REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-061
';, iJo, 6,,~'8
{Ill--' t '. 9'-1-
P p/.J
f~
March 16, 1995
TO:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
wi~t/~v. Hukill, P.E.
~~g Official
ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY - NAOTICA
FROM:
RE:
Please place ticklers in our system restricting the issuance of
Certificates of Occupancy in Nautica Plat I as follows:
Lots 17 thru 35 - none to be issued until
fence, hedge, trees and irrigation along
north property line from lot 17 thru lot 35
are completed and accepted.
Lots 35 thru 64 - none to be issued until
fence, hedge, trees and irrigation along west
property line from lot 35 thru lot 64 are
completed and accepted.
Place similar ticklers in our system restricting the issuance of
Certificates of Occupancy in Nautica Plat II as follows:
Lots 266 thru 298 - none to be issued until
fence, hedge, trees and irrigation along
north property line from lot 266 thru lot 298
are completed and accepted.
Lots 298 thru 308 - none to be issued until
fence, hedge, trees and irrigation along west
property line from lot 298 thru lot 308 are
completed and accepted.
In addition, all fences constructed on any lot in Nautica I or II
must be of the same design and construction as all other fences
in the developments. The design must be as submitted by the
developer and approved by the Planning Department.
WVH:bh
XC: Michael Haag
-_.~
~-ff1~~L_L. : ~\ :
~r;\J '~I~, \~'
'\ ~ 1\
\\IU\ Mt~;~' ,\ <-
~-~--=~~~
~~-_..._'- ...
NAl1TICA
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag
Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: January 24, 1995
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Master plan modification for
Phase I and Phase II
File # MPMD 94-004
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the 2nd
review of the rectified plans of the above-referenced project:
1. Add the following note to the landscape notes found on sheet
3 of 5:
2.
~
~
(
',"
3.
4.
"No building of any kind of construction or trees or shrubs
shall be placed on any easement without written consent of all
easement beneficiaries and all applicable city approvals or
permits as required for such encroachments".
The notes, regarding regulations for accessory buildings,
found on sheets 2 of 5, 4 of 5 and 5 of 5 are confusing.
Either propose accessory building regulations, and specify
same on the plans, or place a note similar to the following on
the plans: "A subsequent master plan modification will be
required to establish accessory building specifications and
setbacks".
At both entrances to the project show on the plans '--a-'-,
through/right turn lan~ exiting the site to Lawrence Road. )
On sheet 4 of 5 make the following corrections, from left to
right:
i. The 25 feet rear setback is a problembiL W-rJJ (//'
ii. Omit lot #266 and replace with lot #267 (lot #266 is
identified as a one sided floater lot).
iii. Omit lot #90 and replace with lot #91 (lot #90 is
identified as a one sided floater lot).
iv. Move lot #97 to the one sided floater lots list and
replace #96 for #97.
v. Omit lot #115 and replace with lot #116 (lot #115 is
identified as a one sided floater lot).
vi. Place an asterisk (*) after the following lot numbers:
10, 344, 359 and 364. Add the following footnote below
the lot numbers: "* 15 foot rear building setback and 8
foot rear screen enclosure setback".
vii. Change the rear screen enclosure setback from 5 feet to
8 feet at the perimeter 5 feet buffer easement detail
drawing. Also, remove the reference to pool setbacks
from both perimeter buffer easement detail drawings. A
footnote on sheet 2 of 5 states, "Z" lot units will not
have a pool". The screen enclosure chart found on sheet
2 of 5 shall also be changed.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-015
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp.
Bill Hukill, Development Department
Michael E. Haa:r?'~~
Zoning & Site De e op~nt Administrator
January 13, 1995
TO:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES - Sign-off of Rectified Master Plan
File No. MPMD 94-004
The Rectified Master Plan for the Boynton Nurseries Project has
been resubmitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review
Committee. Four (4) sets of plans each requiring your
unconditional signature are available in the Planning and Zoning
Department. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff
comments and City Commission approval of the Master Plan will be
available for your use to perform the review.
Please review and sign-off each of the four (4) sets of plans, NO
LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 20, 1955. If the plans are not in
compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, sign the
plans subject to memo. To facilitate the sign-off process, please
resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning
Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 20, 1955.
It should be noted that the applicant is processing, through the
Development Department, preliminary plat and construction plans for
the project. The plat and construction documents shall coincide
with the signed-off master plan, and major deviation desired by the
developer must be approved by the Technical Review Committee.
Thank you for your prompt response to this request.
CC:
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
Steve campbell, Fire Department
Larry Quinn, Public Works
Project File (Original)
m..o.015.arw
C:wp51
page 2
Boynton Nurseries PUD
Master Plan comments
memorandum
viii. Move lot #9 to the one sided floater lots list and add
an asterisk (*). Replace lot #8 for lot #9.
ix. Omit lot #81 and replace with lot #82 (lot #81 is
identified as a one sided floater lot).
x. Omit lot #362 and replace with lot #363 (lot #362 is
identified as a lake lot).
xi. Omit lots #11 and 12 (lots #11 and 12 are identified as
back to back lots).
xii. Add a double asterisk (*) following lot #266. Add the
following footnote below the lot numbers: "** 25 foot
rear building setback/buffer easement".
5. On sheet 5 of 5 make the following corrections from left to
right:
i. Add an asterisk (*) to lot #230.
ii. Add the text "or back to back lots" to the various pool
and screen enclosure detail drawing titled "corner lot -
floater".
iii. Change the screen enclosure rear setback dimension from
5 feet to 8 feet at the perimeter 5 foot buffer easement
detail drawing. The screen enclosure chart, found on
sheet 2 of 5, shall also be changed.
6. Considering the unique shape of some of the "Z" lots it is
recommended that a front setback be proposed for screen
enclosures and/or a setback be proposed for both sides of the
diagonal property line located along both sides of each lot.
7. The plat documents for the project depict lots that do not
meet the minimum lot width as identified on the master plan.
The master plan on sheet 2 of 5 identifies 40 feet as the
minimum width for "Z" lots and 50 feet as the minimum width
for "Zero lot line"lots. The design professional preparing
the plat documents is attempting to apply the zoning code
specification regarding irregular shaped lots. The code will
allow the lot width at the building setback line to equal 75%
of the required lot width. This method of determining lot
width is acceptable for the project, however, the master plan
shall have language that describes the 75% method. The
description shall be placed on the master plan at each
location where the minimum lot width is specified.
a:memboynu.pud
2
.Do
No{ l<~mo~r;
E:xTl~A
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-015
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
William cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities Chief Field Insp.
Bill Hukill, Development Department
Michael E. Haa:t?~~
Zoning & Site De e opJint Administrator
January 13, 1995
TO:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES - Sign-off of Rectified Master Plan
File No. MPMD 94-004
The Rectified Master Plan for the Boynton Nurseries Project has
been resubmitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review
Committee. Four (4) sets of plans each requiring your
unconditional signature are available in the Planning and Zoning
Department. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff
comments and City Commission approval of the Master Plan will be
available for your use to perform the review.
Please review and sign-off each of the four (4) sets of plans, NO
LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 20, 1955. If the plans are not in
compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, sign the
plans subject to memo. To facilitate the sign-off process, please
resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning
Director, NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M., JANUARY 20, 1955.
It should be noted that the applicant is processing, through the
Development Department, preliminary plat and construction plans for
the project. The plat and construction documents shall coincide
with the signed-off master plan, and major deviation desired by the
developer must be approved by the Technical Review Committee.
Thank you for your prompt response to this request.
CC: Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
Steve campbell, Fire Department
Larry Quinn, Public Works
Project File (Original)
ElII!I.o.015.arw
C:wp51
fpA ~P1
6'1
MEMORANDUH
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
Michael E. Ha~e~
Zoning and Site ~opment Administrator
September 29, 1994
D
S
/ 9 _\I
. . f"\c~/r1.
! Iv ~ '\'\,\
'V-O\J\ ,
\\ ')
\\' \l- :\ _ ' ,<),
\ 'O\~", ....t",."
"Jr( 2.
'-.. \.// -~ '--
,\) , .
,~
\\'}'.,....
c' \l\ .',
'J \ , 13 , )
(J"' 1'-: ,: '
\:~\
~ \~) -- 4 .
0'*'---
!./
d .----
,.,\0--
...
-1 ~) ----
~--
\:)
\i~
\1..'
} '\
~ /~ t
l
L; ~
?~
<
f.....~
l
~
I
11
Boynton Nurseries PUD 2nd Review Master Plan
Modification of 400 units to 374 units, change in type of
units form 162 single-family units on 6,000 square feet
lots and 238 multi-family units to 231 "z" lot units on
4,000 square feet lots and 143 zero lot line units on
5 , 000 square feet lots, including other changes
identified on the plans and letter describing the
requested changes. ,0
File No. MPMD 94-004") J/.' r:,'
\,-..~/ ,.\ I
,'\'
I,
(
f, i
".d
C 1
, (':
be advised of the following comments relative to the second
of the above-referenced requested Master Plan Modification.
, '
~.
On the master plan drawing add a general note indicating each
residential dwelling unit shall have two (2) nine (9) feet
wide by eighteen (18) feet long parking spaces.
Add to the master plan drawing the phase
corresponding notes that reflect compliance
conditions of the original traffic analysis.
line
with
and
the
Change the setback along the south property line to depict no
less than 25 feet to correspond with the setback dimension
previously approved by commission. If the proposed setback is
approved, clarify the difference between the 5 foot setback
and the 10 foot shown on the plans.
On the dedicated park property show a dimension of 25 feet to
the abutting property lines.
Indicate on the typical screen enclosure setback notes and
drawings whether or not they apply to the "ZII lots. If they
do, add to the drawings a typical "z" lot screen enclosure
setback drawing. See recommendation number 16d and 16e.
Below each typical setback drawing identify the lot numbers
that they represent.
Since it is known that if construction to the buildable area
for each lot would exceed the maximum allowed floor area for
the project, provide on each building permit drawing, area
computations and tabulations that track the disbursement of
the maximum allowed floor area.
Provide verification that the City Attorney has approved the
ownership documents regarding unified control of the
property/project.
The 1990 rezoning was approved subject to the conditions in
the attached traffic analyses prepared by Walter H. Keller Jr.
dated February 5, 1990 and May 3, 1990. The traffic
statement submitted with this request does not mention the
condi tions, Provide verification from Palm Beach County
Traffic Division and the project traffic engineer (Simmons &
White, Inc.) that the conditions listed in the analyses are no
longer applicable,
c13
,.
age 2
oynton Nurseries Comments
aster Plan Modification - 2nd review
0".
,"'-
I ,'-' \
<Y (:>-
o ) ~'fI I.j
\1& v
~ V' -y
'0;/1./.)"
'\ ~,
>( f
\f-- ,,'
,;-' y'
\ ~' 1.
\?
2r
~
.,....{ ~
~' \1" 4 .
\:\ .
,:
!S\
Wi th respect to condition 9 above, if any of the road
improvements referenced in the 1990 Walter Keller Jr. traffic
analyses are still required, the issuance of building permits
for the residential dwelling units will be contingent upon the
assurance of the improvements in the County IS five year
Transportation Improvement Program or posting of surety for
developer commitments, rather than being contingent upon the
letting of contracts for the required roadway improvements.
The private recreation facilities shall be bonded with
approval of the first plat and completed within 21 months of
approval of the first plat.
A posting of a bond for 50% of the cost of the pedestrian
signalization for Lawrence Road shall be submi~ed with the
plat documents. /--AO D "I(e L'jt, \: \ '-')v~: ~:' :.. .,~, !,. ':'i 'I ,,)
I
"---
/1
../~) ECOMMENDATIONS:
, \',
~Q)\ "
,~ ~ ,~\j,-,--\, 5')
IV f "-..
, \
t3"~\
As was required of Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove, southbound
right turn lanes shall be constructed at both project
entrances.
I, IJ~' ' ----- ~-----
3. 'At both entrances show and construct a northbound left turQ)
~) ',- lane on Lawrence _R!?~_~~to the Si~_~.Jana'separaEe--eastbound
~------- left turn and through/r1ght turn lane exiting the site to
Lawrence Road.
,
/ \:{;
!r'.j. .,)\
'l'J ,',
, 1:.'1
;::{
16.
\
.' ')
To ensure that the perimeter landscape buffer material,
located on the individual platted lots, remains in a well-
maintained state, create and show on the drawings a landscape
tract (minimum width 15 feet) around the perimeter of the
proj ect . The tract, landscape material, and maintenance
thereof shall be dedicated to the home owners' association.
To be consistent with the majority of the other planned unit
developments located in the City, the following lot sizes and
setbacks shall be established for the project:
~---G
\)J.~--b.
\J ' -- c.
Modify your plans to show fifty (50) feet wide lot and
ten (10) feet building separation as the minimum lot
width and minimum distance between buildings for all "Z"
lots. The minimum lot area shall be no less than 4,500
square feet.
To maintain frontage, show on the plan a minimum of 15
feet front building setback from both street frontage for
the following lots located in Parcel B: 81, 99 and 116.
Indicate on the plan the building setback for corner lots
shall match the fifteen (15) feet front building setback
on both street frontages, rather than 13.5 feet.
The building rear setback for all lots shall be no less
than fifteen (15) feet, except that when the rear
property line of a lot abuts a lake maintenance
tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract,
and/or recreation area, the rear setback may be reduced
to ten (10) feet, ie; the rear setback for lots backing
up to internals roads would become fifteen (15) feet,
rather than ten (10) feet.
Jf
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
.~. {
\j/
\ ,f 'l
V ~'i
i} \,
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and zonin~rector
Michael E. Ha~e~
Zonin~ and Site ~lopment
December 22, 1994
f... ~"
jJ ; r'
/If) \ V ", ,;
I ,'~'~ ~)
"
Administrator
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Master plan modification for
phase I and phase II
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the review
of the rectified plans of the above-referenced project:
1. Add the~asement note below to the areas with the following
~_~:~sements and Landscape Requirements (found on sheet
------- 2 of5:'h~~andscape Notes (found on sheet 3 of 5) ,"various Lot
Condi tions note (found on sheet 4 of 5) and ~arious Lot
Conditions and Various Pool Conditions notes (found on sheet
5 of 5).
"No building or any kind of construction or trees or
shrubs shall be placed on any easement without written
consent of all easement beneficiaries and all applicable
city approvals or permits as required for such
encroachments."
,-l
, ~~
, I
v\L2.
'\-3.
\1 4
~ I~ \'-- .
I'")c:..
'-'
Add to the typical "z" lot Various Lot Conditions drawings
(sheet 4 of 5) a building footprint that shows a building with
a 15 foot front setback. It appears plan type 4 units will
use the 15 foot front setback. To be consistent with the
approved setback identify the 15 foot setback on all lot
drawings.
On sheet 4 of 5 and sheet 5 of 5 add the text "at garage" to
each lot condition where the 20 foot garage setback is
identified.
)~dd the following text to the end of footnote (B) (sheet 2 of
5) "on all I Z' lots". (1~lso show and label, on each lot
drawing, found on sheet 4 of 5, the location of the 5 foot
dimension.
On sheet 2 of 5 designate the purpose, type and size of the
existing and proposed easements for the entire project. The
easements shall coincide with the easements shown on the plat
drawings. Correct the master plan wher~ the plan identifies
lake accesses as tracts when the plat docL~ents identify the
area as an easement located on individual lots.
6. Gl-on sheets 1 of 5 and 2 of 5 omit the text and notes that
reference the 5 foot improvement/setback/landscape easement
and replace with the text "perimeter 5 foot buffer easement".
6~On each drawing add a new line along the southern property
line depicting and identifying the required 10 foot building
setback. ~~lso, on sheets 1 of 5 and 2 of 5, omit the word
"landscape" and insert the words "perimeter buffer" at each
location where the "25 foot b~ding setback landscape
easement" 9~ "10 foot landscape e.cR{ment" note is written on
the plan. ~L>n sheet 3 of 5 omit the text "setback line", from
the "5 foot open space setback line" note found along the
southern property line.
5.
j"
<'"
! '
h'
""\
Ii
l'
-\ ' ,
/ .,~j
?)l
"
,
page 2
Boynton Nurseries PUD
master plan comments
'0. Change the title of the following "z" lot Various Lot
Conditions drawings (sheet 4 of 5). From left to right, the
first caption shall read "perimeter 25 foot buffer easement",
the fifth caption shall read "perimeter 5 foot buffer easement
(southern property line)" and the sixth caption shall read
"double frontage lots internal right-of-ways".
t'~-8.
'\'
"
! 9.
" '
I'" I
, .
I t"-
-13.
_::/-14.
Change the rear building and screen enclosure setback
dimensions and notes on the "z" lot 25 foot buffer easement
Various Lot Conditions drawing (sheet 4 of 5 ),~o show and
identify a 25 foot rear setback for building, ~l')and screen
enclosures. "-...:--./
".' /, r lv~ ,.
"-
") change the title of the following "Zero" lot Various Lot
Conditions drawings (sheet 5 of 5). From left to right, the
fourth caption shall read "perimeter 5 foot buffer easement
(southern property line)" and the fifth caption shall read
"double frontage lots internal right-of-ways".~Add the text
"screen enclosure" to the "Various Pool Conditions", title
(sheet 5 of 5). Also change the title of the following
Various Pool Conditions drawings (sheet 5 of 5). From left to
right, the third caption shall read "corner lot - (floater)",
the fourth caption shall read "perimeter 5 foot buffer
easement (southern property line)", the fifth caption,shall
read "double frontage lots internal right-of-ways". 'l'1\lso,
omit the first drawing and caption because the plan does not
depict "Zero" type lots with a perimeter 25 foot buffer
easement. ('hTo further clarify the setbacks, insert a new
Various Pool Conditions drawing captioned " corner lot".
Identify the appropriate pool and screen enclosure setbacks on
the new drawing.
1 0 . Remove the "0 ' " rear setback dimension from the screen
enclosure note, identified on the Various Pool Conditions
(canal buffer drawing), found,; on sheets 4 of 5 and 5 of 5 and
re&ace ~h ~e di,f.!lJma.ion ,II 8,~" . Also remove the text "5 foot
rmprovement setback/landscape easement" or "5 foot open space
setback line" and replace with the text "8 foot setback for
screen enclosure or pool".
11.
To be consistent with the "z" lot drawings, extend the leader
line and arrowheads for the Various Pool Conditions drawings
found on sheet 5 of 5 to the appropriate dimension.
, ....
.J
12.
Either establish specifications for accessory buildings (such
as storage shed) or list the accessory building text from the
zoning code on the plans. Also a note may be added that would
specify that a subsequent master plan modification will be
required to establish accessory building specifications and
setbacks. Place the specification notes on sheets 2 of 5, 4
of 5, and 5 of 5.
On sheet 2 of 5 remove the text that references wall and
fences. The data is identified on sheet 1 of 5. It is
recommended that the fence, wall and sign data be relocated
from sheet 1 of 5 to sheet 2 of 5.
, Add the following text as the next line following the title
} "Setbacks (Both Product Categories)" found on sheet 2 of 5:
"Specif ic building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks for
each lot are identified on drawings found on sheet 4 of 5 and
5 of 5."
Page 3
Boynton Nurseries PUD
master plan comments
<,,";" 15 .
(i' 16.
Add the following note to sheets 4 of 5 and 5 of 5 :
"Additional notes found on sheet 2 of 5".
......
\ Specify on the Various Lot Conditions
, depicting lot 1, sheet 4 of 5, that the
is 15 feet against Nautica Boulevard.
screen enclosure setback is 8 feet.
(corner lot drawing)
rear building setback
Also, indicate the
17. Provide a Various Lot Conditions ("Z" lot drawing) depicting
the building setbacks and screen enclosure setbacks for the
one sided floater lots 81, 90, 115, etc. Ii '0
r,...18.
I.;
19.
20.
~', _". . 0'_
~ '~~. .-...
~
"-f..i
::;' Specify on the Various Lot Conditions ("Zero" corner lot
drawing) (sheet 5 of 5) that there is a 15 foot rear building
setback for lots; 123, 166, 177, 178, 239 and 255 where the
rear of the lot is against a right-of-way and/or when the rear
of the lot is against the zero side of another lot. Also,
indicate on the new Various Pool Conditions (corner lot
drawing) that the same lots have a 10 foot rear pool setback
and an 8 foot rear screen enclosure setback.
Specify on the new titled Various Pool Conditions (" Zero"
corner lot-floater drawing) (sheet 5 of 5) that there is a 1~~
foot rear building setback for lots; 156, 157, 167 and 230
where the rear of the lot is against a right-of-way and/or
when the rear of the lot is against the zero side of another
lot. Also, indicate on the new titled drawing, that the same
lots have a 10 foot rear pool setback and an 8 foot rear
screen enclosure setback.
Specify on the Various Lot Conditions (preserve lot drawing)
depicting lot 219, sheet 5 of 5, that the building setback
along the right-of-way is 15 feet, the pool setback is 10 feet
and the screen enclosure setback is 8 feet.
On the building setback chart, sheet 2 of 5, under the 10 foot
rear setback notes, insert the text "5 foot buffer easement"
after the word, "perimeter".1 p.i-- Also, within the same chart
under the 15 foot rear setback notes, remove the text "units"
... "adjacent to internal roads" and insert the text "double
frontage lots along internal right-of-ways" . \ Add a new
category to the chart that includes text similar to the
following: REAR (from back of house to rear property line) at
lots along the perimeter 25 foot buffer easement the setback
is 25 feet, see footnote (A).
L 22. i, On the pool setback chart, sheet 2 of 5, under the 10 foot
rear setback notes, omit the text "back to back" and insert
the text "double frontage lots internal right-of-ways and back
to back 10ts".I''Also, within the same chart, under thel foot
rear setback notes omit the text "perimeter"..." (A)" ' :. For
further clarification add two new categories to the cha , one
for the rear setback of the lots along the perimeter 5 foot
buffer easement requiring them to have an 8 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A) and one for the rear
setback of the lots along the perimeter 25 foot buffer
easement requiring them to have a 25 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A).
(
21.
,)'
\
Page 4
Boynton Nurseries PUD
master plan comments
23.
24.
~ 25'-
t
26.
27.
A:MP-NAUTI
1
On the screen enclosure setback chart, sheet 2 of 5, under the
8 foot rear setback notes, omit the text "internal roadways"
and insert the text "double frontage lots internal right-of-
ways". Also, within the same chart under the 5 foot rear
setback notes, insert the text "park" following the words,
"preserve and" and omit the text "perimeter"..." (A)". For
further clarification add two new categorie.to the chart, one
for the rear setback of the lots along th~imeter 5 foot
buffer easement requiring them to have an 8 ~oo~ rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A) and..dne for the rear
setback of the lots along the perimeter 25 foot buffer
easement requiring them to have a 25 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A).
specify on sheet 1 of 5 directly below L.U.! calculations the
following text: "A tabular sunnnary identifying the total floor
area ratio (FAR) square footage will be submitted with each
residential building permit as well as with the building
permits submitted for the recreational buildings. The tabular
sunnnary will identify the total floor area, lot by lot, to
date for the entire project, the lot number and total floor
area of the subject permit request and the total floor area
allowed (16.76 acres) for the entire project."
On the dedicated park property correctly show, to scale, the
25 foot setback to the abutting property lines.
Provide verification that the City Attorney has approved the
ownership documents regarding unified control of the
property/project.
At both entrances show through/right turn lane exiting the
site to Lawrence Road.
l::>o
f\)~+
R~fY\OV6
~..~'''''.1\fY.l:Jr.ol!'''''~-''~'''''-:.'''''~,:J.;';'''-'''';; ,~~. .,A"':' ~'; , ."':,....., ""''''-'''~\~'\ :"::'ll".,.~~.,,~..~
7 .B.l.
-,
b~~
BOYNTON NURSERIES pun
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-305
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
FROM: Tambri J, Heyden 7fjtJ-,
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: october 6, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - MPMD #94-004
Revised density, unit type, layout, setbacks and roads
INTfWDUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for Boynton Nurseries, property
owner and G,L. Homes, contract purchaser of the Boynton Nurseries
PUD, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the Boynton Nurseries PUD, as described in the
attached report (Planning and zoning Department Memorandum No.
94-295), The Boynton Nurseries PUD is to be located on the west
side of LawrenCE: Road, at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road
and the L.W.D.D, L-21 Canal.
F'.ECOMHENDATION
At the october 3, 1994. city Commission meeting, the city
Commission, with a 4 - 1 vote, made a finding of no substantial
change regarding the modifications requested, Staff recommended
that the modification be approved, subject to the attached staff
comments (see Exl1ib.i t "E" - Building Department Memorandum No,
94-210; utilities Department Memorandum No. 94-301; Fire
Department Memorandum No. 94-215 WDC; Engineering Department
Memorandum No, 94-289, 94-254, 14-255, 94-263 and 94-288;
Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum No, 94-342, 94-320 and
94-340; and Planning and ZOllil,g Department memorandum dated
September 29, 1994), However, the City Commission included in
their motion, approval of all staff comments, with exceptions,
withill the Planning and Zoning Department memorandum, comments 2,
3, 15, 16(a) and 17 were deleted and comment 14 was revised to
require pedestrian signalizatioll for a school crossing to Citrus
Cove Elementary, located 0pposite Eoynton Nurseries on the east
side of Lawrence Road, only if the signal is warranted.
The deleted comments are described as follows:
1, Comment 2 relates to traffic; specifically phasing of 48
units, which equate to trips per day that are not vested
under the 1990 master plan approval, The applicant's
traffic engineE'r stated pl1as ing was necessary, however Palm
Beach County's traffic certification letter does not mention
the phasing. staff is waiting to hear back from Palm Beach
County for clarification on this issue..
2. Comment 3 relates to the wldth of the buffer (five feet)
proposed along the south property boundary, as compared to
the width of the other pe]~imeter buffers (25 feet); all of
which \o'lE~re originally approved at 25 feet, If the Planning
and Development Board det~rmines that five feet is adequate
along the south boundary, it is recommended th~t the second
sentence within comment 2, "Clarify the difference between
the five foot setbacJ'o: and the 10 foot setback shown 011 the
plans", be retained a::; a '.:ondi tion of approval.
3. Comment 15 also relates tl) the buffer and recommends the
buffer as a dedicated tract, rather than an easement
encumbering the private lots,
4, Comment 16 (a) relates to increasing the size of the "z" lots
to 4,500 square feet, wit)} a minimum 50 foot wide lot and
ten foot building separation,
/
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
October 6, 1994
5, Compliance with comment 17 would place a limitation on the
number of two-story, "z" lot units that could be built in a
row (a distance of 160 feet is recommended - i.e. four
units). At the city Commission meeting the applicant stated
that the developer has some "internal rules" about allowing
too many units of the same type in a row, The intent of
staff's comment was to encourage mixing of the one and two-
story units for variety (the applicant estimates that 60% of
the "Z" lots will be two-story) and to alleviate the dense
feeling that will result with the proposed, small lot sizes
and shallow setbacks, Unless some variable of this comment
is required, there is nothing in place (on the plans or
within staff comments) to ensure that the developer enforces
his "internal rules II , Thl~ applicant has not submitted his
"internal rules", therefore staff is unaware of the
specifics of the rules or their implication. As a point of
information, by code the city can regulate the number of
units by type.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:PDBoyNMP
~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-295
Agenda Memorandum for
Octobe~ 3, 1994 city Commission Meeting
TO: Carrie Parker
city Manager
FROH: Tarnbri J. Heyden ~
Planning and Zoning Department
DATE: September 29, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - MPMD #94-004
Revised density, unit type, layout, setbacks and roads
NATURE OF REQUEST
Kilday and Associates, agent for Boynton Nurseries, property
owner and G.L. Homes, contract purchaser of the Boynton Nurseries
PUD, located on the west side of Lawrence Road, at the northwest
corner of Lawrence Road and the L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal (see Exhibit
"A" - location map), is requesting approval to modify the
previously approved master plan for the Boynton Nurseries PUD
(see Exhibit "B" - letter of request and Exhibit "C" - approved
and proposed master plans), The modifications are as follows:
1. Reductlon in total number of units from 400 to 374.
2. Change in type of units. original master plan shr)wed
162 single-family uni ts ",ith a minimum 6,000 square
foot lot and 238 multi-family units, Proposed master
plan 8110"'8 all single-family units, comprised of 23J
"Z" lot units on 4,000 (40' x 100') square foot lots
and 143 zero lot line units on 5,000 (50' x 100')
square foot lots.
2, phasing of the project into two phases. Phase I would
include all but 49 units; Phase II would include the
remaining 43 units, Even though there is a reduction
in the total number of units from the original
flpproval, due to the change in type of units (multi-
family gener3ting fewer trips per day than single-
family), phasing is necessary with this modifi~ation to
avoid road improvements to the surrounding roadHays,
3. An increase in the traffic impact to surrounding
roadways as dE'scribed in item 2 above, a decrease in
'""atpr dnd sewer demand and a decrease in the population
growth anticipated.
4. Change in pod layout and size and access points to the
pods.
5, Establ~shment of the alignment and size (40 feet wide
with a fOUl" foot \"iOe sidewalk on one side) of the
local streets (private) that serve the pods.
6. Alteration of the size (reduction from 5,3 acres in
total to 2.5 acres) and arrangement of the tree
preservation area.
7, Revisions to the master drainage plan (change in lake
sizes and locations).
8. Reduction in 5i=e, from 2.84 acres to 2.5 acres, of the
public park to be dedicated to the City.
9. Reduction in width, from 25 feet to 5 feet, of the PUD
perimeter buffer along the south boundary of the PUD,
~
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
September 29, 1994
10. A condition of the original master plan approval was
that prior to applying for preliminary plat approval, a
master plan modification would be required to establish
lot layout and setbacks. Therefore, this modification
establishes lot layout and the following, more
significant, minimum setbacks:
Building Setback - both type of units
a) front - 20 feet to the garage, but 15 feet to
the house;
b) rear - 15 feet for units that back up to one
another, but 10 feet for units that back up
to a lake, preserve, PUD perimeter or a
roadway;
c) side (non-zero portion) - 10 feet (13.5 feet
for corner lots);
Screened Enclosures - "Z" lot line units
d) rear - 0 feet when abutting a lake or
preserve;
e) side - 0 feet (? - could not ascertain from
plans), but 13.5 feet for corner lots;
Screened Enclosures - Zero lot line units
f) rear - 0 feet when abutting a lake or
preserve, 5 feet when units back up to one
another;
g) side - 10 feet, but 13,5 feet for corner
lots.
BACKGROUHD
The Boynton Nurseries PUD master plan (valid for 18 months,
unless a preliminary plat is filed) was approved by the City
Commission on September 5, 1990, subject to numerous conditions.
Sub~~equently, a one year time extension and concurrency exemption
for traffic, drainage and neighborhood parks were granted through
March 5, 1993. A second one year time extension was granted and
lastly a third time extension. The current time extension and
concurrency exempti<:'n for the levels of service previc1llsly
men t ioned, expi res March ~" 19 ~ 5. Submittal of a mas ter pI an
modification does not extend the life of a master plan,
Regarding the procedure for processing master plan modifications,
Appendix B, planned Unit Development, of the city code of
ordinances states that changes in planned unit developments shall
be processed as follows:
Section 12, Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD
may be permitted by the planning and zoning board upon
application filed by the developer or his successors in
interest, prior to the expiration of the PUO classification,
but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes
are in accord with all regulations in effect when the change
or changes are reque8ted ::1I1c1 the intent and purpose of the
comprehensive plan iE effect at the time of the proposed
change, SlllJst::llltLal chaIlYf~i: shall be proposed as for a Hew
application of PUD zoning. The determination of what
constitutes a 8ubstantial change shall be \o'lithin the sole
1-
TO: Carrie Parker
-3-
September 29, 1994
discretion of the city commission. Nonsubstantial changes
as determined by the city commission in plans shall not
extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the
PUD classification, II
ANALYSIS
staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the following sections of Appendix B,
Planned Unit Developments of the code of ordinances:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established,
It is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient aud economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the city, and the protection of
adjacent and existing and future city development, The
district is suitable for development, redevelopment, and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the city.
Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations,
and other applicable city regulations to the same degree
that they intended to control development on a lot-by-lot
basis. In view of the substantial public advantages of
planned unit developments, it is the intent of PUD
regulations to promote and encourage development in this
form where tracts suitable in size, location, and character
for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and
developed as unified and coordinated units."
section 9. B. Intenial Lots and Frontage. "Wi thin the
boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards
shall be required, provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requi~ements
in acccrdancp \\1i th the zc,ning district the PUD use most
closely res'embles and that peripheral yards abutting other
zoning districts shall be the same as required in the
abutting zone."
Of the proposed modific~tions, only the changes in buffer width,
recreation, lot sizes and setbacks generated concern by staff.
Regarding the proposed width and treatment of the landscape
buffers, staff has ellcountered problems wit~ peripheral landscape
__!2..~.lffArs \I'/hen they arp i ncorpnrated as an easement on _l2..!-ivate,
homeolt1ller lots. or even af~ a separate tract, dedicated to the
homeowners' association, that abuts homeowner lots. TheRe
buffers frequently succumb to homeowner pressure to fence them
in. Landscaping within the buffers are then difficult to ensure
tllat they are retained as originally required. In addition, to a
preference for landscaping within dedicated tracts, staff is
recommending that the 25 feet, originally approved by the city
Commission, be provided around the entire PUD perimeter,
Regarding recreation, witll the number and type of units shown on
the original master plan, the total parks and recreation
dedication requirement was 6.75 acres. Fifty percent credit was
allowed for the provision of a private recreation area, comprised
of fiv~ different recreCltional amenities, leaving 3.375 acres to
be dedicated as a public park, Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.5.5
requires par~ d~dicatioll of 6 acres/1,OOO persons (further
refined in section 8, Jlxticle IX, of the Subdivision
Regulations), The private recreation facilities to be provided
satisfy the 2.5 acre/l,aOO population level of service for
neighborhood facilities, but not the total park dedication
requirement of 6 acres/1,OOO population satisfied by the public park,
s
TO: Carrie Parker
-4-
September 29, 1994
To meet the level of service for parks and recreation in this
neighborhood, the public park site is needed in the northeast
corner of the project, as is p~oposed with this modification,
Since the minimum size required for a neighborhood park is 5
acres, the acreage acquired from Boynton Nurseries is to be
combined with the acreage (estimated to be only 2 acres) from the
future development of the KnolJwood Groves property directly to
the north, This is the last opportunity for the city to acquire,
by dedication, enough park acreage to build a neighborhood park
in the vicinity of Lawrence Road. with the original master plan,
staff recommended that the Commission require 3,375 acres to be
dedicated as a public par](. The master plan was approved
requiring 2,84 acres in public park dedication and a cash payment
equivalent to the value of the remaining .535 acres.
with the proposed decrease in !lumber of units and change in type
of units to all single-family, the total parks and recreation
dedication requirement is 6,732, as compared to 6.75 acres with
the original master plan. The proposed master plan reduces the
public park dedication further to 2,5 acres, with a cash
equivalent of .866 acres to be paid to the city at time of
platting, putting the City at risk of not being able to assemble
enough land, given the Boynton Nurseries acreage and the future
Knollwclod Groves acreage, for a 5 acre neighborhood park,
----Regarding the_.PX2l?Qsed_,~o!: size~~d setback~, Exhibit liD"
contains a cbart listing the planned unit developments (PUD)
within the city that have been approved with minimal lot sizes,
lot frontages (widths) and building, pool and screened enclosure
setbacks. When comparing these minimums approved, to date,
witllin the City, with the minimum lot sizes, lot frontages and
setbacks proposed within the Boynton Nurseries PUD, it is noted
that no one PUD conta1ns the minimums of all the various
characteristics (lot size, width and setbacks) proposed within
the Boynton Nurseries PUD, For example, the smallest front
bUilding setback is currently 18 feet and is within Citrus Glen.
The smallest rear building setback is currel - 10 feet and is
wi thin Boynton Lakes. The smallest side bu "'l")ack,
excl uding the ze1-0 lot 1 ine s ides for II Z II ~ '-t- 1 ine
units, is currently 10 feet and is within
Lawrence Lake shows 7.5 feet, this is pro'
yielding a 15 foot building separation),
4,500 square feet with a 50 foot wide 10'
-Boynton LaKes:-----ne~rarcIT11g screened enclc
"Setback 1S :; feet; 0 feet iyhen abutting
within Boynton Lakes and Citn.ls Glen, r
side setback for screened enclosures i
within Boynton Lakes (excludes same 7.
previously mentioned for Lawrence Lak
at The Meadows, tract M, where such f
prior to final approval and withdraw
unit is angled on the lot, so no buj
from the street), (;f ~....-vt
Over the past ten to fifteen years, the PUD ~_
City have included smaller and smaller lot sizes, ..
homes and increased lot coverages (decreased permeabil~v~ c
closer and closer to property lines. These small lots with
narrow building separations llave posed ever-changing problems for
emergency personnel who must park large vehicles on narrow
streets and maneuver emergency equipment within tight openings
between buildings. Also, an increasing problem with small lots
with narrow frontages and shallow front building setbacks, is
parking. Driveways on these luts are not deep or long enough to
accommodate more than one personal car, not to mention guest
vehicles. In addition, most families have at least two vehicles,
so vehicles are parked continually within the street, blocking
passage of vehicles, and withill swales or over sidewalks, causing
unsightly, costly damage to both.
o
LOCATION MA~)
BOYNTON NURSERIES
r-1
,'; I H t-t- f-- : .~ I 1-
2~1 ~; 0 / '~J)l :,t
.;' := :tlJ)~rn<)y
~ - L =" <LLD r 1 H-t-f.'\)J t:;
. . '. k(lmlULLIII"III~1I1', ' w - ~
-O~~r .~~~~C~~~~ ~ I ~~,:+:,)i'
I . I t;:..":".) -- ..... -,
~~
_ I, Jm, ii''> :'i" - ~ ::~fH
):Gt~~ - ~,,_': f ~
7j If!~\' I" ~ - '
I . ft
~~ ~: ---" I =xua
~,' ",- '., ~I ,
1".;-' ~ L
t___, <(
N -::'
~I
~
· KI'\I"
; i
I
.1_
II f11_
II rr
I fI.. . - +Hi LU.
1= - ,-
.1 u-- or' ~ / P-
I r J--I I ~lvlj
I_Jo__ " s!fl '--:-, hI --:- ". .~, . ' .-..
o ,4,V7 r7/ l. ~ Q t? c-A~A L J. - ~D ~, ~~~: ,\:i"J: I.::
-~' ,~'
o=r L~ ~". ,///~ //// 0/'///':/, ~ ~;l[.~' ~ {~
I .. // ~ ,_ ~/L/L '///, '/L~, '/ ~,:':'~,~ ~
~.==-- __ (1/ A\Yl!/' I' ; I I ~lliilrr=~~:~ 77. ///2 "/ I:; r'rT-J~:r:~, ~I ..':,?~
~" --=:I~~~.~~~_ ~ __ {I1+illIl ~u.L.',J~l;~ ~~~'/ ~~0 ~~ I:;~ !!.)i"r:"/rrr ;;\,~:' f (t~
'" ,//,,^\~ 1 -1 , 1 \',.., ~,.::,'.... I~'i .L /I~ "CITRUS G
I " '~?~1UJVl~ I ~._--- .o__' ~:I /. III~~ PUD L
'\.'~:;'-"IIP); n\~~f_ ..- ~ : -'. ,.. ---- 0~1 '/~ ~~~~~~
f-i . (.~' J .; f- I I /'./': 11/ ,1////
;::_ H; ;r '. _"', : .- : / /'/~ '//11 ,/ ///1 '/ / /
I- 1-1. 'I J " ' ;..= "//'// ~ ,/11 .~ / // 1 '/ //:
13."<'~ ,(..:.' .,'= // /h '//1 /'1 ,// :/~ ~ ~% ~~ ~ ~I :'-:I"/~ /' /,/- q 1 A A
.~~~~~_~L~,c ~~~/~~~~$?~~~~~ ~'.5:.'Z~1 "-~'1
-~1'd .0 ~\~<~v Ul~~\"--: I --: ;= . == I j - ~a:im
I jJr -~""" I.~\f ~<U, " D ~ I t "~~?~~ij
, ,,~. ....., <Q::,:~~<-~~ > I ~ :', I SITE [~.~i
" 'K~:r, '. .(~B\ <~, -:.1 : '
'-1>L"~1i!:;iill~)'<)2I 1== RI ,G I (.~ f)
'~ W~ -> ~',\'\. I Cl r I \;..' II !J
_ .l:L.W- ;jl. , "'1) AI"e:f'(Ue.
'--
\ "-~. II; ~! r I~ "II 11111 ! 111111111111 L J I I ['
.. >t II( .. 0 ~mffi~l- ~== .1,
~ 0 J I' " U I ~ ,U ::'1: ~ ~ I~: ~ :,: ~~, g~ l:' .J._--L.-'r~L-r-kral'L ...1:-" =::,.'
Ie-A I.i II ~ Inll' H fl I I~"~ J1 i ~ FtJ:~\::f~~ ,~~
. :) II II II . ~" : O. II 4 4_," . ~lJJ.U.JlLUl~
. ~ ~I :'. . - r ~~..r '(i<<ri Ii ~(fll~~. .
. 1/8 MILES (" '-" 'I '_lrtH H.I-IDL ,!r ~U-t..h;~I::~ ~".tL.l.J IIID rn rrTlT
'1'1111 I, 'I'" :'L~~R,:~ · ! .~ .1111"1 1111 Eh[~JD EO li ;
'0 401'r. '8010 FE' cT - - ~jlllli._ ~.-:. ~ ~ '~- _..,.~~~~~ ILrr1TTTlrrn I
I "J, L., ,L1(1} {jT,,,"'j C. -/0, C..1;')__
, Pt-It/'llNIN6-1?C:PI:. lo~9Lt ------~l:f-,....,......-~--,....,.~:- J if! r" ' I' \ 1 I ..
L_
I. I
I I
III I
I mmII1Tl
H'~ II ~ J]]JO
, Jill] [IT,D - 1
"...~
Kilday & Auoelata.
landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
14071 689-5522 · Fax: 14071 689.2592
August 4, 1994
Ms. Tambri J, Hayden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Boynton Nursery PUD
Minor Master Plan Modification Application
Our Project No.: 1020.7
Dear Ms. Hayden,
Please accept and process the attached information for a Minor Master Plan
Modification to the previously approved Boynton Nursery PUD located on the west
side of Lawrence Road, north of Gateway Boulevard, We are submitting this
Minor Master Plan Modification application on behalf of GL Homes of Florida, Inc.,
contract purchasers of the property, and Boynton Nurseries, owners of the
property. The original master plan, approved March 20, 1990, reflected a total of
400 units which were comprised of 162 detached units and 238 multi family units.
The proposed master plan reflects a total of 376 zero lot line detached units, The
overall master plan has been revised to delete twenty-four (24) units from the
original approval.
There are two (2) product types proposed, one a zero lot line product which
utilizes a 5,000 s.f. lot and the other a "Z" lot product which utilizes 4,000 s.f. lot.
Details of typical units, setbacks, and open space areas are included with this
application, The sile is divided into four (4) development pods, two (2) pods will
utilize the 5,000 s.f. zero lot line lot and two (2) pods will utilize the 4,000 s.f. "l"
lot line lot.
Access for the PUD remains as previously approved with two (2) access points
off of Lawrence Road, Also, a central loop road is maintained, similar to the past
approval. This road will be dedicated publicly with this approval. Also, pursuant
to conditions of the previous approval, a 2.5 acre public park site is proposed
adjacent to Lawrence Road in the northern portion of the site. A private
community recreation facility of 2.84 acres in size has been incorporated in the
interior of the site which will include a minimum of five (5) amenities.
Pursuant to on-site meetings with Kevin Hallahan, a preserve area which more
accurately represents preservation of significant existing vegetation has been
II
Ms, Tambri Hayden
August 4, 1994
Page 2 of 2
proposed along the southern portion of the property. The original proposal of a
preservation area within the perimeter buffers of the "tail" of the site was not
appropriate due to the lack of existing vegetation in those areas.
Attached with this letter is a comparison of impacts for the project. You will note
that in most areas, this project will reduce impacts from that previously approved,
especially in areas of water and sewer capacity and population. The development
of this project will be phased. Phase 1 will be limited to 328 zero lot line units
which has traffic capacity equivalent to that which was originally approved. Phase
2 development of 48 units will be conditioned upon the contract being let for the
expansion of surrounding roadways, Attached with this application is a traffic
impact letter. A full traffic statement is being produced which will be reviewed and
approved by both the City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County prior to the
Technical Review Committee Meeting. Also included with this submittal are
conceptual engineering plans, landscape plans and typical home elevations,
If you have any questions or concerns in regards to this application, or if you need
any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me,
Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
Cdk4W,LchQje~r
Co Ilene W. Walter
cc: Alan Fant; GL Homes
Larry Portnoy; GL Homes
Rob Rennebaum; Simmons & White, Inc,
Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble
Application Received By:
Date:
/~
SENi B
8-26-94 :12:13PM
Boynton BCh fax~KrLDAY & ASSOC
;; 3
/
I reviewing the pl~ns, I would request the following be added to
t e plans:
MEMORANDUM
Tambri Heyden
Director
sgt. Jamas Cummings
August 24, 1994
Boynton Nursery
.a========a........m======================
1. Right Turn Only arrows indicated on plans, indicating
ich lanes will be used for Right Turn Only (Southbound) onto
wrence Road.
as
~JM .l".:M
ill
AUG :2 ~, j~~' j
mill
V'
oo]m.a-o (J) ~ -l ::I ~ >NWI -l -l
~ ., ~ CD -. 0 Sl. Sl.
I!..,.,~ 0 a ~ 3 [ ID ., ::J e:
g CD e: -, CD :i' OOCQ.C11 I!. I!.
:!l ~ a -. a CD ., 0 :T r CD -.
-CD 0" ., cc i (J)
l!.n~::J3-3. 0 CD Sl. ::J
0 JlO a. " ~.
o CD m CD CD iD cC~-l ~ CD
iil~~m~dl 3 3 -0 C )>
~ ~ :T CII ::J ::J -. :i' 0
~ 0 a:g.a."C IJ: m iJfCD-<!I! cc ca
.,. a.e: a. a.
a.CD:T' - :j' ~ c ~
i~~~f~' cc ~ ::J
jjt. CD :
, ..
CD < iil -, I :T -a . 'i
0 ,,'<
CII :< ~ Iii ::J z !C c
:T - 3.9. .!ff,.
i~'~:;la-!I! ~ :: ::: :
_CDs,1II :,:: )
. =_.51.3 z ~
~ ~g:~~ :.:.
! ~ R ~'8 ., :
G)
!i in [ ~~ a. ::, \'
CD "'0
! "i -. iiI ~. ::J /: :<.' :D
iililiio )> e
o m ::J 11 ' "',,>:::>:,
9-ii1 g:i' :::'>:":':::::::::
CD ~ - in m
0.'0 ~ a ~ 0
-oCDt.) -I
o ., lil:::'[:::::
"0 ~ 'i 0' Ii. 0
~liiiil.,g 0
a 0 ~
<5" ~ iil 1:'/> "'0
::J 0 )-
a: ,: :..::.,,;:>i :D
N -O(J) ':)', .'.:. en
8l~~~ CD CD ...., :: 0
3 CD Z
+ ~U;CD 8 .,.. .. ,. .,
:,::: ::':::,::'::,:'
8 ~! ';,>.(i: .. 0
~ ~~ ~a. ~
~ @c:. t.)
. In . In N fii=B. ~ '::":"')>' . :D
~~ ~~ Q) m~ "':ita -I
-0 -0 0) Z N ~ .,.. m
~~~~~ )> )> ~oRJ 8
G)8 G)Cf 0 B' ~ I> II 0)
a iil -oG) -OG) -i ~. 0
0-0 0-0 In : -<
0' :
0 0 ., 1.\.::.::,",. :: Z
II II -I
0
I::.::'",,: z
z
8l~o &~ rd-o -0 -0 C(J) C
+ I · ~ co:T m:Tm:T In CD ',: ': :D
~~CD )( IJ: )( IJ: e: IJ: e: IJ: m CD en
"'CD CD lfCDlfCD Ii m
ON ...
t.) t.) 0'" ONO'" ~ :D
..... ..... )>, )>' s, , S, I :<
0) 0) ~& ord ...&~rd 3- i
a. ~o. ~
~ -0 t1l e:. oe: In e: -ico ~!5~~
o ...CD 'NCII ~ (n- Il ::J CII e: ~ ~ ,CD !=
m~~~~ &ii II ::J ii ::J 3-
8~ ~)( t.)ii jjt' B' t.) t.) m p
ON 0 'N 0.....0 ..... :: (J)
G)8 G)Cl )> co ~ 0) 0) e:
0 -OG) 0 0 0' ~ ~
iil -OG) -i )> .,
0-0 0-0 In 0 -0 : : if
0 0 -i CD
II II In 3 : ..
a-
3.
.. :
, .. ..
.., ,.... .
8 J,. a + ':'::"':[:0
i>> ~ .,.. 0, :..:[
~ . ,.. .
-0 8 )> z ,{)+.:. N ?:~cg.,
CD 0
iil )> 0 )> 0 t.)~RJ .,.. 0
0 G) G) 0 -i Q)O) -~"
iil el -0 -i In
0 In ):-.ii.'~"
/~
" l!i'
'r---
: ....:.~l,
f' t} ~ .
I' , "
,t ,. . ;.
I ( "
, l,",.~;r.,
, r ~'( j. I ,
I I ',' , '1 "II" :
I I . , ", \ , '. ;.. ,~. d
... ....- ~"'" ... 4 --.Ift.,.:..: ~:'" ...t'::"'-' ...-.!';- ... -
_ ..J_, , ",. '"""'f- . '.. r ~'lf, r. .- ljii,.l/tt,;i4i...." - '. _' .". )
J . " -. n. -. - -- __ ----.J.AlOIlIINl!. .''.In . _,... ....
, -. ............. --. ).,r, '. .~.=~.._-::, 'I ~-----
I rN -ijL "I'~ 1"1 g 1--o<~."t:;:f..~l'Icl."../l;~;,.\1 II: II ~~'!I:IIIJ-IJI'-:-I
~ '.~::'u '(1'10. rn IIJI' .o~.ro. .U"'U'II, '011"0"' 'Utoo. no.,... I'
I
I
I
,~i
I
,f; ,
!, '\
;\'\'
I\J
I
R
~
~'
;r
r
I
I
I
I
,
"'D
,l ~
II' a ~
11' :: ~ .
.1 ~ _
11\ ! I
"I I
,
,
1'...* ,. .' ,
I,
,'f/::,'- J'.;' ..i.~-.~:~,) .'1 'I m
f,'i ',' I '. ''f A; , 1!11
,i.~~~-i ..i;..'j~~;'~i:. ~..::.~:;;~\~
~ ' ,.' .{ 4lao;, ~:,hr.~? !S -i :!
. · "'.. J"~'; ,;,; " >>
I~ '. ' '.', ~'~,;,;t,-' '".....' v,'f: !a..1 "
" ... ,..' ,::t. ,', i I. ..
. S:; ; " , " :-:f-', t,/,. ",. t J ! J
I.: ..', ~f',.! ~11E8:1' ," ~~fl ill it!5
"':1' J ~,;..III&~'" ..,~ji I ;..~
· ttf.,;, I "~':T"" f SI .." '.' ,( E: ~
~' I'" :,':';',"1.1,' :.:; ~.'() Is !
I .' .1", i '. .~.;, ,', '
, , ", ,
.' . :: .'. ~. ~:.. i
. : ::. f,~~~..", . ....
. .. . . . . I r.v ..', . .
J~". ~, ,'.\..:....~.'.a~.l..~.,:.,'
~ ~,. . ('..,_..,..>:;.'"....,~..-
~ '111
/6
· ,. ., I' .. ,.. i ~ f'
fiuUlll'1 ~111"I!11l ~l ~ ij~i!ll ~
l!!l!!i ! Iii Ii ill H!; I !~i,*l ',i'I' U ':
1111,'11 1111"1"1' :!,' ! ::,11,' I" ;t
tI 'II I II'!'I I !I'" I"
Ii Ii'. ilU :,,! '! : 'I 'Iii
i I" I 'I' III i; I H ~'
I .1 II, I 11111. ': ! .,
"ill ij ill! It I ! i q
~I
'UiI' ,
111'1 i' I ft fi III II pi a I a :imu !~ 1'19 III 1,I'I:Uml , 10
"",'11 '!I "I II !1 ' Y I'T~ I;. 'I,ll II! ,1'!I,lliII15
1'111 I ij I ii' b III II :'1 1111111 ':/lll
!I ,I I' !II!, .., ili I II
'1', I ,. .. - II . · I " U II 5" ...-...-, .
, I I I """ .... !: I · I .1 '" .,...........1
I'; ,i i ' ; i, ':1 : ; : : I JI U ...........!
, 'II .. II II
I I I 'I ' . nil ! I I !:::::!:::! I
I Ii ' I · II ... ......--.;
I
....n
---
I......
'..' ,',
,
I
C....;! I
.IEa
Iii- I.
:'~
..
I ' .
I
I
~
i
. '
, .
(
l
~
\)
\')
u\
\n
d
~
xn
t
~
}
()
4
o
M-
e!
()
4-
i r. . ~ '
i . \11
i H
· .It
! I-I
ill'
i i~1
I :q
I Hi
! i ~ \
4 Ii'
i Il'
_ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ II &&~I J"'~ 'I ll"lii
~," "~ :}!.t:;::~';"1i.:~~!L~- ~~_'IV ~l, ri;~ UJ; ~il j'Uli~u,u,i l;i~1
r f.\ j- ,- ,- ,-- -- ~--I-I i~ ~~~~ n lUi ~h 'II ,n, \1;\ llill,
: ! lii,r 'I i'j ii m: !lIlii Illllli~" Inn-
\ ' m i; ,,:, r m III I i' I 'I '\1
I r--l Ii Ii; Ii mi ;m ~ II I ,I ,;UlI "
~il~l \ II ii I ~ i' \ t-S ~ I~~( I at, g;~;~mim Uin~~;:
{I\ )1 ~. " l~ ~ ~~ ~ m~H~ n i~
i:t ,_~ -0 I/!i \', ~ im ( U
_. () 4.1 ~~~~ I 3~ i e.-.......-. ;!
; \ Ii 0 ~S \ '\ : 1'1 I~' mm~~.:~ · ~
~l'\ ~)> l;m , L _.. i 1,.I~ ::' . · l · c.' ~ ~
I 1_ I W6 1;1 IW e' IIII I .~i .".-I! ~IQ in!' U J>
, ~: I l \ I (15., I I: Ill' illl ~l\ !!I :11\11 ! \1I111UU 'illli~il gg
"\ I i ~ ~i.i iil s" ~,., i~I' I .1lI v H~~t i~ a~HI &Ii
"I, i: L' L ~~ ~- ,_0:,. -~I: \1: i ilidi lfl n. Ii I-IN I U11~nn, .i i~ih ~l
_, ;~ il I, tali I~I 11,1 \11 jilt i: ,I! li\'ia, !: i !~I it
, I. ~I I 1;1 d I. I lUll ;'. ~~;~I. II i=ii _i
I \ I .I _' I II Il, I Ih ~11I1 l' In I n I I! I ! ~~H i!
! ~ I' "" I \' (j) 10 i~ ~ Iii I 1-" ,Icll UI ! i! I i
~e' ; fn 1 g ~ ~ d, I ~1111 II' " In I i\ ! i~ .
, ; I -;;' .J ~ ---uti I I" Is ~!I 'l Ih Ii ~ h
~ I 0 '18 L i i h 11 ~C1 . U~ n ~ u ei~~
o ' b~.
I. ," ' ., ~~
"~_' __ _:?~_ .._ _ _ ..........)!.."' L d ~
i1
"
~I
I
, I
"l~ i ,
J~J
~ "
~
\ li
'I
~!
.
;
! ~\
~ tJ 1
("'I
\~
\ ~~ \
\ r~!
51~
~= r I
. ij" \, " '~I/:..-- Rl-- ~~;~:) <-"--. -.. -, ~ --:.- - ~ill-r- - ;;1- -'-- - . :.- --,.rL I'
'aa ~~ ' \" \"_ ,.,'! 0 I"{ \ :")lo \ . II
1.."j " \ \ ----. i Rl ~I' L.': "';:II; ..~i.i'la; III
'l,l;I~~ ',\\"\' il~~ il' ~ __.~..~m \'h~l\il~~!l'
I~~'" " " 0 ",' '- "1"11,11 I '
,. !r \ \,\ i:!l ~z ~Il . ~ ."...... 1 f!h 'I! , :
I ~ ~ ,'\ ilI)lo la, . ii= ....... i ·
;iIJ~ \\ ~lUC: ~ ~
, . I, ~ (' \ )lo I .. I :: I ,
i~;'l ~~ .'.' ~\",_/~---~'L. :.;_"'0 II
'\ "., ~__:,.....-' . .'"0 'I
I : ~ 1 ~~;.--------------------' ---~ ~:.o !,;
~
\ I i I\~fl r I "'0 I \,
P , i C ..I i i~ ~ () i~ l' . ,)
I Ii UJ'iJ' ~i~C~! \ ~~~ :::~
\ I ~ ' . II! 0 ~i I I------=---~- :
\ I', . ~ ; .. I L"lll :'i! 4 E~ - ~ :0 \', I" i
. I ' .. I 1 I I -iq~ i :p I' Cl
I I I ~ ~ ': l -:=:J/ " I; 1 I il' ~ ~ ~!,,:J] I, ~
III! ~~ ~: I ~ - -,-~ ~r--- ---=-=-- ! I \i.;~s s:: :,:;
I _: '" ~ I f I I I ~~ i ~ ; .. fl::j :
, _ " ".~ / .~ :;j~-hOml'
_ _;:..;; ~._..:; -=- _~ -=-,~:J!-l!I_::. ___ _ _ ~1>f' j~a ~ jJ
~ _ _, ,,--rs:--~ ,-- _"C" _ _ _ ,=...o =--" .__ - - - __ - l~a - I
-T' _ _~ - -,- - -- ,-- I .. .j;li""7. "un, ~ - -~, .--, .~; ~,.~ ,I c.' 4- . -: c' ,
~ - - H~l - ""rn~I' ,.... - -*:~~I~f i.?Ol\D ---..:} - ---=....::..'.... ,..co.....f- ;-
~ "~.15 "\)c) "o;Y~ ,i I ."rl"~ --
_, ~~,9 ii-s1::;=< h"2 ' ::; .q- ~.s..: ! -
~~ ~~i~ ;~l S "'~ d. \ :U h' J ::" ill
i i I ," ~~" : i. ~ ~ "l c. ~.
o _ J
;col. ,~ lUU:,_,__.. Uol. u. u[ ~'l~ ....
~~~~I~'I~l';~h-- :~ '~~"~II~~R'JJ!."'" BOlnton NUrSerlteS PUD
"i1~ Nil OZO.7 q ~ ~ ""lIl;:!~C. ~ --
1,.......111.: Iln ~II 4':" ~ "' - .
I'"'" <,,'U,Ul'lu.o, '" - ,: nO\'lnl; 1It;,\CII HOlm],\ / f."
-~ -- -- - - - ~l
t
Kilday " A"oc\al..
landscope Architects, 'PlannflfS
'5~' Fowm Ploc..
Suitt 100A
W..,t Pol", ~eoch. florido 3.}401
1.0') 689 5~21.lod'07) 689 ~~91
i . nllt~~'I\'- '.'\i i~n\l~t\\t,~\
...,....._ 1\ I III \\1 'il'l ,I \" II H · i " II
_...'"-"_ ~ \1\llli '\ ,\\\\\H ..H' \\'\'
_ _ ~~"'~ -:._.;;=.;, , \ \ \\ 'I~' \ \ i 'h\!. ,. 1 II 'I \
,~ '" ,,"~,.;1'--- -.J-. - \\ \ \\ \ i \ \ \",'\ \~ \,\ I ....., ~ \\ \\
\ r" ,." '115! I ill .. \ . d ',11 " - \'"
,,(:.~\. - ' / ' - , , II \ I' '" ,I ' ,...
;', _ ~ 0- __ T _' I .~~ II I I IJ\~, l\' d'. d ~ \\ \~
",C" ,D"I 1.,,\ · 1\ ~o' 1 , . . - \1" - . \"
[,I "" ,1(1 .,\.1\''''~'' I.df li ~,\ "Ji' <:. · ;" I ,\ ."... ~ i \
,,\ ""f p, -~.~ ',k4' .2, '
'I~ ",.~ "" ~. 0"
\ I.'" ' """. .~ ~ ',1\' .' ""' ---, i'~rH ,~\\ uq}\
1\1 i;'t. ~ \t ~ · {',Hl\ \1" \\ W~\\,\\~\\ \\\\'\ \\\\\'\ \ \, \\\'\\ \ ", \\ '\ \
~\\ \:::::.;0- ~ >i ~ ,.;h\i '1.2.~ \, \\ \\'h ..\ 't '~i ",\"~ ,~,l \"" i\
~\\\~~~~ ~ \'::= \\4J,~..1\\ '1\ '\ .~\\\\\. ,Ii \\ lv\ \\~\\'\ ,~ \ ,\\1 \ \\ \ \ \ \
~ '\ ,i2 \ "" \:;;iH~ %~ · 1 w, Iii \I ,'III I" \ 1 \ i \ I I \ '
~ \";,, , ~ ' I C,l J fili \ ',\ '\\\\ '~I\' \'\\ \'\\1\ \\ ~ \,' \ \\ \ \\
\ '" "J, I " ,~ ,,~ · I \., i" " I". "\ · '
,,~, r1 \ ~~ ~.;-'.' \ \ \\ Ili\ \i \\" \\ ;'~ \ ;;:' \ \\ \~. .~~
t, I ",,.' 'Ed! ' J ' '. j I' \" \ I' 1\ \' , \ \, - ,\\ ~
~'\ ""~ r ..15,-,\1\1 \ I ii' I I' " !
\ \ ~ \~,3R\~~~~ "!m~J\~\ I - i7.
\:' 16; 'i;" ._ I · ,I' "~ .fl
d ."' y - - " '.\ ". "".
\ \\ V,~, .l\\;~''lI~''ti., r~ I It ~.:
\ (~0~)F~~~. ~{ (.,1 ~~I "'I ~~ r~~
,"1. \ I R'\'t--' ><. d. II ~~\ ~,II\\ ~~
\ \ : '( . 'il ' ~ ,'\ ' I' \ ,~l\~':; \
\c~ h' ' \ ' \ I '
" h ,,,,,-, ' ~ " I \
b -'RI ~ --" I I t?il
\ l:J, ^ \1111 __ t J I;:; .. _ _ -""-~' _.....-,.., - -''-'-1 . .,-.........\.. -:-:-.... T" - /
n, " ; \I -L"-I</\ ~ . _ . - H "h lnr r' I 11 I \
"\ ~\ I~V I?: __~=-*. ,;:: k-.J.\;),i. . .h. ; . . . .~III." · .1., .'.h,h.h.h.~/h,l".hrl., -~ \
I~.\ L.~ r;r ...\ \~~ ~ 2~. .- -.- - ~~\,\
\~, tt', ~J';' '~'(jf"-~~I~\\,,{"\\"n"li"i\"l1"l~,'" ~ "h"ll"il"ll"ll"K'W ;)\It,~\'
'. ' e.!' 8~ ,,~~~uj';-..:..-'-'--'-" SOl ~' ',-:: - ..-;.;- ~ ~I%1\\ \
\ '\ 0Jj\ cITl'''"?,'\ cO ~Y-Wy:/ \'~ \(,c'!l tiklr ,~.~ ~ !i- \ \
1 ~ \~~' ~~f> '/ '/. ~..\.'::""'\ II,' 'a'~ \iPl'~ \ -'; W \ ~ \1 \\ "
\ ; "I L!..! ' LC,U. \V <.'"'' \'\ ( \Ir,""~ c, n r- - - <= ' I
\ 'i: \'Jl ,cD' '" ~:.. .. ~';".." .. \ II' ':i~ I~ .11 .~.\glJr.7nn =1 '&i;3\\
\iil1J' m\ ,\\ ~J\~'11'.~W ~.Q'~ .-~~.\~. ,,\~\.,
\ \:tiJ ,rl ,-,," ~ ' .'~ ~~> ~\lD' o:~ W~\J,~\J,;l'~:;d. --~~ I\\~~
~I" i LoJ 'Po\ ...t \''\?, IJ., -Ly:-.....,.,~ "II ,niT '.. fjf(" ~ \ \~
l~."::=:;- ~ 0 '1ft" \ !l~' ~~~<<":;;~ C ~" 'f ",1\\
l'\ ~ .~ ~\~i'~ ji/..~ ~~ "-;-' -- ~ I~!\\\
", ~ ,~ \,~\ ~l.Qjf. ~'\B\j8'B' - 'In. ~~'\' /~I: \\!~
'\' c.,~, .~\ '-'-1 LGJJ' ...~~"~v~~~ ~~.~ < w~~~~' oJ" \\~
I.' ~ tl 1\' ~ ~ ~R:I ~~~ "\r; ll:1I -\In \? ' I \'"
\'\' ... "" .. ., IL!./ 61\-" '\1'\1,1, 'I' .\.~. ,. ,"__"/1
\' EJ \. ~H~ ~ GJ1 -" J _--'t . c.-.; d\~ EB ......."" 1"'- \\'\
1 " .' "...... 'ILl .1 r.;'r' -mf.\t\\.1R~-1"\~~\'\\Y~~' . ,-,---"_..,,,
1\\ '~~l;l~iTC:i\':\\)-:'~""~ ~~~J,0:; J-'-.... ?\\~t\
\ \ . .. \l2L2~~h)b!Y' Ii i ~ 7> 'E8',;,.f,11cfjDf;irfib~)'" \ \. \\ ~ \\ \. \~\
I \ D'~ ' \ ,--.~~~~Y.d-\-' \ \ \\ " li \ \\'\
, ' r," \ I b "'~ ' ~ i-' II \
L ,.' " ' \ \ ..-0 \ t ~
\ ' l) ': J' I · '" '\ \ \, , , "
~ .__ /, 1\ . ..............._-----=:-=~- --------- ~' ;uc.;---rl--------' I, I
_ _-::1=- = = = = = = =f;.:l.k '~~= ~o == = == ,~~O:;;; ....'-'= ~ =,.d' I
_----- _~ __---------'d. =-"---
_. _0''''''' _'" ,.- -r'"' '----
__"~ ~ _~ _ ':-1\i\::~Wi ;-\~~'r- 'I ~ ~1It~'jP,"--- - f-::.=--:\\;~r~ \f ~ =-
, ,'....\. ~~ ..I. ' " Ii ,\ c '
:\ .... 'i' J ~ '1' : ,\ '0 /.
, ., ..'. .. 1
hi i\ ,)'l'l1\1'O];l HURS1EJ.lllES 1\'.U.D', /7 f'I,\.H ~ ~,! ( ,Sl'l~.'12\j'l
__ ._ "LAlI ' ',: " ,-~~' .
t" '
~
'\.)
~
\j)
\\\
'Q
~
~
~
f1
~
('--..
~
~
,
l
EXHIBIT "D"
/g
0\ IJI 0$>
() \P \P
\-" 0 0
_("t _'Z.~ _'Z.~
t-tt1 t-10 t-10
(O~ (0' ("t (0' ("t
1'1t11 1'1 0 1'1 0
o G:\ oO'p oO\p
l-')' t'" l-' t'"
l-'l-'
0(0 0 ~ 0 ~
("tP ("t ("t (0
tn tII (0 tII
-" - tn - tII
.
>:t
o
>4
..
~
Oi
.
"
'd
..
*
v>
~
~
("t
("t
\-"
P
10
l-'
~
(0
l-'"
(1)
'*
*
l-'"
\'oJ
o
0
~
~ r>
("t
("t IJI
\-"
P
10
l-'
~
(0
*
(1)
~
v>
0:>
~
\'oJ
o
l-'"
o
o
l-'"
l.JI
*
%
(t)
-pi
-::p..
~<i
tn
l-'~
o
("tl'Q
tIIp1
_1'1
o
(0
l-'
%
v>
- -
t'1 t'1
P P
tT1 t'tI
0 0
1'1 1'1
0 0
(0 (0
p. P.
0:> 0:>
~
-" -"
\'oJ \'oJ
0 0
-::
l.JI l.JI
0 0
*
*
0:>
o
l-'"
IJI
N
o
~
\-'-
P
\-'-
~
~
\)j
~
\-'.
l-'
po
\-'.
P
..a
(1)
~
pi
1'1
pi
("t
r'-
o
P
\'oJ r> C.
~ t'" l'Q
~ .,,~ ~
l"'\ l-'t1
(0 fI)(t) C..\
P ("tP ~
0 0 ~
~ (0 l-"'(t)
,..:j ~ _G:\ :to
~ ~ t-11'1
.' (00 ~
(0 1'1~
~ tII O(t)
l-'
(0 0
t1 ("t
(0 tII
fI) -"
1'1
0
t'tI N
N
pi 0 0
l-' ~
l-' l-'"
....
l-' l.JI l.JI
0 ~
("t
tII -3
~ l.JI 0
~
("t -3
l-'"
fI) l.JI IJI
N
0
\'oJ
o
l-'"
l.JI
*
'*
tII
(0
(0
."
9:'
t.:I
o
~
("t
o
*
l-'"
o
0:>
~
(\)
~
o
"""
\0
,$:0
,
N
\0
l.JI
t'tI
o
1'1
(0
:a
l-'
pi
P
pi
("t
r'-
o
P
to
-
\'oJ t11
0 -"
v> 0:>
~
(j) 0:>
-
(j) 0:> tIl
-"
....
o
o
....
IJI
0:>
'*
*
tTI
o
o
("t
i:
r'-
po
(0
t'"
~
(t)
%
fI)
r'-
P
("t
(t)
p
~
o
(0
tc1
fI)
tII
(\)
~
(t)
p
("t
'*
*
0:>
N \'oJ -
0 0 I'll
~ -
tI1
_:toW
v> 0:> ~()~
0'-'"
-3 t'1
_C'Z
l.JI 0 ~~
-3
.... -
IJI IJI tIl
-
*
*
'*
'*
l.JI 0\ l.JI
IJI ,$:0 ""
~ ~ 0
0' IJI IJI v> 0 0
v> 0 0 \0 0 0
....) 0 0
tII tII t.n
tII t.n t.n ,a ,a ,a
,a ,a ,a
tTI tTI tTI
tTI tTI tTI ("t ("t ("t
("t ("t ('"I"
Ul 0\ IJI
Ul Ul IJI ~ 0 0
l.JI 0 0
v> 0 0
0 0 0 \0 0 0
0 0 0
/1
()
H
,..:j
>4
."
C
o
W
~
"P
()
~
~
t'"
o
,..:j
W
H
t..'3
t'1
W
~
t'1
~
~ ~
~~
~O
t'1';d
~~
~~:
tIlO
';d
~
cg
~
~
EXHIBIT "E"
~o
\
'-,
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-210
September 8, 1994
FROM:
Tambri Heyden
Planning &jpJ:.ing Director
Don Jaeger
Building 0 'cial
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
TO:
THRU:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD (2nd REVIEW)
LAWRENCE ROAD & LWDD, L- 21 CANAL
The Building Department has reviewed the plans and documents
submitted for the above referenced project and has no comments.
We recommend that this project be forwarded through the approval
process.
#M,~~7'
Al Newbold'-- ",.
AN:bh
-.
\1~~\1
~
SlY \ ~::... " i
NURSERY
02..1
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 94-301
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning aod Zoo'
/
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Utilities Director
DATE:
September 15, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nursery PUD. Master Plan Modification - 2nd Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following
comments:
1. An 8" water main exists on Old Military Trail approximately
1000' north of this project's northwest property corner, Extension
of an interconnecting water main from POD A to this existing main
will be required when the infrastructure for POD A is built.
This looping of the main is required to maintain appropriate
chlorine residuals within POD A, which would otherwise be a
dead-end system for the forseeable future, The interconnecting
main must therefore be shown on the Master Plan. (See, 26-12,
26-16(a) City Code; See, 9(20) ECRII),
2. All other Utility concerns will be addressed at time of Health
Department Applications to construct water and sanitary sewer
systems.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process,
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor
at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404,
Ibks
Attachment
cc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter MazzellatV
Mark Law
File
m' ~,~~ ill
~e2-
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-275 WDC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
september 19, 1994
Master Plan Modifications
Boynton Nurseries PUD
Lawrence Rd
We have no objections at this time.
023
.:-
4t/~/z,
William
Boynton
74
~ t~":'~~r(
D. C vanaugh, FPO
Beach Fire Dept.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-289
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
W~lliam ~ukill, P.E. QK.A~Ji'
Clty Englneer 0-1
FROM:
DATE:
September 16, 1994
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
RE:
We have no additional comments beyond those contained in our two
August 19, 1994 memos (94-254 & 94-255) and the August 23, 1994
memo (94-263) except for the attached Finizio memo (94-288).
WVH/ck
C:BNURSERY.P&Z
c: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
rn
r:2.f
m~mowm
~1'1' I f- \~-I~n
rn
.
-
, . _ ~.- .t ,.7v/....,..~, .
I
), , ' '
." ....
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-254
TO:
Mike Haag
~on'ng/Site Administrator
. 'am HUkill, P.E.
. ngineer
August 19, 1994
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
We have reviewed subject documents with respect to those items
included in your memo of August 16, 1994, Part I, Section A,
Description and offer the following comments:
1/1 .
1. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7, Par. 7.1 of Land
Development Regulations, Part III, including, but not limited
to, deeds, easements or other instruments recorded in public
record.
Loop Road is a collector road by both Palm Beach County and
Florida D.O.T. standards (see F.S. 334.03(4). Required R.O.W.
is 80' (see Boynton Beach Code, Appendix C, Art. X., Sect. 10.
Par. B). It will be a public road.
Dedicate R.O.W. (public) for access road to adjacent property.
Provide drainage calculations.
Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage
plan complies with all City codes & standards (see Chap. 5,
Art. X & Appendix C).
6. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless adequate documentation
is presented to support something different.
Road serving Pods A, D and the recreation area appears to
exceed the maximum permitted ADT's (1500) and therefore is a
collector to a point past Pod 0 requiring an 80' R.O.W to that
point.
Provide Traffic Impact Statement.
j 2.
'(
? _3.
I 4.
5.
-z
I 8.
Approval of the master plan modifications by the Office of the City
Engineer is subject to satisfaction of these conditions and
consideration of the recommendation cited by Mr. Finizio on the
attached list.
WVH/ck
C:BNURSERY.COM
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
attachment: V. Finizio recommendations
026
I J
~+" , ,...{.e '.
I
I I .'
. ..,.1 ....'
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-255
TO:
william Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
FROM:
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
August 19, 1994
Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. - Master Plan Modification
DATE:
RE:
I would suggest that the driveway widths depicted on plan
attachments (15' wide) be widened to 18' to allow for the parking
of two motor vehicles in each driveway. If this suggestion is
adopted by the City Commission, it would abate the potential for
numerous motor vehicles parking along the roadway and on grassed
areas within this subdivision.
VAF/ck ~
c: BNURSERY . VAF ~l:LIV
, ~ ~tvV \ \_ .
~~~( ?~
~ lolrll/Q4
~ L D(lf<
" I tJl ctU"
-2(P
'1 j-
J-.~ 1- h'..-vt-.-
lJ ',\.......:-
..) ..~ I'
0,/'
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-263
TO:
Mike Haag
.onong/Site Administrator
. 0 Huki II, P. E .
Engineer
FROM:
DATE:
August 23, 1994
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. MASTER PLAB MODIFICATION
RE:
In addition to our comments contained in the August 19, 1994 memo
to you (and attachment), we offer the following:
?,1. Developer to provide impact statement from Palm Beach County
School Board.
2. Developer to comply with March 1, 1990 comments;
~,a. Provide established centerline elevations for all adjacent
streets and rights-of-way.
v1O. Indicate the proposed layout of the lo~s and blocks.
c. Indicate on plans utilities such as telephone, power,
water, sewer, gas, etc. o~ or adjacent to the tract
including a statement on plans, that all utilities are
available and have been coordinated with all required
utilities. Section 4.C.17.
3. Developer provide commitment for perpetual maintenance and
irrigation of public rights-of-way.
WVH/ck
C:BNURSERY.PUD
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
021
,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-288
TO: William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
FROM: vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: September 16, 1994
RE: Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D.
Second Submission of Master Plan Modification
Kilday & Associates TRC Follow-up Letter dated 9/2/94
1. Reference Engineering Department Memo No. 94-255, dated August
19, 1994 wherein I suggest that driveway width depicted on
plans be widened from 15' to 18' to allow for the parking of
two motor vehicles in each driveway, has resulted in an
objection from Kilday & Associates (see page #6 - Kilday's
letter dated 9/2/94), however, I still recommend that the City
Commission compel the applicant to perform the suggested
modification as based upon my observations of P.U.D.s with
only one driveway over the past eight years, I have determined
that from a functional standpoint a single car garage with one
15' wide driveway, simply does not work. Inevitably, the
garages are utilized either for storage or are converted into
rooms with the resultant effect being that second motor
vehicles are parked in the roadway or along grassed areas.
This has been a major on-going problem for most Condominium
Associations and major Homeowner Associations, therefore I
believe that a 3' wide increase in driveway width is "no big
deal" when compared to the scope and nature of the problems
that will arise based upon the aforementioned scenario.
2. I am deeply concerned regarding the unprotected lakes along
Lawrence Road immediately in front of Citrus Park Blvd. and
the Citrus Cove Elementary School site. In my opinion, the
Master Plan should be revised to place a notation stating that
FDOT approved guardrails will be installed along the east side
of the subject lakes in accordance with Appendix C,
Subdivision and Platting Regulations, Section 3, Design,
wherein this code states that "where.., lakes. . . are adjacent to
or exist upon the property to be subdivided, they shall...be
so designed and protected that they do not represent a hazard
to life and safety.".
3. The master plan should be modified to provide for sidewalks on
both sides of the internal roads as required by City code,
including the installation of handicap sidewalk connections at
all intersections including the pedestrian striping of the
proposed bike path thru the collector road points of
intersection at Lawrence Road.
ol~
Engineering Dept. Memo No. 94-288
Re: Boynton Nurseries
September 16, 1994
Page #2
4. The bicycle path referenced in the general notes on page #1 of
the master plan should be depicted on the plan and be
constructed, or if existing, constructed and/or repaired
concurrent with the development of this site.
5. I believe that deceleration lanes should be constructed along
Lawrence Road to facilitate vehicular movements into the
subdivision. Additionally, I have discussed this matter with
Mr. Andy Hertel of Palm Beach County Traffic Division and have
been advised that he has not yet received a copy of this
master plan which will impact Lawrence Road {a County rights-
of-way) and therefore the applicant shall, as a condition of
approval submit a copy of the subject plan to Mr. Hertel and
agree to comply with County comments (if any) prior to City
Board approval.
VAF/ck
C: BOYNNURS. COM
027
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '94-342
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dir1~tJr
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent 61v-
Master Plan Modification: Boynton Nurseries POD
Second Review
TO:
RE:
DATE:
september 14, 1994
The Recreation & Park Department
MasterPlan for Boynton Nurseries PUD.
submitted:
has reviewed the amended
The following information is
1. Recreation & Park Memo *94-320 remains in effect.
2. Plan indicates the below listed elements:
A. Children's Play Area
B. Pool
C. Clubhouse
D. Tennis Courts
E. Basketball Court
3. Developers are aware that, based on one-half credit for
private recreation and the provision of 2.5 acres of land for
public recreation, they will still owe .884 acres of
recreation dedication fee in lieu of land.
4. Private recreation facilities and equipment provided must be
of commercial grade and of sufficient size and scope needed to
provide for the recreation needs of the residents of the
subdivision.
JW:ad
~ .. "...!" .
'~~;:''Iol:,;..
~o
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-320
~l
f) (,~v . t
~I (If U
Tambri Heyden. Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Charles C. Frederick. Director Recreation & Park <2, ( (~
John Wildner, Superintendent of Parks W
Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D. - Amended ~ter Plan
RE:
ATE: August 26, 1994
---------------------------------------
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the Master Plan (amended) for the Boynton
Nurseries P.U.D. The following infonnation is submitted:
I. Park Land Dedication Requirement
376 single family units @ ,018 acres each = 6.768 acres
2. Credit For Private Open Space
A, The Park Land Dedication Ordinance provides for up to 1/2 credit for,private open
space if it provides a minimwn of five (5) local park basic requirements. The
developer has indicated he intends to apply for this credit. Before credit is given, the
developer must indicate details regarding type. number. size. and location of the
private recreation facilities (per sub-division code. section 8).
B. Assuming half credit for private recreation facilities provided. (6.768 divided by 2).
the developer is required to provide 3.384 acres.
3. Location
The amended master plan shows that the 2.5 acres to be dedicated be located in the northeast
corner of the development. adjacent to Lawrence Road and abutting the Knollwood Grove
property to the north.
This location will allow for eventual consolidation of public park property to be dedicated
from the Knollwood Grove property if it is annexed and developed for residential use.
These combined properties would ultimately provide a neighborhood park of approximately
five acres which will comply with the level of service standards required in the parks and
recreation element of the comprehensive plan.
JW:bjm The remaining ,884 acres required must be paid in cash at the time of plattin ~
\'f1 rn
A' ft., ? h !fln n
'.. PlNtNING AND
ONING OEPl.
J/
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-340
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist I~~~
Boynton Nurseries PUD - Second Review
TO:
RE:
DATE:
September 14, 1994
The applicant should show the following items at the preliminary
plat stage:
1. All existing desirable trees located outside the preserve area
should be quantified.
2. The existing desirable trees which are located in "greenspace"
areas should be shown to be preserved, not relocated or
replaced.
3. The existing perimeter desirable trees should be cleared of
exotic Florida Holly and underplanted with relocated saw
palmetto.
4. All undesirable trees should be removed from the entire site.
KH:ad
\VI m
ill
ill
SEP I 6 1993
".~'l'.'
~ 1
I
Q...C--' \0 -a.. \~u\~. '-'- ,\\~- \ ~
.----
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Lt. James Cwnming~
11 January 1995
Nautica Development
TRC MEMO # 95-0111
Upon returning from vacation, I received the attached memo from Lt. Yannuzzi indicating that
there was unresolved discussion at a TRC meeting regarding the egress at the Nautica
Development, onto Lawrence Road.
It is my opinion that traffic leaving the proposed site do so by way of two lanes, which are clearly
indicated on the plans provided, The left turn lane should be for only that purpose, while the right
lane should act as both a right turn lane and a through traffic lane, This will provide the most
efficient traffic flow, while also complying with DOT standards regarding intersections.
ill
ffi ~ ~ a '\!J ~ r~':\
Ii ! .
,_',< ~ J~ \L
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT. ,.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To:
cc:
Tambri Heyden, Director of Planning
Lt. James Cummings
Lt. Chris Yannuzzi
From:
Dat
Subje
December 29, 1 994
T.R.C./Nautica Development
On Tuesday, December 27, 1994 I substituted for Lt. Cummings as the Police
Department's representative at the T.R.C. meeting, The Nautica Development was
discussed and an issue was raised with regard to traffic flow involving the two
entrance/exits at Lawrence Road of this site, It appears that a traffic study was done,
prior to the installation of a traffic signal at Citrus Cove Elementary, and that the
study made some recommendations regarding designated turn lanes for those vehicles
exiting the development.
However, at this meeting, the developer requested that the left turn & thru lanes be
combined and a designated right-turn lane be created. Previous discussions
apparently indicated the opposite should take place, namely the right turn & thru
lanes should be combined and there should be a designated left-turn lane,
Due to the confusion, I 'will refer this matter to Lt. Cummings upon his return from
Vacation on January 9, 1995. As the former Traffic Coordinator, he is much more
qualified to determine the proper recommendation for these intersections.
CTY Icy
LT. CHRIS YANNUZZI
DNIsrON OF ADMINISTRATION
BOYNIDN BFACH PoueE DEPARTMENr
100 E. BOYNIDN BFACH BLVD.
ROYNIDN BFACI-[. FL 3'H'35
00
UJ U \17 ~ II fn)
JAN , 2 "- . ~
I
FROM n'ffi DESK OF...
PLANNIf\!G M~D
ZONiNG f)[pr
(-107) 375.6108
Fax: (-107) 375,6185
7.B.l.
BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-305
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
FROM: 'rambri J. Heyden 7?fIJ
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: October 6, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - MPMD #94-004
Revised density, unit type, layout, setbacks and roads
INTRODUCTION
Kilday and Associates, agent for Boynton Nurseries, property
owner and G.L. Homes, contract purchaser of the Boynton Nurseries
PUD, is requesting approval to modify the previously approved
master plan for the Boynton Nurseries PUD, as described in the
attached report (Planning and Zoning Department Memorandum No.
94-295). The Boynton Nurseries PUD is to be located on the west
side of Lawrence Road, at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road
and the L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal.
RECOMMENDATION
At the October 3, 1994, City Commission meeting, the City
Commission, with a 4 - 1 vote, made a finding of no substantial
change regarding the modifications requested. Staff recommended
that the modification be approved, subject to the attached staff
comments (see Exhibit "E" - Building Department Memorandum No.
94-210; utilities Department Memorandum No. 94-301; Fire
Department Memorandum No. 94-275 WDC; Engineering Department
Memorandum No. 94-289/ 94-254, 94-255, 94-263 and 94-288;
Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum No. 94-342, 94-320 and
94-340; and Planning and Zoning Department memorandum dated
september 29/ 1994). However, the City Commission included in
their motion, approval of all staff comments, with exceptions.
within the Planning and Zoning Department memorandum, comments 2,
3, 15/ 16(a) and 17 were deleted and comment 14 was revised to
require pedestrian signalization for a school crossing to Citrus
Cove Elementary, located opposite Eoynton Nurseries on the east
side of Lawrence Road, only if the signal is warranted.
The deleted comments are described as follows:
1. Comment 2 relates to traffic; specifically phasing of 48
units, which equate to trips per day that are not vested
under the 1990 master plan approval. The applicant's
traffic engineer stated phasing was necessary, however Palm
Beach County's traffic certification letter does not mention
the phasing. staff is waiting to hear back from Palm Beach
County for clarification on this issue.
2. Comment 3 relates to the width of the buffer (five feet)
proposed along the south property boundary, as compared to
the width of the other perimeter buffers (25 feet); all of
which were originally approved at 25 feet. If the Planning
and Development Board determines that five feet is adequate
along the south boundary, it is recommended that the second
sentence within comment 2, "Clarify the difference between
the five foot setback and the 10 foot setback shown on the
plans", be retained as a condition of approval.
3. Comment 15 also relates to the buffer and recommends the
buffer as a dedicated tract, rather than an easement
encumbering the private lots.
4. Comment 16(a) relates to increasing the size of the "Z" lots
to 4,500 square feet, with a minimum 50 foot wide lot and
ten foot building separation.
/
TO: Planning and Development Board
-2-
October 6, 1994
5. Compliance with comment 17 would place a limitation on the
number of two-story, "Z" lot units that could be built in a
row (a distance of 160 feet is recommended - i.e. four
units). At the city commission meeting the applicant stated
that the developel- has some "internal rules" about allowing
too many units of the same type in a row. The intent of
staff1s comment was to encourage mixing of the one and two-
story units for variety (the applicant estimates that 60% of
the "Z" lots will be two-story) and to alleviate the dense
feeling that will result with the proposed, small lot sizes
and shallow setbacks. Unless some variable of this comment
is required, there is nothing in place (on the plans or
within staff comments) to ensure that the developer enforces
his "internal rules". The applicant has not submitted his
"internal rules", therefore staff is unaware of the
specifics of the rules or their implication. As a point of
information, by code the City can regulate the number of
units by type.
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A:PDBoyNMP
0<.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUl-f NO. 94-295
Agenda Memorandum for
october 3, 1994 city Commission Meeting
TO: carrie Parker
city Manager
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden ~
Planning and Zoning Department
DATE: September 29, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - MPMD #94-004
Revised density, unit type, layout, setbacks and roads
NATURE OF REOUEST
Kilday and Associates, agent for Boynton Nurseries, property
owner and G.L. Homes, contract purchaser of the Boynton Nurseries
PliD, located on the west side of Lawrence Road, at the northwest
corner of Lawrence Road and the L.W.D.D. L-21 Canal (see Exhibit
"A" - location map), is requesting approval to modify the
previously approved master plan for the Boynton Nurseries PUD
(see Exhibit "B" - letter of request and Exhibit "c" - approved
and proposed master plans). The modifications are as follows:
1. Reductlon in total number of units from 400 to 374.
2. Change in type of units. Original master plan showed
162 single-family units with a minimum 6,000 square
foot lot and 238 multi-family units. Proposed master
plan shows all single-family units, comprised of 231
"Z" lot units on 4,000 (40' x 100') square foot lots
and 143 zero lot line units on 5,000 (50' x 100')
square foot lots.
2. phasing of the project into two phases. Phase I would
include all but 49 units; Phase II would include the
remaining 43 units. Even though there is a reduction
in the total number of units from the original
approval, due to the change in type of units (multi-
family gener3ting fewer trips per day than sing18-
family), phasing is necessary with this modification to
avoid road improvements to the surrounding roadvlays.
3. An increase in the traffic impact to surrounding
roadways as described in item 2 above, a decrease in
water and sewer demand and a decrease in the population
growth antici,pated.
4. Change in pod layout and size and access points to the
pods.
5. Establ~shment of the alignment and size (40 feet wide
with a four foot wide sidewalk on one side) of the
local streets (private) that serve the pods.
6. Alteration of the size (reduction from 5.3 acres in
total to 2.5 acres) and arrangement of the tree
preservation area.
7. Revisions to the master drainage plan (change in lake
sizes and locations).
8. Reduction in size, from 2.84 acres to 2.5 acres, of the
public park to be dedicated to the City.
9. Reduction in width, from 25 feet to 5 feet, of the PUD
perimeter buffer along the south boundary of the PUD.
o
TO: Carrie Parker
-2-
September 29, 1994
10. A cond~tion of the original master plan approval was
that prior to applying for preliminary plat approval, a
master plan modification would be required to establish
lot layout and setbacks. Therefore, this modification
establishes lot layout and the following, more
significant, minimum setbacks:
BUilding Setback - both type of units
a) front - 20 feet to the garage, but 15 feet to
the house;
b} rear - 15 feet for units that back up to one
another, but 10 feet for units that back up
to a lake, preserve, pun perimeter or a
roadway;
cl side (non-zero portion) - 10 feet (13.5 feet
for corner lots);
Screenf:d Enclosures - II Z" lot line units
d) rear - 0 feet when abutting a lake or
preserve;
e) side - 0 feet (? - could not ascertain from
plans), but 13.5 feet for corner lots;
Screened Enclosures - Zero lot line units
f) rear - 0 feet when abutting a lake or
preserve, 5 feet when units back up to one
another;
g) side - 10 feet, but 13.5 feet for corner
lots.
BACKGROUND
1~e Boynton Nurseries PUD master plan (valid for 18 months,
unless a preliminary plat is filed) was approved by the City
Commission on september 5, 1990, subject to numerous conditions.
Subsequently, a one year time extension and concurrency exemption
for traffic, draInage and neighborhood parks were granted through
March 5, 1993. A second one year time extension was granted and
lastly a third time extension. The current time extension and
concurrency exemption for the levels of service previously
mentioned, expires March 5, 1995. Submittal of a master plan
modification does not extend the life of a master plan.
Regarding the procedure for processing master plan modifications,
Appendix B, Planned Unit Development, of the City code of
ordinances states that changes in planned unit developments shall
be processed as follows:
Section 12. Changes in plans.
"Changes in plans approved as a part of the zoning to PUD
may be permitted by the planning and zoning board upon
application filed by the developer or his successors in
interest, prior to the expiration of the pun classification,
but only [after] a finding that any such change or changes
are in acco~d with all regulations in effect when the change
or changes are requested and the intent and purpose of the
comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the proposed
change. Substantial changeE shall be proposed as for a new
application of pun zoning. The determination of what
constitutes a 8ubstantial change shall be within the sole
1-
TO: Carrie Parker
-3-
September 29, 1994
discretion of the city commission. Nonsubstantial changes
as determined by the city commission in plans shall not
extend the expiration of the eighteen month approval for the
PUD classification. II
ANALYSIS
staff has reviewed this request for consistency with the PUD
development standards, and the intent and purpose of planned unit
developments as stated in the folloWing sections of Appendix B,
Planned Unit Developments of the code of ordinances:
Section 1. Intent and purpose.
"A Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is established.
It is intended that this district be utilized to promote
efficient and economical land use, improved amenities,
appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and
economical development in the city, and the protection of
adjacent and existing and future city development. The
district is suitable for development, redevelopment, and
conservation of land, water and other resources of the city.
Regulations for planned unit developments are intended to
accomplish the purposes of zoning, subdivision regulations,
and other applicable city regulations to the same degree
that they intended to control development on a lot-by-lot
basis. In view of the substantial pUblic advantages of
planned unit developments, it is the intent of PUD
regulations to promote and encourage development in this
form where tracts suitable in size, location, and character
for the uses and structures proposed are to be planned and
developed as unified and coordinated units.1I
Section 9.B. Internal Lots and Frontage. "Within the
boundaries of the PUD, no minimum lot size or minimum yards
shall be required, provided, however, that PUD frontage on
dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements
in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most
closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other
zoning districts shall be the same as required in the
abutting zone. II
Of the proposed modifications, only the changes in buffer width,
recreation, lot sizes and setbacks generated concern by staff.
Regarding the proposed width and treatment of the landscape
buffers, staff lIas encountered problems with peripheral landscape
buffers when they are incorporated as an easement on private,
homeowner lots, or even as a separate tract, dedicated to the
homeowners' association, that abuts homeowner lots. These
buffers frequently succumb to homeowner pressure to fence them
in. Landscaping within the buffers are then difficult to ensure
that they are retained as originally required. In addition, to a
preference for landscaping within dedicated tracts, staff is
recommending that the 25 feet, originally approved by the City
Commission, be prOVided around the entire PUD perimeter.
Regarding recreation, with the number and type of units shown on
the original master plan, the total parks and recreation
dedication requjrement was 6.75 acres. Fifty percent credit was
allowed for the provision of a private recreation area, comprised
of five differel.t recreational amenities, leaVing 3.375 acres to
be dedicated as a public park. Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.5.5
requires park dEdication of 6 acres/l,OOO persons (further
refined in Section 8, Article IX, of the Subdivision
Regulations). The private recreation facilities to be provided
satisfy the 2.5 acre/l,OOO population level of service for
neighborhood facilities, but not the total park dedication
requirement of 6 acres/l,OOO population satisfied by the public park.
.5
TO: Carrie Parker
-4-
September 29, 1994
To meet the level of service for parks and recreation in this
neighborhood, the public park site is needed in the northeast
corner of the project, as is proposed with this modification.
Since the minimum size required for a neighborhood park is 5
acres, the acreage acquired from Boynton Nurseries is to be
combined with the acreage (estimated to be only 2 acres) from the
future development of the Knollwood Groves property directly to
the north. This is the last opportunity for the city to acquire,
by dedication, enough park acreage to build a neighborhood park
in the Vicinity of Lawrence Road. With the original master plan,
staff recommended that the Commission require 3.375 acres to be
dedicated as a public park. The master plan was approved
requiring 2.84 acres in public park dedication and a cash payment
equivalent to the value of the remaining .535 acres.
With the proposed decrease in number of units and change in type
of units to all single-family, the total parks and recreation
dedication requirement is 6.732, as compared to 6.75 acres with
the original master plan. The proposed master plan reduces the
public park dedication further to 2.5 acres, with a cash
equivalent of .866 acres to be paid to the city at time of
platting, putting the City at risk of not being able to assemble
enough land, given the Boynton Nurseries acreage and the future
Knollwood Groves acreage, for a 5 acre neighborhood park.
Regarding the proposed lot sizes and setbacks, Exhibit liD"
contains a chart listing the planned unit developments (PUD)
within the city that have been approved with minimal lot sizes,
lot frontages (widths) and building, pool and screened enclosure
setbacks. when comparing these minimums approved, to date,
vlithin the City, with the minimum lot sizes, lot frontages and
setbacks proposed within the Boynton Nurseries PUD, it is noted
that no one PUD contains the minimums of all the various
characteristics (lot size, width and setbacks) proposed within
the Boynton Nurseries PUD. For example, the smallest front
building setback is currently 18 feet and is within Citrus Glen.
The smallest rear building setback is currently 10 feet and is
within Boynton Lakes. The smallest side building setback,
excluding the zero lot line sides for IIZ" lots and zero lot line
units, is currently 10 feet and is within The Meadows (although
Lawrence Lake shows 7.5 feet, this is provided on both sides,
yielding a 15 foot building separation). The minimum lot size is
4,500 square feet with a 50 foot wide lot and is found within
Boynton Lakes. Regarding screened enclosures, the minimum rear
setback is 5 feet; 0 feet when abutting a lake area and is found
within Boynton Lakes and Citrus Glen, respectively. The minimum
side setback for screened enclosures is 8 feet and is found
within Boynton Lakes (excludes same 7.5 foot stipulation
previously mentioned for Lawrence Lake and excludes the "Z" lots
at The Meadows, tract M, where such structures were permitted
prior to final approval and withdrawal of request and where the
unit is angled on the lot, so no building separation is visible
from the street).
Over the past ten to fifteen years, the PUD proposals within the
City have included smaller and smaller lot sizes, with very large
homes and increased lot coverages (decreased permeability), built
closer and closer to property lines. These small lots with
narrow building separations have posed ever-changing problems for
emergency personnel who must park large vehicles on narrow
streets and maneuver emergency equipment within tight openings
between buildings. Also, an increasing problem with small lots
with narrow frontages and shallow front building setbacks, is
parking. Drlveways on these lots are not deep or long enough to
accommodate more than one personal car, not to mention guest
vehicles. In addition, most families have at least two vehicles,
so vehicles are parked continually within the street, blocking
passage of vehlcles, and within swales or over sidewalks, causing
unsightly, costly damage to both.
(;;
TO: Carrie Parker
-5-
September 29, 1994
The City has approved these proposals in an attempt to offer a
full range of housing choices to current and potential City
residents, so as not to exclude anyone group of people and
encourage population and housing diversity. In general, the
smaller the lot, the less expensive the dwelling and associated
land. This has a direct correlation with the type and number of
jobs available within the City, the percentage of the City's
population that both lives and works within the City, the type of
market that City retailers gear toward, the types of businesses
that are attracted to the City, etc.
Logically, the area of the City over the past five to ten years
that has seen the most PUD approvals is the area along Lawrence
Road (including Military Trail), between Hypoluxo Road and N.W.
22nd Avenue. This area has become a monoculture of developments
comprised of 5,000 and 5,500 square foot lots, yet it is probably
the remaining area, within the city or flannexable", with the
exception of a few infill areas within the City, where larger
lots and homes could be developed, compatible with the larger
lots and homes that spot the area. The City has not seen the
build-out of a development approved for lots 70 feet in width or
wider, and larger than 6,000 square feet, in over eight years
(Jonathan's Grove of 32 lots is an exception and is under
construction) .
For the technical reasons previously mentioned and to reconsider
the progression of smaller and smaller lot sizes, staff is
recommending that the approval of this modification to the
Boynton Nurseries PUD be, at minimum, consistent with the
majority of the PUDs within the City. Therefore, among other
specific recommendations relative to lot sizes and setbacks (see
attached Planning and Zoning Department memorandum, dated
September 29, 1994, comment 16 - Exhibit "E"), staff is
recommending that the minimum lot size within the Boynton
Nurseries PUD be 4,500 square feet, with a minimum lot width of
50 feet. Further, staff is recommending that the rear setback
for screened enclosures, even those that abut lakes or open
areas, be increased to 5 feet, that all side, building
separations be maintained at 10 feet and that the rear setback
for screened enclosures that back up to other lots be increased
to 8 feet.
RECOMMENDATION
On Tuesday, August 23, 1994 and Tuesday, September 13, 1994, the
Technical Review Committee (TRC) met to review the master plan
modification. The TRC recommends that the City Commission make a
finding of no substantial change for the proposed modification,
and that the Planning and Development Board approve the request,
subject to the attached staff comments (see Exhibit "E"
Building Department Memorandum No. 94-210; utilities Department
Memorandum No. 94-301; Fire Department Memorandum No. 94-275 WDC;
Engineering Department Memorandum No. 94-289, 94-254, 94-255, 94-
263 and 94-288; Recreation and Parks Department Memorandum No.
94-342, 94-320 and 94-340; and Planning and Zoning Department
Memorandum No. 94-256).
tjh
Attachments
xc: Central File
A: BoyNMPMl
7
. H:< .eLl co .
"\ : '-
~\~', ~~hf~}l~
:~:::. J( ~c- ;rt',-"-I::
. ::::,l/f-. \ \ r"\ ~ :-
-' :-~...
-., L J "'fnT\\ \:\1 "1fn\~l '- .~
~c..,.' " ~.~ "
...-' . "~ .;.~..- ?AN'\: Tp' ~ -
L "" '''\ f I _'~: l"'"
/1- .~~(; fe' \---
t. \":iu)!;.'--,.", ';,
t .......-.v~. ./ .',
_ ,/ ~)&k\L.' 0 I, ~ -
_ :\: .-::: l L~~' ~~\~.~ -' ~,l \
\'j_'\'_~-- t r 7'] I.. \ .,) \ F\ \ · ~ ----
l---- 7 I ,/). ': : ,.. L_
\ .\.l---1'~f\Jf\' ~~\ {}~~ ~ ~,~' ~~
, 5l~ ~}-:-:~--:~- __.:-1\1f\\'i1'ltU1, ':.
. _ \~f'I 1," _ 2: s\ _~iSl ,r. ,%:
'1M #/ ,_ '1~~l:; ~
....:l~~1 J ,,/////," ./////// ~iI:''L::V.)~~
~ " I, rJI' III. ,T' "''''''\ .. '. i \
, .. l' , ',\' "" .. n. "I ".... , ," ..1'
\ _' /'1 ' '/ ,"::< ,,' ,\\1'lU~'~ 7/,'/.'// /1 '11/.lll, 'I I >i<;\'l'" if,' I;..'
~o/\ _ ~ ."l" 'h 'fil//II'I.'I. 'I
_.~ <L ~~~>~'F:~:-'\ :r" ,,\I '(/.) '1' 'II / 'I "C\'t'AUS~
\ ..~ II\' 1~ ' \\~. ~~I' ::.. ,"'-' .1. ..' = ','/'1 'lh r, 'II /lit pU P
I U ,'. /,1 ,~'" .,'" .... 'I, 'I '//"'1 u I
r/.' ",11\ ,S:\I"l i'~ ,. ...--". \ " ' ' I /Ii/It . ///' I
\\... '~ ' ~'r',- \ ./1/1 ,/, '1/1 '1/ I" '\ Po- Po-
~ ,! I. /~:r ~~ 17: ..,.., '" I//.II(/////. '/1, '1/ 1//
:~~$':: I/. '1/;' 1'/I/,/I'//;'WI.IJ1Ili/Il//I/lJ///1J. ".......-4
I ffiAl{l: >\{l:\'~ f% 1;//J;//I/!;'I//I/I~ . j --l l/~--\~"WII
-l~' y".~~~~ ~ I: ,\~ \ r-I'--~/,/ -
Jl" ~....,,_~:Q~'7"I\ i ':. \ srtE. 'J! ,--'
I . /' ,..-. '.". c',,, .~.____\, ~ ~/. \ I ~
x' " ,""" ~, .. "" 1 I \.
;:,J ~" ,>,- ~\ I <:"...'
, ';Mltt~{\f2) _ ~ ll;:: .::', ~ r \ \ \ ~
d~:~~.~':fi~/ ~ / ,-,~ ~ <P"'\ - I \ .,.,~ ., v.....--.
'\.' \ l.:-'~'- - "p==<
/~_ l;:--~'~ l" '\ \ .
___---------~- ~ \ . .. ,:.\0.J:=:: \-
, \ \ <il ~ I ' ~\r - ~ ..-
, \ ' ".' r'
I I "- ' \ ,,' ~ i:::l~ffi ", ~. :t'~'1
\ \ l I , \ ' " \ --~~~ \ ~~w:~~i\\~,~"
_rll" \ I I ' (:'4\\~' ,/"""\'~ ..,'
II II II! ,,\, ~.' ~ -~ ',. - ,. .ct .'. ~ \
~~ ,e-- "'-, ,." ,. _ ,-' 7l#;:'~1" I I'" ~".'.. ?ri'1\
:-~~~ \I II \I F:'~ ~i \\ \ \ \ \~",,'~"~i~t .\(i'\W/,\.t' ~
, . 7/1 ~ \\ -;:,'c\.\.t\\\ \'-" ,,,," ......:';: ?~(';;,lTl'l..n u:tL.
(j ~ '" 'J -"."'" -,P [.\1
\~\\ "\ 1\8 \ I'I\\\.E51 :. ~~\. \/,C:>I. \\l~\ "" '.~' :.\ \ n r
\\\' ,.:'\' '~I ,~" 1'l1l- r ~~",-,-"'-',
. 12~..' . . ...... 1("
. ~"I'\OO fEEl ." . B [~ ,u r .;::/~ ...:;_.,..,...-r-\ '
\ \ \,;..
\-OCA."nON MA ~
\30"N10N NURSER\ES
.~,"'-"
~
-.l
l-
-~\
~. .r ..~.. I, k. ~
. : ..'
, .
\ \ \
l\
,,,. 1\
--- ..-.----
.\ nmgD11
". \ \1..l~B
\\.\. \ \ ,It:: l\ \\
1 .~.
T{ \
{fT\~~' n ,nl(\
.4
.-
.,
l' \
\
\ .
.. al /.
1JIf!I-...
Kilday & Aaoclat..
Landscape Architectsl Planners
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(4071 689-5522 · Fax: 14071 689-2592
August 4, 1994
Ms. Tambri J. Hayden, Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Boynton Nursery PUD
Minor Master Plan Modification Application
Our Project No.: 1020.7
Dear Ms. Hayden,
Please accept and process the attached information for a Minor Master Plan
Modification to the previously approved Boynton Nursery PUD located on the west
side of Lawrence Road, north of Gateway Boulevard. We are submitting this
Minor Master Plan Modification application on behalf of GL Homes of Florida, Inc.,
contract purchasers of the property, and Boynton Nurseries, owners of the
property. The original master plan, approved March 20, 1990, reflected a total of
400 units which were comprised of 162 detached units and 238 multi family units.
The proposed master plan reflects a total of 376 zero lot line detached units. The
overall master plan has been revised to delete twenty-four (24) units from the
original approval.
There are two (2) product types proposed, one a zero lot line product which
utilizes a 5,000 s.f. lot and the other a IIZII lot product which utilizes 4,000 s.t. lot.
Details of typical units, setbacks, and open space areas are included with this
application. The site is divided into four (4) development pods, two (2) pods will
utilize the 5,000 s.f. zero lot line lot and two (2) pods will utilize the 4,000 s.f. "Z"
lot line lot.
Access for the PUD remains as previously approved with two (2) access points
off of Lawrence Road. Also, a central loop road is maintained, similar to the past
approval. This road will be dedicated publicly with this approval. Also, pursuant
to conditions of the previous approval, a 2.5 acre public park site is proposed
adjacent to Lawrence Road in the northern portion of the site. A private
community recreation facility of 2.84 acres in size has been incorporated in the
interior of the site which will include a minimum of five (5) amenities.
Pursuant to on-site meetings with Kevin Hallahan, a preserve area which more
accurately represents preservation of significant existing vegetation has been
1/
Ms. Tambri Hayden
August 4, 1994
Page 2 of 2
proposed along the southern portion of the property. The original proposal of a
preservation area within the perimeter buffers of the Utail" of the site was not
appropriate due to the lack of existing vegetation in those areas.
Attached with this letter is a comparison of impacts for the project. You will note
that in most areas, this project will reduce Impacts from that previously approved,
especially in areas of water and sewer capacity and population. The development
of this project will be phased. Phase 1 will be limited to 328 zero lot line units
which has traffic capacity equivalent to that which was originally approved. Phase
2 development of 48 units will be conditioned upon the contract being let for the
expansion of surrounding roadways. Attached with this application is a traffic
impact letter. A full traffic statement is being produced which will be reviewed and
approved by both the City of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County prior to the
Technical Review Committee Meeting. Also included with this submittal are
conceptual engineering plans, landscape plans and typical home elevations.
If you have any questions or concerns in regards to this application, or if you need
any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you in advance for your past time and future consideration for this project.
Sincerely,
Cd~W.WilleA
Co Ilene W. Walter
cc: Alan Fant; GL Homes
Larry Portnoy; GL Homes
Rob Rennebaum; Simmons & White, Inc.
Chuck Justice; Lawson & Noble
Application Received By:
Date:
/~
o 0" a1 OJ ..8 " en ~ -l ::I ~ >NWI -l -l
! ~ ::l: III -. 0 g. g.
e.....i a 3 i III .. :J C .',
III c-' e. e.
2::!1s -.! III S' oOlQ.en
-! 0" .. .. 0 10 :r r CD -. ~ en
~, f;i:J~~ 0 0- III g, :J ..
0 jlO a. 'T1 ~ .....
CD CD CD cC~-l III ,.,.....
~~~lf!dl 3 3 " c ~ >
! ! :r en :J :J -, S' 0
! 0 0:g.0.'C a. III m iJl" CD .:c !Il 10 iil I...."...)..
a. iil ;,.. a.!:. a. S' ~ C ~
f~~~I~' CO ~ :J
iJl" CD .'".,
......} . ,..",
CD < ill -. , :r '8 ...
0
0<!!ltii:JZ c c
:T . ~g, 0 ~
1~'I::;la-!Il CD .}
_CDs.1Il !
. ~ _. n. 3 Z ~ >'.
cg fir 81 ... I ..,.,.....V....
!! ~~"8 ..
0
a. .... . "..
i Ul [ ~~ ""
III : .....: "'tJ
t'i-'ill~. :J J]
ii1itiio > 2
o m :J -g
g. ill &> S' in m
CD ... -
0.'C ~ i ~ 1...:'.:;.......1..::::...::.... (')
"CD(,) -I
o ..
'C s'i 0' 8, (')
!:.liiiil..g "',:.,::::, 0
a 0 .":"}"':::': s::
cr ~ ill 1/ :,:,:, ~
:J 0
0: I" j "" :c
I\) .....:i en
"en 0
8l';'';'1i III CD
3 CD Z
+~COCD 8 8 ~I (')
... ~~ ...0. ...,.. "......: ;;
~ gc:;. Co)
'N ~ ...,. . ~
. 0 . en en a. I,:; i
~~ ~~ CXl m~ I\) 81
" -0 Ol Z ... ....
~m~~~ > )> ~o~ 8
08 oCj 0 ~ '. 11 OJ
5' I.......:..
ill ill "0 "0 , ~ 1<.'.,:\ Q
0-0 0-0 0 -
0 0 0 z
.. I.:......:,......
II II -I
,...:.:..: .,:.:: 0
Z
Z
8l~0 ~~ l'cl-o -0 -0 cen : .,):\ c
+ I '~ )( III CXl:r OJ:TOJ:r o m :c
~~CD )( III c III c III m III en
"'CD CD =CD=1ll m
01\) ... 8-1\)8-.... ::l:
~ ~ 0'" ~ ~
>, >' s. ' s. .
Ol Ol ~~ ol'cl ...~....l'cl ~ 4'
a. ...0. :u
~ ~ (]I c. o c. 0 c 'CXl ~5~~ m
'Nen :--0 II :J 0 c ~ ~ :CD ~
,,~~~~ ~ii II :J ii :J 3-
8~ ~)( Co)ii ii Co) Co) 81 I",:' p
~ Ol ill 01\) 0 'N 5' 0....0 ....... "..en'
(j)8 oCj > CXl ~ Ol Ol C
"(j) 0 0 0' ~ i
ill "0 , > ..
0-0 0-0 0 0 -0
0 0 , III
II II 0 3
i:f .. .
~ .. ..
... n ..
......
.' .'::, .:'.
>:. ::':..'
8 ~ m + ~i'~
Co ~ .... m
" 8 ~ > Z N+~ N
CD 0 > 0 )> 0 Co)Co)~ 0
iiI (j) 0 CXl....... ....
0 0 , (l) )i'l~.
ill -0 -0 , 0
0 0 0
:::: ,:. .':
/~
,~
.~
!,
;~.
IQ
I
~
~
~.
;(\>
r
I
I
I
I
,
.',
I.
11,1'" .:.'. :'.t.:..~.. '1 III
..~ ,,~'; ,': ," . ': ~. ',~.;.) . .
lco,. ,." "'f .;..
r...:'.... .. .. ,... '. '.~ "~'.'.
1 t.....~~ ..'. .. _,r. w~. 'c:oO ..::a. ~;.',,,
Y' ""Hi _....\..JIl..r !~."'a
" /".1., t, :..;--!t!."t' .
, .... l" ,. .... .... ~
1 ~ '. . :,.', .;';\;1';'. 7.... ..... Ii 1-11 i ~
I. . . ' .'. ." r.iI-.. , I. ! ")
. s'" , I.' ...,., ..'.,'....,..: t I
"r' ~. ., . ~
, '., , .. .... ~'"
I,~ ....: .;. 11E8.' "I i" : ~ut
1-1':1'. I .'~' ;'''IIII~'. .',:,,;': i ! ;.~
I ttf. _. I '.....f~~.. f ." .' ~
, ' . " .....1 I ...
. . : '1 . " 0
;..'" . ". ..,.: '; z
~. I.... ..::; ...1.. .:~: :~).:.. I ..
J . '....1 . " . .
. . "... .... ~.
. ..' '. .' ..... I
. .:." . :t......,. .' .;'
. " . . , . ,~.... -. . ..
Jf". ~, .,.,..:.....~..'.~.l..;'...,
I ..... . .~l'.~ :.."...:s:;...\~,.. ,....:....
~
. sal
J I
· .. · I .. .. , "1 '6 f'
unnl Ii, !!I il"I!!1 ml ~ I,Q111 ! ;
t!!~!!i ! Iii il i!1 Hli t !;it!~l'lii II.!
bll'lll'l II., '1 !~! i ii; ! ::!ll~ " .1; I ;~
II P 11,111' "1 ,t.!: 1"1',
i III I ",,','Ii i I!! ~
I .1 II, I .1I.t. '. · .,
dil In It! II I P q
@I
'UD' .
'1111 i I IS fi el' "111 a I a mint !5 I.IR UI',III;umll 10
'11'.'1' I Ii I' I II !t' filiI! J'. 'I,IIII! ,l,ht"il ~
I,'l II I n I : II b ! 111 r. :!I II qll, :~I~1I ·
:! .; I il !II! . q ili I II
'" I I' . . - 11.1 .. : .' q II ,., ..._u._. .
I I I ., ...... ;; ... I ,. 'I ........... ·
I' · · · ',,' · · ., I U ...........,
"1 Ii! Ii! hi' U"II :
,... 1111 d
I I I 'I I . nil t C !::::::!:::! I
It. I I . · · ... ......-. ·
II ;
I
....n 1111...
---
/6
.
'I!;;~~
J~ "~n
ii~l'
1'1-
...
".' .",
I
c....;!
.IEa
Iii.
I
. .
t -l!)' is: . ~ ..,............_-_.....~;:-.::~~:,~~~;.-:0:;~;;.7.~;;~._--........
. t = . ., ~.a..a:s.a '-',
I' 'n ......--....-==--.0:,.... 'V ....~.. . ....
~ ~~ ".' .' ....
'r"." .. r' ': .' . . . '.' "'\
" \
I 'l \
I ,... . "
. . ,
I' .: 4. ' \".
, J'
I · I . , \
I ~ ", ;
It..
, 11" ~.(.
I ' . ,~ .
~ . ; . ". ,
I I ;1. ,.! ..,
I' I . " s'.1
I I r .).; IPro "
, I . "r .~. ., .'
I I . , ' ,. \ ," :.. , ~; d
.......... .......~.. _..rr,.....~~~.. __ . ..t..;:;.....~~.._.
_ __:1_':""_ ' ,- "'''''r- . ,. ;--~'.,r. r... ~ji;'~;eJ... /. - "..... .'. )
.__ . . . - -- ~ -. - -- --.:..:...:....J.l'RlllIe. .1'I..n 'w ~.. .__
. .------~.11,r ~.::~.._-- .0: o--~-_
I D 'l.itl' t 'I' M' ~,~ct'I:UI ACRES P.U.Q.
Jl:.1 " 11. I ,. o'M'OlleuCH. ,LORIDA
'.. "T"-- ... . t ,
" .~..... r t t .'. 'UI' ".""0. _"."1. ,orono. 11&(...,.00101
il
~ r t>.
I
I
. ..". I
", I' - -.. .... - .--:---
.11' I 'Iii ~1111111
~
\J
\')
U\
~
o
3-
~
t
7"
~
(J
4
o
r\--
<.1
()
~
~
i i .~n~
. \.iU~
; ;Hi
. .WI
! fi;~t
l Hii:
i t~'
1 ..a:
1 Hii:
\ ;\\.~
,,17, ! W\
~ v""
Wi:;
_ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _~_ _ " II m~ '" I \\,'"
W~T~~':~=~~-=: ill~il \\ 1111 \.\\ \i\\\' iil\\\\ ,\\.i\\
, \~ "i I ~ h'! .. \"\ l~! \n ii' Ii\'! IUIII
\ \ .\\ ',r i r \ it ...' ,il '1' ", i" ,1\
\ J. la\~ \ \. I in \\\ \- \ \ '\ i
, \ r\ --l\ \~ iil\ l\ \ ~'ij im i\ \\ ~ ! II linn !i
"\.. . . ~ \ \ i\ii\~ h "
~~\ '_"0 \ V i\' \\ '\' \ \ ':::. \ \\ \ i\\\\\iI\il\ ie' it
~"t .. 0 4 I. ' ..., .. i.""""'" ,.
~. . \ \ . i ., '1 , ......".". " w
~I~ \' i\ ~ ~ \ ~~ \ . \ 'I~' . \i :...:....:.. ., ~
!. l-~ " · "
~I II l \! ~ i '. \11' lilll\" rill'! II' ""Il i\i IIIiI 1\ ~
~, 1 \ . qpa\ \\ -l\i ~l\ ll' i' \\~\\ l ii\ ' Ii \i\ t\n' gg
\\,\,~~.\\,'l \- ~~~ ~-'iI .-:......\1, \ \ \ .1 !. ,I ;1\ tlll!\ \\ III I '\' I II. I,'j\ U
, :\ \ \\ \\ i\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \i \\~ \ \i\ \\\\\.\ \~ \,'\\ \\
,_ \,\\ \'\ \ i\\ 11\ \\i \\, \l\\ \ \\\ \1\;1 \ \\ iii\ l\.
11 \" ' ' \"' \0 i' \ I'i " i'\, 11" UI ! (! ,I
~~l I, ~ 85 ill' It\ '\\\\ \\ 1'\'\ jl qi ,
p~\ \ ~ \ N;Q ~l , \ \\i '\ \~\ ~l ,l 1\ i 91
~ I -6 18" I II ,1\ I Ii. . 11\ II i II \II!
,~ ~ 1 Q w : ,~.'
_ 0 ' '\
," "'- -~.."...... """~ - . -'- ~-
~ __ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_ .=__ _0
! ~
d
\ :
~ \
! .
\ ;
I'
\
,
,
.
i
..\ \
,,., ,
\ \
\ 1 .
\~~\'\1
q
\ ~l~
'I'
ill
\ ~\
'i:)
\ i:),
"
\ 1: I
\~\
i\:;
, ~~i A'- -'~~ r------=O \ "
. , ' ,0,---"'-----' cC,--" ,'''t:::]- . ~- - MF---- - --r~ -
'" .' '"' ' .. ' -- - --.-,
'ii,!\ '., \,;::-.,/h Jill l ~~ ~ ~ \\\\l\;i~\~; \ \.
\,;~l'\~\\:' \ H ~ ~ \,i ~ . - - --- ~~~ ~\\\\n\u i 1.. I
\ ,4; \ ,., \ \~ . % ~~\ ~ ~ \ .!h ~!! \ ,
, ' '" . ~ I., ,-' ~ j · '
I ~ )' ~liCl - ~
1\1\ \ i (', ~, 'L' I .. ':..... \\ I
;'\!~ \ ' , ' ,,_,---'::.:.:.:d. .. .' - w '
~ ., ~. '''l' ", ~------...;----" ---~, .. ~o 0 -
, . ., ......,.. _..... j;i · !
I '\ \ .'t(Y ~ -3"':'''''~''' ~~1lI':
\' \\ \ ~fg i ~ :; - i\ , \ ~,
\ \ \ j;.~: l .~ · "0 .. \ \ ,- ~
\ Ii UO 1"1 i } ~9 ~ g U' ~ oPEll-"EI~
\ ., ., 0 .. .-.-
\ \ tl .~ 1'1 [' 'l 0 ., i\ \1, \~':~~T~'"
II ',\ \. ~~ ~: l ':;;;<--- ~::;.~_~r~::1i 'I \jI\\! ~~~
l o. : _-= _ ~ 0 ~ ; I" , "Ii .":;
, J'"' 0::-- ~ "u::; r .~~ :- :-.'" - o~.,':~- = d-=--' !IIM\'\ t. i '"
. __ ~__ _ ___ _ I - -. --I 'I~_ _."''''''~''''' -'-~-==-' ~.~)l - ~.:=.~ -=. .
.~_ _ ___ " , ,~'T'- ~ -- - ' - ~
7- - - - - ~u - i~l[\i~ -un-r- ....-- __'-~;f;~f-~---~i~- -~";;~f\':'''c,:;;;;~- - ~
~;: ~~." 'i.14 ~" ,'" ' ," "", >>c, ..\
, ... ...... _" .0> ... w" -"..
., ," ,'! Ie"" : .1' -, . ,,~.
. ." ~ 'I' : r " " c"
\
t
'c.l. ~ lUU~---- O'\lL .11< Vl~b
n.t. u.~, ~~.' . - "J31"\~' ,...'" B tN' pun
~r\~"\Lilrozo\:--:-:- ;:im....~.- -
\~~::t~;.\:ii cC~'=:: '''~X~,,~~"'''' ur,enes
''',' ','" _ ___ MASTI.:l{ 1'1.\N C!'
Kilday '" AISOclal..
lonostope ,..rcni.tecJS, 'Planners
l551 forum place
Sui'~ 100p.
West Pal"'" k:leOc\'!, florida 3~40'
(401) 669- 5522 .fod.07) 669-
,.- j"
. n 111' 11 ~
H ,Ill ,\ !! t:. t
'I IJI~'
!i! \ h " ,l I
. ~ I I1III "
" ~I " . II
I ,1 II -
. I \i~
o:;Oiii;'U \~
I i
j \\ n \ ,: -~ \
' db! ~ i\~
H H \ U It
IUi
. '.1 \\
o . . . . , ~ I'
, \~ U
0""'1.\11
u ·
. n t
......1 t \
~
i
1 P Jln
L I" II'
till \
I \ H \ I \i
};' d ~
I II '
l\
II
.
t~~l"""" U
~_~1" 2\
~___tl
_ _ - -0;:0 r;iLlfIe'(~ - ~
~ _(~ ;.. /'~ .....~- '.-'i,
I\W~-V~~ ~l-A':m
\1\ t~:~, '~G!l
!t~ ' ~ '1" .41\.1\~ · 1\ r~ ~ 'i%~
2h ~ I r.Jl.'----' ~ I 15il'6 ~~...
;Sill!~;:: ~ ;:=->; II ~\; ~ ,,~~
: lli~~' '= I ~ ." ~ ;:=: --. ~
;' ::-' · \i; ~ ~ .~ ~i' . ~ \' II
!\I !I~" ' 8 i~I.S ~~ ~~'\ \\ i\ \\\\\\\'\ \" "Iill;,!' \\\\1,\\\\ \\11\ \ II PH
il'l' ;:::: ~ \ '. ~ Ii-~~"~ \1, \1 \\,I,ili\ .' \,! ( n1111\1 "11 1\ n t 1\
i I;'" Ed I \~ ,~~h~ I, jl bit \!I \II .\ Iii '1\'11 .; "i PI' II
\ \i ;..~ I ~~: ~i ' ~, ~ro':~; ~i \ \\ 't\\\ ~\I iI" U \'l\\ l\\\ \ \ i \ '\1' ,I \ \
_ _, ;:=;0 ~ _ "t \.. (- I ~ 't, rll I ' . \ I
~('I ~;::, i ~ i ~'6~ \ ,,' ~ I \ Ii: '\iU\ \i \. \l ; ~ I \ ',l \ i
c ;=-;; h t 't I I. , I I I . ,. l I I I - - 0 .,
\'; \ ~ ~ ~ I.!-' I'" II \' Ii tl,;i;~ \" ,~. E
\ 1m' · 'III' I I \1 I' ' I, , · I ,II · I
\ ; ~.: \ -:.1\'\1'1"(<1['\('\ "'i'n I~~I I < ~
., !.Q; ~,~ D'-lYLHtl ~' -'- ," \ " .~
\" ',;" ' _' _ __ , ""',.,\ o~ .~
\ i\ y'S. 'iI" '~'\l'll;\\'~ . ~ ,. ~i 3~'
1 T . ""'3 · ~.:
1~1~~oh\P~'0:' ~.\ \l~ ;\ III!~~\
\ \' ULQ' ""'"' '~ I' \ ~ l~~, ~~
I~ h Q ~ -'- i I i \ '\ I i
I'" ,7:'l~i -'- ___' ' I 1
l~ 0.>' ',,' · b;(0)' - - -,._~~ - J.-- ~' ~- .' --\-~ T.-M
\ ~' \ ,c~ /' -- ~1~ I~ -:' ,\ J. , " . .~,I;,,,I.U. ,. J, Jh.~.~.~;~;I~.\\",~.1 Y.1(5 $. J
\ ~ rrr1 r r-;t ~"rt: ~~'~ ,- ,. -- - ,~:\
\ \ tffi~ ~ ~{ ': .!\~ "...~ !jI"li''rh~'1l'\'~' ~ ,'~'~'~'~'n"i\''-=:- ~\'I
4\ ~J ~:-Gt Il/\ ~~'lvr-------------' ~ " Il - ,..- ~, ~\l\I~
, ',. ' , 1..9' .' ". I ~ . ~'1 ~ · ,
\ ! i~ . ~ ~ \ '. \'"S ~~ \. ,~__:::-(,., \ 2~ ~-} ~ tl ~5 ;:::5 I\- ~~\ \
.",,",, ~ " .~"..". ~I .. Ii r. .,~ ~ ,.,. -' I
\ t I~I ~i ;d:::l / e 'l '\~'" I . ltl \(ali~>\;" 1 n rIDtif<::l ~ 1Il ~ \r L " .
\ \Ii ~ "b I 1"\"". . > '1>.\ ~"" ' I I II' ~C1J ~ITPI WUJ14' ~ ~ I ~ '\'
!~, . I" .,""", ""~ ,~~ '. >=. ('r:
\ _!~ ~ ir~/' ,II, ~~~\~l,j~'\ ~ 1iM'/ ..- T- ~. ~ jl~1 H
\\,~ ,,' "b: ~ " a \ ";. '". ,L ,?:,:",,,J · 1'1\ ,~-~"~ .~" . - -.....:: ~~;..
," , c= 'I~.\ . \,' ," 0~"-"'u---'-/ ~ - -'. ";-~'\~.~
'\ ~, . 11~1 ji""~ ':-.- -- · ,~\ 'l
\ ~,'7 """-- , y:'--:; ( " ~ ' II
, ,"
'I, ~ ~ ~ . ~ill '< ' .- -- ,'~\ ~~~rJ\\I\\.:
~ \ ~ I m ~ · 'B'S 1I~ .. t · :;1 Q l ~ tr;l~~ 0\ " .I_"\.Ji
\ ~, ,'" {} ,I~I ~ ,; , -- -- ~ --"- . ~,~ iddE1 ...:::-:~ 1\
I' ,,,'/ ,'" _ , . .",,' F " Ir,- , ,," · I '''.:II -II' hlY!J.:: I - I-- -- -' :.---.\\1
t '\ vv"t71 .\\-11: . :\\ '\Q' :; f ~l ~ n' , ~~ /, <b : r------ (\ ~\Ui..
\ ~__ r .' 11'1 ~.7. EG1X1G8tfif:if~if;1B\.~ ' !! ii " Ii \ I~
~f; J U - - - .:lbJJ:JWbL\-~- " \s ~ n 1 I'I!
I . '" ' I r' \ I ~"'tl ~M. I I I '"
, I' '~ ' , I '.. 1 i I li II: \'\ i
I ~ 0 II ,i l ,,,. I · \' \, : ,:
\-1'= _ -::.- _ _ = = ~' '~ ___ _ -- - d; ~;!rl{~--~l__-__L~: I
__ _' __ ~ ___:.~ _~__, '~i" __ ,_~ =-.,. _' =-.:'-::.=. -- =- ~"..-~.,. 'I'-~~ ~-- -' I
----< __ __ _ __ __ _" __ ...,."'... "",,___ .~,_...o....- C -- .-.
.~ ~~il Ulii 1 ~0r-'" - iti( - - -:- - - ij~~'l '. 00 r' 1,--
,. . '. ...."". .... : k"'" ij
i~ ~Ii'h ~l!"'C ;,,\i! ' ;, h t :-~ t
uj i V\ i~ ~ : i ~ tn
~
\)
~
\J\
~
Q
X
~
~
r
~
~
t
-
\1
l'
cf
~
~
"---
~ ~ EO YlTfON HURS1BRJffiS P.U.lD'.
~ MlASTlER SmE PLAN
(>I'lA"! . 1 r /'~'
i ~ i "I~' ( . I
i "" ,\
I g <; "
'-S1Q1)lgJl1913' i'
sm """"'''''''
'-""'""^"' .....0lITfCI11RB
"D'IS5r.A l.,AHl\' eoYNTON '&Ql. FL )\A61
~(1'I'u'r" ...."
/7
ROYlITON BEAOl. FLORIDA
G' \J' ~
n tP tP
r'- 0 0
_('1' _'.t.~ _'.t.~
t'lti t'lo:;$ t'lo
(1)~ (1)" ("t (1)' ('1'
1'1 0 1'1 0
1'1(fl oG':;$ 00'1:;$
0(;) r-' ';J:l' t" r-' t"
r-'r-'
0(1) o ~ 0 I>>
('1':;$ ('1' 'F
~ (1) (fl (1)
(fl - (fl
- - (fl
..
tt
o
...
"
"
'"
'"
..
...
OS
"
\I:
Vl
~
~
('1'
("t
r'"
~
10
r-'
~
(1)
"""
CO
\I:
:11.
"""
('J
o
0
~
C """
('1'
('1' IJI
r'"
~
10
r-'
~
(1)
\I:
CO
Vl
~
CO
('J
o
"""
o
o
"""
\J'
\I:
';:t.
(1)
_I>>
::p...
~~
tIl
\-,h
o
('1'''Cl
till>>
_1'1
o
CO
\-'"
';:t.
('J """ "Cl
t" r'
~ "Cl~
1'1 r-'1'1
CO 1>>(1)
~ ("t~
0 0
'.t. (1) 1-"'(1)
0 t'" -(;)
~
ts:1 ~ t'l1'1
(1)0
1""\<
~ tn o (t)
';:S' \-'"
(1) 0
1'1 ('1'
(1) (fl
I>> -
1'1
0
t't< ('J -
N
I>> 0 0 ~
\-'" ~ -
\-'" """
I-"'
\-'" \J' \J'
0
('1'
tIl -.1
~ IJI 0
C
("t -.1
"""
I>> \J' \J'
('J
0
Vol
N
o
*
*
- -
ts:1 ts:1
~ ~
t't< t't<
0 0
1'1 1'1
0 0
(1) (1)
p... p...
CO CO
~ -
--- -
('J ('J
0 0
::
\J' IJ'I
0 0
,.
*
CO
o
I-"'
\J'
N
o
';:t.
r""
:;$
r'"
~
~
tP
~
r'"
\-'"
po
""'"
:;$
10
tSl
CO
to
I>>
1""\
I>>
("t
""'"
o
~
I-"'
IJI
o
,.
"""
o
(fl
CO
(t)
"Cl
ll'
t'3
o
~
('1'
CO
';:t.
CO
~
o
~
\.0
~
,
N
\.0
IJ'I
t't<
o
1""\
(t)
:a
r-'
I>>
~
I>>
("t
""'"
o
~
t't<
o
o
("t
1-
r'"
~
t"
~
(1)
';:t.
I>>
r'"
~
("t
(1)
~
~
o
(1)
ts:1
l>>
tIl
(t)
~
(1)
~
('1'
co
\I:
:11.
,.
:11.
co
-
N ~ro
0 0
_0
';dt"
Vl CO -
tSl
- ts:1
- ~
CO CO tSl 0)
~ - --- t
~
-
CO CO tSl
~ ---
*
*
N ('J -
0 0 ~
~ -
~
- 1;t.tSl
Vol CO ';d n~
- btEl
-.1 ~~
-
IJI 0 tSl ~
---
-.1
""" -
IJI IJI tSl
-
I-"'
o
o
I-"'
\J'
CO
,.
:11.
IJI 0'1 IJI
\J' ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 0
G' \J' \J' Vl 0 0
Vl 0 0 \.0 0 0
-1 0 0
tIl tn tIl
(fl (fl tn .p, .p, .p,
.p, .p, .p,
t't< t't< l"t.
'"'" t't< '"'" ('1' ("t rt
('1' ('1' rt
IJI 0'1 IJI
IJI IJI IJI ~ 0 0
IJI 0 0
" Vl 0 0
0 0 0 1..0 0 0
0 0 0
11
o
\-I
~
14
."
C.
o
tSl
ts:1
~
h
~
~
t"
~
tSl
\-I
t'3
tEl
tSl
~
ts:1
~
~ tEl
~ \I
tSl~
~ca
tEl';d
o~
\b14
~~~
aIDO
~ ';d
~ ~
~
t'"
~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-275 WDC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
september 19, 1994
Master Plan Modifications
Boynton Nurseries PUD
Lawrence Rd
We have no objections at this time.
023
~l;,/z'
~ . ~~~'fr'
D. C vanaugh, FPO \
Beach Fire Dept.
William
Boynton
.....
.,~~"..........
"'~'''"1IlflIl''''';'
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 94-301
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning and Zon'
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Utilities Director
DATE:
September 15, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nursery PUD. Master Plan Modification - 2nd Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following
comments:
1. An 811 water main exists on Old Military Trail approximately
1000' north of this project's northwest property corner. Extension
of an interconnecting water main from POD A to this existing main
will be required when the infrastructure for POD A is built.
This looping of the main is required to maintain appropriate
chlorine residuals within POD A, which would otherwise be a
dead-end system for the forseeable future. The interconnecting
main must therefore be shown on the Master Plan. (Sec. 26-12,
26-16(a) City Code; Sec. 9(20) ECRII).
2. All other Utility concerns will be addressed at time of Health
Department Applications to construct water and sanitary sewer
systems.
It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor
at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
/bks
Attachment
cc: Clyde "Skip" Milar
Peter Mazzella(V
Mark Law
File
SIP , I> lqQ1
rn
~~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-289
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
William Hukill, P.E. QJ(.A~~.
City Engineer ~.
FROM:
DATE:
September 16, 1994
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
RE:
We have no additional comments beyond those contained in our two
August 19, 1994 memos (94-254 & 94-255) and the August 23, 1994
memo (94-263) except for the attached Finizio memo (94-288).
WVH/ck
C:BNURSERY.P&Z
c: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
ill
02.f
rnoomnwm
~ \.") I f- \~~ISJ3
ill
\
",
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-210
September 8, 1994
FROM:
Tambri Heyden
Planning &jpting Director
Don Jaeger
Building 0 'cial
Al Newbold
Deputy Building Official
TO:
THRU:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD (2nd REVIEW)
LAWRENCE ROAD & LWDD, L-21 CANAL
The Building Department has reviewed the plans and documents
submitted for the above referenced project and has no comments.
We recommend that this project be forwarded through the approval
process.
~Jdf/~
Al Newbold:- ",'
AN : bh
-.
~ ~ ~ ~
~
SlP \ ,:.-
, '
. I. ,)
NURSERY
02-1
,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-288
TO: William Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
FROM: vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: September 16, 1994
RE: Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D.
Second Submission of Master Plan Modification
Kilday & Associates TRC FOllow-up Letter dated 9/2/94
1. Reference Engineering Department Memo No. 94-255, dated August
19, 1994 wherein I suggest that driveway width depicted on
plans be widened from 15' to 18' to allow for the parking of
two motor vehicles in each driveway, has resulted in an
objection from Kilday & Associates (see page #6 - Kilday's
letter dated 9/2/94), however, I still recommend that the City
Commission compel the applicant to perform the suggested
modification as based upon my observations of P.D.D.s with
only one driveway over the past eight years, I have determined
that from a functional standpoint a single car garage with one
15' wide driveway, simply does not work. Inevitably, the
garages are utilized either for storage or are converted into
rooms with the resultant effect being that second motor
vehicles are parked in the roadway or along grassed areas.
This has been a major on-going problem for most Condominium
Associations and major Homeowner Associations, therefore I
believe that a 3' wide increase in driveway width is "no big
deal" when compared to the scope and nature of the problems
that will arise based upon the aforementioned scenario.
2. I am deeply concerned regarding the unprotected lakes along
Lawrence Road immediately in front of Citrus Park Blvd. and
the Citrus Cove Elementary School site. In my opinion, the
Master Plan should be revised to place a notation stating that
FOOT approved guardrails will be installed along the east side
of the subject lakes in accordance with Appendix C,
Subdivision and Platting Regulations, Section 3, Design,
wherein this code states that "where.. .lakes. . . are adjacent to
or exist upon the property to be subdivided, they shall...be
so designed and protected that they do not represent a hazard
to life and safety.".
3. The master plan should be modified to provide for sidewalks on
both sides of the internal roads as required by City code,
including the installation of handicap sidewalk connections at
all intersections including the pedestrian striping of the
proposed bike path thru the collector road points of
intersection at Lawrence Road.
elf{
Engineering Dept. Memo No. 94-288
Re: Boynton Nurseries
September 16, 1994
Page #2
4. The bicycle path referenced in the general notes on page #1 of
the master plan should be depicted on the plan and be
constructed, or if existing, constructed and/or repaired
concurrent with the development of this site.
5. I believe that deceleration lanes should be constructed along
Lawrence Road to facilitate vehicular movements into the
subdivision. Additionally, I have discussed this matter with
Mr. Andy Hertel of Palm Beach County Traffic Division and have
been advised that he has not yet received a copy of this
master plan which will impact Lawrence Road (a County rights-
of-way) and therefore the applicant shall, as a condition of
approval submit a copy of the subject plan to Mr. Hertel and
agree to comply with County comments (if any) prior to City
Board approval.
VAF/ck
C:BOYNNURS.COM
027
MEMORANDUH
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
Michael E. Ha~e~
Zoning and Site ~opment Administrator
September 29, 1994
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Boynton Nurseries PUD 2nd Review Master Plan
Modification of 400 units to 374 units, change in type of
units form 162 single-family units on 6,000 square feet
lots and 238 multi-family units to 231 "Z" lot units on
4,000 square feet lots and 143 zero lot line units on
5,000 square feet lots, including other changes
identified on the plans and letter describing the
requested changes.
File No. MPMD 94-004
) ]/". "
, , .).
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the second
review of the above-referenced requested Master Plan Modification.
1. On the master plan drawing add a general note indicating each
residential dwelling unit shall have two (2) nine (9) feet
wide by eighteen (18) feet long parking spaces.
.'~
, 2.'
Add to the master plan drawing the phase
corresponding notes that reflect compliance
conditions of the original traffic analysis.
line
with
~-"
~.) Change the setback along the south property line to depict no
less than 25 feet to correspond with the setback dimension
previously approved by commission. If the proposed setback is
approved, clarify the difference between the 5 foot setback
and the 10 foot shown on the plans.
4. On the dedicated park property show a dimension of 25 feet to
the abutting property lines.
5. Indicate on the typical screen enclosure setback notes and
drawings whether or not they apply to the "Z" lots. If they
do, add to the drawings a typical II Z" lot screen enclosure
setback drawing. See recommendation number 16d and 16e.
6. Below each typical setback drawing identify the lot numbers
that they represent.
7. Since it is known that if construction to the buildable area
for each lot would exceed the maximum allowed floor area for
the project, provide on each building permit drawing, area
computations and tabulations that track the disbursement of
the maximum allowed floor area.
8. Provide verification that the City Attorney has approved the
ownership documents regarding unified control of the
property/project.
9. The 1990 rezoning was approved subject to the conditions in
the attached traffic analyses prepared by Walter H. Keller Jr.
dated February 5, 1990 and May 3, 1990. The traffic
statement submitted with this request does not mention the
condi tions. Provide verification from Palm Beach County
Traffic Division and the project traffic engineer (Simmons &
White, Inc.) that the conditions listed in the analyses are no
longer applicable.
<.13
~,
','
It
, ,
./
and
the
Page 2
Boynton Nurseries Comments
Master Plan Modification - 2nd review
10. With respect to condition 9 above, if any of the road
improvements referenced in the 1990 Walter Keller Jr. traffic
analyses are still required, the issuance of building permits
for the residential dwelling units will be contingent upon the
assurance of the improvements in the County's five year
Transportation Improvement Program or posting of surety for
developer commitments, rather than being contingent upon the
letting of contracts for the required roadway improvements.
11. The private recreation facilities shall be bonded with
approval of the first plat and completed within 21 months of
approval of the first plat.
\~/ 12
c) .
As was required of Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove, southbound
right turn lanes shall be constructed at both project
entrances.
.~
13. At both entrances show and construct, a northbound left turn
lane on Lawrence Road into the site) and separate eastbound
left turn and through/right turn lane exiting the site to
Lawrence Road.
, 14. A posting of a bond for 50% of the cost of the pedestrian
signalization for Lawrence Road shall be submitted with the
plat documents. tH\C"J>':'I,.I,,' _."j:" ,
RECOMMENDATIONS:
~:~)
To ensure that the perimeter landscape buffer material,
located on the individual platted lots, remains in a well-
maintained state, create and show on the drawings a landscape
tract (minimum width 15 feet) around the perimeter of the
proj ect. The tract, landscape material, and maintenance
thereof shall be dedicated to the home owners' association.
To be consistent with the majority of the other planned unit
developments located in the City, the following lot sizes and
setbacks shall be established for the project:
16.
o
b.
c.
Modify your plans to show fifty (50) feet wide lot and
ten (10) feet building separation as the minimum lot
width and minimum distance between buildings for all "z"
lots. The minimum lot area shall be no less than 4,500
square feet.
To maintain frontage, show on the plan a minimum of 15
feet front building setback from both street frontage for
the following lots located in Parcel B: 81, 99 and 116.
Indicate on the plan the building setback for corner lots
shall match the fifteen (15) feet front building setback
on both street frontages, rather than 13.5 feet.
The building rear setback for all lots shall be no less
than fifteen (15) feet, except that when the rear
property line of a lot abuts a lake maintenance
tract/easement, preservation area, landscape tract,
and/or recreation area, the rear setback may be reduced
to ten (10) feet, ie; the rear setback for lots backing
up to internals roads would become fifteen (15) feet,
rather than ten (10) feet.
Jj
Page 3
Boynton Nurseries Comments
Master Plan Modification - 2nd review
d.
e.
(0
18.
The side setback for all "Z" lot screen enclosures shall be
established as the width of the rear of the building. The
width of the rear of the building is taken as the widest part
of the building behind the five (5) foot "Z" offset, so as to
provide a minimum five (5) foot wide visual opening between
structures when viewed from the street. Setbacks for screen
enclosures on corner lots shall match the fifteen (15) feet
front bUilding setback, rather than 13.5 feet.
The rear setback for pools and screen enclosures for all lots
shall be no less than eight (8) feet, rather than five (5)
feet except that when the rear property line of a lot abuts a
lake maintenance tract/easement, preservation area, landscape
tract, and/or recreation area, the rear setback may be reduced
to five (5) feet, rather than zero feet.
It is further recommended that the two (2) story homes located
on the "Z" lots be I imi ted to a minimum distance in any
direction of 160 feet between the lot lines of any two story
home.
Dedication to the city for public park purposes of 2.84 acres
as originally approved by the City Commission, rather than 2.5
acres, is proposed. In addition to this public park
dedication, the cash value of .526 acres of land would have to
be paid at time of platting.
"")
fer
. ..&,)
a:boynnurlS.2nct
2
J6
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM '94-342
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dir^~tJr
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent J1V-
Master Plan Modification: Boynton Nurseries PUD
Second Review
TO:
RE:
DATE:
September 14, 1994
The Recreation & Park Department
MasterPlan for Boynton Nurseries PUD.
submitted:
has reviewed the amended
The following information is
1. Recreation & Park Memo #94-320 remains in effect.
2. Plan indicates the below listed elements:
A. Children's Play Area
B. Pool
C. Clubhouse
D. Tennis Courts
E. Basketball Court
3. Developers are aware that, based on one-half credit for
private recreation and the provision of 2.5 acres of land for
public recreation, they will still owe .884 acres of
recreation dedication fee in lieu of land.
4.
Private recreation facilities and equipment provided must be
of commercial grade and of sufficient size and scope needed to
provide for the recreation needs of the residents of the
subdivision.
JW:ad
rn
-;fri .~.~,~..
.30
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-340
TO:
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist /~~~
Boynton Nurseries PUD - Second Review
RE:
DATE:
September 14, 1994
The applicant should show the following items at the preliminary
plat stage:
1. All existing desirable trees located outside the preserve area
should be quantified.
2. The existing desirable trees which are located in "greenspace"
areas should be shown to be preserved, not relocated or
replaced.
3. The existing perimeter desirable trees should be cleared of
exotic Florida Holly and underplanted with relocated saw
palmetto.
4. All undesirable trees should be removed from the entire site.
KH:ad
\VI rn
m
m
SEP I 6 1993
j;L
VIA:
Charles C. Frederick, Director Recreation & Park
John Wildner, Superintendent of Parks W
Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D. - Amended MZter Plan
<2(./
r-............
,i"
f) {/~~ .t
~W,J (I' r U
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-320
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
August 26, 1994
-------------------------------------------
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the Master Plan (amended) for the Boynton
Nurseries P.U.D. The following infonnation is submitted:
I. Park Land Dedication Requirement
376 single family units @ .018 acres each = 6.768 acres
2. Credit For Private Open Space
A. The Park Land Dedication Ordinance provides for up to 112 credit for private open
space if it provides a minimwn of five (5) local park basic requirements. The
developer has indicated he intends to apply for this credit. Before credit is given, the
developer must indicate details regarding type. number, size, and location of the
private recreation facilities (per sub-division code, section 8).
B. Assuming half credit for private recreation facilities provided. (6.768 divided by 2),
the developer is required to provide 3.384 acres.
3. Location
The amended master plan shows that the 2.5 acres to be dedicated be located in the northeast
corner of the development, adjacent to Lawrence Road and abutting the Knollwood Grove
property to the north.
This location will allow for eventual consolidation of public park property to be dedicated
from the Knollwood Grove property if it is annexed and developed for residential use.
These combined properties would ultimately provide a neighborhood park of approximately
five acres which will comply with the level of service standards required in the parks and
recreation element of the comprehensive plan.
The remaining .884 acres required must be paid in cash at the time of plattin
WI rn (
At K", ? {) !flll ,n
'" PlANNING AND
ON\NG DEPT.
JW:bjm
S/
}J ,_ f.,.y~(;,.__
V''I ,.
1'.) 'y-':-
~ ", I
\I'
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-263
TO:
Mike Haag
.zon'ng/Site Administrator
. . Hukill, P.E.
Engineer
August 23, 1994
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
In addition to our comments contained in the August 19, 1994 memo
to you (and attachment), we offer the following:
1. Developer to provide impact statement from Palm Beach County
School Board.
2. Developer to comply with March 1, 1990 comments;
a. Provide established centerline elevations for all adjacent
streets and rights-of-way.
b. Indicate the proposed layout of the lots and blocks.
c. Indicate on plans utilities such as telephone, power,
water, sewer, gas, etc. on or adjacent to the tract
including a statement on plans, that all utilities are
available and have been coordinated with all required
utilities. Section 4.C.17.
3. Developer provide commitment for perpetual maintenance and
irrigation of public rights-of-way.
WVH/ck
C:BNURSERY.PUD
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
027
.
-
. _ ,.-. ." __,,,Vy,>-. .
I
) . , ' .
." ""
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-254
FROM:
Mike Haag
~on'ng/Site Administrator
. 'am Hukill, P.E.
. ngineer
August 19, 1994
TO:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
We have reviewed subject documents with respect to those items
included in your memo of August 16, 1994, Part I, Section A,
Description and offer the following comments:
1. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7, Par. 7.1 of Land
Development Regulations, Part III, including, but not limited
to, deeds, easements or other instruments recorded in public
record.
2. Loop Road is a collector road by both Palm Beach County and
Florida D.O.T. standards (see F.S. 334.03(4). Required R.O.W.
is 80' (see Boynton Beach Code, Appendix C, Art. X., Sect. 10.
Par. B). It will be a public road.
3. Dedicate R.O.W. (public) for access road to adjacent property.
4. Provide drainage calculations.
5. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage
plan complies with all City codes & standards (see Chap. 5,
Art. X & Appendix C).
6. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless adequate documentation
is presented to support something different.
7. Road serving Pods A, D and the recreation area appears to
exceed the maximum permitted ADT's (1500) and therefore is a
collector to a point past Pod D requiring an 80' R.O.W to that
point.
8. Provide Traffic Impact Statement.
Approval of the master plan modifications by the Office of the City
Engineer is subject to satisfaction of these conditions and
consideration of the recommendation cited by Mr. Finizio on the
attached list.
WVH!ck
C:BNURSERY.COM
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
attachment: V. Finizio recommendations
026
I 1 I
M'" ,...<...0 ". ,...1 ~.. .'
I
ENGINEERING DEPARTMEH~ MEMORANDUM NO. 94-255
TO:
william Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
FROM:
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
August 19, 1994
Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. - Master Plan Modification
DATE:
RE:
I would suggest that the driveway widths depicted on plan
attachments (15' wide) be widened to 18' to allow for the parking
of two motor vehicles in each driveway. If this suggestion is
adopted by the City Commission, it would abate the potential for
numerous motor vehicles parking along the roadway and on grassed
areas within this subdivision.
VAF/ck
C:BNURSERY.VAF
....2(c,
C-C/ To \3..\~u\.J....,-l... \h~\~
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of Professional Standards
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Lt. James Cumming~
11 January 1995
Nautica Development
TRC MEMO # 95-0111
'-.--
Upon returning from vacation, I received the attached memo from Lt. Yannuzzi indicating that
there was unresolved discussion at a TRC meeting regarding the egress at the Nautica
Development, onto Lawrence Road.
It is my opinion that traffic leaving the proposed site do so by way of two lanes, which are clearly
indicated on the plans provided. The left turn lane should be for only that purpose, while the right
lane should act as both a right turn lane and a through traffic lane. This will provide the most
efficient traffic flow, while also complying with DOT standards regarding intersections.
ill ffi@~n\IJ~ ~1
I) ,
L.
JAN J ~ Igq~ "
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
From:
Tambri Heyden, Director of Planning
Lt. James Cummings
Lt. Chris Yannuzzi
To:
cc:
Dat
December 29, 1994
Subje
TR.C./Nautica Development
On Tuesday, December 27, 1 994 I substituted for Lt. Cummings as the Police
Department's representative at the T R.C. meeting. The Nautica Development was
discussed and an issue was raised with regard to traffic flow involving the two
entrance/exits at Lawrence Road of this site. It appears that a traffic study was done,
prior to the installation of a traffic signal at Citrus Cove Elementary, and that the
study made some recommendations regarding designated turn lanes for those vehicles
exiting the development.
However, at this meeting, the developer requested that the left turn & thru lanes be
combined and a designated right-turn lane be created. Previous discussions
apparently indicated the opposite should take place, namely the right turn & thru
lanes should be combined and there should be a designated left-turn lane.
Due to the confusion, I will refer this matter to Lt. Cummings upon his return from
Vacation on January 9, 1995. As the former Traffic Coordinator, he is much more
qualified to determine the proper recommendation for these intersections.
CTY Icy
LT. CHRIS Y ANNt rZZI
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION
BOYNlDN BEACf-1 POLICE DEPARTMENr
100 E. BOYNlDN BFACII BLVD.
Bm'NTDN BFACIl. FL 'Hn'i
00 rn J:N ~ : !"~~ ~ i 00
I'ROM Tim DESK OF...
PLANNIW; PJ)
ZON!Nt; :'fcPr
t
---l
(407) 17'i-6108
Fax: (407) 37'i-618'i
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-381
TO: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
Bill Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Dept. Chief Field Insp.
Lt. James Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
William Hukill, Director of Department of Development
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director~
FROM:
DATE:
December 29, 1994
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1st Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Project - Nautica PUD (aka Boynton Nurseries)
Location - Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and
the LWDD L-21 Canal
Applicant - Alan Fant, GL Homes of Florida
File No. - MSPM 94-009
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-
referenced project. Site Plan Review approval for this project
will be granted by the City conunission. To ensure that the project
stays on line with the review time frame, I request that the plans
and exhibits be reviewed and formal written cOlIDDents transmitted to
the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department no later than
5:00 P.M. on January 17, 1994. Do not return plans and exhibits.
Retain same for the review of the amended plans (2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Conunittee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section
8 of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate conunents.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process
the project based on the review standards or the documents
show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections
should be requested by the reviewer through the Planning and
Zoning Department.
3. Each conunent shall reference the section of the code that is
incorrectly depicted on the documents.
4. Technical Review Conuni ttee member ( s) shall identify in their
conunents when the plans depict or when the location and
installation of their departmental required improvements may
conflict with other departmental improvements.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-374
TO:
William Hukill
City Engineer
DATE:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and ~zoni;~rector
Michael E. Haag np(f
Zoning and Site e elopment Administrator
December 16, 1994
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. (now known as Nautica - Plat
One and Two) - Preliminary Plat and Construction Plans
Please be advised of the following Planning and Zoning Department
comments with respect to the above-referenced request:
Nautica - Plat One
1. Add to the plat documents a five (5) foot wide limited access
easement along the ultimate right-of-way of Lawrence Road,
L.W.D.D. lateral # 21 canal and along both sides of Tract "B".
The easement shall be omitted at intersections of right-of-
ways and the access points to the private and city park sites.
It is recommended that a limited access easement be placed at
the rear property line of the lots abutting both sides of
Bermuda Sound Way. The easements that border Lawrence Road,
L.W.D.D. and Tract "B" shall be dedicated to the City of
Boynton Beach and the proposed easement on Bermuda Sound Way
should be dedicated to the Nautica Homeowner's Association.
2. Show and label on the plat drawing the location of the signage
easement identified in the dedication note 10.
3. In the plat dedication notes, that reference "without recourse
to Palm Beach County", omit the text "Palm Beach County" and
insert" City of Boynton Beach".
4. The Boynton Nurseries master plan identifies "Z lots" as being
forty (40) feet wide and "Zero lots" as being fifty (50) feet
wide. Adjust the width of the following lots consistent with
the applicable type: [Appendix C Article VIII Section 5.]
Lots - 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 131, 132, 133, 134, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91,
63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 153, 152, 151, 150, 149, 148, 146, 145
and 144.
5. Add the following note to the surveyor's notes, sheet 1 of 4:
The building lines shall be consistent with the building lines
established on the approved master plan for the proj ect.
[Appendix C Article VIII Section 6.0.10.]
6. Add the following symbol to the title of the plat:
"PUD".[Appendix C Article VIII Section 6.E]
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-364
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Al Newbold, Building Division
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Lt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities chief Field
Bill HUki~ Development Department
Micha~~Haag, Zoning & Site Development
Decembe~, 1994
Insp.
TO:
Administrator
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES - Sign-off of Rectified Master Plan
File No. MPMD 94-004
The Rectified Master Plan for the Boynton Nurseries Project has
been submltted for final sign-off by the Technical Review
Committee. Four (4) sets of plans each requiring your
unconditional signature are available in the Planning and Zoning
Department. A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff
comments and City Commission approval of the Master Plan will be
available for your use to perform the review.
At your earliest convenience, please review and sign-off each of
the four (4) sets of plans. If the plans are not in compliance
with your staff comments or City regulations, sign the plans
subj ect to memo. To facilitate the sign-off process, please
resubmi t written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning
Director, as soon as possible.
It should be noted that the applicant is processing, through the
Development Department, preliminary plat and construction plans for
the project. The plat and construction documents shall coincide
with the signed-off master plan, and major deviation desired by the
developer must be approved by the Technical Review Committee.
Thank you for your prompt response to this request.
CC:
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director
Steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Project File (Original)
memo.364.arw
c: wp 51
'17ie City of
tJ3oynton tJ3eacli
- UJf'l k>P- P~ge~"( t=:~
f1I!$J r'l-t)Df
100 'E. 'Boynton 'Beadi 'Boulevara
P.O. 'Bo:t31O
'Boynton 'Beadi, 7"foritfa 33425-0310
City 9fa[[: (407) 375-6()()()
7".9IX: (407) 375-6090
December 22, 1994
Kilday & Associates
Collene W. Walter
1551 Forum Place
Suite 100 A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
RE: Rectified Master Plan Submittal
Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. a.k.a. Nautica
Dear Mrs. C. Walter,
Attached please find the outstanding comments generated by the
Technical Review Committee, following their review of the Rectified
Master Plan dra~lings of the Boynton Nurseries P.U.D.. Please
correct the drawings and submit four (4) complete sets of plans to
the office of the Planning and Zoning Director.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Administrator
MEH/pb
attached
a: boynur. pud
1
;;{mema's (jateway to tfu (julfstre.am
i - _ J
II
,':' '.I ~ :J.:
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 94 - 282
TO:
FROM:
DATe~
Tambrl Heyden, Planning Directo
John A. Guidry. Utilities Director
August 26, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nursertes PUD . Master Plsn Modification
We offer the following comments on this project:
______ 1) The package submtted to thl. offloe dfd not _how .ny I~out for wat.,. end
Ranltary ..wer H",,'n the project, .Ithough mention WI' made In )'aur oover rMmo
of change. to the approVed master plan. PI'.s, heve thtp applicant provIde
dr.wlng(t) IndlcaUng the proposed layout of the wlter and ,ewer IYlterna for thl.
PUD. The pie". .hall IndiCAte appropriate looping of the water main. elpeclally for
poe A. (eOA II Seot, '..0, Sect 28-1 e city Cade). Th.re".n existing water meln
north of the property In the right of way of Old Military Trail (aka Sun-Up Trail), to
which the applicant can complete his lOOp.
(~) The proJeot engineer shall provide calculations In support of hIe sanitary sewer
layout, demonstraUng the feasibility of 8Jd81,dlng gravity sewer from Lawrence Roed
to the extreme west end of the project. If that Ie hI. Intent. (Seo. 28-18 City Code)
NJA
3) Provide 8 typical cross-sectional view of the UIU't'es within l!I 40-foot rlght-of.way
end adjoining ea..ment, 10 as to demonstrate serviceability of our proposed Unes.
We request this project 110t proceeq to the City Commleslon until .fter wa have had the
opportunity to review and comment on the uU11ty layout requested In the above comments.
Please rofer any que.tlons on thlsa matter to Peter Mezzella of thia offioe.
JAG/PVM
bc~ Peter Mazzetla
xc; Skip Milor
File
ill
/II 'r~ 'J f: "'I" "
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
, '
00
5\
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
planning and zonin~rector
Michael E. Ha~e~
zoninq and Site ~lopment Administrator
December 22, 1994
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Master plan modification for
phase I and phase II
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the review
of the rectified plans of the above-referenced project:
1. Add the easement note below to the areas with the following
titles: Easements and Landscape Requirements (found on sheet
2 of 5), Landscape Notes (found on sheet 3 of 5), Various Lot
Conditions note (found on sheet 4 of 5) and Various Lot
Conditions and Various Pool Conditions notes (found on sheet
5 of 5).
"No building or any kind of construction or trees or
shrubs shall be placed on any easement without written
consent of all easement beneficiaries and all applicable
city approvals or permits as required for such
encroachments."
2 . Add to the typical " Z" lot Various Lot Conditions drawings
(sheet 4 of 5) a building footprint that shows a building with
a 15 foot front setback. It appears plan type 4 units will
use the 15 foot front setback. To be consistent with the
approved setback identify the 15 foot setback on all lot
drawings.
3. On sheet 4 of 5 and sheet 5 of 5 add the text "at garage" to
each lot condition where the 20 foot garage setback is
identified.
4. Add the following text to the end of footnote (B) (sheet 2 of
5) "on all 'z' lots". Also show and label, on each lot
drawing, found on sheet 4 of 5, the location of the 5 foot
dimension.
5. On sheet 2 of 5 designate the purpose, type and size of the
existing and proposed easements for the entire project. The
easements shall coincide with the easements shown on the plat
drawings. Correct the master plan where the plan identifies
lake accesses as tracts when the plat documents identify the
area as an easement located on individual lots.
6. On sheets 1 of 5 and 2 of 5 omit the text and notes that
reference the 5 foot improvement/setback/landscape easement
and replace with the text "perimeter 5 foot buffer easement".
On each drawing add a new line along the southern property
line depicting and identifying the required 10 foot building
setback. Also, on sheets 1 of 5 and 2 of 5, omit the word
"landscape" and insert the words "perimeter buffer" at each
location where the "25 foot building setback landscape
easement" or "10 foot landscape eaement" note is written on
the plan. On sheet 3 of 5 omit the text "setback line", from
the "5 foot open space setback line" note found along the
southern property line.
page 2
Boynton Nurseries PUD
master plan comments
7. Change the title of the following "z" lot Various Lot
Conditions drawings (sheet 4 of 5). From left to right, the
first caption shall read "perimeter 25 foot buffer easement",
the fifth caption shall read "perimeter 5 foot buffer easement
(southern property line)" and the sixth caption shall read
"double frontage lots internal right-of-ways".
8. Change the rear building and screen enclosure setback
dimensions and notes on the "z" lot 25 foot buffer easement
Various Lot Conditions drawing (sheet 4 of 5), to show and
identify a 25 foot rear setback for building, pool and screen
enclosures.
9. Change the title of the following "Zero" lot Various Lot
Conditions drawings (sheet 5 of 5). From left to right, the
fourth caption shall read "perimeter 5 foot buffer easement
(southern property line)" and the fifth caption shall read
"double frontage lots internal right-of-ways". Add the text
"screen enclosure" to the "Various Pool Conditions", title
(sheet 5 of 5 ) . Also change the title of the following
Various Pool Conditions drawings (sheet 5 of 5). From left to
right, the third caption shall read "corner lot - (floater)",
the fourth caption shall read "perimeter 5 foot buffer
easement (southern property line)", the fifth caption shall
read "double frontage lots internal right-of-ways". Also,
omit the first drawing and caption because the plan does not
depict "Zero" type lots with a perimeter 25 foot buffer
easement. To further clarify the setbacks, insert a new
Various Pool Conditions drawing captioned " corner lot".
Identify the appropriate pool and screen enclosure setbacks on
the new drawing.
10. Remove the "0'" rear setback dimension from the screen
enclosure note, identified on the Various Pool Conditions
(canal buffer drawing), found on sheets 4 of 5 and 5 of 5 and
replace with the dimension "8'''. Also remove the text "5 foot
improvement setback/landscape easement" or "5 foot open space
setback line" and replace with the text "8 foot setback for
screen enclosure or pool".
11. To be consistent with the "z" lot drawings, extend the leader
line and arrowheads for the Various Pool Conditions drawings
found on sheet 5 of 5 to the appropriate dimension.
12. Either establish specifications for accessory buildings (such
as storage shed) or list the accessory building text from the
zoning code on the plans. Also a note may be added that would
specify that a subsequent master plan modification will be
required to establish accessory building specifications and
setbacks. Place the specification notes on sheets 2 of 5, 4
of 5, and 5 of 5.
13. On sheet 2 of 5 remove the text that references wall and
fences. The data is identified on sheet 1 of 5. It is
recommended that the fence, wall and sign data be relocated
from sheet 1 of 5 to sheet 2 of 5.
14. Add the following text as the next line following the title
"Setbacks (Both Product Categories)" found on sheet 2 of 5:
"Specific building, pool and screen enclosure setbacks for
each lot are identified on drawings found on sheet 4 of 5 and
5 of 5."
Page 3
Boynton Nurseries PUD
master plan comments
15. Add the following note to sheets 4 of 5 and 5 of 5:
"Additional notes found on sheet 2 of 5".
16.
Specify on the Various Lot Conditions
depicting lot 1, sheet 4 of 5, that the
is 15 feet against Nautica Boulevard.
screen enclosure setback is 8 feet.
(corner lot drawing)
rear building setback
Also, indicate the
17. Provide a Various Lot Conditions ("Z" lot drawing) depicting
the building setbacks and screen enclosure setbacks for the
one sided floater lots 81, 90, 115, etc.
18. Specify on the Various Lot Conditions ("Zero" corner lot
drawing) (sheet 5 of 5) that there is a 15 foot rear building
setback for lots; 123, 166, 177, 178, 239 and 255 where the
rear of the lot is against a right-of-way and/or when the rear
of the lot is against the zero side of another lot. Also,
indica te on the new Var ious Pool Conditions ( corner lot
drawing) that the same lots have a 10 foot rear pool setback
and an 8 foot rear screen enclosure setback.
19. Specify on the new titled Various Pool Conditions ("Zero"
corner lot-floater drawing) (sheet 5 of 5) that there is a 15
foot rear building setback for lots; 156, 157, 167 and 230
where the rear of the lot is against a right-of-way and/or
when the rear of the lot is against the zero side of another
lot. Also, indicate on the new titled drawing, that the same
lots have a 10 foot rear pool setback and an 8 foot rear
screen enclosure setback.
20. Specify on the Various Lot Conditions (preserve lot drawing)
depicting lot 219, sheet 5 of 5, that the building setback
along the right-of-way is 15 feet, the pool setback is 10 feet
and the screen enclosure setback is 8 feet.
21. On the building setback chart, sheet 2 of 5, under the 10 foot
rear setback notes, insert the text "5 foot buffer easement"
after the word, "perimeter". Also, within the same chart
under the 15 foot rear setback notes, remove the text "units"
... "adjacent to internal roads" and insert the text "double
frontage lots along internal right-of-ways" . Add a new
category to the chart that includes text similar to the
following: REAR (from back of house to rear property line) at
lots along the perimeter 25 foot buffer easement the setback
is 25 feet, see footnote (A).
22. On the pool setback chart, sheet 2 of 5, under the 10 foot
rear setback notes, omit the text "back to back" and insert
the text "double frontage lots internal right-of-ways and back
to back lots". Also, within the same chart, under the 7 foot
rear setback notes omit the text "perimeter"..." (A)". For
further clarification add two new categories to the chart, one
for the rear setback of the lots along the perimeter 5 foot
buffer easement requiring them to have an 8 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A) and one for the rear
setback of the lots along the perimeter 25 foot buffer
easement requiring them to have a 25 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A).
Page 4
Boynton Nurseries PUD
master plan comments
23. On the screen enclosure setback chart, sheet 2 of 5, under the
8 foot rear setback notes, omit the text "internal roadways"
and insert the text "double frontage lots internal right-of-
ways". Also, within the same chart under the 5 foot rear
setback notes, insert the text "park" following the words,
"preserve and" and omit the text "perimeter"..."(A)". For
further clarification add two new categories to the chart, one
for the rear setback of the lots along the perimeter 5 foot
buffer easement requiring them to have an 8 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A) and one for the rear
setback of the lots along the perimeter 25 foot buffer
easement requiring them to have a 25 foot rear setback,
including a reference to see footnote (A).
24. Specify on sheet 1 of 5 directly below L.U.I calculations the
following text: "A tabular sununary identifying the total floor
area ratio (FAR) square footage will be submitted with each
residential building permit as well as with the building
permits submitted for the recreational buildings. The tabular
sununary will identify the total floor area, lot by lot, to
date for the entire project, the lot number and total floor
area of the subject permit request and the total floor area
allowed (16.76 acres) for the entire project."
25. On the dedicated park property correctly show, to scale, the
25 foot setback to the abutting property lines.
26. Provide verification that the City Attorney has approved the
ownership documents regarding unified control of the
property/project.
27. At both entrances show through/right turn lane exiting the
site to Lawrence Road.
A:MP-NAUTI
1
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-448
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Bill Hukill, Director, DevelopmentEe art ent
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Boynton Nurseries, MasterPlan & Pr iminary Plat
TO:
RE:
DATE:
December 16, 1994
The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the Boynton Nurseries
masterplan and preliminary plat documents. The following comments
are submitted:
1. In accordance with Recreation & Park memorandums #94-320 and
#94-342, masterplan and preliminary plat documents now reflect
the 2.84 acres recreation dedication as agreed by the
developer and the City Commission. The remaining dedication
requirement will be paid in cash.
Three hundred seventy-three single family units at .018 acres
equals 6.714 acres. 6.714 acres divided by 2 (1/2 credit for
private recreation) equals 3.357 acres.
3.357 acres minus 2.84 acres provided = .517 acres cash.
2. The following recreation elements are noted on the masterplan
qualifying for one-half credit:
1. Children's Play Area
2. Basketball Court
3. Tennis Courts
4. Swimming Pool
5. Recreation Center Building
3. Private recreation facilities and equipment must be of
commercial grade and of sufficient size and scope needed to
provide for the recreation of the residents of the sub-
division.
4. Approval of recreation equipment by this department will be
required prior to issuing a construction permit.
JW:ad
XC: Charles C. Frederick, Director, Recreation & Park Department
ill ~ L~' ~ : 19:4 ~ ill
;
PLANNING AND V- ~ !
ZONING DEPT. ,
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-456
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning & Zoning Director
~>>tt
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. (A.K.A. Nautica)
DATE:
December 20, 1994
The applicant should prepare a statement to:
1. Identify by survey the existing desirable trees on site to be
preserved, relocated and replaced.
2. The lakes must have a littoral and upland hardwoods planting
plan. (5 lakes) (document).
3. The three perimeter buffer areas 40'(A), 25'(B), 5'(C)
contains existing desirable trees. These trees should be
addressed in a review of these areas for landscaping.
4. All public street R.O.W.'s must be irrigated and sodded with
floratam sod.
KH:ad
rn
Ij'c.G 2 0 1994
rn
rn@rnnwm
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-308
FROM:
carrie Parker
City Manager
Tambri J. HeYden~tl
Planning and zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
October 12, 1994
RE:
Copies of Development Plans of Current Projects
Scheduled for Review by the City Commission at the
october 18, 1994 City Commission Meeting
Please find attached five (5) sets of plans for the following
current development project:
Master Plan Modification - Boynton Nurseries PUD
Major Site Plan Modification -Boynton Festive center
NOTE:
Please return the plans/documents to the Planning and
Zoning Department following the meeting.
If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.
Tambri J. Heyden
TJH/jj
Attachments
a:transmtl.jj
-
,
I
I-
I
,'r ';
I~~
/'
'/
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-053
,~
/)LP f:. J p..
cofY' ,r1
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
THRU: Timothy P. Cannon jr(
Interim Planning Director
TO:
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden
Assistant City Planner
DATE: March 9, 1990
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Rezoning - File No. 385
Please be advised of the following Planning Department staff
comments relative to the above-referenced request for rezoning to
PUD:
/,
",'
-,''-'1; 1.\
I
2 .J
/,.t.-
\\
:; ,'/
3.'
The private recreation facilities shall be bonded with
approval of the first plat and completed within 21 months of
approval of the first plat. Appendix C, Article XI, Section
5. c...'1nvlu;,.-..) fD fifA'.?uJ <\ r'-,?,~
- , -
It is recommended that the applicant post a bond at the time
of platting for 50% of the cost of providing pedestrian
signalization to enable safer pedestrian movement from this
project to Palm Beach County School "P" located on the
opposite (east) side of Lawrence Road (Comprehensive Plan
Policy 2.4.4).
Sidewalks/bike paths are required on all collector and local
streets to provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian
circulation. With respect to the small loop road in the
southwest portion of the site, the Technical Review Board,
at the prehearing conference on March 1, 1990, agreed to
accept a pedestrian path in lieu of a sidewalk, to link the
units fronting on the pod A loop road to the private recre-
ation area. Comprehensive Plan Policy 1,11.9. and 2.4.4,
Section 11, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision Regula-
ations.
-;.''''' 4. The width of the loop road in pod A has not been specified
on the master plan. This width will have to be wide enough
to accommodate (2) 11 foot lanes, swales for drainage,
utilities, and any other necessary improvements.
5. The 80 foot collector road shall be a dedicated right-of-way
consistent with Policy 1.3.8 of the Comprehensive Plan.
6.
1~ ':,
'\'l'
7,
.- 8.
"J
<;:
I
9 .
T
The remaining 3.375 acres required by the Subdivision
Regulations for parks and recreation shall be dedicated in
the northeast corner of the project for a neighborhood park,
exercising the City's option of requiring land dedication,
fees or a combination of both. Comprehensive Plan Policy
5.5.5 and Section 8, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision
Regulations.
The availability of private recreation facilities to all
residents of the PUD shall be specified consistent with
Policy 5.5.3 of the Comprehensive Plan.
Approval of the rezoning to PUD is contingent upon approval
of the annexation and land use amendment requests.
As was required of Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove,
southbound right turn lanes are recommended at both project
entrances.
\
Dept. Memorandum No. 90-053
1990, Page 2
/
~
10. The fpllowing roadway improvements are required for approval
of this request consistent with the 1989 City of Boynton
aeach Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 89-39) and Section
9.C.4.h(S) of Appendix A-Zoning:
~
o
Project Entrances on Lawrence Road
~~~
- Northbound left turn lane
-)Separate eastbound left turn and through/right tur~ lane
,
T, ,'l '
Six-Ianing of Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard" .-. .,
0
/
.' to Miner Road * ..
/
(\./
,0 Six-Ianing of Congress Avenue from Miner Road to Hypoluxo
,'" Road
o
, -
Four-Ianing of Old Bdynton Road from Knuth Road to Lawrence
Road*
o'v:/
o
Six-laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynton Road
to I-95*
/j
,
*
Improvements which are assured or are in the process of
being assured either through the Palm'Beach County
Transportation Improvement Program or developer commitments.
In order for the traffic impact analysis to be conside'red
complete, the applicant needs to show the 'City that a 1992
buildout yea~ is feasible and the analysis of projected
conditions needs to'be expanded to all roadways impacted by the
project assignment. In addition to this information, assurance
of roadway improvements should be provided.
Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway
improvements would require the project to be scheduled for
construction in the County Transportation Improvement Program,
the.State Five Year Work Program or part of a Municipal Capital
Improvement Program. The project may also be considered assured
if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured
through bonding with the City or County.
Building permits for dwelling units cannot be issued for the
proposed project until contracts have been let for the required
roadway improvements as outlined above.
Pursuant to policy 2.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the City can
recommend to Palm Beach County that the developer's road impact
fee payment be credited toward any of the roadway improvements
listed above, subject to approval by Palm Beach County.
n .~ ~,j/
-d~ . 1)~
TAMBRI J. YDE
TJH:frb
Encs
xc: Central File
A:PM90-053
.--
~ oJ r PA L-8?1
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-053
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
THRU: Timothy P. Cannon yC
Interim Planning Director
FROM: Tambr i J. Heyden
Assistant City Planner
DATE: March 9, 1990
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Rezoning - File No. 385
Please be advised of the following Planning Department staff
comments relative to the above-referenced request for rezoning to
PUD:
1. The private recreation facilities shall be bonded with
approval of the first plat and completed within 21 months of
approval of the first plat. Appendix C, Article XI, Section
5.
2. It is recommended that the applicant post a bond at the time
of platting for 50% of the cost of providing pedestrian
signalization to enable safer pedestrian movement from this
project to Palm Beach County School "P" located on the
opposite (east) side of Lawrence Road (Comprehensive Plan
Policy 2.4.4).
3. Sidewalks/bike paths are required on all collector and local
streets to provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian
circulation. With respect to the small loop road in the
southwest portion of the site, the Technical Review Board,
at the prehearing conference on March 1, 1990, agreed to
accept a pedestrian path in lieu of a sidewalk, to link the
units fronting on the pod A loop road to the private recre-
ation area. Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.11.9. and 2.4.4,
Section 11, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision Regula-
ations.
4. The width of the loop road in pod A has not been specified
on the master plan. This width will have to be wide enough
to accommodate (2) 11 foot lanes, swales for drainage,
utilities, and any other necessary improvements.
5. The 80 foot collector road shall be a dedicated right-of-way
consistent with Policy 1.3.8 of the Comprehensive Plan.
6. The remaining 3.375 acres required by the Subdivision
Regulations for parks and recreation shall be dedicated in
the northeast corner of the project for a neighborhood park,
exercising the City's option of requiring land dedication,
fees or a combination of both. Comprehensive Plan Policy
5.5.5 and Section 8, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision
.t<egulations.
7. The availability of private recreation facilities to all
residents of the PUD shall be specified consistent with
Policy 5.5.3 of the Comprehensive Plan.
8. Approval of the rezoning to PUD is contingent upon approval
of the annexation and land use amendment requests.
9. As was required of Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove,
southbound right turn lanes are recommended at both project
entrances.
,,/
"4
o
Planning Dept. Memorandum No. 90-053
March 9, 1990, Page 2
10. The following roadway improvements are required for approval
of this request consistent with the 1989 City of Boynton
Beach Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 89-39) and Section
9.C.4.h(5} of Appendix A-Zoning:
o Project Entrances on Lawrence Road
- Northbound left turn lane
- Separate eastbound left turn and through/right turn lane
o Six-laning of Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard
to Miner Road*
o Six-laning of Congress Avenue from Miner Road to Hypoluxo
Road
o Four-laning of Old Boynton Road from Knuth Road to Lawrence
Road*
.
o
Six-laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynton Road
to 1-95*
*
Improvements which are assured or are in the process of
being assured either through the Palm Beach County
Transportation Improvement Program or developer commitments.
In order for the traffic impact analysis to be considered
complete, the applicant needs to show the City that a 1992
buildout year is feasible and the analysis of projected
conditions needs to be expanded to all roadways impacted by the
project assignment. In addition to this information, assurance
of roadway improvements should be provided.
e
Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway
improvements would require the project to be scheduled for
construction in the County Transportation Improvement Program,
the State Five Year Work Program or part of a Municipal Capital
Improvement Program. The project may also be considered assured
if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured
through bonding with the City or County.
Building permits for dwelling units cannot be issued for the
proposed project until contracts have been let for the required
roadway improvements as outlined above.
Pursuant to policy 2.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the City can
recommend to Palm Beach County that the developer's road impact
fee payment be credited toward any of the roadway improvements
listed above, subject to approval by Palm Beach County.
/l , . 2 -3 f " ~
~/~~ . {;{idk-
TAMBRI J. PlEYDEN'
TJH:frb
Encs
xc: Central File
A:PM90-053
Ii-'
r
I -'\ \- L
1- --4-
v
" v
I, 1./ "I;. \
~ \' y
\/ V
. ,..\
ul
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-107
//'
/
TO:
Timothy Cannon, Interim Planning Director
FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Horticulturist
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries (Resubmittal) - Master Plan
DATE: March 1, 1990
The resubmittal shows a revised plan for the tree preservation
areas on the overall site. These new areas fall under the
guidelines of the City Tree Protection Ordinance #81-21. A
preliminary tree management plan should be submitted to include
the following:
1. The areas shown as tree preservation areas to be delineated
on the master plan and the boundaries flagged in the field.
2. No mechanical equipment of any kind to be allowed into the
areas.
3. A control system be established for resprouting of Melaleuca
and Australian Pine trees within the preserve areas.
4. The above three items be completed in a document submitted
to this office by March 30, 1990.
5. A full and completed tree management plan and tree survey be
submitted at the preliminary platt stage of review.
-y;..~ ~ ##~
Kevin J. Ha aha
Forester/Horticulturist
cc: John Wildner, Superintendent, Parks Division
KJH:ad
/
4
i ~'\'
1---
ci t' l:>
I~() ,
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 90-200WC
Tel:
JIM GOLDEN, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
F R")~1 :
W. D. CAVANAUGH, FIRE DEPT. TRB REP.
DATE:
~1ARCH 2, 1990
R E :
BOYNTON NURSERIES ANNEX - LA'rIRENCE ROAD
SHARED RISK/ACCESS FOR FIRE RESCUE -
IT IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S POSITION THAT THE LOOP ROAD
SHOULD BE PUBLIC.
SECURITY GATES, PRIVATE ROADS, LONG DEAD-END ROADS, AND
SINGLE POINT ACCESS ALL HAMPER RAPID RESPONSE OF FIRE RESCUE
PERSONNEL. ALL FIRE RESCUE RESPONSE IS BASED ON IIGOLDEN
~lINUTE::;II. USUALLY ONLY 3 TO 6 MINUTES IS THE "\"'INDO.,../I' ALLOV.JED
F()R OPTIMUM RESPONSE. ANVTH1E USED AFTER THIS IIWINDO\./II IS SHUT
DRASTICALLY REDUCES THE CHANCE TO SAVE LIFE AND PROPERTY.
DEVELOPERS WHO IMPINGE ON FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITY MUST BE
WILLING TO ACCEPT PART OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOSSES INCURRED.
IN MY OPINION, THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE DEED NOTES, IN
ADDITION TO HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTS, TO PROPERTY OWNERS
APPRISING THAT THE CITY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE OPTIMUM
SERVICE SHOULD A DEVELOPER WISH ENCLAVE STATUS FOR HIS PROPERTY.
I
\./DC/pg
xc: D. Crockett, Deputy Chief
File
;'
MEMORANDUM
POLICE # 90-019
-, (i'
rf
~', ~
,jt
j;.
f"
I' "(,h
I)!;
TO:
Mr. James Golden
FROM:
Lt. Dale Hammack
RE:
Boynton Nursery
DATE:
March 1, 1990
In regards to the plans reviewed 1 March 1990, I am recommending
the following:
1. Main loop road remain public.
2. Southbound right turn lanes at both entrances.
i<f)r:frr!c~
DH/cm
,,'
\/ /,~'
r -1
\~'
I':'
4 .~.-
rf ~",: ~
('b
()- C'
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #90-033
TO:
James Golden, Senior Planner
THROUGH
Charles C. Frederick, Director, Recreation &
72;ept.
FROM:
John Wildner, Superintendent, Parks Division
SUBJECT:
Boynton Nurseries, P.U.D.
DATE:
March 8, 1990
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the Master Plan
for the Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. The following information is
submitted:
1. Park Land Dedication Requirement
250 single family and duplex units @.018 acres each =
150 multifamily units @.015 acres each =
Total requirement:
4.50
2.25
6.75
2. Credit For Private Open Space
A. The Park Land Dedication Ordinance provides for up to
1/2 credit for private open space if it provides a
minimum of five (5) local park basic requirements. The
developer has indicated he intends to apply for this
credit. Before credit is given, the developer must
indicate details regarding type, number, size, and
location of the private recreation facilities (per
sub-division code, section 8).
B. Assuming half credit for private recreation facilities
provided, (6.75 divided by 2), the developer is
required to provide 3.375 acres.
3. Location
It is recommended that the 3.375 acres required to be
dedicated be located in the northeast corner of the
development, adjacent to Lawrence Road and abutting the
Knollwood Grove property to the north.
This location will allow for eventual consolidation of
public park property to be dedicated from the Knollwood
Grove property if it is annexed and developed for
residential use.
These combined properties would ultimately provide a
neighborhood park of approximately five acres which will
comply with the level of service standards required in the
parks and recreation element of the comprehensive plan.
JW: ad
REV. (from memorandum dated January 22, 1990)
/
I
/
'lliIS MEM) REPLACES MEM) NO. 90-033 DATED FEBRUARY 27, 1990
ENGINEERIN3 DEPAR'IMENT MEMO NO. 90-039
March 1, 1990
TO: J. Scott Miller
City Manager
FRCM: Vincent A. Finizio
Acting Assistant to the City Engineer
RE: Technical Review Board Caments
Boynton Nurseries Master Plan
1. Provide established centerline elevations for all adjacent streets and
rights-of-ways. Section 4.C. 8.
2. Indicate the proposed layout of the lots and blocks. Section 4.C.IO.
3. Indicate an plans utilities such as telephone, power, water, sewer, gas
etc. on or adjacent to the tract including a staternant an plans, that all
utilities are available and have been coordinated with all required
utilities. Secian 4.C.17.
1L~A~; .:y
Vincent A. Finizio
VAF/ck
cc: Jim Golden, Senior City Planner
;\
(.( ,~ "
11 f' Xl\
U~ .,(,'
i;!'
/
I
Cf:J\.}
t':- 'f tf:A [;(?
'111"%
L,L() 01"l'1t
/'
PLANNING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 90-053
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Zoning Board
Timothy P. Cannon jrG
Interim Planning Director
THRU:
FROM:
Tambri J. Heyden
Assistant City Planner
SUBJECT:
March 9, 1990
Boynton Nurseries PUD - Rezoning - File No. 385
DATE:
Please be advised of the following Planning Department staff
comments relative to the above-referenced request for rezoning to
PUD:
1. The private recreation facilities shall be bo~ded with
approval of the first plat and completed within 21 months of
approval of the first plat. Appendix C, Article XI, Section
5.
2. It is recommended that the applicant post a bond at the time
of platting for 50% of the cost of providing pedestrian
signalization to enable safer pedestrian movement from this
project to Palm Beach County School "P" located on the
opposite (east) side of Lawrence Road (Comprehensive Plan
Policy 2.4.4).
3. Sidewalks/bike paths are required on all collector and local
streets to provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian
circulation. With respect to the small loop road in the
southwest portion of the site, the Technical Review Board,
at the prehearing conference on March 1, 1990, agreed to
accept a pedestrian path in lieu of a sidewalk, to link the
units fronting on the pod A loop road to the private recre-
ation area. Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.11.9. and 2.4.4,
Section 11, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision Regula-
ations.
4. The width of the loop road in pod A has not been specified
on the master plan. This width will have to be wide enough
to accommodate (2) 11 foot lanes, swales for drainage,
utilities, and any other necessary improvements.
5. The 80 foot collector road shall be a dedicated right-of-way
consistent with Policy 1.3.8 of the Comprehensive Plan.
6. The remaining 3.375 acres required by the Subdivision
Regulations for parks and recreation shall be dedicated in
the northeast corner of the project for a neighborhood park,
exercising the City's option of requiring land dedication,
fees or a combination of both. Comprehensive Plan Policy
5.5.5 and Section 8, Article IX of Appendix C - Subdivision
Regulations.
7. The availability of private recreation facilities to all
residents of the PUD shall be specified consistent with
Policy 5.5.3 of the Comprehensive Plan.
8. Approval of the rezoning to PUD is contingent upon approval
of the annexation and land use amendment requests.
9. As was required of Citrus Glen and Lawrence Grove,
southbound right turn lanes are recommended at both project
entrances.
"
Dept. Memorandum No. 90-053
1990, Page 2
,/
~
10. The fpllowing roadway improvements are required for approval
of this request consistent with the 1989 City of Boynton
~each Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 89-39) and Section
9.C.4.h(5) of Appendix A-Zoning:
o Project Entrances on Lawrence Road
- Northbound left turn lane
- Separate eastbound left turn and through/right tur~ lane
Six-laning of Congress Avenue from Boynton Beach Boulevard
to Miner Road* ~
o
o
Six-laning of Congress Avenue from Miner Road to Hypoluxo
Road
o
Four-laning of Old Bdynton Road from Knuth Road to Lawrence
Road*
o
Six-laning of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Old Boynton Road
to I-95*
*
Improvements which are assured or are in the process of
being assured either through the Palm 'Beach County
Transportation Improvement Program or developer commitments.
In order for the traffic impact analysis to be conside'red
complete, the applicant needs to show the 'City that a 1992
buildout year is feasible and the analysis of projected
conditions needs to'be expanded to all roadways impacted by the
project assignment. In addition to this information, assurance
of roadway improvements should be provided. '
Based on Palm Beach County standards, assurance of roadway
improvements would require the project to be scheduled for
construction in the County Transportation Improvement Program,
the,State Five Year Work Program or part of a Municipal capital
Improvement Program. The project may also be considered assured
if it is part of a developer agreement and has been secured
through bonding with the City or County.
Building permits for dwelling units cannot be issued for the
proposed project until contracts have been let for the required
roadway improvements as outlined above.
Pursuant to policy 2.6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan, the City can
recommend to Palm Beach County that the developer's road impact,
fee payment be credited toward any of the roadway improvements
listed above, subject to approval by Palm Beach County.
/l tJt'
~~'. Ii~
TAMaRI J. JEYDE
TJH:frb
Encs
xc: Central File
A:PM90-053
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-135
DATE:
Al Newbold
Deputy Building of~~Tial
Michael E. Ha~g)\B,f~
Zoning and Site lopment
April 3, 1995
Administrator
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Transmittal of Development Orders
Accompanying" this memorandum you will find documents regarding
development plans that received final approval.
1. Project Name:
Type of Application:
Planning and Zoning
Department File No.:
Staff Report and Comments:
Control Plans:
Color Elevation Drawings:
Board of Adjustment Approval:
Planning and Development
Board Approval:
City Commission Approval:
Boynton Nurseries PUD
Master Plan Modification
MPMD 94-004
35 pages
8 sheets
N/A
N/A
Resolution No.:
Ordinance No.:
10/11/94 meeting minutes
10/03/94 & 10/18/94
meeting minutes
N/A
N/A
MEH:pab
Attachments
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention officer
Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde IISkip" Milor, utilities Chief Field Insp.
office of the City Engineer
Vincent%iniZQtY;jitY Engineer
Michael H~ Zoning &~DeVelopment Administrator
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
August 16, 1994
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Concurrency Review Board Meeting
Tuesday, August 23, 1994
RE:
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee/Concurrency
Review Board will meet on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, at 9:00 A.M. in
Conference Room "CII (West Wing) to discuss the following:
I. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans)
Written comments and plans are due August 26, 1994, three (3)
working days following the TRC meeting unless otherwise noted
below.
A. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Boynton Nurseries PUD
Lawrence Road and LWDD, L-21 Canal
Amended master plan showing a revision
number of units from 400 to 376, change
in type of units from 162 single-family
units on 6,000 square foot lots and 238
multi-family units to 233 IIZ" lot units
on 4,000 square foot lots and 143 zero
lot line units on 5,000 square foot
lots, an increase in traffic impact
(traffic statement not completed),
change in road widths and public/private
ownership of same, altered layout and
size o~,~rese~ve ar~a and revised master
draina~e'Lufilitie~and landscape plans
(see attached copy of approved master
plan). ~
'pdhKlv
REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITT
AND PLANS RECEIVED
II.
Written comments and plans are due August 26, 1994, before 5:00
P.M.
A. NEW SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
PROJECT:
Location:
DESCRIPTION:
The Vinings
At Woolbright Place
S.W. 8th Street, North of woolbright Rd
Multi-family Development - 548 units
page 2
Technical Review Committee Meeting
August 16, 1994
III. OTHER
None
cc: MEMO ONLY
Carrie Parker, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to utilities Director
steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Gary Lanker, Lanker Engineering Service
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Dorothy Moore, Zoning and Site Plan Reviewer
Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner
Project File
Chronological File
TRC File (Original)
A: ':'II.CllGIlD.!2Z
~.'
-~~---
/-2'c.-'e( f'd~4t-'lC0K~7~
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 94 - 456
TO:
DATE:
Mike Rumpf
Deputy Chief J. N~
August 18,1994
I.
'"
n
FROM:
Re: Annexation of Property West of Lawrence Road
The question of our Fire Department's ability to provide necessary EMS and fire
suppression service~, to those areas under consideration for annexation, is considerably
more involved than simply including those areas into our current response charge. Given
the nature of the areas under consideration, the age and needs of the EMS population and
the types of structures involved (trailer park), the impact on our current department's ability
to provide adequate services becomes controversial. Response times become more
critical when combating fires in older trailers. Trailers can become fully involved in a
matter of minutes. This is particularly true for older trailers which were built under less
stringent fire code standards than those currently enforced. The majority of residents in
the Royal Manor trailer park are older. They traditionally have more need for EMS
services, response times for cardiac arrest, chest pain, shortness of breath, strokes, and
seizures become critical. I
The distances and response times from our Fire Station No. three are in line with similar
areas served by that station. A problem becomes apparent when units from that station
are unavailable due to other calls. The response times for back-up vehicles becomes
unacceptable when these units must respond from either station one or two. Unless
additional equipment and personnel are made available" the response times for these
back-up units will fall below our standard of care. Delays' generated by the necessity to
respond with back-up vehicles will have adverse affects on both EMS patients and fire
suppression. Until such time as a reliable fully, staffed ALS unit is available for all back-up
responses to the proposed annexed areas, I can not endorse the proposed addition of this
Ii abi Iity. :
a. fJ (,
If the city is considering an overall goal of annexing additional properties to include those
areas west to Military Trail, and we wish to maintain the current standard of care now
offered to all city residents, I would advise the following plan be implemented:
1. An additional ALS pumper be purchased to accommodate the immediate
needs of supplying EMS and fire suppression, coverage for those impending
annexation areas. The full time staffing of this unit would require the hiring
of three new fire personnel (one per shift).!
r~
2. Formulate plans to develop impact fees and/or a bond issue to support the
construction of a new fire station to provide coverage to those expansion
areas west of Lawrence Road. The addition of this fire station would provide
additional coverage to those areas requir~ng back-up support in all three
current fire zones.
With our current station locations and resources, any expansion to the west will require
a commitment to expand our department.
c: Chief Jordan
3~
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-176SC
August 16, 1994
TO:
Chief Jordan
/'
,),,~{',,/.
I ~ r /'
" U j/
...J~ '
FROM:
FPO II Campbell
SUBJECT: PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEED
REGARDING ANNEXATION
Mike Rumpf from the Planning Department would like a memo from
you stating that any further annexation would result in:
1) an increase of personnel (1 per shift) and
2) an additional new rescue unit for Station #3
He also stated that the memo should include that our experience
with senior citizen oriented areas like Royal Manor Mobil Home
Village does provide for an increase in rescue calls.
He needs the memo by Thursday. Page me if you need further
clarification.
SaC/1mb 10P::rlC14
J/~-,0
-----
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 92-2~4
October 9, 1992
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Fire Department
RE:
N.W. BOYNTON - .
BOUNDED by'HYPOLUXO & N.W. 22ND AVE
CONGRESS AVE. & LAWRENCE RD
The City has committed to providing certain services in this
area. Master and site plans have all reflected Fire Department
input pertaining to roads and water service. Presently, research
is bein9 conducted pertaining to additional annexation in this
same area. Fire Department staff have consistently placed a high
priority on connective roads in this area. NOW, due to
circumstances, planning and expectations have sunk to a critical
level.
Examples: KNOLLWOOD GROVES - request to modify impact fees for
Miner Road.
LAWRENCE GROVE - previously released from agreement to
provide 60' right of way road connection with the
meadows; ie Bedford Blvd.
CITRUS GLEN - unfulfilled agreements with regard to
Miner Road.
Prior expectations by staff in the Fire Department w~re that
Miner Road would be complete at approximately the sarne time Fire
Station III was brought on line. It appears that several more
years will pass before this will be accomplished.
This situation is becoming untenable as response time elevates
along with additional value in the area served. It. is the
Department's position that NO EXCEPTIONS CONCERNING MINER ROAD BE
MADE and that THE PROCESS TO ATTAIN A COMPLETED ROAD BE
EXPEDITED.
~A1o-- ·
William D.
- We/1mb
Attachment: Response time stats ,C' -<:: '::>_".1 .--/
cc: Chief Allen
5~b
\
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 92 - 477
TO:
Wm. D. Cavanaugh
FROM:
Jim Ne~
O,.::t. 13, 1992
DATE:
Re:
Lawrence Road EMS Response Times
Per your request, I have researched EMS response times to various
subdivisions located off of Lawrence Road. The critical importance
of a rapid EMS response can not be over emphasized. High priority
call s such as cardiac arrest requi re treatment wi thin 4 to 6
minutes. The average response for most EMS calls within the City
limits is approximately 3 minutes. It is the goal of our EMS
program to maintain a response time of less than 4 minutes whenever
possible. The average response time to those calls off of Lawrence
Road (based on historical data) has been in excess of 5 minutes.
Calls which require responses from other stations as back-up to
station 3 will have even longer delays.
Based on this data, I would strongly recommend that the City
aggressively pursue the expansion of Miner Road to connect Lawrence
Road to Congress Ave. As we begin a program of growth to include
more EMS and Fire responses West of the prevailing City limits,
this link becomes even more critical. No expansion of services
should be considered without first considering the maintaining our
current standard of care.
cc: Chief Allen
(,~(o
,if.'
kr thO,1
..." ;1.."1\
. J '\
~\t..v {'1i,f
'f\
'1"
l
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-254
TO:
Mike Haag
j;on'ng/Site Administrator
. 'am Hukill, P.E.
. ngineer
August 19, 1994
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
We have reviewed subject documents with respect to those items
inc 1 uded in your memo of August 16, 19 9 4, Part I , Section A,
Description and offer the following comments:
1. Survey must comply with Chapter 4, Sec. 7, Par. 7.1 of Land
Development Regulations, Part III, including, but not limited
to, deeds, easements or other instruments recorded in public
record.
2. Loop Road is a collector road by both Palm Beach County and
Florida D.O.T. standards (see F.S. 334.03(4). Required R.O.W.
is 80' (see Boynton Beach Code, Appendix C, Art. X., Sect. 10.
Par. B). It will be a public road.
3. Dedicate R.O.W. (public) for access road to adjacent property.
4. Provide drainage calculations.
5. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage
plan complies with all City codes & standards (see Chap. 5,
Art. X & Appendix C).
6. Inlets must be in grassy areas unless adequate documentation
is presented to support something different.
7. Road serving Pods A, D and the recreation area appears to
exceed the maximum permitted ADT's (1500) and therefore is a
collector to a point past Pod D requiring an 80' R.O.W to that
point.
8. Provide Traffic Impact Statement.
Approval of the master plan modifications by the Office of the City
Engineer is subject to satisfaction of these conditions and
consideration of the recommendation cited by Mr. Finizio on the
attached list.
WVH/ck
C: BNURSERY. COM
attachment: V. Finizio recommendations
ill
~u"m
ill
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
AUG ! () 'CSt:
PlANNIN~ AND
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-255
TO:
william Hukill, P.E.
City Engineer
FROM:
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
August 19, 1994
Boynton Nurseries P.U.D. - Master Plan Modification
RE:
I would suggest that the driveway widths depicted on plan
attachments (15' wide) be widened to 18' to allow for the parking
of two motor vehicles in each driveway. If this suggestion is
adopted by the City Commission, it would abate the potential for
numerous motor vehicles parking along the roadway and on grassed
areas within this subdivision.
VAF/ck
C:BNURSERY.VAF
Qe:.... fCIrJ/J..J( rJ~
.. -, ~
,., --..
~ ~~. ,
fir/ .
("..;\ ,tf~
,j
.. \~? "{
Q',I.Y
,\.'"
Cfl"
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-263
{!:,.iP"
(/,'P'i
f,p,j ,..;"\'"
.~
,';/
c.
TO:
Mike Haag
.zon'ng/Site Administrator
. . Hukill, P. E.
Engineer
August 23, 1994
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
BOYNTON NURSERIES P.U.D. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
In addition to our comments contained in the August 19, 1994 memo
to you (and attachment), we offer the following:
1. Developer to provide impact statement from Palm Beach County
School Board.
2. Developer to comply with March 1, 1990 comments;
a. Provide established centerline elevations for all adjacent
streets and rights-of-way.
b. Indicate the proposed layout of the lots and blocks.
c. Indicate on plans utilities such as telephone, power,
water, sewer, gas, etc. on or adjacent to the tract
including a statement on plans, that all utilities are
available and have been coordinated with all required
utilities. Section 4.C.17.
3. Developer provide commitment for perpetual maintenance and
irrigation of public rights-of-way.
WVH/ck
C:BNURSERY.PUD
xc: vincent Finizio, Dep. City Engineer
'fD) W Ii fii1
liiJ AUG 2 ~ /994 ~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #94-310
If -_!"
'/
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Director
Planning, Zoning, Community Improvement
Kevin Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist f(~ If
:",j 1\7
ill'-' A [-
IV,'-
~r
L"/
FROM:
RE:
Boynton Nurseries P .U.D.
DATE:
August 22, 1994
The applicant should prepare a statement to:
I) IdentifY by survey the existing desirable trees on site to be preserved, relocated and replaced.
2) A tree management plan for the preserve area (2.5 acres) (docwnent).
3) The lakes must have a littoral and upland hardwoods planting plan. (5 lakes) (document).
4) The three perimeter buffer areas 40' (A), 25' (B), 5' (C) contains existing desirable trees.
These trees should be addressed in a review of these areas for landscaping.
5) All public street R.O.W.'s must be irrigated and sodded with floratam sod.
6) If Lawrence Road is improved and contains a grassed median abutting this project the
applicant must landscape/irrigate the area.
KH:bjm
2219!M IE ill
m
,) '"
\\0.
J
)<
,
I .'~/.,
I' 'f:'
"/
/ I' fr'l
(/'1 ') \
,) ,.J
{/' .:,:.,.
tJV,.!-
{/.l
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tambr i Heyden
Director
FROM: Sgt. James Cummings
DATE: August 24, 1994
SUBJECT: Boynton Nursery
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
In reviewing the plans, I would request the following be added to
the plans:
1. Right Turn Only arrows indicated on plans, indicating
which lanes will be used for Right Turn Only (Southbound) onto
Lawrence Road.
JC:as
A: \BOYNNURS.MEM
ill
AUG 2 it 199.1
rn
m@mO\Vlrn
/nJ>
r- 1\'
'./
(;.J~\I
,J
~e
t.'V
-f,
.f'v
!',
Lit
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #94-218
TO: Michael Haag, Zoning & Site Development Administrator
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: TRC Review - Boynton Nurseries PUD
DATE: August 24, 1994
The Public Works Department only concerns at the above site is that
the stub road at the west end of the property does not provide a
turn around. Backing of large trucks is very dangerous especially
if vehicles happen to be parked in the street.
Eichorst
Works Director
REier
00 m ~~ ~ fUQ:~ m ill
1/
PLANNING AND ~
ZONING DEPT. ~
, .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
bffA ~y
,.Ii)
~tyV'le
!J(lY
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
Michael E. Haa~~
zoning and Site. velopment Administrator
August 26, 1994
CotLt?:Nf {).J. /VJtJ:.e1l
&Iff - 5S,J.j..
SUBJECT: Boynton Nurseries PUD - Master Plan Modification
of 400 units to 376 units, change in type of units form
162 single-family units on 6,000 square feet lots and 238
multi-family units to 233 "Z" lot units on 4,000 square
feet lots and 143 zero lot line units on 5,000 square
feet lots, including other changes identified on the
plans and letter describing the requested changes.
File No. MPMD 94-004
Please be advised of the following comments relative to the first
meeting with staff regarding review of the above-referenced
requested master plan modification.
~
(
-S~tt B
5D
1.
alL-
2 .
oiL 3.
...}jO\ 4 .
'.Y t\ bJ>,J
Nb~ ~~~s
NO{
.~/~5.
~31' ,y1J-
IlIl'o . kl~
v- -< q.
.J!~t (l\J~ ,pf'
fJ lr\fl "v.
lt~tt!'Y
~. ,<I
\I tr' 1
p~~ ~ .
~itt- '\6 .
() \L I""",
1T"
~~"'5 ~
t '7
N).;"
.~~1
S::lJI~ .
iT's.
LoS"~
~tJc
~"" '('\1'$
~
...~ 1"~
On the master plan drawing add a general note indicating each
residential dwelling unit shall have two (2) nine (9) feet
wide by eighteen (18) feet long parking spaces. On the
typical detail drawings dimension the width of the driveway
and identify the minimum width of the garage. (Appendix B
Section 9 C.).
Show on the master plan the proposed street layout for each
pod. (Appendix C Article VIII Section 4.C.10.).
To properly evaluate the proposed setbacks, a plan showing lot
and block layout is required. Note all setbacks are subject
to the restrictions of easements. Show on the master plan the
proposed lot and block layout for each pod. Number each lot.
(Appendix C Article VIII Section 4.C.10.).
Add to the master plan the total acreage of the site after
dedicating the new 80 foot road right-of-way (R-O-W), 10 foot
road R-O-W at Old Military Trail, 35 foot R-O-W along LWDD
canal-21 and the park site. Use this acreage for the Land Use
Intensity (L.U.I.) calculations.
Considering that the buildable area for each lot would allow
the maximum allowed floor area to be exceeded, provide floor
area computations and data for each lot including the building
proposed for the recreation area to ensure that the floor area
for the project does not exceed the maximum allowed area per
the land use intensity (L.U.I.) requirements. verify the
proposed maximum floor area of 12.13 acres is an accurate
number. (Appendix B Section 4.).
Change the OSR, LSR and RSR L.U.I. calculations by omitting
the assumed average floor area of 12.13 and substitute the
actual floor area or insert the maximum allowed floor area.
Transfer the proposed typical setbacks (building, pool and
screen enclosures) onto a sheet and add same to the set of
master plan drawings. Below each drawing identify the lots
they represent.
page 2
Boynton Nurseries comments ~
master plan modification ~
---------..--.
~Nt-(p.()Q. 'I
Sc.~ 1. 1.0.-1 .
With respect to the setbacks for the lots located along the
perimeter of the project, depict on the master plan and
typical detail drawings twenty-five (25) feet as originally
recommended by staff. (Appendix B Section 9.B.).
(;:; .
i ~ U I?< ,
~ so&J11l- ~
~-r NJA 10.
'.' ~
:~~J
() IlAl.
(112.
b\L
~^3.
~~
, O'fA4.
,,/'.l415.
~
oIl. 1\6.
"'/\17 .
(J ~
ptO\V'
1
pV
~(L\J1 e'
~l-otJ'" \;\~tl1.~~ I
. .,v!,< I'~ ~ 0\1
V''' 6tf 4' v ~l"
d- \
""
A ')~
3" l)"
r ~i
iJ,'b''' ~ \
t\Lv J
\1- oV--'
if v T
f~
~
~"t~,J,""
. ~
~ V
Add the sidewalk symbol to the master plan and lot layout
drawings. The master plan indicates that there are no
sidewalks in pod B, C and D. Whereas the typical road section
drawings show all roads in the development have a sidewalk.
Modify the section drawing for the public road to include the
bikepath shown on the master plan drawing.
Place the following note on the master plan: site plan review
approval is required for all improvements with the exception
of the single family homes and the specific improvements
review approved as part of the platting process.
Approval of an easement abandonment will be required prior to
construction of a building that encroaches an existing
easement.
Consistent with city Commission approval (March 20, 1990) show
and/or note on the master plan there will be two posts
connected with a chain (to meet Fire and Police Department
requirements) installed at the required emergency access on
Old Military Trail.
On the master plan and/or master landscape plan show and label
the material that will form the barrier and/or buffer required
along the Old Military Trail frontage of the property, as part
of the March 20, 1990 approval.
Add to the master landscape plan symbols and notes that
represent the location and identify the type of specie for the
proposed landscape material. (Appendix B Section 11.B.).
Clarify on the master plan whether the thirty-five (35) feet
wide area of land located along the LWDO canal-21 will be an
easement on the subject property or land dedicated to the
LWDO. The survey indicates the 35 feet is an easement and the
written data indicates the land will be dedicated to the LWDD.
Correct the location of the south property line on all plans
and data accordingly. (Appendix C Section 4 C. 14.).
,
,
18. Submit for review by the City Attorney, ownership documents to
determine if the requirements for unified control have been
met, pursuant to Section 6 of Appendix B - Planned Unit
Development of the Code of Ordinances.
\~
19. Show on the master plan and/or master landscape plan the
proposed location, height and materials for the following:
~\~Fences, Wells and Planting ~creen (Appendix B Section 11.B.).
tfl}~ ~C)Il..
To be consistent with the proposed rear setback identified as
(A) in the building setback data, change the note "25' open
space setback line", identified on the master plan, to "251
building setback/landscape easement". Correct the pool and
screen enclosure setbacks accordingly.
iY ;0.
l!>.c.~
mS~
~r)Lt O'
~t n \ .. to
? ,.... /)~ ~~"'" ..~\(. LI~
vJ~y Of ~,tg
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 94-198
August 26, 1994
...~!' vc'1
, j\'\
IY
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning Direct:o
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Of icial
,vrY l
I ."",'
(J'J''''
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
BOYNTON NURSERIES PUD - LAWRENCE RD. & LWDD, L-21 CANAL
The Building Department has reviewed the plans for the above described
project and offers the following comments:
1. Details for the entry sign, in compliance with the Boynton Beach Sign
Code, must be provided.
2. The Building Department comments for this project, dated February 2,
1990, must be addressed. They are as follows:
A. Show the lot layouts on the plans, including lot sizes and
setbacks, and proposed common areas, etc.
B. The landscaping plan must identify all plantings and they must
meet the minimum size requirements of the Landscape Code.
3. Planned Unit Developments permit a relaxation of the technical code
requirements; however, the code requires that they resern~le the
nearest zoning which in this case is R-1 or above. None\of these
residential zones will permit 40 foot wide lots or more t\an 45
percent lot coverage. \
4.
The proposed setbacks for
for property maintenance,
adjoining property owner.
easement.
the pools and screen enclosures do not allow
either by the property owner or the
Please provide a maintenance and drainage
5. Sometimes, screen enclosures are constructed with hard roofs and are
enclosed at a later date. If the proposed setbacks are approved, the
screen enclosures should only have screen roofs and should not be
enclosed at any time. ---
6. Street lights and sidewalks along the school route on Lawrence Road
should be mandatory. This issue needs to be addressed by the Planning
or Engineering Department.
7. On the "0" lot line lots, roof overhangs cannot protrude more than two
feet and compliance with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code is
required.
~
Al New 01
AN: bh
NURSERY
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 94-269 WDC
~ ,lIt) 6r;'
Ii }I
V
l~~ ,r';'\
! U!'
FROM:
Planning Departmeh~ ,
Fire Department ~
August 29, 1994
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Master Plan Modification
Boynton Nurseries
Lawrence Rd
Consideration of this project has brought to. mind several important
points.
Road Access:
Miner Road has not been completed between congress Avenue and
Lawrence Road. Without this link, service delivery is not up to
specification. Further, an extension of Miner Road to Military
Trail should be considered and given utmost priority at this time.
Considering the length of time necessary to accomplish road
connections, a proposed additional fire station is not out of line.
Water for acceptable fire flow:
A connection from the west boundary of this project to lines of the
north and west may be necessary.
Right of Way:
The right of way within this project appears to present future
conflicts, i.e.: fire hydrants in the middle of front yards and
difficul ty in maneuvering fire and rescue apparatus should any
vehicle be parked in the street.
Lot Size:
Lot size especially the 40 x 100 foot type, may be so congested a
fire operations will cause more harm than good. setbacks around
pools, in the 3 to 5 foot range, are especially hazardous after
dark. The hours when most fire operations take place.
Fire Sprinkler:
Considering these new concepts in home buildings, the concept of a
fire sprinkler system in single family residences is not far
removed from reality.
--
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Build~ng Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Clyde "Skip" Milor, utilities Chief Field Insp.
Office of the City Engineer
Vincent Fin/;~' Deputy City Engineer
Micha~~ning & Site Development Administrator
sePtember~ 1994
':'0:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Tuesday, September 13, 1994
please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
Tuesday, September 13, 1994, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West
Wing) to discuss the following:
I. LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS (other than site plans) ,
Direct written comments and plans to the Planning and Zoning
Director by 5:00 P.M. September 16, 1994, (three (3) working
days following the TRC meeting) unless otherwise noted
below.
1.
A. MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
B. CONDITIONAL USE
1.
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Boynton Nurseries PUD
Lawrence Road and LWDD, L-21 Canal
Second review of amended master plan
showing a revision to the number of
units from 400 to 376, change in type of
units from 162 single-family units on
6,000 square foot lots and 238 multi-
family units to 233 "Z" lot units on
4,000 square foot lots and 143 zero lot
line units on 5,000 square foot lots, an
increase in traffic impact, (traffic
statement attached), change in road
widths and public/private ownership of
same, altered layout and size of
preserve area and revised master
drainage, utilities and landscape plans.
Yachtman's Cove
1406 N. Federal Highway
Existing bUilding and site previously
used for retail sales of boats.
Proposed to reinstate the retail sale of
boats conditional use.
Note: 1st review comments due September
9, 1994. See Memorandum #94-274.
page 2
Technical Review Committee Meeting
September 2, 1994
II. REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
AND PLANS RECE:VED
A. None
III. OTHER
A.
1 .
PROJECT:
New Boynton High school
LOCATION:
Gateway and Parkridge Boulevard
DESCRIPTION:
Courtesy review of new prototype high
school located in Quantum Park of
Commerce. Note, plans are to show
compliance with previous staff comment.
Note: Direct written comments and plans
to the Planning and Zoning Director.
Bring same to the september 13, 1994 TRC
meeting.
cc: MEMO ONLY
Carrie Parker, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaeger, Building Official
Floyd Jordan, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police chief
John Guidry, utilities Director
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to utilities Director
steve campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
central File
Gary Lanker, Lanker Engineering Service
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Dorothy Moore, Zoning and site Plan Reviewer
Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner
Project (each) File
Chronological File
TRC File (Original)
Bulletin
~ ~RC~~N~. ~:3