdon and Depth of Itle Boring,
Auttlonzallon for publication of stalementa. cancIusions. or extrlICtS tram or regarding our reportS is reserved pending our written approval.
FIGURE 1 PAGE 3
Ar
ALL TERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
REPORT OF AUGERS
PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section #7. Township 4,. R~nq~
CUENT GL Homes
SAMPLED BY DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 JOB NO.
i4l - Palm Be
county, FloI
95-331
WIlIer
TABLE
LOCATION DEPTH DESCRIPTION
E-1 - Center of 0'-2' Tan medium fine sand
2'-3' Dark Brown medium fine sand
3'-5' Brown medium fine sand
5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 5.6'
E-2 - Center of 0'-1' Grey medium fine sand
1'-3 ' Tan medium fine sand
3'-5' Dark Brown medium fine sand
5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 4.6'
E-3 - Center of 0'-4' Tan medium fine sand
( 4'-5' Brown medium fine sand
5'-10' Tan medium fine sand 4.6'
.-
E-4 - Center of 0'-4' Tan medium fine sand
4'-6' Brown medium fine sand
6'-20' Tan medium fine sand 5 '
CI'\V ro~ DI'::1'LU)
E-5 - Center of 0'-6" Top Soil IN
6"-4' Tan medium fine sand
4'-6' Brown medium fine sand
6'-10' Tan medium fine sand 5.2'
(
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
TheH Soil Boring Testa ... RepraentaliYe of and AfII)ty to Ih8 Exact Lccalion and ~ of the Boring.
Autnonzalion tor publication of statements. c:anc:tusionS. 0( exncrs from 0( regllldin9 our f8PCl'lS is res8lV8d pending our written apptOY8l,
FIGURE 1 PAGE__L_____________
Ar
ALL TERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section ~7. Township 4S. R~nqp i41 - Palm BE
CUENT GL Homes county, FlOl
SAMPLED BY DD/EC/QVDATE 5/20/95 .JOB NO. 95-331
Water
TABLE
REPORT OF AUGERS
LOCAnON
DEPTH
E-6 - Center of
0'-4'
4'-5'
5'-7'
7'-10'
F-l - Center of
0'-2'
2'-6'
6'-10'
F-2 - Center of
0'-6"
6"-6'
6'-20'
F-3 - Center of
0'-2'
2'-7'
7'-10'
F-4 - Center of
0'-3'
3'-4'
4'-10'
\ -
DESCRIPTION
Tan medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand 5.1'
Tan medium.fine sand
Light Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand
4.3'
D I '::> t... cJtI\ ()Q-
Top Soil
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand
4.5'
Grey medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand
4 '
Tan medium fine sand
Silt $"QvJU~ #JI.KIIV~
Tan medium fine sand
5.6 t
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
ThMe Soil Boring rem are R....ntative of and Apply to ltle Exacll.oCIIllOn and Depth of lt1e EIclIing.
AuthoriZallon for pt IblIc:aliott of statementS. c:ondusiOns. Of' elClr8ClS from Of' regarding our reports is reseMlc:l pending our written approval.
FI.GJ1R~ 1 PAGR 5 - ------------
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road. Jupiter, Florida 33458. 575-0012
REPORT OF AUGERS
PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section
CUENT GL Homes
SAMPLED BY OO/EC/QVDATE
#7. Township
45. R;!nqp
5/20/95
JOB NO.
i41 - Palm BE
County, FlOl
95-331
Water
TABLE
LOCAnON
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
P-S - Center of
0'-3'
3'-5'
5'-6~'
6~'-10'
Tan medium fine sand
Grey medium fine sand
Brown medium fine sand
Tan medium fine sand,
yellow tint
5.6'
F-6 - Center of
0'-6'
6'-10'
Tan medium-fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand 5.5'
.-
"
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
These Sol Boring T.... .. ~ of II1d /4fJply to the Exact LacdOn II1d Depctr of the Boring.
AulnotiZaIion lot pc IbIIclIlion of ItaI8fMntI. canc:tuaions. or exnclS from or regarding our NPOfIS is ~ pending our Millen apptOVaI,
FIGURE 1 PAGE 6
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Rorida 33458 · 575-0012
PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section #7, Township #45, Range *43
LOCAnON Located on Plan - A-1
\,
DEPTH
t
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
46
49
50
CUENT GL
DAILUR
SAMPLER DATA 2'
Semple IA~!OW. DEPTH
No. .". Fool
"'-... t
4-:> 2
6-5 3
C;_C; ..
6-5 5
C;_h 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
BORING NO. A- 1
U"-b"
DESCRIPTION op.....--a
ffrown med~um t~ne sand, trace/roots
6"-5'
Brown medium fine sand
I _
~-
8-9
Q-Q
5'-20'
Tan medium fine sand
o "'7
7-7
h_7
7-7
=-
Homes JOILNO. 95-331
SG/EC/DV WATlRTAIIU 2~' DATE 5/22/95
Split Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
,.,.. Sol BorIng T_.. ~ 01_ /IfIrJlf Ill.. EDCt LocatIan'" 0epIb 01.. Boring.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBlICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
~_~~~ OUR REPORTS IS RESERVeD P!ND!NG OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. -
- Palm Bee
County, FJ
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Jadiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
PROJECT ea owoo roves - Sect1.on , Towns 1.p 45, Range *4 - Palm
LOCATION Located on Plan - B-3 BOAlNG NO. B-3 County,
DEPTH ~..JftOII 0# IlATIIUL s.:- .:,~ DEPTH
1 0"-6" Brown med1.um f1.ne sand, trace/roots L-4 1
2 -.1 ~.1 2
3 c::: II 3
4 ;)-;) 4
5 6-5 5
8 c:::._7 8
7 6"-7' Brown medium fine sand l-tJ 7
a 6-6 8
9 R_R 9
10 1-0 10
11 -g- -9 11
12 . r [- II U,2
13 T2- 1 113
14 I u- ~ 14
15 9-9 15
18 R_Q 18
17 ::1-() 17
18 8-7 18
11 7 .7 19
20 7'-20' Tan medium fine sand o c. 20
21 21
22 22
23 ~ 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
21 21
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
:M 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
3i 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
41 49
I 50 50
M d
d G
#7
h' #
3
Seal
Fl,
co
~
~
Cl.4
N
~
=:
o
~
1-4
r:..
CUEHT GL
DfIUSI
SAMPlER DATA 2'
Homes J08.NO. 95-331
SG/EC/OV WATlRTA&8 21s' DATE 5/22/95
Split Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
TheM Sol BalIng T_.. ~...~ oIn ~ to.. ex.ct LacatIon'" o.plh of ltle BolIng.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBl.JCATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCWSJONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
_ _....._ na af:l.:l.&at"\aIt2.NlD ~~ r~ ,.~~e'D\1ef'\ f'!I~..__._ _.._ ......~LI ...ft.."".....
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
.-o.ET ea owoo roves - ec ~on , owns ~p , ange - Palm
LOCATION Located on Plan - C-l BORING NO. C-1 County,
DEPnf DESCRPTIOH 011 MATERIAL s.ntpIe BIoww DEPTH
No. Per Foo
1 0'-6" Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots J-4 1
2 4-6 2
3 ~_'7 3
4 7 - I 4
5 6-b 5
6 6"-6~' Brown medium fine sand 7 ~7 6
7 \)-, 7
8 7-ff 8
9 6-7 9
10 '7 _Q 10
11 'j-';J 11
12 . 8-9 12
13 ---'-'- n13
14 1 " 114
15 10-- ~ 15
16 R_R 18
17 a 0 17
18 7-7 18
19 7-h 19
20 6~'-20' Tan medium fine sand 6-7 20
21 21
22 22
23 ~ 23
24 24
25 2S
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 36
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
48 49
50 50
M d
d G
s t'
#7 T
h' #45 R
#43
Bea
Fl
\
CUI!HT GL
DRILLER
SAIIPLER DATA 2'
Homes 0108. NO. 95- 33 1
SG/EC/DV WATERTMU 3' DATI! 5/22/95
Split Spoon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
,..... Sol Bartng T_ ... ~ 01_ Af1pI'f to ... EllIIct LccalIan ..., DepIh 0I1tle BorIng.
AUTHOAIZATJON FOR PUBlJCATION OF STATEIotENTS. CONCWSJONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PeNDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL
Ar
ALL TERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836lndiantown Road. Jupiter. Rorida 33458. 575-0012
PROJECT ea owoo roves - ec .1on , Towns .1p , ange ,4 - Palm
LOCATION Located on Plan - D-3 BORING NO. D-3 County,
DEPnf DUCRlPTION OP IlATIIUL s.mple r:,~1 DEPTH
, No.
1 0"-6" Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots .) '.) 1
2 6"-2' Grey medium fine sand 4-:) 2
3 5-5 3
4 6-4 4
5 s-s 5
8 2'-7' Brown medium fine sand A_~ 6
7 4-4 7
8 5-6 8
9 i._~ 9
10 7 --F, 10
11 ~_i 11
12 /-'d 12
13 . 8-9
13
14 'd-'d 14
15 q-8 15
18 i .., 18
17 '0-/ 17
18 1-6 18
19 7'-20' Tan medium fine sand ~. ,i;; 19
20 7-6 20
21 21
22 22
23 ~ 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
Z7 Z7
26 26
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
3t 39
.0 .0
41 41
.c2 .c2
43 43
44 44
45 45
48 46
47 47
48 48
4.. 49
50 50
M d
d G
s t'
#7
h' #45 R
# 3
Bea,
Fl,
c:
..
~
t!
~
II
('\
~
c:l:
-
...
t!
I-
r:.
CUeNT GL
DRILLIR
SAMPLER DATA 2'
Homes J08.HO. 95-331
SG/EC/OV WA18ITAaU 4~' DATE 5/22/95
Split Spoon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
TheM Sol BorIng T_ .. ~1IatI... 01 Md AflPl'IIO .. Euct LocaIIon Md Oeplh 01.. Baring.
AUTHOFUZATION FOR PUBUCATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRrTTEN APPROVAL
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Ronda 33458 · 575-0012
PROJECT ea owoo roves - ec ~on , owns ~p , ange - Pa m
LOCAnON Located on Plan - D-4 BORING NO. 0-4 County,
DEP1H DUCRPI'IOH 0# 1lA1IIUL s.m. ~~ DEPIH
No.
1 J 'J 1
2 011_611 Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots q-::> 2
3 4-~ 3
. J-5 4
5 6"-5~' Brown medium fine sand 5-6 5
6 ~ ~ 8
7 1- 1 7
8 0-7 8
9 K_j:; 9
10 [-r.:; 10
11 0-: 11
12 . 7-1 12
13 6-1 13
1. fi-;; 14
15 .., t. 15
18 !j-I 18
17 7- 17
18 Q_e: 18
19 0- 19
20 5~'-20' Tan medium fine sand 6-E 20
21 21
22 22
23 ;::. 23
2. 2.
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
38 38
37 37
38 38
39 39
<<) 40
., 41
42 42
43 43
.... ....
45 45
48 46
.7 .7
48 48
49 49
50 50
M d
d G
s t'
.7 T
h' #45 R
#43
1 Beal
Fl,
..
..
CI
c;
IC
g
l'"
CI
Cl
~
~
~
rz
CUI!NT GL
DRILLER
SAMPLER DATA 2'
Homes. J08.NO. 95-331
SG/EC/OV WATDTAIIU 5' DAlE 5/22/95
Split Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
These Sol Borlng T.... ... ~1IatM 01 and AfJIItt tel .. Euct Locdon and Oeplh of ttle BorIng.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
. """ ...~,.. ..."'....... All.... ..~__.....~ .-' .....,.........."" ......."'........ "'I '" ,............... .........""'..'&1
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida S3458 · 575<<>12
PROJECT ea owoo roves - Sect~on , owns 1P , ange - Pa m
LOCAnON Located on Plan - B-1 BORING liD. B-1 County,
DEPTH DDGM'TIOH ex- 1lA1BIAL e.::- 910ft DEPTH
1 0"-6" Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots j-:J 1
2 5-6 2
3 h_C\ 3
4 r= "'7 ..
S 6-6 5
6 6"-6' Brown medium fine sand C;-h 6
7 c " 7
8 s-::) 8
9 6-5 9
10 t;_e:: 10
11 0-0 11
12 4 5-::) 12
13 O-q 13
14 5-5 14
15 h_7 1S
18 {-O 18
17 6-6 17
18 r::;_h 18
19 6-5 19
20 6'-20' Tan medium fine sand t;_h 20
21 21
22 22
23 ;:, 23
24 24
2S 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
38 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
.4S 4S
48 48
47 47
. 48
~ 49
.50 50
M d
d G
#7 T
h' 145 R
#43
1 Bea
Fl,
CLIENT GL
DfIILLIR
SAIIPLER DATA 2'
Hom~s .I08.NO. 95-331
SG/ECIOV WATlllTMU! 4~' DATE 5/22/95
Solit Spoon 2" 0.0. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
TbeH Sol BorIrII T_... ,.......... of MIl /IfIIJly 10 the ex.ct ~ Md ~ of 1M Boring.
AUTHORIZATJON FOR PUBlICATION OF STATEMENTS. COHCUJSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
OR REGARDNJ OUA_RE~~I~ RESERVED PENt)~_~R WAJTT'EH APPROVAL.
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836lndiantown Road. Jupiter, Florida 33458. 575-0012
PROJECT Meadowood Groves - Section #7, Township #45, Range #43 - Palm Bea
LOCATION Located on Plan - F-3 BORING NO. F-3 County, Fl
I s.::- Blows
. DEPTH DUCAIPTIOH CW 1lAu.AL DEPTH
"""""
1 J-:;) 1
2 4-1 2
3 8-H 3
4 0'-4' Brown medium fine sand l~ 4
5 4'- Unpenetrable (Wood) 5
8 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 . 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
18 18
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 ::P 23
24 t 24
25 25
28 28
Xl Xl
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
301 301
35 35
38 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
<10 <10
41 41
<f2 42
43 43
.. ..
45 45
<48 46
47 47
<48 <48
41 49
r 50 50
r
..
CUENT GL
DRlLLIR
SAMPLER DATA 2'
Homes JOILNO. 95-331
SG/EC/DV WATERT,uu 3' DATE 5/22/95
Split Spoon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
TheM Sol BorIng T_ .. Ret:nN.ltdva 01_ AfJ1Pk11D lie EDCI LOClIlIon and Deplh 01 the Baring.
AUn<<)RJZATION FOR PU8UCATION OF STATEMENTS. CONClUSIONS OR EXTRAcTs FROM
.~_ na aC'-2:,aDnIlalt: t'\f ID ae~.......~ I~ aec::~ DCIJf'taJt':l ^' 18 lalftt"P"'P'eU & BI"toI"ll_.....
Ar
ALLTERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Rorida 33458 · 575-0012
PROJECT ea owoo roves - ec ~on , owns ~p , ange - a m
.
LOCAnON Located on. Plan - F-6 BORING NO. F-6 County,
DEPTH DBCIW'TION tJ'_~ SMlpIe sac.. DEPTH
No. Per FoG
1 0' -1 ' Grey medium fine sand J-J 1
2 ::;-n 2
3 h_7 3
4 /-0 4
5 1 '-5 ' Brown medium fine sand 6-8 5
6 Q 1 11 6
7 5'-7' Brown medium fine sand, trace/roots I ~- II .,.,
8 ll:l- II 18
9 10- Iq 9
10 o .0 10
11 (j-;1 11
12 . 7- 12
13 h_- 13
14 o-c 14
1S !::l-;. 15
18 A_'" 18
17 /- I 17
18 b- 18
19 7-E 19
20 b- 20
21 7'-20' Tan medium fine sand 21
22 22
23 ::> 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
'Z7 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
3S 3S
38 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
., .,
42 42
43 43
.... ....
45 45
46 46
47 .7
46 48
49 49
I 50 50
M d
d G
s t'
#7 T
h' lt45 R
~43
P 1 Bea
Fl
CLENT GL
DfaLLER
SAMPLER DATA 2'
Homes J08.NO. 95-33'
SG/EC/OV WATERTA8LE 5' DAlE 5/22/95
Split Sooon 2" O.D. in accordance with ASTM-D-1586
These Sol Boring T.... .. ~ 01 Md ~ to the Exet Locatian lIftd 0ecMh of the Boring.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBUCATION OF STATEUENTS, CONClUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM
f"\Q aC'nADf"\~ ~ let eer"W"'\PY'Pf"..... ",eC'lle''''''lel'\ "e...""...,..,.... tn \AIrt~.' ..ft"'..........'At
Ar
ALLiERRA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiar,toM't Road · Jupiter, Ronda 33458 · 575.0012
REPORT OF
'l'ES-r P:Ilft)
DESCRIPTION
#45. Ranqe ~43 - Palm Bea
County, F
JOB NO. 95- 3 3 1
Water
TABLE
PR~Meadowood Groves - Section #7. Townshio
CUENT GL Homes
SAMPLED BY OD DATE 5/20/95
LOCATION
UEPTH
GRID C-1
Northeast Corner of
Garage Facility
0'-1'
1 ' -3 '
3'-4'
4'-5'
West side of
Westernmost Shed
0'-1'
1 '-3 '
3'-4'
4'-5'
(
North side of
Westernmost Shed
o t -1 '
1 '-3'
3'-4'
4'-5'
~
Grey medium fine sand
Light Brown medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Light Brown medium
fine sand 4'
Grey medium fine sand
Light Brown medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Light Brown medium
fine sand 4'
Grey medium fine sand
Light Brown medium fine sand
Dark Brown medium fine sand
Light Brown medium
fine sand 4'
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
TheM Sol Sortno T_ .. RepI........ 01 w1d ,.., to IN EllAICl L..ocdOn .nd DepIh olIN Boring.
AuttrorIza1Ion for P'~ 01............ ~or.... tram or ~ our rwpons is.-wd pending our wnaen approval.
FIGURE 3 PAGE 15
Ar
ALL TER RA ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
836 Indiantown Road · Jupiter, Florida 33458 · 575-0012
REPORT OF
TEST PITS
PAO,IECT Meadowood Groves - Section It 7, Townshi 0
CUENT GL Homes
SAUPLEDSY DO DATE 5/20/95
LOCAnON
DEPTH
DESCRIPTION
~45. Range t43 - Palm Bea
County, F
JOB NO. 95-331
W..
TABLE
GRID P-3
North Pit,
Centerline of Grid
0' -11
11-2.5'
2.5'-4.5'
4.5'-6'
6'-7'
Top Soil
Tan medium fine sand
Concrete,.Wood, & Trash
Muck and Sand
Grey medium. fine sand
3.5'
South Pit,
Centerline of Grid
0' -1 '
1'-2.5'
2.51-4.5'
4.5'-5.5'
5.5'-6'
Top Soil
Tan medium fine sand
Concrete, Wood, & Trash
Muck
Grey medium fine sand
4 '
(
tAte.
(AJ/V::)
-, /-CA:>' (tJI P<f)
tj DO I. lP
s.~
'240,OCO e.. ~ p..~'"
~ O!
'2.
~
(,00,
~ 1.1
~'f
1.:1, ,
~
* Immediate Water Table
(ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE)
TheM Soil Boring Teem are ~ 01 and ~ to the Exact Location and Depth of the Boring.
Autnorization for publIc:ation of statements. c:cncIuIlons. Of' extnICII from or regarding our reportS is reserved pending aur written approval.
FIGURE 3 PAGE 16
"... 1
...tvedl ral"Z5m
TCICJ_ CIlIP. I!PClIT
ra/24/95 12:42:45
REPORT AlM INGINI..ING & REstARCH
TO 836 I NO I AIlTCMI RtW)
~ITER. fL 33458
407.747-13~1 FAX 407.S47-1Z44
ATTEN DARYL DREW
eLllNT AIM SNU'LES ..i
c:o.AIlT AI" IIOJIlUIJIfG & ItISEAIICH
flACILITY 836 INDIAlTCMI Rag
UtTER. FL n4~
WOK [D GL 1 . lIOYNTCII
TAKlN OSIZ3/93
TUIIS ell ENY
TYPE LIClUID
P.O. , NIA
INVOICl! W1der seDIIrat, cover
IMPlI! IDI!II1'IFlCATICII
II GL 1
2i NrTIU) IIU.1e
U MUN X ltiCOVERY . LCS
V! RPO . LCS
r
\
l
PIEPAIlEO TOXIKON WlST PALM lEACH
BY 1860 OLD OKfECHOBEf RD. t401
WEST PALM &!ACH. fll 33409
HitS 1e86278 QAt 910"oa
ATTEN YAR JUC
PHONE (.401> 478-4<<13 FAX 478.0214
WIlIIrk Ordw . 95.05-117
COITACT JOlIN
TEST CGDES and MMES UMd tlft thfs workorder
~ EXTRACTlON- GC PIT
ik.HI P!TIlOt.!tJt SCAlI BY GC
FIGURE 4 PAGE 17
,.. 2
...i Wid: 05123195
(
SAMPLE .10 Gl.1
FltACT 1011 gJ4 TI!ST CODE ~ NNt! peTIOle. SCAlI IT GC
Oat. & Time Collected 05123195 category LIQUID
(
~,-
TOXIUII CXIIP. IEPOIT
.....l ts ." s.ple
AllALYT!
RESUl T
Miner.l spirits
Motor Oi l
G..ol'ne
J(M'O......
Diesel/Fuel NO. 2
Jet A
NO.4 'uel Oil
110. 6 Fuel Oil
Pet. Cont..tnant 11.0.5.
Total Petroleu. Hydroe.r~
DITeCTION LIMIT 0.50 .aiL
Not.. .nd Oefinition. for this Report:
fXTlACTEO
DATI RUN
AJtAL YST
INSTRUMENT
OS/23/95
~/~/95
Sf
PI
NO
NO
NO
ND
lID
II)
NO
lID
NO
NO
work 0IWr . 95-05-117
N.O.S. a Not Otherwi.e Specified
NO a C~( s) not ~taeted above dtttlCt f on l 1., t
CCMENTS HYDROCARBON RANGe: C7-C]4
FIGURE 4 PAGE 18
y
r
S
~al
-""
'~ J:>
..J C"'l
;:l _
:
~2--~
;> .Po
,~ <J'
..,
-:; C"'l
:;> ~
c
z
...
-<.
"1
~
..,
."
=:
.-- ~
,
,
"-
,.\
,....
f
-
!
~
l
::;
\
FIGURE 5 PAGE 19
.~_. ..:;l" -::,'
,~. \. ' -.: ':., _;' _ .::r
-"
00 rn rn 0\Vl rn rn
J! 3 I 1995
PLANNING AND ,))
ZONING DEPT.
G.L. HOMES
OF FLORIDA
July 27, 1995
City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Dept.
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P,O,Box310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Attention: Mr. Mike Haag
Re: Nautica Sound
Dear Mr. Haag,
I have been in contact with one of our subcontractors (EDL - Electronic Door Lift) who installs the
operating equipment for our gated communities to question them about mechanisms that could be
installed at the gate to allow emergency vehicles or City workers 24 hour access into the community,
According to Mr. Jack Trout with EDL, there are three different systems which can be installed to allow
the 24 hour access. They are as follows:
1, SOS System (Siren Operable System): This system is activated by the sound of a siren when
an emergency vehicle approaches the gate, This system will automatically open the gate,
therefore, all personal will remain in their vehicles.
2, Knox Box: This is a key entry system, The City would have a master key which would allow
City personal to get out of their vehicles and unlock (open) the gates.
3. Remote System: This is the exact same system which is used on automatic garage door
opening systems. This system would allow City personal to remain in their vehicles when
entering the community,
1401 UNIVERSITY DRIVE. SUITE 200 . CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA 33071 . 305-753-1730 . FAX #305-753-4509
Mr. Mike Haag
July 27,1995
Page 2
Please review these three options and should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact Jack Trout
with EDL. His phone number is (305) 972-9300. I think one or a combination of two of the above
mentioned systems would guarantee the City 24 hour access into the community.
S~;2L-
Rick E. Elsner, P,E.
cc: By way of facsimile
Mr. Bill Cavanaugh, City Fire Department
Mr. Skip Milor, City Utilities Department
Sgt. Marlon Harris, City Police Department
Collene W. Walter, Kilday & Associates
KIld8y & Aaoclatea
Landscape Architects/ Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
July 10. 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Nautica Sound f.k.a. Knollwood Groves P.U.D.
Minor Master Plan Modification Application
Our Project No.: 1020.13
Dear Ms. Heyden.
Please accept and process the attached information for a Minor Master Plan Modification to the
previously approved Knollwood Groves P.U,D., now known as Nautica Sound, located on the
east side of Lawrence Road. north of Gateway Boulevard and south of Hypoluxo Road. We are
submitting this Minor Master Plan Modification application on behalf of G.L. Homes of Florida II
Corporation, contract purchasers of the property, and Meadowwood Groves. Inc. and R. Bradford
Arnold, Trustee, owners of the property, The latest master plan approved on February 19. 1991
reflected a total of 539 units which were comprised of 150 detached units and 389 multi-family
units, The proposed master plan reflects a total of 434 units comprised of 246 Zero Lot Line
detached units and 188 "Z" Lot Line detached units. The overall master plan has been revised
to delete 1 05 units from the original approval.
There are two product types proposed, one a Zero Lot Line product which utilizes a minimum
of 5,000 s.f, lot and the other a "Z" Lot product which utilizes a minimum of 4,000 s.f, lot. Details
of typical units, setbacks, and open space areas are included with this application, The site is
divided into two development pods, one pod will utilize the Zero Lot Line lot and the other pod
will utilize the "Z" Lot Line lot.
As noted above, the approved project originally included multi-family units. Today we are
proposing to build a community composed of 1 00% single-family units, Therefore, the entire
project today is all fee simple ownership whereas the previous approval could have been
developed as a rental community. Of the 539 units approved in 1991, 28% were zero lot while
72% were multi-family. The proposed Nautica Sound P.U.D, incorporates 434 total units where
57% are Zero Lot Line. the larger 5,000 s,f. unit and 43% are "Z" Lot units, the 4,000 s,1. unit,
Access for the P.U.D, remains as previously approved with an entrance off Meadows Boulevard
and an additional entrance off Lawrence Road, The extension of Meadows Boulevard to
Lawrence Road has also been maintained. Meadows Boulevard will be a 60' right-of-way and
will be publically dedicated with this approval. A central loop road has been designed within the
project to answer those concerns voiced from the Fire Department at the preliminary meeting to
discuss this project. A fifty foot minimum turning radius has also been maintained throughout
the site.
Ms. Tambri Heyden
July 10, 1995
Page 2
Pursuant to conditions of the previous approval, a 5 acre public park site is proposed and the
land has been dedicated to the City in the southeast corner of the site and adjacent to Meadows
Boulevard. A private community recreation facility of 3 acres in size has been incorporated in
the interior of the site which will include a minimum of 5 amentities, The current approved plan
for Knollwood Groves has no proposed landscape buffers, and only one setback has been
identified on the west side of the property adjacent to the previously approved multi-family, The
proposed plan for Nautica Sound will incorporate landscape buffers surrounding the entire
perimeter of the project with the smallest buffer being 15' wide. The previously approved plan
consisted of 22 acres of open space. The proposed master plan for Nautica Sound reflects a
total of 30,97 acres of open space which amounts to a 70% increase in the amount of open
space proposed.
Attached with this letter is a comparison of impacts for the project. You will note that in all areas,
this project will reduce impacts from that previously approved, especially in areas of water and
sewer capacity and population.
Attached with this application is a full traffic statement which will be reviewed and approved by
both the City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County priorto the Technical Review Committee
Meeting. Also included with this submittal are conceptual engineering plans, landscape plans,
and typical lots, If you have any questions or concerns in regards to this applicaiton or if you
need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me,
Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
,{CtL-tltl I dtlt[0~1~
Karyn I. Janssen
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Enclosures
KIJ/cdd\cheyden. 710
cc: Alan Fant; GL Homes
Larry Portnoy; GL Homes
Rick Elsner; GL Homes
Walter Keller; Walter Keller & Associates, Inc.
Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble
Received By:
Date:
~-I
~~
u.O_
WO:~
'1"1 a.. +
\.J a.. -
z~
~I--
Ien
()~
o I--
::> z
a.. w-l
en~
~ w~
0: 0:-
W o..~
en CO
0: ::>
::> en
z
z -I
o ~
I-- 0
Z 0:
>- a..
o a..
CO ~
I-- I--
e: en
~ ~
B ~
z
o
en
0:
~
a..
~
o
o
I--
()
~ ~
o ~
e: 0
a.. I--
()
W
a
e:
a..
g~
" >-
+ <D
2:
:J
en
<D
'-
-
()
c:tl
C\I
CD
,-
,-
,-
~
CD
f'o..
,-
,-
,-
<D
C>>
c:tl
<D
'-
()
~
<D
-
iJ)
c:tl
-
o
I--
ro
0>
0>
,-
1.0
o
,-
I
CD co 0>
CD 0> CD
'-+('1)
+ '
v
('I)
v
CD co
CDvO
,-C\I
0>
('I)
1.0
00>
o 1.0 CD
,-('1)
C
<D
"E
c:tl
C)
-
en
::>
o
-
'-
o
-
"'0
C
c:tl
<D
en
:J _
o >-
..c=
c E
~ c:tl
OLL
1--.,6
'S
.CDg Q) "~~ ID
Cc en
<D .- __ en ::>
I--c-l--'-
o<:J (5 ~ 55 <D
.~ (5 -I ..c E ~
~-Ie~~ ~
o 0
I~~~~ ~
en
:~
C
::>
0>
c
<D
~
o
c:tl
-
o
I--
o
en
'U'-~
<Do__
..c_--'
()-'U
c:tl .- <D
:t::8:t::
c:tl ..c ,-
Q) x E
Q)w,-
(j) Q)
a..
en
~'-~
..cQ::>
()
c:tl:~ "'0
:t::..o<D
c:tl .- :t::
..c ,_
<D X E
<DW,-
(j) <D
a..
en
~
o
~
1.0
co
,-
I
o
v
('I)
X..f
"~ II
c en
:J _
vI-
~~
o
,-
en
~
o
~
1.0
o
1.0
v
()
~
I-
o
a..
C)
o
1.0
('I)
CD-
C\I
I
xll~
enOC)
-:J a.. 0
'UC)CD
v 0 ,--
('I)f'o..f'o..
vC\l'-
,-
o
x II a..
_en 0 C)
:Jo..o
'UC)('I)
LO
0> 0 -
('I)f'o..LO
LOC\lV
,-
"'0
C
c:tl
E
<D
o
'-
<D
ro
~
o
a..
C)
o
o
o
,-
C\I
I
x II 0
a..
_en 0 C)
:Jo..o
'UC)0
vOCD
('I) 0 -
VC\l~
o
x II a..
enoC)
-:J a.. 0
'UC)O
0> 0 CD_
C')Of'o..
LOC\lO
,-
"'0
c
c:tl
E
<D
o
'-
<D
~
<D
en
en
c
o
en
'-
<D
a..
('I)
co
C\I
I
en
c
o CDC') V
~C\lC\lC')
<DC\lVV
a..
en
c
o
~
<D
a..
LO
CD
o
v
<DOLO+
,;;,. C\I I
::;.' I ,- LO
-.OC\lLO
,-
en
c
oC')COO>
enCDC\lC')
Q5C\1LOLO
a..
en
c
o
en
'-
<D
a..
~
('I)
v
<DO>LO+
,;;,.,- I
::;..OLO
-.OC\lLO
,-
t5 "'0
o~ 'U~
0>1- -()
0> oc:tl
C ,- en 'U-..c :t::
o :J-<Dc:tl
:;::::;Eenoen "
c:tloc..c:J<D(i)
:J ~ <D <D ..cO <D -
0.. 0 en en <D
0"'0 :J,--Q)
0.. <D . 0 Q) Q)..c
c ..c..c 0.. :s en
~ "E ~ '- en 0> c:tl
<D'-<D<Dc-+=ro
Z 2co 0..0 <D'U
"Q) en~>
<D ..... C C <D .- "'0
-'-'00 -c
o'U-eno..~c:tl
zC5-Q5~<Den
I c:tl 0 0..C\I en c
c'UCO.... cO
o <D I~ "'0 0 ,-
"_- '- '- C\I Q) () ro
... .- 0 . N -
~:J-C\l:=<D:J
:J 0" en en''+:; '- ()
o..()c<D:JOc:tl
oc:tl:Jro<DEo
a.. 5 0 "~ ~ c:tl C
"'0 ,_ 0 "'0 - _ 0
<D - C '-<D () ,-
_ c:tl en .- <D ro
()E:Jrn>--
<D en ~-" <D - :J
'0' 0 c ~ ~ ~ 0..
0..'- C oQ) CD 0 0 0
. LO ..c _ a..
NAUTICA SOUND, P.U.D.
Projected Population Calculations
1990 Census of Boynton Beach
Total Population 46,194
Aqe
Population
% of Population
0-20
21 - 54
55 +
9,721
18,204
18,269
21
39
40
434 d.u.'s x 2.5 persons per household
1085 Persons
Aqe
=
228 Persons
423 Persons
434 Persons
0-20
21 - 54
55 +
.21 x 1085
.39 x 1085
.40 x 1085
=
=
TOTAL
1085 Persons
Above based on % of population age brackets, as determined
by 1990 Census counts.
L
1990 Census of Population and Housing
040 Florida
050 Palm Beach County
140 Tract 58.03
Total population..............................................
--
SEX
Male.
Female. .
AGE
Under 5 years.
5 to 17 years.
18 to 20
21 to 24
25 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 59
60 to 64
65 to 74
75 to 84
85 years and over.
Median age........
Under 18 years..........
Percent of total population,
65 years and over..............,
Percent of total population.
HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE
Total households...
Family households (families).
Married-couple families....
Percent of total households.
Other family, male householder.
Other family, female householdel'.
Nonfamily households... ........,..
Percent of total households.
Householder living alone......,.
Householder 65 years and over.
Persons living in households.
Persons per household........
GROUP QUARTERS
Persons living in group quart('['s...
Illstitutiollalized persons.......
Other persons in group quarters.
RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN
White-.
Black.
Percent of total population.
American IlIdil1l1, Eskimo, 0[' Aleut..
Percent of total population.
Asian or Pacific Islander......
Percent of total population.
Other race....................
Hispanic origin (of any race).
Percent of total population.
years. .
years. . . . . . .
years.
years.
years.
years. .
years. .
years. .
. .
L
Page 1
6,189
3,004
3,185
433
679
180
342
2,334
674
296
351
597
221
82
35.6
1,112
18.0
900
14.5
2,671
1,826
1,486
55.6
101
239
845
31. 6
634
162
6,074
2.27
115
115
o
5,401
644
10.4
3
0.0
81
1.3
60
386
6.2
1990 Census of Populat_ _., Al_ousing
0'0 Florida
160 Boyn~on Beach city
Total population...........,............,.....................
SEX
Hal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r...l.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AGE
Under 5 y.ars..........................................,..........
5 to 17 year............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18 t,o 20 y.ars......................,.............................
21 to 24 year....................................................
2S 'to 44 year........... I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45 to 54 years...................................................
55 to 59 years...................................................
60 to 64 years...................,........"".....""."".."."".....
65 to '74 y.ars...................................................
75 to 84 years...................................................
85 y.ars and over.............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hedian ag.............................................. . . . , , . . . . .
Under 18 years......................................................
P.rc.nt of total population......................................
65 years and over.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percent of total population......................................
HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE
To~al households....................................................
P_ily households (f_ilies).....................................
Harried-couple f_ilies.......................................
Perc.n~ of total households................................
Ot.her t_ily, .ale householder................................
Other f_ily. feaale householder..............................
Monf_ily households.................. . .... .... ........ .. .. .. . . ..
Percent of total households................................
Householder living alone......................... .... . . . . . . . . .
Householder 65 years and over. .... ... .. ... . .. . ..... . . . . .. . .
Persons living in households.....................................
Per.ona per household...................""......""......".. . " . " . . .
CROUP QUARTERS
Persons living in group quarters.................................
Institut.ionalized persons........,............................
Ot.her person. in group quart.ers..........".. " . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN
,.
'Whi te. . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . " . . " . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . " . . " . . . . . "
Black. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . " .
Percen~ of total population...................................
Aaerican Indian. Bskimo, or Aleut................................
Perc.nt. of total populat.ion...................................
A.ian or Pacific Islander.........................................
P.rcen~ of total population....................................
Other rac..............................................................
Hispanic origin (of any rac.)...............................,....
Percent. of tot.al population...................................
,
,
Page 1
46,194
21,575
24,619
2,695
5,710
1,316
1,980
12,544
3,680
1,890
2,382
6,527
6,044
1,426
42.7
8,405
18.2
13,997
30.3
20,292
12,983
10,363
51.1
696
1,924
7,309
36.0
6,090
3,856
45,608
2.25
586
515
71
35,912
9,296
20.1
52
0.1
290
0.6
644
3,124
6.8
,-,.
LATEST APPROVAL
PermUted Uses
In a pun District, buildings, or structures, or land, or
water shall be used only for the following purposes:
A. Single-family dwellings;
B. Two-family dwellings or duplexes;
C. Multiple-family dwellings, townhouses, garden apart-
ments and cluster housing;
D. Private, nonprofit clubs, community centers, civic and
social organization facilities;
E. Private parks, tennis courts, playgrounds, putting
greens, golf courses, driving ranges and other
recreation facilities;
F. Public utility buildings, structures, and facilities
necessary to service the surrounding neighborhood;
G. Houses of worship, schools, nursing homes, nursery
schools, kindergartens and hospitals;
H. "Neighborhood" commercial uses which are deter-
mined at the time of zoning to pun, to be compatible
with the existing and future development of adjacent
and nearby lands outside the pun;
1. Other uses of a nature similar to thOle listed, after
determination and recommendation by the planning
and zoning board, a determination by the governing
body at the time of zoning that the use or uses are
appropriate to the pun development;
J. Permitted uses for a pun District shall be specified in
the application for zoning of land to pun classifica-
tion.
K. Prohibited use. Any structure more than forty.five (45)
feet in height and more than four (4) stories.
L. Home occupations consistent with appendix A, section 11.D.
are permitted without the necessity of being specified at
the time of zoning to P.U.D. COrd. No. 8945, ~ 4, 12-5-89)
PRESENT SUBMITTAL
Permitted Uses
In a POD District, buildings or structures, or land, or wa:e~
shall be used only for the following purposes:
A. Single-family dwellings;
B. Two-family dwellings or duplexes;
C. Multiple-family dwellings, townhouses, garden apartments
and cluster housing;
D. Private, nonprofit clubs, community centers, civic and
social organization facilities;
E. Private parks, tennis courts, playgrounds, putting
greens, gold courses, driving ranges and other recrea:io~
facilities;
F. Public utility buildings, structures, and facilities
necessary to service the surrounding neighborhood;
G. Houses of worship, schools, nursing homes, nursery
schools, kindergartens and hospitals;
H. "Neighborhood" commercial uses which are determined at
the time of zoning to PUD, to be compatible with the
existing and future development of adjacent and nearby
lands outside the PUD;
I. Other uses of a nature similar to those listed, after
determination and recommendation by the pla~~ing and
development board, a determination by the governing body
at the time of zoning that the use or uses are
appropriate to the PUD development.
J. Permitted uses for a PUD District shall be specified in
the application for zoning of land to PUD classification.
K. Prohibited use. Any structure more than forty-five (45)
feet in height and more than four (4) stories.
L. Home occupations consistent with Chapter 2, Section 11,D.
are permitted without the necessity of being specified at
the time of zoning to PUD.
1.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-421
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and site Administrator
DATE: August 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Nautica Sound - MPMD 95-006 Master Plan Modification
(Request to amend the previously approved PUD master plan
to omit the day care use, modify access points, change
the type of units and lot size form 150 single-family
detached units on 6,000 square foot lots and 389 multi-
family units to 246 zero-lot-line units on 5,000 square
foot lots 188 "Z" lot-line units on 4,000 square foot
lots, and reduce the front setback front 20 feet to 15
feet, reduce the side setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and
reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet on lots
that do not back to one another.)
1. Identify the appropriate setback dimension at the rear of all
lots along the east and northwest property lines. The setback
shall be the same as required in the abutting zoning district.
considering the land located in Palm Beach County along the
northwest property line is being annexed into the city at the
R-lAAB zoning classification, it is recommended that the
setback of the lots along this property line where the subject
development abuts residential or proposed residential land
have a 25 foot rear setback. The proposed 25 foot rear
setback matches the rear setback for the R-lAAB zoning
district. Therefore, the proposed setback of 15 feet will be
increased to 25 feet. A further requirement along the
northwest property line is to have the setback for the lots
number 22 to 29 that abut the C-3 Community commercial zoning
be changed from the proposed 25 feet to 30 feet. Thirty feet
is the setback required for property C-3 zoning when it abuts
a residential zoning district. The setback required along the
east property line is 40 feet this setback matches the setback
of the adjacent multi-family project. It is recommended that
the setback along the northeast property line be established
at 40 feet. Therefore the setback along the entire east
property line will be 40 feet. [Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit
Development, Section 9. B.]
2. Redesign the zero-lot-line and "Z" project to show single-
family lots with a minimum lot frontage of sixty (60) feet and
a minimum lot area of six thousand (6,000) square feet. Amend
all plans, data and charts accordingly.
3. Change the front building setback from the proposed twenty
(20) feet at the garage and fifteen (15) feet at the building
to twenty (20) feet for all lots. Establish the rear building
setback for all double frontage lots as twenty (20) feet.
Maintain the proposed fifteen (15) foot rear building setback
on all back to back lots and maintain the proposed ten (10)
foot rear building setback for all lots that abut a lake
maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract.
Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
4. Change the side building setback for the non zero side of the
zero-lot-line units from the proposed ten (10) feet to fifteen
(15) feet and specify a fifteen (15) foot building separation
setback between the sides of all "Z" lot units. Maintain the
proposed fifteen (15) foot corner side building setback.
Amend all plans, data and charts accordingly.
Page 2
Memorandum # 95-421
Nautica Sound
MPMD 95-006
5. Change the side pool and screen enclosure setback from twelve
(12) feet for pools and ten (10) feet for screen enclosures to
fifteen (15) feet for the non zero side of the zero-lot-Iine
units and specify a fifteen (15) foot side pool and screen
enclosure separation for all "Z" lots. Maintain the proposed
seventeen (17) foot corner side setback for pools and fifteen
(15) foot for screen enclosures. Maintain the proposed ten
(10) foot rear pool setback for back to back lots and maintain
the seven (7) foot rear pool setback for all lots that abut a
lake maintenance easement, common ground or recreation tract.
Also maintain the proposed eight (8) foot rear screen
enclosure setback for all back to back lots and maintain the
proposed five (5) foot rear screen enclosure setback for all
lots that abut a lake maintenance easement, common ground or
recreation tract. Amend all plans, data and charts
accordingly.
6. Show on the plans the off-site roadway improvements required
as a result of the City's and/or Palm Beach County's
evaluation of the traffic conditions.
7. It is recommended that a dense landscape buffer be provided
along the interior lot lines of the project. It is further
recommended that the tree and shrub landscape material be
native material and installed prior to the completion of the
first house that has a landscape buffer easement located on
the lot. The dense landscape buffer shall be shown on the
plans and be depicted as clumps of 6 to 8, eight foot tall
canopy trees (mahogany or oak) then approximately 30 feet away
a clump of 6 to 8, seven gallon size bushy (wax myrtle)
shrubs. The buffer shall also have a continuous hedge
(florida privet) running along the entire property line i
however, the hedge may form a meandering shape from above. All
of the tree and/or shrub material shall be maintained uncut
and the hedge material shall be maintained at 5 to 6 feet in
height. The bushy hedge material plants may count for the no
net less of trees as described in the forester's memorandum
no. 95-356.
8. Revise the plans to show a Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress to the
project. The Hypoluxo Road ingress/egress was original
approved for the project to divert trips to surrounding
roadways.
9. On sheets 4 of 8, 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from note #3 the
text "or building".
10. On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 amend the text shown on the
perimeter detail drawings, at the rear landscape easement to
read as follows: "Width of landscape buffer easement and
other easements, where applicable."
11. On sheets 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 change the title of the perimeter
landscape buffer easement detail drawing to "Perimeter lots".
12. Amend the double asterisk note found on sheet 6 of 8 to read
as follows: "Subj ect to rear perimeter landscape buffer
easement and other easements, where applicable."
13. On sheet 6 of 8 and 7 of 8 remove from Accessory Building note
#3 the following text "pergolas and gazebos". Also define
trellis as "A free standing structure maximum height of 6 feet
located only behind the front building setback line with a
configuration having a height and length and no depth (example
- similar to a fence."
Page 3
Memorandum # 95-421
Nautica Sound
MPMD 95-006
14. On sheet 6 of 8 move the 15 foot corner side setback symbol to
the corner of the building.
15. Please note that association documents are required for the
project. The documents are reviewed by staff and the legal
department and required prior to final plat approval.
[Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5 - Planned Unit
Development, Section 2. D.]
16. A revised master plan, which reflects all staff comments and
conditions approved by the City Commission and the Planning
and Development Board, shall be suhmitted in triplicate to the
Planning and Zoning Department, prior to initiating the
platting process.
MEH:dim
xc: Central File
a:Nautice.SDZ
\
KllUy It Aaoclat..
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(407) 689-5522 · Fax: (407) 689-2592
August 30, 1995
Ms. Tambri Heyden, Planning Director
Mr. Mike Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Nautica Sound F.K.A. as Knollwood Groves P.U.D.
Minor Master Plan Modification-City Commission Meeting Follow Up
Our File No: 1020.13
Dear Ms. Heyden and Mr. Haag,
Attached please find twelve revised Master Site Plans addressing those site planning
issues that were raised at the City Commission meeting of August 15, 1995.
For the record, the request of this application is for a minor amendment to the previously
approved Master Plan for Knollwood Groves P,U.D. Included with this resubmittal is a
Master Site Plan which reflects the layout of the individual lots, the interior right-of-way
configuration, pavement and sidewalks, This amended plan should address the major
concerns of members on the City Commission, The following is an overview of the
modifications that have been made to the Master Site Plan.
1. The minimum lot square footage has been increased from 4,000 square feet to 4,500
square feet. In turn, the number of lots under 5,000 square feet has been reduced from
89 to 59 lots. The number of lots in the 5,000 to 6,000 square foot range has been
increased from 160 to 183 lots. The total lot number has been reduced from 434 to 424
which is an overall reduction of 115 units from the previously approved Master Plan of
539 units. The breakdown between zero and "Z" lots has also been altered, There are
now 21 more zero lot line units than previously proposed and 31 zero lot line units have
been eliminated.
2. The developer has agreed upon an acceptable location for the lift station with the
City's Utilities Department and has also agreed to upsize the facilities to accommodate
a small neighboring parcel to the northeast. The lift station is located in the southwest
corner of the top portion of the site. In order to provide a more amenable plan for the
City Utilities Department, four of the deeper cul-de-sacs have been eliminated.
Ms. Tambr; Heyden
Mr. Mike Haag
August 3D, 1995
Page 2
In response to Comment 7 of the Planning and Zoning Memorandum #95-421, a
proposed typical dense landscape buffer has been provided for your review. I have
spoken with both Mike Haag and Kevin Hallihan regarding this issue and I believe the
attached proposed plan should be an acceptable alternative. The majority of the plant
material will be native and, as indicated, the plan does offer some diversity of design.
Attached with this letter is a revised Master Site Plan and a proposed typical dense
landscape buffer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the material attached
or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
~I~
Karyn I. Janssen
Kilday & Associates, Inc.
cc: Alan Fant, GL Homes
Larry Portnoy, GL Homes
Rick Elsner, GL Homes
Chuck Justice, Lawson & Noble
I
~
\
~
l
~
\
lD
- --
IITie City of
'.Boynton '.Beac/i
.'
@.,OO'r.,'"'''Y''''''''.StIllr.'&1""vard
.., ,
_ P.O. ~o.{JIO
· , r.. ". ,_'" 'lI/Jy",.." '1f(lUli, 'J(ori4.l JJ.,25-0JIO
'::':'" " ",' . l"jty;H;u:(: .407}iJ.,.81 U
-__ :1":U: ,..,Oil iJ6,US9
OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
March 13, 1991
Attn: Ms. Anna Cottrell
Urban Design studio
~OOO Palm Beach Lat.. Blvd.
Suite 600, The Concourse
West Palm Beach, Fl 33409-6582
RE: Knollwood Groves Master Plan Modification - File No. 570
Dear Ms. Cottrell:
Please bu advised that the City Commission at their February 19,
1991 meeting made a finding that the changes requested in the pod
boundaries, access points and unit type for the above-referenced
project were not substantial in nature. Regarding the modifica-
tions to the approved setbacks, lot size and lot width, the City
commission made a determination of no substantial change based on
your consent to comply with the following minimum standards:
1. 6,000 square foot lot size
2. 60 foot lot width
3. 20 foot front yard setback
4. 15 foot side yard setback on the non-zero lot line
5. 15 foot rear yard setback
6. An 8 foot pool and screen enclosure setbilck
The Planning and Zoning Board at their Harch 12, 1991 meeting
made a final determination on this request, including compliance
with the minimum standards stated above, by approving this
modification to the Kn01lwood Groves PUD master plan, subject to
the attached staff comments. These comments shall be addressed
on the submission plans for preliminary plat approval.
Pursuant to Appendix a-Planned Unit Developments, Section 10.a.3,
approval of this master plan modification and PUD zoning will
expire on September 12, 1992 if a preliminary plat has not been
submitted. An extension to the master plan approval for a
maximum period of one year, may be filed not later than 60 days
after the expiration of the master plan, November 12, 1992
(Chapter 19, Section 19-92 of the. Code of Ordinances).
Ixt.nllon. mu.t b. til.d with the P1annin9 Department bY
SUbmitting a letter of extension for review by the Concurrency
Review Board and the Planning and Zoning Board.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to call me at (407) 738-7490.
Very truly yours,
c.t..~tI11"_ -t~
CHRISTOPHER CUTRO, AICP
Planning Director
CC: f rb
Encs
cc: Technical Review Board
...., ''1
~ (b t\.
1<6
~ J
_", '1 I \i fI! ..
if!1 ~l I ~ l~ ~i 1'\ ~
~\_,=!,t~:~,:~.vtl",i'~, ~ i~L=~"
~\\Ir ~ " ", " · ". ---~----~ ~....,,- '=-"
~t<i\ '~\__f'\~-i '::-.~P ;jr "'r- ~~,. \\1\' r l~\ :\ m'i~
':\ ,.,' ~JJ "\ "",'r-;" 1\ ~,"',
~\l\ : : e,; : P \~\i: GLl ;.: \ \' ~l' \ \ ~,.~ \ ' \\~\i\
\ \ I . ," I'" · .: ,~:. · 1:1: ~tl:i ~- . \ \ l ,lla Q
1_ ( "..\ ]l\iF Lt' -') I ~.a\
..\.~ . :" I ", .:;~: . \ · " .... v ,.' ".
,I' i " ,.: ~.. ,~.. :""C' ...~.. .~. ~.; .... ,.,. .". .., II \' r \\ I ·
~)i. ~I(\~. : i: :r;;':/;'Vl;'\ n ',; ,;,;;' ~ ;~~ J~ ~ \; ~ \\ \
I .\\' ~ ~ =- · )~.~ ..,
\ ~. ~ ii-'- 'c'--' , __~--...- ,'''>Y~ o.
\ ." ...... rh · ~ "". ". ,.,.' ...,;
\. . 0<i.,'P-:' i ~ ,~..,,~,>., \ [---.,
~ . 1\ ,.,":' ~ ". \ '\ ..~ \X:-1 ~:" \\,\~. \' \ i'..~. ~l
~.. . ,',." ~. .,~ ~';"'-' \ ,I 'II \;1
II ...,' 'Wy). . / 't" . \ 'il \,!
~\\~~ \ -_!;-~:"~-:t~;-~' -. ':'~l~r~ ~ :~..,~ ,:, ~i~:;,'~ \~~,\\\ U\
Wi" . \ ",', : 1\ ~~ ' I"" \ " ~ ~ " '
-it. \ ' ....' ..' ' , ,/," ~ ... "~ ,a . ..
h\ ~'_ '. J< ." ,,' ,..' ,',,"." . ' d \11' ' ~ I~'\
;~ . ~ <'-1--;::0" '" ' .....' i i\;n-:- \'~ l~ ~\ \~ t\\"'!.!. \\~ h r'a
\ \ \ , . ":. ~: ~ '."":,,,..' ',;. .;;,' II II\- i: F~~t '" 1\\ \\'\'\\~~ ~:~
,....' .'~ _H .,~ ,~., · 'C 11>.\" ,"
, ' .....,. . . . .. ' ,\,'" ~ " ". \\/./ \ \' ~,. 1\
~\ \ ' . ;\'~~"~ ,;h. :___'\ . if ::f: :, ~r""~ 1:-:" '. '\L i · ;~\ I \
~\ ~: \\.'~~~ :=~";~i*-J:~:t:I:, 3{'i~' (!).'~C1~i1jj: Jl~!tP1J:fJ:1!1. ~~~\ \, \
~i ~~. .... . ,,; ','1.,; \. ., ,,'.. ,,,' _ . '-' . ~ -' .... , ..' " ;i, ,U,~,j,,;\"'" ' " , ,
" ,." I~ ." ./..... I'" ':'f.:t"~ ~;"".><' ~ ,"'" .."- ~ ,....,""'. . - ,- ' -'- . -= . -""011' ," \ '
, ~". _....!" . p ~'r .pi ': \ '. .,,, . ,c'':''':'; .." ,.". ' .'" (,'n'1" ,"IT' ",\,',' ,," " ,,' ,\ _~\I . \
~ \~\-'/?X~"" ., _:.':_ i \': E:l:EQ - "1:>1 ~ .,"':: \": ~:,,:,". 0 .~'~.. .~.~... OJ" · .\"lltfY,~\.'i \ '
\'~ ';;i;\'''' . .' .' , ' "",,- p':' ''',' ' ''''~ ~. I '
"nl ", .' .,."". . ., ~ \. tllQ ....~. . .,..... r ' "'\' \
.... ,.,-,/.'" "'., . ;,.,." i:; ,-.. .:~ ''i- ."t, i ." ' ., \ I ,,'\I :
\;\ \~~'~' . <~;;.;:,;>. . >~:"",,'~l~~~:~ 7r::'<)J~', ~,,~~~~-:~ ~~~;0~:;" \ \; ~\\ ~\~~
.t', ',''$i' .:'...; ." .\ /,~,".' .' .....Il~ "" ;;,,, ~. i" ".', Ir;;" ...\ : 'c ..\'
;~ " ~.. <; ~~ . . ,'-, .~,~,)~,;:,., /. . '.' u __ .;,.;' '~~l:; j~ :". .. .,:\ ...... .: ;r .j' ", 'l\~'\\\ ~t
,\ ' ~~.,~' 7i11'a'" ,'. / i\ l~\ \ \ '\"ll--! :~. ~ r-'l"\t\~ \ \-.-;: \~~~\l::JI"\ ~'\
~~ \ ~/''''-,:.Jjl 'lrk.-~/ ~\;", ~ ~' 1 .,~ 'ill. 'c,.. \ : · .~" ':>' .z1",
~t \ .-.-1 ~ ~ .. ~ ' ,\, (, i' .' \ r;~' ~b;. I' --~, -~ ' ! " II \ ~ ~,' I '0:
, c'-- .... ~ " \ .1' ~ ,\,~'~~J~" :, 7--;-0- ~ ,..-\11
_...,,/1 ',.?i . \, ,>>-' ,,' · ,:" .' .I-'-W TO'" ,,~..' · ,'. ':.' -' ':., . ,\ .
~ i>>"~O'" \ ,. ...-',.,.... " " I'" .. '" ."."..,. ~'1 .' · ~'" ", ~
~ ',~ ~~ . (\\\ . :: ~\i-tll J ,,~ ~ " ~.:,...'1ii: ~ \ ,;: · y~ }\r-",' ~ .~:\3 :.;.7 ~ ':~, .'""; ~ \
, '" \\. \\ , ... ~ ' . . , ~ '-' . '1':0" ' . ~" ~ ~ ' ~
~ \ \ ~~\ ~ ~~i~ 'y\ \'\~ i\~;:' ~r.- :. .....-- __,-1.~,r.: 1,\ ',; '. ,~,,\;'\ ~~ ,~~,: ;..1' I \t\\:,
" " * ,..." '. ,\I .'" ;;.-_ .r, ~1 .;, \::, ,:\.'\'::'" --- __J · '\ .,'. ,4 \ ~., I
, (, _ . ~.. co.!. ,..,,,.\ ~v' . . . . . , ' . . .... · ''', ,... ;r:n.f.f. .",..,' "" ,ill.' .
J J"'~; \\H~ \ \'\ /.ffintr;;:-'I:~'--;~--~:-:~-:;~-~-::~'~~~~:~;~1~~'r~I~'~oo;'~;i'ff:~-[J-~/l~~~l :,.\~\\!\\ \
~,,~"J:4 d~LJ,'.' ~\'.: · · : ' .~.~'~.~ .~ .:f; .1;;'; ; , · .. " ;.;; ';.; ; .; ;V; ;; · ,"If' ,
~ ,I I- U - '--~C -- - · ' --' ">' . t'" ,
i\\ .' i'" .-,,! P .m'~"""~ ,-,,"~...._-' ' ...,'<"~\.
1,\ /\ 1\ ~t~. ,"' r " \ \ II
~ ~o i\~ i ~ ~ i' " \' . l\I' ~ t \ :a III 11'1 II i\ :\\i\ :
't'> 5 Z .8'" " w' ~~ ~ \j!. II! ~ ..~. - \. Ii'"
r- 0 0 ~ .' ...\ · I ~ \, - .... "\ ,.".
m u .. fi 'I ' " ,~. · · 1...f ~;f:\~
., " ~ ,~ ' ,,' . :>- . ,,;.'
6 )% L '" ' '. .,--- - - '" ' . I
o -, ,~ \ <. '
,~" ,\ \ '
o -
'l'i'G'!$6
ttli~'\
vtl\\\
$
,
Y~ i;~; l~ii U~ \'i'~ \
':l ~H~~l.lb~~~\i
V!~! -H; ["\ .h~
. .._~ h!l \ li.i
,s,~'ll" · t~lt
n \'i~4 lli~i'
_ \'l I tit
\ \.~ L~it lit'r\
1 .t <.t S~!i\i
.t 1 " ~. ·
. "l . I i
i
~\\dJOY " A"IDC\O...
LandScape ArChl,.ct,/PIOt\rt.U
'5~' for\.lrT' place
!loull- \Ou/t.
we1-' po'lTI e.ocp, FlOrlOO ~~
(401) 1j6q_~S-::2 ofOJI:{40i\ f
1Il1l'flCl801J1ID ,$.l. Ka.Il..... G..... p.1l.D,
cOol<<: ~
~ I)a\('
\.lr..n kt~ . <no
t~:"~I~~-1:~
.,,~.~
.---
R<"yn\on }W\\ch flondtt
"'8~\ l'r ~11 r ...'al)
---
Z lJl'" VI!..).....
'?;
0"- Cr-O
.... Q _.Jo'"
:J g. 5. ~ ~~ C'
~ 0 ~
y, ~.g I ~.-g
o tI _:l I
~ .'0 Oft
u. I Z -s -
!: ~?:: ~ ()\
~. ~ ~ : " ~.
;;:t :l I?
~,~ -:. CO :;-".)-
, ~ 0 ?. a;
1 (t ~ 9-;~
g ~~ o~i
i:g~
g":~
o.o.~
_c
.,. .~ n
:f ~ g
f .'t ...
:r:!CJf
~~
~
0. "
..
.. I
-0 _.
~ ~
~ "
:.;c
it Co
0.1
.,.
~ 5
0. .
~~
~."
0. _
, -
-.:.
\11 ~
o
'7
~
..
- ~
a III ~
~ g ~'~
~ ~ 3
~.:) a:::
,'0
';:'"
: [
v'
, ~
.11 ==-
~ ~
.
, ..
, 0.
~~
S ~
J .::.
_0'
? '
%
9'
;;;
~
, 0.
,
, a
, c
3 ~
, "
, 0
-'0.
g
~
,.,
~
,.,
3
'"
~ ~
rf
~
CD
~
~
~3,3
.... " 0 '"
c 0'< 0
n", . lIlI
_ _ "
c =; .,
"" ft;::;'<l
!'to. Q.
__3-
0.... 0 ....
~~: 3
~;;~b
e:.~~!
.&~if::
0_. '"
lfl~ ~
...... :1)
g.<~.g
("\ _ =CL
1fr 3'-< 0
>:ga
gOo.;:
~l3~
~~i3
6'~~m
VI _'" t)
f\o ,,~
30. .. ~
on <
~ g- 11 ~
...:.&:sQ..
J3J
~?;
0. ~
"'!ii~
'"
It\
c
"
D ~ ~
:> "
~ Q. Q
ft.
, 0. :7
;:73 :r3
g ~ ~ ~ ~.
- ~ :). ~ It
~ ~ ~.~:
\ h3~S'
.a ~~ g ~
~ lit''': 0' ~ ~
~ -<'2.:!.'& g
~ ~.!II ~ ~ i
9- ~ a
cr2.E..
g ~~~
~ ,go 3" Z
~ :-a ~
;; a~~
o~~
:a",
.. ..
",,-
..o.a
-~~
",~r
. :l _'
-" ..
0383
,. ..
:70
o ..
a ;'~
1~a.
:l~
:5 '" 3
.. "
0.-0
-<> ~
o....g
.. .,."
Q.. c ;:.
... ='<
2. ~ 3
" '.
",'
..
.,
~
~
III
~
a
o
<;:.
%
0.
;;
"'l!:
.. -
it"
" 0.
0.
00
m-
co.
_.~
~.tI
~ ~
..:I"
(')~
7C
a~
~..
i~
.~
~..
o~
~~
/i:"-
S'.
"':7
n5:
ai
~iA
c.
"'..
0.'"
<0
"!"
;;..,
;~
0.
~o.
-~
",0
..-.
a~
oc:
0..
~~.
..
o !.
a=
0.
;ig'
-n
cag
,," "
~ ~
" C
a.~
..
",0.
..
~!.
0.-
~,,-
....
q
..
..
~
3
~
%
Q
:7
0.
a.
3
..
~
"
<:.
~
3'
'"
..
..
c;:
"
~
o
0.
;;
~
CT
..
o
6'
.
..
"-
l>
..
D
<:.
;;
3
~
..
~ ~~~~I~ci'~ ~
~:2=~~~ ~
'2 ~~g g~'2. ~
3 () 0 U'l.... :e ..,
11 ,:J a:1~>~ :e
~ ~~.. ~ ~
:i' .~I" ..
~ N-g.~ Q
:- ~~I~ I~
U'&.~
,,-,,-
~
"
'"
o
o
c
n
-<
n
~
,.,
Cl
o
:0
~
Z
1>
C
-\
o
1>
(f)
o
2
o
'1J
t:
9
(f)
-\
1>
b
1>
iQ
o
(f)
g*,~
~a:1!'
~ n'~
.&'f~
~f.~
~'P%:
2>.., 'tl
gHI
"':....~
ig'~
;~.~
---l"\ <
9..lS f
"'i ~ '<
Q 0 V't '"
!:- f:
tit g ~
:70
..
....
-~
"':l
Q ~
-..
"'i!
;;
..
ii
..
"l
N
,.,
'"
o
gS
_VI
""
c
5:~
3'S'
~ ~.
'~ ~
S'VI
~'g
30
..
OD
:>C
"g
" ..
~o
",0.
-a:
00.
"'-
!O..
""
..
g;
~
3
5'
3'
c
3
ilo
8
(;
e:
..
~
o
;;
8 B g ~ NN:O"'f"""~ lj; -0
. . 0. 0 -. ~~ :0 J:J
[o~1fZ ~ :z ,.,
'" 3'" ..., 0
Z ~ C ~ .. ~g,a.~ ~ '" :0
0. ~ > ~ n c I E
~ n :- ~ ti:g.-"!il ~ 3 ."
;;- ,., 0
... VI .. .. _t~o5'~ ~'" 0
- , '" . %
i __C\ Cl '" VI
" '" ~ o-~(JlI 0'0 erO ottOO o::_~~gc; '" ..8
~ 5 '< c: ~ n. g .. g~:~ :H~ ~C~.... ..- g en
2t't"" ~ '0 ~ "" ':7 2,$ ~
'" 0 ~ ~o
.. t~~~ .. g"3 ~.; 0" ~~);:la ii'~
., ~ :7 n [~gtD i ii" 5" CD n" :5 m
0. :> 0.:.., a ~s ~ ~ '< '" ~~ig~ 0" -Q.'PS ~ a &. ~. .. '0" .. ,., .. "
-" . .!1.S 3'1. ..
-0. .. 0. o \) 0 0 .. 2.g''72 ~~~g""~ I: 0
0>" H : a~ 3 ~.i;:. ~ _0. ~'t~g ,,0 ,.,
.g !;-: ~-< n. ~- 3..~ "'00 Q. _ tJ -05'
... i'~ ~ ~a~ i:;1.-1g t'~~6 '7~"~ _" "",.a ~
" !:: ~c 9.0 ~~g~. " g~-c."C ;2.&' ~
J'C 1 &..8 -a "0 "'" It-. III
".. 0.- o e . ~:::r. ~ ~aA._ fI, 3'C ~o _~:I ..
-0. 0 i~.
..- 3';- f: -;; II "g~Ci g= ".. ~~o' ~"'=~ .gs..a[ ~:J~ ~ 3 ,,' 0
~g ;l"~ i;:~i' i-.c t.. :,.~ ~ ~~2 i.~ '-I a ~". ~ i e. ~
-, jiH " - {.a ln~ Ii: :- :;;-< "- p%
~~ l= 113:,- : D ..-::~ .. h~.~ i-no. y [till
i~~~~ ~i ; :-'0: ~~: g:- ..-
la ...." ~.& :: 0
_.0 0.., a Ii. '-'::3= ~! "-0 e~",
l~l~ "r' c::_.
~3 .' CII ~ 12.:.j g i;1 m
i~ a "a!\ ~ -or ooi ~ -& p~ ~ 0
I" t...." [I !i';r ,!f ' r w,- lz, ~ gQ J:J
iio a oil> lu" " h 1_
.3: i'S;[[ :::'~ '7-~ ~ .. 0 i .
:7 ~ ft,. II .~Oi'~ a:::1i . 0..... ."
00. .7:> ..,2 -- o~'O
d: '7 .z < ",0 ~ ~.&'." 3- .00 ... 0.":< t
~~g1 o -1!.~ _z, ... .. o -~ It .- ,-," <;>'2. ..-t;a.. ):
. lS:",S!. .!! S'~ .3 __ : ~ :ri "-
ty;' 0"00.- ,,- .. ~~= .., ,i ~~fi
0.0 , g.~Q.g ,&'!3' ,,0 I.~[~ . ~ c., 0 ~..
~o ~ !:~~a ~ "- "-.. ;; .. ;; 3 "'~ .- 0..., Z
~:&.~ =:< _3 ;; "0 . 0..,
CA"' ;:.: Dotr~ 0. < ~o.
!~.g~ . ~!!. . ~. ~']: ~ ..'" ...
5'Q 0 " 0 .. .. .. ~. S" ~.i~ a. :-0 ~~ ..,..
." ~ 1:- __0 " t 0-
~ ... ~lt_ a" ~i;'g~ 00'- ;[i :>'0. a a."g:>> s: .. c: ~
3 0' - .'" "-
~ .. :i[ "30. 0:7 ~'a a. o~::=o .. a:- 0
~ :;Q~ --~g: -.. _i5:- .. <
3 n ..,- i;a=' [.S: II! ~!.I "rrCTfr 0. 2:2.- ::.< 2-
. ~ eM 3' ~:.a .,.~.i- ~ " ..
C 3':~~ g: !-< t
3 ;; .. a> co l"~ 0:" ~-~ ~ 00... ~~l~' Et~
... 0 1~;Z :S' 0 [[ nn'" 1 .. ,,0
.. e C co ~~~ "P."" ~Q." ~ ~:~~ 00
~ a ~~~ "'~ gi 5'.. go .. it ~::: n
n _..n ~ 0
.. o' o ca... :>. ....:) '" lQ ;:;. . .. 0. 0. " e
--- ~ ;:'0..:: 0."- 1:-::;~ 0." ii' ~ ~ :;~ go.~ .. 2- ?>
, .. ..
0. 0 '< .2- " ~ 0.
~ '& :: ~ 3' 1iCC;-'" g o~ "-o~ ..
:3i 0 " ..0 3 '< ~
25' i i~ 0- ~o.
.-- 3- ~=
0. ~i S" 0. " "
":7 ;; ~ "
. .. !l :o;tI ~
li
.-~_._~~----------_....- -_.- -
"!
r
o
~U;
"
" I
.1:
0' ~~
s.~
g-3
S:!"
~'8
3~
2:5
3 ;;
"
3;;
oS!.
i~
n"
g..<
g~.
0. -
"'-
~ 2-
..
N'
..
..
q
2.
~o..o>:",~q
8
~
'"
."
(}'I....'"
uo
q
~~
~
a
S!.
7
'"
o
"'... -,;;:~";
o ...t...... 0
~
..
a:
..
..
2.
'"
q
'"
o
..
..
c;:
0.
o
,..
..
&
~
~
~
..
"
o
,,-
~
0.
.
3
:f
3'
c:
3
N
o
o
..
f
~
ii'
"-
9-
!!.
E X H I BIT "E"
J;A