REVIEW COMMENTS
hie
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-247
FROM:
~g~~lding Official
Christopher cutro: Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
September 27/ 1993
RE:
TRANSMITTAL OF APPROVED SITE PLAN FROM THE AUG.17/1993
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Accompanying this memorandum you will find the approved site pla~
package for the project(s) listed below. The site plan package
will include the following items:
a. A copy of the City issued approval letter
b. Written order signed by the Mayor
c. A copy of the site plan review comments made by the
Technical Review Committee (TRC)
d. A set of plans reviewed by the TRC
1. Ascension Lutheran Church 2929 S. Seacrest Blvd. - Slte
plan drawings for phase I.
Attachment
XC: (Memo only)
Al Newbold
Project File
Numbered File
A: TRANSMTL.SP
~.T~
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 93-208
FROH:
J. Scott Hiller, City Hanager
~~ CL~
Chrlsfopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
TO:
DATE:
August 12, 1993
SUBJECT:
Ascension Lutheran Church Site Plan
Roy Simon, architect for Ascension Lutheran Church, has requested
a site plan review of the church located at 2929 South seacrest
Boulevard. The improvements to the site include building
additions of just over 1000 square feet and improvements to the
parking area around the church.
This site plan has been reviewed by various departments and the
few remaining comments are attached to the staff report. Staff
recommended that the site plan be forwarded to the Planning and
Development Board.
At its meeting of August 10, 1993 the Planning and Development
Board reviewed this site plan and forwarded it to the City
Commission with a recommendation for approval subject to the
condit~ons in the staff report. The Board also added a condition
that staff review the drainage plan at time of building permit
and, if possible, mitigate flooding to the west if caused by this
property.
This site plan has been scheduled for final review before the
City Commission on August 17, 1993.
CC:cp
7B3
ASCENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
SITE PLAN REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
FOR
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION
July 22, 1993
Project Name: Ascension Lutheran Church
Applicant: Ascension Lutheran church
Agent: Roy A. Simon, Architect
Location: 2929 south Seacrest Boulevard
Land Use plan Designation: Public and Private
Governmental/Institutional
Zoning Designation: R-l-AA
Type of Use: Religious Facility
Number of Units: N/A
square Footage: Building Addition: 1,047.3 square feet
Total Building: 10,969.3 square feet
site: 4.13 acres
Description of Project: Roy A. Simon, agent tor Ascension Lutheran
Church, is requesting site plan approval to modify the existing
church site located at 2929 South Seacrest Boulevard. The proposed
modifications to the site are all within the existing 4.13 acre
site. The following is a description of the scope of the request:
1.
Site
a.
c.
Improvements -
Relocate north ingress/egress driveway two hundred
forty-five (245) feet south and construct new turn
lane for the new driveway.
Extend paved access aisles and parKlng spaces at
the northwest portion of the site.
Install new sidewalk allowing pedestrian access to
the site from Seacrest Boulevard.
Upgrade existing landscaping to comply with current
code.
Relocate freestanding sign to approximately fifty
(50) feet north of the new driveway.
b.
d.
e.
II. Addition to Existing Structures -
a. Add one thousand forty-seven (1047) square feet to
the south site of the existing sanctuary.
b. Construct an entrance portico west of the sanctuary
that abuts the parking area.
c. Install a covered walkway between the sanctuary and
the fellowship hall.
The proposed Sll:e improvements regaralng the new driveway and
extension of parking area create an acceptable traffic circulation
pattern for the proj ect. The landscape improvements meet the
standards of the Landscape Code. The one thousand forty-seven
(1047) square foot addition to the narthex aligns with the design
and color of the existing sanctuary. The portico and covered
walkway blend into the existing features of the facility. There are
no improvements proposed for the existing structure indentified on
the site plan as fellowship hall, administration and classrooms.
Review of Departmental Comments: Please find attached the comments
from all of the reviewing departments. The Technical Review
Committee recommends that the project proceed forward through the
approval process subject to the following comments: Public Works
Ascension Lutheran Church
Page 2
Memorandum No. 93-145, Cl~y Engineer Memorandum No. 93-173,
Engineering Department Memorandum No. 93-178 and Planning and
Zoning Department Memorandum dated July 2, 1993 reference 2nd
Review, File No. 747.
Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that
the Planning and Development Board find the site plan review
acceptable and forward same to the city Commission with a
recommendation to approve I subj ect to the applicant submitting
working drawings to the Building Department that depict the project
in compliance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances and the attached staff comments.
C:LUTHERAN.P&D
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-145
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Second Review - Acension Lutheran Church
DATE: June 28, 1993
The dumpster enclosure at this site must be a minimum of 10' inside
dimensions. Also the approach angle of the dumpster enclosure
should be angled to be more parallel to driveway.
,
Eichorst
Works Director
RE/cr
€66l 6 Z Nnr
03^13038
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-173
TO: Chris Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Bill Archdeacon,
City Engineer
DATE: June 24, 1993
RE: Ascension Lutheran Church
We are in receipt of your Memo #93-153, have reviewed the plans
and comments letter, and have the following comments:
1. The detailed site engineering drawings will not be exempt from
the parking lot requirements per City cod~. We concur with the
Phase I parking count increase % as outlined by Mr. Simon.
2. The response from Palm Beach County is acceptable at this time.
3. Proposed drainage concept appears adequate.
4. We still require calcuations supporting the adequacy of the
stopping sight distance.
5. The driveway variance was intended to be for ultimate buildout,
not required as a Phase I item, and was tb cover the existing
driveway at SE 28th Avenue. This variance request is not
required at this time, but could be considered if so desired by
the applicant.
Other items, as addressed by applicant, are satisfactory.
WCA/ck
cc: Vincent A. Finizio
RECEIVED
JUN 2 ~ 1993
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-178
TO: Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE: July 1, 1993
RE: Technical Review Committee Comments
Ascension Lutheran Church
Roy M. Simon - Architect
I have reviewed the above referenced plans and herein submit that
the only comment which will be addressed at time of permit submission
involves the parking facility and pedestrial walkway lighting.
Attached for your review and consideration is a copy of Mr. Simon's
June 28, 1993 letter wherein under item #1 states that a photometric
grid will be provided this office, reference existing levels of
illumination and should they fall below minimum City standards, the
agent for the property owner agrees to have the lighting system
modified to conform with current code, therefore, I have no objection
to this plan moving forward to the reviewing boards conditioned upon
item #1 of Mr. Simon's letter which shall be made part of the Planning
& Development Board's record, via this memorandum.
iam C. Archdeacon, PE,PLS
Engineer
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Enginee
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
attachment: Roy M. Simon, Architect, letter dated June 28, 1993
Fl~CE:IVED
.J 11/. 1 - 1993
Qoy M. &imon · A.LA. · Architect
architects and planners
June 28, 1993
Mr. Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Re: Ascension Lutheran Church
Our Project No. 9212
Dear Mr. Finizio:
In response to your comments regarding the site lighting and the
stabilized sod parking areas, I submit the following.
1.
JJt'
~d' ~~
if~
2.
t
~,t()J
~\\\~
Site Lighting:
According to the electrical engineer's drawings of the
existing parking lot lighting, the photometric diagram
indicates that the lighting for the existing parking
lot meets or exceeds the code of 1 foot-candle average.
As stated, this was constructed in 1983.-84 and approved
by the City of Boynton Beach. A computerized
photometric grid ~s being prepared and will be
submitted to your office. This will advise that in the
event the photometrics of the parking lot and walkway
lighting do not meet with your approval, such lighting
will be redesigned to conform to code.
Stabilized Sod Parking:
When the present churcn facility and parking lot
improvements were constructed in 1983-84, the
stabilized sod parking spaces were indicated on the
drawings as "sod on 2" of topsoil on 6" shellrock base"
and approved by Tom Clark on 3/28/83. It is presumed
that it was constructed with the City's approval. In
the event that the existing stabilized sod parking
areas are found not to meet City standards, the owner
will upgrade those areas to be in compliance.
If you have any questions regarding these items, please advise.
Sincerely,
vJ A~. ,'_ .
~. S'mon, A.I.A.
RMS : wdm
cc: Rev. Conrad Braaten
Jim Lavold
100 northeast fifth avenue . suite a-2 . delray beach. norida 33483 . (407) 278-1914
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-137
July 1, 1993
TO:
Chris Cutro
Planning Dir
FROM:
Don Jaeger!
Building Q
Milt Duff
Chief Plans Check Inspector
THRU:
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - ASCENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH
We have reviewed the plans for the above described project and
have no objection to these plans being forwarded to the Planning
& Development Board since all Building Department comments have
been addressed.
Ih~ ~ ,tJ*
Milt Duff
MD:bh
xc: Al Newbold
CHURCH
RECEt\l~O
JUt 1 - 1993
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
pg
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-260
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
JUNE 30, 1993
ACENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH - PHASE I
WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO FIRST PHASE OF THIS PROJECT.
~~fL~c
WILLIAM D CAVAN UGH, FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
RECEIVED
."" 1 - 4"01
MEMORANDUM
Utilities No. 93-294
TO:
chris Cutro,
Planning and Zoning
/
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
DATE: June 28, 1993
SUBJECT: Ascension Lutheran Church - phase I
File No. 747
Major Site Plan Modification - 2nd Review
staff has reviewed the above-referenced plan and otter no
comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through
the review process.
The plan will again be reviewed at the time of building permit
for adherance to all City Codes and Specifications.
If you have any questions regarding this subject please contact
Mike Kazunas at 738-7460.
Ibks
cc: Mike Kazunas
Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
Utility Engineer - .5 hr.
Administrative Ass't. .5 hr
RECEIVED
JUN 2 8 1993
M E M 0 RAN DUM
POLICE NO. 93-108
TO:
Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
June 28, 1993
REF:
Second Review - Ascension Lutheran Church
Sir,
I have reviewed the amended plans submitted on the Ascension
Lutheran Church.
I fend no major problem with modifications listed and my original
comments were addressed.
I also recommend that the plan should be forwarded to the Planning
and Development Board.
~.~~ld~k${ ~
MK/jb
REceIVED
JUN 2 9 1993
ATTEN: APRILLE DAY
MEMORANDUM
RE:
Chrstopher Cutro, planning and Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks superintendentUt~
7 - ;)-f 3 I
Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification -
1st Review /1 I..t- ~
Project: '-1S,,/fWJ;Ot..J {".<-tf(.1~t{4...v C 4/<--c(\
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the
above referenced project. There are no outstanding
recreation related issues on this project.
C:PARKS.MSP
f\E.CE.\\iE.O
1 ... \f?Jf?J3
~~\.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-270
TO:
Chris Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
YJ it-
RE:
Ascension Lutheran Church
Phase 1 - 2nd Review
DATE:
June 30, 1993
My comments as previously made have been addressed.
KH:ad
RECEIVED
JUl 1
PLANNING DEPT.
- ~Jtl
-
MEMORANDUM
'fO: Christopher cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, zoning and site Development Administrator
DATE: July 2, 1993
RE: Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Second Review
Project: Ascension Lutheran Church
Site Improvements and Addition
(Phase I - Narthex addition, covered walkway,
extension of parking area and relocation of
north driveway)
Location: 2929 south Seacrest Boulevard
Applicant: Ascension Lutheran Church'
File No.: 747
'I'he amended plans for the above referenced proj ect have been
submitted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments
from the original set of comments that were not satisfactorily
corrected on the amended plans or that were generated as a result
of the review of amended plans. All comments shall be corrected.
'However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the outstanding
comments on the plans that are required to.be submitted to the
Building Department for permit review. The applicant must
understand that the following comments are comments generated for
Site Plan Review and that additional comments may be forth coming
as a result of the review of the working drawings and documents
submitted to the Building Department for permits. All permit
documents are reviewed for compliance with the requirements
specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
1. As indicated on Sheet A-2 "classroom note: II "The existing
classroom (the original church building) is used for Sunday
school classes, Sundays only, for 9 months each year. The
classes consist of 25 students whose ages vary from 5 years to
18 years." Identify on the plan the use of the structure for
the remaining three (3) months of the year. If the only use of
the structure is for sunday school classes that are held in
conjunction with the regular church services of the existing
sanctuary there is not a requirement to provide parking spaces
for the classrooms. Therefore, remove same from the required
parking calculations. I f the Sunday school use is not a
function of the primary use of the site (church) or the
structure is used for other purposes the remaining three (3)
months of the year the parking spaces for the classroom are
required.
2. On the site plan extend the required curbing along the edge of
the pavement starting at the north edge of the new concrete
sidewalk located southwest of the existing classroom building
to the southeast edge of the dumpster area.
E. Haa
(:---
!
I
i
;
-;
\' ,\\\ \h~\l ,:\\1\1 \\\ in\ ~ H
\ \ \\1\ 1 \ I \ \
. . ," . . . .. . ..,
,,,., It It ."l'"
~ .._ . 4 .. \
. 'II ", ~ .
, ~."" u \
I "" n
~ ~ \
I.~ 0.0.'::)O~(::}O
~\\ \\~ \. ~ \-\ \ \\ \-
It ~ \ \ \ . \ '1..'
t.t ,'t t\ ~ l ·
i:' \ 1. t a \ A ;l a
'\ .~1- ; l- I'
II r. \ l ,. \
L ~.. · 1- \ -
\ _ t-l \ - I
L 0CATION M4P
ASCENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH
~LJ..LlLJ~
, ~ rift
-t- ~- -I T11 \ ~ \ ~'~' I \ \ I rD:
~ ,'" "vi
REC
o
pu~
, 'I
I ,
~ '
, ,
.
~.._ to
(:2
'--
't.,. '\
)'C'L. jI' ,
'I~__l
:If-- - \
I I ,
III \'-
If FI r\
j~:rii"/
~:L___ }\
! fir ~..
.~
I -
. . - .... '.4.
,
,
,
,
1----
I
I
o 1/8
Till I \ \
'0 400. . 800 FEET
I
I
MEMORANDUM
~J\"~
'20""
~
0"'\1)
( i-t-~
{p' ?
.l:\
(\"r
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and Site Development Administrator
DATE: July 2, 1993
RE: Site Plan Review - Major Site Plan Modification
Second Review
Project: Ascension Lutheran Church
Site Improvements and Addition
(Phase I - Narthex addition, covered walkway,
extension of parking area and relocation of
north driveway)
Location: 2929 South Seacrest Boulevard
Applicant: Ascension Lutheran Church
File No.: 747
The amended plans for the above referenced proj ect have been
submitted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments
from the original set of comments that were not satisfactorily
corrected on the amended plans or that were generated as a result
of the review of amended plans. All comments shall be corrected.
However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the outstanding
comments on the plans that are required to be submitted to the
Building Department for permit review. The applicant must
understand that the following comments are comments generated for
Site Plan Review and that additional comments may be forth coming
as a result of the review of the working drawings and documents
submi tted to the Building Department for permits. All permit
documents are reviewed for compliance with the requirements
specified in the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
1. As indicated on Sheet A-2 "classroom note:" "The existing
classroom (the original church building) is used for Sunday
school classes, Sundays only, for 9 months each year. The
classes consist of 25 students whose ages vary from 5 years to
18 years." Identify on the plan the use of the structure for
the remaining three (3) months of the year. If the only use of
the structure is for Sunday school classes that are held in
conjunction with the regular church services of the existing
sanctuary there is not a requirement to provide parking spaces
for the classrooms. Therefore, remove same from the required
parking calculations. If the Sunday school use is not a
function of the primary use of the site (church) or the
structure is used for other purposes the remaining three (3)
months of the year the parking spaces for the classroom are
required.
2. On the site plan extend the required curbing along the edge of
the pavement starting at the north edge of the new concrete
sidewalk located southwest of the existing classroom building
to the southeast edge of the dumpster area.
~ 3.
On the landscape plan the lineal footage of vehicle use area
that is visible from the north property line is 189 lineal
feet not 145 lineal feet. Correct the plans and computations
accordingly.
-- - 4
-., .
On the landscape plan extend the symbol that represents the
required vehicle use area hedge screening material around the
radius of the new walkway located northwest of the existing
sanctuary. Adjust the quantity accordingly.
To: Christopher cutro
Re: Ascension Lutheran Church
l>age 2 of 2
~.,
_. lr 5.
On the landscape plan extend the symbol that represents the
required vehicle use area hedge screening material to within
three (3) feet of the south side of the new driveway and to
within (3) feet of the north and south sides of the existing
driveway. Adjust the plant quantities accordingly.
_.. '\J..-. 6 .
On the landscape plan specify the "on center" spacing of the
existing cherry hedge that is required to screen the vehicle
use area. The maximum spacing allowed per code is two (2) feet
on center. Approval of an appeal to the landscape code is
required if the spacing is greater than two ( 2) feet on
center.
~ 7.
Considering the note on the landscape plan indicates that the
native species count of required hedge material is below the
required fifty (50) percent, approval of an appeal to the
landscape specifications is required.
~/1f "'
1?tC~
,.'t.Uchael
f.fEH:ald
C:ASCENSN.ALD
R. .r,.." b'lJ.
--
lot.: L., """" , "I ^ ,,~
'1.;.93
A
LA",o' c.Ar6. A ("P(:4 (...
A""&:lIIo T/.J~ t..4 NOS. c.-Ap t
fL4tJ$ n ni"'T CoIfllPL,4NC.t.
tv,rw T\I~ ~e Lh.,) IQ~TIf,e:!>
lA,.,o S Co. f:: Co "'" ~ .eo", T oS .
S'V6MI-r /'1... ,q"'~~4 .r1l4~T.
~! t. 1,~.1.. 7"IIA,.:L WI"
/t\I.rttltr IIIII'D T1J1. Sf'r.1' f>L. ~,
""",0$.
~~ Rc:"4'~/N' G"'Itf4f~7:{
/114)' BE .sHtUeJ,u lit} G>~""'^,e~
~ 7JJ1: ,P~~..",r S6r rI ,tt..~.S'
.
4 ~)1 ",c /It" .rrAI'"~
~.,..,t!-vn ~~AiZ.o~, .R:e&l~~
()~ ~ A.", do4J'04,::) , L.."",.1 #,Ir
d~4A1 M.dJt.!o 7f) /DJJA /J ?'~<:.~
l~/4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Christopher cutro, planning and Zoning Director
FROM: Michael E. Haag, Zoning and site Development Administrator
DATE: July 2, 1993
RE: Site Plan Review - Major site Plan Modification
Second Review
project: Ascension Lutheran Church
Site Improvements and Addition
(Phase I - Narthex addition, covered walkway,
extension of parking area and relocation of
north driveway)
Location: 2929 south Seacrest Boulevard
Applicant: Ascension Lutheran church
File No.: 747
The amended plans for the above referenced proj ect have been
submitted and reviewed. The following comments are either comments
from the original set of comments that were not satisfactorily
corrected on the amended plans or that were generated as a result
of the review of amended plans. All comments shall be corrected.
However, it is acceptable to show compliance with the outstanding
comments on the plans that are required to be submitted to the
Building Department for permit review. The applicant must
understand that the following comments are comments generated for
Site Plan Review and that additional comments may be forth coming
as a result of the review of the working drawings and documents
submitted to the Building Department for permits. All permit
documents are reviewed for compliance with the requirements
specified in the Boynton Beach code of Ordinances.
1. As indicated on sheet A-2 "classroom note: II liThe eXlstlng
classroom (the original church building) is used for sunday
school classes, Sundays only, for 9 months each year. The
classes consist of 25 students whose ages vary from 5 years to
18 years.if Identify on the plan the use of the structure for
the remaining three (3) months of the year. If the only use of
the structure is for Sunday school classes that are held in
conjunction with the regular church services of the existing
sanctuary there is not a requirement to provide parking spaces
for the classrooms. Therefore, remove same from the required
parking calculations. If the Sunday school use is not a
function of the primary use of the site (church) or the
structure is used for other purposes the remaining three (3)
months of the year the parklng spaces for the classroom are
required.
2. On the site plan extend the required curbing along the edge of
the pavement starting at the north edge of the new concrete
sidewalk located southwest of the existing classroom building
to the southeast edge of the dumpster area.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #93-145
TO: Christopher Cutro, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ: Second Review - Acension Lutheran Church
DATE: June 28, 1993
The dumpster enclosure at this site must be a minimum of 10' inside
dimensions. Also the approach angle of the dumpster enclosure
should be angled to be more parallel to driveway.
Eichorst
Works Director
RE/cr
E66l 6 Z Nnr
a3^1303i:1
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-173
TO: Chris Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Bill Archdeacon,
City Engineer
DATE: June 24, 1993
RE: Ascension Lutheran Church
We are in receipt of your Memo #93-153, have reviewed the plans
and comments letter, and have the following comments:
1. The detailed site engineering drawings will not be exempt from
the parking lot requirements per City code. We concur with the
Phase I parking count increase % as outlined by Mr. Simon.
2. The response from Palm Beach County is acceptable at this time.
3. Proposed drainage concept appears adequate.
4. We still require calcuations supporting the adequacy of the
stopping sight distance.
5. The driveway variance was intended to be for ultimate buildout,
not required as a Phase I item, and was to cover the existing
driveway at SE 28th Avenue. This variance request is not
required at this time, but could be considered if so desired by
the applicant.
Other items, as addressed by applicant, are satisfactory.
WCAlck
cc: Vincent A. Finizio
REceIVED
JUN 2 '* 1993
--
-
/
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-178
TO:
Christopher Cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Engineer
DATE:
July 1, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Comments
Ascension Lutheran Church
Roy M. Simon - Architect
I have reviewed the above referenced plans and herein submit that
the only comment which will be addressed at time of permit submission
involves the parking facility and pedestrial walkway lighting.
Attached for your review and consideration is a copy of Mr. Simon's
June 28, 1993 letter wherein under item #1 states that a photometric
grid will be provided this office, reference existing levels of
illumination and should they fall below minimum City standards, the
agent for the property owner agrees to have the lighting system
modified to conform with current code, therefore, I have no objection
to this plan moving forward to the reviewing boards conditioned upon
item #1 of Mr. Simonis letter which shall be made part of the Planning
& Development Board's record, via this memorandum.
iam C. Archdeacon, PE,PLS
Engineer
Vincent A. Finizio
Deputy City Enginee
VAF/ck
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
attachment: Roy M. Simon, Architect, letter dated June 28, 1993
Fl r.: f"" ~/\ '.
"-vi:.:: v'EO
.J U I. 1 - 1993
/
J
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-137
July 1, 1993
THRU:
Chris Cutro
Planning Di~rc;tor
Don Jaeger!!
Building oi~icial
TO:
FROM:
Milt Duff
Chief Plans Check Inspector
RE:
TRe COMMENTS - ASCENSION LUTHERAN CIRJRCH
We have reviewed the plans for the above described project and
have no objection to these plans being forwarded to the Planning
& Development Board since all Building Department comments have
been addressed.
In~ ~ ,b*
Milt Duff
MD:bh
xc: Al Newbold
CHURCH
RECEtV1EQ
JUt 1 - 1993
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
pg
FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 93-260
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
JUNE 3 0, 1 9 9 3
ACENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH - PHASE I
WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO FIRST PHASE OF THIS PROJECT.
~d~~c
WILLIAM D CAVANAUGH, FPO I
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT
RECEIVED
.1' !' 1 - ~"!')3
MEMORANDUM
Utilltles No. 93-294
TO: Chris cutro,
Planning and Zoning
FROM: John A. Guidry,
Dlrector of utllltles
DATE: June 28, 1993
SUBJECT: AscenSlon Lutheran Church - Phase I
Flle No. 747
MaJor Site Plan Modification - 2nd ReVlew
staff has reviewed ~he above-referenced plan and ot~er no
comment. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through
the reVlew process.
The plan will again be reviewed at the time of bUllding permlt
for adherance to all City Codes and Specifications.
If you have any questlons regardlng this subJect please contact
Mlke Kazunas at 738-7460.
/bks
cc: Mike Kazunas
Skip Milor
Peter Mazzella
Utility Englneer - .5 hr.
Admlnistrative Ass't. .5 hr
RECEIVED
JUN 2 8 1993
M E M 0 RAN DUM
POLICE NO. 93-108
TO:
Christopher cutro
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Sgt. Michael Kirrman
DATE:
June 28, 1993
REF:
Second Review - Ascension Lutheran Church
Sir,
I have reviewed the amended plans submitted on the Ascension
Lutheran church.
I fend no major problem with modifications listed and my original
comments were addressed.
I also recommend that the plan should be forwarded to the Planning
and Development Board.
~.~\~&dkj({ ~
MK/jb
RECEIVED
JUN 2 9 1993
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #93-270
Chris Cutro, Planning & zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Ascension Lutheran Church
Phase 1 - 2nd Review
June 30, 1993
Yj11-
My comments as previously made have been addressed.
KH:ad
.'.
RECEIVED
JUL 1
PLANNING DEPT.
- ~.J(
-
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
William Cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
Mike Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Vincent Finizior Engineering Department
William C. Archdeaconr Gee & Jenson Consulting Engineers
FROM:
Dorothy Moore, Zoning & Site Plan Reviewer
DATE:
June 2, 1993
RE:
Technical Review Committee Meeting
Thursday, June 10, 1993
Please be advised that the Technical Review Committee will meet on
ThursdaYr June 10,1993, at 9:00 A.M. in Conference Room "C" (West Wing)
to discuss the following site plans for inter-departmental conflicts:
a. Ascension Lutheran Church
b. Waffle House
c. Boynton Lakes (Park)
d. Meadow Park II
D~~~~'
DM/jm
Att.
cc: J. Scott Miller, City Manager
City Commission (5)
Don Jaegerr Building Official
Ed Allen, Fire Chief
Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director
Thomas Dettman, Police Chief
John Guidry, Utilities Director
steve Campbell, Fire Department
Bob Gibson, Public Works
Central File
Christopher cutror Planning & Zoning Director
Tambri Heyden, Senior Planner
Mike Haag, zoning and Site Development Administrator
Projec't File
Chronological File
.D.. : TF..::::THURE . JH
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-153
TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Vince Finizio, Engineering Department
William Archdeacon, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Mike Kazunas, utility Engnieer
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
K vin Halla an Forester/Environmentalist
FROM: Planning & Zoning Director
DATE: June 23, 1993
RE: second Review - Major site Plan Modification
Project Acension Lutheran Church - Phase 1
Location - 2929 South Seacres~ Boulevard
Applicant - Ascension Lutheran church (Roy Simon, Architect)
File No. - 747
Attached is the amended site plan for the above referenced development for
your final review and recommendation.
We would ask that you review this amended site plan to determine if the plans
have been adjusted to satisfy comments made previously by your department.
If the comments have been satisfied or if your comments can be met at time of
building permit, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
If your comments have not been met or must be met by correcting the site plan
again, please advise the Planning and Zoning Department in writing.
Finally we would ask that you recommend to us if the plan should be forwarded
to the Planning and Development Board/Community Redevelopment Advisory Board
for review or held for further revisions by the applicant. All correspondence
shall be received by the Planning and Zoning Department per the following:
Please return your memo and the amended plans to the Planning and Zoning
Department by 5:00 P.M. on June 30, 1993.
If you should have any questions regarding this plan, please feel free to
call Mike Haag at 228 who is coordinating the review of this development.
xc: (Memo Only)
Don Jaeger
Ed Allen
Charlie Frederick
Tom Dettman
John Guidry
project File
Chronological File
Note: A Parking Lot Variance
and a Landscape Appeal will
be required.
C:LUTHERAN.2RV
,....~~\
4. & 5.
6. - 9.
10.-20.
SITE IMPROVEMENTS & ADDITION TO
ASCENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH - PHASE 1
RESPONSE TO STAFF INITIAL REVIEW COMMENTS, MAY 27, 1993
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT:
1.
The existing "classroom" facility (the original church
building), containing 2841.6 square feet, is used for Sunday
School classes, in session from September until mid-June
each year, Sundays only. The present enrollment is 25
students ranging in age from 5-18 years. The average
parking requirement for schools (Appendix A, Zoning Section
11.H, 16-C) is one space per 300 s.f. which equates to 9.5
parking spaces. Ten (10) are provided. See Site Data on
Drawing A-2 for additional parking ratio
(required/provided).
2.
The proposed "Narthex" addition will increase the size of
the church by 1047.3 s.f. from 9,922 s.f. to 10,969.3 s.f.
The present Narthex is 432 s.f. and not adequate in size to
serve as the church lobby; therefore, it is proposed to
increase the area to better serve as the church lobby.
3.
The number of required and provided spaces for the
handicapped was shown on the Drawing No. A-2 under "Parking
Notes" .
The existing parking lot was constructed to provide concrete
curbing at all paved stalls. Each existing stall is 18' x
20' from the curb which exceeds the requirement. The
restriping only reduces the stall widths to 9 ft. minimum.
The allocated spaces will allow 16 ft. stall depths.
The Site Plan has been amended to provide the information
requested.
The landscape drawings have been amended to reflect the
information requested. with regard to native plants, please
note that the ratio of native plants i~43%. It is
requested that this be accepted to avoid removing the hedge
material along the west property line which is in good
condition, healthy, and established. . Additionally, there
exists continuous wood fencing the entire length of the west
property line on the west side of the hedge.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. The drawings have been amended to reflect the corrections
noted by the Director of Utilities.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1,2 Items 1, 2, & 3 are noted and will be dealt with in
& 3. connection with the submittal for Phases 2 & 3.
4. Drawing A-2 has been amended to provide handicap
accessibility from the property line to the walkways.
5. Details for signage will be presented with permit
application. Phase 1 proposes the relocation of the
existing permitted sign.
TRAFFIC
1,2. Signage and traffic control markings are to be incorporated
into final engineering plans to be submitted at the time of
Building Permitting.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1. As indicated on the original submittal, Drawing No. A-2, the
existing parking lot, approved and constructed in 1983-84,
contains 187 parking spaces (94 paved & 93 stabilized sod).
The proposed improvements converts 94 existing paved spaces
to 96, paves 36 of the existing stabilized sod spaces, and
retains 57 of the existing stabilized sod spaces, and
provides 26 new paved spaces. The net increase in parking
spaces is 18, (from 187 to 205), or 9.6%.
2. The proposed improvements have been reviewed by Palm Beach
County. Details will be addressed as part of final design
and the required permits will be secured. Copy of letter
from Palm Beach County Engineering Department is attached.
3. The proposed drainage plan was included with the original
submittal, entitled "Preliminary Civil Plans", Drawing C-l.
4. Access Drive:
a) A Variance Application has been submitted.
b) The proposed new driveway eliminates the potential
problems associated with sight distance concerns at the
existing northernmost driveway which is to be removed with
Phase 1 improvements. The new driveway's location exceeds
the required stopping sight distance from the crest of the
hill to the North.
c) By City Code definition, the proposed new driveway is not
a Major Driveway and therefore the 100' requirement is no~
applicable, however, a Variance Application has been
submitted.
. ...,
d) The proposed driveway will accommodate 150 right turn
movements based upon County criteria. Anticipated Peak Hour
directional turn movements, for Phase 1, are anticipated to
be in the order of 25 turns in either direction.
5. Parking area design details will be in accordance with City
requirements which will be reflected on the permit drawings.
6. Sidewalk details will be in accordance with City standards
and will be detailed on final permit drawings.
7. The Phase 1 project will not add any net vehicle trips to
the County roadway network and therefore conforms to Palm
Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. Future phases
will be addressed independently to determine their relative
impact.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 93-106
Robert Eichorst, Public works Director
Vince Finizio, Admin. Engineering Department
Richard staudinger, Gee & Jenson
Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official
Bill cavanaugh, Fire Prevention Officer
Michael Kazunas, utilities Engineer
Sgt. Mike Kirrman, Police Department
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
~.~
Christopher cutro, Planning & zoning Director
May 13, 1993
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
Major Site Plan Modification
Project Ascension Lutheran Church
site Improvements and Addition,
Phases 1, 2, and 3
2929 south Seacrest Boulevard
Ascension Lutheran Church
747
Location
Applicant -
File No.
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above
referenced project. The applicant desires review for all three
phases, 1, 2, and 3, as a single site plan. Phase 1 will be the
initial phase of construction within the time frame allowed by
code. Phase 2 and 3 will be constructed in subsequent future time
frames. site Plan Review approval for this project will be granted
by the City commission/Community Redevelopment Agency. To ensure
that the project stays on line with the review time frame, I
request that the plans and exhibits be reviewed and formal written
comments transmitted to the Director of the planning and zoning
Department no later than 5:00 P.M. on Hav 27. 1993. Do not return
plans and exhibits. Retain same for the review of the amended plans
(2nd review).
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a
comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain
Technical Review Committee approval:
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: tAI1JlaJ
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support~)
COLORED ELEVATIONS AESTHETIC ~J^EW APP. FEE: tJl~
RECID: REC'D:. RECEIPT NO.: l ~fJt
MEMO SENT TO T~f/jTOJ PERFORM 2nd REWAW., ,. It
DATE SENT: ~'J117 MEMO #:~ RETURN DATE: ~
2nd REVIEW RECOMMENDATION/DENIAL
1.
2.
l.Mt::i:) l..ut:: l..'!'l;
Use the review standards specified in Part III, Land
Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section
8 to review and formulate comments. (See planning
& zoning Department memo #92-020)
The documents submitted for the project were determined to be
substantially complete based on the submittal requirements
identified in Section 7 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance.
However, if the data provided to meet the submittal
~~v~~w App., Qa~es O~ Doara m~gs. << cneCK11st sent out wi comments)
Util.
PLANS MEMO # I DATE I"RiD" PLANS
Ut'/'~ q'?>~:J.qill{,~:J.f I f)/ 'Pl::llnn;nn
MEMO # I DATE /"R/D"
/ /
L~CATION M~P
ASCENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH
~~
. ~ (jft
a
pu~
,
, I
, ,
I I
I
I "
, ,
, I 1
I ,
~' .' I
I
I
I
1---- 0 - .0.
j
,
o 1/8
TII11 II
10 ,400. '800
'Iff /'.',/ I
"-
~...'t.
I
:'
(/
/:/
f'- /1/
. - ,
. ii;' I
.1- I
v:
j_l'
, I
I" I
-,.
.
~ ~
1111 un I n iill ii II
III i !Iii 111,111"111 ~I I, \l
II; ~ 10m " I ~
- I .. 1.1 . ,
III I II Iii ! i
ii I !II i
I III I
I (
jiili Iii 'I li!i l!li iiii I il II Ii Ii I lit \
~~lll~ !Il M mlijll I 11'1;
Ii Iii I! il i~ ill 1111 II q ! d I!i .
III Ii , ~lllll I,tlll, 111111 !I
I ,I I I II , I,
I
F
~
U
;
... l
.
Ii
f'ri
g; s
!I J Ii
I~ i;i
i i i
,I
IIIII s". ..,.s,
i n (f III', 1,'1 1(11'(111111111 i
,it II. II I I I I
.".".. .-a",
, . . . . . , . ~ . I
.......- -I
J Iff '" I
I ~; !I
I
..~ O..O_~',:)00(:.)O
111 { I ! 1 ! ! 1 i i i
c~ l f i i 1 ! I I l f t
~~ 1 (~ L ; i : ; :
11 ,~&.- : L S C L-
1 .l l ! f" L I
if:
L
V\l
r-
t>
"
t7
~ 't
~- .,
~
Board of S;ounty Commissioners
Mary M'3Carty, Cl!air ,
Ken L. Foster, Vice Chairman
Karen T. Marcus
Carol A. Roberts
Warren H. Newell '
Burt Aaronson
Maude Ford Lee
'. ""
~
June 8, 1993
Dick Sheremeta, P.E.
Sheremeta and Associates, Inc.
101 S.E. 6th Ave.
Delray Beach, FL 33483
SUBJECT: -ASCENSION LUTHERAN CHURCH
RIGHT TURN LANE AND DRIVEWAY ON SEACREST BOULEVARD
Dear Mr. Sheremeta:
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
RFr.~!"Fn
J ~ I~ 1 ; 1~)93
q~/~?J ·
I am writing pursuant to your request, to confirm that the County would have no
objections to your conceptual proposal to construct a new driveway connection,
with a right turn lane, to serve the above referenced church.
The driveway, which is conceptually shown on a survey by O'Brien, Suiter, and
O'Brien (dated April 20, 1993), will take the place of the existing northern
driveway, which is to be removed.
As a suggestion, rather than removing the right turn lane to serve the existing
driveway, you might want to consider simply extending it to the new driveway.
This would provide increased storage for turning vehicles and eliminate the need
for much of the demolition.
It is understood that you will be submitting detailed construction plans to the
County for permitting. Your plans with permit application should be submitted
to Mr. Jim Peters of the Land Development Division, Permit Section.
I hope this 'letter is sufficient to fill your needs. Please feel free to contact
me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
/Y'/71 kJ
~er~ a:?
Engineering Asst. III - Traffic Division
ASH: 1 b
CC: Jim Peters - Land Development
File: Roads - "Seacrest Blvd"
H:ASH:AshChurc.rtl
"An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled ".""r
Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416.1229 (407) 684-4000
...
..
L
. III
I tooo4
~=n";:!
!I; elS~
l.:;!1Il1ll
~~a~:
E.I m
I: ~ZOl
~Oo
Ei' ~
.. a
I
\l
r
l:>
r
~
. .l
f "
H
J
O~0_:',:)00(~~'O
ll~!! I I! i
'---.; -
,
~i ~
r
~
~
'k
h
<I
.
i
L
@
i
~II-'-----'--'
I' ') / t'~ _/_~n_ '"
. ':. /<J,/
. '//j
// "
. ..~
~r n
"8 f 1
r:1- ~ ..
II': L
"5
~~
~~
Iii
qf
J
i
"-.,
I
j;
f" II/
it j /
.l- I
?
I . /
/ m j un I II U:1 i ~i II
iil - "1-- ! II., I' j~ I 5
/ rf. ~ M~ III f" I ;f I ~
t i .= i. f .
an liifii: i
51 I a' I
I I,' f
! fIr
I .
"If' 1'- " jll' Ill' ':I' , !I II IT ' n' ;J
fl Ullll ~ I'll ~I 11"',"11,'; :! III! iil !
tl 'U 'II ~I 'l III 1. tIll 1IIIt ~
jt"1 'ili! Iii 1i1 in Hili i iJ .i! ~
IPi: II ~t :1: ii' n! t II" i I, Uj !!'
II ,I 'II Ii !a :ii :H i ilrJf ; !! fh
It J u. Hi III I,,' I I I 1 il
i Ii JI I :II iil jH1 J11 1\ ! ! 1 i ii
I ,I, I I" . .,
"
/
IllS. 1111.'5'
i :; If if If "f 'If 'If II II JI I 5
I II " II I f I I I fit I I
~ ~ i . · .
.---~
~ ~ ~
~'-'I
" !
. I
I
~ ~
, . ..
f
,
~
q
~
"
f
i l J ~
L
f " ,
~ ,
t , . " t
, c i .
: t ~
, : L. L-
A : i
i [ .
,L L ~
i
L
. i
~ .
,
J t f
.. ~
. .
; , ~
, ~
. c :
l- f
1 "
. I
L L
.
.
r
~
.l'
te
I_
Q