Loading...
LEGAL APPROVAL Do 1\)0+ ~'E" "'oV~ ~ - OCTOBER 3t 1994 from Lake Worth. may consider the is gOing to do and Bill ukill, the Director of' evelopmen said it auld be askin for a legal pr lem if the City had th inspectors e structural i egrity of the d clcs. The inspectors ca detennine ural member i falling down or s in disrepair and wil put the pea e on ice. The rea it costs as much as it does to get an e ineer to c tify... uctural soundn s, e't,en if it is a new dock, is because t takes sam time . d calculation do )hat. It is very difficult to assess he structur int rity of any thin un . the water without destructive testi . Even with est ctive testing, i i Cfifficult and very expensive. Staf can detennin wh er a dock is re bly safe or unsafe. Mayor Hannenin stated that if tare detennined t e unsafe just from obser- vation, Code forcement shaul e r1gorously app11ed 1mmediately for the remov- al thereof City Manager Parker will put this item on the October 18, 1994 agenda. NO ONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK, MAYOR HARMENING DECLARED THE PUBLIC AUDIENCE CLOSED. VIII. DEVELOPMENT PLANS A. Boynton Nurseries Master Plan Modification \ /Ill(' nr D ~1 'f - () () t Tambr1 Heyden, Planning and Zon1ng D1rector, stated that K~lday and Associates is requesting approval of a modification to their 1990 master plan. The PUD is located on the west side of Lawrence Road at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and the L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal. A number of mod1f1cations are being requested. The first one is a reduction in the total number of units from 400 units to 374. The next is a change in the type of units. The first approval included a mixture of single-family and multi-family units. The proposal before the Corrmission this evening is all single-family with two types of units, a "Z" lot line on 4,000 square feet (231 of those types of units) and a zero lot line product (143 of these types of units), and they would be on 50' x 100' wide lots. he project also includes phasing and Phase 1 would include all but 48 of the nits. The reason for this is that even though there is a reduction 1n the - 12 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 3. 1994 total number of units, because of the difference in the types of units, there is a difference in the traffic generated (a slight increase). To avoid certain road improvements to be attached to this approval, a phasing plan is being pro- posed for the remaining 48 units of the project. Because of the decrease in the number of units, there is a decrease in the water and sewer demand, as well as the population that can be expected through this project. There is also a change in the pod layout and the access points to the pods. There is also ~n establishment of the local streets to the pods, which was not included in the original master plan. This is a 40 foot wide street with a sidewalk on one side, 4 feet wide, and those will be private streets. There is also an altera- tion in the size of the preserve area, which has been reduced in size and the location has moved. There is a change in the lake sizes and the location of the stonn water management tracks. There is a reduction in the size of the public ark to be dedicated, a decrease from 2.84 acres to 2.5 acres. There is a reduction in the width from 25 feet to 5 feet for the PUD perimeter along the south boundary of the PUD. Lastly, a condition of the original master plan was that prior to platting, the project come back before the Commission for a master lan modification approval because the original master plan did not establish ot sizes and lot layout. he master plan this evening shows a proposal for lot layout and lot sizes. The u1ld1ng setbacks are proposed at 20 feet to the garage, 15 feet to the house. 15 foot rear setback is being proposed for all units that back up to one nother, and a 10 foot rear setback for units that. back up to a lake, a pre- erve, or the perimeter of the PUD. A 10 foot side setback is proposed for the on zero portion of the property line. On the corners, 13.5 feet is being pro- osed. eg~rding screened enclosures, a zero foot setback for .Z. lot line units is eing proposed when they abut a lake or preserve, and a 10 foot setback for the ide. For zero lot line units, the proposal is a zero foot rear setback' when hey abut a lake or preserve, a 5 foot setback when the units back up to one nother, and a side setback of 10 feet, 13.5 feet for corner lots. f the City Commission detenmines that this is a substantial change, the apprev- 1 would necessitate a rezoning. If the City Commission detennines this is not substantial change, it 15 forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for inal approval. taff reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD regulations, the intent nd purposes of PUDs, and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff was oncerned with the buffer widths, the recreation area, the lot sizes, the lot 1dths, and setbacks. buffer is proposed around the entire PUD perimeter. The landscape area being reposed is part of an easement rather than a dedicated tract. The prOblem is hat the long tenn integrity of that buffer is jeopardized when treated as an asement rather than a dedicated tract and it is difficult to ensure that that uffer is always going to be there. In addition, staff recommends that the 25 eet be maintained along the entire PUD boundary as originally proposed, with he exception of the south boundary, which will have a 5 foot landscape buffer. - 13 - MINUTES - REGUlAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 3, 1994 In response to Commissioner Aguila regarding the continuity of the buffer, 4It Ms. Heyden stated that what ends up happening. with or without penmits, is that people start putting up fences to enclose the area to make their lots seem larger. Commissioner Aguila asked who would be responsible for maintaining the 25 feet to the overall PUO property line. Ms. Heyden advised that staff recommends it be dedicated to the homeowners' assor.iation. Ms. Heyden said the purpose of the buffer is to buffer this project from the property to the north. Ms. Heyden stated that with the number and type of units shown on the original master plan, the total dedication for recreation was 6.75 acres. Fifty percent of that was to be satisfied by providing private recreation, leaving approxi- mately 3.3 acres to be dedicated as a public park. When the project went through the public hearing process, the City Commission approved the project with a 2.84 public dedication and the balance of a cash payment equivalent to over half an acre to pay the City at time of platting. We have a Comprehensive Plan policy regarding this particular neighborhood planning area. Knol1wood Groves is an area that needed a neighborhood park. The intention was to secure a neighborhood park in this area, to get 2.84 acres in this corner, and when the property to the north came in, assemble those two properties to hopefully end up with a 5 acre neighborhood park. The concern here is that there is, as part of their proposal, a reduction in the acreage to 2.5 acres, the difference to be paid in cash. If this were to occur, we would be at further risk of not getting the 5 acre park when the property to the north came in. Regarding lot sizes and setbacks, a chart was put together, listing the PUOs within the City that have minimal lot sizes and setbacks. etc. The smallest front building setback is currently 18 feet. The smallest rear building setback is currently 10 feet. The smallest side building setback is 10 feet. Minimum lot size is 4.500 square feet. , With respect to screen enclosures. the minimum thus far in the City has been established as a minimum rear setback of 5 feet. zero feet when abutting a lake, and a minimum side setback of 8 feet. Ms. Heyden stated that staff has had technical problems with this progression over the past ten or fifteen years with smaller and smaller lot sizes. Staff has been seeing a progression of smaller lot sizes and larger homes on lots, and a narrow building separation. With these smaller and smaller lot sizes staff has been seeing. we have run into some technical problems. These smaller and smaller lot sizes have come with larger and larger homes. increased lot coverage. decreased penmeability, and narrower and narrower building separa- tions. That makes it really tough for emergency personnel to park their large vehicles and get their equipment in between these buildings. Another problem that we had have, and it is becoming more and more prevalent. is parking. When you have a very narrow lot width, and you have a building setback that is very close to the street edge, you have a very shallow and narrow driveway. We are seeing a lot of parking on streets and swales and across sidewalks, and it causes damage to the swales and sidewalks. - 14 - j MINUTES - REGULAR _,TY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 3. 1994 Staff recommends that the City Commission make a finding of no substantial change for this modification, subject to the staff comments. This recommenda- tion is based on approving this request for. at minimum, no less than the stan- dards that have been approved in other PUDs in the City to date. This would establish within the Boynton Nurseries a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet, a minimum lot width of 50 feet, and a rear setback of 5 feet for screen enclo- sures, including those that abut the lakes and open areas, all side and building separations be maintained at 10 feet, and the rear setbacks for the screen enclosures that back up tc ether lots be increased to 8 feet~ In response to Vice Mayor Matson, Kieran Kilday of Kilday & Associates, advised that double driveways have been provided throughout and are 16 feet. Commissioner Katz felt the Planning Department should continually look at net useable acreage. This property is 83.81 acres. Howevlr, the net useable acreage 1s 57 acres. They have decided to reduce the number of, units, but the actual unit per acre is almost a 50 percent increase over what 1s allowed. He felt the site it too dense and should only have 220 to 230 units. He felt the 2.84 acres should be dedicated to the City for a public park. He felt the pre- serve area should be 25 percent of the gross acreage of the property, which would further reduce the net useable property, but he did not think this would be fair. He felt we should go to the net useable acreage, give this man his 4.46 allowable density, and multiply it by that, and then do the project from there. Mr. Kilday stated that there is a zoning approval on this property. The density issue has already been approved by a previous Commission, and he is working within the parameters of that approval to make the. modifications. He stated that the final traffic report does not require phasing of the project. Therefore, he is not requesting this modification. He advised that 2.84 acres ~iJl be dedicated for a park site if that was what was approved. Alan Fant, Vice President of GL Homes, stated that GL Homes is the second largest single-family home builder in South Florida and lives up to high stan- dards. GL Homes develops 24 foot wide streets, puts curb and gutter in, has 40 foot wide rights-of-way, and has a sidewalk, at least on one side, in all com- munities. Mr. Fant described the site plan and the units. He stated that GL Homes offers 15 different prOduct types. GL Homes is not trying to put any more units on the property than what is allowed. To the contrary, GL Homes is reducing the units from 400 to 376. Mr. Kilday addressed the staff comments. With regard to Engineering Department Memorandum No. 94-255 about widening the driveway widths to 18 feet, Mr. Kilday stated that there is a two car driveway, which is 16 feet, for all units. With regard to Engineering Department Memorandum No. 94-288, there was a suggestion that the lake area shown running along Lawrence Road on the front of the property also have a guardrail across the entire lake. Mr. Kilday said this lake has been set back to DOT standards and has been reviewed by the City Engineering Department, as well as the County Engineering Department, and a guardrail would not be required. The lake meets all safety standards. - 15 - j ~ I~ MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 199~ OCTOBER 3. .~ Mr. Kilday referred to the Memorandum to Ms. Heyden from Michael Haag, the Zoning and Site Development Administrator, dated September 29, 1994. He stated that comments 2, 9, 10, 12 and 13 are redundant due to the submission of the new traffic statement. With regard to the proposed landscape buffer along the south canal line (item number 3), Mr. Kilday stated that the recent master plan indicates a 25 foot setback as opposed to a specific buffer. He requested that a landscape buffer 5 feet be allowed on the south property line, along with another 5 foot setback, making it a 10 foot setback. The reason for this is that the applicant is being required to dedicate to the drainage canal an additional 35 feet. He felt there was no need for additional buffering because there is significant buffering there already from the canal right-of-way. Mr. Kilday agreed to provide pedestrian signalization (item number 14). However, he requested that the verbiage "if warrantedll be added to this comment. With regard to item number 13, Commissioner Aguila was concerned with a decel- eration lane or additional turn lanes to access this site. Traffic Engineer Rob Rennebaum with Simmons & White, explained that exclusive left turn lanes were recommended at both project entrances. Coming from the north, the right turn lanes are not warranted based on Palm Beach County guidelines. Therefore, no right turn lanes were recommended. Commissioner Aguila felt this was a mistake. He expressed concern about a right turn lane at both entrances. With regard to item number 15 regarding the landscape buffer, Mr. Kilday stated ~I that having done many projects with similar buffers, GL Homes has found that having the property association responsible for polfcing the buffer has worked wel" but actual maintenance of the buffer has generally been assigned to the individual property owners that abut it. One of the reasons is that nonmally the irrigation system put in to include the buffer is hooked up to the indivi- dual unit1s irrigation system. This has not presented a problem in the past. Even if the association owned the tract of land, if someone puts up a fence, the association has the right to tell them to take it down. However, it does create somewhat of a problem in tenms of the setbacks because in some cases, the set- backs overlap some of the buffer area. With regard to item 16(a) regarding larger homes being built on smaller lots, Mr. Kilday stated that this plan was designed to meet the LUI requirement. Therefore, there cannot be increased lot coverage. A concern was raised at the TRC meeting regarding monitoring the different units and different floor areas. At that meeting, he agreed to create quarterly monitoring of the types of units going on the lots as a condition of approval. With regard to the separation of the buildings becoming smaller and smaller, Mr. Kilday stated that a 10 foot separation of the units has been maintained throughout the project. That has been the standard separation of other proj- ects approved within the City. f. Kilday did ask for less setbacks on the screen enclosures. However, in ding the staff report, he agreed to the staff recommendation, and will make th screen enclosures meet the setbacks recom- mended by staff. ei - 16 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 3. 1994 From a side to side basis, he promised that the SCreen enclosures will have the same setbacks as the penmanent structures so that there is a penmanent 10 foot minimum width going through the building. As different unit types are placed on the lots, many areas get bigger because of the architectural detailing. Therefore, many times the minimum setback is exceeded. With regard to parking, Mr. Kilday stated that an 80 foot separation is pro- posed. This separation is made up of a paved area, _~ concrete Miami gutter, and six feet of'landscaping on each side. One side has a sidewalk. The effect of having that extra curb and extra width of right-of-way is that the cars in the driveways get pulled back off the road. The depth of the lot has net been taken out to create that walk. Two outdoor parking spaces per unit have been provided and many of the units have two car garages as well. Mayor Harytening a~ke~ ,1 f..thltJJ.oJ.,t~~,~~h!~.~ave "one ..car...9a~~ges still have the wi de enough driveway'to park two vehicles. Mr. Kilday answered aff1nmatively. Regarding Hem 17, which recommends that the two story homes located on the "I" lots be limited to a minimum distance in any direction of 160 feet between the lot lines of any two story home, Mr. Kilday felt this is too rigorous a standard to apply and this has not been required of any of the other projects. There are fifteen different unit types. He estimated that half of them will be single story and half two story. He advised that GL Homes has some internal rules about allowing too many units of the same type in a row. In response to Mayor Hanmening, Ms. Heyden stated that the 160 feet is based on four 40 foot wide lots in a row. She pointed out that the color renditions do not show that when you have the .Z. lot line, although there is a 10 foot building separation, from the street you only see a 5 foot distance between the two buildings. Staff feels that this, along with a two-story building, presents a very dense appearance. Mr. Fant advised that this concept was done intentionally to break up the units and streetscape. He explained that all two-story units are at least twenty feet apart from each other. With regard to item 18, Mr. Kilday already agreed to dedicate 2.84 acres for the parle. Vice Mayor Matson's concerns (parleing, screen setbacks, and public parle dedica- tion) have been addressed to her satisfaction. With regard to Ms. Heyden'S argument about seeing only 5 feet from the street, she would rather not seen an open expanse between every house. She would like to see something architec- turally different from home to home. She felt this project is not detrimental to the health and welfare of the residents and would bring a higher assessed valuation and a bigger tax base into the City. Commissioner Katz had a problem with the density. He said it is not 4.46 units per acre; it is closer to 7. - 17 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 3, 1994 In response to Commissioner Aguila, Mr. Fant agreed to put in the right turn lanes. e Motion Commissioner Aguila moved to authorize staff to take this to the Planning and Development Board with a finding of minor modification. Referring to the com- ments and recommendations set forth in the September 29, 1994 Memorandum to Ms. Heyden from Michael Haag, the Zoning and Site Development Administrator, Commissioner Aguila deleted numbers 2, 3, 15, 16(a), and 17. He added the ver- biage "if warranted" to item number 14. Vice Mayor Matson seconded the motion, which carried 4-1. Commissioner Katz cast the dissenting vote. AT 9:00 P. M., MAYOR HARMENING DELCARED A RECESS. THE MEETING RESUMED AT 9:05 P. M. B. Milmi Subs - color selection In entrlnce David Daszkal, 5334 Buck ead Circle, Boca Raton, c culated color ch n, Executive Vice esident of Miami Subs, sta that Miami Sub has an image maintain and a re onsibility to its franchis s to insist upon er- tain images eing maintained. ey factor in the success Miami Subs is it building. Su eys have shown that 8 percent of the people w ate at Miami Subs last year e to Miami Subs st ctly because of its buil . The appl1- tit cant has already a reed to eliminate s e neon and colors and is tt1ng in barrel tile. Severa exceptions have be made out of respect to tH Commission. The cola of the building is ry significant. Neon and age are very significant. Mr. rlyn said he cannot t the same color go on t ~ 1lding as is on the sho ing center. The suc ss of Miami Subs weighs avil on ts building image. If is blended in with e shopping center any furt r, he has grave concern as to the total paten al success of the project ng the color chips, Vice ayor Matson moved to color chip Vice Mayor Matson auld like to see the pro t move forward, but n detriment of the int rity of what has been ap oved in the shopping Commissioner Katz secon the motion, which fa1le 2-3. Mayor Hanmening, ro Tern Bradley and Comm1s oner Aguila voted agains the motion. Commiss er Aguila moved to appro Benjamin Moore color ch #1066. Mayor P Tem Bradle seconded the motion, whic carried 3-2. Vice Mayor atson and Commissione Katz cast the dissenting v e. t - 18 - (~ {iff f'4.f pW if 'f ..0 Dt MINUTES - REGU~. CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: OCTOBER 1B, 1994 Boynton Nurseries PUD Kilday and Associates Boynton Nurseries Lawrence Road and L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal; northwest corner MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION: Reconsider request for approval of an amended master plan showing a reduction in number of units from 400 to 374, change in type of units from 162 single-family units on 6,000 square foot lots and 238 multi- family units to 233 .Z. units on 4,000 square foot lots, and 143 zero-lot line units on 5,000 square foot lots, establishment of lot layout and setbacks, altered pod size and access points, change in buffer and road widths and their ownership, revised location and size of preserve and drainage areas and modified utili- ties and landscape plans. Tambri Heyden made the presentation. She reminded the Commission that when this application came before them previously, they voted 4-1 that the changes requested were not substantial in nature and passed onto the Planning and Devel- opment Board some guidelines to assist them in their detenm1nat1on which involved certain Planning and Zoning Department comments. When this application went before the Planning and Development Board, there was a conflict between what they wanted to approve in tenms of conditions, and what the City Commission had recommended. For that reason, this application is back for reconsideration. The conflict and the comments involve Comments 15, 16a and 17. The one comment ~eglrding traffic has been resolved. These comments deal with the landscape buffer, lot area and limiting the number of two-story units which can be constructed in a row. Kieran K11dlY, representing the petitioner, advised that the applicant accepted the conditions approved by the City Commission. There was a question needing clarification with regard to the driveways. The applicant showed the driveways at 161 in width. Commissioner Aguila said he reviewed the previous actions of the Commission and the plans, ami reviewed the minutes of the Planning and Development Board meeting. He stands by the motion made at the last City Commission meeting. He clarified that agreement was reached on the 161 driveways. One thing not discussed at the Planning and Development Board meeting which was discussed at the City Commission meeting, was the issue of the two (2) right turn lanes the applicant agreed to put in. Commissioner Aguila said there is nothing about the discussion of two weeks ago, or the motion that was made including the st~pulations, that he wishes to change. - - 10 - MINUTES - REGULA' ~ITY CCMUSSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLu~IDA OCTOBER 18. 1994 '.'_..~.._' ~ Commissioner Aguila pointed out that the lot on the northwest corner has acces from SE 12th Avenue. He questioned whether or not half of the 60' which abuts their property will go to that property owner. Ms. Heyden esponded affinma- tive1y, and advised that Gulf tream Lumber could then approac them about buying it. Commissioner Aguila believes Gulfstre Lumber has a weakness in th r security system. However, he does not have a pr 1em with this request as 10n as the water service can be tapped and the servic extended down to 12th. Commissioner Katz said he is philosophically a inst abandoning such alar piece of property. e also feels it is not the ty's responsibility to ma Gu1fstream's property cure. If they have probl with security, they shou d invest the money to take re of the situation. Comm s10ner Katz will not sup~ port this abandonment. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley quest10ne hether there is a. problem ith illegal dumping on this site. Ms. Heyden did not ve 1nfonmat1on with regar to illegal dumping. She said Gulfstream parks s vehicles in this area. Mayor Hanmening said he read somewhere t t Gulfstream feels by own g this prop ty, their security would be enhanced. He feels Gulfstream nee to contro here their employees are parking. Vice Mayor tson referred to Planning and Zon1~ Department Memorandum No. 94-293 wherein s. Heyden refers to illegal dump1n and securing the property. She asked if any e has investigated the claim of 11 gal dumping. Ms. Heyden said she has visit the property, and during that vis t, there was no dumping; however, that situat can change daily. Mayor Hanmen1ng does not 1 the correct way to control .C1ty to give away proper . Comm1ss10 Katz moved to deny the ab donment. Vice Mayor Matson s onded the motion, wh1c carried,5-0. VII. PUBLIC V I I I . DEVElOPlmlT : A. CONSENT AGENDA None B. NON-CONSENT AGENDA - Not Unanimously Approved by Plannint and Development - 9 - MINUTES - REGUr CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. .....ORIDA OCTOBER 18. 1994 Vice Mayor Matson feels the same and thought it was clear that the Commission detenmined the 161 width driveways would work and were not aesthetically unpleasant. Commissioner Katz said his comment remains the same as before. The applicant haS approximately fifty buildable acres with a density of 4.46, when it is really closer to 7. He feels they are creating a sardine-can situation. He will not support this project. Mt)t1on Commissioner Aguila moved to appr~ve Boynton Nurseries PUD as referenced in Michael Haag1s memo of September 29th, with the deletion of items 2, J, 16a, 15, and 17. On Item 14, we added, Hif warranted". He would like to include that the driveways should be IS', and to reaffinn that there will be one right-turn lane at each entry off of Lawrence Road into the development. Vice Mayor Matson pointed out that Commissioner Aguila'S previous motion is stated on Page 18 of the last City Commission minutes. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley seconded the motion. Mayor Hannening clarified that the motion is to approve the request of G.L. Homes as set forth in the minutes of the meeting of October J. 1994. on Page 18, plus clarifications with regard to the driveway size of lSI. and two right-turn lanes on Lawrence Road into the development. The motion carried 4-1. (Commissioner Katz cast the dissenting vote.) Attorney Cherof advised that this item came back to the City Commission because of an inconsistency in the Code. He requested pennission to work with Planning staff to deal with the inconsistency so that an applicant does not have to return to the Commission a second time. Mayor Hanmening had no problem with this request. ---.. -~--.._~.'-~:-,;~-~.-,-- '-...-~-~OII -~ ... . . 2. Project N~:~ Boynton FIst1vI Center ," ~.,.. Agent: .,;,' Douglas McMillen .~~., Owner.~<'- Great Western ~flk" -9"-:'-" LQcat10n: Northwest. c~fner 0 ongres~~~venue 6 Old ,. Boynton Jiqad /'f-r.." /~". Description: CQIIU41TY DESIGN PLAN )!PEAL: Jlequest for an /; ap~~a:1' to ttfe NMode)'n' desig'l""dhtrict architec- // t\lral f,<<iures a~ld;16r treat.ment requirement for /' r...;~a 11 ...accessor~,tnd wi nd~~ype in connect ion · ~:{ wit~a propp~ed lease~estaurant outparcel ,.../ ,.(!" ~fldin,.~~~ftir Longhor Steaks._,'.' . " /' / ~" . /;,..- .,~ Tambri HeYden~ me .tht:~presentat.1o.'l;. This reque. is {(u~,;the Longhorn Steak Restaurant. E va _ 6'ns wer~~ilJtraYed on an e.el.~fhe building style is a Texas ranch ho . tyle, wi h. redominantly 0 $tf8des of gray brick with a con- cealed flat roof deck. and anding seam sl roof embellishments. -oos' / - 11 - Do No1- ~~ ~ov~ , MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 1. Project Name: Agent: Owner: Location: Description: -.. .,. - OCTOBER 18, 1994 J'ltfp\J> cry -Dot Boynton Nurseries PUG Kilday and Associates Boynton Nurseries Lawrence Road and L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal; northwest corner MASTER PlAN MODIFICATION: Reconsider request for approval of an amended master plan showing a reduction in number of units from 400 to 374. change in type of units from 162 single-family units on 6,000 square foot lots and 238 multi- family units to 233 .zn units on 4.000 square foot lots, and 143 zero-lot line units on 5.000 square foot lots, establ1shment of lot layout and setbacks, altered pod s1ze and access points, change 1n butfer and road w1dths and their ownersh1p, rev1sed location and s1ze of preserve and drainage areas and mod1f1ed utili- ties and landscape plans. Tambri Heyden made the presentation. She reminded the Commission that when this appl1cation came before them previously, they voted 4-1 that the changes requested were not substantial in nature and passed onto the Planning and Devel- opment Board some guidel1nes to assist them 1n their detenm1nat10n which involved certain Planning and Zoning Department comments. When this applicat10n went before the Planning and Development Board, there was a conflict between what they wanted to approve in tenns of cond1t1ons, and what the City Commission had recommended. For that reason, this appl1cat10n 1s back for recons1derat1on. The confl1ct and the comments 1nvolve Comments 15, 16a and 17. The one comment ~egirding traffic has been resolved. These comments deal w1th the landscape buffer, lot area and l1miting the number of two-story un1ts which can be constructed 1n a row. ~t.ran ~i1dlY, representing the pet1t1oner, advised that the applicant accepted the conditions approved by the City Comm1ssion. There was a question needing clarification with regard to the dr1veways. The applicant showed the driveways at 161 1n width. Commissioner Agutla said he reviewed the previous actions of the Commission and the plans, an4 reviewed the minutes of the Planning and Development Board meeting. He stands by the motion made at the last City Commission meeting. He clarified that agreement was reached on the 161 driveways. One thing not discussed at the Planning and Development Board meeting which was discussed at the City Commission meeting, was the issue of the two (2) right turn lanes the applicant agreed to put 1n. Commissioner Aguila sa1d there 1s nothing about the discussion of two weeks ago. or the motion that was made including the st~pulations, that he wishes to change. . - 10 - MINUTES - REGULJ :ITY COMMISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA OCTOBER 18. 1994 "M~______' Commissioner Aguila pointed out that the lot on the northwest corner has acces from SE 12th Avenue. He questioned whether or not half of the 60' which abuts their property will go to that property owner. Ms. Heyden esponded affinma- t1vely, and advised that Gulf tream Lumber could then approac them about buying it. Commissioner Aguila believes Gulfstre Lumber has a weakness in th r security system. However, he does not have a pr lem with this request as lon as the water service can be tapped and the servic extended down to 12th. Commissioner Katz said he is philosophically a inst abandoning such alar piece of property. e also feels it is not the ty's responsibility to ma Gulfstream's property cure. If they have probl with security, they shou~d invest the money to take re of the situation. Comm sioner Katz will not sup~ port this abandonment. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley questione hether there is a. problem ith illegal dumping on this site. Ms. Heyden did not ve infonmat1on with regar to illegal dumping. She said Gulfstream parks Mayor Hannening said he read somewhere t t Gulfstream feels by own g this prop ty, their security would be enhanced. He feels Gulfstream nee to contro here their employees are parking. Vice Mayor tson referred to Planning and Zoni~ Department Memorandum No. 94-293 wherein s. Heyden refers to illegal dumpin and securing the property. She asked if any e has investigated the claim of 11 gal dumping. Ms. Heyden said she has visit the property, and during that vis t. there was no dumping; however, that situat can change daily. Mayor Hannening does not 1 the correct way to control f .City to give away proper . Commissio Katz moved to deny the ab donment. Vice Mayor Matson s onded the motion. whic carried,S-O. VII. PUBLIC : V I I I . DEVElOPlmlT : A. CONSENT AGENDA None B. NON-CONSENT AGENDA - Not Unantmously Approved by Planntng and Development - 9 - MINUTES - REGU l CITY CCllCISSION MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, tLORIDA OCTOBER 18. 1994 Vice Mayor Matson feels the same and thought it was clear that the Commission detenmined the 16' width driveways would work and were not aesthetically unpleasant. Commissioner Katz said his comment remains the same as before. The applicant has approximately fifty buildable acres with a density of 4.46, when it is really closer to 7. He feels they are creating a sardine-can situation. He will not support this project. Mt)tion Commissioner Aguila moved to approve Boynton Nurseries PUD as referenced in Michael Haag's memo of September 29th, with the deletion of items 2, 3, 16a, 15, and 17. On Item 14, we added, Nif warranted.. He would like to include that the driveways should be 16', and to reaffinm that there will be one right-turn lane at each entry off of Lawrence Road into the development. Vice Mayor Matson pointed out that Commissioner Aguila's previous motion is stated on Page 18 of the last City Commission minutes. Mayor Pro Tem Bradley seconded the motion. Mayor Hanmening clarified that the motion is to approve the request of G.L. Homes as set forth in the minutes of the meeting of October 3. 1994. on Page 18, plus clarifications with regard to the driveway size of 16', and two right-turn lanes on Lawrence Road into the development. The motion carried 4-1. (Commissioner Katz cast the dissenting vote.) Attorney Cherof advised that this item came back to the City Commission because of an inconsistency in the Code. He requested pennission to work with Planning staff to deal with the inconsistency so that an applicant does not have to return to the Commission a second time. Mayor Hanmening had no problem with this request. Boynton FIst1vI Clntlr .., ....- Douglas McMillen ~., Great Western ~nk.' ~9'~"d Northwest corner 0 ongres~~venue ij Old Boynton ~alj ~~." COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN j!,rAL: Request for an appeal torttfe NMod~n .'desi.g~/c(istrict architec- ~~ral f,atures ~9~16r treatment requirement for ~ r.~~all accessor~~nd wind~ype in connection ./ ".:.f' wi tJr.ra pro-p'p~ed 1 eas~...estaurant outparce 1 /,.." "r(.(!" /')lfl~~~~~f-or LOngh7 Stea~,~.:_.;'.' . / . Tambri Heyden m~e .thlttpresent.atio.,!/' This requ~ 15 {cu~;;the Longhorn Steak .// Restaurant. E va~'6ns wer~&i!p-raYed on an e"el~fhe building style is a ,." Texas ranch ho . tyle, wi h . redominantly ;~strades of gray brick with a con- cealed flat roof deck, and -anding seam sla"l'1fa roof embellishments. -~ -" 2. Project N~~:~ Agent: . ;~., Owner.:<:' L9ca~t ion: -005 -- ~-_...__..-~. -'":_'."- ,'.' ,.' ~',. Description: .~t ,/ - 11 -